Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hi everybody Cheryl
0:02
Atkinson here. I hope
0:04
you enjoy this special
0:06
from the archives edition
0:09
of Full Measure After Hours.
0:11
Hi everybody Cheryl
0:14
Atkinson here. Welcome to
0:16
another edition of Full
0:18
Measure After Hours. Today,
0:20
what's behind the long
0:22
wait times to see
0:24
the doctor? I'll
0:28
bet a whole lot of you
0:30
listening have experienced what we're talking
0:32
about today, excruciatingly long wait times
0:35
to see the doctor for maybe
0:37
a basic checkup, maybe to establish
0:39
a new doctor, or even for
0:42
important surgery. What exactly is going
0:44
on? After Obamacare, we were promised
0:47
everything with our health care system
0:49
would be better. And while it's
0:51
true that more people now have
0:54
insurance coverage as a result, America's
0:56
total health bill has
0:58
skyrocketed. We are paying more in
1:01
premiums, but also through invisible
1:03
costs, such as taxpayers paying
1:05
for all the people getting
1:08
subsidized on insurance. Yes, some
1:10
of them are paying a reduced amount,
1:12
but we're all picking up the
1:14
slack. We also have to pay
1:16
more for Medicare and Medicaid, that's
1:19
insurance for the poor and
1:21
the elderly. It may seem like things
1:23
are somewhat affordable in the moment because
1:25
when you pay out of pocket that
1:27
amount may not seem too bad, but
1:29
we're getting hit in a way that's
1:31
bigger than ever when you're talking about
1:33
total costs that we're covering in other
1:36
ways. And in the meantime, with
1:38
more people having insurance and us
1:40
paying more than ever, people are getting
1:42
sicker and sicker with all kinds
1:44
of chronic disorders, more people are trying
1:46
to see the doctor and finding
1:48
they can't get a timely appointment.
1:50
It's reached crisis proportions in
1:53
some cities. Here are a few
1:55
stats, according to surveys. The average
1:57
wait time for new patient appointments
1:59
and... 2004, way back then it
2:01
was widely considered unacceptably long. It
2:04
was just over four weeks. But
2:06
by 2022, the last date they have
2:08
figures for this, the weight had grown
2:10
a full week longer. Now, the average
2:12
weight for a new patient appointment had
2:14
grown to five weeks and a day,
2:16
or 26 days. But that's hardly the
2:18
worst of it. For a heart check
2:20
up with a cardiologist,
2:22
hope nothing's wrong with you, because
2:24
you could find yourself waiting as
2:26
long as... four and a half
2:29
to five months in Washington DC
2:31
and Houston, Texas, you could wait about
2:33
five and a half months in Seattle,
2:35
Washington, same in Miami, Florida, and
2:37
Atlanta, Georgia, and you might be
2:40
waiting nine and a half months
2:42
in New York City for a
2:44
heart checkup with a cardiologist.
2:46
In Atlanta, Georgia, the longest
2:48
wait time for a basic
2:50
women's gyological exam jumped from
2:52
about 2.3 months in 2004 to
2:55
nearly eight months in 2022. Hope you're
2:57
not suffering anything serious when
2:59
you're waiting for that
3:01
gynecological exam. In Portland, Oregon,
3:03
to check for possible skin cancer
3:06
with a dermatologist, the longest wait
3:08
time went up from about 2.3
3:10
months back in 2004 to 10 months
3:13
in 2022. And in San Diego, California,
3:15
just try to get an appointment
3:17
with an orthopedic surgeon for a
3:19
knee injury. You're going to be
3:21
in pain for a long time.
