Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:07
Hey there, and welcome to Another Bight,
0:09
where we we rewatch the most
0:11
innovative and intriguing pitches from Shark
0:13
Tank. I'm Jory, and I'm
0:15
joined by the ambitious, the adventurous,
0:17
and the admirable and the admirable aerial. Hey
0:19
guys! In sports, it's important to
0:21
be gritty, or or to today's
0:23
founders, founders, grippy. That's right, forget about
0:26
shock. Today's product promises stronger grips
0:28
with a quick pat with a
0:30
clap clap. pat But with a with
0:32
a $10 million dollar these founders may
0:34
find themselves in a sticky situation.
0:36
Will the sharks bite or will they slip away? We'll
0:38
tell tell you all about it in just a
0:40
moment. We
0:44
all know trends, right? Avocado toast,
0:46
cat videos, Remember, planking. But here's a But here's
0:48
a trend you'll wanna hop on
0:51
right now. HubSpot's entrepreneurship trends report
0:53
is your ticket to big business
0:55
growth. We talked to more than
0:57
500 small biz owners to dig
0:59
into what's working for them, what
1:01
isn't, and what you can learn
1:03
from it all. Want Want to
1:05
turn these trends into real results
1:07
for your business today? Go to
1:09
today?.com slash slash AB to download the report
1:11
for free. free. Today
1:17
in we have we and Choclis is
1:19
brought to us by founders Greg and
1:21
James is are asking for us ,000 for
1:23
Greg in their business, which is a
1:25
$10 for $400,000 for the limit business, I
1:27
don't mean to a $10 but considering this
1:29
product, I was like, the limit here Choclis
1:31
is a grip enhancer. to I'm just
1:33
going to put it like that.
1:36
It is an alternative to putting I was
1:38
on your hands to increase your
1:40
grip of your rackets and your bats
1:42
and maybe even that. wall, climbing
1:44
wall, depending on the sport that you
1:46
do. do. Yeah, it helps you grip.
1:48
Like like when your weight and your hands get
1:50
all sweaty, hands don't have like of
1:52
a hold on as good of a it's like
1:55
removing the oil. the that's what's landed
1:57
them, these two These two issued and two
1:59
patents pending where like actually physically removing
2:01
the oil from your skin when you
2:03
clap it off. So thinking about our
2:05
pitch, our founders, and our product, this
2:08
grip-enhancer, what were your thoughts of chocolates,
2:10
Ariel? Sure, it's a dry shampoo for
2:12
the hands. It's pretty much what it
2:14
is. I loved that. Okay, tell me
2:16
more. It's chalk. A $10 million valuation.
2:18
It's not chalk. We don't know what
2:21
it is. It's an anti-shock. which is
2:23
a whole other can of worms if
2:25
you want to open it up, right?
2:27
They say that it's environmentally friendly and
2:29
non-hazardous, but that's all we get. Yeah,
2:31
I just I don't buy that it's
2:34
non-hazardous. Could be anything. It's not chalk,
2:36
but it's something else that like dries
2:38
up oil and naturally. Yeah, it just
2:40
didn't really feel right to me. I
2:42
think this product is a little too
2:44
niche. This is my hot take. I
2:46
think this could actually be utilized in
2:49
other circumstances outside of weightlifting. Like you
2:51
mentioned bouldering is a really great example,
2:53
but also gamers. have controllers and get
2:55
sweaty while they play and can probably
2:57
utilize some form of like chalk as
2:59
well. If you are a hardcore gym
3:02
goer, you have your routines, you have
3:04
your brands, you may have mitts that
3:06
you use for like weights as opposed
3:08
to chocolate, you have kind of your
3:10
set preferences. I just don't think that
3:12
it has enough benefits and uniqueness. to
3:15
really become like the next you need
3:17
to have this if you're a bodybuilder
3:19
or a weightlifter. I wasn't really sold
3:21
by the grip test that they did
3:23
at the beginning on their own technology.
3:25
Right. Like I don't see how this
3:28
can scale. Yeah. They walk out and
3:30
I need your take on this because
3:32
one of the founders physically throws a
3:34
bat behind the sharks and we hear
3:36
this crash and at first I was
3:38
like, oh, obviously that's like a joke
3:41
and fine. But then Lori was like,
3:43
did you actually throw that? And then
3:45
the founder looked really guilty. So I
3:47
wanted to know, like, did he actually
3:49
mean to let go of the bat?
