One of Them Days, The Last Journey, Uppercut & Mickey 17

One of Them Days, The Last Journey, Uppercut & Mickey 17

Released Monday, 17th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
One of Them Days, The Last Journey, Uppercut & Mickey 17

One of Them Days, The Last Journey, Uppercut & Mickey 17

One of Them Days, The Last Journey, Uppercut & Mickey 17

One of Them Days, The Last Journey, Uppercut & Mickey 17

Monday, 17th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

It's another week in the

0:02

four-year reference household, and it

0:04

is another reference Max Friends

0:07

and Lovers. This is where

0:09

we have a combined reviews

0:12

on screeners and screenings that

0:14

we have received. Before we

0:16

get to that, O.T. I saw you

0:18

coming out of the boot of the

0:21

G&X. Friends and Love is go and

0:23

check out the collab that is in

0:25

the most recent of the podcast feed.

0:27

Quick thoughts, because we didn't get the

0:30

oat daddy stamp of approval. What did

0:32

you think about G&X? I loved

0:34

it. I loved every little bit of it.

0:36

I think it's my most listened to

0:39

album to date. Wow. And it's, what, what,

0:41

what, what, what, what, what, what, did, they

0:43

call in December? November, I

0:45

think. Yeah, this is a lot.

0:47

Yeah, you know what? I'm

0:50

feeling good, O.T. Give us

0:52

one more in the Black

0:54

Clansman review. I was actually

0:56

going to ask you to

0:58

give us your best white

1:00

voice and I didn't get

1:02

to. So we're loving on

1:04

all each other, friends and

1:06

lovers, this is a gift.

1:09

Can you give us your best

1:11

O.T. Stolesworth voice?

1:14

No, I think not

1:16

even Adam Driver

1:18

can help you.

1:20

Let's get on.

1:23

That's a bit

1:25

of Vigro Mortinson.

1:27

It's got some

1:29

green book connotations.

1:32

Let's get on at

1:34

the show. friends

1:41

and giggle-gag-all around the

1:43

world lovers. Welcome back

1:45

to the four-year reference

1:47

podcast. You got your host, Katie.

1:50

And Ote. Today we have a

1:52

full schedule. We have quite a

1:54

lot of reviews because we had

1:56

our Spike Lee reference station Friends

1:59

and Lovers. and check out our

2:01

Spike Lee run. It was gorgeous,

2:03

it was beautiful, but it does

2:06

stop our scheduling. So we do

2:08

have some reviews that we're going

2:10

to get to today, Friends and

2:13

Lovers, One of them Days, The

2:15

Last Journey, Upper Cup, Mickey 17.

2:17

We have some more indie titles

2:20

on the way as well, and

2:22

I hope we have time for the

2:24

Pit. Okay, we got 10 of

2:26

them bitches. What a what a

2:28

sad reflective New Year's we had

2:31

O.T. And we've been deliciously

2:33

enjoying every drip feed if

2:35

you'll pardon the pun of

2:37

every episode that we're getting.

2:39

We're almost up to episode

2:41

15 of the pit. Also, friends and

2:44

lovers to tantalize you with some

2:46

more spices as well. Can we

2:48

do a four review episode

2:50

on Delhi boys, please? Of

2:53

course. Tan France! All right,

2:55

friends and lovers, thank

2:57

you so much for joining. If

2:59

you didn't know if you

3:01

weren't a hoea, Oti and

3:03

I do have a little

3:05

box account and from time

3:07

to time we will share

3:09

our views on things that

3:11

we are watching. But let's

3:13

get straight into it. Thank

3:15

you so much to Jess

3:17

and the global team at

3:19

Sony. You would have seen

3:21

it in the podcast feed.

3:23

We had the opportunity to

3:25

interview the Kiki Palmer. So

3:27

thank you all around. We finally

3:30

get some time to talk about

3:32

it. I feel so sad that

3:35

we don't have time for a

3:37

full review, but this can be

3:39

as chunky as a honey bun,

3:42

if you like, Otee. Non-spoilers, give

3:44

us your thoughts, Otee. One

3:46

of them days blends depth

3:48

with sharp humor and

3:51

undeniable charm. Hickey and Caesar

3:53

shine bringing wit and warm to

3:56

a film that's both entertaining and

3:58

meaningful. Yes,

4:02

okay, both

4:04

in front of and

4:06

behind the lens, one

4:09

of them days delivers

4:11

a laugh out loud

4:13

comedy and builds a

4:15

layered world

4:17

of friendship squabbles,

4:19

community coming

4:21

together and delicious

4:24

romance a

4:26

modern comedy classic.

4:29

Wow. I

4:32

don't know how we fit that laughing in the

4:37

there's so much to talk about

4:39

in this film and you know, where

4:41

do we even start? I think the easiest

4:45

the most difficult thing for

4:47

me personally you know friends

4:49

and lovers we've been doing

4:51

this podcast since 2019 and I

4:53

find it very easy to

4:55

critique and review dramas serious heavy

4:58

shit but when it comes

5:00

to comedy for me I'm like

5:02

it was so good but

5:04

there is an art like there's

5:06

absolutely an art to making

5:08

a great comedy and I would

5:10

love to hear from you

5:13

where you think it worked I

5:15

don't know if you felt

5:17

like in some points it didn't

5:19

work but does it

5:21

does it stack up with the

5:23

comedies of your childhood and your

5:25

upbringing? It does it

5:27

does stack up I think

5:30

first of all I think that it needs

5:32

to as well it doesn't but one of

5:34

the things that I think

5:36

made this stand

5:38

out was the chemistry

5:40

between Cesar and Kiki yes

5:42

it just worked yes

5:44

also seeing Cesar act was

5:46

quite wonderful right um

5:48

she nailed her moments the comedic

5:50

timing was there like you didn't

5:53

feel a miss and I think

5:55

most of the time when you

5:57

watch movies like this um the

5:59

sort of says a character portrayal,

6:01

doesn't really get to do

6:03

much, whilst in there's this

6:05

sort of go against that

6:07

vein where we see, you

6:10

know what? She actually did

6:12

quite a lot. It's just

6:14

all falling on Kiki's back

6:16

to carry the movie through.

