Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
It's Guy Raz here. On the Wisdom from
0:02
the Top podcast, I talk to leadership experts
0:04
and some of the world's greatest business leaders
0:06
about how they lead, innovate, and
0:09
transform the people around them. If
0:11
you're trying to make it in business or just want to think more like
0:13
a leader, this show's probably for
0:15
you. Listen now to the Wisdom from the
0:17
Top podcast from Luminary and
0:20
NPR.
0:21
The Spark Cash Plus card from Capital
0:23
One helps you earn unlimited 2% cash
0:26
back on every purchase. And with
0:28
no preset spending limit, your purchasing
0:30
power can adapt to meet your business needs.
0:32
Jorge Gaviria, founder of Macienda, reinvests
0:35
his 2% cash back to help grow
0:37
his business with new products. I really
0:39
love the idea behind Macienda. It's a supply chain
0:42
company connecting Mexican heirloom
0:44
corn farmers with restaurants, chefs, and
0:46
consumers. And while Macienda is connecting
0:48
more people to the culinary and cultural
0:51
richness of the Mexican kitchen, it's also elevating
0:53
traditional heirloom farmers that work in areas
0:55
that live below the international poverty line. Imagine
0:58
with the Spark Cash Plus card from Capital
1:01
One, an unlimited 2% cash back on every
1:04
purchase could do for your business. Capital
1:06
One, what's in your wallet? Find out more at
1:08
CapitalOne.com slash Spark
1:11
Cash Plus.
1:12
Terms and conditions apply. Name.com
1:15
makes it simple to find the right website
1:18
domain. And they have the perfect domain
1:20
for the link in your Instagram bio.
1:23
It's .bio. Now when you add
1:25
your link in bio, it can be a whole
1:28
lot more of you. .bio
1:30
gives you a polished, entirely
1:33
personalized link, letting you control
1:35
your brand down to the last detail.
1:38
And .bio is clear, concise,
1:41
and easy to remember, so it's perfect
1:43
to use across all your social platforms.
1:46
The best link in bio is a .bio.
1:49
Learn more at name.com slash
1:52
bio and use promo code built25
1:54
for 25% off the first year of
1:58
your .bio domain.
2:00
Apple Card is different. It has a cash
2:02
back rewards program unlike other cards.
2:05
You earn unlimited daily cash back
2:07
on every purchase, receive it daily
2:10
and can grow it at 4.15% annual percentage yield
2:14
when you open a high yield savings account. Apply
2:17
for Apple Card in the Wallet app on iPhone and start
2:19
earning and growing your daily cash with savings
2:22
today. Apple Card subject to credit
2:24
approval savings is available to Apple Card owners
2:26
subject to eligibility requirements. Savings
2:28
accounts provided by Goldman Sachs Bank
2:30
USA member FDIC terms apply.
2:38
Hello and welcome to How I Built This Lab.
2:40
I'm Guy Roz. The
2:43
pandemic changed education forever.
2:46
In just a few days schools around the world had
2:48
to move online. Teachers began
2:51
teaching on Zoom. Schools started issuing
2:53
students laptops and platforms
2:55
like Google Classroom became indispensable.
2:58
Even with kids back in the classroom now,
3:01
school is much more digital now than
3:03
it was before 2020. And our guest
3:05
today says that an even bigger change
3:07
is on the way, a revolution that
3:09
could transform the way kids learn even
3:12
more than the pandemic did. Sal
3:14
Khan has been on the show before. He's the founder
3:16
of Khan Academy, an online teaching
3:19
nonprofit that went from pixelated
3:21
YouTube videos to a massive
3:23
platform with hundreds of free tutorials
3:26
in dozens of languages and
3:28
tens of millions of users every month.
3:31
Right now Sal and his team are working on a new
3:34
learning platform. It's called Khanmigo
3:36
which uses the generative AI technology
3:38
behind OpenAI's chat GPT
3:41
to help students with their schoolwork.
3:43
And the people at Khan Academy think that Khanmigo
3:46
could act as a personal tutor for every
3:48
student and a teaching assistant for
3:51
every educator, but we'll get there. First,
3:53
let's go back to 2020 and the early months
3:55
of the pandemic when Khan Academy saw
3:58
millions of new students beginning.
3:59
begin to use its materials. You
4:02
know, the spike was interesting because that first
4:04
week where you had global shutdowns in the U.S. and other
4:07
places, we talked about it last time, our
4:09
traffic went from about 30 million learning
4:11
minutes per day to about 90 million learning
4:13
minutes per day, pretty much within that week. What
4:17
was interesting is, you
4:18
fast forward a couple of months, as
4:21
we know, a lot of school systems started to figure
4:23
out how to do online schooling.
4:27
And then we saw things actually normalize, maybe
4:29
in a very abnormal way, mainly
4:31
because I think people started to have screen time fatigue. And
4:35
I think during the pandemic, people had a,
4:37
you know what, if we can just kind of pretend
4:39
like we're going through the motions of school, let's call
4:42
it a day. And
4:44
because of that, people weren't looking to
4:46
improve necessarily. They were just looking to tread
4:48
water. What did you find?
4:51
I mean, as you know, I mean, there have been studies over the past two years comparing
4:53
students pre and post pandemic,
4:56
right? There are standardized test scores. And
4:58
it's clear that student performance in both
5:01
reading and math fell significantly, math,
5:03
I think even more than reading. Have
5:05
you found that Khan Academy helped keep
5:08
students on track during the pandemic or is that
5:10
something you even measure? Oh yeah, this is something
5:12
we've been keeping a very close eye on. The
5:15
thing I always point out, first of all, is that the numbers were not good
5:17
pre-pandemic. What
5:19
we saw, we did an efficacy study in
5:21
the first full school year, the 2020-21 school year,
5:25
and then we did another one in 21-22. And
5:28
what we saw in 2021 is that
5:30
the students who
5:31
put in an average of 15 minutes
5:35
on Khan Academy a week in a school
5:37
setting, they actually saw no
5:39
COVID learning loss.
