Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This is moment. Your
0:02
time to shine. Your comeback.
0:04
You're ready for the next
0:06
step in your career and
0:08
you want an education employer's
0:11
respect. So you're not just
0:13
going back to school. You're
0:15
coming back with Purdue Global.
0:18
Backed by Purdue University, one
0:20
of the nation's most respected
0:22
public universities. Purdue Global is
0:24
built for people who bring
0:27
their life experience into the
0:29
online classroom. Purdue Global. your comeback today
0:31
at Purdue Global.EDU. Hey kids, it's
0:33
me Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith! And it's me,
0:35
Harley Quinn Smith. That's my daughter, man, who my
0:37
wife has always said is just a beardless, deekless version
0:39
of me. And that's the name of our podcast. Beardless-less-less-less
0:41
me. I'm the old one. I'm the young one. And
0:44
every week we try to make, and every week we
0:46
try to make, I'm the old one. I'm the young
0:48
one. And every week we try to make, we try
0:50
to make, and every week, we try to make, we try
0:52
to make, we try to make, we try to make, we try to
0:54
make, and every week, we try to make, we try to make, we
0:56
try to make, we try to make, we try to make, we try
0:58
to make, we try to make, we try to make, we try to
1:00
make, we try to make, we make, we make, we make, we make,
1:02
we make, we make, we make, we The
1:05
first night I came over here. How goes lower?
1:08
From Blumhouse TV, I-Hart podcast, and
1:10
Ember 20 comes in all new
1:12
fictional comedy podcast series. Join the
1:14
flighty, Damien Hearst as he unravels
1:16
the mystery of his vanished boyfriend.
1:18
I've been spending all my time
1:20
looking for answers about what happened
1:22
to Santee. And what's the way
1:25
to find a missing person? Sleep
1:27
with everyone he knew, obviously. Listen
1:29
to the hookup on the I-Hart
1:31
radio app, Apple podcast, or wherever
1:33
you listen to your favorite shows. Military
1:36
veterans and active duty service
1:38
members. You could become a
1:40
certified cyber warrior with just
1:42
12 weeks of training at
1:44
my computer career. Cybersecurity specialists
1:46
are in high demand. And
1:48
IT pros with these skills
1:50
often enjoy abundant opportunity and
1:52
a great lifestyle. Protect our
1:54
people, liberty, and treasured institutions
1:57
from cyber threats. Skillbridge and
1:59
other VA benefits are available
2:01
to those who qualify. Learn
2:03
more at my computercareer.EDU slash
2:05
CWP. to let you know
2:07
this is a compilation episode. So every
2:09
episode of the week that just
2:11
happened is here in one convenient
2:13
and with somewhat less ads package
2:15
for you to listen to in
2:17
a long stretch if you want.
2:19
If you've been listening to the
2:22
episodes every day this week, there's
2:24
going to be nothing new here
2:26
for you, but you can make
2:28
your own decisions. Welcome
2:31
to It Could Happen Here. It
2:33
is continuing to happen. Staunks. But
2:35
we will discuss Staunks probably later
2:37
this week. This episode's going to
2:39
be much more fun because I
2:42
am, I am pleased to have
2:44
returning to the show, Ellie Ehrman,
2:46
writer, comedian and creator, and host
2:48
of Going Down, with Ellie Ehrman,
2:50
a trans political comedy news show,
2:52
as well as joining us here,
2:55
is Teen Vogue's News and
2:57
Politics and Politics Editor-Mc Miniman
2:59
Welcome, both of you. Hi.
3:01
Hi, thanks. So we're going to
3:04
be talking about the recent Teen
3:06
Vogue special issue cover story on
3:08
Vivian Wilson, the estranged daughter of
3:11
Elon Musk. Ella, you put together
3:13
a fantastic piece last month and
3:15
this is what we're going to
3:17
discuss, how this article came
3:20
together, that viral photo shoot
3:22
in Japan, which is fantastic.
3:24
All the styling in that
3:26
shoot was lovely. But... I think
3:28
this particular piece was really relevant
3:31
for like trans people and also
3:33
relevant because of the way like
3:35
global politics has been shaken
3:38
up by a few specific people and
3:40
focusing in on Vivian I think was
3:42
really special. So I guess I would
3:44
first like to hear about like yeah
3:47
like the broad strokes of how
3:49
this first came together. From our
3:51
perspective, you know, I don't know that
3:54
like everyone is aware of this and
3:56
certainly I don't know that. all of
3:58
my friends in our various trans
4:00
cultures know this, but at team vote we've been
4:02
covering like trans politics and trans rights for a
4:05
long time, like far before I got here, but
4:07
I've been here for almost four years and it's
4:09
been a pretty big part of my beat in
4:11
part because of it being like a very unavoidable.
4:14
thing within like US state legislatures and
4:16
then obviously like a federal level which
4:18
has only intensified more and more in
4:20
the last year. And so that's like
4:22
one aspect of it but at the
4:24
same time we love young people that
4:26
shit post and so Vivian had been
4:28
on our radar for a while. Totally.
4:30
I also think people are maybe more
4:32
aware of this whole like comrade teen
4:35
vogue vibe of like we're really interested
4:37
in talking to people that have a
4:39
clear political leaning that have like a
4:41
sense of how they see themselves in
4:43
the world in a political context and
4:45
Vivian sort of came right out the
4:47
gate as someone who was really eager
4:50
to share her thoughts on these things.
4:52
So from last summer like within like
4:54
a month of when Vivian was kind
4:56
of introduced to the world through her
4:58
father talking about her on Jordan Peterson's podcast.
5:01
We were trying to get in touch with
5:03
her and it was something I was talking
5:05
a lot about within the office and we
5:07
didn't really know what to do because she
5:09
was just kind of she just kind
5:12
of emerged from nowhere onto the internet
5:14
and so I had been talking about
5:16
it a lot including with Ella because
5:18
we talk a lot and so
5:20
Ella eventually revealed like Oh, that's
5:22
oomphie. I am usual with him.
5:24
Not oomphie. You, you did kind,
5:26
I mean, are you threads oomphies?
5:29
What, what are you, oomphies? On
5:31
Instagram. Instagram, nice. I would never use
5:33
threads, my God. So over to you, that's
5:35
my, that's my teen vogue intro, but
5:37
Ella, if you wanna. Yeah. No, because
5:39
yeah, I, I have, I, I
5:41
have just, just, in contacting Vivi,
5:43
Vivi, Vivian, Like an unhinged number
5:46
of media requests starting last summer.
5:48
Yeah, that's that's true. Right. So
5:50
she did that one NBC interview
5:52
after after Elon went on Peterson.
5:54
And I do not work at Teen
5:57
Vogue, but Lex and I know each
5:59
other because your country actually obligated to
6:01
know everyone else who's part of the
6:03
you know deep state Illuminati doing
6:05
trans politics online club yeah I
6:07
was just gonna say trans people club
6:10
the pronoun the deep state yeah
6:12
the pronoun council exactly we're all
6:14
established members right we swear allegiance
6:16
once a year there's a whole
6:18
ritual don't don't worry about it so what
6:20
I got in touch with Vivian last
6:22
fall which I got in touch with her initially
6:24
to see if she would come on going down
6:26
and I reached out to her and I said
6:28
you want to come on my live comedy show
6:31
and she said no I'm actually not
6:33
sure live comedy is for me I'm
6:35
a little worried I'm not funny enough
6:37
and since then she has changed her
6:39
mind she's told me repeatedly that
6:41
she was saying that to me
6:43
that she has decided she actually
6:45
is funnier than everyone else alive
6:48
all of the things that a
6:50
prolific 20 year old poster might
6:52
say absolutely but so I got
6:54
in touch with her and then she
6:56
said no and I was like okay
6:58
Well, at least I have this mutual
7:00
now. And then a few months later,
7:02
I mentioned to Lex that I got
7:04
in touch with her and Lex said,
7:06
okay, so she doesn't want to
7:08
do a live comedy show that
7:10
nobody knows about. What if instead
7:12
we did a really fancy photo
7:14
shoot and put her in Teen
7:16
Vogue a legacy journalism magazine and
7:18
I said, honestly, I think that's
7:20
a better sales pitch. And it
7:23
was. Yeah, no, it is really compelling. I
7:25
mean, the photo shoot pulls a whole bunch
7:27
of people in. It's certainly, if I
7:29
was in Vivian's position, that would be
7:31
interesting to me. And it does help
7:33
spread around, like, so much of the
7:35
piece is talking about, like, the struggles
7:37
of living as a young trans
7:40
person in America and the fact that
7:42
you can use a teen-vogue photo shoot to,
7:44
like, spread writing about that around the internet.
7:46
It's like super, super useful. Yeah, I mean,
7:48
I just want to like second what Lex
7:51
has been saying. I think the work Teen
7:53
Vogue has been doing is really important. Like,
7:55
so many, I mean, Garrison, you know, like
7:57
so much trans media is like independently distributed.
8:00
and like DIY. And I love us
8:02
for that, but it is always really
8:04
heartening to see like mainstream media institutions
8:06
uplift trans voices the way Teen Gog
8:08
has been doing. And it's also like
8:11
Conde Nast as an institution which is
8:13
like Teen Vokes Parent Company is only
8:15
one of multiple media conglomerates that will
8:17
very proudly like use trans people in
8:19
a representative way like and like sell
8:22
magazine covers with trans people on it
8:24
like you could think of Hunter Schaefer
8:26
for example she's been on the cover
8:28
of several vokes but at the same
8:30
time Hunter Schaefer also received a misgendering
8:33
passport after the Trump admin so like
8:35
I think that if legacy media is
8:37
unwilling to connect the dots between profiting
8:39
off of like the aesthetics of trans
8:42
people but not actually. like talking about
8:44
the political underpinnings of like why trans
8:46
people are even able to be visible
8:48
at this time and like what the
8:50
you know trap doors turmoil calls it
8:53
of the transvisibility means then it's like
8:55
why even do this work in the
8:57
first place so Vivian was like a
8:59
really great opportunity for us to like
9:01
build on like we've done several photo
9:04
shoots particularly with trans women because I
9:06
in trans girls at Teen Vogue because
9:08
we like feel very strongly and Ella
9:10
makes this point in the piece that
9:13
like the way that trans them people
9:15
are like objectified and commodified and commodified
9:17
and commodified and of such extreme vitriol
9:19
is something it feels really important to
9:21
take a stand against. It just felt
9:24
like doing this with Vivian who's so
9:26
high profile, but also hadn't had the
9:28
opportunity yet to take control of her
9:30
own narrative in the public eye and
9:32
with this being her second ever interview
9:35
first ever photo shoot, like it just
9:37
felt like a really big opportunity that
9:39
was worth using as a big swing,
9:41
you know? No, like she is at
9:44
like the center of this like matrix
9:46
of trans commodification in so many ways.
9:48
was really like framed as the subject
9:50
matter of like any piece and like
9:52
framed as her own person for the
9:55
entirety of her adult life she's been
9:57
used as this rhetorical object like both
9:59
by her dad but as well as
10:01
like by people on the left who's
10:03
like objectified Vivian to use her as
10:06
a bludgeon against her father. And yeah,
10:08
like people are very willing to like
10:10
commodify or use use trans people in
10:12
certain ways, but to have like trans
10:15
people writing about other trans people in
10:17
a way that frames them as a
10:19
subject matter is so important. Yeah, I
10:21
mean, I think Vivian, one of the
10:23
things that drew me to the story
10:26
in the first place is that Vivian's
10:28
sort of case is such an interesting
10:30
microcosm of the transome experience as a
10:32
whole. Yeah. incredibly talked about for something
10:34
that is not her fault and not
10:37
under her control at all in the
10:39
same way that right now on the
10:41
national stage like trans femininity and transness
10:43
at large but specifically trans femininity is
10:46
the like problem to be spoken about
10:48
by especially conservative like butler calls it
10:50
a phantasm that like gender nonsense I
10:52
read that book you have my copy
10:54
I said I'm almost certain I do.
10:57
That makes sense. Yeah, that makes sense.
10:59
Almost certainly. That's the trouble with gender,
11:01
right? Gender trouble, yeah. No, no, that's
11:03
the original book. It's who's afraid of
11:05
gender. It's who's afraid of gender. Thank
11:08
you very much. I have your book,
11:10
but I haven't looked at it. In
11:12
a long time, except for to remember
11:14
the word phantasm. And so yeah, I
11:17
totally agree with what like said of,
11:19
it's really exciting moments in the piece
11:21
to me is, the moment where I
11:23
ask her about sort of the allegations
11:25
that Elon like shifted right word because
11:28
of her and she pushes back against
11:30
sort of that narrative very strongly and
11:32
I think that is the way we've
11:34
seen her being used both on the
11:36
left and the right as sort of
11:39
a this is why he's doing this
11:41
it's clearly the fact that he has
11:43
this 20 year old trans girl and
11:45
she's like actually that's a crazy thing
11:48
to say about a 20 year old
11:50
Well, and especially to like counter the
11:52
narrative of her life that's been driven
11:54
by Walter Isaacson's 2023 biography, which is
11:56
like so hostile and to have like
11:59
a prominent like. prominent biography like that
12:01
like trying to make a narrative out
12:03
of out of your existence and it
12:05
was something you have like no like
12:07
input in no control in that's like
12:10
so demeaning it's also like a very
12:12
like you know trans misogyny moments as
12:14
well like yeah it is interesting
12:16
how much of like Vivian is so
12:19
relatable like like a lot of trans
12:21
people have shall I say challenging relationships
12:23
with their parents maybe not to this
12:25
extreme but but Sometimes, frankly,
12:28
right, like there's a lot of people
12:30
are forced to cut off contact
12:32
with their family. Yeah, no, I've
12:34
just been thinking a lot about
12:36
this because, you know, Trump released
12:38
yet another executive order. I think
12:40
that this one was today basically
12:42
trying to codify, allowing transuse to
12:44
access gender affirming care as abuse,
12:46
quote unquote, which is like something
12:48
that the Republican Party has been
12:50
flagging for months that they were
12:52
going to do at the federal level
12:55
as a federal level
12:57
as well.
13:01
targeting trans
13:04
adults, like,
13:07
objectively is...
13:11
like abusive
13:14
and it's
13:17
not the
13:21
access to
13:24
health care that
13:26
is the abuse it's like the way that they're
13:28
dismissed yeah the way they're belittled it's the way
13:30
they can't even be like trusting their own parents
13:32
to be looking out for them and to the
13:34
extent that they have to push themselves out into
13:37
the world to clarify that point so like that's
13:39
one aspect of it I totally agree with what
13:41
you were both saying that it is like a microcosm of
13:43
the trans experience but I do think there's
13:45
like this other valence for like this allowing
13:47
her to like control how this is
13:49
being perceived or received sort of by
13:51
cis media and like cis like the
13:53
cis political sphere which is like how
13:55
trans people are just getting shoved into
13:57
that over and over and over again.
13:59
with very little context felt like a
14:02
really valuable thing to be able to
14:04
do given how like frankly so much
14:06
of my coverage right now just feels
14:09
like it's like trying to raise attention
14:11
to the fact that like these are
14:13
kids these are young people like everyone
14:15
should be able to relate to a
14:18
young person saying like I have a
14:20
bad parent and that sucks and is
14:22
a formative thing for me like that
14:24
is something that like other children are
14:27
afforded the ability to do and like
14:29
we just don't let trans kids like
14:31
have that. as something that's part of
14:34
their truth when it's such a key
14:36
part of like growing up trans in
14:38
a hostile household. and how like the
14:40
landscape that like me, like her, Ella,
14:43
and like a lot of people that
14:45
our age, like, came out of is
14:47
not going to exist for the next
14:50
generation of like, trans kids, or at
14:52
least it's going to be very different.
14:54
And we need to do everything we
14:56
can to stop it from being as
14:59
bad as what it looks like it's
15:01
going to be. And Vivian, like, talked
15:03
about this at length in the piece,
15:06
with the restriction of puberty, the people
15:08
of like trans kids as as this
15:10
own demon of America that's that's that's
15:12
like invading or is like threatening. So
15:15
I think it is really cool a
15:17
50 and do talk about that at
15:19
length in the special teen vogue cool
15:21
photo shoot article. I will say I
15:24
think it's so important that that's talked
15:26
about and I'm glad she did. I'm
15:28
also really glad as someone who covers
15:31
like trans politics and news all the
15:33
time it was such a breath of
15:35
fresh air to be able to frame
15:37
this piece as like a look into
15:40
what like the joy of transition looks
15:42
like and and looking at like totally
15:44
yeah has brought her closer to the
15:47
life she wants to be living and
15:49
I'm not that old but like talking
15:51
to someone who's a few years younger
15:53
than me and who transitioned at an
15:56
earlier stage in life gave me like
15:58
such a beautiful vision of what the
16:00
future could look like if we if
16:03
we fix some of the bullshit that's
16:05
going on these days. All right I'm
16:07
being I'm being cloned on in the
16:09
chat. I'm not that much older than
16:12
Vivian is what I meant and now
16:14
I'm peaking my microphone and now I'm
16:16
peaking my microphone. I'm not that much
16:18
older than Vivian, but she started transitioning
16:21
at a much younger stage of life
16:23
than me and to see like what
16:25
that has done for her and like
16:28
the way I don't know it was
16:30
just really beautiful to talk to like
16:32
a 20 year old girl and be
16:34
like oh you're like trans but it's
16:37
like it's like not actually that big
16:39
of a deal. And it like it
16:41
also like confirms a thing that like
16:44
I mean I made a joke about
16:46
this earlier with like we love young
16:48
people that shit post but like I
16:50
think so much of. liberal and right
16:53
wing talking points about like young people
16:55
in general like sees them as so
16:57
humorless like they are like cancel culture
17:00
nah nah nah nah nah. Whereas Vivian
17:02
is so funny like we actually struggled
17:04
to cut jokes out of the piece
17:06
like Ellen Ella could tell you we
17:09
went back and forth for hours about
17:11
so many jokes that did not. And
17:13
just one-liners, like, she's so quickly, and
17:15
so, like, she's so funny. She's extremely
17:18
funny. A very dense style of humor,
17:20
as in, like, there's a lot, there's
17:22
a lot packed in, like, almost every
17:25
other sentence. Alex and I are both
17:27
some of the fastest talking people I
17:29
know, and I would put Vivian in
17:31
that same group of people who can
17:34
read that pace into the piece. She's
17:36
awesome. So much of our editing was
17:38
just like sort of taking out, yeah,
17:41
like little jokes or like, she's 20,
17:43
so she is swearing all the time.
17:45
Or- Dude, the amount of cursing, I
17:47
much love, but also that was the
17:50
editing process for this was much less
17:52
like stress and more just like, how
17:54
many F bombs are we? keeping today
17:57
hearthand emogies. The way edits go is
17:59
you send in a piece and the
18:01
editors give you like change some stuff
18:03
and then I get to look at
18:06
a new draft and I get to
18:08
be like hey why do you change
18:10
that and then we go back and
18:12
forth over and over again. Until eventually
18:15
it's not up to me anymore. But
18:17
at one point I did have to
18:19
I did have to say actually fem
18:22
boy is one word Correct. Yeah, it's
18:24
different from fem space boy and space
18:26
boy Yeah, specific and I felt really
18:28
like I was bringing I'd like to
18:31
clarify I was not in the grammatical
18:33
edit of that there were multiple editors
18:35
whose hands that as a subject matter
18:38
expert What can I say? who's able
18:40
to appreciate drag way more than what
18:42
I'm ever like able to even though
18:44
I can like appreciate it on like
18:47
on like a conceptual level having this
18:49
like complete sincere like engrossment in it.
18:51
is so thrilling, because a significant portion
18:54
of this piece is talking about how
18:56
much Vivian loves Drag. Oh my God,
18:58
and so much. Ellen knows nothing about
19:00
Drag also, so that was like a
19:03
really good combo for all of us.
19:05
That was, I, I, yeah, I sat
19:07
down with her and we started talking
19:09
very, very quickly. She brought up Ru
19:12
Paul's drag race, and I would just
19:14
like, she kept calling it RPDR, which
19:16
I'm pretty sure. Garrison, is that something
19:19
you call drag race? Have you heard
19:21
RPDR said out loud? I've never heard
19:23
this, no. Okay, whatever. What I'm here
19:25
to say is as someone who actually
19:28
watches a drag race, Ella, that is
19:30
actually not that uncommon to refer to
19:32
it that way. But you know, we
19:35
had two different roles, as the two
19:37
trans people whose brains were wiped by
19:39
the story, Ella's job was to... actually
19:41
writes the piece in mind was too
19:44
interfaced with Vivian. About drag race. So
19:46
clearly it all came together the way
19:48
it was supposed to. I did at
19:51
the very end of our first call.
19:53
I said, is there anything else you
19:55
want to say? And she talked to
19:57
me for another 15 minutes about about
20:00
drag race specifically. rules yeah like I
20:02
know I'm like sort of meant about
20:04
your dad or about like any of
20:06
the important things we talked about this
20:09
as you're like no so in season
20:11
15 of drag race that rules
20:13
that's so cool she's the best
20:15
but no I it's it's so
20:17
funny that you you talk about
20:20
how like there's this there's
20:22
this character of like humorless
20:24
trans people which is very funny
20:26
because like all of like the
20:29
biggest shit posters online right now are
20:31
mostly trans women the trans comedy
20:33
scene is is huge and like
20:35
this is something that if you
20:37
can talk about like spending the
20:40
COVID lockdown and like online queer
20:42
communities and how how like
20:44
the the like drama and like conflict
20:46
in those spaces trains you for how
20:48
to be like really like funny and
20:51
snappy how fighting with like fellow queer
20:53
teenagers like prepared you for for that
20:55
which has like certainly been like my
20:57
experience. I mean there's a reason you
20:59
can sort of tell and I'm sure
21:01
this applies to beyond trans people but
21:03
you can sort of tell which social
21:05
media you grew up on like if
21:08
you were a tumbler teen or a
21:10
redit teen or a for chanting you
21:12
can tell because your style of fighting
21:14
and making jokes changes because it's it's
21:16
it's such a deeply formative part
21:18
of it and I don't know what Online
21:20
forums the right were on growing up,
21:22
but they they were the wrong ones
21:25
Well a lot of fortune as well
21:27
Sure just the not funny parts
21:29
of the fun. Yeah, no, I'm
21:31
still trying to untrain my like
21:33
a defensive way of writing that
21:35
I learned on Twitter Because it's
21:38
a horrible style where you'd have
21:40
to like have like 12 prefaces
21:43
Exactly yeah, yeah, you're article one.
21:45
I am not a racist waffle
21:47
pancaking the entire time Which is it's
21:49
weird because like it's like Twitter does have its
21:51
own style of humor which I also like also
21:53
like also like picked up on but it also
21:56
has that defensive style of writing which which needs
21:58
to get untrained but it is you know a
22:00
work a working progress. I think it's downstream
22:02
of Tumblr. I remain strong on my
22:04
stance that the Tumblr porn ban ruined
22:06
the internet. No, absolutely. Absolutely. I guess
22:08
I'd like to talk a little bit
22:10
more about like the structure of the
22:12
piece and how it succeeded so much
22:15
in putting Vivian as a subject, right?
22:17
Because like the first half. is written
22:19
in more of like a traditional like
22:21
article format to give context and frame
22:23
Vivian as like a person. But then
22:25
halfway through it switches to like a
22:28
back and forth interview which allows Vivian
22:30
to just speak for herself. And I
22:32
think having both of those and not
22:34
just one or the other strengthens the
22:36
piece entirely and strengthens like being able
22:38
to see Vivian as a complete person
22:41
because like as I'm as I'm getting
22:43
the context like for her life and
22:45
the political situation in the first half.
22:47
Then I get to see how much
22:49
she reminds me of like, regular 20-something
22:51
trans girls. And you know, like half
22:53
of the friends I have, though I
22:56
do disagree on team Pita. Pita's a
22:58
bitch boy. It's team gale all the
23:00
way. Thanks you. Controversial. All right. All
23:02
right. All right. I'm excited that we
23:04
agree on this. But those sorts of
23:06
like offhand comments, like there's other things
23:09
that like give you like a, you
23:11
know, a view into into into this
23:13
person. it's so useful to have like
23:15
you know like at least 50% of
23:17
the piece be this like just straight
23:19
interview. We unsurprisingly talked a lot about
23:21
how we were going to structure this
23:24
piece and partially landed on Q&A format
23:26
for like we knew this was going
23:28
to be a behemoth like no matter
23:30
how we tackled it given the subject
23:32
matter and then ultimately how long the
23:34
transcript was and you know just like
23:37
it there were many aspects of this
23:39
that like we were like okay how
23:41
do we How do we do this
23:43
in a way that's going to read
23:45
well to people? Because something we also...
