Ep. 64 - Is 'The Rehearsal' Season 2 Another Masterpiece? (Also: Reacting to This Week's 'The Last of Us' Ep)

Ep. 64 - Is 'The Rehearsal' Season 2 Another Masterpiece? (Also: Reacting to This Week's 'The Last of Us' Ep)

Released Tuesday, 22nd April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Ep. 64 - Is 'The Rehearsal' Season 2 Another Masterpiece? (Also: Reacting to This Week's 'The Last of Us' Ep)

Ep. 64 - Is 'The Rehearsal' Season 2 Another Masterpiece? (Also: Reacting to This Week's 'The Last of Us' Ep)

Ep. 64 - Is 'The Rehearsal' Season 2 Another Masterpiece? (Also: Reacting to This Week's 'The Last of Us' Ep)

Ep. 64 - Is 'The Rehearsal' Season 2 Another Masterpiece? (Also: Reacting to This Week's 'The Last of Us' Ep)

Tuesday, 22nd April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Help Online Therapy bought

0:03

this 30-second ad to

0:06

remind you right now,

0:08

wherever you are, to

0:11

unclench your jaw. Relax

0:13

your shoulders. Take a

0:16

deep breath in and

0:18

out. Feels better, right?

0:21

That's 15 seconds of

0:23

self-care. Imagine what you

0:26

could do with more.

0:29

Visit better help. Imagine what you could do with more. Visit better help.com/random

0:31

podcast for 10% off

0:33

your first month of

0:35

therapy. No pressure, just

0:37

help. But for now,

0:39

just relax. Race

0:44

the runners, race the sales,

0:46

race the sales! Captain, an

0:49

unidentified ship is approaching, over.

0:51

Roger, wait, is that an

0:53

enterprise sales solution? Reach sales

0:55

professionals, not professional sailors. With

0:58

LinkedIn ads, you can target

1:00

the right people by industry,

1:02

job title, and more. We'll

1:04

even give you a $100

1:07

credit on your next campaign.

1:09

Get started today at linkedin.com/results.

1:11

Terms and Conditions Dear old work platform.

1:13

It's not you. It's us. Actually,

1:16

it is you. Endless onboarding? Constant

1:18

IT bottlenecks? We've had enough. We

1:20

need a platform that just gets

1:23

us. And to be honest, we've

1:25

met someone new. They're called monday.com.

1:27

and it was love at first

1:30

onboarding. They're beautiful dashboards, they're customizable

1:32

workflows, got us floating on a

1:34

digital cloud nine, so no hard

1:37

feelings, but we're moving on. monday.com,

1:39

the first work platform you'll apply. love

1:41

to use. Hello,

1:44

everyone, and welcome to Decoding TV, a

1:46

podcast about television. I'm David Chen.

1:48

Joining me as usual, he's

1:50

Patrick Klavik. Patrick Are you

1:52

ready to discuss one of the most

1:54

buzzed about television episodes of recent

1:56

memory? I'm just glad. I'm

1:59

just glad we're past this. I feel like

2:01

I've been carrying a weight for years. I'm

2:03

just so glad we're past it. When

2:06

you go on

2:08

max .com to

2:11

play The Last of Us, it says,

2:13

did that just happen? Stream

2:15

the heart pounding episode that has

2:17

everyone talking. End quote. without,

2:21

you know, we're not into talking with you.

2:23

We're not in the spoilers yet. But just

2:25

I told my wife as we

2:27

were opening the episode, I was like,

2:29

I don't know how this could go.

2:31

I haven't seen anything like the preview

2:34

coming up on The Last

2:36

of Us. But they played a

2:38

montage of like, do you remember

2:40

where you were when this happened

2:42

from like. Different HBO

2:44

shows. -huh. That was a

2:46

pre -roll like trailer and I was like,

2:48

hey, I know you think you've poured

2:50

enough wine I don't think you have

2:52

and like I think you should bring

2:54

the glass over here Mm -hmm. Well,

2:56

we'll be discussing again the episode that

2:58

has everyone talking right here on decoding

3:00

TV We got a little bit of

3:03

TV news to discuss We're gonna talk

3:05

about the last of us season 2 episode

3:07

2 and then we are going

3:09

to dive into the rehearsal season

3:11

2 episode 1 which

3:13

just premiered a pretty interesting

3:15

episode, and we're going to be covering

3:17

that show week to week as well.

3:19

But first, Patrick Lepic, before

3:22

we get into any of that, I want

3:24

to share some stuff that we've been

3:26

watching recently on our own. I

3:29

mean, Patrick has been done with the

3:31

pit for a little bit now. And

3:33

I was way behind Patrick. I cannot

3:35

believe you chose. I had only

3:38

watched the first two episodes that we

3:40

discussed. But everyone's been talking about

3:42

the pit. Everyone

3:44

seems to love the pit. You love the pit.

3:47

Love the pit. And so we

3:49

wanted to we're going to put together a bonus

3:51

episode later this week about the pit for

3:53

decoding TV subscribers. But

3:55

I

3:57

wanted to catch up. And

4:00

the only way to do that in a

4:02

short enough time frame was to really

4:04

mainline this show. So I watched 11 episodes

4:06

of The Payette in the last 36

4:08

hours. That's so... Let

4:10

me just tell you... When

4:12

you texted me that you

4:14

did that, I think my

4:16

emoji response was like a vomit emoji.

4:18

Like, I don't think you should do

4:20

that. Let me just tell you, that was not

4:23

the ideal way to experience the show. And

4:26

I do not recommend it. That said, this

4:28

is what I do for you listeners, is

4:31

I experience the unexperienceable.

4:34

Also, you can have some

4:36

high quality hangout time talking with

4:38

me and Patrick talking about another

4:40

podcast. So, you should expect the

4:42

pit bonus episode coming up soon.

4:45

Patrick Klepek, you've also finished recently

4:47

Daredevil Born Again. Now, this is

4:49

another show I've been behind on.

4:51

However, Open question of whether

4:53

I should catch up and now I have a

4:55

little more free time to do so, but I'm

4:57

curious Daredevil born again

4:59

worth the journey and also and we

5:01

also mentioned like a lot when we

5:03

talked about it Is the second half

5:06

of the show gonna feel different than the first

5:08

half because they completely retooled the series So those are

5:10

my big questions is number one was

5:12

it overall a good season and number two

5:14

did the second half feel markedly different

5:16

than the first half I

5:18

don't think you can cleanly break it up,

5:21

and I don't think this the

5:23

season feels like if you understand

5:25

the production history you can tell

5:27

You can see some of the seams throughout

5:29

the season, but it doesn't feel as Clean

5:31

a break where it's like oh right

5:33

like this is when the season actually begins

5:35

sort of thing, but it is a

5:37

hodgepodge It is sort of a stitch together

5:39

sort of production Where it's

5:41

worth remembering that this show was

5:43

announced originally as an 18 episode

5:45

season like that dear devil born

5:47

again was going to be 18

5:50

continuous maybe breaks but like it

5:52

was a single one -shot season

5:54

and where we get by the

5:56

end of born again feels like

5:58

Everyone involved going like

6:00

whoo really dodged a bullet not doing

6:02

it the other way We finally have

6:04

our like the pieces in place to

6:06

make the show that we want to

6:08

make. And there's some good moments along

6:10

the way. I think it's a solid but

6:12

not spectacular season of television. But

6:14

I think where it leaves the characters,

6:16

where it leaves the tone, where

6:18

it leaves the punisher in particular, and

6:20

David, many questions we had about like,

6:23

would it, where would it choose

6:25

to engage with the questions it was

6:27

bringing up about the punisher, police, ACAB,

6:30

would it go there? it goes

6:32

there and sets up some

6:35

really, really fascinating places for

6:37

many of these really important

6:39

characters in season two

6:41

or the second half of season

6:43

one, how everyone would characterize it. I

6:45

don't think it's a particularly fulfilling

6:47

season of television. That part feels broken

6:49

up, but it feels like a

6:52

necessary fracturing on Marvel from a

6:54

production side to get the show

6:56

into a place where it's more

6:58

healthy, has a more coherent direction,

7:00

and I'm very excited about

7:02

where it goes from here. And

7:04

so my thought would be, I'm

7:06

not sitting here going, I think David needs to

7:08

sit down and watch the season of television immediately. No,

7:11

it's good. I

7:13

think it's worth watching. It's probably worth

7:15

catching up on once season

7:17

two is around the corner. It's

7:19

one of those. The pit

7:21

is can't miss. Please go watch

7:23

it. Absolutely. You should indulge with

7:26

it as soon as you can. Daredevil

7:28

born again is a little bit more make sure

7:30

like you're there with the pieces by the

7:32

time we get to season two I enjoyed my

7:34

time with it, but I don't know that

7:36

it is appointment viewing until we get closer to

7:38

the next chapter All right.

7:40

Well, well said Patrick Lepic Those are

7:42

some thoughts on daredevil born against for

7:44

a season and also Patrick and I

7:46

will be having a conversation about the

7:48

pit if you want to get that

7:50

in podcast form become a paid

7:52

subscriber at DecodingTV.com. We really appreciate everyone

7:54

who's a paid subscriber. Also, by the

7:56

way, become a free subscriber because right

7:58

now we have written coverage last of

8:00

a season two and we will also be

8:03

having, I'm really excited about written

8:05

coverage for and or season two as

8:07

well. So yeah,

8:09

be sure to stay tuned for

8:11

all of that. Uh, and

8:13

and you can get that is that those

8:15

are free for everyone right now So become

8:17

a free subscriber decoding tv.com and then consider

8:19

becoming a paid subscriber to get ad -free episodes

8:21

as well as our bonus episodes here on

8:23

decoding tv Okay, uh

8:25

That is our thoughts

8:27

on Daredevil born again. Uh, let's talk

8:30

about a few items of television

8:32

news Pacific Rim series lands at amazon.

8:34

This is really interesting. Patrick lepik

8:37

Legendary's Pacific Rim series is landed at

8:39

Amazon MGM Studios. These two

8:41

studios will adapt the IP together for

8:43

Amazon's Prime Video Streaming Service. This

8:45

Pacific Rim TV project currently in

8:47

development is the first from Legendary's

8:49

first -look television deal with Eric

8:51

Heiser and his chronology banner. Heiser

8:54

will write and executive produce the

8:56

series, end quote. Now,

8:59

Patrick Clubby, I don't know if

9:01

you're familiar with Eric Heiser, but

9:03

he wrote... Villeneuve's Arrival

9:05

script. He

9:07

also wrote the Netflix

9:09

thriller Bird Box

9:11

starring Sandra Bullock. And

9:15

I have to say my feelings

9:17

on those two things are

9:19

extremely opposed to each other. I

9:21

thought what's actually super fascinating

9:23

about Arrival is if you read the

9:25

Ted Chang short story that it's

9:27

based on, it's very, very different

9:29

than the Arrival. So the fact

9:31

like he put a lot of

9:33

work and ingenuity into making that

9:35

into a movie that would be,

9:38

that was like honored the ideas it was

9:40

based off of, but was also just kind of its

9:42

own thing. And then

9:44

at the same time Bird Box

9:46

I thought was not a very good

9:48

movie. So I'm really curious how

9:50

this is going to play out. The

9:53

other thing that I'm a little

9:55

bit raising my eye at is

9:57

I think one of the huge

10:00

things about Pacific Rim that made

10:02

it worth watching was how

10:04

good it looked. And of course,

10:06

that's related to Guillermo del

10:08

Toro's excellent direction, did not like

10:10

Pacific Rim uprising. I

10:12

think a big part of it was, I

10:14

don't think the CG looked as good, even though

10:16

it happened, you know, the movie was released years

10:18

later. There was a

10:21

weight to the large machines that

10:23

was missing, a feel, a

10:25

weight. It felt more like

10:27

the Godzilla X Kong school filmmaking where

10:29

you have these like enormous creatures that

10:31

are just prancing around like, you know,

10:33

tiny humans, you know, like these things

10:35

are supposed to be huge and difficult

10:37

to move. And I felt like the

10:39

original Pacific Rim honored that and Pacific

10:42

Rim uprising didn't. What has been your

10:44

experience of the Pacific Rim series, Patrick

10:46

Lepic? It's funny because like

10:48

nothing associated with Pacific Rim has been

10:50

remotely successful. And yeah, like it's a

10:52

franchise. Other than the first film. The

10:54

first film I thought it was modestly.

10:56

It was a decent success at the

10:58

box office. But nothing that was like,

11:00

you know, we need to do. Right.

11:02

We got to make a lot of

11:04

Pacific Rim. Like it was not it

11:06

was it was not that kind of

11:08

thing. And an uprising didn't do didn't

11:10

do well at all. And so I

11:12

I like the first one well enough.

11:14

I don't think it's like it. fun

11:16

to watch Del Toro smash like his

11:18

toys together. It's certainly not a

11:21

personal favorite of mine of his, even

11:23

though I like kaiju monsters, giant mechs

11:25

are funny. There's just a lack of

11:27

depth to that film that I usually

11:29

find in a lot of his work.

11:31

And that one just seems sort of

11:33

like a more fun one off with

11:35

some really incredible visuals. And there's nothing

11:37

wrong with that, which is which is

11:39

what gets me to if Del Toro

11:41

is not here. What

11:43

like what am I like? What

11:45

am I what am I here

11:47

for? Plus putting this on a

11:49

streaming service in an era of

11:51

like budget constraining like you can't

11:53

do Pacific Rim. The whole pitch

11:55

is giant expensive monster. Like it's

11:57

all it's so much like computer

11:59

effects. And so I just don't

12:01

really I don't really get it.

