Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hi, this is Christopher Kimball from Milk Street
0:02
Radio. I often shop at Whole Foods
0:04
Market since they sell the kind of food I like.
0:06
Organic vegetables, a great meat counter, and of
0:09
course a great staff. For
0:11
Thanksgiving, Whole Foods offers brine
0:13
turkeys, as well as a spiral
0:15
cut bone and ham. The Whole
0:17
Foods Market bakery has a large assortment of
0:19
pies, even a vegan pumpkin pie. Or
0:22
grab some brioche and butterflake rolls for the
0:24
table as well. Or you
0:26
can ask the Whole Foods team to cater your
0:28
meal for you, including the bird, the sides, and
0:30
desserts. Get your holiday party
0:32
started at Whole Foods Market. And
0:56
he's here to answer your questions. A warm
0:58
welcome. Chris, great to have
1:00
you back. Hi Clarence. Cambridge actually. But
1:02
what's 80 miles? No, 80 kilometres
1:04
between friends. Not far. But
1:07
Cambridge is the centre of the universe, you know. Copernicus
1:10
had it wrong. The universe does not
1:12
rotate the way he
1:14
thought. It's actually the universe rotates
1:16
around Cambridge. Yeah, absolutely. I
1:18
got that horribly wrong. Let's
1:23
start with, I think, a very loaded question.
1:25
It comes in from Soli in
1:28
Weinberg. It reads, not actually a
1:30
question. Yeah, a loaded question it
1:32
is. But can you share your
1:34
thoughts on an article I read
1:36
on the UK's independent website on
1:39
the trends in Ecology and Evolution
1:41
Journal that ethanol consumption, consumption amongst
1:43
animals, in one study,
1:45
one 2012 study, male fruit
1:48
flies were found to increase
1:50
their alcohol consumption after
1:52
being rejected by a mate, while
1:54
females of a closely related species
1:57
were found to be less selective
1:59
in the animal. their choice of
2:01
mate after consuming ethanol. I
2:03
did see that headline. It was
2:05
very clickbaity in journal terms.
2:08
Even science PR can
2:10
be clickbaity. And
2:12
we've known for a long time that animals succumb to
2:15
alcohol the same way we do. And
2:17
when many insects go and eat fruit, because
2:19
that's where even mosquitoes don't just drink blood,
2:21
only the females do that anyway, but mosquitoes
2:23
get most of their energy by going and
2:25
finding moldy pieces of fruit. And
2:28
then they suck up the juices. And anyone
2:30
who's walked through an orchard in autumn will
2:33
know that smell almost like cider of fermenting
2:35
fruit. The rotting fruit on the ground has
2:37
yeasts on it, and it is becoming a
2:39
bit alcoholic. So anything that's eating the fruit
2:41
is getting a bit of a dose of
2:43
alcohol. And so, yes,
2:46
animals have always been exposed, not
2:48
through choice or volition necessarily, but through
2:51
necessity of going and getting their lunch.
