Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
Hey
0:07
everyone, and welcome to another bite
0:09
where we rewatch the most innovative and
0:11
intriguing pitches from Shark Tank. I'm Jory
0:14
and I'm joined by the ambitious, the
0:16
adaptable, and the admirable Ariel. Hey friends!
0:19
Some hobbies, like hiking, can come cheap.
0:22
Other hobbies, not so much. Rabbit
0:24
collectors will shell out thousands of dollars
0:26
to get the latest and greatest hat,
0:28
figurine, or sneaker. Today's founders
0:31
are banking on just that. Will
0:33
their sneaker company, inspired by the auspicious date
0:35
of 1587, be a hit? Or
0:39
will the Sharks see this as more of a
0:41
miss? We'll find out after this break. Marketing
0:46
used to be fun. And with HubSpot's newly
0:48
launched marketing and content hubs, it can be
0:51
fun again. With tools like
0:53
Content Remix to turn existing content into
0:55
all new assets, lead scoring to shine
0:57
a light on the leads most likely
0:59
to purchase, and an analytics
1:01
suite for out-of-the-box reports, it's quick to
1:03
get you results. It's easy to use
1:06
and it connects all your data. So put
1:08
the fun back in your marketing funnel with
1:10
HubSpot. Visit hubspot.com to get
1:12
started for free. Today
1:18
in the tank we have 1587 sneakers. And
1:21
I promise, loyal listeners, I will definitely say that
1:23
number wrong at least once during this segment because
1:25
1587, very specific. Anywho,
1:28
1587 sneakers is brought to us by
1:30
founders Sam and Adam who are asking
1:32
for $100,000 for
1:35
15.87% of their business, which is a whopping $360,000 valuation. Now
1:43
1587 sneakers is a sneaker company and
1:45
it's entirely based on this year that
1:48
is the first time
1:50
that an Asian stepped foot on North America,
1:52
which was 1587. And
1:55
their product is a sneaker company that's
1:57
trying to drill into the very
2:00
rich history that Asian Americans have
2:02
with our country. So they're trying
2:04
to prove that Asian Americans aren't
2:06
just follower consumers, particularly in the
2:08
realm of sneakers, that they're leaders
2:10
and they're leading the gang in
2:12
terms of classic styles and affordable
2:14
products that are also made from
2:16
quality materials. So you'll see that
2:18
this product is actually marketing primarily
2:20
towards Asians, although we find out
2:23
later in the pitch that 30
2:25
percent of the customers actually aren't Asians,
2:28
but they're selling direct to consumers. And
2:30
I think we can think about this
2:32
as a bit more of like a
2:35
lifestyle brand that focuses primarily on well-made
2:37
shoes from Italy. As of the
2:39
tank, they had started 10 months
2:41
ago, so it's very much still a
2:43
new company. But thinking about our pitch,
2:45
our founders, and our products, Ariel, thoughts
2:47
on 1587 sneakers. I
2:50
love the branding. I'm sure we'll dive
2:53
into it. Yes. So it was giving
2:55
Kahawa 1893. Coffee
2:57
a little bit, remember? We actually
2:59
interviewed the founder in a past
3:01
episode and it really reminded me
3:03
of this coffee brand because it's
3:05
so rooted in a piece of
3:07
history that we don't learn so
3:09
much about in the American school
3:11
system. So I love the
3:14
fact that they were able to
3:16
tie in something that is preserving
3:18
history, that is serving as a
3:20
voice to underrepresented voices within the
3:22
sneaker heads community. I think
3:24
these are all really strong differentiators for
3:26
the brand itself. I think this product,
3:29
though, when we think about sneakers, highly
3:31
competitive market, the sharks kind of get
3:33
into distribution channels. And I think they're
3:36
mostly in alignment that retail may not
3:38
be the best space. But I think
3:40
the way that the story is told
3:42
and the fact that this roots so
3:45
much into history, an actual history, is
3:47
a differentiator compared to a Nike or
3:49
a footlocker. It's less about the designs
3:52
of the shoes. It's less about the
3:54
feels and the experience. To me, their
3:56
main bread and butter for this product
3:59
is. the brand and how effectively they
4:01
can tell the story. Visually,
4:03
beautiful branding, very clean,
4:06
minimalistic. But I
4:08
think they need to ensure that where
4:10
they are showing up from a distribution
4:12
perspective communicates that story effectively or else
4:15
there is nothing that is going to
4:17
drive folks to purchase these shoes from
4:19
a brand that they haven't heard of
4:22
before or don't understand the context behind
4:24
1587 versus other
4:26
bigger brands in the space.
