It Could Happen Here Weekly 177

It Could Happen Here Weekly 177

Released Saturday, 12th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
It Could Happen Here Weekly 177

It Could Happen Here Weekly 177

It Could Happen Here Weekly 177

It Could Happen Here Weekly 177

Saturday, 12th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This is moment. Your

0:02

time to shine. Your comeback.

0:04

You're ready for the next

0:06

step in your career and

0:08

you want an education employer's

0:11

respect. So you're not just

0:13

going back to school. You're

0:15

coming back with Purdue Global.

0:18

Backed by Purdue University, one

0:20

of the nation's most respected

0:22

public universities. Purdue Global is

0:24

built for people who bring

0:27

their life experience into the

0:29

online classroom. Purdue Global. your comeback today

0:31

at Purdue Global.EDU. Hey kids, it's

0:33

me Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith! And it's me,

0:35

Harley Quinn Smith. That's my daughter, man, who my

0:37

wife has always said is just a beardless, deekless version

0:39

of me. And that's the name of our podcast. Beardless-less-less-less

0:41

me. I'm the old one. I'm the young one. And

0:44

every week we try to make, and every week we

0:46

try to make, I'm the old one. I'm the young

0:48

one. And every week we try to make, we try

0:50

to make, and every week, we try to make, we try

0:52

to make, we try to make, we try to make, we try to

0:54

make, and every week, we try to make, we try to make, we

0:56

try to make, we try to make, we try to make, we try

0:58

to make, we try to make, we try to make, we try to

1:00

make, we try to make, we make, we make, we make, we make,

1:02

we make, we make, we make, we The

1:05

first night I came over here. How goes lower?

1:08

From Blumhouse TV, I-Hart podcast, and

1:10

Ember 20 comes in all new

1:12

fictional comedy podcast series. Join the

1:14

flighty, Damien Hearst as he unravels

1:16

the mystery of his vanished boyfriend.

1:18

I've been spending all my time

1:20

looking for answers about what happened

1:22

to Santee. And what's the way

1:25

to find a missing person? Sleep

1:27

with everyone he knew, obviously. Listen

1:29

to the hookup on the I-Hart

1:31

radio app, Apple podcast, or wherever

1:33

you listen to your favorite shows. Military

1:36

veterans and active duty service

1:38

members. You could become a

1:40

certified cyber warrior with just

1:42

12 weeks of training at

1:44

my computer career. Cybersecurity specialists

1:46

are in high demand. And

1:48

IT pros with these skills

1:50

often enjoy abundant opportunity and

1:52

a great lifestyle. Protect our

1:54

people, liberty, and treasured institutions

1:57

from cyber threats. Skillbridge and

1:59

other VA benefits are available

2:01

to those who qualify. Learn

2:03

more at my computercareer.EDU slash

2:05

CWP. to let you know

2:07

this is a compilation episode. So every

2:09

episode of the week that just

2:11

happened is here in one convenient

2:13

and with somewhat less ads package

2:15

for you to listen to in

2:17

a long stretch if you want.

2:19

If you've been listening to the

2:22

episodes every day this week, there's

2:24

going to be nothing new here

2:26

for you, but you can make

2:28

your own decisions. Welcome

2:31

to It Could Happen Here. It

2:33

is continuing to happen. Staunks. But

2:35

we will discuss Staunks probably later

2:37

this week. This episode's going to

2:39

be much more fun because I

2:42

am, I am pleased to have

2:44

returning to the show, Ellie Ehrman,

2:46

writer, comedian and creator, and host

2:48

of Going Down, with Ellie Ehrman,

2:50

a trans political comedy news show,

2:52

as well as joining us here,

2:55

is Teen Vogue's News and

2:57

Politics and Politics Editor-Mc Miniman

2:59

Welcome, both of you. Hi.

3:01

Hi, thanks. So we're going to

3:04

be talking about the recent Teen

3:06

Vogue special issue cover story on

3:08

Vivian Wilson, the estranged daughter of

3:11

Elon Musk. Ella, you put together

3:13

a fantastic piece last month and

3:15

this is what we're going to

3:17

discuss, how this article came

3:20

together, that viral photo shoot

3:22

in Japan, which is fantastic.

3:24

All the styling in that

3:26

shoot was lovely. But... I think

3:28

this particular piece was really relevant

3:31

for like trans people and also

3:33

relevant because of the way like

3:35

global politics has been shaken

3:38

up by a few specific people and

3:40

focusing in on Vivian I think was

3:42

really special. So I guess I would

3:44

first like to hear about like yeah

3:47

like the broad strokes of how

3:49

this first came together. From our

3:51

perspective, you know, I don't know that

3:54

like everyone is aware of this and

3:56

certainly I don't know that. all of

3:58

my friends in our various trans

4:00

cultures know this, but at team vote we've been

4:02

covering like trans politics and trans rights for a

4:05

long time, like far before I got here, but

4:07

I've been here for almost four years and it's

4:09

been a pretty big part of my beat in

4:11

part because of it being like a very unavoidable.

4:14

thing within like US state legislatures and

4:16

then obviously like a federal level which

4:18

has only intensified more and more in

4:20

the last year. And so that's like

4:22

one aspect of it but at the

4:24

same time we love young people that

4:26

shit post and so Vivian had been

4:28

on our radar for a while. Totally.

4:30

I also think people are maybe more

4:32

aware of this whole like comrade teen

4:35

vogue vibe of like we're really interested

4:37

in talking to people that have a

4:39

clear political leaning that have like a

4:41

sense of how they see themselves in

4:43

the world in a political context and

4:45

Vivian sort of came right out the

4:47

gate as someone who was really eager

4:50

to share her thoughts on these things.

4:52

So from last summer like within like

4:54

a month of when Vivian was kind

4:56

of introduced to the world through her

4:58

father talking about her on Jordan Peterson's podcast.

5:01

We were trying to get in touch with

5:03

her and it was something I was talking

5:05

a lot about within the office and we

5:07

didn't really know what to do because she

5:09

was just kind of she just kind

5:12

of emerged from nowhere onto the internet

5:14

and so I had been talking about

5:16

it a lot including with Ella because

5:18

we talk a lot and so

5:20

Ella eventually revealed like Oh, that's

5:22

oomphie. I am usual with him.

5:24

Not oomphie. You, you did kind,

5:26

I mean, are you threads oomphies?

5:29

What, what are you, oomphies? On

5:31

Instagram. Instagram, nice. I would never use

5:33

threads, my God. So over to you, that's

5:35

my, that's my teen vogue intro, but

5:37

Ella, if you wanna. Yeah. No, because

5:39

yeah, I, I have, I, I

5:41

have just, just, in contacting Vivi,

5:43

Vivi, Vivian, Like an unhinged number

5:46

of media requests starting last summer.

5:48

Yeah, that's that's true. Right. So

5:50

she did that one NBC interview

5:52

after after Elon went on Peterson.

5:54

And I do not work at Teen

5:57

Vogue, but Lex and I know each

5:59

other because your country actually obligated to

6:01

know everyone else who's part of the

6:03

you know deep state Illuminati doing

6:05

trans politics online club yeah I

6:07

was just gonna say trans people club

6:10

the pronoun the deep state yeah

6:12

the pronoun council exactly we're all

6:14

established members right we swear allegiance

6:16

once a year there's a whole

6:18

ritual don't don't worry about it so what

6:20

I got in touch with Vivian last

6:22

fall which I got in touch with her initially

6:24

to see if she would come on going down

6:26

and I reached out to her and I said

6:28

you want to come on my live comedy show

6:31

and she said no I'm actually not

6:33

sure live comedy is for me I'm

6:35

a little worried I'm not funny enough

6:37

and since then she has changed her

6:39

mind she's told me repeatedly that

6:41

she was saying that to me

6:43

that she has decided she actually

6:45

is funnier than everyone else alive

6:48

all of the things that a

6:50

prolific 20 year old poster might

6:52

say absolutely but so I got

6:54

in touch with her and then she

6:56

said no and I was like okay

6:58

Well, at least I have this mutual

7:00

now. And then a few months later,

7:02

I mentioned to Lex that I got

7:04

in touch with her and Lex said,

7:06

okay, so she doesn't want to

7:08

do a live comedy show that

7:10

nobody knows about. What if instead

7:12

we did a really fancy photo

7:14

shoot and put her in Teen

7:16

Vogue a legacy journalism magazine and

7:18

I said, honestly, I think that's

7:20

a better sales pitch. And it

7:23

was. Yeah, no, it is really compelling. I

7:25

mean, the photo shoot pulls a whole bunch

7:27

of people in. It's certainly, if I

7:29

was in Vivian's position, that would be

7:31

interesting to me. And it does help

7:33

spread around, like, so much of the

7:35

piece is talking about, like, the struggles

7:37

of living as a young trans

7:40

person in America and the fact that

7:42

you can use a teen-vogue photo shoot to,

7:44

like, spread writing about that around the internet.

7:46

It's like super, super useful. Yeah, I mean,

7:48

I just want to like second what Lex

7:51

has been saying. I think the work Teen

7:53

Vogue has been doing is really important. Like,

7:55

so many, I mean, Garrison, you know, like

7:57

so much trans media is like independently distributed.

8:00

and like DIY. And I love us

8:02

for that, but it is always really

8:04

heartening to see like mainstream media institutions

8:06

uplift trans voices the way Teen Gog

8:08

has been doing. And it's also like

8:11

Conde Nast as an institution which is

8:13

like Teen Vokes Parent Company is only

8:15

one of multiple media conglomerates that will

8:17

very proudly like use trans people in

8:19

a representative way like and like sell

8:22

magazine covers with trans people on it

8:24

like you could think of Hunter Schaefer

8:26

for example she's been on the cover

8:28

of several vokes but at the same

8:30

time Hunter Schaefer also received a misgendering

8:33

passport after the Trump admin so like

8:35

I think that if legacy media is

8:37

unwilling to connect the dots between profiting

8:39

off of like the aesthetics of trans

8:42

people but not actually. like talking about

8:44

the political underpinnings of like why trans

8:46

people are even able to be visible

8:48

at this time and like what the

8:50

you know trap doors turmoil calls it

8:53

of the transvisibility means then it's like

8:55

why even do this work in the

8:57

first place so Vivian was like a

8:59

really great opportunity for us to like

9:01

build on like we've done several photo

9:04

shoots particularly with trans women because I

9:06

in trans girls at Teen Vogue because

9:08

we like feel very strongly and Ella

9:10

makes this point in the piece that

9:13

like the way that trans them people

9:15

are like objectified and commodified and commodified

9:17

and commodified and of such extreme vitriol

9:19

is something it feels really important to

9:21

take a stand against. It just felt

9:24

like doing this with Vivian who's so

9:26

high profile, but also hadn't had the

9:28

opportunity yet to take control of her

9:30

own narrative in the public eye and

9:32

with this being her second ever interview

9:35

first ever photo shoot, like it just

9:37

felt like a really big opportunity that

9:39

was worth using as a big swing,

9:41

you know? No, like she is at

9:44

like the center of this like matrix

9:46

of trans commodification in so many ways.

9:48

was really like framed as the subject

9:50

matter of like any piece and like

9:52

framed as her own person for the

9:55

entirety of her adult life she's been

9:57

used as this rhetorical object like both

9:59

by her dad but as well as

10:01

like by people on the left who's

10:03

like objectified Vivian to use her as

10:06

a bludgeon against her father. And yeah,

10:08

like people are very willing to like

10:10

commodify or use use trans people in

10:12

certain ways, but to have like trans

10:15

people writing about other trans people in

10:17

a way that frames them as a

10:19

subject matter is so important. Yeah, I

10:21

mean, I think Vivian, one of the

10:23

things that drew me to the story

10:26

in the first place is that Vivian's

10:28

sort of case is such an interesting

10:30

microcosm of the transome experience as a

10:32

whole. Yeah. incredibly talked about for something

10:34

that is not her fault and not

10:37

under her control at all in the

10:39

same way that right now on the

10:41

national stage like trans femininity and transness

10:43

at large but specifically trans femininity is

10:46

the like problem to be spoken about

10:48

by especially conservative like butler calls it

10:50

a phantasm that like gender nonsense I

10:52

read that book you have my copy

10:54

I said I'm almost certain I do.

10:57

That makes sense. Yeah, that makes sense.

10:59

Almost certainly. That's the trouble with gender,

11:01

right? Gender trouble, yeah. No, no, that's

11:03

the original book. It's who's afraid of

11:05

gender. It's who's afraid of gender. Thank

11:08

you very much. I have your book,

11:10

but I haven't looked at it. In

11:12

a long time, except for to remember

11:14

the word phantasm. And so yeah, I

11:17

totally agree with what like said of,

11:19

it's really exciting moments in the piece

11:21

to me is, the moment where I

11:23

ask her about sort of the allegations

11:25

that Elon like shifted right word because

11:28

of her and she pushes back against

11:30

sort of that narrative very strongly and

11:32

I think that is the way we've

11:34

seen her being used both on the

11:36

left and the right as sort of

11:39

a this is why he's doing this

11:41

it's clearly the fact that he has

11:43

this 20 year old trans girl and

11:45

she's like actually that's a crazy thing

11:48

to say about a 20 year old

11:50

Well, and especially to like counter the

11:52

narrative of her life that's been driven

11:54

by Walter Isaacson's 2023 biography, which is

11:56

like so hostile and to have like

11:59

a prominent like. prominent biography like that

12:01

like trying to make a narrative out

12:03

of out of your existence and it

12:05

was something you have like no like

12:07

input in no control in that's like

12:10

so demeaning it's also like a very

12:12

like you know trans misogyny moments as

12:14

well like yeah it is interesting

12:16

how much of like Vivian is so

12:19

relatable like like a lot of trans

12:21

people have shall I say challenging relationships

12:23

with their parents maybe not to this

12:25

extreme but but Sometimes, frankly,

12:28

right, like there's a lot of people

12:30

are forced to cut off contact

12:32

with their family. Yeah, no, I've

12:34

just been thinking a lot about

12:36

this because, you know, Trump released

12:38

yet another executive order. I think

12:40

that this one was today basically

12:42

trying to codify, allowing transuse to

12:44

access gender affirming care as abuse,

12:46

quote unquote, which is like something

12:48

that the Republican Party has been

12:50

flagging for months that they were

12:52

going to do at the federal level

12:55

as a federal level

12:57

as well.

13:01

targeting trans

13:04

adults, like,

13:07

objectively is...

13:11

like abusive

13:14

and it's

13:17

not the

13:21

access to

13:24

health care that

13:26

is the abuse it's like the way that they're

13:28

dismissed yeah the way they're belittled it's the way

13:30

they can't even be like trusting their own parents

13:32

to be looking out for them and to the

13:34

extent that they have to push themselves out into

13:37

the world to clarify that point so like that's

13:39

one aspect of it I totally agree with what

13:41

you were both saying that it is like a microcosm of

13:43

the trans experience but I do think there's

13:45

like this other valence for like this allowing

13:47

her to like control how this is

13:49

being perceived or received sort of by

13:51

cis media and like cis like the

13:53

cis political sphere which is like how

13:55

trans people are just getting shoved into

13:57

that over and over and over again.

13:59

with very little context felt like a

14:02

really valuable thing to be able to

14:04

do given how like frankly so much

14:06

of my coverage right now just feels

14:09

like it's like trying to raise attention

14:11

to the fact that like these are

14:13

kids these are young people like everyone

14:15

should be able to relate to a

14:18

young person saying like I have a

14:20

bad parent and that sucks and is

14:22

a formative thing for me like that

14:24

is something that like other children are

14:27

afforded the ability to do and like

14:29

we just don't let trans kids like

14:31

have that. as something that's part of

14:34

their truth when it's such a key

14:36

part of like growing up trans in

14:38

a hostile household. and how like the

14:40

landscape that like me, like her, Ella,

14:43

and like a lot of people that

14:45

our age, like, came out of is

14:47

not going to exist for the next

14:50

generation of like, trans kids, or at

14:52

least it's going to be very different.

