Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Open banking means different
0:02
things to different people. For
0:04
some people, it's a series
0:06
of regulations. And to some
0:08
people, it's a set of
0:10
technologies. And then to some
0:13
people, it's something of a
0:15
global movement. An idea that
0:17
when a customer has data,
0:19
that data belongs to them. And
0:21
they should decide how it's shared,
0:24
by whom, for what purpose, and
0:26
for how long. Open banking is
0:28
many things. A new set of
0:30
tools, a slew of regulations and
0:33
a movement that starts with financial
0:35
services and takes us way beyond
0:38
that into an age where data
0:40
is both open and protected. In
0:42
today's episode, we dive into the
0:45
world of open banking with one
0:47
of its strongest advocates. A.L. Stephen,
0:49
Mr. Open Banking himself. And no,
0:52
that is not a nickname we
0:54
made up. Mr. Open Banking is
0:56
a podcast that gathers more
0:58
than 100,000 listeners worldwide, and
1:00
is AL's platform to educate
1:03
the public and discuss the
1:05
latest innovations in the space.
1:07
AL has more than 25
1:09
years of experience in information
1:11
and banking technologies. Today, he
1:13
is a general manager for
1:15
ozone API. A tech pioneer
1:17
who empowers global institutions to
1:19
adopt open finance and Thratf.
1:21
It is this wealth of
1:23
knowledge and expertise that AL
1:25
brings to FinTech Files. What
1:27
a privilege. So could open
1:30
banking revolutionize the way we
1:32
use financial services? What is
1:34
in it for consumers, banks,
1:36
and even governments? What are
1:39
the risks? And crucially, does
1:41
it hope potential for better
1:43
financial inclusion? AWOL answers all
1:45
these questions in our conversation
1:48
today. So here is this
1:50
conversation with Nora. AL's
1:56
career took root in the early
1:58
days of the internet. He was
2:00
part of a generation that
2:02
started companies in basements. How
2:04
cool is that? With his
2:07
first firm, Everywhere Inc., he
2:09
taught himself how to use
2:11
emerging computer operating systems, like
2:13
UNIX, Pearl, HDML, and he
2:15
planted himself in a new
2:17
ecosystem, the world of information
2:19
technology. And yes, this niche
2:22
would take AL all the
2:24
way to Mr. Open Banking.
2:26
So can you tell us
2:28
a little bit about your
2:30
background and how you became
2:32
Mr. Open Banking? Sure. Happy
2:34
to, Nora. I am a
2:36
career IT professional, almost to
2:39
the point of being a
2:41
cliche. Back in the 90s,
2:43
I had my own internet
2:45
shop. Eventually, I learned about
2:47
databases and how to make
2:49
websites and databases work together
2:51
to create what would eventually
2:54
be called web applications. and
2:56
eventually found a home at
2:58
CIBC, a major Canadian bank,
3:00
as part of their architecture
3:02
team. I came in as
3:04
the sort of internet and
3:06
web services whiz kid at
3:08
my firm. We had started
3:11
playing with early versions of
3:13
XML. So I came into
3:15
CIBC to clean up how
3:17
they did integration and APIs.
3:19
By the time I left...
3:21
I held a pretty senior
3:23
role in the architecture team.
3:26
I was head of strategic
3:28
platforms. And because we had
3:30
taken a very novel approach
3:32
to building APIs, creating our
3:34
own in-house platform, I found
3:36
myself standing on a lot
3:38
of stages talking about the
3:41
work we had done. People
3:43
wanted to hear how exactly
3:45
we had tackled the integration
3:47
challenge of the modern day.
3:49
In those travels... at an
3:51
event in Oslo. I met
3:53
a gentleman named Gunner Berger.
3:55
He was the head of
3:58
open banking at Nordia, a
4:00
bank out of the Nordics,
4:02
and his title. was what
4:04
intrigued me the most. His
4:06
title was head of open
4:08
banking. I thought to myself,
4:10
what on earth is that?
