AMT404: Sand Heists, the Northern Lights, and Werewolf Menstruation

AMT404: Sand Heists, the Northern Lights, and Werewolf Menstruation

Released Thursday, 27th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
AMT404: Sand Heists, the Northern Lights, and Werewolf Menstruation

AMT404: Sand Heists, the Northern Lights, and Werewolf Menstruation

AMT404: Sand Heists, the Northern Lights, and Werewolf Menstruation

AMT404: Sand Heists, the Northern Lights, and Werewolf Menstruation

Thursday, 27th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Is Natasha

0:03

Bedging Fills

0:05

window still

0:07

dirty? Do

0:09

we still

0:11

do diet

0:13

Coke break

0:15

at 1130?

0:17

I must thank you for the

0:19

valuable service you're doing with this

0:21

show. Oh thank you Helen. It's

0:23

only taken 18 years. I really

0:26

appreciate you saying that. You're illuminating

0:28

people who are outside the UK

0:30

as to what Toby Carvary is.

0:32

My friend Ashra now understands the

0:34

Toby Carvary reference in her Richard

0:36

Osman book. It's important to

0:38

know what Toby Carvary is. It's very

0:40

on trend if you live in Hartsmere

0:42

like I do. It's like Sohoho, farmhouse,

0:44

around here. I never knew. Until last episode,

0:47

just how many of my friends are

0:49

Toby Carvary officinadoes? But you brought them

0:51

all out the woodwork, Ollie. Out the

0:53

woodwork and right to the mac and

0:55

cheese. Did they give you any tips for your

0:57

future Toby Carvery journey, which we are

0:59

going to do? Yes, they said mac and cheese

1:01

for sure, separate plate. It's like a whole

1:03

other meal. Yeah. I mean, there are other tips,

1:06

like when we do do our spin-off Toby

1:08

Carvery podcast, which I would say, just to

1:10

give you give you some headlines. As a

1:12

general rule, if it's a standalone Toby Carverian,

1:14

a converted former pub, you're going to be

1:16

on better ground than if it's attached to

1:18

a travel lodge. It's always better to be

1:21

detached from a travel lodge. Remember to put

1:23

your registration number in the parking console, or

1:25

they will fuck you. And the other thing

1:27

I would say as well, the refill

1:29

machine has Apple tango on it.

1:31

Try it out. Like it's free,

1:34

it's on the refill machine. Chuck

1:36

it out the window, if you

1:38

don't like it, refill with

1:40

Pepsi Max. It's risk-free.

1:42

Apple tango. It's a

1:45

rarity, Apple tango. Exactly,

1:47

you don't just get

1:49

that anywhere. Even in

1:51

an apple officinado's house

1:54

or a tango officinado's

1:56

house. Or at the

1:58

Apple store. either. Jonathan on

2:00

Patreon has even suggested roasting potatoes in

2:02

Mayo instead of in fat or oil.

2:05

I don't know if he's pulling my

2:07

leg. I've never heard of anyone cooking

2:09

anything in Mayonnaise. I recently did read

2:11

an article extolling the virtues of cooking

2:13

everything in Mayonnaise. But I'm not late

2:15

to the Mayonnaise party on anything. I

2:17

don't know how I haven't done this.

2:20

Really let yourself down. How would you

2:22

face Mayo Club? I mean I love

2:24

a potato salad obviously. Of course. It's

2:26

never occurred to me to cook the

2:28

potatoes in mayonnaise before adding them to

2:30

more cold mayonnaise and now I wonder

2:32

if that's like the salad equivalent of

2:34

a triple-cooked chip. Like poach it in

2:37

mayonnaise, then fry it in mayonnaise and

2:39

then mayonnaise it. It's bold Ali, I

2:41

don't want you to die that way

2:43

but... He died as he lived they'll

2:45

say covered in Mayo. Well, he answered

2:47

me this. Why, when you have an

2:49

error message on your computer, does it

2:51

say 404? An appropriate question, because this

2:54

is episode 404 of answer me this.

2:56

Capow. Will it live to be an

2:58

error? We'll find out. It's not quite

3:00

an error, though, is it? It's what

3:02

you see when for some reason that

3:04

page doesn't exist anymore. So typically, when

3:06

a company has taken a page down,

3:08

for example, but the link to it.

3:11

still remains. But actually 404s, the code,

3:13

were not initially designed to be seen

3:15

by people at all. The codes were

3:17

there for a computer network to interpret

3:19

what's going on. And in fact, there's

3:21

a whole list of codes. 404s kind

3:23

of like the famous one is the

3:26

one who broke through. After 403, reject

3:28

siblings. Yeah, exactly. For example, 100 means

3:30

continue. 302 was found. 402 was payment

3:32

required. 503 was service unavailable, which now

3:34

I think about it, I think I

3:36

have seen. But all of this comes

3:38

back to a 1992 document prepared by

3:40

the World Wide Web Consortium, which established

3:43

the 41 defined responses a web server

3:45

can generate. And the fun fact, because

3:47

don't worry, there is a fun fact

3:49

coming in all this Because back in

3:51

the 1980s at CERN in Switzerland, when

3:53

they had the World Wide Web Central

3:55

Database, it was on the fourth floor

3:57

of the building. It was in room

4:00

404. And inside room 404 were a

4:02

load of workers who would actually manually

4:04

locate pages to servers. So if you

4:06

were in a queue for that process

4:08

to happen, you'd get a 404, but

4:10

it would say, room 404, colon, file

4:12

not found. but it did originally mean

4:15

the people in room 404 will get

4:17

around to sorting this out eventually. Huh.

4:19

Which is fun. I love it when

4:21

there's like a real world connection to

4:23

a well-known phrase. Yeah. Like when we

4:25

talked about left wing and right wing

4:27

in the houses of parliament. Does room

4:29

404 have any relation to room 101?

4:32

Yeah. Did they deliberately put the difficult

4:34

to get requests in that room? No.

4:36

But at the same time, I wonder

4:38

if you go back even further than...

4:40

the 1980s and you come up with

4:42

the nerds who built the building at

4:44

CERN. I wonder if they were paying

4:46

tribute to Room 101 by putting it

4:49

in Room 404 in the physical world

4:51

in the first place. And also the

4:53

other thing that's happened regarding 404s generally

4:55

and the reason we all know about

4:57

them is that consumer brands at some

4:59

point in the 1990s started realizing that

5:01

an oops page was actually an opportunity

5:03

to redirect customers to things that might

5:06

interest them anyway. You know, perhaps their

5:08

latest product launch. Always be selling. Or

5:10

just a joke, like a bit of

5:12

branding, you know, hey we're a cloud

5:14

computing company but we're really fun guys.

