Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Some things you wouldn't mind being stuck with.
0:02
Like a huge inheritance. But a phone that
0:04
has to be plugged in just right so
0:06
it charges is not one of those things.
0:09
Switch to Verizon and we'll pay off your
0:11
old phone up to $800 five prepaid MasterCard
0:13
for a new one on us. Just trade
0:16
in any phone from our top brands with
0:18
Select Unlimited Plans minimum $90 per month with
0:20
auto pay plus taxes and fees for 36
0:22
months for quite. Trade in an additional term
0:25
supply. See Verizon and Com for details.
0:41
Hello everybody and welcome back to
0:43
Critically Acclaimed the movie review podcast where
0:46
the explosion won the poll. Yay! My
0:48
name is William Bibiani. I am a
0:50
film critic. I write for the rap
0:53
and everybody calls me Bebs. My name
0:55
is Whitney Seivold. I too am a
0:57
film critic. I'm senior staff writer of
1:00
its slash film. I don't have a
1:02
nickname. I don't need one. And if
1:04
you're wondering what the hell we're talking
1:07
about on the last proper episode of
1:09
critically acclaimed We we joked that maybe
1:11
after over a thousand episodes of our various
1:14
shows It was time to retire the explosion
1:16
sound effect at the beginning of every episode
1:18
and we we gave everyone Competing hashtags and
1:20
just like just put you can post it
1:22
in the comments on the patron you can
1:25
post it on our blue sky you can
1:27
whatever I don't think we got a
1:29
single vote against the explosion? No, ever,
1:31
anybody who voted voted to keep it.
1:33
So, okay, so the explosion, the explosion
1:35
is in. Is our unofficial third host?
1:37
When are these days we should properly
1:39
interview it? Every explosion. Yeah, like, yeah.
1:41
Excuse me, Mr. Explosion, how do you
1:43
feel about the state of the world
1:45
today? Mr. What lights your fire? What kind
1:48
of tree would you be? This is
1:50
a brand new year here critically acclaimed.
1:52
Normally we would have done more episodes
1:54
by now, but again, and I know
1:56
some people only listen to like certain
1:59
shows on the critically claimed network, so
2:01
if you've been listening to critically acclaimed
2:03
and you met some other stuff, the
2:05
Los Angeles fighters have been very devastating.
2:08
If you have any means to
2:10
help out there are various charities and
2:12
go fund me and donations you can
2:14
do really help a lot. Whitney and
2:16
I have been very lucky in that
2:18
we are situated. like well within the
2:20
concrete confines of Los Angeles County so
2:23
we weren't really close. Yeah we were
2:25
never in an evacuation zone we were
2:27
never close to the fires. I was
2:29
close to a fire there was a
2:31
brief fire on sunset. That's right. It
2:33
was like in the heart of Hollywood.
2:36
Right on the edge of having to
2:38
evacuate but they got right on top
2:40
of that one quickly. My mother had
2:42
to evacuate Pasadena but her house is
2:44
well didn't catch fire but we still
2:47
have to do some repairs. So because
2:49
it was still like a huge. giant
2:51
windstorm. But I digress, the long short
2:53
of it is for those who have
2:55
asked and maybe who have missed our
2:58
updates, we are okay. But the situation
3:00
is still pretty chaotic. It is complicated
3:02
to get to get to record lately
3:04
for a variety of reasons. They're all
3:07
practical. Yeah. Just so we've been haven't
3:09
been as productive as we wanted to
3:11
and we are we do apologize for
3:14
that. We're doing the best we can.
3:16
But on that note, we have a
3:18
lot of catching up to do here
3:20
at critically acclaimed. Right. And it's good
3:23
that we can catch up. in January.
3:25
Oh yeah, it's good that
3:27
you did that January. It's
3:30
real good. January is notoriously
3:32
when studios dump, famously critics
3:34
see it as the time
3:37
of the year when studios
3:39
dump garbage. For the rest of the
3:41
country, it's a great time of year because
3:44
it's when the limited release sort of Oscar
3:46
contenders finally make it to the public. In
3:48
like November and December, those were available here
3:50
in Los Angeles and maybe in New York
3:52
or Chicago. And it's not until January that
3:54
those go wide. And so a lot of
3:57
people can now finally see all of these
3:59
big awards content. Yeah, but we we reviewed
4:01
them already. Yeah, so all we have is
4:03
we have the new films that we have
4:05
to review and studios Know nobody's paying attention.
4:07
Yeah, it's only they only they only want
4:09
to talk about their Oscar movies And this
4:11
is a great time to just sort of
4:13
slip out some junk So we got some
4:16
junk, but we do some Oscar contenders as
4:18
well. That's right And it's it. Well, it's
4:20
a lot of movies. Let's let's run down
4:22
the list We're gonna be reviewing Lee Winnell's
4:24
new universal horror reboot Wolfman The
4:27
now this this only just came
4:29
out of Netflix proper right Emilia Perez
4:31
Okay, because it had been around
4:33
for a while and theaters
4:35
trying to get the Oscar by some boy did it
4:37
got some but yeah the new Musical
4:40
Emilia Perez the new Ardman
4:42
animated Wallace and Gromit movie Wallace
4:44
and Gromit vengeance most foul
4:46
A movie called wish you were
4:48
here a movie called I'm
4:50
still here. I assume one is
4:52
a prequel No, they're
4:54
quite different in fact. Okay,
4:56
that's interesting Whitney saw those. I
4:58
didn't Let's see. We've got
5:00
the Pamela Anderson drama the last
5:02
showgirl the new miglee drama
5:05
hard truths a Really
5:07
interesting documentary called grand theft hamlet about
5:09
a bunch of actors who stage the
5:11
production of hamlet inside grand theft auto
5:13
online and then finally a documentary about Quite
5:17
legendary songwriter Diane Warren
5:19
called Diane Warren
5:21
relentless Relentlessly
5:23
nominated. She is oh boy. Howdy.
5:25
Well, yeah, we'll talk about that I
5:27
I actually learned a lot about Diane
5:29
Warren this time. I'm actually really excited
5:31
to talk about some of that stuff
5:34
But we're gonna go In well we
5:36
talked about the biggest theatrical release
5:38
and I guess that's technically wolf man
5:40
It's it's the highest profile new release
5:42
of 2025. I think it's the first
5:44
2025 film. I've seen in theaters Anyway,
5:46
uh, yeah liwanel was back, uh liwanel
5:48
previously did Another universal sort of modern
5:51
reboot with invisible man a couple
5:53
years ago And this is after he had
5:55
spent like excuse me like well over
5:57
like 15 years. I think uh creating
6:00
a variety of hit movie
6:02
franchises, horror movie franchises, he co
6:04
-created Saw, he co -created Insidious.
6:06
And yeah, they gave him the
6:08
crack, came out
6:10
right at the beginning of
6:13
2020 at remaking The Invisible
6:15
Man, which is the
6:17
original Invisible Man directed by James Welle, is
6:19
still one of the great movies of
6:21
the 1930s. It's incredibly visually spectacular. The visual
6:23
effects hold up really good. Yeah, yeah,
6:25
for sure. But yeah, it's about a mad
6:27
scientist and he takes a potion and
6:29
it becomes invisible. And he realizes, oh my
6:31
God, I could do anything I want,
6:33
anything in the world as long as I'm
6:35
naked. And so he runs off naked
6:37
as a J -Bird and like sabotages trains
6:39
and does a lot of horrible things. And
6:41
It goes a little mad, partly because
6:43
of like the chemicals, but partly because of
6:45
- Mad power. Yeah, this new ability that
6:47
he has. Yeah, it's
6:49
fantastic. It's been remade ad nauseam. There
6:51
are many, many Invisible Man movies. I don't
6:54
know if it's been properly remade that often,
6:56
but just the concept of the Invisible Man
6:58
has been done many times. We had
7:00
Memoirs of Invisible Man, there was Invisible Man
7:02
TV series in the 70s with David McCallum.
7:05
I forgot who starred, but yeah, there
7:07
was Invisible Man TV series. Hollow Man
7:09
is practically a remake. Paul Verhoeven did
7:11
Invisible Man. But this is the Universal
7:13
Studios version of The Invisible Man and
7:16
Lee Willenel knocked that shit out of
7:18
the park. What Lee Willenel did with
7:20
both Invisible Man and with this Wolf
7:22
Man is he focused just as much
7:24
on the man part of the title
7:26
as he did the qualifiers because Invisible
7:28
Man is about a controlling man. It's
7:30
the protagonist who's played by Elizabeth Moss. One of
7:33
the great performances should have gotten awards is
7:36
being stalked by an abusive ex -boyfriend who
7:38
might be invisible. And so she's really
7:40
paranoid. And I think that film really
7:42
captures because something actually kind of went
7:44
through personally that fear of like being
7:46
stalked by an ex. Yeah, yeah. Cause
7:48
like, and everyone else things like, oh,
7:50
you're just being paranoid. And it's like,
7:52
no, they're everywhere. They're
7:54
watching me and you just don't
7:56
see them. You don't realize
7:58
what I would. their
8:01
presence is like she gets news like oh,
8:03
and it turns out he's dead and
8:05
but she doesn't trust that you know She's
8:07
like no he's still there somewhere and
8:09
that was a genius move because the thing
8:11
with a lot of these older monsters
8:13
Dracula Frankenstein the Wolfman mummy is Well
8:16
frankly we take every granted now don't wait like
8:18
they can be they can be kids shows
8:20
You know like we don't they don't have to
8:23
be truly terrifying and in order to get
8:25
back to what makes them terrifying You know the
8:27
critic isn't like we're gonna do Dracula 2000
8:29
and make it hip and now and wow It's
8:31
like no what at the root of this
8:33
is still frightening Mm -hmm, and I think Lee
8:35
Winnell really understood that with the invisible
8:37
man What what it would be terrifying about
8:39
having someone who is invisible stalking you
8:42
and just absolutely nailed it That's one of
8:44
the great horror movies of the 20th
8:46
century. We recently did a They
8:49
wouldn't do like an iron list
8:51
that was like the best remakes. Yeah,
8:53
and we forgot We forgot invisible
8:55
man. We fucked up. That's an error
8:57
on our part because invisible man
8:59
is terrific Yeah, but no Lee Winnell
9:01
is back with a remake of
9:03
the Wolfman George Wagner. I did the
9:06
original Wolfman in 1941 Nobody knows
9:08
about George Wagner that much. He's not
9:10
celebrated No, George
9:12
Wagner is the name of the director
9:14
of the 1941 Wolfman with two Gs But
9:17
yeah, I it started
9:20
long Cheney Jr. I there was
9:22
a lot of Between
9:25
that film and a film that preceded actually
9:27
called werewolf of London, which wasn't quite
9:29
as popular a wolf man really popularized it
9:33
They kind of invented modern
9:35
werewolf mythology Wrote it. Oh, that's
9:37
how I fucked that up.
9:39
Okay. I'm not I'm not not
9:43
a Fool I would just I
9:45
would just tell me what George
9:47
Wagner directed because he's not as
9:49
celebrate as some of us like
9:51
Todd browning I'm James whale known
9:53
for the wolf man and then
9:55
stuff you've never heard of He
9:57
directed man -made monster also in
9:59
1941. Okay lot of TV
10:01
towards the end of his career. Oh,
10:03
he did that Boris Karloff series, The
10:05
Veil that we tried to cover. Tried
10:07
to cover that one. That didn't quite
10:09
work out. But anyway, yeah, the original
10:11
Wolfman is really great, by the
10:13
way. Yeah, but what
10:15
I was gonna say is that
10:17
they, the werewolf mythology is pretty complicated
10:19
because there's a biological element you
10:21
get bitten by a werewolf. So there's
10:23
like a disease, something in the
10:25
saliva that's passing on to you. But
10:27
it's also linked to Romany magic
10:29
and all these weird kind of exotic
10:32
spells. Racism. Yeah,
10:34
there's, I was gonna say, there's this very
10:36
strong racist undercurrent with a lot of it.
10:39
And it's all connected to the full moon. That's a
10:41
big part of it. That was introduced in Werewolf
10:43
of London. The whole full moon thing is a very
10:45
recent addition to like, like, can't there
10:47
be myths? As is the silver thing, which
10:49
I think was invented for the Wolfman.
10:51
Yeah, a lot of it was invented for
10:54
the Wolfman. A lot of the stuff
10:56
that we were like, oh, all these ancient
10:58
legends about werewolves. Like, no shit, we
11:00
know the people who made that up were
11:02
alive, like when your parents were alive,
11:04
you know? I feel like werewolf movies, as
11:06
opposed, like you think of vampire movies,
11:08
you can probably list 20 or 30 great
11:10
vampire movies off the top of your
11:12
head. Lesso with Wolfman, like werewolves just don't
11:14
get the same kind of cred. They
11:17
don't frequently, they're not as frequently visited,
11:19
but there's only maybe like five or six
11:21
great werewolf movies. I mean, I think
11:24
the biggest reason for that, the reason why
11:26
we don't have as many great, and
11:28
there are great werewolf movies, the Howling, Miracle
11:30
Wolf of London, Ginger Snaps, but
11:34
it's difficult to make a Wolfman look
11:36
good on camera. Like a Frankenstein monster,
11:38
you make a dead guy who's stitched
11:40
up. Zombies, you make a dead guy. Ghosts,
11:43
you make them translucent. Vampire, teeth. Werewolf,
11:45
whole fucking makeup whole body thing or a
11:47
model, yeah, something. Yeah, and if you
11:49
don't have the chops, if you can't make
11:51
it look good, you're gonna make it
11:53
look silly, you're gonna make it look unconvincing,
11:55
and at that point, you might as
11:58
well make a serial killer movie because. that
12:00
is kind of the modern equivalent, though
12:02
there's a monster inside of me and
12:04
I'm fighting with them and nobody knows
12:06
my secret. I feel like that's what
12:08
a lot of werewolf movie stories kind
12:10
of just turned into, because it's cheaper
12:12
and it's easier and sadly they're real.
12:14
You can scare people with them. Well,
12:16
and also, but there's also other fantasy
12:18
versions of that. The Incredible Hulk is
12:20
a werewolf story. More or less, yeah.
12:23
In fact, there was even a knockoff
12:25
of the Incredible Hulk TV series called
12:27
Werewolf. And it was like the
12:29
same premise. I accidentally let someone borrow my
12:31
copy of that so we can never
12:33
cover it. I can't so too assumed. It
12:35
was like 30 episodes in their hour
12:37
long. That's hard for us. It's really hard
12:39
to get around to. I always wanted
12:41
to that. But Lee Winnell has made a
12:44
new wolf man and has removed all the
12:46
mysticism from it. It's almost like a
12:48
virus at this point. And it's also a
12:50
bit of a symbol and we'll get
12:52
into that in a minute. But his approach
12:54
to making a werewolf does
12:57
not incorporate that one key thing
12:59
that werewolf movie lovers love,
13:01
a really cool transformation sequence. There
13:03
isn't that in Wolfman. There's
13:05
a little bit of one. It's
13:07
brief and it's not dramatic.
13:09
How would I argue? No, I'm
13:11
gonna fight you on that
13:13
because I think the whole movie is
13:15
such a slow transformation sequence. You're thinking of
13:17
a transformation sequence that happens over a
13:19
couple of minutes. Your bones crack and throw
13:21
cops out of your body, your flesh
13:24
rips off. Face extends, that kind of stuff.
13:26
Yeah, all that shit's cool. How even
13:28
Van Helsing, when the vampires rip off their
13:30
human flesh and there's a monster underneath,
13:32
it's cool. I agree with that, but I
13:34
think what he's doing is actually slowing
13:36
that down. I thought you were gonna say
13:38
the version, the thing that he leaves
13:40
out that everyone loves in a wolf man
13:42
movie is the wolf part. Well,
13:45
what that? The wolf part is suspiciously absent
13:47
from this. He's trying to, what Lee
13:49
Winnell I suspect is trying to do was
13:51
make a wolf man that was realistic,
13:53
which is a weird approach to a wolf
13:55
man story. He didn't do that with
13:57
Invisible Man. It was all like, you know,
14:00
five optics and shit, more plausible than
14:02
a potion, I guess. I guess. So
14:04
the way Christopher Abbott plays the character
14:06
transforms and like his face swells and
14:08
his hair falls out. The only thing
14:10
that's like notably wolfish is the teeth.
14:12
The teeth. gets like the bottom row
14:14
of teeth in the fang. And eventually
14:16
his fingers a little bit. Like his
14:18
fingernails also grow into claws. But mostly
14:20
he's just sort of like a swollen
14:22
guy. He's a guy. Honestly, a lot
14:24
of this is, we'll talk about the
14:26
plot, but honestly this is the thing
14:28
that I think the movie fucks up. I
14:30
actually like a lot of this movie.
14:32
But the thing that it really messes up is, okay,
14:35
you do not have to go conventional wolfman. You
14:38
do not have to do the Lon Chaney
14:40
Jr. Wolfman. You do not have to do American
14:42
Werewolf in London Wolfman. You don't have to
14:44
do dog soldiers. You can totally do your own
14:46
thing and you can even like diminish the
14:48
wolf thing. That is, it's bold, but it's it's
14:50
not necessarily a bad thing. The makeup still
14:52
has to look good. And I'm sorry, I know
14:54
that what they're trying to do is let
14:56
the makeup get out of the way of Christopher
14:58
Abbott's performance so that you can see, because
15:00
here's a guy who is conscious that he is
15:02
losing his humanity very gradually. And I can
15:05
see his performance. I think he's giving a very good performance. But
15:08
a lot of the movie, he looks like
15:10
Christopher Abbott wearing makeup. Yeah, he doesn't
15:12
look like a monster. He doesn't look like
15:14
natural. He looks like he's wearing, he
15:16
looks like he's wearing, wearing movie makeup. Yeah.
