Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:05
For a while now, the new
0:07
kids on the block in India's
0:09
$750 billion mutual fund industry have
0:11
been trying to really shake things
0:13
up. I'm talking about the likes
0:15
of Navi, Zirodha, Grow, the non-banks
0:18
and discount brokers that are relatively
0:20
new to a game that has
0:22
so far been dominated by legacy
0:25
fund houses. You see, these newbies
0:27
have been dreaming of a big
0:29
disruption. And a couple years ago, they
0:31
thought they had found the answer to
0:33
their prayers. A playbook that would...
0:35
catable their growth. So what
0:37
Zerodha Navi and Groh decided
0:40
to do was they decided
0:42
to sort of introduce passive
0:45
funds. So around like some
0:47
sometime around 2021 these new
0:49
fund houses decided to introduce
0:52
like a slew of NFOs
0:54
that were mostly like passive
0:56
funds. That's my colleague Achish
0:59
Meyer. She's been tracking how
1:01
these new players, Navi Zerodha and
1:03
Grou, have been betting big on
1:05
passive funds. But the obvious first
1:08
question is, what are they? Okay,
1:10
so there are two types. One
1:12
is an active fund and a
1:14
dandel is a passive fund. An
1:16
active fund is essentially a scheme
1:18
which will look to outper the
1:20
benchmark. A passive fund is just
1:22
a plain vanilla index fund that
1:24
will look to just mirror the
1:26
benchmarks returns. So typically passive
1:28
funds are either index funds
1:30
or exchange-traded funds, ETFs, that
1:33
don't rely on expensive fund
1:35
managers. Instead, like Archigma said,
1:37
they just mirror the market.
1:39
And these newbies can't get enough of
1:41
them. In fact, in the last six
1:43
months, they've all launched new fund, and
1:46
every single one of them has been
1:48
a passive fund. So in February a
1:50
Navi mutual fund debuted with a
1:52
variant of a small cap fund
1:54
which was called the nifty small
1:56
cap 250 momentum quality 100 index
1:59
fund Like it sounds like, it
2:01
itself sounds too long, right? And
2:03
around at the same time, Grow
2:05
had also introduced two passive funds,
2:07
one that was tracking the nifty
2:10
200 and another that just buys
2:12
the first one. So, and also
2:14
last October, Zerota Fundhouse had rolled
2:16
out an open-ended scheme investing primarily
2:18
in units of a gold ETF.
2:21
Now, there's a good reason for
2:23
them to think that this is
2:25
the future. Passive funds have had
2:27
a proven track record in the
2:29
US. In fact, last year, for
2:32
the first time ever, they even
2:34
managed to overtake Active Funds in
2:36
Assets Under Management, or EUM. Forms
2:38
like Black Rock and Vanguard were
2:40
able to build empires entirely based
2:43
on this shift. So naturally that
2:45
got newbies here thinking, why not
2:47
us? Well, unfortunately for them, things
2:49
haven't been playing out quite as
2:51
dramatically as they had hoped. You
2:53
know, you can say that it
2:56
wanted to sort of replicate the
2:58
success in the US, but if
3:00
we are taking official stats, official
3:02
data, it's not been, I mean,
3:04
data sort of tells us like
3:07
a very different story. Well, yes,
3:09
passive EUM has surged. In fact,
3:11
it's more than tripled in four
3:13
years. But as a share of
3:15
the total mutual fund industry, well,
3:18
it's been a sluggish climb from
3:20
9% in 2020 to just 16%
3:22
in 2023. And the thing is...
3:24
Even when it comes to that
3:26
16% slice, these newbies aren't the
3:29
ones that have been reaping the
3:31
rewards. They account for merely 1%.
3:33
So is the revolution they hoped
3:35
for dead? Well, let's find out.
3:37
Welcome to Daybreak, a business podcast
3:39
from the Ken. I'm your host
3:42
Rahil Philopos and I don't chase
3:44
the news cycle. Instead, every day
3:46
of the week, my colleagues Nikhash
3:48
Sharma and I will come to
3:50
you with one business story that
3:53
is worth understanding and worth your
3:55
time. Today is Tuesday the 8th
3:57
of April. I
4:15
think India, what it wanted to
4:17
do was it wanted to create
4:19
its own Vanguard. Vanguard is by
4:21
far the largest, you know, passive
4:24
fund AMC in the US, right?