4:29
And it gets a little sticky,
4:31
right? Because the concept, gorgeous. Lifestyle
4:34
brand following on Instagram, less so. So we
4:36
find out like as of the taping that
4:38
they have 7,000 followers,
4:41
which again, 10 months
4:43
is still a following. It is
4:45
a following. They exist, but it's
4:48
very difficult when you need that
4:50
flash point of virality and growth.
4:53
I guess it comes back to sort
4:55
of like the fundamentals of we have
4:57
a good story, we have a good
4:59
concept. How do we build
5:01
a community? So when talking
5:03
about like a lifestyle brand or
5:06
building a community, especially around like
5:08
a physical consumer good, what
5:10
would you recommend these founders look into to
5:12
experience that sort of scale and to get
5:15
that story out? Because I think it's an
5:17
awareness problem, less of a like product or
5:19
quality problem. Yeah, I mean, for being 10
5:21
months in the business, definitely an awareness play.
5:24
I think between Sam and Adam, they mentioned
5:26
that I think one of them was an
5:28
influencer, right? That has like a pretty steady
5:30
following. I think that
5:33
is the play here, you can tap
5:35
into influencers within the Asian American community.
5:37
First thing that came to mind my
5:39
unhinged thought is the ABG is the
5:42
Asian baby girls who are very aesthetically
5:44
cute, fashionable, like showing off their outfits.
5:46
Like I think there's really fun influencers
5:48
within that space that could already have
5:50
that domain authority and audience to increase
5:53
awareness and exposure, but it cannot be
5:55
their only means because if they continue
5:57
to be this niche, they're are going
5:59
to run into a lot of challenges.
6:02
I think they best need to position
6:04
this brand as this is
6:06
how we're reinventing the shoe category. It hasn't
6:08
changed in the last 50 years. The way
6:10
that Nike, Foot Locker, all these brands go
6:12
to market hasn't changed. This needs to be
6:14
disruptive. This is 1587. Be
6:17
a part of that disruptive kind of
6:19
moment and rethink the way that underrepresented
6:21
voices have a seat at the table
6:23
in this industry. I think that's the
6:25
broader push that they need to keep
6:27
fundamentally. Tactically, though, they could reach out
6:29
to very specific Asian communities, but I
6:31
really think they need to be more
6:33
broad in their audience. Yeah. The
6:36
thing too is they need to
6:38
engage the sneaker head community. Now
6:40
I will be very transparent that
6:42
I don't know anything about
6:44
sneaker heads, Ariel. I'm front loading
6:46
that in terms of my
6:49
recommendation here. But we've seen similar products
6:51
on Shark Tank. So I'm going to
6:53
take a similar flavor of recommendation as
6:55
our custom hats product
6:57
that we reviewed a couple months ago.
7:00
I think what they should do
7:02
is they should focus on the
7:04
rabid purchasing power of a super
7:06
obsessed fan base. It's like
7:09
sneaker heads, I'm assuming, based on just that
7:11
name alone, really are focused on
7:13
getting the newest, coolest sneaker. Cool.
7:16
Amazing. You can tap into
7:18
the psychology of that buying behavior any day of the week. You
7:20
want to do it to a specific demographic. Have that even more.
7:23
Get the artists that are
7:25
known in the Asian American
7:27
community, get them painting or
7:29
customizing certain sneakers, doing super
7:31
limited drops. Get your
7:33
favorite influencers designing with you,
7:35
even if it's specific colors.
7:37
They don't even have to be complicated sneakers. Two
7:40
block colored sneakers that are designed by
7:42
your favorite influencer do a limited drop.
7:46
Get it so that people have incentive
7:48
to keep coming back to your social
7:50
media platform because it's not just about
7:52
followers. It's also getting people to continuously
7:54
reengage with you and repurchase from you.
7:56
You just don't want someone to own
7:58
one pair of sneakers and then. and
8:00
they fall off and you never get them
8:02
again. This type of community building and lifestyle
8:05
brands, you need people bought in. And
8:07
the best way I could think about doing it if
8:09
you have this type of product is, you
8:12
need to do limited drops, you need
8:14
to gamify it in some way, and
8:16
then just get the people that are
8:18
already big names in your community doing
8:20
it. That's artists, that's musicians, that's your
8:22
favorite influencers. You could do really fun
8:24
things with influencers that maybe are in
8:26
the gaming community, but they still design
8:28
something super specific for you. I think
8:30
you could tap into multiple communities that
8:32
are within your larger demographic and then
8:34
just have them each build custom sneakers
8:36
with you. And through a
8:38
couple of just strategic partnerships or influencer
8:40
marketing campaigns with the right people, you
8:43
just get more eyes on you. And
8:45
sure, it's gonna cost some money upfront,
8:47
but I think it's also going to
8:49
show that you're really valuing that community.