23:47
about a lot of accessibility, like young
23:49
people famously hate reading now, but we
23:52
wanted this to actually be something that
23:54
like a young person could sit down,
23:56
dash through, still get some like, you
23:58
know, historical, political context out of, and
24:00
still come away being like, ha ha,
24:02
teen pita, team gale, or whatever the
24:05
hell, right? And so... And maybe have
24:07
like subway surfers on like another phone
24:09
at the same time. Yes, exactly. Exactly,
24:11
exactly, exactly. And then I would say
24:13
the... I want Ella to talk about
24:15
the transcript and like interview stuff, but
24:18
like the intro I think is probably
24:20
where I spent the most of my
24:22
time editing this piece and like adding
24:24
stuff and a lot of adding stuff
24:26
it ballooned like we wanted this to
24:28
be a lot shorter than it was
24:30
and then it just kept feeling like
24:33
there were more pieces to really tie
24:35
it together but I would say like
24:37
the reason that was the case is
24:39
because it was a really hard line
24:41
to walk to acknowledge that like people
24:43
would be clicking on this in part
24:46
because of Elon, but that we wanted
24:48
to like trick them into coming for
24:50
Elon, but staying for Vivian. Yeah, like
24:52
it's not about Elon, nor like should
24:54
it be? Yeah. Right. And so like
24:56
one, like Ellen and I had a
24:58
zoom with Vivian and. what November was
25:01
the first one or was that? I
25:03
think so. Yeah November, December to just
25:05
like so she could kind of get
25:07
our vibe and just kind of suss
25:09
out if she was willing to like
25:11
consider this at all. And one of
25:14
the earliest things she said was like
25:16
I don't really want to talk about
25:18
him, I don't want this to be
25:20
about him. And we were really down
25:22
for that like we don't think that
25:24
her story is about him ultimately. I
25:27
felt really important and it was also
25:29
challenging to make sure that. we felt
25:31
like people were coming away from this
25:33
without like a garbled interpretation of what
25:35
the stakes were for her to be
25:37
coming forward like we wanted it to
25:39
be especially right now while so much
25:42
a mainstream media is really fumbling their
25:44
coverage of like politics at this moment
25:46
it felt really important to be like
25:48
trans politics especially especially and then also
25:50
just like all of it so like
25:52
all of it and then especially trans
25:55
politics we just really wanted the intro
25:57
to be like as strong and also
25:59
like informative and also like kind of
26:01
funny and also like just all the
26:03
things because and I would say that
26:05
probably took the most time alone correct
26:07
me if I'm wrong but yeah I
26:10
mean I think the intro started off
26:12
as probably an eighth of the piece
26:14
and yeah now is is closer to
26:16
a half of the piece and there
26:18
were so many hands on it I
26:20
wrote like sort of a very loose
26:23
like skeleton of what that intro ended
26:25
up being. And I would say the
26:27
most, like, it wasn't that many people
26:29
adding text, it was mostly me. Mostly
26:31
Lex. But part of that is because,
26:33
I mean, everything like said, but also
26:35
that Musk is currently a high level
26:38
government official and is in the news
26:40
all the time. I mean, when we
26:42
started writing, the intro said that Musk
26:44
had 13 children and then we had
26:46
to update that. twice. New kid just
26:48
dropped, yeah. Over the edit process, things
26:51
wouldn't stop happening. And then also Vivian
26:53
wouldn't stop posting, which was a little
26:55
bit frustrating. At one point, I had
26:57
to DM her. I said, hey, if
26:59
you get any more information, can you
27:01
please just tell me and not post
27:04
it on threads? And she said, oh,
27:06
totally. That girl is a poster of
27:08
her for sure. But yeah, I mean,
27:10
I think I really love the balance
27:12
the piece found in the end. Early
27:14
on when we were talking about structure,
27:16
I think I pushed for more of
27:19
a standard profile, mostly because, you know,
27:21
then I get to show off my
27:23
writing skills more and I like to
27:25
write. But after talking to Vivian, even
27:27
after our early pre-interview, but certainly after
27:29
the full interview where I sat with
27:32
her for a very long time over
27:34
Zoom and a 14-hour time difference, I
27:36
immediately was like, no, if I write
27:38
this out, it's going to be... mostly
27:40
dialogue anyway because her voice she had
27:42
she's so voice and it's so fun
27:44
to keep it in in that voice
27:47
she's a very very distinctive voice yeah
27:49
yeah and so to you Ella and
27:51
so like it's like that's really the
27:53
strength of the piece in so many
27:55
ways is that like people come away
27:57
with it it doesn't feel like you're
28:00
in the background or like hiding by
28:02
something when you're writing this piece like
28:04
it very much feels like the success
28:06
of it is because you are a
28:08
part of it and um the New
28:10
York Times reported that this was Ella's
28:13
first freelance article so I just wanted
28:15
to add that you know Ella kind
28:17
of did her did her big one
28:19
with her first article thanks no this
28:21
is now everything I write the next
28:23
15 years will be underwhelming it's all
28:25
downstream from here it's not true barren
28:28
Trump I'm coming for you you're gonna
28:30
reenroll at NYU you Exactly. They'll never
28:32
see me coming. I am waiting for
28:34
him to get fixed by like a
28:36
bisexual she-they. It's gotta happen, right? No,
28:38
I don't think so. I don't know.
28:41
Obama was like into a bisexual she-they
28:43
and he still bombed the Middle East
28:45
or whatever. But no, like mainstream coverage
28:47
is just completely failing trans people right
28:49
now. I got so mad at a
28:51
Washington Post article yesterday that I that
28:53
I skied it about it, something I
28:56
never do. Was it the sports one?
28:58
The girl playing it? Girl. After President
29:00
Donald Trump banned transgender girls from competing
29:02
in girl sports, a Virginia high schooler
29:04
joins the boys team. She wasn't going
29:06
to let the president's executive order stop
29:09
her. Framers like a feel-good story, fucking
29:11
infuriating. And it's so like transparent, like,
29:13
and I, again, I feel like I
29:15
keep bringing the cis into the space.
29:17
I'm really sorry. One of my, like,
29:19
cis colleagues was like, this is disgusting.
29:22
Why did they write this, like, a
29:24
feel-good story? And it's like, my thing
29:26
is, if, like, if anyone with some
29:28
amount of critical thinking skills can see
29:30
exactly through what you're doing, why even
29:32
do it? Like, it's so transparent. clicks.
29:34
I mean I guess we you know
29:37
what got clicks was Vivian so I
29:39
actually don't know about that's true and
29:41
say that and I did and I
29:43
will. Do you want to talk about
29:45
the length of the transcript because I
29:47
am curious how long Vivian talked for.
29:50
Am I allowed to say you're not?
29:52
Damn. I think I'm legally damn. Can
29:54
we explain why? When we're not recording
29:56
I can explain why. Okay. I think
29:58
I got to say most of What
30:00
I want to say, I mean I
30:02
think Vivian's just like a delightful person
30:05
and I'm really excited for her that
30:07
she gets her moment in the
30:09
spotlight and that hopefully this like
30:11
helps her build herself as a
30:13
public figure outside of and away
30:15
from Elon Musk and she has
30:17
all of these aspirations to perform
30:19
and model and I hope she
30:21
gets to do her Anna Winter
30:23
Drag one day soon. Oh, me too.
30:26
I love that movie. It's a great movie.
30:28
Hi Anna Winter. Lex. Do you want to
30:30
plug your little outlet? What's this teen vogue?
30:32
Oh yeah, I don't know if anyone's
30:35
heard. Actually, so frequently people
30:37
haven't heard of it. So
30:39
it's actually fine. Yes, you
30:41
can find us at teenvogue.com.
30:43
We have no paywall. We
30:45
have a fact-checking department. Most
30:47
of mainstream media is not
30:49
doing it like us if you
30:51
consider those two points. So yeah.
30:54
Labor politics, especially teen vogue, it's
30:56
been phenomenal. If you love Kim
30:58
Kelly, she is our labor columnist,
31:00
so come through. I also do
31:02
some of our labor coverage, but
31:04
like, definitely not the extent Kim
31:06
does. Yeah, I'm on the things,
31:08
I'm on the socials, yeah, that's
31:10
it, that's all I had, Lil. Ella,
31:12
where can people find you on
31:15
the World Wide Web? I'm on
31:17
Instagram and X, everything, everything app
31:19
as Ella Yerman or Ella Dot
31:21
Yerman on Instagram. We're going to
31:23
get you on Blue Skyi. I
31:26
suffered through 2012 Tumblr once. I don't
31:28
need to do it again. That is
31:30
so not the vibe. I wish it
31:32
were, but it's not, oh, Fluske, guy.
31:34
No, it's, it's, it's more 2019 Twitter.
31:36
Yeah, I agree. You can also find
31:38
my show at Going Down TV on
31:40
Instagram, going down the show on
31:42
YouTube, going down show on Patreon,
31:44
I don't know, I make a transgender daily
31:46
show, you guys know about it. New Studio
31:49
looks great. It's so fun, we gotta get
31:51
you on there. We gotta get you to
31:53
come hang out. Hey, well I will I
31:55
will I will be in town shortly so
31:58
hell yeah. Oh fun! I go to the taping. so
32:00
I can crash. That'll be fun. You
32:02
should do it. Hell yeah. Are we,
32:04
did we do it? Yeah, we're done.
32:22
Hey, kids, it's me Kevin Smith.
32:25
And it's me Harley Quinn
32:27
Smith. That's my daughter, man, who
32:29
my wife has always said is
32:32
just a beardless, deckless version of
32:34
me. And that's the name
32:36
of our podcast. Beardless Lickless Me.
32:38
I'm the old one. I'm the
32:41
young one. And every week we
32:43
try to make each other. And
32:46
every week we try to make
32:48
each other laugh. I'm the old
32:50
one. I'm the young one.
32:52
And every week we try to
32:55
make each other to make each
32:57
other. And every week. You get
33:00
your podcast. Do you remember
33:02
what you said the first night
33:04
I came over here? Ow goes
33:06
lower. From Blumhouse TV, I-Hart
33:08
podcast, and Ember 20 comes in
33:11
all new fictional comedy podcast series.
33:13
Join the flighty Damien Hearst as
33:16
he unravels the mystery of
33:18
his vanished boyfriend. And Santi was
33:20
gone. I've been spending all my
33:22
time looking for answers about what
33:25
happened to Santi. And what's the
33:27
way to find a missing person?
33:30
Sleep with everyone he knew, obviously.
33:32
Hmm, pillow talk. the most
33:34
unwelcome window into the human psyche.
33:36
Follow our out of his element
33:39
hero as he engages in a
33:41
series of ill-conceived investigative hookups.
33:43
Mama always used to say, God
33:46
gave me gumption in place of
33:48
a gag reflex. And, as
33:50
I was about to learn, no
33:53
amount of showering can wash your
33:55
hands of a bad hookup. Listen
33:57
to the hookup on the
33:59
I-Hart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or
34:02
wherever you listen to your favorite
34:04
shows. Sonoro and I-Hart's Mike Kuntura
34:07
podcast network present The Set Up,
34:09
a new romantic comedy podcast. Starring
34:11
Harvey Ian and Christian Navarro. The
34:14
setup follows a lonely museum
34:16
curator searching for love. But when
34:18
the perfect man walks into his
34:21
life... Well, I guess I'm saying
34:23
I like it. You like
34:25
me? He actually is too good
34:27
to be true. This is a
34:30
con. I'm calling you. to
34:32
get the DeLado painting. We could
34:34
do this together. To pull off
34:37
this heist, they'll have to get
34:39
close and jump into the
34:41
deep end together. That's a huge
34:43
leap, Fernando, don't you think? After
34:46
you, Trudeau. But love is the
34:48
biggest risk they'll ever take. Fernando
34:51
is never going to love you
34:53
as much as he loves in
34:55
this dog. Trudeau. That painting
34:57
is ours. Listen to The Set-Up
35:00
as part of the Michael Duda
35:02
podcast network available on the I-Hart
35:05
Radio app, Apple podcast, or
35:07
wherever you get your podcasts. On
35:09
November 5th, 2018, at 6.33am, a
35:11
red Volkswagen Golf was found
35:13
abandoned and a ditch out in
35:16
Sleephole Valley. The driver's seat door
35:18
was open. No traces of footsteps
35:21
leaving the vehicle. No belongings
35:23
were found except for a cassette
35:25
tape lodged in the player on
35:27
that tape were 10 vile No,
35:30
no, no, no, no, no No,
35:32
no No, no! Brotesque. Oh my
35:35
god. Oh my god Horific stories,
35:37
but to this day have
35:39
been kept restricted from the public
35:41
until now You feel
35:44
in this too? A horror anthology
35:46
podcast. Listen on the I heart
35:48
radio app. Apple podcasts or wherever
35:50
you get your podcast. Hello everybody.
35:52
It could happen here. and this
35:55
is Robert Evans. We're a show
35:57
about things falling apart and boy
35:59
howdy they sure seem to be
36:01
doing just that as they always
36:03
are and have been for years.
36:05
You know, in fact, anticipation of
36:07
the end times, I think, is
36:10
probably close to the number one
36:12
hobby in the United States at
36:14
this point. I suspect if you
36:16
counted up the dollar value of
36:18
all the collapse-themed movies, books, prepping
36:20
gear, monetize social media content, and
36:23
of course, religious sects in the
36:25
country, the apocalypse would be one
36:27
of our big industries. Doomsday prepping
36:29
alone was an almost $1.2 billion
36:31
business last year, and it's expected
36:33
to more than double by 2030.
36:35
Our popular fiction can't even imagine
36:38
a better future right now. 90%
36:40
of modern future media takes place
36:42
during or shortly after an apocalypse.
36:44
The odd exception today, like Bongshun-Ho's
36:46
recent Mickey 17, is so rooted
36:48
in Trump's politics that we only
36:51
catch occasional glimpses of anything beyond
36:53
it. In other words, in our
36:55
fiction, there's no respite from the
36:57
news. We watch a slow-motion self-inflicted
36:59
global economic collapse and then relax
37:01
with shows about mushroom zombies or
37:04
literal wage slaves created by mind-control
37:06
surgery. In other words, it's bleak
37:08
out there. Tomorrow could be the
37:10
day Trump invokes the Insirection Act,
37:12
or uses the military to occupy
37:14
Greenland, or like one of a
37:16
dozen equivalent horrors. We all just
37:19
know are coming in some form
37:21
or another, even if no one
37:23
can say when. And I'm not
37:25
here today to tell you how
37:27
we're going to get past all
37:29
of that or fix it, because
37:32
I don't know. So today, I'm
37:34
just here as a merchant of
37:36
hope. My job is to convince
37:38
you that our species will someday
37:40
get past our bullshit, and perhaps
37:42
even lay claim to the stars.
37:44
And no, Elon Musk isn't going
37:47
to have anything to do with
37:49
that. But in order to convince
37:51
you of all this, I'm going
37:53
to have to talk about a
37:55
movie. It's called War. And it
37:57
is technically a 1981 comedy adventure
38:00
film. about an American naturalist. This
38:02
guy lives on a nature preserve in
38:04
Tanzania filled with big cats. His family
38:06
comes to visit at the same time
38:08
as a grant committee shows up to
38:10
evaluate his project, which has an unclear
38:12
goal. He's apparently just trying to prove
38:14
people and giant cats from all over
38:16
the world can live together, which the
38:18
movie shows they can't. It's really immaterial
38:20
what happens in the plot. All I
38:22
can tell you is how Wikipedia describes
38:25
it. I've watched this movie dozens of
38:27
times and I have very little idea
38:29
what it's supposed to be about. This
38:31
is because, in any given scene, the
38:33
script is only ever a vague suggestion.
38:35
As each scene starts with actors trying
38:37
to read lines and evolves into those
38:39
same actors trying to survive while being
38:42
mauled by dozens of lions, tigers, and
38:44
panthers. I should probably step back a
38:46
minute to explain some things. Ror is
38:48
largely the brainchild of Tippy Hedron
38:50
and her husband Noel Marshall. If
38:53
you're on the younger side, Tippy Hedron
38:55
was the female lead in a little
38:57
movie called The Birds. It is a
38:59
horror film and also an early apocalypse
39:02
flick by Alfred Hitchcock. It's often credited
39:04
with inventing modern horror cinema. Hitchcock
39:06
himself sexually and psychologically harassed Hedron,
39:08
but his worst actions came during
39:11
a crucial scene where Hedron was
39:13
attacked by a flock of birds.
39:15
Up to the day of filming, Hitchcock
39:17
had assured Tippy the birds used in
39:19
this scene would be animatronic. But when
39:22
the time came to shoot it,
39:24
she spent five days having hundreds
39:26
of live birds hurled at her
39:28
in huge numbers by the crew.
39:30
Hedron later described it as brutal,
39:32
ugly, and relentless. Kerry Grant, her
39:34
co-star, told her she was the
39:36
bravest woman he'd ever seen. Now whatever
39:38
other impacts this had on Tippy,
39:40
she has no discernable fear of
39:42
animals after this point in her
39:44
life. Though she really should. Her husband Noll
39:47
is a bit more of a mystery
39:49
to me. He was an agent, a
39:51
producer, a film investor, and a serial
39:53
entrepreneur whose best financial decision was putting
39:55
money behind what became the exorcist. In
39:57
1969, he and Hedron were in Mosaic.
39:59
Well, she starred in the film Satan's
40:02
Harvest, about which Les has said the
40:04
better. This is only relevant because during
40:06
their time in Africa, they observed a
40:08
pride of lions lounging about an abandoned
40:10
home. And this gave them an idea.
40:12
They wanted to make a movie about
40:15
poaching and conservation, something that could use
40:17
the power of film to save these
40:19
majestic creatures being threatened by humanity. All
40:21
four of their children agreed to star
40:23
in it and to help with production.
40:25
But there were immediate snags. They wanted
40:28
the film to be set in a
40:30
big cat sanctuary, but actual lion tamers
40:32
warned them that it was flat out
40:34
impossible to keep so many large fee
40:36
lines together safely. This would eventually prove
40:38
to have been very accurate advice. After
40:41
a while, one tamer introduced them to
40:43
their first tame lion, and for reasons
40:45
known only to God, he suggested to
40:47
this traumatized movie star and her family
40:49
of charmingly deranged Californians that they could
40:51
just get their own big cats and
40:54
train them by adopting animals confiscated from
40:56
their previous owners. Generally, sketchy zoos and
40:58
circuses. So a lot of these cats
41:00
had never known the wild and they'd
41:02
often been badly mistreated. Given that this
41:04
was the 1970s, we must assume that
41:07
some had been confiscated property of coke
41:09
dealers. Tipianole had no professional or legal
41:11
qualifications to care for dozens of big
41:13
cats. When the authorities eventually found out,
41:15
there was trouble. Although since Hedron and
41:17
Marshall were rich, they bought their way
41:20
out of said trouble by purchasing a
41:22
rural compound and having a house built
41:24
specifically for they and their dozens of
41:26
apex predators of apex predators to live.
41:28
While lions had inspired the initial vision
41:30
the compound in California soon filmed with
41:33
big adopted cats of every kind Tippy
41:35
and her husband took them in and
41:37
raised them among and around their own
41:39
Children who came to see the animals
41:41
as something between pets and family When
41:43
they actually started filming the movie that
41:46
became war making any kind of movie
41:48
had become secondary to the act of
41:50
caring for these many many giant traumatized
41:52
kitties as I noted earlier the plot
41:54
to war is kind of immaterial I've
41:56
never watched. it with the sound on.
41:59
I can tell you though that none
42:01
of these cats were trained in any
42:03
really meaningful way, which meant that every
42:05
scene devolved into the same spectacle. The
42:07
cast, surrounded by dozens of giant cats,
42:09
stumbled through a few lines before one
42:12
or all of the cats began to
42:14
bite and claw them, at which point
42:16
each scene becomes about surviving from one
42:18
moment to the next. Ror took more
42:20
than five years to film and more
42:22
than a decade to actually make. No
42:25
cats were harmed during the production of
42:27
this movie, but more humans were injured
42:29
than in any other film production on
42:31
record. Of the 120 or so cast
42:33
and crew on Ror, more than 100
42:35
suffered significant injury. Often more than once.
42:38
Yandebant, the cinematographer, had his scalp ripped
42:40
off by a lion, requiring 120 stitches.
42:42
He went on to make speed and
42:44
twister. Melanie Griffith. Tippy's daughter and a
42:46
future star herself left production at one
42:48
point because she was worried a big
42:51
cat might rip her face off. She
42:53
ultimately returned and immediately had a large
42:55
chunk of her face ripped off, requiring
42:57
extensive surgery. This all sounds horrifying and
42:59
impossible to justify. But before you make
43:01
a final judgment, I want to remind
43:04
you of two things. One, for all
43:06
its horrors and severe injuries, fewer people
43:08
were killed on the set of war
43:10
than an Alec Baldwin's recent film rust.
43:12
The second thing that you must remember
43:15
is that Roar is a work of
43:17
art on the level of Moby Dick.
43:19
If you watch it enough, among the
43:21
right people, and in the right headspace,
43:23
you can come to a deeper understanding
43:25
of every facet of human existence. I've
43:28
taken a lot out of it over
43:30
the years. Recently, it has convinced me
43:32
that we will one day get over
43:34
our bullshit and escape the present hell
43:36
that our species seems mired in. I
43:38
know that doesn't make much sense now,
43:41
but give me some time. I'll explain
43:43
why. It's probably time for some ads.
43:45
We're back. And the first thing I
43:47
need you to understand about all of
43:49
these fucking cats is that an every
43:51
mauling caught on tape and there are
43:54
dozens of them. I see no anger
43:56
or malice in the actions of these
43:58
cats. I don't even see hunger. It's
44:00
clear to me as a cat owner
44:02
that the cats didn't see these people
44:04
tippy in her family in the cast
44:07
and crew as prey or as a
44:09
threat. If anything, they saw them as
44:11
fellow big cats, cousins and close-kin, who
44:13
they extend a kind of familiarity, and
44:15
perhaps even a kind of love that,
44:17
since they are cats, is expressed primarily
44:20
by batting at them with claws that
44:22
hit like bowie knives embedded in the
44:24
hood of a speeding camry. If you
44:26
have cats of your own, you understand.
44:28
Now, given that nearly every person on
44:30
this film was badly injured, including Tippy,
44:33
who got gangrene from infected cat wounds,
44:35
and all of her children, you might
44:37
feel inclined to judge who are a
44:39
knoll or both of them for risking
44:41
their kids' lives to make this insane
44:43
movie. I understand the impulse, but I
44:46
believe it to be an error. The
44:48
first thing you need to see to
44:50
understand the deeper dynamics going on with
44:52
war is a picture from a Playboy
44:54
magazine photo shoot of Tippy husband and
44:56
co-star star, Noel Marshall. He's in his
44:59
office on his typewriter and this fully
45:01
grown male lion gets up on his
45:03
desk because it wants attention. Again, normal
45:05
cat behavior. Now despite the best efforts
45:07
of this animal, who has to weigh
45:09
500 pounds, no old marshal won't stop
45:12
focusing on his work. And so the
45:14
cat inches away from his face, roars.
45:16
The sound of a male lion's roar
45:18
is deeply imprinted on all of us,
45:20
an epigenetic memory passed down by the
45:22
handful of our ancestors who heard the
45:25
sound up close and lived to tell
45:27
the tale. It has such a foundational
45:29
impact on our mind that Metro Goldwyn
45:31
Meyer, the film studio, used it to
45:33
open every movie they made from 1928
45:35
on. I believe they did this because
45:38
the sound is a sort of hack
45:40
to compel our attention. It pulls an
45:42
audience out of whatever state of mind
45:44
dominates their outside lives and makes them
45:46
more attentive to the film that is
45:48
to come. And so the first thing
45:51
you need to understand about the people
45:53
who made war is that Marshall, upon
45:55
having a living adult lion... inches from
45:57
his face, roar, gives the creature a
45:59
look that says, hey man, can you
46:01
give me a second? I'm like, I'm
46:04
in the middle of something. I bring
46:06
this up so that you will understand
46:08
that these were not people operating on
46:10
anything close to the same wavelength as
46:12
you and I. Their lives and their
46:14
choices are to outsiders, inconceivable. There's another
46:17
great photo from the set of that
46:19
playboy shoot. While the camera people roamed
46:21
the Hedron compound, one of them caught
46:23
a shot a shot of Tippy's adolescent
46:25
daughter, Melanie, An adult male lion, which
46:27
she must have considered to be in
46:30
some way a member of the family,
46:32
steeze this girl passing by in the
46:34
corner of its eye and that motion
46:36
ignites an instinct inside it. So like
46:38
any cat of that size in the
46:40
same situation, it reaches out to bite
46:43
her. Afterwards, the Hedron family and the
46:45
cast and crew had complicated feelings about
46:47
what happened that extended to the present
46:49
day. Tippy divorced Marshall almost as soon
46:51
as the filming finally wrapped. She has
46:53
alleged that while Roar was being made,
46:56
he utterly ignored her well-being. She also
46:58
does not seem to have ever seriously
47:00
considered leaving. She later wrote that she,
47:02
quote, was into it every bit as
47:04
much as he was, and that production
47:06
was an obsessive, addictive drama. John Mitchell,
47:09
Noll's son, who acted in the movie,
47:11
and like everyone else, was mulled repeatedly,
47:13
came to own the rights to Roar
47:15
when his dad died in 2010. Dad
47:17
was a fucking asshole to do that
47:19
to his family, he said recently. He
47:22
said this. It was amazing to live
47:24
through that. I should have died many
47:26
times, but I kind of want to
47:28
do it again. If you have any
47:30
friends or family who have survived extended
47:32
periods of every combat, there's a good
47:35
chance they may have expressed a variation
47:37
of the same feeling. This is because
47:39
trauma is sometimes a drug. Taking it
47:41
can be more than just hell. It's
47:43
often also a high, which is one
47:45
thing that drives a lot of people
47:48
crazy. I need to take a moment,
47:50
away from roar. to talk about some
47:52
people that I met in 2017 in
47:54
Iraq during the desperate and ferocious urban
47:56
combat against ISIS. The closer I drew
47:58
to the front the more guys... who
48:01
were elite veterans of the Iraqi Special
48:03
Forces. They did the bulk of the
48:05
fighting. These were mostly young men, ranging
48:07
from the tail into their teens to
48:09
their twenties. Many had grown up in
48:11
places like Fallujah, fighting from the time
48:14
they were seven or eight, sometimes younger.
