Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This message comes from rinse. These
0:02
days you can do a lot
0:04
from your phone. Book a vacation,
0:06
buy and trade stocks, but you
0:08
can also make your dirty laundry
0:10
disappear. And then reappear, wash and
0:12
fold it with rinse. Schedule a
0:14
pickup with the rinse app and
0:16
before you know it, your clothes
0:18
are back folded and ready to
0:20
wear. They even do dry cleaning.
0:22
Sign up now and get $20
0:24
off your first order at rinse.com.
0:26
That's r-i-i-n-s-e.com. You
0:28
understand tech. You
0:30
already use a
0:32
VPN, a password
0:34
manager, and an
0:36
ad blocker. Surely
0:38
you are not
0:40
exposed. Right? Find
0:42
out for sure
0:44
by going to
0:46
cloaked.com/VOS. That's C-L-O-A-K-E-D-D-K-L-K-L-S-L-L-L-L-L-S-L-L-S-L-L-L-L-L-S-L-L-L-L-S-L-L-L-L-S-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-
0:49
Cloked can help
0:51
you get your
0:53
data removed from
0:55
hundreds of data
0:57
brokers, generate unlimited
0:59
working phone numbers to
1:01
protect your real one
1:03
and also offers one
1:05
million dollar insurance
1:07
against identity theft.
1:10
That's cloked.com slash
1:12
Vox, and check out with
1:14
Code Podcast to get 30%
1:16
off a Cloke subscription. Through
1:18
the ADT Plus app, easily
1:21
grant and automate event-based or
1:23
scheduled access for neighbors, friends,
1:25
and helpers. Notify trusted individuals
1:27
of events like alarms or
1:29
packages, and set access windows
1:31
for planned guests or even
1:34
the dog walker without interrupting
1:36
your day. Visit adt.com. When
1:38
every second counts, count on
1:40
ADT. Requires ADT Complete Pro
1:43
Monitoring Plan and Compatible
1:45
Devices. Copyright 2025 ADT
1:47
LLC. All rights reserved.
1:49
Hello and welcome to Decoder.
1:51
I'm Neelapetel, editor-in-chief
1:54
of The Virgin. Decoder is my
1:56
show about big ideas and other
1:58
problems. Today I'm talking... with Vimeo
2:00
CEO Philip Moyer. You probably know
2:02
Vimeo from its beginnings is an
2:04
artier, more creative competitor to YouTube.
2:06
But over the last few years,
2:08
and especially after Republic in 2021,
2:10
Vimeo has really turned itself into
2:12
an enterprise software company, selling video
2:14
hosting services to companies of all
2:16
sizes. I got to tell you
2:18
I was pretty excited to talk
2:21
to Philip because this episode is
2:23
a particularly fun full circle Dakota
2:25
moment. I interviewed Philip's predecessor, Anjali
2:27
sued, both when she was CEO
2:29
of Vimeo, and again more recently in
2:31
her new gig as CEO of Tube.
2:33
So I had a sense of how
2:35
Anjali ran Vimeo and what strategies she
2:37
took to Tube. And then it was
2:40
fascinating to close the loop and see
2:42
how Philip wanted to change Vimeo after
2:44
taking over himself. Especially because the entire
2:46
ecosystem of online video is itself changing
2:48
incredibly rapidly. You'll hear Philip be very
2:50
complementary of what Anjali accomplished at Phymio,
2:53
but now he's pushing to make Phymio
2:55
grow into a very different kind of
2:57
YouTube competitor, one that can support everything
2:59
from independent creators to huge corporations. It's a
3:01
shift from the strategy that Anjali used to
3:04
reset the company and take it public, and
3:06
there's a lot of interesting nuance to it.
3:08
It turns out everyone wants to put videos
3:10
on the internet. But only some of those
3:12
people want them to be ingested by YouTube's
3:14
advertising and recommendation systems. What's interesting about this
3:16
is that Philip has experience at Google. He
3:19
worked at Google Cloud. In fact, he has
3:21
experience at a lot of places. He's worked
3:23
at Amazon and Microsoft as well. And he's
3:25
deep in the weeds on both the tech
3:27
and the business. You'll hear us talk about
3:29
Google and YouTube in particular quite a
3:31
bit in this one, but we also
3:34
get into TikTok and what it means
3:36
that the incentives of algorithmic video platforms
3:38
have drastically influenced both creators worldwide and
3:40
the culture we all consume. Of course,
3:42
we also talked about AI, which is
3:44
upending every platform in different ways. Vimeo
3:46
markets itself now is an AI powered
3:48
video platform. So I wanted to know
3:50
how Philip is thinking about Vimeo's history
3:52
as a creator focus platform. It's present
3:54
as an alternative to the YouTube algorithms.
3:56
and how all of that collides with
3:58
the pitfalls of a... a lot of
4:00
creators and a lot of consumers do
4:02
not like AI generated content. But there's
4:04
still a place for these tools to
4:06
make some parts of the video process
4:08
easier. And Philip and I talked a lot
4:10
about where those lines might be. I
4:12
also asked Philip about a pretty simple
4:15
supply and demand bath problem I've been wrestling
4:17
with recently, one that seems like it
4:19
will change the creator economy drastically in
4:21
the years to come. If the total amount
4:23
of video on the internet explodes because
4:25
of AI... Well, the total amount of
4:28
time we can spend watching
4:30
that video remains relatively fixed.
4:32
Well, how is anyone going to make
4:34
any money at all? This is a
4:37
fun one. You can tell that Philip
4:39
and I could have kept going for
4:41
a long time. Okay, Vimeo, CEO Philip
4:43
Moir. Here we go. Philip
4:53
Moyer, you are the CEO of Vimeo.
4:55
Welcome to Decoder. Thank you. Hey, it's
4:57
great to be here. I am very
4:59
excited to talk to you. I gotta
5:02
tell you, just structurally, this is one
5:04
of the very first, like, truly full
5:06
circle Decoder episodes, because we had your
5:08
predecessor, Angelion, a CEO of Vimeo. And
5:10
then we had her on in her new
5:13
job as CEO of Tubi. And now we
5:15
have you on as her replacement. It's full
5:17
circle. It's full circle for a show that's
5:19
about structure and decision making and organizational culture.
5:21
This is as good as it gets for
5:23
me. So thank you so much for joining
5:25
us. That's fantastic. I have a lot of
5:27
respect for unduly and have to say a
5:29
big thank you to her for all she
5:31
built here. So it's wonderful. Yeah, I'm very
5:34
curious. You know, Angela, you know, when we
5:36
talked about Vimeo and when she was there,
5:38
she was in the middle of executing a
5:40
big pivot, right? People know Vimeo is what
5:42
it started as a consumer video service,
5:44
kind of the artier competitor to YouTube.
5:46
She pivoted it to a SAS business.
5:48
She was very open. This is now
5:50
a SAS company. We're doing a lot
5:52
of enterprise work. We're a video hosting
5:54
provider to a lot of people. We
5:56
are a video creation tool for small
5:58
businesses for small businesses. That was several
6:00
years ago. I talked to her three
6:02
years ago, Vimeo. You're the new CEO.
6:05
What do you think of Vimeo today?
6:07
You know, I think in a lot
6:09
of ways, I mean, a little bit
6:11
of what she started and a lot
6:13
of, you know, what we're continuing here
6:15
is going back to the roots of
6:17
what Vimeo is known for. You know,
6:19
people came to us because of the
6:21
time, you know, 20 years ago, it
6:23
was hard to upload video. I kind
6:26
of call that I'll say the second
6:28
or third epic of video was right
6:30
around that time period where video files
6:32
were getting bigger. It was hard to
6:34
stream video. They were no longer just
6:36
a single file. We were starting to
6:38
get multiple formats. And so people came
6:40
to us because of the quality of
6:42
our transcoding and then ultimately our ability
6:44
to be able to serve it directly
6:47
to the person, you know, that was
6:49
most important that they wanted to provide
6:51
that video to. And a lot of
6:53
what we're doing right now and what
6:55
we've kind of taken that Anjali had
6:57
started and extended pretty significantly is it
6:59
turns out that lots and lots of
7:01
organizations and individuals around the world want
7:03
to be able to keep a video
7:05
private or they want to be able
7:08
to serve it only to an intended
7:10
audience. They don't want to have someone
7:12
collect data. They don't want to have
7:14
an algorithm that tries to like send
7:16
them down a rabbit hole. Instead they
7:18
want to just literally be able to
7:20
provide that video. We're seeing video today
7:22
is about 82% of the world's internet
7:24
and we're seeing that same concept arrive
7:26
inside of with private individuals with doctors
7:29
with educators with large organizations. And so
7:31
yes, I would say that what we're
7:33
really becoming now is, you know, our
7:35
goal is to become the largest private
7:37
video distribution platform in the world because
7:39
we think that there's an increasing demand.
7:41
That video doesn't have to be public
7:43
or doesn't have to be algorithm during,
7:45
but instead it could be very personal
7:47
and deliberate at the right moment at
7:50
the right time, to the right individual.
7:52
Let me try to just understand that
7:54
in context. There was the beginning, right
7:56
you're saying to YouTube button. at the
7:58
operating system level because no one thought
8:00
that public videos were a big deal,
8:02
right? You just needed some place to
8:04
watch videos in YouTube. that. And then
8:06
YouTube grew into the social media juggernaut
8:08
it is now. Tic-talk exists, all that's
8:11
there. And the initial reaction was it's
8:13
very hard to compete with that, will
8:15
be for enterprises. Business, customers have video
8:17
needs, will service them. You're saying there's
8:19
some kind of middle ground in the
8:21
middle of the spectrum between big algorithmic,
8:23
consumer video platforms, and enterprise, where just
8:25
a lot of regular people want private
8:27
video sharing. We have hundreds of thousands
8:29
of school districts that use us. Teachers,
8:32
you know, want students to be able
8:34
to upload video assignments, especially in the
8:36
world of chat GPT and AI. They
8:38
want to see that the student is
8:40
actually doing the assignment. We've got tens
8:42
of thousands of medical professionals that want
8:44
to be able to send a video
8:46
to a patient without having some algorithm
8:48
capture the fact that their their disease
8:50
state or the question that they have.
8:53
We've got lots and lots of marketing
8:55
organizations that want to be able to
8:57
serve their video over to an individual
8:59
inside of a big company or to
9:01
their client and they don't want it
9:03
to be public. And then what we're
9:05
also finding is on the YouTube front,
9:07
I think organizations that we're hosting entire
9:09
YouTube sections of their website, they're finding
9:11
that YouTube is redirecting their customers over
9:14
to some other place. I was meeting
9:16
with a really large financial services company
9:18
CEO. And the chief economist, I said,
9:20
I took him to the website and
9:22
I said, let me show you your
9:24
chief economist speaking. And I clicked on
9:26
the video. And before the video played,
9:28
we had to watch some advertising on
9:30
some, you know, Bitcoin or something. And
9:32
then we had to go over and,
9:35
like on the right-hand side, it said,
9:37
here's how the top three credit rating
9:39
organizations are trying to control the world.
9:41
This is the video you should watch
9:43
next. And we're just trying to watch
9:45
the economist's video. And so organizations are
9:47
kind of getting tired of being redirected
9:49
or having their data captured. And so
9:51
a lot of organizations, you know, are
9:53
starting to. bypass what I call the
9:56
big walled gardens. And in a lot
9:58
of ways, we're kind of in the
10:00
back of the MSN and AOL error
10:02
for websites. That's what we are with
10:04
video right now. And people like want
10:06
to be able to go directly to
10:08
their consumer. They want to be able
10:10
to serve the message, you know, in
10:12
an unfederated way. And then ultimately, whether
10:14
they just want to be able to
10:17
ensure the highest quality and the most
10:19
personalized experience. And so we're seeing. tremendous
10:21
demand for those kind of scenarios. And
10:23
again, it's everything from the school teacher,
10:25
the fitness instructor, in some cases the
10:27
faith institution, all the way up to
10:29
some of the biggest companies in the
10:31
world. And I do mean literally the
10:33
biggest companies in the world are becoming customers.
