Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
It's another week in the
0:02
four-year reference household, and it
0:04
is another reference Max Friends
0:07
and Lovers. This is where
0:09
we have a combined reviews
0:12
on screeners and screenings that
0:14
we have received. Before we
0:16
get to that, O.T. I saw you
0:18
coming out of the boot of the
0:21
G&X. Friends and Love is go and
0:23
check out the collab that is in
0:25
the most recent of the podcast feed.
0:27
Quick thoughts, because we didn't get the
0:30
oat daddy stamp of approval. What did
0:32
you think about G&X? I loved
0:34
it. I loved every little bit of it.
0:36
I think it's my most listened to
0:39
album to date. Wow. And it's, what, what,
0:41
what, what, what, what, what, what, did, they
0:43
call in December? November, I
0:45
think. Yeah, this is a lot.
0:47
Yeah, you know what? I'm
0:50
feeling good, O.T. Give us
0:52
one more in the Black
0:54
Clansman review. I was actually
0:56
going to ask you to
0:58
give us your best white
1:00
voice and I didn't get
1:02
to. So we're loving on
1:04
all each other, friends and
1:06
lovers, this is a gift.
1:09
Can you give us your best
1:11
O.T. Stolesworth voice?
1:14
No, I think not
1:16
even Adam Driver
1:18
can help you.
1:20
Let's get on.
1:23
That's a bit
1:25
of Vigro Mortinson.
1:27
It's got some
1:29
green book connotations.
1:32
Let's get on at
1:34
the show. friends
1:41
and giggle-gag-all around the
1:43
world lovers. Welcome back
1:45
to the four-year reference
1:47
podcast. You got your host, Katie.
1:50
And Ote. Today we have a
1:52
full schedule. We have quite a
1:54
lot of reviews because we had
1:56
our Spike Lee reference station Friends
1:59
and Lovers. and check out our
2:01
Spike Lee run. It was gorgeous,
2:03
it was beautiful, but it does
2:06
stop our scheduling. So we do
2:08
have some reviews that we're going
2:10
to get to today, Friends and
2:13
Lovers, One of them Days, The
2:15
Last Journey, Upper Cup, Mickey 17.
2:17
We have some more indie titles
2:20
on the way as well, and
2:22
I hope we have time for the
2:24
Pit. Okay, we got 10 of
2:26
them bitches. What a what a
2:28
sad reflective New Year's we had
2:31
O.T. And we've been deliciously
2:33
enjoying every drip feed if
2:35
you'll pardon the pun of
2:37
every episode that we're getting.
2:39
We're almost up to episode
2:41
15 of the pit. Also, friends and
2:44
lovers to tantalize you with some
2:46
more spices as well. Can we
2:48
do a four review episode
2:50
on Delhi boys, please? Of
2:53
course. Tan France! All right,
2:55
friends and lovers, thank
2:57
you so much for joining. If
2:59
you didn't know if you
3:01
weren't a hoea, Oti and
3:03
I do have a little
3:05
box account and from time
3:07
to time we will share
3:09
our views on things that
3:11
we are watching. But let's
3:13
get straight into it. Thank
3:15
you so much to Jess
3:17
and the global team at
3:19
Sony. You would have seen
3:21
it in the podcast feed.
3:23
We had the opportunity to
3:25
interview the Kiki Palmer. So
3:27
thank you all around. We finally
3:30
get some time to talk about
3:32
it. I feel so sad that
3:35
we don't have time for a
3:37
full review, but this can be
3:39
as chunky as a honey bun,
3:42
if you like, Otee. Non-spoilers, give
3:44
us your thoughts, Otee. One
3:46
of them days blends depth
3:48
with sharp humor and
3:51
undeniable charm. Hickey and Caesar
3:53
shine bringing wit and warm to
3:56
a film that's both entertaining and
3:58
meaningful. Yes,
4:02
okay, both
4:04
in front of and
4:06
behind the lens, one
4:09
of them days delivers
4:11
a laugh out loud
4:13
comedy and builds a
4:15
layered world
4:17
of friendship squabbles,
4:19
community coming
4:21
together and delicious
4:24
romance a
4:26
modern comedy classic.
4:29
Wow. I
4:32
don't know how we fit that laughing in the
4:37
there's so much to talk about
4:39
in this film and you know, where
4:41
do we even start? I think the easiest
4:45
the most difficult thing for
4:47
me personally you know friends
4:49
and lovers we've been doing
4:51
this podcast since 2019 and I
4:53
find it very easy to
4:55
critique and review dramas serious heavy
4:58
shit but when it comes
5:00
to comedy for me I'm like
5:02
it was so good but
5:04
there is an art like there's
5:06
absolutely an art to making
5:08
a great comedy and I would
5:10
love to hear from you
5:13
where you think it worked I
5:15
don't know if you felt
5:17
like in some points it didn't
5:19
work but does it
5:21
does it stack up with the
5:23
comedies of your childhood and your
5:25
upbringing? It does it
5:27
does stack up I think
5:30
first of all I think that it needs
5:32
to as well it doesn't but one of
5:34
the things that I think
5:36
made this stand
5:38
out was the chemistry
5:40
between Cesar and Kiki yes
5:42
it just worked yes
5:44
also seeing Cesar act was
5:46
quite wonderful right um
5:48
she nailed her moments the comedic
5:50
timing was there like you didn't
5:53
feel a miss and I think
5:55
most of the time when you
5:57
watch movies like this um the
5:59
sort of says a character portrayal,
6:01
doesn't really get to do
6:03
much, whilst in there's this
6:05
sort of go against that
6:07
vein where we see, you
6:10
know what? She actually did
6:12
quite a lot. It's just
6:14
all falling on Kiki's back
6:16
to carry the movie through.