3:51
Did you think that was part of
3:54
the skit? Because I was like on
3:56
the fence of like, I feel like
3:58
this is and they wouldn't do that
4:00
but then something broke and like the
4:02
founder the way his face looked told
4:04
me was like was that an accident
4:07
actually and you're just like playing it
4:09
off I had the same thought too
4:11
but listen it got their attention true
4:13
it got the hook it sold the
4:15
story he threatened them a little bit
4:17
you know because it could have hit
4:20
one of the sharks and it felt
4:22
like it soared really high but it
4:24
could have hit mark yeah could you
4:26
imagine dealing with like being sued by
4:28
one of the shark Oh yeah, they'd
4:30
bury you. They'd bury you. But I
4:33
think the issue with me is the
4:35
type of story that they're telling. I
4:37
feel like they really level into it
4:39
being sort of like baseball-centric and like
4:41
they mention racket-centric without being like here's
4:43
all of the use cases. So I
4:45
guess because it was in the pitch,
4:48
my mind only went to baseball and
4:50
not a million other use cases you
4:52
could be using it for, which is
4:54
why I was like rock climbing feels
4:56
like actually... the niche both to sell
4:58
to the gyms that do rock climbing,
5:01
but then also to the individuals and
5:03
getting like influencers in the rock climbing
5:05
space. Like I feel like that's a
5:07
massive community and a massive use case
5:09
for this that they just didn't mention
5:11
at all. But It's the one community
5:14
that I think about the most when
5:16
I'm thinking about who's actually like using
5:18
chalk and clapping it off in the
5:20
gym. It felt like this could have
5:22
been really focused on a very specific
5:24
persona or set of personas, but because
5:27
they're trying to sell it as everyone,
5:29
it actually felt like a less effective
5:31
product to me because it required me
5:33
the user to try to come up
5:35
with use cases versus them being like,
5:37
here's all of these use cases. I'm
5:40
telling you. but you could also use
5:42
it for whatever else you need, but
5:44
here's our core personas, our core selling
5:46
points, and these are the sales that
5:48
we've done in each of those verticals.
5:50
And without that, I just didn't feel
5:53
it was as compelling as it could
5:55
have been. They come onto the tank
5:57
because they mentioned that marketing is the
5:59
issue and maybe this is the marketer
6:01
and me being like, man, like you
6:03
could really sell this a bunch of
6:06
different ways, but it just didn't feel
6:08
like an effective pitch over. get me
6:10
the viewer to really understand who this
6:12
is for, what exactly is the problem
6:14
it's solving for the unique user, and
6:16
all I'm left is like, it makes
6:19
your grip more grippy, which is just
6:21
not effective storytelling. Yeah. When you have
6:23
a product like this, I think it's
6:25
absolutely imperative that you are able to
6:27
show off all the different use cases
6:29
because that will differentiate you. Even if
6:32
they do have a very specific persona
6:34
and audience, like maybe it is like,
6:36
okay, we do take the rock climbing
6:38
example. Maybe it's we offer this in
6:40
gyms, the same way of hand sanitizers.
6:42
You can just get your chocolas on
6:45
your hands and like ready to go.
6:47
Like I think there are so many
6:49
different what are all the different use
6:51
cases when there's so many other solutions
6:53
in the market, and then understanding what
6:55
your main reasons to believe are, from
6:57
there you can slightly tweak that messaging
7:00
depending on your audience without excluding anyone,
7:02
but while staying true to kind of
7:04
like your brand. So it's really just
7:06
thinking about what do we want chocolate
7:08
to be and why is it better
7:10
than the alternatives? The alternative, which is
7:13
a lot cheaper, right? Because even a
7:15
small bottle of this is like $25.
7:17
They mentioned that a bottle of 100
7:19
doses. I hated that they called it
7:21
dose. I don't like that either, because
7:23
everyone, like, what's a dose for one
7:26
person versus the other? Yeah, what does
7:28
that mean? And then, so that's 3599.