10:36
I think the thing that I'm keying on
10:38
there is there's the consumer facing video
10:40
platforms and then you have a bunch
10:42
of enterprise video needs. And you're kind
10:44
of in some way describing a bunch
10:46
of core enterprise customers, right? companies
10:48
big enough to have a chief
10:51
economist, I think those are classic
10:53
enterprise customers. And then somewhere in
10:56
the middle, those companies actually want
10:58
to go reach consumers without participating
11:00
in algorithmic media. And that consumer
11:02
surface, Vimeo has kind of gotten
11:04
away from. Are you saying you're
11:07
kind of, you're pushing back towards it? You know, we
11:09
get about 100 billion views of video a year on
11:11
Vimeo, and only 20% of those it on Vimeo. e-commerce
11:13
platforms. You know, I was meeting with a physician. He is
11:15
an independent practitioner or a fertility doctor and he records a
11:17
video before his patients come in. He sends that video over
11:19
to, to, you know, his patients in the fertility clinic.
11:21
And so we have individual proprietors, you know, we have
11:23
individuals that want to be able to share a family
11:25
video or, you know, something that they learned, you know,
11:27
if they had been into a doctor's visit or otherwise.
11:29
And so we have lots and lots and lots of
11:31
people that people that are using people that are using
11:33
individuals that are using individuals that are using individuals that are
11:36
using individuals that are using individuals that are using individuals
11:38
that are using individuals that are using individuals that
11:40
are using individuals that are using individuals that are
11:42
using individuals, what is most amazing to me right
11:44
now is the sheer number of filmmakers that I
11:47
have coming to me. And this has really started
11:49
kicking up since I've become CEO. I would tell
11:51
you it's been a trend about this past six
11:53
months. I have so many filmmakers that are coming
11:55
to me saying, you know, we don't like the
11:58
deal. We don't like the deal that we have. have
12:00
with the big studios. We don't like the
12:02
fact that if we go to YouTube, as
12:04
an example, they take 45 cents of every
12:06
advertising dollar. Or if we want to try
12:08
and go on to one of the big
12:10
platforms they'll take as much as 50 cents
12:12
of every dollar, is there a way for
12:14
me to be able to sell tickets to
12:16
my audience? In some cases, some of these
12:18
filmmakers that come to us, they have audiences
12:20
that are bigger that they might get on
12:22
one of those platforms. And so we're finding
12:24
people want to go direct. Our streaming business
12:26
is like that. When you post on some
12:28
of these big platforms, I really encourage people
12:31
to look at the terms of service of
12:33
the big major consumer -based video platforms. It
12:35
says in their terms of service, they're able
12:37
to monetize your content any way they want
12:39
to. They can reuse your content.
12:41
They can serve the content. And
12:43
quite frankly, they're capturing 45 cents
12:45
of every dollar in that process. And
12:48
so a lot of these organizations want to
12:50
be able to bypass those kind of economics
12:52
and those kind of IP. So is that
12:54
you building a consumer interface? You're saying it's
12:56
only a small percentage that's coming to vimeo.com.
12:58
Where are they finding audiences? Is it all
13:00
on their own websites? Is it in other
13:02
people's platforms? Where is that audience actually going?
13:05
You know, it's been interesting because there
13:07
was just this trend among streamers in
13:09
particular, well, they'll go to the large
13:11
platforms, they'll get some following, and
13:13
then when they want to be able to serve
13:15
premium content, that's where they'll come
13:17
over and say, you know, we want to put
13:19
SBOT. We want to be able to put
13:22
a gate in front of this content. Or they
13:24
may want to go live or and they
13:26
may want to go asynchronous. And so they'll come
13:28
to us and say, look, you know, we
13:30
want to be able to have a common library
13:32
so that people can see past live events.
13:34
Plus they want to be able to serve new
13:36
content. In some cases, we're getting some organizations
13:38
that want to do more interactive. So like clickable
13:40
videos as an example. And so it's a
13:42
whole variety of creators that are kind of saying,
13:44
look, we might not want to adhere to
13:46
the requirements or the, let's call it
13:48
the compliance requirements or the economic
13:50
requirements or the IP requirements of
13:52
the big platforms. Give us an
13:54
environment that we can control ourselves. And
13:57
that environment lives on their websites. Exactly.
14:00
Like I'll give you an example. Sideman is
14:02
a great example of a group. They're one
14:05
of the biggest followerships over in the UK.
14:07
They sold out Wembley Stadium in like two
14:09
hours and they famously played a soccer match
14:11
where when a yellow card was shown one
14:14
of their one of the Sideman held up
14:16
an Uno Reversi card to the ref and
14:18
it blew up the internet over the UK.
14:20
They serve on Vimeo. They have both content
14:23
they put on a YouTube or they put
14:25
on Instagram, but then some of their more
14:27
extended content, they actually put on Vimeo. And
14:30
then that library lives on us as
14:32
well, you know, for a lot of
14:34
things. Dropouts is a great example. That
14:36
Try Guys is a great example. That
14:38
Zeus Networks, Martha Stewart, where they want
14:40
a little bit more control over the
14:42
monetization, more so than what what the
14:44
traditional platforms give you. I'm going to ask
14:46
you a question and you're just going to
14:49
have to bear with me on sort of
14:51
the mathematical nature of this question. Hopefully it
14:53
makes sense. I have a lot of
14:55
CEOs of web hosting companies on the
14:57
show because I'm very curious about the
15:00
web in the age of platforms. How
15:02
will it grow? Where will the audience
15:04
come from? The last great refer of
15:06
web traffic as everyone knows is Google
15:08
Search. Google Search is undergoing some sort
15:10
of gigantic AI-powered identity crisis. Who
15:13
knows what's going on over there? And
15:15
so I have the CEO of Squarespace
15:17
or a CEO of Wicks or whatever
15:19
other hosting platform on. I say, why
15:21
does anyone build a website? Why would
15:23
you do that instead of starting a
15:25
Tiktok channel now if you're a small
15:28
business or an individual creator? And
15:30
they all kind of say, well, it's
15:32
to do e-commerce, right? And they all
15:34
kind of say, well, it's to do
15:36
e-commerce, right? And they all kind of
15:39
say, well, it's to do your audience,
15:41
and you're going to your audience. You're
15:43
describing the content itself being valuable,
15:45
right? Being more valuable when it's hosted on
15:47
Vimeo. Maybe you're selling it. Maybe you're doing
15:49
subscriptions, whatever you're doing. But that's happening on
15:52
a website because you can't transact that way
15:54
on YouTube or TikTok. You can't make the
15:56
content valuable. But you're still stuck with how
15:58
do you get all. to come to the
16:01
website, right? That's still just some fraction
16:03
of a search audience or some fraction
16:05
of conversions from one of the social
16:07
video platforms. And that, this is the
16:09
math, that seems like the upper bound
16:11
of your growth, right? Because the people
16:13
have, some number of people have to
16:16
come to the website, some number of
16:18
people have to choose to transact on
16:20
a video from the tri-guies, and that
16:22
can only grow insofar as all of
16:24
those individual customers can get people to
16:26
websites. Do you see that the web
16:28
is the limiter in that way? No, not
16:30
at all. I've worked for Google,
16:32
Amazon, and Microsoft in my life.
16:35
You know, most recently, you know,
16:37
Google, I've worked in all manners
16:39
of businesses and data problems. And
16:41
I have this foundational philosophy that
16:43
there's actually more data behind firewalls
16:45
and paywalls and there is in front.
16:48
There's more information behind those firewalls and
16:50
paywalls than in front. And you know,
16:52
when I take a look at the
16:54
enterprise market for video, or you might
16:56
have like a couple product videos like
16:58
for e-commerce, or you might have, you
17:00
know, for example, the CEO's message. Video
17:02
is coming to literally every single element
17:04
of business. In the same way, it's
17:06
82% of the internet. It's coming in.
17:08
And so whether or not it's that
17:10
e-newsletter, whether or not it's for sales,
17:12
like if you look at an organization
17:14
like seismic or gong, it records sales
17:16
calls, and then it helps to
17:18
coach individuals. If you watch a
17:21
video, you're 67% more likely to
17:23
buy a product. And so we've
17:25
got very large e-commerce customers where
17:27
they now have millions of videos
17:29
on us that are serving to
17:31
every single product on their website.
17:33
And so what I'm seeing is
17:35
quite frankly that there is an
17:37
explosion of video. It's such an engaging
17:39
media. Like when you watch a video,
17:41
you have 91% better retention than when
17:43
you read something. So what I'm seeing
17:45
is that a lot of the stuff
17:47
that's behind the firewall and behind the
17:49
paywalls now getting video enabled and that
17:51
it's going across every single division inside
17:53
of an organization. And it actually dwarfs
17:55
what I'll call kind of a lot
17:57
of the content. We're going to see
17:59
video. show up in so many different ways
18:01
and in so many different businesses. Like people
18:04
are starting to use video to determine efficiencies
18:06
like inside a quick service restaurants. They're starting
18:08
to use video to be able to evaluate
18:10
what's on a shelf and whether or not
18:13
there's a stockout in the shelf. And so
18:15
when I think about this, I don't think
18:17
about it just in terms of like one
18:19
segment. of our organization, I actually, you know,
18:22
the beauty of Vimeo is that we're able
18:24
to live inside and outside the firewall. And
18:26
there's very, YouTube does not live inside of
18:28
the firewall. Like we're able to hook in
18:31
and sign a BAA, you know, like an
18:33
agreement to do HIPAA for a doctor. YouTube's
18:35
not going to do that. And then you
18:37
think about all the interactions in the healthcare
18:40
industry, you know, that actually can be video
18:42
enabled. And so. Our upper bound of growth
18:44
is, you know, I actually kind of feel
18:46
like it's a larger opportunity than what YouTube
18:49
is focused on right now. I see, I
18:51
mean, YouTube right now is focused on video
18:53
podcasts. It's like very, they've picked their shot
18:55
and they're going to take it. By the
18:58
way, every time anyone says that stat about
19:00
video retention, I feel like a dinosaur because
19:02
I need to read for as much video
19:04
podcasting as I literally do. I'm a reader
19:07
to the core. I'm an underliner. I'm an
19:09
underliner, right? I learned to highlight in five
19:11
colors in law school. It's still where I'm
19:13
at in maybe the future is video and
19:16
that's why we do a video podcast, but
19:18
still a reader to my core. There's like
19:20
three parts of just sort of the video
19:22
business. We've talked a lot about distribution where
19:25
you might distribute that video. It sounds like
19:27
that's where you think there's a lot of
19:29
growth across organizations even to consumer in some
19:31
new way. Then there's monetization, which I don't
19:34
I get to. But the first part is
19:36
the hardest, and I think, undergoing the most
19:38
change in terms of what we expect videos
19:40
to be, and that's obviously creation, right? You
19:43
need to make a video, you need to
19:45
distribute it, you need to monetize it. Creation
19:47
of video right now is super interesting because
19:49
you have in particular, not just the young
19:52
generation, but everybody learning to speak the language
19:54
of TikTok, I think is most importantly expressed
19:56
to people as a video editor, not just
19:58
a scrolling video editor. Then
20:01
there's AI, which is making it a
20:03
lot easier to make all kinds of
20:05
videos and all kinds of ways. And
20:07
then there's like the sort of like
20:09
smaller AI components, right? That it's going
20:11
to write a script for you that
20:13
you can read. And like, maybe that's
20:15
good, maybe that's bad. But it's all
20:17
just in the mix, right? Like everyone
20:20
is expecting the tools to guide them.