6:18
Yeah, like without spoilers, Sizza's
6:20
character really was the driving
6:22
force for a lot of,
6:24
not even the plot, just
6:26
for the growth and for
6:29
the story. as well. You
6:31
know, you can talk about
6:33
Oti's favorite friends with Phoebe,
6:35
but I think of Sinclair
6:37
from Living Single as well.
6:39
If we talk about our
6:41
woo-woo-w girls in media, whether
6:43
it's television and film, and
6:45
Cesar does it so well,
6:48
like there's a, we don't
6:50
want to spoil too much,
6:52
but there's a moment at
6:54
the start of the film.
6:56
where she jokes about getting
6:58
extra exercise by tripping over
7:00
her boyfriend's Jordans. And it
7:02
just, it just works so
7:04
well. It does. I think
7:07
also at the same time,
7:09
because the story is very
7:11
specific to experiences and it's
7:13
very culturally tapped in, you
7:15
don't really, like, you don't
7:17
need to be some sort
7:19
of thespian to be able
7:21
to tap into what's real.
7:23
Just the dynamic and how
7:26
they carry themselves throughout. I
7:28
think we get to see
7:30
cut Williams in there as
7:32
well. The things that he
7:34
said, was he a furious
7:36
to you? He sort of,
7:38
but not as serious as
7:40
a, you know, furious was
7:42
too much, not too much,
7:45
just he came with everything
7:47
and he felt very Malcolm
7:49
X. With him, it's a
7:51
bit more chilled and it's
7:53
not only reminded me of
7:55
that message from Don't Be
7:57
a Man, as you know.
7:59
where we get to have
8:02
those reflective moments
8:04
as well. But yeah, you
8:06
know, from, was it she
8:08
a butter or cocoa butter?
8:10
Yeah, she butter butter. Oh,
8:13
it was good, good fun.
8:15
You know, if you don't
8:17
have the money this month,
8:19
what makes you think you
8:22
got the money next month?
8:24
Yeah, like they cover a lot
8:26
from. payday loans to, you know,
8:29
it's a systemic sort of way
8:31
of which, you know, keeps you
8:33
down, keeps the community tied up,
8:36
but, you know. It's one thing
8:38
to, I guess, cover
8:40
like gentrification, shout out
8:42
to Sarita Singleton, screenwriter,
8:45
but also showrunner for
8:47
rap shit. Lawrence
8:49
Lamont directing also, I know I can
8:51
feel the pain, I can feel the
8:53
pain in your heart. I miss out.
8:55
Shout out, shout out, to Issa
8:57
and the Hooray team because there's
8:59
a documentary called Scene and Heard
9:02
that just premiered at South By
9:04
Southwest and it's about black creatives
9:06
and show running and I guess
9:08
the building of audiences. just to
9:10
disregard the audiences that made them.
9:12
So it's going to be very
9:14
interesting and it's so nice to
9:16
be able to, I guess, speak
9:19
on it, but I guess to
9:21
go back to the point of
9:23
gentrification. Like, it's
9:25
one thing to be able to cover
9:27
that in a film, whether it's dramatic
9:29
or any other sort of genre,
9:32
but there is an art to
9:34
be able to cover gentrification, but
9:36
also do it. in a way that
9:38
taps into the humor, which is the
9:41
joy that you find through community, right?
9:43
And, you know, we literally just did
9:45
our Spike Lee run, like, do the
9:47
right thing where you had the unks.
9:50
I don't know if Royal Junior would
9:52
associate himself with these unks. But, you
9:54
know, that we're talking about
9:56
businesses who owns businesses who
9:59
gets opportunity. And you see this
10:01
through especially a lot of black
10:03
media and being able to traverse
10:05
those, you know, even in the
10:07
quote that you were talking about
10:09
as well, that sharp wit and
10:12
humor. Yeah, it does quite a
10:14
lot, you know, from, you know,
10:16
I think one of the better
10:19
also portrayals of gentrification in movies
10:21
was Kandi Man and... Yeah. the
10:23
way it was done, the O.G.
10:25
Candyman. I know. But the
10:27
white professor. Yeah. Yeah, being
10:29
for Snickety and explaining
10:32
it all. But I think
10:34
that's like a really great
10:36
allegory in the way to
10:38
do that. Thoughts on love
10:41
interests. You said that Te
10:43
Diggs was your... It stopped
10:45
after Te Diggs. So maybe
10:47
they're not 90s fine, but how
10:49
did you feel about that? Was
10:52
there a little something for everyone,
10:54
a little something? I guess, I don't
10:56
know. You're the one that wanted
10:58
the 90s, sort of blokes in
11:01
there. And to me, if it
11:03
wasn't eight digs, I don't know.
11:05
I'm just a personal intimacy coordinator
11:08
routine. What can I say? The
11:10
love interest was a bit cartoonish,
11:12
especially when it came to... Maniac.
11:15
Caesar? Oh yeah. Yeah, I
11:17
was like, yeah, we're like, come
11:19
on now. Yeah, come on now.