8:51
But I think it's gonna take more
8:54
than just them telling their story on
8:56
social to get there. But
8:58
I am curious about how you would
9:00
expand this, how you would continue to
9:03
scale their go-to-market where it is more
9:05
of a like sneakers for everyone while
9:07
still kind of maintaining that really strong
9:09
brand story around the Asian American community.
9:12
So I think from what I know about
9:14
sneaker heads, never ever wear the
9:16
shoes. Oh. And the more rare
9:19
and exclusive the shoe is, or
9:21
harder to find, the better. So I
9:23
think you're onto something with the limited
9:25
time offering. Cool. So
9:28
if I was gonna broaden this, I would
9:30
start first with the base of Asian American
9:32
influencers. Offer some kind of incentive for the
9:34
influencers that you're working with to design a
9:36
shoe. If it's gonna be
9:38
a limited time offering and you
9:40
have your production all in place
9:42
in manufacturing's in a good spot,
9:44
why not just offer that? And
9:46
I think to your point, that
9:48
continuous engagement algorithms love that. The
9:50
more that you share and send
9:52
videos, the higher you bump up
9:54
in your organic algorithm. So I
9:57
think by training your buyers to
9:59
know, okay, a drop is happening
10:01
the first Friday. of every month,
10:03
this upcoming month, it's gonna be
10:05
the specific influencer that I love.
10:07
You get some cross promotion going
10:09
on. I think that's a really
10:11
strong way to kind of build
10:13
that awareness and build that audience
10:15
first. And then, you know, from
10:17
there expanding on, you know, I
10:19
think continuing to have, you know,
10:21
a pipeline of artists or influencers
10:23
within the community is critical to
10:25
make this be successful. So I
10:28
think really having a clear thought
10:30
out partner program or influencer program
10:32
in place will definitely
10:34
be a game changer. Story
10:36
can only carry so far. Yeah. And,
10:38
you know, I was thinking about it too,
10:40
is it doesn't even go that much against
10:43
their current manufacturing play. Granted, they're still proving
10:45
out concept and things, so they're only getting
10:47
these sneakers in small batches. But if you're
10:49
doing limited drops, small batch production is actually
10:51
not a bad thing, right? Because you would
10:53
want them to be really exclusive. So while
10:56
they mentioned that they're like moving away from
10:58
like Italian manufacturers, I don't think they would
11:00
need to, as Damon mentioned, like produce a
11:02
bunch of these sneakers in a bunch of
11:04
sizes, right? Like you have what you have
11:06
and once it's gone, you don't have to
11:09
worry about carrying all that inventory overhead. So
11:12
then we start to dive into the costs.
11:14
I'm just gonna talk about it in terms
11:16
of their Italian productions because there's a lot
11:18
that's happening now that they're moving their manufacturers
11:20
to Asia, but this is what we know
11:22
so far. So as of the taping, cost
11:25
to make in Italy around $110, that's
11:28
expensive to make. They do mention that it's quality
11:30
Italian leather and whatnot and they're able to get-
11:32
No, there's no reason. I'm sorry, when I heard
11:34
that I was so shocked. I was like, there
11:36
is some low hanging fruit that you can kind
11:38
of cut. They are getting it down to 50
11:41
with their new manufacturer in Asia. They do say
11:43
that. But it's the cost
11:45
to the consumer. And like, again, maybe this
11:47
is because I'm not a sneaker head but
11:49
like they mentioned that originally they were selling
11:52
these for $288. They
11:54
did get it down to 175, but
11:56
these are very much a premium
11:59
sneaker. Granted. they're projected to make
12:01
$500,000 as of this year
12:03
because this is the taping year, but
12:06
expensive sneakers. Is
12:08
that premium? I feel like sneakers can
12:11
go way depending on
12:13
the shoe. Maybe. Right? Because these are everyday
12:15
shoes. Again, not a sneaker head. These aren't
12:17
collection shoes. You're paying $288 to walk around
12:19
in your
12:22
sneakers day to day. I am not this
12:24
persona. I paid $200 for good hiking boots.
12:26
Sure. It's not necessarily that big of a
12:29
jump. Remember Tom's when Tom's were a thing?
12:31
I was never a Tom's girl. Everyone was
12:33
buying Tom's because of the social component of
12:35
it. Sometimes people will pay more for
12:38
a product if it aligns to that. That's true.