14:54

And we need to do everything we

14:56

can to stop it from being as

14:59

bad as what it looks like it's

15:01

going to be. And Vivian, like, talked

15:03

about this at length in the piece,

15:06

with the restriction of puberty, the people

15:08

of like trans kids as as this

15:10

own demon of America that's that's that's

15:12

like invading or is like threatening. So

15:15

I think it is really cool a

15:17

50 and do talk about that at

15:19

length in the special teen vogue cool

15:21

photo shoot article. I will say I

15:24

think it's so important that that's talked

15:26

about and I'm glad she did. I'm

15:28

also really glad as someone who covers

15:31

like trans politics and news all the

15:33

time it was such a breath of

15:35

fresh air to be able to frame

15:37

this piece as like a look into

15:40

what like the joy of transition looks

15:42

like and and looking at like totally

15:44

yeah has brought her closer to the

15:47

life she wants to be living and

15:49

I'm not that old but like talking

15:51

to someone who's a few years younger

15:53

than me and who transitioned at an

15:56

earlier stage in life gave me like

15:58

such a beautiful vision of what the

16:00

future could look like if we if

16:03

we fix some of the bullshit that's

16:05

going on these days. All right I'm

16:07

being I'm being cloned on in the

16:09

chat. I'm not that much older than

16:12

Vivian is what I meant and now

16:14

I'm peaking my microphone and now I'm

16:16

peaking my microphone. I'm not that much

16:18

older than Vivian, but she started transitioning

16:21

at a much younger stage of life

16:23

than me and to see like what

16:25

that has done for her and like

16:28

the way I don't know it was

16:30

just really beautiful to talk to like

16:32

a 20 year old girl and be

16:34

like oh you're like trans but it's

16:37

like it's like not actually that big

16:39

of a deal. And it like it

16:41

also like confirms a thing that like

16:44

I mean I made a joke about

16:46

this earlier with like we love young

16:48

people that shit post but like I

16:50

think so much of. liberal and right

16:53

wing talking points about like young people

16:55

in general like sees them as so

16:57

humorless like they are like cancel culture

17:00

nah nah nah nah nah. Whereas Vivian

17:02

is so funny like we actually struggled

17:04

to cut jokes out of the piece

17:06

like Ellen Ella could tell you we

17:09

went back and forth for hours about

17:11

so many jokes that did not. And

17:13

just one-liners, like, she's so quickly, and

17:15

so, like, she's so funny. She's extremely

17:18

funny. A very dense style of humor,

17:20

as in, like, there's a lot, there's

17:22

a lot packed in, like, almost every

17:25

other sentence. Alex and I are both

17:27

some of the fastest talking people I

17:29

know, and I would put Vivian in

17:31

that same group of people who can

17:34

read that pace into the piece. She's

17:36

awesome. So much of our editing was

17:38

just like sort of taking out, yeah,

17:41

like little jokes or like, she's 20,

17:43

so she is swearing all the time.

17:45

Or- Dude, the amount of cursing, I

17:47

much love, but also that was the

17:50

editing process for this was much less

17:52

like stress and more just like, how

17:54

many F bombs are we? keeping today

17:57

hearthand emogies. The way edits go is

17:59

you send in a piece and the

18:01

editors give you like change some stuff

18:03

and then I get to look at

18:06

a new draft and I get to

18:08

be like hey why do you change

18:10

that and then we go back and

18:12

forth over and over again. Until eventually

18:15

it's not up to me anymore. But

18:17

at one point I did have to

18:19

I did have to say actually fem

18:22

boy is one word Correct. Yeah, it's

18:24

different from fem space boy and space

18:26

boy Yeah, specific and I felt really

18:28

like I was bringing I'd like to

18:31

clarify I was not in the grammatical

18:33

edit of that there were multiple editors

18:35

whose hands that as a subject matter

18:38

expert What can I say? who's able

18:40

to appreciate drag way more than what

18:42

I'm ever like able to even though

18:44

I can like appreciate it on like

18:47

on like a conceptual level having this

18:49

like complete sincere like engrossment in it.

18:51

is so thrilling, because a significant portion

18:54

of this piece is talking about how

18:56

much Vivian loves Drag. Oh my God,

18:58

and so much. Ellen knows nothing about

19:00

Drag also, so that was like a

19:03

really good combo for all of us.

19:05

That was, I, I, yeah, I sat

19:07

down with her and we started talking

19:09

very, very quickly. She brought up Ru

19:12

Paul's drag race, and I would just

19:14

like, she kept calling it RPDR, which

19:16

I'm pretty sure. Garrison, is that something

19:19

you call drag race? Have you heard

19:21

RPDR said out loud? I've never heard

19:23

this, no. Okay, whatever. What I'm here

19:25

to say is as someone who actually

19:28

watches a drag race, Ella, that is

19:30

actually not that uncommon to refer to

19:32

it that way. But you know, we

19:35

had two different roles, as the two

19:37

trans people whose brains were wiped by

19:39

the story, Ella's job was to... actually

19:41

writes the piece in mind was too

19:44

interfaced with Vivian. About drag race. So

19:46

clearly it all came together the way

19:48

it was supposed to. I did at

19:51

the very end of our first call.

19:53

I said, is there anything else you

19:55

want to say? And she talked to

19:57

me for another 15 minutes about about

20:00

drag race specifically. rules yeah like I

20:02

know I'm like sort of meant about

20:04

your dad or about like any of

20:06

the important things we talked about this

20:09

as you're like no so in season

20:11

15 of drag race that rules

20:13

that's so cool she's the best

20:15

but no I it's it's so

20:17

funny that you you talk about

20:20

how like there's this there's

20:22

this character of like humorless

20:24

trans people which is very funny

20:26

because like all of like the

20:29

biggest shit posters online right now are

20:31

mostly trans women the trans comedy

20:33

scene is is huge and like

20:35

this is something that if you

20:37

can talk about like spending the

20:40

COVID lockdown and like online queer

20:42

communities and how how like

20:44

the the like drama and like conflict

20:46

in those spaces trains you for how

20:48

to be like really like funny and

20:51

snappy how fighting with like fellow queer

20:53

teenagers like prepared you for for that

20:55

which has like certainly been like my

20:57

experience. I mean there's a reason you

20:59

can sort of tell and I'm sure

21:01

this applies to beyond trans people but

21:03

you can sort of tell which social

21:05

media you grew up on like if

21:08

you were a tumbler teen or a

21:10

redit teen or a for chanting you

21:12

can tell because your style of fighting

21:14

and making jokes changes because it's it's

21:16

it's such a deeply formative part

21:18

of it and I don't know what Online

21:20

forums the right were on growing up,

21:22

but they they were the wrong ones

21:25

Well a lot of fortune as well

21:27

Sure just the not funny parts

21:29

of the fun. Yeah, no, I'm

21:31

still trying to untrain my like

21:33

a defensive way of writing that

21:35

I learned on Twitter Because it's

21:38

a horrible style where you'd have

21:40

to like have like 12 prefaces

21:43

Exactly yeah, yeah, you're article one.

21:45

I am not a racist waffle

21:47

pancaking the entire time Which is it's

21:49

weird because like it's like Twitter does have its

21:51

own style of humor which I also like also

21:53

like also like picked up on but it also

21:56

has that defensive style of writing which which needs

21:58

to get untrained but it is you know a

22:00

work a working progress. I think it's downstream

22:02

of Tumblr. I remain strong on my

22:04

stance that the Tumblr porn ban ruined

22:06

the internet. No, absolutely. Absolutely. I guess

22:08

I'd like to talk a little bit

22:10

more about like the structure of the

22:12

piece and how it succeeded so much

22:15

in putting Vivian as a subject, right?

22:17

Because like the first half. is written

22:19

in more of like a traditional like

22:21

article format to give context and frame

22:23

Vivian as like a person. But then

22:25

halfway through it switches to like a

22:28

back and forth interview which allows Vivian

22:30

to just speak for herself. And I

22:32

think having both of those and not

22:34

just one or the other strengthens the

22:36

piece entirely and strengthens like being able

22:38

to see Vivian as a complete person

22:41

because like as I'm as I'm getting

22:43

the context like for her life and

22:45

the political situation in the first half.

22:47

Then I get to see how much

22:49

she reminds me of like, regular 20-something

22:51

trans girls. And you know, like half

22:53

of the friends I have, though I

22:56

do disagree on team Pita. Pita's a

22:58

bitch boy. It's team gale all the

23:00

way. Thanks you. Controversial. All right. All

23:02

right. All right. I'm excited that we

23:04

agree on this. But those sorts of

23:06

like offhand comments, like there's other things

23:09

that like give you like a, you

23:11

know, a view into into into this

23:13

person. it's so useful to have like

23:15

you know like at least 50% of

23:17

the piece be this like just straight

23:19

interview. We unsurprisingly talked a lot about

23:21

how we were going to structure this

23:24

piece and partially landed on Q&A format

23:26

for like we knew this was going

23:28

to be a behemoth like no matter

23:30

how we tackled it given the subject

23:32

matter and then ultimately how long the

23:34

transcript was and you know just like

23:37

it there were many aspects of this

23:39

that like we were like okay how

23:41

do we How do we do this

23:43

in a way that's going to read

23:45

well to people? Because something we also...

23:47

about a lot of accessibility, like young

23:49

people famously hate reading now, but we

23:52

wanted this to actually be something that

23:54

like a young person could sit down,

23:56

dash through, still get some like, you

23:58

know, historical, political context out of, and

24:00

still come away being like, ha ha,

24:02

teen pita, team gale, or whatever the

24:05

hell, right? And so... And maybe have

24:07

like subway surfers on like another phone

24:09

at the same time. Yes, exactly. Exactly,

24:11

exactly, exactly. And then I would say

24:13

the... I want Ella to talk about

24:15

the transcript and like interview stuff, but

24:18

like the intro I think is probably

24:20

where I spent the most of my

24:22

time editing this piece and like adding

24:24

stuff and a lot of adding stuff

24:26

it ballooned like we wanted this to

24:28

be a lot shorter than it was

24:30

and then it just kept feeling like

24:33

there were more pieces to really tie

24:35

it together but I would say like

24:37

the reason that was the case is

24:39

because it was a really hard line

24:41

to walk to acknowledge that like people

24:43

would be clicking on this in part

24:46

because of Elon, but that we wanted

24:48

to like trick them into coming for

24:50

Elon, but staying for Vivian. Yeah, like

24:52

it's not about Elon, nor like should

24:54

it be? Yeah. Right. And so like

24:56

one, like Ellen and I had a

24:58

zoom with Vivian and. what November was

25:01

the first one or was that? I

25:03

think so. Yeah November, December to just

25:05

like so she could kind of get

25:07

our vibe and just kind of suss

25:09

out if she was willing to like

25:11

consider this at all. And one of

25:14

the earliest things she said was like

25:16

I don't really want to talk about

25:18

him, I don't want this to be

25:20

about him. And we were really down

25:22

for that like we don't think that

25:24

her story is about him ultimately. I

25:27

felt really important and it was also

25:29

challenging to make sure that. we felt

25:31

like people were coming away from this

25:33

without like a garbled interpretation of what

25:35

the stakes were for her to be

25:37

coming forward like we wanted it to

25:39

be especially right now while so much

25:42

a mainstream media is really fumbling their

25:44

coverage of like politics at this moment

25:46

it felt really important to be like

25:48

trans politics especially especially and then also

25:50

just like all of it so like

25:52

all of it and then especially trans

25:55

politics we just really wanted the intro

25:57

to be like as strong and also

25:59

like informative and also like kind of

26:01

funny and also like just all the

26:03

things because and I would say that

26:05

probably took the most time alone correct

26:07

me if I'm wrong but yeah I

26:10

mean I think the intro started off

26:12

as probably an eighth of the piece

26:14

and yeah now is is closer to

26:16

a half of the piece and there

26:18

were so many hands on it I

26:20

wrote like sort of a very loose

26:23

like skeleton of what that intro ended

26:25

up being. And I would say the

26:27

most, like, it wasn't that many people

26:29

adding text, it was mostly me. Mostly

26:31

Lex. But part of that is because,

26:33

I mean, everything like said, but also

26:35

that Musk is currently a high level

26:38

government official and is in the news

26:40

all the time. I mean, when we

26:42

started writing, the intro said that Musk

26:44

had 13 children and then we had

26:46

to update that. twice. New kid just

26:48

dropped, yeah. Over the edit process, things

26:51

wouldn't stop happening. And then also Vivian

26:53

wouldn't stop posting, which was a little

26:55

bit frustrating. At one point, I had

26:57

to DM her. I said, hey, if

26:59

you get any more information, can you

27:01

please just tell me and not post

27:04

it on threads? And she said, oh,

27:06

totally. That girl is a poster of

27:08

her for sure. But yeah, I mean,

27:10

I think I really love the balance

27:12

the piece found in the end. Early

27:14

on when we were talking about structure,

27:16

I think I pushed for more of

27:19

a standard profile, mostly because, you know,

27:21

then I get to show off my

27:23

writing skills more and I like to

27:25

write. But after talking to Vivian, even

27:27

after our early pre-interview, but certainly after

27:29

the full interview where I sat with

27:32

her for a very long time over

27:34

Zoom and a 14-hour time difference, I

27:36

immediately was like, no, if I write

27:38

this out, it's going to be... mostly

27:40

dialogue anyway because her voice she had

27:42

she's so voice and it's so fun

27:44

to keep it in in that voice

27:47

she's a very very distinctive voice yeah

27:49

yeah and so to you Ella and

27:51

so like it's like that's really the

27:53

strength of the piece in so many

27:55

ways is that like people come away

27:57

with it it doesn't feel like you're

28:00

in the background or like hiding by

28:02

something when you're writing this piece like

28:04

it very much feels like the success

28:06

of it is because you are a

28:08

part of it and um the New

28:10

York Times reported that this was Ella's

28:13

first freelance article so I just wanted

28:15

to add that you know Ella kind

28:17

of did her did her big one

28:19

with her first article thanks no this

28:21

is now everything I write the next

28:23

15 years will be underwhelming it's all

28:25

downstream from here it's not true barren

28:28

Trump I'm coming for you you're gonna

28:30

reenroll at NYU you Exactly. They'll never

28:32

see me coming. I am waiting for

28:34

him to get fixed by like a

28:36

bisexual she-they. It's gotta happen, right? No,

28:38

I don't think so. I don't know.

28:41

Obama was like into a bisexual she-they

28:43

and he still bombed the Middle East

28:45

or whatever. But no, like mainstream coverage

28:47

is just completely failing trans people right

28:49

now. I got so mad at a

28:51

Washington Post article yesterday that I that

28:53

I skied it about it, something I

28:56

never do. Was it the sports one?

28:58

The girl playing it? Girl. After President

29:00

Donald Trump banned transgender girls from competing

29:02

in girl sports, a Virginia high schooler

29:04

joins the boys team. She wasn't going

29:06

to let the president's executive order stop

29:09

her. Framers like a feel-good story, fucking

29:11

infuriating. And it's so like transparent, like,

29:13

and I, again, I feel like I

29:15

keep bringing the cis into the space.

29:17

I'm really sorry. One of my, like,

29:19

cis colleagues was like, this is disgusting.

29:22

Why did they write this, like, a

29:24

feel-good story? And it's like, my thing

29:26

is, if, like, if anyone with some

29:28

amount of critical thinking skills can see

29:30

exactly through what you're doing, why even

29:32

do it? Like, it's so transparent. clicks.

29:34

I mean I guess we you know

29:37

what got clicks was Vivian so I

29:39

actually don't know about that's true and

29:41

say that and I did and I

29:43

will. Do you want to talk about

29:45

the length of the transcript because I

29:47

am curious how long Vivian talked for.

29:50

Am I allowed to say you're not?

29:52

Damn. I think I'm legally damn. Can

29:54

we explain why? When we're not recording

29:56

I can explain why. Okay. I think

29:58

I got to say most of What

30:00

I want to say, I mean I

30:02

think Vivian's just like a delightful person

30:05

and I'm really excited for her that

30:07

she gets her moment in the

30:09

spotlight and that hopefully this like

30:11

helps her build herself as a

30:13

public figure outside of and away

30:15

from Elon Musk and she has

30:17

all of these aspirations to perform

30:19

and model and I hope she

30:21

gets to do her Anna Winter

30:23

Drag one day soon. Oh, me too.

30:26

I love that movie. It's a great movie.

30:28

Hi Anna Winter. Lex. Do you want to

30:30

plug your little outlet? What's this teen vogue?

30:32

Oh yeah, I don't know if anyone's

30:35

heard. Actually, so frequently people

30:37

haven't heard of it. So

30:39

it's actually fine. Yes, you

30:41

can find us at teenvogue.com.

30:43

We have no paywall. We

30:45

have a fact-checking department. Most

30:47

of mainstream media is not

30:49

doing it like us if you

30:51

consider those two points. So yeah.

30:54

Labor politics, especially teen vogue, it's

30:56

been phenomenal. If you love Kim

30:58

Kelly, she is our labor columnist,

31:00

so come through. I also do

31:02

some of our labor coverage, but

31:04

like, definitely not the extent Kim

31:06

does. Yeah, I'm on the things,

31:08

I'm on the socials, yeah, that's

31:10

it, that's all I had, Lil. Ella,

31:12

where can people find you on

31:15

the World Wide Web? I'm on

31:17

Instagram and X, everything, everything app

31:19

as Ella Yerman or Ella Dot

31:21

Yerman on Instagram. We're going to

31:23

get you on Blue Skyi. I

31:26

suffered through 2012 Tumblr once. I don't

31:28

need to do it again. That is

31:30

so not the vibe. I wish it

31:32

were, but it's not, oh, Fluske, guy.

31:34

No, it's, it's, it's more 2019 Twitter.

31:36

Yeah, I agree. You can also find

31:38

my show at Going Down TV on

31:40

Instagram, going down the show on

31:42

YouTube, going down show on Patreon,

31:44

I don't know, I make a transgender daily

31:46

show, you guys know about it. New Studio

31:49

looks great. It's so fun, we gotta get

31:51

you on there. We gotta get you to

31:53

come hang out. Hey, well I will I

31:55

will I will be in town shortly so

31:58

hell yeah. Oh fun! I go to the taping. so

32:00

I can crash. That'll be fun. You

32:02

should do it. Hell yeah. Are we,

32:04

did we do it? Yeah, we're done.

32:22

Hey, kids, it's me Kevin Smith.

32:25

And it's me Harley Quinn

32:27

Smith. That's my daughter, man, who

32:29

my wife has always said is

32:32

just a beardless, deckless version of

32:34

me. And that's the name

32:36

of our podcast. Beardless Lickless Me.