7:30
I also didn't love that it looks
7:32
like it came in a seasonings can.
7:34
Yes. It looks like a shaker that
7:36
you'd get your big garlic powder out
7:39
of and like it didn't look that
7:41
different. So I was like, that feels
7:43
like slightly a hazard, even though one
7:45
of their patents is on their innovative
7:47
distribution system or what have you. I'm
7:49
sorry. I thought this was also patent
7:52
ruling. because they list what their patents
7:54
are for. They're cornering the shock market.
7:56
No, because they patent to the use
7:58
of grip in some way. And it's
8:00
like, that is a massive English verb.
8:02
Like, be so for real right now.
8:05
So they have a couple things that
8:07
they're up against, right? They have the
8:09
pricing issue. They have the fact that
8:11
it. look intuitively like the type of
8:13
product it is, it looks like a
8:15
spice out of the can. Potential misuse
8:18
and liability. Yep, there's a liability issues.
8:20
I think there was just a couple
8:22
problems that they could have very easily
8:24
solved for with like that effective storytelling
8:26
element. And benefit of the non-doubt, so
8:28
say this was just a cloud chasing
8:31
thing, right, like say they were just
8:33
going on shark tank. for the sales
8:35
bump. This is a huge missed opportunity
8:37
in fully leveraging the opportunity that is
8:39
shark tank to get eyes on your
8:41
product. Now people are going to think
8:44
about them as the grip product when
8:46
it could have been these sports go-to
8:48
product. Yeah. It was a bit weird
8:50
though as we start to pull back
8:52
the layers of this company that the
8:54
founders didn't want to tell the sharks
8:56
how much it cost to make. And
8:59
one of them is a chemical engineer,
9:01
mind you. And so knows a thing
9:03
or two about chemicals. Although I think
9:05
he was like, oh, but I'm a
9:07
chemical engineer for like nuclear plants. And
9:09
I was like, oh gosh, what are
9:12
you putting in your chocolate solution? Then
9:14
I didn't, I don't think, it doesn't
9:16
really help the credibility in this instance.
9:18
Yeah, that proximity to authority didn't do
9:20
what you think it did there, Bud.
9:22
But it was a little bit interesting
9:25
that they started to get. a little
9:27
bit coy with their numbers, but then
9:29
we're giving us blended margins. So it's
9:31
technically something that was calculable because we
9:33
know how much it cost to make.
9:35
They do say that they have a
9:38
67% margin, which is good, and sales
9:40
are $740,000. So they are breaking in
9:42
somewhere, but they do mention that they're
9:44
here because they have an awareness issue.
9:46
And I was kind of curious from
9:48
your point of view, for a product
9:51
like this, if you're having an issue
9:53
with awareness, like and it's like a
9:55
physical product and you haven't broken into
9:57
retail yet, what's your gut instinct in
9:59
terms of where people should be thinking
10:01
when it comes to building awareness? Like
10:04
is your thought ads initially? Do you
10:06
start organic with and building your own
10:08
content? Are you trying to build social
10:10
media followings? Like in 2024, how are
10:12
you unpacking an awareness issue? Yeah, so
10:14
I think definitely having a social media
10:17
presence should never be underestimated, especially with
10:19
just the emergence of like we talk
10:21
about video on social a lot, but
10:23
with like brain rot being on the
10:25
rise, I feel like now more than
10:27
ever having video content is like essential
10:30
because you are going to get more
10:32
eyes and visibility on, you know, your
10:34
product. I think this one would be
10:36
really interesting to almost have kind of
10:38
like a gorilla marketing tactic. around it
10:40
of like maybe it is a video
10:43
series where you have one very charismatic
10:45
person go in and say hey just
10:47
try this out and tell me what
10:49
you think about like your exercise like
10:51
a little bit that social experiment kind
10:53
of place so that way it's engaging
10:56
content it's showcasing the product how it
10:58
works it comes across in a very
11:00
natural non-branded corporate kind of feel and
11:02
way which we know that video content
11:04
resonates really well with audiences anything that
11:06
feels more authentic is something that your
11:08
target audience is going to align more
11:11
with. But I think it comes back
11:13
to them having a very specific audience
11:15