11:21
Well I think, and that's
11:23
also because the strength
11:26
of the film is
11:28
kicky and sizzer. So yeah,
11:30
if the background
11:32
kind of had met them
11:35
at that level, but also
11:37
it doesn't make or
11:39
break the film. It
11:42
doesn't. But he was in
11:44
more scenes than I thought he
11:46
was. Yeah. Yeah, no, I absolutely
11:48
agree. I loved it and
11:50
I can't wait to watch
11:52
it again. All right
11:54
friends and lovers, let's
11:57
move into the last
11:59
journey. Thank you to
12:01
the team at Universal. We
12:03
also have an interview with
12:06
Philippe and Frederick, Friends and
12:08
Lovers, where I definitely made
12:10
sure to have some time
12:12
to talk about Harry Belafonte.
12:15
Shake, shake. Yeah, I did. And I
12:17
thought they were going to join in, but
12:19
they didn't. Oh, how we're watching this?
12:21
Um, I mean, you, not
12:23
I'm either. Common Side effects.
12:25
Common side effects. Yes. It's
12:28
I think on HBO and
12:30
Bloody Hell. It's
12:32
amazing. Oh, you want me
12:34
to go? What a segue, yes.
12:36
The last Johnny reveals
12:39
the dissonance between
12:41
memory and reality
12:44
as apparent ages.
12:46
Its emotional core is
12:48
strong, though at times
12:51
the Johnny feels more
12:54
frustrating than moving.
12:57
I want to get my hoo
12:59
in your book, quote. Oh, see,
13:01
you're the silent assassin, but...
13:03
It's just not even that.
13:05
Tap, tap, tap. Am I
13:07
wrong, though? No, give me yours.
13:10
And what's up, though?
13:12
Okay. Accepting or struggling
13:14
to accept the helplessness
13:16
of witnessing parents
13:18
get older proves
13:20
to be difficult
13:22
to separate from
13:24
the intended... elevated
13:27
reality. Okay. Moments are
13:29
understandable but
13:31
also difficult
13:33
to watch. Pretty much the
13:35
same thing we said. Absolutely.
13:38
And this is the thing, right?
13:41
It's hard to see. Oh,
13:43
and this is like the
13:45
perfect sort of thing that
13:47
all the overarching theme that
13:49
we're talking when it came
13:52
to Wolfman. seeing your
13:54
loved one change from the person
13:56
you used to know to someone
13:58
who is unrecognized. And that
14:01
helplessness. And that
14:03
helplessness. So overlaying it
14:06
with this, you get
14:08
to see, you remember your
14:10
pops one way. And the
14:12
memories and everything that
14:15
you think that he was or
14:17
is, is no longer there
14:20
or it's sort of diminished.
14:22
And you want to rekindle
14:24
and relieve and be
14:26
part of, you know, one
14:28
last hurrah. Yeah, it
14:30
does sound romantic.
14:33
Because it's not delusional.
14:35
I think Philip is
14:37
quite clear. But there's,
14:40
there's, to me, there's
14:42
the dissonance, right, between
14:45
what was and what
14:47
is, and accepting what is,
14:49
and navigating what is now
14:51
in a way that feels
14:54
healthy. Yes. And, and
14:56
for both people involved.
14:59
Yeah. And it's so hard to it
15:01
was so hard watching this
15:03
because the moments where I
15:05
felt very sad Because you
15:07
know it's talking to things that
15:10
most of us will go
15:12
through if not everyone It's
15:14
that aspect of those like neatly
15:16
feeling of mmm. Come on now
15:18
like yeah is this for the
15:20
benefit of your dad or you
15:22
is this for the benefit
15:24
of your dad or you is this
15:26
for the benefit of TV?
15:29
Oh, your relationship. That's
15:32
interesting. Okay, okay. Well,
15:34
let's pick up on that.
15:36
And honestly, your quote summarized
15:39
everything. But I actually
15:41
would disagree with you on
15:43
that. I don't think... I
15:45
summarized everything but wrongly... No,
15:48
no, no, no. It's just,
15:50
because you were saying, is he
15:52
doing that for himself or
15:54
is he doing it for the
15:57
cameras? Okay. I think
16:00
We just are seeing him document
16:02
him being able to a certain
16:04
extent be unable to accept That
16:07
is that's getting older. That's
16:09
what I disagree with but in
16:11
terms of me saying like I don't
16:13
think he's going out of his way
16:15
to make a show and dance because
16:17
of the cameras I don't mean in
16:19
terms of it being like a jaka
16:21
sort of portrayal more in terms
16:24
of what's scripted if there's
16:26
any scripted moments or is
16:28
it fully just unscripted
16:31
and fully just leaning into
16:33
what's being captured. Okay, well
16:35
friends and lovers, because sometimes you
16:37
are nasty, well do be fair,
16:39
we did say non-spoilers, but for
16:42
those that don't want to know
16:44
anything, you might be a little
16:46
bit nasty and you want to
16:48
hear mummy and daddy talk about
16:50
this. Aging mummy and daddy, but
16:52
still sexy otherwise, right, Ote? Like
16:54
I guess to give a bit
16:57
of a context for this
16:59
film. Philip's dad, he lectured
17:01
and taught French and
17:04
he retired and
17:06
Philip documented that
17:09
and then there was
17:11
an idea to do
17:13
a documentary about his
17:16
dad's life and What
17:19
Oti is talking about is
17:21
essentially, and also, let's be
17:23
very clear, medical tests were
17:25
done on the dad and
17:27
there's nothing physically, he's
17:30
not diagnosed with anything, he's
17:32
just getting old. He seems
17:34
like he lived a pretty good
17:36
life, he's still living a good
17:39
life, right? But medically, there's nothing,
17:41
quote, in quote, wrong with
17:43
the father. And I think
17:45
that's where the first, if there
17:47
were going to be some barriers
17:50
in this film, I think that's
17:52
where for me personally, that was
17:54
my first sort of barrier in
17:56
this film. And you know, like I've
17:58
shared a bit on. social media.
