Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:04
Hello and welcome to the Farming Today
0:06
podcast with me Charlotte Smith. In
0:08
this episode the posters you can't find
0:10
and what cow power can mean
0:12
in a woodland. The benefits that cows
0:14
grazing in woodlands can bring they basically
0:16
do it all for free I think
0:18
and on the back of all that
0:20
we managed to keep our farming business
0:22
going and we're producing food as well.
0:25
I think that's really important in these
0:27
sort of communities to try and keep
0:29
our business going and put the money
0:32
back into the community. More
0:34
on that later. First, talk of tariffs
0:36
is giving way to talk about
0:38
a trade deal between the UK and
0:40
the USA. So we thought
0:42
we'd try to work out what
0:44
that might mean for food and
0:46
farming. The government says they're not
0:48
going to negotiate on food standards.
0:50
But given that the US exported
0:52
goods worth $92 billion to the
0:54
UK last year, that's about £69
0:56
billion worth, and food exports made
0:59
up just $3 billion of that,
1:01
how strong a voice can UK food
1:03
and agribusiness have in any negotiation? I
1:06
spoke to Chris Southworth, Secretary General
1:08
of the International Chamber of Commerce. Well,
1:10
first of all, nobody knows what
1:13
the deal is because business have not
1:15
been consulted properly. So it's an
1:17
unknown quantity. What we're looking for
1:19
is a really ambitious deal, with
1:21
or without the tariffs. I think we should be looking
1:23
for that anyway. But the
1:25
big opportunity here is not
1:27
so much on agricultural food,
1:30
where there's big disagreement on food
1:32
standards, but much more on investment,
1:35
data, digitalization
1:37
and improving the trade environment
1:39
between the US, where we
1:41
can work together to transform
1:43
the trading environment globally. Let's
1:46
look at the agricultural side of things
1:48
and things that farmers in particular are
1:50
concerned about. Now the Prime Minister
1:52
and the Chancellor have both reiterated that
1:54
they're not going to negotiate on food
1:56
standards, so no beef where cattle have
1:58
been given growth hormones which are
2:00
banned here, no chickens washed
2:02
in antimicrobial washes. What
2:05
farmers are worried about is that when push comes to
2:07
shove they might give way on that. Is that
2:09
at all likely? We don't know
2:11
is the answer, but what we do
2:13
know is that's a complete showstopper in
2:15
the sense that nobody agrees. We
2:18
all agree with the farmers on that front.
2:20
We all want high food standards. There's a big
2:22
global market for high food standards from the
2:24
UK. We all, I think,
2:26
all recognize that the farmers and farming sector
2:28
is under terrific pressure already. We don't want
2:30
to add more pressure to that. So
2:32
I think the farmers in this case have huge support.
2:35
There are, I suppose, sort of compromises, aren't
2:37
there? Because the USA does produce beef
2:40
which isn't fed hormones. So
2:42
could we, for instance, allow
2:44
that as a way of just making
2:46
headway if we needed to? Yeah,
2:48
I think that's one approach. Quite
2:51
complicated in terms of how you actually
2:53
implement that, whether it's a sort
2:55
of green lane for non -hormone beef
2:57
and chlorinated chicken and a red lane
2:59
for the opposite. But
3:01
that's quite hard to implement when it
3:03
comes to practical trade and exports
3:05
and into ports and customs and all
3:08
the sort of practical processes of trade. You
3:10
were saying earlier that we know
3:13
very little about this trade deal because
3:15
nothing's being consulted on. Would businesses
3:17
expect to have input? Yes,
3:20
but I think so would consumers, so would
3:22
unions and so would others. So,
3:24
you know, we have to stand up for what we
3:26
believe. We can't compromise our
3:28
relationship with the EU, which is
3:30
a much bigger trade market than
3:32
the US. That's our biggest trade
3:34
relationship. There's a real
3:36
opportunity to reset that relationship right
3:38
now. And this I suppose is
3:40
what makes a negotiation with America
3:42
even more complicated because we're also
3:44
looking towards Europe, which has a very
3:46
different approach. Well, you know,
3:48
lots of other countries are in similar situations.
3:50
If you look at the likes of Singapore, They
3:53
have to navigate around the needs
3:55
of the ASEAN markets, but also China
3:57
is the big market on their
3:59
doorstep, but also the US. It's
4:01
not neither or, it's a both and,
4:03
but we just have to find
4:05
that delicate balance between finding areas of agreement
4:07
with the US, but also not closing
4:09
doors on the EU, which is a
4:11
much bigger market, and keeping doors
4:13
open to the rest the world where there
4:16
is a huge advantage and a real demand
4:18
for UK goods and services. Chris
4:20
Southworth from the ICC. When
4:23
James Colston took on the management
4:25
of Arrasague Farm in the West Highlands
4:27
of Scotland more than 30 years
4:29
ago, he never imagined that he'd become
4:31
obsessed by the wonderful world of
4:33
a small endangered butterfly, the checkered skipper.