5:16

And so then the 404 pages became

5:18

more sophisticated and had jokes on and

5:21

stuff and that's why we all... know

5:23

what they are and notice when despotic

5:25

president shut down taxpayer funded institutions that

5:27

used to be there. What does it

5:29

do? Redirected Trump golf courses. Here's a

5:31

question from NR from the West Midlands

5:33

who says, thanks for bringing back the

5:35

podcast. In your absence I've been put

5:38

in a situation that requires advice. One

5:40

day at home I was sitting in

5:42

the lounge minding my own business when

5:44

I heard a fairly loud banging. coming

5:46

from the kitchen being repeated over and

5:48

over. My brother-in-law, aged about 40, was

5:50

teaching my son, age 10, that the

5:52

way to open a coconut was to

5:55

hurl it at the floor as hard

5:57

as you can until it cracks. It's

5:59

anyway. Naturally, I shut this down as

6:01

quickly as possible and opened the coconut

6:03

with a hammer. But when I returned

6:05

to the lounge to tell my wife

6:07

what had just unfolded, she looked at

6:10

me like one of us was stupid

6:12

and said they'd always open coconuts like

6:14

that in her house when she was

6:16

growing up and implied that I was

6:18

being weird for having a problem with

6:20

it. So Helen answered me this, am

6:22

I being weird? No, I think you

6:24

seem to be someone who perhaps is

6:27

concerned for the integrity of your kitchen

6:29

floor. If it's ceramic tiles, a coconut

6:31

could easily crack one of those. We

6:33

did drop coconuts onto a stone path

6:35

just outside our front door, our front

6:37

door when we were growing up when

6:39

we were growing up. but we would

6:41

drain the liquid first by boring a

6:44

hole into the coconut and then we're

6:46

allowed to go and smash it onto

6:48

the path. But that was stone flags.

6:50

And the idea of smashing it on

6:52

the pavement was that deliberately encouraged by

6:54

your parents because it was a fun

6:56

novelty way to open the coconut? Or

6:58

was it done in all innocence as

7:01

it appears to be the case here

7:03

of just like, yeah, it's the floor,

7:05

bang it? Yeah, well I think that

7:07

the advantage of that over the hammer

7:09

method is that it's smashing in your

7:11

eye. Whereas the hammer method I think

7:13

you could get a lot of coconut

7:16

ricocheting around. But I do identify with

7:18

the satisfaction of hurling things at the

7:20

floor. I actually do this for my

7:22

chickens. We keep chickens and the most

7:24

fun way to feed a chicken is

7:26

to feed a chicken is to just

7:28

chuck fruit hard at the floor until

7:30

it explodes. It's really fun. And it's

7:33

obviously it's easier with soft fruit in

7:35

the first place like bananas and avocados.

7:37

But if you just go boom with

7:39

an out-of-date fruit, you love it. It's

7:41

incredibly therapeutic. It's incredibly therapeutic. It's incredibly

7:43

therapeutic. It's incredibly therapeutic. It's incredibly therapeutic.

7:45

It's incredibly therapeutic. another strong argument for

7:47

getting chickens. What I like that is

7:50

subtly embedded in this is that NR's

7:52

wife looks at NR like one of

7:54

us was stupid and said they'd always

7:56

open coconuts like that in her house

7:58

when she was growing up. It's like

8:00

there's little family psychodromas you hear about

8:02

where someone's like I went to my

8:05

partner's family home for Christmas for the

8:07

first time and they were like what's

8:09

the problem we always tongue kiss in

8:11

this family. But coconut opening so much more

8:13

innocent. Well let Mickey plough the dolzai polisher

8:15

in my family. Yeah, he's throwing that in

8:17

as if everyone will understand what the fuck you're talking about.

8:20

Oh, uh, it was my great-grand used to say when, you know,

8:22

when someone asks, oh, where you're off to, and you don't really

8:24

want to tell someone, especially if they're a child, so you say,

8:26

I'm going to see a man about a dog. Oh, yeah, yeah.

8:28

Her equivalent was, I'm going to see Nikki Plough. I'm going to

8:30

see a man about a better dog. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

8:32

Her equivalent was, yeah. Her equivalent was, I'm going to I'm going

8:35

to. Her equivalent, I'm going to. Her equivalent, I'm going to I'm

8:37

going to, I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to, when,

8:39

when older people, when older people, when older people. speak in code

8:41

and expect younger people to have understood just through insinuation even though

8:43

the references are well out of date. My father-in-law

8:45

does this when he's giving directions to anywhere

8:48

from where he lives. So they live in a village

8:50

called Ashwell which is near Bullock and that's literally

8:52

what the address says, Ashwell comma and our

8:55

dot Bullock. Yes, my grandparents used to live

8:57

next door and if I was writing to them

8:59

it was Ashwell near Bullock on the envelope. There

9:01

we go. And so if you want directions

9:03

to anywhere, you get directions from Bulldock.

9:05

Like it's just assumed that you know

9:07

how to get to Bulldock. So immediately,

9:09

like you're out of your depth if

9:11

you don't know the way to Bulldock.

9:13

Getting to Bulldock is your problem mate.

9:15

But then, the landmark that he uses

9:17

in Bulldock is Fishie Taylor's, a fish

9:19

and chip shop that has not existed

9:21

for over 20 years. So he always

9:24

says, get to Fishy Taylor's and take

9:26

a fishy Taylor's. You know if you. Being

9:28

from the West Midlands has also had Nikki

9:30

Plough experience, or if that is Martin's

9:32

family special. I think that was my

9:34

great grandmother. But if someone else has

9:36

heard that, I'd be really curious because,

9:38

you know, there's things that you wonder

9:40

if they're specific to your family and

9:42

maybe they're regional. Well, Madeline from Ely

9:44

and Cambridge says, Ollie, answer me this. When

9:46

coffee giants like Costa and Starbucks are designing

9:48

new coffee drinks for their menu, what is

9:51

the process for this? What are the parameters

9:53

they must stick to? For example, the drinks

9:55

must be able to be made by a

9:57

barista within a certain time limit, or they

9:59

must... certain ingredients or caffeine limits etc.

10:01

I'm assuming price point would be a

10:03

compelling example that Madeline has not specified.

10:05

Absolutely. I mean her own imagination has

10:07

brought us roughly to the list of

10:09

criteria though as you say sometimes other

10:11

commercial factors come in and new drinks

10:13

are introduced without having been properly road

10:15

tested so I know from a mole

10:18

on the inside that caffeine era introduced

10:20

a mystery Batman flavor. Wouldn't it be

10:22

amazing? It was like a hot chocolate

10:24

with a riddler question mark on it

10:26

in the froth and you were supposed

10:28

to guess what the flavour was. But

10:30

that was the problem. The mystery flavour

10:32

was like oranges and oat milk. This

10:34

is a chain that prides itself on

10:36

traditional Italian coffee. So their customers did

10:38

not like that. But they'd been bugged

10:40

a load of money from Warners to

10:42

promote the film. And so you get

10:44

this thing of like, this isn't the

10:46

right product for us, but there are

10:48

commercial reasons why we should be offering

10:50

this. Obviously everything is sort of market

10:52

research to within an inch of its

10:54

life and then rolled out slowly. So

10:56

the classic case study is pumpkin spice

10:58

latte, a phenomenon I think we can

11:00

agree. Yes, out of control. That started

11:02

with a need from the HQ. So

11:04

the need was we need a special

11:06

drink for autumn and so they had

11:08

a brainstorm and then they came up

11:10

with like 200 different options for what

11:12

would sell to their customers. But then...

