In this Episode, Kelly Twigger, CEO and Founder of eDiscovery Assistant, unpacks the complexities of attorney-client privilege using the dominant purpose test from the recent In re Uber Technologies Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation case. She offers practical insights for litigation professionals on privilege determinations, inadvertent productions, and effective processes for resolving discovery disputes.

Key Takeaways:

• Understand the nuances of the dominant purpose test in determining attorney-client privilege.
• Recognize the importance of analyzing each document individually when asserting privilege.
• Implement a clear process for inadvertent production and clawback to manage risks effectively.
• Start early with discovery planning, especially regarding privilege issues, to keep cases on track.

 In re Uber Techs., Inc. Passenger Sexual Assault Litig.
Read the blog about this case
eDiscovery Assistant Website
Sign up for Kelly's Case of the Week Newsletter here
eDiscovery Assistant Free 7 day Trial (no credit card required)

#Litigation #eDiscovery #AttorneyClientPrivilege #DominantPurposeTest #LegalInsights

Thank you for tuning in to Case of the Week with Kelly Twigger. If you found today’s discussion helpful, don’t forget to subscribe, rate, and leave a review wherever you get your podcasts. For more insights and resources on ediscovery, visit Minerva26 and explore our practical tools, case law library, and on-demand education from the Academy. Join us next episode as we break down another important case shaping the future of ediscovery.