32:38

I'm the old one. I'm the

32:41

young one. And every week we

32:43

try to make each other. And

32:46

every week we try to make

32:48

each other laugh. I'm the old

32:50

one. I'm the young one.

32:52

And every week we try to

32:55

make each other to make each

32:57

other. And every week. You get

33:00

your podcast. Do you remember

33:02

what you said the first night

33:04

I came over here? Ow goes

33:06

lower. From Blumhouse TV, I-Hart

33:08

podcast, and Ember 20 comes in

33:11

all new fictional comedy podcast series.

33:13

Join the flighty Damien Hearst as

33:16

he unravels the mystery of

33:18

his vanished boyfriend. And Santi was

33:20

gone. I've been spending all my

33:22

time looking for answers about what

33:25

happened to Santi. And what's the

33:27

way to find a missing person?

33:30

Sleep with everyone he knew, obviously.

33:32

Hmm, pillow talk. the most

33:34

unwelcome window into the human psyche.

33:36

Follow our out of his element

33:39

hero as he engages in a

33:41

series of ill-conceived investigative hookups.

33:43

Mama always used to say, God

33:46

gave me gumption in place of

33:48

a gag reflex. And, as

33:50

I was about to learn, no

33:53

amount of showering can wash your

33:55

hands of a bad hookup. Listen

33:57

to the hookup on the

33:59

I-Hart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

34:02

wherever you listen to your favorite

34:04

shows. Sonoro and I-Hart's Mike Kuntura

34:07

podcast network present The Set Up,

34:09

a new romantic comedy podcast. Starring

34:11

Harvey Ian and Christian Navarro. The

34:14

setup follows a lonely museum

34:16

curator searching for love. But when

34:18

the perfect man walks into his

34:21

life... Well, I guess I'm saying

34:23

I like it. You like

34:25

me? He actually is too good

34:27

to be true. This is a

34:30

con. I'm calling you. to

34:32

get the DeLado painting. We could

34:34

do this together. To pull off

34:37

this heist, they'll have to get

34:39

close and jump into the

34:41

deep end together. That's a huge

34:43

leap, Fernando, don't you think? After

34:46

you, Trudeau. But love is the

34:48

biggest risk they'll ever take. Fernando

34:51

is never going to love you

34:53

as much as he loves in

34:55

this dog. Trudeau. That painting

34:57

is ours. Listen to The Set-Up

35:00

as part of the Michael Duda

35:02

podcast network available on the I-Hart

35:05

Radio app, Apple podcast, or

35:07

wherever you get your podcasts. On

35:09

November 5th, 2018, at 6.33am, a

35:11

red Volkswagen Golf was found

35:13

abandoned and a ditch out in

35:16

Sleephole Valley. The driver's seat door

35:18

was open. No traces of footsteps

35:21

leaving the vehicle. No belongings

35:23

were found except for a cassette

35:25

tape lodged in the player on

35:27

that tape were 10 vile No,

35:30

no, no, no, no, no No,

35:32

no No, no! Brotesque. Oh my

35:35

god. Oh my god Horific stories,

35:37

but to this day have

35:39

been kept restricted from the public

35:41

until now You feel

35:44

in this too? A horror anthology

35:46

podcast. Listen on the I heart

35:48

radio app. Apple podcasts or wherever

35:50

you get your podcast. Hello everybody.

35:52

It could happen here. and this

35:55

is Robert Evans. We're a show

35:57

about things falling apart and boy

35:59

howdy they sure seem to be

36:01

doing just that as they always

36:03

are and have been for years.

36:05

You know, in fact, anticipation of

36:07

the end times, I think, is

36:10

probably close to the number one

36:12

hobby in the United States at

36:14

this point. I suspect if you

36:16

counted up the dollar value of

36:18

all the collapse-themed movies, books, prepping

36:20

gear, monetize social media content, and

36:23

of course, religious sects in the

36:25

country, the apocalypse would be one

36:27

of our big industries. Doomsday prepping

36:29

alone was an almost $1.2 billion

36:31

business last year, and it's expected

36:33

to more than double by 2030.

36:35

Our popular fiction can't even imagine

36:38

a better future right now. 90%

36:40

of modern future media takes place

36:42

during or shortly after an apocalypse.

36:44

The odd exception today, like Bongshun-Ho's

36:46

recent Mickey 17, is so rooted

36:48

in Trump's politics that we only

36:51

catch occasional glimpses of anything beyond

36:53

it. In other words, in our

36:55

fiction, there's no respite from the

36:57

news. We watch a slow-motion self-inflicted

36:59

global economic collapse and then relax

37:01

with shows about mushroom zombies or

37:04

literal wage slaves created by mind-control

37:06

surgery. In other words, it's bleak

37:08

out there. Tomorrow could be the

37:10

day Trump invokes the Insirection Act,

37:12

or uses the military to occupy

37:14

Greenland, or like one of a

37:16

dozen equivalent horrors. We all just

37:19

know are coming in some form

37:21

or another, even if no one

37:23

can say when. And I'm not

37:25

here today to tell you how

37:27

we're going to get past all

37:29

of that or fix it, because

37:32

I don't know. So today, I'm

37:34

just here as a merchant of

37:36

hope. My job is to convince

37:38

you that our species will someday

37:40

get past our bullshit, and perhaps

37:42

even lay claim to the stars.

37:44

And no, Elon Musk isn't going

37:47

to have anything to do with

37:49

that. But in order to convince

37:51

you of all this, I'm going

37:53

to have to talk about a

37:55

movie. It's called War. And it

37:57

is technically a 1981 comedy adventure

38:00

film. about an American naturalist. This

38:02

guy lives on a nature preserve in

38:04

Tanzania filled with big cats. His family

38:06

comes to visit at the same time

38:08

as a grant committee shows up to

38:10

evaluate his project, which has an unclear

38:12

goal. He's apparently just trying to prove

38:14

people and giant cats from all over

38:16

the world can live together, which the

38:18

movie shows they can't. It's really immaterial

38:20

what happens in the plot. All I

38:22

can tell you is how Wikipedia describes

38:25

it. I've watched this movie dozens of

38:27

times and I have very little idea

38:29

what it's supposed to be about. This

38:31

is because, in any given scene, the

38:33

script is only ever a vague suggestion.

38:35

As each scene starts with actors trying

38:37

to read lines and evolves into those

38:39

same actors trying to survive while being

38:42

mauled by dozens of lions, tigers, and

38:44

panthers. I should probably step back a

38:46

minute to explain some things. Ror is

38:48

largely the brainchild of Tippy Hedron

38:50

and her husband Noel Marshall. If

38:53

you're on the younger side, Tippy Hedron

38:55

was the female lead in a little

38:57

movie called The Birds. It is a

38:59

horror film and also an early apocalypse

39:02

flick by Alfred Hitchcock. It's often credited

39:04

with inventing modern horror cinema. Hitchcock

39:06

himself sexually and psychologically harassed Hedron,

39:08

but his worst actions came during

39:11

a crucial scene where Hedron was

39:13

attacked by a flock of birds.

39:15

Up to the day of filming, Hitchcock

39:17

had assured Tippy the birds used in

39:19

this scene would be animatronic. But when

39:22

the time came to shoot it,

39:24

she spent five days having hundreds

39:26

of live birds hurled at her

39:28

in huge numbers by the crew.

39:30

Hedron later described it as brutal,

39:32

ugly, and relentless. Kerry Grant, her

39:34

co-star, told her she was the

39:36

bravest woman he'd ever seen. Now whatever

39:38

other impacts this had on Tippy,

39:40

she has no discernable fear of

39:42

animals after this point in her

39:44

life. Though she really should. Her husband Noll

39:47

is a bit more of a mystery

39:49

to me. He was an agent, a

39:51

producer, a film investor, and a serial

39:53

entrepreneur whose best financial decision was putting

39:55

money behind what became the exorcist. In

39:57

1969, he and Hedron were in Mosaic.

39:59

Well, she starred in the film Satan's

40:02

Harvest, about which Les has said the

40:04

better. This is only relevant because during

40:06

their time in Africa, they observed a

40:08

pride of lions lounging about an abandoned

40:10

home. And this gave them an idea.

40:12

They wanted to make a movie about

40:15

poaching and conservation, something that could use

40:17

the power of film to save these

40:19

majestic creatures being threatened by humanity. All

40:21

four of their children agreed to star

40:23

in it and to help with production.

40:25

But there were immediate snags. They wanted

40:28

the film to be set in a

40:30

big cat sanctuary, but actual lion tamers

40:32

warned them that it was flat out

40:34

impossible to keep so many large fee

40:36

lines together safely. This would eventually prove

40:38

to have been very accurate advice. After

40:41

a while, one tamer introduced them to

40:43

their first tame lion, and for reasons

40:45

known only to God, he suggested to

40:47

this traumatized movie star and her family

40:49

of charmingly deranged Californians that they could

40:51

just get their own big cats and

40:54

train them by adopting animals confiscated from

40:56

their previous owners. Generally, sketchy zoos and

40:58

circuses. So a lot of these cats

41:00

had never known the wild and they'd

41:02

often been badly mistreated. Given that this

41:04

was the 1970s, we must assume that

41:07

some had been confiscated property of coke

41:09

dealers. Tipianole had no professional or legal

41:11

qualifications to care for dozens of big

41:13

cats. When the authorities eventually found out,

41:15

there was trouble. Although since Hedron and

41:17

Marshall were rich, they bought their way

41:20

out of said trouble by purchasing a

41:22

rural compound and having a house built

41:24

specifically for they and their dozens of

41:26

apex predators of apex predators to live.

41:28

While lions had inspired the initial vision

41:30

the compound in California soon filmed with

41:33

big adopted cats of every kind Tippy

41:35

and her husband took them in and

41:37

raised them among and around their own

41:39

Children who came to see the animals

41:41

as something between pets and family When

41:43

they actually started filming the movie that

41:46

became war making any kind of movie

41:48

had become secondary to the act of

41:50

caring for these many many giant traumatized

41:52

kitties as I noted earlier the plot

41:54

to war is kind of immaterial I've

41:56

never watched. it with the sound on.

41:59

I can tell you though that none

42:01

of these cats were trained in any

42:03

really meaningful way, which meant that every

42:05

scene devolved into the same spectacle. The

42:07

cast, surrounded by dozens of giant cats,

42:09

stumbled through a few lines before one

42:12

or all of the cats began to

42:14

bite and claw them, at which point

42:16

each scene becomes about surviving from one

42:18

moment to the next. Ror took more

42:20

than five years to film and more

42:22

than a decade to actually make. No

42:25

cats were harmed during the production of

42:27

this movie, but more humans were injured

42:29

than in any other film production on

42:31

record. Of the 120 or so cast

42:33

and crew on Ror, more than 100

42:35

suffered significant injury. Often more than once.

42:38

Yandebant, the cinematographer, had his scalp ripped

42:40

off by a lion, requiring 120 stitches.

42:42

He went on to make speed and

42:44

twister. Melanie Griffith. Tippy's daughter and a

42:46

future star herself left production at one

42:48

point because she was worried a big

42:51

cat might rip her face off. She

42:53

ultimately returned and immediately had a large

42:55

chunk of her face ripped off, requiring

42:57

extensive surgery. This all sounds horrifying and

42:59

impossible to justify. But before you make

43:01

a final judgment, I want to remind

43:04

you of two things. One, for all

43:06

its horrors and severe injuries, fewer people

43:08

were killed on the set of war

43:10

than an Alec Baldwin's recent film rust.

43:12

The second thing that you must remember

43:15

is that Roar is a work of

43:17

art on the level of Moby Dick.

43:19

If you watch it enough, among the

43:21

right people, and in the right headspace,

43:23

you can come to a deeper understanding

43:25

of every facet of human existence. I've

43:28

taken a lot out of it over

43:30

the years. Recently, it has convinced me

43:32

that we will one day get over

43:34

our bullshit and escape the present hell

43:36

that our species seems mired in. I

43:38

know that doesn't make much sense now,

43:41

but give me some time. I'll explain

43:43

why. It's probably time for some ads.

43:45

We're back. And the first thing I

43:47

need you to understand about all of

43:49

these fucking cats is that an every

43:51

mauling caught on tape and there are

43:54

dozens of them. I see no anger

43:56

or malice in the actions of these

43:58

cats. I don't even see hunger. It's

44:00

clear to me as a cat owner

44:02

that the cats didn't see these people

44:04

tippy in her family in the cast

44:07

and crew as prey or as a

44:09

threat. If anything, they saw them as

44:11

fellow big cats, cousins and close-kin, who

44:13

they extend a kind of familiarity, and

44:15

perhaps even a kind of love that,

44:17

since they are cats, is expressed primarily

44:20

by batting at them with claws that

44:22

hit like bowie knives embedded in the

44:24

hood of a speeding camry. If you

44:26

have cats of your own, you understand.

44:28

Now, given that nearly every person on

44:30

this film was badly injured, including Tippy,

44:33

who got gangrene from infected cat wounds,

44:35

and all of her children, you might

44:37

feel inclined to judge who are a

44:39

knoll or both of them for risking

44:41

their kids' lives to make this insane

44:43

movie. I understand the impulse, but I

44:46

believe it to be an error. The

44:48

first thing you need to see to

44:50

understand the deeper dynamics going on with

44:52

war is a picture from a Playboy

44:54

magazine photo shoot of Tippy husband and

44:56

co-star star, Noel Marshall. He's in his

44:59

office on his typewriter and this fully

45:01

grown male lion gets up on his

45:03

desk because it wants attention. Again, normal

45:05

cat behavior. Now despite the best efforts

45:07

of this animal, who has to weigh

45:09

500 pounds, no old marshal won't stop

45:12

focusing on his work. And so the

45:14

cat inches away from his face, roars.

45:16

The sound of a male lion's roar

45:18

is deeply imprinted on all of us,

45:20

an epigenetic memory passed down by the

45:22

handful of our ancestors who heard the

45:25

sound up close and lived to tell

45:27

the tale. It has such a foundational

45:29

impact on our mind that Metro Goldwyn

45:31

Meyer, the film studio, used it to

45:33

open every movie they made from 1928

45:35

on. I believe they did this because

45:38

the sound is a sort of hack

45:40

to compel our attention. It pulls an

45:42

audience out of whatever state of mind

45:44

dominates their outside lives and makes them

45:46

more attentive to the film that is

45:48

to come. And so the first thing

45:51

you need to understand about the people

45:53

who made war is that Marshall, upon

45:55

having a living adult lion... inches from

45:57

his face, roar, gives the creature a

45:59

look that says, hey man, can you

46:01

give me a second? I'm like, I'm

46:04

in the middle of something. I bring

46:06

this up so that you will understand

46:08

that these were not people operating on

46:10

anything close to the same wavelength as

46:12

you and I. Their lives and their

46:14

choices are to outsiders, inconceivable. There's another

46:17

great photo from the set of that

46:19

playboy shoot. While the camera people roamed

46:21

the Hedron compound, one of them caught

46:23

a shot a shot of Tippy's adolescent

46:25

daughter, Melanie, An adult male lion, which

46:27

she must have considered to be in

46:30

some way a member of the family,

46:32

steeze this girl passing by in the

46:34

corner of its eye and that motion

46:36

ignites an instinct inside it. So like

46:38

any cat of that size in the

46:40

same situation, it reaches out to bite

46:43

her. Afterwards, the Hedron family and the

46:45

cast and crew had complicated feelings about

46:47

what happened that extended to the present

46:49

day. Tippy divorced Marshall almost as soon

46:51

as the filming finally wrapped. She has

46:53

alleged that while Roar was being made,

46:56

he utterly ignored her well-being. She also

46:58

does not seem to have ever seriously

47:00

considered leaving. She later wrote that she,

47:02

quote, was into it every bit as

47:04

much as he was, and that production

47:06

was an obsessive, addictive drama. John Mitchell,

47:09

Noll's son, who acted in the movie,

47:11

and like everyone else, was mulled repeatedly,

47:13

came to own the rights to Roar

47:15

when his dad died in 2010. Dad

47:17

was a fucking asshole to do that

47:19

to his family, he said recently. He

47:22

said this. It was amazing to live

47:24

through that. I should have died many

47:26

times, but I kind of want to

47:28

do it again. If you have any

47:30

friends or family who have survived extended

47:32

periods of every combat, there's a good

47:35

chance they may have expressed a variation

47:37

of the same feeling. This is because

47:39

trauma is sometimes a drug. Taking it

47:41

can be more than just hell. It's

47:43

often also a high, which is one

47:45

thing that drives a lot of people

47:48

crazy. I need to take a moment,

47:50

away from roar. to talk about some

47:52

people that I met in 2017 in

47:54

Iraq during the desperate and ferocious urban

47:56

combat against ISIS. The closer I drew

47:58

to the front the more guys... who

48:01

were elite veterans of the Iraqi Special

48:03

Forces. They did the bulk of the

48:05

fighting. These were mostly young men, ranging

48:07

from the tail into their teens to

48:09

their twenties. Many had grown up in

48:11

places like Fallujah, fighting from the time

48:14

they were seven or eight, sometimes younger.