11:14

There's a lot of rigorous testing, partly

11:16

based on obviously taste combinations, you know,

11:18

balancing the floral notes, etc. The initial

11:21

test for the pumpkin spice latte was

11:23

they dunked pumpkin pie in espresso. That

11:25

was the first thing they tried. Just

11:27

to see whether the taste combination was

11:29

right. And it is often that basic.

11:31

I once interviewed the guy who invented

11:33

balies. on the modern hand. No, wow.

11:35

Touch you, you're real. The test kitchen

11:37

for that was literally popping down to

11:39

the off licence, buying some nest quick

11:41

and putting it in some rum. I

11:43

mean that is how they developed to

11:45

see whether the combination works before you

11:47

then create any further. And you know

11:49

we take for granted that those things

11:51

would work together. but you really can't

11:53

be sure. Like the other day I

11:55

got a spicy iced mokker because I

11:57

like an iced mokker and I like

11:59

spicy things together. monstrous, appalling. Right, yes,

12:01

yes, yes, yeah, but you see some

12:03

people do like the combinations and you

12:05

can't tell even until you roll it

12:07

out. So I mean that's the next

12:09

stage is that the pumpkin spice latte,

12:11

I mean the classic example as I

12:13

say, the textbook. was rolled out to

12:15

two locations first Vancouver BC in fact

12:17

yeah so you could have been amongst

12:19

the first where you are the other

12:21

place they tested it was Washington DC

12:24

and then when it caught on then

12:26

they started rolling out and that broadly

12:28

speaking what Starbucks still do it's interesting

12:30

because the basics innovate like that so

12:32

for example in the UK the standard

12:34

Starbucks latte in the 90s was one

12:36

shot of espresso and a full fat

12:38

milk puddled in the middle puddled whereas

12:40

now It's two shots of espresso and

12:42

foam art on top because that's what

12:44

the market has come to expect and

12:46

the UK was ordering extra shots of

12:48

espresso for their lattice anyhow whereas in

12:50

the US they still use one shot.

12:52

So that kind of stuff is informed

12:54

by customers. So market research that they're

12:56

already getting paid for. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

12:58

yeah. But sometimes that still goes wrong.

13:00

Just last year they withdrew almost immediately

13:02

after introducing it, a strawberry and vanilla

13:04

oat milk coffee and a Fraicino that

13:06

had a layer of jelly at the

13:08

bottom. I wonder whether they were trying

13:10

to get on the Boba market. Yeah,

13:12

I've got really into the text to

13:14

drink, so there was a time when

13:16

I would offend that jelly constituent quite

13:18

off-putting, but no, I'm... I'm into them

13:20

all, the grass jellies, the coconut jellies,

13:22

the coconut jellies, tapiocas. Sometimes I guess

13:25

you can be too ahead of a

13:27

trend, can't you? If you're a mainstream

13:29

chain, you've got to get it right

13:31

when the masses are ready to have

13:33

it. I guess you could know who

13:35

your customers are, haven't you? Well, I

13:37

was clever about it, of course, just

13:39

to go back about it. Just to

13:41

know who your customers are, haven't you.

13:43

Well, I was clever about it, haven't.

13:45

Well, I was clever about it, I

13:47

haven't. Well, I was, I was, of,

13:49

I was, I was, of, I was,

13:51

I was, I was, I was, I'm,

13:53

I was, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm,

13:55

I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm,

13:57

I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm so

13:59

called on the height. No. So it's

14:01

similarly, it's like Costa now have a

14:03

thing that they call a Spanish latte

14:05

for the UK market. It's coffee con

14:07

leche, that's what it is. Oh, yeah.

14:09

But it's just you can only get

14:11

a Spanish latte at Costa. So it's

14:13

like you use the coffee, if you

14:15

can, to create a meme. Like for Apuccino,

14:18

that people associate with your

14:20

main brand. In North America,

14:22

people still drink coffee. But actually

14:24

in the UK, the top orders,

14:27

none of them are really, you

14:29

basically can't get brewed coffee in

14:31

most of those stores, they don't

14:33

do filter coffee, and the top

14:35

orders are latte, cappuccino, caramel macciato,

14:37

Americano, and ice latte. I would

14:39

say out of those only really

14:41

an Americano, actually is a coffee.

14:44

Well maybe people are getting their

14:46

coffee elsewhere, and they're going to

14:48

Starbucks for the things that they are

14:50

not making at home or getting from

14:53

a better place. If you've got

14:55

a question, email your

14:57

question to answer me

15:00

this podcast at Google

15:02

mail.com, to answer me

15:04

this podcast at Google

15:07

mail.com, to answer me

15:09

in this podcast at

15:11

Google mail.com, to answer

15:13

me in this podcast

15:16

at Google mail.com. to

15:18

answer me this podcast

15:20

at Google mail.com. Ducey

15:23

Konyak is the perfect

15:25

ingredient to elevate the

15:27

vibe. Whether you're out for

15:29

the night or staying in it's

15:32

best enjoyed your way. Maybe that's

15:34

keeping it simple with Ducey

15:36

and Lemonade, an easy to

15:38

make cocktail that blends the

15:40

sweet tart flavor of lemonade

15:43

with the smoothness of Ducey.

15:45

Just add do say to

15:47

make good vibes better tap

15:49

the banner to learn more

15:51

drink responsibly Here's a question

15:53

from Sarah for Massachusetts who

15:55

says I'm currently filling out

15:57

an anatomical gift form for a

15:59

So I can donate my body to

16:02

science. No worries for my immediate fate

16:04

necessary, just planning for the inevitable future.

16:06

Well, that's some real long-term planning then.

16:08

I do a bit of forward planning

16:10

on a down day and it's usually

16:12

like, where should we go camping in

16:14

September rather than what's going to happen

16:16

to my knee caps when I die?

16:18

Your most precious body part? I thought

16:20

I would turn them into little snack

16:23

dishes. Stop knee shaming him. Sarah says,

16:25

the form has spaces for me to

16:27

write, what being an anatomical donor means

16:29

to me, and to write a message

16:31

for the future healthcare professionals who will

16:33

be learning from my body, or bits

16:35

of it as the case may be.

16:37

I find myself at a loss for

16:39

what to write here. Have fun, kids,

16:42

seems a bit glid. I doubt they'd

16:44

take seriously my request that my skeleton

16:46

be dressed up for Halloween every year.

16:48

But I also don't want to go

16:50

to the other extreme and write something

16:52

tried or overly sentimental. So, Ollie, answer

16:54

me this, what should I say to

16:56

the future medical students who will be

16:58

dissecting my corpse? Oh, I really don't

17:00

know that there's any should on this.

