Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
We went through a time where home
0:02
theater, and mainly we're talking in the
0:04
United States, right? I mean, sure it
0:06
exists in other places, but not like
0:08
it does in the United States, where
0:11
we have larger homes. We have the
0:13
space. But yeah, they still exist, and
0:15
they're very vibrant. I mean, gosh, home
0:17
theaters especially go. all out. I mean,
0:19
again, you're usually, you're not talking about
0:22
the pro or the hobbyist. You're talking
0:24
about the guy that's got lots of
0:26
books. I'm generalizing here, but he may
0:28
not even appreciate the audio, the fact
0:31
that he's got the best. He wants
0:33
the best, and maybe he just wants
0:35
to show off the fact that he's
0:37
got the best. But it doesn't have
0:39
the ears, the experience, appreciation, and knowledge.
0:42
Welcome to Bobby Osinsky's inner circle. I'm
0:44
Bobby Osinsky, and this is a show
0:46
all about music, music production, and the
0:48
music business. My guest today is acoustic
0:50
consultant Norman Varney of AV Room
0:52
Service. Norman has designed over 500
0:55
critical listening rooms around the world,
0:57
starting back when he owned audio
0:59
retail store. After that he became
1:01
director of custom installation and home
1:03
theater divisions at Music Interface Technologies.
1:05
There he designed an innovative and
1:07
elaborate electrical system for the scoring
1:09
stage of Lucas Films Skywalker Ranch.
1:11
Norman then became a senior engineer
1:14
with acoustic systems business at Owens
1:16
Corning Science and Technology Center. There
1:18
he spent a considerable amount of
1:20
time testing in an anicoke chambers,
1:22
reverberation chambers, and acoustic labs in
1:24
general. During the interview we
1:26
spoke about some common acoustic
1:28
myths, acoustic listening tests that
1:30
Owens Corning, how extravagant home
1:32
theaters can get, the difficulty
1:34
in designing an immersive playback
1:37
room, the built-in resident point
1:39
in American home construction, and
1:41
much more. I spoke with Norman
1:43
from his home in Johnstown, Ohio. I
1:45
saw that you were going to do a
1:47
webinar about the myths of acoustics. And
1:50
this is going to posts. Afterwards
1:52
this is probably going to
1:55
post January so You
1:57
might be giving out anything here
1:59
if I ask you about some
2:01
of the myths that you'd like
2:03
to bust about acoustics. Okay.
2:05
Yeah, I know this one that's
2:08
coming up says that that's
2:10
not really what it's about.
2:12
I'm sure we'll cover that,
2:14
but that's not what I
2:17
planned out. Okay. It's really,
2:19
but there are so many
2:21
myths out there that I'm
2:23
confronted with as an acusical
2:25
engineer every day. And it seems
2:27
like... You know, I've been at
2:30
it for decades and these
2:32
myths don't go away.
2:35
And it's really frustrating.
2:37
I find it more miss in
2:39
the audio file world than
2:41
the pro audio world, which,
2:44
you know, is understandable. But
2:46
it is very
2:48
frustrating. And even in
2:50
the pro audio world,
2:53
there are constantly things
2:55
that I just
2:58
fundamental. observations that
3:00
you know you're going oh
3:02
my gosh you know if
3:04
you just if you just
3:06
did this it would make
3:08
such a big impact on
3:10
on your work and and
3:13
your flow and your efficiency
3:16
and your translation
3:18
and you know all those things
3:21
it would be so
3:23
obviously acoustics is is
3:25
still Not often thought of
3:28
it's not often top of
3:30
mind and it should be
3:32
for you know those that
3:34
are in the professional
3:36
audio business it's it's got
3:39
to be front of mind.
3:41
So yeah, it's a it's an
3:43
issue. I guess we'll always be
3:45
an issue. Yeah. Okay. So give
3:48
me a couple of the most
3:50
common ones. Studios on
3:52
a console. I'll see small
3:55
monitors. with the tweeters on
3:57
on you know they're instead
4:00
of vertically standing, they're
4:03
horizontal. And they're
4:05
towed in. And it's like, wow, you
4:07
know, I mean, that limits you to
4:09
right here. You know, I can't move,
4:11
I can't move around at all,
4:13
or it's going to completely change
4:15
the sound. And just an inch
4:17
makes a tamper totally changes,
4:20
spatiality totally changes. It's, you
4:22
know, you don't want to
4:24
be stuck right here. And
4:26
for an audio file, you
4:28
can be. You know, you can
4:30
just sit there and listen.
4:32
But when you're on the
4:34
board, you're all over, you
4:37
know, you're reaching around and
4:39
you're making adjustments and you
4:42
want to listen and
4:44
hear those adjustments while
4:46
your head's in the not
4:48
ideal perfect spot. So let's
4:50
make it better. Let's make
4:52
it easier on you. So that's
4:54
one. And then along that
4:57
same line timing. time
4:59
alignment of those drivers if it's
5:01
if it's on an angle like
5:03
that and it's Get my hand
5:06
in the screen and it's
5:08
towed in Then that tweeter
5:10
is going to be arriving
5:12
before the the mid-range and
5:14
woofers The subwoofers
5:16
subwoofers are often
5:18
hopefully their time aligned, but
5:21
they're often not So
5:23
with a subwoofer you have
5:25
you have the the phase
5:27
any variable phase and you have
5:29
the gain and you have the
5:31
crossover. And hopefully you're
5:33
crossing over from the midst
5:35
and highs as well, right?