48:16

They'd been born into the US occupation

48:18

in many cases. Their earliest memories were

48:20

as runners, faring supplies and information to

48:22

the older men and teenage boys who

48:24

did most of the fighting. When the

48:27

opportunity presented itself, they sometimes dropped grenades

48:29

or improvised explosive devices on U.S. troops,

48:31

most of whom were teenagers themselves. Now

48:33

they fought against ISIS in close quarters,

48:35

building to building a few weeks at

48:37

a time. Periodically, they'd rotate off the

48:40

front and would go to Erbil, an

48:42

hour or two away. Many of them

48:44

were gangsters in their spare time, running

48:46

drugs and guns and brothels. They spent

48:48

their days off in a drunken haze

48:50

of Turkish amphetamines. Then they would drive

48:53

back to the front and new brightly

48:55

colored mustangs and dodged charges. The trunks

48:57

folded bursting with so many machine guns

48:59

and rocket launchers. They can only be

49:01

closed with bungee cords. The guns and

49:03

rockets were useful at a distance to

49:06

soften up enemy positions in the impossibly

49:08

dense warren-like urban environment of Mosul's old

49:10

city. In every building on every block,

49:12

the fighting terminated with door-to-door, room-to-room battles,

49:14

where the most useful weapons were hand

49:16

grenades, combat knives, and pistols in that

49:19

order. I don't know if any of

49:21

these guys were at that point that

49:23

I met them, capable of feeling what

49:25

you or I would recognize as fear.

49:27

These were the men and boys whose

49:29

bodies formed the cutting edge of the

49:32

fighting against ISIS and Mosul. On occasion,

49:34

when they kidnapped ISIS fighters, some of

49:36

them committed war crimes with the ease

49:38

and with as much thought as you

49:40

and I give to breathing. This is

49:42

bad, of course. Unforgivable. But I've never

49:45

really given much thought to judging them

49:47

for it. Where would I even start?

49:49

I think I've come to understand that

49:51

my travels is that human beings are

49:53

capable of contorting themselves of contorting themselves

49:55

into the most incredible shapes in order

49:58

to live in. This has been the

50:00

story of our entire long journey on

50:02

this earth, and if there is one

50:04

reason our species has survived... above all

50:06

the others, it is our capacity for

50:08

infinite variety and infinite contexts. We can

50:11

make ourselves into anything if we're given

50:13

the right incentives, and to an extent

50:15

you can't judge individual humans without judging

50:17

the incentives the world we collectively create

50:19

presents for them. We evolved and we

50:21

still live in a world where trauma

50:24

and pain are inevitable, and those of

50:26

us who survive the worst things that

50:28

life can throw at us tend to

50:30

become addicted. sometimes to the cause of

50:32

the trauma, but nearly always to the

50:34

people we experience it with. This is

50:37

why the cast and crew of Roar

50:39

often reported feeling almost addicted to spending

50:41

time among these gigantic predators, and it's

50:43

why many kept coming back despite being

50:45

repeatedly maimed. Roar happened because the core

50:47

cast and crew exhibited radical empathy for

50:50

roughly 140 large cats and for each

50:52

other, and almost exercised zero critical judgment

50:54

beyond that point. Now I will understand

50:56

if you still feel that nothing could

50:58

justify the decision of two parents to

51:01

risk their children's lives in such folly.

51:03

And I know this essay is supposed

51:05

to be my ultimate enduring optimism about

51:07

mankind's potential, and I'm going to get

51:09

to that, but you know, we still

51:11

live in 2025. So first, here's ads.

51:23

So here's my best step at explaining

51:25

why I find Roar inspirational. There's a

51:28

scene about three quarters of the way

51:30

through this movie. After roughly an hour

51:32

straight of watching the Hedron Marshall family

51:34

and their friends get repeatedly mauled for

51:37

real by giant cats. And in this

51:39

scene, John Marshall finds a dirt bike

51:41

and engineers a scenario that I am

51:43

certain has never happened before or since

51:45

in the history of this planet. He

51:48

rides away from the home where his

51:50

family is trapped and draws several dozen

51:52

lions, panthers, and tigers away by making

51:54

them chase him. The cats assume this

51:57

is a game and repeatedly try to

51:59

murder or maim him. But he continues

52:01

building up... in an ever greater tale

52:03

of the most lethal killing machines to

52:06

evolve on this planet. You can see

52:08

from the look in John's eyes in

52:10

this scene that he has no idea

52:12

if he seconds away from death. It

52:15

would have been physically impossible to stop

52:17

or control this number of giant cats.

52:19

The only reason this number and variety

52:21

of lions, Panthers, and tigers would ever

52:24

have existed together at any previous point

52:26

in world history would have been across

52:28

a distance of thousands of miles of

52:30

rugged wilderness. But thanks to Tippy and

52:33

Noll's insane dream, and thanks to the

52:35

deranged and utterly unjustifiable commitment of many

52:37

of the crew and their family, a

52:39

moment of utter novelty occurs, where the

52:42

singular assortment of big cats watches as

52:44

a man fleeing in terror from them

52:46

on a dirt bike does one of

52:48

the sickest jumps in film history and

52:51

lands directly into a river and then

52:53

keeps riding until he is charged by

52:55

a juvenile African elephant, which the Edrons

52:57

also kept on their property. In its

53:00

uniqueness, this moment has to rival if

53:02

not exceed the moon landing. After all,

53:04

considerably more men have stepped foot on

53:06

the moon than have achieved what John

53:09

Marshall does in this scene, although some

53:11

of that may be due to the

53:13

fact that it is extremely illegal for

53:15

anyone today to even try. And this

53:17

is why I encourage you to watch

53:20

Roar, my dear friends, during the Dark

53:22

Times, not because it's a good movie,

53:24

but because it reveals what is best

53:26

about humanity. What piece of art could

53:29

better illustrate the infinite possibilities within us?

53:31

If a group of human beings can

53:33

learn to live among lions and tigers,

53:35

despite the constant guarantee of severe injury,

53:38

without really understanding why, is it so

53:40

mad to think that perhaps we too

53:42

can transcend the barbarities of our age,

53:44

and become something better, or at least...

53:47

Something far stranger than money-grubbing fascists. I

53:49

don't know how we escape the darkness

53:51

that seems to encroach a bit further

53:53

with each passing day, but I do

53:56

know this. If we can make war,

53:58

we can do anything. Hey

54:15

kids, it's me, Kevin Smith. And it's me,

54:17

Harley Quinn Smith. That's my daughter, man, who

54:19

my wife has always said is just a beardless,

54:21

dickless version of me. And that's the name

54:24

of our podcast, beardless, dickless me. I'm the old

54:26

one. I'm the young one. And every week,

54:28

we try to make each other laugh really hard.

54:30

Sounds innocent, doesn't it? A lot of cussing,

54:32

a lot of bad language. It's for adults only.

54:34

Or listen to it with your kid. It

54:36

could be a family show. We're not quite sure.

54:38

We're still figuring it out. It's a work

54:40

in progress. Listen to beardless, dickless me on the

54:42

iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get

54:44

your podcasts. Do you

54:46

remember what you said the first night

54:48

I came over here? How goes

54:50

lower from Blum House TV, iHeart Podcasts

54:52

and Ember 20 comes in all

54:54

new fictional comedy podcast series. Join

54:57

the flighty Damien Hurst as he unravels

54:59

the mystery of his vanished boyfriend.

55:01

And Santi was gone. I've been spending

55:03

all my time looking for answers

55:05

about what happened to Santi. And what's

55:07

the way to find a missing

55:10

person? Sleep with everyone he knew, obviously.

55:12

Hmm, pillow talk. The most unwelcome

55:14

window into the human psyche. Follow

55:16

our out of his element hero as

55:18

he engages in a series of ill -conceived

55:20

investigative hookups. Mama always used to say,

55:22

God gave me gumption in place of

55:24

a gag reflex. And as I was

55:26

about to learn, no amount of showering

55:29

can wash your hands of a bad

55:31

hookup. Now

55:33

take a big whiff, my

55:35

bra. Listen

55:37

to the hookup on the iHeart radio

55:39

app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you

55:41

listen to your favorite shows. Sonoro

55:46

and I Heart's MyCultura podcast

55:48

network present The Set Up,

55:50

a new romantic comedy podcast

55:52

starring Harvey Guillen and Christian

55:54

Navarro. The Set

55:56

Up follows a lonely museum

55:58

curator searching for - - But when the

56:01

perfect man walks into his

56:03

life... Well, I guess I'm saying I

56:05

like you. You like me? He actually

56:07

is too good to be true.

56:09

This is a con. I'm conning

56:12

you. To get the DeLado painting,

56:14

we could do this together. To

56:16

pull off this heist, they'll have

56:18

to get close and jump into

56:20

the deep end together. That's a

56:22

huge leap, Fernando, don't you think?

56:24

After you, Trudeau. But love is

56:27

the biggest risk they'll ever take.

56:29

Fernando is never going to love

56:31

you as much as he loves in this

56:33

dog. Trudeau. That painting is

56:35

ours. Listen to The Set-Up as part

56:37

of the Mike Wintuda podcast network

56:40

available on the I-Hart radio

56:42

app, Apple podcast, or wherever

56:44

you get your podcasts. I'm

56:47

Israel Gutierrez, and I'm hosting

56:49

a new podcast, Dub Dynasty. The story

56:51

of how the Golden State Warriors have

56:53

dominated the NBA for over a decade.

56:56

Once again, our NBA champions. From the

56:58

building of the core that included Clay

57:00

Thompson and Drey Mon Green, to one

57:02

of the boldest coaching decisions in the

57:04

history of the sport. I just felt

57:07

like the biggest thing was to earn

57:09

the trust to the players and let

57:11

the players know that we were here

57:13

to try to help them take the

57:15

next step, not tear anything down. Today,

57:18

the Warriors dynasty remains alive. In large

57:20

part because of a scrawny six-foot

57:22

two-two hooper. who everyone seems to

57:24

love. For what Steph is done

57:26

for the game, he's certainly on

57:29

that like Mount Rushmore for guys

57:31

that have changed it. Come revisit

57:33

this magical Warriors ride. This is

57:35

Dub Dynasty. The Dubs dynasty is

57:37

still very much alive. Listen to

57:40

Dub Dynasty on the I-Hart Radio

57:42

app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

57:44

you get your podcast. Welcome

57:53

to Itcadap Here are podcasts

57:56

where here is the rapidly

57:58

encroaching rise of fascism. My

58:00

name is Mia Wong and one

58:02

of the major factors of fascism

58:04

that we have been covering on

58:06

the show has been the increase

58:08

in just effectively straight up black

58:10

baggings by ICE and Immigrations Enforcement

58:13

in general. We have spent a

58:15

good amount of time covering a bunch

58:17

of different angles of this, but

58:19

there is another incredibly distressing angle

58:22

that we have not covered as

58:24

much yet, which is their targeting

58:26

of labor organizers. And with me

58:29

to talk about that is Mark

58:31

Medina from Portland Jobs with Justice

58:33

and the Coalition of Independent Unions.

58:35

And yeah, Mark, welcome to the

58:37

show. Hi, thanks to having me. Yeah, I'm glad

58:40

to have you on. So one of the

58:42

most pressing sort of black baggings

58:44

that's happened fairly recently is ICE's

58:46

kidnapping of Alfredo Juarez, E. Federino,

58:49

otherwise known as Lalo. Can you

58:51

tell us about... sort of

58:53

his work and the projects

58:55

he's been doing and Famila's

58:57

Unillas Prolegesticia? Yeah,

59:00

so it's been a very

59:02

disheartening and scary couple of

59:04

weeks since this happened because

59:06

it opens up a new path for the

59:08

state to go after organizers to

59:10

go after workers and the most

59:13

underprivileged in our

59:15

society in a way that I

59:17

suppose we all expected, but now that

59:19

we see it. now that we see it

59:21

happening, now that we see it happening to

59:23

people that we know in our community,

59:25

it's becoming apparent. There is no turning

59:28

back from the idea that we have

59:30

to be able to take this on

59:32

headfirst. We as activists, as organizers, have

59:35

to look at this and then see it

59:37

as an actual thing in our day to

59:39

day that we have to combat and

59:41

incorporate into our organizing. So maybe it might

59:43

be a little helpful to start off with

59:46

a little bit of a backstory.

59:48

So the union has its origins going

59:50

back to 2013. The area in

59:52

which they organize the Bellingham or

59:55

the Washington, Walken, Skagit areas, has

59:57

a very particular type of immigrant

59:59

community. Lelow himself is

1:00:01

of Mexico background. There's a lot

1:00:04

of indigenous Mexican populations in the

1:00:06

region. It's also one that has long

1:00:08

roots. A lot of these people go

1:00:10

back generations, have been here for quite

1:00:12

some time. This area also happens

1:00:15

to be a very particularly

1:00:17

with the non-Hispanic population, particularly

1:00:19

the white population, a very

1:00:22

conservative, particularly conservative, for the

1:00:24

area. It's one of the very few

1:00:26

areas of North West that Donald Trump

1:00:29

came to visit. It's an area that

1:00:31

has had repeated attacks on

1:00:33

the Indian community. And so

1:00:35

it's in this context that workers

1:00:37

are organizing in 2013 for this

1:00:39

first independent union. And two,

1:00:42

it's important to mention the independent

1:00:45

part of it. A lot of the

1:00:47

organizers from the start of this of

1:00:49

the union came from a tradition

1:00:51

of the United Farm Workers in

1:00:53

California. Some of them worked with Ses

1:00:56

of Chavez. in the in the heyday

1:00:58

of the United Farm Workers. And in

1:01:00

the years and decades since then, since

1:01:02

the Delano void costs and other things,

1:01:04

there's been a growing rift of what

1:01:06

the next steps should be. And I

1:01:09

think that a lot of farm workers,

1:01:11

because they don't organize under the general

1:01:13

labor law that we have for most

1:01:15

workers, there is a sort of patchwork system

1:01:18

for how farm working organizing

1:01:20

happens in the United States

1:01:22

that's dependent upon different

1:01:24

states and legislatures. And for

1:01:26

the most part, with the exception of

1:01:28

only two states, farm workers don't have

1:01:31

the same kind of protections that

1:01:33

regular workers generally in the

1:01:35

society have for union recognition

1:01:37

for collective bargaining. Only Washington

1:01:40

and New York at the moment,

1:01:42

I believe, have laws that allow

1:01:44

for elections for farm worker unions.

1:01:46

And there's a very particular reason

1:01:48

for that being the case. Farm

1:01:50

workers were excluded from the Wagner

1:01:52

Act for having general labor rights. in

1:01:54

the 1930s because precisely it

1:01:56

was seen as immigrant labor.

1:01:59

Yeah. and immigrants were not seen

1:02:01

as meriting the same rights as white American

1:02:03

in the same way that domestic workers

1:02:05

were removed because I was seen at the time

1:02:08

as black labor. So it has its roots in

1:02:10

racism. And yeah and that's something that

1:02:12

you know like you you can tie

1:02:14

that exclusion true like there's a straight

1:02:16

line between that and Japanese internments which

1:02:18

also to a large extent is just

1:02:20

is about land seizure and the sort

1:02:22

of like fusion of racism specifically racism

1:02:24

in the farming sector with with tax

1:02:27

and labor rights and with this desire

1:02:29

to just sort of sees literally the

1:02:31

land and labor from non-white people. Yeah.

1:02:33

Yeah, so it's a long and bleak

1:02:35

history. No, absolutely. And I'm sure your

1:02:37

audience is well aware of a lot

1:02:39

of these subject matter. It is a bleak

1:02:42

history. And it wasn't until groups

1:02:44

like the United Farm Workers in

1:02:46

the 60s and the 70s, that

1:02:48

they began to create the possibility

1:02:51

for something new for the Hispanic

1:02:53

community. It was United Farm Workers

1:02:55

that. built not just a lot

1:02:57

of solidarity with other immigrant groups

1:02:59

in the California area, but they also

1:03:01

built a sense of pride and identity

1:03:03

and belonging for a lot of communities.

1:03:06

I grew up in Boyle Heights, East Los

1:03:08

Angeles, since Chavez and the farm worker murals

1:03:10

are everywhere. You know, me and my friends

1:03:12

would often joke that such Chavez is like

1:03:14

the patron saint, if he's Los Angeles, even

1:03:17

though it's nowhere near Delano. And there's a

1:03:19

reason for that. I think that a lot

1:03:21

of us looked up to the United States

1:03:23

Farm Workers, we looked up to the Farm

1:03:25

Workers Union movement and we saw

1:03:27

in them our heroes, our modern day heroes.

1:03:30

We saw them, we saw people who said, be

1:03:32

proud to be brown, you know. There's a courage

1:03:34

that comes from that history. The Union

1:03:36

movement that then sprung up in

1:03:38

2013 in the Bellingham Northern Washington

1:03:40

area was coming out of that milieu.

1:03:42

They understood that background, they understood

1:03:45

that history, but they also understood

1:03:47

that there was very little organizing.

1:03:49

in the region. There was a lot of

1:03:52

fear in the region. It's very difficult to

1:03:54

organize farm workers. To have access to

1:03:56

a lot of these areas, you have

1:03:58

to cross just private property. for quite

1:04:00

some time before you reverse farm

1:04:02

workers. And it becomes very,

1:04:04

very difficult to have organizing

1:04:07

happen. And it's intentional that way.