20:22
Are you thinking of that component of
20:24
it? Like we need to build an
20:26
enterprise tick-talk editor for people in order
20:28
to just bring them in the pipeline?
20:30
You know, I think there's a couple
20:32
dynamics that are happening right now, and
20:34
this is what gets me so excited
20:36
about this one. It's one of the
20:38
biggest things that brought me here, is
20:41
the barriers to video creation are dropping
20:43
so dramatically, which leads to that mass
20:45
proliferation of video, and then the difficulty
20:47
in being able to manage at that
20:49
scale. Like that's just foundation like the
20:51
market forces that are behind us. I
20:53
always pause for a second. I always
20:55
tell people, you know, I can, I'll
20:57
be able to talk to you for
21:00
a long time about artificial intelligence in
21:02
a couple seconds, but let me talk
21:04
to you about like what's happening in
21:06
video formats. You're 100% right. Right now,
21:08
mobile video, we're kind of in that
21:10
error where mobile video is becoming much
21:12
easier. People were becoming much easier. People
21:14
were becoming much easier. People were becoming
21:16
more comfortable. Culturally people are getting much
21:18
more comfortable shooting video. The proliferation of
21:21
tools has been extraordinary. Now we made
21:23
some acquisitions of the past, you know,
21:25
like Magista was an example of this
21:27
because we really felt that we had
21:29
to make it easier and easier to
21:31
be able to create video. Well, I
21:33
have been thrilled. with proliferation of tools.
21:35
We shot a video for our reframe
21:37
conference, I don't should say shot a
21:40
video, we actually like created a video
21:42
using 16 AI tools that didn't exist
21:44
18 months ago and it was over
21:46
$15 billion of venture capital had gone
21:48
into. creating those tools. That's just one
21:50
small set of tools. But you're absolutely
21:52
right is that you've got all these
21:54
tools that are being created. And so
21:56
we're thrilled about that. But simultaneously, the
21:58
format of video is also proliferating. And
22:01
so you've got traditional like 1068, you've
22:03
got 4K that's starting to become more
22:05
commonplace. 8k is arriving and when you
22:07
do 8k it's roughly about six times
22:09
the size of a 4k well 16k
22:11
and 32k televisions are on the horizon
22:13
right now you've got wide stream formats
22:15
you got square formats you know for
22:17
podcasting you got rectangular formats and then
22:20
you know we just recently released Apple
22:22
Vision Pro support to be able to
22:24
stream on Apple Vision Pro which is
22:26
8k per I 36 frames per second
22:28
and so While simultaneously, well, the tools
22:30
are proliferating, the format types are also
22:32
proliferating. And so your ability to be
22:34
able to both accept video from any
22:36
format, you know, in some cases you
22:38
accept something that's an old old format,
22:41
you know, that you have to have
22:43
improved or whether or not it's a
22:45
super high quality, giant wide screen format
22:47
that needs to be cut up for
22:49
all the different areas that you're going
22:51
to serve that video. What I would
22:53
tell you is that it's becoming more
22:55
complex on the creator about which tool
22:57
to use when and then how do
23:00
I ensure that the right format gets
23:02
served at the right moment. And so
23:04
the two simultaneously simultaneous things that are
23:06
happening in our in our business are
23:08
creative tools and formats are just are
23:10
exponentially growing right now. You're exponentially growing
23:12
the amount and a video that a
23:14
creator has to deal with. What's going
23:16
the fastest? You know, it's really interesting.
23:18
As you can imagine, I think square
23:21
format is popping up a lot. We
23:23
are seeing a lot of demand for
23:25
4K, you know, in live formats and
23:27
in in serving formats. I think people
23:29
are, you know, people are starting to
23:31
use, demand that format more, which is
23:33
obviously for us, we have to move
23:35
more bits, we have to store more
23:37
bits, we've got to, you know, transcode
23:40
more bits. And so I would tell
23:42
you, that's probably the thing that we're
23:44
seeing that we're seeing spiked the most
23:46
the most in terms. of like consumption.
23:48
Like the traditional mobile stuff is going
23:50
to be there and it's going to
23:52
be constant. I think it's kind of
23:54
almost like growing at the speed of,
23:56
you know, just so-called mobile phones basically,
23:58
but like I'm actually surprised about how
24:01
many people are coming to us asking
24:03
for 4K. What do you think that
24:05
is? I look at the broader industry
24:07
and you see the big streamers are
24:09
pushing everybody to basically 1080P with ads.
24:11
Like that's sort of the default for
24:13
Max or Netflix and then you got
24:15
to pay extra for 4K. Are you
24:17
seeing that demand in the same way
24:19
they do, which is people will pay
24:22
extra for it? Or are you seeing
24:24
that demand as this is now the
24:26
understood industry norm? It may be the
24:28
place that we sit in the industry.
24:30
You know, as I mentioned at the
24:32
top of our talk was that people
24:34
have always come to us for quality.
24:36
You know, and so it may just
24:38
be that because we actually are, you
24:41
know, we've been known for quality, we've
24:43
been known for the quality of our
24:45
stream, the quality of the serve that
24:47
we do. It may just be that
24:49
people are not finding that kind of
24:51
support elsewhere and coming to us for
24:53
it. But I would just say I
24:55
think that people are experimenting with those
24:57
formats. I've been pleasantly surprised with the
24:59
sheer number of people that have come
25:02
to us since we've launched the Apple
25:04
Vision Pro and are coming to us
25:06
with really interesting film projects to do
25:08
8K per eye, you know, stitching all
25:10
the camera work together. So there's also
25:12
some like really interesting stuff and you'll
25:14
see us talk a lot about this
25:16
at South by Southwest, about like what
25:18
we think, you know, I'm seeing some
25:21
good excitement in those 8K formats as
25:23
well, as all I'll say. But it
25:25
might just be the position that we
25:27
sit in the position that we sit
25:29
in the industry. It's so interesting to
25:31
see the rest of the industry basically
25:33
insist that consumers don't care about 4K.
25:35
You and I are talking two days
25:37
before the Super Bowl, and for all
25:39
of Fox's talk about 4K, they're still
25:42
producing that in 1080P and then upscaling
25:44
it. And it's kind of fascinating to
25:46
see the consumer side of the market
25:48
land at one sort of standard quality
25:50
level while you're saying the enterprise of
25:52
the market, the more discerning part of
25:54
the market, is now not just assuming
25:56
that 4K it will exist, but that
25:58
you will support. 8K per I, 36
26:01
frames per second in the vision prep.
26:03
When there's 16K for TVs out, I
26:05
think people will be buying them. Is
26:07
that, does that, that's a lot of
26:09
cost, right? I mean, you're talking about
26:11
moving an enormous amount of data. Are
26:13
you just getting ahead of it? Because
26:15
that's what the customers expect? You have
26:17
a background in cloud services and big
26:19
data. Like, is that something where you
26:22
say, okay, this is just scalable, like
26:24
we can just solve this problem with
26:26
the tools we have? Or is it
26:28
we have to re-archate the systems? Or
26:30
is it we have to re-archate the
26:32
systems? I'll use the corollary of what's
26:34
going on with token. is going to
26:36
come down over time. The cost of
26:38
storage comes down, the cost of bandwidth
26:41
that comes down, and then even the
26:43
innovations that are in the televisions, those
26:45
costs are going to be coming down.
26:47
When you think about the quality of
26:49
the TVs we have now versus even
26:51
just 10 years ago, it's like so
26:53
discernably different. And I think that as
26:55
those costs come down, you know, somebody
26:57
has to serve that content. and you
26:59
know our infrastructure we have the infrastructure
27:02
to be able to do it. And
27:04
so some of us we have we
27:06
have to stay slightly ahead so that
27:08
we are that place that's always viewed
27:10
as quality. And so yeah I guess
27:12
it's just it's part of our it
27:14
has to be part of our DNA
27:16
that we're always going to support those
27:18
cutting edge formats. We need to take
27:21
a quick break. We'll be right back.
27:26
Support for this show comes from
27:28
Attentive. Millions of marketing messages are
27:31
sent out every day. So if
27:33
you're trying to make sure your
27:35
business's message actually gets delivered and
27:38
sticks in customers' minds, you might
27:40
want to try Attentive. Attentive is
27:43
the SMS and email marketing platform
27:45
designed to help brands build and
27:47
connect with their ideal audience. It
27:50
helps marketers create unique messages for
27:52
every subscriber transforming the consumer shopping
27:55
experience and maximizing marketing performance. Here's
27:57
how it works. Attentives AI learns
27:59
what subscribers actually want based on
28:02
their real-time interactions with your brand.
28:04
That means it customizes the content,
28:07
tone, and timing of every message
28:09
so they always resonate. You can
28:11
send out truly personalized messages at
28:14
the perfect times, and you'll be
28:16
able to keep supporting customers throughout
28:19
the buying process with conversational AI
28:21
that's actually helpful. All in all,
28:23
when you use attentive, you can
28:26
connect with the right customers because
28:28
they'll feel a connection with the
28:31
messages you send. For messages that
28:33
perform and results that transform, check
28:35
out attentive. Visit attentive.com/decoder to get
28:38
started. Support for the show comes
28:40
from Vanta. Trust isn't just earned.
28:42
It's demanded. Whether your startup founder
28:45
navigating your first audit or season
28:47
security professional scaling your GRC program,
28:50
proving your commitment to security has
28:52
never been more critical or more
28:54
complex. That's where Vanta comes in.
28:57
Vanta says they can help businesses
28:59
establish trust by automating compliance needs
29:02
across over 35 frameworks like SOC
29:04
and ISO 27001. They also centralized
29:06
security workflows, complete questioners up to
29:09
five times faster, and proactively manage
29:11
vendor risk. In short, VANA wants
29:14
to save you time and money,
29:16
and a new IDEC white paper
29:18
found that VANA customers achieved $535,000
29:21
per year in benefits, and the
29:23
platform pays for itself in just
29:26
three months. You can join over
29:28
9,000 global companies like Atlacian, Cora,
29:30
and Factory who use Vanta to
29:33
manage risk and prove security in
29:35
real-time. For a limited time, our
29:38
audience gets $1,000 off, vanta.com/Dakota, for
29:40
$1,000 off. It's been reported that
29:42
one in four people experienced sensory
29:45
sensitivities. making everyday experiences like a
29:47
trip to the dentist is especially
29:50
difficult. In fact, 26% of sensory
29:52
sensitive individuals avoid dental visits entirely.
29:54
In sensory overload, a new documentary
29:57
produced as part of Sensodyne's Sensory
29:59
Inclusion Initiative, we follow individuals navigating.
30:01
I've only had two full-time jobs
30:04
where I felt safe, loud sounds,
30:06
and unexpected touches can turn routine
30:09
moments into overwhelming challenges. Burnett Grant,
30:11
for example, has spent their life
30:13
masking discomfort in workplaces that don't
30:16
accommodate neuro divergence. I've only had
30:18
two full-time jobs where I felt safe,
30:20
they share. This is why they're advocating
30:22
for change. Through deeply personal
30:25
stories like Burnett's, sensory overload
30:27
highlights the urgent need for
30:30
spaces, dental offices and beyond,
30:32
that embrace sensory inclusion. Because
30:34
true inclusion requires action with
30:37
environments where everyone feels safe.