2:54
But the question is, do they do this
2:56
in order to change their behavior? We drink
2:58
alcohol as a social thing and also to
3:00
change our behavior a bit, in
3:02
some people's cases, a lot. And sometimes of the
3:04
year and some days of the week more than
3:06
others. But do animals
3:08
actually do this intentionally? Well, it's very hard to prove,
3:11
isn't it? Because you can only
3:13
say what you can observe and
3:15
draw conclusions from the association. You can't say one
3:17
thing causes the other. But if you've got an
3:19
animal that has tried to mate and failed, it
3:21
might be it's been rejected because it's not big
3:23
enough. So what do you do? You go and
3:25
eat. Well, what do you eat? You go and
3:27
eat fruit juice that happens to have some alcohol
3:29
in it and that may make a difference. On
3:31
the other hand, maybe they are just
3:33
drowning their sorrows. Who knows? The other interesting thing about
3:36
booze, I learned this a few years ago, goldfish
3:38
and members of the carp family
3:40
that live in ponds that traditionally
3:43
freeze over in winter have a
3:45
quirk of their metabolism that means
3:47
that they can divert the waste
3:49
products of their metabolism into
3:51
making alcohol. So these
3:53
fish pee alcohol into
3:56
their pond when there's
3:58
low oxygen conditions. So they
4:00
will get a little bit drunk over winter,
4:03
although given it's literally a drop in the
4:05
ocean for them It won't
4:07
make a huge physiological effect But it
4:09
was an interesting discovery by researchers at
4:11
John Moores Liverpool University About
4:13
ten years ago and they did actually
4:16
show that these these animals get round
4:18
the low oxygen environment by shunting metabolism
4:20
into the production of alcohol and they
4:22
pee out the booze and That
4:24
enables them to scavenge a little bit
4:27
more energy without any oxygen So alcohol
4:29
has been inveigled and intertwined with our
4:31
evolution and other animals evolution for millions
4:33
of years Michael
4:36
the question that keeps him awake at
4:38
night is as follows Please ask the
4:40
doc to satisfy my curiosity when I
4:43
pass gas Sometimes the
4:45
sound is loud and sometimes it's just a
4:47
hiss Everyone
4:50
does it men and women equal times of
4:52
the day about 12 times a day on
4:54
average and Each one is
4:57
a couple of hundred milliliters at
4:59
most Probably probably a
5:01
bit less than that in some people's cases certainly a
5:03
lot more and the Answer
5:06
to this question is it will come
5:08
down to the volume because not all
5:11
farts arrive in similar proportions sometimes it's
5:13
little pockets of gas sometimes much bigger
5:15
volumes and The
5:17
amount that you dispense at each sort
5:19
of sitting as it were is Going
5:23
to make a difference to how open the aperture
5:25
is because the gas is there that needs to
5:27
come out if it needs to come Out all
5:29
in one go and it's under high pressure It
5:32
will open things up to a different extent
5:34
than little bits of gas that can be
5:36
snuck out through a small hole But without
5:38
much turbulence because what makes a noise
5:40
is Turbulence if you think
5:42
about taking a really deep breath if you
5:44
take a deep breath in really quickly It
5:46
makes more noise than if you take a
5:48
similarly sized breath in but more slowly Why
5:51
if you do it more slowly the velocity of
5:53
the air is lower and if you
5:55
have air moving at a lower velocity It
5:58
does not exceed something called the Reynolds number, which
6:00
is proportional to the size of the thing that
6:02
the air is flowing through, the tube, and
6:05
if you exceed that number you get turbulent
6:07
flow. If you get turbulent flow you get
6:09
a rushing noise. So a really
6:11
raucous ripper fart is probably going to be
6:13
big volume but it's going to be going
6:15
through a fairly tight aperture, fairly
6:17
fast and make a big noise. Small volumes
6:20
of gas are probably going to go through
6:22
a small aperture but they're going
6:24
to come out probably a bit more slowly because
6:26
the pressure's lower and they've probably come out in
6:29
a way that is less obvious,
6:31
let's say, which is where the silent but
6:33
deadly gets into the equation. A
6:35
ripper fart, okay, is silent violent?
