25/04/25 Concerns around lack of awareness of EU food import ban, trade talks, agroforestry

25/04/25 Concerns around lack of awareness of EU food import ban, trade talks, agroforestry

Released Friday, 25th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
25/04/25 Concerns around lack of awareness of EU food import ban, trade talks, agroforestry

25/04/25 Concerns around lack of awareness of EU food import ban, trade talks, agroforestry

25/04/25 Concerns around lack of awareness of EU food import ban, trade talks, agroforestry

25/04/25 Concerns around lack of awareness of EU food import ban, trade talks, agroforestry

Friday, 25th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:04

Hello and welcome to the Farming Today

0:06

podcast with me Charlotte Smith. In

0:08

this episode the posters you can't find

0:10

and what cow power can mean

0:12

in a woodland. The benefits that cows

0:14

grazing in woodlands can bring they basically

0:16

do it all for free I think

0:18

and on the back of all that

0:20

we managed to keep our farming business

0:22

going and we're producing food as well.

0:25

I think that's really important in these

0:27

sort of communities to try and keep

0:29

our business going and put the money

0:32

back into the community. More

0:34

on that later. First, talk of tariffs

0:36

is giving way to talk about

0:38

a trade deal between the UK and

0:40

the USA. So we thought

0:42

we'd try to work out what

0:44

that might mean for food and

0:46

farming. The government says they're not

0:48

going to negotiate on food standards.

0:50

But given that the US exported

0:52

goods worth $92 billion to the

0:54

UK last year, that's about £69

0:56

billion worth, and food exports made

0:59

up just $3 billion of that,

1:01

how strong a voice can UK food

1:03

and agribusiness have in any negotiation? I

1:06

spoke to Chris Southworth, Secretary General

1:08

of the International Chamber of Commerce. Well,

1:10

first of all, nobody knows what

1:13

the deal is because business have not

1:15

been consulted properly. So it's an

1:17

unknown quantity. What we're looking for

1:19

is a really ambitious deal, with

1:21

or without the tariffs. I think we should be looking

1:23

for that anyway. But the

1:25

big opportunity here is not

1:27

so much on agricultural food,

1:30

where there's big disagreement on food

1:32

standards, but much more on investment,

1:35

data, digitalization

1:37

and improving the trade environment

1:39

between the US, where we

1:41

can work together to transform

1:43

the trading environment globally. Let's

1:46

look at the agricultural side of things

1:48

and things that farmers in particular are

1:50

concerned about. Now the Prime Minister

1:52

and the Chancellor have both reiterated that

1:54

they're not going to negotiate on food

1:56

standards, so no beef where cattle have

1:58

been given growth hormones which are

2:00

banned here, no chickens washed

2:02

in antimicrobial washes. What

2:05

farmers are worried about is that when push comes to

2:07

shove they might give way on that. Is that

2:09

at all likely? We don't know

2:11

is the answer, but what we do

2:13

know is that's a complete showstopper in

2:15

the sense that nobody agrees. We

2:18

all agree with the farmers on that front.

2:20

We all want high food standards. There's a big

2:22

global market for high food standards from the

2:24

UK. We all, I think,

2:26

all recognize that the farmers and farming sector

2:28

is under terrific pressure already. We don't want

2:30

to add more pressure to that. So

2:32

I think the farmers in this case have huge support.