4:13
Open banking. So I took
4:15
Gunner out for drinks and
4:17
asked him. And he said,
4:19
well, don't you know? There
4:21
was a regulation passed in
4:23
Europe that required banks to
4:25
publish standardized APIs for sharing
4:28
data. After meeting Gunner, I
4:30
went back to my hotel
4:32
room and started watching. YouTube
4:34
clips of European legislators arguing
4:36
with each other about people
4:38
having rights to their data
4:40
and leveling the playing field
4:42
and all these other very
4:45
philosophical ideas. And it was
4:47
a little like being struck
4:49
by a bolt of lightning.
4:51
I kind of fell in
4:53
love. I couldn't sleep. It
4:55
was keeping me up at
4:57
night. I'd been working an
5:00
integration for my whole career.
5:02
And I knew what it
5:04
meant to... make an entire
5:06
ecosystem standardized, and it was
5:08
even more bewildering that a
5:10
regulation was what was driving
5:12
that to happen. I sort
5:14
of became obsessed with the
5:17
whole idea. When he left
5:19
his role as the IBC,
5:21
A.L. had one objective. Funny
5:23
the development of his brand
5:25
and launching the first three
5:27
episodes of Mr. Open Banking.
5:29
But going all in an
5:32
adventure, It's not without risk.
5:34
So when the COVID-19 pandemic
5:36
hit, he had to improvise.
5:38
That's how AL found his
5:40
next role at Axway, an
5:42
API management firm that believed
5:44
in the idea of open
5:47
banking and wanted to sponsor
5:49
his platform. AL became their
5:51
head of open banking following
5:53
the footsteps of top leaders
5:55
who had inspired him. Over
5:57
the next five years he
5:59
went on to build a
6:01
network of innovators experts influencers
6:04
for all advanced open banking
6:06
and making it a reality.
6:08
But before we dive into
6:10
what this new reality looks
6:12
like, AL wants to be
6:14
transparent about what open banking
6:16
is. You can't talk about
6:19
open banking without talking about
6:21
money, moving your money around
6:23
and moving the data that's
6:25
associated with your money, like
6:27
your transactions. your history, your
6:29
credit records, the products that
6:31
you might have, that can
6:33
be really tricky. It often
6:36
involves a lot of paper
6:38
and phone calls and heaven
6:40
forbid visits to branches. That
6:42
is a very constraining thing.
6:44
Someone like my grandma would
6:46
just assume that that's how
6:48
it is. That's how it's
6:51
always been and that's always
6:53
going to be. But the
6:55
fact is... that doesn't have
6:57
to be the case. We
6:59
live in a world where
7:01
moving data around across the
7:03
internet has become part of
7:06
our daily lives. When you
7:08
order a taxi, when you
7:10
need to get some food
7:12
delivered, it's a matter of
7:14
a few swipes on your
7:16
phone. And the apps that
7:18
make that happen often integrate
7:20
a whole bunch of different
7:23
capabilities, menu capabilities, maps, maps.
7:25
deliveries, payments, all of those
7:27
are sort of stitched together.
7:29
So what if moving money
7:31
from one bank to another
7:33
was as easy as swiping
7:35
your finger across your phone?
7:38
Or what if switching accounts
7:40
between banks was just as
7:42
easy? What if you could
7:44
get approved for a line
7:46
of credit or get financed
7:48
for a large purchase you
7:50
wanted to make all with
7:53
a few taps on your
7:55
phone? And to do so...
7:57
not with a single provider,
7:59
but... in a way that
8:01
lets you look at all
8:03
the different options that were
8:05
available across the providers and
8:07
pick the best one for
8:10
you. That's how I would
8:12
explain what open banking does.
8:14
So would you say that
8:16
this convenience, the new convenience
8:18
of banking and maybe also
8:20
transparency around it, that is
8:22
like the core mission of
8:25
open banking or? So in
8:27
terms of what's it for,
8:29
what's it trying to achieve?