3:23
In 2004, you could find yourself
3:25
waiting about... 1.6 months, but in
3:27
2022, that wait time skyrocketed to
3:29
more than 11 months. Imagine waiting
3:32
about a year to get an
3:34
appointment with an orthopedic surgeon for
3:36
a knee injury. In today's podcast,
3:38
we're going to get some insight
3:40
into all of that. With a
3:43
physician and professor at Harvard Medical
3:45
School, he also takes care of
3:47
patients at the Beth Israel
3:49
Deaconess Medical Center. He is
3:52
Dr. Ativ Morotra. He studied this
3:54
issue and has some great insight into
3:56
what's happening to our health care system
3:58
and maybe what we... could do about
4:01
it. Here's Dr. Marotra. I
4:03
mean I think that the US health
4:05
care system is going through a lot
4:07
of change right now and I think
4:09
that the patients unfortunately are suffering
4:11
from that and some of those
4:14
changes are positive. We're really seeing
4:16
how technology can be used to
4:18
really transform how people get care
4:20
and we're Before it was always
4:22
this theoretical idea in the future,
4:24
but now most Americans through telemedicine
4:26
and portals and other things are
4:29
actually seeing that, that their day-to-day
4:31
experience getting care is changing. But
4:33
at the same time, we're also
4:35
seeing some trends that are really
4:37
disturbing in terms of consolidation in
4:39
the health care system, private equity,
4:41
buying hospitals and practices, and I
4:43
think people don't feel like they're
4:45
getting the same care that they
4:47
used to. And I think that's
4:50
a source of understandably great frustration
4:52
for the average American and also
4:54
the wait time thing we're about to talk about.
4:56
What is that you have looked at
4:58
and studied? Yeah, most of my
5:00
work has been on the digital
5:02
health transformation in the United States
5:04
and both what's happening, what are
5:06
the new ways that people are
5:09
getting care, what has been the
5:11
impact of that in terms of
5:13
quality, spending, access to care, who's
5:15
actually receiving this new form of
5:17
health care? I feel like it's almost
5:19
a time from the past to be
5:22
able to... say, hey, I needed to see
5:24
my doctor and got in to see him
5:26
today or the next day or on a
5:28
timely basis. So many people are saying they're
5:31
having trouble getting basic appointments or even to
5:33
see specialists. That's a whole new ball game.
5:35
Yeah, and I think you touched, you
5:37
hit upon a really important issue. Both
5:39
seeing your regular doctor, your primary care
5:41
doctor, Americans increasingly are having difficulty getting
5:44
in in a timely manner today, tomorrow,
5:46
as well as specialty weight times. Those
5:48
have gone up quite a bit over
5:50
the last decade or so. And so
5:52
what you're describing from, and I hear
5:54
from my friends and family also, why
5:57
does it take so long to get
5:59
to see? to see a doctor or
6:01
schedule an appointment. Not all that long
6:03
ago, we heard stories about this in
6:05
other countries. We would say, oh, the
6:07
Canadians are coming here for health care
6:09
because they have to wait so long
6:11
to see a doctor. They have to
6:13
wait months and months or a year
6:15
for a surgery. It now feels like
6:17
we're approaching something like that. Can you say
6:19
why this is happening or explain some
6:22
of the factors behind it? Yeah,
6:24
so first I think you're correct.
6:26
And when people have done surveys
6:28
of... people in different industrialized nations.