2:35

There are, I suppose, sort of compromises, aren't

2:37

there? Because the USA does produce beef

2:40

which isn't fed hormones. So

2:42

could we, for instance, allow

2:44

that as a way of just making

2:46

headway if we needed to? Yeah,

2:48

I think that's one approach. Quite

2:51

complicated in terms of how you actually

2:53

implement that, whether it's a sort

2:55

of green lane for non -hormone beef

2:57

and chlorinated chicken and a red lane

2:59

for the opposite. But

3:01

that's quite hard to implement when it

3:03

comes to practical trade and exports

3:05

and into ports and customs and all

3:08

the sort of practical processes of trade. You

3:10

were saying earlier that we know

3:13

very little about this trade deal because

3:15

nothing's being consulted on. Would businesses

3:17

expect to have input? Yes,

3:20

but I think so would consumers, so would

3:22

unions and so would others. So,

3:24

you know, we have to stand up for what we

3:26

believe. We can't compromise our

3:28

relationship with the EU, which is

3:30

a much bigger trade market than

3:32

the US. That's our biggest trade

3:34

relationship. There's a real

3:36

opportunity to reset that relationship right

3:38

now. And this I suppose is

3:40

what makes a negotiation with America

3:42

even more complicated because we're also

3:44

looking towards Europe, which has a very

3:46

different approach. Well, you know,

3:48

lots of other countries are in similar situations.

3:50

If you look at the likes of Singapore, They

3:53

have to navigate around the needs

3:55

of the ASEAN markets, but also China

3:57

is the big market on their

3:59

doorstep, but also the US. It's

4:01

not neither or, it's a both and,

4:03

but we just have to find

4:05

that delicate balance between finding areas of agreement

4:07

with the US, but also not closing

4:09

doors on the EU, which is a

4:11

much bigger market, and keeping doors

4:13

open to the rest the world where there

4:16

is a huge advantage and a real demand

4:18

for UK goods and services. Chris

4:20

Southworth from the ICC. When

4:23

James Colston took on the management

4:25

of Arrasague Farm in the West Highlands

4:27

of Scotland more than 30 years

4:29

ago, he never imagined that he'd become

4:31

obsessed by the wonderful world of

4:33

a small endangered butterfly, the checkered skipper.

4:35

But that is what happened. And

4:38

by introducing both trees and what he

4:40

calls cow power to the woodlands

4:42

alongside a flock of sheep, he has

4:44

changed this 10 ,000 acre hill farm,

4:46

something he says wouldn't have been

4:48

possible without support from environmental grant schemes.

4:51

Well as part of our week looking

4:53

at agroforestry, James explained his approach to

4:56

Kathleen Carrower beside a small lock where

4:58

the checkered skippers will soon be putting

5:00

in an appearance. Well

5:03

I've just given the cows

5:06

a little bit of breakfast

5:08

really. They spend the

5:10

whole winter in these woodland blocks

5:12

but it's important to get some

5:14

supplement. There isn't enough food for

5:16

them without that. Come

5:19

on girls, come on. There's

5:21

five adult counts here. There's

5:24

one late arrival where she's had her calf

5:26

a couple of days ago and she's hidden

5:28

it in the woods somewhere. I haven't found

5:30

it yet but she knows where it is

5:32

so that's why she's a bit late to

5:34

the party. What

5:37

effect have the cattle had in this area? When

5:39

we started this grazing job here,

5:41

this bit here was solid birch trees

5:43

because there'd been no grazing in

5:45

it for ten years. and

5:48

it was so thick and you couldn't walk in

5:50

it, you know. And the cattle

5:52

were introduced to break up these clumps

5:54

of birch trees and to allow a bit

5:56

of light in and a bit of

5:58

open space, which is part of the woodland really. So

6:01

now we've got much more of an

6:03

open mosaic of 30 -year -old trees, a

6:06

lot of birch trees, but amongst

6:08

it there's scots pine, there's oak seedlings

6:10

coming, you know. And for this

6:12

type of woodland, that's a success. It's

6:16

wet, it's boggy in places. You

6:18

can see the cows are chewing away

6:20

at these tusks there. And

6:23

they're not getting much to eat,

6:25

but in actual fact, by

6:27

removing all that rough stuff,

6:29

they're allowing these smaller plants a

6:31

chance to get into the light

6:33

and grow. You

6:35

mentioned the biodiversity and the growth in

6:37

birds and insects and I know

6:39

that you're particularly proud of the Czechoskipper

6:41

butterfly which is native here. It's

6:44

a pretty rare butterfly isn't it? They're

6:46

very fussy of the caterpillars and what

6:48

they eat so they only eat millennia grasses.