4:35
But that is what happened. And
4:38
by introducing both trees and what he
4:40
calls cow power to the woodlands
4:42
alongside a flock of sheep, he has
4:44
changed this 10 ,000 acre hill farm,
4:46
something he says wouldn't have been
4:48
possible without support from environmental grant schemes.
4:51
Well as part of our week looking
4:53
at agroforestry, James explained his approach to
4:56
Kathleen Carrower beside a small lock where
4:58
the checkered skippers will soon be putting
5:00
in an appearance. Well
5:03
I've just given the cows
5:06
a little bit of breakfast
5:08
really. They spend the
5:10
whole winter in these woodland blocks
5:12
but it's important to get some
5:14
supplement. There isn't enough food for
5:16
them without that. Come
5:19
on girls, come on. There's
5:21
five adult counts here. There's
5:24
one late arrival where she's had her calf
5:26
a couple of days ago and she's hidden
5:28
it in the woods somewhere. I haven't found
5:30
it yet but she knows where it is
5:32
so that's why she's a bit late to
5:34
the party. What
5:37
effect have the cattle had in this area? When
5:39
we started this grazing job here,
5:41
this bit here was solid birch trees
5:43
because there'd been no grazing in
5:45
it for ten years. and
5:48
it was so thick and you couldn't walk in
5:50
it, you know. And the cattle
5:52
were introduced to break up these clumps
5:54
of birch trees and to allow a bit
5:56
of light in and a bit of
5:58
open space, which is part of the woodland really. So
6:01
now we've got much more of an
6:03
open mosaic of 30 -year -old trees, a
6:06
lot of birch trees, but amongst
6:08
it there's scots pine, there's oak seedlings
6:10
coming, you know. And for this
6:12
type of woodland, that's a success. It's
6:16
wet, it's boggy in places. You
6:18
can see the cows are chewing away
6:20
at these tusks there. And
6:23
they're not getting much to eat,
6:25
but in actual fact, by
6:27
removing all that rough stuff,
6:29
they're allowing these smaller plants a
6:31
chance to get into the light
6:33
and grow. You
6:35
mentioned the biodiversity and the growth in
6:37
birds and insects and I know
6:39
that you're particularly proud of the Czechoskipper
6:41
butterfly which is native here. It's
6:44
a pretty rare butterfly isn't it? They're
6:46
very fussy of the caterpillars and what
6:48
they eat so they only eat millennia grasses.
6:50
The adults themselves are only on the
6:53
wing for about two weeks a year
6:55
and it's vital they have this sort
6:57
of mixture of habitats, food source, flowering
7:00
plants and areas to perch where
7:02
they can defend their territories. It
7:04
requires a quite unique set
7:06
of circumstances to thrive and I
7:08
think the cattle are definitely
7:11
helping provide that. So did you
7:13
think all those years ago that you'd become very fond
7:15
of these checkered skipper butterflies?
7:17
No, no I didn't. I
7:19
didn't at all. But
7:21
there we are. I talk about
7:23
cow power which is really
7:25
the benefits that cows grazing
7:27
in Woodlands can bring. They
7:30
basically do it all for free I think.
7:33
On the back of all that, we managed to
7:35
keep our farm and business going and we're
7:38
producing food as well. I think
7:40
that's really important in these sort
7:42
of communities to try and keep our
7:44
business going and put the money back
7:46
into the community. So
7:48
what's more financially beneficial to
7:50
the farm, the cattle or the
7:52
trees? Well,
7:57
the grounds
8:00
are good, okay, but There's
8:03
a lot of work attached to getting the money. You
8:05
have to do a lot of stuff to get that. I
8:08
like the cows and I
8:10
wouldn't be without them really
8:12
but you know economics is
8:14
economics. If you didn't get those
8:16
grants would you still do this kind of
8:18
work? We probably would
8:20
actually but whether or not the cattle
8:22
would be sustainable without it is a
8:24
difficult point really and we would make
8:27
use of the land we've got so
8:29
I guess we would still be Grazing
8:31
woodlands with cattle, yes we would, but
8:33
the economics of it would be very
8:35
different. James Colston
8:37
there. Now, as regular listeners
8:39
will know, concerns about foot and
8:41
mouth outbreaks in Europe have led
8:43
to restrictions on what visitors and
8:45
returning holidaymakers can bring into the
8:47
UK. Meat and dairy products cannot
8:49
now be brought back from Europe,
8:51
the aim being to prevent an
8:54
outbreak here. That rule was
8:56
introduced on the 12th of April this
8:58
year and covers everything from cured meats
9:00
and cheeses to sandwiches, regardless
9:02
of whether it's packaged or not. But
9:04
over the past couple of weeks you've
9:06
been getting in touch to say that there
9:08
hasn't been much publicity about this and
9:10
that it ports and airports so you're not
9:13
seeing signs or inspections. Peter
9:15
Shorten emailed. My son and
9:17
his family were returning last Friday from
9:19
Germany through the Channel Tunnel and
9:21
had carefully consumed all meat and dairy
9:23
products at risk of serious indigestion
9:25
in the process. They were
9:27
surprised that there was no signing
9:29
warning that such products were not allowed.
