Zerodha and Groww wanted to disrupt mutual funds. But they're stuck in first gear

Zerodha and Groww wanted to disrupt mutual funds. But they're stuck in first gear

Released Tuesday, 8th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Zerodha and Groww wanted to disrupt mutual funds. But they're stuck in first gear

Zerodha and Groww wanted to disrupt mutual funds. But they're stuck in first gear

Zerodha and Groww wanted to disrupt mutual funds. But they're stuck in first gear

Zerodha and Groww wanted to disrupt mutual funds. But they're stuck in first gear

Tuesday, 8th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:05

For a while now, the new

0:07

kids on the block in India's

0:09

$750 billion mutual fund industry have

0:11

been trying to really shake things

0:13

up. I'm talking about the likes

0:15

of Navi, Zirodha, Grow, the non-banks

0:18

and discount brokers that are relatively

0:20

new to a game that has

0:22

so far been dominated by legacy

0:25

fund houses. You see, these newbies

0:27

have been dreaming of a big

0:29

disruption. And a couple years ago, they

0:31

thought they had found the answer to

0:33

their prayers. A playbook that would...

0:35

catable their growth. So what

0:37

Zerodha Navi and Groh decided

0:40

to do was they decided

0:42

to sort of introduce passive

0:45

funds. So around like some

0:47

sometime around 2021 these new

0:49

fund houses decided to introduce

0:52

like a slew of NFOs

0:54

that were mostly like passive

0:56

funds. That's my colleague Achish

0:59

Meyer. She's been tracking how

1:01

these new players, Navi Zerodha and

1:03

Grou, have been betting big on

1:05

passive funds. But the obvious first

1:08

question is, what are they? Okay,

1:10

so there are two types. One

1:12

is an active fund and a

1:14

dandel is a passive fund. An

1:16

active fund is essentially a scheme

1:18

which will look to outper the

1:20

benchmark. A passive fund is just

1:22

a plain vanilla index fund that

1:24

will look to just mirror the

1:26

benchmarks returns. So typically passive

1:28

funds are either index funds

1:30

or exchange-traded funds, ETFs, that

1:33

don't rely on expensive fund

1:35

managers. Instead, like Archigma said,

1:37

they just mirror the market.

1:39

And these newbies can't get enough of

1:41

them. In fact, in the last six

1:43

months, they've all launched new fund, and

1:46

every single one of them has been

1:48

a passive fund. So in February a

1:50

Navi mutual fund debuted with a

1:52

variant of a small cap fund

1:54

which was called the nifty small

1:56

cap 250 momentum quality 100 index

1:59

fund Like it sounds like, it

2:01

itself sounds too long, right? And

2:03

around at the same time, Grow

2:05

had also introduced two passive funds,

2:07

one that was tracking the nifty

2:10

200 and another that just buys

2:12

the first one. So, and also

2:14

last October, Zerota Fundhouse had rolled

2:16

out an open-ended scheme investing primarily

2:18

in units of a gold ETF.

2:21

Now, there's a good reason for

2:23

them to think that this is

2:25

the future. Passive funds have had

2:27

a proven track record in the

2:29

US. In fact, last year, for

2:32

the first time ever, they even

2:34

managed to overtake Active Funds in

2:36

Assets Under Management, or EUM. Forms

2:38

like Black Rock and Vanguard were

2:40

able to build empires entirely based

2:43

on this shift. So naturally that

2:45

got newbies here thinking, why not

2:47

us? Well, unfortunately for them, things

2:49

haven't been playing out quite as

2:51

dramatically as they had hoped. You

2:53

know, you can say that it

2:56

wanted to sort of replicate the

2:58

success in the US, but if

3:00

we are taking official stats, official

3:02

data, it's not been, I mean,

3:04

data sort of tells us like

3:07

a very different story. Well, yes,

3:09

passive EUM has surged. In fact,

3:11

it's more than tripled in four

3:13

years. But as a share of

3:15

the total mutual fund industry, well,

3:18

it's been a sluggish climb from

3:20

9% in 2020 to just 16%

3:22

in 2023. And the thing is...

3:24

Even when it comes to that

3:26

16% slice, these newbies aren't the

3:29

ones that have been reaping the

3:31

rewards. They account for merely 1%.

3:33

So is the revolution they hoped

3:35

for dead? Well, let's find out.

3:37

Welcome to Daybreak, a business podcast

3:39

from the Ken. I'm your host

3:42

Rahil Philopos and I don't chase

3:44

the news cycle. Instead, every day

3:46

of the week, my colleagues Nikhash

3:48

Sharma and I will come to

3:50

you with one business story that

3:53

is worth understanding and worth your

3:55

time. Today is Tuesday the 8th

3:57

of April. I

4:15

think India, what it wanted to

4:17

do was it wanted to create

4:19

its own Vanguard. Vanguard is by

4:21

far the largest, you know, passive

4:24

fund AMC in the US, right?