6:38
Well, silent but deadly or silent but violent, I
6:40
think, was the saying we used to use in
6:42
school and those are usually the highly
6:44
sulphurous ones, the ones that are fuelled by cabbage,
6:47
brussel sprouts, cauliflower, vegetables with lots
6:50
of sulphur in the plant because
6:52
when this ends up in your
6:54
intestine it gets metabolised by the
6:57
bacteria and we can't use those
6:59
sulphur compounds but the bacteria can
7:01
and they produce odiferous by-products including
7:03
hydrogen sulphide and also
7:06
one called methyl mercaptan which
7:08
is the same stuff that skunks fart out
7:10
and spray out of their rear end in
7:12
order to deter you from pursuing them and
7:15
these are part of the odiferous bouquet that
7:17
is what makes a silent but deadly fart
7:19
smell the way it does. Okay,
7:22
Ray's got a question about gravity, the question
7:24
is what is the most
7:26
appropriate action to take if a
7:28
lift's cable snaps and
7:30
plummets several floors with you and others
7:33
still inside it? What's
7:35
that, make peace with your God I guess, huh? Aye, Ray, I
7:37
was going to say put your hands together and pray. First
7:40
point, lifts have built into them since
7:42
the time of Schindler who actually was
7:44
one of the most prolific
7:47
producers of things like lifts for
7:50
decades but built into lifts
7:52
is a special ratchet mechanism so when
7:55
the cable pulls and the lift is
7:57
under load the ratchet pay
7:59
which stick out from the side of the lift
8:01
into the lift shaft are withdrawn in. But
8:05
if anything unloads the cable and
8:07
therefore the lift is potentially in a
8:09
free-fall position, there's nothing pulling on a
8:11
giant spring. Those ratchet hooks inwards from
8:13
the sides of the lift, so they
8:15
spring out and they engage with gaps
8:17
on the sides of the lift shaft,
8:19
stopping the lift from falling. So
8:22
a lift all being well and
8:24
it's being made properly, cannot go into free-fall,
8:26
even if the cable snapped, it won't do
8:28
that. Let's assume that in Ray's scenario it
8:31
can. If you're in a lift, you
8:33
are falling as the lift falls and
8:35
it's as though you have jumped off a building. And
8:39
you are in free-fall inside the lift. So people
8:41
often say, well, why don't I just jump the
8:44
minute the lift hits the ground, because
8:46
then I will be moving upwards as
8:48
the lift goes splat and that would
8:50
offset the effect. But the
8:52
reality is that that would be like you saying, well, I'm
8:54
in free-fall off a building, how do I
8:57
stop myself going splat when I hit the ground?
8:59
Well, you'd have to accelerate yourself off
9:01
the bottom of the lift with
9:04
a jump which would give you an
9:06
equivalent amount of energy as the energy
9:08
that you have effectively now
9:10
got, which is
9:12
free-fall energy, kinetic energy of
9:15
you, a tone of velocity, and
9:17
you'd got to do that incredibly quickly. So
9:20
you'd have to basically accelerate yourself as though you could jump
9:22
over a house. That's the way
9:24
of thinking about it, because you've got to have the
9:26
equivalent amount of energy that you started with in order
9:29
to offset the momentum downwards. So
9:31
unless you are a pole vaulter with
9:33
incredible leg muscles and capable of
9:35
jumping over a house like a flea can, then
9:37
you are never going to be able to
9:40
offset the momentum in the opposite direction so
9:42
that you are literally in a neutral movement
9:44
position when the lift goes splat. So
9:46
unfortunately, I think your suggestion to put your
9:48
hands together and meet
9:51
your maker is probably the only answer
9:53
if you are genuinely in free-fall under
9:55
those circumstances. Sure, that
9:57
roof is going to crash into the floor anyway. Yes,
10:00
the lift will crash into the floor and you'll be crashing
10:02
into the floor with it, but unless you can go in
10:05
the opposite direction to the lift and very, very quickly and
10:07
know when the lift's about to hit the ground, you're
10:09
never going to offset the momentum so that your momentum
10:11
is the opposite of the lift or the lift or
10:14
the momentum you previously had so you will
10:16
still go splat. The
10:18
naked scientist on Cave Talk, it is 9.45. Your
10:21
questions via WhatsApp, 0725671567. Leave
10:25
a voice note or a text note and we'll get to
10:28
it. First of all, give us a call, 0214460567 and we'll
10:30
prioritise your call. Mark
10:35
Bright has the following
10:37
question. Could you please ask Dr.
10:39
Chris about the two earth theory?