15:18
Yeah. It's not convincing. Damn shame. And
15:20
I think when you compare this also to
15:22
Invisible Man, this one's not quite as
15:24
thematically rich. It's not as emotionally moving. Christopher
15:26
Abbott plays a character. We see him
15:28
flashback to him as a boy and he's
15:30
being raised in the woods by a
15:32
father who insists that he be ready at
15:34
all times. His father's like putting a
15:36
lot of fear into him. Yeah. Not an
15:38
abusive. He's not hitting the kid, but
15:40
he's psychologically abusive. Yeah. But he's also
15:43
like being raised in isolation in the woods
15:45
and he's being told there's monsters out
15:47
in the woods. There are. Yeah. So it's
15:49
actually kind of practical for the father
15:51
to treat him this way, but the implication
15:53
is the wolf man, the symbol of
15:55
it, is this kind of fear that your
15:57
parents give you. Yeah. Or the or
15:59
the. of a generational sort of trauma
16:02
like what your parents inflict on
16:04
you when because we see him
16:06
we cut to like 15 years
16:08
later and he is like he's
16:10
a young man 30 or something
16:12
like that he's married he's married
16:15
to Julia Garner an actress I
16:17
love who still comes across a
16:19
little young for this character she's
16:21
playing a mom yeah and I
16:23
just like she's I think you're
16:26
trying to give her this like
16:28
very uh She just looks a
16:30
little, she looks younger than Christopher Abbott
16:32
significantly and it just, it's kind of,
16:34
I mean, I really, she's 30, but
16:36
she's playing her age, but yeah. I
16:39
realize that, but you have to, and
16:41
listen, I'm, I'm not judging Julia Garnett,
16:43
she's a great actor, it's just a
16:45
little distracting and it feels like
16:47
that's something that, how did they meet?
16:49
What do they have in common? Because
16:51
their marriage is already kind of strained.
16:54
And so they just don't see the
16:56
connection. But anyway, he has a daughter.
16:58
They have a daughter. Before we get
17:00
to the present, all of these flashbacks
17:02
in the past I think are significant
17:05
because a lot of what's being set
17:07
up in those sequences are something that
17:09
I don't think they address or explore
17:11
very well. The idea that what the
17:13
father is giving to his son is
17:15
this notion of like a... drive to
17:18
be a patter familius, like to be
17:20
a protective male figure. There's this
17:22
kind of element of toxic masculinity
17:24
that I think they don't really
17:27
establish very well in those opening.
17:29
No, they really don't. Like, it's,
17:31
you get the impression. Because there's
17:33
an actual monster that they're fighting.
17:36
And there's not a lot of
17:38
dialogue about how you need to
17:40
be the man. And it's manly,
17:43
like, there's not a lot of
17:45
masculine language to incorporate. At the beginning
17:47
was they go off hunting and then they may see
17:49
a wolfman But that's off camera. It's off camera But
17:51
like it's setting up. There's a wolfman out there and
17:54
then we cut the years later But there's this bit
17:56
a little bit, but like they're walking past a bunch
17:58
of mushrooms and the kids looking at them Like,
18:00
don't touch those mushrooms. Those are death
18:02
cap mushrooms. Those will kill you. And
18:04
like, it's like, it's like, it's like
18:06
a 45 minute speech about how deadly
18:08
these mushrooms are. And so you know,
18:10
later in the movie, those will be
18:12
important, or that's how you become a
18:15
werewolf, or that's how you kill the
18:17
werewolf, or maybe the dad will eat
18:19
those so that he doesn't, you know, try
18:21
to kill his family. Never brought up
18:23
again. Yeah, it's a little weird. Lee
18:25
Winnell is a is knows how to
18:27
write a screenplay I feel like there
18:30
was a rewrite in there somewhere supposed
18:32
to be a payoff for like a
18:34
reshot ending or something. It just feels
18:36
weird. But anyway, 15 years later 20
18:38
years later. He's he's married. He has
18:40
a daughter and he loves his daughter.
18:42
They have a great relationship. But every
18:44
time she does something just a little
18:47
dangerous like walks on top of like
18:49
some tall stuff near traffic. His protectiveness
18:51
of her gets scary Yeah. It gets
18:53
very loud, gets very angry, why don't
18:55
you, you know, why don't you
18:57
listen to me? And he doesn't
18:59
like how that makes him feel.
19:01
It's like how that means him
19:03
become. He doesn't like how his
19:05
daughter looks at him when he's
19:07
like that, and he knows that's
19:09
from his father. He's a strange
19:11
from his wife a little bit,
19:13
but it's really not entirely clear
19:15
why other than just life career.
19:17
It's almost like a hallmark movie,
19:19
kind of. Yeah, you're too busy.
19:22
We need to do something. Because
19:24
the conflict is vague. Yeah, it's not
19:26
specific. And so we don't actually believe
19:28
it. We just understand it in premise.
19:30
Anyway, the block kicks in when he gets
19:32
a letter saying that his father who went
19:34
missing many years ago has been declared legally
19:36
dead because he never turned up. And what
19:38
that means is he now has to go
19:40
back to his dad's house in the middle
19:42
of the woods and take care of things.
19:44
It goes from San Francisco to the woods
19:46
of the woods of Oregon. Go back
19:48
to this cabin. The cabin, the
19:51
linoleum on the floor of the
19:53
kitchen in this cabin. Yeah. Was
19:55
this, it was also used in
19:58
the movie Annabel comes home. And
20:00
I know and I know this detail
20:02
very specific because it was the exact same
20:04
linoleum I learned to walk on as
20:06
a baby that was in my kitchen when
20:08
I was growing up So when I
20:10
saw it, it's like look like this weird
20:12
sort of bolt of nostalgia first night
20:14
But anyway, he takes his he takes his
20:16
wife and daughter and they drive up
20:18
They get a little lost and then they
20:20
don't even get to the cabin they
20:22
see a wolf man in the middle of
20:24
the road We know what it is
20:26
They don't and they veer off the road.
20:28
They get like almost like Jurassic Park like
20:30
hanging off of a thing I got the truck
20:32
like lands on a tree doesn't hit the ground
20:34
and the yeah, they're the climb off the truck
20:36
It's there's another character in there, but he doesn't
20:38
really matter Early so
20:41
that like we'll we'll be raised. Yeah,
20:43
it's a race. Anyway, they they run
20:45
off Run away from this creature in
20:47
the woods and the cabin and he
20:49
starts fortifying the place But he also
20:51
starts realizing something is wrong with him
20:53
because he got bitten during the conflagration
20:55
Yeah, and the conflagration interesting. Okay, I
20:57
would have gone confrontation, but whatever and
21:00
But and and not only is
21:02
he like gradually, you know changing But
21:04
I really like how Lee Winnell
21:06
handles this though because he doesn't just
21:08
Start getting angry or start getting
21:10
furry. He starts going non -verbal and
21:12
he starts not being able to understand
21:14
his own family He's coming alien
21:16
to them. Yeah, that's the coolest thing
21:18
There's this camera trick that Lee
21:20
Winnell does or he puts the camera
21:22
behind the wolf man and we
21:24
get to see his wolf vision Yeah,
21:27
it's you know, it's like Terminator vision or
21:29
robot vision. We see in other science fiction
21:31
movies and You
21:33
know things kind of brighten up you can see
21:35
things But yeah, what I find really interesting is
21:37
when people start talking to him his wife and
21:39
his daughter They start just sort of saying gibberish.
21:41
She can't understand what they're saying anymore and after
21:43
a while And I thought this was cool detail
21:45
their faces lose expression Yeah, after a while they
21:48
turn into like these kind of mass. He can't
21:50
read them at all. Yeah Yeah, they're just sort
21:52
of like pray to him. Yeah, and that's really
21:54
scary and I really like that I really like
21:56
that we're finally getting like a wolf man where
21:58
it's not just a physical thing. It's a mental thing
22:00
and we're actually kind of delving into
22:02
that in an interesting visual way. I
22:04
think that's really cool. Anyway, there's still
22:06
a wolfman out there. It's attacking him
22:08
and then the rest of the movie
22:10
is basically a siege picture. There's a
22:12
wolfman outside, but there's also a wolfman
22:14
inside and Julia Garner who admitted earlier
22:16
in the film she'd ever really hasn't
22:18
really felt like much of a mom has to
22:21
finally step up. That's a good pitch. It's
22:23
a good pitch. It's pretty basic. I feel
22:25
like a... You can have that same pitch
22:27
in some shitty B picture or like, like,
22:29
like, Tales from the Crypt episode. It's a
22:31
skeleton on which to hang. good stuff but
22:33
I think it's perfectly okay. I feel like
22:36
a lot of this could have been could
22:38
have been an hour long anthology series. There
22:40
are a lot of scenes of them running
22:42
from one location then back to the house
22:44
and then back to the house. It gets
22:46
a little repetitive after a while. I think
22:48
it becomes a siege picture too early. I
22:51
honestly think that like we really needed
22:53
because the thing with they needed to
22:55
establish what life is like in the
22:57
home. We also needed him. We need
22:59
the Christopher Rabbit Rabbit Character. they had
23:01
how he feels about his father and
23:03
why why it's significant that you know
23:05
this wolfman is sort of linked to
23:07
that I think we needed more from Julia
23:10
Garner's character in particular we have like one
23:12
line where she said she doesn't really feel
23:14
like she connects to her daughter as well
23:16
as her husband does that's it now there's
23:18
no scene of her like trying to connect
23:21
and failing yeah it doesn't really all of
23:23
the important character stuff that Lee Wendell is
23:25
clearly trying to lean into feels very perfunctory
23:27
and so moments that I know should hit
23:30
like this is clearly the moment where Julie
23:32
Garner steps up it does something really cool
23:34
this is clearly the moment where you know
23:36
dad gives into that monster he's always feared
23:39
he had within within him but then maybe
23:41
there's still a part of him that is
23:43
able to protect his family even as a
23:45
wolf there's a moment in this movie where
23:47
I thought was really cool where it's like okay
23:49
he's turning into a wolf man is
23:51
he tameable Yeah, right? I was
23:54
like, there's no reason to assume
23:56
he couldn't be. That's an interesting
23:58
wrinkle. I think of the move. he
24:00
had been taking place over a longer
24:02
period of time, we could, if it wasn't
24:04
so much. You have an epilogue, they
24:06
finally chased off the bad werewolf, but then
24:08
mom and daughter are living in the
24:10
cabin and dads just sort of like their
24:12
dog in the yard. Yeah, but he's
24:14
also, but it's protected. Yeah, he's their doggy
24:16
daddy. That
24:18
could have been really cool. There's so many
24:20
things that are brought up by this, but
24:22
because it just becomes this kind of pretty
24:24
straightforward, could have been even lower budget than
24:26
it was, just werewolf siege
24:29
picture, especially with
24:31
not very good makeup, it just doesn't amount
24:33
to as much as it should. And I
24:35
like the ideas. I think Christopher Abbott gives
24:37
a great performance. I really love seeing his
24:39
slow transformation as a wolf man. I feel
24:41
like I've seen a lot of that kind
24:43
of stuff before in vampire movies mostly, but
24:45
yeah. I think he does it well. I
24:47
think he deserves mentioning. It's
24:49
not as inspired, I
24:51
think, conceptually or in its
24:53
execution as the invisible
24:55
man. Yeah. It's pretty good.
24:58
It's pretty good. But
25:00
it's not great. I like the ideas they're
25:02
hinting at. I wish they were better
25:04
explored. Really, it just needs a better script.
25:06
I feel like there were scenes missing
25:08
from this one. I would be very surprised
25:10
if this wasn't tinkered with a lot,
25:12
either in post or development notes because it
25:14
just feels like the good stuff is
25:16
so obvious and yet it's so obviously
25:19
unexplored in a way
25:21
that's weird. All
25:23
right, bit of a bummer. Why don't
25:25
we talk about a movie everyone's
25:27
talking about? And you saw more recently,
25:30
because I saw this months ago.
25:32
You just saw it last week. Let's
25:34
talk about the new film Amelia
25:36
Perez, which
25:38
is a musical
25:41
Mexican drug
25:43
cartel trans
25:46
movie from
25:48
a white cisgender director who doesn't speak
25:50
Spanish and hasn't really
25:52
been to Mexico and doesn't
25:54
know anything about trans
25:57
people. And has said in
25:59
interviews, what sort of
26:01
research into Mexican culture did
26:03
you do? And he's... saying
26:05
frustrating things like, oh, I didn't bother. I didn't
26:07
look into it at all. It's Jacques Odillard is
26:10
the director, who's done films I like. He did
26:12
the sisters brothers, which is really fantastic. He did
26:14
that film unprofet, a couple years back. That one
26:16
was also really good. He also did
26:18
a couple others. I heard a lot
26:20
of good things about the beat that
26:22
my heart skipped, which was really good.
26:24
I never had one of that. And
26:26
he did the remake of District
26:28
13. Or we didn't. Or maybe
26:31
did the original. No we
26:33
didn't. The free original
26:35
was pure morale. He did
26:37
one of the District 13
26:40
movies. I don't think he
26:42
did, dude. Hold on, let
26:44
me look this up, because
26:46
I'm certain. I mean, I
26:48
mean, Paris 13th District. What? Oh,
26:50
well, sorry, that's not one of
26:53
the District 13 movies. Oh, okay.
26:55
I was about a little. Yeah,
26:58
no, he's he's not. I would
27:00
have had to have seen a film,
27:02
but okay. Okay, things are starting to
27:04
make more sense of my brain now.
27:06
Thought he would like. mixed it
27:09
up. You could see why I
27:11
would mix it. I know, I
27:13
get it, I get it. It's
27:15
an innocent mistake. Okay, Emily Perez
27:17
follows the main character who's a
27:20
lawyer, character, played by Zoe Saldana.
27:22
Yeah, she's, she's cisgender, and so
27:24
we're gonna see it through her
27:26
eyes as she finds out what
27:28
transgender people are like. Yeah, and
27:31
she meets a character who is
27:33
living as a man. Yeah,
27:35
they're, they're, they're, they're,
27:37
It's a sign mail at birth, yeah. Yeah,
27:39
a sign mail at birth, and has discovered
27:42
her own gender and wants to
27:44
transition. Yes. And this is also
27:46
an opportunity for her to get
27:49
out of the life. Yeah, she's
27:51
currently married to Selina Gomez, has
27:54
some kids. And not playing a
27:56
character, just Selina Gomez, which is
27:58
a bold choice. That movie,
28:00
that would have been. That would have
28:03
been pretty cool. Right? Like, yeah, she's
28:05
married to. Yeah. There's, and yeah, there's
28:07
a lot of songs about this. And
28:10
this cartel lord has asked the Zoe
28:12
Saldania character to look into the kinds
28:14
of surgery that need to be done,
28:16
the kinds of things that need to
28:19
be done to erase the old identity.
28:21
Yeah. So she can become. Amelia
28:23
Perez. Yes. And so the first
28:26
maybe 20 or 30 minutes of
28:28
this movie is that, exploring all
28:30
of that. And there's a lot
28:32
of songs devoted to it. The songs
28:34
are pretty much uniquely terrible. Is
28:36
it just me? I think some
28:38
of them are some of them
28:41
are okay. The one where there's
28:43
one later in the movie where
28:45
the Zoey Seline character goes to
28:47
this big ball and it's like...
28:49
populated by all these
28:51
oligarchs, and she kind of disappears
28:53
into her head and just sort
28:56
of says how horrible they are.
28:58
I think that's a pretty cool
29:00
song. I think if that song
29:02
works, it's because Zoe Saldana is
29:05
a really talented physical performer, and
29:07
that's like her showcase number. Yeah.
29:09
Because she's telling the story with
29:11
like interpretive dance, very, very forcefully.
29:14
She's getting a lot of Oscar
29:16
attention for this. So is Carla
29:18
Sophia Gaskin who plays Amelia Perez
29:20
I Get it. I get why they
29:22
are I I'm not and the thing
29:25
is a lot of people argue
29:27
that like Zoe Saldana is um
29:29
is a leap is a is supporting
29:32
and Gaskin is the leader vice versa
29:34
and the thing is that from a
29:36
First off, there is actually no rule
29:38
saying what differentiates a supporting an elite
29:41
performance. It's all vibes. Yeah. It's all
29:43
vibes. There's no actual like Academy rule
29:45
saying it's less screen time or whatever.
29:47
But Zoe still done is like,
29:49
she's the protagonist. She's the protagonist.
29:52
This is one of those movies about
29:54
people who the audience is going to
29:56
feel like divorce from like I don't
29:59
understand that experience. instead of just telling their
30:01
story, we have to tell it from the
30:03
perspective of a cisgender, like a quote unquote
30:05
normal person. Normalist
30:07
case, meaning cis and YA. Huge air quotes
30:09
in that shit, and she's not white, but
30:11
like still cis. Well,
30:14
I was thinking of other examples like Green
30:16
Book. Green Book is an obvious example of
30:18
this, but yeah, usually cis and YA. Going
30:20
back as far as something like wind talkers,
30:22
it's about the Navajo code speakers. It goes
30:24
back way further than that, but like, anyway,
30:26
the point is the movie is about her
30:28
learning about what it's like to be Amelia
30:30
Perez when we could have just made
30:32
it about Amelia Perez. And that would have
30:35
been fine. And the thing is that
30:37
in the second half of the movie, they
30:39
reconnect, and Amelia Perez brings her back
30:41
into her life because she wants
30:43
to bring back her
30:45
family and pretend to
30:47
be her own sister so
30:49
that she can infiltrate her own
30:51
family. She poses as her
30:53
children's aunt that they had never
30:55
known about, and has them
30:57
moved into her mansion. It seems
30:59
that she still has all
31:01
of her ill -gotten gains from
31:03
her previous criminal life. So she's
31:06
still very, very wealthy, but
31:08
had gone undercover. There's some dialogue
31:10
devoted to, but not a
31:12
lot of things on camera that
31:14
explain that Amelia Perez like
31:16
has set up charities and orphanages
31:18
or something. no, no, that's a
31:20
big part of it. She's
31:22
trying to, she realizes that what
31:24
she did when she was
31:26
a drug lord and what she
31:28
was participating in was despicable.
31:30
And she wants to try to
31:32
balance the books by
31:34
starting a charity. And what she does is
31:36
there's a lot of people who went missing.
31:40
They were kidnapped or murdered or whatever,
31:42
and people never found the bodies because
31:44
of all the criminality she was involved
31:46
in. And so her charities. not until
31:48
later in the movie. The second half,
31:50
but like regardless. They introduced that in
31:52
the second half. What she's been doing
31:54
since she disappeared until she contacts Zoe
31:56
Saldana. That's like a decade and nothing.
31:58
And we don't get to learn. We
32:00
know what she's been doing. That's what's her
32:02
doing, eat, pray, love, just fucking off,
32:04
having a great time. But like the second
32:06
half, it's her trying to make amends,
32:08
trying to help people second half is, the
32:10
elevator pitch of the second half is
32:12
Mrs. Doubtfire, more or
32:14
less. Yeah, with drug money With
32:16
drug money and Mrs. Doubtfire
32:18
is now a trans woman. Like
32:21
that's the pitch. Yeah, and
32:23
also there's an actual,
32:26
it's fucked up because like Mrs. Doubtfire is
32:28
always kind of a weird film, if you think
32:30
about it. Like the plot doesn't make sense.