5:38
Often I don't see that.
5:40
They'll be running the the
5:42
main's full range. So they're
5:44
still playing down low. They're
5:46
still playing, say, whatever, below
5:49
80 hertz. And working and
5:51
the amplifier that's driving them
5:53
is also working. So
5:55
crossovers and external
5:57
crossover. be it analog or or
6:00
DSP needs to come into play.
6:02
Nowadays, especially with DSP, gosh, you
6:04
can dial it in so that
6:06
you don't have, especially if you're
6:09
talking about an array of subwovers
6:11
where you can really eliminate
6:13
the room mode problems and
6:15
really get the time alignment
6:18
correct and really get it to
6:20
act as one voice, to sound like
6:22
one voice rather than a combination
6:24
of a couple of different
6:26
voices. So that's a couple. I
6:29
noticed that your company does what
6:31
you call frequency response panels.
6:33
Yeah. Concentrating on the lower
6:35
frequencies rather than the midst and
6:37
the highest, which most acoustic
6:39
panels do. Yeah. And that's the
6:42
biggest problem in studios for the
6:44
most part. It's the low end.
6:46
It's always, always the most difficult,
6:48
the most problematic for a couple
6:50
of reasons. The average Joe even,
6:52
you know, somebody who's not into
6:54
audio. The first thing that... from
6:57
a sound quality attribute, he'll
6:59
notice is the base. How
7:02
extended is it, how
7:04
articulate is it, how dynamic
7:06
is it. Even if he's,
7:08
like I say, not aware,
7:11
not appreciative of audio, that's
7:13
the first thing that they'll
7:15
notice. But they're large
7:18
wavelengths. They have lots
7:20
of energy. They're room shape
7:22
and size dependent.
7:24
So it's not just about
7:26
the low frequency extension
7:29
of the the mains or the subwoofers.
7:31
The room has so much to do
7:33
with how that interacts. And
7:35
so yeah, it's low frequencies.
7:37
And again, when we're talking about
7:40
noise control, not just sound
7:42
quality, but noise control, the
7:44
low frequencies are the difficult.
7:47
The long wavelengths, the
7:49
high energy. So they're very
7:51
difficult and often expensive.
7:54
to treat. But there's a number of
7:56
ways that can be treated. It can
7:58
be treated and like anything. in acoustics,
8:01
it's usually many
8:04
different solutions to
8:06
address it. So with the
8:08
low frequencies, we're talking
8:11
about the size of the
8:13
room. So the dimensions
8:15
are going to dictate
8:17
the room modes and where
8:19
they live in the
8:21
room and how they're
8:24
distributed amongst themselves.
8:26
So the dimensions
8:28
and or shape. of the room. So
8:30
if the room is, let's say it's
8:32
a concrete bunker, then its shell
8:35
construction is not going to
8:37
give at all. It's not going
8:39
to act as a low-frequency absorber.
8:42
It's not going to move. So
8:44
all that energy is going to stay
8:46
contained and linger. It doesn't
8:48
have a chance to be absorbed, right?
8:51
So if you have a shell construction
8:53
that flexes. So the
8:55
room still resil, it's
8:57
a resilient, it's a
8:59
resilient. construction, but it's still
9:02
airtight or water tight. So
9:04
you might have a
9:06
floating floor, isolated walls,
9:08
suspended ceiling, but all those,
9:10
though they're independent from
9:12
each other, the construction allows
9:15
it to move, and
9:17
yet they're still all sealed.
9:19
So you've got, you know,
9:21
resilient caulking and so forth.
9:23
So it's still airtight from
9:26
a noise control point of
9:28
view. Yeah. Yeah, it's expensive
9:30
too because it's kind of
9:32
brute force stuff. And everybody
9:34
keeps on hoping for really
9:36
cheap and expensive way to
9:38
do that. There's not. And
9:40
you know, that's the construction
9:42
part of it. Then there's
9:44
still other ways that we can
9:46
address the room modes. Location
9:48
of the listener and location
9:51
of the main speakers or subwovers
9:53
so that we don't. Now it's
9:55
a room. So there are room
9:57
modes in there. and the smaller
9:59
the and often control rooms,
10:01
mix rooms are very small,
10:04
the more problematic those room
10:06
modes are. We've got a
10:08
big room, then we have
10:10
many room modes, and so
10:12
then they're evenly distributed, they're
10:14
not piling up on top
10:16
of each other, they're not
10:18
as perceptual, not as
10:20
obvious. So let's put our
10:22
speakers and our ears in a
10:24
position in the room that's optimal.
10:26
that stays away from, say,
10:28
peaks or troughs of rheumas.
10:31
Then we can look at, you
10:33
mentioned the frequency response
10:35
panels, so we make,
10:38
that consists of many
10:40
different panels, and we
10:42
do make some that are for
10:44
low frequencies that work diaphromatically.
