The myth of the demon boy and how we justify mistreatment of boys | Maintaining Frame 146

The myth of the demon boy and how we justify mistreatment of boys | Maintaining Frame 146

Released Sunday, 13th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
The myth of the demon boy and how we justify mistreatment of boys | Maintaining Frame 146

The myth of the demon boy and how we justify mistreatment of boys | Maintaining Frame 146

The myth of the demon boy and how we justify mistreatment of boys | Maintaining Frame 146

The myth of the demon boy and how we justify mistreatment of boys | Maintaining Frame 146

Sunday, 13th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Yet another video thought

0:02

piece on the

0:04

Netflix series adolescence.

0:06

Documentary documentary

0:08

sorry I misspoke

0:11

documentary slash fictional

0:13

account true completely non

0:15

fictionalized. Totally

0:18

happened totally happened. You

0:20

can't deny it because

0:22

of how well shot it

0:24

was. Oh, but also, it's confined

0:26

to anecdotal evidence that it is correct.

0:28

Because there have been boys, white boys,

0:31

who have stabbed people in, or in

0:33

schools. It has happened. So I have

0:35

girls, by the way, but. That's not

0:37

important. Yeah, that's not important.

0:40

Yeah, that's not really the point here.

0:42

So, we are here to shit on

0:44

men and white men in particular, because

0:46

if we shit on white men without

0:48

anybody, like taking issue with it, we

0:50

can shit on the rest of men.

0:52

because we will have already set

0:54

the precedent by shitting on white men.

0:57

So ultimately this is about all men

0:59

but we start with the men that

1:01

it's permissible to attack and then you

1:03

just sort of like open up your

1:05

you widen your net little by little

1:08

and all of a sudden you can

1:10

just cast it wherever and if there

1:12

is a racially inconvenient component to your

1:14

shitting on men then you just start

1:17

from oh well it's just a male

1:19

problem and then you can like you

1:21

know if you stay safe and you

1:23

never actually make anything better you

1:26

never address anything because why would

1:28

you you need things to get

1:30

worse so that you can justify

1:32

your paycheck you can justify

1:34

getting getting paycheck but after

1:37

paycheck getting tenure getting promotions

1:39

staying in office whatever it

1:41

is that you're looking for

1:43

or just growing more subscribers on

1:46

your YouTube channel so we're going

1:48

to be looking at a video

1:50

called, this is what happens

1:52

when boys aren't taught how

1:54

to lose toxic masculinity

1:57

in adolescence and the youth

2:00

channel I'm not no lie

2:02

okay the name of the YouTube

2:04

channel is literally paranoia but

2:07

there's nothing paranoid

2:09

happening here okay so yeah

2:11

I don't I don't know if anybody

2:14

in the chat has seen

2:16

this video I watched it

2:18

because I had to prepare for

2:20

the show and my blood is

2:22

boiling but I'm gonna try

2:24

to keep from becoming

2:26

emotional even though this

2:28

video would tell me that I

2:30

should be allowed to become emotional,

2:33

but not that way. Not

2:35

like, you know, not righteous

2:37

indignation. That's not cool. I should

2:39

just cry. I should just cry

2:41

and accept that I'm a loser.

2:44

That's kind of what that's why

2:46

it says. This is what happens

2:48

when boys aren't taught how to

2:50

lose. Just lose, just lose. And

2:52

things will work out. Women will

2:55

respect you if you do that. Yeah.

2:57

Definitely. Oh man. Yes, okay. But it's

3:00

interesting though, it's like you

3:02

can't, how much do, how many generations

3:04

of boys have to lose

3:06

before retribution is had for

3:08

whatever happened in the past

3:11

that we can conjecture or

3:13

pretend that happened in the

3:15

past? This is the real question.

3:17

At what point do boys get theirs?

3:19

I mean, if they- At what point? Well,

3:21

I mean, if they just decide to do

3:23

it, it just gets done. So, like, if,

3:26

like, you're lucky, honestly, you're lucky that

3:28

they're just checking out. Because if boys get

3:30

to the point where they're like, you know what, we're taking

3:32

the power back, they're just gonna take it. And women

3:34

can't do a damn thing about it. And you know

3:36

what? I'm not gonna weep. I'm just gonna say, you

3:38

should have listened. And that's it. Like, I don't know,

3:40

I mean, like, I don't know what to do what to do.

3:42

Like, like, like, I don't know what to do know what to

3:44

do, like, like, like, like, I don't know what to do,

3:47

like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, I don't

3:49

know, like, I don't know, I don't know, like, like, like, like,

3:51

I don't know, I don't know, like, I don't know, like,

3:53

like, like, like, I don't know, like, You're just

3:55

gonna keep doing this and at

3:57

some point boys are gonna be

3:59

like you know what I think we're

4:02

just going to have to like

4:04

put things in check now and

4:06

they will and if they do

4:08

like women can't do anything about

4:10

it so like that there all

4:12

of this is predicated on the

4:14

idea that men could take away

4:16

women's rights now if they chose

4:19

to and the only reason why

4:21

it hasn't happened is because they

4:23

haven't chose to and it's because

4:25

they still think women care about

4:27

them yes every society women sort

4:29

of define what is, in some

4:31

ways, the purpose or not, like

4:33

the worst of men's actions in

4:36

protecting and providing for women. And

4:38

what feminists specifically are attacking is

4:40

this kind of idea that boys

4:42

can develop a unique value in

4:44

certain, like, they have something unique

4:46

to give in service to society.

4:48

And when you attack that, you

4:51

basically decouple Boy's identity to the

4:53

society you're part of. Well, you

4:55

know, and once you've done that,

4:57

you eventually just lose control over

4:59

the whole thing. It just spins

5:01

out of control. And I mean,

5:03

because the thing is that, yes,

5:05

men can, are the ones who

5:08

ultimately are the ones who defend

5:10

and provide rights in society. However,

5:12

most men in our society at

5:14

this point in time define their

5:16

self-worth in terms of... providing for

5:18

women these kind of almost, they're

5:20

not even physical things and they're

5:22

more they're like psychological resources of

5:25

rights. So I think that ultimately

5:27

what would happen is there's going

5:29

to be generations of boys who

5:31

aren't connected to that, that whole

5:33

identity in terms of providing women's

5:35

rights. And this is something like

5:37

the last century, it was actually

5:40

men who spearheaded all of this.

5:42

No, no like they they were

5:44

the ones who are most likely

5:46

to want to see women get

5:48

the vote women were like no

5:50

So it's like this this idea

5:52

that our society created this identity

5:54

for men where they afford women

5:57

these psychological resources rather than physical

5:59

resources known as rights. And I

6:01

think ultimately what we'll see happen

6:03

is that the people who will

6:05

end up continuing to fight for

6:07

women's rights will be men even

6:09

as this entire system collapses because

6:11

that's how they've identified their self-worth.

6:14

But then there will be a

6:16

whole bunch of men who've checked

6:18

out and other men who just

6:20

don't give a damn. But it's

6:22

like in Afghanistan, you know, what

6:24

did the men do? They fought

6:26

to the death. What did the

6:29

women do? They went out and

6:31

bought a burka. And it's because

6:33

those men identified with that particular

6:35

form of giving women something. And

6:37

that's the unfortunate truth of it

6:39

all. So it's, I think it's

6:41

a little more complicated than boys

6:43

will just take away women's rights.

6:46

It's that women will cut. their

6:48

connection to those things as being

6:50

giving them a positive sense of

6:52

self like feminist say you know

6:54

you don't get it you don't

6:56

get a thank you what what

6:58

that's the that's the that's the

7:00

bare minimum we should have always

7:03

had our rights you took them

7:05

away in the first place what

7:07

gave you the right to be

7:09

you know and all of that

7:11

stuff so they won't even recognize

7:13

that men who give women their

7:15

rights in the context of a

7:18

western system are positive you see

7:20

what I'm saying cutting that that

7:22

connection yeah no my point was

7:24

not that that i wasn't making

7:26

a prediction i was saying that

7:28

if it gets to the point

7:30

where that happens then people will

7:32

act surprised that's all and there

7:35

won't be anything that can do

7:37

about it even though yes it

7:39

will be men that will stand

7:41

up you know like essentially defend

7:43

women at the end of the

7:45

day and it will become a

7:47

thing that kills men that men

7:50

will be harmed by this in

7:52

the long run no matter what

7:54

women could stop it like they

7:56

could stop it now but they're

7:58

not doing it so yeah Essentially

8:00

what I'm saying is that I

8:02

think this absolves women of the

8:04

culpability. I mean the thing is

8:07

that and this is something I've

8:09

said to these women who are

8:11

like on the radical feminist separatists.

8:13

I don't know if they're lesbian

8:15

separatists but the radical feminists and

8:17

they talk about how you know

8:19

it's great that women aren't having

8:21

children in the West and it's

8:24

like well okay so you are

8:26

essentially doing to extinction the society

8:28

that gave you rights. This is

8:30

your choice ladies. this will be

8:32

your choice every single time you

8:34

say to yourself, oh, it's the

8:36

bare minimum, instead of expressing gratitude

8:39

and saying, hey, it's great that

8:41

men in the West have given

8:43

us their rights, or our rights,

8:45

or have afforded us these rights

8:47

because they make the ultimate physical

8:49

sacrifice to create and defend a

8:51

society that affords these rights, right?

8:53

No gratitude. No recognition of any

8:56

kind of positive contribution to these

8:58

societies by the men in them.

9:00

That's what's going to kill it.

9:02

It's going to be women no

9:04

longer upholding their part of the

9:06

psychological bargain with men. And again,

9:08

what will happen is that boys

9:10

will just end up being divorced

9:13

from any of the processes of

9:15

maintaining the society. They'll check out.

9:17

Maybe some of them will be

9:19

absorbed into like a gengis Khan

9:21

army. But most of them will

9:23

just check out and then it'll

9:25

just deteriorate. But anyway, we are

9:28

not even into the video. Yeah,

9:30

I know. We got to get

9:32

into the video. So this video

9:34

is using the Netflix television show

9:36

and adolescence to make the case

9:38

for my favorite feminist talking point,

9:40

toxic masculinity. I said my if

9:42

you're in the in the special

9:45

chat, I said that completely sarcastically.

9:47

I actually despised the concept of

9:49

toxic masculinity. But anyway. Let's go

9:51

ahead and play. I just haven't

9:53

set up to a couple of

9:55

main points and really this isn't

9:57

about the show So I want

9:59

to make that clear. If you've

10:02

watched it, you're going to tell

10:04

me like, well, the plot, this

10:06

happens, that's not relevant at all.

10:08

The show is just the launch

10:10

pad for the discussion. So like,

10:12

that's the point. It's already done

10:14

the Cyop. Now we all have

10:17

to wrestle with the stupid ideas

10:19

that came out of the Cyop.

10:21

So let's go ahead and listen

10:23

to the first clip. Through trial

10:25

and error. They learn it in

10:27

the way a room changes when

10:29

a man becomes uncomfortable. No needs

10:31

to be softened. Framed. or delayed,

10:34

not because it's unclear, but because

10:36

the reaction might not be safe.

10:38

In the silence that follows being

10:40

interrupted, dismissed, or called dramatic for

10:42

expressing a perfectly reasonable feeling. Note

10:44

the super dramatic music and, you

10:46

know, like the way, the whole

10:48

thing is just so emotionally manipulative,

10:51

like from start to finish, sad

10:53

piano music, super scary. like weird

10:55

like found footage type b-roll you

10:57

know ripped paper like it's it's

10:59

a comp if you fall for

11:01

this you're retired and you do

11:03

get checked into an asylum but

11:06

anyway let's place the rest of

11:08

the clip. Toxic masculinity doesn't just

11:10

shape male behavior it reshapes the

11:12

lives of the people around them

11:14

especially women who are often left

11:16

to manage the emotional fallout. It

11:18

doesn't always show itself through violence.

11:20

More often, it shows up in

11:23

control in how some men treat

11:25

affection like a transaction, in how

11:27

emotional expression is treated like weakness,

11:29

and how that weakness is projected

11:31

onto the women closest to them.

11:33

Are you replying to people in

11:35

the chat? Yeah, somebody's upset, okay,

11:38

so Andy, De Frisney, De Frisney?

11:40

Says to the man in this

11:42

interview quickly if your points are

11:44

not being responded to this is

11:46

not a dialogue you're being talked

11:48

at not with What he's talking

11:50

about our conversation about who is

11:52

ultimate? to blame. I will maintain

11:55

that women will ultimately be to

11:57

blame for the implosion of Western

11:59

society, period. Not men. Men will

12:01

probably do whatever they can to

12:03

keep it afloat. At least the

12:05

men that are still somehow managed

12:07

to navigate the feminist minefield in

12:09

trying to disconnect or trying to

12:12

get them to maintain society without

12:14

having any positive reflection on themselves

12:16

for having done so is what

12:18

I'm getting it. There will be

12:20

men who navigate that minefield and

12:22

continue to try to maintain our

12:24

society as it is. But it

12:27

will be women who ultimately are

12:29

responsible for its end. That's what

12:31

I'm saying. It's going to be

12:33

women who are ultimately responsible because

12:35

for whatever reason, they can't express

12:37

any gratitude for the men who

12:39

maintain our society to the point

12:41

where now there are probably generations

12:44

of men who do not know

12:46

if maintaining the society actually benefits

12:48

women. You get what I'm saying?