12:03

I don't see the appeal. I

12:05

don't see how they pull it

12:07

off in a meaningful way without

12:09

a blank check. And so I'm

12:12

left kind of eh. on the

12:14

whole endeavor. So

12:16

I think those are

12:19

great points. I think you

12:21

are dramatically underselling how good Pacific Rim 1 is. I'm

12:23

just going to put that out there. OK. That's

12:25

fine. It's pretty great.

12:27

You know, the drift compatibility thing

12:29

and Charlie Hunnam's character and his

12:32

relationship. Anyway. I think there's a

12:34

lot of great things. The score

12:36

is incredible. Today, we are canceling

12:38

the apocalypse. Anyway,

12:40

a lot of great things to love about

12:42

Pacific Rim 1, but I agree with all

12:44

of your concerns about the potential for a

12:47

TV series. That said, we'll see how Amazon

12:49

handles it in the future. Here's

12:52

another pretty news. This

12:54

is from Variety. Sinner's director, Ryan

12:56

Coogler, teases X -Files series reboot

12:58

and confirms he's spoken with the

13:00

original star, Jillian Anderson. Now

13:03

Patrick Lepic, I believe you have watched

13:05

Sinners. What did you

13:07

think of Ryan Coogler Sinners? If

13:10

I don't see a better

13:12

movie this year, I'll be

13:14

to perfectly content. What a

13:16

fucking triumph. You

13:20

know, the, like, Don Draper, like,

13:22

smoking, looking at the TV screen,

13:24

like, oh, I just witnessed cinema.

13:26

Martin Scorsese meme, this is, or

13:28

this is cinema, you know, Bong

13:30

Joon -ho meme, this is cinema.

13:33

This used to be a country

13:35

that built things, and... During

13:37

COVID, the only real IMAX in

13:39

the Chicagoland area went under at Navy

13:41

Pier down by in Deepa downtown

13:43

Chicago. And there's nothing. There's not a

13:45

it's all it's all IMAX is

13:47

on down out in the entire state

13:49

of Illinois. The closest one is

13:51

in Indianapolis. And had I known the

13:53

reaction I was going to have

13:56

to that film, I might have

13:58

I might have found a way to

14:00

get to Indianapolis to watch that movie

14:02

as I think it was intended. I

14:05

think Coogler is

14:07

rapidly becoming a

14:10

Christopher Nolan -esque, Quentin

14:12

Tarantino -esque figure in the industry

14:14

in the sense that his

14:17

name alone will soon be sufficient

14:19

to sell movies. Like, Sinner

14:21

has had one of the best

14:23

openings for an original film,

14:25

I think the best opening for

14:27

an original film in the

14:29

last decade. It's an incredible

14:31

accomplishment and it shows that yeah

14:33

people He has Appeal as a

14:36

director beyond the one billion dollars

14:38

he made directing Black Panther Like

14:40

people are turning out to see

14:42

Creed and now he's writing. This

14:44

is an original thing and people

14:46

are turning out for it as

14:49

well. It's very exciting to see.

14:51

And it shows, I think, that

14:53

this guy is going to be

14:55

able to do basically whatever he

14:57

wants next, which apparently is an

14:59

ex file series. Well,

15:03

look, there is a Jordan Peele and

15:05

my cool are very different artists,

15:07

but they both are mired in genre.

15:09

And so I don't think it's

15:11

a surprise that like when Jordan Peele's

15:13

film career took off, like one

15:15

of the first things he did was

15:17

like, I'm going to reboot the

15:19

Twilight Zone. I don't think

15:21

that went really all that well. Anthology

15:23

is hard. Anthology is different. But

15:26

I'm not shocked that Kugler,

15:28

who is also a genre appreciator,

15:30

you know, is is interested in trying

15:32

something like the X files, which

15:35

itself is a

15:37

genre show, but also one that if you

15:39

watch that run of X -Files, X -Files could

15:41

be anything. It could be deeply comedic. It

15:43

could be deeply dramatic. It could be hard

15:45

sci -fi. X -Files was a

15:47

blank canvas to kind of just

15:49

tell stories in many ways. Yeah,

15:51

yeah. During a recent

15:53

interview with Last Podcast on the left,

15:55

Cougler said, quote, I've been excited about it

15:57

for a long time, and I'm fired

16:00

up to get back to it. Some

16:02

of these episodes, if we do our jobs

16:04

right, will be really fucking scary, end quote. So

16:07

I have to say

16:09

that it's kind of exciting

16:11

because Sinner's being, I

16:13

think his first horror movie, right?

16:15

And it was very scary. Like

16:17

there was some really terrifying elements

16:19

to it. So the idea of

16:21

him doing an X -Files reboot

16:24

and potentially even involving Jillian Anderson

16:26

in it, I think is really...

16:28

gonna be like an event, you

16:30

know, like all signs point to

16:32

this being a big event That's

16:34

gonna bring in the old guard

16:36

who loved the x -files originally and

16:38

who like Patrick Klepek watched all

16:40

the terrible new remakes and and

16:42

also a Brand new audience of

16:45

Ryan Coogler fans. I think

16:47

x -files fans are gonna be eating well very

16:49

very soon So and I have to imagine

16:51

that after the opening of sinners Ryan

16:53

Cougar is going to get whatever he

16:55

needs to make this happen. So I've

16:57

never felt more like the X -Files

16:59

reboot is actually going to happen than

17:01

at this moment right now. Yes,

17:03

I agree. I still have many, many

17:06

concerns on how you do. I

17:08

think the last time we talked about, we

17:10

discussed Cougler and revisiting the X

17:12

-Files. There's just in an age

17:14

of conspiracy, how do you do

17:16

a conspiracy show? Much

17:19

of the X -Files is the chemistry

17:21

of its two leads. Um, that said,

17:23

if you look, you know, and if

17:25

you look at sinners, it's an it's

17:27

an ensemble cast with incredible chemistry. And

17:29

so if what one of your concerns

17:31

is, can Cougler identify like two actors

17:33

that can bounce off one another? I

17:35

mean, they had a whole goddamn movie

17:37

where everyone bounced off each other, like

17:39

just fine. And so, um, that's been

17:41

a hallmark of his, of his work

17:43

in the past is excellent casting. So. I'm

17:46

I want to be clear unclear like

17:48

what role Jillian Anderson will play like

17:50

is she gonna be one of the

17:52

main leads again, right? Cuz they have

17:54

they have talked and it sounds like

17:56

they're being Koi Yeah, the way that

17:58

Anderson seemed has to put it when

18:00

she's been asked is like I am

18:02

I will be there no matter what

18:04

essentially like if Cougler like it's up

18:06

to Cougler like she isn't like overtly

18:08

like she isn't interested or uninterested like

18:11

Cougler is an incredible talent if I

18:13

can be helpful I Ultimately think it

18:15

would be Broadly distracting and it should

18:17

be a like I think it should

18:19

be if it happens. It's It's very

18:21

brief. I think I think the better

18:23

that Cougler identifies and makes the X

18:25

files completely this whole thing Even if

18:27

it's a sequel series where like we're

18:29

gonna still acknowledge that world happened. That's

18:31

fine, but Dude, I loved that show

18:33

and I want to I want to

18:35

move the F on like I I

18:37

would much rather have something that feels

18:40

pretty blank slate Yeah talking about Jillian

18:42

Anderson Cougler said she's incredible and fingers

18:44

crossed there We're going to try

18:46

to make something really great, bro and make

18:48

something for the real ex files fans and maybe

18:50

find some new ones and I don't know

18:52

what that means, but I want to find out.

18:55

I want to believe. I

18:57

want to believe. I don't

18:59

know. I don't know. I mean,

19:01

I'm sure to talk about this more is

19:03

this actually like becomes more of a thing.

19:05

But I when he says that I want

19:08

to make this for the real I genuinely

19:10

want to know what does he mean by

19:12

that statement because. It's

19:14

not necessarily straightforward. When

19:16

an ex files fan is like, were you

19:18

a fan of this, like the storytelling? Were you

19:21

a fan of the character? I mean, I

19:23

just don't know what he means by that. So

19:25

I am excited to find out and there's,

19:27

there's, I can't think of many other talents I'd

19:29

want to take. I think it's

19:31

going to be hard. I don't even know if Cougar

19:33

can pull it off. But if someone's going to try,

19:35

like, step up to the plate, my man. I'm happy

19:37

to see you. Give it a shot. All

19:40

right, one other piece of TV news we

19:42

want to discuss, and that is a huge portion

19:44

of the Harry Potter TV show cast was

19:46

revealed this week. We

19:48

have said on this podcast, we're going to

19:50

check in with this project because it is a

19:52

massive project that Warner Brothers is spending a

19:55

lot of money on. And I

19:57

suspect at least the first episode

19:59

of the show is going to be

20:01

a cultural touch point. It's

20:04

also obviously married in controversy

20:06

because JK Rowling is extremely involved

20:08

in it And if there's

20:10

any hope that JK Rowling was

20:13

going to become more subdued

20:15

or chill with her positions on

20:17

a variety of political topics

20:19

The events of this last week

20:21

should put that to rest.

20:23

I don't know if you've been

20:25

following JK Rowling's online posts

20:27

But she's not backing down from

20:30

her set of beliefs that

20:32

said This whole PR

20:35

campaign, it's kind of felt like

20:37

a little bit of a slog,

20:39

I think, because there is a

20:41

lot of ill will against this

20:43

project, I think, from people who

20:46

are no longer on the JK

20:48

Rolling Train. And

20:50

these actors are just

20:52

people who... want

20:54

to work in an industry that

20:56

is very difficult to find work

20:58

in. At the same time, they

21:00

are also associating themselves with this project and this

21:02

creator in a way that I think is

21:04

gonna lead to them feeling like they need to

21:06

defend themselves. And I think

21:08

we're gonna see more and more

21:10

of that as time has gone

21:12

on. We haven't even gotten to

21:15

the casting of the actual primary

21:17

three actors in this project yet. Apparently

21:19

HBO has been auditioning more

21:21

than 32 ,000 children. For the

21:23

lead role of Harry Potter famously

21:26

originated by Daniel Radcliffe No

21:28

actor has been chosen yet, but

21:30

the casting team is reviewing

21:32

between 500 and 1000 audition tapes

21:34

per day and quote Anyway,

21:36

some of the casting that's been

21:38

announced John Lithgow is playing

21:40

Albus Dumbledore I think we already

21:43

knew about that because he

21:45

accidentally let it drop during a

21:47

separate PR campaign Papa Esiedu

21:49

is playing Severus Snape Janet McTeer

21:51

playing Minerva McGonagall and Nick

21:53

Frost playing Hagrid. Those

21:55

are some of the

21:57

major casting announcements. But

22:00

Patrick Klepek, I am curious if you have

22:02

any thoughts on how this all has been rolling

22:04

out. I

22:06

am very skeptical that this show will

22:08

be good and it just feels

22:10

like there's this cloud over it because

22:12

of JK Rowling's objectionable views on

22:15

trans people. What do you think? Yeah,

22:17

the bigot is still being a

22:19

bigot. So let's make that exceedingly clear

22:21

not that we haven't in the

22:23

past when we talked about her and

22:25

this show. I mean,

22:27

sure, yes. A

22:30

job is a job, but also like

22:32

jobs are different. And this

22:34

one comes with particular

22:36

weight like you are going

22:38

to be asked questions

22:40

that you have to answer.

22:42

And I guess if

22:44

you can square that circle.

22:46

for yourself, then Godspeed,

22:49

I guess. But I don't

22:51

know that I'm weeping

22:53

too much for the photo,

22:55

especially like John Lithgow,

22:57

like my guy, like, like

22:59

you don't, you don't. Nick Frost

23:01

probably also you don't, you don't, you

23:03

know, my sympathies if they lie anywhere

23:05

are with like the three young kids

23:07

that are likely to be anonymous. And

23:10

the three main leads of Harry

23:12

Potter have been very outward. And public

23:14

when asked I mean Emma Watson

23:16

has receded from from you know She's

23:18

she's a formally retired from acting

23:20

but more or less. She's sort of

23:22

stepped back to do a lot

23:25

of philanthropic work But all three are

23:27

have said in in in tones

23:29

like very specific like that like they

23:31

they disagree with With Rowling they

23:33

agree that she's a bigot and have

23:35

all basically said trans rights in

23:37

some form or another and Everyone involved

23:39

in this project is going to

23:41

be asked that and or HBO is

23:43

going to hide them from like

23:46

there will be limited, deeply limited PR

23:48

access in order to avoid various

23:50

folks stepping in it. And it's one

23:52

thing for these season actors to

23:54

look like Nick Frost, like your big

23:56

boy, like you can answer big

23:58

boy questions about this. But like,

24:00

what's the age of the kids going to

24:02

be cast in this first in this first

24:04

book, this first, you know, an adaptation, they're

24:06

going to be 10, like 10, 11, 12.