10:47
So you've got a membrane
10:49
that is able to move.
10:51
So rather than resistive, it's
10:53
pressure. activated, I guess you'd
10:55
say. So they need to
10:58
be in the right location.
11:00
Any acoustic treatment though, the
11:02
right type, in the right
11:04
location, in the right quantity.
11:06
Every room's different, every room's
11:09
unique. So there's going to
11:11
be a prescription, a formula that's
11:13
ideal for your particular room to
11:16
get it so that it is
11:18
neutral. So that it translates well.
11:20
And then lastly, then you've got
11:23
DSP or other kind of equalization.
11:25
And with DSP it's nice in
11:27
that you've got, you know, you can
11:30
play with variable phase
11:32
and you've got a, you know,
11:34
you can, you can change the cue.
11:36
All of that is a dream that,
11:38
you know, we didn't have, you know,
11:40
way back. That was not, not
11:43
available to us. Now it's available
11:45
to us. It's easy to implement
11:47
and it's inexpensive. Well, I go
11:50
back and I'm sure you do.
11:52
Go back to the days of,
11:54
you. the white DQs that we're
11:56
using for room tuning. Oh yeah.
11:59
A manual. the analog ones. Yeah,
12:01
yeah, and they were problematic.
12:03
They introduced their own
12:05
problems as well. So like
12:07
anything, I mean, it's, it's a
12:09
room. So it's always a compromise.
12:11
What you, but what we can
12:13
do is optimize it. We can make
12:16
it the best that it can be.
12:18
And we can understand what
12:20
the compromises are, you
12:22
know, and that's my job as an accusation
12:24
is. is to explain to my
12:26
clients, okay, here's the problems and
12:29
here's the solutions and how we
12:31
can address them. Here's the pros
12:33
and cons of each of those.
12:35
And you're always going to have constraints.
12:37
It's going to be budgetary
12:40
or maybe real estate. You know,
12:42
when you're talking a little frequency,
12:44
you're talking about a lot of real
12:47
estate often to correct the problem.
12:49
It might be time constraints. It
12:51
might be weight, physical weight constraints.
12:54
many possibilities. And so those
12:56
have to those decisions have
12:58
to be made. And I
13:00
can't make them for the client.
13:02
All I can do is explain
13:04
to him, here's the pros and
13:07
cons of each of them, and
13:09
so that they can make an
13:11
informed decision. You've been in the
13:13
audio file world for a long
13:15
time, and I know you've been constructing
13:19
home theaters for a while. Well,
13:21
let's talk about that world for
13:23
a It doesn't seem to
13:26
be as vibrant as
13:28
it once was to
13:30
me as an outsider.
13:32
Is that the case?
13:34
As vibrant. I don't know
13:36
if I'd use that word,
13:38
Bobby. Yeah, poor choice.
13:41
I mean, they're maybe
13:43
not as prevalent. I
13:45
think that that's a
13:48
possibility. I mean, we
13:50
went through a time where
13:52
home theater, and mainly we're talking the
13:55
United States, right? I mean sure it
13:57
exists in other places, but not like
13:59
it does in the... United States
14:01
where we have larger homes,
14:03
you know, we have the
14:05
space. But yeah, they still
14:08
exist and they're very
14:10
vibrant. I mean, gosh,
14:12
home theaters especially go
14:15
all out. I mean, again,
14:17
you're usually, you're
14:19
not talking about the
14:22
pro or the hobbyist.
14:24
You're talking about the
14:26
guy that's got lots of
14:28
bucks. You know, and he,
14:30
I am generalizing here, but
14:33
he may not even appreciate
14:35
the audio, you know, the fact
14:37
that he's got the best. He
14:39
wants the best, you know, and
14:42
maybe he just wants to
14:44
show off the fact that he's
14:46
got the best, but, you
14:48
know, doesn't really, doesn't
14:50
have the ears, the
14:53
experience, the appreciation, the
14:55
knowledge that... you know, that
14:57
yeah, he's got great gear
14:59
and it's calibrated really precisely.
15:02
He doesn't, I mean, he
15:04
goes yes, and I totally
15:06
believe this, that the average
15:09
Joe appreciates that. I know
15:11
that for a fact, from
15:13
doing some work at Owens,
15:15
some jury tests with people.
15:17
I know that when given
15:20
the opportunity, that the
15:22
average Joe completely appreciates,
15:25
quality sound and
15:27
an acoustic environment
15:29
that's right and
15:31
it changes their emotion.
15:34
We did an Owens Corning,
15:36
we had two AB rooms,
15:38
we had, we were doing
15:41
R&D, we were developing
15:43
some acoustic panels and
15:46
how to engineer them.
