ELI5 Panama Canal - why did the original French attempt fail?

ELI5 Panama Canal - why did the original French attempt fail?

Released Friday, 18th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
ELI5 Panama Canal - why did the original French attempt fail?

ELI5 Panama Canal - why did the original French attempt fail?

ELI5 Panama Canal - why did the original French attempt fail?

ELI5 Panama Canal - why did the original French attempt fail?

Friday, 18th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:04

Hi everyone, welcome back to Explain Like I'm

0:06

Five, the podcast where we take the questions you

0:08

always wanted to ask and talk about them in

0:10

a way that's easy to understand. We are your

0:12

hosts, I'm Tim. Hi everyone,

0:14

I'm Kevin. So Kevin, do you remember

0:16

we did an episode a few years

0:18

back about the Suez Canal when there was

0:20

a huge boat stuck in it? Of

0:22

course. We also asked what

0:24

Napoleon also had to do with the Suez Canal.

0:27

That was a pretty good episode. Yes, I

0:29

remember that. So today we are talking

0:31

about the Panama Canal. A listener wrote

0:33

in with a great question, which is,

0:36

why does the Panama Canal have locks,

0:38

but the Suez Canal does not? Great

0:41

question. It's the other famous canal. So

0:44

the big difference here is really all

0:46

about geography. The Suez

0:48

Canal essentially runs across a

0:50

pretty flat desert in Egypt, so

0:53

they can actually just dig a straight trench and

0:55

connect the two oceans at sea level. But

0:58

the Panama Canal... man, it

1:00

cuts through this kind of like really

1:02

mountainous terrain in Central America. There

1:04

are so many hills and valleys and actually

1:06

even a huge artificial lake in the middle. It's

1:09

just not flat at all. So

1:12

instead of digging a deep sea level

1:14

trench all the way through, which

1:16

really would have been super dangerous and also

1:18

insanely expensive, what they actually did

1:20

was they built a system of locks. And

1:23

you can kind of think of

1:25

these locks as giant water

1:27

elevators. for ships. And

1:30

they literally lift the ships up and

1:32

down to help them cross the mountains

1:34

and reach the other side. But

1:36

why couldn't they just keep digging

1:39

until things were flat enough, like

1:41

make a huge trench from one ocean to

1:43

the other? It's funny because they

1:45

actually did try. The French,

1:47

they were the first to start building a

1:49

canal in the 1880s. And basically, yeah,

1:51

wanted it to be sea level just like the Suez.

1:54

But they ran into such a

1:56

big nightmare. Everything from disease to

1:58

mudslides and obviously the sheer amount of

2:00

earth that needed to be moved. You

2:02

know, we're talking billions of cubic

2:04

yards of dirt. And the

2:07

jungle was an obstacle too. It was

2:09

brutal. Workers were dying

2:11

from malaria and yellow fever and

2:13

alarming rates. I think about 20 ,000

2:15

people died during the French attempt

2:17

alone. Ah, yes, I had

2:19

forgotten. The French attempt is an important part

2:21

of history. So what happened in the

2:23

end? Well, eventually the project collapsed

2:26

and the French had to give

2:28

up. And then the

2:30

US took over in 1904

2:32

with a different plan. Instead

2:35

of digging deeper, they built

2:37

the Gatun Lake in the middle

2:39

and used a series of locks to

2:41

raise ships up and over

2:43

the tough terrain. was

2:45

actually way safer and just more doable. Oh,

2:47

I see. So we shouldn't think about it

2:50

as just going from point A to point

2:52

B. It's literally going over a mountain

2:54

in between. Exactly.