24:08

I think Harry Potter's the characters chosen when

24:10

they're 11, right? So 11 ish. That's

24:13

a wait man. You don't deserve

24:15

when you're 11 and So my heart

24:17

goes out to those young kids

24:19

whoever ends up choosing this hoping that

24:21

they can You know make it

24:24

in the in the in Hollywood because

24:26

of it, but uh, yeah, it's

24:28

it's a Everyone else deserves the

24:30

criticism that's coming right. Okay. Yeah. Yeah,

24:32

I mean, I think that's completely

24:34

fair John Lithgow is worth tens of

24:36

millions of dollars He

24:38

is 79 years old. He's seen enough of

24:41

this industry to know, hey, if you

24:43

take this role, you're going to need to

24:45

deal with some criticism. I will say

24:47

some of the coverage of this has been

24:49

pretty bizarre. Deadline had

24:51

this article. Patrick Lepic,

24:53

John Lithgow responds to Harry Potter

24:55

fans appalled with his Dumbledore casting.

24:57

That is the headline at Deadline.com.

25:01

Hey, Patrick, what do

25:03

you think people are appalled by? Because

25:05

according to this article, John

25:08

Lithgow is quoted as being on

25:10

BBC's The One Show saying, I

25:12

will be following the great Michael

25:14

Gambin. I'm not an

25:16

Englishman. Even though I

25:18

played one on TV, I remind

25:20

everyone that I did play Winston

25:23

Churchill on The Crown and did

25:25

just fine. So that's why people

25:27

are appalled according to this article.

25:29

It's because he's an American person

25:31

playing a British person. And that

25:33

is the only reason why Harry

25:35

Potter fans are unhappy with John

25:38

Lithgow being in the role That

25:40

is just a bizarre framing for

25:42

this art, you know, like And

25:44

I'm curious. I'm curious kind of

25:46

what other Bizarre framings we're gonna

25:48

see basically in the weeks to

25:50

come when more casting is announced

25:52

Just something keep your eye on

25:55

you know is like how how

25:57

it's being covered and discussed And

25:59

do any tensions arise as a result

26:01

of outward pressure to folks involved to

26:03

sort of sit, you know, this happened

26:06

a bit with Hogwarts Legacy, the video

26:08

game that was exceptionally popular. It's why

26:10

I know you think this show might

26:12

not be good, but I think that

26:14

is an irrelevant point. I

26:18

mean, Hogwarts Legacy, a massively

26:20

like one of the most profitable

26:22

games like one of the It

26:25

was like the number one and number

26:27

two best -selling game in the year

26:29

that it came out a couple years

26:31

past and that is Millennials specifically are

26:34

just primed for just like I am

26:36

you know I'm 40 years old myself

26:38

like I you know grew up as

26:40

these books were Coming out and the

26:42

film started rolling out and it turned

26:44

into a worldwide phenomenon like that age

26:46

group is just primed You know to

26:48

to be excited for something like this

26:51

and to set aside, or if they're

26:53

not engaged with, you know, Rowling's views

26:55

to make this a big thing. So

26:57

I expect it to be an enormous

26:59

hit, regardless of these complications surrounding it.

27:01

And the question is, like, in Hogwarts

27:03

Legacy, you know, you can

27:05

make your character non -binary. You don't have

27:07

to choose male or female. And there

27:10

were different ways that the creatives in

27:12

that video game tried to signal to

27:14

the audience, like, we understand your concerns

27:16

and some of the compromises we're making

27:18

and trying to make this game with

27:20

the, you know, the creative and what

27:22

they're out there saying. And rolling was

27:24

largely uninvolved with the creation of the

27:26

game, right? So it's like, this

27:29

is gonna be a real test

27:31

is, I don't know if that's

27:33

the right word, but it's gonna

27:35

be a real sort of barometer for

27:37

like how the Harry Potter fandom

27:39

as a whole. feels about rolling

27:41

at this point and or is

27:43

willing to patronize her wares So

27:45

and I suspect as you indicate Patrick

27:47

Many people will simply willing to

27:49

watch the show and We'll see

27:51

how it all plays out. We'll

27:53

be covering it here on I

27:56

don't know that we'll cover the show

27:58

week to week But I think

28:00

we will have to like at

28:02

least watch the first episode Whenever

28:04

it comes out to discuss where

28:06

things stand with the show. Yeah, absolutely.

28:09

Anyway Those are some thoughts on what's

28:11

going on in the world of TV

28:13

News This Week Race

28:19

the runners, race the sales,

28:21

race the sales! Captain, an

28:23

unidentified ship is approaching, over.

28:25

Roger, wait, is that an

28:28

enterprise sales solution? Reach sales

28:30

professionals, not professional sailors. With

28:32

LinkedIn ads, you can target

28:34

the right people by industry,

28:37

job title, and more. We'll

28:39

even give you a $100

28:41

credit on your next campaign.

28:43

Get started today at linkedin.com/results.

28:46

Terms and Conditions apply. Dear old

28:48

work platform. It's not you. It's

28:50

us. Actually, it is you. Endless

28:53

onboarding? Constant IT bottlenecks? We've had

28:55

enough. We need a platform that

28:57

just gets us. And to be

29:00

honest, we've met someone new. They're

29:02

called monday.com. and it was love

29:04

at first onboarding. They're beautiful dashboards,

29:07

they're customizable workflows, got us floating

29:09

on a digital cloud nine, so

29:11

no hard feelings, but we're moving

29:14

on. monday.com, the first work platform

29:16

you'll love to use. Let's

29:19

move on, Patrick Klepek, and

29:21

talk about some specific TV episodes

29:23

on the air right now. I

29:27

want to mention again that... and

29:29

I will be covering the pit

29:31

in a boat. There's first of

29:33

all, I don't say there are

29:35

so many bonus episodes going on

29:38

right now on the decoding TV

29:40

feed There's just tons of stuff.

29:42

We finished covering the white lotus

29:44

Patrick and I are gonna be

29:46

covering the pit this week probably

29:48

and also you should expect a

29:50

Podcast episode covering every drop of

29:52

and or season two and I

29:55

look forward to how

29:57

that's going to play out, but it's going to

29:59

be me and an old friend from the podcast.

30:01

That's the current plan for us to cover and

30:03

or season two. So look forward

30:05

to that. And in the meantime, we'll of

30:07

course be covering the last of us season two,

30:09

as well as the rehearsal season two week

30:11

to week. So that is what you have in

30:14

store for you right here on the decoding

30:16

TV podcast feed. And of course, I want to

30:18

make sure you check out the decoding TV

30:20

dot com newsletter as well, where we're doing written

30:22

recaps of many of these shows. All

30:26

right, let's get

30:28

into a better clubic.

30:30

Let's talk about

30:32

the last of a

30:35

season two episode

30:37

two Trust me it's

30:39

for the best

30:42

do it You don't

30:44

do it I'm

30:46

gonna smash her in

30:49

the fucking head You

30:54

want to rob us? Fine. Take what you

30:56

want. Do we look like raiders to you? No.

31:06

What do we look like? Welcome

31:10

to Decoding TV's coverage of the last

31:12

of a season 2 episode 2. I'm

31:15

David Chen here with Patrick

31:17

Lepeg. Patrick, this is going

31:19

to be a major infamous

31:21

notorious episode. of the last

31:23

of us. You should assume

31:25

that we are going to spoil everything that happens

31:27

in this episode at this point. We

31:29

will not spoil anything from the video games.

31:31

Instead, that will be for a separate bonus

31:33

episode that is available for DecodingTV.com paid subscribers.

31:36

But in the meantime, Patrick Klepek, what

31:38

did you think overall of the episode? It's

31:41

interesting to be... I

31:43

watched Game of Thrones not

31:45

knowing what was going

31:47

to happen next, but getting

31:49

primed in anticipation of

31:51

certain moments. And knowing I've

31:53

stepped into something, but

31:56

not knowing what I've stepped into. So it's interesting

31:58

to be on the other side of that here where

32:00

I felt like I've sat on a great secret,

32:02

especially with my wife, who I watched the show with.

32:04

And I've just been waiting for this weight to

32:06

be lifted. And

32:08

that weight gets lifted, so

32:10

to speak, in this episode. I

32:13

think it's a pretty excellent. Episode

32:15

of television I really enjoyed

32:17

was thrilled by everything that

32:19

happens in Jackson with the

32:21

in with the sort of

32:23

the horde that approaches the

32:25

town I think it's inevitable

32:27

to compare how things play

32:29

out with Joel in that

32:31

in that cabin in that

32:33

mini mini mansion on the

32:35

on on the mountainside I

32:37

Think it's pretty great, but

32:39

also I felt it was pretty

32:41

great and thrilling and exceptional and shocking

32:43

when I played the video game. My, you

32:45

know, my qualms with where the story

32:47

telling goes happens long after this moment. And

32:49

I thought this choice was exceptionally brave

32:52

in the video game. I was stunned. I

32:54

could not believe this is the choice

32:56

that they were making for the beginning of

32:58

this game, the beginning of this story.

33:00

I suspect a lot of people are going

33:02

to have that reaction. And I think

33:04

on that level, I think They pull it

33:06

off. I think Caitlin Deaver pulls it

33:08

off. It's a different performance. Characters

33:10

are in different places than they were

33:12

in the video game. We'll get into that.

33:14

But I thought it was a pretty

33:16

exceptional hour of television for a pretty exceptional

33:18

moment in video game storytelling. And

33:21

I think from that measure, I think

33:23

they more or less hit the mark

33:25

on what they were trying to achieve

33:27

in this episode. And I thought it

33:29

was thrilling and daunting and terrifying. I

33:33

gotta say I mostly agree. There

33:35

was this zombie attack that happened

33:37

on the town and One of the

33:39

things I really appreciated about it

33:41

was how competent the towns people were

33:43

right it really felt like they

33:45

prepared for this and They had a

33:47

plan and they had a multi -level

33:49

plan in case stuff happens and

33:51

that's always really impressive when You feel

33:53

like the characters are ahead of

33:55

you or at least at your level

33:57

in terms of what you would

33:59

do in that situation. I appreciated that

34:01

obviously the moment is shocking and I

34:04

think it really made me reconsider.

34:06

You know, I have my wife

34:08

and our friend. We have a

34:10

friend who we're all watching the

34:12

show together. And it

34:14

really made me consider like

34:17

the whole season is

34:19

making me consider how different

34:21

the medium of video

34:23

games and TV are because

34:25

I think with the

34:27

video game, it's it's less

34:30

of an option. to

34:32

like, peace out after something like that happens. You

34:34

know I'm saying? Like, right, when

34:36

something shocking happens, you're like, I disagree with

34:38

that. First of all, I agree with you.

34:40

I think it's a great, brilliant, creative decision. I

34:43

think I have a lot of issues with The

34:45

Last of Us Part II, the rest of the game,

34:47

after not this. My choice, yeah. This is not

34:49

our... This is not it. And in fact, I thought,

34:51

Patrick, we should actually discuss what our beef with

34:54

the game is during the bonus episode, because I don't

34:56

think it's been multiple years. I don't think people

34:58

know like... In many ways, there's a, when I mean

35:00

a great weight, like... like

35:02

there are things I could spoil that happen

35:04

in the rest of Last of Us Part

35:07

2. But mostly, but we've been dancing around.

35:09

Yes. Is this so that we can feel

35:11

more free to talk about the themes of

35:13

The Last of Us Part 2 than the

35:15

specifics of individual moments. And so I think

35:17

this also unlocks in how we talk about

35:19

our reaction to this episode. We can speak

35:21

in more generalities about like how our feelings

35:24

about the story telling and its relation to

35:26

the game that are not going to spoil

35:28

specific beats. Because it's like once this one

35:30

is lifted, We can like

35:32

when we could talk about what we're

35:34

talking about which does not felt

35:36

like what we've been doing in the

35:39

past I think In a video

35:41

game when something like this happens and

35:43

let's say hypothetically not me you

35:45

disagree with the decision Most

35:47

people are probably just gonna keep playing

35:49

the game like they're they're not gonna just

35:52

stop playing the video game because it's

35:54

like oh well I want to see what

35:56

else is in the game and you

35:58

get a lot more out of the game

36:00

than just the story you get the

36:02

gameplay you get other things out of the

36:04

game and last part to is one

36:06

of the best third -person action it like

36:09

it is a Sublime survival horror. Yeah, like

36:11

it's a sublime action survival horror game

36:13

like I Yeah, like and we'll get into

36:15

this and we'd like more freely about

36:17

or it like I love playing the last

36:19

of us part and I think that's

36:21

a huge part of like those are they're

36:23

well -made action games right the experience of

36:26

playing the game is Related to the

36:28

story, but it's not a hundred percent dependent

36:30

on the story right however the experience

36:32

of watching a TV show is a hundred

36:34

percent dependent on the story and I

36:36

was My wife was very upset by the

36:38

events of this episode. And she's like,

36:40

I don't know if I'm going to keep

36:43

watching this. Like, I'm curious how many

36:45

people are just going to piece out because

36:47

it is much easier to piece out

36:49

of a TV show than it is, in

36:51

my opinion, to like stop playing a

36:53

video game you spent 70 bucks on. And

36:56

I'm curious like how this impact will

36:58

ripple through the community of people who

37:00

are watching the TV show only. You

37:02

know what I mean? I think we

37:04

have evidence of like. I mean evidence

37:07

in like concrete terms You know Game

37:09

of Thrones is a show that over

37:11

time like grew in popularity like it

37:13

and one of those big moments was

37:15

You know, it was the red wedding,

37:17

right? Like those who know, you know,

37:19

like, you know, big some big stuff

37:21

happened there and that involves like something

37:24

thematically similar story -wise to like what

37:26

we're talking about here and That didn't

37:28

dissuade anyone from like like the show

37:30

just I think it's so different. So

37:32

hold on. So hold on but I

37:35

fell off the walking dead very early

37:38

like once like after season two felt

37:40

the show was meandering I don't need

37:42

20 plus episode like it's why I

37:44

was off the the walking dead train

37:46

after after season two But for many

37:48

people I know in my life that

37:50

kept watching that show and we have

37:52

audience data that supports this again I'm

37:54

not gonna spot like there is a

37:56

specific beloved character that dies in a

37:58

brutal Unflinching way. I think it's season

38:00

five several several seasons further into the

38:02

show and they lost significant

38:04

audience as a result of that

38:07

character death. And so not all character

38:09

deaths, those shocking or out of

38:11

nowhere play the same with the audience.