15:48
So we built these two identical
15:52
rooms and I designed
15:54
them. average size and average
15:56
furnishings, but they did have good
15:58
dimensions because I didn't want to
16:00
have room-book problems and they
16:02
were good as far as noise
16:05
control too because again that was
16:07
not I didn't want that to
16:09
be interfering in the study. So
16:11
anyway so one had our acoustic
16:13
treatment and the other one
16:15
did not and and so
16:18
frequently we would have these VIPs
16:20
come in and you'd have to
16:22
explain the R&D that you're doing
16:24
and so forth. Now both these
16:26
systems like I say had they
16:28
were They were set up exactly
16:31
the same from construction and
16:33
furnishings. We had carpet, a
16:36
couple of sofas, a couple
16:38
of bookshelves, and large screen
16:41
TV, and a 5.1 surround
16:43
sound. This is back in, I
16:45
don't know, late 90s, I think. Every
16:48
once in a while we'd have these
16:50
VIPs you have to do a little
16:53
dog and pony show and so I
16:55
play a little clip of a little
16:57
seven minute clip of from Das Bogh.
17:00
Do you remember that movie that
17:02
German movie? Very cool movie.
17:04
There's a section where they're
17:06
diving down deeper than the
17:08
sub was designed to withstand trying
17:11
to evade some explosives being
17:13
dropped down after them. And
17:15
so I'm playing that clip. And
17:17
I had so many VIP
17:20
guys who don't care, don't
17:22
know about audio at all,
17:24
be in the treated room
17:27
and go, I want this
17:29
at home. And so it
17:31
was after whatever, you
17:33
know, the third or fourth
17:35
one where I'm going, it's
17:38
not just me who appreciates
17:40
this, who understands it
17:42
and everything. We had
17:44
our own, we had
17:46
our own medical facility
17:48
there, our own staff full-time,
17:51
had our own audiology, you
17:53
know, booth, and everyone, we
17:55
had, you know, this is
17:57
the Science and Technology Center.
18:00
at that time there were about
18:02
600 people and they're
18:04
they're all engineers they're
18:06
from all over the
18:09
world so a great you know
18:11
a conglomerate of people and
18:13
so I asked the medical
18:16
staff I go can we
18:18
do some biofeedback you know
18:20
studies on on this
18:22
and they got really
18:24
into it after experiencing
18:26
it for themselves so I
18:28
did an email to those who
18:30
qualified as far as hearing and
18:33
got volunteers. And so we
18:35
did that. And so there,
18:37
that's how I can say
18:39
that because of that, the
18:41
average Joe, the acoustics can
18:43
control your emotions. And when
18:45
it's done right, you're the
18:47
same clip, whether they watched
18:49
it in the before treated
18:52
room or the after treated
18:54
room. first, because we would
18:56
alternate that, let them cool
18:58
down, and then go
19:00
again. They're in the
19:03
acusically treated room, their
19:05
blood pressure increased, their
19:07
respiration increased, sweat. We
19:10
could see on the
19:12
graph that was being
19:14
recorded of their vitals.
19:17
We could see this guy
19:19
got affected by the blood.
19:21
This woman got affected by
19:24
when the water started coming
19:26
in. I mean, it was
19:28
fascinating. It was a real, that
19:31
was a great experience for
19:33
me. Yeah, yeah, that's awesome.
19:35
You know, a few years ago,
19:37
there was, it wasn't a
19:39
study, it was an article,
19:41
I think from the Guardian,
19:43
that said, the headline was,
19:45
when a 20 year old,
19:47
here's final for the first
19:50
time. Here was a girl
19:52
who grew up listening
19:55
to music on her
19:57
phone. Yeah. And very...
20:00
very poor audio and that's
20:02
all she knew. And she
20:04
went to a friend's house
20:06
who had a reasonable
20:08
setup, playback setup
20:10
with final and she freaked
20:13
out. And it was like,
20:15
I've never heard anything like
20:17
this before and immediately
20:20
became an owner and
20:22
user of final. And I
20:24
think that's really the case, not
20:26
so much from the vinyl standpoint,
20:29
but from the standpoint that when
20:31
you hear really good audio, you
20:33
know it, you don't have to
20:35
be a professional. You just know
20:37
and it does something to you.
20:39
It's like, yes, I. Yeah. And
20:42
I think there's a couple of
20:44
things to that. One is, you
20:46
know, for example, her format, probably
20:48
MP3 and earbuds, you know,
20:50
low quality. So. dynamics
20:52
were missing and so a
20:55
lot of emotion from the
20:57
artist was missing. And then
20:59
also I think that, you
21:01
know, when you and I
21:03
grew up, we sat
21:05
down and listened. We
21:07
weren't doing other things
21:09
simultaneously while we were
21:12
listening. So we had
21:14
an opportunity to be
21:16
affected, to focus more.
21:18
And vinyl requires
21:20
that. Really? So yeah, it's an
21:22
experience that most of the
21:24
last generation or two have missed
21:26
out on. Yeah, you know, the other
21:29
thing was, I remember when I
21:31
was in college, everybody had
21:33
a pretty good stereo system.
21:35
I mean, everybody, that was part of
21:38
the rite of passage. You bought
21:40
a stereo system when you went
21:42
to college. And afterwards, it carried
21:45
over. Everybody had a good system.
21:47
and we lost that and that's
21:49
a real shame it is it
21:51
is a real shame and you
21:54
know i i can understand i mean
21:56
i don't know how they did
21:58
it back then you know That
22:00
would be a lot of noise, right?
22:02
Because those dorms were not,
22:05
you know, not isolated well.
22:07
And yet it was allowed.