2:57

Ships are getting lifted 85

2:59

feet up to cross

3:01

the Catoon Lake and then lowered

3:03

back down. And without

3:05

the locks, I mean, the project probably

3:07

wouldn't have been impossible. The

3:09

canal is 48 miles long and

3:12

crosses the narrowest part of Panama,

3:14

But even that was a massive,

3:16

massive engineering challenge. And you

3:18

mentioned water levels earlier. Aren't sea

3:20

levels all the same? Why do you

3:23

need locks if both oceans are

3:25

sea level? Well, fun fact, the

3:27

Pacific and Atlantic oceans actually

3:29

have slightly different sea levels. So

3:32

the Pacific side is actually

3:34

a little higher and also importantly

3:36

has more extreme tides. Plus,

3:39

the terrain in Panama just isn't even close

3:41

to flat. ships would be stuck

3:43

or grounded without the locks and the

3:45

lake system to manage those changes in

3:48

height. You know, there's another fun

3:50

factoid. Catoon Lake doesn't

3:52

just help ships float across the middle

3:54

of Panama. It also prevents

3:56

marine life from the

3:58

Pacific and Atlantic from actually mixing

4:00

too much. So it acts as

4:02

an ecological barrier too. Hmm,

4:05

interesting. And you mentioned the

4:07

French had tried first. Who was it who

4:09

was leading it for leading that project

4:11

for them? So the French effort was led

4:13

by Fernand de Lesseps, the guy

4:15

who actually built the Suez Canal. But

4:17

like I said, the Panama was just an

4:19

entirely different beast and the company eventually

4:21

went bankrupt and the project was abandoned, you

4:24

know, in the 1890s. And when

4:26

the US came to get involved,

4:28

weren't they originally looking at

4:30

it being through Nicaragua, not

4:32

Panama? That's actually right. The

4:34

US originally wanted to build a

4:36

canal in Nicaragua, which

4:38

is flatter and doesn't have the

4:41

same elevation problems. But

4:43

there were some other concerns

4:45

around volcanoes and earthquakes. You

4:48

know, opponents even printed Nicaraguan's

4:50

postage stamps erupting

4:52

volcanoes to scare

4:54

lawmakers. And

4:57

so eventually the US realized it was

4:59

probably cheaper and faster to take

5:01

over the half -finished French project in

5:03

Panama. And at that particular

5:05

time, Panama was part of

5:07

Colombia prior to all of this,

5:09

right? That's right as well. So

5:12

the US also saw an

5:14

opportunity when Panama wanted independence

5:16

from Colombia. They

5:18

basically supported Panama's independence

5:21

movement and in return got rights to

5:23

build and control the canal. So

5:25

that basically helped create a new country, Panama.

5:28

They got a permanent lease over the

5:30

canal zone and it stayed under US

5:32

control for basically most of the 20th century.

5:34

And so how did Panama get the

5:36

canal back then? Well, it's all

5:38

the way in the 1970s now. There

5:41

was some growing resentment happening

5:43

in Panama. And many

5:45

people saw the US presence as

5:47

colonial and unfair. After

5:49

lots of protests and negotiations,

5:52

it was actually President Jimmy Carter who

5:54

signed a treaty in 1977. agreeing

5:57

that the canal would be handed back to

5:59

Panama by the end of 1999. And

6:02

finally, as we wrap up, I heard that

6:04

someone once swam across the Panama Canal. Can

6:06

you tell us about that? Oh, yes.

6:08

That's a fun story. This

6:10

was all the way back in 1928. And

6:13

there was a guy named Richard

6:15

Halliburton, who swam the

6:17

entire 48 mile length

6:19

of the canal and also

6:21

paid a toll of just 36

6:23

cents. It took

6:25

him 10 days. And he had to

6:27

dodge, you know, ships and alligators and even

6:29

sharks. And also that

6:31

36 cent toll is still the lowest

6:33

ever paid to use the canal. Very

6:36

interesting. Did

6:40

you learn something new? If you did,

6:42

send us an email. We are at ELI5, the

6:44

podcast at gmail .com. We love hearing from you,

6:47

especially when you've got comments and suggestions for

6:49

us. If you are a regular

6:51

listener of this podcast, please do leave us a

6:53

rating or a review. It only takes a couple

6:55

seconds, but it does really help

6:57

other people to discover this podcast, so

6:59

we really appreciate it. As always,

7:01

thanks to the community at r slash explainercom5, and

7:03

we will see you all next week.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features