30:39
Watch Sensory Overload now, streaming
30:42
on Hulu. We're
30:47
back with Vimeo CEO Philip Moir. Before the
30:49
break, we were discussing the kinds of
30:51
opportunities that still exist for online video
30:53
distribution and the types of tools that
30:56
are dramatically changing video creation. But before
30:58
we really got into AI, I wanted
31:00
to ask the big decoder questions about
31:02
structure and decision making and how Philip
31:04
is changing Vimeo now that he's in
31:06
charge. We've opened the door to AI and I
31:08
definitely want to talk about that and... in
31:10
particular using AI as a creative tool and
31:13
how your customers might be thinking about that
31:15
and their relationship to it. But first of
31:17
all, I just want to get to the
31:19
decoder questions. We've talked a lot about how
31:21
you're thinking about growing Vimeo's business. What
31:23
would you say is the most tangibly
31:25
different thing you're doing than your predecessor,
31:27
Anjali? There's a couple things. Anjali, she
31:29
was supporting a lot of different businesses. I'll
31:32
say as you went through COVID. And as
31:34
you went through kind of when when video
31:36
was hard and I would say it's it
31:38
wasn't as culturally ingrained as it is right
31:40
now I think you know she had to
31:42
make a lot of decisions around the business
31:44
when I got here a lot of people
31:46
asked me this question like well do we
31:49
serve the consumer or do we serve the
31:51
enterprise do we serve the filmmaker or do
31:53
we serve the physician when I really spent
31:55
time down with you know who our customer
31:57
was like I really had to get deep
31:59
deep deep. inside and go, you know, who
32:01
really uses this? Show me the type of
32:04
company, show me the names of the companies,
32:06
the industries that we're in. You know, it
32:08
was very clear to me that we serve
32:10
the creator that is professional, somebody that is
32:12
using video for their business, like professionally,
32:15
it's not a hobby, it's actually like
32:17
to get a job done. You know,
32:19
so being able to consensus around that
32:21
creative pro. not trying to go and
32:24
create a YouTube competitor or trying to
32:26
create, you know, create a low-cost, you
32:28
know, tool for the hobbyist, but truly
32:30
that we serve that professional creator. And
32:33
then being able to describe very succinctly,
32:35
you know, the fact that all of
32:37
that comes together, that sometimes a professional
32:39
creator, and then being able to describe
32:42
very succinctly, you know, the fact that
32:44
all of that comes together, that sometimes
32:46
a professional creator, or square formats. I
32:48
think one of the core things I
32:50
did when I got here was really
32:53
obsessed around the customer. Every meeting we
32:55
start, we start by telling a customer
32:57
story. I learned a lot of this,
32:59
I would tell you between Google and
33:01
Amazon, you know, Amazon is, I would
33:03
say, renowned for this, but we really
33:06
tell the stories of who our creators are.
33:08
And then really building the ability to be
33:10
able to move quickly and listen to those
33:12
enterprise requirements. You know, when you start a
33:14
company, and I... I started at Microsoft in
33:17
the very early days of Microsoft. It wasn't
33:19
an enterprise company then, believe it or not.
33:21
Amazon, you know, when I got there, there
33:23
weren't a lot of financial services companies using
33:25
the cloud. I went through that transition and
33:28
Google, I kind of, you know, it wasn't
33:30
really known as like an enterprise-grade cloud when
33:32
I first got there. And so I've been
33:34
through this transition and when you start a,
33:36
you know, when you start a product that
33:39
is going to serve the enterprise, you know,
33:41
what I always tell people is easier to
33:43
get more complex, but it's really hard to
33:45
be complex and get easier. And so we
33:47
were starting from these routes as a kind
33:49
of a consumer and filmmakers product, and a
33:52
lot of what I've focused on is really
33:54
listening quickly, you know, to not just our
33:56
individual customers, but like the entire spectrum and
33:58
being able to say yes. to the requirements.
34:00
I also come with a tremendous amount of
34:03
experience. As you can imagine, you could look
34:05
at my background. It's years of enterprise experience.
34:07
And so I also, I know, you know,
34:09
what's required to be able to do that.
34:12
I understand what it is to be able
34:14
to GDPR. I understand compliance requirements. And so
34:16
when we go into things like artificial intelligence
34:19
or we go into storage and distribution, like
34:21
I have, you know, a lot of instincts
34:23
around that. And so spending the time to
34:25
explain. where we're going as a company to
34:28
be able to serve both inside and outside
34:30
the firewall and then the requirements that
34:32
we're going to have architecturally and just
34:34
explaining that to the organization and weaving
34:37
together. Hey, that filmmaker once their content
34:39
protected the same way that may be
34:41
the largest, you know, retailer in the
34:43
world or that CEO wants their content
34:46
protected and weaving those two messages together
34:48
and building a product roadmap is going
34:50
to serve both. I would tell you.
34:52
I feel like probably the biggest thing
34:55
that I've probably done since getting here
34:57
is unify the vision into a single
34:59
cohesive vision. And then the second thing is
35:01
that really making sure that all of us
35:03
are telling the stories, hey, did you know
35:05
that this fertility clinic is using us in
35:07
this way? Did you know that this schoolteacher
35:09
is using us in this way? Did you
35:11
know that this faith organization uses us in
35:13
this way? Do you know that the largest
35:15
retailer uses us this way? Getting people to
35:17
tell the stories internally, I think was an
35:19
important. The last thing I'll tell you is
35:21
that, you know, the company kind of like
35:23
there was a little bit of a shine
35:25
that came off the company after the IPO.
35:28
And I think, um, given the company
35:30
confidence. and saying, let me tell you
35:32
who's actually using us. I don't think
35:34
that a lot of people really realized
35:36
internally even the broad array of customers.
35:38
And I put this in our shareholder
35:41
letter where we have, you know, eight
35:43
out of the top eight big box
35:45
retailers, you know, eight of the top
35:47
eight big box retailers, you know, we've
35:49
got air on the top eight media
35:51
companies that are using us internally, we've
35:54
got, you know, huge numbers of insurance,
35:56
and financial tool in a world
35:58
of increasing complexity. I think
36:00
it's given the company a lot more confidence
36:02
to take to be even bolder as we
36:04
go forward. You're talking a lot
36:06
about culture change, renewed focus. Kind of
36:08
the thesis of this show is that
36:10
comes out of structure. I'm just looking
36:12
at our notes here from the producers.
36:15
In the past few months, you've named
36:17
a new chief marketing officer, a new
36:19
chief information security officer, a new people
36:21
officer, a new revenue officer, you're obviously
36:23
making some changes in the organization. How
36:25
was Vimeo structured and how are you
36:27
restructuring it? You know we had in some
36:29
cases our technology organizations were incredibly siloed.
36:32
How we did trust and safety as
36:34
an example you know in some cases
36:36
how we did data in some cases
36:39
who owned what parts of engineering they
36:41
were actually broken up in a
36:43
lot of ways. I think oftentimes our
36:45
marketing organization had a mandate while the
36:47
sales organization might have had another mandate.
36:49
A lot of what I would tell
36:51
you what was really important to me,
36:53
like one of my first hires was
36:56
the chief technology and product officer, you
36:58
know, Bob Petroselli, bringing an individual in
37:00
that unifies product engineering and, you know,
37:02
is able to have like the single-threaded
37:04
leadership over top of parts of the
37:06
business, but are that important. They have
37:08
to be working together well. some of
37:10
the things that we're doing in trust
37:12
and safety, we actually think we can turn
37:15
around and expose that to our enterprise customers
37:17
because it turns out they probably don't want
37:19
things on their platform the same way that
37:21
we don't want certain things on our platform.
37:23
And so getting that kind of like any
37:25
internal function can become an external function and
37:27
getting that kind of view that we all
37:29
serve the customer in some way shape of
37:31
form, super important inside of our product and
37:33
technology organizations. One of the most important things
37:36
I had to do as well, you know,
37:38
our chief marketing officer that came in, you
37:40
know, he has a really extensive experience in
37:42
Charlie Ungersick in being able to both do
37:44
marketing to individuals as well as to enterprise.
37:46
We are going out and talking about how
37:48
we can protect videos as well as serve
37:51
videos as well as, you know, as well
37:53
as provide AI to that entire audience. And
37:55
so we had to get an individual that
37:57
was able to oversee both parts of the
37:59
business. recent restructuring where we put an
38:01
individual completely in charge what we call
38:03
our self-service business and to be able
38:05
to move even faster in that part
38:08
of the business and obsess on everything
38:10
from the top of the funnel all
38:12
the way through you know when a
38:14
subscriber comes in right down to what
38:16
are we actually using in the product
38:18
and this is a big element as
38:20
well. We will tell you one of
38:22
the other change they didn't mention is
38:24
that we're obsessing on use like right
38:26
down to the feature level. where I
38:28
look at those kind of reports on
38:30
a weekly basis, like how many people
38:32
are using our edit feature, how many
38:34
people are using our live feature, how
38:36
many people applied permissions to a video,
38:38
you know, did that increase week over
38:40
week? What did we do? And so
38:42
that self-service leader is really now single-threaded
38:44
leader. And we just, you know, we
38:46
had as well a single-threaded leader around
38:48
our streaming business and we really started
38:50
seeing, you know, some of the results
38:52
from that internally inside of the company.
38:55
So giving single-threaded leadership, I will tell
38:57
you, it is talked about a lot,
38:59
but oh my God, it's beautiful to
39:01
actually be able to call up somebody
39:03
that owns the number that owns the
39:05
resources that worries about it as much
39:07
as you do, like every single-threaded leadership
39:09
is an Amazon concept. You've worked at
39:11
all the companies, so I can pick
39:13
out where the concepts come from. It's
39:15
pretty fun for me. That's a classic
39:17
Amazon concept. You need to have a
39:19
pretty small team that owns a thing,
39:21
and there's a leader who's responsible for
39:23
the whole stack. That is how you
39:25
get silos. You can look at Amazon's
39:27
product and say, oh, there's a much
39:29
single-threaded leaders here. This is not necessarily
39:31
cohesive. Everything is running as fast as
39:33
it can, but the holistic as it.
39:35
You started out talking about having too
39:37
many silos and we're talking on single-threaded
39:39
leaders. How are you managing that tension?
39:42
I was asked one time to give
39:44
a talk on what it was like
39:46
to work because you know at Microsoft
39:48
Amazon and Google, you know, I got
39:50
an opportunity to work directly with Gates
39:52
and Balmer, directly with Jesse and then
39:54
certainly with Thomas Curry and Sundar. One
39:56
of the most important lessons I learned
39:58
very early on, you know, at Microsoft
40:00
was around having like really establishing a
40:02
strong single vision for the entire company
40:04
about what we're trying to do in
40:06
the future and you know you wake
40:08
up every single morning and I mean
40:10
I was there in the early days
40:12
when the vision was a PC on
40:14
every desktop in every home. Now that
40:16
was like extraordinary the time now we
40:18
have a PC in every you know
40:20
pocket at this point but We all
40:22
knew that what we were trying to
40:24
do was unlock information for the world
40:26
by putting this powerful computing device in
40:29
someone's hands. And so regardless of the
40:31
the divisions or otherwise, it all feathered
40:33
into a common vision. And it was
40:35
a lot of what I had to
40:37
do when I was when I got
40:39
here was I owed, you know, the
40:41
company a strong agreement among everybody in
40:43
the company of what we're trying to
40:45
build. You know, are we trying to
40:47
build the best live stream product? Are
40:49
we trying to build the best marketing
40:51
platform? Are we trying to build just
40:53
a product for filmmakers? You know, we
40:55
settled on this common vision. And then,
40:57
you know, being able to say, okay,
40:59
this is the individual, you know, that
41:01
owns this part of the business. There's
41:03
a huge portion from our individual business
41:05
where people swipe a credit card and
41:07
start using us or that register for
41:09
free. Huge number of those customers actually
41:11
end up as enterprise customers. You know,
41:13
You know, I started talking to him
41:16
about, you know, Vimeo. He said, well,
41:18
first of all, he goes, you don't
41:20
have to tell me who you are.