6:18

Yeah, like without spoilers, Sizza's

6:20

character really was the driving

6:22

force for a lot of,

6:24

not even the plot, just

6:26

for the growth and for

6:29

the story. as well. You

6:31

know, you can talk about

6:33

Oti's favorite friends with Phoebe,

6:35

but I think of Sinclair

6:37

from Living Single as well.

6:39

If we talk about our

6:41

woo-woo-w girls in media, whether

6:43

it's television and film, and

6:45

Cesar does it so well,

6:48

like there's a, we don't

6:50

want to spoil too much,

6:52

but there's a moment at

6:54

the start of the film.

6:56

where she jokes about getting

6:58

extra exercise by tripping over

7:00

her boyfriend's Jordans. And it

7:02

just, it just works so

7:04

well. It does. I think

7:07

also at the same time,

7:09

because the story is very

7:11

specific to experiences and it's

7:13

very culturally tapped in, you

7:15

don't really, like, you don't

7:17

need to be some sort

7:19

of thespian to be able

7:21

to tap into what's real.

7:23

Just the dynamic and how

7:26

they carry themselves throughout. I

7:28

think we get to see

7:30

cut Williams in there as

7:32

well. The things that he

7:34

said, was he a furious

7:36

to you? He sort of,

7:38

but not as serious as

7:40

a, you know, furious was

7:42

too much, not too much,

7:45

just he came with everything

7:47

and he felt very Malcolm

7:49

X. With him, it's a

7:51

bit more chilled and it's

7:53

not only reminded me of

7:55

that message from Don't Be

7:57

a Man, as you know.

7:59

where we get to have

8:02

those reflective moments

8:04

as well. But yeah, you

8:06

know, from, was it she

8:08

a butter or cocoa butter?

8:10

Yeah, she butter butter. Oh,

8:13

it was good, good fun.

8:15

You know, if you don't

8:17

have the money this month,

8:19

what makes you think you

8:22

got the money next month?

8:24

Yeah, like they cover a lot

8:26

from. payday loans to, you know,

8:29

it's a systemic sort of way

8:31

of which, you know, keeps you

8:33

down, keeps the community tied up,

8:36

but, you know. It's one thing

8:38

to, I guess, cover

8:40

like gentrification, shout out

8:42

to Sarita Singleton, screenwriter,

8:45

but also showrunner for

8:47

rap shit. Lawrence

8:49

Lamont directing also, I know I can

8:51

feel the pain, I can feel the

8:53

pain in your heart. I miss out.

8:55

Shout out, shout out, to Issa

8:57

and the Hooray team because there's

8:59

a documentary called Scene and Heard

9:02

that just premiered at South By

9:04

Southwest and it's about black creatives

9:06

and show running and I guess

9:08

the building of audiences. just to

9:10

disregard the audiences that made them.

9:12

So it's going to be very

9:14

interesting and it's so nice to

9:16

be able to, I guess, speak

9:19

on it, but I guess to

9:21

go back to the point of

9:23

gentrification. Like, it's

9:25

one thing to be able to cover

9:27

that in a film, whether it's dramatic

9:29

or any other sort of genre,

9:32

but there is an art to

9:34

be able to cover gentrification, but

9:36

also do it. in a way that

9:38

taps into the humor, which is the

9:41

joy that you find through community, right?

9:43

And, you know, we literally just did

9:45

our Spike Lee run, like, do the

9:47

right thing where you had the unks.

9:50

I don't know if Royal Junior would

9:52

associate himself with these unks. But, you

9:54

know, that we're talking about

9:56

businesses who owns businesses who

9:59

gets opportunity. And you see this

10:01

through especially a lot of black

10:03

media and being able to traverse

10:05

those, you know, even in the

10:07

quote that you were talking about

10:09

as well, that sharp wit and

10:12

humor. Yeah, it does quite a

10:14

lot, you know, from, you know,

10:16

I think one of the better

10:19

also portrayals of gentrification in movies

10:21

was Kandi Man and... Yeah. the

10:23

way it was done, the O.G.

10:25

Candyman. I know. But the

10:27

white professor. Yeah. Yeah, being

10:29

for Snickety and explaining

10:32

it all. But I think

10:34

that's like a really great

10:36

allegory in the way to

10:38

do that. Thoughts on love

10:41

interests. You said that Te

10:43

Diggs was your... It stopped

10:45

after Te Diggs. So maybe

10:47

they're not 90s fine, but how

10:49

did you feel about that? Was

10:52

there a little something for everyone,

10:54

a little something? I guess, I don't

10:56

know. You're the one that wanted

10:58

the 90s, sort of blokes in

11:01

there. And to me, if it

11:03

wasn't eight digs, I don't know.

11:05

I'm just a personal intimacy coordinator

11:08

routine. What can I say? The

11:10

love interest was a bit cartoonish,

11:12

especially when it came to... Maniac.

11:15

Caesar? Oh yeah. Yeah, I

11:17

was like, yeah, we're like, come

11:19

on now. Yeah, come on now.