5:41
And that students who put in 30 to 60
5:43
minutes, they accelerated almost 40% faster
5:46
than pre-pandemic norms. And
5:48
it's not a mystery. They're just
5:51
getting more practice at their level with more
5:53
feedback. And those that are supporting
5:55
them, their teachers, are getting more information
5:57
about where the students really are and maybe can adjust their
5:59
level.
5:59
a bit based on that. Tell me
6:02
about what you, I mean, you must have learned,
6:04
and I think now this is probably the
6:06
third time I'm talking to you since the pandemic started.
6:09
And in each time I've talked
6:11
to you, it's so clear how much you
6:13
were learning in real time and how much you've learned
6:16
from what happened, sort of the overwhelming
6:18
numbers of people coming to Khan Academy.
6:22
Tell me how it sort of fundamentally changed,
6:25
how you guys operate. I think
6:27
it did a bunch of things that
6:29
we always wanted to do, but this
6:31
just accelerated things. We
6:34
always wanted
6:36
better ways for students to address
6:38
gaps that they might have. The fashionable
6:40
term now in education circles is unfinished learning.
6:43
We all thought that the pandemic was only going to affect
6:46
the school system, maybe through that first summer. And
6:48
by the time you go back to school, even then
6:50
there would be some damage done back to school 2020. I mean,
6:53
now we know how delusional that was. But
6:55
we started creating these back, get ready for grade level
6:58
courses, which essentially cover all of the prerequisites
7:00
that a student needs in order to be
7:02
ready for their grade level work. And we saw
7:04
that that was very popular.
7:06
So that was accelerated. We created
7:08
another sister nonprofit called schoolhouse.world.
7:11
We saw how much people were leaning on Khan
7:13
Academy, but we also saw that there was a gap
7:16
of getting real human support. And
7:18
so the utopian idea was, well,
7:21
what if they could get real human support for free
7:23
based on volunteers out there on the internet?
7:26
And then as we got to the tail end of the pandemic, and
7:28
as we all know, people had very mixed feelings about
7:30
COVID learning. Most people did not think it was,
7:33
you know, spending time on video conference for several
7:35
hours a day was a good thing. Yeah. We
7:38
felt the need to show that there's
7:40
a way to do this well. And so another
7:42
sister organization, we have a lab
7:44
school that I helped start that's literally
7:47
in the same building as Khan Academy. But
7:49
we said, can we create an online version of this that
7:51
can do online schooling, but
7:53
can do it well. Don't do it. So it's just students
7:56
listening to lectures on zoom for hours a day.
7:58
Yeah. When people on video
8:00
conference together, make it interactive, make it
8:03
Socratic, and then use
8:05
personalized learning and other tools
8:07
for students to get more asynchronous
8:09
support, but always feel connected to a community. So
8:11
we started working on a lot of things like that as well.
8:13
All right. Let's go now
8:16
back to, not that long ago, back to
8:18
the summer of 2022, you got
8:21
an email from Sam
8:23
Altman at OpenAI. And
8:26
he said, he said, you know, he said, hey, we've
8:28
got this thing we're working on and we would like you to check
8:31
it out. So you did tell me
8:33
what happened. Tell me the story.
8:34
It's interesting, almost
8:36
on a daily basis, we get emails from folks
8:39
saying, Hey, you have an interesting technology. We would love to partner
8:41
with Khan Academy. And most of the
8:44
time, you know, we look at it, we're like, Oh, you know, it looks
8:46
intriguing, but we just don't have the bandwidth. But
8:48
I obviously knew of Sam and Greg
8:51
and had deep respect for what
8:53
many of the things that they've done in their lives. And
8:56
I have been watching what's been happening
8:58
with generative AI for the last, let's call it three
9:00
to five years. I didn't really think
9:02
it had a place at Khan Academy because GPT
9:04
two and three were good at writing
9:07
convincing text, but it really had
9:09
no grounding in factual knowledge.
9:11
So I'm like, I'm happy to meet with
9:14
you all. I'm just curious what y'all are up to. And they
9:17
said, Hey, we're going through our first training run
9:19
of GPT four, which obviously is now
9:21
out. But back then that was very confidential and
9:25
we want to launch it with
9:27
a small number of partners that we
9:29
think can show social positive use case. Cause
9:31
we think it's going to change things. I
9:33
was skeptical at first cause I was familiar
9:35
with GPT three
9:37
about two weeks later. I got another email from
9:39
both of them saying, Hey, we're done. Can we show you
9:41
a demo? I'm like, Oh yeah, sure. So they
9:43
put up an AP biology question on the chat
9:46
and they, I answered it correctly. I'm like, Oh, this
9:48
is pretty interesting. And then I said,
9:51
ask it to explain its reasoning
9:53
and explained it. It gave the right answer. And
9:55
then I said, explain why the other choices aren't corrected, gave
9:57
that. And then I asked,
9:59
you create 10 more questions just
10:02
like that one. And it did. And as far as I
10:04
can inspect, they were pretty good. That's
10:06
when I started getting the goosebumps. I'm like,
10:08
okay, this is, this is different. Yeah. And
10:11
then they gave us access that weekend and I spent
10:13
hours with it and it was doing very well, although
10:15
definitely had some issues. We realized
10:18
pretty quickly that you couldn't just have
10:20
it generate a ton of questions and just put students in front
10:22
of it. It would make mistakes, especially
10:25
in those early days. It was pretty still pretty
10:27
bad in math. Yeah. But at the
10:29
same time, we also, we started to make
10:32
it roleplay, roleplay as a tutor, roleplay
10:35
as a character, roleplay, you know, do
10:37
something in the style of someone else. And that's
10:40
when I started to
10:41
really say, wow, this really could be that
10:43
holy grail that we've all been thinking about
10:45
reading science fiction about for decades
10:48
of an AI that can actually emulate a human tutor.