4:26

So in an attempt to like

4:28

sort of get to that space,

4:30

I think the new age players

4:32

wanted to sort of, you know,

4:35

sort of get into the market

4:37

saying, hey, listen, this is what

4:39

this is the product that we

4:41

are offering and we believe this

4:43

product is the future. Passive investing

4:46

was supposed to be an inevitability

4:48

in India. But the first shift

4:50

happened back in 2017 when Sebi

4:52

rewrote its rulebook. So at that

4:55

point of time what happened is

4:57

that Sebi had forced fund managers

4:59

to like properly define what a

5:01

large cap, mid cap and a

5:03

small cap stock would be. So

5:06

that would limit like how much

5:08

their funds could... drift between categories.

5:10

For example, you know, managers who

5:12

have been quietly patting up their

5:14

large cap stocks, large cap funds

5:17

with like mid cap and small

5:19

cap stocks, they couldn't do it

5:21

anymore. They had to stick to

5:23

like one particular lane. So what

5:25

was even worse that is that,

5:28

you know, the fund house could

5:30

no longer launch more than one

5:32

fund in an active category. Passive

5:34

funds did not have that sort

5:36

of a restriction. Because they were

5:39

anyways following, they were anyways, you

5:41

know, replicating the performance of the

5:43

benchmark. And due to that, many

5:45

indices had sprung over the years.

5:48

Even after that, everything pointed in

5:50

the passive direction. low fees, a

5:52

bull market and also several data

5:54

points indicating active funds underperforming. Which

5:56

explains why between 2020 and 2023,

5:59

we saw passive funds as share

6:01

of mutual fund assets climb quite

6:03

steady. But cut to 2020. 25

6:05

and things aren't looking all that

6:07

great. Unlike in the US where

6:10

passive fund AUM had grown steadily

6:12

and even surpassed active fund AUM,

6:14

the same trend isn't quite playing

6:16

out here in India. Last year

6:18

in fact, passive funds as a

6:21

share of the total mutual fund

6:23

industry actually shrunk. It seems like

6:25

the grand march of passive investing

6:27

in India is starting to roll

6:29

backwards. And Atchishma says there are

6:32

three reasons for it. So one

6:34

of the one of the factors

6:36

that sort of went against passive

6:38

funds is like active funds is

6:41

still dominant in India like mutual

6:43

fund distributors still want to push

6:45

active funds to their investors just

6:47

for the one single factor that

6:49

you know they just pay healthy

6:52

commissions like I remember this distributor

6:54

giving like context to it. So

6:56

if we were to push a

6:58

passive fund to an investing, he's

7:00

probably going to gain like only

7:03

10 or 20 pasa for every

7:05

100 rupees that's being invested. So

7:07

in that sort of scenario, it

7:09

doesn't make good business sense for

7:11

the distributor himself, right? So what

7:14

they would rather do is like,

7:16

you know, they would want to

7:18

push like an active fund to

7:20

an investor and he would rather

7:22

gain like... a much bigger commission

7:25

in that sense. At the end

7:27

of the day, India's fund industry

7:29

runs on commissions. Like Atrichma mentioned,

7:31

even if passive funds are good

7:34

for the customer, it has to

7:36

make good business sense for the

7:38

distributor. This is after all a

7:40

system where distributors have a very

7:42

strong say. And one more thing

7:45

is that, you know, active fund

7:47

NFOs have garnered more than passive

7:49

fund NFOs. So from, if you

7:51

take from the timeline of India,

7:53

from 2020 to like March 2025.

7:56

You know, active on NFOs that

7:58

have been introduced during that time,

8:00

what was once like, you know,

8:02

an initial AEM, AEM is assets

8:04

on the management, what was initially

8:07

like an AEM of 3.1 lakh

8:09

road has now gone. grown to

8:11

about 5.6 lakh. And whereas for

8:13

passive funds, what started out from

8:15

43,000, has now just has now

8:18

only grown to like 2.1 lakh

8:20

and it's like a fraction of

8:22

what active funds have managed to

8:24

like, you know, have what active

8:27

funds have managed to garner at

8:29

this point. The biggest NFOs in

8:31

recent years have all been active

8:33

funds. Not just that, they were

8:35

all being led by legacy fund

8:38

houses, the likes of SBI, HDFC

8:40

and ICICI. In fact, quite impressively,

8:42

SBI alone accounted for half of

8:44

the top 10 highest-dosing NFOs between

8:46

2020 and March 2025. Even if

8:49

you look at the most successful

8:51

passive NFO, which is Motila Loswal

8:53

Nifty Inda Defense Index Fund, it...