11:21

Well I think, and that's

11:23

also because the strength

11:26

of the film is

11:28

kicky and sizzer. So yeah,

11:30

if the background

11:32

kind of had met them

11:35

at that level, but also

11:37

it doesn't make or

11:39

break the film. It

11:42

doesn't. But he was in

11:44

more scenes than I thought he

11:46

was. Yeah. Yeah, no, I absolutely

11:48

agree. I loved it and

11:50

I can't wait to watch

11:52

it again. All right

11:54

friends and lovers, let's

11:57

move into the last

11:59

journey. Thank you to

12:01

the team at Universal. We

12:03

also have an interview with

12:06

Philippe and Frederick, Friends and

12:08

Lovers, where I definitely made

12:10

sure to have some time

12:12

to talk about Harry Belafonte.

12:15

Shake, shake. Yeah, I did. And I

12:17

thought they were going to join in, but

12:19

they didn't. Oh, how we're watching this?

12:21

Um, I mean, you, not

12:23

I'm either. Common Side effects.

12:25

Common side effects. Yes. It's

12:28

I think on HBO and

12:30

Bloody Hell. It's

12:32

amazing. Oh, you want me

12:34

to go? What a segue, yes.

12:36

The last Johnny reveals

12:39

the dissonance between

12:41

memory and reality

12:44

as apparent ages.

12:46

Its emotional core is

12:48

strong, though at times

12:51

the Johnny feels more

12:54

frustrating than moving.

12:57

I want to get my hoo

12:59

in your book, quote. Oh, see,

13:01

you're the silent assassin, but...

13:03

It's just not even that.

13:05

Tap, tap, tap. Am I

13:07

wrong, though? No, give me yours.

13:10

And what's up, though?

13:12

Okay. Accepting or struggling

13:14

to accept the helplessness

13:16

of witnessing parents

13:18

get older proves

13:20

to be difficult

13:22

to separate from

13:24

the intended... elevated

13:27

reality. Okay. Moments are

13:29

understandable but

13:31

also difficult

13:33

to watch. Pretty much the

13:35

same thing we said. Absolutely.

13:38

And this is the thing, right?

13:41

It's hard to see. Oh,

13:43

and this is like the

13:45

perfect sort of thing that

13:47

all the overarching theme that

13:49

we're talking when it came

13:52

to Wolfman. seeing your

13:54

loved one change from the person

13:56

you used to know to someone

13:58

who is unrecognized. And that

14:01

helplessness. And that

14:03

helplessness. So overlaying it

14:06

with this, you get

14:08

to see, you remember your

14:10

pops one way. And the

14:12

memories and everything that

14:15

you think that he was or

14:17

is, is no longer there

14:20

or it's sort of diminished.

14:22

And you want to rekindle

14:24

and relieve and be

14:26

part of, you know, one

14:28

last hurrah. Yeah, it

14:30

does sound romantic.

14:33

Because it's not delusional.

14:35

I think Philip is

14:37

quite clear. But there's,

14:40

there's, to me, there's

14:42

the dissonance, right, between

14:45

what was and what

14:47

is, and accepting what is,

14:49

and navigating what is now

14:51

in a way that feels

14:54

healthy. Yes. And, and

14:56

for both people involved.

14:59

Yeah. And it's so hard to it

15:01

was so hard watching this

15:03

because the moments where I

15:05

felt very sad Because you

15:07

know it's talking to things that

15:10

most of us will go

15:12

through if not everyone It's

15:14

that aspect of those like neatly

15:16

feeling of mmm. Come on now

15:18

like yeah is this for the

15:20

benefit of your dad or you

15:22

is this for the benefit

15:24

of your dad or you is this

15:26

for the benefit of TV?

15:29

Oh, your relationship. That's

15:32

interesting. Okay, okay. Well,

15:34

let's pick up on that.

15:36

And honestly, your quote summarized

15:39

everything. But I actually

15:41

would disagree with you on

15:43

that. I don't think... I

15:45

summarized everything but wrongly... No,

15:48

no, no, no. It's just,

15:50

because you were saying, is he

15:52

doing that for himself or

15:54

is he doing it for the

15:57

cameras? Okay. I think

16:00

We just are seeing him document

16:02

him being able to a certain

16:04

extent be unable to accept That

16:07

is that's getting older. That's

16:09

what I disagree with but in

16:11

terms of me saying like I don't

16:13

think he's going out of his way

16:15

to make a show and dance because

16:17

of the cameras I don't mean in

16:19

terms of it being like a jaka

16:21

sort of portrayal more in terms

16:24

of what's scripted if there's

16:26

any scripted moments or is

16:28

it fully just unscripted

16:31

and fully just leaning into

16:33

what's being captured. Okay, well

16:35

friends and lovers, because sometimes you

16:37

are nasty, well do be fair,

16:39

we did say non-spoilers, but for

16:42

those that don't want to know

16:44

anything, you might be a little

16:46

bit nasty and you want to

16:48

hear mummy and daddy talk about

16:50

this. Aging mummy and daddy, but

16:52

still sexy otherwise, right, Ote? Like

16:54

I guess to give a bit

16:57

of a context for this

16:59

film. Philip's dad, he lectured

17:01

and taught French and

17:04

he retired and

17:06

Philip documented that

17:09

and then there was

17:11

an idea to do

17:13

a documentary about his

17:16

dad's life and What

17:19

Oti is talking about is

17:21

essentially, and also, let's be

17:23

very clear, medical tests were

17:25

done on the dad and

17:27

there's nothing physically, he's

17:30

not diagnosed with anything, he's

17:32

just getting old. He seems

17:34

like he lived a pretty good

17:36

life, he's still living a good

17:39

life, right? But medically, there's nothing,

17:41

quote, in quote, wrong with

17:43

the father. And I think

17:45

that's where the first, if there

17:47

were going to be some barriers

17:50

in this film, I think that's

17:52

where for me personally, that was

17:54

my first sort of barrier in

17:56

this film. And you know, like I've

17:58

shared a bit on. social media.