18:00
I haven't really shared it
18:02
on this podcast, Friends and
18:04
Lovers, but because this is
18:06
a deeply personal film, intended,
18:08
you know, elevated reality, but
18:11
it kind of, you know,
18:13
it's hard to, it blurs
18:15
the lines of that. But as
18:17
much as it relates to this
18:19
review, Friends and Lovers, I have
18:21
a mom that has dementia, right?
18:23
She was diagnosed with 58.
18:26
It was early onset dementia
18:28
because if you're after 65
18:31
then I guess it's your
18:33
garden variety dementia. And as
18:36
much as this film
18:38
was frustrating, it
18:40
isn't unrealistic to me because
18:42
I also have people in
18:45
my life that are like Philip.
18:47
Yeah. That are unable to
18:49
accept the reality.
18:51
And That was my first barrier
18:54
because I am the sort
18:56
of person that I get
18:58
involved in the appointments in
19:00
the organizing and the planning
19:02
and that's part of how
19:04
I get through the shit
19:06
that I need to get
19:08
through. I intellectually understand that
19:10
that doesn't stop me unfortunately
19:12
it took me a while,
19:14
but you know I intellectually
19:17
understand that That shit
19:19
doesn't stop me. I still need
19:21
to feel the shit that I
19:24
need to feel. And it's scary
19:26
at the end of the day, right?
19:28
But this film was a
19:31
continuous, I wouldn't necessarily
19:33
call it a denial,
19:35
but like you said, it
19:37
was a prioritizing. I need
19:39
to be able to execute
19:41
this recreation of my
19:44
dad's life because what else is
19:46
there? Yeah. The memories I
19:48
guess aren't enough. The time
19:50
that you can spend isn't,
19:53
there isn't enough beauty
19:55
in that. There's so
19:57
much logistics and core.
19:59
that go into this, and even
20:02
if it gets achieved, how then
20:04
does that, like there are so many
20:06
ways that you can bond with
20:08
your dad. There are so many
20:11
ways that you can bond with
20:13
your parent. And you know, like
20:15
you said, like I said, it
20:17
was very frustrating watching this film,
20:20
but it was more, let's just
20:22
like, like, if we just accept
20:24
it, there's so much beauty
20:26
that we can have. And that's
20:29
right, and that's where we
20:31
come, you know, at least
20:33
at the end of this movie,
20:35
you have your frustrations
20:38
aside, but you felt
20:41
a lot because in
20:43
your life you've experienced
20:45
one of these things,
20:47
and it taps into
20:49
something, it does, because then
20:52
you ask yourself. a
20:54
lot of questions, introspective
20:56
questions, you reevaluate the
20:58
relationships that you do
21:00
have, what you feel
21:02
that needs to be
21:04
done, and I think
21:06
that's one of the key take-aways
21:09
at least for this, for me,
21:12
is what is there anything that
21:14
I need to do, that I
21:16
need to make sure that is
21:18
taken off to ensure that
21:20
my relationship with my...
21:23
parents with whoever else is
21:25
there that is, you know, being
21:27
fully realized in its
21:29
entirety without me feeling there
21:32
will be any regret if anything
21:34
ought to happen. Yeah. And I
21:36
guess, if anything, it does that.
21:38
And, you know, how many movies
21:41
how many movies out there can
21:43
make that can make you say
21:45
that. So in as much as
21:47
those frustration, at
21:49
least there's something you walk
21:51
away with. Suppose. Yeah.
21:53
We really chose very
21:55
specifically for our ordering
21:58
or a T. Thank
22:00
you so much to Jazelle
22:02
and the team at
22:05
Katrina 1PR. We are
22:07
covering Upka. Shall I
22:09
submit frames before we
22:12
get into it. Wow. Yeah,
22:14
that's ordering that.
22:17
Upaker feels disjointed
22:19
with a protagonist
22:22
whose cuts around
22:24
deeper themes without
22:26
truly engaging. A
22:28
strong performance from
22:31
Ving for what it's worth.
22:33
I love that you had to give
22:35
a nod to Ving Rames.
22:37
Just to make it clear,
22:39
we haven't got no problems.
22:42
I don't want someone showing up
22:44
in my... Give me some baby
22:46
boy squats. I don't need it.
22:49
There were African squats,
22:51
Oatee. You call them
22:53
baby boy Africans. Uppercutt's
22:56
nerve center operates from
22:59
a aggrieved entitled protagonist
23:01
that is barely held
23:03
to account and little
23:06
room for growth, let alone
23:08
pay off. Wow. You can't get
23:10
away from the million-dollar
23:13
baby comparisons. You
23:15
cannot. It is also a remake
23:17
of the German film. as
23:19
well. Oh, there's a German film.
23:22
Which also had mixed reactions.
23:24
I was looking at the...
23:26
So nothing was lost in translation.
23:29
This... I didn't understand
23:31
what they wanted to do with
23:33
this movie. I didn't get... I
23:35
kept on asking myself why a lot
23:37
of the times. Yeah. As to why
23:39
sudden decisions were being
23:42
made. Something references were
23:44
being made. Use of language
23:46
is very... important and
23:48
intentional so when words are
23:51
used and they're left to
23:53
linger without any sort of
23:55
resolution or without any sort
23:58
of callback you were left.