12:50

I mean, the more feminists say,

12:52

oh, we always live in a

12:54

patriarchy. Everything is the worst patriarchal

12:56

day in all of human existence.

12:58

How do men know what to

13:01

do? Like, how is maintaining this

13:03

society, actually maintaining oppression of women?

13:05

Because that's where feminists are at

13:07

now. I think it was Naomi

13:09

Wolf, or Gloria Steinham. Oppression of

13:11

women has never been worse. Since

13:13

the 60s, it's gotten worse. How

13:16

do you be in that context?

13:18

How do you know how to

13:20

benefit the world or to uphold

13:22

Western civilization as a man in

13:24

that context? It will be because

13:26

women have wanted to have their

13:28

cake and eat it too, in

13:30

my opinion. And yes, it will

13:33

be, it will probably be a

13:35

result of men just giving up,

13:37

as Brian said, or men just

13:39

throwing in with a system that

13:41

makes some god damn fucking sense.

13:43

I think they'll do it if

13:45

men decide that they're just going

13:47

to seize power from women. They're

13:50

going to do it for women.

13:52

look we need to step in

13:54

here and stop you from destroying

13:56

everything because it's going to hurt

13:58

you. And so I think even

14:00

in the case where men step

14:02

in and oppress women, which I

14:05

don't think is going to look

14:07

like oppression, they're going to do

14:09

it to save them from themselves.

14:11

It's like some it's like a

14:13

woman gets drunk and rowdy in

14:15

a bar and starts fighting with

14:17

everybody and the bouncer or her

14:19

date or her date or some

14:22

random dude. just like takes her

14:24

and puts her in the car

14:26

and drives her to a hotel

14:28

room so that she can sleep

14:30

it off. Like for her for

14:32

her own protection. I think it

14:34

might get to that point. So

14:36

yeah, I don't think at least

14:39

on the Western side. I mean,

14:41

if you're talking about men who

14:43

are part of different religious or

14:45

ethnic continuums, yeah, they might actually

14:47

engage in the kind of violence.

14:49

But for men born in the

14:51

West. The reason why they will

14:54

dismantle women's rights is because they

14:56

think it will protect women. That'll

14:58

be the reason. And I've said

15:00

this for a decade now. And

15:02

feminism is laying the groundwork for

15:04

that because feminists, like look at

15:06

the case where that woman who

15:08

was an influencer who ended up

15:11

getting killed and she was pulled

15:13

over by the cops. Do you

15:15

remember that? I don't remember her

15:17

name. a van life thing and

15:19

i think her boyfriend or whatever

15:21

killed her yeah she had a

15:23

van life thing and her boyfriend

15:26

killed her or something if you

15:28

remember the name of this woman

15:30

just put it in the chat

15:32

and i really appreciate it but

15:34

the police pulled her over he

15:36

had the marks she was they

15:38

both i think pretty much insinuated

15:40

that she was the one who

15:43

was being the aggressor at that

15:45

point in time and the feminist

15:47

who got into this said that

15:49

the police failed to protect her

15:51

But the only thing that the

15:53

police could have done was have

15:55

a wardship over her and say,

15:57

okay, we think that you are

16:00

engaged in some kind of domestic

16:02

violence. Now, you know, get to

16:04

have authority over your life we

16:06

make the decisions for you because

16:08

they specifically said hey I think

16:10

you too got you should get

16:12

like separate hotel rooms and she

16:15

decided to continue on with him

16:17

at that point what are they

16:19

supposed to do if they don't

16:21

have the authority to make decisions

16:23

for her so if feminists continue

16:25

to to complain and get upset

16:27

at men for not making decisions

16:29

in favor of women's if safety

16:32

If they keep blaming men for

16:34

failing to keep women safe, eventually

16:36

men will realize, hey, the priority

16:38

here is to keep them safe.

16:40

Therefore, the police should have wardship

16:42

over all women in society. And

16:44

when a woman gets pulled over

16:46

like that and the police say,

16:49

hey, you need to go, you

16:51

know, cool off in separate hotel

16:53

rooms, instead of just making it

16:55

a suggestion, the police take her,

16:57

put her in their wardship van

16:59

and say now. you are our

17:01

property, we are going to take

17:04

you where you're safe. Right? That's

17:06

what the feminists are laying out

17:08

by continuing to say, not accept

17:10

that women have to deal with

17:12

the consequences of their own choices

17:14

in their lives. And that includes

17:16

consequences like those ones. Otherwise, men

17:18

have to have the authority to

17:21

stop, to make decisions for women.

17:23

Right. And I've said this for

17:25

years. And I've watched it

17:27

happen. And if we end up

17:29

in the handmaidens' tail, it'll be

17:31

because feminists, and it won't be

17:33

the handmaidens' tail, women will still

17:35

be able to choose who they

17:37

have children with, that just won't

17:39

be able to choose to walk

17:41

down a street. I got a,

17:43

so it was Gabby Petito, that's

17:45

the name of the one. Yeah,

17:47

thank you. And I also want

17:49

to point out, I know someone

17:51

who knows, who knew, who knew

17:53

her, who knew her, her, her,

17:55

her, who knew her, her, her,

17:57

her, who knew her, her, her,

17:59

her, her, her, her, her, her,

18:01

her, her, her, her, who knew,

18:04

her, who knew, who knew, who

18:06

knew, her, who knew, her, her,

18:08

who knew, who knew, her, who

18:10

knew, who knew, who knew, her,

18:12

who knew, who knew, who knew,

18:14

who knew, who knew, who knew,

18:16

her, who knew, semi vocal men's

18:18

issues advocate as well but when

18:20

Gabby potato Died she basically like

18:22

dropped out of social media. I

18:24

don't know that she figured out

18:26

how to reckon with it But

18:28

I know someone who know who

18:30

knew her so but anyway, okay.

18:32

So let's go ahead and play

18:34

the next clip So that bit

18:36

was well. It's the way that

18:38

the toxic masculinity doesn't just manifest

18:40

like in you know boys not

18:42

crying it's like the damage that's

18:44

left behind and it's it's very

18:46

it's very insidious yet invisible yet

18:48

ever present public spaces way silence

18:50

during conflict and second-guess themselves in

18:52

conversations that should have been simple

18:54

it's in the way their pain

18:56

is minimized and their anger is

18:58

framed as instability toxic masculinity doesn't

19:00

no this is about women yeah

19:02

it's it's about women yeah it's

19:04

about it's about women yeah it's

19:06

about it's about women or Not

19:08

because they chose that role, but

19:10

because the system around them quietly

19:12

assigned it. This isn't theoretical. It's

19:14

not just cultural analysis. It's in

19:16

the way women adjust their tone

19:18

before disagreeing. So yeah, see, it's

19:20

about women. I got something for

19:22

this and I sent it to

19:24

you. I don't know if you

19:26

saw that. It's in the way

19:28

women had got. Yeah, the toddlers.

19:30

It's in the way women adjust

19:33

their tone. Oh really? Is that

19:35

the case? Because I'm seeing something

19:37

completely different. I don't think women

19:39

adjust their tone. In fact, honestly,

19:41

yeah, let's take a look at

19:43

this. I'm gonna watch it, don't

19:45

say anything, because if you talk,

19:47

it'll change scenes. I'm

19:50

not a baby. You were in

19:53

the diaper? I'm not a baby

19:55

though. Yes, you were in the

19:57

diaper. Well, I'm not... A baby.

19:59

A diaper. I'm not. Well, I'm

20:02

not even a baby. No. But.

20:04

You can't say but. That's one.

20:06

What? Oh, I didn't say real.

20:09

Oh, bye. Oh, good lord. She

20:11

really knows it. She knows. It's

20:13

all in policing. Out of context.

20:16

Oh, sorry. I regret to inform

20:18

you. Oh good lord so yeah

20:20

she doesn't sound like she's in

20:23

fact if you look at the

20:25

body language this is something I

20:27

put it out on Twitter her

20:30

body language is very aggressive. Oh

20:32

yeah her fingers in his face

20:34

yeah we watch it already so

20:37

you can see that but She

20:39

actually pokes him at one point,

20:41

looks like it hurts. So she's

20:44

very dominating with her body language.

20:46

And I guarantee if it was

20:48

the other way around, the parents

20:51

who are currently snickering and just

20:53

filming would actually intervene. Because this

20:55

is the standard. Whatever this guy

20:58

is saying is bullshit. It's actually

21:00

justifying the reverse. This is what

21:02

is acceptable. this kind of very

21:05

aggressive physically dominating actually harmful body

21:07

language actually touching the boy and

21:09

hurting him in the process of

21:11

having the argument this is something

21:14

that most people look at and

21:16

they think it's cute because it's

21:18

a girl but if you reversed

21:21

the sexes and had the boy

21:23

doing that they would immediately say

21:25

that there's something wrong and the

21:28

parents should intervene to prevent the

21:30

boy from physically dominating his sister

21:32

in that way So, and this

21:35

wouldn't just be a cute thing

21:37

that was shared over all over

21:39

social media. And nobody remarked on

21:42

it either. Nobody said, hey, this

21:44

girl is being aggressive towards her

21:46

brother. Nobody. Well, actually, there was

21:49

somebody in the chat that said

21:51

there was. woman in the chat

21:53

that said technically she's a toddler

21:56

not a baby like completely an

21:58

adult woman completely missing the point

22:00

like yeah but she's wearing a

22:03

diaper that's the only thing the

22:05

boy is saying is that she's

22:07

wearing a diaper and she's that

22:10

she's insists that he think of

22:12

her differently despite the reality she's

22:14

a toddler yeah but they're not

22:17

even focusing on the logical art

22:19

or the illogical argument but again

22:21

the behavior This is behavior that

22:23

we find acceptable. So this man

22:26

is full of absolute shit when

22:28

he's talking about, oh, women are

22:30

expected to be small. And, and,

22:33

and, and, I mean, I get

22:35

into constant arguments with feminists, not

22:37

because they are actually changing the

22:40

dynamic between men and women. They

22:42

still, you know, there's still all

22:44

they can do is ask men

22:47

for stuff, except demanded or be

22:49

really crabby about it. And so

22:51

the only difference is, is that

22:54

I'm saying, hey, let's, and all

22:56

of that and they're like no

22:58

you're a pick me even though

23:01

it's exactly the same dynamic they're

23:03

still asking men for stuff too

23:05

or demanding it from men so

23:08

there's no change in the dynamic

23:10

they're not creating woman topia where

23:12

women do everything for themselves it

23:15

still demands towards men the only

23:17

difference is I'm saying hey let's

23:19

maybe be polite or pull some

23:22

of our own weight and be

23:24

polite and grateful about the things

23:26

that men do And my position,

23:29

and I know my position, is

23:31

a minority position, right? It is

23:33

a minority position among women, being

23:36

grateful to men, being kind to

23:38

men, being compassionate towards their issues,

23:40

is a minority position among women.

23:42

And so this guy is totally

23:45

out to lunch. And the other

23:47

thing is that I think what's

23:49

happening here, overall... when he talks

23:52

about these things because this this

23:54

this dynamic between those that boy

23:56

and that girl is the acceptable

23:59

dynamic is that he wants to

24:01

appeal to the possibility of the

24:03

demonic boy. the reversed dynamic as

24:06

justification for that girl abusing her

24:08

brother. Oh, her brother could. Oh,

24:10

he could be that way. Therefore,

24:13

it's justified to actually abuse boys

24:15

to make sure they don't become

24:17

that way. And I think that's

24:20

what this all is about. Adolescence

24:22

isn't about reality. It's about an

24:24

excuse to justify abusing boys. Okay.

24:27

All right. Let's play more. It's

24:30

in the way they pause before

24:32

rejecting someone. It's in the way

24:34

they carry tension in public spaces,

24:36

way silence during conflict, and second-guess

24:38

themselves in conversations that should have

24:40

been simple. Really? In the way

24:43

their pain is minimized. This is

24:45

not the way women conduct themselves.

24:47

They're so afraid about strange men,

24:49

but they still, you know, hook

24:51

up with them. There this is

24:53

this doesn't resemble reality. I don't

24:55

see women doing this at all

24:57

Again, they're trying to construct a

24:59

justification. This isn't describing reality. It's

25:01

describing a justification For a certain

25:04

type of behavior towards men. Okay.

25:06

This might not be a real

25:08

person though. This might be an

25:10

AI because some of the ways

25:12

that it speaks well like somebody

25:14

may have gave Fed the AI

25:16

a bunch of prompts and asked

25:18

it to write and you know

25:20

talk about but it doesn't matter

25:22

because what it shows is like

25:25

this is how normal this is

25:27

how normalized it is the AI

25:29

can regurgitate feminist talking points just

25:31

as efficiently as a regular feminist

25:33

can like that just goes to

25:35

show you know how pre-recorded these

25:37

people are literal NPCs But I

25:39

don't know if I'm right about

25:41

that. It just sat, like I

25:44

listened to it and there's some

25:46

of the way. of speaking sound

25:48

a bit AI-ish, like the pauses,

25:50

like where, you know, because like

25:52

when human beings talk, we have

25:54

a certain way of like speaking

25:56

sentences and, you know, we know

25:58

when we're, when appropriate pauses happen

26:00

and this one misses some and

26:02

I'm like, is this AI, I

26:05

think it's AI. Toxic masculinity doesn't

26:07

just limit men emotionally, it punishes

26:09

the people around them for trying

26:11

to connect with what's buried underneath.