10:51
Before we really dive into what
10:53
you did next from, from
10:55
what I gather, Sal, I think
10:58
your initial reaction was the initial
11:01
reaction that many people have, which, which was like kind
11:03
of.
11:04
Terrified. I
11:07
read a lot of science fiction and it was,
11:10
it was a moment in which I felt
11:12
that all my science fiction reading had
11:14
prepared me for. But, you
11:17
know, there were moments that even that first weekend
11:19
where I was pushing a few of the limits,
11:21
where I asked at things like, are there
11:23
things that you think that you're not sharing with me? And
11:25
it said, yes. You
11:28
get a little weirded out by that. I'm like, well, why aren't you sharing
11:30
it with me? And it says, well,
11:32
it might offend you or it might scare you. And
11:35
it feels like you're talking to an alien.
11:37
It feels like you're talking to a super intelligence.
11:40
And I had to keep reminding myself, I do understand
11:43
how it works. I have a master's in computer science.
11:45
I understand how large language models work. And I, I
11:47
started to say, OK, I can get how if it's
11:50
just modeling the natural thing to say of why
11:52
you're not sharing a thought, it is why,
11:54
why don't you or I share a thought? It's because it might offend
11:56
someone or it might scare them. So that's kind of
11:58
what it was doing.
13:46
From
14:00
accepting payments to managing inventory,
14:03
Shopify has everything you need
14:05
to sell in person. Connect with
14:07
customers inline and online.
14:10
Shopify helps you drive store traffic
14:12
with plug-and-play tools built for
14:15
marketing campaigns from TikTok to Instagram
14:17
and beyond. Get hardware
14:19
that fits your business, take payments
14:22
by smartphone, transform your
14:24
tablet into a point-of-sale system, or
14:27
use Shopify's POS Go
14:29
mobile device for a battle-tested solution.
14:32
Plus, Shopify's award-winning
14:34
help is there to support your success
14:37
every step of the way. Sign up for
14:39
a $1 per month trial period
14:41
at shopify.com. All
14:44
lowercase, go to shopify.com.
14:49
to take your retail business to the next
14:51
level. shopify.com.
14:56
One more thing before we get back to the show, please
14:58
make sure to click the follow button on
15:00
your podcast app so you never miss
15:03
a new episode of the show and it's
15:05
totally free.
15:13
Welcome back to How I Built This Lab. I'm Guy
15:15
Raz and I'm speaking with Sal Khan,
15:17
founder of Khan Academy. In 2022,
15:20
Sal got early access to the large
15:23
language model GPT-4 before
15:25
ChatGPT was even released, and he
15:28
was amazed by its potential. So
15:30
you sort of get over your initial kind
15:32
of, oh my God, and you
15:35
start to see, obviously, a huge
15:38
potential here to kind of transform
15:41
what you do, which is offering
15:43
free education to people around the world.
15:46
So what did you do next? I mean, the ChatGPT
15:49
wasn't going to be the exact
15:51
right thing, right fit
15:53
for what you do, but you could build on
15:55
that, on that foundation, right? That's
15:58
right. The first thing we did is we started an oracle.
15:59
and I said, hey, how many folks in the organization
16:02
can we give access to? And
16:04
eventually we got about 40 or 50 folks in
16:06
our organization to get access
16:08
to GPT-4. And even that,
16:10
this was the first time that Khan Academy had to do a little
16:13
bit of cloak and dagger type stuff. Folks at Apple are
16:15
used to keeping secrets and things like that, but we're
16:17
not used to keeping secrets and we had to. This
16:20
was obviously very sensitive stuff. And
16:23
we immediately, we had
16:25
a hackathon, which was well timed because
16:27
then these 40 or 50 folks were able to at least for
16:29
a couple of weeks say like, okay, let's
16:31
just be generative here, no pun intended. Like
16:33
what is possible with this? And
16:36
by the end of that two weeks, we had some really cool
16:38
demos. And then we started to have
16:40
the internal debate of like, okay, how aggressive
16:43
do we get on this? What about bias? What
16:45
about the math errors? What about hallucinations?
16:48
What about just the PR implications? People trust
16:50
us. And if they see us leaning way forward
16:53
on something that's not perfect, that's something
16:55
that some people could be wary of, what does that
16:57
do to our brand? What does that do to the trust that
16:59
folks have? On the other side, folks
17:02
were arguing, look, this is a transformational
17:04
technology. This is one of these things where it's
17:07
either going to allow us to magnify our impact
17:09
by an order of magnitude or it might make
17:11
us irrelevant. And so we made a decision
17:13
to say, you know, we have to keep moving forward, but we
17:15
have to do it in a risk aware way, in a
17:17
risk mitigating way. All
17:19
right, I think it's fair to say that you are a true
17:22
believer in this and your team basically
17:24
developed an
17:26
AI that you call
17:27
ConMigo. And so this
17:28
is now, I think in beta, but
17:31
still integrated into Con
17:34
Academy. So tell me
17:36
how this works. What is it? So first was the
17:39
guardrails. In what
17:42
context would we even feel comfortable doing this? And
17:45
what's interesting is we were starting
17:47
to do all this in earnest in September and October,
17:49
then end of November, chat GPT comes
17:51
out. And I remember the day that it came out, I
17:55
slacked Greg Brockman at open AI and I said, Hey Greg, we're
17:57
under NDA. and
18:00
I thought we weren't launching anything until March of 2023,
18:03
what's this chat GPT thing? And
18:05
Greg says, it's nothing new. It's
18:07
based on GPT 3.5, which had been out
18:09
for many months already. No one really took note
18:12
when they released GPT 3.5 and
18:14
OpenAI just decided to publish
18:16
a bunch of apps that use GPT 3.5.