10:42
Were there really two earths at one point
10:44
in time? I think what Mark might be
10:46
referring to is the question of,
10:49
and this is a sort of detective story,
10:51
when we look up into space, we see
10:53
Earth's moon and when we
10:56
look at the rocks that the Apollo missions have
10:58
brought back from the moon and we date them
11:00
about four and a half billion years, same age
11:02
as the Earth. And when we look at other
11:04
planets like Mars, very similar to the Earth, they
11:07
have mutants, Phobos and Deimos, but they're very, very
11:09
small. Our moon is huge compared
11:12
to other moons and compared to our
11:14
planet. So when you put all that
11:16
together, you've got a moon made of the same stuff
11:18
that the Earth crust is made of. It's
11:20
got a similar age to what we
11:23
call the current planet Earth and it's
11:25
disproportionately big for the size of
11:27
our planet and where it is. There's no
11:29
way we could have caught that as a moon coming in from
11:31
somewhere else. So it must have got made. How
11:34
did it get made? Well, the theory
11:36
is that way back about 4.57 billion
11:38
years ago, there were two planets, which
11:41
for various reasons, one probably a bit smaller,
11:43
one a bit bigger, Mars size, Earth size,
11:46
ended up on a collision course in
11:48
space and one rammed into the
11:50
other. The two planets
11:52
merged, but in the course of
11:54
the collision, which melted the new
11:56
planet and made a completely molten
11:58
ball in space, ejected a whole
12:01
load of the surface material of
12:03
what was then the Earth into
12:05
space around this ball of molten
12:07
material and that ejector then coalesced
12:09
to form the Moon as we
12:11
see it today. And
12:13
that's probably where this two planet idea comes
12:16
from and they notionally call the other planet
12:18
that hit us about four and a half
12:20
billion years ago, Thea. So I think
12:23
that's what Mark's referring to. Let's
12:25
go to the WhatsApp line as a
12:27
voice note there, Joe. Good morning, Clarence
12:30
and Dr. Chris. Dr. Chris,
12:32
where do mosquitoes disappear to
12:34
during daytime, the day hours?
12:37
I'd like to know where they are so I
12:39
can do something about them
12:41
before they reemerge at night. Thank you,
12:43
Dion Perro. Hello, Dion. Well, the answer
12:46
to this is that there are thousands
12:48
of species of mosquito and
12:50
only some of them disappear during
12:53
the daytime. The ones
12:55
we tend to talk about the most
12:57
are the ones most closely linked to
12:59
the transmission of diseases, including diseases like
13:01
malaria. And the anopheles mosquitoes
13:03
that transmit that are night active, which
13:05
is why you put bed nets up.
13:08
If you want to stop yourself getting
13:10
bitten, you sleep under a net. The
13:12
mosquitoes then go away during the day
13:14
and you're much less likely to be
13:16
bitten. But other mosquitoes, including Aedes mosquitoes
13:18
that spread things like yellow fever and
13:21
dengue and Zika virus, they
13:24
are de-active mosquitoes. They love also
13:26
big animals like humans and they
13:28
tend to love living in cities.
13:31
So the problem is even if you
13:33
have one strategy that deals with the
13:35
nighttime active malaria spreading anopheline mosquitoes, you've
13:37
got a problem with the de-active Aedes
13:39
mosquitoes. So it will really depend
13:41
on what species, Dion, you're talking about because
13:43
your strategy to control them is going to
13:46
differ, but some things are common to both.
13:48
And one of them is mosquitoes are
13:51
all united in their need to breed
13:53
over water because they lay eggs
13:55
in water, they turn into a little larvae and
13:57
the larvae then eat algae and other things in
13:59
the water. to grow into mosquitoes that emerge and
14:01
then come and bite you. So
14:04
most of the infection control strategies and
14:06
transmission control strategies for malaria and dengue
14:08
and that kind of thing all evolve
14:10
or revolve around finding pools of water
14:12
and getting rid of them. So
14:15
if you can do that by not having pots
14:17
and pans and water butts and stuff like that
14:19
you can stop the mosquitoes breeding near where humans
14:21
are and you also combine that
14:23
with things like strategies
14:26
to spot them in homes and splat them and
14:28
also warn people about sleeping under bed nets if
14:30
it's a malaria area and also
14:32
wearing repellents and so on but it's very
14:34
hard to have a one-size-fits-all way to control
14:36
them. They're amazing as a vector for disease
14:38
which is why they have evolved to be
14:40
that very thing. A question
14:42
from T it reads morning Dr Chris
14:45
I have very mild tinnitus I
14:47
assume in one ear that can only
14:49
be heard when falling asleep. I
14:52
think it's tinnitus but it comes and
14:54
goes and sounds like a duck softly
14:56
quacking every few seconds.