in mind. So if it is the
11:17
bouldering community, I think having that on
11:19
the ground, like, hey, try this out,
11:21
let me know what you think, like
11:24
type approach works really well, because word
11:26
of mouth is really strong in those
11:28
communities. If you're trying to reach out
11:30
to everyone for multiple different use cases,
11:32
then you're going to prioritize distribution channels,
11:34
whether that's social media, whether that's, you
11:37
know, PR, to have your wide amount
11:39
of reach to as many people as
11:41
possible. So if I were them, I
11:43
would lean into this is who our
11:45
persona is, or this is who I
11:47
know is making the most amount of
11:50
purchases or our repeat buyers tend to
11:52
have this trait in common, or tend
11:54
to have this specific use case. and
11:56
really just kind of hone in on
11:58
that a little bit, make that more
12:00
prevalent in your marketing, and then see
12:03
how it naturally expands to other infinity
12:05
groups, because I think so often brands
12:07
will try to focus on speaking to
12:09
everyone. And sometimes you. need to focus
12:11
on that one specialized cohort and then
12:13
from there it kind of has more
12:16
of its organic kind of trickle-down effect
12:18
but this is not something that should
12:20
be like blasted all over on like
12:22
Facebook ads like I think there has
12:24
to be that community aspect and like
12:26
that hey I love this product you
12:29
have to try this out. Yeah, and
12:31
with those types of communities, there's often
12:33
like competitions and events that you could
12:35
set up a small booth and then
12:37
people are physically trying it. And that's
12:39
the thing with the product like this
12:42
is it's so experiential that you kind
12:44
of have that lack of trust when
12:46
it's something that's online because you never
12:48
quite know right how it's going to
12:50
feel if it's really going to do
12:52
it. But if you get in those
12:55
communities and they feel it. like on
12:57
the ground, then they're either going to
12:59
believe it and buy it or not.
13:01
But if you believe in your product,
13:03
they're probably going to buy it. I
13:05
like that as a strategy. I was
13:08
also thinking in terms of virality, it's
13:10
less of a popular thing these days,
13:12
but you know those videos of like
13:14
the urban explorers who would like go
13:16
to like massive skyscrapers and scaffolding and
13:18
like parkor their way up to the
13:20
top. You know what I mean? Oh,
13:23
you're thinking extreme sports. Yeah, yeah. But
13:25
like, it's like they're like building climbers.
13:27
I don't know, there's like probably a
13:29
name for them, but they climb like
13:31
the tallest buildings across the world and
13:33
like the Eiffel Tower and they do
13:36
it with like a GoPro. With like
13:38
the GoPro cameras and stuff. Exactly. And
13:40
it's like if you can partner with
13:42
one of them and get one of
13:44
them to like be like, yeah, I
13:46
climbed whatever structure not advised at home
13:49
with. you know, chockless, then I think
13:51
that that could also have like a
13:53
viral moment of like, man, if it
13:55
can hold this guy up at 97
13:57
stories, then it can definitely hold me
13:59
up at my rock climbing, Jim. And
14:02
what I love about that, it can
14:04
just be a very simplistic tagline of
14:06
like, watch me climb this building without
14:08
chalk. Because it's true. Like, and then
14:10
you'd be like, oh, that's really interesting.
14:12
Like, what is this? Even though they're
14:15
still utilizing the product. a fun tagline
14:17
like the scaling challenge or something. I
14:19
don't know. Don't climb buildings that aren't
14:21
meant to be climbed, disclaimer. But yeah,
14:23
I think there could be fun ways
14:25
that you could go viral on TikTok
14:28
with the right influencers, but it would
14:30
have to be a little bit shocking.
14:32
But I think that there's plenty of
14:34
even communities that are shocking in nature.
14:36
What was not shocking is how many
14:38
sharks went out because they just did
14:41
not see how this would be a
14:43
good fit. Mark always goes out when
14:45
people are being a little sketchy about
14:47
the numbers and I feel like founders
14:49
going into Shark Tank just need to
14:51
know that going in. Like if you
14:54
flounder or if you don't know or
14:56
don't want to disclose, you're not getting
14:58
Mark Cuban. It's just not a thing.
15:00
I think they know that it's cheap.