18:00

I haven't really shared it

18:02

on this podcast, Friends and

18:04

Lovers, but because this is

18:06

a deeply personal film, intended,

18:08

you know, elevated reality, but

18:11

it kind of, you know,

18:13

it's hard to, it blurs

18:15

the lines of that. But as

18:17

much as it relates to this

18:19

review, Friends and Lovers, I have

18:21

a mom that has dementia, right?

18:23

She was diagnosed with 58.

18:26

It was early onset dementia

18:28

because if you're after 65

18:31

then I guess it's your

18:33

garden variety dementia. And as

18:36

much as this film

18:38

was frustrating, it

18:40

isn't unrealistic to me because

18:42

I also have people in

18:45

my life that are like Philip.

18:47

Yeah. That are unable to

18:49

accept the reality.

18:51

And That was my first barrier

18:54

because I am the sort

18:56

of person that I get

18:58

involved in the appointments in

19:00

the organizing and the planning

19:02

and that's part of how

19:04

I get through the shit

19:06

that I need to get

19:08

through. I intellectually understand that

19:10

that doesn't stop me unfortunately

19:12

it took me a while,

19:14

but you know I intellectually

19:17

understand that That shit

19:19

doesn't stop me. I still need

19:21

to feel the shit that I

19:24

need to feel. And it's scary

19:26

at the end of the day, right?

19:28

But this film was a

19:31

continuous, I wouldn't necessarily

19:33

call it a denial,

19:35

but like you said, it

19:37

was a prioritizing. I need

19:39

to be able to execute

19:41

this recreation of my

19:44

dad's life because what else is

19:46

there? Yeah. The memories I

19:48

guess aren't enough. The time

19:50

that you can spend isn't,

19:53

there isn't enough beauty

19:55

in that. There's so

19:57

much logistics and core.

19:59

that go into this, and even

20:02

if it gets achieved, how then

20:04

does that, like there are so many

20:06

ways that you can bond with

20:08

your dad. There are so many

20:11

ways that you can bond with

20:13

your parent. And you know, like

20:15

you said, like I said, it

20:17

was very frustrating watching this film,

20:20

but it was more, let's just

20:22

like, like, if we just accept

20:24

it, there's so much beauty

20:26

that we can have. And that's

20:29

right, and that's where we

20:31

come, you know, at least

20:33

at the end of this movie,

20:35

you have your frustrations

20:38

aside, but you felt

20:41

a lot because in

20:43

your life you've experienced

20:45

one of these things,

20:47

and it taps into

20:49

something, it does, because then

20:52

you ask yourself. a

20:54

lot of questions, introspective

20:56

questions, you reevaluate the

20:58

relationships that you do

21:00

have, what you feel

21:02

that needs to be

21:04

done, and I think

21:06

that's one of the key take-aways

21:09

at least for this, for me,

21:12

is what is there anything that

21:14

I need to do, that I

21:16

need to make sure that is

21:18

taken off to ensure that

21:20

my relationship with my...

21:23

parents with whoever else is

21:25

there that is, you know, being

21:27

fully realized in its

21:29

entirety without me feeling there

21:32

will be any regret if anything

21:34

ought to happen. Yeah. And I

21:36

guess, if anything, it does that.

21:38

And, you know, how many movies

21:41

how many movies out there can

21:43

make that can make you say

21:45

that. So in as much as

21:47

those frustration, at

21:49

least there's something you walk

21:51

away with. Suppose. Yeah.

21:53

We really chose very

21:55

specifically for our ordering

21:58

or a T. Thank

22:00

you so much to Jazelle

22:02

and the team at

22:05

Katrina 1PR. We are

22:07

covering Upka. Shall I

22:09

submit frames before we

22:12

get into it. Wow. Yeah,

22:14

that's ordering that.

22:17

Upaker feels disjointed

22:19

with a protagonist

22:22

whose cuts around

22:24

deeper themes without

22:26

truly engaging. A

22:28

strong performance from

22:31

Ving for what it's worth.

22:33

I love that you had to give

22:35

a nod to Ving Rames.

22:37

Just to make it clear,

22:39

we haven't got no problems.

22:42

I don't want someone showing up

22:44

in my... Give me some baby

22:46

boy squats. I don't need it.

22:49

There were African squats,

22:51

Oatee. You call them

22:53

baby boy Africans. Uppercutt's

22:56

nerve center operates from

22:59

a aggrieved entitled protagonist

23:01

that is barely held

23:03

to account and little

23:06

room for growth, let alone

23:08

pay off. Wow. You can't get

23:10

away from the million-dollar

23:13

baby comparisons. You

23:15

cannot. It is also a remake

23:17

of the German film. as

23:19

well. Oh, there's a German film.

23:22

Which also had mixed reactions.

23:24

I was looking at the...

23:26

So nothing was lost in translation.

23:29

This... I didn't understand

23:31

what they wanted to do with

23:33

this movie. I didn't get... I

23:35

kept on asking myself why a lot

23:37

of the times. Yeah. As to why

23:39

sudden decisions were being

23:42

made. Something references were

23:44

being made. Use of language

23:46

is very... important and

23:48

intentional so when words are

23:51

used and they're left to

23:53

linger without any sort of

23:55

resolution or without any sort

23:58

of callback you were left.