24:00
wondering what the fuck we're doing
24:02
here? May I may I tease on
24:04
that thread? No, because it goes
24:07
into the spoilary thing. I
24:09
think what the movie does is
24:11
give us a protagonist who
24:13
feels a bit so hard done
24:16
by hard done by, but then
24:18
we don't know why. Hard
24:20
done by to the point
24:22
where Ving who feels like
24:24
has gone through a tremendous
24:26
a lot of shit. and
24:28
the mere fact that he
24:30
is a black man operating
24:32
his studio his
24:34
boxing studio whatever
24:37
and feeling as if oh my
24:39
god this girl has gone through
24:41
it I need to help her
24:44
after 10 minutes of
24:46
meeting up with her I
24:48
think there's a trope
24:51
of magical society I
24:53
don't know, like... What was a
24:55
man's name, Darius as well? Like
24:58
everyone was just... Like everyone
25:00
was her problem, like everyone
25:02
was a problem to her. She
25:04
is flawed and I think the movie
25:07
is trying to portray the aspect
25:09
of it that she is flawed,
25:11
there's things going around her
25:13
outside of a control. We
25:15
get to have this Darius
25:17
thing lingering throughout without really
25:19
knowing the wrong reason behind
25:22
it. Even at the end where
25:24
there's this phone call that she
25:26
misses, I'm like, it feels it
25:28
needs to be more pivotal than
25:31
that than what it was. Can
25:33
I pick up on that? Because
25:35
you said, okay, so she's so
25:38
aggrieved, she's so downtrodden by the
25:40
world, and you said we didn't
25:42
know why. We did. It just
25:45
wasn't compelling enough.
25:47
If that was all, then, bro. That
25:49
was it. And, you know, essentially.
25:52
She's this white brunette woman speaking
25:54
to a black man talking about
25:56
how much she's been through in
25:58
her life and and it was because
26:00
of a pretty blonde girl. I
26:04
guess Lez. No!
26:07
Maybe, because I looked at the cast for
26:09
the German one and they were all white. So
26:12
maybe it would have helped thematically,
26:14
but it really comes off
26:16
like oh you don't know what
26:18
I've been through. It was
26:20
a blonde girl, that's so
26:23
pretty. Like really bitch? Get the
26:25
fuck out of my boxing
26:27
studio. It's the intersectionality darling. I'll
26:29
do anything. I'll do anything. I'm
26:31
going to, I'm ignoring you. I'll
26:33
do anything. And then he'll ask
26:35
her to do one small thing for
26:37
their training. I can't believe you would ask
26:39
me to do that. Get the fuck
26:41
out then. Ving
26:44
Reims character extends too much
26:46
for her. He was
26:48
acting. I hope he got
26:50
all of his pennies for this
26:52
film because the performance that Ving Reims
26:54
brought to this film was
26:57
not warranted based
26:59
on the performances of
27:01
the lead, as well as
27:03
the writing, as well
27:05
as everything. I'm
27:08
not the biggest fan of
27:10
time jumps, flash forward, flashbacks. I
27:12
feel like sometimes it can
27:14
be used as a crutch, but
27:16
it can still be used well
27:18
and relay a lot of
27:20
important information and tie in the
27:23
story. But all
27:25
my wards, this
27:27
was not needed here. And
27:29
you know what, like it's
27:32
one thing to, and friends
27:34
and lovers, you're going to see it
27:36
in Mickey 17 from me in particular.
27:38
Like it's one thing to, I
27:40
guess, be facetious and generalize
27:42
a film because of
27:44
how you feel about it.
27:46
But the very shallow way that
27:48
we're describing it is exactly how
27:51
this film is. And
27:54
that's what I don't get from a
27:56
writing perspective on what they wanted
27:58
to achieve with it. I understand
28:01
maybe the German version
28:03
would have been different,
28:05
but what are we working towards?
28:08
We didn't get anywhere. With
28:11
million dollar baby, you
28:13
understood what the goal was,
28:15
what we understood what the
28:18
goal for the protagonist was
28:20
throughout, we got to see
28:22
her challenges, we got
28:25
to see everything. Here we, we
28:27
are sort of a step removed.
28:30
We are unaware
28:32
of anything about
28:34
the protagonist. Yeah,
28:37
it's it feels like
28:39
everyone wants to be
28:42
part within her circle.
28:45
Yeah, but why? Yeah. We
28:47
get this Tyrone thrips.
28:50
I was wondering
28:52
when you were going to
28:54
get to your favorite
28:57
part. Oh, man.
28:59
level of writing
29:01
character names. Hey, we need
29:03
a black boxer. Let's
29:05
name them Tyrone Thribs.
29:08
Jesus. That's that's
29:10
a boondox. That's
29:13
a boondox episode making
29:15
fun of Tyler Perry.
29:17
Oh my, anyway. This,
29:19
you know, he's an upcoming
29:22
black boxer who wants
29:24
to make it and wants
29:26
to get, you know,
29:28
an audience with the
29:31
protagonist but for
29:33
whatever reason can't
29:35
or then by the end
29:38
of it she's part of
29:40
it but she can't like
29:42
yeah yeah this movie had
29:44
a lot of things just
29:47
had me questioning
29:49
what I was watching yeah
29:52
absolutely yeah let's move
29:54
on Thank you to the
29:57
team at Warner Brothers opportunity.