48:16
They'd been born into the US occupation
48:18
in many cases. Their earliest memories were
48:20
as runners, faring supplies and information to
48:22
the older men and teenage boys who
48:24
did most of the fighting. When the
48:27
opportunity presented itself, they sometimes dropped grenades
48:29
or improvised explosive devices on U.S. troops,
48:31
most of whom were teenagers themselves. Now
48:33
they fought against ISIS in close quarters,
48:35
building to building a few weeks at
48:37
a time. Periodically, they'd rotate off the
48:40
front and would go to Erbil, an
48:42
hour or two away. Many of them
48:44
were gangsters in their spare time, running
48:46
drugs and guns and brothels. They spent
48:48
their days off in a drunken haze
48:50
of Turkish amphetamines. Then they would drive
48:53
back to the front and new brightly
48:55
colored mustangs and dodged charges. The trunks
48:57
folded bursting with so many machine guns
48:59
and rocket launchers. They can only be
49:01
closed with bungee cords. The guns and
49:03
rockets were useful at a distance to
49:06
soften up enemy positions in the impossibly
49:08
dense warren-like urban environment of Mosul's old
49:10
city. In every building on every block,
49:12
the fighting terminated with door-to-door, room-to-room battles,
49:14
where the most useful weapons were hand
49:16
grenades, combat knives, and pistols in that
49:19
order. I don't know if any of
49:21
these guys were at that point that
49:23
I met them, capable of feeling what
49:25
you or I would recognize as fear.
49:27
These were the men and boys whose
49:29
bodies formed the cutting edge of the
49:32
fighting against ISIS and Mosul. On occasion,
49:34
when they kidnapped ISIS fighters, some of
49:36
them committed war crimes with the ease
49:38
and with as much thought as you
49:40
and I give to breathing. This is
49:42
bad, of course. Unforgivable. But I've never
49:45
really given much thought to judging them
49:47
for it. Where would I even start?
49:49
I think I've come to understand that
49:51
my travels is that human beings are
49:53
capable of contorting themselves of contorting themselves
49:55
into the most incredible shapes in order
49:58
to live in. This has been the
50:00
story of our entire long journey on
50:02
this earth, and if there is one
50:04
reason our species has survived... above all
50:06
the others, it is our capacity for
50:08
infinite variety and infinite contexts. We can
50:11
make ourselves into anything if we're given
50:13
the right incentives, and to an extent
50:15
you can't judge individual humans without judging
50:17
the incentives the world we collectively create
50:19
presents for them. We evolved and we
50:21
still live in a world where trauma
50:24
and pain are inevitable, and those of
50:26
us who survive the worst things that
50:28
life can throw at us tend to
50:30
become addicted. sometimes to the cause of
50:32
the trauma, but nearly always to the
50:34
people we experience it with. This is
50:37
why the cast and crew of Roar
50:39
often reported feeling almost addicted to spending
50:41
time among these gigantic predators, and it's
50:43
why many kept coming back despite being
50:45
repeatedly maimed. Roar happened because the core
50:47
cast and crew exhibited radical empathy for
50:50
roughly 140 large cats and for each
50:52
other, and almost exercised zero critical judgment
50:54
beyond that point. Now I will understand
50:56
if you still feel that nothing could
50:58
justify the decision of two parents to
51:01
risk their children's lives in such folly.
51:03
And I know this essay is supposed
51:05
to be my ultimate enduring optimism about
51:07
mankind's potential, and I'm going to get
51:09
to that, but you know, we still
51:11
live in 2025. So first, here's ads.
51:23
So here's my best step at explaining
51:25
why I find Roar inspirational. There's a
51:28
scene about three quarters of the way
51:30
through this movie. After roughly an hour
51:32
straight of watching the Hedron Marshall family
51:34
and their friends get repeatedly mauled for
51:37
real by giant cats. And in this
51:39
scene, John Marshall finds a dirt bike
51:41
and engineers a scenario that I am
51:43
certain has never happened before or since
51:45
in the history of this planet. He
51:48
rides away from the home where his
51:50
family is trapped and draws several dozen
51:52
lions, panthers, and tigers away by making
51:54
them chase him. The cats assume this
51:57
is a game and repeatedly try to
51:59
murder or maim him. But he continues
52:01
building up... in an ever greater tale
52:03
of the most lethal killing machines to
52:06
evolve on this planet. You can see
52:08
from the look in John's eyes in
52:10
this scene that he has no idea
52:12
if he seconds away from death. It
52:15
would have been physically impossible to stop
52:17
or control this number of giant cats.
52:19
The only reason this number and variety
52:21
of lions, Panthers, and tigers would ever
52:24
have existed together at any previous point
52:26
in world history would have been across
52:28
a distance of thousands of miles of
52:30
rugged wilderness. But thanks to Tippy and
52:33
Noll's insane dream, and thanks to the
52:35
deranged and utterly unjustifiable commitment of many
52:37
of the crew and their family, a
52:39
moment of utter novelty occurs, where the
52:42
singular assortment of big cats watches as
52:44
a man fleeing in terror from them
52:46
on a dirt bike does one of
52:48
the sickest jumps in film history and
52:51
lands directly into a river and then
52:53
keeps riding until he is charged by
52:55
a juvenile African elephant, which the Edrons
52:57
also kept on their property. In its
53:00
uniqueness, this moment has to rival if
53:02
not exceed the moon landing. After all,
53:04
considerably more men have stepped foot on
53:06
the moon than have achieved what John
53:09
Marshall does in this scene, although some
53:11
of that may be due to the
53:13
fact that it is extremely illegal for
53:15
anyone today to even try. And this
53:17
is why I encourage you to watch
53:20
Roar, my dear friends, during the Dark
53:22
Times, not because it's a good movie,
53:24
but because it reveals what is best
53:26
about humanity. What piece of art could
53:29
better illustrate the infinite possibilities within us?
53:31
If a group of human beings can
53:33
learn to live among lions and tigers,
53:35
despite the constant guarantee of severe injury,
53:38
without really understanding why, is it so
53:40
mad to think that perhaps we too
53:42
can transcend the barbarities of our age,
53:44
and become something better, or at least...
53:47
Something far stranger than money-grubbing fascists. I
53:49
don't know how we escape the darkness
53:51
that seems to encroach a bit further
53:53
with each passing day, but I do
53:56
know this. If we can make war,
53:58
we can do anything. Hey
54:15
kids, it's me, Kevin Smith. And it's me,
54:17
Harley Quinn Smith. That's my daughter, man, who
54:19
my wife has always said is just a beardless,
54:21
dickless version of me. And that's the name
54:24
of our podcast, beardless, dickless me. I'm the old
54:26
one. I'm the young one. And every week,
54:28
we try to make each other laugh really hard.
54:30
Sounds innocent, doesn't it? A lot of cussing,
54:32
a lot of bad language. It's for adults only.
54:34
Or listen to it with your kid. It
54:36
could be a family show. We're not quite sure.
54:38
We're still figuring it out. It's a work
54:40
in progress. Listen to beardless, dickless me on the
54:42
iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get
54:44
your podcasts. Do you
54:46
remember what you said the first night
54:48
I came over here? How goes
54:50
lower from Blum House TV, iHeart Podcasts
54:52
and Ember 20 comes in all
54:54
new fictional comedy podcast series. Join
54:57
the flighty Damien Hurst as he unravels
54:59
the mystery of his vanished boyfriend.
55:01
And Santi was gone. I've been spending
55:03
all my time looking for answers
55:05
about what happened to Santi. And what's
55:07
the way to find a missing
55:10
person? Sleep with everyone he knew, obviously.
55:12
Hmm, pillow talk. The most unwelcome
55:14
window into the human psyche. Follow
55:16
our out of his element hero as
55:18
he engages in a series of ill -conceived
55:20
investigative hookups. Mama always used to say,
55:22
God gave me gumption in place of
55:24
a gag reflex. And as I was
55:26
about to learn, no amount of showering
55:29
can wash your hands of a bad
55:31
hookup. Now
55:33
take a big whiff, my
55:35
bra. Listen
55:37
to the hookup on the iHeart radio
55:39
app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you
55:41
listen to your favorite shows. Sonoro
55:46
and I Heart's MyCultura podcast
55:48
network present The Set Up,
55:50
a new romantic comedy podcast
55:52
starring Harvey Guillen and Christian
55:54
Navarro. The Set
55:56
Up follows a lonely museum
55:58
curator searching for - - But when the
56:01
perfect man walks into his
56:03
life... Well, I guess I'm saying I
56:05
like you. You like me? He actually
56:07
is too good to be true.
56:09
This is a con. I'm conning
56:12
you. To get the DeLado painting,
56:14
we could do this together. To
56:16
pull off this heist, they'll have
56:18
to get close and jump into
56:20
the deep end together. That's a
56:22
huge leap, Fernando, don't you think?
56:24
After you, Trudeau. But love is
56:27
the biggest risk they'll ever take.
56:29
Fernando is never going to love
56:31
you as much as he loves in this
56:33
dog. Trudeau. That painting is
56:35
ours. Listen to The Set-Up as part
56:37
of the Mike Wintuda podcast network
56:40
available on the I-Hart radio
56:42
app, Apple podcast, or wherever
56:44
you get your podcasts. I'm
56:47
Israel Gutierrez, and I'm hosting
56:49
a new podcast, Dub Dynasty. The story
56:51
of how the Golden State Warriors have
56:53
dominated the NBA for over a decade.
56:56
Once again, our NBA champions. From the
56:58
building of the core that included Clay
57:00
Thompson and Drey Mon Green, to one
57:02
of the boldest coaching decisions in the
57:04
history of the sport. I just felt
57:07
like the biggest thing was to earn
57:09
the trust to the players and let
57:11
the players know that we were here
57:13
to try to help them take the
57:15
next step, not tear anything down. Today,
57:18
the Warriors dynasty remains alive. In large
57:20
part because of a scrawny six-foot
57:22
two-two hooper. who everyone seems to
57:24
love. For what Steph is done
57:26
for the game, he's certainly on
57:29
that like Mount Rushmore for guys
57:31
that have changed it. Come revisit
57:33
this magical Warriors ride. This is
57:35
Dub Dynasty. The Dubs dynasty is
57:37
still very much alive. Listen to
57:40
Dub Dynasty on the I-Hart Radio
57:42
app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
57:44
you get your podcast. Welcome
57:53
to Itcadap Here are podcasts
57:56
where here is the rapidly
57:58
encroaching rise of fascism. My
58:00
name is Mia Wong and one
58:02
of the major factors of fascism
58:04
that we have been covering on
58:06
the show has been the increase
58:08
in just effectively straight up black
58:10
baggings by ICE and Immigrations Enforcement
58:13
in general. We have spent a
58:15
good amount of time covering a bunch
58:17
of different angles of this, but
58:19
there is another incredibly distressing angle
58:22
that we have not covered as
58:24
much yet, which is their targeting
58:26
of labor organizers. And with me
58:29
to talk about that is Mark
58:31
Medina from Portland Jobs with Justice
58:33
and the Coalition of Independent Unions.
58:35
And yeah, Mark, welcome to the
58:37
show. Hi, thanks to having me. Yeah, I'm glad
58:40
to have you on. So one of the
58:42
most pressing sort of black baggings
58:44
that's happened fairly recently is ICE's
58:46
kidnapping of Alfredo Juarez, E. Federino,
58:49
otherwise known as Lalo. Can you
58:51
tell us about... sort of
58:53
his work and the projects
58:55
he's been doing and Famila's
58:57
Unillas Prolegesticia? Yeah,
59:00
so it's been a very
59:02
disheartening and scary couple of
59:04
weeks since this happened because
59:06
it opens up a new path for the
59:08
state to go after organizers to
59:10
go after workers and the most
59:13
underprivileged in our
59:15
society in a way that I
59:17
suppose we all expected, but now that
59:19
we see it. now that we see it
59:21
happening, now that we see it happening to
59:23
people that we know in our community,
59:25
it's becoming apparent. There is no turning
59:28
back from the idea that we have
59:30
to be able to take this on
59:32
headfirst. We as activists, as organizers, have
59:35
to look at this and then see it
59:37
as an actual thing in our day to
59:39
day that we have to combat and
59:41
incorporate into our organizing. So maybe it might
59:43
be a little helpful to start off with
59:46
a little bit of a backstory.
59:48
So the union has its origins going
59:50
back to 2013. The area in
59:52
which they organize the Bellingham or
59:55
the Washington, Walken, Skagit areas, has
59:57
a very particular type of immigrant
59:59
community. Lelow himself is
1:00:01
of Mexico background. There's a lot
1:00:04
of indigenous Mexican populations in the
1:00:06
region. It's also one that has long
1:00:08
roots. A lot of these people go
1:00:10
back generations, have been here for quite
1:00:12
some time. This area also happens
1:00:15
to be a very particularly
1:00:17
with the non-Hispanic population, particularly
1:00:19
the white population, a very
1:00:22
conservative, particularly conservative, for the
1:00:24
area. It's one of the very few
1:00:26
areas of North West that Donald Trump
1:00:29
came to visit. It's an area that
1:00:31
has had repeated attacks on
1:00:33
the Indian community. And so
1:00:35
it's in this context that workers
1:00:37
are organizing in 2013 for this
1:00:39
first independent union. And two,
1:00:42
it's important to mention the independent
1:00:45
part of it. A lot of the
1:00:47
organizers from the start of this of
1:00:49
the union came from a tradition
1:00:51
of the United Farm Workers in
1:00:53
California. Some of them worked with Ses
1:00:56
of Chavez. in the in the heyday
1:00:58
of the United Farm Workers. And in
1:01:00
the years and decades since then, since
1:01:02
the Delano void costs and other things,
1:01:04
there's been a growing rift of what
1:01:06
the next steps should be. And I
1:01:09
think that a lot of farm workers,
1:01:11
because they don't organize under the general
1:01:13
labor law that we have for most
1:01:15
workers, there is a sort of patchwork system
1:01:18
for how farm working organizing
1:01:20
happens in the United States
1:01:22
that's dependent upon different
1:01:24
states and legislatures. And for
1:01:26
the most part, with the exception of
1:01:28
only two states, farm workers don't have
1:01:31
the same kind of protections that
1:01:33
regular workers generally in the
1:01:35
society have for union recognition
1:01:37
for collective bargaining. Only Washington
1:01:40
and New York at the moment,
1:01:42
I believe, have laws that allow
1:01:44
for elections for farm worker unions.
1:01:46
And there's a very particular reason
1:01:48
for that being the case. Farm
1:01:50
workers were excluded from the Wagner
1:01:52
Act for having general labor rights. in
1:01:54
the 1930s because precisely it
1:01:56
was seen as immigrant labor.
1:01:59
Yeah. and immigrants were not seen
1:02:01
as meriting the same rights as white American
1:02:03
in the same way that domestic workers
1:02:05
were removed because I was seen at the time
1:02:08
as black labor. So it has its roots in
1:02:10
racism. And yeah and that's something that
1:02:12
you know like you you can tie
1:02:14
that exclusion true like there's a straight
1:02:16
line between that and Japanese internments which
1:02:18
also to a large extent is just
1:02:20
is about land seizure and the sort
1:02:22
of like fusion of racism specifically racism
1:02:24
in the farming sector with with tax
1:02:27
and labor rights and with this desire
1:02:29
to just sort of sees literally the
1:02:31
land and labor from non-white people. Yeah.
1:02:33
Yeah, so it's a long and bleak
1:02:35
history. No, absolutely. And I'm sure your
1:02:37
audience is well aware of a lot
1:02:39
of these subject matter. It is a bleak
1:02:42
history. And it wasn't until groups
1:02:44
like the United Farm Workers in
1:02:46
the 60s and the 70s, that
1:02:48
they began to create the possibility
1:02:51
for something new for the Hispanic
1:02:53
community. It was United Farm Workers
1:02:55
that. built not just a lot
1:02:57
of solidarity with other immigrant groups
1:02:59
in the California area, but they also
1:03:01
built a sense of pride and identity
1:03:03
and belonging for a lot of communities.
1:03:06
I grew up in Boyle Heights, East Los
1:03:08
Angeles, since Chavez and the farm worker murals
1:03:10
are everywhere. You know, me and my friends
1:03:12
would often joke that such Chavez is like
1:03:14
the patron saint, if he's Los Angeles, even
1:03:17
though it's nowhere near Delano. And there's a
1:03:19
reason for that. I think that a lot
1:03:21
of us looked up to the United States
1:03:23
Farm Workers, we looked up to the Farm
1:03:25
Workers Union movement and we saw
1:03:27
in them our heroes, our modern day heroes.
1:03:30
We saw them, we saw people who said, be
1:03:32
proud to be brown, you know. There's a courage
1:03:34
that comes from that history. The Union
1:03:36
movement that then sprung up in
1:03:38
2013 in the Bellingham Northern Washington
1:03:40
area was coming out of that milieu.
1:03:42
They understood that background, they understood
1:03:45
that history, but they also understood
1:03:47
that there was very little organizing.
1:03:49
in the region. There was a lot of
1:03:52
fear in the region. It's very difficult to
1:03:54
organize farm workers. To have access to
1:03:56
a lot of these areas, you have
1:03:58
to cross just private property. for quite
1:04:00
some time before you reverse farm
1:04:02
workers. And it becomes very,
1:04:04
very difficult to have organizing
1:04:07
happen. And it's intentional that way.
1:04:09
The rise in farm worker unions
1:04:11
that happen in 60s and 70s
1:04:13
had a massive plummet by the time
1:04:15
that we get into the 90s and
1:04:17
2000s. And so these workers had heard
1:04:19
these stories, had heard by
1:04:21
this legacy, but had been
1:04:24
essentially dealing with increasing frustration,
1:04:26
racist behavior by bosses, lower and
1:04:28
lower pay. and the use of certain
1:04:30
types of immigrants to try
1:04:32
to scab their jobs. It be the
1:04:35
capitalist class using one type of
1:04:37
worker against another type of worker,
1:04:39
picking them against each other. It's in
1:04:42
this context in 2013 that this
1:04:44
union starts to form. They go
1:04:46
public at that time period. They
1:04:48
call for recognition and they
1:04:50
start taking action directly. And
1:04:53
they organize this years and
1:04:55
years-long boycott campaign. to gain
1:04:57
recognition to get the employer
1:04:59
to start bargaining. And after years
1:05:01
and years of this, in court battles
1:05:03
and the employer trying to lay everyone
1:05:06
off and hire certain types of newer
1:05:08
immigrants coming in to replace all them,
1:05:10
putting one worker against another, all these
1:05:12
types of maneuvers. By 2017, these workers
1:05:15
win a contract. And the philosophy
1:05:17
of the union since then has been
1:05:19
not just to grow this union, but also
1:05:21
for them to be able to stand on
1:05:23
their own two feet. Their idea is that...
1:05:25
they are very proud of their independent
1:05:27
nature of that union. They're not part
1:05:30
of, you know, the ASL, CIO, they're
1:05:32
not part of the United Farm Workers,
1:05:34
they're not part of any other organization.
1:05:36
You know, when I spoke to some
1:05:38
of their leaders last year, one of
1:05:40
the things that came to mind was they
1:05:43
brought up a quote from Eugene Debs in
1:05:45
the notion of like, if we were to
1:05:47
lead you into the promised land, someone else
1:05:49
would just lead you out. And the notion
1:05:52
of their union is their union is, Tomorrow
1:05:54
they'll hold something over us. That's the
1:05:56
notion that farm workers leave this movement
1:05:58
and leave this union. is an
1:06:00
incredibly powerful statement of what working
1:06:03
class people can do. The kinds of
1:06:05
workers that everyone else kind of looks
1:06:07
at, they could never do it. These, you know, these
1:06:09
workers could never handle this kind
1:06:11
of level of struggle and couldn't
1:06:14
do this kind of organization, have
1:06:16
built one of the most powerful
1:06:18
independent farmer for unions in the
1:06:20
West Coast. Lelo, Lelo Juarez, was a
1:06:22
founding member of this union. He was
1:06:24
a farm worker starting at the age of the
1:06:26
age of 12. And since then, devoted
1:06:28
his entire life to organizing,
1:06:31
to helping workers, to being
1:06:33
the kind of person who
1:06:35
commits himself, to the work of
1:06:37
making the world a better place than
1:06:39
he founded. You know, at 25, he is
1:06:41
significantly younger than me.
1:06:43
And when I think of people who I
1:06:45
look up, too, who I think of, wow,
1:06:48
when I grow up and want to be
1:06:50
someone like that, I think of Lelow. Yeah.
1:06:52
I have met Lel many a times over
1:06:54
the years. He's a very soft-
1:06:57
owes him a bit of a
1:06:59
debt now. It is time
1:07:01
that we as a whole
1:07:04
stand up for him.
1:07:06
Yeah, yeah, we are
1:07:08
going to go to
1:07:10
ads regrettably and
1:07:12
then when we
1:07:15
come back we are
1:07:17
going to start
1:07:19
talking I think a
1:07:22
bit more about the
1:07:24
repression. The sort of
1:07:26
capitalist class out in
1:07:28
Bellingham, and you know, this sort of,
1:07:30
I mean, this has been true of
1:07:32
the broader capitalist class since it's kind
1:07:34
of organizing, starting like, has been
1:07:36
trying to break these unions this
1:07:39
entire time. You know, that has
1:07:41
been a major focus of everything that
1:07:43
they've been doing. And, you know, what
1:07:45
we're seeing right now seems like a
1:07:47
massive sort of escalation in the decree
1:07:49
of repression. So, yeah, can we
1:07:51
talk about the recent blackbagging of
1:07:53
Lalo and... Yeah, and sort of
1:07:56
what happens and where we
1:07:58
go from there? Yeah, the... The weaponization
1:08:00
of the state to go after
1:08:02
immigrants and go after activists is,
1:08:05
I'm sure, to your audience is
1:08:07
well known is nothing yet. And
1:08:09
it knows party affiliation. The Democrat
1:08:11
administrations have been doing this to
1:08:13
immigrant communities and have been using
1:08:15
it to silence political activists. The
1:08:17
Trump administration, however, is now
1:08:19
doing this on a level that is, at
1:08:22
least to a lot of us, unheard of in the
1:08:24
modern day, which is to go
1:08:26
after specific union leaders in
1:08:28
the labor movement. to go
1:08:30
after civil rights leaders. You've
1:08:32
seen this happen also when
1:08:34
it comes to Palestinian rights
1:08:36
activists around the country. The
1:08:38
idea is pretty simple. It's
1:08:40
to silence the loudest voices
1:08:43
to cut the leadership from
1:08:45
the movement. On March 25th,
1:08:47
Alfredo Lelo Juarez was dropping
1:08:49
off his girlfriend at a
1:08:51
nearby farm for work and was
1:08:54
accosted by ice agents as he
1:08:56
was exercising his rights. or what
1:08:58
he thought to his rights were
1:09:00
at the time, because of the regime, who
1:09:02
knows what your rights are. They broke
1:09:05
his window, they dragged him out of
1:09:07
his car, you know, this was
1:09:09
obviously very traumatic incident,
1:09:11
but also it was a real shock
1:09:13
to the union to see the community
1:09:15
group that works with the union and
1:09:18
to the local Hispanic community
1:09:20
in the area. Within hours of
1:09:22
that, workers organized his community
1:09:24
went to move to try
1:09:26
to carry a response. knowing
1:09:28
that time was of the
1:09:30
essence. It was then taken
1:09:33
to a localized facility. He's
1:09:35
now since been moved to
1:09:37
a detention center in Tacoma,
1:09:39
Washington. A large rally of
1:09:41
hundreds took place calling for
1:09:43
his immediate release. What we know
1:09:46
now, seemingly, is that at the
1:09:48
very last minute, apologies I
1:09:50
forget the exact day, but
1:09:52
it was within a couple
1:09:54
of days of the kidnapping,
1:09:56
He has an automatic stay of
1:09:58
deportation in place. At this point,
1:10:00
no longer has any legal authority
1:10:03
to remove Lello. This came at
1:10:05
the last minute. He was in
1:10:07
line for deportation and was removed
1:10:09
at the very last minute. However,
1:10:12
while this is good news, this is
1:10:14
not good for someone's personal
1:10:16
health and well-being. These
1:10:18
are massively cramped facilities,
1:10:21
underfunded facilities. You know,
1:10:23
there are horror stories around the
1:10:25
country of... the conditions in some
1:10:27
of these places every day
1:10:29
that Lello is stuck behind
1:10:31
these prison walls is an injustice
1:10:33
to our movement. Yeah. Yeah. The thing
1:10:36
the thing it immediately reminds me of is
1:10:38
the story of Thomas Payne who was like
1:10:40
slated to be executed in the French Revolution
1:10:42
and they didn't they didn't execute him because
1:10:45
his door was open so they didn't see
1:10:47
the slash line on the cell that was
1:10:49
supposed to execute him and then like the
1:10:51
next day the reign of terror ended with
1:10:54
the coup against the jokovins it rides me
1:10:56
a lot of that but you know but
1:10:58
on the other hand here's the thing we
1:11:00
have gotten the the stay of the deportation
1:11:03
but we have not we have not brought
1:11:05
down the rate of terror yet so yeah and
1:11:07
it would hope a little doesn't have to wait
1:11:09
four more years for that one yeah good lord
1:11:11
good lord Yeah, yeah. So let's talk a bit
1:11:14
about, so I mean, obviously, you know, what we're
1:11:16
seeing here, and this is, you know, the
1:11:18
connection that you made, is where we're
1:11:20
seeing just on a sort of broad
1:11:22
scale, the use of the state and
1:11:24
of the sort of blackbagging and of
1:11:27
these deportations as a way to
1:11:29
target organizers from Palestine to
1:11:31
label organizers. That's only going to
1:11:33
expand as this goes on. And I think
1:11:35
something critical about, you know, one of
1:11:37
the first things you were saying here
1:11:39
about. the fact that they're targeting sort
1:11:41
of the loudest voices in the community.