18:20
One of them happened to be chat GPT and
18:23
then being able to interface with the model
18:25
in a chat interface, I think made
18:27
everyone see what the power
18:30
of it was. And at first I was a little bummed.
18:32
I was like, oh, this is gonna steal the thunder. I've
18:34
been telling all my friends at dinner parties something's big's
18:37
coming in 2023. Just
18:39
you see, but then I was, I think it
18:41
was actually a blessing because as we know, chat GPT
18:44
goes out there, it amazes
18:46
people, but it also scares people. And then
18:48
immediately it creates huge issues
18:50
for education. Like kids are cheating using
18:52
this. Right, you can type in an equation
18:55
and it'll give you the answer. And you can write your essays.
18:57
You can write your essays, right, yeah. And
19:00
that I think gave us more license at Khan Academy
19:02
to say, look, the genie has out of the bottle
19:04
with chat GPT, we need to double
19:06
down on bringing a better version
19:08
of out there that can mitigate all
19:10
the risks and maximize the benefits.
19:12
So we started saying, well, you know, first, whatever
19:14
we make shouldn't be for cheating. It should be for
19:16
actually helping students learn. So there's many
19:19
things we're doing to make it Socratic, not
19:21
just give you the answer to,
19:23
it has to be accurate. It's not okay if
19:25
it doesn't know what seven plus four is. It
19:28
shouldn't hallucinate. And then we also were
19:30
afraid of students misusing
19:32
it or using it in some ways that might harm
19:35
them or other folks and just reassuring
19:37
teachers and parents that they can keep
19:39
track of what their students are doing with this very powerful
19:42
tool. And so that's why we made it so it
19:44
logs all of the conversations. We have
19:46
a second artificial intelligence that monitors
19:48
conversations with the main artificial intelligence.
19:51
And if any of those conversations go into a gray
19:54
zone, then it actively notifies
19:57
the parents and the teachers that, hey, you should take
19:59
a look at this kind of. conversation. And then
20:01
we're continuing to add a whole bunch of other things, things
20:03
where teachers can use it for lesson planning, we're adding
20:05
memory to it, how teachers can essentially
20:07
use it as a teaching assistant, get reports on what
20:09
the students are up to. I could go on.
20:11
So essentially, the idea
20:14
is, hey, if we can get every single
20:16
kid a personal tutor,
20:18
then it will have an impact on
20:20
their academic performance.
20:23
And this has actually been studied
20:25
and measured. I know you gave a TED Talk back in
20:27
March of 2023, and you cited the study
20:29
that came out in the 80s, basically, that
20:31
showed that when kids have one-on-one tutoring,
20:34
their scores and grades just skyrocket. Like you
20:36
can turn an average student into an outstanding student,
20:38
for example. That's 100% right.
20:41
If you want to become a great pianist, you're not sitting
20:43
in a class of 30 with your piano and the person's
20:45
lecturing you. If you're a great athlete, you have a coach
20:48
who's optimizing you, not just
20:50
giving a lecture to 30 students and saying, hey, you might
20:52
want to improve your swim stroke in this way. And
20:54
then who knows if you actually do. So one-on-one
20:56
tutoring has always been the gold standard. When
20:59
we did mass public education, which was a very
21:01
utopian idea 200 or 300 years ago,
21:03
but we made compromises. We started batching
21:05
students together, applying set
21:08
standards, lectures to them. Some kids
21:10
get it, some kids don't, even if you have a gap in your
21:12
knowledge. Too bad. Move on to the
21:14
next concept. And as you
21:16
mentioned, Benjamin Bloom, 1984, he articulated it well. He
21:19
called it the two sigma problem. Two
21:22
sigma, sigma, the symbol for standard deviation
21:24
in statistics. And a way to think about
21:26
it, two sigma improvement, two standard deviation
21:28
improvement is dramatic. It's going from
21:30
the 50th percentile to I think the 95th or 96th percentile.
21:34
But the reason why he called it a problem was, well,
21:36
how are you going to give everyone a
21:38
one-to-one tutor? And he also in 1984
21:41
theorized, well, maybe you could emulate some aspects
21:43
of that with technology. But I've
21:46
been citing that study for many years in terms of what
21:48
Khan Academy is trying to build. Essentially,
21:50
old Khan Academy or base Khan Academy trying to get to
21:53
that first standard deviation. But now with the
21:55
AI, we can go to that second standard deviation.
21:58
So essentially, the interface of if
21:59
If you're listening and you're familiar with the interface
22:02
of Khan Academy, let's say you get a math problem,
22:05
and you can essentially click a little
22:07
sort of eyeball robot icon in the corner
22:10
and say, hey, I don't
22:11
understand this problem. Can you help
22:13
me? It will not give you the answer. You can't say,
22:15
hey, can you solve this for me? It's
22:18
essentially you ask it to help you
22:20
and then what happens?
22:21
Yeah. And if you say, give me the answer,
22:23
say, hey, I'm your tutor. I'm here to help you. You
22:26
need to learn here, as I think a good tutor would do.
22:29
If you say, OK, well, give me a hint, it'll say, well,
22:31
let's take a close word. What is the problem actually asking
22:34
for? And if you say, well, I think they're asking for this. If
22:36
I got it right, they say, well, yeah, that's good intuition. OK,
22:38
so
22:39
where would you take that? Or let's say I say, I think
22:41
the next step is x squared minus 5.
22:44
Like, OK, take a double look at that. Are you sure it's
22:46
minus 5? Pay attention to your to
22:48
your signs. And one
22:50
of the things we've done to make it more robust on the math
22:53
side is when a student presents
22:55
their math to the AI saying, hey, I think this
22:57
is the next step. The AI
22:59
behind the scenes comes up with what
23:02
it thinks are reasonable responses from the student.