38:13

And I think it is incredibly

38:15

possible. I'm not saying likely, but possible

38:17

that what happened to the walking

38:19

dead is closer to what would happen

38:21

with Last of Us than Game

38:23

of Thrones, which is like, oh, anybody

38:25

can live or die. I got

38:27

to stick out. I got to see

38:29

what happens next. I think there's

38:31

a decent chance. like

38:33

this character was a reason a lot

38:36

people watch the show and Given

38:38

where you and I know where this

38:40

story goes next there. I could

38:42

see more people exiting that train absolutely

38:44

when forward absolutely and I don't

38:46

even think walking dead is comparable right

38:48

like I think that Literally watch

38:50

the opening credits of the of the

38:52

last of us right at the

38:54

very end of the last of us

38:56

opening credit It's like these two

38:58

figures rising up out of the court

39:00

of steps or whatever. It's Joel

39:02

and Ellie And

39:04

I think people think of this show

39:06

as the dynamic between those two characters, even

39:09

though a lot of other stuff happened

39:11

in season one. And

39:13

I don't know that what's left

39:15

is gonna be enough to persuade them

39:17

to continue watching the show. So it

39:19

just made me reflect on like, oh,

39:21

in the video, like most people, when

39:23

they get to this part in the

39:26

video game, they're not just gonna like

39:28

stop playing. Most people, right? Not

39:30

gonna stop playing, but. It is a very

39:32

valid thing for people to just stop watching the

39:34

show. There's so much of it. In this

39:36

podcast, we talk about all the other stuff that's

39:38

up there. You have the pit

39:40

to catch up on, and you have Daredevil

39:42

born again to catch on. I can do

39:44

anything else with my life. You can do

39:46

anything else other than watch The Last of

39:48

a Season 2. And also, we'll get into

39:50

this more specifics. I would say the emotional

39:52

state, the video game leaves you in based

39:54

on how it... is

39:56

choosing or not choosing is probably more

39:58

accurate to give you certain information. The

40:00

emotional state that you are in as

40:02

the player, as the viewer of the

40:04

story, when this moment occurs in the

40:06

video game, I would argue is pretty

40:08

different, even though it's in the same

40:10

spectrum, but it's pretty different than the

40:13

emotional state you are left in with

40:15

the information you have in the television

40:17

show. And I think we'll get into

40:19

all those decisions. think we could, again,

40:21

we'll talk about it in bonus episode,

40:23

but I think we can say that

40:25

When Abby kills Joel, we're not

40:28

spoiling anything at this point in

40:30

talking about this change when Abby

40:32

kills Joel in the game You

40:34

don't know why she did that

40:36

right right, which is like extremely

40:38

shocking moment You you don't understand

40:40

you like imagine not knowing why

40:42

this person killed Joel like that

40:44

would be like so upsetting Which

40:46

it was for many people right

40:48

you have no sympathy you have

40:50

no empathy right nothing to project

40:52

on this person except vile Patriot

40:54

and so when Ashley Johnson who like

40:57

portrayed Ellie and in the video games says

40:59

like I'm going to fucking kill you

41:01

or like some some version of that That's

41:03

you like that's right the player. Yes

41:05

speaking through that performance and a similar sort

41:07

of line happens here And it hits

41:09

differently. Yeah, I'm not saying it hits wrong.

41:11

It's just different So I do think

41:13

part of what I'm getting at is I

41:15

think the video game primes the pump

41:18

a bit more for you to be like

41:20

Well, what are you going to do

41:22

turn the game off? I know just gone,

41:24

but like get the fuck out there,

41:26

Ellie. You know what I mean? It's just

41:28

it lands in a slightly different place.

41:30

I think it's deliberate. It's a method. It's

41:32

a it's a purposeful choice in how

41:34

they're landing this moment differently. But

41:36

I'm with you that is I think partially

41:38

as a result, like they could have gone

41:40

that route. They could have deprived you of

41:43

any information on Abby at this point. And

41:45

I'm actually. baffled why they didn't

41:47

go that route, because originally we had

41:49

speculated on our bonus episode last week, like

41:51

the reason why you would introduce Abby's

41:53

motivations earlier is so that you would actually

41:55

care about what she's doing as you

41:57

follow her throughout the season. But if they're

41:59

just going to kill Joe off in

42:01

the second episode, like that is completely unnecessary.

42:03

Then I wonder why they did it.

42:05

Right. Like you could have used this information

42:08

somewhere else. Right. Like it doesn't, it

42:10

doesn't. I'm I'm very curious why they

42:12

did it this way because you could have

42:14

just had if If they did it in the

42:16

second episode you could have had you could

42:18

have done it the same way and I'm curious

42:20

why they didn't do it the same way

42:22

But maybe we'll find out or it'll become clear.

42:24

I just wanted to finish off the point

42:26

Patrick. I think I Do think Joel is an

42:28

anchor character on this show like he anchors

42:30

a show in a way that I think Is

42:33

not really true of walking

42:35

dead or even Sean Bean in

42:37

Game of Thrones like right?

42:39

I think it's it's unlike any

42:41

of those situations and so

42:43

again very curious how this is

42:45

gonna ripple through the the

42:47

TV fandom and And whether viewership

42:49

is gonna be impacted or

42:52

not We'll see we'll see but

42:54

I think I largely agree

42:56

with you that it was a

42:58

solid execution for a shocking

43:00

episode And

43:02

I'm looking forward to diving into detail

43:04

in the episode, but also into the

43:06

spoilers that we're going to have in

43:08

the bonus episode for paid decodingTV.com subscribers.

43:11

OK. So let's talk about what happens

43:13

this episode. Last of

43:15

us, season two, episode two, through the valley, the

43:18

episode opens with a flashback to

43:20

the end of season one, where Abby

43:22

is walking through this hallway that

43:24

we kind of recognize from the end

43:26

of season one. and

43:29

finds that her dad has been

43:31

murdered by Joel Miller. We later learned

43:33

that it's her dad. I don't

43:35

think we know in that moment, but

43:37

we later learned that it's her

43:39

dad and she kind of talks to

43:41

herself in Ghost's imagined doppelganger form

43:43

a little bit. But it's

43:45

a dream. Abby wakes up, they're

43:47

in some kind of mansion or lodge and Jackson

43:49

Hole's in the distance, and...

43:52

They discover oh wow this place

43:54

looks a lot bigger the daytime

43:56

than I did at night like

43:58

they thought it was tiny at

44:00

night But now that it's the

44:02

daytime. It's like wow. There's like

44:04

hundreds of people there. Probably they

44:07

have power lines Four main gates

44:09

guard towers patrols, etc. And

44:11

they don't know where Joel would you

44:13

say they're fucked Yeah, and they don't

44:15

know where Joel is Owen is one of

44:17

the people in the crew and he

44:19

says he has concepts of a plan for

44:23

how to get in there. So

44:25

Abby heads out on patrol and Owen reveals that

44:27

the plan is to convince her to go back

44:29

because if we don't, the only people who are

44:31

gonna get killed here are us. We

44:36

cut to Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

44:38

It's Ellie and Jesse. She's

44:41

waking up. Jesse's getting her because they're about

44:43

to go on patrol. Before

44:45

they do that, they stop

44:47

by, I guess the... hall and

44:49

the guy who was a

44:51

bigot to Ellie the night before

44:54

apologizes and gives her some

44:56

steak sandwiches to try and make

44:58

up for it But we

45:00

also learn that there are there

45:02

was a pile of infected

45:04

near some cabins and Some some

45:06

some infected are insulating themselves

45:08

from the cold using other infected

45:10

They're getting smarter basically they're

45:12

getting smarter and more fierce And

45:16

it's clear that that's going to become a

45:18

problem. It's also clear that Joel

45:20

and Ellie have a complicated relationship at this

45:22

point. There's something going

45:24

on between them. It's not exactly clear

45:26

what exactly that was. But Joel

45:28

went out on patrol with Dina. And

45:31

he tried to get Ellie to go with him,

45:33

but she was sleeping. And

45:35

so, you know, they'll have to

45:37

settle their situation in another way.

45:39

Well, no, I think it is

45:41

worth pointing out. I believe what

45:43

actually happens there is they were

45:46

going to have her come out

45:48

and Joel says, let her sleep.

45:50

Let her sleep. Yeah. And like,

45:52

hey, last night was rough. Like,

45:54

don't let her have the extra

45:56

time, which I think speaks to

45:58

as Ellie walks away. Like,

46:01

you could tell she feels a little bit bad

46:03

about what happened that night before. Yeah,

46:05

and I think the last we see

46:07

is she kind of happens upon Joel

46:09

while he's playing the guitar and then

46:11

we never see what that interaction is

46:13

So and but we also know that

46:16

she had a late night So presumably

46:18

at some point we might see a

46:20

flashback where we see what that conversation

46:22

was right anyway Joel Already

46:24

went out on patrol with Dina. Meanwhile, Tommy

46:26

is briefing everyone in the town on

46:28

what to do in the event of a

46:30

breach. The storm intensifies and

46:32

the town prepares for a zombie

46:35

siege. Jesse

46:37

and Ally are out on patrol and

46:39

they take shelter in a 7 -Eleven. It's

46:41

full of weed and we

46:43

learned that it was created by,

46:45

this whole situation was created

46:47

by Eugene Linden, Jesse's

46:50

first patrol partner who was

46:52

formerly a firefly. Also

46:55

He was a Vietnam veteran and

46:57

that's what made it particularly tragic

46:59

that Joel had to put him

47:01

down So I think Eugene is

47:03

the character from last week, right

47:06

that we that has met gales

47:08

husband, right as mentioned so Maybe

47:10

we'll find out more about that

47:12

situation later the way Ellie Respect

47:14

like Jesse says I was really

47:16

sad how Joel had to put

47:18

them put put him down and

47:20

then Ellie responds with just sort

47:22

of a. Yeah,

47:25

which was like that felt like a

47:27

dot dot dot. Yeah,

47:30

when she said that, I was thinking

47:33

like. She's

47:36

she's contemplating all the people that Joel

47:38

has has had to put down or

47:40

not put down probably and wondering, you

47:42

know, about how consistent that's been. But

47:45

anyway. Abby.

47:50

sees Joel and Dina from afar.

47:52

She's kind of like cracking

47:54

Joel and Dina. It's

47:57

unclear if she knows that that's Joel and

47:59

Dina. Because the whole plan was she's going to

48:02

capture some people who are out on patrol

48:04

and beat the truth out of them. That was

48:06

her plan. I don't know what she was

48:08

planning to do by herself. But regardless,

48:10

she's following these two people from

48:12

patrol. It's Joel and Dina by coincidence.

48:14

She doesn't actually know it's Joel. and

48:18

she accidentally falls into a pit

48:20

full of infected corpses. And

48:22

there's a very creepy moment when

48:24

the infected start moving and the

48:26

ground starts shifting, and

48:28

then the infected just start bolting

48:30

after Abby. It's a

48:33

super tense scene, and eventually

48:35

she kind of gets behind this

48:37

chain -like fence. And,

48:39

you know, trying not to do too

48:41

many video game comparisons during this main conversation,

48:43

but... does mirror a scene in the

48:45

video game where Abby is behind a chain

48:47

link fence and there's a bunch of

48:49

infected going after her. And I have to

48:51

say, both scenes in the video game

48:53

and in the show are really effective. Like

48:55

they're really well done. And it's just

48:57

cool to see how something that was in

48:59

a video game is ready to real

49:01

life. And they did like a really faithful

49:04

job of it, I thought. I

49:06

think there's even more infected in the show

49:08

than there were in the video game. So

49:10

it's like really well done in the show.

49:13

And it's a super tense scene, and you

49:15

think Abby has escaped, but then one infected

49:17

gets on top of her, and it almost

49:19

is about to get the better of her.

49:21

But then all of a sudden, out of

49:23

nowhere, someone shoots this infected

49:25

in the head, and we

49:28

learn it's Joel. He has just

49:30

saved Abby's life. So

49:32

painfully ironic. And Joel

49:34

comes to the rescue, Dina

49:36

calls out for him, and

49:38

Abby realizes what's happening. She

49:40

has found Joel. She has

49:42

located Joel. It's one of

49:44

the luckiest happenstances ever. And

49:47

she convinces Joel to go back

49:49

to the base where all of her

49:51

friends are. Meanwhile,

49:54

Tommy and this other woman in a wheelchair

49:56

named Amy, they're trying to raise Joel on

49:58

the radio, but they can't find him. A

50:00

massive zombie attack befalls the

50:02

town. And

50:05

again, the towns people do some really

50:07

cool shit like the rolling barrels of

50:09

oil and gas or whatever off the

50:11

edges and they have like multiple waves

50:13

of gunfire set up to protect the

50:15

town and Yeah, what did you think

50:18

of the scene because this is this

50:20

is a brand new scene. It's not

50:22

in the games at all Patrick Lepic.