1:11:43
And I think a big part of this
1:11:46
is that they know that their position isn't
1:11:48
as strong as they're making it out to
1:11:50
be, right? Like they have just detonated
1:11:52
a nuke across the entire economy. They
1:11:54
are systematically going through and individually fucking
1:11:56
over every single group of people who
1:11:58
are supposed to be there. base. And
1:12:00
I think part of what they're
1:12:02
doing is they're trying to
1:12:04
spread sort of raw terror and
1:12:06
spread fear and you know and
1:12:09
and attack the critical infrastructure of
1:12:11
organizing because they want to make
1:12:13
it look like resisting them as
1:12:16
impossible. And that's just not
1:12:18
true. They can be. Yeah, absolutely. I
1:12:20
think that oftentimes, particularly
1:12:22
fascistic power. wants and
1:12:24
needs to present itself
1:12:26
as inevitable as overwhelming
1:12:28
and impossible to defeat. In
1:12:31
part because it's meant to hide the
1:12:33
ultimate weakness of some of these powers.
1:12:35
The actual power that these farm workers
1:12:38
showed against the Sakuma farms when they
1:12:40
went on strike and boycotted for years
1:12:42
and years and years out in the
1:12:44
fields talking to workers for years and
1:12:46
years and years and years. It showed
1:12:49
that no matter how powerful some of
1:12:51
these companies are, that the power of
1:12:53
workers overwhelms and the power of
1:12:55
solidarity overwhelms. And they know that.
1:12:57
Going after leadership, going after some
1:12:59
of the most, some of the
1:13:01
bravest people in our movement is a way
1:13:04
of trying to hit the movement
1:13:06
at the knees and trying to
1:13:08
convince folks that struggle is impossible.
1:13:10
But I think it is important to
1:13:12
remember that what we're doing, the
1:13:14
struggle now, the response, this is how
1:13:16
we show the population, the world, you know,
1:13:19
our communities. that they're not
1:13:21
inevitable. It is not
1:13:23
insurmountable. And so in by
1:13:25
taking action, responding to the kinds
1:13:28
of assisted behaviors of the state,
1:13:30
we show how feeble the state can
1:13:32
be at times, even when it seems
1:13:34
its most treacherous and awful. Yeah, and
1:13:36
I think a lot of times when we win
1:13:38
fights, it can be very, very hard
1:13:40
to actually see our victory because
1:13:42
we don't see the world that could
1:13:45
have been if we didn't fight. And that's
1:13:47
the thing I think about with the First Trump administration,
1:13:49
where in the First Trump administration, they absolutely wanted
1:13:51
to be doing this kind of shit. And they
1:13:54
were able to do a lot of terrible stuff,
1:13:56
but they weren't able to sort of go this
1:13:58
far because of the kind of... mass mobilizations
1:14:00
that shut down a lot of
1:14:02
the kinds of things that they
1:14:05
wanted to do. And I think
1:14:07
that's a kind of victory that
1:14:09
is hard to kind of like
1:14:11
process because all we see is,
1:14:13
you know, the suffering that did
1:14:15
happen. And we can never see an
1:14:17
image of like all of the people,
1:14:19
you know, who got to continue
1:14:22
living their lives because we stopped
1:14:24
them. And that I think is another sort
1:14:26
of powerful tool here, but also we do
1:14:29
have an opportunity to make sure that we
1:14:31
can beat them right here and right now
1:14:33
in a way that's very very public and
1:14:35
visible. And that's a question mark about that
1:14:38
in my mind because, you know, my entire
1:14:40
adult life I've heard stories of the state
1:14:42
repression against union organizers in the 20s and
1:14:44
the 30s and the 30s in the 40s.
1:14:47
You hear the stories if you're an organizer
1:14:49
about the violiderideradaresas
1:14:51
and and how hard it was in
1:14:54
the past and we forget. that a
1:14:56
lot of that does continue on is
1:14:58
just not where you would imagine it,
1:15:00
where a lot of American workers imagine
1:15:02
it. And so they don't see it
1:15:04
in their shops and their factories and
1:15:06
their unions. But this right here
1:15:08
is an attack on the labor movement.
1:15:11
Had this been the head of the
1:15:13
electricians union, the head of the SCIU,
1:15:15
had this been an attack on what a
1:15:17
lot of Americans would view as
1:15:19
the mainstream labor movement? This would
1:15:21
be headlines. The fact that it
1:15:23
isn't shows and that it has been
1:15:26
so much work to try to get
1:15:28
attention to a union leader being picked
1:15:30
up and kidnapped by the state should
1:15:32
be, you know, a blaring red light on the
1:15:34
labor movement to take action immediately.
1:15:36
I hope that what we're doing is
1:15:39
the first steps of that because, you
1:15:41
know, this is one of those moments,
1:15:43
you know, they went after the trade
1:15:45
unions unionists and I was not a
1:15:47
trade unionist. Well, they're going after the
1:15:49
farm workers. I am not a farm worker.
1:15:51
common upon us morally to stand
1:15:53
up one another at this point
1:15:56
in time. Yeah, and I think there's
1:15:58
been a real kind of real... power
1:16:00
this and a real sort of appeasement of
1:16:02
power and a real sort of demonstration of
1:16:04
where a lot of these unions politics are.
1:16:06
I mean, we saw we saw the way
1:16:08
that the Teamsters like leadership just, I
1:16:10
mean, just, you know, openly went to
1:16:12
speak at the RNC, right? We've been
1:16:14
seeing the UAW, which traditionally has had
1:16:17
better like immigration politics in the last
1:16:19
few years than a lot of these
1:16:21
other sort of mainstream unions, but has
1:16:23
also been sort of going to bat
1:16:25
for Trump's tariff. I've been calling you
1:16:27
the turf tariffs because of the wages of
1:16:29
transphobia, but you know, they've been going to
1:16:31
bat for like the turf tariffs, right? And
1:16:34
that I think is like part of why they've
1:16:36
been sort of unable to like respond to
1:16:38
this moment and why they've been unable to
1:16:40
respond to the past fucking 50 years of
1:16:42
moments, which is that like if you're
1:16:45
sort of like labor politics is rooted
1:16:47
in this sort of like American nationalist
1:16:49
like American jobs for American workers stuff.
1:16:51
right and it's not actually based in the
1:16:53
power of workers and the power of workers
1:16:56
everywhere then you're going to lose it's not
1:16:58
it's not just sort of reactionary politics also
1:17:00
it is it's also bad politics and we're
1:17:02
seeing it right now yeah and I think
1:17:04
that the history of the labor movement
1:17:06
has been an interesting one in my
1:17:08
adult life because you know I'm as pro-laborous
1:17:11
they come however the history of the labor
1:17:13
movement in the modern day has been a
1:17:15
fascinating one it is one that when it
1:17:17
came to large strikes was that it's nadier
1:17:19
at the mid and late 2000s. I think
1:17:22
at one point it was just over a
1:17:24
dozen strikes over 2000 workers and you compare
1:17:26
that to the hide the labor movement in the
1:17:28
40s and the 50s when it was in
1:17:30
the hundreds and you had strike actions all
1:17:32
the time and that is what built so
1:17:34
much of what we called middle class for
1:17:36
some and it was this really historic moment
1:17:39
at the time and we're in a
1:17:41
historic moment now where I think the
1:17:43
labor movement now where I think the
1:17:45
labor movement for so long from that
1:17:47
point has been trying to kind of
1:17:49
reshaped the labor movement and the thoughts
1:17:51
and the ideas of the new. But it
1:17:53
comes with its own regressive setbacks
1:17:56
and it comes with its own
1:17:58
shortcomings of leadership. You know, the
1:18:01
teamsters making statements around
1:18:03
immigration rights was a very unfortunate
1:18:06
thing to be said in the modern
1:18:08
day, in the modern context. I think
1:18:10
that, you know, other unions seemingly looking
1:18:12
to, you know, circle the wagons
1:18:15
rather than take the risks that
1:18:17
need that need to happen in
1:18:19
this current time has really shown
1:18:21
a lack of imagination
1:18:23
from some of the mainstream unions. And the
1:18:25
thing is... I hope for the best for
1:18:27
them. I want them to succeed and I
1:18:29
want them to get better. Because the world
1:18:31
is a better place for having these larger
1:18:34
unions. However, it's the independent movements,
1:18:36
the independent unions, like Familius
1:18:38
Unidis, what else, Thesea, like these
1:18:40
other unions in the region, that can be
1:18:43
the kind of canary in the coal mine,
1:18:45
the kind of labs of experimentation that can
1:18:47
be the first people out to do some of
1:18:49
the most radical and interesting and
1:18:51
worker-centric type of movement building
1:18:54
and messaging messaging messaging and
1:18:56
messaging. I think there is a reason
1:18:58
why it was the Coalition of
1:19:00
Independent Unions here in the Pacific
1:19:02
Northwest that came up with the
1:19:04
notion of having Trans-Day of Solidarity,
1:19:07
this idea of patterning contracts together
1:19:09
to have inclusive and protections for
1:19:11
trans workers and having that be
1:19:13
a thing that unions take up together.
1:19:16
I think that it's incredibly notable that
1:19:18
it's groups like Familius Unida
1:19:20
Ses, Polozizia, that carry out
1:19:22
this long years-long boycott and created
1:19:24
a model by which other workers
1:19:26
in the region can not just
1:19:29
organize themselves, but organize themselves on
1:19:31
a low-cost member-led democratic model. I think
1:19:33
it's important to see that sometimes
1:19:35
the large unions have to start looking
1:19:37
at some of the radical pragmatism that
1:19:39
comes from the necessities of these smaller
1:19:42
independent campaigns. Yeah, and I mean, before
1:19:44
we go to ads, I think the last thing I want
1:19:46
to say there is like, you know, the other option
1:19:48
they have is to do the option of what the
1:19:50
unions didn't during the rise of the Nazis. Which is
1:19:52
like during the rise of the Nazis the unions fell
1:19:55
in line, right? They fell in line because they were
1:19:57
scared and they thought that they could fucking win benefits
1:19:59
from it and And you know, it saved
1:20:01
some of them, like there were a
1:20:03
few of those people, like just became
1:20:05
Nazis, but the rest of them got
1:20:08
fucking liquidated anyways. So those are your
1:20:10
options, right? You either stand and fight
1:20:12
now with the independent unions, or you
1:20:14
become part of the regime and eventually
1:20:17
get liquidated when, you know, Trump in
1:20:19
like, two and a half years,
1:20:21
science executive order that says unions
1:20:23
are illegal or whatever. And what does
1:20:25
that do at the end of the day?
1:20:27
Even if it saves you, even if you're
1:20:30
the head of some of these large unions,
1:20:32
and by working with the administration today,
1:20:34
by selling your soul, by selling the
1:20:36
movement out, you give up the moral high
1:20:38
ground of our movement, of our
1:20:40
working class democratic movement, you give
1:20:42
it up for another generation.
1:20:44
Then when workers, when people like
1:20:46
myself growing up, looking at images
1:20:49
of the United Farm Workers, There are
1:20:51
similar, I presume, there are similar people
1:20:53
in the United States growing up who look
1:20:55
that way up to the United Auto Workers, who
1:20:57
look that way up to the teachers union.
1:21:00
What happens to those children, to those kids,
1:21:02
those young people who want to be the
1:21:04
next leadership, the next era of the labor
1:21:06
movement, they will not look at us
1:21:08
as having the moral high ground. We give
1:21:11
that up. We give our role in history,
1:21:13
our moral role in history to fight for
1:21:15
the working class when we do things like
1:21:18
this. Yeah, and what you've become instead is
1:21:20
just another extension of the state. You've become
1:21:22
like one of the like the national syndicates
1:21:24
in like Franco is Spain. And what that
1:21:27
does to you is people, people don't look
1:21:29
at you in a generation as a labor
1:21:31
movement. They look at you as just another
1:21:33
arm of a fascist regime. And it
1:21:35
doesn't have to be like that. It really
1:21:37
doesn't. But yeah, I take no pleasure in
1:21:39
saying this. But it's an unfortunate
1:21:42
reality and hopefully the turn around
1:21:44
can come from anywhere. It can come
1:21:46
from unexpected places, and I hope that
1:21:48
there is one. And things like solidarity
1:21:50
for Lello, I hope it be a
1:21:52
small link in the chain that moves
1:21:54
the pendulum right back into the direction
1:21:56
of unethical and moral superiority that
1:21:59
comes with. for working
1:22:01
class folks. Yeah, we're
1:22:03
going to take an ad
1:22:05
break and when we come
1:22:07
back we're going to talk
1:22:09
about what we can do
1:22:12
for Lillow right now as
1:22:14
you are listening to
1:22:16
this. We are back. So
1:22:18
let's talk about both the
1:22:21
operation, I mean just immediately
1:22:23
the plans to sort of... Put
1:22:25
pressure to free Lelow and also
1:22:27
would then I guess we'll get
1:22:30
into sort of more broadly the
1:22:32
kinds of fighting that we need
1:22:34
to be doing in order to resist this.
1:22:36
Sure, sounds good. So, like I mentioned
1:22:38
earlier, and you need an aftermath of
1:22:41
Lelow is kidnapping by ICE. Workers in
1:22:43
the region began organizing and
1:22:45
unions came together and supportive Lelow
1:22:47
and helped a rally in front
1:22:49
of the tension center in Tacoma.
1:22:51
Now what we're trying to do is
1:22:54
trying to spread the word further.
1:22:56
There are other communities, particularly here
1:22:58
on the West Coast, that can
1:23:00
stand solidarity, that should stand
1:23:03
a solidarity, and when we heard
1:23:05
this use go down, activists within the
1:23:07
CIIU ask themselves, we can't stand idly
1:23:09
by while a leader in our movement
1:23:11
is kidnapped by the state. We need
1:23:14
to take action. And so we did.
1:23:16
And the point was to move as
1:23:18
quickly as possible to try to build
1:23:20
a larger voice. for Lelow while he
1:23:22
is in detention. So there is a good number
1:23:24
of activists here in the Portland
1:23:26
area. We can be of service to
1:23:29
the Farm Workers Union. You know, we
1:23:31
have a strong core of independent unions
1:23:33
here in the Pacific Northwest, particularly in
1:23:36
the Portland area. We can do what
1:23:38
other unions are hesitant to do, which
1:23:40
is take action immediately and stand firmly
1:23:42
with our resident sisters at Manosi Edmanis
1:23:45
up in Northern Washington. So what's
1:23:47
happening is the call from the
1:23:49
union is... workers individually for people
1:23:51
individually to call into the attorney
1:23:53
general in Washington state and Call
1:23:56
to the release of Lelow also calling
1:23:58
the new governor up in Washington to
1:24:00
call for the release, bring a wider
1:24:02
attention, making me know that this
1:24:04
person is someone who is important
1:24:06
to the community, cannot be spirited
1:24:09
away to another country where they
1:24:11
are not from, where that is
1:24:13
not their home, and taken away from
1:24:15
their family, the community, and
1:24:17
from the good work that they do. And
1:24:19
the other thing that we're trying to do
1:24:21
is we're trying to get local
1:24:24
officials to also use their voice
1:24:26
to maximize the pressure, to give more
1:24:28
attention to this issue. So that's the
1:24:30
call so far. This rally that we're
1:24:32
having in front of City Hall on
1:24:35
Saturday, April 12th at 2 p.m. is
1:24:37
the beginning of what we hope is
1:24:39
a larger campaign that will not
1:24:41
end until Lello is free and
1:24:43
until these raids stop attacking the
1:24:45
labor movement in the Pacific Northwest.
1:24:48
You know, just because we in
1:24:50
Portland, you know, are not farm
1:24:52
workers, because we don't work with
1:24:54
farm workers, because a lot of
1:24:56
the workers who work here. and maybe never
1:24:58
met a farm worker, it does not mean that
1:25:00
we should not stand shoulder to shoulder and
1:25:03
arm and support the farm workers doing it
1:25:05
up in northern Washington to the hills. And
1:25:07
this begins this fight of building that kind
1:25:09
of level of solidarity begins by showing up
1:25:11
for them. They're doing what they can't do.
1:25:14
Right now they don't have the resources to
1:25:16
go state by state and city by city to
1:25:18
bring attention and awareness to one of their
1:25:20
leaders being attacked. But we can do it. And
1:25:22
if we can do it, we should do it. It's
1:25:24
a moral imperative that little be free. Yeah, and so
1:25:26
I mean statistically there are a lot
1:25:29
of you in Portland listening to the
1:25:31
show but statistically most of you are not
1:25:33
in Portland. Are there other things that people
1:25:35
in the rest of the country and I
1:25:37
guess the rest of the world I know I
1:25:40
know there's some of you statistically don't live in
1:25:42
the US. Yeah, are there things that people
1:25:44
in other places can do to put
1:25:46
pressure specifically for Lalo, but also just
1:25:48
can do in their own communities to,
1:25:50
you know, I mean, put pressure to
1:25:52
stop pressure to stop these raidss. The CII,
1:25:54
the Coalition of Independent Unices, Coalition of
1:25:57
Independent Unions here in the Pacific Northwest,
1:25:59
it was trying... to do and is trying to
1:26:01
do with transient solidarity. The idea is we
1:26:03
are trying to make this work here in the
1:26:05
Pacific Northwest, and if it's useful, if it's
1:26:07
good, if people are paying attention to it,
1:26:09
then we can export this to other cities
1:26:11
and other areas to bring more attention to
1:26:13
these causes. And so with that, when patterning
1:26:16
our contracts together, particularly
1:26:18
on this one issue of transgender
1:26:20
health care and trans inclusive language
1:26:22
in contracts and codifying that between
1:26:24
unions, and having that demand of labor
1:26:26
movement that they not walk away from this
1:26:29
from this, we want to. also do the
1:26:31
same thing with this fight for freedom for
1:26:33
the farm workers union and their leaders
1:26:35
and workers everywhere and the attack will
1:26:37
come soon enough I suppose I would
1:26:40
imagine from this this regime in Washington
1:26:42
yeah if this works we want workers
1:26:44
in other cities that are assisting the
1:26:46
farm worker union taking up the
1:26:48
call of action and fighting for
1:26:50
it so not just let up
1:26:52
whoever comes afterwards because there will
1:26:54
be little's in the future unfortunate
1:26:56
as it may be So if this works here,
1:26:59
if workers hear, as they hear more
1:27:01
updates, we would hope and we would
1:27:03
love if workers elsewhere, if organizing groups
1:27:05
elsewhere, would want to take up this fight
1:27:07
and bring attention to the cause. Hell yeah,
1:27:09
yeah, and I think there is a lot
1:27:12
of, you know, potential and sort
1:27:14
of mobilizations, there's a lot of potential
1:27:16
in getting people to understand that this
1:27:18
stuff's happening and there's a lot of
1:27:20
potential in... cross-union organizing, and also, and
1:27:23
I will say this too, because like,
1:27:25
you know, obviously statistically, like, there are
1:27:27
a large number of people listening to
1:27:29
this who are like union staffers, but
1:27:31
also like most of you are not, that also
1:27:34
doesn't mean that whatever kind of organizing
1:27:36
that you're doing doesn't overlap with this
1:27:38
and doesn't have capacity that they can
1:27:40
bring to bear to stop the entire
1:27:42
deportation regime that we're facing right now.
1:27:45
And that's something that you have to
1:27:47
do, both on the level of solidarity,
1:27:49
on a moral level, and also on
1:27:51
a strategic level, because, again, he is
1:27:54
going to come for you too. So... Yeah. You know,
1:27:56
without making it too personal, like,
1:27:58
I know level personally. I have met
1:28:00
a little many a time over the
1:28:03
years. He's a fantastic person. The reason
1:28:05
why a lot of us as organizers is
1:28:07
why we do this kind of work to
1:28:09
begin with is because we believe as
1:28:11
bizarrely as it may be that we
1:28:13
could be a link in the chain
1:28:15
that makes the world a better place,
1:28:17
that we can leave the world better
1:28:19
off than we found it. And we
1:28:22
also believe in what we're doing because
1:28:24
when we look at people who have
1:28:26
been attacked by corporations and attacked
1:28:28
by the state, we feel a moral
1:28:31
compulsion to help. And what I would say
1:28:33
to folks who are outside of Portland, who
1:28:35
are hearing this story, who hear the
1:28:37
calls to call the Attorney General
1:28:39
in Washington State and demand that
1:28:41
they'll be released to follow up
1:28:43
with the unions by millions on
1:28:46
US Polo Svisia, further direction on
1:28:48
how they can assist and potentially
1:28:50
holding their own rallies and support
1:28:52
and solidarity and bringing attention to
1:28:54
the issue. I would hope that they do this.
1:28:56
Imagine if Lalo were your brother. Imagine
1:28:59
if Lille were your cousin, your father,
1:29:01
your friend, act as if they were
1:29:03
them, because it requires that
1:29:05
level of empathy to have
1:29:07
the kind of solidarity that we
1:29:09
need in order to fight this fascist
1:29:12
regime and everything that it does.
1:29:14
It is easy to say, I will
1:29:16
wait for someone else to do the
1:29:18
work. I will, someone else will come
1:29:20
along and it'll get resolved that way.
1:29:23
No, if you don't do the work,
1:29:25
it just will not get done. And
1:29:27
so we have to go in every
1:29:29
day as part of civic engagement and
1:29:31
assisting the working class as part of
1:29:33
our daily routines and using the kind
1:29:36
of the kind of sense of moral necessity
1:29:38
and of immediate action it requires
1:29:40
that you would do for someone that
1:29:42
was close to you. Because this person
1:29:45
is you just by another name. This
1:29:47
person is your family even if you've
1:29:49
never met them. We are all in this together
1:29:51
as working class people and if we start coming
1:29:53
up with boundaries and reasons for why we shouldn't
1:29:56
stand up for one another, those reasons
1:29:58
then become excuses for everyone. else.
1:30:00
So I would hope that when people hear
1:30:02
this, they look and see the struggle of
1:30:04
this person and they can imagine what
1:30:06
would happen to them in the future
1:30:08
and they say, I would want someone
1:30:10
there for me in my corner in
1:30:12
my time of me. So I will
1:30:14
be there for them and theirs. Yeah,
1:30:16
it reminds me a lot of this
1:30:18
line from Peggy Seeger who wrote an
1:30:21
anti-fascist song called Song of Choice. And one
1:30:23
of the verses that's always stuck
1:30:25
with me is, today the soldiers took away
1:30:27
one. Tomorrow they may take away two.
1:30:29
One April they took away Greece, but surely they
1:30:31
will never take you. And, you know, I mean,
1:30:34
that's the thing that people in the 30s
1:30:36
woke up to, right, is, you know, if you're
1:30:38
in this country, then this is the thing
1:30:40
that you're waking up to now, is that,
1:30:42
yeah, the soldiers are taking people away. And
1:30:44
every day they're taking you away more
1:30:46
and more people. And one day you
1:30:48
wake up, and they've taken entire countries.
1:30:50
And the only way that you can
1:30:53
stop this is by making sure that
1:30:55
the action that you're taking is not
1:30:57
just waking up and going back to
1:31:00
sleep, right? You have to take a
1:31:02
stand, you have to fight, because no
1:31:04
one is coming. The only person
1:31:06
who is coming, for these people,
1:31:08
the only person who is coming,
1:31:10
for these people, the only person
1:31:13
who is coming, for these people,
1:31:15
for the people coming next to
1:31:17
them, right? There always been a
1:31:19
thing about fascism. is that it
1:31:21
relies on us not fighting them,
1:31:24
it relies on us, on our
1:31:26
passivity, it relies on us not
1:31:28
caring enough about the people that
1:31:30
they take first, you know, to sit
1:31:33
back and do nothing and think that
1:31:35
we can wait. And you can't.
1:31:37
You have to start right now, and
1:31:39
you have to stop them before
1:31:41
they advance any further, and
1:31:43
you have to roll back what
1:31:46
they've already done. And this
1:31:48
is our opportunity to do that.
1:31:50
Yeah. Do you have anything else that you
1:31:52
want to add before we head out?
1:31:54
And we will put links to a whole
1:31:57
bunch of things in the description
1:31:59
to this. Yeah, I suppose to those
1:32:01
that would want to know more about
1:32:03
not just the struggle of the
1:32:05
Farm Workers Union, but also
1:32:07
the general experiments in independent
1:32:10
unionism here in the Pacific
1:32:12
Northwest, I'd highly encourage the
1:32:14
folks take a deep dive
1:32:16
and see that to organize
1:32:18
your workplace to have the kind
1:32:21
of solidarity with your coworkers.