24:00

wondering what the fuck we're doing

24:02

here? May I may I tease on

24:04

that thread? No, because it goes

24:07

into the spoilary thing. I

24:09

think what the movie does is

24:11

give us a protagonist who

24:13

feels a bit so hard done

24:16

by hard done by, but then

24:18

we don't know why. Hard

24:20

done by to the point

24:22

where Ving who feels like

24:24

has gone through a tremendous

24:26

a lot of shit. and

24:28

the mere fact that he

24:30

is a black man operating

24:32

his studio his

24:34

boxing studio whatever

24:37

and feeling as if oh my

24:39

god this girl has gone through

24:41

it I need to help her

24:44

after 10 minutes of

24:46

meeting up with her I

24:48

think there's a trope

24:51

of magical society I

24:53

don't know, like... What was a

24:55

man's name, Darius as well? Like

24:58

everyone was just... Like everyone

25:00

was her problem, like everyone

25:02

was a problem to her. She

25:04

is flawed and I think the movie

25:07

is trying to portray the aspect

25:09

of it that she is flawed,

25:11

there's things going around her

25:13

outside of a control. We

25:15

get to have this Darius

25:17

thing lingering throughout without really

25:19

knowing the wrong reason behind

25:22

it. Even at the end where

25:24

there's this phone call that she

25:26

misses, I'm like, it feels it

25:28

needs to be more pivotal than

25:31

that than what it was. Can

25:33

I pick up on that? Because

25:35

you said, okay, so she's so

25:38

aggrieved, she's so downtrodden by the

25:40

world, and you said we didn't

25:42

know why. We did. It just

25:45

wasn't compelling enough.

25:47

If that was all, then, bro. That

25:49

was it. And, you know, essentially.

25:52

She's this white brunette woman speaking

25:54

to a black man talking about

25:56

how much she's been through in

25:58

her life and and it was because

26:00

of a pretty blonde girl. I

26:04

guess Lez. No!

26:07

Maybe, because I looked at the cast for

26:09

the German one and they were all white. So

26:12

maybe it would have helped thematically,

26:14

but it really comes off

26:16

like oh you don't know what

26:18

I've been through. It was

26:20

a blonde girl, that's so

26:23

pretty. Like really bitch? Get the

26:25

fuck out of my boxing

26:27

studio. It's the intersectionality darling. I'll

26:29

do anything. I'll do anything. I'm

26:31

going to, I'm ignoring you. I'll

26:33

do anything. And then he'll ask

26:35

her to do one small thing for

26:37

their training. I can't believe you would ask

26:39

me to do that. Get the fuck

26:41

out then. Ving

26:44

Reims character extends too much

26:46

for her. He was

26:48

acting. I hope he got

26:50

all of his pennies for this

26:52

film because the performance that Ving Reims

26:54

brought to this film was

26:57

not warranted based

26:59

on the performances of

27:01

the lead, as well as

27:03

the writing, as well

27:05

as everything. I'm

27:08

not the biggest fan of

27:10

time jumps, flash forward, flashbacks. I

27:12

feel like sometimes it can

27:14

be used as a crutch, but

27:16

it can still be used well

27:18

and relay a lot of

27:20

important information and tie in the

27:23

story. But all

27:25

my wards, this

27:27

was not needed here. And

27:29

you know what, like it's

27:32

one thing to, and friends

27:34

and lovers, you're going to see it

27:36

in Mickey 17 from me in particular.

27:38

Like it's one thing to, I

27:40

guess, be facetious and generalize

27:42

a film because of

27:44

how you feel about it.

27:46

But the very shallow way that

27:48

we're describing it is exactly how

27:51

this film is. And

27:54

that's what I don't get from a

27:56

writing perspective on what they wanted

27:58

to achieve with it. I understand

28:01

maybe the German version

28:03

would have been different,

28:05

but what are we working towards?

28:08

We didn't get anywhere. With

28:11

million dollar baby, you

28:13

understood what the goal was,

28:15

what we understood what the

28:18

goal for the protagonist was

28:20

throughout, we got to see

28:22

her challenges, we got

28:25

to see everything. Here we, we

28:27

are sort of a step removed.

28:30

We are unaware

28:32

of anything about

28:34

the protagonist. Yeah,

28:37

it's it feels like

28:39

everyone wants to be

28:42

part within her circle.

28:45

Yeah, but why? Yeah. We

28:47

get this Tyrone thrips.

28:50

I was wondering

28:52

when you were going to

28:54

get to your favorite

28:57

part. Oh, man.

28:59

level of writing

29:01

character names. Hey, we need

29:03

a black boxer. Let's

29:05

name them Tyrone Thribs.

29:08

Jesus. That's that's

29:10

a boondox. That's

29:13

a boondox episode making

29:15

fun of Tyler Perry.

29:17

Oh my, anyway. This,

29:19

you know, he's an upcoming

29:22

black boxer who wants

29:24

to make it and wants

29:26

to get, you know,

29:28

an audience with the

29:31

protagonist but for

29:33

whatever reason can't

29:35

or then by the end

29:38

of it she's part of

29:40

it but she can't like

29:42

yeah yeah this movie had

29:44

a lot of things just

29:47

had me questioning

29:49

what I was watching yeah

29:52

absolutely yeah let's move

29:54

on Thank you to the

29:57

team at Warner Brothers opportunity.