6:30
It is what we're describing, the
6:32
average American in terms of getting
6:34
into their regular doctor in a
6:36
timely manner, has about the same
6:38
difficulty as in other industrialized nations
6:40
or in some cases it's worse
6:42
here in the United States. So
6:44
I think just to echo what
6:46
you're saying. I mean in terms
6:48
of what's driving this. There's obviously
6:51
at its heart a supply demand
6:53
issue with the supply of physicians
6:55
the United States has been about
6:57
per capita has been stagnant or
6:59
gone up just a little bit
7:01
but the demand for health care
7:04
has gone up Some of that is
7:06
because our population is aging and an
7:08
older adult needs more health care on
7:10
average than a younger adult or a
7:13
child Another aspect of this is
7:15
the we in the United States have
7:17
made a big push to expanding insurance
7:19
And so now when you have insurance,
7:21
you can go get care. So that
7:24
means more Americans can actually go and
7:26
get care, which is good, but that
7:28
increases demand. And also maybe something
7:30
that people don't recognize as much
7:32
as the style of health care
7:34
has changed. And what I mean
7:36
by that is what we would
7:38
have previously just had your primary
7:41
care doctor handle, increasingly we have
7:43
a specialist handle. One study found
7:45
that if over a decade, the
7:47
fraction of primary care appointments where
7:49
the primary care doctor referred to
7:51
a specialist more than doubled. Well,
7:54
that means a large amount of
7:56
demand out there in terms of
7:58
more specialty needs. And that again,
8:01
as some of it is driven by
8:03
the complexity of health care. It's getting,
8:05
there's so much to know and how
8:07
can the average primary care doctor know
8:10
all the nuances under many conditions. And
8:12
I also think that's on the patient
8:14
side, where previously they might have
8:16
been okay having their primary care
8:18
doctor handle a problem, but now
8:21
there's an expectation, no, no, I'm
8:23
going to go see a specialist
8:25
for that problem. And so that's
8:27
also driving that increased demand for
8:29
that. you know, largely contributing to
8:31
the problem we're describing. From
8:34
the patient's viewpoint, do you
8:36
have any stats or has
8:38
someone collected facts over time that
8:40
shows how long waits for a typical
8:42
appointment used to be compared to what
8:44
we're facing today? Yeah, there are some
8:47
numbers. Merritt Hawkins, for example, does a
8:49
secret shopper study every couple years and
8:51
what they're describing and then they do
8:53
that in different markets in the United
8:55
States for some... you know, I have
8:58
a knee problem, I got a rash,
9:00
I got to go in. And what
9:02
they're documenting in those secret shopper studies
9:04
is a substantial increase if I remember
9:07
exactly. It's about a 35% increase in
9:09
the wait time to get an appointment
9:11
in the United States. Another trend I've
9:13
noticed and I've heard from other people
9:15
as well, they're places that won't even
9:18
take appointments. They're so booked out
9:20
into the future and I know Mayo Clinic
9:22
have this issue because we called to try
9:24
to get an appointment for something and they
9:26
said not only Can we not get you
9:29
now? We can't put you on the
9:31
waiting list and don't even call in
9:33
six months because that's too soon.
9:35
That's sort of like it starts
9:37
to feel like crisis proportions in terms
9:39
of when do we know we've
9:41
reached something that someone takes some
9:43
kind of action to take care of
9:46
or try to fix? Yeah. And I think that
9:48
is, you know, where I hear it most is
9:50
a person moves to a new town. They need
9:52
to get a new primary care doc and they
9:54
start calling around. And so many of the primary
9:57
care practices say we're close to new patients. And
9:59
that is it. source of enormous frustration
10:01
and then you go to your
10:03
insurance book and you look at the
10:05
different primary care doctors listed but many
10:07
of them are full and I think
10:10
that really highlights you know the difficulty
10:12
here. But I also want to bring
10:14
up another complexity why it's not just
10:16
about the supply of physicians because if
10:18
that was the case then we would
10:20
go around the country and in areas
10:22
of the country where there are a
10:24
lot more physicians per capita. For example,
10:26
where I live in Boston, Massachusetts,
10:28
or New York City, or Florida,
10:30
where we have more doctors per
10:33
capita, we would expect in those
10:35
areas of the country, it would
10:37
be pretty easy to get into
10:39
a doctor, and in other areas of
10:41
the country, that have fewer physicians, it
10:43
would be much harder. And that's
10:45
not what we see. We see
10:47
across the country, even in those
10:49
areas that have more physicians per capita,
10:51
we see more, you know. terrible
10:53
wait times, again, for example, where
10:55
I live in Boston. So I think
10:58
it also, I just wanted to emphasize
11:00
that point, and one of the other
11:03
complexities here is style, and that
11:05
different regions of the country have
11:07
different propensity to make a
11:09
referral or how they practice. For
11:11
example, if I'm a cardiologist, how
11:13
often do I have my patients come
11:15
back? that's going to vary from doctor
11:17
to doctor and from region of the
11:19
region of the country to another region
11:21
of the country. So I think I
11:23
just wanted to bring that up because it
11:25
just getting more doctors in the market
11:28
will help, but we also have to
11:30
address this difference in style and how
11:32
medicine is practiced in different parts of
11:34
the country because that also plays a
11:36
role in the wait times that patients
11:38
are suffering from. Who teaches doctors the
11:40
style? I mean, I'm sure some of it
11:43
is developed through their own practice and experience,
11:45
but there must be something, if this is
11:47
kind of happening across the country with
11:49
a lot of doctors, where is this
11:51
coming from that maybe they're bringing the
11:53
same patients back more often or the
11:55
patients need to come back more often
11:57
and there's not room for new patients?