8:31
I could broadly break it
8:33
down into three buckets. The
8:35
first one is competition. It
8:37
came out of the 2008
8:39
financial crisis, which was more
8:42
than just a financial crisis.
8:44
It was a crisis of
8:46
trust. A lot of people
8:48
all over the world felt
8:50
that they had essentially been
8:52
fooled by financial services, by
8:54
the banks, all over the
8:57
world, that they could no
8:59
longer trust them. And open
9:01
banking came out of an
9:03
idea that to repair that
9:05
trust, there had to be
9:07
a distribution of financial services.
9:09
There had to be a
9:12
wider playing field that allowed
9:14
more players to come in
9:16
and more financial services to
9:18
be offered. That competition would
9:20
increase value and reduce a
9:22
kind of corruption, the kind
9:24
that had caused. the irresponsibility
9:26
that led to 2008. So
9:29
the second bucket is this
9:31
idea of doing financial services
9:33
in a completely new way,
9:35
innovation. When it comes to
9:37
banking, innovation isn't just about
9:39
letting more people participate. It's
9:41
not just widening the range
9:44
of financial companies. It's also
9:46
about opening the field to
9:48
new pathways, letting in entirely
9:50
new kinds of financial products.
9:54
The third, and often not
9:57
given enough attention, is this...
9:59
idea of transparency, that in
10:01
order for competition and innovation
10:04
to thrive, you needed to
10:06
be able to see through
10:08
the fine print that often
10:11
accompanied financial services to compare
10:13
products fairly, to see how
10:15
much a line of credit
10:18
cost in one place versus
10:20
another, what were the terms
10:22
and conditions that went with
10:25
it, what were the fees
10:27
associated. So those are the
10:30
three big goals. competition, innovation
10:32
and transparency. So transparency is
10:34
a best word that I
10:36
want to hook on to
10:39
because when people hear data
10:41
sharing, data sharing between organizations,
10:43
they often feel like a
10:46
bit alert because they obviously
10:48
don't want it to just
10:50
be shared without them being
10:52
in control. So how does
10:55
that work within the open
10:57
banking environment? Do consumers? still
10:59
have control over their data?
11:02
Yeah, you've hit upon a
11:04
really important point, Nora. There's
11:06
a bit of a misconception
11:08
about open banking, that it's
11:11
actually unsafe, that if I
11:13
combine the word open and
11:15
the word banking, this conjures
11:18
an image in people's mind
11:20
that my data is sort
11:22
of out there and exposed
11:24
and anyone can just pick
11:27
it up. People who don't
11:29
know anything about it. automatically
11:31
react negatively. They don't like
11:34
seeing those two words together.
11:36
Open means an open door.
11:38
In reality, the open means
11:41
more like open source. It
11:43
refers to the notion of
11:45
common standards. The point Avel
11:47
is making here is substantial.
11:50
Contrary to what you might
11:52
expect, security is not optimized
11:54
in many parts of the
11:57
banking sector. financial institutions often
11:59
operate with their own security
12:01
systems. which can be out
12:03
of date. It sometimes uses
12:06
either very archaic practices, like
12:08
batch files and integration systems
12:10
that are built bespoke with
12:13
questionable security mechanisms, or sometimes
12:15
they use a mechanism called
12:17
screen scraping, which requires you
12:19
to actually share your bank
12:22
credentials, your card number and
12:24
password, with an intermediary. who
12:26
is essentially tricking the bank
12:29
on the other side into
12:31
thinking it's you as a
12:33
customer logging in and then
12:35
proceeds to scrape all the
12:38
data off of the actual
12:40
HDML screens so highly insecure.