29:59

to go to the screening

30:02

in I'm Max, friends and

30:04

lovers. Mickey 17. Oh, you've

30:06

picked up, hey? Feeling those

30:08

creepers all up in your

30:11

body. Mickey 17 delivers its

30:13

political message with an overzealousness

30:15

of a sledgehammer cracking and

30:17

not. Strong performances shine, but

30:20

trimming the theatrics would have

30:22

made it more impactful. Wow,

30:24

that sounds like you could

30:27

be rotten. I'm actually not

30:29

sure. I guess we can

30:31

wait for the pool quote

30:33

to go up on rotten

30:36

tomatoes friends and lovers. Whether

30:38

inspired by the book or

30:40

current politics, Mickey 17 sadly

30:42

proves we are past the

30:45

point of cartoonish caricatures. The

30:47

tone was diluted. and commentary

30:49

too heavy-handed to be as

30:51

distant as the sci-fi genre

30:54

can offer. Yeah, getting your

30:56

doom salts from it. But

30:58

too bad, we're in Sanara

31:01

Desert already, fan. It's not,

31:03

it's not... It's so special.

31:05

Yeah, well, I guess, you

31:07

know, general thought, but you

31:10

enjoyed the film. I enjoyed

31:12

the film. I enjoyed the

31:14

film. I enjoyed the film.

31:16

I enjoyed the film. I

31:19

enjoyed the film. I enjoyed

31:21

the film. I enjoyed the

31:23

film. I enjoyed the film.

31:25

I just felt the film.

31:28

I just felt... They went

31:30

to overhanded on it. Yeah,

31:32

he didn't need What was

31:35

his character's name? Mark Ruffalo

31:37

Marshall just being this character

31:39

sort of thing that was

31:41

I guess tying to try

31:44

to Trump The mannerisms the

31:46

way he spoke the mouth

31:48

thing the overbite like It

31:50

just felt unnecessary and distracting

31:53

from what the movies sort

31:55

of message was and I

31:57

felt like it could have

31:59

been done in a much

32:02

more grounded way and deliver

32:04

a more impactful

32:06

sort of product at the

32:08

end of it. Uh-huh. Because

32:11

we have your Edward guy.

32:13

Eddie Gallegi? Robert

32:15

Patinson. We have Robert

32:17

Paterson, who I think did

32:20

quite well with the role.

32:22

Talking didn't, I got used

32:24

to his weird accent. Pretty

32:27

quickly. It took me a second time

32:29

watching to get used to that. No,

32:31

I got used to it pretty quickly.

32:34

It didn't distract me. It didn't take

32:36

me out from it. It was just very

32:38

stuck because it just felt very

32:40

stuck coming from him. But I thought

32:43

he did quite well. Yeah. I thought he

32:45

did quite well on this. He's always going

32:47

to do well though. He is. But wow.

32:49

I think at the end of it,

32:51

take out everything that the

32:53

movie is. You didn't say

32:55

that about The Big Rames

32:58

movie. Because the Johnny is

33:00

fully focused on Mickey and

33:02

I think with the destruction

33:04

of Marshall here and there,

33:06

you know, whatever. You can

33:08

sweep that under the rag

33:10

a bit. It's more getting

33:12

into where how Marshall grows and

33:15

how he needed, you know, if

33:17

it's Mickey, or how Mickey

33:19

grows and whether it's Mickey

33:22

18 and all. Brother

33:24

are you doing this

33:26

review by yourself? Let's

33:29

have a repartee

33:31

if you're nesting

33:33

repartee the entire on

33:36

trips Give me a

33:38

rope ado I want to

33:40

go to the Trump comparisons

33:44

because when I shared

33:46

I didn't even like it

33:48

was a social reaction quote

33:50

where I talked about it

33:52

a little bit. I remember

33:55

I showed you this quote

33:57

that I was still going

33:59

to do. for the pool quote, but

34:01

we decided it was a bit too

34:03

much for a social media reaction when

34:06

it first, you know, when the film

34:08

first comes out, not many people get

34:10

to see it. I kind of like

34:13

rejigged it a bit, but I'm

34:15

gonna say personally, it was very

34:17

annoying. I had a handful of

34:19

people being like, well, actually, this

34:21

book wasn't even the bad Trump.

34:23

And it's like, shut the long enough.

34:25

Well, the movie is, bitch. Yeah. And

34:27

that's what annoy me, because even

34:30

if you want to say it

34:32

wasn't about Trump, it

34:34

had, I was going to

34:36

say the red insignia, like

34:38

it had, like his hats,

34:40

but it also had the

34:42

caricature and you know, this

34:44

isn't a full review friends

34:46

and lovers, this isn't even

34:49

spoiling, but you're still going

34:51

to get the FIR, O.T.

34:53

Randy balls of it all, okay? That

34:55

man. has been elected twice.

34:57

He's probably got his favorite

34:59

rooms in that white house.

35:02

We're past the point of caricatures,

35:04

friends and lovers. He's

35:06

already there. If it

35:08

makes you feel better,

35:10

sometimes us and Elleyshire,

35:12

they'll find very funny,

35:14

even John Oliver, our

35:16

favorite Brit. Aside from Ben,

35:18

we love you Ben. They'll

35:20

find funny satirical ways to

35:22

explain it, but the train

35:25

is still heading toward hell.

35:27

You know what I'm saying? And

35:29

it's like, whether you want to

35:31

say that this is about Trump

35:33

or not, it was very heavy-handed,

35:36

like you said with a sledgehammer,

35:38

like I said pretty much in

35:40

every word of what I said, like,

35:43

it's there. And it's so present.

35:45

And it didn't even need to be

35:47

there. Apparently in the book, Tony Collette,

35:49

the wife's character, wasn't even there. And

35:52

I think that would have helped to...