6:50

The adults themselves are only on the

6:53

wing for about two weeks a year

6:55

and it's vital they have this sort

6:57

of mixture of habitats, food source, flowering

7:00

plants and areas to perch where

7:02

they can defend their territories. It

7:04

requires a quite unique set

7:06

of circumstances to thrive and I

7:08

think the cattle are definitely

7:11

helping provide that. So did you

7:13

think all those years ago that you'd become very fond

7:15

of these checkered skipper butterflies?

7:17

No, no I didn't. I

7:19

didn't at all. But

7:21

there we are. I talk about

7:23

cow power which is really

7:25

the benefits that cows grazing

7:27

in Woodlands can bring. They

7:30

basically do it all for free I think.

7:33

On the back of all that, we managed to

7:35

keep our farm and business going and we're

7:38

producing food as well. I think

7:40

that's really important in these sort

7:42

of communities to try and keep our

7:44

business going and put the money back

7:46

into the community. So

7:48

what's more financially beneficial to

7:50

the farm, the cattle or the

7:52

trees? Well,

7:57

the grounds

8:00

are good, okay, but There's

8:03

a lot of work attached to getting the money. You

8:05

have to do a lot of stuff to get that. I

8:08

like the cows and I

8:10

wouldn't be without them really

8:12

but you know economics is

8:14

economics. If you didn't get those

8:16

grants would you still do this kind of

8:18

work? We probably would

8:20

actually but whether or not the cattle

8:22

would be sustainable without it is a

8:24

difficult point really and we would make

8:27

use of the land we've got so

8:29

I guess we would still be Grazing

8:31

woodlands with cattle, yes we would, but

8:33

the economics of it would be very

8:35

different. James Colston

8:37

there. Now, as regular listeners

8:39

will know, concerns about foot and

8:41

mouth outbreaks in Europe have led

8:43

to restrictions on what visitors and

8:45

returning holidaymakers can bring into the

8:47

UK. Meat and dairy products cannot

8:49

now be brought back from Europe,

8:51

the aim being to prevent an

8:54

outbreak here. That rule was

8:56

introduced on the 12th of April this

8:58

year and covers everything from cured meats

9:00

and cheeses to sandwiches, regardless

9:02

of whether it's packaged or not. But

9:04

over the past couple of weeks you've

9:06

been getting in touch to say that there

9:08

hasn't been much publicity about this and

9:10

that it ports and airports so you're not

9:13

seeing signs or inspections. Peter

9:15

Shorten emailed. My son and

9:17

his family were returning last Friday from

9:19

Germany through the Channel Tunnel and

9:21

had carefully consumed all meat and dairy

9:23

products at risk of serious indigestion

9:25

in the process. They were

9:27

surprised that there was no signing

9:29

warning that such products were not allowed.