26:13

So when we speak of toxic

26:15

masculinity, We're not only talking about

26:17

the damage it does to boys

26:19

who, but told not to cry.

26:21

We're talking about the harm it

26:23

spreads outward, quietly, chronically, and often

26:26

invisibly, into the lives of the

26:28

women who are taught to carry

26:30

what men were never allowed to

26:32

feel. Oh my God, dude. This

26:34

is so boring. Like I feel

26:36

like I have to... How can

26:38

I come up with a novel

26:40

way? of responding to the same

26:42

old shit. Like I don't like,

26:45

it's like, there's no way to

26:47

do it. It's just, it's just

26:49

trash. Let me see if Allison

26:51

is back. She apparently had a

26:53

reboot or something. Artforce says, yep,

26:55

that's AI. Yeah, I mean, it

26:57

sounds like AI to me. I

26:59

watched the original source, the comment

27:01

section sucks. Yeah, yeah, because it's,

27:03

no, it's just so easily consumed

27:06

though. Allison's back, okay. Yeah, sorry

27:08

about that. No, no, it's all

27:10

right. So, do you want to

27:12

hear that last bit again? I'll

27:14

play it short. Is it anything

27:16

I haven't heard? Okay, all right.

27:18

Well, no, nothing is any, like,

27:20

this is AI, which I think

27:22

it is, nothing that it's going

27:24

to say is going to be

27:27

new because it's derivative. Thinking about

27:29

the damage it does to boys

27:31

who are told not to cry.

27:33

We're talking about the harm it

27:35

spreads outward, quietly, chronically, and often

27:37

invisibly, into the lives of the

27:39

women who are taught to carry

27:41

what men were never allowed to

27:43

feel. What? Wait, wait, wait, wait,

27:46

what? No, they're saying toxic masculinity

27:48

is not only like how something

27:50

that harms men because it doesn't

27:52

let them feel or whatever, but

27:54

it also harms women in like

27:56

little ways, you know, invisibly and

27:58

chronically. It's like cancer. This is

28:00

basically like testosterone poisoning was the

28:02

term that feminists used to use

28:04

in the 60s. when they were

28:07

referring to toxic masculinity or hegemonic

28:09

masculinity or curiosity or whatever it

28:11

is they choose to call it

28:13

today. But yeah, obviously toxic masculinity

28:15

exists women most affected, but also

28:17

when it's convenient it hurts men,

28:19

but mostly it hurts women, let's

28:21

be real. Like that's what the,

28:23

that's the, that's the payload. Yep,

28:25

that's the payload. But I don't,

28:28

like if men are not taught

28:30

to express these emotions and how

28:32

are women carrying them. Like how

28:34

is it possible that men? Can

28:36

be taught to to bottle up

28:38

these emotions and not express them

28:40

and women are still carrying them.

28:42

But also if men express them

28:44

women are doing emotional labor. It's

28:47

almost like you just have to

28:49

see being a man is living

28:51

in permanent state of a hair

28:53

suit. You know what I mean?

28:55

You're just supposed to be uncomfortable

28:57

all the time. You're supposed to

28:59

be like, you, I hate myself.

29:01

Wearing pajamas made out of like,

29:03

fiberglass insulation. It's just worst feeling.

29:05

I feel for men just on

29:08

that level alone. It's like, can

29:10

they not take the fiberglass pajamas

29:12

off for once? You know, and

29:14

so it's not good enough that

29:16

man, you know, maintains society. They

29:18

also have to feel like shit

29:20

constantly. Just just shit like everything

29:22

every single moment of the day.

29:24

They should feel like shit You

29:26

know I and put on that

29:29

fiberglass long underwear. I don't want

29:31

to hear it. I wish men,

29:33

I've started to, in my arguments,

29:35

I've started to use something I

29:37

call the feminist Adronicus, which is

29:39

basically the feminist conjecture about what

29:41

men are and how men react.

29:43

And I, sometimes I wish men

29:45

were the feminist Andronicus because a

29:48

woman would have gone up. and

29:50

said something like, I feel, and

29:52

the feminist and Dronicus would have

29:54

been like, no, no you don't,

29:56

you go to jail now, and

29:58

we're slapping a scold's bridle into

30:00

you. Women don't get to speak

30:02

in public. That's what the feminist

30:04

and Dronicus would have done. The

30:06

first suffer jet comes on to

30:09

the stage, and she just get

30:11

dragged off and put in the

30:13

sandwich minds, if feminist conjecture about

30:15

the nature of man was correct.

30:17

The feminist and Dronicus, which has

30:19

just been, yep, no, no, I'm

30:21

stopping you right there. There's no

30:23

I. What, what, lady? You're a

30:25

woman. You don't have a self?

30:27

There's no I. Those are forbidden

30:30

words for women. That's what the

30:32

feminist and Dronicus would have done.

30:34

All right, so let's keep going.

30:36

Okay. Because she had been broken

30:38

down. Because in his eyes, she

30:40

had become easier and that's the

30:42

part that lingers. Not just what

30:44

he did, but how plainly he

30:46

believes it made sense. He thought

30:49

she'd be more open to him.

30:51

And how improbable it is? Like,

30:53

it's improbable. Like, I mean, the

30:55

feminist and Dronicus would think in

30:57

terms of the logic of that

30:59

boy, but I think most boys

31:01

would be like, wow, she's feeling

31:03

bad. Maybe I will, you know,

31:05

comfort her. I'm going in for

31:07

the kill. She's weak. She's a

31:10

weak gazelle. Isolate her. from the

31:12

herd. Killer! That's the feminist and

31:14

dronicus thinking. It's not actual man

31:16

thinking. Okay. Oh yeah, for sure.

31:18

All right. Like me more, when

31:20

she was weaker, he says it

31:22

calmly, without malice, as if it

31:24

makes perfect sense. Like if he

31:26

wasn't trolling, why would he say

31:28

that to the therapist like that?

31:31

Do you know that people, that

31:33

men who are genuinely psychopathic are

31:35

able to... to pretend to be

31:37

normal to a degree as long

31:39

as they don't aren't like, you

31:41

know, have retardation. So why would

31:43

he just openly say, yeah, I

31:45

did it because she was weak?

31:47

Twirling mustache. And then I was

31:50

going to tie her to the

31:52

train tracks. Like, Jesus Christ. It's

31:54

almost that on the nose though.

31:56

Like, they might as well have

31:58

just gone the extra... Just go

32:00

the just put in snidely whiplash

32:02

just go the extra mile just

32:04

do it I mean like you're

32:06

basically like trying to oh we

32:08

want this to we want and

32:11

and you know what really annoys

32:13

me is that people keep falling

32:15

for this shit I'll show you

32:17

guys a little bit later like

32:19

some of people who are supposedly

32:21

based were falling for this and

32:23

I know why because they're not

32:25

ready to look at this in

32:27

the way that you should be

32:29

looking at this, which is what

32:32

I said at the outset, the

32:34

toxic masculinity argument, when used against

32:36

white boys, because that's the acceptable

32:38

level, it works on two fronts.

32:40

One is that the people who

32:42

care about, were concerned about the

32:44

racial component, will only see the

32:46

racial component and not see that

32:48

this is an attack on men,

32:51

and the people who don't will

32:53

think it's not about them when

32:55

they're men. and they will miss

32:57

it completely so like everyone gets

32:59

all swept up in the whole

33:01

like Well, actually, these crimes were,

33:03

you know, this, the crime of

33:05

the story is based on an

33:07

actual knife crime that happened in

33:09

the UK, where a black man

33:12

or a black boy did this

33:14

to a black girl, and they're,

33:16

and they're like, you know, intentionally

33:18

doing this anti-white thing. And it's

33:20

like, yeah, because people like you

33:22

will will obsess over the wrong

33:24

thing, which is the race of

33:26

the perpetrator, which is the real

33:28

goal, and the people who oppose

33:30

you will... understand that this is

33:33

just an attack on men. So

33:35

they'll like accept that. They'll be

33:37

like, well, you know, and then

33:39

when it does happen in the

33:41

case where they can't actually, you

33:43

know, like get around it where

33:45

you show them, or here's real

33:47

evidence, then they're just gonna broaden

33:49

the net and say, well, yeah,

33:52

it's a problem with men. And

33:54

because you don't want to see

33:56

that as like the real issue,

33:58

and I don't say you, the

34:00

audience, but I mean some of

34:02

these people who are supposedly based.

34:04

They're going to for like excuse

34:06

it because they're like well I

34:08

don't I don't know about the

34:10

whole male thing I mean like

34:13

I know you know because they

34:15

can't get around that they Martin

34:17

Bailey yeah it is it'll be

34:19

it take me a moment to

34:21

sort of set this up let

34:23

me just bear with me guys

34:25

I know um what are you

34:27

doing now what's going on can

34:29

you hear me yeah I can

34:31

hear you oh I'm I'm I'm

34:34

doing like three things but I'm

34:36

gonna I'm gonna focus on this

34:38

for a for a second it's

34:40

a So they present the white

34:42

boy and people are like, but

34:44

the real, the real case was

34:46

a black boy and black girl.

34:48

We've whitewashed this. And then they'll

34:50

say, but it's all men. That's,

34:53

that is the, the Bailey is

34:55

the white man and the Mont

34:57

is all men. Yeah. And when

34:59

you accept the premise, even if

35:01

it is like, you know, like

35:03

the other thing is like, even

35:05

if you accept that, yes, this

35:07

is a real crime that happened.

35:09

But you also miss the other

35:11

part of it is that the

35:14

boy that they're presenting. isn't just

35:16

a white boy, he's a boy

35:18

whose father taught him that according

35:20

to the narrative of the show.

35:22

And the other kid probably doesn't

35:24

know his father. Because like if

35:26

you, this is like a thing

35:28

that you, that you're going to

35:30

miss because most of these, most

35:32

people, most people that are talking

35:35

about this, they're not looking at

35:37

the family dynamics at all. They're

35:39

not thinking about it. They're not

35:41

looking at this from the perspective

35:43

of what's the deal with. you

35:45

know, the presence of fathers, what's

35:47

the deal with masculinity itself? No,

35:49

they're all on board. Like almost

35:51

everyone else is on board with

35:54

at least part of this narrative,

35:56

whether they're, you know, distracted by

35:58

the racial components or the family,

36:00

the part that they're not looking

36:02

into, they're just not accounting for

36:04

it. That's why, like, like, I

36:06

see a lot of, like, supposing

36:08

the, like, wignat types, like white

36:10

nationalist types, right. and they see

36:12

this as like obviously this is

36:15

race bait for them that they

36:17

just eat up right now and

36:19

I get it but you're missing

36:21

the fact that this isn't about

36:23

you in that regard it's about

36:25

you as men and they're also

36:27

the same guys were like we're

36:29

gonna make families and we're gonna

36:31

focus on all that it's like

36:33

yeah but your greatest enemy are

36:36

the white women like that if

36:38

you don't address the woman question

36:40

I'm sorry white nationalist, you're fucked,

36:42

you're not going to change that

36:44

situation at all. And they don't

36:46

like you because they have bought

36:48

into most of this propaganda. So

36:50

you have to confront this at

36:52

the gender level. It's the only

36:55

way the race shit, the religious

36:57

shit, all the other shit is

36:59

like it used to be the

37:01

point or used to be a

37:03

thing that I would talk about

37:05

when the Black Lives Matter thing

37:07

was happening, right? You know, they

37:09

only care about... men when it's

37:11

a black man that dies in

37:13

a way that is politically expedient

37:16

for like for these activist grifters

37:18

and I was trying to explain

37:20

to people that if you don't

37:22

look at this from the perspective

37:24

of how what are the gender

37:26

dynamics at place? what are the

37:28

sex dynamics between men and women?

37:30

Why is this happening? Like if

37:32

you have a problem with rape

37:34

culture, right, male rapists, for example,

37:37

it's like, well, let's look at

37:39

the history of these male rapists.

37:41

Oh, look, almost all of them

37:43

have been raped by women in

37:45

a lot of places. Oh, but

37:47

we're not going to address that,

37:49

right? This is the same people

37:51

would be like. Well, I think

37:53

it's just not the same when

37:56

a teacher bangs her students. Because,

37:58

like, you know, when a female

38:00

teacher's bangs, bangs a male student,

38:02

because for whatever reason, male students

38:04

are just different that way. And

38:06

it's like, yeah, but those guys,

38:08

because they don't understand consent because

38:10

of how they were treated by

38:12

an adult, if they go on

38:14

later to commit a sexual crime,

38:17

then you're just going to say,

38:19

well, that's just men, yes. And

38:21

it's really frustrating because these people,

38:23

you know, that they have like

38:25

massive platforms and they're still saying

38:27

the same stupid shit that they've

38:29

been saying for 10 years. They

38:31

just can't see it. If you

38:33

look in the link, did you

38:36

send me? Yeah, it's a link

38:38

to a comment in our resources.

38:40

And incidentally, guys, if you want

38:42

to see the resources that we

38:44

use, go to Badger Nation. Dot

38:46

online and be part of our

38:48

discord. That's where I put the

38:50

stuff up. So anyway, this is

38:52

a link to one of my

38:54

posts or well comments in Badger

38:57

Nation. Online. Yes, men will be

38:59

men regardless of intersectionality. And in

39:01

fact, this is just incoherent nonsense.