35:54

Well, I think she grounded him, though.

35:56

But that's what I'm saying. I'm saying it

35:58

softened the blow of the... of a

36:00

man like Marshall. And that

36:02

was my overall quam quarrel

36:04

quandary with Mickey 17. And

36:07

Bonjoon her, I love you.

36:09

I still have my table

36:11

outside of the official hive

36:13

because they won't let me

36:15

in. They definitely won't let

36:17

me in now. But I

36:20

love you, love you, love

36:22

you. The host was a

36:24

gorgeous way to meld sci-fi

36:26

as well as commentary. It

36:28

was a commentary about the

36:30

US military and its occupation

36:32

and its involvement in geopolitics

36:35

in Korea, right? That was

36:37

done so beautifully. You had

36:39

independent sci-fi elements and you

36:41

had sci-fi elements that spoke

36:43

to and was woven inside

36:45

of that same commentary. Okcha

36:48

was very jarring. The non-Korean

36:50

characters, pretty much the English-speaking

36:52

characters. I'm looking at you

36:54

guillen hall. Well, very caricatur,

36:56

were very one-sided, very one-dimensional,

36:58

and, you know, I still

37:00

have no interest in watching

37:03

civil war, but there's something

37:05

about, I think US politics

37:07

in general, unfortunately, does affect

37:09

a lot of other governments,

37:11

including Western countries. So it's

37:13

hard to not be... aware

37:16

of what's going on, it's

37:18

hard not to be affected

37:20

by it, but also at

37:22

the same time, you aren't

37:24

on the ground in US

37:26

politics. So to make commentary

37:28

on that, it kind of

37:31

shows, like, the proof is

37:33

in the pudding essentially. So

37:35

I didn't care for that.

37:37

I would also say that

37:39

it didn't need to be

37:41

that extreme. of essentially friends

37:44

and lovers and if you've

37:46

watched a trailer, Mickey signs

37:48

up to be what's called

37:50

an expendable. So his life

37:52

does not matter and for

37:54

his actual job, he will

37:56

lose his life many times.

37:59

And to me, there's no...

38:01

No need for that to

38:03

be so extreme because unfortunately

38:05

at the hands of capitalism,

38:07

people are dying all the time.

38:09

So why are we, why are we

38:12

frolicking with big teeth ruffalo,

38:14

trying to find some giggle

38:16

goggles about human printing

38:19

and the ethics of it? You

38:21

see what I'm saying? No I hear,

38:23

yeah. I agree with you for most

38:26

part. It's, it's... In as much as

38:28

I did enjoy aspects, I did enjoy

38:30

a lot of things in the movie.

38:32

I think the only sort of

38:34

thing that took me out, like

38:36

I've said, was the theatrics around

38:38

it. You cannot say it's not

38:40

about Trump when it's very clear,

38:42

even if it's not, you made

38:44

sure that it painted that way.

38:46

Yeah. And you can't divorce the

38:49

movie from it. It's like watching

38:51

the heart and then Lindelov coming

38:53

out and saying, oh no, this

38:55

was not about it. Just

38:57

and there was nothing wrong with it

38:59

wrong. There's nothing wrong. Yeah, there's

39:02

nothing wrong But trying to gas

39:04

like people into thinking that oh no,

39:06

it's not when it is Because we

39:08

can make all the action and you're

39:10

very clear what you know one plus one

39:12

is two quick mouths Yeah, absolutely

39:14

agree But yeah, like outside of that

39:17

other bullshit. It worked. I

39:19

loved Mickey's sort of relationship

39:21

with I know you don't think it

39:23

was love. I still feels love and

39:25

I enjoyed every aspect of it I

39:27

guess what I will say is

39:30

maybe we just have

39:32

a very different definition

39:35

of love and I

39:37

hate that I'm being

39:39

so considerate about such

39:42

a slack slapstick

39:44

Jim Kerry level

39:46

movie. But we are, we're,

39:49

well, it was, it was

39:51

pandering and it was

39:53

being dumb, baby. Really?

39:58

And you did... I didn't

40:01

enjoy Shrek. Exactly. I don't

40:03

Shrek just didn't appreciate it.

40:05

Just know who the martial

40:08

is in this podcast, 13.

40:10

Wow. Yeah, I said it.

40:13

Hey, Tyrone strips of the

40:15

knockout. We're all deserving of

40:18

love, friends and lovers, even

40:20

if we don't love ourselves.

40:23

Mickey was so pathetic. And

40:25

I don't mean that in

40:28

the mean way, he was

40:30

just very pathetic. He was

40:33

very down on himself. You

40:35

enjoyed that macaron joke as

40:38

well. But it just felt

40:40

like he was just happy

40:42

to get any attention. Nasha...

40:45

I don't know, there were

40:47

some moments later in the

40:50

film that I was like,

40:52

and you even were like,

40:55

oh she loves this man.

40:57

Like, you know what I

41:00

mean, but it felt very

41:02

possessive, it felt very controlling.

41:05

Possessive and controlling. Brother. Just

41:07

because I don't want to

41:10

share Mickey A.T. Who's another

41:12

girl? Fair. No. Both Mickey's

41:15

and Mickey's. Well, let's get

41:17

to that. Let's have some

41:19

fun routine. Miki's 17, Miki

41:22

18, which isn't too much

41:24

of a spoiler if you've

41:27

watched any trailer, or any

41:29

interview, that's how I got

41:32

spoiled that there were two

41:34

Miki's. Well, can I have

41:37

two Otis? Like, let's talk

41:39

about the moral quandre. It's

41:42

our favorite genre, friends of

41:44

lovers, go and check out

41:47

our cube episode. Thoughts. Mickey-17,

41:49

Mickey 18, uploading the same

41:52

memories to separate bodies. Are

41:54

they the same person? They're

41:56

the same person. I think

41:59

so. What is just a

42:01

vessel? Everything else is

42:04

what makes a person. Wow.