1:32:23
You need not be dependent
1:32:25
upon someone else and other
1:32:27
organizations to come in. and sort
1:32:30
of rescue you from the
1:32:32
mystery and drudgery of non-union
1:32:34
workplaces, you can do it too. You can create,
1:32:36
you have it in your head, in your own
1:32:38
mind, in your own hands, the ability
1:32:41
to organize, the ability to fight
1:32:43
with your coworkers, you have the
1:32:45
kinds of clever problem-solving skills that
1:32:47
every worker has in order to
1:32:49
combat the boss and create a
1:32:51
better world than the one that
1:32:53
currently exists, and also that when
1:32:56
it comes to issues like standing
1:32:58
up, for this struggle now and
1:33:00
struggles in the future. I would say you
1:33:02
have it now, the creative capacity
1:33:04
to in whatever city you're
1:33:06
in, to make connections to build
1:33:08
inroads with the labor movement,
1:33:11
to build inroads with working
1:33:13
class people, and to try to
1:33:15
create those bonds that happen. We
1:33:17
here are trying to build closer
1:33:19
bonds with city workers. and farm
1:33:21
workers out in the country. It's an important
1:33:24
struggle because one is going to be more
1:33:26
and more important in the future. You don't
1:33:28
have to wait for anyone else to tell
1:33:30
you how to do that. You yourself can
1:33:32
show solidarity and work together to build those
1:33:34
kinds of bonds now so that in the
1:33:37
future, you can create working class movements
1:33:39
that whether that takes the form of
1:33:41
collective bargaining or something else. Organizing for
1:33:43
the common good is useful no matter
1:33:45
in what legal capacity it happens. Yeah,
1:33:47
and I mean, you know, one last
1:33:49
point I want to add about that
1:33:51
in terms of looking at like you not needing
1:33:54
helps do things like, you know, I know a
1:33:56
lot of the people who, you know, like
1:33:58
are the organizers who are hired. by places
1:34:00
like the UAW, like AFL-CO unions,
1:34:02
right? They're good people, like they're
1:34:05
good people, they're good organizers, they
1:34:07
don't know anything that you can't
1:34:09
learn, like a lot of these
1:34:11
people are just literally college students,
1:34:14
right, who are recruited, like, from
1:34:16
college campuses and are thrown with
1:34:18
no training into organizing these
1:34:20
things, right? And, you know, and again,
1:34:22
these are people who are just like
1:34:24
stepping out of classrooms. into these
1:34:26
organizing scenarios with very minimal training
1:34:29
and they've been able to do
1:34:31
it. And if those people can
1:34:33
do it, so can you. Like I know
1:34:35
you, I know these organizers, and the only
1:34:37
difference between them and you is that they
1:34:39
spent some time learning some things, and then
1:34:41
they apply the same tools, like they
1:34:43
apply in some ways worse versions of
1:34:46
the same tools that the independent union
1:34:48
organizers use, and they're all tools that
1:34:50
you can learn. Yeah, and if any of
1:34:53
the people listening want to learn some
1:34:55
of those tools, or need help with
1:34:57
education and training or just want to
1:34:59
make connections and inroads with workers elsewhere,
1:35:01
contact the coalition of independent
1:35:04
units and seeing how we can
1:35:06
build these bonds together because I think
1:35:08
that we will problem solve how to
1:35:10
defeat this regime one way or
1:35:12
another, but I think that we
1:35:14
particularly in the independent union space
1:35:16
provide a unique possibility for how
1:35:18
this can happen. Because since we
1:35:20
are not tied to larger established
1:35:23
contracts, we're not tied to, you know,
1:35:25
jurisdictional disputes, we're not tied to a
1:35:27
lot of the legacies of some of
1:35:29
the larger unions, God bless them, we
1:35:32
can create and fashion a labor movement
1:35:34
that doesn't have to live in a
1:35:36
labor movement that doesn't have to live
1:35:39
by those rules. You know, if you
1:35:41
imagine the idea of what it would look
1:35:43
like to rebound the CIO in the 1930,
1:35:45
if you would want to see, we can create
1:35:48
that together today. And today it
1:35:50
takes the form of standing up in solidarity
1:35:52
with Lelow and farm workers' union up in
1:35:54
northern Washington, not because we get anything
1:35:56
from it, not because it's easy, but
1:35:58
precisely because it is difficult. precisely because
1:36:00
it is a moral compulsion on us to
1:36:03
take action today for it. We don't have
1:36:05
to wait for anyone to tell us what
1:36:07
to do. As part of an independent labor
1:36:09
movement, we get to decide our future and
1:36:11
our fate and we get to decide our
1:36:13
struggles. Yeah, and if and when we beat
1:36:15
them here, we can beat them tomorrow, we
1:36:17
can beat the next day, and one day, you
1:36:19
know, we will have one, one victory too many
1:36:22
for them to hold on to power. And that's
1:36:24
the only way forward. Absolutely. fascism wants
1:36:26
you to believe in a nihilistic perspective
1:36:28
of the world. They want you to
1:36:30
believe in which it is hopeless to
1:36:32
fight back. They want you to believe
1:36:34
just doom scroll forever and don't take
1:36:36
any action and focus on yourselves and
1:36:38
naval gaze indefinitely. I don't know. The way that
1:36:40
you find out the kind of person
1:36:43
that you are and the way that
1:36:45
you build... the kind of future that
1:36:47
you want for yourselves, your families, for
1:36:49
your communities, for the people that you
1:36:51
don't even know and never will meet
1:36:53
what you want a good life for
1:36:56
them. The way that you do that
1:36:58
is you take action now, you start
1:37:00
organizing, you do what you can, you
1:37:02
build what you can. That's how we
1:37:04
do this, you build what you can.
1:37:06
That's how we do this. Like we
1:37:09
said earlier, they want you to believe
1:37:11
that the fight is already. We don't
1:37:13
believe this out of nowhere. We believe this
1:37:15
because we truly do see that the better
1:37:17
world is possible if we fight. Yeah, and
1:37:19
I think that's a spectacular place to end.
1:37:22
Mark, thank you so much for coming on
1:37:24
the show. Yeah, thank you. And everyone else
1:37:26
who's listening to this, go out and fight.
1:37:45
Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith. And it's
1:37:47
me, Harley Quinn Smith. That's my daughter, man,
1:37:49
who my wife has always said is just a
1:37:51
beardless, depless version of me. And that's the name
1:37:53
of our podcast. Beardless, depless me. I'm the old
1:37:55
one. I'm the young one. And every week we
1:37:58
try to make each other laugh really hard. It
1:38:00
sounds innocent, doesn't it? A lot of cussing. A
1:38:02
lot of bad language. It's for adults only. Or,
1:38:04
listen to it with your kid. Could be a
1:38:06
family show. We're not quite sure. We're still figuring
1:38:08
it out. It's a work in progress. Listen to
1:38:11
Beardless. This is me on the I Heart Radio
1:38:13
app, Apple podcast, or wherever. You get your
1:38:15
podcast. Do you remember what you
1:38:17
said the first night I came
1:38:19
over here? How goes lower? From
1:38:21
Blumhouse TV, I-Hart podcast, and Ember
1:38:23
20 comes in all new fictional
1:38:25
comedy podcast series. Join the flighty
1:38:27
Damien Hearst as he unravels the
1:38:29
mystery of his vanished boyfriend. And
1:38:31
Santi was gone. I've been spending
1:38:33
all my time looking for answers
1:38:35
about what happened to Santi. And
1:38:37
what's the way to find a
1:38:39
missing person? Sleep with everyone he
1:38:42
knew, obviously. Hmm, pillow talk. the
1:38:44
most unwelcome window into the human
1:38:46
psyche. Follow our out of his
1:38:48
element hero as he engages in
1:38:50
a series of ill-conceived investigative hookups.
1:38:53
Mama always used to say, God
1:38:55
gave me gumption in place of
1:38:57
a gag reflex. And, as I
1:39:00
was about to learn, no amount
1:39:02
of showering can wash your hands
1:39:04
of a bad hookup. Listen
1:39:07
to the hookup on
1:39:09
the I-Hart Radio app,
1:39:11
Apple Podcasts, or wherever
1:39:13
you listen to your favorite
1:39:16
shows. On November 5th,
1:39:18
2018, at 6.33am, a
1:39:20
red Volkswagen Golf was
1:39:22
found abandoned in a
1:39:24
ditch out in Sleephole
1:39:26
Valley. The driver's seat
1:39:28
door was open. No
1:39:30
traces of footsteps leaving
1:39:32
the vehicle. No belongings
1:39:35
were found, except for
1:39:37
a cassette tape lodged
1:39:39
in the player. On
1:39:41
that tape were ten.
1:39:43
Vile. No, no, no,
1:39:45
no, no, no! No!
1:39:47
Ah! grotesque. Oh my
1:39:50
God! Oh my God!
1:39:52
Horrific stories. But to
1:39:54
this day have been
1:39:56
kept restricted from the
1:39:59
public. Until now. You
1:40:01
feel in this too? A
1:40:03
horror anthology podcast. Listen
1:40:06
on the I Heart
1:40:08
Radio app. Apple podcasts
1:40:10
or wherever you get
1:40:12
your podcast. I'm Israel
1:40:14
Gutierrez and I'm hosting a
1:40:17
new podcast. Dub dynasty.
1:40:19
The story of how the
1:40:21
Golden State Warriors have dominated the NBA
1:40:23
for over a decade. our NBA champions.
1:40:26
From the building of the core that
1:40:28
included Clay Thompson and Dreymont Green to
1:40:30
one of the boldest coaching decisions in
1:40:33
the history of the sport. I just
1:40:35
felt like the biggest thing was to
1:40:37
earn the trust of the players and
1:40:40
let the players know that we were
1:40:42
here to try to help them take
1:40:44
the next step not tear anything down.
1:40:47
Today the Warriors dynasty remains alive in
1:40:49
large part because of a scrawny
1:40:51
six-foot two-foot hoopper. who everyone seems
1:40:53
to love. For what Steph is
1:40:55
done for the game, he's certainly
1:40:58
on that like Mount Rushmore for
1:41:00
guys that have changed it. Come
1:41:02
revisit this magical Warriors ride. This
1:41:04
is Dub Dynasty. The Dubs dynasty
1:41:07
is still very much alive. Listen
1:41:09
to Dub Dynasty on the I-Hart
1:41:11
Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
1:41:14
you get your podcast. Hello
1:41:23
and welcome to Ikrapin here. I
1:41:25
want you to imagine a world
1:41:27
where everyone shared a second language,
1:41:30
not because of imperial conquest, but
1:41:32
out of a shared desire for
1:41:34
unity and understanding. That
1:41:36
was the dream behind Esperanto,
1:41:38
a constructed language designed
1:41:41
to be the basis for
1:41:43
global bilingualism. Long before I learned
1:41:45
anything about anarchism, I spent
1:41:47
some time trying to learn
1:41:49
Esperanto. It had shown up on my
1:41:52
duelingo one day and it seemed like
1:41:54
such a fascinating and simple project to
1:41:56
pick up. I was enamoured with the
1:41:58
philosophy behind it so I'd generally
1:42:00
spent a few months on and off trying
1:42:02
to learn it. That was probably a decade ago
1:42:05
at this point, so I don't remember
1:42:07
too much about it, but the connection
1:42:09
was there. And it's really because I've
1:42:11
been exploring this topic for this
1:42:13
episode that I ended up going back
1:42:15
and dabbling in some of it again. I've
1:42:17
learned recently that there's actually
1:42:20
somewhat of a connection between
1:42:22
Esperanto and Anachism. So let's
1:42:24
take the time to explore the
1:42:26
origins of Asperanto. It's Anicus connections,
1:42:28
its floors. and its future. My
1:42:30
name is Andrew Seage and I'm here
1:42:32
once again with... It's me, it's James
1:42:34
again, very excited for this one.
1:42:37
Yes, you're familiar with Esperanto,
1:42:39
right? Yeah, very familiar. I wrote about
1:42:41
it a little bit in my first
1:42:44
book and my PhD dissertation. Also, the
1:42:46
last living person to participate in
1:42:48
the popular Olympics, which is what
1:42:51
I wrote my book about, was
1:42:53
an aspirantist, part of the project
1:42:55
of the popular front. in Catalonia was
1:42:58
to bring people together through sport and
1:43:00
then Esperanto is going to be this
1:43:02
thing that would, as you mentioned, like bridge
1:43:04
the gaps between people. Right. Yes, it's a
1:43:06
really inspiring project. And so I
1:43:08
know you're probably going to know all
1:43:10
this information, but I do have to
1:43:12
share it with the audience. Yeah, I'm excited. I
1:43:15
never really did a full run down Esperanto. It
1:43:17
just appeared. And I was like, holy shit, that's
1:43:19
cool. So I'm going to learn a lot. Sure,
1:43:21
so Esperanto was first constructed
1:43:24
in a little booklet in
1:43:26
1887 by Polish Jewish ophthalmologist
1:43:28
L.L. Salmonoff. According to the
1:43:31
Encyclopedia Britannical, the name itself
1:43:33
comes from the pseudonym he took
1:43:35
on to publish the booklet.
1:43:37
He called himself Dr. O' Esperanto,
1:43:40
meaning one who hopes. And
1:43:42
hope really analyzed the whole
1:43:44
project. According to a BBC
1:43:46
article written by Jose Luis
1:43:48
Benare Donda. He lived as a
1:43:50
Polish Jew in the multicultural Russian
1:43:52
Empire, in a time rife with racial
1:43:55
and national conflict. He was trying to
1:43:57
promote peace and understanding and he
1:43:59
saw an... international language as a
1:44:01
way to do that. With a flag of
1:44:04
green and white, the colors of
1:44:06
hope and peace, for his efforts,
1:44:08
Zaman Hoff himself was nominated 14
1:44:10
times for the Nobel Peace Prize.
1:44:12
He genuinely believed that if we
1:44:14
all shared a common second
1:44:16
language, quote, education, ideals, convictions,
1:44:19
aims would be the same
1:44:21
too, and all nations would be
1:44:23
united in a common brotherhood,
1:44:25
end quote. Esperanto
1:44:27
was created in a time when
1:44:29
modernism was on the rise, and
1:44:32
the idea of rationality and science
1:44:34
was being used to quote and
1:44:36
quote optimize the world. When it
1:44:38
was featured in Paris's exposition
1:44:40
universal in 1900, the language caught
1:44:43
on amongst the French intelligence
1:44:45
here, who sought as more optimal
1:44:47
in the messy and illogical realm
1:44:49
of natural languages. Because
1:44:51
it was so easy... All words and sentences
1:44:53
being built from 16 basic rules that
1:44:56
could fit on a paper, and the
1:44:58
language lacked the confusing exceptions and
1:45:00
special rules of other languages, it
1:45:02
was once seen as the language
1:45:05
of the future. Esperanto made its
1:45:07
full-fledged public debut in 1905,
1:45:09
when 7.5 published the Fundamento
1:45:12
Desperanto, which laid on the basic
1:45:14
principles of languages structure and
1:45:16
formation. Esperanto was designed
1:45:18
to be simple, logical, and
1:45:21
accessible. drawn from the influence
1:45:23
of romance, Germanic and Slavic
1:45:25
languages in its construction. The
1:45:27
orthography is phonetic, so all the
1:45:30
words are spelled as pronounced, and
1:45:32
the grammar is so straightforward
1:45:34
there's a consistent word ending
1:45:37
for nouns, pluralisation, adjectives and
1:45:39
verbs. But although simple, it
1:45:41
can convey complexity. There's a
1:45:43
lot of suffixes you can add to
1:45:46
give degrees of meaning, and there's room
1:45:48
for compound words too. Its European
1:45:50
focus would be the target of
1:45:52
criticism later on, but it actually ended
1:45:54
up being picked up in some
1:45:56
unusual places anyway. Zamenhof translated
1:45:59
literature. and wrote original verse
1:46:01
and after years of effort there
1:46:03
were speakers to be found across
1:46:05
Europe, the Americas, China and
1:46:08
Japan. By 1908 the Universala
1:46:10
Esperanto Association was founded
1:46:12
and it can now find
1:46:14
members in 83 countries worldwide.
1:46:16
Today is also 50 national
1:46:18
Esperanto associations and
1:46:20
22 international professional
1:46:22
associations that use
1:46:24
Esperanto. There's an annual
1:46:27
World Esperanto Congress and
1:46:29
more than a hundred
1:46:31
periodicals published in Esperanto.
1:46:33
Estimates range widely in terms
1:46:35
of how many people speak
1:46:37
Esperanto today. They are apparently
1:46:39
a handful of native speakers.
1:46:42
Folks were raised speaking Esperanto.
1:46:44
Oh wow. Yeah, it's really really cool.
1:46:46
Yeah. But L2 speakers are somewhere
1:46:49
between 30,000 L2 being, you know,
1:46:51
second language speakers, are somewhere between
1:46:53
30,000 to 2 million. According
1:46:55
to Wilfirth's article on Esperanto,
1:46:58
anarchism, there are tens of thousands of
1:47:00
books in Esperanto and several hundred
1:47:02
mostly swampy articles that appear
1:47:05
regularly. Hard day at day
1:47:07
passes throughout international meetings, such
1:47:09
as those of specialized organizations,
1:47:12
conferences, youth get-togethers, seminars, group
1:47:14
holidays, and regional meetings. There
1:47:16
are several radio stations that
1:47:18
broadcast programs in Esperanto. An
1:47:20
Esperanto has even been used by
1:47:23
couples of different origins as a
1:47:25
family language. It's cool. Funny
1:47:27
enough, as with every language, even
1:47:29
an aspiring universal language, it has
1:47:32
since had its offshoots. I saw
1:47:34
in Wikipedia that merely a year
1:47:36
after Zavenhofe's creation of Esperanto, in
1:47:38
1888, Dutch author Jay Brakman proposed
1:47:41
a few changes to language, like
1:47:43
combining the ending for the adjective
1:47:45
and adverb. changing conjugations, introducing
1:47:48
more Latin roots, getting
1:47:50
rid of the diacritics
1:47:52
and so on. This language will be
1:47:54
called Mundo Lingco and it was
1:47:56
the first of many offshoots from
1:47:58
Esperanto proper. Hammond Hoff
1:48:00
would try to reform the language
1:48:02
at one point in 1894, but
1:48:05
it was rejected by the Esperanto
1:48:07
community and eventually even himself. These
1:48:09
reforms were later to be used
1:48:11
to develop EDO, another attempt at
1:48:13
universal language with far less success.
1:48:15
I also learned via Wikipedia there
1:48:18
was an attempt to make Esperanto
1:48:20
more complex by introducing Cherokee components,
1:48:22
called police poe, created by a
1:48:24
Native American activist named Billy Ray
1:48:26
Waldon. Esperanto speakers continue to play
1:48:28
with the language in all sorts
1:48:31
of ways to this day. Esperanto
1:48:33
is an evolving language and Zarnoff
1:48:35
himself is honoured as part of
1:48:37
this global Esperanto culture. They celebrate
1:48:39
his birthday, the 15th of December.
1:48:41
There are statues and streets and
1:48:44
plaques remembering him worldwide and even
1:48:46
an asteroid bears his name. At
1:48:48
one point, according to the BBC
1:48:50
article, there was an effort to
1:48:52
establish an Esperanto speaking land called
1:48:54
Amiquejo. which would have been a
1:48:57
3.5 square kilometer territory between the
1:48:59
Netherlands, Germany and France. Yeah, 3.5
1:49:01
square kilometers. Yeah, not huge, yeah.
1:49:03
It's like a big, I know,
1:49:05
we've got a few of those
1:49:07
like little ones in Europe, you
1:49:10
know. Yeah, a couple microstates, it
1:49:12
could have been another microstate, but
1:49:14
the idea was very quickly squashed
1:49:16
following World War I. Yeah, I
1:49:18
know the Cenite, the Spanish anarcho
1:49:20
Cenocindiclis Union was like like... in
1:49:23
its first Congress, like its foundational
1:49:25
Congress, I suppose, they were like,
1:49:27
and everyone has to, everyone should
1:49:29
try and learn Esperanto, like that
1:49:31
was one of their, like, the
1:49:33
things at the foundation of like
1:49:36
what became probably the most powerful
1:49:38
anarchist movement the world's ever seen.
1:49:40
They were like, also this is
1:49:42
a big thing. Yeah, yeah, Esperanto
1:49:44
is really huge in the anarchist
1:49:46
movement at a certain point. Yeah.
1:49:49
But we're gonna get to those
1:49:51
connections soon enough. I
1:50:02
want to bring up this other
1:50:04
interesting story. There was actually an
1:50:06
effort by Esperantists, including a delegate
1:50:09
from Iran, to get the language
1:50:11
to become the official language of
1:50:14
the League of Nations. But take
1:50:16
one guess as to which country
1:50:18
blocked that effort. Was it one
1:50:21
of the Anglophone countries? No. Oh,
1:50:23
wow. The French. It was the
1:50:25
French. There is not a state
1:50:28
more invested in its language than
1:50:30
France. Indeed. They have laws, I
1:50:33
think, about broadcasting music and dubbing
1:50:35
films and things. Yeah, the French
1:50:37
government seemingly hated Esperanto, at least
1:50:40
according to an article on imp
1:50:42
of the reverse blog site. They
1:50:44
blocked its study in universities and
1:50:47
public schools, and as the article
1:50:49
quotes the opponents directly. Quote, on
1:50:52
September 10th, 1902, the New York
1:50:54
Tribune ran a translation of a
1:50:56
piece by the editor-in-chief of the
1:50:59
matine, Stefan Lazon. Mr. Lazon spent
1:51:01
half his editorial writing about Esperanto.
1:51:03
And I'm not going to do
1:51:06
a French accent for this section,
1:51:08
but just imagine, like, the most
1:51:10
French Frenchman reading this. That fins
1:51:13
or Albanians fevered such a propaganda
1:51:15
is comprehensible. Their dialect has no
1:51:18
chance of imposing itself on the
1:51:20
universe. They need a second language,
1:51:22
just as well Esperanto as any
1:51:25
other. But that French people, or
1:51:27
English, or Germans, could have let
1:51:29
themselves be allured by this linguistic
1:51:32
Bolshevism. That is far more extraordinary.
1:51:34
It is nevertheless a fact that
1:51:37
Esperanto, which was born 25 years
1:51:39
ago and ought to have died
1:51:41
through ridicule, continues to have disciples
1:51:44
in Europe. Every year in a
1:51:46
different capital they hold a Congress
1:51:48
at which they are not very
1:51:51
numerous but where they make a
1:51:53
great noise. They get so excited
1:51:56
that Quite recently, the Minister of
1:51:58
Public Instruction had to address a
1:52:00
circular to all the French educational
1:52:03
resorts to warn them against the
1:52:05
danger of Esperanto. An article in
1:52:07
the Washington Herald on that same
1:52:10
day explained the danger, at least
1:52:12
according to the Ministry of Public
1:52:15
Instruction. The reason for this order,
1:52:17
according to certain schoolteachers, is that
1:52:19
teaching of a language as easy
1:52:22
as Esperanto, endangers the existence of
1:52:24
the French language and thus the
1:52:26
national solidarity of the country. They
1:52:29
contend that children will naturally take
1:52:31
to an easy language as Esperanto,
1:52:33
and in that time French and
1:52:36
English would perish, and the literary
1:52:38
standard of the world would be
1:52:41
debased. Furthermore, they argue that a
1:52:43
national language plays a predominant part
1:52:45
in maintaining national unity and points
1:52:48
to Poland and Lorraine as examples.
1:52:50
Esperanto is an artificial language of
1:52:52
no real merit, writes one professor.
1:52:55
It has no very definite origin,
1:52:57
and one aims to draw the
1:53:00
scattered people of the world together.
1:53:02
Does it off rather tend to
1:53:04
de-nationalization? End quote. They're not wrong.
1:53:07
Like France is like language if
1:53:09
you read like a peasant's inter
1:53:11
Frenchman is kind of the classic
1:53:14
work on like French nationalization. But
1:53:16
like in order to make people
1:53:19
French they did have to suppress
1:53:21
like Basque and Breton and Catalan
1:53:23
and other languages right and make
1:53:26
people go to schools where they
1:53:28
learned French and conceived of themselves
1:53:30
as French as a result of
1:53:33
that. Yeah, their imposition of national
1:53:35
identity was perhaps among the most
1:53:37
successful in the world. In terms
1:53:40
of its ooliness and its consistent
1:53:42
enforcement. It shows like nations are
1:53:45
always projects of the bourgeois era,
1:53:47
like at least I would argue
1:53:49
that and so a lot of
1:53:52
other people, but like the French
1:53:54
example is one where we can
1:53:56
see it more clearly than others.
1:53:59
Like it's a state and specifically
1:54:01
like a certain class within the
1:54:04
state. project to enforce and continue
1:54:06
to perpetuate this narrative of nation.
1:54:08
And you know, they weren't the
1:54:11
only enemies of Esperanto. And do
1:54:13
you know that saying, judge me
1:54:15
by my enemies? Yeah, who else
1:54:18
have we got? Nazi Germany, Francoist
1:54:20
Spain, and the Soviet Union also
1:54:23
hated Esperanto. Gets cooler with everyone.
1:54:25
The Nazis, they were nationalists and
1:54:27
Zaman Hoff was Jewish. So his
1:54:30
family was actually targeted and the
1:54:32
languages banned. and Esperantists were targeted
1:54:34
and put in camps during the
1:54:37
Holocaust, which is really tragic. Yeah,
1:54:39
pretty fucked. Yeah. His whole family
1:54:41
was heavily targeted by not Germany.
1:54:44
Franco associated Esperanto with internationalism and
1:54:46
anarchism, which true. Yeah, he wasn't
1:54:49
wrong. So it was targeted for
1:54:51
a while. Yeah. And the Soviets,
1:54:53
while originally recognizing Esperantists, eventually reversed
1:54:56
that policy under Stalin during the
1:54:58
great purge and executed, exiled or
1:55:00
googued, Esperantists. And as you can
1:55:03
imagine, all that repression, all at
1:55:05
once, kind of killed Esperanto's momentum.