22:10
And now that you wouldn't
22:12
be able to do that
22:14
without, you know, getting in trouble.
22:16
So that's a problem
22:19
because that exposure leads you,
22:21
right? I mean, when everyone's...
22:24
bar everyone's references at different
22:27
levels and if you've
22:29
never experienced this you
22:31
don't know it exists you don't
22:33
understand it and and so yeah
22:35
I think that that's one of
22:38
our challenges as with the younger
22:40
generation. Hi I'm Bobby Osinsky
22:42
and I'm a best-selling author of
22:44
several books on recording mixing and
22:47
mastering that are considered the gold
22:49
standard by many. I recently created
22:51
a new resource for songwriters, artists,
22:54
bands, and producers, and anyone looking
22:56
to fix common mixing problems so
22:58
they can get a better result,
23:00
stop wasting time experimenting, and not
23:03
get buried in information overload. I'm
23:05
calling it the Mix Fix Playbook.
23:07
15 Quick Solutions to Common Mix
23:10
Problems. These fixes are well known
23:12
among top mixing pros, but you
23:14
probably never knew they existed. If
23:17
you're looking to create mixes that
23:19
stand up to what you hear
23:21
on the radio, Spotify, or TV,
23:24
go to go. Bobbyosinski.com, slash Mix
23:26
Fix, to check it out now. Well, that
23:28
brings me to something else then. You
23:30
talked about the study that you did
23:32
with the 5.1 system. And now
23:35
here we are in immersive
23:37
world. And I'm curious
23:39
if you're building immersive
23:42
at most ready
23:44
rooms or is it still 5.1
23:46
or what does the client
23:49
care? Okay, well personally or
23:51
the... Both. Both. All right.
23:53
Well, I really enjoy
23:56
an immersive experience
23:58
and the day of... dedicated
24:01
space that I have here is a,
24:03
I mean, it's a dedicated space, it's
24:05
a room inside of a room,
24:07
and it's a, what I call
24:09
a 5.2 studio. So I
24:12
don't have everything else, though
24:14
I've, you know, designed it
24:16
and experienced it and
24:18
calibrated it and so
24:20
forth for others. Okay,
24:22
so here's my thoughts.
24:24
Totally depends on the
24:26
engineer. I mean, even more
24:28
so, you know. It depends on
24:31
the material, whether it's
24:33
believable or not, or just,
24:35
you know, it can be silly.
24:38
When it's good, it's a
24:40
great experience. My other thought
24:42
about it is this. If
24:44
you've, so more channels
24:47
mean more opportunity for
24:49
distortion, for errors,
24:51
for things to go wrong, for,
24:54
you know, I can't tell you
24:56
how many. existing home
24:58
theaters I've gone to help
25:00
out with the acoustics and
25:02
then when I come to
25:04
the calibration find out that did
25:06
you know that this tweeter's not
25:08
even working? I mean that
25:10
that kind of stuff or the
25:12
channels are out of phase or
25:15
maybe even reverse I mean it's
25:17
just unbelievable how you know it's
25:19
like how did you not know this
25:22
happen? When you've got umpteen
25:24
channels You've got lots
25:27
of electronics and lots
25:29
of calibration that needs to,
25:31
you have a system that's much
25:33
more complicated. You also
25:36
have the fact that you've got,
25:38
let's see, it's not a private,
25:40
well I could be a
25:42
private theater and still have
25:44
many people sitting. Well you've
25:46
got more people, when you
25:48
increase the number of listeners,
25:50
you have more people, you
25:53
have more people. closer to
25:55
other speakers and further
25:57
away from other speakers.
26:00
That's always going to
26:02
be a problem. If
26:04
we went the other way
26:06
and we had one mono
26:08
speaker, everyone, every
26:11
seat would get pretty
26:13
much really high quality
26:15
sound. Soon as we
26:17
add a pair, there's only
26:20
one point in space
26:22
where sound can converge
26:24
at the same point at
26:26
the same time. And we're never
26:29
going to get around that
26:31
unless we start wearing immersive
26:34
headphones. You know, and then
26:36
you can, you can get.
26:38
And there's a problem there too.
26:40
So, yeah. You know, it's funny
26:42
because I understand that how,
26:44
how much of a leap for
26:47
theatrical releases that
26:49
immersive can be, and
26:51
it certainly adds to it.
26:53
I'm not convinced about it.
26:55
I'm not convinced about. immersive
26:58
for music. And the funny
27:00
thing is there's record
27:02
labels, distributors, they all
27:04
want it and yet there's
27:07
no consumer demand. Yeah. So
27:09
it makes you wonder, huh?
27:11
Right. Well, and then again,
27:14
like you brought up, Bobby, I
27:16
mean, how many consumers have
27:18
atmos, you know, in their in
27:20
their home and are then,
27:22
you know, consumers of that
27:25
media. and it never will
27:27
be a lot. So yeah. I
27:29
went to a
27:31
private playback party
27:33
at EMI for
27:35
the Beatles at
27:37
most revolver, Allah.