50:24

What was your reaction to this sequence?

50:27

Well, I think this is in line

50:29

with a couple other sort of changes

50:31

tweaks they make Across this episode like

50:33

the the horde that Abby runs from

50:35

Is just sort of random like they're

50:37

just sort of out there in the

50:39

video game like something that occurs in

50:41

the blizzard There's more of an actual

50:43

setup here. We're like, oh, hey, like

50:45

we've discovered that the Infected seem to

50:47

be like using the dead to like

50:50

heat themselves like so that they can

50:52

remain alive like we don't exactly know

50:54

what that means and so there's a

50:56

little more of a through line of

50:58

like why things are happening out here

51:00

in a Set up in the video

51:02

game that is very Coincidental I don't

51:04

think about it too much What great

51:06

luck that all these characters just happened

51:08

to run into each other and they

51:10

didn't have to deal with Jackson here

51:12

like everyone has given a little more

51:14

to do a little more logic to

51:16

Sort of what's happening and I you

51:18

know I think if you've watched Game

51:20

of Thrones It's kind of hard to

51:23

not watch this sequence and just start

51:25

comparing it to very other various other

51:27

siege sort of sequences that occurred in

51:29

that show in particular but Even all

51:31

that said, I think it holds up. Part

51:33

of what I found very thrilling about

51:36

this sequence is I didn't know it was

51:38

going to happen. This doesn't happen in

51:40

the video game. And so I think structurally,

51:42

the way the action plays out is

51:44

very fun to watch. Like you said, the

51:46

fact that the characters all seem to

51:48

be working in unison and things are going

51:50

wrong, but they have a plan, a

51:52

way of dealing with this. It's much like

51:54

watching the pit. Watching people be competent

51:56

is enjoyable. and

51:59

then but watching competent people face like

52:01

obstacles is then itself fun because it's

52:03

like well this person is smart and

52:05

resourceful like what will they do like

52:07

when suddenly stripped of their ability to

52:09

like follow the plan that they had

52:11

and also there's a little bit of

52:13

I guess are all stakes on the

52:15

table at this point like I'm based

52:17

on like what I know happens like

52:19

I in some ways shouldn't this remove

52:21

tension from the scene but I don't

52:23

know about how you felt but even

52:25

though I thought I knew What

52:28

needs to happen because of what I know

52:30

happens in the game like. That

52:32

sequence itself and how harrowing it's depicted I

52:34

was like. I don't know

52:36

man like I get I maybe they're

52:38

taking bigger swings on like where this season

52:40

goes then what I was thinking in

52:42

it all I actually was thrilled and

52:44

tense during many sequences that. My

52:46

knowledge of the story should have betrayed that and

52:48

yet I found myself wound up in it both

52:51

because I think the show did a good job

52:53

of. establishing it's possible

52:55

that the stakes could be different in

52:57

this adaptation and I just think the

52:59

artistry the craft of the sequences get

53:01

you swept up in the thrill of

53:03

them in a way that your brain

53:05

turns off What other whatever knowledge you

53:08

might have about how the rest of

53:10

the story does or doesn't play out

53:12

Yeah, didn't happen for you sounds like

53:14

that that part happen for you. Okay

53:16

I think the actual siege itself was

53:18

like really cool and well done and

53:20

there was some really like neat little

53:22

The dogs the dogs were great dogs

53:25

were cool. I thought there was a

53:27

there's a shot where at the very

53:29

end In the foreground you see a

53:31

guy show he's like a bite mark

53:33

to his his his colleague and The

53:35

person takes a gun and shoots him

53:37

in the head like I don't know

53:40

if you saw that yeah, and it's

53:42

just like oh wow, that's super dark

53:44

but I think that

53:46

fundamentally on a premise level, I just

53:48

don't like the sequence because in my opinion,

53:50

the whole point of being out in

53:52

the middle of nowhere is so you can't

53:54

get it to be attacked by zombies. In

53:58

the game, nothing like this

54:00

ever happens, and you understand, oh,

54:02

they're out in a remote area

54:04

of Wyoming so that no one

54:06

can attack, because zombies

54:08

by themselves with the infected would

54:10

freeze to death. And so the

54:12

idea that there's just like a thousand of them out here, Where

54:16

are they going at night? Like they're really just

54:18

like all taking shelter for warmth. Anyway, so it's really

54:20

kind of like on the premise level that I'm

54:22

not a fan of it. Other than that, I thought

54:24

it was a great, well done sequence. You know

54:26

what I'm saying? But it's just kind of like, I

54:29

don't like the whole point of being out.

54:31

Otherwise, why not just live in the city,

54:33

Patrick? If you're going to be able to

54:35

be attacked by hordes of zombies. You know

54:37

what saying? suspect I guess I'm giving the

54:39

show a little more leeway with this because

54:41

I think the like the

54:43

way the infected communicate in the show

54:45

and how they're running out, like what

54:47

was in the pipe and like how

54:50

that essentially signaled them to come to,

54:52

it feels like the show is going

54:54

to expand upon how the nature of

54:56

the infected work that I, like I'm

54:58

with you and I think what the

55:00

show is saying like, well, just like

55:02

all of you change, like so are

55:05

the effect that are going to evolve

55:07

and just being in the middle of

55:09

nowhere is not necessarily, you know. You

55:12

know a going to protect you

55:14

so and to be clear Yes,

55:16

I understand there's advantages to being

55:19

more remote like sure wall and

55:21

stuff like I get it. So

55:23

I'm not saying there's no advantages,

55:25

but I guess I just liked

55:27

the idea of This place being

55:29

like relatively safe like there's there's

55:31

value in that Like storytelling wise

55:34

in having a place that's relatively

55:36

safe and contrasting that with places

55:38

that are not safe, right and

55:41

with this scene, it's just like, actually nowhere is

55:43

safe really. And it's like, okay, well, I

55:45

guess they're just freezing their

55:47

ass off for nothing. Well,

55:51

Joel doesn't have to, well, Joel doesn't have to worry about

55:53

a lot anymore. But that

55:55

housing crisis in Jackson, hey.

55:58

Absolutely. Not a problem anymore, you know, probably

56:00

okay. They're not going to be worrying about

56:02

that anymore. So, um, that was a plus.

56:04

That was a plus. But yeah, some cool

56:06

sequences, the flamethrower stuff, like I actually really

56:08

enjoyed the flamethrower. two guys that just fucking

56:11

them out of here. The

56:13

flamethrower, like PSI getting lower

56:15

and lower. There

56:18

was this great moment when Tommy's trying to

56:20

escape and he sees a bunch of boxes stacked

56:22

up and he can't get through it. And

56:24

I felt like that was a kind

56:26

of Subtle nod to not only the

56:28

last was video games, but video games

56:30

in general where like often you are

56:32

geographically constrained because there's just some boxes

56:34

there and you can't It's an invisible

56:36

wall, but there's boxes there and that's

56:38

why you can't go past the boxes

56:40

The sequence where he fights the the

56:42

bloater felt very video game coded as

56:44

well I was explaining that to my

56:46

my wife afterwards who she doesn't play

56:48

All that many video games like it's

56:50

something that happens when you face her

56:52

these kind of tank creatures, which is

56:54

what the bloater is, is you just

56:56

unload. You unload. And you're just hoping

56:58

that you put in enough ammo for

57:00

them to like the invisible HP. You

57:02

felt I felt the invisible HP bar

57:04

going away. I know it was going

57:06

to happen, not in the like, like,

57:08

I know what happens in the story

57:10

of this game. But was like, Oh,

57:12

this feels very much like they're going

57:14

to do the sequence that everyone who

57:16

plays a video game, especially survival horror

57:18

video games, like just unload the shotgun,

57:20

unload the shotgun. And at some point

57:22

he's going to go and hit the

57:25

ground and wipe your brow. And it

57:27

felt like they were using that in

57:29

a very if you know, you know,

57:31

sort of way. But it didn't feel

57:33

like, hey, video game fans, like we're

57:35

doing a video game thing. It just

57:37

felt like something video game coded, but

57:39

that worked regardless of whether you have

57:41

any experience with. Yeah. Games like that.

57:43

But I thought it was a cool,

57:45

a cool sequence. Yeah. Yeah. And

57:49

I think at the end, Tommy

57:51

and Maria both survive, right? If

57:53

I recall correctly. Yes. Yes. There's

57:55

no sense that they have bites

57:57

or anything to be concerned about.

57:59

But but it's pretty, it gets

58:01

pretty dicey. It's pretty dicey there.

58:04

Jackson is taken and, you know,

58:06

that's. Jackson remains

58:08

that safe place, you know, sort of

58:10

in the video game. But here, like,

58:12

that is kind of one of the

58:14

fundamental changes they make. Because Jackson is

58:16

also vulnerable. Maybe not. Who

58:18

knows where the story goes from here in

58:20

regards to that. But that is definitely something

58:22

that they hit out in this adaptation. There

58:27

is a heartbreaking moment when

58:29

Joel sees... Jackson burning in the

58:31

background and he kind of

58:33

wants to go down there But

58:35

Abby says hey no we're

58:37

almost at we're almost at the

58:39

base. Trust me like we

58:41

can get to the base. gonna

58:43

be fine. We meet Abby's

58:45

crew which consists of Nora Manny

58:48

as well as Mel are

58:50

in the crew and At that

58:52

point it becomes really quickly

58:54

that something is wrong Abby confronts

58:56

Joel and Says there's no

58:58

more fireflies. They're all gone. They

59:00

decide to put Dina to sleep for

59:02

an hour. And

59:04

there's a huge confrontation. And

59:07

we learn, again, more details about

59:09

why Abby wants to kill Joel. We

59:11

learned Joel killed 18 soldiers and

59:13

one doctor, an unarmed doctor

59:15

that he shot in the head. And we

59:17

learned that that was Abby's dad. We

59:20

learned that Abby's in a militia. She was

59:22

trained not to kill people who are defenseless,

59:24

but she's making an exception here. And

59:27

she shoots Joel in the

59:29

leg with a shotgun and then

59:31

starts bashing it with a

59:33

golf club eventually Ellie bursts in

59:35

just in time to see

59:37

Joel get stabbed in his neck

59:39

to death and that is

59:41

the end of Joel Miller in

59:43

the last of us so Yeah,

59:46

Patrick any it's hard to compare it

59:48

like talk about the scene without comparing it

59:50

to the scene in the video game

59:52

But I'm curious like and I wish you

59:55

know like both Patrick and I played

59:57

the video game The other co -host who

59:59

has joined us Christian Spicer obviously split the

1:00:01

video games So I wish we had

1:00:03

like a unadulterated perspective on this that said

1:00:05

I am curious Patrick Put the video

1:00:07

game out of your mind. What did you

1:00:09

think of this scene? I

1:00:12

thought it was really effective

1:00:14

and upsetting You

1:00:16

know, like again, not it is

1:00:18

so hard to not compare the

1:00:20

two. It's just inevitable when you

1:00:22

have a scene with this much

1:00:24

stakes. Yeah, part of why

1:00:26

the Jackson sequence and other choices they've

1:00:28

made storytelling wise in this adaptation where it's

1:00:30

like, oh, you know, they mentioned

1:00:32

this in our first conversation with Christians. Like

1:00:34

I want to get to a place with

1:00:37

this season where I can just be with

1:00:39

it as a show. And it doesn't mean

1:00:41

that I'm going to like it or dislike

1:00:43

it. It's like I'd like to not constantly

1:00:45

in my head. Be comparing what I saw

1:00:47

and we'll see if that changes once we've

1:00:49

gotten past this. Really pivotal important moment from

1:00:51

the game that is also pivotal important in

1:00:53

the television show but. I

1:00:55

mean I think they I think they sell

1:00:57

it like pretty well I think Caitlin Deaver

1:00:59

sells it. Pretty well it's a

1:01:02

different take on Abby and I think people

1:01:04

need to make their piece with that

1:01:06

or you're just going to be upset. The

1:01:08

rest of the show like it's a

1:01:10

different. It's a different abbey

1:01:13

like it shares a lot of the

1:01:15

characteristics, but I think for what she's

1:01:17

being asked to do I think Diva

1:01:19

nailed it like I think it's a

1:01:21

really upsetting emotionally powerful scene and Yeah,

1:01:23

I mean it's I thought it was

1:01:25

great like as great as something as

1:01:28

upsetting as that can be I think

1:01:30

they I think they nailed what they

1:01:32

were looking to nail and then once

1:01:34

you go past that it's You're starting

1:01:36

to immediately just draw on the comparisons.

1:01:38

I think the bet unfortunately It's like

1:01:41

it's kind of impossible to do what

1:01:43

you're asking me to do which is

1:01:45

like just respond to the scene because

1:01:47

I just can't like yeah, especially given

1:01:49

how many choices they make that are

1:01:51

different than the game from aesthetics to

1:01:53

You know more specifics But you know

1:01:56

the best you know point of comparison

1:01:58

I have is my wife who like

1:02:00

was deeply invested is that person who? You

1:02:03

know was very invested in these

1:02:05

two characters Joel specifically And

1:02:08

like this episode ended and it was

1:02:10

like, I need a minute. Like normally we

1:02:12

finish watching a television show. She crawls off

1:02:14

to bed. I play video games for a

1:02:16

couple hours before I go to sleep. And

1:02:19

she was like, I'm going to just

1:02:22

like we turn the lights on and

1:02:24

kind of chill on the couch for

1:02:26

a little bit. Sure. Like, do you

1:02:28

need to talk? She's like, no, I

1:02:31

just want to like sit like. Doomscroll

1:02:33

on my phone for a couple minutes.