39:03

I'll read it to you guys

39:05

though. Men have always had the

39:07

upper hand, therefore misinjury does not

39:09

exist because it has never and

39:11

will never be as bad or

39:13

rampant as misogyny. Y'all just want

39:15

to use homophobia, ableism and racism

39:18

as an excuse to try to

39:20

get treated the way we women

39:22

have been treated. So... My first

39:24

read of that statement is that

39:26

she thinks men are using Intersectional

39:28

issues in order to get attention

39:30

This is despite the fact that

39:32

black men are the ones who

39:34

are more likely to be shot.

39:37

Actually, it's white men, but let's

39:39

not count that Daymen were the

39:41

ones who were more likely to

39:43

be beaten and... By far... German

39:45

castration and other stuff like that.

39:47

Men who are disabled are less

39:49

likely to find partners and more

39:51

likely to be discriminated against. So

39:53

in every instance, homophobia, ableism and

39:55

racism actually hits men harder, and

39:58

yet she's saying that men are

40:00

using these things to get consideration

40:02

when they shouldn't, when it should

40:04

only be women. And then I

40:06

said, I asked her to clarify

40:08

this, try and get treated the

40:10

way women have been treated, and

40:12

what is that? And she responds

40:14

with raped abuser or beat murdered.

40:16

You have to be stupid if

40:19

you don't know that. I'm not

40:21

answering you anymore though, so you

40:23

can go suck yourself. Now again,

40:25

I don't know if this is

40:27

a frickin' bot might be, but

40:29

again, bots do scrape a whole

40:31

bunch of opinions that are very

40:33

common. So this isn't a completely

40:35

incoherent thought, but it does reveal

40:38

something. intersectionality is used as a

40:40

siphon to take all of these

40:42

issues and move them to women.

40:44

So it's not, it is not

40:46

black men being shot by the

40:48

police. Using the intersectional pipeline, you

40:50

remove the man because black women

40:52

have it worse and then you

40:54

remove the black because women have

40:56

it worse and now it's just

40:59

women have it worse. That's how

41:01

intersectionality works. They take these issues

41:03

that verifiably affect men more and

41:05

they turn them into issues that

41:07

suddenly and inexplicably just somehow affect

41:09

women more and justify making women

41:11

millionaires. That's how it works. And

41:13

if you cannot see through this

41:15

and see it is men and

41:17

women. Yes, Britain shouldn't be importing

41:20

people with these kind of very...

41:22

different cultural attitudes and from places

41:24

where they're dealing with a lot

41:26

of violence, sexual and physical. So

41:28

they have problems along that score,

41:30

especially from areas where they basically

41:32

rape boys in order to preserve

41:34

women's chastity. That stuff that needs

41:36

to be very carefully dealt with,

41:39

not just like, oh, we're going

41:41

to pick you up and smash

41:43

you into a Western ethnic group,

41:45

but that doesn't work. And it's

41:47

incredibly arrogant to assume that somehow...

41:49

people in other cultures are still

41:51

just inherently white Westerners. It just

41:53

doesn't work. So I'm not saying

41:55

that this is appropriate, but it's

41:57

like at the end of the

42:00

day, they are using this black

42:02

boy who shot a black girl

42:04

in order to have a black

42:06

girl in order to manipulate the

42:08

narrative around all men, including white

42:10

men, but all men, because white

42:12

is now men. Like, why is

42:14

male? All right, so I- And

42:16

there's a number of ways to

42:18

pivot on this too. Like, if

42:21

there's an incident, for example, that

42:23

involves a man doing harm to

42:25

another man, like for example, prison

42:27

rape, all of a sudden, the

42:29

men who are being raped don't

42:31

matter because now we're just gonna

42:33

talk about the rapist men. So

42:35

like that's another thing that they

42:37

do to a sense. It's all

42:40

about how can we make it

42:42

to where women are always the

42:44

primary victims of whatever it is,

42:46

or male victims don't exist. Like

42:48

that's all it is, right? And

42:50

so they do that. Like when

42:52

there was an incident in Texas

42:54

recently, I was talking about where

42:56

a black man stabbed a white

42:58

man to death in, you know,

43:01

over a seat or something at

43:03

like a track me. And it's

43:05

really terrible and everything. But feminists,

43:07

if they say anything about it,

43:09

it's going to be about masculinity.

43:11

And they're going to not talk

43:13

about the racial component because that's

43:15

not as useful. So they just

43:17

make it about men. None of

43:19

these people have any interest in

43:22

solving these problems. Nothing about this

43:24

at all will ever come up.

43:26

because they don't want to fix

43:28

it. They just want to figure

43:30

out how can we blame men

43:32

and how can we victimize women.

43:34

Let's try to get some more.

43:36

How much more time? I had

43:38

10. So what number are we?

43:41

This is number five. This is

43:43

number five. So. Okay, so I'm

43:45

gonna do the things. I know

43:47

it's a bit late, but I

43:49

was doing some stuff in the

43:51

background. So. If you would like

43:53

to send us a message, the

43:55

very best way to send us

43:57

a tip and a message is

43:59

feed the badger.com/just the tip. You

44:02

get a little more space to

44:04

send whatever comment you want, if

44:06

you want to send a comment,

44:08

can just be a tip. We

44:10

appreciate that. You get a little

44:12

more space to comment and you

44:14

also send it directly to us

44:16

which avoids it. being subject to

44:18

YouTube's comment pressure system, which I'll

44:20

leave it as an exercise what

44:23

that means. So Feedthebadger.com/just the tip

44:25

to send us a comment, a

44:27

tip in a message, and if

44:29

you would like to support the

44:31

show, you're just like flat out,

44:33

I want to see you guys

44:35

succeed in your endeavors, then go

44:37

to Feedthebadger.com/support and put a few

44:39

shekeles in the hat. It should

44:42

be live now, there might be

44:44

a few glitches, because I just,

44:46

if you were here we're here

44:48

me clicking, that was what I

44:50

was what I was what I

44:52

was what I was what I

44:54

was what I was what I

44:56

was doing. But it looks like

44:58

it's working and so go to

45:00

feed the badger.com/support and Just yeah,

45:03

just to throw a few shuckles

45:05

in the hat so that we

45:07

can continue to bring you this

45:09

very very different content. Let's say

45:11

I think most people just won't

45:13

do it They just will not

45:15

say yeah, this this comes down

45:17

to men and women and this

45:19

is something that we need to

45:21

deal with on that level and

45:24

it's because most people cannot blame

45:26

women They just can't but I

45:28

can I can do that and

45:30

nobody can stop me so That's

45:32

right. Okay, let's play. Anything to

45:34

like, comment on, and forward to

45:36

your friends. It turns behaviors that

45:38

once happened in private, quiet, whispered,

45:40

sometimes even shameful, into group. So

45:43

he's talking about social media and

45:45

the role it plays, and he's,

45:47

again, not like women, women are

45:49

not social media, right? But it's

45:51

all run by boys. Did you

45:53

know that? Did you guys know?

45:55

If you go to Instagram, it's

45:57

just a bunch of dudes. That's

45:59

all it is. But anyway, let's

46:01

play some more. But he's framing.

46:04

Well, actually, I'm starting to actually

46:06

think, this is likely AI, like

46:08

I'm almost 99% sure. And then

46:10

it makes me wonder if this

46:12

AI, this whole thing was created

46:14

by a woman who thought the

46:16

message would be taken more seriously

46:18

if a male voice was delivering

46:20

it. A private photo. Leaked. Passed

46:22

from phone to phone like a

46:25

joke. One person started it. But

46:27

almost everyone participated. And no one

46:29

stopped it. That's what makes even

46:31

more dangerous. Plot of the show

46:33

where some girl... I think she

46:35

had like sent a nude or

46:37

something revealing or whatever to some

46:39

guy and he... like shared it

46:41

everywhere and she got bullied for

46:44

it or something. Do you think

46:46

if one of these boys shared

46:48

a new to himself with one

46:50

of these girls the entire female

46:52

population of the school wouldn't have

46:54

a copy and be laughing at

46:56

it? Like are we not gonna

46:58

ask that? Are we gonna blame

47:00

that on patriarchy too? Well patriarchy

47:02

makes women feel like they gotta

47:05

put their news out. Did you

47:07

guys know that? You go find

47:09

a girl that you have a

47:11

crush on and say look patriarchy

47:13

says you gotta show me your

47:15

tits. And then they have to

47:17

do it, they have to do

47:19

it. Like they're all tearful and

47:21

oh, okay, click. Behave a bit

47:23

more of like the feminist and

47:26

drawnicus guys. You know, you don't

47:28

want to prove the feminist wrong

47:30

by actually acting like a normal

47:32

man. You need to act in

47:34

the manner consistent with their stupid

47:36

theories. Oh, wait, Andrew Tate does

47:38

that. Okay. Well, yeah. worked for

47:40

him or whatever it was. No,

47:42

they didn't, they didn't know what

47:45

was happening. They were just brainless

47:47

balloon girls that were just out

47:49

there putting, putting, putting, like it's

47:51

just crazy like how people. just

47:53

pretend like women don't look foot

47:55

well I don't know how many

47:57

probably not a lot but it

47:59

doesn't matter a significant number of

48:01

women make only fans accounts as

48:03

soon as they think they can

48:06

do it if not before that

48:08

have you heard of the Bob

48:10

House you know you know the

48:12

Bob House is I think we

48:14

talked a little bit it was

48:16

on Manifestel and she manifestel of

48:18

course treated like oh yeah this

48:20

is women getting that bag while

48:22

also securing their own bag so

48:24

like women celebrate their own bag

48:27

so like women celebrate other women

48:29

being like You know, putting their

48:31

bodies out on social media, and

48:33

when other guys look at it,

48:35

it's a problem, even though women

48:37

are doing it for the look,

48:39

for the attention. Like, we just,

48:41

we're just trying to square this

48:43

circle. So, hmm. The idea that

48:46

something so invasive, so violating can

48:48

feel normal, like it's just part

48:50

of growing up, like it's something

48:52

boys just do. And when everyone's

48:54

doing it stops feeling like a

48:56

choice. It starts feeling like culture.

49:00

Only boys do that though. Girls

49:02

don't do that. Again, just I

49:04

want as a thought experiment. Imagine

49:06

it was the reverse and this

49:09

boy shared his nude with this

49:11

girl. That nude, like they should

49:13

probably research girls and gossiping in

49:16

like quantum physics because that nude

49:18

would probably before it even hit

49:20

her phone. It would have hit

49:22

the phone of all of her

49:25

girlfriends. and all of her frenemies.

49:27

Like before he even hit send,

49:29

that photo would already be in

49:32

the entire collective girl hive mind.

49:34

It's a mean girl quantum paradox,

49:36

but it would be all over

49:38

the school. And I guarantee that

49:41

that every single girl would be

49:43

like, like, seriously, just do the

49:45

thought experiment. And would there be

49:47

any recourse? This would be considered,

49:50

what is it revenge porn? Do

49:52

you think there would be any

49:54

recourse for that boy? No. would

49:57

be brought into the principal's office

49:59

and the principal would look at

50:01

him or what is it like

50:03

I don't know if it's the

50:06

principal in the UK the predator

50:08

yeah whatever they call it would

50:10

drag him into the office yeah

50:13

the dragoon of education I don't

50:15

know but just drag him in

50:17

the office look actually that'd be

50:19

fucking cool as shit they had

50:22

like armor and like maybe a

50:24

halber or something the dragoon of

50:26

education yeah like a horse like

50:29

with barting Okay, but he just

50:31

get dragged into whatever office they

50:33

have, head office they had, headmaster

50:35

that's what it is. Dumbledore. Yeah,

50:38

like how many? Be a wizard.

50:40

No, it would be, you know,

50:42

like it's, they would laugh at

50:45

him. And there would be no

50:47

reprisals for the girls because it

50:49

would be blamed on the boy

50:51

for sending it in the first

50:54

place. That's the difference between how

50:56

we treat boys and girls. Right.

50:58

If the boy sends a girl

51:01

his news and she sends it

51:03

to every single girl she has

51:05

contact information with, plus maybe a

51:07

few around on the other side

51:10

of the world, maybe puts it

51:12

on a website, maybe gives it

51:14

to a bunch of known pedophile

51:16

offenders. Hey, here's a boy who

51:19

really likes to share his news.

51:21

That girl will receive absolutely no

51:23

reprisal, because everybody will say, well,

51:26

why did you send it to

51:28

her in the first place? Because

51:30

we always refocus on the choices

51:32

of boys and men when anything

51:35

bad befalls them because otherwise we'd

51:37

have to look at the choices

51:39

of women and girls and actually

51:42

regard women in terms of being

51:44

responsible for the well-being of the

51:46

men and boys in their life.

51:48

And we can't do that. That's

51:51

like, that's black speech. Okay, and

51:53

also you know again if you

51:55

need reminding like if you're new

51:58

here You don't know like women

52:00

are way more vicious to other

52:02

women on social media than boys

52:04

are Like that's literally what social

52:07

media is for. It's basically a

52:09

battlefield where women try to one

52:11

up each other in status by

52:14

tearing each other down. Boys are

52:16

not the reason for that. It

52:18

is not caused by patriarchy. It's

52:20

just women competing in the sexual

52:23

marketplace with other women. And that's

52:25

mostly where it occurs. This whole

52:27

thing about like the problem with

52:30

boys in social media, it's just

52:32

kind of retarded because you're leaving

52:34

out. Again, the dynamic, women treat

52:36

social media like a call of

52:39

duty lobby with other women. They

52:41

will find ways to pair at

52:43

your ego that men couldn't even

52:45

conceive of because they're not able

52:48

to pay that much attention. So

52:50

anyway, let's get to the next

52:52

clip. This is 1120. Yeah. Boundaries

52:55

aren't real. They're obstacles. And the

52:57

sharing of a private photo doesn't

52:59

feel like a violation. It feels

53:01

like access, like a door opening.