27:40
And Giles Martin,
27:42
who did it, was there
27:45
and had outtakes
27:47
and described what they did. you
27:49
know it was only done on four
27:52
track but they used Peter Jackson's technology
27:54
to extract everything and not only extract
27:56
that they could extract a kick drum
27:58
and a snare drum. So it was
28:01
amazing, but it was a fantastic
28:03
mix. And one of the
28:05
reasons why is they kept
28:07
it fairly in the center.
28:09
And occasionally, when there
28:11
was a reason, there were things
28:13
that were out in size or
28:16
around you or above you or whatever,
28:18
it was rare, but it was
28:20
very tastefully done. everything seemed was
28:22
and this brings back to your
28:25
point about mono where it was
28:27
close to the center and it
28:30
was a very enjoyable experience on
28:32
the other hand i've gone to
28:34
playback parties for very successful albums
28:37
and immersive where you go
28:39
what are they thinking what's going on what's going
28:41
on yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah
28:43
yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah
28:46
yeah yeah yeah you know it just goes to
28:48
show you know it just goes to show you
28:50
the engineer and experience
28:52
and everything has to
28:54
do with this with the playback experience.
28:57
It does. That's why I was
28:59
saying you know it depends on
29:01
on what's being done and who's
29:03
doing it too but yeah I
29:05
mean for movies it can be
29:08
fantastic very you know
29:10
involving but for music sometimes
29:12
it can just be a
29:14
distraction and silly but a
29:16
good example of the Beatles
29:19
and Because I mean, you
29:21
know, I grew up with them. And
29:23
so when it sounds different, I mean,
29:25
a lot of the things that I
29:28
think the stuff that Giles has done
29:30
has been really fascinating, even if it's
29:32
not, oh, this is what I grew
29:35
up with. It's like, oh, you know,
29:37
I mean, I'm hearing that differently. I
29:39
mean, everything is arranged differently. Okay, I
29:42
understand that. And he did, I think a
29:44
very good job, but the Beatles
29:46
love in surround sound. It's
29:48
a trip. It's very cool.
29:50
It's meant to be that
29:52
way though, you know. So it's
29:55
acceptable, I
29:57
think. Too bad that closed
29:59
down. did it? Well, because
30:01
the hotel closed. Yeah, they're
30:04
going to rebuild something else
30:06
there. So the show had
30:09
to go to Unfortunately.
30:11
Yeah, yeah, yeah, that was pretty
30:14
good. That was pretty good.
30:16
I was looking somewhere doing
30:18
some research on you and
30:20
I saw that you at
30:22
one point in time attended
30:24
a Dick Grove workshop. Oh,
30:26
yeah, yeah. have a high
30:28
respect for anyone who's gone
30:30
to Dick Grove because everyone,
30:32
it was an outstanding program. I
30:35
never went and I wish I
30:37
would have, but it seems like everyone
30:39
I know who's ever gone there
30:42
has benefited greatly from that. Yeah,
30:44
I went for probably a couple
30:46
of years. You know, I lived in Southern
30:48
California and Palestine. So
30:51
Studio City was I don't know,
30:53
an hour drive or something like
30:55
that. So anyway, as soon as
30:57
I got a driver's license,
31:00
that was something I did. And
31:02
it was a great experience.
31:05
I got to, I was there
31:07
primarily studying drums. And so
31:09
I got to have, these
31:11
were group lessons with
31:13
people like John Garen, Louis
31:15
Belson, Ralph Humphrey's. I
31:18
mean on and on and on, it
31:20
was a, it was a, wonderful
31:22
experience. Yeah, I wish
31:24
there was something that was
31:27
similar to that today. There should
31:29
be, you know, there really should,
31:31
yeah. Yeah, I mean, there are
31:33
things that are kind of
31:36
close, but nothing exactly like
31:38
that because of the talent
31:40
that Dick could get, I
31:42
think, like you say, Ralph
31:44
Humphreys and Louis Belson.
31:46
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You know.
31:48
Okay. So. I'm curious about
31:51
some of the products that
31:53
you guys make and one
31:56
is vibration protectors. Oh
31:58
yeah, gosh Bobby. I should have
32:01
won in front of me.
32:03
Gosh, darn it. It's all
32:05
right. We can put one
32:08
up. So, it's not a
32:10
big, not a big idea,
32:12
a big deal. Tell me
32:14
how those came about and
32:17
there are other isolation products
32:19
available. Why are they better?
32:21
Yeah. Okay. Oh, thanks for
32:24
bringing this up. It goes
32:26
totally along with your first
32:28
question about Miss. Not that
32:31
they're... Okay. In the pro
32:33
world, this doesn't really exist,
32:35
but in the audio file
32:38
world, this totally exists, this
32:40
myth of coupling. You know,
32:42
using spikes and coupling versus
32:44
decoupling. It's so aggravating. It
32:47
is the exact opposite of
32:49
what you want to do,
32:51
and yet it is done
32:54
almost all the time. And
32:56
so if you've got something
32:58
rigid, something hard, something solid
33:01
like that, especially if you're
33:03
going to put it down
33:05
to a point and concentrate
33:08
all that weight, all that
33:10
cabinet vibrations are going to
33:12
be transferred into the structure.