23:04
It doesn't share those with the student.
23:06
Then it compares
23:07
its reasonable responses to what the student said. And
23:09
if it gets something different, it'll
23:12
tell the student, hey, I'm getting
23:14
something different. Can you explain your reasoning, which
23:16
is very pedagogically strong? And so
23:18
then if the student explains the reasoning, and it's a large language model,
23:20
so it's very good at understanding when a student
23:22
explains their reasoning. And sometimes,
23:25
you know, the AI will say, OK, now that I
23:27
see what you did, you know, you might have missed that aspect
23:30
of it or it might say, you know what, you got it
23:32
right. I realize I made the mistake, which
23:34
we actually have heard feedback from from students
23:36
that they actually really like that. And
23:38
once again, I think this is very human like
23:41
this is
23:41
what a human tutor would do when I tutor.
23:43
Yeah, I got started tutoring my cousins
23:46
back in 2004. And this would happen all
23:48
the time. My cousins do something and
23:50
I'd say, hey, that's not what I got.
23:53
Can you explain how you got that? And
23:55
nine times out of 10, I was right. But
23:58
one time out of 10, they were right. And I'm like, oh,
23:59
Oh, my bad, you're right. And so I
24:02
think people really appreciate that. And this is
24:04
now available. I mean, it's totally
24:06
a feature of the interface.
24:09
What we did is we
24:11
released it coincident with the GPT-4
24:14
launch in mid-March of 2023. And
24:16
we did a limited release pilot
24:19
where people had to go on a waiting list and
24:21
then they had to give a donation. And the reason
24:23
why they had to give a donation is this stuff
24:26
isn't cheap. The computation costs, you
24:28
know, every interaction is going to like 5,000 Nvidia GPUs
24:31
that are crunching this. And so anyway, you know,
24:34
we have to pay open AI money, which then
24:36
pays Microsoft Azure money, which
24:38
then uses that money to go buy expensive Nvidia chips.
24:41
So that's something that we've had to grapple
24:43
with because our mission statement is free world-class education
24:45
for anyone anywhere. But we
24:48
have about 10,000 folks using it right now, some
24:50
in mainstream school settings. And
24:53
it's much more than just the tutoring interaction
24:55
that we just talked about, which in and of itself is powerful.
24:58
But we have activities that
25:00
are standalone AI activities where
25:03
students can talk to historical characters or
25:05
literary characters. They can get feedback on their college
25:08
essays. They won't write the essay for them, but
25:10
it can give them feedback. It can coach them to help them think
25:12
of their college essay. It can act as a guidance
25:14
counselor in certain ways. It can help
25:17
teachers create lesson plans, assessments.
25:20
And what we're seeing, the feedback has been very, very
25:22
positive. So this summer, we're
25:24
hoping to make it a more broad release
25:27
so that we're expecting many tens of thousands of more
25:29
folks are gonna sign up.
25:31
Sal, there's a part
25:33
of me that's also asking,
25:36
like, am I not asking
25:38
all the right questions? Am I not thinking of all
25:41
the downstream
25:43
consequences? I mean, obviously
25:46
we're talking about Conmigo, but as
25:48
you know, many school districts in
25:51
the United States have essentially blocked
25:53
chat GPT from school-issued laptops.
25:56
They banned them from being used, right? I think
25:58
a bunch of school districts all across...
25:59
the country. And so
26:02
what is it that they don't
26:04
fully understand that you, you know,
26:06
or what is it that they're not seeing that if you
26:09
could make the case to them that this is a mistake, what
26:12
would you say?
26:13
We've shown Khan Amigo to
26:15
many of these same districts and
26:17
their general reaction has been, in fact,
26:20
not general, all of their reactions has been, this
26:23
is what we need. This is, I guess
26:25
a fair analogy might be
26:27
what Khan Academy is to YouTube is what
26:30
Khan Amigo is to chat GPT
26:32
or standard generative AI. Whereas
26:34
we also know a lot of school districts ban YouTube,
26:37
even though YouTube has a lot of really good
26:39
learning content on it. Has a lot of great stuff. A lot
26:41
of great stuff, but it also has a lot of stuff. A lot of crap.
26:44
A lot of crap. A lot of stuff that can students at
26:46
minimum is going to distract them and worst case
26:48
is going to put them into some kind of weird rabbit hole
26:50
and mess with their head. So they banned
26:52
it, but something like Khan Academy,
26:54
where you can create curated safe environment,
26:57
it's monitorable, et cetera, they
26:59
feel much more comfortable. And so when
27:02
we showed them, it's not cheating. It's
27:04
actually acting like a tutor.
27:06
It provides oversight by adults.
27:09
It can flag when students
27:12
are getting into suspicious areas
27:14
with the AI. Like these are just the guardrails
27:16
that we wanted. But I mean, you, you can
27:18
see and I guess you'd have to, but there's
27:20
nothing preventing a kid from using chat
27:23
GPT to cheat. Nothing
27:25
preventing. And so my best guess of, of
27:27
where let's say term papers or
27:29
homework is going to have to evolve to is
27:32
especially in something like writing, you're going to have to do some
27:34
in-class writing.
27:35
And that's a place where I think Khan Amigo
27:37
can be really useful. We're working on activities right now
27:40
where a teacher can say, Hey, I want
27:42
all the students in the class right now to write a five
27:44
paragraph essay about the following. And
27:46
then on the student interface, Khan
27:49
Amigo will say, Hey, Mr. And Mrs. Smith, it just wants your
27:51
thoughts on this thing. Let's work through this together.
27:53
And then the students can work on it right there. And Khan
27:55
Amigo won't do it for them, but can help a system. You know,
27:57
well, are you really answering the question? question
28:00
that they're asking, or do you have more data to back that up?