9:32
And even more staggered when they realised
9:34
no check had been made on their
9:36
arrival at the British end. Valerie
9:38
Honeyfield also got in touch. She
9:40
says there should be TV adverts about
9:43
the restrictions, as she says posters
9:45
at airports are insufficient. And
9:47
farmer Becky Berry told us... Having just come
9:49
back from France, I was shocked that there
9:51
was zero awareness of the no -meat and
9:53
dairy policy. No one asked about it
9:55
at the border, and whilst there were the
9:57
usual random checks being undertaken, there wasn't any mention
9:59
of the changes. Therefore, can
10:01
we assume that many people will still be bringing
10:04
cheese and meats back into the country? With
10:06
reclet on offer and the cold weather, my
10:08
daughters were sorely tempted to bring a wedge
10:10
back, and we were all mortified that there
10:12
weren't any signs or indication at the border
10:14
that we couldn't have. Anthony Boldock,
10:16
chairman of the Association of Port
10:18
Health Authorities, who also sits on
10:20
the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health's
10:23
advisory panel on Port Health, told
10:25
me whose responsibility it is to
10:27
alert the public. It's a
10:29
matter that the Border Force people do,
10:31
and that's because it's connected to
10:33
customs controls. It used to be a shared
10:35
function. At the present
10:37
time, Port Health Authorities are assisting Border
10:39
Force colleagues, but it really is primarily
10:42
their function at borders. Is it working
10:44
at the moment, do you think? I
10:46
think it's working in some places and
10:48
other places that needs protection. I think
10:50
the whole move away from Europe has
10:52
had an impact in showing where weak
10:54
points are and we certainly need to
10:57
do more in those areas. Now,
10:59
the restrictions came in in mid -April,
11:01
but as we've heard, numerous listeners
11:03
have been in touch with us, saying
11:05
they haven't seen any signs at
11:07
ports. Why not? I'm sure there
11:09
are products there, whether they haven't been
11:11
noticed, whether they're not prominent enough, but there
11:13
certainly is always a space for more
11:15
signage to go up in these kind of
11:17
situations. I would think there's very
11:19
large digital campaign being run as well
11:21
at the moment. That's certainly what happens in
11:23
legally imported goods in the commercial sector. People
11:26
are also saying that they're worried that nobody's
11:28
doing any inspections either. If
11:30
nobody checks, can restrictions
11:33
like this ever work? Well,
11:35
it's always better if we do more,
11:37
checks are happening, but obviously it's something
11:39
that is a limited resource, so
11:42
they always could do better, but checks will
11:44
be happening and people will be profiled for
11:46
certain kinds of checks, but
11:48
it is a limited resource, of course.
11:50
That's why I say there's probably
11:52
a space to use Environmental Health staff
11:54
who've got those skills to work
11:56
alongside Border Force colleagues for the long
11:58
term rather than just for periods of
12:00
time when funding is available. Have
12:03
those environmental health officers though got
12:05
the time because we've talked before
12:07
on this program about the constraints
12:09
on budgets? How much of
12:11
what we're hearing from listeners is
12:13
going to be down to money? Well,
12:15
that's very true and investment doesn't need
12:17
to come and that's where we
12:19
do need more environmental health officers. You're
12:21
quite right. The government does have
12:23
its own struggles with funding, but they
12:25
are certainly a workforce that aren't
12:27
utilised in that space well enough at
12:29
the moment. How confident are you, given
12:31
where we are, that we can keep foot
12:34
and mouth out this time? There's always
12:36
a risk the person imports, but I
12:38
think the focus is right. It's
12:40
about educating the public. I think
12:42
many people don't knowingly break the rules. They
12:44
do it in ignorance. So it's very much
12:46
about that campaign. And to say,
12:48
this is why we're being asked to do these
12:50
things and get responsible behavior than the public.
12:52
It's about coaching people, I think, rather than catching
12:54
them. That's the way we have most effects. And
12:57
what would you say to the listeners we've
12:59
heard from who say they've been in various places
13:01
coming back into the country with no signs, no
13:03
inspections and they're not feeling very confident about
13:05
this? I think that's something of grace
13:07
importance and it really needs to be
13:09
shared with people that are responsible for
13:12
that policy. So that's obviously a matter
13:14
of urgency and that needs to be
13:16
raised with Border Force colleagues. Anthony
13:18
Baldock. We did ask to speak to
13:20
the Border Force but they told us to
13:22
contact the Department for Environment, Food and
13:25
Rural Affairs and in a statement they told
13:27
us, the government will do whatever it takes
13:29
to protect British farmers from foot and mouth.
13:31
We have strict import controls in
13:33
place to manage the risk of
13:35
disease and they added, we are
13:37
working closely with ports, airports and
13:39
travel operators ensuring that awareness of
13:41
the new restrictions is raised including
13:43
via prominent signage. And that's
13:45
it from us. I'm Charlotte Smith. The producer
13:47
is Beatrice Fenton and farming today is a
13:50
BBC Audio Bristol production.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More