32:33
Like the whole thing at Mrs. Doubtfire. He's getting
32:35
a divorce. He can't see his kids. Well,
32:37
he can't see his kids. he sneaks into his
32:39
ex -wife's house. But he dressed as Mrs. Doubtfire.
32:41
he can see his kids. The whole thing
32:43
is, he's an out -of -work actor and he's like,
32:45
oh listen, you need someone to see the
32:47
kids. Why don't I do it? He says, oh,
32:49
I'd rather get a nanny. So what he
32:51
does is he changes the phone number on the
32:53
want ad so that no one is actually
32:56
gonna call her number. He pretends to be a
32:58
bunch of different people and he makes himself sound
33:00
like every nanny in this town is a
33:02
danger to her kids. And then he calls her
33:04
up and instead of saying, hey honey, how's
33:06
the nanny thing going? Do you still need me
33:08
to take care of the kids? And then
33:10
being able to take care of the kids and
33:12
everything's fine, he decides for no fucking reason
33:15
to pretend to be an elderly woman. I'm pretty
33:17
sure there's a plot point in there that
33:19
they're getting a divorce and he's like not allowed
33:21
to see the kids. No, it's not, here's
33:23
the thing. She knows he's an okay dad. It
33:26
really isn't because if there
33:28
was, then the movie doesn't work
33:31
because he's questionable, right?
33:33
Oh, he's not allowed to see his kids. Oh,
33:35
what is he doing then? He's not allowed
33:37
to see his kids. Well, he's not allowed to
33:39
see his kids because typically when parents separate, moms
33:41
get custody more often than not. I realize that,
33:43
but that's the plot point in Mrs. I
33:45
get it, but there's actually nothing keeping him from
33:47
it. He goes out of his way. I don't
33:49
wanna talk about Mrs. Elgar. I do, but here's
33:51
the thing. Like when they're doing it in
33:53
Amelia Perez. They
33:55
also, like look, it treats...
34:00
this trans person as though like
34:02
they're this like insidious trickster. Yeah,
34:04
I was going to say there's
34:06
there's a villainous quality to the
34:08
Amelia Perez character that is very
34:10
retrograde. Yeah. And it goes beyond
34:12
the fact that she's a drug
34:14
lord, like beyond that. Like the
34:16
and if there was something along the line, if
34:18
there was like dialogue or songs where
34:20
they said, well, and there's like some
34:22
lines of dialogue early on, like you
34:24
can transition, but you know, you're not going
34:26
to change fundamentally as a person. You're going
34:29
to still have the same character flaws. Yeah.
34:31
But that person is a woman. So who
34:33
cares? Like is the answer to that? Yeah.
34:36
And I think it's perfectly all
34:38
right to have trans characters who
34:40
have character flaws or are still
34:42
wrestling with anger issues that they
34:44
had pre -transition. All of that
34:46
is completely legit. But this is
34:48
not what this movie is really
34:51
exploring. This movie is actually treating
34:53
transness as sort of like almost
34:55
like an extension of the character's
34:57
villainy or vice versa. At the
34:59
very least, that is, that is
35:01
a left to be a valid
35:03
interpretation. Yeah. Fucked up. And also,
35:06
I'm sorry. It's pretty fucking racist
35:08
as well to portray, frankly,
35:10
just all the Mexican characters as
35:13
I mean, as drug lords. And
35:15
even Zoe Saldania, you know, she
35:17
has that big song about all
35:19
these guys are corrupt. You're working
35:21
with them. I don't know. You
35:23
don't really get to to you only
35:25
get to judge so much. And if she
35:27
was like ever seen as like being morally
35:29
torn, like I need the money, I need
35:31
this. But so she's like drinking heavily or
35:34
something. That doesn't really come up at She
35:36
doesn't actually have her own plot. Her arc
35:38
is non -existent. There's a few interesting twists. There's
35:40
a twist at the end involving the Selena
35:42
Gomez character, like what how her character is
35:44
going to grow and what she wants out
35:46
of this life and how, you know, she
35:48
actually doesn't really care what Amelia Perez thinks
35:50
of like her personal life now. Yeah, you're
35:52
my you're my X slash possibly dead
35:54
husband sister. Yeah, what you've no
35:56
fucking right to tell me what
35:58
to do or talked about or custody
36:00
of my kids, fuck you, and she's
36:02
by her standards, by her knowledge, she's
36:05
right. And I think there's a fun
36:07
twist that could have turned some things
36:09
around, but I think they play it
36:12
so poorly that it eventually just turns
36:14
into a straight-up barrier gaze. Yeah, barrier
36:16
gaze is a term a lot of
36:19
critics have used to describe essentially homophobia
36:21
throughout cinema history, how queer characters are
36:23
typically treated as very depressed, kind of
36:26
wicked, very devious, and always doomed. They're
36:28
either going to, either they're either suicidal,
36:30
or they're going to get killed in
36:32
some way. Or they're going to, or
36:34
they're going to, are they going to
36:36
contract AIDS? Yeah, some kind of, and
36:39
so kind of, and once you start
36:41
looking, and once you start looking at
36:43
all these characters, Oh, you have a
36:45
gay character. Well, I guess they kind
36:47
of have to die. And there's and
36:49
there's so yeah, there becomes this kind
36:51
of like doom's quality to all queer
36:53
character. And again, it's not it's not
36:55
that you can't have characters who have
36:57
a tragic story. It's that when there
36:59
is a consistent pattern in which a
37:01
person or a type of person
37:03
is constantly portrayed the same way
37:05
and also that way has. Honestly,
37:07
even if it was always positive,
37:09
it's a little dehumanizing, but when
37:12
it's always negative or when their
37:14
death is always like held up
37:16
as like some important like platform,
37:18
like, ah, see, it's good that
37:20
they died. If you learn to
37:22
lesson. Oh, oh, queer people are
37:24
martyrs. Good to know. Yeah, do
37:26
things, fuck, oh, like, what the
37:28
hell. So, put that on the
37:30
poster. Emily press, thanks, fuck, fuck,
37:32
oh. And it's, and I understand
37:34
there's conflicts here because, and listen,
37:36
not everyone's on the same page,
37:38
a lot of queer critics. When
37:40
this movie came out of Can, one awards,
37:42
the critics of Can loved it, I didn't
37:45
see a lot of queer critics it can.
37:47
And then when it finally came out and
37:49
other people could see it, their exceptions,
37:51
but the majority of the queer critics
37:53
that I've read don't just like dislike
37:56
this movie. We were actively hate this
37:58
movie. It's not very terrible. It doesn't,
38:00
like there's like one or two songs
38:02
that almost work as camp, but like
38:04
the songs, even the songs aren't very
38:06
good. I don't think it's very well
38:09
photographed. I think it's actually kind of
38:11
murky and unclear. I feel like, uh,
38:13
Jacques-Dillard is passingly familiar with the works
38:15
of Pedro Elmer de Vavar. Oh, I
38:17
think you've seen one or two. Yeah,
38:19
maybe so. I'm an airplane. What if
38:21
El Motivar sucked? Yeah, woo! Have we
38:23
ever tried that? Maybe we should try
38:26
that. Even El Motivar's bad movies are
38:28
at least interesting. Yeah. And he hasn't
38:30
made too many bad ones. And
38:32
it's frustrating because, you know, Carl
38:34
Sophia Gaskan is most likely going
38:36
to be the first openly trans
38:39
person to be nominated for an
38:41
Academy Award for Best Actress at
38:43
least. Elliot Page wasn't out yet
38:46
when he was nominated for journal.
38:48
Never forgetting someone? From the crying game.
38:50
I forgot the actor's name. Was he Jay Davidson? Jay
38:52
Davidson, that's it. Were they, were they, are they, are
38:54
they trans? I thought they were, no, they were playing
38:56
trans. I don't know if they were. Okay, well, I'd
38:58
have to look up Jay Davidson. Regardless,
39:00
it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's seen
39:03
as like a potentially history making thing,
39:05
especially considering we're recording this on January
39:07
20th when an executive order just went
39:09
out saying that they're just went out
39:11
saying that they're only to saying that
39:13
they're only to fuck you. I mean
39:15
we're living in dark times right
39:17
now. This is this is this
39:19
is going to be heavily politicized.
39:21
Yeah, a thing. And honestly, you
39:23
know, girls have a good gun.
39:25
She gives a good performance. It's
39:27
just frustrating that it's in this
39:29
movie. And so there's a lot to
39:31
be very conflicted about that. And clearly,
39:33
you know, she's a trans actress, she
39:35
read the script. She's clearly okay with
39:37
this material. People are allowed to differ
39:39
on whether the material is good or
39:42
not. I mean, a lover in Cox
39:44
was in Uglies. She literally thought that
39:46
was a good idea and that and that
39:48
would be she plays a super villain who
39:50
tries to force just gender people to get
39:52
surgery to change what they are. And it's
39:54
like nobody think about the meaning of that.
39:57
To be fair Laverne Cox is is okay
39:59
with doing trash. Because Liverin Cox played
40:01
the cop in that movie Jolt.
40:03
Fair enough. I think that's, that's,
40:05
I think it's a really enjoyably
40:07
trashing movie. I didn't see Jolt.
40:09
I like to think Liverin Cox
40:11
thought that whoever directed Uglies would
40:13
understand like how campy that is
40:16
and how like and unfortunately McG
40:18
directed it. Oh no. She's not
40:20
known for their subtlety. So I
40:22
want to give her the benefit
40:24
of the doubt. My point is
40:27
this, you know, people are in
40:29
people are in movies that. aren't
40:31
necessarily great representation because they feel
40:33
like Harvey Firestein has said all
40:35
representation is good because we're putting
40:38
yourself in into the open. Some
40:40
people do it because they generally
40:42
think it's good material and they have
40:44
their tastes differ. Some people just
40:46
need the work. I can't speak
40:48
for why she took the role or she
40:51
seems to be you know, on board.
40:53
She isn't like being self-critical about it.
40:55
So listen, we're going to have... differences
40:57
of opinion on this. I know
40:59
some critics who enjoy it.
41:01
Not many. I know of many,
41:04
but I don't know many personally.
41:06
No, I think it's really morally
41:08
irresponsible. I think it's really sloppily
41:10
written. I think it's sloppily filmed.
41:12
I think it's not. I think
41:15
it's a, for a musical, the
41:17
music and overall like visual,
41:19
you know, impact of it is, it's
41:21
like a, I don't understand why we're
41:24
so eager to celebrate musicals
41:26
that Aren't very happy to
41:28
be musicals? I feel like Chicago,
41:30
I feel, is a pretty bad
41:32
rendition of Chicago. Yeah, I feel
41:35
like, and this is just because
41:37
I'm a theater brat, I think,
41:39
I saw a lot, I've seen
41:41
like Broadway shows, and I feel
41:44
like, you know, when you put
41:46
a musical on stage, there's a
41:48
certain kind of dazzle that Hollywood
41:50
so rarely knows what to do
41:52
with. Right. I feel like Chicago,
41:55
I feel is a pretty bad
41:57
rendition of Chicago. Yeah. and trying to
41:59
turn it. into glitz. Not all
42:01
musicals have to be glitzy,
42:04
and especially not Chicago. And
42:06
I wasn't even a big fan
42:08
of wicked, which I know is
42:10
kind of an unpopular view, but
42:12
I feel like there's a certain
42:14
kind of life and verve and
42:16
energy to even a show like
42:18
Wicked that is absent from the
42:20
feature film version. They're trying to
42:22
turn it into sort of like a big
42:24
movie movie movie. There's too few
42:27
filmmakers. I would think John M. True because he
42:29
can do it. I've seen him do it before
42:31
He did in the Heights. He did the step-up
42:33
movies. I feel like he didn't do it with
42:35
wicked for some reason He played it quite safe
42:37
with wicked I feel And I liked him more
42:39
than you I think I think it became a
42:42
studio monster is the problem. It was too big
42:44
for him. He couldn't he couldn't he couldn't pull
42:46
out the real razzled dazzled because he had to
42:48
appease he had to appease everybody he had to
42:50
appease everybody because he had to appease everybody. He
42:52
had to appease everybody to appease everybody doesn't know
42:54
what to do with musical material. I think he
42:57
does. I think Zoe sat on
42:59
yet knows better than he does
43:01
what to do with musical material.
43:03
She can dance. She's got the
43:05
physicality. She's got a good physicality.
43:07
Yeah, yeah. I feel like and she's, she and,
43:10
and Selena Gomez are, I think. I think
43:12
Selina Gomez specifically had to like relearn Spanish.
43:14
She grew up as a small child speaking
43:16
Spanish. Yeah. And then moved to the United
43:19
States and didn't use it for many years.
43:21
I don't speak a lot of Spanish, but
43:23
I have talked to people who have seen
43:25
the movie who are fluent and who were
43:27
raised in Spanish. And they say her accent
43:30
is just all over the place weird. Yeah.
43:32
Well, anyway. We should move on, I think
43:34
we've set our piece. Yeah. Why don't we,
43:36
why don't we, why don't we, why don't
43:39
we, why don't we skip
43:41
to a happy movie? Okay,
43:43
well, happy movie movie. We're
43:46
talking about Walsh and Gromit
43:48
Vengeance Most Fowl. Another Netflix
43:51
movie. Golly, I love Ardman.
43:53
I've loved Ardman since the
43:56
start, like even before they
43:58
started making movies. creature comforts.
44:00
Was the creature that was first I
44:02
thought grand day out was was it
44:05
the same year? Well in terms of
44:07
what put them on the map like
44:09
a kind of got them recognized by
44:11
I think a broader audience than just
44:13
the animation community was creature comforts and
44:16
what they did is they interviewed people
44:18
talking about in character as animals but
44:20
speaking very naturally they they I don't
44:22
think they interview people as animals they
44:25
they they I don't think they interview
44:27
people as animals they just talked to
44:29
people on the street about just
44:31
things yeah everyday things nothing and
44:33
then they took the audio on
44:36
the animated over it's yeah it's
44:38
really great So great. And then,
44:40
but their biggest most iconic work
44:42
was the creation of Wallace and
44:44
Gromit. And Wallace is a sort
44:47
of a dippy inventor lives alone
44:49
with his dog. His dog is,
44:51
he can't speak, but he is
44:53
very intelligent. He can walk around
44:56
on his hind legs. In
44:58
many respects, he's smarter than
45:00
Wallace, even though Wallace is
45:02
clearly a technical wizard. And
45:05
their first outing, they realize that
45:07
the moon is made of cheese,
45:09
and they love cheese. They love
45:11
cheese so much. So they decide
45:13
to build a spaceship and
45:15
go to the moon. And they go to
45:18
the moon, I love this, they land
45:20
on the moon, and then they walk
45:22
up to the nearest cheese vending machine. It's
45:24
just right there. They put it in. It's
45:26
so fucking whimsical like they die. And
45:28
they put it in a coin and nothing
45:31
happens for a moment. But then the
45:33
gears, once they walk away, the gears start
45:35
turning and it turns into a sentient machine
45:37
with arms, like arms spring out of
45:39
its side. Yeah. And it. clearly is an
45:41
extermination but and wants to kill Wallace
45:43
and Grohn. Oh, it's so good. But they
45:46
don't know that, but this thing's stalking them.
45:48
So yeah, it's, it's adorable. Was, uh, the
45:50
wrong trousers? The next one, right? The wrong trousers
45:52
is the second one. Yeah, yeah, the wrong trousers,
45:54
which is very relevant because the movie is actually
45:57
a sequel to the wrong trousers. But in that
45:59
one, Wallace and Grohn. they take on
46:01
a tenant, they rent out
46:03
one of their rooms to
46:05
a chicken. They think it's
46:08
a chicken. No, it's a
46:10
penguin. They don't think it's
46:13
a penguin. No, they
46:15
don't think it's a
46:17
penguin. No, they don't
46:19
think it's a penguin.
46:21
No, they don't think
46:23
it's a penguin. No,
46:25
they don't think it's
46:27
a penguin. No. No.
46:30
countryside house and in
46:32
Bristol in fact where
46:34
I think where Arndman
46:36
is located. Wallace has
46:38
built techno trousers as you do
46:40
which can take Gromit on walks
46:42
by themselves. This is a big
46:44
robotic pants. And this gives the
46:47
penguin, aka Feathers McGraw. We don't
46:49
know it's Feathers McGraw. Yeah, no,
46:51
but it gives him an idea.
46:53
And it turns out Feathers McGraw
46:55
is a wanted super thief. And
46:57
he's going to use the trousers
46:59
to steal a diamond. And his
47:01
disguise is, he puts a rubber
47:03
glove on his head and people
47:05
think he's a chicken. Yeah. It's good.
47:08
And there's a wonderful bit where
47:10
he's like he's wearing the the
47:12
Cox comb and he's using he's
47:15
using a remote control to control
47:17
the trousers and trying to steal
47:19
a diamond. It's all very complicated.
47:22
Oh, it's a darn. And he
47:24
finally like gets the diamond and
47:26
abscondes and Wallace doesn't know
47:29
what's going on. He's been asleep for
47:31
most of it. And Wallace goes, good
47:33
grief, it's you! Love
47:36
that moment. It's great. We'll move on.
47:38
The next short was called a close
47:40
shave, which was where they met Sean
47:42
the sheep. Sean the sheep. And I
47:44
honestly don't remember the plot as well
47:47
of this one. They found a sheep
47:49
and it's adorable and that's all kind
47:51
of all I got. They find a
47:53
sheep, but there's also been a wool
47:55
shortage. And it turns out there's been
47:58
some sort of sheep rustlers. around
48:00
through town. That's it. And the sheep
48:02
rustler turns out to be this woman
48:04
that Wallace is attracted to and she
48:06
has pressed in her own. Oh yes,
48:09
an evil version of ground. Yeah, adorable.
48:11
They figure out what's going to be
48:13
going on. I have to stop the
48:15
sheep rustlers. This led to the spin-off
48:18
Sean the Sheep, which is actually a
48:20
TV series that became one of the
48:22
funniest movies of all time. The Sean
48:24
the sheep movie is like not exaggerating
48:26
like Buster Keaton levels of... physical comedy.