1:04:09

The rise in farm worker unions

1:04:11

that happen in 60s and 70s

1:04:13

had a massive plummet by the time

1:04:15

that we get into the 90s and

1:04:17

2000s. And so these workers had heard

1:04:19

these stories, had heard by

1:04:21

this legacy, but had been

1:04:24

essentially dealing with increasing frustration,

1:04:26

racist behavior by bosses, lower and

1:04:28

lower pay. and the use of certain

1:04:30

types of immigrants to try

1:04:32

to scab their jobs. It be the

1:04:35

capitalist class using one type of

1:04:37

worker against another type of worker,

1:04:39

picking them against each other. It's in

1:04:42

this context in 2013 that this

1:04:44

union starts to form. They go

1:04:46

public at that time period. They

1:04:48

call for recognition and they

1:04:50

start taking action directly. And

1:04:53

they organize this years and

1:04:55

years-long boycott campaign. to gain

1:04:57

recognition to get the employer

1:04:59

to start bargaining. And after years

1:05:01

and years of this, in court battles

1:05:03

and the employer trying to lay everyone

1:05:06

off and hire certain types of newer

1:05:08

immigrants coming in to replace all them,

1:05:10

putting one worker against another, all these

1:05:12

types of maneuvers. By 2017, these workers

1:05:15

win a contract. And the philosophy

1:05:17

of the union since then has been

1:05:19

not just to grow this union, but also

1:05:21

for them to be able to stand on

1:05:23

their own two feet. Their idea is that...

1:05:25

they are very proud of their independent

1:05:27

nature of that union. They're not part

1:05:30

of, you know, the ASL, CIO, they're

1:05:32

not part of the United Farm Workers,

1:05:34

they're not part of any other organization.

1:05:36

You know, when I spoke to some

1:05:38

of their leaders last year, one of

1:05:40

the things that came to mind was they

1:05:43

brought up a quote from Eugene Debs in

1:05:45

the notion of like, if we were to

1:05:47

lead you into the promised land, someone else

1:05:49

would just lead you out. And the notion

1:05:52

of their union is their union is, Tomorrow

1:05:54

they'll hold something over us. That's the

1:05:56

notion that farm workers leave this movement

1:05:58

and leave this union. is an

1:06:00

incredibly powerful statement of what working

1:06:03

class people can do. The kinds of

1:06:05

workers that everyone else kind of looks

1:06:07

at, they could never do it. These, you know, these

1:06:09

workers could never handle this kind

1:06:11

of level of struggle and couldn't

1:06:14

do this kind of organization, have

1:06:16

built one of the most powerful

1:06:18

independent farmer for unions in the

1:06:20

West Coast. Lelo, Lelo Juarez, was a

1:06:22

founding member of this union. He was

1:06:24

a farm worker starting at the age of the

1:06:26

age of 12. And since then, devoted

1:06:28

his entire life to organizing,

1:06:31

to helping workers, to being

1:06:33

the kind of person who

1:06:35

commits himself, to the work of

1:06:37

making the world a better place than

1:06:39

he founded. You know, at 25, he is

1:06:41

significantly younger than me.

1:06:43

And when I think of people who I

1:06:45

look up, too, who I think of, wow,

1:06:48

when I grow up and want to be

1:06:50

someone like that, I think of Lelow. Yeah.

1:06:52

I have met Lel many a times over

1:06:54

the years. He's a very soft-

1:06:57

owes him a bit of a

1:06:59

debt now. It is time

1:07:01

that we as a whole

1:07:04

stand up for him.

1:07:06

Yeah, yeah, we are

1:07:08

going to go to

1:07:10

ads regrettably and

1:07:12

then when we

1:07:15

come back we are

1:07:17

going to start

1:07:19

talking I think a

1:07:22

bit more about the

1:07:24

repression. The sort of

1:07:26

capitalist class out in

1:07:28

Bellingham, and you know, this sort of,

1:07:30

I mean, this has been true of

1:07:32

the broader capitalist class since it's kind

1:07:34

of organizing, starting like, has been

1:07:36

trying to break these unions this

1:07:39

entire time. You know, that has

1:07:41

been a major focus of everything that

1:07:43

they've been doing. And, you know, what

1:07:45

we're seeing right now seems like a

1:07:47

massive sort of escalation in the decree

1:07:49

of repression. So, yeah, can we

1:07:51

talk about the recent blackbagging of

1:07:53

Lalo and... Yeah, and sort of

1:07:56

what happens and where we

1:07:58

go from there? Yeah, the... The weaponization

1:08:00

of the state to go after

1:08:02

immigrants and go after activists is,

1:08:05

I'm sure, to your audience is

1:08:07

well known is nothing yet. And

1:08:09

it knows party affiliation. The Democrat

1:08:11

administrations have been doing this to

1:08:13

immigrant communities and have been using

1:08:15

it to silence political activists. The

1:08:17

Trump administration, however, is now

1:08:19

doing this on a level that is, at

1:08:22

least to a lot of us, unheard of in the

1:08:24

modern day, which is to go

1:08:26

after specific union leaders in

1:08:28

the labor movement. to go

1:08:30

after civil rights leaders. You've

1:08:32

seen this happen also when

1:08:34

it comes to Palestinian rights

1:08:36

activists around the country. The

1:08:38

idea is pretty simple. It's

1:08:40

to silence the loudest voices

1:08:43

to cut the leadership from

1:08:45

the movement. On March 25th,

1:08:47

Alfredo Lelo Juarez was dropping

1:08:49

off his girlfriend at a

1:08:51

nearby farm for work and was

1:08:54

accosted by ice agents as he

1:08:56

was exercising his rights. or what

1:08:58

he thought to his rights were

1:09:00

at the time, because of the regime, who

1:09:02

knows what your rights are. They broke

1:09:05

his window, they dragged him out of

1:09:07

his car, you know, this was

1:09:09

obviously very traumatic incident,

1:09:11

but also it was a real shock

1:09:13

to the union to see the community

1:09:15

group that works with the union and

1:09:18

to the local Hispanic community

1:09:20

in the area. Within hours of

1:09:22

that, workers organized his community

1:09:24

went to move to try

1:09:26

to carry a response. knowing

1:09:28

that time was of the

1:09:30

essence. It was then taken

1:09:33

to a localized facility. He's

1:09:35

now since been moved to

1:09:37

a detention center in Tacoma,

1:09:39

Washington. A large rally of

1:09:41

hundreds took place calling for

1:09:43

his immediate release. What we know

1:09:46

now, seemingly, is that at the

1:09:48

very last minute, apologies I

1:09:50

forget the exact day, but

1:09:52

it was within a couple

1:09:54

of days of the kidnapping,

1:09:56

He has an automatic stay of

1:09:58

deportation in place. At this point,

1:10:00

no longer has any legal authority

1:10:03

to remove Lello. This came at

1:10:05

the last minute. He was in

1:10:07

line for deportation and was removed

1:10:09

at the very last minute. However,

1:10:12

while this is good news, this is

1:10:14

not good for someone's personal

1:10:16

health and well-being. These

1:10:18

are massively cramped facilities,

1:10:21

underfunded facilities. You know,

1:10:23

there are horror stories around the

1:10:25

country of... the conditions in some

1:10:27

of these places every day

1:10:29

that Lello is stuck behind

1:10:31

these prison walls is an injustice

1:10:33

to our movement. Yeah. Yeah. The thing

1:10:36

the thing it immediately reminds me of is

1:10:38

the story of Thomas Payne who was like

1:10:40

slated to be executed in the French Revolution

1:10:42

and they didn't they didn't execute him because

1:10:45

his door was open so they didn't see

1:10:47

the slash line on the cell that was

1:10:49

supposed to execute him and then like the

1:10:51

next day the reign of terror ended with

1:10:54

the coup against the jokovins it rides me

1:10:56

a lot of that but you know but

1:10:58

on the other hand here's the thing we

1:11:00

have gotten the the stay of the deportation

1:11:03

but we have not we have not brought

1:11:05

down the rate of terror yet so yeah and

1:11:07

it would hope a little doesn't have to wait

1:11:09

four more years for that one yeah good lord

1:11:11

good lord Yeah, yeah. So let's talk a bit

1:11:14

about, so I mean, obviously, you know, what we're

1:11:16

seeing here, and this is, you know, the

1:11:18

connection that you made, is where we're

1:11:20

seeing just on a sort of broad

1:11:22

scale, the use of the state and

1:11:24

of the sort of blackbagging and of

1:11:27

these deportations as a way to

1:11:29

target organizers from Palestine to

1:11:31

label organizers. That's only going to

1:11:33

expand as this goes on. And I think

1:11:35

something critical about, you know, one of

1:11:37

the first things you were saying here

1:11:39

about. the fact that they're targeting sort

1:11:41

of the loudest voices in the community.

1:11:43

And I think a big part of this

1:11:46

is that they know that their position isn't

1:11:48

as strong as they're making it out to

1:11:50

be, right? Like they have just detonated

1:11:52

a nuke across the entire economy. They

1:11:54

are systematically going through and individually fucking

1:11:56

over every single group of people who

1:11:58

are supposed to be there. base. And

1:12:00

I think part of what they're

1:12:02

doing is they're trying to

1:12:04

spread sort of raw terror and

1:12:06

spread fear and you know and

1:12:09

and attack the critical infrastructure of

1:12:11

organizing because they want to make

1:12:13

it look like resisting them as

1:12:16

impossible. And that's just not

1:12:18

true. They can be. Yeah, absolutely. I

1:12:20

think that oftentimes, particularly

1:12:22

fascistic power. wants and

1:12:24

needs to present itself

1:12:26

as inevitable as overwhelming

1:12:28

and impossible to defeat. In

1:12:31

part because it's meant to hide the

1:12:33

ultimate weakness of some of these powers.

1:12:35

The actual power that these farm workers

1:12:38

showed against the Sakuma farms when they

1:12:40

went on strike and boycotted for years

1:12:42

and years and years out in the

1:12:44

fields talking to workers for years and

1:12:46

years and years and years. It showed

1:12:49

that no matter how powerful some of

1:12:51

these companies are, that the power of

1:12:53

workers overwhelms and the power of

1:12:55

solidarity overwhelms. And they know that.

1:12:57

Going after leadership, going after some

1:12:59

of the most, some of the

1:13:01

bravest people in our movement is a way

1:13:04

of trying to hit the movement

1:13:06

at the knees and trying to

1:13:08

convince folks that struggle is impossible.

1:13:10

But I think it is important to

1:13:12

remember that what we're doing, the

1:13:14

struggle now, the response, this is how

1:13:16

we show the population, the world, you know,

1:13:19

our communities. that they're not

1:13:21

inevitable. It is not

1:13:23

insurmountable. And so in by

1:13:25

taking action, responding to the kinds

1:13:28

of assisted behaviors of the state,

1:13:30

we show how feeble the state can

1:13:32

be at times, even when it seems

1:13:34

its most treacherous and awful. Yeah, and

1:13:36

I think a lot of times when we win

1:13:38

fights, it can be very, very hard

1:13:40

to actually see our victory because

1:13:42

we don't see the world that could

1:13:45

have been if we didn't fight. And that's

1:13:47

the thing I think about with the First Trump administration,

1:13:49

where in the First Trump administration, they absolutely wanted

1:13:51

to be doing this kind of shit. And they

1:13:54

were able to do a lot of terrible stuff,

1:13:56

but they weren't able to sort of go this

1:13:58

far because of the kind of... mass mobilizations

1:14:00

that shut down a lot of

1:14:02

the kinds of things that they

1:14:05

wanted to do. And I think

1:14:07

that's a kind of victory that

1:14:09

is hard to kind of like

1:14:11

process because all we see is,

1:14:13

you know, the suffering that did

1:14:15

happen. And we can never see an

1:14:17

image of like all of the people,

1:14:19

you know, who got to continue

1:14:22

living their lives because we stopped

1:14:24

them. And that I think is another sort

1:14:26

of powerful tool here, but also we do

1:14:29

have an opportunity to make sure that we

1:14:31

can beat them right here and right now

1:14:33

in a way that's very very public and

1:14:35

visible. And that's a question mark about that

1:14:38

in my mind because, you know, my entire

1:14:40

adult life I've heard stories of the state

1:14:42

repression against union organizers in the 20s and

1:14:44

the 30s and the 30s in the 40s.

1:14:47

You hear the stories if you're an organizer

1:14:49

about the violiderideradaresas

1:14:51

and and how hard it was in

1:14:54

the past and we forget. that a

1:14:56

lot of that does continue on is

1:14:58

just not where you would imagine it,

1:15:00

where a lot of American workers imagine

1:15:02

it. And so they don't see it

1:15:04

in their shops and their factories and

1:15:06

their unions. But this right here

1:15:08

is an attack on the labor movement.

1:15:11

Had this been the head of the

1:15:13

electricians union, the head of the SCIU,

1:15:15

had this been an attack on what a

1:15:17

lot of Americans would view as

1:15:19

the mainstream labor movement? This would

1:15:21

be headlines. The fact that it

1:15:23

isn't shows and that it has been

1:15:26

so much work to try to get

1:15:28

attention to a union leader being picked

1:15:30

up and kidnapped by the state should

1:15:32

be, you know, a blaring red light on the

1:15:34

labor movement to take action immediately.

1:15:36

I hope that what we're doing is

1:15:39

the first steps of that because, you

1:15:41

know, this is one of those moments,

1:15:43

you know, they went after the trade

1:15:45

unions unionists and I was not a

1:15:47

trade unionist. Well, they're going after the

1:15:49

farm workers. I am not a farm worker.

1:15:51

common upon us morally to stand

1:15:53

up one another at this point

1:15:56

in time. Yeah, and I think there's

1:15:58

been a real kind of real... power

1:16:00

this and a real sort of appeasement of

1:16:02

power and a real sort of demonstration of

1:16:04

where a lot of these unions politics are.

1:16:06

I mean, we saw we saw the way

1:16:08

that the Teamsters like leadership just, I

1:16:10

mean, just, you know, openly went to

1:16:12

speak at the RNC, right? We've been

1:16:14

seeing the UAW, which traditionally has had

1:16:17

better like immigration politics in the last

1:16:19

few years than a lot of these

1:16:21

other sort of mainstream unions, but has

1:16:23

also been sort of going to bat

1:16:25

for Trump's tariff. I've been calling you

1:16:27

the turf tariffs because of the wages of

1:16:29

transphobia, but you know, they've been going to

1:16:31

bat for like the turf tariffs, right? And

1:16:34

that I think is like part of why they've

1:16:36

been sort of unable to like respond to

1:16:38

this moment and why they've been unable to

1:16:40

respond to the past fucking 50 years of

1:16:42

moments, which is that like if you're

1:16:45

sort of like labor politics is rooted

1:16:47

in this sort of like American nationalist

1:16:49

like American jobs for American workers stuff.

1:16:51

right and it's not actually based in the

1:16:53

power of workers and the power of workers

1:16:56

everywhere then you're going to lose it's not

1:16:58

it's not just sort of reactionary politics also

1:17:00

it is it's also bad politics and we're

1:17:02

seeing it right now yeah and I think

1:17:04

that the history of the labor movement

1:17:06

has been an interesting one in my

1:17:08

adult life because you know I'm as pro-laborous

1:17:11

they come however the history of the labor

1:17:13

movement in the modern day has been a

1:17:15

fascinating one it is one that when it

1:17:17

came to large strikes was that it's nadier

1:17:19

at the mid and late 2000s. I think

1:17:22

at one point it was just over a

1:17:24

dozen strikes over 2000 workers and you compare

1:17:26

that to the hide the labor movement in the

1:17:28

40s and the 50s when it was in

1:17:30

the hundreds and you had strike actions all

1:17:32

the time and that is what built so

1:17:34

much of what we called middle class for

1:17:36

some and it was this really historic moment

1:17:39

at the time and we're in a

1:17:41

historic moment now where I think the

1:17:43

labor movement now where I think the

1:17:45

labor movement for so long from that

1:17:47

point has been trying to kind of

1:17:49

reshaped the labor movement and the thoughts

1:17:51

and the ideas of the new. But it

1:17:53

comes with its own regressive setbacks

1:17:56

and it comes with its own

1:17:58

shortcomings of leadership. You know, the

1:18:01

teamsters making statements around

1:18:03

immigration rights was a very unfortunate

1:18:06

thing to be said in the modern

1:18:08

day, in the modern context. I think

1:18:10

that, you know, other unions seemingly looking

1:18:12

to, you know, circle the wagons

1:18:15

rather than take the risks that

1:18:17

need that need to happen in

1:18:19

this current time has really shown

1:18:21

a lack of imagination

1:18:23

from some of the mainstream unions. And the

1:18:25

thing is... I hope for the best for

1:18:27

them. I want them to succeed and I

1:18:29

want them to get better. Because the world

1:18:31

is a better place for having these larger

1:18:34

unions. However, it's the independent movements,

1:18:36

the independent unions, like Familius

1:18:38

Unidis, what else, Thesea, like these

1:18:40

other unions in the region, that can be

1:18:43

the kind of canary in the coal mine,

1:18:45

the kind of labs of experimentation that can

1:18:47

be the first people out to do some of

1:18:49

the most radical and interesting and

1:18:51

worker-centric type of movement building

1:18:54

and messaging messaging messaging and

1:18:56

messaging. I think there is a reason

1:18:58

why it was the Coalition of

1:19:00

Independent Unions here in the Pacific

1:19:02

Northwest that came up with the

1:19:04

notion of having Trans-Day of Solidarity,

1:19:07

this idea of patterning contracts together

1:19:09

to have inclusive and protections for

1:19:11

trans workers and having that be

1:19:13

a thing that unions take up together.