33:15
So now, whatever the resting
33:17
platform is, and everything in,
33:19
especially in the United States,
33:21
our construction is... Everything's hard
33:24
fastened to one another. So
33:26
if our speakers are on
33:28
the floor, the floor is
33:31
vibrating. And so now the
33:33
walls are vibrating and the
33:35
ceilings vibrating and the furnishings
33:38
are vibrating. And this is
33:40
why, you know, once the
33:42
vibrations get into the structure,
33:45
they really don't dissipate. The
33:47
denser, the material, the faster,
33:49
the faster and the further
33:52
energy. travels. And so, for
33:54
example, a subwoofer, this is
33:56
why you can hear the
33:58
subwoofer, the low... frequencies at
34:01
the other end of the
34:03
building or the construction
34:05
if it's not isolated. So
34:07
you want to isolate. And
34:10
the pro audio, this is,
34:12
yes, there's a number of
34:14
products out there. Why ours is
34:17
better. For one, there's a
34:19
standard test. There's a, you
34:21
use an impulse hammer,
34:23
it's a vibration transmissibility
34:26
test. And so under
34:28
while developing, this was something that
34:31
we were focusing on. I wanted
34:33
to be sure that the resonance,
34:35
everything has resonance, right? And like
34:38
cones, rigid things have many
34:40
residences and they're in the
34:42
audible bandwidth. Not good. So
34:44
in other words, residences are
34:46
amplifications. They're peaks at
34:48
different frequencies. You don't want
34:51
those in the audible bandwidth. You
34:53
want them at least an octave
34:55
below the lowest frequency of interest.
34:58
So let's say 20 hertz. So
35:00
I don't want to have anything,
35:02
you know, I want something below
35:04
10 hertz. So the
35:07
natural resident frequency, under
35:09
proper load, we make
35:11
different densities and different
35:13
sizes to handle different
35:15
weights, different loads. When you
35:18
do this properly, then the
35:20
natural resonant frequencies at 3.4
35:22
hertz, and they become effective
35:24
right at 5 hertz. So
35:26
from 5 hertz on up.
35:28
conservatively, they'll mitigate 90%
35:31
of the energy. So now
35:33
the room's quiet. When you
35:35
have a speaker on the floor,
35:37
and it's not decoupled, it's
35:40
coupled, you're experiencing
35:42
four arrivals of that
35:45
speaker. And you don't want
35:47
that. So the first one is
35:49
structural. Like I said, it goes
35:52
to the floor, that medium is
35:54
denser than air. So the
35:56
energy arrives to your whatever
35:58
you're sitting on. to your butt
36:00
bone and via bone conduction to
36:03
your ear. That's the first arrival.
36:05
The second one is airborne from
36:07
the speaker to your ear. That's
36:10
the one, the only one that
36:12
we want. The third one is
36:14
airborne again. These are reflections from
36:16
the surfaces of the room
36:19
and we can control those
36:21
pretty easily with with acusical
36:23
products. And then the fourth
36:25
one is structural again and
36:27
these are... Buzzes and resonances
36:29
and maybe rattles that are
36:31
created. And again, in our
36:34
typical two by four construction
36:36
in the US, put a
36:38
little light fist bump between
36:41
studs. You hear 70 hertz.
36:43
That resonance is going to
36:45
sympathetically, it's going to play
36:48
back whenever you play any music
36:50
with 70 hertz, which is going
36:52
to be like anything, right?
36:54
It's going to act like a
36:57
capacitor. It's going to store that
36:59
energy for a moment, and then
37:01
it's going to release it later in
37:03
time. After the original event,
37:05
it ceased. So now you've
37:07
got loudspeakers playing, you know,
37:10
new voices playing at different
37:12
times interfering with what you want
37:14
to hear. So when you get
37:17
rid of those pre and post,
37:19
rivals and your room is quiet
37:21
and most people have not experienced
37:23
this unless you know they're
37:26
isolating their their speakers.
37:28
It's a huge deal and
37:30
it hits it hits every
37:32
sound quality attribute. I know
37:34
of no other acusical treatment
37:36
that does and in addition
37:39
it handles noise control too.
37:41
Now you now your subwooper
37:43
isn't heard in an adjacent
37:46
space. So to me That
37:48
product, the EVPs, the equipment
37:50
vibration protectors, are the biggest
37:53
bang for the buck. And they take
37:55
three seconds to witness. Okay,
37:57
yeah, I didn't realize that.
38:00
When you said the four arrivals,
38:02
I was thinking myself, okay,
38:04
what are they? And the one I couldn't
38:07
think of was the rattles
38:09
and busses. Yeah, and synthetic
38:12
vibrations, yeah, and resonance. Yes,
38:14
yeah, and that's that's a
38:16
big one and very annoying.
38:18
Again, you talked about low
38:21
frequency energy. Okay, now we're
38:23
talking about isolation of the
38:25
structure, right? And those residences,
38:28
most people have not
38:30
experience their room, have
38:32
not experienced the
38:34
elimination of those
38:37
residences. And it's a big
38:39
deal. To experience the
38:41
room being quiet, like I say,
38:44
tamper, spatiality, every
38:46
sound quality attribute is
38:48
improved, dynamics. All of
38:50
that is improved when
38:52
the room no longer
38:55
plays. Have you ever
38:57
encountered a space? where you
38:59
went, no, this is just not
39:01
going to work no matter what I
39:03
do. Yeah, oh gosh, all the time.