12:42
And the fact is, these
12:45
practices are still in place
12:47
today. Open banking by contrast
12:49
by leveraging this base of
12:51
common standards introduces some of
12:54
the most stringent... powerful security
12:56
controls available today, and they're
12:58
continuously improving. And in general,
13:01
it is one of the
13:03
most secure mechanisms of providing
13:05
the utility of data sharing
13:07
in the world across all
13:10
industries. So rather than being
13:12
less safe, open banking is
13:14
actually much, much more safe
13:17
than data sharing practices in
13:19
place today. AL
13:23
touches on another important aspect
13:25
of open banking here. It
13:28
is a global phenomenon. As
13:30
a movement, open banking came
13:32
into its own in 2018,
13:34
when Europe adopted PSD2, a
13:36
regulation that asked banks to
13:38
open their APIs to specific
13:40
third parties. The idea behind
13:42
this legislation was to better
13:44
integrate payments into the European
13:46
market, and importantly to provide
13:49
a level playing field for
13:51
service providers. And that's really
13:53
interesting, because it means that
13:55
from the get-go, open banking
13:57
has been geared towards financial
13:59
inclusion. And that explains why
14:01
over the last seven years,
14:03
open banking has vastly expanded
14:05
its reach. It has traveled
14:07
quickly to the UK, Australia,
14:09
Brazil, and other regions of
14:12
the American continent. Now it's
14:14
even taking hold in parts
14:16
of Africa and in the
14:18
Middle East. To say nothing
14:20
as Southeast Asia that has
14:22
actually been working with advanced
14:24
API technology for a long
14:26
time. All of these regions
14:28
have very needs and financial
14:30
products. And in some cases,
14:32
they have used open banking
14:35
to better serve their communities.
14:37
It's interesting, open banking is
14:39
done for different purposes in
14:41
different places. So in certain
14:43
places, it is an explicit
14:45
goal of open banking to
14:47
support the underbanked or unbanked.
14:49
A great case study here
14:51
is Brazil, who managed to
14:53
go from essentially a plan.
14:56
to one of the most
14:58
mature open banking ecosystems in
15:00
the world in the space
15:02
of about a year. And
15:04
as part of their commitment,
15:06
explicitly their goal was to
15:08
support underbanked and unbanked individuals.
15:10
You'll find this to be
15:12
very common in places where
15:14
you do have a large
15:16
unbanked population. The way it
15:19
solves it is by essentially
15:21
lowering the cost of introducing
15:23
new financial services providers. and
15:25
lowering the cost of being
15:27
able to send money to
15:29
people and to allow them
15:31
to send money to each
15:33
other. So, for example, in
15:35
Brazil, shortly after launching their
15:37
open banking regime, they introduced
15:40
public wallets. In Brazil, I
15:42
believe it's two of the
15:44
major banks are partially state-owned.
15:46
What they essentially did was
15:48
issued wallets to... everybody, the
15:50
entire population, who wanted to
15:52
just come into a branch
15:54
and say, here's my phone,
15:56
I want you to issue
15:58
me, a digital wallet. provided
16:00
them a way to be
16:03
able to participate in the
16:05
economy by sending money to
16:07
each other, applying for credit
16:09
through these digital wallets, and
16:11
adding to their credit history,
16:13
leading to additional products, and
16:15
essentially creating that financial inclusion
16:17
that was ultimately their goal.
16:19
But the effect was to
16:21
effectively bank millions of people
16:24
who were previously unbanked. And
16:26
again, that's possible because standardization
16:28
fundamentally lowers the costs of
16:30
creating financial services. It really
16:32
is a non-zero-sum game. So
16:34
this may be getting a
16:36
bit idealistic, but could open
16:38
banking contribute to lowering financial
16:40
inequality in the long term?
16:42
Or is there a limit
16:44
to what you can achieve
16:47
with open banking? I don't
16:49
want to make it sound
16:51
like it's an automatic fix.