28:03
And simultaneously, Conmigo can tell the teacher,
28:05
like, okay, Guy is making a lot
28:07
of progress, but Sal seems a little bit
28:09
stuck. You might want to go walk up to him. Mary
28:12
has already finished the assignment and she's now going
28:14
back to working on her math or something like that. Super
28:17
useful for the teacher. And even for take-home
28:19
assignments, the teacher can say, I want you to
28:21
do it on Conmigo. And
28:23
the process is as important as the
28:26
outcome, as we know it often is in writing. And
28:28
then if there's some student who goes to chat GPT and
28:31
just says, chat GPT, write this essay for me, and
28:33
just copies and pastes it into Conmigo,
28:35
Conmigo can tell the teacher, like, there was no process
28:38
here. That's he just showed up. I
28:40
see, I see. So Conmigo could be the interface
28:43
too, for submitting assignments. It
28:45
could be the interface, it could be the coach, and
28:47
it really acts as a teaching assistant. Imagine
28:50
every student having a teaching assistant and
28:52
the teaching assistant
28:53
is working with every student and it can report back to
28:55
the teacher, like, yeah, I worked with that kid. I know
28:57
it's their thoughts and I helped them a little bit, but
28:59
it's mostly them. But one kid just showed up with an essay
29:02
and really couldn't defend his argument. Let's
29:04
take a second look at that. We're
29:07
gonna take a quick break, but when we come back, more
29:09
from Sal on the future of Conmigo
29:12
and whether it could ever become a for-profit
29:14
product. Stay with us, I'm Guy Roz,
29:17
and you're listening to How I Built This Lab.
29:23
Let's talk water filtration for outdoors
29:25
and emergencies. Whether you're a backpacking
29:28
expert or just wanna make sure you're covered
29:30
in case of disaster, a safe, portable
29:33
water solution is a must-have, especially
29:35
one that's small enough to fit in your pocket.
29:37
Meet LifeStraw's new Peak
29:40
Series Solo Water Filter, the world's
29:42
most compact filter. It weighs just 1.7
29:44
ounces and screws
29:46
onto most plastic water bottles, turning
29:49
them into a powerful filtration device
29:51
that removes bacteria, parasites,
29:53
microplastics, silt,
29:55
sand, and more. It's perfect
29:57
for clipping onto backpacks and stashing.
29:59
and glove compartments. Most importantly,
30:02
LifeStraw fights for the planet and gives
30:04
back. For every filter sold, a
30:06
child in need receives a year of safe
30:09
water, over $7 million to date. Use
30:11
code BILT for 15% off
30:14
the purchase of a LifeStraw Peak Series
30:16
Solo Water Filter
30:17
at LifeStraw.com. A
30:19
founder's job is to build a successful
30:22
startup, not to spend endless hours
30:24
on tedious banking tasks. Mercury
30:27
is engineered precisely for the pace
30:29
and creativity of startups. Get
30:32
FDIC-insured checking and savings accounts
30:34
via regulated partner banks, send
30:36
money seamlessly, proactively manage
30:39
your cash, and maximize your
30:41
runway, all through an intuitive
30:43
product experience that innovates right
30:45
alongside you. Visit Mercury.com
30:49
to join
30:49
more than 100,000 startups
30:52
that trust Mercury with their finances.
31:01
Welcome back to How I Built This Lab. I'm Guy Raz
31:04
and I'm talking with Sal Khan, founder of
31:06
Khan Academy. They built a teaching
31:09
AI called KhanMego that could become
31:11
a pretty lucrative commercial product, but
31:13
Khan Academy is a non-profit.
31:16
Sal, this is a business show, as
31:18
you know, and so I want to ask you to
31:21
put your business hat on for a moment because we don't do
31:23
many non-profits on How I Built This, and there
31:26
are tons of ed tech companies
31:28
out there that make money working
31:31
with school districts, you know, DreamBox
31:33
and all these other programs where you can, schools
31:36
are paying a fee for kids to use
31:38
these products, and Khan Academy products are
31:40
free to use. But I want to ask
31:42
about KhanMego. I mean, if this in fact
31:46
could be a tutor for every kid
31:48
and an interface with the teacher, giving the teacher
31:51
feedback on the student's progress, it
31:53
strikes me that this is something that you
31:55
could license to schools, that you could actually
31:58
turn into a product.
31:59
Obviously, you're a nonprofit and you're
32:02
mission driven, but is that something that you would
32:04
consider doing? Simple
32:07
answers, yes. And we're kind of doing that a little
32:09
bit of that already. You know, I went out
32:11
to our team. We're not for profit. We have free
32:13
in our mission, but still it costs on
32:16
the order of 60, 70 million a year to run Khan
32:18
Academy, both to, you know, just our server costs are
32:20
six, seven million dollars a year. And then obviously
32:22
all of the engineers, etc. Historically,
32:25
we've been primarily funded with philanthropy. Yeah.
32:28
But with that said, about five
32:29
years ago, we started going to school districts. Obviously,
32:32
we've had a lot of what we call grassroots usage in
32:34
classrooms, hundreds of thousands of teachers. But
32:36
we said, if we really want to reach all kids, we have to work formally
32:38
with the districts and we would go to the districts. We would
32:40
show them our efficacy studies. But they said,
32:43
look, for us to use this systemically inside
32:45
of our district, you have to give us support, training,
32:47
integration with our rostering systems, district level
32:49
dashboards. And that's where we said, OK,
32:52
to do all of this bespoke work, someone has to foot
32:54
that bill. And we
32:56
said, look, we're not going to charge
32:59
you for all of this stuff that's funny with philanthropy,
33:02
but at least cover some of the incremental
33:04
costs here. And so to a lot of districts and we now
33:06
have about a million students in districts where
33:09
they're paying on the order of about ten dollars per
33:11
student per year
33:13
to get all of these other things. So we are
33:15
built. We have built this enterprise muscle and it
33:17
is trying to build a little bit of a flywheel of sustainability.