41:22
He goes, my son is on your
41:24
on Vimeo every weekend. He says, an
41:26
independent filmmaker. He goes, so I know
41:28
who you are. Why are you calling
41:30
me? And I said, we have 2,600
41:32
accounts, self-service accounts that are on us.
41:34
We should do an enterprise agreement. And
41:36
so being able to explain to the
41:38
organization to the organization. between where we're
41:40
applying more features, maybe in one part
41:42
of the business or another, and how
41:44
those features actually feather, how we might
41:46
start them for an individual, but they
41:48
have to grow to be, you know,
41:50
for an entire enterprise, really, really, really,
41:52
really important. And so I would tell
41:54
you these, starting with a strong vision
41:56
that everybody buys into, that they understand
41:58
their piece of it, really critical. And
42:00
then each one of those, those leaders,
42:03
I expect them to have a, another
42:05
important that you can't let their vision
42:07
exist in the absence of the rest
42:09
of the company's vision. So you have
42:11
to actively stitch those visions together. You
42:13
brought up decisions, that's the other classic
42:15
decoder question. I will warn you, this
42:17
is a honeypot for former Amazon executives,
42:19
because when you ask Amazon executives how
42:21
they make decisions, everybody sings chapter and
42:23
verse. But you've been a bunch of
42:25
places you are now the CEO of
42:27
this company. How do you make decisions?
42:29
What's your framework? The other company I
42:31
didn't talk about that I learned a
42:33
lot from was Google. And one of
42:35
the things that I would tell you
42:37
that Google gave me was I think
42:39
they've managed something like 10 out of
42:41
the top 11 billion user products in
42:43
the world and really like thinking big
42:45
actually like giving an organization like incredibly
42:47
lofty goals that sometimes you only make
42:50
like 80 to 90% of them. One
42:52
of the things that I do, you
42:54
know, first and foremost is that I,
42:56
you know, I really am a believer
42:58
that you've got to set these very
43:00
high goals. You've got to have this
43:02
vision and you've got to be willing
43:04
to like put yourself out there to
43:06
set extremely high goals. And then backing
43:08
into that from a decision-making process, I
43:10
would tell you that we've had to
43:12
make some a number of decisions around
43:14
what products we focus on, what areas
43:16
we deprecate. I come back to the
43:18
customer. And one of the things I
43:20
really try to hold people accountable to,
43:22
and I think it's really important, I
43:24
think I learned a lot of this
43:26
both at Google and at Amazon, but
43:28
actually explaining the customer problem that we're
43:30
trying to solve. And there's all kinds
43:32
of studies that you can do. There's
43:34
user studies, there's data and so forth,
43:37
but truly being able to assess on
43:39
what that workflow looks like, you know,
43:41
what are we trying to solve? What
43:43
is the most challenging thing for the
43:45
customer for the customer most? And really
43:47
having a strong sense for your customer
43:49
and the customer anecdotes as well as
43:51
what we call, you know, Google, we
43:53
call it a customer empathy, like actually
43:55
putting yourself in the shoes of the
43:57
customer. One of the things that we
43:59
ask all of our everyone inside of
44:01
being able to do is be a
44:03
user of the product. And so the
44:05
things that are frustrating us, we actually
44:07
are elevating those things into our decision-making
44:09
process. And so we both... bring the
44:11
voice of the customer in, we bring
44:13
our own voice in, and then we
44:15
also are saying, okay, well, what's going
44:17
to help us grow, you know, what's
44:19
going to grow the next million users
44:21
for us, or what's going to grow
44:24
us to 10X. And so I can't
44:26
just kind of tell you it's like
44:28
one thing. It's a little bit of
44:30
a framework of the customer, making sure
44:32
we're tethered to big ideas and really
44:34
make sure that we're being innovative enough
44:36
in how we push the team. Well,
44:38
I applaud you for being the only
44:40
former Amazon executive to not talk about
44:42
one way and two way doors when
44:44
I ask that question. You've done it.
44:46
You've done it. You've achieved escape velocity.
44:48
Well done. I mean, I appreciate the
44:50
one way and two way doors. I'm
44:52
just saying. I don't know that I
44:54
buy that. I mean, like, you know,
44:56
Google, I think they've proven that there's
44:58
not a lot of one way doors.
45:00
Fair enough. Google is. Come out against
45:02
YouTube, but you have entire blog posts
45:04
about how your search capabilities are better
45:06
than YouTube search capabilities or you're a
45:08
better platform You've talked even in this
45:11
episode about wanting things to be private
45:13
not being part of the algorithmic ecosystem
45:15
or the advertising ecosystem on YouTube Google
45:17
is big. They think so big that
45:19
sometimes they let opportunities just slide away
45:21
because they think it's such massive scale.
45:23
How are you thinking about competing with
45:25
a YouTube at that scale when they
45:27
seem to own so much of the
45:29
attention space and video? I'll say it
45:31
again. I don't think that a lot
45:33
of product companies love the fact that
45:35
you got to go to YouTube to
45:37
get some customer support for one of
45:39
their products and meanwhile one of their
45:41
competitors could be rolling right next to
45:43
you. When I look at YouTube, I
45:45
was at Google and I spent a
45:47
lot of time with customers and I
45:49
really foundationally believe, like I love YouTube.
45:51
I'll watch, you know, YouTube as much
45:53
as the next person. And I think
45:55
that what they're doing, you know, for
45:58
all call it kind of the attention
46:00
economy, for what they're doing around content
46:02
for democratizing access to more and more
46:04
content, I think it's absolutely wonderful. a
46:06
lot of our customers are great YouTube
46:08
customers as well. You know, people will
46:10
house their videos on video and post
46:12
on YouTube in a lot of ways.
46:14
But I really do think, you know,
46:16
there is in the same way that,
46:18
you know, you don't do a lot
46:20
of your business on Facebook, or you
46:22
don't do it on LinkedIn, you kind
46:24
of do it behind closed walls. I
46:26
think that a lot of the economy
46:28
runs behind fire walls and pay walls.
46:30
And so I think that we can,
46:32
we can go directly at that. Think
46:34
about what happened in content and why
46:36
some of these platforms rose. You know,
46:38
think about, and I, you know, again,
46:40
I'm old enough to have remembered MSN
46:42
and AOL. The reason why we went
46:45
there was because news had to be
46:47
consolidated. It was hard to create websites.
46:49
It was difficult to find information. It
46:51
had to be curated. Well, you know,
46:53
Netflix and YouTube were born in an
46:55
error where it was really hard to
46:57
categorize content. to say, hey, this video
46:59
is about a cat. This video is
47:01
about how to, I don't know, plug
47:03
a HDMI cord in the back of
47:05
your LGTV. And so there was categorization
47:07
that had to take place. There was
47:09
standardization of the data and the metadata.
47:11
And then recommendations, I don't know if
47:13
you remember them, but Netflix famously paid
47:15
a million dollars to be able to
47:17
write their recommendation engine that they went
47:19
out and said, whoever builds the best
47:21
recommendation engine will win a million dollars.
47:23
you know with an AI model I
47:25
can like categorize content in seconds now
47:27
with a recommendation engine I can buy
47:29
recommendation engines off the shelf and quite
47:32
frankly the metadata that we can produce
47:34
now out of a video is extraordinarily
47:36
more detailed than a human being can
47:38
even write like I can tell you
47:40
precisely when the purse like went left
47:42
the beach and like you know who
47:44
was carrying the person what the brand
47:46
was of shoes that the individual was
47:48
wearing you know all stuff that maybe
47:50
missed in a traditional human being after
47:52
entering all that metadata. And so what
47:54
I see is that, you know, there
47:56
is going to be kind of a
47:58
democratization of content classification and content recommendation
48:00
and context discoverability. You know, searches, there's
48:02
been a single search place that you
48:04
go to be able to get your
48:06
content and your videos and your maps
48:08
and, you know, pick your favorite things.
48:10
But I think that there's billions of
48:12
dollars going into another part of, you
48:14
know, in other ways to be able
48:16
to find and interact with information. And
48:19
so. I think that Vimeo can serve that kind
48:21
of information outside of like a traditional Google
48:23
search in a lot of ways. Whether or
48:25
not you're inside an internet, inside of a
48:27
company, whether or not you're inside an AI
48:30
model, you don't want to leave the ecosystem
48:32
of the AI model, you know, we can
48:34
provide an answer to a question as well.
48:36
And so I guess what I'd say to
48:38
you is that I think YouTube is fantastic,
48:41
I love it. But I think that
48:43
the discoverability, accessibility, indexing, and recommendations
48:45
is there's a whole new error
48:47
coming and we intend to be
48:49
part of it. There's another piece of
48:51
that dynamic that I'm wondering if you are
48:53
considering, which is a Google is a huge
48:56
company that is under an enormous
48:58
amount of pressure right now. And maybe
49:00
so much pressure that it will be
49:02
hard for the company to execute, right?
49:04
There's an antitrust trial in this country
49:06
that has resulted in the government suggesting
49:08
that Google break itself up and sell
49:10
chrome. There's a Donald Trump in the
49:12
mix who makes some sort of deal.
49:14
There's a Donald Trump in the mix
49:16
who's done a tariffs regime with China
49:18
that has resulted in a Chinese antitrust
49:20
investigation in Google, which is amazing because
49:23
Google doesn't really operate in that country.
49:25
there's Europe exists much to the chagrin
49:27
of many of our tech companies. There's
49:29
just a lot going on, right? There's
49:31
a lot of pressure on Google to
49:33
not flex that dominance. And then there's
49:35
competitive pressure from the AI products, right?
49:38
From chat GPT, from search GPT, from
49:40
Bing to whatever extent that Microsoft believes that
49:42
Bing is a real competitor to Google. Is
49:44
that create an opening for you? Do you
49:46
see that as a real opening? Or is
49:48
that just, well, if those doors open, you'll
49:50
be ready? You'll be ready. It absolutely does.
49:52
I mean, I would tell you, I have a
49:54
lot of friends at Google. I really enjoy my
49:57
time there. You know, I don't wish them ill
49:59
in any way. I really hope that they,
50:01
you know, sail through this, you know, this
50:03
error right now of challenge for them, like
50:05
in a really great way. But it does,
50:08
we, I clearly, you know, I came here
50:10
from Google because I saw the opportunity, you
50:12
know, I really, I really did see the
50:14
opportunity that we're about to go through a
50:17
seismic shift. in accessibility of information, in
50:19
new ways to access, you know, to go
50:21
and access it. Whether or not you're using
50:23
chat GPT, you're using anthropic, you know, whether
50:25
or not you're using, you know, mistral, there
50:27
are so many different ways to be able
50:29
to discover information. And, you know, the notion
50:31
of, like, the common crawl on the web,
50:33
the ability to be able to crawl the
50:35
whole web index it and then be able
50:37
to ingest it into these models, you know,
50:39
it's just kind of showing that it's democratizing
50:42
that it's democratizing that it's democratizing access to
50:44
that information access to that information, Video is
50:46
a very important element of video and you
50:48
can't imagine I mean you I
50:50
think you'd agree You can't just
50:52
imagine only one platform is going
50:54
to serve all the video answers
50:56
You know in the world, and
50:58
so that's where I just see it's
51:01
such a super opportunity for us
51:03
at Bimeon We need to take
51:05
another quick break. We'll be back in
51:07
just a minute Support
51:13
for this show comes from Oracle.