12:40
That they believe in. But
12:43
Tom's was because they were giving back to the
12:45
community. Right now, there's not that flywheel with this
12:47
company. Right. And so was Kahawa 1893 too. Now
12:49
when I think about maybe that's what they need
12:51
is a social component. Even I bought Kahawa 1893
12:53
because of the giving back to the computer
12:57
date. Right. There's not that component here, but
13:00
I do get it in terms of believing
13:02
in the founders. The power of belief is
13:04
really what you're saying. It's like going to
13:06
drive purchases. And I totally agree. But yeah,
13:08
average purchase, $170. Compared to a CAC, again,
13:10
we don't get the channels
13:14
here. I have a sense that
13:16
it's somehow related to social media, but $45 to
13:19
acquire a customer,
13:21
which I don't know, it seems kind of
13:23
high. I need your take on that though.
13:26
On something like Instagram and Facebook, $45
13:28
is that high? Yes,
13:31
I would say for Instagram and
13:33
Facebook, that is a much higher
13:35
CAC. Now if they were running
13:37
programmatic ads, so ads that show
13:39
up in TV or on streaming
13:41
services or those pre-ads that you
13:43
skip on YouTube videos, I don't
13:45
think that would necessarily be a
13:47
much higher customer acquisition cost. I
13:49
think it's just the early stages
13:51
too of this business. They're 10
13:53
months running as a business. It
13:55
takes a few months. Yeah.
13:58
And it takes a few months. You're going
14:00
to be tested. investing and experimenting. And anytime
14:02
you're introducing a new product in market, you're
14:04
going to have a higher cost per acquisition
14:06
because you're going to learn what are the
14:09
right targeting filters to put in place. Who
14:11
is your audience over time? And as you
14:13
get smarter, that cacti should go down. So
14:15
I don't think it's necessarily they're in the
14:17
worst spot for where they're at. I don't
14:20
think it's an indicator that there's a lack
14:22
of interest. I just think they need more
14:24
of that awareness and market in order to
14:26
get more sales and more conversion. And then
14:28
they'll see things kind of net out a little
14:31
bit more. Yeah. And I
14:33
think ultimately it's sort of because they
14:35
were so new to the
14:37
market that we saw the sharks
14:39
responding like they did. Because I
14:42
think their numbers are very indicative
14:44
of a company that is in
14:46
the beginning stages of being successful.
14:48
Granted, they are making sales, but
14:51
I think because of the competitive
14:53
space and the perceived lack of
14:55
traction, everything will tell if
14:57
that's actually true. All of our
14:59
sharks either went out because this is just
15:01
not their business portfolio or
15:03
because again, as a competitive
15:06
market, they need to explode
15:08
super quickly. And while Mark
15:10
did say that they should focus on D2C, which
15:13
I think they primarily are instead
15:15
of focusing into retail, which they did
15:18
talk about pivoting into. No, that would
15:20
be shoe aside. Shoe aside, all
15:23
of the sharks did go out. Womp
15:26
womp. But I do have a good update
15:28
for you, like a small good update, even though
15:30
this just happened. They have 9,000
15:32
Instagram followers post Shark Tank. So they
15:34
have had at least some Shark Tank
15:36
bunk maybe in a couple of years
15:38
with here about the actual numbers about
15:41
how many they sold post Shark Tank.
15:43
But it does seem like Shark Tank
15:45
has helped them at least build more
15:47
brand awareness. So I'm excited to see
15:49
what comes from this company. Also, just
15:51
like as a jewelry note, they were
15:53
both Boston boys and Boston will always
15:56
have a place in my
15:58
heart. I don't know about the Boston sneaker heads. scene,
16:00
but I just love it when fun things come
16:02
out of Massachusetts. And their names are Sam and
16:04
Adam. Yeah, I know. It's like so many good
16:07
things. Like, we're rooting for you Sam and Adam,
16:09
just because it's just like I'm a Massachusetts girl.
16:11
And who? You can definitely check out 1587 stinkers
16:15
online because yeah, still in business.
16:24
Production for today's episode was brought to
16:27
you by Ari D'Sarva. Editing comes from
16:29
Robert Hartwig and support from Alfred Schultz.
16:31
Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify Podcasts, or
16:34
wherever you subscribe to the greatest podcast
16:36
ever. That does it for me. See
16:38
you next week in the tank for
16:41
another bite. I
16:48
want to tell you about a podcast
16:50
I think you might like if you
16:52
want to succeed in sales. It's called
16:54
Sales Evangelist and it's hosted by Donald
16:57
Kelly. Each week, you'll learn about the
16:59
successful strategies used by the world's best
17:01
sales experts and successful sellers. You'll
17:03
hear from folks like Jeffrey Gittimer,
17:06
Jill Conrad, Bob Berg, and Guy
17:08
Kawasaki. You'll get actionable insights and
17:10
stories that will encourage, challenge, and
17:12
motivate you. If you want
17:14
to take off in your sales career and earn
17:17
the income you want, find Sales Evangelist wherever you
17:19
get your podcast.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More