53:04

This is what we need to

53:06

name. I mean, either we're going

53:08

to judge girls by the same

53:11

standards? Because if you hold women,

53:13

you don't hold women in the

53:15

same account as men, they aren't

53:17

going to develop the skills necessary

53:20

to achieve in the same ways.

53:22

So we are not going to

53:24

hold women accountable, for example, if

53:27

a boy shares his nudes with

53:29

her, for her behavior, but we

53:31

will. We'll say, well, why did

53:33

you give it to her? If

53:36

you didn't expect her to share

53:38

it with half, you know, the

53:40

female half of the human race,

53:43

why did you give her news?

53:45

If we're not going to say

53:47

that to a girl as well,

53:49

to a boy as well, I

53:52

mean, what is equality at this

53:54

point? It's an excuse for special

53:56

treatment of women, it seems. All

53:59

right. It doesn't exist. But the

54:01

ecosystem that allows it to grow,

54:03

because when everyone is laughing, reposting,

54:05

staying silent, What feels criminal on

54:08

paper starts to feel cultural in

54:10

practice. And that's when it becomes

54:12

hardest to stop. Oh my God.

54:14

So dark, I'm so afraid for

54:17

all girls everywhere. Especially the ones

54:19

that choose to put their private

54:21

matters online, it's crazy. Next clip

54:24

is, okay, let's play this one.

54:26

Oh, inches. Yeah, I was gonna

54:28

say that a lot of, I

54:30

think they're finding a lot of

54:33

red bench porn as done by

54:35

women. Yeah. Go figure. Wild. Absolutely

54:37

insane. I think women were capable

54:40

of doing anything bad, especially not

54:42

to the sisterhood. Yeah, but you

54:44

know, like, are women even capable

54:46

of doing anything at all? Oh,

54:49

well, yeah, if they do anything

54:51

bad, it's because of men. I

54:53

forgot. They're basically like skin suits

54:56

that men put on every so

54:58

often when they want to do

55:00

bad things. You haven't even exist?

55:02

I mean, after all, people who

55:05

assert this stuff can't define one.

55:07

I can't guarantee that I'm not

55:09

talking to a hologram. Maybe my

55:12

light bees floating around somewhere. Like

55:14

a million little drones and they're

55:16

all making a shape and it

55:18

looks like you. Anyway, let's go.

55:21

I've been studying this for years.

55:23

Studies show that the more a

55:25

boy believes he has to be

55:28

a man. in the narrow traditional

55:30

sense, the more likely he is

55:32

to struggle with depression, anxiety, and

55:34

loneliness. Time, he's less likely to

55:37

see- Like here's that the survivors

55:39

sit bias, okay? I've actually seen

55:41

the statistics. And we don't know.

55:43

Men who are more masculine may

55:46

struggle with depression more, but they're

55:48

alive to struggle with it. And

55:50

what they also found, this man-box

55:53

research found, is that men who-

55:55

And what they, what they're actually

55:57

looking at is men who regard

55:59

masculinity as a positive. So even

56:02

if you think being masculine is

56:04

like painting the most awesome painting,

56:06

if you regard being masculine as

56:09

positive. than you are seen as

56:11

being in the man box. See,

56:13

how you get out of the

56:15

man box is you regard masculinity

56:18

as being only negative. And what

56:20

they found is that men who

56:22

believe that there are positive aspects

56:25

to masculinity that are unique to

56:27

men actually do have the ability

56:29

to cry in front of their

56:31

friends and talk to their issues

56:34

with people, men who... Think that

56:36

masculinity affords them a positive personal

56:38

sense of self are actually able

56:41

to talk to people more it's

56:43

feminist men who think that masculinity

56:45

is horrible and awful Who actually

56:47

struggle with talking to other people

56:50

crying in front of other people

56:52

and it's interesting because the guys

56:54

who do think that masculinity has

56:57

value and also pursue stoicism? Again,

56:59

they are able to express their

57:01

emotions when they think it's appropriate.

57:03

The only difference is they choose,

57:06

and for whatever reason, because they

57:08

value themselves, they can value their

57:10

feelings more, if you want to

57:12

look at it that way. Men

57:15

who are masculine, or at least

57:17

find value in the masculine, are

57:19

able to cry in front of

57:22

their friends. they are able to

57:24

talk about things to other people.

57:26

They may struggle with depression more,

57:28

but that may be because they

57:31

don't die from it as much.

57:33

All right, so that's the only

57:35

thing they got here. That literally

57:38

when he says men who are

57:40

masculine struggle with depression more, that's

57:42

all they got, because everything else

57:44

they found the opposite. They found

57:47

that feminist men have trouble talking

57:49

about their problems with their friends.

57:51

They have trouble crying in front

57:54

of others. feminist men are actually

57:56

the ones who are closed off.

57:58

And what a surprise. surprise. If

58:00

you think your masculinity is awful

58:02

and you think you have nothing to

58:05

complain about because you're a man and

58:07

if you think you're responsible for all

58:09

the world's problem, what a surprise you

58:12

don't think that it's right for you

58:14

to actually talk about them. And that

58:16

again, this is the only thing that

58:18

they could possibly spin as a negative

58:21

towards masculine men. And if you think

58:23

about it not in terms of survivorship

58:25

bias, it's not a negative at all.

58:28

Because you don't know... How many feminist

58:30

men have actually off

58:32

themselves? How many men

58:34

who don't regard anything

58:36

positive in their masculinity

58:38

have off themselves as

58:41

a result of being depressed? Okay,

58:43

you don't know that until

58:45

you know that saying that

58:47

masculine men struggle with

58:49

depression. No, it's like saying people

58:52

who eat healthy struggle with cancer

58:54

and then you look at it

58:56

and you see They actually

58:58

live longer with cancer

59:01

because they're eating

59:03

healthy. Die. They just die.

59:05

Like, yeah. Oh, okay. All right. Okay.

59:07

So let's listen to

59:10

the thi-chological impacts,

59:12

the sea-chological

59:14

impacts on young man. Why?

59:16

Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait,

59:19

wait, sigh. Yeah, I see

59:21

that. Is it spelled completely

59:23

wrong? This is like the

59:25

the lukewarm scrapings of people's

59:27

brains on young man and

59:30

young is capitalized for some

59:32

reason. I don't know. Is

59:34

it a man named Young?

59:36

Is that what it is?

59:38

Richard you sent us AI

59:40

Slop. Yeah, this is absolute garbage.

59:43

Okay. This is like the

59:45

the lukewarm scrapings of

59:47

people's brains. Let's be

59:50

honest. Yep, no for sure

59:52

for sure. It's not not

59:54

real, but okay. Let's take

59:56

a look at the speechological

59:58

impacts on young man more likely

1:00:00

to reach out. More likely

1:00:03

to feel like asking for

1:00:05

support means admitting failure. So

1:00:07

it stays bottled up. They

1:00:10

try to fix it with

1:00:12

validation, with control, with conquest.

1:00:14

They chase a sense of

1:00:16

being enough. But this thing

1:00:19

is doing a lot these

1:00:21

claims are doing a lot

1:00:23

of heavy lifting. Yeah men.

1:00:26

See, talks about stability makes

1:00:28

men into conquering warriors. We

1:00:30

don't like. Really, we don't

1:00:33

like that. That whole song,

1:00:35

it's raining men, no. Lean,

1:00:37

mean? No, no, no, we

1:00:40

don't want that. We want

1:00:42

you all soft, like, like,

1:00:44

plushies. And then you see

1:00:47

the articles about feminist women

1:00:49

saying, why don't I find

1:00:51

feminist men attractive? This is

1:00:53

the feminist, feminist and dronicus.

1:00:56

Like what he's describing here,

1:00:58

you have to realize this

1:01:00

has nothing to do with

1:01:03

the normal man. It's just

1:01:05

feminist and dronicus. Okay. Yeah.

1:01:07

All right, let's, let me

1:01:10

see. Oh, before you continue,

1:01:12

I should explain where I

1:01:14

get that from. Like, economists

1:01:17

have something called Homo economic,

1:01:19

econicus, which is basically the

1:01:21

perfectly rational actor. projected onto

1:01:23

humans by a lot of

1:01:26

economic theorists. So I figured,

1:01:28

you know, if economics can

1:01:30

have the homoeconomicus, feminism can

1:01:33

have the feminist and Dronicus,

1:01:35

which is basically the man

1:01:37

of feminist conjecture, the masculine

1:01:40

nature of feminist conjecture. the

1:01:42

male culture of feminist conjecture.

1:01:44

Feminist and Dronicus. So all

1:01:47

you should, all, everybody should

1:01:49

ask themselves what would feminist

1:01:51

and Dronicus do? And then

1:01:54

do that. You know, it's

1:01:56

funny is that women hold

1:01:58

on to feminism. Like

1:02:01

it somehow protects them from the

1:02:03

man of their nightmares, the whatever,

1:02:05

like this abstract man, it doesn't

1:02:07

do anything, but women cannot let

1:02:09

it go. Like they really can't.

1:02:11

And I'm not going to say

1:02:13

feminist, I'm just going to say

1:02:16

women, and a lot of men,

1:02:18

like on some level, like whether

1:02:20

they're, you know, supposedly conservative women,

1:02:22

which are just closeted feminists from

1:02:24

like 20 years ago, or or

1:02:26

full on like... Super radical, intersectional,

1:02:28

pussy hat wearing, protesting, feminist. They

1:02:31

all have this, like they hold

1:02:33

on to this belief system, thinking

1:02:35

that it's the only thing stopping

1:02:37

men from, I guess, killing and

1:02:39

murdering and raping them. And it

1:02:41

doesn't do anything. It's like, it's

1:02:43

not even a security blanket. At

1:02:46

least a security blanket, you can

1:02:48

wear it when it's chilly out.

1:02:50

It does nothing, but they think

1:02:52

it's so important. Isn't that sad?

1:02:54

I think it's really sad. It's

1:02:56

a really good point, because like

1:02:58

I said, and I keep challenging

1:03:01

the feminists that I argue with,

1:03:03

well, okay, if man's world is

1:03:05

so horrible, what are you doing

1:03:07

to get, like, you know, build

1:03:09

an underground railroad, you know, park

1:03:11

the road? Where's your, where's your,

1:03:13

side? Where's your, Zion? And they're

1:03:16

like, oh, well, we're getting to

1:03:18

that. I'm like, no, you're not

1:03:20

getting to that. You're not getting

1:03:22

to them. 70-foot in years, you

1:03:24

don't want to sigh on, you

1:03:26

don't want to actually leave this

1:03:28

society of horrible oppression. You just

1:03:31

want to continue to continue to

1:03:33

manipulate men to give you shit,

1:03:35

except there's nothing left for them

1:03:37

to give you. And now you're

1:03:39

just like, oh, they hate us.

1:03:41

No, there's just nothing left. Anything

1:03:43

else you could get you'd have

1:03:46

to build yourselves ladies and you

1:03:48

don't have the mental tools to

1:03:50

do that Yep word so anyway

1:03:52

societal consequences. Is that spelled right?

1:03:54

Yeah, it is. And that's where

1:03:56

things get even darker. Darker. Because

1:03:58

in adolescence, we see this logic

1:04:01

play out with haunting clarity. Jamie

1:04:03

describes what happened between him and

1:04:05

Katie, and in his own words,

1:04:07

he makes a startling claim. Remember,

1:04:09

we're talking about fiction, just saying,

1:04:11

okay, remember that? He insists that

1:04:13

what he did wasn't wrong, because

1:04:16

he didn't take it further, because

1:04:18

he stopped, because he stopped, because

1:04:20

he stopped, because he left, because

1:04:22

he left. As if that distance

1:04:24

was enough to clean everything that

1:04:26

came before. He frames it like

1:04:28

a kind of morality, like proof

1:04:31

that he still has integrity. I

1:04:33

didn't touch her, he says. As

1:04:35

if restraint, after inflicting harm, is

1:04:37

the same as innocence. So doing

1:04:39

the bare minimum? That's what this

1:04:41

is, right? Did you get that?

1:04:43

I don't know. I got that,

1:04:46

but what... So he... They had

1:04:48

some interaction and he just left?

1:04:50

I don't know, because I refuse

1:04:52

to watch that garbage, but what

1:04:54

this guy is claiming is that,

1:04:56

well, this AI, this bot that's

1:04:58

likely programmed by a woman, is

1:05:01

saying because he, like basically, let's

1:05:03

look at it like this, okay?

1:05:05

Feminists say, no means no, right?