12:00
I mean, I think this is a bit
12:02
of a dirty secret. There is no, in
12:04
medical school, there's never a lecture
12:07
on when you have a patient with
12:09
high blood pressure, how often do you
12:11
bring them back? You develop a style
12:14
or a sort of practice pattern by
12:16
where you trained. So you see when you're
12:18
in residency, for example, you see that
12:20
your preceptor says bring them back in
12:23
a month or three months and then
12:25
you adopt that style and slightly adjust
12:27
it as you go on into practice.
12:29
So I think that plays a substantial
12:32
role in there. And I think there
12:34
has been one way to potentially improve
12:36
specialty access and some health systems are
12:38
trying this as saying to their specialty
12:41
physicians. You've been seeing this patient once
12:43
a year for the last five years.
12:45
everything's pretty stable, send them back
12:47
to the primary care doc, and
12:49
that'll open up a new slot for
12:52
a new patient. So addressing that style,
12:54
sort of pushing back, because as a
12:56
doctor it's very, and I understand
12:58
it, that when I see a patient, I'll see
13:00
you back next year, Cheryl. And,
13:02
but maybe sometimes it's better to
13:04
say, you're doing really well. If
13:06
there's an issue, call me. but I
13:08
don't need to see you. And trying to
13:11
make that more, I take care of the
13:13
problem and then they move back to the
13:15
primary care doc. And that's another interesting way
13:17
that people are trying to increase specialty access.
13:19
Now, if you don't have thoughts on this,
13:22
no problem, but my dad who's a doctor
13:24
called it the diagnostic pipeline, and some of
13:26
this is insurance driven, and some of it
13:29
is just driven by technology that we have
13:31
available, that people go to the doctor now,
13:33
and they're, even if there's nothing seriously
13:35
wrong with them. Maybe they're put
13:38
through a battery of tests
13:40
that require follow-ups and new
13:42
appointments and appointments to do
13:44
technological things to check this
13:46
or that. Do you think that's a factor
13:48
in this? I think you really touched upon
13:51
a really important point that when
13:53
you, it seems so natural to
13:55
get a test and in modern
13:57
medicine tests such as laboratory tests,
13:59
x-ray. CT scans, MRIs, all the things
14:01
we have available to us, play such
14:04
a valuable role. But one of the things
14:06
that we don't think a lot about
14:08
and maybe don't focus as much as
14:10
we should in the in medicine is
14:12
the cascade event effect of those tests. So
14:14
you get one test, it's a little
14:16
abnormal, for example, just give you an
14:19
example to take it to an extreme.
14:21
A person comes to me and some
14:23
doctors will do a yearly urinalysis. Well,
14:25
maybe the protein level is a little
14:27
high. Maybe I'll do a follow-up test
14:29
and just see what's going on. Oh,
14:31
the protein level is a little bit
14:34
higher. I'm going to do a CT
14:36
scan of looking at what's going on
14:38
in the kidneys. Maybe there's something a
14:40
little funny going on in those kidneys.
14:42
Maybe I need to do a biopsy
14:44
of that. That's an example of that
14:47
cascade where there were a lot
14:49
of appointments there. that used
14:51
up valuable physician resources, as well as
14:53
in the end didn't really help the
14:55
patient. So being more judicious in our
14:57
testing because of that cascade effect is
14:59
a really important issue. And I don't
15:02
think it gets the attention that we
15:04
really need to. There has been more
15:06
and more research on that cascade effect,
15:08
but it's something that we really need
15:10
to consider. Now I do want to
15:12
emphasize these tests are very valuable in
15:15
some cases. It's just being a bit
15:17
more judicious in when it's really important
15:19
to get that test. and maybe not
15:21
overusing those tests because of
15:24
the issue we're describing. I
15:26
take your point about the aging
15:28
of America and people living
15:31
longer and needing more care.