1:55:08
Today, despite its goal of being
1:55:10
a truly international language, Esperanto's global
1:55:12
retremains uneven. While it has made
1:55:15
some strides in recent years, it's
1:55:17
still underrepresented in many parts of
1:55:19
Africa and Asia. The majority of
1:55:22
Esperanto speakers today are in Europe.
1:55:24
Those development outside of Europe deserves
1:55:27
some attention, as Esperanto management remark
1:55:29
in China, Iran, Togo, and the
1:55:31
Democratic Republic of Congo. But the
1:55:34
response to Esperanto historically should give
1:55:36
you an indication as to how
1:55:38
anarchists must have felt about Esperanto.
1:55:41
As an internationalist or anti-nationalist movement,
1:55:43
anarchismism was very supportive of the
1:55:45
Esperanto project. Let me run you
1:55:48
through the timeline, could see Wilfirths
1:55:50
Esperanto anarchism. One of the earliest
1:55:53
anarchist Esperanto groups was founded in
1:55:55
Stockholm in 1905. The same year,
1:55:57
the anarchist Paul Bruthelot founded the...
1:56:00
country magazine Esperanto. Similar groups soon
1:56:02
emerged in Bulgaria, China, and other
1:56:04
countries. In 1906, anarchist anarcho cynicalists
1:56:07
founded an international association, Paco Liberico,
1:56:09
Peace Freedom, which published the International
1:56:12
Social Review. By 1910, Paco Liberico
1:56:14
merged with Esperantista La Veristaro to
1:56:16
form Liberiga Stelo, Star of liberation,
1:56:19
strengthening anarchist Esperanto networks. The 1907
1:56:21
International Annicus Congress in Amsterdam formally
1:56:23
addressed the role of Esperanto in
1:56:26
international communication. Subsequent Annicus Congresses continue
1:56:28
to pass resolutions advocating for Esperanto's
1:56:31
use within the movement. By 1914,
1:56:33
these Annicus Esperantist organizations had published
1:56:35
extensive revolutionary literature, including Annicus texts
1:56:38
in Esperanto. Around this time, correspondence
1:56:40
between European and Japanese anarchists became
1:56:42
more active, facilitated by Esperanto. In
1:56:45
Prague, Eugene Adam proposed the formation
1:56:47
of Senesciessa Associate Tutmander, the SAT,
1:56:50
or the World International Association. Unlike
1:56:52
other Esperanto associations, SAT rejected nationalism
1:56:54
wholesale and sought to create a
1:56:57
transnational, class-conscious workers' movement. To quote,
1:56:59
why is there an Esperanto workers'
1:57:01
movement by Gary Michael? SAT was
1:57:04
not meant to usurp the role
1:57:06
of political parties by engaging in
1:57:08
political struggles directly, but was to
1:57:11
be a cultural association engaged in
1:57:13
workers' education, one that would help
1:57:16
to break down national and ethnic
1:57:18
barriers between workers by involving them
1:57:20
in practical collective activity, bringing workers
1:57:23
into contact, freeing them from the
1:57:25
shackles of nationalism. SAT's ideas, and
1:57:27
especially the ideas of its a-nationalist
1:57:30
faction, were an early statement of
1:57:32
an idea that has more recently
1:57:35
come to be known as globalization
1:57:37
from below. Since August 1921, 79
1:57:39
workers from 15 countries gathered in
1:57:42
Prague to formally established SAT. By
1:57:44
1929 to 1930, SAT had grown
1:57:46
to 6,524 members across 42 countries,
1:57:49
reaching its peak influence. The use
1:57:51
of Esperanto flourished in German workers'
1:57:54
movements between 1920 and 1933. By
1:57:56
1932, the German Workers' Esperanto League
1:57:58
had 4,000 members, leading to Esperanto
1:58:01
being called the Workers Latin. But,
1:58:03
as you can imagine, this was
1:58:05
not to last by the time
1:58:08
Hitler came into power. The Scientific
1:58:10
Anarchist Library of the International Language,
1:58:12
or ISAB, was founded in the
1:58:15
USSR in 1929, publishing anarchist works
1:58:17
by Kropotkin and Anbervoy in Esperanto.
1:58:20
This also would not last the
1:58:22
great purge. The Berlin Group of
1:58:24
Anarchist Nicholas Esperantus greeted the Second
1:58:27
Congress of the International Workers' Association
1:58:29
in Amsterdam in 1925 and reported
1:58:31
that Esperanto had become so integrated
1:58:34
into their movement that an international
1:58:36
libertarian Esperantist organization had formed. This
1:58:39
likely referred to the T-L-E-S, the
1:58:41
World League of Stateless Esperantists, which
1:58:43
later merged with SAT. Esperanto was
1:58:46
also popping off amongst anarchists and
1:58:48
socialists in Korea, China, and Japan.
1:58:50
Liu Shifu, a key figure in
1:58:53
Chinese anarchism, began publishing La Vocho
1:58:55
de La Popolo, the Voice of
1:58:58
the People, in 1913, the first
1:59:00
anarchist periodical in China. His work
1:59:02
relied heavily on information from Indonesia
1:59:05
Socialia Social Revio. and helped popularize
1:59:07
Esperanto in China. Japanese anarchists and
1:59:09
socialists, as I mentioned, were among
1:59:12
the earliest Esperantists in the country,
1:59:14
but faced heavy persecution. And sadly,
1:59:16
between Imperial Japan, Franco-Spy, Nazi Germany,
1:59:19
and Salas, Russia, the rise of
1:59:21
totalitarian regimes led into World War
1:59:24
II largely suppressed the anarchist Esperanto
1:59:26
movement. After the war, the Parasanicus
1:59:28
Esperanto group was the first to
1:59:31
resume organized work. Lonchund publication, Sen
1:59:33
Sh Dalitano, in 1946. Most Anachist
1:59:35
asparantists have since been organized within
1:59:38
SAT, with an anachist faction maintaining
1:59:40
its autonomy. In 1969, this faction
1:59:43
began publishing the Libera Sana Bolteno.
1:59:45
Later in the Libera Santa Legilo.
1:59:47
By 1997, SAT membership had dwindled
1:59:50
to fewer than 1,500 members. The
1:59:52
initial radical vision of SAT was
1:59:54
weakened by political shifts and the
1:59:57
growing dominance of English as a
1:59:59
global lingua franca. The early separations
2:00:02
in SAT and mainstream Esperanto organizations
2:00:04
was a response to bourgeois political
2:00:06
neutrality, but it also contributed to
2:00:09
its marginalisation. And today the anarchist
2:00:11
Esperanto movement exists largely as a
2:00:13
niche within SAT. So what can
2:00:16
we say about the role of
2:00:18
Esperanto today? Well... One of the
2:00:21
more interesting currents I found in
2:00:23
the Esperanto community, mentioned by Firth,
2:00:25
is Raumismo, a philosophy named after
2:00:28
the Finnish city of Rauma, where
2:00:30
a youth Congress in 1980 helped
2:00:32
define this approach. Raumismo views Esperanto
2:00:35
speakers as a kind of linguistic
2:00:37
diaspora, a cultural group bound together
2:00:39
by a shared language rather than
2:00:42
a national identity. Instead of focusing
2:00:44
on making Esperanto a universal second
2:00:47
language, Raoumistouge embraced it as just
2:00:49
one language among many, valuing its
2:00:51
use in literature, culture, and everyday
2:00:54
communication, without any grand ideological ambitions.
2:00:56
But it's possible Esperanto can still
2:00:58
play a role in facilitating exchange
2:01:01
and collaboration between people of different
2:01:03
linguistic backgrounds. A German anarchist once
2:01:06
lamented the barrier's international understanding, quoted
2:01:08
in Firth's article. More or less,
2:01:10
in isolation for one another, We
2:01:13
work and fight without engaging in
2:01:15
exchange about our victories and defeats,
2:01:17
and without supporting and encouraging one
2:01:20
another. Intensifying contact above the regional
2:01:22
level with people having similar ideas
2:01:25
and aims, should be an important
2:01:27
component of our work in order
2:01:29
to make effective active solidarity possible."
2:01:32
And that's the trouble even today.
2:01:34
Linguistic barriers hinder international cooperation. Groups
2:01:36
struggle to maintain foreign language correspondence,
2:01:39
organize multilingual meetings, or find interpreters.
2:01:41
Instead, communication tends to rely on
2:01:43
chance. You know if someone in
2:01:46
a group happens to speak a
2:01:48
certain language, that determines who they
2:01:51
can connect with. But when those
2:01:53
key individuals move on, those connections
2:01:55
can have fallen apart. So I
2:01:58
get the appeal. I mean, wouldn't
2:02:00
it be beneficial for these movements
2:02:02
and for any interest group working
2:02:05
across language barriers to have a
2:02:07
relatively easy to learn politically neutral
2:02:10
means of communication? Major languages like
2:02:12
English, Spanish or French don't fully
2:02:14
solve the problem as they come
2:02:17
with historical baggage and imbalances in
2:02:19
fluency levels. Esperanto on the other
2:02:21
hand provides a more equitable solution
2:02:24
because everybody is starting from the
2:02:26
same point. Since it isn't tied
2:02:29
to any one nation, it avoids
2:02:31
the power dynamics that arise when
2:02:33
non-native speakers was conformed to the
2:02:36
linguistic norms of dominant cultures. Unlike
2:02:38
English, which often privileges native speakers
2:02:40
and places others as perpetual liners,
2:02:43
Esperanto fosters a more level playing
2:02:45
field. English is treated like a
2:02:47
global lingua franca right now, but
2:02:50
a lot of people leave school
2:02:52
without ever developing enough fluency to
2:02:55
navigate an English-dominated world. And English
2:02:57
is not the easiest language to
2:02:59
learn. Esperanto, regardless of whether it
2:03:02
ever becomes a global standard, offers
2:03:04
an alternative path. It can help
2:03:06
people overcome language learning anxieties, as
2:03:09
particularly those who feel disempowered by
2:03:11
traditional educational systems, and it can
2:03:14
inspire an interest in language itself.
2:03:16
If you've ever met an Esperanto
2:03:18
speaker, you know that they are
2:03:21
very passionate about linguistics, more often
2:03:23
than not. Many of its speakers
2:03:25
go on to study linguistics, language
2:03:28
politics. or even lesser known languages.
2:03:30
It's also a great way to
2:03:33
develop translation skills in a friendly
2:03:35
cooperative environment. For monolingual English speakers,
2:03:37
using Esperanto can be an eye-open
2:03:40
experience. It puts them the shoes
2:03:42
of those who never got to
2:03:44
rely on their native language in
2:03:47
international settings. Rather viewing Esperanto as
2:03:49
a competitor to other languages, perhaps
2:03:52
a more productive approach is to
2:03:54
see it as a tool for
2:03:56
promoting multilingualism. cultural exchange, and a
2:03:59
more cosmopolitan mindset. Within the Esperanto-speaking
2:04:01
community, opinions on its future vary
2:04:03
widely. But one thing is clear.
2:04:06
The question of how we communicate
2:04:08
across linguistic divides is still very
2:04:10
much alive, and Esperanto offers but
2:04:13
one possible answer. However, as I
2:04:15
alluded to earlier, Esperanto is not
2:04:18
without its critiques, as covered by
2:04:20
Firth. Let's start with one of
2:04:22
the most frequent critiques. Esperanto is
2:04:25
an artificial language. Unlike the so-called
2:04:27
natural languages which evolved organically over
2:04:29
time, Esperanto is deliberately constructed. But
2:04:32
here's the thing. Since the rise
2:04:34
to the nation-state, the line between
2:04:37
natural and artificial languages has become
2:04:39
increasingly blurry. Many national languages, like
2:04:41
standard German or standard French, have
2:04:44
been shaped by deliberate standardization, legal
2:04:46
regulations, and media influence. In that
2:04:48
sense, every language is to some
2:04:51
degree engineered. Authors, storytellers and ordinary
2:04:53
speakers continuously influence language development, meaning
2:04:56
that Esperanto is not as different
2:04:58
after all. It does continue to
2:05:00
evolve. And here's where I think
2:05:03
James C. Scott had a rather
2:05:05
negative characterization of Esperanto as a
2:05:07
purely high modernist endeavor, as though
2:05:10
all Esperanto is sought to make
2:05:12
Esperanto the official international language. In
2:05:14
seeing like a state, he claims
2:05:17
that Esperanto was created to replace
2:05:19
the dialects and vernacular of Europe.
2:05:22
But... Such was never the case.
2:05:24
It was always meant to be
2:05:26
a language used to facilitate communication.
2:05:29
There was more than one motivation
2:05:31
for Esperanto's use, and boiling such
2:05:33
an exercise in human creativity in
2:05:36
attempting to the connection down to
2:05:38
just that status focus, to me,
2:05:41
seems needlessly reductive. He also calls
2:05:43
it, quote, an exceptionally thin language
2:05:45
without any of the resonances, connotations,
2:05:48
ready metaphors, literatures, oral histories, idioms,
2:05:50
and traditions of practical use that
2:05:52
any socially embedded language already had,
2:05:55
end quote. Which may be true,
2:05:57
when I began, but is not
2:06:00
true now. with over a century
2:06:02
of use and evolution. His analogies
2:06:04
between Esperanto and planned cities also
2:06:07
miss the mark for me, as
2:06:09
Esperanto has clearly operated as a
2:06:11
self-organized and grassroots movement for most
2:06:14
of its history and has never
2:06:16
really received the backing of states
2:06:18
or their enforcement. It's a weird
2:06:21
angle from Scott because normally he'd
2:06:23
advocate for like what he calls
2:06:26
like the anarchist squint, right? seeing
2:06:28
history through a perspective of anarchism,
2:06:30
I guess, like an anarchist lens.
2:06:33
And I feel like this is
2:06:35
very applicable with Esperanto, like the
2:06:37
only language which is inherently tied
2:06:40
to any state or nation or
2:06:42
ethnicity. Exactly. When I saw that,
2:06:45
I remember reading, seeing like a
2:06:47
state some years ago, and I've
2:06:49
already glossed over that, but in
2:06:52
doing the research for this I
2:06:54
ended up, you know, stumbling upon
2:06:56
it again, and I was like,
2:06:59
hmm. after reading the history is
2:07:01
like this wasn't quite accurate. Yeah,
2:07:04
yeah, that's a bummer. Yeah, Germany
2:07:06
likes Scott. Me as well. Yeah,
2:07:08
recently some listeners, very kindly, James
2:07:11
C. Scott passed away out of
2:07:13
this net, as I'm sure you
2:07:15
know Andrew. Yes. But his library
2:07:18
was donated to a local secondhand
2:07:20
book shop and some folks, I
2:07:23
asked online and they went and
2:07:25
got me some books and sent
2:07:27
them, which was really kind. So
2:07:30
I have some of his books
2:07:32
now. Oh, that's nice. Yeah. There's
2:07:34
another common claim about Esperanto, which
2:07:37
is that it's Eurocentric, right? And
2:07:39
linguistically there's some truth to this.
2:07:41
Esperanto originated in Eastern Europe and
2:07:44
it still carries structural elements to
2:07:46
resemble Indo-European languages. The majority of
2:07:49
Esperanto speakers today are European and
2:07:51
its vocabulary is largely drawn from
2:07:53
European languages. However, critics whom make
2:07:56
this argument often suggest alternatives like
2:07:58
English or Spanish, languages that are
2:08:00
just as, if not more, eccentric
2:08:03
in the historical and political reach.
2:08:05
Esperanto in contrast has evolved through
2:08:08
influence from non-European languages as well,
2:08:10
particularly through its development in China
2:08:12
and Japan. Its aggressive word formation,
2:08:15
a feature more common in languages
2:08:17
like Turkish or Japanese, are what
2:08:19
some call the Hungarian period of
2:08:22
Esperanto's history. So while Esperanto has
2:08:24
European roots, its global evolution challenges
2:08:27
the idea that is exclusively European
2:08:29
in character. Another critique is that
2:08:31
Esperanto is sexist. The argument goes
2:08:34
that because feminine forms are typically
2:08:36
created by adding in to a
2:08:38
base form, like laboristo, worker, become
2:08:41
a labristino, female worker, the language
2:08:43
assumes masculinity as a default. And
2:08:45
while this is a valid concern,
2:08:48
Esperanto differs from any European languages
2:08:50
in a key way. It is
2:08:53
not a sign chromatical gender in
2:08:55
an element objects. A chair isn't
2:08:57
arbitrarily feminine like in French or
2:09:00
masculine like in German. However, in
2:09:02
practice, gender bias can still creep
2:09:04
in. The basic form of a
2:09:07
noun is often assumed to be
2:09:09
masculine, even though Esperanto allows for
2:09:12
explicitly male forms as well. Like
2:09:14
in any language, reducing linguistic sexism
2:09:16
in Esperanto requires conscious effort in
2:09:19
how people actually use it. Yeah.
2:09:21
That's an interesting one. We see
2:09:23
this in Spanish too, right? Like,
2:09:26
with attempts to create, like, gender
2:09:28
neutral forms. the presumptive masculine or
2:09:31
if you're addressing a mixed gender
2:09:33
group then you would you would
2:09:35
use the masculine but like people
2:09:38
who are first language of valid
2:09:40
speakers can correct me I'm sure
2:09:42
you will on the subreddit if
2:09:45
you want to so like When
2:09:47
I hear in English language media,
2:09:49
it's referred to as Latin X,
2:09:52
but like, that's kind of a
2:09:54
word that I struggle to say
2:09:57
in Spanish, like is it Latinicus
2:09:59
or like, is it Latinics? And
2:10:01
so that this very kind of
2:10:04
clumsy gender neutral form, which seems
2:10:06
to be easier to say in
2:10:08
English and Spanish. Yeah, I've seen
2:10:11
Latin used in some circles. Yeah,
2:10:13
Latiné. speak to non-binary people in
2:10:16
Spanish that's what they prefer to
2:10:18
use of this relatively small sample
2:10:20
size given that there are probably
2:10:23
millions of non-binary Spanish-speaking people I
2:10:25
haven't obviously spoken to all or
2:10:27
most of them but like it's
2:10:30
very interesting to see this like
2:10:32
outside critique of the language which
2:10:35
seems to also ignore an inside
2:10:37
movement within people who are Spanish
2:10:39
first language speakers to create a
2:10:42
organic like gender neutral form, which
2:10:44
could also happen in any language,
2:10:46
right? Like just because Esperanto has
2:10:49
a certain form doesn't mean that
2:10:51
people within that language, you don't
2:10:53
feel represented by them, can create
2:10:56
forms within that language, or better
2:10:58
represent them. Exactly. And it's easier
2:11:01
because you don't have like a
2:11:03
government telling you you can't use
2:11:05
it or whatever. Exactly, exactly. Esperanto
2:11:08
is and continues to be a
2:11:10
grassroots movement. And that has actually
2:11:12
been a subject of critique critique
2:11:15
for some. You know, perhaps one
2:11:17
of the biggest critiques of Esperanto
2:11:20
is that it never achieved its
2:11:22
original goal of becoming a universal
2:11:24
second language. Zamenhof, its creator, envisioned
2:11:27
a world where Esperanto would bridge
2:11:29
linguistic divides. But for many, linear
2:11:31
language that relatively few people spoke,
2:11:34
simply wasn't practical. But the rise
2:11:36
of the internet changed the game
2:11:39
for Esperanto. What was once difficult
2:11:41
to learn and use daily has
2:11:43
become far more accessible. For example,
2:11:46
Esperanto is actually one of the
2:11:48
most overrepresented languages on the internet.
2:11:50
The Esperanto Wikipedia has around 240,000
2:11:53
articles, putting it in the same
2:11:55
league as languages spoken by tens
2:11:58
of millions of people, like Turkish
2:12:00
and Korean. Google and Facebook have
2:12:02
offered Esperanto versions of their platforms
2:12:05
for years, and language learning services
2:12:07
like Doolingo have helped introduce it
2:12:09
to a new generation of learners,
2:12:12
like myself. In fact, the people
2:12:14
who developed Esperanto courses for Doolingo
2:12:16
did so voluntarily, simply because they
2:12:19
believed in the language's potential. Esperanto
2:12:21
has fostered a unique online community,
2:12:24
and there's even a free hospitality
2:12:26
network called Pasporta Servo, where Esperanto
2:12:28
speakers can stay with each other
2:12:31
around the world. No money required.
2:12:33
Just a shared language and a
2:12:35
common philosophy of global connection. Not
2:12:38
everyone learns Esperanto for the same
2:12:40
reasons. Some people seek intellectual challenge,
2:12:43
some want a sense of unique
2:12:45
community, and others are drawn to
2:12:47
its political neutrality. As communications lecturer
2:12:50
Sarah Marino points out in the
2:12:52
BBC article, people engage in Esperanto
2:12:54
for many different motivations, whether it's
2:12:57
personal fulfillment, social inclusion, civic engagement,
2:12:59
or just the simple joy of
2:13:02
learning a new language. It's important
2:13:04
not to reduce Esperanto learners to
2:13:06
a stereotype. Their reasons for participating
2:13:09
are as diverse as the language
2:13:11
itself. So, where's Esperanto stand today?
2:13:13
It would never replace English as
2:13:16
the global lingua franca, but perhaps
2:13:18
there was never the point. Instead,
2:13:20
it serves as a tool for
2:13:23
promoting bilingualism, fostering cross-cultural connections, and
2:13:25
encouraging people to think differently. about
2:13:28
language itself. And I think that
2:13:30
is worthy of its own reward.
2:13:32
That's what I have for today.
2:13:35
All power to all the people,
2:13:37
peace. Hey
2:13:54
kids it's me Kevin Smith and it's
2:13:56
me Harley Quinn Smith. That's my daughter
2:13:58
man who my wife has always said
2:14:01
is Just a beardless, dicless version of
2:14:03
me, and that's the name of our
2:14:05
podcast. Beardless, was me. I'm the old
2:14:07
one. I'm the young one. And every
2:14:10
week we try to make each other
2:14:12
laugh really hard. Sounds innocent, doesn't it?
2:14:14
A lot of cussing, a lot of
2:14:16
bad language. It's for adults only. Or,
2:14:19
listen to it with your kid. Could
2:14:21
be a family show, we're still figuring
2:14:23
it out. It's a work in progress.
2:14:26
Listen to beardless, me on the I
2:14:28
heart radio app, Apple Podcast, Apple podcast,
2:14:30
Apple Podcast, Apple Podcast, Apple Podcast, Apple
2:14:32
Podcast, or wherever, or wherever. You get
2:14:35
your, you get your podcast, you get
2:14:37
your podcast, you get your podcast, you
2:14:39
get your podcast, you get your podcast,
2:14:42
you get your podcast, you get your
2:14:44
podcast, you get your podcast, you, you
2:14:46
get your podcast, you, you, you, you,
2:14:48
you, you get your podcast, you, you,
2:14:51
you, you, you, you How goes lower?
2:14:53
From Blumhouse TV, I-Hart podcast, and Ember
2:14:55
20 comes in all new fictional comedy
2:14:57
podcast series. Join the flighty Damien Hearst
2:15:00
as he unravels the mystery of his
2:15:02
vanished boyfriend. And Santee was gone. I've
2:15:04
been spending all my time looking for
2:15:07
answers about what happened to Santee. And
2:15:09
what's the way to find a missing
2:15:11
person? Sleep with everyone he knew, obviously.
2:15:13
Hmm, pillow talk. the most unwelcome window
2:15:16
into the human psyche. Follow our out
2:15:18
of his element hero as he engages
2:15:20
in a series of ill-conceived investigative hookups.
2:15:23
Mama always used to say, God gave
2:15:25
me gumption in place of a gag
2:15:27
reflex. And, as I was about to
2:15:29
learn, no amount of showering can wash
2:15:32
your hands of a bad hookup. Listen
2:15:34
to the hookup on the iHeart Radio
2:15:36
app, Apple podcast, or wherever you listen
2:15:39
to your favorite shows. Are your ears
2:15:41
bored? Yeah. Are you looking for a
2:15:43
new podcast that will make you laugh,
2:15:45
learn, and say, gee? Yeah! Then tune
2:15:48
in to Locatora Radio, season 10, today.
2:15:50
Okay! I'm Diosa. I'm Mala. The host
2:15:52
of Locatora Radio, a radio fan of
2:15:54
Novella. Which is just a very extra
2:15:57
way of saying, a podcast. We're launching
2:15:59
this season with a mini-series, totally nostalgic.
2:16:01
A four-part series about the Latinos who
2:16:04
shaped pop culture in the early 2000s.
2:16:06
It's Lala checking in with all things.
2:16:08
Y2K 2000s, my favorite memory honestly was
2:16:10
us having our own media platforms like
2:16:13
Mundos and MTV Tres. You could turn
2:16:15
on the TV, you see Talia, you
2:16:17
see Jalo, Nina Sky, Ivy Queen, all
2:16:20
the girlies doing their things, all of
2:16:22
the beauty reflected right back at us.
2:16:24
It was everything. Tune in to Locatora
2:16:26
Radio Season 10. Now that's what I
2:16:29
call a podcast. Listen to Locatora Radio
2:16:31
Season 10 on the I-Hart Radio app,
2:16:33
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your
2:16:35
podcasts. I'm Israel Gutierrez, and I'm hosting
2:16:38
a new podcast, dubbed dynasty. The story
2:16:40
of how the Golden State Warriors have
2:16:42
dominated the NBA for over a decade.