51:15
Even if you think it's a
51:17
bit overhyped, AI is suddenly everywhere,
51:19
from self-driving cars to molecular medicine
51:22
to business efficiency. If it's not
51:24
in your industry yet, it's coming.
51:26
Fast. But AI needs a lot
51:28
of speed and computing power. So
51:31
how do you compete without cost
51:33
spiraling out of control? Time to
51:35
upgrade to the next generation of
51:37
the cloud. Oracle cloud infrastructure, or
51:40
OCI. OSI is a blazing fast
51:42
and secure platform for your
51:44
infrastructure, database, application development, plus
51:46
all your AI and machine
51:48
learning workloads. OSI cost 50%
51:50
less for compute and 80%
51:53
less for networking, so you're
51:55
saving a pile of money.
51:57
Thousands of businesses have already
51:59
upgraded to OCI, including Vodafone,
52:01
Thompson Reuters, and Suno
52:03
AI. Right now, Oracle
52:06
is offering to cut
52:08
your current cloud bill
52:10
in half if you
52:12
move to OCI. For
52:14
new US customers with
52:16
minimum financial commitment, offer
52:18
ends March 31st. See
52:20
if your company qualifies
52:22
for this special offer
52:24
at oracle.com/Vox. Support
52:29
for this show comes from
52:31
ADT. From ADT comes trusted
52:33
neighbor, the new standard in
52:35
home access. Through the ADT
52:37
Plus app, easily grant and
52:40
automate event-based or scheduled access
52:42
for neighbors, friends, and helpers.
52:44
Notify trusted individuals of events
52:46
like alarms or packages and
52:48
set access windows for planned
52:50
guests or even the dog
52:52
walker without interrupting your day.
52:54
Visit adt.com. When every second
52:56
counts, count on ADT. requires
52:58
ADT complete pro-monitoring plan
53:01
and compatible devices. Copyright
53:03
2025 ADT LLC. All
53:06
rights reserved. Okay, business
53:08
leaders, are Okay, business
53:10
leaders, are you playing defense or are
53:12
you on the offense? Are you just...
53:15
Excuse me. Hey, I'm trying to talk
53:17
business here. As I was saying, are you
53:19
here just to play or are you
53:21
playing to win? If you're in it
53:24
to win, meet your next MVP. Next
53:26
week by Oracle. Net Suite is your
53:28
full business management system in one suite.
53:30
With Net Suite, you're running your accounting,
53:33
your financials, HR, e-commerce, and more, all
53:35
from your online dashboard. One source of
53:37
truth means every department's working from the
53:39
same numbers with no data delays. And
53:41
with AI embedded throughout, you're automating manual
53:44
tasks, plus getting fast insights for your
53:46
next move. Whether you're competing on your
53:48
home turf or looking to conquer international
53:50
markets, Net Suite helps you get the
53:53
W. Over 40,000 businesses businesses of already...
53:55
I made the move to Netsweet,
53:57
the number one cloud ERP. Right
53:59
now, get the CFO's guide to
54:02
AI and machine learning at netsweet.com
54:04
slash stereo. Get this
54:06
free guide at netsweet.com/stereo.
54:08
Okay guys. CEO Philip
54:10
Moyer, discussing what generative
54:13
AI might do to video
54:15
creation and how the attention
54:17
economy can possibly sustain an
54:19
even larger amount of AI
54:22
generated content. Let's talk about AI,
54:24
I want to start by again asking
54:26
sort of a mathematical question. One of
54:28
my the thesis for the year is
54:31
that the creator economy is under an
54:33
enormous amount of pressure, not just from
54:35
AI, but just from what you're describing,
54:37
this huge shift to video. You can
54:40
see that there's just an exponential
54:42
increase in supply of video in all
54:44
these platforms, right? More and more kids
54:46
are making videos, more and more people
54:48
are choosing to communicate in video first
54:50
ways, more enterprises are doing it, and
54:52
then you have AI, which is just
54:55
making it easier and easier to produce.
54:57
a massive amount of video. So the platforms
54:59
are getting flooded with supply. There's not as
55:01
much ad revenue as there is increasing video
55:03
supply. So just, you do the division,
55:05
you're like, well, the ad rates are going to
55:07
go down. And then attention is sort of fixed,
55:10
right? There's only so many people with so many
55:12
hours in a day, and presumably they do have
55:14
to eat and do productive work. So attention
55:16
is kind of fixed, right? It's just like
55:18
a fixed number that you can capture, That
55:20
all just seems like it's a
55:22
bubble that's going to pop, right?
55:24
You flood an ecosystem that has
55:26
been pretty stable for a few
55:28
years with an enormous amount of
55:30
supply, the ad rates go down, attention
55:32
stays fixed, something happens in there.
55:34
And it seems like to me,
55:37
AI is the most important component
55:39
of that, because it's the thing
55:41
that can change the economics of
55:43
the supply the fastest, right? You just
55:45
say, make 50 videos about my product
55:47
on whatever platform. Is that an opportunity
55:49
for you? That this whole sort of
55:51
the creator economy or the video creator
55:53
economy as we know it seems like
55:55
it's going to go just a pretty
55:57
basic shift in its economics? You
56:00
know, it's a huge question. To me, it
56:02
feels like the question of 2025. Like
56:04
if you ask me, what is the
56:06
version of the number in 2025? There's,
56:08
there's Elon and Toehan and there's, what
56:10
happens to the creator economy? Yeah, you
56:13
know, I mean, I think the creator
56:15
economy, we are, I think we are
56:17
reaching saturation. I mean, I don't know
56:19
what we're going to get to the
56:21
post mobile phone error, like, but this
56:23
is not a way we're going to
56:25
live for the rest of the rest
56:27
of eternity. Yes, you know, there is a
56:29
saturation point, but I also think that people are
56:32
looking for a little bit of a higher quality
56:34
experience. I think people are getting tired of like
56:36
the doom scrolling. I think the mere fact that
56:38
we name it, you know, the fact that we
56:40
are now, you know, acknowledging that we get sent
56:43
down rabbit holes. I do think that people will
56:45
like storytelling. I do think there's going to be,
56:47
you know, really different opportunities. I get asked all
56:49
the time, when will AI be able to take
56:51
my favorite book and turn it into a movie
56:54
and turn it into a movie? Think about
56:56
how wonderful that would be. Think about
56:58
being able to take your child's favorite
57:00
book and be able to turn it
57:02
into a video as an example for
57:04
them that has like an extended storyline.
57:06
I think storytelling is as old as
57:08
humanity and it's going to continue forward.
57:11
Can I just stop you there for one
57:13
second? I know the Dakota audience fairly
57:15
well. A lot of people just started
57:17
screaming at you in their car because
57:19
they think that's a bad outcome. Right. Like
57:21
I'll just, I have a young child,
57:23
right? The idea that we're going to
57:25
read the Wild Robot and then some
57:27
AI tool is going to make the
57:29
movie The Wild Robot instead of the
57:31
beautiful actual movie made by people, the
57:33
Wild Robot. I would argue that that's a
57:36
bad outcome. I think it is for a,
57:38
for a class. Like here's what I, here's
57:40
what bugs me the most right now. You
57:42
know, last year the Big Six Studios
57:44
only put out 88 movies. 88. Right,
57:46
because the economics of video have collapsed on
57:48
them, right? They don't have the distribution monopoly.
57:50
And I think there's like so many stories
57:52
to be told, you know, if the creator
57:54
of, you know, the giant robot gets paid,
57:56
you know, for having a now movie and
57:58
is able to have... monetized, you know, in
58:01
some ways should perform in a really
58:03
beautiful way. I actually think we're supporting
58:05
storytellers in a foundation away. I think
58:07
that's a decade away. I would say
58:09
maybe five to seven years away. And
58:11
so, you know, first and foremost, I
58:13
do think that AI is going to
58:15
help people create more stories. I think
58:18
they are. I think they're going to
58:20
be able to illustrate more stories. Let's
58:22
put it that way. I talked to
58:24
a lot of creative types that tell
58:26
me that like, look, you know, AI
58:28
is fairly disjoint it right now. It's
58:30
indeterministic. I don't know what I'm going
58:32
to get out of it. Human curation
58:34
of AI creation is going to be
58:37
a necessity. And, you know, the same
58:39
way that shooting a green screen and
58:41
then being able to... I'm not, you
58:43
know, when I say this, what I'm
58:45
saying is that like I do think
58:47
that longer form stories are going to
58:49
be more compelling. I think people are
58:51
going to want to stay inside of
58:53
a story a little bit longer. That
58:56
doesn't mean that the creator is going
58:58
away. It doesn't mean that the creator
59:00
is going away. It doesn't mean the
59:02
human curation is going away. I just
59:04
think that we're going to be able
59:06
to uplift them and make them faster.
59:08
So I think this is a real
59:10
tension. And I see it expressed all
59:12
the time. I've heard it from your
59:15
peers on the show when they tell
59:17
me about the tools that people use
59:19
in Photoshop, right? Generative fill in Photoshop,
59:21
according to Sean Thine Neu Ryan and
59:23
Adobe, is like 100% usage rate. But
59:25
then everyone yells about Jennifer, fill existing.
59:27
And there's a real mismatch between consumer
59:29
expectations and how people feel about AI
59:31
and then the creatives actually using the
59:34
tools at high rates. I get all
59:36
that. But I also think there's a
59:38
mismatch between you saying you're for filmmakers
59:40
and how marketers want to use AI.
59:42
I think we're careening towards a world
59:44
of basically custom creative being shown to
59:46
individual users, right? Where some brand uploads
59:48
their assets to a video platform and
59:50
literally ads get assembled for you in
59:53
AI. for you as specific user targeted
59:55
to your interests. We're headed there. The
59:57
big platform is already talking about it.
59:59
But those really commercial uses of AI,
1:00:01
we're going to make a whole bunch
1:00:03
of ads, and we're going to do
1:00:05
some of the most creative filmmaking that
1:00:07
exists. They don't seem like they're happening
1:00:09
at the same rate or with the
1:00:12
same level of acceptance, or even like
1:00:14
they should happen with the same tools.
1:00:16
And you have every piece of the
1:00:18
puzzle in front of you. Where do
1:00:20
you see the biggest pushback? One of
1:00:22
our creators, Jake Olson, recently shot Currents,
1:00:24
you know, for Applevision Pro. And when
1:00:26
you shoot for an Applevision Pro, you
1:00:28
know, you have to maintain perfect stillness
1:00:31
in the camera, you'll shoot four to
1:00:33
six cameras, and by hand, you have
1:00:35
to stitch all these things together. If
1:00:37
you get an opportunity to watch Currents,
1:00:39
it's absolutely stunning. You kind of look
1:00:41
at and go, oh my God, I've
1:00:43
seen the future filmmaking. I truly have.
1:00:45
This is where I kind of saying
1:00:47
that I'm. for watching content and creativity.
1:00:50
And I think that we'll experience film
1:00:52
in new ways. We'll experience stories in
1:00:54
new ways. I would tell you that
1:00:56
I think that the best creators are
1:00:58
going, I'm seeing them blend together, you
1:01:00
know, the content, blend together AI usage,
1:01:02
you know, with traditional techniques to make
1:01:04
something incredible. Most filmmakers that I talk
1:01:06
to start with something they've shot and
1:01:09
then enhance it with AI. One of
1:01:11
the things that is most interesting to
1:01:13
me as well is in the marketing
1:01:15
world, the thing that's taking off the
1:01:17
most right now are not avatars. And
1:01:19
avatars I like to call and like
1:01:21
nobody wants to talk to a robot.