8:55

barely raised a fraction of what

8:57

an active fund would. You see,

9:00

more passive launches failed to cross

9:02

200 craw rupees in AOM, and

9:04

the numbers are even worse for

9:06

newbies. Some of Navi's funds, for

9:08

instance, couldn't even hit 10 craw

9:11

rupees. Achitma says a big reason

9:13

for that is because fund houses

9:15

just don't know how to keep

9:17

things simple, which was the whole

9:20

point of index funds in the

9:22

first place. People go to a

9:24

passive fund because it just because

9:26

of the fact that it will

9:28

replicate the benchmark's performance. But when

9:31

you're going to add, when you're

9:33

going to add like other type

9:35

of factors like momentum quality value,

9:37

all of these factors when you

9:39

just put it then, the investor

9:42

just gets like confused. Like what

9:44

mutual fund scheme should I go

9:46

to? You know, it's like you

9:48

know. left right and center when

9:50

like you know when mutual fund

9:53

houses they start introducing schemes like

9:55

this rather than giving like a

9:57

plain vanilla index the investor just

9:59

gets confused like you know okay

10:01

how do I now okay which

10:04

one should I actually go towards

10:06

to like what is the criteria

10:08

the thing is even the complicated

10:10

stuff is selling especially when it

10:13

is launched by a legacy fund

10:15

house. You see, they don't want

10:17

to miss out if passive becomes

10:19

big. So they've also just been

10:21

throwing everything at the wall. But

10:24

in their case, the chances of

10:26

something actually sticking is considerably higher

10:28

than with the newer entrance. Players

10:30

like SBI, ICICI, HDFC, they've still

10:32

continued to rule the rules. For

10:35

example, I can give you. There

10:37

was this instance where SBI had

10:39

launched a slew of passive NFOs

10:41

in 2022 September and all of

10:43

them had garnered an initial AOM

10:46

of at least like you know

10:48

900 crores. You can take that

10:50

in comparison to what gross current

10:52

AEM is just about like you

10:54

know some 1,700 crores. So you

10:57

you get the disparity right. And

10:59

one of the reasons why these

11:01

legacy fund houses have been able

11:03

to have been able to capture

11:06

this is because once they have

11:08

like a robust distributor system, they

11:10

also have brand name. You would

11:12

believe someone like an SBI over

11:14

a relatively newer fund house, right?

11:17

So that sort of brand name

11:19

sort of helps in like, you

11:21

know, people going towards these legacy

11:23

fund houses. So breaking into this

11:25

increasingly complicated passive market is hard

11:28

for new players. But after that,

11:30

the fact that there is an

11:32

even bigger player waiting in the

11:34

wings. The real disruptor, geo-Blackrock. This

11:36

is a subsidiary of geo-financial services

11:39

formed in partnership with the US-based

11:41

investment company Blackrock. It's still waiting

11:43

on regulatory approvals, but once it

11:45

does enter the picture, everything could

11:47

change. Actually, I remember one of

11:50

an executive whom I was talking

11:52

to, actually he was a mutual

11:54

fund distributor, who I was talking

11:56

to, he was saying when the

11:59

geo Black Rock AMC starts coming

12:01

into play. What he said was,

12:03

he made the geo Black Rock.

12:05

you may not be able to

12:07

sort of make that big of

12:10

a dent in passive funds because

12:12

there's already like so many variations

12:14

going on in the passive fund

12:16

space itself but what it can

12:18

do is like make a disruption

12:21

in the active fund space say

12:23

for example if they sort of

12:25

introduce an expense ratio of you

12:27

know a lower expense ratio of

12:29

for example like 0.4 or 0.5

12:32

percent which is much lower than

12:34

the industry average other legacy fund

12:36

players will be forced to like

12:38

follow that sweet right because and

12:41

then in that sense geo black

12:43

rock will become like the cost

12:45

leader in at least when when

12:47

it launches. So what does that

12:49

mean for the likes of Ziroudha

12:52

or Nadi or grow and their

12:54

dream of a Wangath style passive

12:56

revolution? So it is going to

12:58

be a slow game like it's

13:00

not easy Like competing with like

13:03

a large fund house like an

13:05

SBI or an HDFC, right? Especially

13:07

with the kind of AEMs that

13:09

they all have at this sort

13:11

of moment, it's going to be

13:14

like a slow burn game. So

13:16

there is no two ways about

13:18

that. A full subscription unlocks daily

13:20

long-form feature stories, newsletters and podcast

13:22

extras. Head to the Ken.com and

13:25

click on the red subscribe button

13:27

on the top of the website.

13:29

Today's episode was hosted by Rahill

13:31

Philipos produced by Meekhta Sharma and

13:34

edited by Rajiv Sien. you

14:19

video.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features