29:59
to go to the screening
30:02
in I'm Max, friends and
30:04
lovers. Mickey 17. Oh, you've
30:06
picked up, hey? Feeling those
30:08
creepers all up in your
30:11
body. Mickey 17 delivers its
30:13
political message with an overzealousness
30:15
of a sledgehammer cracking and
30:17
not. Strong performances shine, but
30:20
trimming the theatrics would have
30:22
made it more impactful. Wow,
30:24
that sounds like you could
30:27
be rotten. I'm actually not
30:29
sure. I guess we can
30:31
wait for the pool quote
30:33
to go up on rotten
30:36
tomatoes friends and lovers. Whether
30:38
inspired by the book or
30:40
current politics, Mickey 17 sadly
30:42
proves we are past the
30:45
point of cartoonish caricatures. The
30:47
tone was diluted. and commentary
30:49
too heavy-handed to be as
30:51
distant as the sci-fi genre
30:54
can offer. Yeah, getting your
30:56
doom salts from it. But
30:58
too bad, we're in Sanara
31:01
Desert already, fan. It's not,
31:03
it's not... It's so special.
31:05
Yeah, well, I guess, you
31:07
know, general thought, but you
31:10
enjoyed the film. I enjoyed
31:12
the film. I enjoyed the
31:14
film. I enjoyed the film.
31:16
I enjoyed the film. I
31:19
enjoyed the film. I enjoyed
31:21
the film. I enjoyed the
31:23
film. I enjoyed the film.
31:25
I just felt the film.
31:28
I just felt... They went
31:30
to overhanded on it. Yeah,
31:32
he didn't need What was
31:35
his character's name? Mark Ruffalo
31:37
Marshall just being this character
31:39
sort of thing that was
31:41
I guess tying to try
31:44
to Trump The mannerisms the
31:46
way he spoke the mouth
31:48
thing the overbite like It
31:50
just felt unnecessary and distracting
31:53
from what the movies sort
31:55
of message was and I
31:57
felt like it could have
31:59
been done in a much
32:02
more grounded way and deliver
32:04
a more impactful
32:06
sort of product at the
32:08
end of it. Uh-huh. Because
32:11
we have your Edward guy.
32:13
Eddie Gallegi? Robert
32:15
Patinson. We have Robert
32:17
Paterson, who I think did
32:20
quite well with the role.
32:22
Talking didn't, I got used
32:24
to his weird accent. Pretty
32:27
quickly. It took me a second time
32:29
watching to get used to that. No,
32:31
I got used to it pretty quickly.
32:34
It didn't distract me. It didn't take
32:36
me out from it. It was just very
32:38
stuck because it just felt very
32:40
stuck coming from him. But I thought
32:43
he did quite well. Yeah. I thought he
32:45
did quite well on this. He's always going
32:47
to do well though. He is. But wow.
32:49
I think at the end of it,
32:51
take out everything that the
32:53
movie is. You didn't say
32:55
that about The Big Rames
32:58
movie. Because the Johnny is
33:00
fully focused on Mickey and
33:02
I think with the destruction
33:04
of Marshall here and there,
33:06
you know, whatever. You can
33:08
sweep that under the rag
33:10
a bit. It's more getting
33:12
into where how Marshall grows and
33:15
how he needed, you know, if
33:17
it's Mickey, or how Mickey
33:19
grows and whether it's Mickey
33:22
18 and all. Brother
33:24
are you doing this
33:26
review by yourself? Let's
33:29
have a repartee
33:31
if you're nesting
33:33
repartee the entire on
33:36
trips Give me a
33:38
rope ado I want to
33:40
go to the Trump comparisons
33:44
because when I shared
33:46
I didn't even like it
33:48
was a social reaction quote
33:50
where I talked about it
33:52
a little bit. I remember
33:55
I showed you this quote
33:57
that I was still going
33:59
to do. for the pool quote, but
34:01
we decided it was a bit too
34:03
much for a social media reaction when
34:06
it first, you know, when the film
34:08
first comes out, not many people get
34:10
to see it. I kind of like
34:13
rejigged it a bit, but I'm
34:15
gonna say personally, it was very
34:17
annoying. I had a handful of
34:19
people being like, well, actually, this
34:21
book wasn't even the bad Trump.
34:23
And it's like, shut the long enough.
34:25
Well, the movie is, bitch. Yeah. And
34:27
that's what annoy me, because even
34:30
if you want to say it
34:32
wasn't about Trump, it
34:34
had, I was going to
34:36
say the red insignia, like
34:38
it had, like his hats,
34:40
but it also had the
34:42
caricature and you know, this
34:44
isn't a full review friends
34:46
and lovers, this isn't even
34:49
spoiling, but you're still going
34:51
to get the FIR, O.T.
34:53
Randy balls of it all, okay? That
34:55
man. has been elected twice.
34:57
He's probably got his favorite
34:59
rooms in that white house.
35:02
We're past the point of caricatures,
35:04
friends and lovers. He's
35:06
already there. If it
35:08
makes you feel better,
35:10
sometimes us and Elleyshire,
35:12
they'll find very funny,
35:14
even John Oliver, our
35:16
favorite Brit. Aside from Ben,
35:18
we love you Ben. They'll
35:20
find funny satirical ways to
35:22
explain it, but the train
35:25
is still heading toward hell.
35:27
You know what I'm saying? And
35:29
it's like, whether you want to
35:31
say that this is about Trump
35:33
or not, it was very heavy-handed,
35:36
like you said with a sledgehammer,
35:38
like I said pretty much in
35:40
every word of what I said, like,
35:43
it's there. And it's so present.
35:45
And it didn't even need to be
35:47
there. Apparently in the book, Tony Collette,
35:49
the wife's character, wasn't even there. And
35:52
I think that would have helped to...
35:54
Well, I think she grounded him, though.