1:01:23
It's actually people that are kind of
1:01:25
sitting there going, hey I just bought
1:01:28
this piece of furniture, this looks really
1:01:30
cool, let me show you what it
1:01:32
looks like inside of my house. And
1:01:34
it's like actually authenticity in a world
1:01:36
of robots I think is actually like,
1:01:38
like I'm already seeing some avatars. And
1:01:40
then we've also offered to them, hey
1:01:42
we have this like super like down
1:01:44
and dirty create tool where you can
1:01:46
record, we can put a teller prompt
1:01:49
or up in front of you so
1:01:51
you can like do your own script
1:01:53
and we can either make the avatar
1:01:55
look. perfect or you can kind of
1:01:57
like you know be sitting in your
1:01:59
living room and do this quick thing
1:02:01
about your product or about your service
1:02:03
and inevitably all of them go to
1:02:05
the the real human being doing this
1:02:08
and it's just I'm just going to
1:02:10
tell you point blank I'm not seeing
1:02:12
the robots take off I'm not seeing
1:02:14
it and and we've we've tried to
1:02:16
serve both and so humans have always
1:02:18
kind of risen above like they've always
1:02:20
kind of brought through the authenticity they've
1:02:22
always brought through you kind of know
1:02:24
when you're getting something and when you're
1:02:27
not like even in the chatbot world
1:02:29
you're like how many people get frustrated
1:02:31
when they're like talking you know in
1:02:33
a chatbot online they quickly want to
1:02:35
talk to a human being and so
1:02:37
I don't know how to say it
1:02:39
to you but like there's we sense
1:02:41
that there's no ghost in the machine
1:02:43
so I don't know how to say
1:02:46
it anyway. I studied artificial intelligence for
1:02:48
a long time and I'm very confident
1:02:50
in the beauty of the human soul
1:02:52
in the context of creativity. I feel
1:02:54
like I'm more cynical than you, but
1:02:56
I spend more time on the social
1:02:58
platforms, it feels like. And the problem,
1:03:00
generally, is you can sense it, some
1:03:02
people can feel it, and a lot
1:03:05
of people cannot, right? Or they just
1:03:07
let it wash over them. And then
1:03:09
you end up in sort of interminable
1:03:11
fights about metadata or labeling, or Google
1:03:13
just wrote about synth ID for images
1:03:15
that you edit and Google photos. And
1:03:17
none of that stuff seems to have
1:03:19
landed, sort of landed, right? Vimeo has
1:03:21
some labeling features, you have some ideas
1:03:24
about how you might show people AI
1:03:26
generated content or expose that meditated to
1:03:28
people. Do you think that's working? Is
1:03:30
that something you're going to continue? Is
1:03:32
that something that you think needs to
1:03:34
be expanded? You know, when I was
1:03:36
at Google, there were about 42 different
1:03:38
regulatory bodies that were working on AI
1:03:40
legislation. The last week checked, there's over
1:03:43
a thousand. One world by basis. And
1:03:45
I'm raising that kind of say that
1:03:47
like when you do translations in certain
1:03:49
states inside of the United States like
1:03:51
Illinois or Texas, you can't actually modify
1:03:53
people's lips and put words in their
1:03:55
mouth. And so that's like one of
1:03:57
the just. one of the regulations. You
1:03:59
know, over in Europe, you actually do
1:04:02
have to identify that something's been AI
1:04:04
enhanced or modified. I think we as
1:04:06
humanity are wrestling with, you know, kind
1:04:08
of like, when do we want to
1:04:10
know, you know, that something's not real?
1:04:12
The mere fact that that's coming from
1:04:14
all over the world, that you're seeing
1:04:16
that kind of like desire to know
1:04:18
when something's not real, you know, I
1:04:21
can't say whether or not that's good
1:04:23
or bad, but I can tell you
1:04:25
that it's actually a human desire. Getting
1:04:27
something done like changing the credit card
1:04:29
on my telephone bill, I'll deal with a
1:04:31
bot to do that. But if I'm like
1:04:33
really having a problem with my elderly father,
1:04:35
you know, father-in-law is having a problem, I
1:04:38
actually do want a human being to pick
1:04:40
up the phone and just talk him through
1:04:42
it. I guess what I'd say to you
1:04:44
is so I think it's filmmaking as well.
1:04:46
We've always used tools to tell our
1:04:48
story. You know, it's been the invention
1:04:51
of so many tools to be able
1:04:53
to be able to tell stories. I
1:04:55
would certainly like to know when characters
1:04:57
aren't real. This is
1:04:59
the hardest question. This is
1:05:01
like an existential philosophical question,
1:05:04
but where do you draw the line?
1:05:06
Where do you personally think the line
1:05:08
should be for when you have to
1:05:10
put the label on? I'll give you
1:05:12
two examples. I think I
1:05:15
stabilized this video with AI does
1:05:17
not require that. I think I'm
1:05:19
talking to a deep fake. avatar of
1:05:21
a creator that is photo realistic is
1:05:23
just lying to me probably requires that,
1:05:25
right? I've replaced products in this
1:05:27
movie with other products, maybe requires
1:05:30
it, right? Where do you think the line
1:05:32
is? You know, I haven't been asked this question
1:05:34
for, but as I reflect on it, you
1:05:36
know, for me, I would like to know
1:05:39
that a particular character or a particular animal
1:05:41
or something that's in that in that film
1:05:43
is actually not real. that's completely made up.
1:05:45
Now you can tell that in innovation, but
1:05:47
like in a real film, if I know
1:05:50
that a certain character or a certain scene
1:05:52
is actually like completely fabricated with a single
1:05:54
individual in it, I probably would like to
1:05:56
know that. Or when there's dialogue involved
1:05:59
or something... talking back to me, that's
1:06:01
not for real. Like, you know, I probably
1:06:03
want to know about it. You know, when
1:06:05
I look at some of the Marvel movies,
1:06:07
clearly, then you start crossing the line, well,
1:06:09
you know, does the Fox, you know, Guardians
1:06:11
of the Galaxy do it? We all know.
1:06:14
I mean, the latest Marvel movie, they're, they
1:06:16
just sounds fantastic for, they made the poster
1:06:18
with AI, and there's fan backlash to it.
1:06:20
And so I'm just wondering, do you see
1:06:22
the norms moving faster than the norms moving
1:06:24
faster than the psychology, Right, I mean you
1:06:26
were shipping these products and you have such
1:06:28
a direct line to creators. It feels like
1:06:31
you're caught up right in the middle of,
1:06:33
oh, where do we put the labels?
1:06:35
Yeah, I mean, I got to tell
1:06:37
you, like the thing that really does
1:06:39
bother me right now is like these,
1:06:41
the influencers that don't even exist. If
1:06:43
I'm looking at something that's clearly animated,
1:06:45
I'm okay with it. You know, I
1:06:47
would love to know that somebody's voice
1:06:49
was actually used for real in that
1:06:51
by that by that individual. you know, will
1:06:53
we become comfortable that basically we're being,
1:06:56
the whole thing is simply animated. Like,
1:06:58
because that's really what we're talking about. We're
1:07:00
just creating like animation that's higher and higher
1:07:02
fidelity in a lot of ways. But I,
1:07:04
you know, I think it should probably be
1:07:07
noted that at some point the human doesn't
1:07:09
exist. I kind of feel like that's probably
1:07:11
where I'd cross a line or that that
1:07:13
dog doesn't actually exist. especially the dog's a
1:07:15
main character. So you might end up doing
1:07:17
it based on the classification of the importance
1:07:20
of the character and you know whether or
1:07:22
not there's actual true existence there and like
1:07:24
how much modification was done to the individual
1:07:26
based on the classic character in the story.
1:07:28
I asked that question three different ways
1:07:31
and pushed on it again because it feels
1:07:33
like the pressure on the creator economy and
1:07:35
the social platforms is just going to
1:07:37
go up. Metah, Mark Suckerberg is out there
1:07:39
openly saying we will have AI content
1:07:41
in people's social feeds on Facebook and Instagram.
1:07:44
How they choose to label it, whether
1:07:46
or not the mean dogs have labels.
1:07:48
I don't know, I don't know what Mark Sucker work
1:07:50
is going to do. No one can see into
1:07:52
his soul. But it's pretty obvious that if he
1:07:54
could get a bunch more cute cat videos on
1:07:56
Facebook using AI, he's going to do it. Like
1:07:59
it's obvious why. he would do that. Does
1:08:01
that create opportunity for you to say
1:08:03
Vimeo is for real content or real
1:08:05
people? Is that something you would lean
1:08:08
into? Because you are, you do have
1:08:10
the AI tools. When you open the
1:08:12
website today, it says you're an AI
1:08:14
powered video platform. There's a lot of
1:08:17
conflation between we can do better classification
1:08:19
and better recommendations and we can do
1:08:21
better marketing videos and we're gonna steal
1:08:23
everyone's data and make cat videos for
1:08:26
Facebook attention spans. And appealing that
1:08:28
apart seems hard. I think I kind of
1:08:30
like as I sit here in protecting the Vimeo
1:08:32
brand I aspire to actually like be that place
1:08:34
that people trust. When I first got here we
1:08:37
were approached to basically crawl our content you
1:08:39
know as many companies were approached and we
1:08:41
talked to the creators and creators said listen
1:08:43
don't replace us and protect us make sure
1:08:45
that we're always the Vimeo is always a
1:08:48
place where we're protected and that's why we
1:08:50
come to you and that's why we want
1:08:52
to continue to come to you and so
1:08:54
we made a decision not to allow that
1:08:56
crawling. and then we very quickly like shortly
1:08:59
thereafter had to like say any time you
1:09:01
use AI on bimio that we're gonna actually
1:09:03
guarantee that none of the AI models will
1:09:05
actually improve based on your usage of it
1:09:07
unless you say improve based on my usage
1:09:10
like you know understand my storyline or understand
1:09:12
my you know my filters or understand you
1:09:14
know my dialogue my style of dialogue we'll
1:09:16
do that for you as an individual creator
1:09:18
will create your own private AI Then we
1:09:21
were actually approached as well to say, listen,
1:09:23
we need you, a number of the creators
1:09:25
said we want you to help us identify
1:09:27
like when content has been generated by AI.
1:09:30
We do a lot of business over the
1:09:32
EU and so we said, yes, we're going
1:09:34
to do that as well. You know, the
1:09:36
thing that I describe about AI was,
1:09:38
you know, back when in the era
1:09:40
of the production line, humans stopped being
1:09:42
able to keep up in a lot
1:09:45
of ways. And so we started creating
1:09:47
creating machines that turned on screws and
1:09:49
so forth. And next year at this
1:09:51
time, there's going to be more information
1:09:53
created in the next year than there
1:09:55
has in the history of mankind coming
1:09:57
up into this point. Humans are starting.
1:09:59
not to be able to keep up with
1:10:01
the production line of information. And so
1:10:04
we've invented these machines. I also think AI
1:10:06
is going to help us identify these things
1:10:08
and help us be able to filter and
1:10:10
help us be able to say this is
1:10:12
AI generated or this content cannot be verified
1:10:14
from the source. We have to do some
1:10:17
work around what we call KYC like Know
1:10:19
Your Creator. I mean, some jurisdictions that we
1:10:21
operate in, we have to actually say, yes,
1:10:23
this is a human being that created this
1:10:25
is the company that created this. I actually
1:10:27
think we have an opportunity to serve as
1:10:29
that as like being a, yes, this was
1:10:31
created by a real human, which actually stands
1:10:34
out in a world of robots. And
1:10:36
so I think there's a lot of
1:10:38
opportunities to protect the viewer and protect
1:10:40
the creator as well as, you know,
1:10:42
serve them in helping them produce stories
1:10:44
faster. There's a lot of talk
1:10:46
about costs right now in the AI
1:10:48
world, right? There's Deep Seek, which might
1:10:50
have brought down the cost of training.