39:06
Yeah, I mean, it depends
39:08
on, so one of the things that
39:10
you have to do when you
39:12
go into a place and your
39:15
ass, okay, can you organize the
39:17
sound for me? Can you
39:19
control it and so forth?
39:21
First you have to talk about,
39:23
okay, noise control, where are
39:26
we there? We have to
39:28
get that under control before
39:31
we can address sound quality,
39:33
right? So it depends on
39:36
the situation. Very frequently, noise
39:38
control, you know, can you
39:41
soundproof this? We're not going
39:43
to soundproof it, but here's,
39:46
we have to discover what
39:48
is the energy, at what
39:50
frequencies, and how is it
39:52
getting in or out? Sound is
39:54
a two-way street, so if it can get
39:56
in it can get out. So from
39:58
a noise control point... you and there
40:00
may be multiple paths and so
40:03
there will be again multiple solutions
40:05
we have to find out what
40:07
are the energies how are they
40:09
getting there and what is the
40:11
goal different people are going to
40:14
have different goals we need to
40:16
determine what is the goal to
40:18
find out what the answer is
40:20
and that may be different it
40:22
may be money that may be
40:24
whatever you know the constraints are
40:26
and then the same goes with
40:28
sound quality. And so if it's,
40:30
we've got a whole lot of, this
40:33
is a great environment to
40:35
work in because we are
40:37
looking at the mountains and
40:39
we've got all these huge
40:41
glass windows or whatever. Well,
40:43
that's going to be a
40:46
little difficult in that, you
40:48
know, the low frequencies are
40:50
going to just go through
40:52
those. And so we're going
40:54
to have to reinforce the
40:56
low frequencies or maybe it's...
40:58
there's we've got these
41:00
big glass windows and there
41:03
is some street traffic out
41:05
there and so we are this
41:07
is going to be a problem
41:10
we can solve it there's good
41:12
quality you know noise rated windows
41:14
that we can we can address
41:17
or maybe it's just you
41:19
know we've got a huge
41:21
reflection where that window is
41:23
Okay, well again, we're going to
41:25
have to make a compromise. We
41:27
can't make that window absorb. We're
41:30
going to have to place some
41:32
kind of an absorber in front
41:34
of it. Or maybe we
41:36
can angle it so that
41:38
that reflection is not aimed
41:40
at us. There's different solutions,
41:42
but again, like I say, it's always
41:44
a compromise. There's no such
41:47
thing as a perfect room. Okay,
41:49
Norman, last question for you.
41:51
So you've been... You've
41:54
been in business for
41:56
a long time and with
41:58
that comes lots of
42:01
challenges, lots of successes.
42:03
I'm curious what was the best
42:05
piece of advice that maybe somebody
42:07
imparted to you or maybe
42:09
you learned along the way? That
42:12
maybe I learned
42:15
early on, on my own,
42:17
was the more I learned
42:19
the more I realized how much
42:21
there is more to learn. And
42:24
so that has
42:26
made me become more open
42:28
-minded. And
42:33
that also I think
42:35
makes me want to prove
42:40
to myself
42:42
ideas that may
42:46
not make sense to me initially. Again,
42:49
when we're talking about perception there
42:53
is so much that we don't
42:55
understand and there is so much
42:57
that we can't yet measure but
43:00
we can proceed, we
43:02
can hear it. And
43:04
so I'm open -minded to
43:06
ideas until I can prove to
43:08
myself that they work or they
43:10
don't work, I'm
43:13
going to be open -minded. It's very
43:15
easy not to be. The older
43:17
you get. Oh yeah. Oh yeah.
43:19
And that's problematic, right? The
43:22
other thing I'll just throw in there is
43:24
when I was at Owens Corning working with the
43:26
acoustic systems business, we had, there
43:28
was a group of I think
43:30
12 of us and we would
43:32
often, what
43:35
you call now, huddle rooms and we'd
43:37
have a big whiteboard and we
43:39
would just brainstorm. Oh, I missed that.
43:41
That is the coolest thing. No, there
43:44
are no bad ideas. Somebody could
43:46
say something super silly. It's like,
43:48
not way, but it then would
43:50
make somebody else think of this.
43:52
And I love that. I miss
43:54
that. And so that working with
43:56
different people is so
43:58
important. And again, being open -minded.
44:01
Very cool. That's a good place to
44:03
stop, think. to right. I think. All right. We should
44:05
do this again. We should do should do
44:08
there's a lot I want there's a talk
44:10
to you about. to talk to you about still. Yeah. Oh
44:12
gosh we it yeah time. do it all the time. Yeah yeah.
44:14
Thanks for Thanks for listening and being in
44:16
my inner circle. Remember if you have
44:18
any questions or comments, you can send
44:20
them to send them to questions at .com. also
44:22
learn all about the latest the latest
44:24
audio, and production news, and find
44:26
out about openings for my latest
44:28
online classes at online .com. This
44:31
is is I will see you next time.
44:33
time.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More