17:03

Like, I can't tell you what to

17:05

say. I think I would try not

17:07

to be, as it sounds like maybe

17:09

you've been, a bit intimidated by the

17:11

formality of the form. Like I feel

17:13

like this prompt, you know. what does

17:15

being an anatomical donor mean to you

17:17

is actually really just for some people

17:19

a good kind of thought exercise to

17:22

imagine the question is being asked by

17:24

a friend over a coffee or a

17:26

beer why are you doing this and

17:28

some people know that they want to

17:30

tell that person why they're doing it

17:32

and some people don't and I think

17:34

it's fine if you don't. If you

17:36

think that your body being donated speaks

17:38

for itself, you don't need to say

17:40

anything. But I think if you imagine

17:43

that question coming to you in that

17:45

informal setting, oh Sarah, why are you

17:47

doing that? Why are you donating your

17:49

body to science? You don't need to

17:51

overthink the answer because you probably do

17:53

have an answer to that. Maybe it's,

17:55

oh, because I don't have a religious

17:57

faith, I'm not bothered about having a

17:59

ceremony. or maybe it's because I've always

18:02

wanted to pay things forward and I think

18:04

this is a way to support the future

18:06

of science. I think it's just a way

18:08

of humanizing that question for people

18:10

who aren't sure what to write and

18:12

also then in turn humanizing you for those

18:14

doctors and scientists who are going to

18:17

be tampering around with you later. Do

18:19

they want that? Do they want you to

18:21

be humanized? Please answer us this if you

18:23

are or have been a medical student. Do

18:25

you want the corpses in front of you

18:27

to be humanized and to be thinking about

18:30

who they were or do you want to

18:32

just think of them as a meat jigsaw

18:34

puzzle? Cadava number seven. Right. I think

18:36

I'd probably want to remove the fact of

18:38

their personalities as much as possible when I

18:40

was like slicing them into bits. What you

18:42

could do, Sarah, if you have tattoos, maybe

18:44

tell them the story of the tattoos, because

18:47

I think I'd be curious about that. Yes,

18:49

yeah. Whatever it was. If you don't have one, maybe you

18:51

could get a tattoo that tells you a whole story to

18:53

them. Oh yeah, then you don't need to write anything on

18:55

the form. Then you don't need to write the form.

18:57

Well, Sarah has an additional question, Ollie. The

19:00

form includes options for the disposal of

19:02

my remains, after all the sciencey stuff

19:04

that can be done with them is

19:06

finished. Most are fairly standard. Cromation and

19:09

burial, cremation and return to my next

19:11

of kin, etc. My favorite option though

19:13

is total skeletonization. Wow. I was pretty

19:15

jazzed about the idea of being a

19:18

skeleton in a medical school classroom, mostly

19:20

because I enjoy the thought of being

19:22

both useful and kind of funny. However...

19:24

It wasn't until further down in the

19:27

form that I discovered the skeletonization process

19:29

is done by a... dermested beetle colony.

19:31

What? Now I'm torn. Because I have

19:33

a huge irrational fear of all things

19:35

creepy-crawley. On the one hand, I really

19:38

want to be a skeleton and I know that

19:40

beetles are probably the best way. Logically, I

19:42

know that I won't be around to see

19:44

or feel any of the happily munching little

19:47

critters, but right now, it's just the mental

19:49

image is enough to give me nightmares to

19:51

give me nightmares. I don't want to be

19:53

on my deathbed someday and be made even

19:56

more upset by the thought of being nibbled

19:58

on, but also skeleton. So Ollie

20:00

answered me this, to Skeleton or not

20:02

to Skeleton? Don't put it on me

20:04

man. Like I'm not giving my body

20:06

to me. Oh I'll take it then.

20:09

What do you care? It's after you've

20:11

died, it doesn't matter if you're afraid

20:13

of Beatles or not, this is the

20:15

one time when you will not have

20:17

to worry about them. Yeah but she

20:19

said in the email hell and the

20:21

issue is not how she knows rationally,

20:23

she's not going to be thinking in

20:26

the future. Much as I like the

20:28

idea of encouraging you to skeletonise yourself,

20:30

if you think there's a chance that

20:32

on your deathbed you will be worried

20:34

about that, don't do it. If you

20:36

know the beetles are going to devour

20:38

your corpse, that makes the phobia you

20:40

have of beetles quite rational and justified

20:43

at that point. Or, seek therapy for

20:45

this phobia, and then get the skeletonisation

20:47

done. Sure. But the point is, isn't

20:49

it, that insects will nibble at your

20:51

corpse anyway? Like unless you're cremated. like

20:53

do some fairly hefty chopping up before

20:55

it gets to that point. Like it's

20:58

not like you're going to be delivered

21:00

pristine to the Beatles to face. I

21:02

think also bear in mind that when

21:04

you're on your deathbed you might not

21:06

be capable of having such thoughts anyway

21:08

or you might have other stuff to

21:10

worry about. I mean the concept of

21:12

having my body hanging around in a

21:15

medical lab, the thing that would stop

21:17

me personally doing that is that I

21:19

don't feel strongly enough about... donating my

21:21

body to be a skeleton that I

21:23

would want to deprive my surviving relatives

21:25

of the opportunity to visit my grave

21:27

or scatter my ashes if that's something

21:29

they wanted to do, rather than being

21:32

like, oh yeah, you have to go

21:34

to King's College London and see him

21:36

strung up on the fifth floor. But

21:38

what if you left your skeleton to

21:40

theatre and if your family wanted to

21:42

visit you, they just had to go

21:44

and see a production of Hamlet? Actually,

21:47

I mean, that's not so fun. When

21:49

they opened Pirates of the Caribbean in

21:51

Disneyland in the 60s, they used real

21:53

human skeletons. What? From UCLA. Oh my

21:55

god. And it's because in the 60s

21:57

they didn't have convincing real skeletons made

21:59

on mass for theme park amusements and

22:01

they just hadn't thought through the ethical

22:04

questions of that. Were people just okay

22:06

with it then? Someone was obviously okay

22:08

with it. I don't know I guess

22:10

once it became a sort of iconic

22:12

ride and people were else that you're

22:14

bringing children along to look at the

22:16

cadavers of people who have not been

22:18

given proper burials as part of an

22:21

amusement. Then they felt uneasy about it

22:23

and they replaced them all. Rumor has

22:25

it, there is one skeleton in the

22:27

parts of the Caribbean ride in California

22:29

that is still real. Oh, that sounds

22:31

like an open myth. Well, you know

22:33

what, I wonder more as if it

22:36

was just not that practical to maintain

22:38

them, like they probably looked a bit

22:40

manky and it's a watery ride, so

22:42

maybe the damp, the heat of Southern

22:44

California, maybe it's just quite a gnarly

22:46

skeleton situation. Both Martin's dad and my

22:48

dad have died in the last couple

22:50

of years. And my family in particular

22:53

don't have any sentimental attachment to dead

22:55

bodies or graves. And neither of our

22:57

dads had specified really what they wanted

22:59

to happen. I think Martin's dad was

23:01

just like, I don't care, I won't

23:03

be around. I think he said, put

23:05

me in a plastic bag and throw

23:07

me in. into a dump or something

23:10

like that. Which we didn't do. Which

23:12

is not practical. You don't like to

23:14

do that? No. I think it's illegal.