4:26
So in an attempt to like
4:28
sort of get to that space,
4:30
I think the new age players
4:32
wanted to sort of, you know,
4:35
sort of get into the market
4:37
saying, hey, listen, this is what
4:39
this is the product that we
4:41
are offering and we believe this
4:43
product is the future. Passive investing
4:46
was supposed to be an inevitability
4:48
in India. But the first shift
4:50
happened back in 2017 when Sebi
4:52
rewrote its rulebook. So at that
4:55
point of time what happened is
4:57
that Sebi had forced fund managers
4:59
to like properly define what a
5:01
large cap, mid cap and a
5:03
small cap stock would be. So
5:06
that would limit like how much
5:08
their funds could... drift between categories.
5:10
For example, you know, managers who
5:12
have been quietly patting up their
5:14
large cap stocks, large cap funds
5:17
with like mid cap and small
5:19
cap stocks, they couldn't do it
5:21
anymore. They had to stick to
5:23
like one particular lane. So what
5:25
was even worse that is that,
5:28
you know, the fund house could
5:30
no longer launch more than one
5:32
fund in an active category. Passive
5:34
funds did not have that sort
5:36
of a restriction. Because they were
5:39
anyways following, they were anyways, you
5:41
know, replicating the performance of the
5:43
benchmark. And due to that, many
5:45
indices had sprung over the years.
5:48
Even after that, everything pointed in
5:50
the passive direction. low fees, a
5:52
bull market and also several data
5:54
points indicating active funds underperforming. Which
5:56
explains why between 2020 and 2023,
5:59
we saw passive funds as share
6:01
of mutual fund assets climb quite
6:03
steady. But cut to 2020. 25
6:05
and things aren't looking all that
6:07
great. Unlike in the US where
6:10
passive fund AUM had grown steadily
6:12
and even surpassed active fund AUM,
6:14
the same trend isn't quite playing
6:16
out here in India. Last year
6:18
in fact, passive funds as a
6:21
share of the total mutual fund
6:23
industry actually shrunk. It seems like
6:25
the grand march of passive investing
6:27
in India is starting to roll
6:29
backwards. And Atchishma says there are
6:32
three reasons for it. So one
6:34
of the one of the factors
6:36
that sort of went against passive
6:38
funds is like active funds is
6:41
still dominant in India like mutual
6:43
fund distributors still want to push
6:45
active funds to their investors just
6:47
for the one single factor that
6:49
you know they just pay healthy
6:52
commissions like I remember this distributor
6:54
giving like context to it. So
6:56
if we were to push a
6:58
passive fund to an investing, he's
7:00
probably going to gain like only
7:03
10 or 20 pasa for every
7:05
100 rupees that's being invested. So
7:07
in that sort of scenario, it
7:09
doesn't make good business sense for
7:11
the distributor himself, right? So what
7:14
they would rather do is like,
7:16
you know, they would want to
7:18
push like an active fund to
7:20
an investor and he would rather
7:22
gain like... a much bigger commission
7:25
in that sense. At the end
7:27
of the day, India's fund industry
7:29
runs on commissions. Like Atrichma mentioned,
7:31
even if passive funds are good
7:34
for the customer, it has to
7:36
make good business sense for the
7:38
distributor. This is after all a
7:40
system where distributors have a very
7:42
strong say. And one more thing
7:45
is that, you know, active fund
7:47
NFOs have garnered more than passive
7:49
fund NFOs. So from, if you
7:51
take from the timeline of India,
7:53
from 2020 to like March 2025.
7:56
You know, active on NFOs that
7:58
have been introduced during that time,
8:00
what was once like, you know,
8:02
an initial AEM, AEM is assets
8:04
on the management, what was initially
8:07
like an AEM of 3.1 lakh
8:09
road has now gone. grown to
8:11
about 5.6 lakh. And whereas for
8:13
passive funds, what started out from
8:15
43,000, has now just has now
8:18
only grown to like 2.1 lakh
8:20
and it's like a fraction of
8:22
what active funds have managed to
8:24
like, you know, have what active
8:27
funds have managed to garner at
8:29
this point. The biggest NFOs in
8:31
recent years have all been active
8:33
funds. Not just that, they were
8:35
all being led by legacy fund
8:38
houses, the likes of SBI, HDFC
8:40
and ICICI. In fact, quite impressively,
8:42
SBI alone accounted for half of
8:44
the top 10 highest-dosing NFOs between
8:46
2020 and March 2025. Even if
8:49
you look at the most successful
8:51
passive NFO, which is Motila Loswal
8:53
Nifty Inda Defense Index Fund, it...