48:29
Yeah, it's basically a silent movie about
48:31
the sheep and they decide to take
48:33
a day off, so they decide to
48:36
like sort of get the farmer out
48:38
of the way in a cute way,
48:40
but he ends up like rolling down
48:43
a hill and getting amnesia and all
48:45
of these sheep need to run into
48:47
the city to get him back and
48:49
it becomes just the most adorable hilarious
48:52
thing. There's a shot of a dog,
48:54
inched on the sheep movie, which
48:56
is maybe the funniest shot in
48:58
the dog. But eventually Hardman
49:01
moved into features. Their first feature
49:03
was chicken run, which is very
49:05
good. But shortly after... Chicken version
49:07
of The Great Escape, essentially. Brilliant
49:09
pitch. But eventually they did do
49:11
a Wallis &Gromit movie, called Wallis
49:13
&Gromit Curse of the Where Rabbit,
49:15
which we did a whole episode
49:17
on once. That is a great
49:20
werewolf movie. It's... I feel like
49:22
both Chicken Run and Curse of
49:24
the Where Rabbit did capture that
49:26
kind of... brisk light tweeness, a
49:28
very British quality, that I
49:30
think a lot of audiences
49:32
really admire about Wallace and
49:34
Gromis. There's a certain kind,
49:36
first of all, I love,
49:38
you know, Ardman's character design,
49:40
that your characters have like
49:42
little marble eyes, but gigantic
49:45
mouths and fuses. Like they
49:47
have, yeah, there's really great
49:49
looking character designs. But they
49:51
also have that kind of...
49:53
gentle politeness underneath everything yeah
49:55
because they are all said
49:57
in England and nothing there
49:59
even there's like threat, there's a
50:01
monster, there's a super criminal. nothing
50:04
really bad is going to happen.
50:06
Yeah, it's not that kind of
50:08
movie. You're not you're not terribly
50:11
worried. You know with them to
50:13
be inconvenienced. It's too bad. Yeah.
50:15
Yeah. Yeah. Um, because all on
50:18
Wallace is a simple guy. All
50:20
he wants is to have his
50:22
breakfast. He wants to eat cheeses
50:24
and just put his feet up
50:27
at the end of the night.
50:29
Yeah. Well, it took a long,
50:31
long time. But Jesus. Damn. vengeance
50:34
most foul with a W. Get
50:36
it? And Feathers McGraw. And
50:38
Feathers McGraw. Time has passed.
50:41
The computer technology has been
50:43
updated. And Feathers McGraw, now in
50:45
prison, at the zoo, is cute.
50:47
But they treat him like he's
50:50
Hannibal Lecter. Like he's got a
50:52
bone jar. Stone cell and bars
50:54
on the windows. He's like bouncing
50:57
balls and doing like one-handed push-ups
50:59
in his cell. figure out where
51:01
Wallace is living. Yes, and what
51:03
Wallace is up to you? Hack
51:06
into things. And at the same
51:08
time, Wallace, who is desperate for
51:10
money, new actor, Peter Salas, who played
51:12
Wallace, passed away a few years back.
51:15
He was a very old man. He
51:17
was in his mid-90s, and he was
51:19
still playing Wallace. And so there was
51:21
a concern, and I think a very
51:23
valid concern, that unless I'm fine with
51:25
recasting him, but can they recapture the
51:27
magic? New guys great. New guys great. Yeah,
51:30
honestly, like, honestly, and in a way
51:32
that doesn't feel, yeah, Ben Whitehead, it
51:34
doesn't feel like it's, he's doing Wallace,
51:36
he's not putting too much of his
51:38
own spin on it, but it doesn't just
51:40
feel like an imitation, he's just, it
51:43
just is just Wallace on camera, he's
51:45
great, good casting, well done indeed. But
51:47
yeah, no, Feddens McGraw, so Wallace has
51:49
decided to build a new invention. Yeah,
51:52
he's built a new invention. It's not
51:54
trousers. This time it's a garden dome.
51:56
He wants to help out, well, gromit
51:59
in the garden. it's a polymath who
52:01
reads sophisticated literature. And he loves
52:03
gardening as we learned in Curse of
52:05
the Wererabbit and he just loves
52:07
taking care of his garden. It's his
52:09
favorite thing. And so Wallah spills
52:11
a garden gnome to help with the
52:13
gardening and it does all the
52:15
gardening for him and rips out his
52:18
favorite flowers and it's awful. Robotic
52:20
garden gnome. And of course, just like
52:22
in that Simpsons episode with the
52:24
killer crusty doll, it has an evil
52:26
switch. So Feathers McGraw from prison
52:28
finds a way to hack into the
52:30
lawn gnome's memory banks and turn
52:32
them evil and the shenanigans
52:35
ensue from there. It's
52:38
not quite as good as Curse
52:40
of the Wererabbit. It's not as inspired
52:42
and the jokes don't come as
52:44
fast and furious. Yeah. It's actually a
52:46
lot gentler. If you like those
52:48
sort of gentle qualities, this has it
52:50
in spades. That tweeness is back.
52:52
I feel like Ardman for a second
52:54
there was trying to go a
52:56
little more hip and it was never
52:58
a good match for them flushed
53:00
away specifically. Oh, yeah, that was also
53:02
their first foray into CG animation.
53:04
Eventually they nailed it with Arthur Christmas.
53:06
But yeah, it just it wasn't great
53:08
on a technical level. And it's not
53:10
a very good movie. I feel like
53:12
they were trying to do something a
53:15
little bit more raucous and American. There's
53:17
the like minion like characters with their
53:19
slugs in that one. It's and they're
53:21
casting like big movie stars. This is
53:23
driving me nuts. The robot garden gnomes
53:25
are called Norbot Norbot. Yes. Yeah, that
53:27
just took me. I was like dying
53:29
trying to remember that it was killing
53:32
me in the ground. Yeah. So
53:34
when when they're trying to do that, it doesn't
53:36
work quite as well. I feel like when
53:38
they're sticking to sort of like their homey,
53:40
more British roots or trying to be a
53:42
little bit trying to be a little bit
53:44
more whimsical, things really work out well. So
53:47
flushed away kind of drove a lot of
53:49
people away from Ardman, because after that, they
53:51
never really picked up again. I think even
53:53
Arthur Christmas was a hit. I didn't do
53:55
as well as I should. That movie is
53:57
a classic, by the way, but no, it
53:59
was not a. it's hit much of a
54:01
hit as it should have been.
54:03
And then they did their chicken
54:05
run sequel which was only last
54:07
year the year before. Yeah. Which
54:09
is also for Netflix and that
54:11
came and went and that is
54:13
not a good movie. That's not
54:15
very good either. It's like it's
54:17
okay you can watch it. I
54:19
love it. Mel Gibson played the
54:21
chicken and the original. We can't
54:23
we can't hire Mel Gibson again.
54:25
He's not well liked anymore. It's
54:27
just too toxic. Oh my god,
54:29
that role is so fucking cursed.
54:32
It's cursed now. But in the
54:34
midst there, they actually did a
54:36
couple of very funny, very British
54:39
comedies. They did The Pirates Band
54:41
of Misfits. Oh, that movie is
54:43
brilliant. That's also one of the
54:46
funniest movies ever made. Yeah, pirates is
54:48
really fantastic. Yeah, they did early man,
54:50
which nobody saw I Like early man.
54:52
It's it's it's a sports movie about
54:55
cavemen versus people from the Iron Age
54:57
And there's like monster ducks and and
54:59
it sounds like something I'd enjoy. I
55:01
think you really like early man. It's
55:04
it's it's a sports movie about cave
55:06
men versus people from the sheet movie
55:08
and then they did a sequel called
55:10
farm again, which I didn't like a
55:13
sequel called And that's true. They use
55:15
up their inspiration. And that's true of
55:17
this Wallace and Gromit film as well. Not
55:19
as good. But still Wallace Gromit. Oh yeah.
55:21
The characters are there. They've still, they invented
55:24
these characters and they're still just as well
55:26
animated, still just as well designed. Some bits
55:28
of cleverness, not quite as like... that Kooky
55:30
Rube Goldberg quality isn't quite there. There
55:33
isn't like one joke in this movie
55:35
that I can point to and go,
55:37
that was a good one. There's stuff
55:39
I liked and I laughed, but there
55:41
isn't like one bit where I was
55:44
like, that is a brilliant joke, I
55:46
fucking love you for that joke. I
55:48
don't recall one, honestly. And that's a
55:50
shame, but yeah, it's not a grand
55:52
day out, it's a pleasant day out.
55:54
There you know, you know, it's a
55:57
perfectly nice movie, nice movie to watch
55:59
movie to watch. That's that's that's a perfect
56:01
assessment. Do you want to? Why don't we talk
56:03
about the last movie that we both saw
56:05
that we'll just we'll go back and forth from
56:07
some things You wouldn't mind being stuck with
56:09
like a huge inheritance But a phone that has
56:11
to be plugged in just right so it
56:13
charges is not one of those things Switch to
56:15
Verizon and we'll pay off your old phone
56:17
up to $800 five prepaid MasterCard for a new
56:19
one on us Just trade in any phone
56:21
from our top brands with select unlimited plans 829
56:23
99 purchase with new smartphone line on select
56:26
unlimited plans minimum $90 per month auto pay plus
56:28
taxes and fees for 36 months required less
56:30
$830 trading/promo credit plight over 36 months trading
56:32
terms apply payoff phone Requires smartphone purchase
56:34
importing with new smartphone line on select
56:36
client must provide most recent bill showing
56:38
payoff amount of eligible phone Additional terms
56:40
apply there. So tell me about Grand
56:42
Theft Hamlet. Oh, okay Grand Theft Hamlet
56:44
I'm glad I got to see this
56:46
one. I am just because I'm a
56:48
Shakespeare nerd Yeah, I'm during COVID a
56:50
bunch of people players of the game
56:52
Grand Theft Auto Online, which is one
56:54
of those games where like Many
56:56
thousands of people can log in and
56:58
interact in a simulated world and
57:00
there's not necessarily like levels or our
57:02
Goals if you don't want there
57:04
to be you can just you just
57:06
around and yell at people and
57:09
Grand Theft Auto is specifically is set
57:11
in like Especially essentially the movie
57:13
Scarface where everybody's encouraged to steal cars
57:15
and murder each other lesson and
57:17
and acquire a lot of wealth That's
57:19
the goal of the game It's
57:22
close enough. It's close enough close
57:24
enough. I'm not gonna it's close. Okay.
57:26
Yeah, but yeah, it
57:28
was Yeah
57:31
during lockdowns that some out of work
57:33
actors because you know, you can't
57:35
act when you can't be in the same
57:37
room together Yeah, especially when you do when
57:39
you when you specialize in live theater. Yeah,
57:41
that whole scene died for a while They
57:43
were just bumming around online playing Grand Theft
57:45
Auto and they discovered in this simulated city
57:47
There was a stage and they were just
57:49
sort of futzing around one day and they
57:51
decided to get up on stage and start
57:53
reading Shakespearean lines Just fun. They started with
57:55
Macbeth, but they said hey, wait a minute.
57:57
Actually We could do that We
58:00
could put on like get use our
58:02
avatars characters these digital characters and stage
58:04
a version inside Grand Theft Auto of
58:06
Hamlet. I mean it is they call
58:08
it a sandbox game. You can get
58:10
in there and do whatever you want.
58:12
They're their parameters, but like and you're
58:15
encouraged to certain things. But strictly speaking,
58:17
you can do whatever the fuck you
58:19
want in there. And so they decided,
58:21
yeah, let's stage Hamlet. And they also
58:23
one of them, his wife is a
58:25
documentary filmmaker. And so they enlist her
58:27
to help put on the production and
58:29
document them making it. And the cute thing
58:31
is that except for like one shot
58:33
in like the final credits, it's only
58:35
in the game. It's all game footage.
58:37
We never see them like clicking on
58:39
their computers. It's all in game footage.
58:41
And it really, really creates an interesting
58:43
world. And the characters like you can
58:46
customize your characters. So some of them
58:48
look like people, but some look like
58:50
space aliens. Some of them are wearing
58:52
stripper clothing. Some of them are like
58:54
part cat. You know, there's all of
58:56
these weird customizations. The documentary filmmaker, she's
58:58
like, I want to look like Tilda
59:00
Swinton, but oh, I can have
59:02
skeleton legs. Right. And when the
59:04
characters speak, like their lips
59:06
aren't going to match the words, but the
59:08
characters do like swivel their jaws like
59:10
puppets. It gives us a weird, eerie effect.
59:12
They have certain sort of gestures that
59:14
are allowed within the game. And as they,
59:16
as they progress and try to act
59:18
as their characters, they get a little bit
59:20
more control over that and get a
59:22
little bit more expressive. It was interesting. But
59:24
yeah, they, they send out a call.
59:26
Hmm. Anyone wants to try. And initially no,
59:28
it shows up. Or like what random
59:30
guy shows up and kills them. Yeah. At
59:32
first it's like, hey, oh, thanks for
59:34
coming to this audition. But because of the
59:37
nature of the game, they're just, people are
59:39
just killing them. Yeah. It's like, oh, there's
59:41
people sitting standing still. I'll just murder them
59:43
because that's the goal. Okay. Listen, we, listen,
59:45
that guy was annoying. We killed them. Oh,
59:47
the cops showed up. Okay. We have to
59:49
flee. We can't stay cops. They can't stand
59:51
the. It's a way
59:53
of trying to stage something within
59:55
this really strict, the strict parameters
59:57
of the game itself. Yeah. And
59:59
I. I feel like this is a
1:00:01
good way for these people to sort
1:00:04
of get a creative outlet during COVID,
1:00:06
but it's also an interesting way to
1:00:08
reinterpret Hamlet. And I feel like later
1:00:10
in the film after they've been working
1:00:13
on Hamlet for a while, they actually
1:00:15
start taking it really seriously. Well, they
1:00:17
start taking it seriously. They set up
1:00:20
like a safe place where nobody's gonna
1:00:22
get shot. At one point they enlist
1:00:24
a guy who doesn't want to act.
1:00:26
I was like, can you do security?
1:00:29
Is that true? Shouldn't it? That's pretty
1:00:31
great. That's delightful. But because of
1:00:33
the world that Grand Theft Auto
1:00:35
takes place in, this world of
1:00:37
acquisition, this world of greed and
1:00:39
corruption, you're killing people and getting
1:00:41
money and just stealing cars, it's
1:00:43
all about this kind of scarface
1:00:45
world where there's not a lot
1:00:47
of intellect. Wouldn't that be a
1:00:50
great place to have a corrupt royal
1:00:52
court where people are killing each other
1:00:54
and usurping the throne? It fits really
1:00:56
well, actually, to see Hamlet staged in
1:00:59
this way. And because of... the parameters
1:01:01
of the game, they're trying to think of
1:01:03
interesting places they could stage different kinds of
1:01:05
scenes. Like, okay, how do we do the
1:01:07
ghost scene? Okay, well, what if, what if
1:01:09
he shows up in like a scary mask
1:01:11
on top of a blimp, which we can't
1:01:13
get, and so there's a, and so we,
1:01:15
he does the whole scene where he meets
1:01:17
his dad on top of a blimp that's
1:01:19
like flying up into the clouds, and it's
1:01:21
like. You know, I haven't seen that
1:01:23
one before. I've seen a lot
1:01:25
of hamlets. There's a lot of,
1:01:27
there's a lot of things. I
1:01:29
love, there's a bit where first
1:01:31
blimp hamlet I've seen. I think
1:01:33
it is. There's this wonderful bit
1:01:35
where one of the guys is,
1:01:37
he's doing his, you know, to
1:01:39
be your not to be speech,
1:01:41
or he's trying to, and he
1:01:43
keeps getting shot. Just be random
1:01:45
guys. To be or not to
1:01:48
be. purpose and feeling like alone
1:01:50
in the universe and whether life
1:01:52
has any meaning and he's saying it
1:01:54
to a bunch of NPC's non-player
1:01:56
characters. These are these are
1:01:58
automatons who take on the
1:02:00
appearance of life and it starts
1:02:02
having real depth and meaning in a
1:02:05
new context and it's really fascinating and
1:02:07
at the end when he finishes giving
1:02:09
a speech and he's surrounded by some
1:02:12
of these NBC's one of them says
1:02:14
something to the effect of like yeah
1:02:16
I tried drinking motor oil and it
1:02:19
just gave me gas and it's like
1:02:21
okay you are still in PTA yeah
1:02:23
I love this movie I love the
1:02:25
juxtaposition between the art of Hamlet and
1:02:28
almost the deliberate artlessness of grand theft
1:02:30
auto, which is supposed to kind of
1:02:32
tap into your base or impulses, whereas
1:02:35
Hamlet is supposed to stimulate. I got
1:02:37
this vibe where like, you know, we've
1:02:39
all seen, I mean, none of us
1:02:41
were there, but we've all seen depictions
1:02:44
or read about how the crowd at
1:02:46
the Globe Theatre. when Shakespeare was putting
1:02:48
on his place. Oh, the groundlings. Yeah.
1:02:51
Was very rowdy. And they would like,
1:02:53
you know, yell and throw stuff and
1:02:55
get up on the stage and sort
1:02:57
fight the other actors. And I'm like,
1:02:59
this is that. The groundlings are mocked
1:03:01
in the text of Hamlet, by the
1:03:03
way. Oh, yeah. In the speak the
1:03:05
speech speech. Yeah, yeah, yeah. to split
1:03:07
the ears of the groundlings, they say.
1:03:09
Yeah, yeah, so it just feels like,
1:03:11
you know, when you can get randomly
1:03:13
killed, they even have to say like,
1:03:15
oh, listen, what if one of us
1:03:17
or one of the audience dies while
1:03:19
we perform? Do we just keep going?
1:03:22
Yeah, we just got to keep
1:03:24
going, I guess. But I also
1:03:26
love, because the parameters are so
1:03:28
strict, there's only certain ways they
1:03:30
can stage, like locations, the... whoever
1:03:32
is watching has to follow them
1:03:34
yeah like you can't just teleport
1:03:36
over there it's like a whole
1:03:38
thing and what I found most
1:03:40
hilarious was in the mouse trap
1:03:43
the play within the play there
1:03:45
was suppose there's a scene where
1:03:47
they'd stage the murder of Hamlet's
1:03:49
father right where Claudius the Claudius
1:03:51
avatar sneaks up and poisons and by
1:03:53
point poison his ear yeah they don't
1:03:55
have poison they can pour in someone's
1:03:58
ear in Grand Theft Auto but They
1:04:00
do have bazookas. So
1:04:02
in the Mousetrap, that one guy
1:04:05
gets blown away with a bazooka and
1:04:07
that's when Claudius leaves on stage.