23:16

It would look suspicious for sure. I

23:18

think my dad just thought he was

23:20

never going to die. I think he

23:22

really thought he was still had like

23:25

hundreds of years ahead of him. And

23:27

so to me it felt a bit

23:29

like a waste disposal task to figure

23:31

out what to their bodies and also

23:33

I was like there's a kind of...

23:35

morbid luxuration in it in a way.

23:37

It's funny isn't it the whole opt-in

23:39

opt-out thing? I think the law probably

23:42

has it right now that they've changed

23:44

organ donation to opt out but you

23:46

know that donating your body to medical

23:48

sciences opt in. But if we had

23:50

a world where it was opt-out, would

23:52

I opt out? Like if that was

23:54

the normal thing to do, it wouldn't

23:56

occur to me that I'd want to

23:59

say... Or do you want to mean

24:01

that I'd have a particular preference?

24:03

It only seems pretty kish because it's

24:05

not a thing that most people do. You

24:07

know what I wouldn't want if I left

24:10

my body to science is just thinking about

24:12

how many scientists of the 20th century

24:14

were eugenicists? Can you specify

24:16

I don't want it to be left for

24:18

phrenologists to pick on? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah,

24:20

can you pick the particular science they can

24:22

look into? Yeah. The thing is if

24:24

you're a genuine scientist. Even if

24:27

you approach a controversial area of

24:29

science that's been disproven in the

24:31

past, if you're approaching it with a

24:33

genuine belief you might be able to

24:35

find out something new in the future, and

24:37

then you do, then everyone who said that you

24:39

were wrong was wrong, right? I mean, that's

24:41

the thing, like, should you be able to

24:43

say to someone, absolutely never think

24:46

of this like this, otherwise they

24:48

wouldn't have people to experiment on.

24:50

I mean, some people have very

24:52

prophonology, so they would probably, yeah.

24:54

They'd be happy. I know that

24:56

my baby is the absolute

24:58

best. I put Facebook photos

25:00

up daily and my friends

25:02

are impressed, apart from ones

25:04

who block me, because they're

25:07

jealous. Because their babies are

25:09

so ugly. Well, why not build

25:11

a gallery of your kid on

25:13

square space with special pages for

25:15

its cute feet and cute hands

25:18

and cute phase? So my Facebook

25:20

feed won't have your kid all

25:22

over the place. He looks like

25:24

a scrotum. Thank you very much

25:26

to Squarespace for sponsoring this episode of

25:28

Answer Me This. Squares make it super easy

25:30

for you to design a website, but also once you've

25:33

got the thing up and running, this is the

25:35

thing about Squares. There are endless features on there

25:37

for you to play with. You can keep it

25:39

as minimal as you like, you don't have to.

25:41

But if you want to put videos up

25:43

there, if you want to sell stuff,

25:45

you can sell stuff. And if you want

25:47

to make sure that as many people

25:49

discover it as possible, then they have

25:51

integrated SEO tools as well. So you

25:53

can make sure that your site turns up

25:56

in global search engine results. Easy-Peezy. Or

25:58

if you want to have something... that

26:00

is private, members only, you can do

26:02

that too. Like one of those speakeasy

26:04

bars where like the guy slides open

26:07

the thing in the door, I was

26:09

like, who are you here for? Yeah,

26:11

say Ollie Man, so you're here for

26:13

Ollie Man. Try it for yourself, head

26:16

to squarespace.com/answer and take out the free

26:18

trial. And when you're ready to launch,

26:20

use the offer code answer for 10%

26:22

off your first purchase of a website

26:24

or domain. And now for a question

26:27

from Jackie from Jackie. Hello, we live

26:29

in the middle of the middle of

26:31

the United States and we want to

26:33

see the Northern Lights. I don't know

26:36

if that means we have to go

26:38

very, very far away to some place

26:40

like Finland or if there is some

26:42

place a little closer that would be

26:45

a little less expensive to get to.

26:47

So Helen and Ali, please answer me

26:49

this. Where should we go to see

26:51

the Northern Lights? To see the Northern

26:54

Lights. You want to go pretty far

26:56

north. and you also want clear skies.

26:58

Far north is expensive. Places like Iceland

27:00

often cloudy. So here is my vote

27:03

for optimal possibility of seeing the Northern

27:05

Nights and not even leaving the landmass

27:07

that you're on. Yellow knife and calendar

27:09

where the Northern Nights are visible up

27:12

to 240 days per year. Wow, that

27:14

is a lot of days. I got

27:16

some advice from our friend Brie who

27:18

lives in Yellow Knife who says if

27:20

you want to see them when it's

27:23

warmest. Then September is a good month.

27:25

If you want to see them during

27:27

winter but not too cold winter, March

27:29

is the best month. But in general

27:32

we have very clear skies from mid-December

27:34

to late April. And then in the

27:36

middle it's too light. It's so far

27:38

north that the nights aren't dark enough.

27:40

Do not come in October, November and

27:42

early December. It's cloudy. Okay, good. All

27:44

right. Another good thing about going to

27:46

Yella Knife. They have an indigenous-owned aurora

27:48

village that you can stay in. If

27:51

you want your tourism- And yellow knife

27:53

is accessible by flights from many flight

27:55

hubs, including Calgary and Toronto, which are

27:57

pretty doable from the middle of the

27:59

USA. Okay. I suggest. If Jackie wants

28:01

to stay in the USA, then you

28:03

have options like Alaska, you can go

28:05

to Fairbanks or further north, mid-August, mid-April,

28:07

and places like Idaho and North Dakota

28:09

have dark sky parks. And our friend

28:11

Dave, who grew up in Michigan, said

28:13

he used to see northern lights in

28:15

the upper peninsula there a lot. But

28:17

I do think you should travel somewhere

28:20

where you know you'd be happy doing the

28:22

other stuff there is to do there in

28:24

case you're disappointed by not seeing the northern

28:26

lights. Or indeed, you see the Northern

28:28

Lights and then find them disappointing. You're

28:31

not going to find the Northern Lights

28:33

as disappointing. No. You really not? You

28:35

tell you've got personal experience. Where have

28:37

you seen the Northern Lights? Yeah, we've seen

28:39

them in Iceland. We saw them here in

28:41

Vancouver last year because at the moment we're

28:44

in a period of great solar storm activity,

28:46

so it's a good time to see the

28:48

Northern Lights between now and 2027. Right. I'm

28:50

a bit jealous. Because there was that

28:52

moment last year in the Northern Lights

28:54

were visible. even in Hartfordshire where I

28:57

live. So obviously at that point, my

28:59

wife, the kids, the freezing cold, 11 p.m.

29:01

at night, we're out on the front drive

29:03

with my kids' novelty telescopes, pointlessly looking up

29:05

with the sky, can't see a fucking thing,

29:08

think we see it and realize it's just

29:10

like the blur of the M25 in the

29:12

background. And then what happened the following week?

29:14

Is it happen again? And if you remember, like

29:17

there were two times where you can see it.