8:55
barely raised a fraction of what
8:57
an active fund would. You see,
9:00
more passive launches failed to cross
9:02
200 craw rupees in AOM, and
9:04
the numbers are even worse for
9:06
newbies. Some of Navi's funds, for
9:08
instance, couldn't even hit 10 craw
9:11
rupees. Achitma says a big reason
9:13
for that is because fund houses
9:15
just don't know how to keep
9:17
things simple, which was the whole
9:20
point of index funds in the
9:22
first place. People go to a
9:24
passive fund because it just because
9:26
of the fact that it will
9:28
replicate the benchmark's performance. But when
9:31
you're going to add, when you're
9:33
going to add like other type
9:35
of factors like momentum quality value,
9:37
all of these factors when you
9:39
just put it then, the investor
9:42
just gets like confused. Like what
9:44
mutual fund scheme should I go
9:46
to? You know, it's like you
9:48
know. left right and center when
9:50
like you know when mutual fund
9:53
houses they start introducing schemes like
9:55
this rather than giving like a
9:57
plain vanilla index the investor just
9:59
gets confused like you know okay
10:01
how do I now okay which
10:04
one should I actually go towards
10:06
to like what is the criteria
10:08
the thing is even the complicated
10:10
stuff is selling especially when it
10:13
is launched by a legacy fund
10:15
house. You see, they don't want
10:17
to miss out if passive becomes
10:19
big. So they've also just been
10:21
throwing everything at the wall. But
10:24
in their case, the chances of
10:26
something actually sticking is considerably higher
10:28
than with the newer entrance. Players
10:30
like SBI, ICICI, HDFC, they've still
10:32
continued to rule the rules. For
10:35
example, I can give you. There
10:37
was this instance where SBI had
10:39
launched a slew of passive NFOs
10:41
in 2022 September and all of
10:43
them had garnered an initial AOM
10:46
of at least like you know
10:48
900 crores. You can take that
10:50
in comparison to what gross current
10:52
AEM is just about like you
10:54
know some 1,700 crores. So you
10:57
you get the disparity right. And
10:59
one of the reasons why these
11:01
legacy fund houses have been able
11:03
to have been able to capture
11:06
this is because once they have
11:08
like a robust distributor system, they
11:10
also have brand name. You would
11:12
believe someone like an SBI over
11:14
a relatively newer fund house, right?
11:17
So that sort of brand name
11:19
sort of helps in like, you
11:21
know, people going towards these legacy
11:23
fund houses. So breaking into this
11:25
increasingly complicated passive market is hard
11:28
for new players. But after that,
11:30
the fact that there is an
11:32
even bigger player waiting in the
11:34
wings. The real disruptor, geo-Blackrock. This
11:36
is a subsidiary of geo-financial services
11:39
formed in partnership with the US-based
11:41
investment company Blackrock. It's still waiting
11:43
on regulatory approvals, but once it
11:45
does enter the picture, everything could
11:47
change. Actually, I remember one of
11:50
an executive whom I was talking
11:52
to, actually he was a mutual
11:54
fund distributor, who I was talking
11:56
to, he was saying when the
11:59
geo Black Rock AMC starts coming
12:01
into play. What he said was,
12:03
he made the geo Black Rock.
12:05
you may not be able to
12:07
sort of make that big of
12:10
a dent in passive funds because
12:12
there's already like so many variations
12:14
going on in the passive fund
12:16
space itself but what it can
12:18
do is like make a disruption
12:21
in the active fund space say
12:23
for example if they sort of
12:25
introduce an expense ratio of you
12:27
know a lower expense ratio of
12:29
for example like 0.4 or 0.5
12:32
percent which is much lower than
12:34
the industry average other legacy fund
12:36
players will be forced to like
12:38
follow that sweet right because and
12:41
then in that sense geo black
12:43
rock will become like the cost
12:45
leader in at least when when
12:47
it launches. So what does that
12:49
mean for the likes of Ziroudha
12:52
or Nadi or grow and their
12:54
dream of a Wangath style passive
12:56
revolution? So it is going to
12:58
be a slow game like it's
13:00
not easy Like competing with like
13:03
a large fund house like an
13:05
SBI or an HDFC, right? Especially
13:07
with the kind of AEMs that
13:09
they all have at this sort
13:11
of moment, it's going to be
13:14
like a slow burn game. So
13:16
there is no two ways about
13:18
that. A full subscription unlocks daily
13:20
long-form feature stories, newsletters and podcast
13:22
extras. Head to the Ken.com and
13:25
click on the red subscribe button
13:27
on the top of the website.
13:29
Today's episode was hosted by Rahill
13:31
Philipos produced by Meekhta Sharma and
13:34
edited by Rajiv Sien. you
14:19
video.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More