2:16:45
Once again, our NBA champions. From the
2:16:47
building of the core that included Clay
2:16:49
Thompson and Drey Mon Green, to one
2:16:51
of the boldest coaching decisions in the
2:16:54
history of the sport. I just felt
2:16:56
like the biggest thing was to earn
2:16:58
the trust to the players and let
2:17:01
the players know that we were here
2:17:03
to try to help them take the
2:17:05
next step, not tear anything down. Today,
2:17:07
the Warriors dynasty remains alive. In large
2:17:10
part because of a scrawny six-foot two-two
2:17:12
hooper. who everyone seems to love. So
2:17:14
what Steph is done for the game?
2:17:16
He's certainly on that like Mount Rushmore
2:17:19
for guys that have changed it. Come
2:17:21
revisit this magical Warriors ride. This is
2:17:23
Dub Dynasty. The Dubs dynasty is still
2:17:26
very much alive. Listen to Dub Dynasty
2:17:28
on the I-Hart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,
2:17:30
or wherever you get your podcast. This
2:17:42
is it could happen here executive disorder
2:17:44
our weekly newscast covering what's happening in
2:17:46
the White House the crumbling world and
2:17:49
what it means for you I'm Garrison
2:17:51
Davis today. I'm joined by Mia Wong
2:17:53
James Stout and Robert Evans This week
2:17:55
we're covering the week of April 3rd
2:17:58
to April 9th We have recovered from
2:18:00
liberation day, fully liberated. Yeah. And now
2:18:02
the economy is back to normal, right?
2:18:04
Yes. Everything's really good. Everyone's 401ks have
2:18:07
been normal. And stable, and stable. And
2:18:09
stable, that's what's important. Just line go
2:18:11
up. The economy runs from stability. I
2:18:13
mean, one of the things the line
2:18:16
did was go up. So yeah, lines
2:18:18
go on. Why should anyone complain? Yeah,
2:18:20
lines go on in a few different
2:18:22
directions this week. Among the different directions
2:18:25
the line went up was, you know,
2:18:27
a portion of that time. Yes, yeah.
2:18:29
The only direction it hasn't gone is
2:18:31
left, I guess, which, you know, we're
2:18:33
waiting for that one. In related news,
2:18:36
a dead cat can bounce. I don't
2:18:38
know why they... picked a cat for
2:18:40
the dead animal to bounce to refer
2:18:42
to that stock market term. I think
2:18:45
this is a term that's new to
2:18:47
garrison just judging by their facial expression.
2:18:49
You don't know what that is? No.
2:18:51
So basically when when a stock price
2:18:54
for a company or whatever collapses, right,
2:18:56
there will generally be it will straight
2:18:58
a line down and then it will
2:19:00
bump back up and it will look
2:19:03
like it's rallying. But this isn't generally
2:19:05
a rally. What it is is that
2:19:07
when people like short a stock there's
2:19:09
a point at which they have to
2:19:12
like buy back the share like shares
2:19:14
and that artificially inflates it briefly before
2:19:16
it then begins to decline again so
2:19:18
it's not a real it's the result
2:19:21
of how short selling works that there
2:19:23
has to be this thing that makes
2:19:25
it temporarily look like it's rallying, but
2:19:27
that's really not what's happening. Yeah, yeah,
2:19:29
yeah. I feel like with this concept,
2:19:32
which is why- And they call it
2:19:34
a dead cat. Yeah, it's referred to
2:19:36
as a dead cat bounce, yeah. I
2:19:38
don't know why it's referred to as
2:19:41
a dead cat bounce, yeah. I don't
2:19:43
know why it's referred to as a
2:19:45
dead cat bounce, but it's, that's probably
2:19:47
why it's called that, like, like, like,
2:19:50
yeah, yeah, yeah, like, like, I've thrown
2:19:52
a lot of, I've thrown a lot
2:19:54
of corpse. Speaking of corpses, Robert, you
2:19:56
have some exciting news on the army.
2:19:59
It's pronounced coal, Garrison. Yes, yes. The
2:20:01
good news is the army is going
2:20:03
to be more lethal and efficient than
2:20:05
ever before. which President Trump announced while
2:20:08
sitting in the White House next to
2:20:10
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had
2:20:12
to take roughly at twice the length
2:20:14
of trip he normally has to take
2:20:17
to go here because so many countries
2:20:19
that he would normally fly over or
2:20:21
stop in, have arrest warrants out for
2:20:23
him for all of the war crimes.
2:20:26
But you know, it's not about the
2:20:28
journey. It's about, you know, the people
2:20:30
you journey too. And Netanyahu Yahoo met
2:20:32
with Trump, you know, someone whom he
2:20:34
clearly... feels very safe and and you
2:20:37
know I dare I say loving with
2:20:39
and the two of them shared the
2:20:41
most intimate bond that two elderly men
2:20:43
who have committed war crimes can share
2:20:46
which is announcing a record budget for
2:20:48
the United States military of one trillion
2:20:50
dollars. Well I should say Trump stated
2:20:52
it would be in the vicinity of
2:20:55
one trillion dollars. Now does that mean
2:20:57
possibly that very little is changing about
2:20:59
the military budget? Yes it does and
2:21:01
we'll get to that in a second.
2:21:04
Peg Seth, our Secretary of Defense, made
2:21:06
a post on Twitter right after, saying
2:21:08
Trump is rebuilding our military and fast.
2:21:10
He also really bragged about that trillion
2:21:13
dollar amount and said, PS, we intend
2:21:15
to spend every taxpayer dollar wisely on
2:21:17
lethality and readiness. Now, here's the thing,
2:21:19
trillion dollars, shit load of money. Current
2:21:22
amount of funding allocated to national defense
2:21:24
programs, $892 billion. So trillion dollars, about
2:21:26
a 10% bump. right for you know
2:21:28
the national defense programs but it's actually
2:21:31
unclear the way in which he phrased
2:21:33
things and the way in which we
2:21:35
like talk about the funding for national
2:21:37
security this could mean that basically the
2:21:39
military will have pretty much the same
2:21:42
you know something of an increase but
2:21:44
not a mass not really a significant
2:21:46
difference from what it has now, and
2:21:48
there will be more money into other
2:21:51
defense related programs. So this is not
2:21:53
like as massive a thing as it
2:21:55
might necessarily sound like. I think one
2:21:57
thing that's sort of significant here is
2:22:00
like how this comports with the way
2:22:02
a lot of the folks on what
2:22:04
we'll call the shithead left had talked
2:22:06
about, where there was this discussion that
2:22:09
Trump's actually going to be, you know,
2:22:11
bad for imperialism and the war machine
2:22:13
and, you know, there was even talk
2:22:15
as of a couple of months ago
2:22:18
that they were going to like half
2:22:20
the Pentagon budget and like, you know,
2:22:22
you know, all these, whatever else happens,
2:22:24
you know, it's worth it if the
2:22:27
military budget comes down and this, you
2:22:29
know, Imperial, uh, juggernaut of hell gets
2:22:31
finally neutered and just all of those
2:22:33
people are always wrong. They were always
2:22:35
going to put more money into... hands
2:22:38
of defense contractors, like anyone who knows
2:22:40
anything about these people or about how
2:22:42
Republicans have worked, knew that was going
2:22:44
to happen. There was never any chance
2:22:47
that they were going to cut the
2:22:49
actual amount of money. They're probably going
2:22:51
to cut the number of people in
2:22:53
the military because despite what Hexeth said,
2:22:56
there's a lot of evidence that a
2:22:58
shitload of this is going to go
2:23:00
towards modernization and in fact armed services,
2:23:02
each branch is being, our armed services
2:23:05
are all being asked to cut about
2:23:07
8% of their individual budgets in order
2:23:09
to put money into modernization efforts, which
2:23:11
obviously any military needs to regularly modernize
2:23:14
different systems, but This is also a
2:23:16
thing where if your country is run
2:23:18
entirely by grifters and conmen trying to
2:23:20
shotgun money to their political supporters who
2:23:23
have a lot of money in different
2:23:25
defense companies, what this means to me
2:23:27
is you are probably going to see
2:23:29
them continue to trim numbers of actual
2:23:32
troops and put more money into bullshit
2:23:34
that gets a lot of money to
2:23:36
contractors. Yeah, that's that is my expectation.
2:23:38
That is what I see happening more
2:23:40
than anything here. We'll see, but I
2:23:43
think a lot of this additional money
2:23:45
is going to go towards buying shit
2:23:47
that may or may not be useful,
2:23:49
but the primary purpose of putting the
2:23:52
money into that shit is because somebody
2:23:54
who is somebody gets a vague. Yeah,
2:23:56
I mean if we look at fascism
2:23:58
as a concept too, it kind of,
2:24:01
it has this troubled relationship with modernity,
2:24:03
but one of the things it likes
2:24:05
to do is flex its new little
2:24:07
weapon systems and toys. And we're going
2:24:10
to see some guys posing with some
2:24:12
weapon systems that probably never get used,
2:24:14
right? Like probably some AI targeting shit,
2:24:16
stuff like that. Yeah. We've got to
2:24:19
find some way to reallocate the alleged
2:24:21
150 billion dollars in doge cuts, which
2:24:23
is certainly a fake number. Absolutely a
2:24:25
fake number. We may as well send
2:24:28
over 200 billion more to the Defense
2:24:30
Department. Based on early IRS filings, there's
2:24:32
something like half a trillion dollars that
2:24:34
we might be losing in tax income
2:24:37
this year. So, you know, net, I
2:24:39
don't think we're doing great. I should
2:24:41
also note here. a big part of
2:24:43
the money that they're going to get
2:24:45
from modernization is coming from cutting 50
2:24:48
to 60,000 civilian jobs, many of whom
2:24:50
are veterans, but also just in terms
2:24:52
of like military readiness. Guys like Hexeth,
2:24:54
who's primarily a push-up dude, and people
2:24:57
who don't know anything about the military,
2:24:59
see it as like, well, you know
2:25:01
the military you just want as many
2:25:03
door kickers as you possibly can and
2:25:06
you actually need very few of those
2:25:08
guys would need a lot of is
2:25:10
guys that can move things to different
2:25:12
places and fix things when they break
2:25:15
and do a lot of the paperwork
2:25:17
that's necessary to make both of those
2:25:19
things possible which is why you need
2:25:21
those jobs and cutting a shit load
2:25:24
of them is not likely to increase
2:25:26
readiness it's also worth noting that the
2:25:28
US Army is looking at a force
2:25:30
reduction of up to 90,000 active duty
2:25:33
soldiers This is based on an article
2:25:35
from April 4th, which is a significant
2:25:37
reduction. And again, like, we're not... Is
2:25:39
that real? Yes. Why? Why are they
2:25:41
doing a 90% reduction? In part because
2:25:44
it's very hard for them to find...
2:25:46
new active duty soldiers. It is not
2:25:48
easy to get people to do this
2:25:50
and it is not the priority of
2:25:53
anybody in charge of anything to actually
2:25:55
get more soldiers. The priority is to
2:25:57
put more money into systems and AI
2:25:59
and all this shit like I don't
2:26:02
think they have a vested interest in
2:26:04
actually helping with that. How are we
2:26:06
going to take Greenland with drones? What
2:26:08
do we do it? Yeah probably. I
2:26:11
mean there's not a lot of people
2:26:13
in Greenland garrison. Excited for the naval
2:26:15
blockade of Greenland to kick off in
2:26:17
about two months. Yeah, it's gonna be
2:26:20
great. Anyway, they're gonna make, part of
2:26:22
why I think they feel confident trying
2:26:24
to make, you know, they're calling this
2:26:26
making the army smaller and more agile,
2:26:29
is because Trump is doing his best
2:26:31
to make friends with Russia and we're
2:26:33
certainly not going to whatever happens with
2:26:35
Taiwan, the US military is not gonna
2:26:38
be involved. Yeah, we ain't gonna go
2:26:40
back for them. You know, his attitude
2:26:42
is like, what do we need this
2:26:44
for? We need an agile military that
2:26:46
we can use to fuck with Greenland
2:26:49
and Panama. Like, that's what we're going
2:26:51
to be doing. Two very similar biomes
2:26:53
where like everything is very similar. Yeah.
2:26:55
And there's a lot of people like,
2:26:58
you know, the folks running Palantir who
2:27:00
have an increasing amount of say in
2:27:02
what happens to the military and, you
2:27:04
know, what Trump does who are basically
2:27:07
advocating for like, we're going to have
2:27:09
this whole kill chain automated soon. We
2:27:11
barely need people. You can't trust people.
2:27:13
You know how trustworthy your generals have
2:27:16
proved, Donald. Cool. Well, I'm excited for
2:27:18
some more Arctic Camo surplus to hit
2:27:20
the market once the Greenland situation is
2:27:22
resolved. I'm excited to be fucking around
2:27:25
wondering who a drone is going to
2:27:27
kill next. That has been a really
2:27:29
life-affirming experience for me, and I'm excited
2:27:31
to have it again soon. It's going
2:27:34
to be great. Robbie, you mentioned the
2:27:36
IRS, and IRS maybe get less money.
2:27:38
So I want to talk a little
2:27:40
bit about the IRS. I guess let's
2:27:43
start with like a little... summary of
2:27:45
this week immigration news. This week, Chair
2:27:47
Rachik, who is the person who runs
2:27:49
Lives of TikTok, joined ICE on a
2:27:51
raid. She is, shall we say, the
2:27:54
Julius Striker of our modern fashion. Yeah.
2:27:56
Yeah. I guess you're right, damn. Sorry,
2:27:58
I'm just... Yeah, no, I mean, like,
2:28:00
I wasn't joking about that. That's the
2:28:03
most direct comparison to that. Sorry, I
2:28:05
just took a moment to reflect on
2:28:07
that, and it's not a great thing
2:28:09
to reflect on. It's really not, no,
2:28:12
it doesn't make me feel good. Yeah,
2:28:14
no. Other things that make me feel
2:28:16
good are the 16 minutes report, 75%
2:28:18
of people, Cintesikot had no criminal conviction,
2:28:21
which seems to leave open the possibility
2:28:23
of the possibility of there being the
2:28:25
possibility of there being a possibility of
2:28:27
there being a crime of there being
2:28:30
a crime of there being a crime
2:28:32
of there being a crime of there
2:28:34
being a crime for which being a
2:28:36
crime for which it being a crime
2:28:39
for which it being a crime for
2:28:41
which would be a crime for which
2:28:43
it would be a crime for which
2:28:45
would be a crime for which it
2:28:47
would be a crime for which it
2:28:50
would be a crime for which it
2:28:52
would be a crime for which it
2:28:54
would be a crime for which would
2:28:56
be a crime to be sent to
2:28:59
a foreign gulag with no hope of
2:29:01
return, which I don't believe is the
2:29:03
case. I'm very disappointed at any reporting
2:29:05
which focuses on guilt as if one
2:29:08
could ever be guilty of anything which
2:29:10
would make this justifiable. You can't. The
2:29:12
government is also soliciting for proposals this
2:29:14
week to massively increase migrant detention, which
2:29:17
again is not surprising, where we talked
2:29:19
about this last November, but it's also
2:29:21
not great. But we're going to focus
2:29:23
today is on the IRS and the
2:29:26
Abrego Garcia case that we spoke about
2:29:28
last week. So you will have seen
2:29:30
some reporting that the IRS has said
2:29:32
it will hand over information of people
2:29:35
who are subject to criminal investigation to
2:29:37
DHS or ICE, right? ICE being under
2:29:39
DHS. So they say they what happened
2:29:41
here is that part of court filings
2:29:44
a memorandum of understanding between ICE and
2:29:46
the IRS was released in the MOU
2:29:48
or in the court filing actually they
2:29:50
cite an offense. of failure to depart
2:29:52
the United States after being ordered removed.
2:29:55
So essentially anyone who they're saying like
2:29:57
you have to go, right, you don't
2:29:59
look, that they could they could then
2:30:01
ask for their tax return information. Exactly
2:30:04
what the IRS will disclose to ICE
2:30:06
is covered by a big black reduction
2:30:08
in the court documents. So we don't
2:30:10
know that. The entire U.A. but like
2:30:13
there's significant reactions in it. Ice has
2:30:15
to hand, one thing that's not redacted
2:30:17
is the ice has to hand over
2:30:19
the person's name, address, and the crime
2:30:22
for which they're investigating. And it has
2:30:24
to be a non-tax crime, not that
2:30:26
that matters usually. This is more limited
2:30:28
than a lot of people have feared,
2:30:31
and it's more limited than a lot
2:30:33
of the reporting I've seen. It's possible
2:30:35
that there's something else going on. I
2:30:37
saw the acting director and Ice was
2:30:40
going to quit over this morning. But
2:30:42
the fact that they have to have
2:30:44
their address suggests that they couldn't locate
2:30:46
them using the tax return form, which
2:30:49
is a good thing, like it is
2:30:51
one less step towards fascism I guess.
2:30:53
I'm also aware of ICE having memorandums
2:30:55
of understanding with other agencies to include
2:30:57
HUD, housing and urban development. All of
2:31:00
this is going to reduce the amount
2:31:02
that migrant communities engage with the federal
2:31:04
government to any degree, right? Contrary to
2:31:06
what you might have heard... undocumented people
2:31:09
do pay their taxes. It's actually relatively
2:31:11
rare for them not to do that.
2:31:13
And this might change if the IRS
2:31:15
starts handing over people's tax return and
2:31:18
information to ICE, right? Obviously, if HUD
2:31:20
starts handing over people's information, that's going
2:31:22
to lead to people not being as
2:31:24
willing to take housing benefits and we'll
2:31:27
be planning up living on the street,
2:31:29
right? On the other hand, Houston, city
2:31:31
in Texas, for those you who aren't
2:31:33
familiar, have I pronounce that right, Robert,
2:31:36
Robert. Tehaus? Yeah. Houston. Oh, Houston. Understood.
2:31:38
It's a place we just don't go.
2:31:40
That's how I refer to Houston. Okay,
2:31:42
beautiful. So this Texas No Man's Land
2:31:45
Town has turned over information, including addresses
2:31:47
and license page, for people charged with
2:31:49
driving without a license, even though some
2:31:51
of this under Texas law is supposed
2:31:53
to remain confidential. So that's great. They're
2:31:56
also now making immigration detentions at regular
2:31:58
traffic stops. Some of where one incident
2:32:00
where a man was arrested after being
2:32:02
stopped for a cracked windscreen and he's
2:32:05
now in ice detention. So that there
2:32:07
was, I presumably an ice warrant for
2:32:09
this person, that the... Houston police then
2:32:11
acted upon. I mean, and this is,
2:32:14
this can just be racial profiling, right?
2:32:16
Like, if they could just pull someone
2:32:18
over and then send them to ice,
2:32:20
like, they're just gonna start pulling over
2:32:23
as many people that they don't want
2:32:25
to be in Houston. Yeah. Like, we
2:32:27
already know that police departments have a
2:32:29
tendency to pull over people who aren't
2:32:32
white more often, right? And then, like,
2:32:34
if you give them this. that's just
2:32:36
going to exacerbate that further. Again, it's
2:32:38
also going to stop migrant communities interacting
2:32:41
with the police in any way, right?
2:32:43
This obviously has, look, not a big
2:32:45
police fan, but like in cases like
2:32:47
domestic violence, right, sometimes people need to
2:32:50
go to the police to be safe
2:32:52
and then not going to do so
2:32:54
if they think that means they or
2:32:56
people they love will be deported. And
2:32:58
this will have negative consequences. And specifically
2:33:01
in cases like domestic violence. And we
2:33:03
know this, there is plenty of evidence
2:33:05
for this nonetheless. continuing anyway. What's also
2:33:07
continuing is our obligation to pivot to
2:33:10
at, which we should do now. Okay,
2:33:12
we are back. We're back. And it's
2:33:14
time to talk about the Supreme Court.
2:33:16
We have to. Yes we do guys
2:33:19
in because it's the biggest court, it's
2:33:21
the big one and they've been crushing
2:33:23
it all week just sending down decisions.
2:33:25
The two big ones I guess I
2:33:28
want to talk about are a 5-4
2:33:30
ruling. that it was vacating Bozberg's TRO.
2:33:32
Bozberg being the judge who had initially
2:33:34
told the United States government that had
2:33:37
to stop sending people to set court,
2:33:39
right, and then the US had ignored
2:33:41
Bozberg and done it anyway, and then
2:33:43
they had this whole case about how
2:33:46
they hadn't ignored him, and anyway, it
2:33:48
was a secret, even they were tweeting
2:33:50
it. You can go back a couple
2:33:52
of EDs and hear about that. In
2:33:55
this decision, the court was unanimous in
2:33:57
asserting that people removed under the alien
2:33:59
enemies' act do have a right to
2:34:01
due process, but... that they have to
2:34:03
bring a habeas petition. So like the
2:34:06
reason they vacated a TRO was that
2:34:08
the case shouldn't have gone to Bozburg,
2:34:10
right? That they should have bought this
2:34:12
habeas petition. In practice, that's going to
2:34:15
be very hard, given the fact that
2:34:17
many migrants, even under the current system,
2:34:19
even under Biden, most migrants who didn't
2:34:21
speak English, didn't have access to legal
2:34:24
representation. So this ruling is still pretty
2:34:26
bad. The only thing the people in
2:34:28
the court case wanted to stop was
2:34:30
their rendition to El Salvador, right. It
2:34:33
wasn't even like opposed to other forms
2:34:35
of removal, it was specific to this
2:34:37
El Salvador situation. The court also cited
2:34:39
criminal cases as precedent, which is a
2:34:42
very different thing, and it gives this
2:34:44
very narrow ruling of the due process
2:34:46
available to migrants, right? And it relies
2:34:48
on migrants having access to a legal
2:34:51
team, which could be expensive and complicated
2:34:53
for them. So this ruling allows Trump
2:34:55
administration to send people to El Salvador,
2:34:57
as long as the... have the quote
2:34:59
unquote right to due process which is
2:35:02
narrowly defined as something that not many
2:35:04
people will have access to anyway? Yes,
2:35:06
yeah, well summarized, yeah, you would need
2:35:08
to have like a lawyer on retainer
2:35:11
to file your habeas right, like straight
2:35:13
away. So if that just doesn't get
2:35:15
filed then you are basically in their
2:35:17
view for fitting your due process and
2:35:20
they can deport you anyway? Well, they
2:35:22
can deport you anyway, yeah, I guess
2:35:24
you have the right to appeal it,
2:35:26
like, like by saying like... I'm going
2:35:29
to file this habeas petition, but most
2:35:31
people aren't going to do that. So
2:35:33
in practice, they haven't explicitly ruled on
2:35:35
the secote thing, right? The Aprago-Garcia case,
2:35:38
which is the other case, a fourth
2:35:40
circuit judge required the US to return
2:35:42
Aprago-Garcia to the US, and then Chief
2:35:44
Justice Roberts, on his own, issued a
2:35:47
administrative stay. So he is effectively telling
2:35:49
them that fourth circuit judge, you can't
2:35:51
order them to have him return right
2:35:53
now. We need to take a time
2:35:56
out. We need everybody to get their
2:35:58
evidence in order and then bring that
2:36:00
to us. So that case, like, remains
2:36:02
ongoing, right? In the brief for
2:36:04
that case, the government referred to
2:36:06
Abilgo Garcia as an enemy alien,
2:36:09
but I don't think MS-13 is
2:36:11
covered by the evocation of the
2:36:13
Alien Enemies Act. I think it
2:36:15
was specific to Trin der Agua.
2:36:17
And then they also claimed that
2:36:19
they removed him under the Immigration
2:36:22
and Nationality Act, not that alien
2:36:24
enemies act. So, like... None of
2:36:26
this I guess is hugely surprising.
2:36:28
We're seeing just like sort of
2:36:30
post hoc justification of what they
2:36:32
did, right, which is kind of how they
2:36:34
operate. But that case still remains ongoing.
2:36:36
So we're still, we're still going to
2:36:38
hear that one which presumably will reflect
2:36:41
on the constitutionality of sending people to
2:36:43
Secott, but like the fact that yeah,
2:36:45
they ruled the other case, right, the
2:36:47
one that was five to four, it wasn't
2:36:49
about whether Secott was legal, it was about
2:36:52
whether Bozburg had the right to make a
2:36:54
decision on this particular case. But it's still
2:36:56
not great, like it looks like the Supreme
2:36:58
Court is doing everything it can to
2:37:00
avoid a face-to-face showdown with the executive
2:37:03
branch because they don't want to deal
2:37:05
with the consequences of ignoring them. And
2:37:07
like we said before, like maybe the
2:37:09
only court that they were listening to as
2:37:11
a Supreme Court, whether the Supreme Court doesn't
2:37:13
make them they won. So that's where we're
2:37:15
out with that we're out with that. So that.
2:37:17
Not great. Not
2:37:20
exactly great at all.
2:37:22
Oh, well, do you know
2:37:24
what is doing great
2:37:26
the economy? And for
2:37:29
more on that I
2:37:31
think it's time for
2:37:34
tariff talk with Mia
2:37:36
Wong. Wait, wait, tariff
2:37:39
talk. Yeah,
2:37:46
every day, every time we
2:37:49
do it. The only band
2:37:51
that matters is the only
2:37:53
band that matters. The narcissist
2:37:55
cookbook doing a very brief
2:37:58
refrain from rock the... as
2:38:00
far. The worst clash song.
2:38:02
By a white margin. Yeah,
2:38:04
the only clash song to
2:38:07
have been played during Operation
2:38:09
Desert Storm, which made Joe
2:38:11
Stummer cry. a real catastrophe.