35:56
But that's what I'm saying. I'm saying it
35:58
softened the blow of the... of a
36:00
man like Marshall. And that
36:02
was my overall quam quarrel
36:04
quandary with Mickey 17. And
36:07
Bonjoon her, I love you.
36:09
I still have my table
36:11
outside of the official hive
36:13
because they won't let me
36:15
in. They definitely won't let
36:17
me in now. But I
36:20
love you, love you, love
36:22
you. The host was a
36:24
gorgeous way to meld sci-fi
36:26
as well as commentary. It
36:28
was a commentary about the
36:30
US military and its occupation
36:32
and its involvement in geopolitics
36:35
in Korea, right? That was
36:37
done so beautifully. You had
36:39
independent sci-fi elements and you
36:41
had sci-fi elements that spoke
36:43
to and was woven inside
36:45
of that same commentary. Okcha
36:48
was very jarring. The non-Korean
36:50
characters, pretty much the English-speaking
36:52
characters. I'm looking at you
36:54
guillen hall. Well, very caricatur,
36:56
were very one-sided, very one-dimensional,
36:58
and, you know, I still
37:00
have no interest in watching
37:03
civil war, but there's something
37:05
about, I think US politics
37:07
in general, unfortunately, does affect
37:09
a lot of other governments,
37:11
including Western countries. So it's
37:13
hard to not be... aware
37:16
of what's going on, it's
37:18
hard not to be affected
37:20
by it, but also at
37:22
the same time, you aren't
37:24
on the ground in US
37:26
politics. So to make commentary
37:28
on that, it kind of
37:31
shows, like, the proof is
37:33
in the pudding essentially. So
37:35
I didn't care for that.
37:37
I would also say that
37:39
it didn't need to be
37:41
that extreme. of essentially friends
37:44
and lovers and if you've
37:46
watched a trailer, Mickey signs
37:48
up to be what's called
37:50
an expendable. So his life
37:52
does not matter and for
37:54
his actual job, he will
37:56
lose his life many times.
37:59
And to me, there's no...
38:01
No need for that to
38:03
be so extreme because unfortunately
38:05
at the hands of capitalism,
38:07
people are dying all the time.
38:09
So why are we, why are we
38:12
frolicking with big teeth ruffalo,
38:14
trying to find some giggle
38:16
goggles about human printing
38:19
and the ethics of it? You
38:21
see what I'm saying? No I hear,
38:23
yeah. I agree with you for most
38:26
part. It's, it's... In as much as
38:28
I did enjoy aspects, I did enjoy
38:30
a lot of things in the movie.
38:32
I think the only sort of
38:34
thing that took me out, like
38:36
I've said, was the theatrics around
38:38
it. You cannot say it's not
38:40
about Trump when it's very clear,
38:42
even if it's not, you made
38:44
sure that it painted that way.
38:46
Yeah. And you can't divorce the
38:49
movie from it. It's like watching
38:51
the heart and then Lindelov coming
38:53
out and saying, oh no, this
38:55
was not about it. Just
38:57
and there was nothing wrong with it
38:59
wrong. There's nothing wrong. Yeah, there's
39:02
nothing wrong But trying to gas
39:04
like people into thinking that oh no,
39:06
it's not when it is Because we
39:08
can make all the action and you're
39:10
very clear what you know one plus one
39:12
is two quick mouths Yeah, absolutely
39:14
agree But yeah, like outside of that
39:17
other bullshit. It worked. I
39:19
loved Mickey's sort of relationship
39:21
with I know you don't think it
39:23
was love. I still feels love and
39:25
I enjoyed every aspect of it I
39:27
guess what I will say is
39:30
maybe we just have
39:32
a very different definition
39:35
of love and I
39:37
hate that I'm being
39:39
so considerate about such
39:42
a slack slapstick
39:44
Jim Kerry level
39:46
movie. But we are, we're,
39:49
well, it was, it was
39:51
pandering and it was
39:53
being dumb, baby. Really?
39:58
And you did... I didn't
40:01
enjoy Shrek. Exactly. I don't
40:03
Shrek just didn't appreciate it.
40:05
Just know who the martial
40:08
is in this podcast, 13.
40:10
Wow. Yeah, I said it.
40:13
Hey, Tyrone strips of the
40:15
knockout. We're all deserving of
40:18
love, friends and lovers, even
40:20
if we don't love ourselves.
40:23
Mickey was so pathetic. And
40:25
I don't mean that in
40:28
the mean way, he was
40:30
just very pathetic. He was
40:33
very down on himself. You
40:35
enjoyed that macaron joke as
40:38
well. But it just felt
40:40
like he was just happy
40:42
to get any attention. Nasha...
40:45
I don't know, there were
40:47
some moments later in the
40:50
film that I was like,
40:52
and you even were like,
40:55
oh she loves this man.
40:57
Like, you know what I
41:00
mean, but it felt very
41:02
possessive, it felt very controlling.
41:05
Possessive and controlling. Brother. Just
41:07
because I don't want to
41:10
share Mickey A.T. Who's another
41:12
girl? Fair. No. Both Mickey's
41:15
and Mickey's. Well, let's get
41:17
to that. Let's have some
41:19
fun routine. Miki's 17, Miki
41:22
18, which isn't too much
41:24
of a spoiler if you've
41:27
watched any trailer, or any
41:29
interview, that's how I got
41:32
spoiled that there were two
41:34
Miki's. Well, can I have
41:37
two Otis? Like, let's talk
41:39
about the moral quandre. It's
41:42
our favorite genre, friends of
41:44
lovers, go and check out
41:47
our cube episode. Thoughts. Mickey-17,
41:49
Mickey 18, uploading the same
41:52
memories to separate bodies. Are
41:54
they the same person? They're
41:56
the same person. I think
41:59
so. What is just a
42:01
vessel? Everything else is
42:04
what makes a person. Wow.