29:19

I was alerted to that fact on social media,

29:21

like I hadn't noticed that people were saying, are

29:23

we going to be able to see the Northern

29:26

Lights again? And suddenly I started seeing all these

29:28

photos on my social media of people taking pictures

29:30

of the Northern Lights in real time. And it was

29:32

midnight and I was lying on my sofa with my

29:34

dressing gown with a glass wine in my hand and

29:36

I had that thought process of... Can I be

29:38

asked to stand up and go outside and stand on

29:40

the front drive just in case I see the Northern

29:42

Lights when I can see them fine here on my I

29:45

can see them fine here on my iPad? and I didn't get

29:47

up and go out for good sides because I just thought

29:49

I probably won't be able to see them but that might

29:51

have been it that might have been my one chance and

29:53

I thought well this guy's taking a picture don't you say

29:55

he's in well in looks all right yeah what's the point

29:57

of doing anything ever when you could just look

29:59

at Google images Exactly, I mean that was

30:01

genuinely my thought process, I realise you're

30:03

being ironic. Here's another question of travel,

30:06

from Elizabeth, who says. My girlfriend and

30:08

I have just got back from a

30:10

lovely holiday in Madeira. We visited a

30:12

beach on the south of the island,

30:14

which had yellow sand, different to the

30:16

native volcanic black sand, which we were

30:18

told by a taxi driver, had been

30:21

transplanted from Morocco to encourage tourism. This

30:23

is the second transplanted beach I've been

30:25

to. There is at least one on

30:27

Lake Michigan in the North Shore area

30:29

of Chicago as well. So Helen answer

30:31

me this. With beaches created like this,

30:33

how do they guarantee they aren't transplanting

30:35

creatures in the sand that are not

30:38

native? Do they sift the sand in

30:40

giant machines? Aren't we lucky to have

30:42

this running feature where I ruin people's

30:44

lovely holiday fun? Oh, what a novelty

30:46

in came out being very harrowed indeed

30:48

by this practice. There's so much controversy.

30:50

There's so much crime because there's not

30:53

enough sand in the world. What? There's

30:55

this big sand shortage in fact because

30:57

of construction, mostly. I know there's a

30:59

shortage in construction. Like even sometimes in

31:01

play sand when you're filling up a

31:03

sand pit, it's hard. But I would

31:05

have thought, like, actually on beaches, no.

31:07

They have to use sand from beaches

31:10

and river and lake shores because it's

31:12

jagged enough. People like, why don't you

31:14

use sand from a desert? They can't,

31:16

because that sand is too rounded. 50

31:18

billion tons a year of sand are

31:20

extracted from beaches, rivers and lakes, and

31:22

there's a lot of theft, there's a

31:25

lot of heists. It's a very big

31:27

business, legal and illegal. It's pretty scary.

31:29

In India, for instance, hundreds of people

31:31

have been murdered over sand. In 2008,

31:33

a quarter mile of white sand beach

31:35

in Jamaica was stolen. and I think

31:37

still no one has found the culprits

31:39

or what happened to the sand. How

31:42

the fuck do you still 500 truckloads

31:44

of sand? I was going to say,

31:46

yeah, like a few bags I can

31:48

understand. And then a lot of beaches

31:50

have more sand added to try and

31:52

slow... erosion. So actually a lot more

31:54

beaches are beach nourished, which is one

31:56

of the usefulness they use, or just

31:59

put there from nothing, whereas other beaches

32:01

all the sand is taken away and

32:03

they see like a rocky nub now.

32:05

Which is actually just bad planning, isn't

32:07

it? I mean, like if people want

32:09

to go to a place because they

32:11

want a sandy beach holiday and that

32:14

place doesn't naturally have a sandy beach,

32:16

then they put the resort in the

32:18

wrong place. I mean, why didn't they

32:20

build the resort in the resort in

32:22

the other place? are like we want

32:24

our money and this is where it's

32:26

going to be. But these beaches in

32:28

Madeira are quite controversial because the sand

32:31

was imported from the Western Sahara which

32:33

is occupied by Morocco and the import

32:35

may be violating international law. What I

32:37

couldn't find out for sure is whether

32:39

or how they clean this sand because

32:41

you're right. Like for instance, the sand

32:43

on Waikiki beach in Hawaii was imported

32:46

there from California. between the 1920s and

32:48

the 70s. What? I thought Hawaii had

32:50

like famously perfect beaches in the first

32:52

place. Well not there, because of erosion.

32:54

Also there's another beach Hanama Bay, it's

32:56

just around the corner from Waikiki, and

32:58

they had white sand shipped in in

33:00

the 70s to make it look more

33:03

attractive to tourists. And I was like,

33:05

what the fuck did they bring in

33:07

with this sand? Hawaii's ecosystems, a delicate...

33:09

So now Waikiki, I think they pump

33:11

the sand in from offshore so that

33:13

it is locally sourced because transporting the

33:15

sand as well is so expensive because

33:17

it sounds really heavy. But also then

33:20

it doesn't have the organism problem. The

33:22

Chicago one, that comes from the Indiana

33:24

shoreline, so that's just along from Chicago,

33:26

it's probably, same sort of ecosystems. Some

33:28

of the sand mining companies do talk

33:30

about, they're like, oh yes, we wash

33:32

it, and then we sort it into

33:35

different types, which I think is by

33:37

size and texture and color and color,

33:39

because they're what they're what they're what

33:41

they're what they're what they're what they're

33:43

what they're doing. because so much of

33:45

this stuff is either not legal or

33:47

no one is really regulating it. It's

33:49

hard to find out. Then I think

33:52

they're probably like, oh whatever, we don't

33:54

give a shit. So troubling. Yeah, that

33:56

is depressing but also fascinating. I mean

33:58

I've been... on beaches that I've been

34:00

told are fake beaches. But they felt

34:02

so real to me. The thing is,

34:04

I feel like the quest for the

34:07

perfect beach, quote on quotes, is

34:09

sort of impossible anyway. We actually

34:11

once went to Siesta Key on the

34:13

west coast of Florida because it is

34:16

routinely voted the best beach in

34:18

America. And I was like, we're going

34:20

to the east coast of the United

34:22

States on holiday, where should we go?

34:24

Let's go somewhere with a good beach,

34:26

found Siesta key. Only to realise that when

34:29

we were there in September it was the

34:31

red tide. And the red tide is this

34:33

seasonal algae that turns the water red. And

34:35

then all the fish die and their bodies

34:37

lit to the sand with a carpet of

34:40

blood. Perfect. And it is not what I

34:42

was imagining for my Instagram. And I thought,

34:44

why was I greedy? I could have just

34:46

gone to Marbaya and they would have had

34:48

a better beach than this. You know, sometimes

34:51

perfection is the wrong thing to attain.

34:53

Exactly. But also what is it.

34:55

What makes it a perfect beach. For

34:57

me, I wouldn't want the landscape to

34:59

be so flat, for instance. I want

35:01

a bit more topographical interest. I

35:03

mean, I think shade for me.

35:06

Oh yeah. That's the big one.

35:08

It doesn't solve the wind problem

35:10

in Britain. I mean, that's the,

35:12

you know, unfortunately, like whatever the

35:15

surface of the beach is, it's the lashing

35:17

wind in your face, blowing it

35:19

into your eyes that's the problem.