1:04:09
I have one, it's not even a
1:04:11
critique, it's a regret about this
1:04:13
movie. There's not enough Hamlet. There's not
1:04:15
enough, yeah. We see the final production
1:04:18
of Hamlet but only in like,
1:04:20
you know, a tiny
1:04:22
fraction of it. Like we see pieces
1:04:24
of it throughout and there's this
1:04:26
one hilarious bit where everything goes wrong,
1:04:28
but yeah. I want to see
1:04:30
their Hamlet and I
1:04:32
realize that might make it a five hour movie.
1:04:34
Yeah. But at the same time, I really
1:04:36
hope that when this comes out on home video
1:04:38
that that's included. You can see the whole
1:04:40
version Because clearly they recorded it. So I mean,
1:04:43
maybe they didn't get all of it, I
1:04:45
don't know but like they clearly wanted to, they
1:04:47
were planning to, they were working on this
1:04:49
documentary, they talk about it. This is a great
1:04:51
bit where one of the actors is spending so much
1:04:53
time in -game preparing for this Hamlet thing that his
1:04:55
wife, the documentarian is like, I just never see you
1:04:57
anymore, man. You're just doing this all the time. And
1:04:59
he's like, I know it's kind of falling down a
1:05:01
rabbit hole. I wish I could give you a hug. We
1:05:04
live in the same house. You can.
1:05:06
Oh, okay, I'll see you. And
1:05:08
that's kind of like the big telling
1:05:10
moment. And I think that's sort
1:05:12
of like, might give people with memories
1:05:14
of COVID some pretty vicious flashbacks
1:05:17
about sort of this feeling of being
1:05:19
trapped and alienated and alone in
1:05:21
a world where everybody's feeling that. We're
1:05:23
starting to reach the end, I
1:05:25
think, of a wave of films that
1:05:27
were produced and or in production
1:05:29
during COVID that reflected COVID. And we started
1:05:31
getting them in the middle of COVID. We
1:05:34
had the host. Or was it just host?
1:05:36
It was just host. Yeah, which I still
1:05:38
think is one of the classics of the
1:05:40
sort of the COVID wave of filmmaking. But
1:05:42
I really do think with Grants Have Hamlet
1:05:45
and plenty of other movies, besides some
1:05:47
really good, some fucking terrible, we
1:05:50
need to have like a
1:05:52
proper retrospective of how
1:05:54
cinema reflected COVID because once
1:05:56
the lockdown like concluded, you
1:05:59
know, or not it should
1:06:01
have or happened too fast, you know,
1:06:03
that's a whole thing. But like,
1:06:05
once people were able to get
1:06:07
back to work, people were really
1:06:09
quick to start making movies about
1:06:11
how that never happened. Like, they
1:06:13
take place in reality in which
1:06:15
that is barely, if ever mentioned. Like,
1:06:18
the first couple of years of
1:06:20
the 2020s. Oh, yeah, that was
1:06:22
the whole thing, wasn't it? Anyway,
1:06:24
moving on. About our love triangle.
1:06:26
Yeah. It was really frustrating. I
1:06:28
mean, one of my biggest complaints
1:06:30
about like sort of the big
1:06:32
ascending like genre films like the
1:06:35
superhero films was that they were
1:06:37
like frustratingly apolitical or at least
1:06:39
they were striving to be. Yeah.
1:06:41
When we're in a world where we need
1:06:43
heroes to address real world problems. Yeah. I
1:06:46
remember there was a line in one of
1:06:48
the Ant Man films about how. the universe
1:06:50
was wiped out and then resurrected and that
1:06:52
caused a huge homelessness problem on earth like
1:06:55
all across the planet and the heroes did
1:06:57
nothing to address that they barely even mention
1:06:59
it yeah they're too busy in other dimensions
1:07:01
fighting super villains there are a few versions
1:07:04
or like TV shows or whatever that did
1:07:06
address some of that directly but yeah it
1:07:08
feels like that whole blip like oh that
1:07:10
five-year stretch I mean, it came kind of,
1:07:13
the plot point came before COVID, but it
1:07:15
really feels like we could have used
1:07:17
that. It's a great way to
1:07:19
express what was going on. But
1:07:21
anyway, Grand Theft Hamlet is a
1:07:23
great film that actually engages with
1:07:25
what it was like. Well, also
1:07:27
like... Well also reflecting on like
1:07:29
just analyzing what Hamlet is. Very
1:07:31
true. Very true. Yeah, I know
1:07:33
it's a beautiful film and I
1:07:35
really like a lot. It's a
1:07:38
great new angle on Hamlet that
1:07:40
uses modern tech and modern sort
1:07:42
of interactive technologies to explore this
1:07:45
ancient art in a new and
1:07:47
exciting way. And it just more
1:07:49
proof that Hamlet is kind
1:07:51
of a As Harold Bloom said, a poem
1:07:54
unlimited. It can fit into any framework.
1:07:56
We were just talking about when we
1:07:58
were doing our David Lynch tribute. had
1:08:00
something similar about Twin Peaks,
1:08:02
the return of all things. Anyway,
1:08:06
we should move on. So I've seen three other movies
1:08:08
and you've seen two, so I'll just do one and
1:08:10
then we'll alternate. Let's talk
1:08:12
about The Last Showgirl. Tell me about The Last
1:08:14
Showgirl. I am so glad I saw The Last
1:08:16
Showgirl. It was almost the movie I didn't get
1:08:18
to see in time for award season. And
1:08:21
then I ran into people who were like, no, you
1:08:23
have to see this movie. I'm like, okay, I'll make it
1:08:25
a priority. And I'm so glad I did. This is
1:08:27
a movie from Gia Coppola. And it
1:08:29
stars Pamela Anderson, known
1:08:32
best for Baywatch,
1:08:34
Barbed Wire, the
1:08:37
notorious and frankly repugnant sex
1:08:39
tape that people stole from her
1:08:41
and put out online. It's
1:08:43
really just cruel how that all
1:08:45
went down. Invaded her privacy
1:08:47
and can still watch it online
1:08:49
like she's trying to have
1:08:51
it taken down. It's tragic. Pamela
1:08:56
Anderson has, it's
1:08:58
interesting because she's known for being very
1:09:00
beautiful and she had a lot of modeling.
1:09:02
Yeah, just as much a model as
1:09:05
she was an actress. But the thing is
1:09:07
that the reason why Baywatch kind of
1:09:09
peaked when she was on it, she
1:09:11
had charisma. She's really funny. She's really
1:09:13
funny. She's got, she just commands the
1:09:15
screen. It seemed like she was destined
1:09:17
to be some kind of movie star,
1:09:19
you know, maybe they're different kinds. But
1:09:22
it seemed like, you know, she was
1:09:24
going to have a good or at
1:09:26
least consistent career. And then she left
1:09:28
Baywatch, honestly, fine. It wasn't a great
1:09:30
show. It was very popular. It wasn't
1:09:32
a great show. Hugely popular. Yeah, oh
1:09:34
my god. was like 12 seasons or
1:09:37
something. Yeah, it was huge. And,
1:09:39
you know, she had a spinoff called,
1:09:41
it wasn't a spinoff. It was a
1:09:43
similar show called VIP that was all
1:09:45
hers. And she had Barbed Wire, which
1:09:47
was a big comic book movie, which
1:09:49
is not very good. It's the Casablanca
1:09:51
story. It is Casablanca. It's like, it's
1:09:53
like post -apocalypse Casablanca. It's Mad Max Casablanca
1:09:55
and she's Humphrey Bogart. No, granted, that's
1:09:57
a good bitch. It's not very good.
1:10:00
It's not her fault, but it's
1:10:02
not a very good movie. And
1:10:04
so her acting career kind of
1:10:07
hit the skids. And she really
1:10:09
hasn't done a lot of acting
1:10:11
since. And she's finally got
1:10:13
a great role. And this
1:10:15
movie, The Last Showgirl, where she
1:10:18
plays, she's been a showgirl
1:10:20
at this one Las Vegas
1:10:22
review for decades. She's been
1:10:24
there for a long time. She's
1:10:26
been there since the beginning and
1:10:29
it's just been one of those
1:10:31
like old standards everyone goes to
1:10:33
this and it's one of those
1:10:35
ones with like glittery Tiaras The
1:10:38
big headdress yeah yeah yeah like
1:10:40
the gold standard classic Idea
1:10:42
of like the sexy Vegas
1:10:44
show of which we see very very
1:10:47
little And she's getting on
1:10:49
in years. She's no longer a
1:10:51
headliner. She's been pushed further and
1:10:53
further back into the chorus She
1:10:56
is constantly, you know, things keep
1:10:58
constantly screwing up. Like she rips
1:11:01
her costume because of a door handle.
1:11:03
She can never remember where it is.
1:11:05
And well, that comes out of your
1:11:07
paycheck. So now she has to stay
1:11:09
up late and try to fix it
1:11:12
herself. And it's just, she doesn't have
1:11:14
a life. She has a best friend
1:11:16
played by Jamie Lee Curtis, who used
1:11:18
to be a showgirl, and now is
1:11:20
a way, like a server at a,
1:11:23
at a, at a casino. Okay. Wandering
1:11:25
around the floor, like, oh, here's your
1:11:27
here's your gin and tonic, don't leave.
1:11:29
It's keep, keep shoving money into
1:11:31
that, into that one-arm monster.
1:11:34
And, and also, she's kind of a
1:11:36
mentor figure to some of the younger
1:11:38
show girls, one's one's one's one's
1:11:40
played by Kiernan Shipka. Okay. But
1:11:42
at the beginning of the movie,
1:11:45
she finds out from the
1:11:47
production manager, the stage manager.
1:11:49
played by Dave Battista who's
1:11:51
giving a great performance, that
1:11:54
after all these years the show
1:11:56
is going to shut down. Okay,
1:11:58
which is true. The, the, the, uh, I think
1:12:00
it was called Not Crazy
1:12:02
Girls. Another long-running Vegas review
1:12:04
with the show Girls with the big
1:12:07
headdresses did shut down. Yeah. And it
1:12:09
was an end of an era, you
1:12:11
know, and I don't have a lot
1:12:13
of attachment to that because I actually
1:12:15
never actually saw one of those. But
1:12:17
it isn't an era. There's a wistfulness
1:12:20
to it, but we see it from
1:12:22
this perspective of someone who has just
1:12:24
been working it. This has been her
1:12:26
job. This has been her
1:12:28
life. This has been what
1:12:30
she clung to. This is
1:12:32
what she did when she
1:12:34
wasn't being a very good
1:12:36
mom. This was her like,
1:12:38
this was her fame. What is
1:12:41
she now? What is she gonna
1:12:43
do? She's supposed to
1:12:45
like get another job?
1:12:47
She's supposed to move?
1:12:49
She gonna try to like
1:12:51
settle down and get married?
1:12:53
Is it too late for
1:12:56
that? And that's kind of
1:12:58
the whole movie. Okay. It's
1:13:00
just this, it's just this
1:13:02
almost kind of death of
1:13:04
a salesman kind of thing where
1:13:06
it's like, it's not that
1:13:08
tragic, but like, who am? What
1:13:11
if I dedicated my life to?
1:13:13
Yeah, now that I'm retiring, what
1:13:15
if I brought to the world?
1:13:17
Yeah, like, is it, is there
1:13:19
more nobility in maybe realizing
1:13:21
that you might have
1:13:23
wasted your life? Yeah. And that
1:13:26
is a very complicated, that's
1:13:28
a lot for one performance.
1:13:30
Like, you know, a lot of movies,
1:13:32
what do they ask you to be?
1:13:34
Okay, you're a grizzled tough guy who's
1:13:36
brought back in for one last
1:13:38
job and you got a divorce and
1:13:41
it hurts. Okay, I think I can
1:13:43
play that. There's not a lot to
1:13:45
that. That's a cliche character.
1:13:47
It's a cliche. A lot of
1:13:49
people who are played by actors
1:13:51
or cliches. It's not a horrible
1:13:53
thing, but it is. This kind
1:13:55
of role actually demands a lot
1:13:57
of an actor it involves a
1:14:00
of internality. It involves a
1:14:02
lot of externality because she's
1:14:04
playing a showgirl. Like, this is
1:14:06
a hard role for any actor.
1:14:08
And Pamela Anderson fucking nails it.
1:14:10
Well, that's great. Yeah. And you might
1:14:13
think to yourself, oh, is she kind
1:14:15
of playing yourself? I mean, maybe,
1:14:17
I'm sure she's culling from her experiences.
1:14:19
But it doesn't feel like this
1:14:21
is like a thinly veiled Pamela Anderson.
1:14:24
Well, no, but I feel like if...
1:14:26
There's a definite prejudice in Hollywood
1:14:28
for the phrases women of a
1:14:30
certain age. Yeah. This is also
1:14:32
what the substance is all about.
1:14:34
Yeah. The Demi Moore character turned
1:14:36
50 and like she's been being
1:14:38
told very directly to her face
1:14:40
in that movie that like she's
1:14:42
just sort of out like aged
1:14:44
out of her useful. Yeah, you're
1:14:46
done. Please leave. Here's the door.
1:14:48
Yeah, exactly. I got you a
1:14:50
book. Yeah, she's oh no, 50.
1:14:52
God. It's like. Yeah. How decrepit
1:14:54
you are at age 50, come
1:14:57
on. And I feel like Hollywood
1:14:59
very much mistreats women
1:15:01
like that. Women start getting
1:15:04
less and less certain kinds
1:15:06
of roles after a while.
1:15:08
Yeah, opportunities dry up because
1:15:11
they just, movies or women
1:15:13
are used as commodities and
1:15:16
for men and entertainment, like
1:15:18
males. You'll notice like. We
1:15:21
always talk about how like there's
1:15:23
a lot of the sex has
1:15:25
been removed from a lot of
1:15:27
mainstream cinema, but you'll notice in
1:15:29
most like mainstream movie trailers, they
1:15:31
always try to shoehorn in one
1:15:33
shot of like a woman putting on her
1:15:35
shirt. Or like, you know, someone in a
1:15:37
bikini, a little bit, yeah. So it's
1:15:39
like, it was just like one shot,
1:15:41
just like, hey, remember, I know you
1:15:44
have a libido, we haven't forgotten about
1:15:46
it. There might be something in here
1:15:48
for you, but we don't really do
1:15:50
that anymore. But regardless, it's still there.
1:15:52
The commodification of a woman's body, and
1:15:54
particularly woman's young body, and then once
1:15:56
that body is seen as not good
1:15:59
for marketing. which is actually a
1:16:01
plot point in this movie when she
1:16:03
was part of the market and then
1:16:05
she wasn't part of the marketing.
1:16:07
Yeah. Yeah, it's hard. But yeah, this is
1:16:09
a really, really good movie about that.
1:16:11
This is a really great character study.
1:16:13
Jamie Lee Curtis is getting a lot
1:16:15
of attention for this. Frankly, she's
1:16:18
good, but I don't think she's doing...
1:16:20
Actually, I think the supporting role
1:16:22
who's just fantastic, and this is
1:16:24
Dave Battista. He gets to play a
1:16:27
very mild-mannered character, but when he finally
1:16:29
has like one really long scene with
1:16:31
Pamela Anderson, you realize how much more
1:16:33
has been going on with this guy, and
1:16:35
it's a lot more complicated than that. He
1:16:38
nails it. He's a really good actor. I
1:16:40
think when you get him in a good
1:16:42
sort of like quiet role, Davidista is really
1:16:44
good. He wants to be a real actor.
1:16:46
Yeah. And he... gets to which is great
1:16:49
yeah i i feel like um he he
1:16:51
he actually seems a lot less comfortable these
1:16:53
days in like he's lost a lot of
1:16:55
weight like i've seen in that movie my
1:16:57
spy where has to play this kind of
1:17:00
like two spy guys like the kindergarten cop
1:17:02
thing yeah he's not in his element there
1:17:04
but you get him in something like um I hate the
1:17:06
movie, but Knock at the Cabin. He's great in that movie.
1:17:08
Yeah, he gives a good performance. It's a despicable film, but
1:17:10
he gives a good performance. I maintain that he's going to
1:17:12
get an Oscar nomination. Maybe even for this, the weirder things
1:17:14
have happened. He's not really in the conversation, but every once
1:17:17
in a while, like someone just kind of sneaks in, like
1:17:19
we weren't really talking about the movie, but we're going to
1:17:21
talk about that performance. He could get in there, I don't there,
1:17:23
I don't know. Anyway, I don't want to talk about it, I don't want
1:17:25
to talk about it, I don't want to talk about it, I don't. Anyway,
1:17:27
I don't want to talk about it, I don't going
1:17:29
to talk about it, I don't, I
1:17:31
don't. Anyway, I don't want to talk
1:17:33
about it, I don't want to talk
1:17:35
about it, I don't want to talk
1:17:37
about it, I think. Well, how about
1:17:40
I talk to you about I'm still
1:17:42
here? Because that's the better of the
1:17:44
films. This is a Brazilian film from
1:17:46
the director Walter Salas, who did the
1:17:48
motorcycle diaries and the film version of
1:17:50
On the Road. And it's a
1:17:53
biography of, let me look
1:17:55
at the actual people's
1:17:57
names. It's about Rubens
1:17:59
Paiva. who in the
1:18:01
70s was infamously disappeared
1:18:03
by the Brazilian dictatorship.
1:18:06
And this is told
1:18:08
from the perspective of
1:18:10
Eunice Paiva, played by
1:18:12
Fernanda Torres, who is
1:18:15
Fernanda, or yeah, Fernanda
1:18:17
Montenegro's daughter. She
1:18:20
plays Ruben's wife, who
1:18:22
wrote the biography of his
1:18:24
disappearance. Okay. So
1:18:27
it takes place in Brazil in
1:18:29
the 1970s. And there is so
1:18:31
much, even though I didn't live
1:18:33
in Brazil in the 1970s, I
1:18:35
could tell that it was accurate.
1:18:37
There's so much attention to the
1:18:39
textures and the details, the light,
1:18:41
the things that the people are
1:18:43
touching, the technologies they're using. It
1:18:45
doesn't feel like some European guy
1:18:47
felt like he got the gist
1:18:49
of it. No, it doesn't. It
1:18:51
feels like they actually paid attention.