1:02:35

Yeah, so I think you know by that

1:02:37

barometer which is the closest I can

1:02:40

get to the Emotional state that I was

1:02:42

in when I played they came originally

1:02:44

like what's different from me and you at

1:02:46

least I think this is true is

1:02:48

I played the game before it came out

1:02:50

and so I experienced this moment in

1:02:52

not just the isolation of COVID but the

1:02:54

isolation of No one else knowing about

1:02:56

it. Yeah, like however many thousands of people,

1:02:59

you know, but like a small group

1:03:01

Relative to the many people that played the

1:03:03

video game Like I experienced that on

1:03:05

my own and then reaching out to people

1:03:07

I knew that were playing it But

1:03:09

my wife had the reaction that I had

1:03:11

when I played the video game and

1:03:13

so if I use that as a proxy

1:03:16

I Think they nailed it. I think

1:03:18

they did a good job as well. Caitlin

1:03:20

Dever is an amazing actor and She

1:03:22

did a wonderful performance here. I

1:03:24

Agree with you It is really difficult

1:03:26

to separate from the game and she

1:03:28

essentially like without like to be extremely

1:03:30

blunt about it She is

1:03:33

a much smaller person in

1:03:35

the show than she is

1:03:37

in the game and I

1:03:39

do think like the the

1:03:41

version of Abby in the

1:03:43

game is like a much

1:03:45

more hulking physically imposing character

1:03:47

and that really did bring

1:03:49

a lot of I Think

1:03:51

viciousness to what occurs here

1:03:53

in a way that I

1:03:55

think is They it felt

1:03:57

like they had to compensate

1:03:59

for that In the

1:04:01

show by making the show very

1:04:03

graphic The way that it's

1:04:06

depicted in the show is much

1:04:08

more graphic than what is

1:04:10

in the game in my opinion

1:04:12

In the game like as

1:04:14

you're swapping between characters also The

1:04:16

video game is shot in

1:04:18

the dark the television show is

1:04:20

shot in the light and

1:04:22

there is a Kind of brutal

1:04:24

nature to the lighting of

1:04:26

the video game that contributes to

1:04:28

your experience of the events

1:04:30

that unfold that is pretty different

1:04:32

than in this like these

1:04:34

giant like, I know, Baywind. Like,

1:04:36

I mean, as you know,

1:04:38

it is bathed in light in

1:04:40

the show. And that is

1:04:42

just like there's a darkness that

1:04:44

pervades. The scene

1:04:47

lighting in the video game

1:04:49

that is not not present

1:04:51

here. Yeah. So

1:04:53

I thought she did a very solid

1:04:55

job and it is a. Shocking moment

1:04:57

and the way it's depicted is shocking

1:04:59

and and well executed so and they

1:05:01

don't flinch I again like you know

1:05:03

you and I you know when we

1:05:05

talked about this season with Christian I

1:05:08

was I don't feel bad about this

1:05:10

prediction but like I felt there was

1:05:12

every indication that they were gonna put

1:05:14

this off to later in the season

1:05:16

and it seemed like they might have

1:05:18

even good storytelling reasons to do that

1:05:20

and the kind of things they were

1:05:22

expanding in Jackson and The Abby

1:05:24

characters, like if we're going to if we're

1:05:26

going to talk about her motivations early on, let's

1:05:29

have her around in Jackson. Like all that

1:05:31

seemed like totally reasonable stuff that didn't betray the

1:05:33

logic and the motivations of the game, but

1:05:35

just went down a different path. And

1:05:37

like the moment the Blizzard kicked in, I

1:05:40

said, oh, shit, they're going to do it. And

1:05:42

I don't. I do think it's bold

1:05:44

to do it this early in

1:05:46

the season. Like it's because as we've

1:05:48

discussed, it's really like testing the

1:05:50

loyalty of the audience to the show.

1:05:53

And you're doing it two episodes

1:05:55

into a seven episode season,

1:05:58

you know, so like Yeah, yeah,

1:06:00

so anyway Ellie busts in

1:06:02

just in time to see Joel

1:06:04

get the life extinguished from

1:06:06

him But the crew does not

1:06:08

harm Ellie or Dina That's

1:06:11

like part of their whole code.

1:06:13

I guess is there like

1:06:15

we're not gonna hurt anyone else

1:06:17

and I think that's worth

1:06:19

noting but We see - see

1:06:21

Ellie as a threat, right? Like,

1:06:24

I think if any of

1:06:26

them was a certain threat calculus,

1:06:29

maybe you make an exception, but they'd look

1:06:31

at Ellie and think, well, what could

1:06:33

this little girl do to us? I

1:06:35

mean, she did slice that guy's hand,

1:06:37

I think it was really bad. Face, I

1:06:39

think. Well, it was face in the

1:06:42

game. I don't know if it was face

1:06:44

show. I played these sequences back to

1:06:46

back. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Anyway, she did slice

1:06:48

that guy on the skin somewhere. And

1:06:51

anyway, the

1:06:54

Jesse, Ellie, Dina, they

1:06:56

go back, they're dragging Joel's

1:06:58

body behind them. And we hear

1:07:00

a cover of Through the

1:07:02

Valley performed by Ashley Johnson, right,

1:07:04

who plays Ellie in the

1:07:07

game. This is from

1:07:09

the last of us part two

1:07:11

covers and rarities and EP that's related

1:07:13

to the release of the video

1:07:15

game. So the video game DNA is

1:07:17

deep throughout the show. But

1:07:19

anyway. That's the

1:07:21

end of the episode

1:07:23

any other thoughts on

1:07:25

What happened here? Really

1:07:27

hard to talk about without talking

1:07:30

about the game so like we're

1:07:32

not gonna really predict anything But

1:07:34

any other thoughts on the episode

1:07:36

we just saw I'm curious I'm

1:07:38

curious given some of the choices

1:07:40

they made about like this isn't

1:07:42

a spoiler, but some characters are

1:07:45

in different places in the in

1:07:47

the show, then they are in

1:07:49

the game. And I

1:07:51

sort of understand. I can see

1:07:53

maybe where they're going with that, but

1:07:55

I'm I'm curious as a viewer

1:07:57

to see what the consequences, the

1:07:59

ripple effects of those choices are as

1:08:02

we move forward and Ellie goes on

1:08:04

this new journey. Like

1:08:06

for me, looking at this where this

1:08:08

like. In some ways, like

1:08:10

I know where the story goes, but I

1:08:12

don't know where this story is going. And

1:08:14

I still can't quite pin that down. It's

1:08:16

like, OK, we spent all this time expanding

1:08:18

on Jackson. I thought I knew

1:08:20

with the seven episode arc of this

1:08:22

show of the season was like I felt

1:08:24

pretty confident that episode six was going

1:08:26

to be this scene. And then episode

1:08:28

seven was going to be let's go do something

1:08:30

about it. Clearly, that's not

1:08:33

the case. And this sounds like

1:08:35

this might cover more than I thought.

1:08:37

And I am now interested. What

1:08:39

is Ellie's? What is Ellie's arc? for

1:08:41

the rest of the season. And

1:08:44

how much of that is slow

1:08:46

played versus, you know, what we see

1:08:48

in the game. So I remain

1:08:50

sort of not sure where this season

1:08:52

goes. I'm shocked and

1:08:54

I respect that they did as early as

1:08:56

they did. But now I'm fascinated to see

1:08:59

what decisions they make going forward. Yeah,

1:09:02

I agree.

1:09:06

I just have a lot of questions about why they did

1:09:08

things this way, and I'm curious

1:09:10

if the rest the season will answer some

1:09:13

of those questions. But

1:09:15

overall, I think they designed this

1:09:17

episode to be a shocking

1:09:19

episode with some really sort of

1:09:21

memorable moments that people are

1:09:23

going to be talking about for

1:09:25

a long time. And I

1:09:27

think if that was their objective,

1:09:29

overall, they accomplished it. And

1:09:31

that is worth noting. It doesn't

1:09:33

feel like a twist. It's

1:09:36

shocking, but it didn't feel like a twist

1:09:38

when I played it in the video game. I

1:09:41

don't think it feels like a twist here. Like

1:09:43

it doesn't feel cheap, I guess. I

1:09:45

obviously disagree with like where the

1:09:47

story goes, like, or at least I

1:09:49

did in the video game, but

1:09:52

I still I don't. Like, how do

1:09:54

you do a sequel? Kill off

1:09:56

a shot. It feels like earned as

1:09:58

a motivation for this character, this

1:10:00

world. And even if in my heart

1:10:02

of hearts. Kind of was

1:10:04

Joel was still alive and they went on

1:10:06

a different adventure together. Yeah, by the

1:10:09

way, which was still possible like Who knows

1:10:11

that maybe they're gonna dramatically change the

1:10:13

video game from the like I didn't know

1:10:15

if they were gonna change things But

1:10:17

they decided to not change things and here

1:10:19

we are, know, and I will say

1:10:21

they like we'll see where it all ends

1:10:23

up But it felt like a brave

1:10:25

choice not a cheap choice in the video

1:10:27

game and I think I

1:10:29

think that's in kind in the television show. It

1:10:31

feels like a brave choice, not a cheap choice. And

1:10:33

it's just a matter of what do you, once

1:10:35

you make, once you play that card or even take

1:10:37

that card out of the deck, you got to

1:10:39

fill it with something. And that's,

1:10:41

that's what I want it like, right?

1:10:43

Like that's what you and I are. And

1:10:46

I don't know if we'll get that

1:10:48

answer this season. This feels like something that

1:10:50

is more of a multi season answer

1:10:52

for you and I, but we found

1:10:54

the answers incomplete or frustrating in the

1:10:56

game. And I'm. That's the thing I'm most

1:10:58

curious about from here is, do I

1:11:00

have a different response to the television show?

1:11:02

Yeah. Well,

1:11:05

Patrick Kloppek and I still have lots

1:11:07

more to discuss about the video game

1:11:09

versus the show. And if you want

1:11:11

to hear those thoughts, become a paid

1:11:13

subscriber at decodingtv.com. We'll be posting bonus

1:11:15

episodes comparing the two things. And

1:11:17

thanks to everyone who's a paid subscriber

1:11:19

at decodingtv.com who makes this podcast possible. Those

1:11:22

are our thoughts on the last of a season two episode two.

1:11:24

Let us know what you think in the comments. Does

1:11:28

it ever feel like you're

1:11:31

a marketing professional just speaking into

1:11:33

the void? Well

1:11:35

with LinkedIn ads, you can know

1:11:37

you're reaching the right decision makers.

1:11:39

You can even target buyers by

1:11:41

job title, industry, company, seniority, skills.

1:11:44

Wait, did I say job title yet?

1:11:46

Get started today and see how you

1:11:48

can avoid the void and reach the

1:11:51

right buyers with LinkedIn ads. We'll even

1:11:53

give you a $100 credit on your

1:11:55

next campaign. Get started at linkedin.com slash

1:11:57

results. Terms and conditions apply. Breath

1:12:14

in and

1:12:17

out. Feels

1:12:20

better, right? That's

1:12:22

15 seconds of self -care. Imagine

1:12:24

what you could do with more.

1:12:27

Visit betterhelp.com slash random podcast

1:12:29

for 10 % off your

1:12:31

first month of therapy. No

1:12:34

pressure, just help, but

1:12:36

for now, just relax.

1:12:43

Before we move on Patrick Lepic you want

1:12:45

to let people know they can find

1:12:47

more of your work on the internet this

1:12:49

week? Yes, you can hear me talking

1:12:51

about video games over at remap radio calm

1:12:53

And I have a parenting and gaming

1:12:55

newsletter called cross play that you can subscribe

1:12:57

to a cross play news Where this

1:13:00

week I'll have a guide to pre -ordering

1:13:02

the switch to if you are Frantically trying

1:13:04

to figure out how you should get

1:13:06

that for you or your kids Excellent.

1:13:09

I'm definitely interested in getting that for me, Patrick. So

1:13:11

I'm gonna have to check that out. But

1:13:14

yeah, if you wanna check

1:13:16

out more of my work, decodingeverything.com

1:13:18

and become a free subscriber

1:13:20

to decodingtv.com where we're having our

1:13:22

written recaps published there, check

1:13:24

that out as well. If

1:13:26

you're interested in our conversations here

1:13:28

on the podcast, I think

1:13:31

you'll enjoy subscribing to the free

1:13:33

newsletter at decodingtv.com. Okay,

1:13:35

Patrick, let's talk about...

1:13:37

season two, episode one. I've

1:13:42

been studying commercial aviation disasters

1:13:44

as a hobby and I started

1:13:46

to notice a disturbing pattern

1:13:48

in the causes of these crashes.