1:05:07

So let's say that a man

1:05:09

does something and a woman says

1:05:11

no, and then the man says,

1:05:13

okay, and backs off. That doesn't

1:05:16

matter. Like, you're not absolved. but

1:05:18

might have done, right? That's what

1:05:20

it, Richard in the chat says

1:05:22

he was being bullied. I don't,

1:05:24

I don't know. I'd be like,

1:05:26

I know he was being bullied

1:05:28

in the story, but that seems

1:05:31

irrelevant. And again, this isn't about

1:05:33

the show. The show has done

1:05:35

its damage, okay? You can go

1:05:37

through the show and find everything

1:05:39

that they did wrong or every

1:05:41

covert way that it was actually

1:05:43

based, it doesn't matter because the

1:05:46

cyop is out there and now

1:05:48

we all have to answer. for

1:05:50

fiction and the people who are

1:05:52

the ones that have the platforms,

1:05:54

the ones with the megaphones, and

1:05:56

even some of the people who

1:05:58

have larger platforms that are too

1:06:01

stupid to see what's happening, even

1:06:03

though they don't like this for

1:06:05

whatever, they just can't, they don't

1:06:07

understand why, they're all missing the

1:06:09

point, and now we have to

1:06:11

respond to that. Well, I think

1:06:13

a lot of people are starting

1:06:16

to pick up on the, on

1:06:18

the, the problem is that nobody

1:06:20

ever actually, this is not going

1:06:22

to stop until we hold women

1:06:24

accountable. The full stop This is

1:06:26

why feminists can operate with impunity

1:06:28

and construct these kinds of narratives

1:06:31

And like he said this is

1:06:33

that making him a white boy

1:06:35

when it was actually a black

1:06:37

boy is a moth and bailey

1:06:39

They can get you to get

1:06:41

hung up on the fact that

1:06:43

it's the race and then call

1:06:46

you a racist and just fart

1:06:48

out some intersectional bullshit and then

1:06:50

disappear in the smog to continue

1:06:52

to do this again and again

1:06:54

This is an entire fiction This

1:06:56

is somebody taking a conjecture about

1:06:58

how men are a feminist conjecture

1:07:01

about how men are and basing

1:07:03

a fictional account on it Like

1:07:05

I'm pretty sure the boy who

1:07:07

actually stabbed the girl Didn't do

1:07:09

any of this or didn't have

1:07:11

the motives that this boy has

1:07:13

Right and the other thing is

1:07:16

that what's really creepy about this

1:07:18

is I've seen feminists now use

1:07:20

this fictionalized account Based on their

1:07:22

own theories or conjecture to excuse

1:07:24

the real world sexual abuse of

1:07:26

boys by teachers I'd a feminist

1:07:28

say to me Well sexual abuse

1:07:31

of boys isn't real by their

1:07:33

teachers because look at him adolescence

1:07:35

His his his therapist with he

1:07:37

she was afraid of him. How

1:07:39

can she have forced him to

1:07:41

do anything? How can boys be

1:07:43

forced by adult women? That's not

1:07:46

real I know I'm getting squeaky

1:07:48

and it's it gets annoying I'm

1:07:50

sorry. This is just so exhaustingly

1:07:52

aggravating is exactly what they do.

1:07:54

This is why the culture is

1:07:56

so sick because the purpose of

1:07:58

it is it's all just psychological

1:08:00

information warfare. And so every piece

1:08:03

of fiction has to be pointed

1:08:05

in the same direction so that

1:08:07

when the supposed smart people or

1:08:09

the academic class and the political

1:08:11

class. and the activist class come

1:08:13

out and they basically make claims

1:08:15

about reality they point to like

1:08:18

this bullshit this culture instead of

1:08:20

looking at the truth and and

1:08:22

it's the reason why I care

1:08:24

a lot about the culture because

1:08:26

I can see that that's where

1:08:28

almost all of our lies are

1:08:30

at and yeah feminists will and

1:08:33

activist types and commies whatever you

1:08:35

want to call it they will

1:08:37

make reference to fiction in order

1:08:39

to make claims about reality. and

1:08:41

because people are just like glued

1:08:43

to their fucking streaming services or

1:08:45

whatever it is they're watching they're

1:08:48

consuming that's what they think the

1:08:50

real world is because they don't

1:08:52

get out of their house they

1:08:54

don't go touch grass so the

1:08:56

culture is it's being engineered this

1:08:58

way on purpose and yeah this

1:09:00

is the of the show is

1:09:03

done somebody asked they was gin

1:09:05

bottle he's he asked if there

1:09:07

was gonna be season after season

1:09:09

of this So this story is

1:09:11

done because it's done its damage,

1:09:13

but there will be something else

1:09:15

and it'll be constant. It'll be

1:09:18

a constant stream of shit. And

1:09:20

sometimes it will, you know, be

1:09:22

well executed or at least well

1:09:24

enough that people will think, oh,

1:09:26

this seems believable as reality. I

1:09:28

guess, I guess there is a

1:09:30

problem within cells, you know, and

1:09:33

Andrew Tay, even though those things

1:09:35

are completely like diametric opposites, save

1:09:37

for the one thing they do

1:09:39

have in common, which is men.

1:09:41

I guess it's reality and feminist

1:09:43

will reference it forever. They've got,

1:09:45

I mean, they started referencing it

1:09:48

for studies. They were doing it

1:09:50

when they were referencing each other's

1:09:52

bullshit studies. Here's the new data

1:09:54

I got. Well, what's the basis

1:09:56

for that? Well, this old data.

1:09:58

Well, who did that old data?

1:10:00

A feminist from 20 years ago?

1:10:03

Well, how good is that data?

1:10:05

Well, don't look at that. It's

1:10:07

accredited. Look at all of the

1:10:09

papers on my wall. Look at

1:10:11

how legitimate I am. Don't question

1:10:13

me. And when somebody does, oh,

1:10:15

this is bad data. They're like,

1:10:18

oh. Yes, they cite each other

1:10:20

in endless circles. They only approve,

1:10:22

like when they say, oh, this

1:10:24

is like, you know, peer reviewed,

1:10:26

they all the, guess what, the

1:10:28

peers all agree with the same

1:10:30

conclusion. So it's, it's bullshit from

1:10:33

the get-go. And then they use

1:10:35

those bullshit peer reviewed papers. to

1:10:37

essentially justify media because they assume

1:10:39

that the average person is too

1:10:41

stupid to read their studies so

1:10:43

they just put it in like

1:10:45

news stories and how they pick

1:10:48

the news and what stories they

1:10:50

choose to cover and how they

1:10:52

decide to describe them you know

1:10:54

like when if it's like a

1:10:56

bunch of men die they just

1:10:58

say people you know it's like

1:11:00

all of these little subtle ways

1:11:03

and then they just make reference

1:11:05

to that oh did you know

1:11:07

about the show well this is

1:11:09

reality guys and people I mean,

1:11:11

I don't know how many, but

1:11:13

I think a significant number of

1:11:15

people are like, oh, yeah, that

1:11:18

seems fair, because they trust their,

1:11:20

you know, the authorities, right? They

1:11:22

trust the experts, so. Yeah, and

1:11:24

yeah, this is, and this is

1:11:26

just another level of it, like

1:11:28

now they're just citing fictionalized yumps.

1:11:30

Oh, yeah. Blaming, they do this

1:11:33

while also claiming that media, like

1:11:35

the way that women are represented

1:11:37

in media affects reality. So they

1:11:39

are believing that the opposite of

1:11:41

what they're doing. So they use

1:11:43

media to create reality while claiming

1:11:45

that media affects reality, right? So

1:11:48

they make a claim about reality

1:11:50

using lies, and then they claim

1:11:52

that those lies actually a... reality.

1:11:54

Well, they make media based on

1:11:56

these lies and then they cite

1:11:58

the media as evidence of these

1:12:00

truth. And then they say, like

1:12:03

Tildear was saying in the chat

1:12:05

that media influences and causes behavior,

1:12:07

so isn't making the show contributing

1:12:09

directly to the murder of real

1:12:11

women. Well, yeah, that's the thing.

1:12:13

Like. If I'm going to say

1:12:15

that they want women to actually

1:12:18

die, true though. They want it

1:12:20

because if it doesn't have like

1:12:22

actually I can't argue with that

1:12:24

because I know they they want

1:12:26

that because if it does happen

1:12:28

then they get to say look

1:12:30

see so like this is what

1:12:33

they they're you know when when

1:12:35

Charlie Manson killed those you know

1:12:37

Sharon Tate and those people on

1:12:39

the the purpose of it was

1:12:41

to start a race war and

1:12:43

the media around it that was

1:12:45

the intention of that right so

1:12:48

why would that have ended there

1:12:50

like why would that have been

1:12:52

the end and it hasn't been

1:12:54

the way that everything is covered

1:12:56

the way that things are presented

1:12:58

i think that accelerationism is the

1:13:00

point so like there's a purpose

1:13:03

it's trying to get people to

1:13:05

respond and yeah they they want

1:13:07

women to be harmed because it

1:13:09

justifies them continuing to do it

1:13:11

while claiming to be on the

1:13:13

right side of that I

1:13:16

would have to say that I

1:13:18

think you I think that there's

1:13:20

a good argument to be made

1:13:22

for that and the reason why

1:13:24

is again because I've seen in

1:13:27

the 80s feminist groups reject interventions

1:13:29

that would have reduced the rate

1:13:31

at which women were raped in

1:13:33

favor of things that supported feminist

1:13:35

conjecture. So there is there is

1:13:37

a precedent for not caring about

1:13:39

the actual harms towards women because

1:13:41

they can be used in order

1:13:43

to continue to perpetrate the ideology.

1:13:46

I don't know about killing, but

1:13:48

you can make the argument, the

1:13:50

direct argument for sexual assault on

1:13:52

women, in my opinion. But regardless...

1:13:54

soundbite, next clip. Yeah, I figure

1:13:56

1828, so this is like there's

1:13:58

three left. Usually against women, sometimes

1:14:00

against peers, after long periods of

1:14:02

emotional isolation, rejection, or quiet radicalization.

1:14:05

And when the interviews are aired,

1:14:07

the journal entries are released, the

1:14:09

posts are found, the same threads

1:14:11

appear again and again, resentment, entitlement,

1:14:13

emotional numbness, and a craving for

1:14:15

validation. that turns dark when it's

1:14:17

denied. 2014, Elliot Roger killed six

1:14:19

people in California. Yeah, he's using

1:14:21

that Elliot, Elliot Roger, as his

1:14:24

example. Wasn't Elliot Roger sexually abused?

1:14:26

He was at least emotionally and

1:14:28

physically abused by his stepmother. His

1:14:30

father, his father was a producer,

1:14:32

like a Hollywood producer, like a

1:14:34

Hollywood producer, like Elliot Roger was

1:14:36

in California, and his father was

1:14:38

not like present, really, because he

1:14:40

was traveling all the time. I

1:14:43

think he would take Elliot Roger

1:14:45

to red carpet events. I remember

1:14:47

there was one bit of footage

1:14:49

of Elliot Roger on the red

1:14:51

carpet with his dad. He was

1:14:53

obviously socially distant and like not

1:14:55

kind of not really there. Probably

1:14:57

his life that he doesn't really

1:14:59

have a good relationship with his

1:15:02

dad, but he did have one

1:15:04

and his mother, I think his

1:15:06

mother didn't want anything to do

1:15:08

with him. That's why he had

1:15:10

his father and then his stepmom

1:15:12

hated him. she didn't like the

1:15:14

fact that essentially this was a

1:15:16

kid that wasn't hers and she

1:15:18

had her own children with her

1:15:21

with this with this man but

1:15:23

she would always treat Elliot Roger

1:15:25

like really really badly but I

1:15:27

don't think it was sexual abuse

1:15:29

but we don't really know but

1:15:31

I know that there was emotional

1:15:33

abuse and yeah he grew up

1:15:35

resenting women probably because he resented

1:15:37

his mom for abandoning him and

1:15:40

his step mom for treating him

1:15:42

like garbage. But again, we're not

1:15:44

going to hear about that. We're

1:15:46

just going to hear about his

1:15:48

entitlement. And the fact, and also

1:15:50

he mentions he killed. six people

1:15:52

in California like how many of

1:15:54

those people were men for at

1:15:56

least four yeah and one of

1:15:59

them was himself this guy's not

1:16:01

gonna well this this bot isn't

1:16:03

gonna mention that because again it's

1:16:05

all about how you deliver the

1:16:07

message how you deliver the message

1:16:09

so that people think oh my

1:16:11

god he killed six people and

1:16:13

when they see people they don't

1:16:15

think about boys they just think

1:16:18

about women oh he must have

1:16:20

killed six women oh he must

1:16:22

have killed six women that's how

1:16:24

you know they don't actually want

1:16:26

to fix these problems they want

1:16:28

these problems continue because it puts

1:16:30

money in their pocket it gives

1:16:32

them more influence it gives them

1:16:34

more power it validates them the

1:16:37

purpose of feminism is to perpetuate

1:16:39

itself that in which is the

1:16:41

opposite by the way of what

1:16:43

any activism should be doing I

1:16:45

think the goal as a as

1:16:47

a men's issue advocate is to

1:16:49

become obsolete yeah Right. Art writing.

1:16:51

So, but like, I'm not in

1:16:54

it for that. I mean, I

1:16:56

think it causes a lot of

1:16:58

pain and suffering. So, but yeah,

1:17:00

anyway. Well, Elliot Roger kills. So

1:17:02

he's going to talk about entitlement.

1:17:04

It's sort of like the research.