1:18:53
There's a lot of attention to
1:18:55
paid to the kinds of records people
1:18:57
are listening to, the kinds of clothes they're
1:19:00
wearing, the concerns they have. And we
1:19:02
have a chance to live in all
1:19:04
of that because the first 30 minutes or
1:19:06
so of this film is just their
1:19:08
life at home. The Paivas live in
1:19:10
this house that is literally two blocks from
1:19:12
the beach. And they're constantly having nice
1:19:14
dinners and friends are coming over. Occasionally, some
1:19:16
of the adults will abscond to a
1:19:19
separate room and talk about how the dictatorship
1:19:21
is not treating people well and they're
1:19:23
disappearing people and they're trying to do what they
1:19:25
can to protest it. But the kids don't care, they're
1:19:27
just sort of wandering through, they live kind of
1:19:29
carefree lives. The older daughter is going to go
1:19:31
on a study abroad program to England and she's
1:19:33
bringing extra money so she can buy records while
1:19:35
she's there. I'm
1:19:38
not sure if you can recall like a
1:19:40
childhood of kids constantly coming in and out
1:19:42
of your house, but I did have a
1:19:44
childhood kind of like that and a lot
1:19:46
of friends over all the time. So it
1:19:48
has that kind of energy, this very kind
1:19:51
of almost blissful suburban life that these people live.
1:19:53
Yeah, I was always the youngest kid anywhere
1:19:55
I went and my neighborhood never had anyone
1:19:57
my age, so I've never really had to
1:19:59
think. But yeah. Rubens Paiva was retired
1:20:01
now but was a left -wing
1:20:03
politician and one day Goons
1:20:05
show up and they just say
1:20:07
come with us and he
1:20:09
has time to put on a
1:20:11
suit tell the people who
1:20:13
are there like some of his
1:20:15
kids around the house I'm
1:20:17
gonna I'm gonna go with these
1:20:19
people sit tight and we'll see
1:20:21
what happens the Goons stay at the
1:20:23
house to keep an eye on
1:20:25
people they start eating their food eventually
1:20:27
Eunice is taken also to the
1:20:30
police station where she and one of
1:20:32
her teenage daughters are essentially tortured
1:20:34
and you look up the history of
1:20:36
Brazil at this time and what
1:20:38
the dictatorship was doing and this is
1:20:40
like right at the height of
1:20:42
the atrocities and how people were being
1:20:44
spirited away and killed and how
1:20:46
a lot of people were being tortured
1:20:48
for I guess communism or something like
1:20:51
there's they're looking for enemies it's
1:20:53
an excuse yeah they just need
1:20:55
to kill off their enemies because
1:20:57
they want to stay threatening I
1:20:59
understand that's a simplification of things
1:21:02
but that isn't that what all
1:21:04
dictators it's a core tenant of
1:21:06
fascism yeah and the frustrating part
1:21:08
of all of this is how little
1:21:10
information Eunice is given in all of
1:21:12
this why am I here where is
1:21:14
my husband what can I do years pass
1:21:16
and they don't know what happened
1:21:19
and it becomes about her investigation
1:21:21
into what happened to this guy
1:21:23
and it does eventually catch up
1:21:25
to the present and we if
1:21:27
you know anything about Brazilian history
1:21:29
and they do explain a little
1:21:32
bit of this in the movie
1:21:34
is that her husband became kind
1:21:36
of a symbol for the evils
1:21:38
of the dictatorship he was like
1:21:40
one one of their more notable
1:21:42
victims so it was sort of
1:21:45
about eventually that her quest turns
1:21:47
into something not just to keep
1:21:49
the households together to keep her
1:21:51
children spirits up she has four
1:21:53
daughters and a son and eventually
1:21:57
though it becomes about not necessarily
1:21:59
finding what happened, but trying
1:22:01
in a little way, in
1:22:03
the smallest possible way, to
1:22:05
get the government to admit
1:22:08
that he's even dead. And
1:22:10
her eventual goal is just
1:22:12
to get a death certificate,
1:22:14
showing that he has died. Good
1:22:16
one to watch today of all
1:22:18
days, isn't it? No, I'm just
1:22:20
going to depress us. The last
1:22:22
couple of years on planet Earth,
1:22:25
we've seen a rise of authoritarian
1:22:27
rulers all over the planet. And
1:22:29
it's happening here in the United
1:22:31
States. It's happened in multiple countries.
1:22:33
And because there are so many
1:22:35
of them, and because so many
1:22:37
of these extreme right-wing governments are
1:22:39
coming into power, it feels like
1:22:42
they're winning. Yeah. We're not doing
1:22:44
a great job of stopping them.
1:22:46
No. What I'll say about
1:22:48
dictators is they can do
1:22:50
all of their atrocities, but
1:22:53
we live on You can
1:22:55
get that first yeah, I
1:22:57
suppose so I don't know
1:23:00
I mean though with perseverance
1:23:02
and we're all gonna all
1:23:04
that's true, but Fuckin damn
1:23:07
it. Yeah, yeah So there's
1:23:09
a lot It's an impeccably
1:23:11
made movie. I'm still here. It's
1:23:13
really fantastic. The lead actress is
1:23:16
so so good. Fernando Torres has been
1:23:18
winning awards and rightly so because she
1:23:20
brings so much not just that kind
1:23:23
of political anger, but just gentle everyday
1:23:25
humanity to this role and so much
1:23:27
of this movie is about these people
1:23:30
sort of just con conversing and these
1:23:32
kids playing and these you know, the
1:23:34
games that they play and the in
1:23:37
jokes they have as a family. One
1:23:39
of the something I really appreciate is
1:23:41
when the older daughter is abroad she
1:23:44
sends eight millimeter film back instead of
1:23:46
just a letter and she says watch this
1:23:48
film I've timed it out with this letter
1:23:50
so if you read it out loud it'll
1:23:53
match up to the film and they take
1:23:55
turns reading the letter and re-watching the real
1:23:57
so there's like little warm so many little
1:23:59
warm moments like that, it
1:24:01
really actually hurts when
1:24:03
the separation happens. This
1:24:07
is going to be a very strange
1:24:09
comparison, but in the Fly 2,
1:24:11
there was a scene because he's working
1:24:13
on this teleporter machine and it
1:24:15
turns animals inside out. And there's a
1:24:17
scene where the Eric Stoltz character
1:24:19
has a kitten and he gives it
1:24:21
to Daphne Zuniga and has her
1:24:23
pet it and cut it and she
1:24:25
kind of bonds with the kitten
1:24:27
and then he throws it in the
1:24:29
teleporter and she says, what the
1:24:31
fuck are you doing? Why did you
1:24:33
introduce me to that kitten? You're
1:24:35
just gonna kill it and I'm like, yeah,
1:24:37
that's mean. If you're gonna kill
1:24:39
a kitten, don't make me bond with it
1:24:41
first. Also, I'd prefer if you just didn't.
1:24:43
The kitten's okay. I know
1:24:45
it's a movie. Yeah. The cat's
1:24:47
fine. Probably not anymore. It's been like
1:24:49
40 years. I'm sure that cat
1:24:52
had lived a very long gratifying life.
1:24:54
But point being, there's something, it's
1:24:56
gonna be more painful if you're attached
1:24:58
to something. And I feel like
1:25:00
those first 30 minutes is vital to
1:25:02
this movie because we do become
1:25:04
attached to this family and we don't
1:25:07
want bad things to happen to
1:25:09
them. And of course, things bad things
1:25:11
do happen to them. I
1:25:14
didn't know a lot about the history of this
1:25:16
person until I saw this movie, but I
1:25:18
started reading a lot about it. I feel like
1:25:20
I know a little bit more about the Brazilian
1:25:23
dictatorship
1:25:25
and the way it
1:25:27
just sort of ripped the
1:25:29
world asunder and changed the direction
1:25:31
of a family, like what
1:25:34
they lived for and what they
1:25:36
thought of and what their
1:25:38
home dynamic was and how that
1:25:40
was all wiped out by
1:25:42
this brazen act of
1:25:44
violence. So depressing. It's
1:25:50
a new film from Mike
1:25:52
Lee. Okay. It's called Hard
1:25:54
Truths. It stars Mary Ann
1:25:56
Jean -Baptiste who, you know,
1:25:59
it's been around. line of everything,
1:26:01
her big breakout role was actually
1:26:03
in Mike Lee's Secrets and Lies,
1:26:05
which we learned an Oscar nomination
1:26:07
for back in the mid-90s. They
1:26:10
have re-teemed. And it is another
1:26:12
like intimate character study, but this
1:26:14
one is depressing as fuck. Like
1:26:16
the last showgirl's kind of a
1:26:19
can be a downer too, but
1:26:21
this one's just emotionally
1:26:23
and psychologically bleak. Marian
1:26:25
Jean Batiz plays a woman
1:26:27
named Pansy. Who can say?
1:26:30
She is deeply troubled.
1:26:32
Because the character hasn't
1:26:35
pursued anything to that
1:26:37
regard, so it would
1:26:40
be probably too easy
1:26:42
for me to suggest...
1:26:45
Excuse me. What a
1:26:47
problem is, manic-depressive
1:26:50
bipolar. Who
1:26:52
can say? She is deeply
1:26:55
troubled. She is angry all
1:26:57
the time. Every time she wakes
1:26:59
up, like someone's like, hey mom,
1:27:02
she wakes up screaming bloody murder,
1:27:04
like she's terrified that something might
1:27:06
happen to her. She goes out into
1:27:08
the world to do her shopping
1:27:11
or go to the dentist, and
1:27:13
every interaction with another human being
1:27:15
is a fight. And she is
1:27:17
looking for slights, she is looking
1:27:20
for people who are trying to
1:27:22
hurt her, and when they're not,
1:27:24
she goads them until they do
1:27:26
until they do. which justifies her
1:27:29
worldview. And then when she tells
1:27:31
her family what happened today, she
1:27:33
tells that version. Yeah. Because that's
1:27:36
her reality. She is profoundly
1:27:38
unhappy. She is profoundly angry
1:27:41
and it is affecting everyone
1:27:43
in her life. She is
1:27:45
married to a plumber. He is
1:27:48
beaten down. He has... He just
1:27:50
kind of glides through everything and
1:27:52
just like just hopes today is
1:27:54
a good day with Pansy She
1:27:56
has a son who Seems like a nice
1:27:58
enough guy, but he He's afraid to
1:28:00
talk. He goes out on walks. And
1:28:02
she says, don't go out on
1:28:05
walks. People will say you're loitering.
1:28:07
You'll get arrested. Stay home. So
1:28:09
it's happy go angry. Kinda. Yeah. This
1:28:11
is the cat. Mike Lee made Happy
1:28:13
Go Lucky. Which is a very cheerful
1:28:16
film. Yeah. This is the counterpoint
1:28:18
of this is her sister
1:28:20
played by Michelle Austin who
1:28:22
is a hairdresser and she
1:28:24
has two grown-up daughters who
1:28:26
are living pretty decent lives
1:28:28
you know they have struggles
1:28:30
and there's this one particularly
1:28:32
a fucking I've been in similar situations
1:28:34
bit where one of the one
1:28:37
of the daughters is trying to
1:28:39
pitch an idea to like the
1:28:41
company she works for that's
1:28:43
been enlisted. I think she's, especially I
1:28:46
do with the company she works for,
1:28:48
it's like a cosmetics company, and she
1:28:50
says, listen, if we do this and
1:28:52
we just advertise, hey, we don't use
1:28:54
this product, that actually turns out isn't
1:28:56
very good for you. And if people who
1:28:58
don't even know that we've changed the product
1:29:01
have said that our products have improved if
1:29:03
we take it out, so all we've got
1:29:05
to do is just spend less money and
1:29:07
advertise that we're even better for you and
1:29:09
we'll make a lot of money. And this
1:29:12
executives looks like it and go. How
1:29:14
fucking dare you! I trusted
1:29:16
you! And you want us
1:29:18
to not put coconut and
1:29:20
shit? Get out! Like it's
1:29:22
just this... The obtuseness
1:29:25
is frustrating. We don't
1:29:27
really find out a lot
1:29:29
about what happened with Pansy.
1:29:32
Her mother's dead. Okay.
1:29:34
There's a scene where she
1:29:36
goes very begrudgingly with
1:29:38
her sister to the
1:29:40
grave. And it's
1:29:42
abundantly clear at this point
1:29:44
when they finally start spending
1:29:47
some time together on Mother's Day.
1:29:49
Panty has gone through some things
1:29:51
that her sister hasn't. It's hard
1:29:53
to say if it's all internal
1:29:55
or if there was some abuse
1:29:58
or traumatic incident or what. But
1:30:00
they don't know each other. They don't
1:30:03
understand how they see the
1:30:05
world. And there's a moment
1:30:07
where you think maybe this is
1:30:09
the moment where Pansy's gonna
1:30:12
like realize that she's been
1:30:14
pushing people away. And I'm
1:30:16
not gonna tell you how it
1:30:18
ends, but it's not a happy ending.
1:30:20
It's not it's not ending we're like
1:30:22
oh we figured our shit out like
1:30:24
no it's unfortunately it's more sad and
1:30:26
complicated than that it's a really it's
1:30:28
a really bleak tragic movie and I
1:30:30
cried and I was kind of mad
1:30:32
at the movie because it made me
1:30:34
cry that way by just in putting
1:30:36
putting me in the middle of this
1:30:39
suffering that sadly I am familiar with
1:30:41
similar situations that have happened in
1:30:43
my life and people around me
1:30:45
And it's accurate, it hit really
1:30:47
close to home though, and I'm
1:30:50
not sure I enjoyed it, but
1:30:52
it is great. It's one of
1:30:54
those. I'm frustrated with these
1:30:57
kinds of reviews of films
1:30:59
that deal with rough subject matter because
1:31:01
I feel like being put through something rough and being
1:31:03
angered and depressed is certainly an exhilarating. form of entertainment.
1:31:05
I'm not denying that. I think it's a great movie.
1:31:07
I'm saying it's just it but I think it's fair
1:31:09
to say it's also unpleasant and I think you should
1:31:12
and again I think part of our job is to
1:31:14
prepare people for the movie they're gonna get. I suppose
1:31:16
so. You know this sounds great. This is right up
1:31:18
my alley. Oh it's very up your alley. You would
1:31:20
love this movie. I'm also frustrated that I didn't see
1:31:22
this because I'm a huge Mike Lee fan. I've. I've
1:31:24
seen most of most of most of most of his
1:31:26
work on your radar. Yeah, I mentioned it. I said
1:31:28
like, oh, yeah, there's a new Mike Lee movie. There's
1:31:30
a new Mike Lee movie. Like, I missed that. I
1:31:32
love Mike Lee, yeah. Mary and Jean Batiste is getting
1:31:34
some big awards attention, but other than that, I mean,
1:31:36
they offered this to like, Can and Venice, they turned
1:31:38
it down. So weird. I don't know, they, they, they,
1:31:41
they, there was an interview, Mike Lee was like, yeah,
1:31:43
I thought maybe, we made a bad movie, we made
1:31:45
a bad movie. And then a show to Toronto and
1:31:47
then a Toronto and everyone, and everyone, and everyone, and
1:31:49
everyone loved it, and everyone loved it, and everyone loved
1:31:51
it, and everyone loved it, and everyone loved it, and,
1:31:53
and, and, and, and, you know, and, and, you know,
1:31:55
and, and, you know, and, and, and, you know, and,
1:31:57
you know, and, and, you know, and, and, and, you
1:31:59
know, and Right, Barry and Tom Dease is
1:32:01
brilliant in it. And I think Michelle
1:32:04
Austin is too. She's not getting as
1:32:06
much attention. Well, Mike Lee is, I
1:32:08
feel like he might be a bit
1:32:11
of a difficult cell. I think after
1:32:13
naked, people feel like they were, they
1:32:15
got him and they were done. And
1:32:17
that was accurate at all. I think
1:32:20
he's done a lot of different stuff
1:32:22
since then. Well, no, he certainly has.
1:32:24
I'm talking about in terms of mainstream
1:32:27
appeal. Maybe Topsy Turvy Turvy. I always
1:32:29
had amazing, like, you know, production design
1:32:31
and costumes, whatever like that, but
1:32:33
it took me a while to
1:32:35
really get on that movie's wavelength
1:32:37
and appreciate it full. Oh, yeah.
1:32:39
It's a good love letter to
1:32:41
theater. I really appreciate that. That
1:32:43
part's true, yeah, 100%. But he's
1:32:45
best known for a lot of
1:32:48
critics have noted. He's a realist
1:32:50
filmmaker. A lot of people use
1:32:52
the phrase kitchen sink realism to
1:32:54
describe his work. Yeah. In that
1:32:56
he makes these realistic dramas, Topsy
1:32:58
Turvey making the exception.
1:33:00
One of them, yeah. Mr.
1:33:03
Mr. Turner is an- Oh,
1:33:05
Mr. Turner is an historical
1:33:07
picture about a painter. But yeah,
1:33:09
he tends to tell his dramas
1:33:11
sort of organically out of character.
1:33:13
Yeah. The story comes from who
1:33:15
those people are. Yeah. He doesn't
1:33:18
have a plot in mind. They
1:33:20
just kind of... He lets those
1:33:22
characters live their lives and we
1:33:24
get to explore what their climax
1:33:26
is. And indeed his process is
1:33:28
he workshops the characters with the
1:33:30
actors. I was going to say,
1:33:33
yeah. And in fact, I feel
1:33:35
like... I know that was the case with
1:33:37
Happy Go Lucky, because he and Sally
1:33:39
Hawkins tried to come up with a
1:33:41
character that was very much based on
1:33:43
who she is as a person. And
1:33:45
it turns out, Sally Hawkins is a
1:33:48
very upbeat human being. She's actually very
1:33:50
optimistic. So they made this drama about
1:33:52
this character who gets her bike stolen
1:33:54
and just says, well, I hope they're
1:33:56
having fun and just moves on. Yeah,
1:33:58
happy Go Lucky. I could really go
1:34:00
for, I could really go for some optimism
1:34:03
lately man, I gotta tell you. I'm guessing
1:34:05
Marianne Jean-Baptiste might be a bit more of
1:34:07
an angry human being. Actually, I just ran
1:34:09
an interview with her and she was like,
1:34:12
yeah, no, if they were me, I wouldn't
1:34:14
have put Pancy through the Ringer so much.