1:19:16

I think that it's incredibly notable that

1:19:18

it's groups like Familius Unida

1:19:20

Ses, Polozizia, that carry out

1:19:22

this long years-long boycott and created

1:19:24

a model by which other workers

1:19:26

in the region can not just

1:19:29

organize themselves, but organize themselves on

1:19:31

a low-cost member-led democratic model. I think

1:19:33

it's important to see that sometimes

1:19:35

the large unions have to start looking

1:19:37

at some of the radical pragmatism that

1:19:39

comes from the necessities of these smaller

1:19:42

independent campaigns. Yeah, and I mean, before

1:19:44

we go to ads, I think the last thing I want

1:19:46

to say there is like, you know, the other option

1:19:48

they have is to do the option of what the

1:19:50

unions didn't during the rise of the Nazis. Which is

1:19:52

like during the rise of the Nazis the unions fell

1:19:55

in line, right? They fell in line because they were

1:19:57

scared and they thought that they could fucking win benefits

1:19:59

from it and And you know, it saved

1:20:01

some of them, like there were a

1:20:03

few of those people, like just became

1:20:05

Nazis, but the rest of them got

1:20:08

fucking liquidated anyways. So those are your

1:20:10

options, right? You either stand and fight

1:20:12

now with the independent unions, or you

1:20:14

become part of the regime and eventually

1:20:17

get liquidated when, you know, Trump in

1:20:19

like, two and a half years,

1:20:21

science executive order that says unions

1:20:23

are illegal or whatever. And what does

1:20:25

that do at the end of the day?

1:20:27

Even if it saves you, even if you're

1:20:30

the head of some of these large unions,

1:20:32

and by working with the administration today,

1:20:34

by selling your soul, by selling the

1:20:36

movement out, you give up the moral high

1:20:38

ground of our movement, of our

1:20:40

working class democratic movement, you give

1:20:42

it up for another generation.

1:20:44

Then when workers, when people like

1:20:46

myself growing up, looking at images

1:20:49

of the United Farm Workers, There are

1:20:51

similar, I presume, there are similar people

1:20:53

in the United States growing up who look

1:20:55

that way up to the United Auto Workers, who

1:20:57

look that way up to the teachers union.

1:21:00

What happens to those children, to those kids,

1:21:02

those young people who want to be the

1:21:04

next leadership, the next era of the labor

1:21:06

movement, they will not look at us

1:21:08

as having the moral high ground. We give

1:21:11

that up. We give our role in history,

1:21:13

our moral role in history to fight for

1:21:15

the working class when we do things like

1:21:18

this. Yeah, and what you've become instead is

1:21:20

just another extension of the state. You've become

1:21:22

like one of the like the national syndicates

1:21:24

in like Franco is Spain. And what that

1:21:27

does to you is people, people don't look

1:21:29

at you in a generation as a labor

1:21:31

movement. They look at you as just another

1:21:33

arm of a fascist regime. And it

1:21:35

doesn't have to be like that. It really

1:21:37

doesn't. But yeah, I take no pleasure in

1:21:39

saying this. But it's an unfortunate

1:21:42

reality and hopefully the turn around

1:21:44

can come from anywhere. It can come

1:21:46

from unexpected places, and I hope that

1:21:48

there is one. And things like solidarity

1:21:50

for Lello, I hope it be a

1:21:52

small link in the chain that moves

1:21:54

the pendulum right back into the direction

1:21:56

of unethical and moral superiority that

1:21:59

comes with. for working

1:22:01

class folks. Yeah, we're

1:22:03

going to take an ad

1:22:05

break and when we come

1:22:07

back we're going to talk

1:22:09

about what we can do

1:22:12

for Lillow right now as

1:22:14

you are listening to

1:22:16

this. We are back. So

1:22:18

let's talk about both the

1:22:21

operation, I mean just immediately

1:22:23

the plans to sort of... Put

1:22:25

pressure to free Lelow and also

1:22:27

would then I guess we'll get

1:22:30

into sort of more broadly the

1:22:32

kinds of fighting that we need

1:22:34

to be doing in order to resist this.

1:22:36

Sure, sounds good. So, like I mentioned

1:22:38

earlier, and you need an aftermath of

1:22:41

Lelow is kidnapping by ICE. Workers in

1:22:43

the region began organizing and

1:22:45

unions came together and supportive Lelow

1:22:47

and helped a rally in front

1:22:49

of the tension center in Tacoma.

1:22:51

Now what we're trying to do is

1:22:54

trying to spread the word further.

1:22:56

There are other communities, particularly here

1:22:58

on the West Coast, that can

1:23:00

stand solidarity, that should stand

1:23:03

a solidarity, and when we heard

1:23:05

this use go down, activists within the

1:23:07

CIIU ask themselves, we can't stand idly

1:23:09

by while a leader in our movement

1:23:11

is kidnapped by the state. We need

1:23:14

to take action. And so we did.

1:23:16

And the point was to move as

1:23:18

quickly as possible to try to build

1:23:20

a larger voice. for Lelow while he

1:23:22

is in detention. So there is a good number

1:23:24

of activists here in the Portland

1:23:26

area. We can be of service to

1:23:29

the Farm Workers Union. You know, we

1:23:31

have a strong core of independent unions

1:23:33

here in the Pacific Northwest, particularly in

1:23:36

the Portland area. We can do what

1:23:38

other unions are hesitant to do, which

1:23:40

is take action immediately and stand firmly

1:23:42

with our resident sisters at Manosi Edmanis

1:23:45

up in Northern Washington. So what's

1:23:47

happening is the call from the

1:23:49

union is... workers individually for people

1:23:51

individually to call into the attorney

1:23:53

general in Washington state and Call

1:23:56

to the release of Lelow also calling

1:23:58

the new governor up in Washington to

1:24:00

call for the release, bring a wider

1:24:02

attention, making me know that this

1:24:04

person is someone who is important

1:24:06

to the community, cannot be spirited

1:24:09

away to another country where they

1:24:11

are not from, where that is

1:24:13

not their home, and taken away from

1:24:15

their family, the community, and

1:24:17

from the good work that they do. And

1:24:19

the other thing that we're trying to do

1:24:21

is we're trying to get local

1:24:24

officials to also use their voice

1:24:26

to maximize the pressure, to give more

1:24:28

attention to this issue. So that's the

1:24:30

call so far. This rally that we're

1:24:32

having in front of City Hall on

1:24:35

Saturday, April 12th at 2 p.m. is

1:24:37

the beginning of what we hope is

1:24:39

a larger campaign that will not

1:24:41

end until Lello is free and

1:24:43

until these raids stop attacking the

1:24:45

labor movement in the Pacific Northwest.

1:24:48

You know, just because we in

1:24:50

Portland, you know, are not farm

1:24:52

workers, because we don't work with

1:24:54

farm workers, because a lot of

1:24:56

the workers who work here. and maybe never

1:24:58

met a farm worker, it does not mean that

1:25:00

we should not stand shoulder to shoulder and

1:25:03

arm and support the farm workers doing it

1:25:05

up in northern Washington to the hills. And

1:25:07

this begins this fight of building that kind

1:25:09

of level of solidarity begins by showing up

1:25:11

for them. They're doing what they can't do.

1:25:14

Right now they don't have the resources to

1:25:16

go state by state and city by city to

1:25:18

bring attention and awareness to one of their

1:25:20

leaders being attacked. But we can do it. And

1:25:22

if we can do it, we should do it. It's

1:25:24

a moral imperative that little be free. Yeah, and so

1:25:26

I mean statistically there are a lot

1:25:29

of you in Portland listening to the

1:25:31

show but statistically most of you are not

1:25:33

in Portland. Are there other things that people

1:25:35

in the rest of the country and I

1:25:37

guess the rest of the world I know I

1:25:40

know there's some of you statistically don't live in

1:25:42

the US. Yeah, are there things that people

1:25:44

in other places can do to put

1:25:46

pressure specifically for Lalo, but also just

1:25:48

can do in their own communities to,

1:25:50

you know, I mean, put pressure to

1:25:52

stop pressure to stop these raidss. The CII,

1:25:54

the Coalition of Independent Unices, Coalition of

1:25:57

Independent Unions here in the Pacific Northwest,

1:25:59

it was trying... to do and is trying to

1:26:01

do with transient solidarity. The idea is we

1:26:03

are trying to make this work here in the

1:26:05

Pacific Northwest, and if it's useful, if it's

1:26:07

good, if people are paying attention to it,

1:26:09

then we can export this to other cities

1:26:11

and other areas to bring more attention to

1:26:13

these causes. And so with that, when patterning

1:26:16

our contracts together, particularly

1:26:18

on this one issue of transgender

1:26:20

health care and trans inclusive language

1:26:22

in contracts and codifying that between

1:26:24

unions, and having that demand of labor

1:26:26

movement that they not walk away from this

1:26:29

from this, we want to. also do the

1:26:31

same thing with this fight for freedom for

1:26:33

the farm workers union and their leaders

1:26:35

and workers everywhere and the attack will

1:26:37

come soon enough I suppose I would

1:26:40

imagine from this this regime in Washington

1:26:42

yeah if this works we want workers

1:26:44

in other cities that are assisting the

1:26:46

farm worker union taking up the

1:26:48

call of action and fighting for

1:26:50

it so not just let up

1:26:52

whoever comes afterwards because there will

1:26:54

be little's in the future unfortunate

1:26:56

as it may be So if this works here,

1:26:59

if workers hear, as they hear more

1:27:01

updates, we would hope and we would

1:27:03

love if workers elsewhere, if organizing groups

1:27:05

elsewhere, would want to take up this fight

1:27:07

and bring attention to the cause. Hell yeah,

1:27:09

yeah, and I think there is a lot

1:27:12

of, you know, potential and sort

1:27:14

of mobilizations, there's a lot of potential

1:27:16

in getting people to understand that this

1:27:18

stuff's happening and there's a lot of

1:27:20

potential in... cross-union organizing, and also, and

1:27:23

I will say this too, because like,

1:27:25

you know, obviously statistically, like, there are

1:27:27

a large number of people listening to

1:27:29

this who are like union staffers, but

1:27:31

also like most of you are not, that also

1:27:34

doesn't mean that whatever kind of organizing

1:27:36

that you're doing doesn't overlap with this

1:27:38

and doesn't have capacity that they can

1:27:40

bring to bear to stop the entire

1:27:42

deportation regime that we're facing right now.

1:27:45

And that's something that you have to

1:27:47

do, both on the level of solidarity,

1:27:49

on a moral level, and also on

1:27:51

a strategic level, because, again, he is

1:27:54

going to come for you too. So... Yeah. You know,

1:27:56

without making it too personal, like,

1:27:58

I know level personally. I have met

1:28:00

a little many a time over the

1:28:03

years. He's a fantastic person. The reason

1:28:05

why a lot of us as organizers is

1:28:07

why we do this kind of work to

1:28:09

begin with is because we believe as

1:28:11

bizarrely as it may be that we

1:28:13

could be a link in the chain

1:28:15

that makes the world a better place,

1:28:17

that we can leave the world better

1:28:19

off than we found it. And we

1:28:22

also believe in what we're doing because

1:28:24

when we look at people who have

1:28:26

been attacked by corporations and attacked

1:28:28

by the state, we feel a moral

1:28:31

compulsion to help. And what I would say

1:28:33

to folks who are outside of Portland, who

1:28:35

are hearing this story, who hear the

1:28:37

calls to call the Attorney General

1:28:39

in Washington State and demand that

1:28:41

they'll be released to follow up

1:28:43

with the unions by millions on

1:28:46

US Polo Svisia, further direction on

1:28:48

how they can assist and potentially

1:28:50

holding their own rallies and support

1:28:52

and solidarity and bringing attention to

1:28:54

the issue. I would hope that they do this.

1:28:56

Imagine if Lalo were your brother. Imagine

1:28:59

if Lille were your cousin, your father,

1:29:01

your friend, act as if they were

1:29:03

them, because it requires that

1:29:05

level of empathy to have

1:29:07

the kind of solidarity that we

1:29:09

need in order to fight this fascist

1:29:12

regime and everything that it does.

1:29:14

It is easy to say, I will

1:29:16

wait for someone else to do the

1:29:18

work. I will, someone else will come

1:29:20

along and it'll get resolved that way.

1:29:23

No, if you don't do the work,

1:29:25

it just will not get done. And

1:29:27

so we have to go in every

1:29:29

day as part of civic engagement and

1:29:31

assisting the working class as part of

1:29:33

our daily routines and using the kind

1:29:36

of the kind of sense of moral necessity

1:29:38

and of immediate action it requires

1:29:40

that you would do for someone that

1:29:42

was close to you. Because this person

1:29:45

is you just by another name. This

1:29:47

person is your family even if you've

1:29:49

never met them. We are all in this together

1:29:51

as working class people and if we start coming

1:29:53

up with boundaries and reasons for why we shouldn't

1:29:56

stand up for one another, those reasons

1:29:58

then become excuses for everyone. else.

1:30:00

So I would hope that when people hear

1:30:02

this, they look and see the struggle of

1:30:04

this person and they can imagine what

1:30:06

would happen to them in the future

1:30:08

and they say, I would want someone

1:30:10

there for me in my corner in

1:30:12

my time of me. So I will

1:30:14

be there for them and theirs. Yeah,

1:30:16

it reminds me a lot of this

1:30:18

line from Peggy Seeger who wrote an

1:30:21

anti-fascist song called Song of Choice. And one

1:30:23

of the verses that's always stuck

1:30:25

with me is, today the soldiers took away

1:30:27

one. Tomorrow they may take away two.

1:30:29

One April they took away Greece, but surely they

1:30:31

will never take you. And, you know, I mean,

1:30:34

that's the thing that people in the 30s

1:30:36

woke up to, right, is, you know, if you're

1:30:38

in this country, then this is the thing

1:30:40

that you're waking up to now, is that,

1:30:42

yeah, the soldiers are taking people away. And

1:30:44

every day they're taking you away more

1:30:46

and more people. And one day you

1:30:48

wake up, and they've taken entire countries.

1:30:50

And the only way that you can

1:30:53

stop this is by making sure that

1:30:55

the action that you're taking is not

1:30:57

just waking up and going back to

1:31:00

sleep, right? You have to take a

1:31:02

stand, you have to fight, because no

1:31:04

one is coming. The only person

1:31:06

who is coming, for these people,

1:31:08

the only person who is coming,

1:31:10

for these people, the only person

1:31:13

who is coming, for these people,

1:31:15

for the people coming next to

1:31:17

them, right? There always been a

1:31:19

thing about fascism. is that it

1:31:21

relies on us not fighting them,

1:31:24

it relies on us, on our

1:31:26

passivity, it relies on us not

1:31:28

caring enough about the people that

1:31:30

they take first, you know, to sit

1:31:33

back and do nothing and think that

1:31:35

we can wait. And you can't.

1:31:37

You have to start right now, and

1:31:39

you have to stop them before

1:31:41

they advance any further, and

1:31:43

you have to roll back what

1:31:46

they've already done. And this

1:31:48

is our opportunity to do that.

1:31:50

Yeah. Do you have anything else that you

1:31:52

want to add before we head out?

1:31:54

And we will put links to a whole

1:31:57

bunch of things in the description

1:31:59

to this. Yeah, I suppose to those

1:32:01

that would want to know more about

1:32:03

not just the struggle of the

1:32:05

Farm Workers Union, but also

1:32:07

the general experiments in independent

1:32:10

unionism here in the Pacific

1:32:12

Northwest, I'd highly encourage the

1:32:14

folks take a deep dive

1:32:16

and see that to organize

1:32:18

your workplace to have the kind

1:32:21

of solidarity with your coworkers.