16:53
Open banking is fundamentally the
16:55
idea that by letting people
16:57
own their data, you're going
16:59
to create a lot more
17:01
competition, create more innovation, create
17:03
more utility, and fundamentally raise
17:05
all boats. That is the
17:08
dream. However, I would be
17:10
remiss if I didn't say
17:12
that there were risks associated
17:14
with it. The fact is
17:16
that if you don't have
17:18
the right kinds of controls
17:20
around it, the right kinds
17:22
of regulation, it can sometimes
17:24
help large incumbents become larger.
17:26
It can help governments who
17:28
want to debank people to
17:31
do so. That is the
17:33
risk, the idea that folks
17:35
who are trying to take
17:37
advantage. through competition and innovation,
17:39
but ultimately those market dynamics
17:41
in order to achieve goals
17:43
like supporting the unbanked and
17:45
providing social good. those market
17:47
dynamics have to have the
17:49
right rules and regulations backing
17:51
them up to ensure you
17:54
don't have that kind of
17:56
digital repeat of the same
17:58
concentration that led to 2008.
18:00
I want to stress that
18:02
that's going to be different
18:04
for every region, for every
18:06
country, the dynamics of how
18:08
much regulation you need and
18:10
how much market activity you
18:12
need are going to vary.
18:15
The two have to find
18:17
a way to work together.
18:19
In my view, the benefits
18:21
of the benefits. far outweigh
18:23
the risks. So open banking
18:25
is not a system without
18:27
its pitfalls, but it holds
18:29
great potential for a fair
18:31
and more modern financial world,
18:33
one where consumers have freedom
18:35
to use their money and
18:38
their data, however they see
18:40
fit. To mitigate risk, regulators
18:42
have a real part to
18:44
play, but institutions do too.
18:46
technological perspective. What other things
18:48
institutions can do to make
18:50
it safe? This is sort
18:52
of the beauty of standardization.
18:54
The idea of making sure
18:56
that everyone's doing things the
18:59
same way sort of automatically
19:01
creates a more secure, more
19:03
transparent environment where folks almost
19:05
have to play fair because
19:07
they're all singing from the
19:09
same song sheet. There's no
19:11
technological moats. This is very
19:13
similar to the way the
19:15
internet operates today. The internet
19:17
came along, rather than being
19:19
based on proprietary walled gardens,
19:22
a website was based on
19:24
the same technology for everyone.
19:26
So suddenly anybody could build
19:28
a website and anybody could
19:30
have email. You didn't have
19:32
to pick one provider or
19:34
another, these different capabilities that...
19:36
where the internet just sort
19:38
of worked together. In many
19:40
ways, that's what Open Banking
19:43
is bringing to financial services.
19:45
It's easy to see why
19:47
AWOL would compare the event
19:49
of the internet to what's
19:51
currently happening in the world
19:53
of open banking. Both technologies
19:55
share an ambition for easy
19:57
access and large-scale integration. But
19:59
if you're thinking we're getting
20:01
closer to global adoption, well.
20:03
there's a slight caveat. Because
20:06
banking varies so widely from
20:08
one country to another, even
20:10
within a region, trying to
20:12
create a global open banking
20:14
system for everybody is not
20:16
likely to work. What you're
20:18
in fact seeing is a...
20:20
focus more on interoperability so
20:22
that even though each region
20:24
and country has their own
20:27
way of approaching open banking,
20:29
there are efforts to try
20:31
and make them work with
20:33
each other. So you would
20:35
essentially translate between the way
20:37
one region does open banking
20:39
and another. They might not
20:41
be exactly the same, but
20:43
they could still interoperate. You
20:45
kind of touched upon it
20:47
already with your vision for
20:50
how the world is evolving,
20:52
but that's maybe narrowed down
20:54
to the next five to
20:56
ten years ahead. How would
20:58
you envision that open banking
21:00
and the world around it
21:02
is evolving? What you're going
21:04
to see over the next
21:06
little while is more mature
21:08
standards, better security. which makes
21:10
it even easier for more
21:13
players to participate, even easier
21:15
to drive more innovation out
21:17
of these systems. For example,
21:19
in the case of AI,
21:21
the writers strike that happened,
21:23
what, a couple of years
21:25
back now, where authors and
21:27
actors said, we don't feel
21:29
great about AI. just sort
21:31
of taking our work and
21:34
our likenesses and our words,
21:36
using it as training data
21:38
and being able to regurgitate
21:40
it without asking us permission.