1:34:16
Oh, character. Yeah. The story comes from who
1:34:19
those people are. Yeah. He doesn't have a
1:34:21
plot in mind. They just kind of... He
1:34:23
lets those characters live their lives and
1:34:25
we get to explore what their climax
1:34:27
is. And indeed his process is he
1:34:30
workshops the characters with the actors and
1:34:32
builds a stick out of that. And
1:34:34
in fact I feel like... I know that
1:34:36
was the case with Happy and Lucky,
1:34:38
because he and Sally Hawkins tried to
1:34:40
come up with a character that was
1:34:42
very much based on who she is
1:34:45
as a person. And it turns out,
1:34:47
Sally Hawkins is a very upbeat human
1:34:49
being. She's actually very optimistic. So they
1:34:51
made this drama about this character who
1:34:53
gets her bike stolen and just says,
1:34:55
well, I hope they're having fun and
1:34:57
just moves on. Yeah, happy-go-lucky is... I
1:34:59
could really go for it. I could
1:35:01
really go... I could really go... Uggle
1:35:03
to find an audience. None of his
1:35:05
films are hits. He's very much admired
1:35:07
by critics. Yeah. But nobody wants to
1:35:10
fund his movies because his movies don't
1:35:12
make huge amounts of money. And this
1:35:14
is true for more filmmakers and this
1:35:16
is true for Spielberg. Yeah. Spielberg has
1:35:18
trouble funding his movie. Like, that's absurd.
1:35:21
I think that's why very occasionally it's like
1:35:23
well, let's let's experiment with you know big
1:35:25
mainstream entertainments So it's gonna do an animated
1:35:27
film like 10 or he's going to do
1:35:29
it. Oh, they met Mike Lee. I was
1:35:31
like I didn't realize. Okay. Yeah, Mike Lee's animated.
1:35:33
I love to see Mike Lee try an animated
1:35:36
film like I'm sure I'm sure I'm successive ready
1:35:38
player one was able to you know get more
1:35:40
things like the Fabelman's made. Yeah. Yeah. Because like
1:35:42
I still got hits. I still got hits in
1:35:44
me. I still got hits in me. It's in me. I
1:35:47
still got hits in me. Very depressing, but
1:35:49
excellent film and incredible performances. Want
1:35:51
to see it? You have another
1:35:53
here movie. I do have another
1:35:55
here movie. Not I'm still here,
1:35:58
but wish you were here. I
1:36:00
think so. Would this be a
1:36:02
good triple feature with Robert Zimekas
1:36:04
is here? Uh, no. Okay. Nothing
1:36:07
would be a good triple feature
1:36:09
because that's a terrible film. Was
1:36:11
there another movie called Here
1:36:13
that came up this year? I
1:36:15
realize that Ryan had me too.
1:36:18
There's like literally another, and not
1:36:20
here a tick either. I mean,
1:36:22
here, tick. Yeah, tick is here.
1:36:24
No, wish you were here is.
1:36:26
Boss Devos had a new phone
1:36:28
call here as well. Oh. Oh,
1:36:30
okay. No wish you were here
1:36:32
is the directorial debut of Oh,
1:36:34
sorry about that. I was trying
1:36:36
to try to knock the fan
1:36:38
of my refrigerator into being a
1:36:40
little more quiet and I ended
1:36:42
up just knocking over my spice
1:36:45
rack We have to record in
1:36:47
my kitchen right now for fire
1:36:49
related reasons, but anyway, no, this
1:36:51
is the directorial debut of Julius
1:36:53
styles Oh my god She, uh,
1:36:55
this flew under my radar. There's,
1:36:57
it's been a kind of a
1:36:59
recent trend recently, where some
1:37:01
notable high-profile actors are taking their
1:37:04
hand at directing. And I think
1:37:06
some of them are coming out
1:37:08
very, very well. I was very
1:37:11
fond of passing, which was, Rebecca
1:37:13
Hall, her, she started directing. And
1:37:15
a Kendrick had one really good
1:37:18
one. Maggie Jo and Hall had
1:37:20
a really great film last year.
1:37:22
Last year. The Law Sister. Yeah, that was
1:37:24
a couple years ago. Yeah. Okay, well,
1:37:26
you said last year. I was like,
1:37:28
recent years. Okay. But yeah, Julia Stiles
1:37:31
is now taking her hand at directing.
1:37:33
And actors, as you might suspect,
1:37:35
try to do character pieces. Actually, pieces.
1:37:37
Off in the case, yeah. They
1:37:40
probably are more focused on their
1:37:42
acting. What I liked about Anna
1:37:44
Kendrick's film is that she actually
1:37:46
had a good eye for her
1:37:48
style. She was like confident in
1:37:50
terms of like camera movements. This
1:37:53
is Hallmark Fluff. Through
1:37:55
and Through Julia Stiles,
1:37:58
loves Hallmark Fluff. and
1:38:00
so it's it's it's it's super super
1:38:02
trickly it's based on a on
1:38:04
the book by Renee Carlino it's
1:38:07
this tragic romance Isabel Furman plays
1:38:09
a young woman who works in
1:38:11
a Mexican restaurant and her life
1:38:13
is sort of at a crossroads
1:38:15
she doesn't really know what she
1:38:18
wants to do she's getting bored
1:38:20
of her job she needs a
1:38:22
new profession She lives with her roommate
1:38:24
and her parents don't on her parents.
1:38:26
Her parents are played by Jennifer Gray
1:38:29
and Kelsey Grammer and just sort of
1:38:31
yeah, just sort of drop it in
1:38:33
to do and they also produce the
1:38:35
film so they're a little extra favor
1:38:38
for Julia Stiles. They're like married in
1:38:40
real life or something? You're like, it's
1:38:42
just such an odd pairing up, you
1:38:45
know, if you're, if you're a celebrity
1:38:47
you can call in favors from your
1:38:49
celebrity friends. It's just such a particular
1:38:52
pairing. It's like, oh. It's like when
1:38:54
you see like, like, Mega Malelli and
1:38:56
Nick Offerman, they're in everything together and
1:38:59
then you find out they're married. Yeah.
1:39:01
Okay, yeah, that tracks. Okay. Well, Bertel
1:39:03
was gay, but, but, uh, yeah. You
1:39:05
can get married if you're gay. I
1:39:07
suppose so, but he was not married to
1:39:10
Mary Warren. Fair enough. So this
1:39:12
young woman, her name is Charlotte,
1:39:14
she can't really get her life
1:39:16
together, and then the most boring
1:39:18
meat cute in the world happens.
1:39:21
She and her roommate are on
1:39:23
a stoop drinking and just sort
1:39:25
of lamenting their quarter life crisis
1:39:27
when the main guy was played
1:39:29
by Mina Masood from Aladdin. Yeah,
1:39:31
who started a billion dollar grossing
1:39:33
movie and then couldn't get him
1:39:35
audition because he's not white. That's
1:39:38
pretty much it. And that fucking
1:39:40
sucks. That guy's charming. He's charming.
1:39:42
He's charming in this too. He's
1:39:44
super handsome. Yeah. You know what
1:39:46
their meat cute is? He walks
1:39:48
past them. That's it. Okay, no
1:39:50
wait a minute. He's literally just
1:39:53
a guy on the street. We
1:39:55
are stripping away the art of
1:39:57
this. This is the Lee Wannell
1:39:59
like Wolfman. We're just taking away everything
1:40:01
that you take for granted to get
1:40:03
back to the part that matters. It's
1:40:05
not a meat cute. It's about the
1:40:07
meat, not the cute. He's just a
1:40:10
guy on the street who walks past
1:40:12
and they say, hey, you're cute, buddy.
1:40:14
What do you want to hang out?
1:40:16
You want to be at the center
1:40:18
of this tragic romance? He's like, sure.
1:40:20
It's weird that he wanted to be
1:40:22
the center of a tragic romance. And
1:40:25
he wished to be the center of
1:40:27
a mural in an alley way. and
1:40:29
do spray paint and I'm really I
1:40:31
don't care about anything anymore and they
1:40:34
go back to his apartment and well
1:40:36
they sleep together maybe there's a lot
1:40:38
of sexual attention and they have
1:40:40
this little game or is like what
1:40:43
describe to me our whole romance
1:40:45
how did we meet and like they
1:40:47
start coming up with the story of
1:40:49
well how they met and how they're
1:40:51
going to get married and how they're
1:40:53
going to grow old and die so
1:40:56
romance won't end on a summer for
1:40:58
mood. and then they sleep together and
1:41:00
then he vanishes out of her life
1:41:03
and then there's a visible band now
1:41:05
yeah then there's a really frustrating amount
1:41:07
of space in this movie it's really
1:41:09
weirdly structured where like it's maybe 30
1:41:12
more minutes of film where she Things
1:41:14
about him a little bit, but then tries
1:41:16
to go on with her life and dates
1:41:18
this other guy who's like a mascot at
1:41:21
a local sporting stadium Okay, that's a very
1:41:23
specific job. And she starts having some tension
1:41:25
with a roommate because a roommate met this
1:41:27
other guy. Wait sexual tension? Not sexual tension
1:41:30
with a roommate. Oh, that's the worst kind
1:41:32
of tension. It's just yeah, no, it's it's
1:41:34
legit tension. That sucks Because she met
1:41:36
a new man and she might move out
1:41:38
so she's gonna mess her best friend It's
1:41:41
like it just sort of becomes this kind
1:41:43
of meandering personal drama for a little bit
1:41:45
It's like so what about all that stuff
1:41:47
with me in a suit at the beginning
1:41:49
of the movie? Well, okay after enough time
1:41:51
has passed We get back to him. He
1:41:53
comes back into the movie. Isn't that so
1:41:55
much nicer than just doing like a smash
1:41:57
cut five years later kind of thing like
1:41:59
no? I get to feel the
1:42:01
passage of time. Like you
1:42:04
really feel that you're sitting
1:42:06
in front of a movie for
1:42:08
30 or so minutes. I really
1:42:10
feel it. It's not a positive
1:42:12
quality. Oh, I see. Okay. You
1:42:15
know what's hard to have shit,
1:42:17
not me. Excuse me. That's wrong
1:42:19
on multiple mess. That was a
1:42:21
joke. You know what I have
1:42:24
is good taste. Oh, where is
1:42:26
it? Where do you keep that?
1:42:28
Comes out when I watch hundreds
1:42:31
of beavers. Drop dead, you tool.
1:42:33
I say that play for it.
1:42:35
I love you two. We're going
1:42:37
mad. I'm going mad north north
1:42:40
north west. I'm going mad. I
1:42:42
can tell a hawk from a
1:42:44
handsong. I'm going off crazy because
1:42:46
this movie is so fucking boring.
1:42:48
Because Minamisoud reappears and she says,
1:42:50
why do you disappear my life?
1:42:52
And he says, I'm sorry, I
1:42:54
have movie cancer. Oh, that's ironically
1:42:57
the best kind. It's movie cancer.
1:42:59
It's movie cancer. It's movie cancer.
1:43:01
It's movie cancer. That is the
1:43:03
kind of, the one you say
1:43:05
beautiful right until you die. Yeah,
1:43:07
where like you're sick, but you
1:43:09
have no real like real symptoms,
1:43:11
maybe have a little dark eye
1:43:14
makeup. recently and I said and
1:43:16
he's dying of movie cancer and
1:43:18
metal and brown the host of
1:43:20
the show and says oh gosh
1:43:22
did he wear a knit cap?
1:43:24
And yes, boy, boy, boy, howdy,
1:43:26
he did. I think it's interesting
1:43:28
that we finally, like, what is
1:43:30
it, Love Story is now so
1:43:32
old, we no longer call it
1:43:34
Ali McGraw disease. Yeah, right. Now
1:43:36
it's just movie cancer. It's too
1:43:38
common. And the entire second half
1:43:40
of this fucking movie is a
1:43:42
prolonged montage of them doing romantic
1:43:44
stuff as he slowly passes away.
1:43:46
And it is, it's just like
1:43:48
eating... It's like in Super Troopers
1:43:51
where they're just chugging syrup. It's
1:43:53
that. You're chugging syrup. Which means
1:43:55
some people will like it. Yeah,
1:43:57
there's definitely a market for that kind.
1:43:59
of very like a maudlin sentimental romance and
1:44:02
I feel like that's a whole I mean
1:44:04
it's a whole book market a billion dollar
1:44:06
yeah and you know and they they bond
1:44:08
and they come up with their own kind
1:44:10
of lovers language and Isabel Furman is a
1:44:12
good actress yeah I've been watching her since
1:44:15
Orphan. What was that movie she was in
1:44:17
when she was like on a rowing team?
1:44:19
Oh, I didn't see the reality movie. Was it like the novice
1:44:21
or something? That's a great fucking movie. I didn't, I, I,
1:44:23
I miss, I missed that one. A little derivative of Whiplash,
1:44:25
but she's really great. I think I started to watch that
1:44:27
and I had to turn it off for some reason. Oh,
1:44:29
I'm going to look it up, because the novice, yeah, that's,
1:44:31
that's, that's, that's, that's an, It's a good movie,
1:44:34
great performance. Yeah, she is very
1:44:36
good. Mina Masuda is very good
1:44:38
too, even though he has this
1:44:40
sort of, kind of martyr character
1:44:42
that he has to play. Like
1:44:44
this romantic doomed character is just
1:44:46
beyond reproach and everything he says and
1:44:49
does is perfect. And it is and
1:44:51
it is and it is and it
1:44:53
does become that cliche the flawless rescue
1:44:56
stud. He's essentially dying to edify her
1:44:58
romantic feelings. I'm really mad that we
1:45:00
haven't popularized that. The flawless rescue stud
1:45:03
is not not made its way into
1:45:05
the likes upon that. When we reviewed
1:45:07
the movie Safe Haven. I believe the
1:45:10
quote I always liked was like I'm
1:45:12
not happy unless I'm changing myself for
1:45:14
you. Yeah. I'm really I'm not existing
1:45:17
unless I'm changing myself for you.
1:45:19
Yeah, I fixed your bicycle damage
1:45:21
I have a daughter, but it's okay. My
1:45:23
wife died Yeah, yeah, it's like
1:45:25
it's so like it's sad, but
1:45:27
it's time to move on They're
1:45:29
conveniently widowed. They have no romantic
1:45:31
attachments that they want to help
1:45:33
around their community, their community leaders.
1:45:35
I work out a lot, but
1:45:37
you never see me do it. Yeah,
1:45:39
like I don't, I'm not at the
1:45:42
gym, but I have perfect hands regardless.
1:45:44
I own a small business, so it's
1:45:46
like it's stable, but also kind of
1:45:48
cool and like India. Yeah. And I'm
1:45:50
really beloved by like the old ladies
1:45:52
in the neighborhood because I deliver the
1:45:54
meals or whatever it is. Yeah, perfect
1:45:56
man who exists specifically to give edification
1:45:58
to the female lady. Kit Harrington that
1:46:00
once and to his face. To his
1:46:03
face? Yeah, because he was kind of,
1:46:05
he played like the the ancient Roman
1:46:07
version of that in the movie Pompey.
1:46:09
He thought it was hilarious. I'm glad
1:46:11
Kit Harrington at least heard it. So
1:46:14
yeah, Metemus suit is the adjunct of
1:46:16
the flawless rescue stud, the flawless rescue
1:46:18
martyr. Yeah. The guy who's gonna literally
1:46:20
gonna die for the Isabel Furman. Right.
1:46:22
And. It's mockish and it's really treakly.
1:46:25
Like you said, there's a market for
1:46:27
this sort of thing. There are people
1:46:29
who would deeply appreciate just how deeply
1:46:31
emotional it gets, but it feels really
1:46:33
phony to me. And it's, and it's,
1:46:36
because it's so weirdly structured, it's a
1:46:38
big portion of the movie. We get
1:46:40
the meat cute, that's not, the meat
1:46:42
cute. Then we have this weird like
1:46:45
fallow period where nothing's really happening. The
1:46:47
movie just sort of spins, spins, spins,
1:46:49
spins out. And then it becomes. every
1:46:51
single scene is this emotional montage of
1:46:54
these people bonding in some kind of
1:46:56
new way. I mean, okay, Julia Styles is
1:46:58
clearly interested in big emotional moments.
1:47:00
I wish she put other bits
1:47:02
of movie in between the big
1:47:04
emotional moments. She just sort of crammed
1:47:07
them all together in the back end
1:47:09
of this film. Why do you, why,
1:47:11
why, why, why, why, uh, why settle
1:47:13
for less? I'll just get all the
1:47:15
good stuff. I mean there's there I
1:47:17
suppose a certain integrity to just doing
1:47:19
all the climaxes, but that doesn't tend
1:47:22
to make a good movie. It sounds
1:47:24
like the the weepy romance version of
1:47:26
like Boy kills world. I was going
1:47:28
to say nothing but action climax from
1:47:30
beginning to end. I was going to
1:47:32
say, I was going to say, nothing
1:47:35
but action climax from beginning to
1:47:37
end. I was going to say,
1:47:39
I was going to say, I
1:47:41
will. We got one more movie
1:47:43
left. It is a documentary. about
1:47:45
Diane Warren, called Diane Warren Relentless.