1:17:06

Yeah. It's the research into male

1:17:08

sexual aggressors. And they find that

1:17:10

they have misogynist attitudes, or they

1:17:13

have anti-female attitudes. And yet, if

1:17:15

you actually look at the research,

1:17:17

a lot of them have been

1:17:19

sexually abused by women. So wouldn't,

1:17:21

I mean, wouldn't you sort of

1:17:23

expect someone who's been abused by

1:17:25

women to have bad attitudes towards

1:17:27

women? Like, I mean, that's, well,

1:17:29

what's the first thing you ask

1:17:32

of feminist? So what did, what

1:17:34

did, what did he do to

1:17:36

you, right? And a lot of

1:17:38

them have a history of being

1:17:40

abused by specific men, which they

1:17:42

then project on to all men.

1:17:44

Well, I mean, if you're going

1:17:46

to accept that with feminists and

1:17:48

then institutionalize it, I mean, the

1:17:51

same thing is happening with abused

1:17:53

boys. Elliot Roger was abused. Don't

1:17:55

you think that might be where

1:17:57

his anger came from? Right why

1:17:59

don't we address the abuse? No,

1:18:01

we're going to use him as

1:18:03

an ideological talking point We're not

1:18:05

actually going to embrace anything that

1:18:07

could reduce violence against women We're

1:18:10

just going to use men who

1:18:12

engage in it as ideological talking

1:18:14

points even if they actually killed

1:18:16

more men So basically they just

1:18:18

you know Elliot Roger is that

1:18:20

the example and he's the go-to

1:18:22

right like it's been 10 years

1:18:24

No 11 years almost since he

1:18:26

did that And he's still like

1:18:29

the primary example. It's almost like

1:18:31

they don't really, they're running out

1:18:33

of examples. So they have to

1:18:35

keep pulling the same old garbage,

1:18:37

right? So anyway, let's see, 2820.

1:18:39

And of course, where this ultimately

1:18:41

lands is that all of this

1:18:43

is systemic systems. Yeah. That's important.

1:18:45

It's important. Because what we have

1:18:48

to do is tear the whole

1:18:50

system down. By the time Katie

1:18:52

said no, the damage had already

1:18:54

been done. Because by then. Jamie

1:18:56

had already been taught that a

1:18:58

girl's rejection wasn't just disappointment. It

1:19:00

was injustice. That if she didn't

1:19:02

choose him, something was wrong with

1:19:04

her, or worse. That something had

1:19:07

been stolen from him. That's how

1:19:09

it works. This kind of violence

1:19:11

doesn't announce itself. It doesn't come

1:19:13

with sirens or warning signs. It

1:19:15

comes quietly, subtly, in jokes that

1:19:17

aren't funny. In boys learning that

1:19:19

the girl who says no... is

1:19:21

just playing hard to get. All

1:19:23

right, do you want to say

1:19:26

anything to that? I'll play a

1:19:28

little bit more of it. I

1:19:30

mean, this is, again, it's not.

1:19:32

It's just the same shit that

1:19:34

they've been saying for 70 years.

1:19:36

No matter what happens, they say

1:19:38

the same shit over and over

1:19:40

and over again. And now they

1:19:42

don't even have to make the

1:19:45

effort of composing it. They can

1:19:47

get AI to just regurgitate their

1:19:49

shit back at them. That's

1:19:51

probably what they're going to do

1:19:53

actually you're probably going to see

1:19:56

like because AI can just pump

1:19:58

out videos right as it gets

1:20:00

better there's going to be like,

1:20:02

it's going to be harder and

1:20:04

harder to tell if it's AI,

1:20:06

if you're not discerning enough. And

1:20:08

they're just going to bombard the

1:20:11

internet with all this feminist tripe,

1:20:13

because if it's all you see,

1:20:15

if it becomes ubiquitous, then most

1:20:17

people will just accept it. And

1:20:19

it already is ubiquitous, but obviously

1:20:21

there's too many dissenting voices like

1:20:23

ours that exist. So we have

1:20:26

to be drowned out. So I'm

1:20:28

guessing that this is going to

1:20:30

be like from every level. of

1:20:32

our society, the baseline AI bots

1:20:34

putting out tweets and videos and

1:20:36

such and posts on social media

1:20:38

all the way up to prime

1:20:40

ministers and like, you know, leaders

1:20:43

in government leaders, world leaders, spouting

1:20:45

this nonsense. I mean, it's, yeah,

1:20:47

it's just gonna get harder for

1:20:49

us, unless people just start to

1:20:51

challenge these notions. Well, you know,

1:20:53

and challenge them directly, not indirectly.

1:20:55

Because again, like they start with

1:20:58

white men that they mean all

1:21:00

men. And it's not a functional,

1:21:02

like the reason why, the strongest

1:21:04

argument why you shouldn't have unchecked

1:21:06

immigration from certain cultures is because

1:21:08

there is a lot of harm

1:21:10

to men being done in those

1:21:13

cultures that you first have to

1:21:15

somehow deal with before you can

1:21:17

bring them into a culture where

1:21:19

that's not the baseline. Right? You

1:21:21

know, you can't just... You got

1:21:23

to rehabilitate the abused animal before

1:21:25

you adopt them. And I know

1:21:27

that it's not like a direct

1:21:30

one-to-one correspondence. I'm just trying to

1:21:32

give something people can relate to.

1:21:34

If you're going to do that,

1:21:36

you need to take responsibility. And

1:21:38

that's not what these people who

1:21:40

are importing men are doing from

1:21:42

these cultures. They're not taking responsibility

1:21:45

for the ultimate good outcome, which

1:21:47

would require a lot more effort

1:21:49

and a lot more ability. This

1:21:51

is what our culture really lacks,

1:21:53

ability to recognize the... done to

1:21:55

men and how to help them

1:21:57

with it so that they can

1:22:00

integrate properly. It's a very difficult

1:22:02

proposition and we're just hand-waiving it

1:22:04

because like you were talking about

1:22:06

with feminism we think that somehow

1:22:08

feminist ideology is going to protect

1:22:10

everyone from everything when it 100%

1:22:12

doesn't do that. The fact is

1:22:14

that Feminist ideology protects no one

1:22:17

from no one. So they think

1:22:19

they bring these guys in, they

1:22:21

slap on some feminism and they

1:22:23

call it a day. Right? They

1:22:25

just say, well, we're going to

1:22:27

judge you for not doing this

1:22:29

this way. Well, that only works

1:22:32

on men who respond to that

1:22:34

kind of judgment. But you were

1:22:36

saying, feminism is like a blankie

1:22:38

that doesn't really do anything. You're

1:22:40

exactly right. It's a security blanket

1:22:42

that does nothing. Because you have

1:22:44

to have men who respond to

1:22:47

it in the first place. Right

1:22:49

if you go ahead and spout

1:22:51

feminist again feminism at gang is

1:22:53

gone. It's not going to do

1:22:55

anything You actually need post-Christian men

1:22:57

for this you need poet Catholic

1:22:59

men who actually Are attracted to

1:23:01

guilt for this to work on

1:23:04

you know You can't just it

1:23:06

doesn't work on everyone Right and

1:23:08

the fact is that men aren't

1:23:10

like this at least in certain

1:23:12

cultures. And I think they're probably

1:23:14

all around the world. So we

1:23:16

need to remind yourselves that most

1:23:19

of the men who come to

1:23:21

the West do actually just to

1:23:23

like, okay, I'm gonna live with

1:23:25

this insanity and I'm going to

1:23:27

work for my family. Like most

1:23:29

of the immigrants coming into the

1:23:31

West are like that. It is

1:23:34

not to say that unchecked immigration

1:23:36

is a good thing or it's

1:23:38

done the right way. I'm just

1:23:40

saying most men who immigrate who

1:23:42

immigrate are still men. They're still

1:23:44

here to try to send money

1:23:46

home to the familia, you know,

1:23:48

to try to make sure that

1:23:51

their wives and kids can eat.

1:23:53

And that is not a justification

1:23:55

for anything. It is just simply

1:23:57

pointing out that men are still

1:23:59

men. Yeah.

1:24:01

You know. Sure. All right. 2856.

1:24:03

Let's jump to the last one.

1:24:06

Yes, thank God. 30 minutes. This

1:24:08

is where he basically makes the

1:24:10

case that this or the bot

1:24:13

makes the case that this is

1:24:15

actually a systemic problem. And we

1:24:17

got to dismantle it. That was

1:24:19

only a word that we could

1:24:22

use that would describe this systemic.

1:24:24

like entity this this this this

1:24:26

thing that we have to dismantle

1:24:28

in order to protect women from

1:24:31

men I don't know if there's

1:24:33

a word for that Jamie isn't

1:24:35

a monster and that's what makes

1:24:38

it terrifying he is familiar he

1:24:40

is quiet he is every boy

1:24:42

who grew up believing that feelings

1:24:44

are facts and wanting justifies taking

1:24:47

and so the question isn't how

1:24:49

did this happen it's how many

1:24:51

times has it almost happened before

1:24:53

This is the moment where we

1:24:56

stop pretending that violence begins at

1:24:58

impact. It begins at the first

1:25:00

entitlement. The first silence. The first

1:25:03

time a boy learns that his

1:25:05

feelings matter more than someone else's

1:25:07

safety. And once you've seen that

1:25:09

clearly, you can't unsee it. So

1:25:12

the next question is, what are

1:25:14

we willing to change before it

1:25:16

reaches that point again? If parts

1:25:18

of this hurt familiar... What the

1:25:21

fuck are they justifying now? Complete...

1:25:23

tyranny over boys and men controlling

1:25:25

them? Where does it always go?

1:25:28

So now we're at the level

1:25:30

of fought crime, are we? What

1:25:32

are you going to just in

1:25:34

check? Wait, have you not been

1:25:37

paying attention to the UK lately,

1:25:39

Allison? I mean, I don't know

1:25:41

if this person is English because

1:25:43

the character has an English accent,

1:25:46

but yeah, and the show it

1:25:48

was made in the room. The

1:25:50

moment you think, the moment a

1:25:53

boy thinks, hey, this is frustrating

1:25:55

and irritating, and he's taught to

1:25:57

regard his feelings as facts, who

1:25:59

taught him that? like where where

1:26:02

is this being taught by boy

1:26:04

like can we look one of

1:26:06

the boy and the girl who

1:26:08

the hell looks like the entitled

1:26:11

and that her feelings are facts

1:26:13

so now we have to get

1:26:15

into so I guess we're gonna

1:26:18

just outfit boys with like clockwork

1:26:20

orange rigs so we can we

1:26:22

can hear their thoughts and correct

1:26:24

them in real time little lasers

1:26:27

maybe a little bottomized boys yeah

1:26:31

Well, babies were diapers and

1:26:33

you're in a diaper. Well,

1:26:36

I'm not a baby. No,

1:26:38

I'm not. I mean, no,

1:26:40

we're in a diaper. I'm

1:26:42

not a baby. You were

1:26:45

in a diaper? But who's

1:26:47

entitled? I'm not. I think

1:26:49

so. Yes. You're in a

1:26:51

diaper. And this is just

1:26:53

not. Right? You can hear

1:26:56

the parents giggling in the

1:26:58

background. Now imagine what she

1:27:00

would be doing if there

1:27:02

wasn't a parent watching because

1:27:04

she probably realizes that she's

1:27:07

going to be expected to

1:27:09

keep her hands to herself.

1:27:11

Well, just imagine her growing

1:27:13

up. There's going to be

1:27:16

a lot of beaten men

1:27:18

in her life because nobody

1:27:20

said, hey, this isn't an

1:27:22

inappropriate way to conduct yourself.

1:27:24

And she probably like... Again,

1:27:27

she's probably holding back because

1:27:29

she knows that if she

1:27:31

does indeed hit her brother,

1:27:33

maybe her mother will intervene

1:27:35

and say, hey, that's not

1:27:38

nice. Who's not being taught

1:27:40

control here? This is again

1:27:42

an anecdote, but it's a

1:27:44

snapshot and it shows a

1:27:46

lot in negative because people

1:27:49

don't say, hey, that girl's

1:27:51

behavior is inappropriate. Nobody's saying

1:27:53

that. Even though if we

1:27:55

reverse the genders, we would

1:27:58

be saying that. So what

1:28:00

this AI? is doing is

1:28:02

presenting the reverse situation and

1:28:04

frightening people with

1:28:06

it to continue to

1:28:08

make boys submit to abuse.

1:28:11

So because boys might one

1:28:13

day rise up and beat our

1:28:15

asses for me treating them

1:28:17

so abominably, we need to

1:28:20

treat them abominably.

1:28:22

They need to continue to

1:28:24

be like that boy and just

1:28:26

take it. from an

1:28:29

entitled little creep of a

1:28:31

girl. So go ahead and get through

1:28:33

it. Because they are, not as

1:28:35

fiction, but as memory. Maybe you

1:28:37

saw it in your school. Maybe

1:28:39

in a conversation you didn't feel

1:28:42

safe enough to finish. Maybe in a

1:28:44

boy you thought you could trust. Maybe

1:28:46

in the silence that followed

1:28:48

something you wish you could

1:28:51

forget. That's what makes it so

1:28:53

difficult. Toxic masculinity.