21:42
I think open banking is
21:44
the other side of that
21:46
coin, the idea that, look,
21:48
we're not saying AI shouldn't
21:50
have data. It's an incredibly
21:52
powerful tool and it should
21:54
be fostered. But if it's
21:57
using our data, well... that
21:59
should be done with our
22:01
permission. And if there's any
22:03
value being created out of
22:05
that data, we should be
22:07
able to participate in that
22:09
value creation and maybe remunerated
22:11
for that value creation. So
22:13
expect it to get cleaner,
22:15
better, more utilitarian, more modern,
22:18
more integrated with some of
22:20
the newer stuff we're seeing
22:22
out there in the technology
22:24
space in general. Would you
22:26
say there's also a potential
22:28
to apply this to other
22:30
industries? I mean, let's say
22:32
not only banking, but health
22:34
care data, for example, or
22:36
also big tech? Oh, 100%
22:38
the idea being that if
22:41
a customer owns their data
22:43
in one sphere, then why
22:45
do they not own their
22:47
data everywhere? This notion of
22:49
data sharing based on your
22:51
consent. your control is fundamental
22:53
to the movement. Once people
22:55
understand that there is a
22:57
way for them to control
22:59
their data, to control how
23:02
it's shared, to turn it
23:04
off if they don't want
23:06
it to be shared, there's
23:08
a certain inevitable march to
23:10
that idea that it will
23:12
move to other spheres where
23:14
you have data that you
23:16
want to protect, and eventually
23:18
come to the point that
23:20
you want. expect that utility
23:22
and protection across all of
23:25
the data that you have,
23:27
not just banking, not just
23:29
finance, not just health care
23:31
and telecom, but indeed things
23:33
that that today we have
23:35
very little control over, like
23:37
our search histories, like our
23:39
social media behavior, like our
23:41
online shopping histories. AL has
23:43
his eyes on the horizon,
23:46
and it seems pretty clear.
23:48
The future of open banking
23:50
is far reaching. When he
23:52
started in the field, Only
23:54
about a dozen authorities were
23:56
banking on open finance. Now,
23:58
there are over 90 jurisdictions
24:00
all around the world pursuing
24:02
it. Making them work as
24:04
a unit is not always
24:06
straightforward. But global actors are
24:09
innovating, and building more mature
24:11
and inclusive open-source systems, one
24:13
after another. So there's much
24:15
more to come from the
24:17
side of Fintec. Watch the
24:19
space. And follow evil's podcast,
24:21
Mr. Open Banking. I was
24:23
really struck by his insights,
24:25
especially with the idea that
24:27
open banking can lead the
24:29
way for more diversity and
24:32
financial inclusion. So let's break
24:34
this down. We talk here
24:36
so much about the potential
24:38
through the podcast about it's
24:40
ability to support underserved communities
24:42
and really facilitate inclusion and
24:44
actual impact. It was cool
24:46
watching him point out that
24:48
open banking is not a
24:50
zero-sum game, which to me
24:53
is exciting and it's how
24:55
we should look at life
24:57
anyways. Vanara, what was your
24:59
opinion? What was the opportunity
25:01
that open banking really represented
25:03
for these developing communities that
25:05
stuck out to you during
25:07
the episode? It's a very
25:09
good question. I very much
25:11
do agree that banks and
25:13
institutions should work towards being
25:16
more inclusive and shaping a
25:18
more inclusive world. So what
25:20
was really interesting to me
25:22
was how open banking and
25:24
creating this standardized way of
25:26
integrating between institutions, how that
25:28
enables new products. new market
25:30
participants to create new products,
25:32
and especially if you look
25:34
at underserved customer groups, for
25:37
example, that maybe wouldn't be
25:39
interesting to the big banks
25:41
and big institutions who are
25:43
just looking at scales and
25:45
how to optimize the last
25:47
bit of their margin. But
25:49
then you can take a
25:51
smaller FinTech or a startup
25:53
that's operating at a smaller
25:55
scale, and they have this
25:57
exciting idea how to offer
26:00
banking services, for example, to
26:02
women specifically. I mean, I
26:04
still remember when the first
26:06
female investment products popped up,
26:08
or investment advisors popped up,
26:10
there was no such thing
26:12
coming from the big banks.