35:21

Right, people go to beaches to get

35:23

exfoliated. who says, when I first

35:25

listened to you at age 13,

35:27

I was doing my paper round,

35:30

round tumbridge. Now I'm old enough

35:32

to buy a house. Simon, when am

35:34

I going to be old enough to buy

35:36

a house? I'm way older than you. No,

35:39

that was a well-paid paper

35:41

round. Thus, buying a house

35:43

has engendered Simon's question. Simon

35:45

says, Holly, answer me this.

35:47

Where does the word solicitor

35:49

come from? What are they

35:51

solicitor? which found itself into Middle English

35:53

to mean agent, one who conducts business on

35:56

behalf of another. There are some who say

35:58

that literally solicitors used to solicitous... sit Exhima

44:25

isn't always obvious, but it's real.

44:27

And so is the relief from

44:29

Epglis. After an initial dosing phase

44:31

of 16 weeks, about four and

44:34

ten people taking Epglis achieved its

44:36

relief and clear or almost clear

44:38

skin. And most of those people

44:41

maintained clear or almost clear

44:43

skin, and most of those

44:45

people maintained skin that's still

44:47

more clear at one year

44:49

with monthly dosing. Ebglis, library

44:51

kizumab, LBK, with moderate to

44:53

severe ecma. doctor

45:07

if you have new or worsening eye problems.

45:10

You should not receive a live vaccine when

45:12

treated with epglis. Before starting epglis, tell your

45:14

doctor if you have a parasitic infection.

45:16

Searching for real relief? Ask your

45:18

doctor about epglis and visit epglis.lis.lis.l.com

45:20

or call 1-800-R-X or 1-800-545. and

46:17

I'm glad you're back. Bye. Here

46:19

to Google for you Julia, of

46:21

course. So the date of Easter

46:23

Sunday is always coinciding with the

46:26

first Sunday after the Pascal full

46:28

moon. after the vernal equinox, which

46:31

is on 21st of March, this

46:33

being in the Gregorian calendar following

46:35

branches of Christianity, Orthodox churches on

46:38

the Julian calendar, an extra Easter

46:40

date range, but stick to Gregorian

46:42

for now because anything involving calendars

46:44

is enough to make your brain

46:46

explode from things that aren't even

46:48

sad. It's the Sunday after the

46:51

first full moon, after the vernal

46:53

equinox on 21st of March, the

46:55

reason it's called Pasca or Passa,

46:57

depending on which Passover. I was going

46:59

to say the last supper, that was a

47:01

Passover meal, wasn't it? There was

47:04

a Sadenite meal, so therefore... I

47:06

never made that connection, but that

47:08

doesn't make perfect sense. Yeah. You

47:10

can't just set it to a

47:12

particular day because we know, because

47:14

of Judaism, that the Passover does

47:16

follow the lunar calendar. You can't then

47:18

just pretend, oh no, it would have

47:21

been three weeks ago, like it always

47:23

has to follow the Passover, doesn't it?

47:25

Right. And so the date of Passover

47:27

is going to fluctuate on the

47:30

Gregorian calendar because the

47:32

Gregorian calendar is not a

47:34

lunar calendar. Yes. Hence Easter's date

47:36

is different each year. But then why

47:38

not Christmas? Christmas was tacked on to

47:40

ancient Roman midwinter festivals and ancient pagan

47:42

festivals that are based around when the

47:45

winter solstice is something that... we know

47:47

when that is, even though the day

47:49

it's calendarized on has changed in the

47:51

ancient Roman calendar, I think it was

47:53

the 25th of December, but a lot

47:56

has happened since then. Because there's nothing

47:58

in the Bible about what Jesus... his mom

48:00

was doing festival-wise before she gave birth.

48:02

Harder to pinpoint. She was celebrating Saturnalia

48:05

when her waters broke. Exactly. I did

48:07

read a book once about the Science

48:09

of Christmas that went quite deep into

48:11

this and they said it's far more

48:14

likely that Jesus' birthday was in April

48:16

or September. He's just so in airy's.

48:18

As I understand it, like... Not only

48:21

do people doubt the month and the

48:23

day, but even the year is debated

48:25

up to about 6 BC, I think.

48:27

Yeah, it's a massive span, isn't there?

48:30

Because he was a baby, like he

48:32

wasn't actually doing anything remarkable until afterwards

48:34

they decided it was remarkable. Oh, he

48:37

probably did an amazing shit in the

48:39

shape of God's beard. The thing though,

48:41

with Easter, right, it's never really recovered,

48:44

I don't think, as a festival, since

48:46

the Puritans banned it. Well, we look

48:48

back through what people used to what

48:50

people used to do, pre-1647, pre-1647, pre-1647,

48:53

pre-1647, pre-47, pre-47, pre-47, pre-47, pre-47, and...

48:55

There was a lot of like parades

48:57

and you know community stuff like you'd

49:00

get at Christmas and also Lent was

49:02

a huge deal right everyone gave up

49:04

sex for Lent. Everyone strictly enforced. Well

49:06

sure it wasn't done to boast about

49:09

not doing that. I mean if you

49:11

were in other countries than Britain then

49:13

Easter often still has parades. Still a

49:16

big deal. And loads of stuff happening.

49:18

Yeah but isn't that interesting like since

49:20

1660 when it was restored? The other

49:22

stuff that's been restored, I just prefer,

49:25

I just prefer Shakespeare. I'm just going

49:27

to wait until they invent the cabry's

49:29

cream egg and then maybe it'll give

49:32

a shit. I do find that being

49:34

secular at Easter is harder than being

49:36

secular at Christmas because you get the

49:38

day off but it's like apart from

49:41

being cute, what do you do? You

49:43

get loaded days off? Yeah, you get

49:45

too, yeah. Four day weekend. What's it

49:48

for? So that you can contemplate how

49:50

sad it was that Christ was crucified

49:52

for our crucified for our sins for

49:54

our sins. One year we did a

49:57

hot wheel hunt because I didn't want

49:59

to do an Easter egg hunt because

50:01

I didn't want the kids to eat

50:04

too much chocolate. So it sounded like

50:06

a really fun idea. I was like,

50:08

I'm going to get all your hot

50:10

wheels. I'm going to put them all

50:13

in different places around the garden and

50:15

you're going to have to find them.

50:17

And then being dyspraxic completely... got where

50:20

I hid all the hot wheels. Are

50:22

you still finding them? Still finding them

50:24

occasionally had a lot of tears that

50:26

Easter. Yeah, it was not a good

50:29

move. I've noticed though the last few

50:31

years there's been a lot more Easter

50:33

tap to buy. Yeah. And it has

50:36

been more of a big deal in

50:38

terms of like our Valentine's days over

50:40

what's the next thing we can decorate

50:42

the shit out of our houses for

50:45

and buy a lot of stuff. But

50:47

now there's like four foot high flocked

50:49

rabbits available in the supermarkets and stuff

50:52

like that. And it just really harrows

50:54

me like that and Halloween just how

50:56

much like plastic shit people are buying.