1:28:55

doesn't always come

1:28:57

with violence in the

1:28:59

beginning. Sometimes it comes in

1:29:02

charm, in quiet competition. Sometimes

1:29:04

it comes in everything

1:29:06

that men do. Freezing,

1:29:09

grouping, eating, walking, just

1:29:11

existing. Get that

1:29:13

fricking fiberglass pajamas on

1:29:15

men. Everything you do is

1:29:17

wrong. Except maybe keep the

1:29:19

lights on. But we don't

1:29:21

even, we'd pretend that doesn't

1:29:24

exist. Yeah. Yep.

1:29:26

I mean, you know, it's absolute.

1:29:28

That's right. And when it finally

1:29:31

erupts, everyone wants to

1:29:33

ask, how could this happen?

1:29:35

But the truth is, it didn't

1:29:37

start here. It started the first

1:29:40

time a girl said no and

1:29:42

had to explain why. The first

1:29:44

time she was told to smile

1:29:47

when she didn't want to. The

1:29:49

first time being careful became routine.

1:29:51

So where do we go from

1:29:54

here? We speak. Wow, you're really

1:29:56

running out of shit to

1:29:58

complain about. This

1:30:01

is so it's so it's so it's

1:30:03

so bad. So bad Though rage is

1:30:05

earned but in refusal

1:30:07

Refusal to protect the comfort

1:30:10

of the ones who never

1:30:12

protected Refusal to absorb

1:30:14

what never belonged to

1:30:16

women Refuse it's normalizing

1:30:19

wrong. Just be good

1:30:21

like everybody trots out

1:30:23

gazelle pelicot. I think that's how

1:30:25

you say your name but if

1:30:27

it was up to gazelle pelicot

1:30:30

and the women, she'd still

1:30:32

be being raped by those

1:30:34

men. It was because male

1:30:36

police officers saw the

1:30:38

footage and didn't let

1:30:40

it go that ended, right?

1:30:43

Men protected her when

1:30:45

she wasn't protecting herself.

1:30:48

And I don't know how

1:30:50

somebody loses two to

1:30:52

three days a week of

1:30:54

time without noticing, but she

1:30:57

apparently was one of those

1:30:59

people. So she didn't even have

1:31:02

the ability to protect herself

1:31:04

simply by recognizing hey, where

1:31:06

are those two three days?

1:31:09

Where did Wednesday go? I'm

1:31:11

trying to imagine that never

1:31:13

crossed her mind. It took

1:31:16

men Police men finding the footage

1:31:18

and saying hey something's off

1:31:21

here to investigate to take

1:31:23

the effort to care about

1:31:25

this woman Investigate it and

1:31:28

end it took men. cared more

1:31:30

about gazelle pelicot safety

1:31:32

than any woman or

1:31:34

herself. They did that! And so

1:31:36

women were like, oh, aren't you

1:31:39

afraid? Aren't you afraid of

1:31:41

a society that would allow

1:31:43

that gazelle pelicot? No, society

1:31:45

didn't allow that. Men didn't

1:31:47

allow that. One sick fuck

1:31:50

did it. Plus he went

1:31:52

on a form and found a

1:31:54

bunch of others. There are... It's

1:31:56

very easy to find Sick Fox

1:31:58

on the internet, okay? news flash

1:32:00

guys, right? So he found these,

1:32:03

that, well, it's not

1:32:05

society and it's certainly

1:32:07

not men. Men were the

1:32:10

ones who protected her. So

1:32:12

I said to them, I will take

1:32:14

heart in the fact if I

1:32:16

ever be, if I ever am

1:32:19

in a position where I can

1:32:21

lose two to three days of time

1:32:23

a week and not notice

1:32:25

that there will be men out

1:32:28

there. who are accounting for my

1:32:30

time, even better than I am,

1:32:32

because I'm a woman and they

1:32:34

want to protect me. I'll take

1:32:37

heart in that. Because yeah,

1:32:39

it wasn't women that protected this.

1:32:41

They came in after when

1:32:43

they could get their pound

1:32:45

of fat to blame men and

1:32:47

to shame men with. They came

1:32:49

in after, but they sure

1:32:51

as hell didn't protect her

1:32:53

before. It was men who did

1:32:55

that. And it's like this

1:32:57

is this is this is saying

1:33:00

that oh men don't protect women.

1:33:02

Yes men protect women But

1:33:04

there will always be the

1:33:07

sons of single mothers abused

1:33:09

boys who also because the most

1:33:11

abused boys don't go on to

1:33:13

abuse at all They don't they

1:33:15

have to also behind the be

1:33:18

behind the eight ball genetically

1:33:20

So they have to have issues

1:33:22

around antisocial personality

1:33:25

disorder, right? This has to,

1:33:27

so they have to have this

1:33:29

combination of abuse and genetic factors

1:33:31

that lead them to low impulse

1:33:33

control. Yes, there will always

1:33:35

be these men. There will always be

1:33:37

a stable of these men. And that

1:33:39

stable will never decrease as long

1:33:42

as you blame all men for them, instead

1:33:44

of abuse and genetic factors,

1:33:46

and try to think about

1:33:48

interventions that ameliorate that stuff.

1:33:50

As long as you blame all

1:33:53

men for the existence of the

1:33:55

minority of criminal... abused and

1:33:57

men with with genetic abnormalities.

1:33:59

You will continue to

1:34:02

be subject to them because

1:34:04

you won't be approaching

1:34:06

it in a way. You'll

1:34:08

always be using the existence

1:34:11

of those men to shame and

1:34:14

manipulate other men. And you

1:34:16

know why? Because like

1:34:18

Brian said, it's not about ending

1:34:21

violence against women. It's not about

1:34:23

reducing the men who engage in

1:34:25

these activities because if it was,

1:34:27

you wouldn't be blaming all men

1:34:29

for it. You'd be looking at

1:34:32

the factors that create them instead.

1:34:34

It's about blaming all men, because

1:34:36

blaming all men is profitable.

1:34:38

It's how feminists get all of this

1:34:41

control, all of this money, all of

1:34:43

this social clout. It's exactly that.

1:34:45

Are we at now? What level

1:34:47

of authoritarian dictatorship are we at

1:34:50

now? Well that's the thing too

1:34:52

though. What they're asking for what

1:34:54

they're suggesting as the solution is

1:34:56

impossible to implement. But that's

1:34:59

why they always make it though because

1:35:01

they know it can't actually be done

1:35:03

so they get to keep doing this

1:35:05

because you can't like they're basically

1:35:07

saying here's what you do and

1:35:09

it's essentially don't like don't allow

1:35:11

men to be entitled. you know,

1:35:13

reject their feelings. Oh, and what

1:35:15

does that do? Well, that's basically

1:35:17

going to anger them and it's

1:35:20

going to frustrate them. It's going

1:35:22

to depress. Things are just going

1:35:24

to get worse and every once

1:35:26

in a while, you know, while

1:35:28

there's a bunch of men just

1:35:30

taking their own lives or just

1:35:32

like retreating out in the boonies

1:35:34

or becoming like, you know, homeless

1:35:36

vagrants or whatever. one guy will

1:35:38

like have a freak out and

1:35:41

you know maybe commit some terrible

1:35:43

crime and it probably will be

1:35:45

against other men but that's irrelevant

1:35:47

because the man committing the crime

1:35:49

committing the violent act is all

1:35:51

they need to start the whole

1:35:53

wheel oh yes oh look here

1:35:55

this happened this is toxic masculinity

1:35:57

have you ever felt scared ladies

1:36:00

like ever, perfect nature to feel

1:36:02

scared. Well, this is why it's

1:36:04

because of men. So you should

1:36:06

continue to feel scared and also

1:36:09

basically contribute to a climate that

1:36:11

continues to perpetuate this, this, this

1:36:13

mood and divides men and women

1:36:16

from each other, makes them not

1:36:18

trust each other, which further makes

1:36:20

women scared because women actually depend

1:36:23

on men for their safety and

1:36:25

security, but. Yeah, they create insecurity

1:36:27

in them. which continues to create

1:36:30

the problem. And if you call

1:36:32

it out, they'll just say, oh,

1:36:34

well, you just say women because

1:36:37

women are obviously unsafe. And so,

1:36:39

yeah, it serves like all of

1:36:41

this is, it's a, I wouldn't

1:36:44

call it genius, but it's a

1:36:46

self perpetuating cycle monster unless you

1:36:48

start to say, well, you know

1:36:51

what, women are adults and they

1:36:53

make choices. because they never address

1:36:55

the issue nothing ever changes about

1:36:58

it and they just use the

1:37:00

products of the thing they won't

1:37:02

address as evidence of the truth

1:37:05

of their own allegations they are

1:37:07

refusing to embrace something that would

1:37:09

actually reduce the rate of violence

1:37:12

against women or anyone really at

1:37:14

the same time as they're using

1:37:16

their refusal to look at this

1:37:19

issue in a solvable way as

1:37:21

evidence of the truth of their

1:37:23

assertions. It's actually evidence of the

1:37:26

opposite, guys. Every man who does

1:37:28

this, after we had, or not

1:37:30

everybody, a good substantial amount of

1:37:33

men who engage in this behavior,

1:37:35

after we've understood for decades where

1:37:37

this is coming from and could

1:37:40

have developed interventions to prevent it,

1:37:42

every man who engages in this

1:37:44

behavior is a failure of feminist

1:37:47

conjecture at this point, or a

1:37:49

good proportion of them are. Feminists

1:37:51

say that all of this shit

1:37:54

comes from things that feminists want

1:37:56

to control? Well, they've controlled it

1:37:58

for 70 years. Has anything changed?

1:38:01

No, it's only gotten worse according

1:38:03

to feminists. Well, obviously they're failures.

1:38:05

Gizelle Pelicot's husband is a failure

1:38:08

of feminism. All of the men

1:38:10

who engaged in abusing her a

1:38:12

failure of feminism. At this point,

1:38:15

the amount of money feminists had

1:38:17

to start reducing the rate of

1:38:19

violence against women should have had

1:38:22

in effect, and yet it hasn't.

1:38:24

Because it's a failure of feminism.

1:38:26

It's a failure a fundamental failure

1:38:29

of their conjecture about where violence

1:38:31

comes from and so all of

1:38:33

this is it's beyond just abusing

1:38:36

men with this bullshit This is

1:38:38

a failure It's a if this

1:38:40

is failure what we're looking at

1:38:43

this is a group of people

1:38:45

that are that are using something

1:38:47

they continue to allow to exist

1:38:50

to justify their existence It's like

1:38:52

Codeimentance feminism is co-dependent with men's

1:38:54

violence all right So that was

1:38:57

the last that was the last

1:38:59

thing so we're done with the

1:39:01

time codes good some I'm freaking

1:39:04

done. Yeah And I got to

1:39:06

let my dog out of the

1:39:08

bathroom Yeah, no problem. Let me

1:39:11

see I think that's it. Yeah,

1:39:13

no super chance or super chows,

1:39:15

but that's all right. It's Monday.

1:39:18

Yeah Yeah, well, I'll see if

1:39:20

there's anything he used to give.

1:39:22

Okay, unrelated to the video. Thank

1:39:25

you to Richard Bier for $500.

1:39:27

Thank you. Thank you. Well, come

1:39:29

again. All right. So if you

1:39:31

would like to send us a

1:39:34

message about what we've talked about,

1:39:36

Feedthebadger.com slash, just the tip is

1:39:38

the very best way to do

1:39:41

that. I'm surprised you guys haven't

1:39:43

said any messages. Usually this kind

1:39:45

of stuff. Gets you guys talking,

1:39:48

but I guess you were content

1:39:50

with the chats So feed the

1:39:52

badger.com/just a tip tip to send

1:39:55

us a message and we'll respond

1:39:57

to it At the next show

1:39:59

that we're both on I suppose

1:40:02

And if you're the Badger.com/support to

1:40:04

support the show, I'm going to

1:40:06

hand it back to you, Brian.

1:40:09

All right. Yeah, let's wrap it

1:40:11

up. So if you guys like

1:40:13

this video, please hit like, subscribe.

1:40:16

If you're not already subscribed, hit

1:40:18

the bell for notifications, leave us

1:40:20

a comment, let us know what

1:40:23

you guys think about what we

1:40:25

discussed on the show today, and

1:40:27

please, please share this video because

1:40:30

sharing is caring. Dude, okay? They

1:40:32

are literal machines. They are talking

1:40:34

point machines. They are impossible to

1:40:37

fucking deal with, especially if you

1:40:39

have like, especially if you have

1:40:41

like a couple dudes who have

1:40:44

good memory on top of that

1:40:46

too. Holy shit, you're fucked. Running

1:40:48

SeaCrest here, when you have a

1:40:51

busy schedule, it's important to maximize

1:40:53

your downtime. One of the best

1:40:55

ways to do that is by

1:40:58

going to Chumba Casino.com. Chumba Casino

1:41:00

has all your... favorite social casino

1:41:02

games like spin slots bingo and

1:41:05

solitaire that you can play for

1:41:07

free for a chance to redeem

1:41:09

some serious prizes so hop on

1:41:12

to chumba casino.com now and live

1:41:14

the chumba life sponsored by chumba

1:41:16

casino That patio you've been dreaming

1:41:19

of is more affordable than you

1:41:21

think. When you do it yourself,

1:41:23

you save. Get free estimates using

1:41:26

our landscaping design program in store

1:41:28

or on Menards.com. Save Big on

1:41:30

the largest selection of concrete landscaping

1:41:33

blocks at Menards. Plus, check out

1:41:35

our weekly flyer on Menards.com for

1:41:37

all the great deals happening now.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features