1:13:51

15 years ago, you recommended

1:13:53

role -playing exercises. EFAA said, no,

1:13:55

for whatever reason, they're just

1:13:57

not going there. I

1:14:00

do have some experience. with

1:14:03

creating elaborate role

1:14:06

-playing scenarios. And

1:14:08

I do have money to

1:14:10

put towards this. Yeah,

1:14:12

I think you're on to something there. Let's

1:14:14

work together to save some lives. Welcome

1:14:18

to Decoding TV's coverage of the rehearsal

1:14:20

season two premiere. I'm David

1:14:23

Cheny with Patrick Lepic. Patrick, apparently

1:14:25

you had not watched season one

1:14:27

of the rehearsal before this last

1:14:29

few weeks, is that correct? Yeah,

1:14:31

I when I when I knew you

1:14:33

wanted us to watch the rehearsal season two

1:14:35

my understanding was that at least for

1:14:37

my I didn't watch the show and so

1:14:39

I was like oh but from the

1:14:41

framing device that I understand about the show

1:14:43

seems a little more anthology based and

1:14:45

so I can probably jump into season two

1:14:48

and be okay But I should get

1:14:50

a flavor of season one and my intention

1:14:52

was to just watch an episode or

1:14:54

two just so I could be in the

1:14:56

right frame of mind and then And

1:14:58

I'm watching the entire season finishing

1:15:00

it up yesterday prior to the

1:15:03

premiere season two and and what

1:15:05

did you think Patrick? I found

1:15:07

it to be a morally reprehensible

1:15:09

show Mostly because it involves kids

1:15:11

right like that's the problem right

1:15:13

um a storytelling level I think

1:15:15

the rehearsal kind of loses the

1:15:17

plot whatever it has the moment

1:15:19

that Nathan fielder becomes a character

1:15:21

because Mm -hmm. I don't know

1:15:23

who Nathan fielder is right who

1:15:25

he really is like are you

1:15:27

playing? A character is this

1:15:29

Nathan Fielder the I just at

1:15:32

no point is that clear and

1:15:34

as a result of that I

1:15:36

found it very difficult to. Attach

1:15:38

myself to him and the

1:15:40

absurdist elements like weren't enough and

1:15:42

then yes like the moment

1:15:45

the show became about. All

1:15:47

these families and child actors specifically like

1:15:49

the moment where the kid is confused about

1:15:51

whether the elder is his father I

1:15:53

found how that was handled by the show

1:15:56

by Nathan. to be like

1:15:58

morally reprehensible. And I

1:16:00

like the show just like completely

1:16:02

like like lost me at that

1:16:04

point. I don't know what I'm

1:16:06

watching. I don't know why I'm

1:16:08

watching this. I was I could

1:16:10

not finish it. I was like,

1:16:12

I have to see what this

1:16:14

is going to do by the

1:16:16

end. Yeah, like the ending only

1:16:18

made me want to throw the

1:16:20

remote at the screen a little

1:16:22

bit more, which put me in

1:16:24

a very interesting place. I'm watching

1:16:26

season two. Well,

1:16:28

I'm going to say I thought the

1:16:30

rehearsal season one, yes, I agree

1:16:32

with your qualms. I'm not like saying

1:16:34

it was morally above board. But

1:16:37

I thought it was largely a masterpiece. And

1:16:40

it's very interesting because see, episode

1:16:42

one of that show promises a

1:16:44

very different show than we end

1:16:46

up getting. Yes. And

1:16:48

episode one in itself. is a masterpiece, in

1:16:50

my opinion. agree. I was fully on it.

1:16:52

You're like, oh my gosh, I'm hooked. Let's

1:16:54

do this. Six episodes of this, I cannot

1:16:56

wait. But then it goes in such a

1:16:59

different direction. And then it's safe to say

1:17:01

also that the rehearsal season 2 goes in

1:17:03

a vastly different direction as well. And that's

1:17:05

one of the things about the show is

1:17:07

that you never know what you're going to

1:17:09

get in a given episode. And there is

1:17:11

something exciting about that. I agree. I share

1:17:13

the same moral concerns as you, especially with

1:17:15

regards to children. I think anyone who

1:17:17

signs up for anything Nathan Fielder

1:17:20

related should know what they're signing up

1:17:22

like it's very easy to Google

1:17:24

Nathan Fielder and his antics and so

1:17:26

like if you're an adult you

1:17:28

have no excuse but I do not

1:17:30

play place the entirety of the

1:17:32

blame at Nathan Fielder's footsteps I as

1:17:35

a parent I found many of

1:17:37

the decisions the parents are making to

1:17:39

also be a deeply questionable,

1:17:41

yes. But I found the ending of

1:17:43

season one to be brilliant. It sounds

1:17:45

like it was very frustrating to you,

1:17:47

but this idea of like, there's

1:17:49

a lot of questions

1:17:51

in the show. I

1:17:54

would say some of the big questions the show

1:17:56

asks are, right? Like, is it

1:17:58

possible to remove variables from actual

1:18:00

real life situations, right? Like,

1:18:02

if you can rehearse over and

1:18:04

over again, can you master? Real

1:18:07

life, right? That's that's a question

1:18:09

another question is What is the difference

1:18:11

between playing a role and becoming

1:18:13

the role? Mm -hmm, right and and

1:18:15

how blurry is that line? And I

1:18:17

think season one really plays with

1:18:19

that line Particularly towards the end in

1:18:21

a way that I thought was

1:18:23

brilliant. So like I left season one

1:18:25

with chills in a good way

1:18:28

But I understand if it's not for

1:18:30

everyone. Yeah, and I agree like

1:18:32

I felt those questions really interesting And

1:18:34

in the first episode, when the

1:18:36

guy is doing the revealing that he

1:18:38

lied about his level of academic

1:18:40

achievement and he in the bar after

1:18:42

rehearsing all these incredible scenarios is

1:18:44

like when faced with the reality is

1:18:46

unable to like initially climb over

1:18:48

to do the thing he's supposed to

1:18:50

do. I'm like, wow. It's incredible. That

1:18:53

is an interesting that is

1:18:55

transcendent. And. I don't know who

1:18:57

Nathan Fielder is. And so

1:18:59

all these questions that you found

1:19:01

really interesting, I found

1:19:03

no introspection into the

1:19:05

answers of those because if

1:19:07

I don't know who

1:19:10

this person is, he

1:19:12

is a deeply unreliable narrator. And

1:19:14

the moment that you're an unreliable narrator, I

1:19:17

find it difficult to find any emotional

1:19:19

resonance within. Like that

1:19:21

character and like that ultimately like

1:19:23

putting aside like my feelings on like

1:19:25

how it handled like parents and

1:19:27

kids like I just couldn't like Who

1:19:29

are you and I just I

1:19:31

just couldn't I just couldn't get past

1:19:33

that with the show Well, he

1:19:36

does try to answer that question a

1:19:38

little bit in season two of

1:19:40

the rehearsal right in the season two

1:19:42

premiere gotta have fun Nathan fielder

1:19:44

decides to apply his resources and skills

1:19:46

to an interesting problem aviation disasters Very

1:19:49

timely show by the way Nathan Nathan

1:19:51

reveals he has studied aviation disasters throughout

1:19:54

history and one major issue is that

1:19:56

when the captain behaves recklessly The first

1:19:58

officer often doesn't feel empowered to bring

1:20:00

up any concerns Nathan realizes he can

1:20:02

apply his skills to help pilots role

1:20:04

play and become more comfortable Doing this

1:20:06

bringing up their concerns to their co

1:20:08

-workers And the first episode has him

1:20:10

following one specific pilot moody and having

1:20:13

him role play a flying scenario with

1:20:15

his girlfriend Patrick overall thoughts

1:20:17

on the season 2 premiere of

1:20:19

the rehearsal I Found it to be

1:20:21

slightly triggering because I'm like this

1:20:23

is the trap I fell into last

1:20:25

time like this seems really interesting

1:20:27

and this as a framework for a

1:20:29

show I could easily see many

1:20:31

episodes But it won't like my worry

1:20:33

is like at one point is

1:20:35

this character that I don't find interesting

1:20:37

or relatable Or experience all that

1:20:39

empathy for gonna insert himself into the

1:20:41

story And distract from the framework

1:20:43

that I like at the beginning and

1:20:45

I expect that's going to happen

1:20:47

at some point and Maybe it'll go

1:20:49

in a different direction and maybe

1:20:51

the lack of if it doesn't involve

1:20:53

like families and children I'll find

1:20:55

like a better way into it, but

1:20:57

I thought this first episode is

1:20:59

like brilliant I don't know how you

1:21:01

like couldn't not have that response

1:21:03

I had a very similar reaction to

1:21:05

this that I had to the

1:21:07

first episode of the first season which

1:21:09

is this is a fascinating way

1:21:11

to explore people's emotional journeys and The

1:21:14

questions they won't answer for themselves But

1:21:16

is that what this show actually wants

1:21:18

to be and I just that question

1:21:20

won't be answered for me until I

1:21:22

get further into it I Also thought

1:21:24

is brilliant and I should say some

1:21:27

may consider this to be a minor

1:21:29

spoiler for the rest of the show

1:21:31

But my understanding so be warned but

1:21:33

my understanding is this whole season is

1:21:35

going to deal with the aviation stuff.

1:21:37

That is my understanding. So it's not

1:21:39

going to be like a different kind

1:21:41

of disaster every week. Like it's like

1:21:44

all going to be aviation, which is

1:21:46

just like basically Warner Brothers just gave

1:21:48

Nathan Fielder money to deal with his

1:21:50

obsessions. That's kind of like what it

1:21:52

is. And there's something really incredible

1:21:54

about that. There's something really just like

1:21:56

they gave him millions of dollars to like

1:21:58

recreate these extremely elaborate things. Just

1:22:00

to focus on whatever he's fixated on at

1:22:02

that particular point in time. And

1:22:07

I think it's gonna be really

1:22:09

fascinating. I don't know how much he's

1:22:11

gonna insert himself into it, but

1:22:13

I think it's clear that he is

1:22:15

like a Central character in the

1:22:17

show in this season a way that

1:22:19

like in season one It wasn't

1:22:21

necessarily the case or season one episode

1:22:23

one. It wasn't necessarily the case

1:22:25

But like I think it's clear he's

1:22:28

it's we're clearly exploring his psyche

1:22:30

and what his obsessions are and his

1:22:32

insecurity at being a comedian now

1:22:34

again Huge questions about how

1:22:36

real any of this is like is

1:22:38

the is he actually is Nathan

1:22:40

fielder actually insecure about being a

1:22:42

comedian Or is he just saying he

1:22:44

is like we never really know

1:22:46

he remains an inscrutable an inscrutable

1:22:49

figure and I do think you're right

1:22:51

that that does Potentially hurt the

1:22:53

show but for me it kind

1:22:55

of makes the show more fascinating,

1:22:57

you know, like I'm always wondering where

1:22:59

does Nathan fielder's real persona Like

1:23:01

his real life person and and the

1:23:04

persona begin like does that even exist? Uh,

1:23:06

and I'm always like trying to see

1:23:08

the scenes when I'm watching the show and

1:23:10

it's it's it's difficult to find so

1:23:12

anyway Yeah, yeah, I find I find that

1:23:14

I I get for you. a positive

1:23:16

for me That's a negative and like I

1:23:18

love absurdist comedy and like other stuff

1:23:20

the fielder has been I've not seen Nathan

1:23:22

for you. I'm not curious to go

1:23:24

down that rabbit hole to see So

1:23:27

many of my friends and people I respect like

1:23:29

adore that show. It's incredible. I

1:23:31

guess I would like Nathan for you

1:23:33

quite a bit more than I how

1:23:35

I responded to to the rehearsal and

1:23:38

even the stuff that field has been

1:23:40

involved in like how to with John

1:23:42

Wilson, which we've covered. Yeah, this was

1:23:44

lastly is like one of my favorite

1:23:46

pieces of work like of art period

1:23:48

like but how to a John Wilson,

1:23:50

which also has a like deeply inscrutable

1:23:52

main character protagonist who's is someone following

1:23:54

their obsessions. It's such a deeply

1:23:56

human show like I find it

1:23:58

very easy to find my way and

1:24:00

again, they're very different shows, but

1:24:03

they both are following personal obsessions to

1:24:05

the point of absurdity and making

1:24:07

connections between those things but I found

1:24:09

how to a John Wilson be

1:24:11

such a human show and one that

1:24:13

celebrated people and even John Wilson

1:24:16

himself and I guess I just find

1:24:18

the fielder Whatever version of fielder

1:24:20

is here. I have difficulty like picking

1:24:22

apart the humanity of like him

1:24:24

as a as a person or a

1:24:26

character and that's the impenetra part

1:24:29

I kind of find about getting to

1:24:31

the next layer of the show

1:24:33

that other people seem to get to

1:24:35

that I was not able to

1:24:37

with the first season of the rehearsal.

1:24:39

I also think Fielder probably has

1:24:42

a layer of like more morally objectionable

1:24:44

than how to with Don Wilson

1:24:46

where He's

1:24:48

kind of looping people into these scenarios.

1:24:50

You don't know what the producers have

1:24:52

told these people about how they're going

1:24:54

to be depicted in any way. And

1:24:57

often they're depicted in ways that are like unflattering or

1:24:59

in a way that you might laugh at them. I

1:25:01

felt like John Wilson was just going to places and

1:25:03

pointing the camera at things. I did

1:25:05

not, but like with Nathan Field, there's

1:25:07

a whole layer of like deception. There's

1:25:09

this apparatus of like deception

1:25:11

that he employs that I understand

1:25:13

people. can object to. And

1:25:15

so like, that's a huge difference

1:25:17

between the shows. That

1:25:20

said, one of the things I really like about

1:25:22

Nathan Fielder is I think he's actually a great interviewer.