15:02
Don't tell me what it's blended. Their
15:04
margins are probably closer to like 90%.
15:07
Let's be honest. There's a very strategic
15:09
reason why they said a blended margin.
15:11
And that's okay. We've seen people be
15:13
very transparent on shark tank and still
15:15
go on to sell bunches and bunches
15:17
of product. But it was the most
15:19
sharky of the sharks that I think
15:22
got involved with this sharky Esk founder
15:24
duo. And it was Kevin who offered
15:26
$400,000 for 4% of the business and
15:28
then two and a half dollars a
15:30
unit until he makes four million dollars
15:32
back. And then that royalty would drop
15:35
to 25 cents into perpetuity. So lots
15:37
of numbers, but basically a waffin royalty
15:39
deal. because he is trying to get
15:41
them $4 million back quick. What was
15:43
interesting here, though, is we saw the
15:45
guest shark, Rashan, also get interested in
15:48
that deal. Of course, he was the
15:50
demonstration shark. Of course, he felt the
15:52
torque, and his torque was the one
15:54
that improved on their specialty torque machine.
15:56
Say torque three more times, founders. But
15:58
it was interesting because this episode, much
16:01
like the episode we just covered Chom
16:03
Shop shop, was an instance where sharks
16:05
teamed up together, so Kevin and Rashan,
16:07
but they didn't up the equity ask
16:09
or the royalty ask. They just kept
16:11
it the same with two sharks to
16:14
try to sway the founders. And I
16:16
thought that was really interesting. So basically,
16:18
Rashan jumped in and offered to split
16:20
the deal with Kevin. Kevin surprisingly said
16:22
yes. And then our founders took the
16:24
deal. So it was a shark tank
16:27
deal for $400,000. for 4% and then
16:29
$2.50 a unit until they hit $4
16:31
million and then 25 cents into perpetuity
16:33
after that point. So a bit of
16:35
a more complicated one, but they did
16:37
walk away with a shark tank deal
16:40
and I was kind of surprised, especially
16:42
when Mark started raising red flags, that
16:44
they got a shark tank deal at
16:46
all. This whole episode five of the
16:48
season was so many surprise deals. So
16:50
many surprises on this episode, but chocolate
16:53
is very much still around. You can
16:55
get it at chocolate. Yeah, please
16:57
fix your packaging. Because it 100% looks
16:59
like pre-workout. It looks edible and it
17:01
looks like it's a spice. This is
17:03
a liability waiting to happen. I think
17:06
someone's going to eat it. It's going
17:08
to be made out of something that
17:10
we find out is not environmentally friendly.
17:12
But it says non-toxic on the bottle.
17:14
They thought to include that, but do
17:16
not consume. Yeah, non-toxic and consumable are
17:19
often very different. I think it would
17:21
be an issue if someone ate this.
17:23
Who knows what this mystery powder is?
17:25
Watch it just be chalk. It's just
17:27
like just really finely ground down like
17:30
chalk. Yeah, it's like chemically enhanced chalk.
17:32
Time will tell. But Shark Tank gave
17:34
chocolate as a shark tank deal. Production
17:43
for today's episode was brought to
17:45
you by Ari DeSarma. Eddining comes
17:47
from Robert Hartwig and support from
17:49
Alfred Schultz. Subscribe on Apple Podcast,
17:51
Spotify Podcast, or wherever you subscribe
17:53
to the greatest podcast ever. That
17:55
does it for me. See you
17:57
next week in the tank for
17:59
another bite. This
18:06
episode is brought to you by
18:08
the Product boss, a a business podcast for
18:10
physical product entrepreneurs. The The Product Boss
18:12
is for anyone trying to create
18:14
consistent income and multiple revenue streams in
18:17
a product -filled world. It's a podcast
18:19
for makers who are asking things
18:21
like, can I turn my Etsy side
18:23
hustle side a full -time income? Each
18:25
episode is a workshop -style strategy session
18:27
with the goal of turning makers into millionaires.
18:29
Learn how to scale your team, your
18:32
your inventory, your sales, and your
18:34
revenue by listening to to Boss today. boss
18:36
Listen to the Product Boss wherever
18:38
you get your you get your podcast.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More