15:33
It also seems to me just
15:35
anecdotally that young
15:37
people are sicker now. There's
15:39
a lot of chronic illnesses,
15:42
whether we're talking about, you know,
15:44
bowel disorders, crones,
15:46
juvenile diabetes. the
15:48
allergies, that sort of thing. So have you looked
15:50
at it? Do you know of anyone
15:52
who's looked at the impact that not
15:54
just older people are having on seeing
15:56
the doctors more often, but are we
15:58
sicker as a society? than we used
16:01
to be? I think the place that
16:03
there's been the most attention
16:05
to that is in the
16:07
area of mental illness where
16:09
year over year more and
16:11
more patients are seeking mental
16:13
health treatment and that has
16:15
been a real positive. We
16:18
have really decreased the stigma
16:20
about saying I have depression
16:22
or I have anxiety or
16:24
whatever other mental disorder is
16:26
that there is and that
16:28
has... I think in a
16:30
very positive change in our
16:32
society. On the other hand,
16:34
because on average an adult in the
16:36
United States is more likely
16:38
to go get care, that has
16:40
put a tremendous amount of strain
16:42
on our mental health specialty. clinicians
16:44
and more maybe more than almost
16:46
any other area in particular in
16:48
the pandemic. We've heard so many
16:50
people struggling, their children are struggling,
16:53
their loved ones are struggling, and
16:55
they just can't get in to
16:57
see somebody. And I think that
16:59
is reflective of some of the
17:01
societal changes we've seen in the
17:03
mental health area. Whose job do you see
17:05
it as being the fix, sort of putting
17:08
their finger on the pulse of all
17:10
this and trying to implement some kind
17:12
of solution? There
17:15
are in terms of solutions for
17:17
this problem. I think there are a
17:19
bunch of them that we could people,
17:21
there's going to be no one single
17:23
fix on this issue. And some of
17:26
it is going to be on the
17:28
health care system, individual,
17:30
doctor's offices, health systems
17:32
to implement changes. And some of
17:35
it is going to be larger
17:37
policy issues. And I'll kind of
17:39
touch upon a couple of those.
17:41
And we can on the. clinician
17:43
side there's an interesting
17:45
paradox which is let's say
17:48
I've used the example of a
17:50
cardiologist and it's a very
17:52
valuable resource it's taking months for
17:54
people to come in but on the
17:56
other hand when you go to the
17:59
their average day, many of those
18:01
appointments don't go filled because of
18:03
no shows because people schedule
18:05
appointments months and months ahead
18:08
of time and for a variety
18:10
of reasons, life happens, they
18:12
forget and they don't cancel the
18:14
appointment and so you have
18:16
this really paradoxical situation where some
18:18
of those resources are not
18:20
used effectively. So one of
18:23
the things that some health systems are
18:25
trying to do, and I encourage more
18:27
to do so, is how do you
18:29
improve the scheduling system, reminders, and how
18:31
people make those appointments so that we
18:33
can better take advantage of that, and
18:35
so we don't have so many free
18:38
slots going unused. In some doctors, what
18:40
they'll do is double book or triple
18:42
book, just because they assume some people
18:44
don't show up, but then when everyone
18:46
shows up, then people wait, and it's
18:48
a very frustrating situation. Another
18:50
aspect of this which is that I've
18:53
been really intrigued with is a thing
18:55
called e-consults. And what that means is
18:57
that so many times when you go to
18:59
a primary care doc and say there's a
19:02
rash, and the doctor's not sure exactly what's
19:04
going on, right now they would say to
19:06
you, why don't you, I'll make a
19:08
referral to a dermatologist and you'll
19:10
go see the dermatologist. But a
19:12
bunch of health systems around the
19:14
country are implementing a thing called
19:17
e-consult. They say to the primary
19:19
care doc, look, Go to the computer,
19:21
take a photo of what's going on
19:23
with the rash, tell me a little
19:26
bit about what's going on, and a
19:28
dermatologist will look at that within 24
19:30
hours and get back to the primary
19:32
care doc. And sometimes they'll
19:34
say, oh, this is what's going on, just
19:36
do X. And you're fine. And the
19:39
patient never ended up having to
19:41
go see the dermatologist. So the
19:43
patient saves a lot of time and the
19:45
patient gets the care that they need in
19:48
a timely manner. And they're finding with those
19:50
kinds of systems that they can reduce the
19:52
number of specialty referrals by about
19:54
a quarter and therefore improve wait time.