9:32

And even more staggered when they realised

9:34

no check had been made on their

9:36

arrival at the British end. Valerie

9:38

Honeyfield also got in touch. She

9:40

says there should be TV adverts about

9:43

the restrictions, as she says posters

9:45

at airports are insufficient. And

9:47

farmer Becky Berry told us... Having just come

9:49

back from France, I was shocked that there

9:51

was zero awareness of the no -meat and

9:53

dairy policy. No one asked about it

9:55

at the border, and whilst there were the

9:57

usual random checks being undertaken, there wasn't any mention

9:59

of the changes. Therefore, can

10:01

we assume that many people will still be bringing

10:04

cheese and meats back into the country? With

10:06

reclet on offer and the cold weather, my

10:08

daughters were sorely tempted to bring a wedge

10:10

back, and we were all mortified that there

10:12

weren't any signs or indication at the border

10:14

that we couldn't have. Anthony Boldock,

10:16

chairman of the Association of Port

10:18

Health Authorities, who also sits on

10:20

the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health's

10:23

advisory panel on Port Health, told

10:25

me whose responsibility it is to

10:27

alert the public. It's a

10:29

matter that the Border Force people do,

10:31

and that's because it's connected to

10:33

customs controls. It used to be a shared

10:35

function. At the present

10:37

time, Port Health Authorities are assisting Border

10:39

Force colleagues, but it really is primarily

10:42

their function at borders. Is it working

10:44

at the moment, do you think? I

10:46

think it's working in some places and

10:48

other places that needs protection. I think

10:50

the whole move away from Europe has

10:52

had an impact in showing where weak

10:54

points are and we certainly need to

10:57

do more in those areas. Now,

10:59

the restrictions came in in mid -April,

11:01

but as we've heard, numerous listeners

11:03

have been in touch with us, saying

11:05

they haven't seen any signs at

11:07

ports. Why not? I'm sure there

11:09

are products there, whether they haven't been

11:11

noticed, whether they're not prominent enough, but there

11:13

certainly is always a space for more

11:15

signage to go up in these kind of

11:17

situations. I would think there's very

11:19

large digital campaign being run as well

11:21

at the moment. That's certainly what happens in

11:23

legally imported goods in the commercial sector. People

11:26

are also saying that they're worried that nobody's

11:28

doing any inspections either. If

11:30

nobody checks, can restrictions

11:33

like this ever work? Well,

11:35

it's always better if we do more,

11:37

checks are happening, but obviously it's something

11:39

that is a limited resource, so

11:42

they always could do better, but checks will

11:44

be happening and people will be profiled for

11:46

certain kinds of checks, but

11:48

it is a limited resource, of course.

11:50

That's why I say there's probably

11:52

a space to use Environmental Health staff

11:54

who've got those skills to work

11:56

alongside Border Force colleagues for the long

11:58

term rather than just for periods of

12:00

time when funding is available. Have

12:03

those environmental health officers though got

12:05

the time because we've talked before

12:07

on this program about the constraints

12:09

on budgets? How much of

12:11

what we're hearing from listeners is

12:13

going to be down to money? Well,

12:15

that's very true and investment doesn't need

12:17

to come and that's where we

12:19

do need more environmental health officers. You're

12:21

quite right. The government does have

12:23

its own struggles with funding, but they

12:25

are certainly a workforce that aren't

12:27

utilised in that space well enough at

12:29

the moment. How confident are you, given

12:31

where we are, that we can keep foot

12:34

and mouth out this time? There's always

12:36

a risk the person imports, but I

12:38

think the focus is right. It's

12:40

about educating the public. I think

12:42

many people don't knowingly break the rules. They

12:44

do it in ignorance. So it's very much

12:46

about that campaign. And to say,

12:48

this is why we're being asked to do these

12:50

things and get responsible behavior than the public.

12:52

It's about coaching people, I think, rather than catching

12:54

them. That's the way we have most effects. And

12:57

what would you say to the listeners we've

12:59

heard from who say they've been in various places

13:01

coming back into the country with no signs, no

13:03

inspections and they're not feeling very confident about

13:05

this? I think that's something of grace

13:07

importance and it really needs to be

13:09

shared with people that are responsible for

13:12

that policy. So that's obviously a matter

13:14

of urgency and that needs to be

13:16

raised with Border Force colleagues. Anthony

13:18

Baldock. We did ask to speak to

13:20

the Border Force but they told us to

13:22

contact the Department for Environment, Food and

13:25

Rural Affairs and in a statement they told

13:27

us, the government will do whatever it takes

13:29

to protect British farmers from foot and mouth.

13:31

We have strict import controls in

13:33

place to manage the risk of

13:35

disease and they added, we are

13:37

working closely with ports, airports and

13:39

travel operators ensuring that awareness of

13:41

the new restrictions is raised including

13:43

via prominent signage. And that's

13:45

it from us. I'm Charlotte Smith. The producer

13:47

is Beatrice Fenton and farming today is a

13:50

BBC Audio Bristol production.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features