1:47:48
There are two kinds of
1:47:50
people in the world, and I
1:47:52
assure you, you're one of them,
1:47:54
but that has nothing to do
1:47:56
with this movie. Diane Warren is
1:47:59
a songwriter. never really like
1:48:01
had her own like singing
1:48:03
career or anything she wrote
1:48:05
songs she wrote hit songs
1:48:07
over and over and over
1:48:09
again and she wrote like
1:48:11
rhythm of the night to
1:48:13
the beat of the rhythm
1:48:16
of the night she wrote
1:48:18
I don't want to miss
1:48:20
a thing the Erasmus song
1:48:22
from Armageddon she wrote nothing's
1:48:24
gonna stop us now from
1:48:26
mannequin she's written songs for like
1:48:28
Kesha and lady Gaga she's
1:48:30
she's still writing huge hit songs
1:48:33
to the stage she has
1:48:35
been for like over 40 years
1:48:37
and I knew only one
1:48:39
thing about Diana Warren besides from the
1:48:41
fact that she wrote nothing's gonna stop
1:48:43
us now it's one of the best
1:48:45
songs ever written I knew that
1:48:47
she had been nominated for
1:48:49
best original song like I think
1:48:51
like 18 times or something
1:48:54
now and she's never won which
1:48:57
seems rude after a
1:48:59
while like after a while
1:49:01
that seems rude right so
1:49:04
here's a documentary about her
1:49:06
it turns out
1:49:08
I fucking love
1:49:10
her well okay
1:49:13
great she has
1:49:15
written she pure
1:49:17
fucking gumption man just like started
1:49:19
cranking out songs and she
1:49:21
would make these demo tapes and
1:49:23
the people like would listen
1:49:25
to the demo tapes and like
1:49:28
wow she can't sing but that's a
1:49:30
good song like there's a bit where
1:49:32
what's that what's that sure song where
1:49:34
she sang it on the battleship battleship
1:49:37
that music video where she
1:49:39
was on the battleship um I
1:49:41
didn't have MTV growing up
1:49:43
catching up with whoever is yelling
1:49:45
at the podcast right now
1:49:47
trying to get me to listen
1:49:50
to you if you sing
1:49:52
it I'll remember it faster so why
1:49:54
don't you give me a couple of bars and
1:49:56
then I'll and then I think I'll got I
1:49:58
think I got a share song on about Yeah, I
1:50:00
don't know. You're right, it was if I could turn
1:50:02
back time. Thank you, audience. Okay, yeah. Haven't seen the
1:50:04
music video for if I can turn back time. There's
1:50:06
this great, there's this great bit where Sher's talking about,
1:50:08
yeah, she, Diane Warren sent me this demo tape and
1:50:10
I thought, and I thought, and I thought, and finally,
1:50:12
Diane Warren sent me this demo tape, and I thought,
1:50:15
and I thought, and finally, if I do it, Diane
1:50:17
Warren sent me this, she, she sent me this, and
1:50:19
she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she,
1:50:21
she, she, she, she, she, and she, she, she, she,
1:50:23
she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she,
1:50:25
she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she,
1:50:27
she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she, she,
1:50:29
she, The thing that I did not know about
1:50:32
Diane Warren more than anything else
1:50:34
that I think is just fucking
1:50:36
great and I have a vested
1:50:38
interest in this but I do
1:50:40
think it's fucking great. Everyone
1:50:42
keeps talking about this like it's
1:50:44
a quirky thing and no one's
1:50:46
kind of saying the word they're
1:50:49
all dancing around. Diane Warren
1:50:51
has written many of the
1:50:53
best love songs in the
1:50:55
last 50 years. She's had
1:50:57
like one relationship her whole
1:50:59
life, and it wasn't long
1:51:01
She has zero interest in
1:51:04
romance She she they don't say
1:51:06
the words a romantic or
1:51:08
a sexual But that's every
1:51:10
they every word they use to
1:51:13
describe her is that And she
1:51:15
talks about how like listen
1:51:17
yeah whenever I'm writing a love
1:51:20
song. I'm imagining someone else
1:51:22
in love and what they
1:51:24
would say That's fucking great.
1:51:26
I don't know if she's
1:51:28
uncomfortable with a term or if
1:51:31
it's never really come up as
1:51:33
a moment of self-realization. I don't
1:51:35
mean to project here because I
1:51:37
happen to be on the A
1:51:39
spectrum, but... I think that's fucking
1:51:41
amazing. And I really, that's something that
1:51:44
they talk about and like there was
1:51:46
an article in people magazine about like
1:51:48
it isn't interesting that the person who
1:51:50
wrote all these love songs has never
1:51:52
really experienced love and I'm like say
1:51:55
the word. At least at least mention
1:51:57
that this is there is a word
1:51:59
for this. I feel like if we just
1:52:01
said it, it would have really, I mean,
1:52:03
I don't know. I can't speak for her.
1:52:05
I don't want to tell her what she
1:52:07
is, but that's a fucking amazing thing.
1:52:10
That's just a really awesome,
1:52:13
that speaks so powerfully to
1:52:15
her imagination and to her
1:52:17
writing, that she was
1:52:20
able to tap into something
1:52:22
that she doesn't experience. And
1:52:25
by filtering it through people
1:52:27
who do experience that more
1:52:29
directly, they create this incredible
1:52:31
music that has true depth
1:52:33
of feeling, but is also,
1:52:36
as far as love is concerned, almost
1:52:38
conceptual. And I think it's why so many
1:52:41
of her songs hit so hard for so many
1:52:43
people and they're so kind of universal. That
1:52:46
was really exciting to me. And I
1:52:48
just feel like we just don't see
1:52:50
enough media about people with that perspective, whether
1:52:53
they say they're ace or not. So
1:52:56
I just think it's really fucking cool.
1:52:58
Like it's not an amazing documentary. They don't
1:53:00
get the greatest insights into the world,
1:53:03
but I didn't know anything about Diane Warren.
1:53:05
And now that I know stuff about
1:53:07
Diane Warren, I have some more respect for
1:53:09
Diane Warren. Like there was this bit
1:53:11
where, because she really wants to win an
1:53:13
Oscar, by the way. She's been a
1:53:15
punchline for so long in terms of being
1:53:18
nominated for Academy Awards and not winning.
1:53:20
And she gets nominated for just the most
1:53:22
random stuff. She writes any song for
1:53:24
any movie. Like the Academy tracks it down
1:53:26
and nominates her. Yeah, and the thing
1:53:28
is that she really wants to win that
1:53:30
award. It's becoming a joke and it's
1:53:33
annoying to her too. She's won Grammys. She
1:53:35
owns almost her entire song catalog. Like
1:53:37
some of her early stuff was like, she
1:53:39
sold like Rhythm of the Night for
1:53:41
like 250 bucks and no royalties or some
1:53:43
bullshit. But once people
1:53:45
realized like, oh no, I actually am worth something.
1:53:47
She got out of that contract and she owns
1:53:50
it all. She's probably worth a half billion dollars
1:53:52
or something right now. One
1:53:54
of the most tragic bits in the movie
1:53:56
is when they do a long bit about
1:53:58
that. What was that song
1:54:01
she did with Lady Gaga for that
1:54:03
really harrowing documentary about sexual assault?
1:54:05
It was like, till it happens
1:54:07
to you? Something like that? Something
1:54:09
like that? Yeah. Look it up
1:54:11
for me, please. I want to make sure
1:54:13
I get the right. Because it's a great
1:54:15
song. It's an amazing song. And she typed
1:54:17
into something and she really connected with Lady
1:54:19
Gaga over it and she dealt with some,
1:54:22
you know, experiences in her life that she'd
1:54:24
never opened up with before and she opened
1:54:26
her soul and wrote this incredible song and
1:54:28
when they played it at the Oscars, like
1:54:31
there wasn't a dry eye in the house,
1:54:33
it was so incredible. And then she lost
1:54:35
to a song about how James Bond is
1:54:38
kind of sad today. And it's like, everyone
1:54:40
else was like, hey, listen, it was
1:54:42
great, we did a great performance and
1:54:44
she's just like, fuck this. What the
1:54:46
fuck do I have to do? Anyway,
1:54:48
I think she's fucking great. So
1:54:50
if you want to learn more about
1:54:52
Diane Warren and hear like, you
1:54:54
know, great stories from a ton
1:54:56
of musicians who she's worked with
1:54:59
over the years, this is a
1:55:01
good documentary. It's a good documentary.
1:55:03
It's not going to blow your mind,
1:55:05
but it is a really good documentary.
1:55:07
Anyway, on that note, it is time
1:55:10
to conclude this very long episode of
1:55:12
critically acclaimed. We review movies on a
1:55:14
scale of C minus to C plus,
1:55:16
where the highest rating a movie can
1:55:18
get is a C plus. Those movies
1:55:20
are above average. We recommend those movies.
1:55:22
The average movie is a C. It's
1:55:25
average. Some good, some good, some bad,
1:55:27
whatever. And a C minus is below
1:55:29
average. We don't particularly recommend those movies.
1:55:31
On that note, we're going to go in reverse
1:55:33
order. Diane Warren, Relent. I'm giving her
1:55:35
a C-plus. It's not a... It's not
1:55:38
one of the great documentaries or anything,
1:55:40
but I liked what I learned. I
1:55:42
had a good time. I cried a
1:55:45
little. It was really good. Uh, let's
1:55:47
see. Oh, I wish you were here.
1:55:49
I'm gonna give that a C minus.
1:55:51
Sounds like, yeah. Maybe some good character
1:55:54
work, but no, it's just, it's, it's
1:55:56
weirdly structured. It's, uh, mokishly presented its
1:55:58
way to sentimental butter. Let's see,
1:56:00
Hard Truth, C+, it's really emotionally
1:56:03
intense, it doesn't leave you with
1:56:05
much catharsis, so just kind of
1:56:07
be ready for that. But if
1:56:10
you're up for that journey, you're
1:56:12
going to get something out of
1:56:14
it and it's got some incredible
1:56:17
performances. Let's see, I'm still here.
1:56:19
I'm still a C-plus for sure.
1:56:21
It's fantastic. Family drama speaks very
1:56:23
much to the politics of Brazil,
1:56:25
speaks very much to the politics
1:56:27
of the world. I think it's
1:56:29
really significant. I think it's really
1:56:31
timely. Definitely see that one out.
1:56:33
All right, the last showgirl, I'm
1:56:35
going to give it a C-plus.
1:56:37
It's a really excellent character study.
1:56:40
It's a better acting showcase maybe
1:56:42
than it is like an overall
1:56:44
movie, but what an acting showcase.
1:56:46
Everyone. Everyone's a family drama. That is
1:56:48
a fascinating experiment is a great way
1:56:50
to explore Shakespeare in a new way.
1:56:52
And I like to Tharsis, so just
1:56:54
kind of be ready for that. But
1:56:56
if you're up for that journey, you're
1:56:58
going to get something out of it
1:57:00
and it's got some incredible performances.
1:57:03
Let's see, I'm still here. I'm
1:57:05
still a C+, for sure. It's
1:57:07
fantastic. Family drama speaks very much
1:57:09
to the politics of Brazil, speaks
1:57:11
very much to the politics of
1:57:13
the world. I think it's really
1:57:15
significant, I think it's really timely.
1:57:17
Definitely see that one out. All
1:57:19
right, the last showgirl, I'm going
1:57:21
to give it a C+, it's
1:57:23
a really excellent character study. It's
1:57:25
a better acting showcase maybe than
1:57:27
it is like an overall movie,
1:57:30
but what an acting showcase. Everyone.
1:57:32
Everyone is really fantastic in it. That is
1:57:34
a fascinating experiment. It's a great way to explore Shakespeare
1:57:36
in a new way. And I like a new technology-based
1:57:38
way. It's exciting that there are, that there's still a
1:57:40
way to do Shakespeare. That's novel. That still gets to
1:57:42
the heart of Shakespeare. And this starts, this is a
1:57:44
great, let's put on a show, but with rocket launchers.
1:57:46
Again, like you, my only complaint is I want to
1:57:48
see more Hamlet. Yeah, yeah. Well, again, hopefully that they
1:57:51
released that, they released that by, they released that by,
1:57:53
they released that by, they released that by, they released
1:57:55
that by itself, they released that by itself, they released
1:57:57
that by itself, they released that by itself, they released
1:57:59
that by itself, Gromit, vengeance must fall. It's
1:58:01
a C. It's pleasant. It's not super
1:58:03
clever, but Wallace and Gromit are back,
1:58:06
baby. Like, it has all of those
1:58:08
qualities you like about Wallace and Gromit.
1:58:10
I'm gonna give it a very high
1:58:13
C. Like, it's not, uh, again, I
1:58:15
don't remember big chunks of it, but
1:58:17
I remember smiling the entire time, and
1:58:20
I can only, you know. I
1:58:22
may not have loved it. It's
1:58:24
hardly my favorite aardman, but it's
1:58:26
sweet. And if you like aardman,
1:58:29
you're going to get something nice
1:58:31
out of it. Amelia Perez. Some
1:58:33
big old C minus. That is
1:58:35
a goose egg. It is irresponsible
1:58:37
and bad in ways that are
1:58:39
difficult to describe. It just whiffs,
1:58:42
it's gender politics. It's not necessarily
1:58:44
even a good musical. The story
1:58:46
and the morality of where it
1:58:48
stands are all bad. It's not
1:58:50
even accurate. Yeah, I'm with you on
1:58:52
this. I don't think this is a very good
1:58:55
film. I don't, I, and this is, this is
1:58:57
the movie, this is the movie about
1:58:59
the trans experience that's sweeping awards
1:59:02
when. In a year when trans
1:59:04
filmmakers are like actually making important
1:59:06
pieces work, like I saw the
1:59:08
TV glow. And the people's joke,
1:59:11
these are like genuinely important groundbreaking
1:59:13
game-changing movies made by actual trans
1:59:15
filmmakers. But say we got the
1:59:17
one from the perspective of the
1:59:20
CIS guy. And then lastly, yeah,
1:59:22
huge C minus. And then lastly,
1:59:24
Wolfman. Wolfman is C. That it's,
1:59:27
I feel like it's stylish enough and
1:59:29
engaging and I think it has a
1:59:31
lot of interesting stuff in it, but
1:59:33
it's not. It's clearly not as rich
1:59:35
as it wants to be. Its points
1:59:37
are actually kind of simple and that
1:59:39
makes it a little frustrating. Yeah, it's
1:59:41
a low C for me. It's like
1:59:43
it's not, it doesn't come together well
1:59:46
enough ultimately. I don't know if I'm
1:59:48
really gonna be too excited to revisit
1:59:50
this one. The makeup really is a
1:59:52
weird distraction and a letdown. Realism is
1:59:54
not the approach you want with your
1:59:56
werewolf makeup. No, and honestly, it didn't
1:59:58
even look that real. Chris Rabbit I
2:00:01
think is really really good, but
2:00:03
I think Julia Garner's character is
2:00:05
really underwritten. So yeah, it's not
2:00:07
a wash, but it's not great.
2:00:09
Yeah, it's not great. All right,
2:00:11
that is it for critically acclaimed.
2:00:13
We'll be back next week with
2:00:15
reviews of something. I don't fucking
2:00:17
know. I'm gonna be seeing Flight
2:00:19
Risk. Oh God. Speaking of Mel
2:00:21
Gibson, he's still directing. Somebody's giving
2:00:23
him some monies and I've been
2:00:25
assigned that one. So, so somebody's
2:00:27
got to review. Anyway,
2:00:30
thank you everybody for listening. Thank you
2:00:32
for joining us. You just described everybody's
2:00:34
year with that noise. Kind of, yeah,
2:00:36
yeah, that, that, that, that, that, that,
2:00:39
that joo on noise in the back
2:00:41
of your throat. Thank you for
2:00:43
listening. Thank you for joining us. We
2:00:45
hope you listen to our recent tribute
2:00:48
to David Lynch. If you haven't yet,
2:00:50
we did a two-hour tribute to the
2:00:52
late, amazing David Lynch on the previous
2:00:55
episode on the Critically Claim Network. You
2:00:57
also can access a lot of exclusive
2:00:59
shows if you don't have enough shows
2:01:01
from us. Now might be a good
2:01:04
time to check out our Patreon. That's
2:01:06
patron.com/Critically Claim Network. We have a lot
2:01:08
of cool stuff there for all of
2:01:11
our patrons. You also get to listen
2:01:13
to all of our new episodes ad-free
2:01:16
and sometimes quite early. It's a
2:01:18
cool place to be. And I
2:01:20
want to thank all of our
2:01:22
patrons in particular. We can't do
2:01:24
this without you. If you want
2:01:26
to talk about anything we discussed
2:01:28
in this episode, do you wildly
2:01:30
disagree with us about, I don't
2:01:33
know, Wallace and Gromit. Or
2:01:35
over the other films as well,
2:01:37
we'd love to hear from you.
2:01:39
Our email address is letters at
2:01:42
Critically Claim. Net. Again, we've been
2:01:44
recording a lot less likely, but
2:01:46
lately because of everything. But we do
2:01:48
want to do a letters episode soon
2:01:50
and we will. So get your letters
2:01:53
in soon so we can read them
2:01:55
on the air in a timely manner.
2:01:57
Also, did I give the email
2:01:59
address? serve PO Box. Send us a
2:02:01
physical letter, send us an actual piece
2:02:04
of mail, postcard, whatever you like, to
2:02:06
the critically acclaimed network, PO Box 641,
2:02:08
565, Los Angeles, California, at 90064, doing
2:02:11
today. Yeah. And we're on social media.
2:02:13
We're at Blue Sky. At. Critic claim,
2:02:15
I am at William Bidey, honey. I'm
2:02:18
at Whitney Seibold and that's kind of
2:02:20
the only social I'm on anymore. Yeah,
2:02:22
I'm going to be ditching them soon.
2:02:24
But, uh... Fascists are taking over all
2:02:27
the others, so... Yeah, I don't need
2:02:29
as much fascism as all that.
2:02:31
Or any... Do these people not know how
2:02:33
the internet works? We find other places. Yeah.
2:02:35
You take away those places, fine, we'll just
2:02:37
leave. Yeah, we'll go somewhere else. Those aren't
2:02:39
so important to us that we want to
2:02:41
need to stick around and listen to the
2:02:44
fascism. We'll just leave. We're all in this
2:02:46
together. We're going to get through it. But
2:02:48
God. It's going to be a
2:02:50
rough couple of things. All right,
2:02:52
listen, we're solidarity everybody. Keep your
2:02:54
hearts open and your middle fingers
2:02:56
extended. Yeah. Take care of your
2:02:58
middle fingers extended. Please take care
2:03:00
of yourselves. You need to take
2:03:02
care of yourselves. You can take
2:03:04
care of other people too. Anyway,
2:03:06
stay, stay frosty, all that cool
2:03:09
stuff, and never forget everyone is
2:03:11
a critic. I want to go
2:03:13
to the midnight show. I'm sorry,
2:03:15
what? Some things you wouldn't mind
2:03:17
being stuck with, like a huge
2:03:19
inheritance. But a phone that has to
2:03:22
be plugged in just right so it
2:03:24
charges is not one of those things.
2:03:26
Switch to Verizon and will pay off
2:03:28
your old phone up to $800.5 prepaid
2:03:30
MasterCard for a new one on us.
2:03:32
Just trade in any phone from our
2:03:34
top brands with select unlimited plans. 82999
2:03:36
purchase with new smartphone purchase with new
2:03:39
smartphone purchase, with select unlimited plans. 82999
2:03:41
purchase with new smartphone line with new
2:03:43
smartphone line limited plans. 82999-99 purchase with
2:03:45
new smartphone purchase, with select unlimited plans.
2:03:47
82999, 2-0-1-3-3.00-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More