42:06
Yeah. Come with a flip's
42:08
energy fact. It is the
42:10
same person. It's, and that's
42:13
why I was with Nasha
42:15
saying like, no, I'm not
42:18
gonna split Mickey 1719 for
42:20
what? Still, Nike. Yeah.
42:22
It's just different
42:24
personalities, but it's
42:27
still the same person.
42:29
Yeah, but wouldn't. Okay,
42:31
Batman Boy. I convinced
42:34
the co-worker, apparently
42:37
there are two books, O.T.
42:39
I convinced the co-worker to
42:42
read the book because she
42:44
also loves sci-fi, and I
42:47
just needed to know things
42:49
in the film or that
42:52
weren't in the film. And
42:54
apparently... When I
42:56
was speaking to her she
42:58
was saying that she was
43:00
really feeling conflicted about the
43:02
two mikies Oh, and Nasha
43:04
trying to Nash on that
43:06
knob, right? Those knobs. It
43:09
was a double-sided door with
43:11
double knobs What conflicted
43:13
in what way? Because to her
43:16
there were two different people.
43:18
Oh, apparently in the book.
43:20
There's a captain that gives like an
43:22
example of if you have a ship
43:24
and you constantly change the parts. So
43:27
all of the parts out of there
43:29
weren't a part of the original ship,
43:31
is that still the same ship? So
43:33
I guess they wanted to make it
43:36
more sexy in this film and they
43:38
talked about that Mickey 17, Mickey 18,
43:40
but they also used the serial killer
43:42
example, which might also be in the
43:44
book as well. But she seemed so
43:46
like, she's like, oh, I guess Nasho
43:48
is free-spirited and I'm like... You're not
43:50
going to the sex shame, I'm not
43:52
sure, excuse me very much, but I
43:54
can't say that on the team's chat.
43:56
But I just thought it was interesting
43:58
that she had such a... Like it
44:01
she went through
44:03
such a tizzy
44:05
because to her
44:07
that's so sexually
44:09
promiscuous and me
44:11
me I was
44:13
like I I
44:15
have no dramas
44:17
there I'm all
44:19
worried about the
44:21
implications of colonialism
44:24
I felt like... I
44:26
hope you don't think
44:28
I'm adorable because it
44:30
was some ugly motherfuggers.
44:33
You didn't feel like
44:35
riding your hand through
44:37
those little legs? We
44:39
know what sort of
44:41
anime you watch your
44:43
tea. There's the FYR
44:45
anime watching and then
44:48
there's the er tea
44:50
in the dark corner.
44:52
Love Tony Collette. Yeah.
44:54
But I feel like
44:56
there needs to be
44:58
a distinction made friends
45:00
and others. Great performance
45:03
does not a great
45:05
film make. Yeah, I
45:07
think the performances were
45:09
very strong, but I
45:11
think they're smooth in
45:13
as much as I
45:15
enjoy it. I wouldn't
45:18
categorize it. I wouldn't
45:20
categorise it as great.
45:22
I wouldn't categorise it
45:24
as. But it doesn't
45:26
have to be great.
45:28
It doesn't have to
45:30
be great. Things can
45:33
just be good. Wouldn't
45:35
it be okay? Oh,
45:37
lopsided. Yeah. We don't
45:39
teach them as well.
45:41
Why are you looking
45:43
at me? From a
45:45
distance they look quite
45:47
evenly shaped. Okay? Wow!
45:50
But yeah, there we
45:52
have it, Oti. Is
45:54
there anything else you
45:56
want to add? No,
45:58
it's, it's, I think.
46:00
One of the fast-reft
46:02
marks we've done with
46:05
that haven't contained
46:07
a lot of
46:09
enjoyable stuff we've
46:11
watched throughout. Damn, dark.
46:14
No, it's speaking truth
46:16
to power. Who's the
46:18
power? We're independent.
46:20
Because if you're
46:23
finding the man, you're
46:25
the man! Purchase, you're
46:27
the long life battle
46:29
with yourself, bird. You're
46:32
right though, you're right.
46:34
There was definitely a lot
46:37
more that we could
46:39
cover as well, so
46:41
you know, subscribe friends
46:43
and lovers to get
46:45
more joy for Ote. Thank
46:48
you so much friends and
46:50
lovers for joining us another
46:52
week in the four-year-old friends
46:54
podcast Do you have any
46:56
watching companions for anything we've
46:58
covered just because you know
47:01
you said it was a
47:03
bit of not as positive
47:05
all the time? Are there any watching
47:07
companions you would have
47:09
for these films? The host the
47:11
host will be good million dollar
47:14
baby. You got anything else?
47:16
On Twitter, until the wheels
47:18
fall off and they're all
47:20
falling off and they're burning on
47:23
their cyber truck already, we're
47:25
on Blue Sky, we're on
47:27
Instagram and Threads, they've lifted
47:29
the block of me commenting
47:32
and posting so I'm on
47:34
Instagram and Threads, I'm
47:36
on Instagram and Threads
47:38
against Friends and Lovers, we're out
47:41
of your phone. We're also on
47:43
the magical society of OT
47:45
podcast. If you like
47:48
to be berating
47:50
a review, I
47:52
will see you
47:54
guys on the
47:56
next one. Tyrone
47:58
creeps out! You
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More