26:14
And that is ultimately enabled
26:16
by open banking. So that
26:18
I find really fascinating. I
26:21
tend to have the same
26:23
experience for the listeners out
26:25
there. They don't know. I
26:27
am for Brazil. And when
26:29
I look at a country
26:31
with so much discrepancy and...
26:33
an income gaps or just
26:35
even education. Open banking shows
26:37
the representation of opportunity of
26:39
what data does that have.
26:41
Open banking to me is
26:44
like leading the footsteps of
26:46
saying how do we put
26:48
parameters that allow us to
26:50
compare information to allow us
26:52
to standardize information to see
26:54
risk differently. So this notion
26:56
that API can also help
26:58
other countries get services that
27:00
they couldn't get before is
27:02
exciting. But I think this
27:05
highlights. another topic that I
27:07
loved you and it was
27:09
talking about it, which is
27:11
the importance of how do
27:13
you manage risk? What do
27:15
you think when you were
27:17
talking about the risk and
27:19
the opportunity in Europe that
27:21
this represents? Open banking, being
27:23
in Europe, what I find
27:25
actually a bit sad is
27:28
that enabling this kind of
27:30
data sharing and this kind
27:32
of standardization, how you communicate
27:34
between institutions, that it had
27:36
to come through a regulator.
27:38
It should have been in
27:40
the banks. own interest actually
27:42
to do that in my
27:44
opinion. But on the other
27:46
side it is a really
27:48
good example how regulators can
27:51
actually enforce innovation and that
27:53
is on the other side
27:55
very beautiful but once you
27:57
take on this I know
27:59
when you've been working quite
28:01
a lot with regulators around
28:03
the world. I love my
28:05
regulators. You probably can't say
28:07
that, but I love working
28:09
with them. In Brazil, we've
28:12
passed on so many changes
28:14
that I think you can
28:16
even see what's happening with
28:18
the FinTech market, and that's
28:20
all to do with a
28:22
lot of open banking and
28:24
open data legislation. You've seen
28:26
financial inclusion. You've seen an
28:28
impact in GDP. So this
28:30
isn't just a make-believe conversation.
28:32
And I think we've yet
28:35
to really fully realize the
28:37
potential for this, the potential
28:39
for what is my personal
28:41
data. What do I do
28:43
with it? Who has to
28:45
be the guardian, the custodian?
28:47
What's the responsibility as well?
28:49
A lot of people only
28:51
talk about the positives, but
28:53
like, this is an opportunity
28:56
for us to redefine citizenship
28:58
in the digital world. This
29:00
has been FinTech Files, a
29:02
podcast from BCG Platonium. This
29:04
season, we're digging deep into
29:06
the groundbreaking ideas that are
29:08
reshaping the future of FinTech.
29:10
And we want to hear
29:12
from you, our listeners. What
29:14
topics do you want us
29:16
to cover and who are
29:19
your dream guests? Feel free
29:21
to reach out any time
29:23
at FinTech dash podcast at
29:25
bcg platinian.com. We can't wait
29:27
to hear from you. Thank
29:29
you so much for tuning
29:31
in and we'll see you
29:33
next time on FinTech Files.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More