19:56
So another way that people can actually
19:59
get the care... that they need. Another
20:01
thing that I'm really excited about is
20:03
telemedicine and portals. I don't know a
20:05
patient portal is just I think what
20:07
most people have in the country where
20:09
they can go to their doctor and
20:11
just ask them a question right away
20:13
and get an answer really heavily quickly
20:15
as opposed to waiting for a couple
20:17
of months if you're already plugged into
20:19
the practice. during the pandemic, more and
20:22
more people are really taking advantage of
20:24
that. That's a really efficient way for
20:26
people to get the care they need,
20:28
at least for some things, where they
20:30
don't need a visit, to actually get
20:32
questions answered. So those are some examples
20:34
on the health system side that I
20:36
think are really, really important. And just,
20:38
I can go in more, but yeah,
20:41
about how they can improve the process
20:43
and therefore decrease the wait time and
20:45
use this resource more efficiently. I mean,
20:47
the frustrating thing from my standpoint
20:49
is it relies on nobody in
20:52
particular to kind of realize and
20:54
implement changes in a way that doesn't
20:56
seem to be organized by
20:58
the American Medical Association, whoever
21:01
might organize it. What about policy?
21:03
You mentioned maybe some policy things that
21:05
could be done. Do you mean by
21:07
federal government or by medical
21:09
groups doing policies? So I think
21:11
first I want to emphasize you
21:13
made a really valuable point. The U.S.
21:16
We don't do a lot of top-down
21:18
policy. We have a very,
21:20
each health system, each doctor's
21:22
office is implementing these changes
21:24
and there's no one saying
21:26
you've got to do something
21:28
in terms of making change.
21:30
I do think there are a
21:32
couple places where policy could have
21:35
a very valuable role. The first
21:37
is in terms of residency slots.
21:39
One of the reasons that I
21:41
told you at its heart is
21:43
a bit of a supply problem.
21:45
We haven't really increased the number
21:47
of specialists per capita relative to
21:49
demand. And we've kept that relatively
21:52
tightly restricted and limited the
21:54
number of international medical grads
21:56
who can come and do
21:58
or into our training. programs as
22:00
well as limited the number
22:02
of medical schools. We could, as
22:04
a nation, decide that we
22:06
want to train more physicians. It's
22:08
not going to fix the
22:10
problem tomorrow. It's going to be
22:12
a long timeline because it
22:14
takes a while to train doctors.
22:16
But that is one area
22:18
that we could emphasize a way
22:20
to improve this problem. Another
22:22
way is to put pressure on
22:24
individual health systems to improve
22:26
specialty wait time. There
22:28
was a recent congressional hearing just last
22:30
week where they were talking about one
22:32
of the things we're trying to do
22:35
in the U .S. health care system
22:37
is not just pay doctors for providing
22:39
care, but actually on the quality of
22:41
care they provide. And one of the
22:43
ways that we could put pressure on
22:45
health systems is that when we pay
22:47
a health system, you would get paid
22:49
more or less depending on your specialty
22:51
wait time. So a health system that
22:53
has very poor specialty wait time would
22:55
hit their bottom line. And the idea
22:57
would be is that this would force
22:59
those health systems to put more resources
23:01
and tackle this problem as opposed to
23:03
maybe ignoring it if they don't prioritize
23:05
it. So those are two examples of
23:07
policies that we could address. And from
23:09
a patient standpoint, is there anything you
23:11
can recommend a patient can do if
23:13
they're facing a long wait time, maybe
23:15
they're new to an area and they
23:17
really need to get in to see
23:20
a primary or a specialist? What advice
23:22
do you have? I
23:24
wish there was an easy answer
23:26
and I've certainly had lots of
23:28
friends and family. A lot of
23:30
it is unfortunately people calling and
23:32
asking around and pulling favors, which
23:35
is not a very useful piece
23:37
of advice. My only other thought
23:39
is that increasingly for some issues,
23:41
you don't need to go to
23:43
a doctor in town. So embracing
23:45
some of these new care options,
23:47
which allow you to see a
23:50
doctor anywhere in the country when
23:52
it's feasible. For example, in particular,
23:54
we talked about mental health treatment.