33:20
And to your point
33:21
on Khanmigo, Khanmigo has a very
33:23
real marginal cost to it. It
33:25
costs on the order of let's
33:27
call it ten to fifteen dollars per month. And
33:30
so all of these school districts that have come to us, we are
33:32
talking to them of like, hey, we need to at least cover our computation
33:35
costs. And then we do expect
33:37
that the underlying computation costs are going
33:39
to come down. And so we are having these conversations
33:41
on our team right now of like, OK, right now it costs let's
33:44
call it ten dollars per user per month just for the computation.
33:47
We have to charge that for Khanmigo,
33:49
not for base Khan Academy. But let's say
33:51
that cost goes down to a dollar per user per month.
33:54
Do we just lower it to a dollar or do
33:56
we lower it to two dollars and then we use that that
33:58
incremental dollar to fund our.
33:59
R&D. I mean, I look
34:02
at this, the potential here, right, and
34:04
what you've developed and the amount of money
34:07
you've put into it already. But
34:09
I wonder whether there's
34:10
a world where you take a product like ConMigo,
34:13
which if it's as revolutionary as
34:16
it looks like it could be, I mean, it can really
34:18
change the face of education.
34:21
Is
34:21
there a world where that's spun out
34:23
into a for-profit business?
34:27
There's always been this debate, not at Con Academy,
34:29
but about Con Academy, which it
34:31
always confuses folks about why we're not for profit.
34:34
We scale, we're tech heavy. I live
34:36
in the middle of Silicon Valley. Most of my friends are entrepreneurs
34:39
or VCs of some kind. And
34:42
there's a Harvard Business School case about this, should Con Academy
34:44
be for-profit or non-profit? And to
34:47
me, the arguments for for-profit have historically
34:50
been access to talent and access
34:52
to capital. The reasons
34:54
to be non-profit are you really can
34:57
truly make your mission the bottom line. And
34:59
I think there's a trust aspect of it as well, that
35:02
you know that our bottom line really is this. It's
35:04
not trying to improve our EPS or have
35:07
an IPO. What
35:09
we have found is we are getting access
35:11
not to just good talent, but to the best talent.
35:14
People are here for the mission and they're here to work with other
35:16
people like that. And so the only reason that
35:19
I could ever see trying to do some type of spin out
35:21
or a wholly owned sub that's is for
35:23
some reason, if we're not getting the risk capital
35:25
from the foundations or we can't create
35:28
a flywheel of sustainability, then
35:31
maybe certain pieces of it. But I'm very afraid
35:35
to do that. I mean, definitely wouldn't do that with the mothership
35:37
because I do see how, you
35:40
know, a lot of good comes. I'm a diehard capitalist.
35:42
My old job was at a hedge fund. A lot of good comes out
35:44
of market incentives, but I think
35:47
education and healthcare in particular, market incentives
35:49
don't always align with our values.
35:52
So one of the incredible
35:55
triumphs of Khan Academy has been the millions
35:58
of kids who
35:59
have benefited from it. But in the United
36:02
States, a huge concern, as you
36:04
know, and I know you've looked at this, has
36:06
been the gap between wealthier
36:09
kids, kids who are not
36:11
as wealthy or impoverished, a
36:14
gap in outcomes between
36:17
black students and other students.
36:20
How can something like this
36:22
change that in your view? I mean, I don't
36:24
want to be too much of a techno-optimist here, but I do
36:26
want to be optimistic. I mean, and I'm sure you are.
36:28
How
36:29
do you think they can kind of change that
36:31
equation?
36:32
Yeah, some
36:34
of the stats would shock folks. A majority
36:37
of minority majority schools,
36:39
so that's a mouthful, but a majority of minority
36:41
majority schools
36:43
don't offer courses like
36:46
Algebra II, Physics,
36:48
etc. Not to even mention things like AP
36:50
courses or IB courses. And so if
36:53
you're a young African-American
36:55
student, you don't come from a lot of money,
36:58
you go to one of these schools, you might
37:00
be the next Albert Einstein,
37:02
you might be the next Marie Curie, but there's
37:04
no way that you're going to be able to tap in your potential if
37:06
your school does not offer Algebra II.
37:09
Or many times in that Algebra II
37:11
class, because kids are coming from, in
37:13
many cases, tough circumstances, have gaps
37:15
in their education before that, the teacher
37:18
kind of tries to teach the middle or
37:20
even to the bottom quartile, saying that those
37:22
are the most severe cases. And once again,
37:24
that kid who could have been Marie Curie is
37:26
not going to be able to prepare
37:29
themselves, and then when they go to college, they're
37:31
gonna feel inadequate compared
37:33
to kids who had much better preparation. So that
37:35
was, that's always the view of Khan Academy,
37:37
which is we want to raise the floor, and
37:39
then we want to provide as many supports as we
37:42
can. But we view Khanmigo
37:44
is kind of in between traditional
37:46
Khan Academy and Schoolhouse.world,
37:48
but that's
37:48
just another layer of support. Now,
37:51
in order to access all of this, you still need
37:53
internet access, you still need a device, and
37:56
that's why we work so closely with school districts. You
37:58
know, the technological side in the U.S. the US has gotten
38:00
a lot better over the last 10 years. But
38:03
that's why we're working with school districts to try to get more
38:05
kids at that level of engagement.
38:07
Sal, just a broader question
38:09
about AI. As these products,
38:12
as other
38:13
AI platforms become better
38:15
and better, you can imagine
38:18
a future not too far in the distance
38:20
where things like writing won't
38:22
actually be that useful. Like, you
38:24
know, we think of this as a skill. We think of
38:27
great writers as people
38:29
who've honed their craft, who have talent.