14:59
Can this be tinnitus as it's
15:02
not a ringing sound as I thought
15:04
tinnitus was? What's more likely
15:06
is that this is the sound of your own
15:08
heartbeat and when you
15:10
put your ear to the pillow you
15:12
occlude block the external auditory canal the
15:14
bit you put your finger in a
15:17
wiggle when you've got an itchy ear.
15:19
That is the pathway that leads to your eardrum and
15:22
when you put your head to the
15:24
pillow and block that you invoke something
15:26
called the occlusion effect. You create a
15:29
cavity between the pillow
15:31
surface and your eardrum and
15:33
certain frequencies will resonate and
15:36
therefore amplify in that cavity
15:39
and when your blood pulses through your
15:41
arteries it will create
15:43
small movements in all
15:46
your body's tissues. They expand and contract expand
15:48
and contract because as the blood rushes in
15:50
they get bigger and when the blood leaves
15:52
in the veins they shrink a bit and
15:55
this makes a noise
15:58
when you hear it in your eyes
20:00
because of the centripetal forces
20:03
but she's spinning in relation to
20:05
what? So if she stands on
20:08
a children's playground merry-go-round on
20:10
the axis and it's spinning in the opposite
20:12
direction she's actually stationary. So I'm wondering if
20:15
there's some such a thing as a universal
20:17
frame of reference across the whole
20:20
universe. We should call
20:22
you Galileo, Brent, because that was almost
20:24
word for word. I don't
20:26
think he talks about children's merry-go-rounds but
20:28
what Galileo Galilei postulated and he made
20:30
that very point that we
20:32
don't know where we're going and where we're moving
20:34
if we don't have those frames of reference. We
20:37
have to look around at the world going past
20:39
us to know that we're moving and if we
20:41
can't see the world going along and you're not
20:43
physically aware you wouldn't know. I
20:45
don't think there is a way of knowing for sure. I
20:48
think it's a very interesting question. I need
20:51
to go and have a think about that one because
20:53
there may well be a clever answer and I like
20:55
your spinning idea. I read a really good book the
20:57
other day by the same guy
20:59
who wrote The Martian with Matt Damon in
21:02
it, what became the film The
21:04
Martian and he's got a follow-up book which I
21:06
was sent and I read it and I interviewed
21:08
him because it was brilliant. He used to be
21:10
a computer scientist actually, the guy who wrote that
21:12
book and it
21:14
starts with the person doesn't
21:17
know where they are and they have no
21:20
recollection of how they got where they are. They just
21:22
know they're in some funny environment which they figure out
21:24
might be some kind of spaceship but they're not sure.
21:27
It might be a prison cell and
21:29
he does this guy a series of
21:31
experiments dropping things off tables to
21:34
work out that he is accelerating because
21:36
he's on a spaceship that's actually getting
21:38
faster and faster and he's able to
21:40
demonstrate that gravity, the apparent gravity, is
21:43
increasing which you would need to see
21:45
an increasing gravity if you were accelerating
21:48
and so there are ways to do
21:50
this but it's
21:52
quite subtle so I'm going to take that away and I'm
21:54
going to have that as homework for next time so thank
21:57
you for this week's question of the week. we
22:00
don't have time for the
22:02
other question about quantum, I think, physics. Oh,
22:04
good. That's good. We'll
22:07
hold it over for next week. Mind you, if it's about quantum
22:09
mechanics, it should be very, very small. So we should better get
22:12
through that really fast, shouldn't we? And
22:14
we'll leave it for next week. A big thank
22:17
you in the meantime. The naked scientist, Dr. Chris
22:19
Smith, lecturer at the University of Cambridge every Friday.
22:21
Huge appointment. Those are questions we weren't able to
22:23
get to this week. Some of
22:25
them we'll hold over for next week. It is
22:27
nearly time for news at 10 o'clock. Natalie Marche
22:30
is standing by with news at the top of
22:32
the hour. progressive.com
22:57
and now some legal info.
23:00
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and
23:02
Affiliates. Price and coverage match
23:04
limited by state law. Not
23:06
available in all states.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More