23:56
There are a number of different
23:58
options that are available to people.
24:00
people of telemedicine for mental health,
24:03
and that increases the pool of
24:05
people they can go to, and
24:07
research has shown that for conditions
24:09
like anxiety and depression, those treatment
24:11
options can be just as good
24:13
as seeing someone in person in
24:15
your local area. So those are
24:18
two considerations. I'm not sure they're,
24:20
but in particular the first one,
24:22
it's tough. I
24:24
mean, would you recommend something practical, and I
24:26
don't know if you would. Should
24:29
they try to leave a message if they can't
24:31
reach somebody and say, when there's no
24:33
appointments, if
24:35
you have a cancellation
24:37
call me, or if
24:40
this is more, not an ER emergency, but
24:42
this is urgent, can you work me
24:44
in? Like, is it a matter to
24:46
do anything like that? Yeah,
24:48
I certainly can't hurt.
24:50
I guess when your comment
24:52
really makes me frustrated,
24:54
because that's exactly what the clinic
24:56
should tell the patient, right? Because I
24:59
told you already that unfortunately, often
25:01
there's no shows, and there
25:03
are a bunch of people who want to get
25:05
in more quickly. It's not rocket science to
25:07
tell the patient, hey, we have a waiting list,
25:09
sometimes people no show the day before will
25:11
pull you in right away. But I don't know
25:13
why health systems and practices don't do that more.
25:15
It's not that complicated, and it would really
25:17
help people in some cases when they need to
25:19
get in more urgently. It's not going to
25:21
fix the problem, but it'll just be a partial,
25:23
at least a little bit of a help
25:25
in terms of improving things. I
25:31
hope you enjoyed today's podcast, and that if you
25:33
did, you will leave a great review and share
25:35
it with your friends. To see the
25:37
actual story on full measure, you
25:39
can watch on Sunday, March 3rd.
25:42
To find a list of stations and
25:44
times, go to SherylAxon .com and click
25:46
the Store tab. Or you can
25:48
just watch it live when
25:50
it feeds on Sunday, March 3rd
25:52
at fullmeasure .news online at about
25:54
9 .31 or so a .m. eastern time.
25:56
That's when the feed starts, and
25:58
then it's posted. at Full Measured Dot
26:01
News thereafter, so you can watch replays right
26:03
now or any time. If you like the
26:05
topics that I cover on this
26:07
podcast, you'll want to hop on
26:09
over and listen to my other
26:11
podcast, the Cheryl Atkinson podcast. And
26:13
you will definitely want to think
26:15
about pre-ordering my new book. It's
26:17
coming out September 3rd from Harper
26:19
Collins. It's called, Follow the Science,
26:21
how big farmer misleads, obscures, and
26:24
prevails. You can order at Harper
26:26
Collins Online or at Amazon or
26:28
anywhere that you like to order
26:30
your books. Visit the Cheryl Akasin
26:32
store by going to Cherylakasin.com and
26:34
clicking the store tab because I
26:37
have some great products for free
26:39
thinkers like you with proceeds going
26:41
to support independent reporting causes. It's
26:43
never been more important. Do your
26:45
own research, make up your own
26:47
mind. Think for yourself.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More