50:58

I can't I can't bear it. Don't

51:01

ruin Halloween for me Helen. Halloween is

51:03

my festival. I'm in TK Max in

51:05

August buying the Halloween data. If it's

51:08

orange I'm there. All right, we'll just

51:10

keep it up. We'll be around. Well,

51:12

talking of calendars, many of you I'm

51:14

sure will now be anxiously hovering a

51:17

barrow over your file of faxes wondering,

51:19

are we going to continue, lunar or

51:21

not, to release episodes of Answerme this

51:24

throughout 2025? Because we did originally say

51:26

we were only going to commit to

51:28

three new comeback episodes. Well, maybe we

51:30

will. So yes, we are, thanks. Thanks

51:33

everybody for supporting the show and thank

51:35

you for being excited that we're back.

51:37

Yeah, we will be back for the

51:40

next episode, not on the last Thursday

51:42

of each month like this one, but

51:44

the first of May because Ollie's going

51:46

to Disney World. I am having an

51:49

epic Disney World binge, which I did

51:51

book way before we decided to do

51:53

these, like it's been in the diary

51:56

for every year. On the Disney calendar.

51:58

on every calendar. Actually talking about calendars.

52:00

So my son Harvey has a special

52:02

calendar that he's made where he crosses

52:05

off the days like an Advent calendar.

52:07

So at the time of recording we

52:09

have 11 days left here we go.

52:12

Oh, fuck you all I'm going to

52:14

Disney World but when I get back

52:16

we will we will be back from

52:18

yes not the last week of April

52:21

but the first week of May and

52:23

then on the last Thursday of every

52:25

month you will have new answer me

52:28

this. For the for the while. Yeah.

52:30

At the time of recording we're at

52:32

850 so it would be churlish to

52:34

turn our backs on those people but

52:37

if you are perhaps available to stump

52:39

up and help make that a thousand

52:41

that would be lovely and we can

52:44

keep the show going all year so

52:46

patreon.com/answer me this please not please that's

52:48

just me being polite patreon.com/answer me this.

52:50

But also we really need your questions

52:53

for while those there is no show.

52:55

That's right. Money and questions feed us.

52:57

If you have a question that you

53:00

would like to ask us, then all

53:02

our contact details are listed upon our

53:04

website. Answer-me-this- podcast.com. And while you're on

53:06

the website, there's also links to our

53:09

first 200 episodes at answer-me-this-store.com, as well

53:11

as our special albums. And there's links

53:13

to our other work, such as the

53:16

many podcasts of Oliver Man. He did

53:18

that in the style of Alfred Hitchcock

53:20

present. The Cabinetive Doctor Man. Let me

53:22

highlight this month my daily history show

53:25

today in history with the retrospectors. in

53:27

which every day, me and my friends

53:29

Arion and Rebecca, uncover curious stories from

53:32

history highlights this month on our feed

53:34

right now for you to find, include

53:36

how Las Vegas became a magnet for

53:38

vice, the time that the FIFA World

53:41

Cup was stolen from a museum, and

53:43

the most expensive divorce ever. It was

53:45

in 1152 and it involved large swathes

53:48

of France. You can find us wherever

53:50

you get your podcasts, just search for

53:52

today in history. with the retrospectors. It's

53:54

just 10 minutes each day, fit us

53:57

into your commute if you still have

53:59

a commute. Helen, what do you do?

54:01

I make the entertainment show about language.

54:04

The illusionist, which has 200 plus episodes

54:06

in the back catalog for you to

54:08

catch up on. And just thinking about

54:10

the the wherewolf chat we had today,

54:13

there are a few episodes in there

54:15

about other mythological creatures. There's an episode

54:17

called nightmare where we talk about like

54:20

demons and leemons, as in the animal.

54:22

So there's an episode where I discuss

54:24

terms from Buffy the Vampire Slayer in

54:26

the company of Jenny and Kristen from

54:29

buffering the Vampire Slayer. So maybe you'd

54:31

like to check those out at the

54:33

illusionist.org and in the pod places. There

54:36

you are. And Martin, what about you?

54:38

What have you guys? I make an

54:40

experimental podcast, Couldn't Etrina Watch, which uses

54:42

computer codes, or every episode changes every

54:45

day. So there's a song, which where

54:47

the lyrics and the instruments change, there's

54:49

advice for the creatively blocked, and then

54:52

the stuff which is more like poems

54:54

and monologues and same pieces. So if

54:56

you're into the Easter Terric end of

54:58

audio, have a listen, and then go

55:01

back tomorrow. download it again or stream

55:03

it and you'll get a slightly different

55:05

version of the same thing. And you

55:08

get that. Nutrino.watch. And if you are

55:10

one of our handsome, benevolent, very sexy

55:12

and discerning patrons at patrons.com/answer me this,

55:14

you also do get bonus material halfway

55:17

through the month. Stuff we lovingly did

55:19

not include in this episode you get

55:21

to hear. And we love to see

55:24

your reactions to the episodes and your

55:26

comments. Yeah, we were asking you last

55:28

episode, which artists dead or retired you'd

55:30

like to have one last work from.

55:33

Michael from Glossop, previously from Wankheim, nominates

55:35

John Kennedy Toole, who wrote a Confederacy

55:37

of Dances but never lived to see

55:40

it published. Sue's pick is author Sue

55:42

Grafton, who completed 25 of her alphabet

55:44

Kinsey Milhone series before her death and

55:46

never completed the Z. Oh! It would

55:49

be good to read that final book.

55:51

Oh, that's harsh. Timothy in Berlin picks

55:53

George Gershwin and Madeline in Fremantle, Western

55:56

Australia, says, Douglas Adams, popular pick, and

55:58

Jim Henson, inventor of the Muppets. Oh,

56:00

well now you're taking me back to

56:02

my Disney World trip because one of

56:05

the reasons that I'm very excited about

56:07

taking my kids to Disney World, is

56:09

because very sadly this hurts me to

56:12

my core. They're closing Muppets for... in

56:14

June. And I'm so excited because had

56:16

we booked the holiday two months later,

56:18

we would never again be able to

56:21

seem up its 40, which is this

56:23

foundational text for me. So I'm essentially

56:25

taking my two children to Florida just

56:28

so I can take them to that

56:30

attraction. And that is Jim Henson's last

56:32

work before he died. He died basically

56:34

making that film, that 4D film at

56:37

Disney World. And if it closed the

56:39

day before you arrived, you would have

56:41

kicked the whole place down. Yeah. Anyway,

56:44

the conversation can continue about everything we've

56:46

discussed today over at patreon.com/answer me this.

56:48

If we don't see you there, we'll

56:50

see you on a Toby Calvary, or

56:53

if not, we'll see you on May

56:55

the 1st. See you then. Bye! Join

56:57

me and Tom Ward every Wednesday and

57:00

Sunday as we reveal the mysteries and

57:02

histories of abandoned places around the world

57:04

and ask, where did everyone go? Brought

57:06

to you by Like a Shot, Makers

57:09

of Forbidden History, search for Where Did

57:11

Everyone Go, on your favorite podcast platform.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features