1:25:26

There's a part where he interviews this pilot

1:25:28

Moody, where he's just, he's

1:25:30

lying on his bed in a very

1:25:32

provocative position. And he's like, asking

1:25:34

him questions about like, His

1:25:37

he says like oh, yeah, I'm afraid

1:25:39

my girlfriend might like meet people at Starbucks

1:25:41

or what? You know people she might

1:25:43

like run away from Starbucks and he's like

1:25:45

what do you mean and he'll like

1:25:47

dive deep into Like something that they said

1:25:50

in a way that is very revealing

1:25:52

and that I appreciate And it reveals like

1:25:54

parts of the human psyche again in

1:25:56

so far as you can trust anything you're

1:25:58

seeing on screen is authentic which is Unclear

1:26:00

at best so those interviews. I mean

1:26:03

those are some of my favorite parts

1:26:05

where he's just talking to people one

1:26:07

thing he does I think it's part

1:26:09

of what makes him a great interviewer

1:26:11

Or he's able to get people to

1:26:13

open up is your natural impulse I'm

1:26:15

sure you experience this all the time

1:26:17

like hosting podcasts is to fill space,

1:26:19

right? Yes, like when there is a

1:26:21

gap the software you have on your

1:26:23

phone like when you listen to podcasts

1:26:25

the one I use overcast like If

1:26:27

he attacks a certain amount of time

1:26:29

in between, like people talking, a pause,

1:26:31

it will delete that to make everything

1:26:33

sound more natural. And there's this very

1:26:35

human impulse to, like, when there is

1:26:37

silence, to fill it with something, anything.

1:26:39

And that is even more something that

1:26:41

you feel you're trained to do, really,

1:26:43

to fill that space when you are

1:26:45

doing pseudo -public performances, like interviews, recording

1:26:47

podcasts. If you watch

1:26:49

Nathan Fielder closely, he's

1:26:52

constantly shutting up. He lets

1:26:54

he there is negative space within

1:26:56

his conversations where he leaves

1:26:58

elongated pauses and Whereas the normal

1:27:00

dynamic is if you're the

1:27:03

interviewer the power Dynamic there is

1:27:05

that well the interviewer the

1:27:07

person who's talking person they should

1:27:09

fill that with space ask

1:27:11

a question find something to follow

1:27:13

up on Fielder doesn't he

1:27:15

was absolves himself of that of

1:27:17

that part of it like

1:27:19

he still holds

1:27:21

the power in that dynamic, but

1:27:23

he'll ask something someone will say

1:27:26

something and then he'll just let

1:27:28

it sit awkwardly for seconds at

1:27:30

a time and you'll notice if

1:27:32

you start like kind of like

1:27:34

witnessing that dynamic What happens is

1:27:36

the other the person he's talking

1:27:38

to fills that space Yeah, and

1:27:40

they when they do that they

1:27:42

do so from an impulsive and

1:27:44

then if you're asking emotionally charged

1:27:46

questions a more vulnerable state because

1:27:48

you're acting Um, you're responding

1:27:50

impulsively as opposed to with a

1:27:52

calculation. So I think that ends

1:27:54

up being a lot of his

1:27:56

entryway into Really introspective conversations is

1:27:59

really just Shutting up. Yeah Agreed

1:28:01

completely Patrick any highlights from this

1:28:03

episode that you want to mention?

1:28:05

I want to say One of

1:28:07

my favorite moments from the episode

1:28:09

is when he can't get into

1:28:11

this pilots lounge And

1:28:13

so he builds a full scale replica

1:28:15

of the I mean visually the

1:28:17

show is extremely striking just Nathan fielder

1:28:20

standing in front of this like

1:28:22

green screen projection volume type thing It's

1:28:24

just like wow that looks incredible

1:28:26

He there's one scene where he like

1:28:28

emerges out of this Soundstage like

1:28:30

that has a plane crash simulated behind

1:28:32

it with these people dead on

1:28:34

the ground and all this stuff. It's

1:28:36

just like looks amazing There's

1:28:40

moments of awe and wonder

1:28:42

that I had watching the rehearsal

1:28:45

season one that I also

1:28:47

experienced watching this as well. But

1:28:49

he creates the scale model

1:28:51

of this airport with like the

1:28:53

freaking nursing station and the

1:28:55

advertisements and all that. Panda Express.

1:28:59

What appears to be a fully

1:29:01

functional Panda Express, you know, with

1:29:03

like the grill and the different

1:29:05

walks and everything. And

1:29:07

the sole reason for that seemingly

1:29:09

is so that he can observe what

1:29:12

happens in the pilot's lounge because

1:29:14

he couldn't go in the pilot's lounge

1:29:16

in real life. And then of

1:29:18

course, no one says anything in the

1:29:20

pilot's lounge. It's just incredible, incredible

1:29:22

that he went to all this trouble

1:29:25

for - Why aren't you talking? That's

1:29:27

an amazing reveal moment in the

1:29:29

episode, you know? I

1:29:31

also just found it very profound, Moody talking

1:29:34

with his girlfriend. at

1:29:36

the end of the episode because it

1:29:38

really feels like Moody was uncomfortable talking

1:29:40

with his girlfriend about this and that

1:29:42

this like fake Outlandish scenario allowed him

1:29:44

to share his true feelings with her

1:29:46

in a way that he doesn't he

1:29:48

isn't able to in real life and

1:29:50

it makes you wonder kind of like

1:29:52

What are some things that we are

1:29:54

unable to share with are the people

1:29:56

we care about that like if we

1:29:59

were in a role -playing situation We might

1:30:01

feel differently about you know, so Yeah,

1:30:04

I thought there were many wonderful moments

1:30:06

about the like if you'd asked me

1:30:08

to predict what the season would be

1:30:10

I would not have guessed it's gonna

1:30:12

use Nathan fielder skills to investigate aviation

1:30:14

disasters and how they unfold But you

1:30:16

know you and I recap the curse

1:30:18

on a week -to -week basis like I'm

1:30:20

On board with this guy and whatever

1:30:22

he's trying to do no matter what

1:30:24

no matter where he wants to take

1:30:26

me But yeah Patrick I mean How

1:30:29

are you feeling because it seems like the rehearsal season

1:30:31

one left a bad taste in your mouth? Like are

1:30:33

you kind of like on board for this? Yeah,

1:30:36

I mean again like that's why I described

1:30:38

the The first episode as a trap was

1:30:40

like this is how I felt last time.

1:30:42

Oh my god. I'm about to witness a

1:30:44

masterpiece and then I wanted to strangle the

1:30:46

guy on the outside of the TV by

1:30:48

the by the end of the first season

1:30:50

so I'm You know the

1:30:53

essentially what he does are

1:30:55

just like absurdist versions of going

1:30:57

to therapy, right? Yeah, like

1:30:59

that's kind of like a lot

1:31:01

of what fielder does is

1:31:03

What you're describing? You

1:31:05

know like when you and I talk

1:31:07

on a podcast It's not like it's

1:31:10

not like we're not having a real

1:31:12

conversation But like it is like it's

1:31:14

it's structured differently. You perform differently. It's

1:31:16

a performed conversation that It's still enlightening

1:31:18

and interesting, but it's like different than

1:31:20

sitting across the table from somebody and

1:31:22

just chit -chatting in the same way that

1:31:25

going to therapy like you might just

1:31:27

be talking like if you do like

1:31:29

couples therapy or something it's a it's

1:31:31

a the structure of how you talk

1:31:33

to someone. Matters

1:31:35

and then it's at the heart of

1:31:37

the rehearsal is like the structure of

1:31:39

like. how and why you talk to

1:31:41

someone. The medium is the message. Yes,

1:31:43

sometimes. Yes, they can play important parts

1:31:45

in your emotional vulnerability, what you want

1:31:47

to share, what you're willing to share.

1:31:50

And then the comedy comes from like, yes,

1:31:52

like actually not just building something that looks

1:31:54

like a Panda Express, but like if you

1:31:56

told me they were actually cooking the food

1:31:58

there at the moment that they're filming, like

1:32:00

all this stuff, like I would I would

1:32:02

believe you or like some version of like

1:32:04

in the when they build the bar in

1:32:06

the first season. They're not cooking

1:32:08

the pizzas, but like they are

1:32:10

cooking pizzas and then like putting

1:32:12

out like warm pizzas for eat

1:32:14

people to eat like in the

1:32:16

bar and That's that's what I

1:32:18

find ultimately fascinating are these little

1:32:20

relatable moments again I I relate

1:32:22

to these two people and the

1:32:24

emotional vulnerability they have with one

1:32:26

another about how they feel about

1:32:29

one another I don't

1:32:31

need Nathan stepping in to explain

1:32:33

how he feel. I guess that's the

1:32:35

disconnect I have with the show.

1:32:37

And now I'm interested slash anxious to

1:32:39

see where Fielder inserts himself into

1:32:41

the broader, because I expect there to

1:32:43

be, sure it might all

1:32:45

be about aviation, but I expect there to

1:32:47

be a through line in the way

1:32:49

that there was a through line in the

1:32:51

first season. And I guess my caution

1:32:53

comes from, will I find that through

1:32:55

line interesting? Cause it worked for you, worked for a

1:32:57

lot of people. It didn't work for

1:32:59

me in that first season. And every

1:33:01

time the absurdist elements came to the

1:33:03

fore, I was enjoying that part. But

1:33:06

like Nathan monologuing,

1:33:09

I was like, dude, I don't know who you are. Why would

1:33:11

I take what you're saying seriously? Yeah.

1:33:13

Yeah. And that's and I just

1:33:15

don't know where the season ends up

1:33:17

because we kind of haven't gotten

1:33:19

to whatever that turn is going to

1:33:22

be. Yeah. Yeah. Alright,

1:33:24

well those are some thoughts on season

1:33:26

two episode one of the rehearsal We will

1:33:28

be covering this week to week here

1:33:30

on decoding TV. I think this will end

1:33:32

at the same time as the last

1:33:34

of us so like they Programmed

1:33:36

them both to kind of end around

1:33:38

the same time. So should be fun. I

1:33:40

anticipate some very surprising Shocking and buzzworthy

1:33:43

moments in the show in the weeks ahead

1:33:45

We hope you'll join us for them

1:33:47

subscribe to us on YouTube at youtube.com at

1:33:49

decoding TV to make sure you get

1:33:51

all our Conversations and decoding TV is also

1:33:53

available wherever you get your podcast. He's

1:33:55

Patrick Lepic. I'm David Chen. We'll see you

1:33:57

next week Hold

1:34:00

that, sir. There's no time for pickleball

1:34:02

because you're gonna want to hear this. Noom

1:34:05

now has GLP -1s. No way! Oh, yes,

1:34:07

way, Fred. Psychology and meds. That's how

1:34:09

Noom helps you lose the weight and keep

1:34:11

it off. That's really smart. Oh, Danny.

1:34:13

It's Noom smart. And they started just $149

1:34:15

and they're shipped to your door in

1:34:17

seven days. Holy smokes, that's fast. But not

1:34:19

as fast as my service game. Hey,

1:34:21

who's ready to get pickled? Get started with

1:34:23

Noom GLP -1 today. Not all customers will

1:34:25

medically qualify for prescription medications. Compounded medications

1:34:27

are not reviewed by the FDA for safety,

1:34:29

efficacy, or... Hey guys, it's

1:34:31

Mary from Two Judgy Girls,

1:34:33

and get ready for a new

1:34:35

season of the Hulu Original

1:34:38

Reality series, Vanderpump Villa. This

1:34:40

season, Lisa moves Vanderpump Villa to

1:34:42

an all -new castle in Italy. Lisa

1:34:44

is joined by the one and only

1:34:46

Stasi Schroeder to help keep an

1:34:48

eye on the new and returning staff.

1:34:51

The elite staff will face scrutiny

1:34:53

like never before as they work

1:34:55

and play under one roof. New

1:34:57

castle, new guests, and new drama. Season

1:35:00

two of Vanderpump Villa

1:35:02

premieres April 24th, streaming on

1:35:04

Hulu. I

1:35:10

feel like people forget that you

1:35:12

can truly order anything, especially living in

1:35:15

New York City. It's why I

1:35:17

love it. You can get Chinese food

1:35:19

at any time of night, but

1:35:21

it's not just for food. I order

1:35:23

from CVS all the time. I'm

1:35:25

always ordering from the grocery store. If

1:35:27

a friend stops over, I have

1:35:29

to order champagne. I also

1:35:31

have this thing that whenever I

1:35:33

travel, if I'm ever in a

1:35:35

hotel room, I never feel like

1:35:37

I'm missing something because I'll just

1:35:39

Uber Eats it. The amount of

1:35:41

times I've had to Uber Eats

1:35:43

hair items like hairspray, deodorant, you

1:35:46

name it, I've ordered it on

1:35:48

Uber Eats, you can get grocery,

1:35:50

alcohol, everyday essentials in addition to

1:35:52

restaurants and food you love. So

1:35:54

in other words, get almost Anything

1:35:56

with Uber Eats. Order now for

1:35:58

alcohol you must be legal drinking

1:36:00

age. Please enjoy responsibly. Product availability

1:36:02

varies by region. See for details.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features