42:06

Yeah. Come with a flip's

42:08

energy fact. It is the

42:10

same person. It's, and that's

42:13

why I was with Nasha

42:15

saying like, no, I'm not

42:18

gonna split Mickey 1719 for

42:20

what? Still, Nike. Yeah.

42:22

It's just different

42:24

personalities, but it's

42:27

still the same person.

42:29

Yeah, but wouldn't. Okay,

42:31

Batman Boy. I convinced

42:34

the co-worker, apparently

42:37

there are two books, O.T.

42:39

I convinced the co-worker to

42:42

read the book because she

42:44

also loves sci-fi, and I

42:47

just needed to know things

42:49

in the film or that

42:52

weren't in the film. And

42:54

apparently... When I

42:56

was speaking to her she

42:58

was saying that she was

43:00

really feeling conflicted about the

43:02

two mikies Oh, and Nasha

43:04

trying to Nash on that

43:06

knob, right? Those knobs. It

43:09

was a double-sided door with

43:11

double knobs What conflicted

43:13

in what way? Because to her

43:16

there were two different people.

43:18

Oh, apparently in the book.

43:20

There's a captain that gives like an

43:22

example of if you have a ship

43:24

and you constantly change the parts. So

43:27

all of the parts out of there

43:29

weren't a part of the original ship,

43:31

is that still the same ship? So

43:33

I guess they wanted to make it

43:36

more sexy in this film and they

43:38

talked about that Mickey 17, Mickey 18,

43:40

but they also used the serial killer

43:42

example, which might also be in the

43:44

book as well. But she seemed so

43:46

like, she's like, oh, I guess Nasho

43:48

is free-spirited and I'm like... You're not

43:50

going to the sex shame, I'm not

43:52

sure, excuse me very much, but I

43:54

can't say that on the team's chat.

43:56

But I just thought it was interesting

43:58

that she had such a... Like it

44:01

she went through

44:03

such a tizzy

44:05

because to her

44:07

that's so sexually

44:09

promiscuous and me

44:11

me I was

44:13

like I I

44:15

have no dramas

44:17

there I'm all

44:19

worried about the

44:21

implications of colonialism

44:24

I felt like... I

44:26

hope you don't think

44:28

I'm adorable because it

44:30

was some ugly motherfuggers.

44:33

You didn't feel like

44:35

riding your hand through

44:37

those little legs? We

44:39

know what sort of

44:41

anime you watch your

44:43

tea. There's the FYR

44:45

anime watching and then

44:48

there's the er tea

44:50

in the dark corner.

44:52

Love Tony Collette. Yeah.

44:54

But I feel like

44:56

there needs to be

44:58

a distinction made friends

45:00

and others. Great performance

45:03

does not a great

45:05

film make. Yeah, I

45:07

think the performances were

45:09

very strong, but I

45:11

think they're smooth in

45:13

as much as I

45:15

enjoy it. I wouldn't

45:18

categorize it. I wouldn't

45:20

categorise it as great.

45:22

I wouldn't categorise it

45:24

as. But it doesn't

45:26

have to be great.

45:28

It doesn't have to

45:30

be great. Things can

45:33

just be good. Wouldn't

45:35

it be okay? Oh,

45:37

lopsided. Yeah. We don't

45:39

teach them as well.

45:41

Why are you looking

45:43

at me? From a

45:45

distance they look quite

45:47

evenly shaped. Okay? Wow!

45:50

But yeah, there we

45:52

have it, Oti. Is

45:54

there anything else you

45:56

want to add? No,

45:58

it's, it's, I think.

46:00

One of the fast-reft

46:02

marks we've done with

46:05

that haven't contained

46:07

a lot of

46:09

enjoyable stuff we've

46:11

watched throughout. Damn, dark.

46:14

No, it's speaking truth

46:16

to power. Who's the

46:18

power? We're independent.

46:20

Because if you're

46:23

finding the man, you're

46:25

the man! Purchase, you're

46:27

the long life battle

46:29

with yourself, bird. You're

46:32

right though, you're right.

46:34

There was definitely a lot

46:37

more that we could

46:39

cover as well, so

46:41

you know, subscribe friends

46:43

and lovers to get

46:45

more joy for Ote. Thank

46:48

you so much friends and

46:50

lovers for joining us another

46:52

week in the four-year-old friends

46:54

podcast Do you have any

46:56

watching companions for anything we've

46:58

covered just because you know

47:01

you said it was a

47:03

bit of not as positive

47:05

all the time? Are there any watching

47:07

companions you would have

47:09

for these films? The host the

47:11

host will be good million dollar

47:14

baby. You got anything else?

47:16

On Twitter, until the wheels

47:18

fall off and they're all

47:20

falling off and they're burning on

47:23

their cyber truck already, we're

47:25

on Blue Sky, we're on

47:27

Instagram and Threads, they've lifted

47:29

the block of me commenting

47:32

and posting so I'm on

47:34

Instagram and Threads, I'm

47:36

on Instagram and Threads

47:38

against Friends and Lovers, we're out

47:41

of your phone. We're also on

47:43

the magical society of OT

47:45

podcast. If you like

47:48

to be berating

47:50

a review, I

47:52

will see you

47:54

guys on the

47:56

next one. Tyrone

47:58

creeps out! You

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features