2:38:14
You know what isn't a
2:38:16
catastrophe? The economy! Yeah, how's
2:38:18
it going? So I just
2:38:21
saw a wonderful chart where
2:38:23
someone was like, ah, this
2:38:25
is this is one of
2:38:28
the eight best days the
2:38:30
S&P has ever had and
2:38:32
every single other one of
2:38:35
those days is like 1929,
2:38:37
1931, 2008. Yeah. 2020! Yeah.
2:38:39
Yeah. It's so good. So,
2:38:42
all right, the tariff situation
2:38:44
as of 243 p.m. Pacific
2:38:46
time on April 9th is
2:38:49
that there is a... Fine.
2:38:51
Going good. It's gotta be
2:38:53
cool guys, don't worry about
2:38:56
it. Oh God. Okay, so
2:38:58
there there is an 125% tariff on
2:39:00
all goods from China. Is that bad?
2:39:02
You know, there's a bit that I
2:39:05
cut here. where I was going to
2:39:07
say about how like at 54% I
2:39:09
was like we've entered the part of
2:39:12
the map where it just says here
2:39:14
there be dragons at 125% there's not
2:39:16
even dragons there they didn't even think
2:39:18
to put that on the map as
2:39:21
an unknown region. Hi this is Mia
2:39:23
from the future it is now Thursday
2:39:25
one of the problems with attempting to
2:39:28
do this episode is that we are
2:39:30
learning the tariff rate from Twitter in
2:39:32
real time so it turns out that
2:39:35
the actual tariff rate on China, as
2:39:37
clarified by Donald Trump today, is 145%.
2:39:39
And also it has become clear for
2:39:42
the 25% turf tariffs on both Mexico
2:39:44
and Canada are also still in effect.
2:39:46
So, yay! In medical terms, it means
2:39:49
what happened to the global economy is
2:39:51
equivalent to you getting hit directly in
2:39:53
the spine by an F-250 going 45
2:39:56
miles an hour. That's what's happened to
2:39:58
the base of the global economy. Yes.
2:40:00
And I mean, it is very funny
2:40:03
that like a lot of people have
2:40:05
been focusing on the bond stuff because
2:40:07
you can just look at the tariff
2:40:09
numbers and it's like, like, yeah, okay,
2:40:12
seeing a 125% tariff on all goods
2:40:14
from China and then looking at the
2:40:16
bond markets to figure out if that's
2:40:19
bad or not is like walking outside
2:40:21
into a blizzard and being like, whoop,
2:40:23
I need the weather around to tell
2:40:26
me if it's snowing here. The reason
2:40:28
I'll explain, like briefly, Treasury bonds are
2:40:30
the underpinning of every country, the entire
2:40:33
global economy, every single country has a
2:40:35
shitload of money in US Treasury bonds,
2:40:37
because they are the most reliable thing.
2:40:40
And what a Treasury bond is, is
2:40:42
you give money to the US government,
2:40:44
and they say in a period of
2:40:47
time you can take this out, and
2:40:49
it will have grown by a set
2:40:51
percentage. Because... Treasury bonds have been for
2:40:54
the last basically a century so incredibly
2:40:56
stable. This is where you put your
2:40:58
money that you don't want to gamble.
2:41:00
So you have, you know, money that
2:41:03
is in stocks and stuff that can
2:41:05
go up and down, but you also
2:41:07
head your bets by having a bunch
2:41:10
of this. And, you know, generally Treasury
2:41:12
bonds are hopefully enough to about keep
2:41:14
pace with inflation or beat it by
2:41:17
a little bit, but usually the rate
2:41:19
is not all that high because there's
2:41:21
a shit load of demand. People are
2:41:24
always buying Treasury bonds. when the treasury
2:41:26
bond rate, which is the percentage you
2:41:28
get back raises, that may look good,
2:41:31
right? They're like, wow, you get 5%
2:41:33
now on if you put money into
2:41:35
a 30-year T bond. But what that
2:41:38
means is that everyone is selling their
2:41:40
treasury bonds. So demand is down and
2:41:42
the rate is higher and everyone is
2:41:45
selling them because entire countries at a
2:41:47
time are pulling their money out of
2:41:49
the US economy. It's great. Yeah, and
2:41:52
we are going to get more into
2:41:54
how the Trump... wants to fuck with
2:41:56
that later. But first off, programming note,
2:41:58
programming note, I am going to be
2:42:01
from this episode forward referring to all
2:42:03
of these as the turf tariffs because,
2:42:05
fuck them, and because these tariffs are
2:42:08
in a large part also about a
2:42:10
bunch of really weird fucking masculinity bullshit,
2:42:12
so... God, excited for that. Yeah, and
2:42:15
when you make most of your election
2:42:17
ads being about trans people... And then
2:42:19
the economy goes to the toilet. This
2:42:22
is what was voted for. Like if
2:42:24
you want a transphobia, this is what
2:42:26
you wanted. You wanted to lose your
2:42:29
job. You wanted everyone to lose their
2:42:31
fucking homes. Speaking of T-bonds, am I
2:42:33
right? Let's skip over that immediately. No,
2:42:36
no, I don't know. No, no. No
2:42:38
one laughs at him. I'm going to
2:42:40
go away. Okay, okay. So the most,
2:42:43
the most chaotic thing happening happening here
2:42:45
other than Robert randomly saying things is
2:42:47
that. Nobody knows what the tariff situation
2:42:49
is going to be. Just even just
2:42:52
on Friday when you're listening to this.
2:42:54
Right? No. Like the time you're listening
2:42:56
to this, there could be 200% tariffs
2:42:59
on Indonesia. There could be 4,000% terrorists
2:43:01
on Vietnam. We don't know. No, Trump
2:43:03
could have dissolved the US dollar and
2:43:06
we're all using the fucking decan or
2:43:08
whatever. Like I don't know. I don't
2:43:10
know. Yeah. You know, so it's all
2:43:13
really unstable. We can talk about the
2:43:15
other things that are still in effect.
2:43:17
So there's a general 10% tariff on
2:43:20
all countries, except for China, are just
2:43:22
supposed to have a general 10% tariff.
2:43:24
There's also the per Megan Cassella, as
2:43:27
a CNBC reporter. There are 25% tariffs
2:43:29
on steel, aluminum, and cars. There's... probably
2:43:31
going to be more, he keeps talking
2:43:34
about more tariffs and it's like who
2:43:36
knows where they're going to happen, like
2:43:38
maybe pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, but the liberation day
2:43:41
tariffs, tariff tariffs are currently on hold.
2:43:43
For 90 days, at least as of
2:43:45
right now. Yeah, yeah. And the quote-unquote
2:43:47
reciprocal tariffs have been low. to 10%
2:43:50
for me at least it's unclear as
2:43:52
of recording on Wednesday. Trump said that
2:43:54
this is a fact, this is in
2:43:57
effect immediately. It's unclear if those 10%
2:43:59
tariffs are also on hold for 90
2:44:01
days. No, I think the 10% ones
2:44:04
are in effect right now, but it's
2:44:06
really hard to tell because he's just
2:44:08
saying shit. Yes, it's very hard to
2:44:11
tell, which is. He ain't saying it.
2:44:13
He's truthing it. He's true social. Yeah,
2:44:15
so okay, and one of the things
2:44:18
that's been happening with the turf tariffs
2:44:20
is that like, the media is just
2:44:22
reporting things as true that are just
2:44:25
clearly obviously a lie. So one of
2:44:27
the ones that's been going around, that's
2:44:29
been going around, and that the media
2:44:32
is reporting that Trump has said, is
2:44:34
that he's going to pause tariffs on
2:44:36
countries that don't retaliate, except we know
2:44:38
that's a lie because the EU already
2:44:41
imposed retaliatory tariffs, right, is like already
2:44:43
down to 10% just like everyone else.
2:44:45
So we know that Trump is lying
2:44:48
about his rationale for the rollback of
2:44:50
the turf tariffs, right? And every single
2:44:52
fucking media outlet is still just reporting
2:44:55
it because nobody fucking knows how to
2:44:57
do fucking reporting anymore. We should move
2:44:59
to what this is going to do
2:45:02
to the supply chain and to put
2:45:04
this in perspective. When I learned about
2:45:06
the 104% tariff on China, that was
2:45:09
before it was 125% where it's at
2:45:11
now. I was writing an episode called
2:45:13
The Old Economy is Dead, which will
2:45:16
probably be still be coming out on
2:45:18
Monday. Again, that was the 54% rate.
2:45:20
I was writing a thing called The
2:45:23
Old Economy is Dead at 104% like...
2:45:25
things are going to break in the
2:45:27
supply chain that only seven people on
2:45:30
earth have ever heard of before like
2:45:32
entire sectors of the economy are going
2:45:34
to be annihilated we're going to see
2:45:36
right now we're probably going to see
2:45:39
everyone attempt to root like all shipping
2:45:41
from China there's there's going to be
2:45:43
a massive effort to try to reboot
2:45:46
it through like literally any other country
2:45:48
but again that's only a solution for
2:45:50
like you know 90 days. And again,
2:45:53
it's not even clear that that can
2:45:55
work. I mean, I'm already seeing a
2:45:57
bunch of reports of small businesses being
2:46:00
like, yeah, we're fucked because, and that
2:46:02
was at the 54% tariffs, and at
2:46:04
125% entire industries are non-viable. Now, it's
2:46:07
maybe possible that if it was just
2:46:09
these tariffs and all Chinese shipping was
2:46:11
able to be routed through some other
2:46:14
country, maybe... we would only have a
2:46:16
regular economic collapse like a like you
2:46:18
know like an early 2000s tech bubble
2:46:21
collapse and not like a 2008 one
2:46:23
but again that's assuming that no more
2:46:25
or more tariffs go into effect now
2:46:27
the problem is that we went through
2:46:30
this with the 90-day pauses on the
2:46:32
Mexican tariffs and the Canadian tariffs and
2:46:34
then after 90 days everyone assumed that
2:46:37
they weren't going to go to effect
2:46:39
again they just went into effect so
2:46:41
The odds are that the absolutely catastrophic
2:46:44
turf tariffs from like liberation day are
2:46:46
going to go into effect. Like in
2:46:48
about 90 days, right? That's probably what's
2:46:51
going to happen. There's probably going to
2:46:53
be some attempts to negotiate them down,
2:46:55
but like again, those absolutely catastrophic tariffs,
2:46:58
which are going to just fucking annihilate
2:47:00
the entire world economy, are probably going
2:47:02
to go into effect. And you know,
2:47:05
part of what's happening here, right, is
2:47:07
that... So the markets are doing this,
2:47:09
they're like dead cap bounds, right. And
2:47:12
a lot of this is because they
2:47:14
haven't because they haven't actually... stop to
2:47:16
think about like how much American manufacturing
2:47:18
and contrary every argument everyone is making
2:47:21
about this. There is actually a lot
2:47:23
of manufacturing still in the US but
2:47:25
all of it relies on Chinese imports
2:47:28
and various stages of infiduous stage of
2:47:30
production and they're fucked. And I haven't
2:47:32
even mentioned yet, by the way, the
2:47:35
sort of capstone to all of this
2:47:37
is that China is doing an 84%
2:47:39
retaliatory tariff on all American goods, which
2:47:42
is going to just fuck massive portions
2:47:44
of American agriculture. We've talked a lot
2:47:46
on the show about soybean exports. It's
2:47:49
going to be absolutely catastrophic. We're going
2:47:51
to go more into this on Monday.
2:47:53
But the thing that's clear from this
2:47:56
is that these people... don't see the
2:47:58
economy as real in the way that
2:48:00
you and I do, right? They simply
2:48:03
don't. We look at the economy as
2:48:05
something where we have to have a
2:48:07
fucking job so we can go to
2:48:10
work, so we can come home and
2:48:12
buy food for families and pay our
2:48:14
rent, and they think it's a fucking
2:48:16
joke, right? They think it's a fucking
2:48:19
masculinity signifier, and they think it's like
2:48:21
they look at tariff rates and they
2:48:23
go, this is just a number on
2:48:26
a fucking page, and that's why the
2:48:28
tariff rate, is now, and that's why
2:48:30
the tariff rate, Now, do you know
2:48:33
what is real? No. I... The products
2:48:35
and services? Let's support this. Yes, yes,
2:48:37
yes, yep, yep. We
2:48:50
are back. Now, okay, one of
2:48:52
the things that I've been seeing
2:48:54
a lot of is there are
2:48:56
a lot of arguments about whether
2:48:58
there is some kind of plan
2:49:01
here. Trump has claimed that he
2:49:03
was going to roll back the
2:49:05
terrace all along. And no, he
2:49:07
wasn't. Just, no, he's just going
2:49:09
by the seat of his pants.
2:49:11
And I can prove that there
2:49:13
is no plan here. By moving
2:49:15
on to the second thing that
2:49:17
I want to talk about here,
2:49:19
which is a speech given by
2:49:21
Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Steve
2:49:23
Mirren at the Hudson Institute, so
2:49:25
this is again, the Council of
2:49:27
Economic Advisers is a federal agency
2:49:30
that is like their job is
2:49:32
to provide economic advice to the
2:49:34
president, right? And their chair gave
2:49:36
a speech where he argues, and
2:49:38
this is something that like, I...
2:49:40
Jesus fucking Christ we were talking
2:49:42
about okay the fact that every
2:49:44
fucking country on earth has US
2:49:46
treasury bonds We're talking about this
2:49:48
earlier right the status of the
2:49:50
US dollar as the global reserve
2:49:52
currency This guy is arguing that
2:49:54
that is actually a public good
2:49:57
that other countries should pay us
2:49:59
for He wants to force countries
2:50:01
to fucking pay taxes to the
2:50:03
United States for holding US Treasury
2:50:05
bonds. And again, if any nation
2:50:07
on earth could pay to have
2:50:09
their currency be the global reserve
2:50:11
currency, there's no amount they wouldn't
2:50:13
pay. Like, the degree to which
2:50:15
this benefits you is ridiculous. Like
2:50:17
the fact that you want to
2:50:19
charge other people for it is
2:50:21
nice. It is like, look, how
2:50:24
this like actually works, right? Is
2:50:26
that every single other country on
2:50:28
earth is forced to buy American
2:50:30
debt? which is what a bond
2:50:32
is, right? Yeah. And this allows
2:50:34
the US to carry out even
2:50:36
more spending without inflationary effects. Every
2:50:38
single other country... Everything is based
2:50:40
on this. Yes, it's all forced
2:50:42
on like other countries having to
2:50:44
stockpile US dollars. Like the literally
2:50:46
the entire global economy, the US
2:50:48
has advantages in the entire global
2:50:51
economy is that every single other
2:50:53
fucking country on earth needs US
2:50:55
dollars. Part of this is to
2:50:57
buy oil and part of this
2:50:59
is again because the dollar is
2:51:01
the fucking reserve currency it's the
2:51:03
currency that fucking trade is done
2:51:05
in and the asset that you
2:51:07
hold. Is, is, like, is the
2:51:09
fucking US bond? The anthropologist David
2:51:11
Graber called this in his book,
2:51:13
Debt, the first 5,000 years, a
2:51:15
tribute system, that, again, every country
2:51:17
in the world is forced up
2:51:20
by US bonds, the US government
2:51:22
has just, like, fairly explicitly, like,
2:51:24
the Reagan administration does this other
2:51:26
times, like, has just fairly explicitly
2:51:28
leaned on countries and been like
2:51:30
you're buying a fucking bunch of
2:51:32
US bonds now, right? Like, this
2:51:34
is, this system, the status of
2:51:36
the dollar of the world reserve
2:51:38
reserve currency. is the entire lattice
2:51:40
that supports and spreads the American
2:51:42
Empire. And these fucking clowns want
2:51:44
people to pay taxes on the
2:51:47
tribute that they are paying to
2:51:49
us. This is not Donald Trump,
2:51:51
but Elon Musk, right? This is
2:51:53
the guy, these people brought in
2:51:55
to be their economist, to do
2:51:57
economic policy. Yeah. There is no
2:51:59
limit. to their stupidity. There is
2:52:01
no rock of sanity upon which
2:52:03
the tide of madness will crash.
2:52:05
Absolutely not. We have seen so...
2:52:07
is just a prelude to an
2:52:09
infinite abyss of stupidity so mind-numbingly
2:52:11
incomprehensible it will shatter our minds
2:52:14
like a snowflake at a hurricane
2:52:16
you can no longer think to
2:52:18
yourself they cannot possibly be this
2:52:20
stupid they are thinking thoughts even
2:52:22
gods could not comprehend they are
2:52:24
attempting to drain the sea by
2:52:26
shouting at the moon. They are
2:52:28
trying to wipe their ass with
2:52:30
pine cones. There is no five-dimensional
2:52:32
plan here. There is not even
2:52:34
a man behind the fucking curtain.
2:52:36
There was only an infinite sea
2:52:38
of cruelty, malice, and stupidity, trying
2:52:41
to drown us all for the
2:52:43
crime of attempting to exist in
2:52:45
the world we were born in.
2:52:47
The reality of the men who
2:52:49
ruled the American Empire. is this,
2:52:51
it is so terrifying that everyone
2:52:53
from the most powerful CEOs on
2:52:55
the planet to the fucking day
2:52:57
traders running the stock markets to
2:52:59
broke left the shit posters, recoil
2:53:01
in horror, and try to construct
2:53:03
meaning, and some kind of like,
2:53:05
anything, any kind of strategy, any
2:53:07
kind of strategic reason why anyone
2:53:10
could possibly be doing this. Because
2:53:12
the existence of a plan, literally
2:53:14
any plan, no matter how evil
2:53:16
it is, is preferable to this,
2:53:18
which is that the largest economy...
2:53:20
In the world, the most powerful
2:53:22
empire the world has ever seen
2:53:24
is being run by the dumbest
2:53:26
people who have ever fucking lived.
2:53:28
And they are doing this because
2:53:30
they are evil and they're stupid.
2:53:32
Yes. Yes. There's absolutely like, yeah,
2:53:34
no, nothing else to say really.
2:53:37
I think one of the things
2:53:39
that is underpinning this, which you
2:53:41
can like pick up on if
2:53:43
you are cursed enough to listen
2:53:45
to enough of these speeches and
2:53:47
enough of their... of their talking
2:53:49
heads and podcasts is like this
2:53:51
reoccurring trend in which these people
2:53:53
really need to be victims in
2:53:55
order to in order to politically
2:53:57
succeed which is an accusation that's
2:53:59
usually thrown against you know woke
2:54:01
SDW's but like before the election
2:54:04
right it was this idea that
2:54:06
that because because of the dem
2:54:08
corrupt elite establishment you know everyday
2:54:10
Americans are victims of this of
2:54:12
this hidden cabal of Democrats that
2:54:14
are ruining everything. But now that
2:54:16
these people are in charge of
2:54:18
the United States, the people who
2:54:20
are victimizing us is just the
2:54:22
entire world, right? The entire world
2:54:24
is ripping off the United States
2:54:26
by using our dollar, by doing
2:54:28
trade with us. They are somehow
2:54:31
ripping us off. Like we are
2:54:33
the victims of this global scheme,
2:54:35
and it's hurting you at the
2:54:37
average blue-collar worker. and it's making
2:54:39
women adopt managerial positions, and this
2:54:41
is what's actually is the core
2:54:43
of your oppression. And even when
2:54:45
they win, even when they control
2:54:47
the country, they can't let go
2:54:49
of this victim's status. They have
2:54:51
to have someone ripping them off
2:54:53
in order to justify them doing
2:54:55
just incomprehensible stupid power grabs. And
2:54:57
it is very much linked to
2:55:00
like this like masculine signifier. It's
2:55:02
very odd, like the way that
2:55:04
people are trying to justify losing
2:55:06
so much money in the stock
2:55:08
market is by reposting a clip
2:55:10
of some like Australian women. Dancing
2:55:12
on... Dancing on... Dancing on... Dancing
2:55:14
on Tiktok in like an office
2:55:16
building and they're like, well, you
2:55:18
know, tariffs are much better than
2:55:20
having to deal with women in
2:55:22
the office. Am I right, fellows?
2:55:24
Women having a joke. This is
2:55:27
how this is how they justify
2:55:29
it. At least we don't have
2:55:31
woke. It's worth it. to not
2:55:33
be able to afford food if
2:55:35
the woke is gone. The global
2:55:37
long house. Yeah, that's a deep
2:55:39
cut there. Long house is burnt
2:55:41
down. Sure, because the long house
2:55:43
is burnt down, we're now exposed
2:55:45
to the elements and all of
2:55:47
our food stores are gone and
2:55:49
it's about to snow 18 feet.
2:55:51
Yeah. But at least the long
2:55:54
house that's gone. Yeah, the long
2:55:56
house with your they, them, nephew.
2:55:58
it's a correct non-binary appellation. In
2:56:00
other news, last week, President Trump
2:56:02
said that he would be, quote,
2:56:04
unquote, honored for the president of
2:56:06
El Salvador to take U.S. citizens,
2:56:08
which he calls American grown and
2:56:10
born criminals, and put them into
2:56:12
CCOT, the Terrorism Confignment Center, which
2:56:14
is essentially a prison work camp.
2:56:16
Yep. No one gets released from.
2:56:18
Yeah. Trump said, quote, why should
2:56:21
it stop just at people that
2:56:23
cross the border illegally? Unquote. shouldn't
2:56:25
stop there. It shouldn't be there
2:56:27
at all and as James already
2:56:29
mentioned 75% of the immigrant's sentencing
2:56:31
caught don't have a criminal conviction.
2:56:33
These people are not criminals. Now
2:56:35
a few days later the White
2:56:37
House Press Secretary reiterated that this
2:56:39
is something that Trump is seriously
2:56:41
discussing both publicly and privately. So
2:56:43
the president has discussed this idea
2:56:45
quite a few times publicly. He's
2:56:47
also discussed it privately. You're referring
2:56:50
to the president's idea for American
2:56:52
citizens to potentially be deported. These
2:56:54
would be heinous violent criminals who
2:56:56
have broken our nation's laws repeatedly.
2:56:58
And these are violent repeat offenders
2:57:00
in American streets. The president has
2:57:02
said if it's legal, right? If
2:57:04
there is a legal pathway to
2:57:06
do that, he's not sure. We
2:57:08
are not sure if there is.
2:57:10
It's an idea that he has
2:57:12
simply floated in. has discussed very
2:57:14
publicly as in the effort of
2:57:17
transparency. Now one of the last
2:57:19
things we're going to discuss is
2:57:21
an update on DHS and ICE
2:57:23
efforts to deport students across the
2:57:25
country. Me and James did an
2:57:27
episode last week, which is still
2:57:29
pretty relevant, but all of the
2:57:31
numbers have increased dramatically since that
2:57:33
episode. As of Tuesday night, April
2:57:35
8th. 92 student visas have been
2:57:37
revoked at California universities, 50 at
2:57:39
U.C. campuses, and 36 at California
2:57:41
State University campuses, with six more
2:57:44
at Stanford. Also, as of April
2:57:46
8th, 50 student visas have been
2:57:48
revoked at Arizona State University, with
2:57:50
multiple students now in ICE detention.
2:57:52
Lawyers for these students believe that
2:57:54
upwards of a thousand visas have
2:57:56
been revoked across the country. A
2:57:58
map on Inside Higher ed.com shows
2:58:00
for... 119 confirmed instances of student
2:58:02
visas or in some cases green
2:58:04
cards being revoked by Secretary of
2:58:06
State Mark Rubio across 34 states.
2:58:08
And as of Wednesday, April 9th,
2:58:11
visas for 18 international students have
2:58:13
been revoked at the University of
2:58:15
Utah. These students and recent graduates
2:58:17
received letters from the Trump administration
2:58:19
instructing them to quote unquote self-deport
2:58:21
immediately. At Utah State University, more
2:58:23
than 30 students have been impacted
2:58:25
according to the university administration. Yeah,
2:58:27
I'm aware of at least one
2:58:29
UCSC student who was detained at
2:58:31
the border and immediately deported. I'm
2:58:33
also aware that UCOP, UC Office
2:58:35
of the President, right, made a
2:58:37
statement about the impact of service
2:58:40
terminations across its campuses. But the
2:58:42
UCSD Guardian, in a dub for
2:58:44
student journalism, reported that UCSD convened
2:58:46
an emergency meeting before this of
2:58:48
faculty, and it knew about the
2:58:50
revocations or the service changes, right?
2:58:52
the revocation of their student status.
2:58:54
And it was reluctant to act
2:58:56
because it hadn't received guidance from
2:58:58
UCOP yet. So we're seeing this
2:59:00
from a lot of university, like
2:59:02
administrations, right? They don't know how
2:59:04
to respond. I did see that
2:59:07
the University of Arizona was helping
2:59:09
fund some of the legal fees
2:59:11
of their students, which is more
2:59:13
than many universities are doing. As
2:59:15
of now, there seems to be
2:59:17
no patent of prior arrest for
2:59:19
the people who have had their
2:59:21
status changed. But in some cases
2:59:23
it seems that in some university
2:59:25
systems all of the people who
2:59:27
have lost their status are either
2:59:29
Chinese, India, nor from majority Muslim
2:59:31
countries. One other thing I want
2:59:34
to close out this episode on,
2:59:36
so we have an episode out
2:59:38
about this already, but one of
2:59:40
the things that ICE has been
2:59:42
doing has been targeting migrant farm
2:59:44
worker labor organizers. They have... I
2:59:46
mean, basically just kidnapped, like, just
2:59:48
straight up broke this guy's window
2:59:50
in his car and dragged him
2:59:52
out. A guy named Alfredo Quares,
2:59:54
he's known as Lalo. He's an
2:59:56
organizer for Famillas Unidas for Lejusticia
2:59:58
in Washington.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More