1:32:23

You need not be dependent

1:32:25

upon someone else and other

1:32:27

organizations to come in. and sort

1:32:30

of rescue you from the

1:32:32

mystery and drudgery of non-union

1:32:34

workplaces, you can do it too. You can create,

1:32:36

you have it in your head, in your own

1:32:38

mind, in your own hands, the ability

1:32:41

to organize, the ability to fight

1:32:43

with your coworkers, you have the

1:32:45

kinds of clever problem-solving skills that

1:32:47

every worker has in order to

1:32:49

combat the boss and create a

1:32:51

better world than the one that

1:32:53

currently exists, and also that when

1:32:56

it comes to issues like standing

1:32:58

up, for this struggle now and

1:33:00

struggles in the future. I would say you

1:33:02

have it now, the creative capacity

1:33:04

to in whatever city you're

1:33:06

in, to make connections to build

1:33:08

inroads with the labor movement,

1:33:11

to build inroads with working

1:33:13

class people, and to try to

1:33:15

create those bonds that happen. We

1:33:17

here are trying to build closer

1:33:19

bonds with city workers. and farm

1:33:21

workers out in the country. It's an important

1:33:24

struggle because one is going to be more

1:33:26

and more important in the future. You don't

1:33:28

have to wait for anyone else to tell

1:33:30

you how to do that. You yourself can

1:33:32

show solidarity and work together to build those

1:33:34

kinds of bonds now so that in the

1:33:37

future, you can create working class movements

1:33:39

that whether that takes the form of

1:33:41

collective bargaining or something else. Organizing for

1:33:43

the common good is useful no matter

1:33:45

in what legal capacity it happens. Yeah,

1:33:47

and I mean, you know, one last

1:33:49

point I want to add about that

1:33:51

in terms of looking at like you not needing

1:33:54

helps do things like, you know, I know a

1:33:56

lot of the people who, you know, like

1:33:58

are the organizers who are hired. by places

1:34:00

like the UAW, like AFL-CO unions,

1:34:02

right? They're good people, like they're

1:34:05

good people, they're good organizers, they

1:34:07

don't know anything that you can't

1:34:09

learn, like a lot of these

1:34:11

people are just literally college students,

1:34:14

right, who are recruited, like, from

1:34:16

college campuses and are thrown with

1:34:18

no training into organizing these

1:34:20

things, right? And, you know, and again,

1:34:22

these are people who are just like

1:34:24

stepping out of classrooms. into these

1:34:26

organizing scenarios with very minimal training

1:34:29

and they've been able to do

1:34:31

it. And if those people can

1:34:33

do it, so can you. Like I know

1:34:35

you, I know these organizers, and the only

1:34:37

difference between them and you is that they

1:34:39

spent some time learning some things, and then

1:34:41

they apply the same tools, like they

1:34:43

apply in some ways worse versions of

1:34:46

the same tools that the independent union

1:34:48

organizers use, and they're all tools that

1:34:50

you can learn. Yeah, and if any of

1:34:53

the people listening want to learn some

1:34:55

of those tools, or need help with

1:34:57

education and training or just want to

1:34:59

make connections and inroads with workers elsewhere,

1:35:01

contact the coalition of independent

1:35:04

units and seeing how we can

1:35:06

build these bonds together because I think

1:35:08

that we will problem solve how to

1:35:10

defeat this regime one way or

1:35:12

another, but I think that we

1:35:14

particularly in the independent union space

1:35:16

provide a unique possibility for how

1:35:18

this can happen. Because since we

1:35:20

are not tied to larger established

1:35:23

contracts, we're not tied to, you know,

1:35:25

jurisdictional disputes, we're not tied to a

1:35:27

lot of the legacies of some of

1:35:29

the larger unions, God bless them, we

1:35:32

can create and fashion a labor movement

1:35:34

that doesn't have to live in a

1:35:36

labor movement that doesn't have to live

1:35:39

by those rules. You know, if you

1:35:41

imagine the idea of what it would look

1:35:43

like to rebound the CIO in the 1930,

1:35:45

if you would want to see, we can create

1:35:48

that together today. And today it

1:35:50

takes the form of standing up in solidarity

1:35:52

with Lelow and farm workers' union up in

1:35:54

northern Washington, not because we get anything

1:35:56

from it, not because it's easy, but

1:35:58

precisely because it is difficult. precisely because

1:36:00

it is a moral compulsion on us to

1:36:03

take action today for it. We don't have

1:36:05

to wait for anyone to tell us what

1:36:07

to do. As part of an independent labor

1:36:09

movement, we get to decide our future and

1:36:11

our fate and we get to decide our

1:36:13

struggles. Yeah, and if and when we beat

1:36:15

them here, we can beat them tomorrow, we

1:36:17

can beat the next day, and one day, you

1:36:19

know, we will have one, one victory too many

1:36:22

for them to hold on to power. And that's

1:36:24

the only way forward. Absolutely. fascism wants

1:36:26

you to believe in a nihilistic perspective

1:36:28

of the world. They want you to

1:36:30

believe in which it is hopeless to

1:36:32

fight back. They want you to believe

1:36:34

just doom scroll forever and don't take

1:36:36

any action and focus on yourselves and

1:36:38

naval gaze indefinitely. I don't know. The way that

1:36:40

you find out the kind of person

1:36:43

that you are and the way that

1:36:45

you build... the kind of future that

1:36:47

you want for yourselves, your families, for

1:36:49

your communities, for the people that you

1:36:51

don't even know and never will meet

1:36:53

what you want a good life for

1:36:56

them. The way that you do that

1:36:58

is you take action now, you start

1:37:00

organizing, you do what you can, you

1:37:02

build what you can. That's how we

1:37:04

do this, you build what you can.

1:37:06

That's how we do this. Like we

1:37:09

said earlier, they want you to believe

1:37:11

that the fight is already. We don't

1:37:13

believe this out of nowhere. We believe this

1:37:15

because we truly do see that the better

1:37:17

world is possible if we fight. Yeah, and

1:37:19

I think that's a spectacular place to end.

1:37:22

Mark, thank you so much for coming on

1:37:24

the show. Yeah, thank you. And everyone else

1:37:26

who's listening to this, go out and fight.

1:37:45

Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith. And it's

1:37:47

me, Harley Quinn Smith. That's my daughter, man,

1:37:49

who my wife has always said is just a

1:37:51

beardless, depless version of me. And that's the name

1:37:53

of our podcast. Beardless, depless me. I'm the old

1:37:55

one. I'm the young one. And every week we

1:37:58

try to make each other laugh really hard. It

1:38:00

sounds innocent, doesn't it? A lot of cussing. A

1:38:02

lot of bad language. It's for adults only. Or,

1:38:04

listen to it with your kid. Could be a

1:38:06

family show. We're not quite sure. We're still figuring

1:38:08

it out. It's a work in progress. Listen to

1:38:11

Beardless. This is me on the I Heart Radio

1:38:13

app, Apple podcast, or wherever. You get your

1:38:15

podcast. Do you remember what you

1:38:17

said the first night I came

1:38:19

over here? How goes lower? From

1:38:21

Blumhouse TV, I-Hart podcast, and Ember

1:38:23

20 comes in all new fictional

1:38:25

comedy podcast series. Join the flighty

1:38:27

Damien Hearst as he unravels the

1:38:29

mystery of his vanished boyfriend. And

1:38:31

Santi was gone. I've been spending

1:38:33

all my time looking for answers

1:38:35

about what happened to Santi. And

1:38:37

what's the way to find a

1:38:39

missing person? Sleep with everyone he

1:38:42

knew, obviously. Hmm, pillow talk. the

1:38:44

most unwelcome window into the human

1:38:46

psyche. Follow our out of his

1:38:48

element hero as he engages in

1:38:50

a series of ill-conceived investigative hookups.

1:38:53

Mama always used to say, God

1:38:55

gave me gumption in place of

1:38:57

a gag reflex. And, as I

1:39:00

was about to learn, no amount

1:39:02

of showering can wash your hands

1:39:04

of a bad hookup. Listen

1:39:07

to the hookup on

1:39:09

the I-Hart Radio app,

1:39:11

Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:39:13

you listen to your favorite

1:39:16

shows. On November 5th,

1:39:18

2018, at 6.33am, a

1:39:20

red Volkswagen Golf was

1:39:22

found abandoned in a

1:39:24

ditch out in Sleephole

1:39:26

Valley. The driver's seat

1:39:28

door was open. No

1:39:30

traces of footsteps leaving

1:39:32

the vehicle. No belongings

1:39:35

were found, except for

1:39:37

a cassette tape lodged

1:39:39

in the player. On

1:39:41

that tape were ten.

1:39:43

Vile. No, no, no,

1:39:45

no, no, no! No!

1:39:47

Ah! grotesque. Oh my

1:39:50

God! Oh my God!

1:39:52

Horrific stories. But to

1:39:54

this day have been

1:39:56

kept restricted from the

1:39:59

public. Until now. You

1:40:01

feel in this too? A

1:40:03

horror anthology podcast. Listen

1:40:06

on the I Heart

1:40:08

Radio app. Apple podcasts

1:40:10

or wherever you get

1:40:12

your podcast. I'm Israel

1:40:14

Gutierrez and I'm hosting a

1:40:17

new podcast. Dub dynasty.

1:40:19

The story of how the

1:40:21

Golden State Warriors have dominated the NBA

1:40:23

for over a decade. our NBA champions.

1:40:26

From the building of the core that

1:40:28

included Clay Thompson and Dreymont Green to

1:40:30

one of the boldest coaching decisions in

1:40:33

the history of the sport. I just

1:40:35

felt like the biggest thing was to

1:40:37

earn the trust of the players and

1:40:40

let the players know that we were

1:40:42

here to try to help them take

1:40:44

the next step not tear anything down.

1:40:47

Today the Warriors dynasty remains alive in

1:40:49

large part because of a scrawny

1:40:51

six-foot two-foot hoopper. who everyone seems

1:40:53

to love. For what Steph is

1:40:55

done for the game, he's certainly

1:40:58

on that like Mount Rushmore for

1:41:00

guys that have changed it. Come

1:41:02

revisit this magical Warriors ride. This

1:41:04

is Dub Dynasty. The Dubs dynasty

1:41:07

is still very much alive. Listen

1:41:09

to Dub Dynasty on the I-Hart

1:41:11

Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:41:14

you get your podcast. Hello

1:41:23

and welcome to Ikrapin here. I

1:41:25

want you to imagine a world

1:41:27

where everyone shared a second language,

1:41:30

not because of imperial conquest, but

1:41:32

out of a shared desire for

1:41:34

unity and understanding. That

1:41:36

was the dream behind Esperanto,

1:41:38

a constructed language designed

1:41:41

to be the basis for

1:41:43

global bilingualism. Long before I learned

1:41:45

anything about anarchism, I spent

1:41:47

some time trying to learn

1:41:49

Esperanto. It had shown up on my

1:41:52

duelingo one day and it seemed like

1:41:54

such a fascinating and simple project to

1:41:56

pick up. I was enamoured with the

1:41:58

philosophy behind it so I'd generally

1:42:00

spent a few months on and off trying

1:42:02

to learn it. That was probably a decade ago

1:42:05

at this point, so I don't remember

1:42:07

too much about it, but the connection

1:42:09

was there. And it's really because I've

1:42:11

been exploring this topic for this

1:42:13

episode that I ended up going back

1:42:15

and dabbling in some of it again. I've

1:42:17

learned recently that there's actually

1:42:20

somewhat of a connection between

1:42:22

Esperanto and Anachism. So let's

1:42:24

take the time to explore the

1:42:26

origins of Asperanto. It's Anicus connections,

1:42:28

its floors. and its future. My

1:42:30

name is Andrew Seage and I'm here

1:42:32

once again with... It's me, it's James

1:42:34

again, very excited for this one.

1:42:37

Yes, you're familiar with Esperanto,

1:42:39

right? Yeah, very familiar. I wrote about

1:42:41

it a little bit in my first

1:42:44

book and my PhD dissertation. Also, the

1:42:46

last living person to participate in

1:42:48

the popular Olympics, which is what

1:42:51

I wrote my book about, was

1:42:53

an aspirantist, part of the project

1:42:55

of the popular front. in Catalonia was

1:42:58

to bring people together through sport and

1:43:00

then Esperanto is going to be this

1:43:02

thing that would, as you mentioned, like bridge

1:43:04

the gaps between people. Right. Yes, it's a

1:43:06

really inspiring project. And so I

1:43:08

know you're probably going to know all

1:43:10

this information, but I do have to

1:43:12

share it with the audience. Yeah, I'm excited. I

1:43:15

never really did a full run down Esperanto. It

1:43:17

just appeared. And I was like, holy shit, that's

1:43:19

cool. So I'm going to learn a lot. Sure,

1:43:21

so Esperanto was first constructed

1:43:24

in a little booklet in

1:43:26

1887 by Polish Jewish ophthalmologist

1:43:28

L.L. Salmonoff. According to the

1:43:31

Encyclopedia Britannical, the name itself

1:43:33

comes from the pseudonym he took

1:43:35

on to publish the booklet.

1:43:37

He called himself Dr. O' Esperanto,

1:43:40

meaning one who hopes. And

1:43:42

hope really analyzed the whole

1:43:44

project. According to a BBC

1:43:46

article written by Jose Luis

1:43:48

Benare Donda. He lived as a

1:43:50

Polish Jew in the multicultural Russian

1:43:52

Empire, in a time rife with racial

1:43:55

and national conflict. He was trying to

1:43:57

promote peace and understanding and he

1:43:59

saw an... international language as a

1:44:01

way to do that. With a flag of

1:44:04

green and white, the colors of

1:44:06

hope and peace, for his efforts,

1:44:08

Zaman Hoff himself was nominated 14

1:44:10

times for the Nobel Peace Prize.

1:44:12

He genuinely believed that if we

1:44:14

all shared a common second

1:44:16

language, quote, education, ideals, convictions,

1:44:19

aims would be the same

1:44:21

too, and all nations would be

1:44:23

united in a common brotherhood,

1:44:25

end quote. Esperanto

1:44:27

was created in a time when

1:44:29

modernism was on the rise, and

1:44:32

the idea of rationality and science

1:44:34

was being used to quote and

1:44:36

quote optimize the world. When it

1:44:38

was featured in Paris's exposition

1:44:40

universal in 1900, the language caught

1:44:43

on amongst the French intelligence

1:44:45

here, who sought as more optimal

1:44:47

in the messy and illogical realm

1:44:49

of natural languages. Because

1:44:51

it was so easy... All words and sentences

1:44:53

being built from 16 basic rules that

1:44:56

could fit on a paper, and the

1:44:58

language lacked the confusing exceptions and

1:45:00

special rules of other languages, it

1:45:02

was once seen as the language

1:45:05

of the future. Esperanto made its

1:45:07

full-fledged public debut in 1905,

1:45:09

when 7.5 published the Fundamento

1:45:12

Desperanto, which laid on the basic

1:45:14

principles of languages structure and

1:45:16

formation. Esperanto was designed

1:45:18

to be simple, logical, and

1:45:21

accessible. drawn from the influence

1:45:23

of romance, Germanic and Slavic

1:45:25

languages in its construction. The

1:45:27

orthography is phonetic, so all the

1:45:30

words are spelled as pronounced, and

1:45:32

the grammar is so straightforward

1:45:34

there's a consistent word ending

1:45:37

for nouns, pluralisation, adjectives and

1:45:39

verbs. But although simple, it

1:45:41

can convey complexity. There's a

1:45:43

lot of suffixes you can add to

1:45:46

give degrees of meaning, and there's room

1:45:48

for compound words too. Its European

1:45:50

focus would be the target of

1:45:52

criticism later on, but it actually ended

1:45:54

up being picked up in some

1:45:56

unusual places anyway. Zamenhof translated

1:45:59

literature. and wrote original verse

1:46:01

and after years of effort there

1:46:03

were speakers to be found across

1:46:05

Europe, the Americas, China and

1:46:08

Japan. By 1908 the Universala

1:46:10

Esperanto Association was founded

1:46:12

and it can now find

1:46:14

members in 83 countries worldwide.

1:46:16

Today is also 50 national

1:46:18

Esperanto associations and

1:46:20

22 international professional

1:46:22

associations that use

1:46:24

Esperanto. There's an annual

1:46:27

World Esperanto Congress and

1:46:29

more than a hundred

1:46:31

periodicals published in Esperanto.

1:46:33

Estimates range widely in terms

1:46:35

of how many people speak

1:46:37

Esperanto today. They are apparently

1:46:39

a handful of native speakers.

1:46:42

Folks were raised speaking Esperanto.

1:46:44

Oh wow. Yeah, it's really really cool.

1:46:46

Yeah. But L2 speakers are somewhere

1:46:49

between 30,000 L2 being, you know,

1:46:51

second language speakers, are somewhere between

1:46:53

30,000 to 2 million. According

1:46:55

to Wilfirth's article on Esperanto,

1:46:58

anarchism, there are tens of thousands of

1:47:00

books in Esperanto and several hundred

1:47:02

mostly swampy articles that appear

1:47:05

regularly. Hard day at day

1:47:07

passes throughout international meetings, such

1:47:09

as those of specialized organizations,

1:47:12

conferences, youth get-togethers, seminars, group

1:47:14

holidays, and regional meetings. There

1:47:16

are several radio stations that

1:47:18

broadcast programs in Esperanto. An

1:47:20

Esperanto has even been used by

1:47:23

couples of different origins as a

1:47:25

family language. It's cool. Funny

1:47:27

enough, as with every language, even

1:47:29

an aspiring universal language, it has

1:47:32

since had its offshoots. I saw

1:47:34

in Wikipedia that merely a year

1:47:36

after Zavenhofe's creation of Esperanto, in

1:47:38

1888, Dutch author Jay Brakman proposed

1:47:41

a few changes to language, like

1:47:43

combining the ending for the adjective

1:47:45

and adverb. changing conjugations, introducing

1:47:48

more Latin roots, getting

1:47:50

rid of the diacritics

1:47:52

and so on. This language will be

1:47:54

called Mundo Lingco and it was

1:47:56

the first of many offshoots from

1:47:58

Esperanto proper. Hammond Hoff

1:48:00

would try to reform the language

1:48:02

at one point in 1894, but

1:48:05

it was rejected by the Esperanto

1:48:07

community and eventually even himself. These

1:48:09

reforms were later to be used

1:48:11

to develop EDO, another attempt at

1:48:13

universal language with far less success.