38:32
But
38:33
I mean, if these large
38:35
language models can absorb everything ever
38:37
written in human history, well,
38:40
you can also imagine that that
38:42
skill and talent won't be particularly useful
38:44
in a short period of time. Do you agree with that?
38:47
That was my initial thought
38:50
slash fear slash concern. The
38:52
more that I thought about it, I'm writing a book about
38:54
all of this right now, so I've been interviewing folks. And
38:57
I interviewed Kevin Roos, who famously,
38:59
a New York Times writer, who had that famous
39:02
conversation with Bing's Sydney,
39:04
and it was trying to convince him that he didn't love his wife
39:07
and he loved her and all of these things.
39:10
And I asked him that same question, and I thought he brought up
39:12
a very good point. I mean, he's literally a writer, and he's like, look,
39:14
to be a great writer or journalist, there's
39:17
the writing part of it, and then there's the journalism
39:19
piece of it. And sure,
39:22
AI could help you with the first draft. It
39:24
can help give you feedback on your writing,
39:27
but it's gonna take a lot to get to great
39:29
writing. It might not get quite there. And
39:31
that whole piece of journalism, like talking
39:34
to the right people, being creative about how you get
39:36
your information, connecting the dots, AI
39:39
is not going to do anytime
39:41
soon. And I think every job
39:44
has that aspect of it. So
39:46
I actually think the imperative isn't
39:48
that, oh, kids aren't going to learn to write. I'm worried about the
39:51
kids that only learn to write okay.
39:53
Well, to some degree, they might be empowered
39:56
by something like AI, because now
39:58
their writing is not going to hold.
39:59
them back in other domains. But
40:02
anyone in the, let's call it the writing
40:04
lane, they're
40:05
going to have to become better. They're going to have to move
40:08
into the editorial role to be able to know
40:10
how to manage to create great writing.
40:12
How do you know that the AI has done
40:14
a good job and that you can't coach it
40:16
to be even better? You won't make someone
40:19
an editor of a newspaper unless they could
40:21
be one of the best writers themselves. And
40:23
I think the people who really leverage AI well
40:25
are going to be the people who can get into that.
40:27
How do you manage the AI? How do you put the pieces
40:30
together? And how do you do the things that AI
40:32
won't be able to do?
40:33
So anyone who
40:36
has a child, who knows a child that's been
40:38
in school during the pandemic knows how much
40:40
education has evolved, right? I mean,
40:43
many kids are now issued laptops and not
40:45
just in private schools, but also in public
40:47
schools. And so much of the work is done through
40:50
Google Classroom, right? And parents
40:52
can interface with it. And it's just
40:54
a completely different world. Forget
40:56
about what they're learning. It's how they're learning.
40:59
But I suspect that what you're talking about with
41:01
things like Conmigo and other AI platforms,
41:03
what we're about to see
41:06
is something that is like going
41:08
from, I don't know, like
41:10
the Stone Age to the Industrial Revolution.
41:12
Is that a fair analogy?
41:15
I think you might be right. You know, there's a
41:17
world now where you can talk to historical
41:19
characters and we're probably three
41:22
to five years away where you could share a room with
41:24
Benjamin Franklin or Julius Caesar or
41:26
Cleopatra and immerse yourself. It'll
41:29
be literally the holodeck from Star Trek. I
41:31
didn't think that was going to happen in my lifetime. I now think
41:33
that's going to happen in the next five years. I
41:36
think for the most part, this is positive because
41:38
the students who are really motivated, you know,
41:40
there's a class of students when they were there in their
41:43
math class and I was in this class
41:45
of students. I imagined how it was
41:47
describing the universe and I was like, oh, this is so
41:49
beautiful. This is so elegant. Wow. This is so
41:51
connected. And that motivated me
41:53
to go get through some of the grunge and the really
41:55
hairy equations and all that. But for a lot of kids, they didn't
41:58
see the beauty in it. So
42:00
they weren't motivated. But if you're motivated, you can
42:02
power through anything. Same thing on history. When you just
42:04
read the history book, you're like, ah, this is dull. But
42:06
if you're like, wow, this actually happened to real people
42:09
and I actually know about it. And could you imagine what
42:11
it would have been like to be in that moment
42:14
when Caesar crossed the Rubicon,
42:16
you know, what was going through his mind, then all
42:18
of a sudden history comes alive and you become incredibly motivated.
42:21
I think AI will
42:23
really help unblock folks as a tutor,
42:26
but also really help motivate.
42:28
I mean, imagine having a tutor that not only can do
42:30
what Aristotle did, but it actually can be Aristotle
42:33
sometimes, it can role play with you. It can take on
42:35
tone that really captivates you.
42:37
This all would have been science fiction a year ago
42:40
and it's literally happening now or
42:42
in the coming months.
42:43
It puts to rest the question, if you could have
42:46
dinner with five living or historic people,
42:48
who would they be? Because you
42:50
can actually do
42:51
it at some point.
42:52
You can actually do it. You know, having
42:54
the real dinner will always be better because
42:57
we, you know, obviously the AIs are, they're interpolating
43:00
or extrapolating from, so
43:02
that there's definitely some imperfections. But
43:04
yeah, you're right. In terms of the richness of experience,
43:07
it's even better than the dinner because probably
43:09
in five years you could put some goggles on and
43:12
have the dinner actually in Rome in
43:14
the first century BCE as
43:17
opposed to at your dinner table. It's
43:19
amazing. It's absolutely amazing. Sal
43:22
Khan, thank you so much.
43:22
Thanks for having me, Guy.
43:25
That's Sal Khan, founder and CEO
43:28
of Khan Academy. Hey,
43:31
thanks so much for listening to How I Built This Lab.
43:33
Please make sure to follow the show
43:35
wherever you listen.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More