1:10:52
There's all this argument about whether the
1:10:54
cost of inference will drop. That's at
1:10:57
the same time Sam Altman is saying
1:10:59
he's going to build 500 billion
1:11:01
dollars for the data centers all around
1:11:03
the world, Soft Bank. You'd use these
1:11:05
tools, right? You're deploying these tools against
1:11:07
large data sets in video, which is
1:11:09
where the costs tend to go up
1:11:11
the fastest, the fastest. Sure answer is
1:11:14
yes, I would tell you that I
1:11:16
expect the cost of inference that dropped dramatically.
1:11:18
You know, we were experimenting, you know, with
1:11:20
some of the exact same things that Deep
1:11:22
Seat claimed to do to be able to
1:11:24
use like really low-cost chips to be able
1:11:26
to do inference. And I do expect inference,
1:11:29
the cost of inference is going to... go through
1:11:31
the floor. I used the joke to
1:11:33
say, you know, if I need to
1:11:35
order a frosty and a double burger
1:11:37
at Wendy's, I don't need to wait
1:11:40
through all of Taylor Swift's boyfriends and
1:11:42
songs to be able to get through
1:11:44
that. So distillation of models to be
1:11:46
able to serve like at the exact
1:11:48
moment of time that's necessary, like whatever
1:11:51
the language is or whatever the function
1:11:53
is. I think that you're going to
1:11:55
see distillation will help with this, you
1:11:57
know, the most recent Blackwell, black-well chips,
1:11:59
to us. And so we're going to solve
1:12:01
a lot of the inference problems and the
1:12:04
cost associated with inference. And I'm seeing it
1:12:06
drop dramatically for what we do. And so
1:12:08
it'll be very manageable over time. I think
1:12:10
that the real big cost for a lot
1:12:12
of these companies is the training of some
1:12:14
of this stuff. And that is going to
1:12:16
come in line as well. like we'll get
1:12:18
to a point of like kind of diminishing
1:12:20
returns that like do you really need to
1:12:22
go to 10 trillion parameter models or do
1:12:24
you need something that's just a lighter way
1:12:27
to be able to do chemistry to be
1:12:29
able to do biology or to be able to
1:12:31
do you know security you know coloration as an
1:12:33
example so i just i think right now we're
1:12:35
in the air of big models yeah i don't
1:12:37
think that'll last do you think we need to
1:12:39
spend 500 billion dollars on data centers all
1:12:41
around the world i think Here's more Google
1:12:43
Cloud executive. Do we need to spend 500
1:12:46
million dollars on data centers all around? You
1:12:48
know, we need to get, we need to
1:12:50
lay down a new infrastructure of silicon. Like
1:12:52
the silicon that's around the world right now
1:12:54
is highly optimized for general compute. And this
1:12:56
is a new mathematical model that has to
1:12:58
be supported with silicon. Otherwise, we'd actually consume
1:13:00
more power if we didn't have specialized chips
1:13:02
that run this this math equation. And so
1:13:04
all that's happening right now is that yes,
1:13:06
we got to run our current compute. And
1:13:08
then we have a new algorithm, we have
1:13:10
to run, and we're going to have an
1:13:12
optimized silicon to be able to run that extra
1:13:14
algorithm. So short answer is that we have to,
1:13:16
we actually do have to duplicate this silicon around
1:13:19
the world. Is that something that you can drive,
1:13:21
VEMIA, right? We talked about needing to serve 8K
1:13:23
and the price of storage and compute for that,
1:13:25
you know, falling on a pretty predictable basis. We
1:13:28
need to invent new silicon to support AI workloads.
1:13:30
That's like a whole of industry
1:13:32
effort, right? And the pressure is
1:13:34
all in maybe a handful of
1:13:36
companies and one foundry to pull
1:13:38
that off. Like, how do you make those
1:13:41
bets? You know, I would tell
1:13:43
you that we're doing a lot
1:13:45
in evaluating quality across a whole
1:13:47
spectrum. Like, one of the things
1:13:49
that as we're doing a lot
1:13:51
in evaluating quality across a whole
1:13:53
spectrum, like, one of the things
1:13:55
that, as I said, you at
1:13:57
the very start, like, how are
1:13:59
creators? or you know, this is what we
1:14:01
need to do to be able to support like
1:14:03
understanding what changed frame to frame. So a lot
1:14:06
of what we're doing is that we're saying, okay,
1:14:08
what are the, what's the best model for the
1:14:10
job that is going to get, that our creators
1:14:12
are going to need to get done. And then
1:14:15
under the surface, we're stitching all that together so
1:14:17
the creator doesn't know there might be multiple models
1:14:19
that are supporting them. And we've established quality and
1:14:21
then also handoffs, you know for that creatoroffs, you
1:14:23
know for that creator for that creator, you know
1:14:26
for that creator, And so we're going to remember
1:14:28
whether or not it's over here in the translation
1:14:30
world or whether or not it's over and
1:14:32
ask a question or indexing or otherwise. We
1:14:34
kind of stitch it all together for the
1:14:36
creator so they don't even know that we
1:14:38
might be using multiple AI. But it's establishing
1:14:41
quality bars for each one of those things.
1:14:43
And then also, you know, economics, like making
1:14:45
sure we get the best economics and also
1:14:47
the best performance like queries per second from
1:14:49
the model providers, you know, for that area
1:14:51
that they can serve our massive. of minutes
1:14:53
of video and our number of creators. So
1:14:55
we're managing performance, cost, and quality on behalf
1:14:58
of the creator across multiple models. Yeah. Well,
1:15:00
as you can probably tell, I could talk
1:15:02
to you forever, but we are out of time.
1:15:04
What's next for me? Let people give people a
1:15:06
preview of what's coming up next and watch it
1:15:08
out here. I'm probably most excited right now, as
1:15:11
I mentioned to you, about the massive formats
1:15:13
that are coming at the creator. I'm super
1:15:15
excited about what can be done with immersive
1:15:17
formats. You know, I'm also starting to see
1:15:19
a lot of people that want to kind
1:15:21
of go back into these like sphere-like experiences
1:15:23
and I do think that that's going to
1:15:25
be exciting and you'll see us continue to
1:15:27
push the edge there. you're going to see
1:15:29
us invest more in the filmmaking community like
1:15:31
on Monday I'm headed over to the Berlin
1:15:33
Film Festival after hopefully my Philadelphia Eagles do
1:15:35
well in the Super Bowl and so you're
1:15:37
going to see us even do more around
1:15:40
staff picks and celebrating filmmakers in every geography
1:15:42
we serve around the geography we serve around
1:15:44
the world I mean it's been a fairly
1:15:46
US-centric and you're going to see us get
1:15:49
a lot more global and supporting filmmakers and
1:15:51
then also just I would tell you as
1:15:53
we look over at our enterprise customers we
1:15:55
think we can support customers in their customer
1:15:58
organization in the service of customers. We're going
1:16:00
to do really well at just in time
1:16:02
videos serving just the right video to just
1:16:04
the right person at the right moment of
1:16:07
the customer interaction. And so you'll see us,
1:16:09
like, really come out with some exciting things
1:16:11
about that between the format and the AI
1:16:13
that we can do to transform storytelling. Amazing.
1:16:16
Well, we'll have to have you back when we
1:16:18
do just in time immerse the video, 8K, to
1:16:20
both eyes at the same time. So thanks so
1:16:22
much for being on a decoderoder. Okay. Thank you.
1:16:24
Thank you. I'd
1:16:27
like to thank Philip Moyer for taking the time to talk to
1:16:29
me and thank you for listening. I hope you enjoyed it. If
1:16:31
you'd like to know what you thought about this episode or really
1:16:33
anything else, drop us a line. You can email us at decoder
1:16:35
at the birdish.com. We really do read all the emails. You can
1:16:37
also hit me up directly on threads or blue sky. And we
1:16:39
have all of the emails. You can also hit me up directly
1:16:41
on threads or blue sky, and we have a Tik. You can
1:16:44
also hit me directly on threads, on threads, on threads, on threads,
1:16:46
on threads, on threads, on threads, on threads, on threads, on, on
1:16:48
threads, on, on, on threads, on, on, on, on, on, on, on,
1:16:50
on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on,
1:16:52
on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on, on,
1:16:54
on, on, on Decoder is a production of urgent part of the
1:16:56
boxing new podcast network. Our producers are
1:16:58
Kate Cox and Nick Sta, our editor
1:17:01
is Ursa Wright. Decoder Music is
1:17:03
my breakmaster cylinder. We'll see
1:17:05
you next time. Support for the show comes
1:17:07
from Alex Partners. If you're in
1:17:10
the tech industry, wondering how
1:17:12
artificial intelligence is going to
1:17:14
affect your business, might seem
1:17:16
like the new normal by
1:17:19
now. Alex Partners is a
1:17:21
global consulting firm dedicated to
1:17:23
helping you navigate the changing
1:17:25
headwinds of AI. without getting
1:17:27
lost in the noise. Learn
1:17:30
how your business can navigate
1:17:32
AI while making sure your
1:17:34
strategic initiatives are aligned by
1:17:36
reading Alex Partners' latest technology
1:17:39
industry insights available at
1:17:42
www. Alex partners.com/VOX. In
1:17:44
the face of disruption,
1:17:47
businesses trust Alex partners
1:17:49
to get straight to
1:17:52
the point and deliver
1:17:54
results, when it really matters.
1:17:57
Support for this show comes from
1:17:59
ADT. From ADT comes trusted neighbor,
1:18:02
the new standard in home access.
1:18:04
Through the ADT Plus app, easily
1:18:06
grant and automate event-based or scheduled
1:18:09
access for neighbors, friends, and helpers.
1:18:11
Notify trusted individuals of events like
1:18:13
alarms or packages, and set access
1:18:16
windows for planned guests or even
1:18:18
the Dog Walker without interrupting your
1:18:20
day. Visit adt.com. When every second
1:18:23
counts, count on ADT. Requires ADT
1:18:25
Complete Pro Monitoring Plan and Compatible
1:18:27
Devices. Copyright 2025 ADT LLC. All
1:18:30
rights reserved. Sometimes a single performance
1:18:32
can define an artist's legacy. Think
1:18:34
about Hendrix's fiery Woodstock National Anthem
1:18:37
or Biance's Homecoming at Coachella. Coming
1:18:39
up on Switched On Pop, we're
1:18:41
exploring artists who've had recent transformative
1:18:44
live shows. First is Missy Elliott,
1:18:46
who recently put on her first
1:18:48
world tour where she taught everybody
1:18:51
to get the freak on. And
1:18:53
then there's her collaborator Timbalin, who
1:18:55
recently evolved from Beatmaker to orchestra
1:18:58
conductor at the Songwriter Hall of
1:19:00
Fame. And then Lady Gaga, whose
1:19:02
chromatic ball featured a theatrical museum
1:19:05
of brutality revealing the darker side
1:19:07
of Gagga's mayhem. Listen to these
1:19:10
live moments on Switched on Pop
1:19:12
wherever you get podcast. Where you
1:19:14
get podcast. brought to you by
1:19:17
defender.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More