1:48:15

I also learned via Wikipedia there

1:48:18

was an attempt to make Esperanto

1:48:20

more complex by introducing Cherokee components,

1:48:22

called police poe, created by a

1:48:24

Native American activist named Billy Ray

1:48:26

Waldon. Esperanto speakers continue to play

1:48:28

with the language in all sorts

1:48:31

of ways to this day. Esperanto

1:48:33

is an evolving language and Zarnoff

1:48:35

himself is honoured as part of

1:48:37

this global Esperanto culture. They celebrate

1:48:39

his birthday, the 15th of December.

1:48:41

There are statues and streets and

1:48:44

plaques remembering him worldwide and even

1:48:46

an asteroid bears his name. At

1:48:48

one point, according to the BBC

1:48:50

article, there was an effort to

1:48:52

establish an Esperanto speaking land called

1:48:54

Amiquejo. which would have been a

1:48:57

3.5 square kilometer territory between the

1:48:59

Netherlands, Germany and France. Yeah, 3.5

1:49:01

square kilometers. Yeah, not huge, yeah.

1:49:03

It's like a big, I know,

1:49:05

we've got a few of those

1:49:07

like little ones in Europe, you

1:49:10

know. Yeah, a couple microstates, it

1:49:12

could have been another microstate, but

1:49:14

the idea was very quickly squashed

1:49:16

following World War I. Yeah, I

1:49:18

know the Cenite, the Spanish anarcho

1:49:20

Cenocindiclis Union was like like... in

1:49:23

its first Congress, like its foundational

1:49:25

Congress, I suppose, they were like,

1:49:27

and everyone has to, everyone should

1:49:29

try and learn Esperanto, like that

1:49:31

was one of their, like, the

1:49:33

things at the foundation of like

1:49:36

what became probably the most powerful

1:49:38

anarchist movement the world's ever seen.

1:49:40

They were like, also this is

1:49:42

a big thing. Yeah, yeah, Esperanto

1:49:44

is really huge in the anarchist

1:49:46

movement at a certain point. Yeah.

1:49:49

But we're gonna get to those

1:49:51

connections soon enough. I

1:50:02

want to bring up this other

1:50:04

interesting story. There was actually an

1:50:06

effort by Esperantists, including a delegate

1:50:09

from Iran, to get the language

1:50:11

to become the official language of

1:50:14

the League of Nations. But take

1:50:16

one guess as to which country

1:50:18

blocked that effort. Was it one

1:50:21

of the Anglophone countries? No. Oh,

1:50:23

wow. The French. It was the

1:50:25

French. There is not a state

1:50:28

more invested in its language than

1:50:30

France. Indeed. They have laws, I

1:50:33

think, about broadcasting music and dubbing

1:50:35

films and things. Yeah, the French

1:50:37

government seemingly hated Esperanto, at least

1:50:40

according to an article on imp

1:50:42

of the reverse blog site. They

1:50:44

blocked its study in universities and

1:50:47

public schools, and as the article

1:50:49

quotes the opponents directly. Quote, on

1:50:52

September 10th, 1902, the New York

1:50:54

Tribune ran a translation of a

1:50:56

piece by the editor-in-chief of the

1:50:59

matine, Stefan Lazon. Mr. Lazon spent

1:51:01

half his editorial writing about Esperanto.

1:51:03

And I'm not going to do

1:51:06

a French accent for this section,

1:51:08

but just imagine, like, the most

1:51:10

French Frenchman reading this. That fins

1:51:13

or Albanians fevered such a propaganda

1:51:15

is comprehensible. Their dialect has no

1:51:18

chance of imposing itself on the

1:51:20

universe. They need a second language,

1:51:22

just as well Esperanto as any

1:51:25

other. But that French people, or

1:51:27

English, or Germans, could have let

1:51:29

themselves be allured by this linguistic

1:51:32

Bolshevism. That is far more extraordinary.

1:51:34

It is nevertheless a fact that

1:51:37

Esperanto, which was born 25 years

1:51:39

ago and ought to have died

1:51:41

through ridicule, continues to have disciples

1:51:44

in Europe. Every year in a

1:51:46

different capital they hold a Congress

1:51:48

at which they are not very

1:51:51

numerous but where they make a

1:51:53

great noise. They get so excited

1:51:56

that Quite recently, the Minister of

1:51:58

Public Instruction had to address a

1:52:00

circular to all the French educational

1:52:03

resorts to warn them against the

1:52:05

danger of Esperanto. An article in

1:52:07

the Washington Herald on that same

1:52:10

day explained the danger, at least

1:52:12

according to the Ministry of Public

1:52:15

Instruction. The reason for this order,

1:52:17

according to certain schoolteachers, is that

1:52:19

teaching of a language as easy

1:52:22

as Esperanto, endangers the existence of

1:52:24

the French language and thus the

1:52:26

national solidarity of the country. They

1:52:29

contend that children will naturally take

1:52:31

to an easy language as Esperanto,

1:52:33

and in that time French and

1:52:36

English would perish, and the literary

1:52:38

standard of the world would be

1:52:41

debased. Furthermore, they argue that a

1:52:43

national language plays a predominant part

1:52:45

in maintaining national unity and points

1:52:48

to Poland and Lorraine as examples.

1:52:50

Esperanto is an artificial language of

1:52:52

no real merit, writes one professor.

1:52:55

It has no very definite origin,

1:52:57

and one aims to draw the

1:53:00

scattered people of the world together.

1:53:02

Does it off rather tend to

1:53:04

de-nationalization? End quote. They're not wrong.

1:53:07

Like France is like language if

1:53:09

you read like a peasant's inter

1:53:11

Frenchman is kind of the classic

1:53:14

work on like French nationalization. But

1:53:16

like in order to make people

1:53:19

French they did have to suppress

1:53:21

like Basque and Breton and Catalan

1:53:23

and other languages right and make

1:53:26

people go to schools where they

1:53:28

learned French and conceived of themselves

1:53:30

as French as a result of

1:53:33

that. Yeah, their imposition of national

1:53:35

identity was perhaps among the most

1:53:37

successful in the world. In terms

1:53:40

of its ooliness and its consistent

1:53:42

enforcement. It shows like nations are

1:53:45

always projects of the bourgeois era,

1:53:47

like at least I would argue

1:53:49

that and so a lot of

1:53:52

other people, but like the French

1:53:54

example is one where we can

1:53:56

see it more clearly than others.

1:53:59

Like it's a state and specifically

1:54:01

like a certain class within the

1:54:04

state. project to enforce and continue

1:54:06

to perpetuate this narrative of nation.

1:54:08

And you know, they weren't the

1:54:11

only enemies of Esperanto. And do

1:54:13

you know that saying, judge me

1:54:15

by my enemies? Yeah, who else

1:54:18

have we got? Nazi Germany, Francoist

1:54:20

Spain, and the Soviet Union also

1:54:23

hated Esperanto. Gets cooler with everyone.

1:54:25

The Nazis, they were nationalists and

1:54:27

Zaman Hoff was Jewish. So his

1:54:30

family was actually targeted and the

1:54:32

languages banned. and Esperantists were targeted

1:54:34

and put in camps during the

1:54:37

Holocaust, which is really tragic. Yeah,

1:54:39

pretty fucked. Yeah. His whole family

1:54:41

was heavily targeted by not Germany.

1:54:44

Franco associated Esperanto with internationalism and

1:54:46

anarchism, which true. Yeah, he wasn't

1:54:49

wrong. So it was targeted for

1:54:51

a while. Yeah. And the Soviets,

1:54:53

while originally recognizing Esperantists, eventually reversed

1:54:56

that policy under Stalin during the

1:54:58

great purge and executed, exiled or

1:55:00

googued, Esperantists. And as you can

1:55:03

imagine, all that repression, all at

1:55:05

once, kind of killed Esperanto's momentum.

1:55:08

Today, despite its goal of being

1:55:10

a truly international language, Esperanto's global

1:55:12

retremains uneven. While it has made

1:55:15

some strides in recent years, it's

1:55:17

still underrepresented in many parts of

1:55:19

Africa and Asia. The majority of

1:55:22

Esperanto speakers today are in Europe.

1:55:24

Those development outside of Europe deserves

1:55:27

some attention, as Esperanto management remark

1:55:29

in China, Iran, Togo, and the

1:55:31

Democratic Republic of Congo. But the

1:55:34

response to Esperanto historically should give

1:55:36

you an indication as to how

1:55:38

anarchists must have felt about Esperanto.

1:55:41

As an internationalist or anti-nationalist movement,

1:55:43

anarchismism was very supportive of the

1:55:45

Esperanto project. Let me run you

1:55:48

through the timeline, could see Wilfirths

1:55:50

Esperanto anarchism. One of the earliest

1:55:53

anarchist Esperanto groups was founded in

1:55:55

Stockholm in 1905. The same year,

1:55:57

the anarchist Paul Bruthelot founded the...

1:56:00

country magazine Esperanto. Similar groups soon

1:56:02

emerged in Bulgaria, China, and other

1:56:04

countries. In 1906, anarchist anarcho cynicalists

1:56:07

founded an international association, Paco Liberico,

1:56:09

Peace Freedom, which published the International

1:56:12

Social Review. By 1910, Paco Liberico

1:56:14

merged with Esperantista La Veristaro to

1:56:16

form Liberiga Stelo, Star of liberation,

1:56:19

strengthening anarchist Esperanto networks. The 1907

1:56:21

International Annicus Congress in Amsterdam formally

1:56:23

addressed the role of Esperanto in

1:56:26

international communication. Subsequent Annicus Congresses continue

1:56:28

to pass resolutions advocating for Esperanto's

1:56:31

use within the movement. By 1914,

1:56:33

these Annicus Esperantist organizations had published

1:56:35

extensive revolutionary literature, including Annicus texts

1:56:38

in Esperanto. Around this time, correspondence

1:56:40

between European and Japanese anarchists became

1:56:42

more active, facilitated by Esperanto. In

1:56:45

Prague, Eugene Adam proposed the formation

1:56:47

of Senesciessa Associate Tutmander, the SAT,

1:56:50

or the World International Association. Unlike

1:56:52

other Esperanto associations, SAT rejected nationalism

1:56:54

wholesale and sought to create a

1:56:57

transnational, class-conscious workers' movement. To quote,

1:56:59

why is there an Esperanto workers'

1:57:01

movement by Gary Michael? SAT was

1:57:04

not meant to usurp the role

1:57:06

of political parties by engaging in

1:57:08

political struggles directly, but was to

1:57:11

be a cultural association engaged in

1:57:13

workers' education, one that would help

1:57:16

to break down national and ethnic

1:57:18

barriers between workers by involving them

1:57:20

in practical collective activity, bringing workers

1:57:23

into contact, freeing them from the

1:57:25

shackles of nationalism. SAT's ideas, and

1:57:27

especially the ideas of its a-nationalist

1:57:30

faction, were an early statement of

1:57:32

an idea that has more recently

1:57:35

come to be known as globalization

1:57:37

from below. Since August 1921, 79

1:57:39

workers from 15 countries gathered in

1:57:42

Prague to formally established SAT. By

1:57:44

1929 to 1930, SAT had grown

1:57:46

to 6,524 members across 42 countries,

1:57:49

reaching its peak influence. The use

1:57:51

of Esperanto flourished in German workers'

1:57:54

movements between 1920 and 1933. By

1:57:56

1932, the German Workers' Esperanto League

1:57:58

had 4,000 members, leading to Esperanto

1:58:01

being called the Workers Latin. But,

1:58:03

as you can imagine, this was

1:58:05

not to last by the time

1:58:08

Hitler came into power. The Scientific

1:58:10

Anarchist Library of the International Language,

1:58:12

or ISAB, was founded in the

1:58:15

USSR in 1929, publishing anarchist works

1:58:17

by Kropotkin and Anbervoy in Esperanto.

1:58:20

This also would not last the

1:58:22

great purge. The Berlin Group of

1:58:24

Anarchist Nicholas Esperantus greeted the Second

1:58:27

Congress of the International Workers' Association

1:58:29

in Amsterdam in 1925 and reported

1:58:31

that Esperanto had become so integrated

1:58:34

into their movement that an international

1:58:36

libertarian Esperantist organization had formed. This

1:58:39

likely referred to the T-L-E-S, the

1:58:41

World League of Stateless Esperantists, which

1:58:43

later merged with SAT. Esperanto was

1:58:46

also popping off amongst anarchists and

1:58:48

socialists in Korea, China, and Japan.

1:58:50

Liu Shifu, a key figure in

1:58:53

Chinese anarchism, began publishing La Vocho

1:58:55

de La Popolo, the Voice of

1:58:58

the People, in 1913, the first

1:59:00

anarchist periodical in China. His work

1:59:02

relied heavily on information from Indonesia

1:59:05

Socialia Social Revio. and helped popularize

1:59:07

Esperanto in China. Japanese anarchists and

1:59:09

socialists, as I mentioned, were among

1:59:12

the earliest Esperantists in the country,

1:59:14

but faced heavy persecution. And sadly,

1:59:16

between Imperial Japan, Franco-Spy, Nazi Germany,

1:59:19

and Salas, Russia, the rise of

1:59:21

totalitarian regimes led into World War

1:59:24

II largely suppressed the anarchist Esperanto

1:59:26

movement. After the war, the Parasanicus

1:59:28

Esperanto group was the first to

1:59:31

resume organized work. Lonchund publication, Sen

1:59:33

Sh Dalitano, in 1946. Most Anachist

1:59:35

asparantists have since been organized within

1:59:38

SAT, with an anachist faction maintaining

1:59:40

its autonomy. In 1969, this faction

1:59:43

began publishing the Libera Sana Bolteno.

1:59:45

Later in the Libera Santa Legilo.

1:59:47

By 1997, SAT membership had dwindled

1:59:50

to fewer than 1,500 members. The

1:59:52

initial radical vision of SAT was

1:59:54

weakened by political shifts and the

1:59:57

growing dominance of English as a

1:59:59

global lingua franca. The early separations

2:00:02

in SAT and mainstream Esperanto organizations

2:00:04

was a response to bourgeois political

2:00:06

neutrality, but it also contributed to

2:00:09

its marginalisation. And today the anarchist

2:00:11

Esperanto movement exists largely as a

2:00:13

niche within SAT. So what can

2:00:16

we say about the role of

2:00:18

Esperanto today? Well... One of the

2:00:21

more interesting currents I found in

2:00:23

the Esperanto community, mentioned by Firth,

2:00:25

is Raumismo, a philosophy named after

2:00:28

the Finnish city of Rauma, where

2:00:30

a youth Congress in 1980 helped

2:00:32

define this approach. Raumismo views Esperanto

2:00:35

speakers as a kind of linguistic

2:00:37

diaspora, a cultural group bound together

2:00:39

by a shared language rather than

2:00:42

a national identity. Instead of focusing

2:00:44

on making Esperanto a universal second

2:00:47

language, Raoumistouge embraced it as just

2:00:49

one language among many, valuing its

2:00:51

use in literature, culture, and everyday

2:00:54

communication, without any grand ideological ambitions.

2:00:56

But it's possible Esperanto can still

2:00:58

play a role in facilitating exchange

2:01:01

and collaboration between people of different

2:01:03

linguistic backgrounds. A German anarchist once

2:01:06

lamented the barrier's international understanding, quoted

2:01:08

in Firth's article. More or less,

2:01:10

in isolation for one another, We

2:01:13

work and fight without engaging in

2:01:15

exchange about our victories and defeats,

2:01:17

and without supporting and encouraging one

2:01:20

another. Intensifying contact above the regional

2:01:22

level with people having similar ideas

2:01:25

and aims, should be an important

2:01:27

component of our work in order

2:01:29

to make effective active solidarity possible."

2:01:32

And that's the trouble even today.

2:01:34

Linguistic barriers hinder international cooperation. Groups

2:01:36

struggle to maintain foreign language correspondence,

2:01:39

organize multilingual meetings, or find interpreters.

2:01:41

Instead, communication tends to rely on

2:01:43

chance. You know if someone in

2:01:46

a group happens to speak a

2:01:48

certain language, that determines who they

2:01:51

can connect with. But when those

2:01:53

key individuals move on, those connections

2:01:55

can have fallen apart. So I

2:01:58

get the appeal. I mean, wouldn't

2:02:00

it be beneficial for these movements

2:02:02

and for any interest group working

2:02:05

across language barriers to have a

2:02:07

relatively easy to learn politically neutral

2:02:10

means of communication? Major languages like

2:02:12

English, Spanish or French don't fully

2:02:14

solve the problem as they come

2:02:17

with historical baggage and imbalances in

2:02:19

fluency levels. Esperanto on the other

2:02:21

hand provides a more equitable solution

2:02:24

because everybody is starting from the

2:02:26

same point. Since it isn't tied

2:02:29

to any one nation, it avoids

2:02:31

the power dynamics that arise when

2:02:33

non-native speakers was conformed to the

2:02:36

linguistic norms of dominant cultures. Unlike

2:02:38

English, which often privileges native speakers

2:02:40

and places others as perpetual liners,

2:02:43

Esperanto fosters a more level playing

2:02:45

field. English is treated like a

2:02:47

global lingua franca right now, but

2:02:50

a lot of people leave school

2:02:52

without ever developing enough fluency to

2:02:55

navigate an English-dominated world. And English

2:02:57

is not the easiest language to

2:02:59

learn. Esperanto, regardless of whether it

2:03:02

ever becomes a global standard, offers

2:03:04

an alternative path. It can help

2:03:06

people overcome language learning anxieties, as

2:03:09

particularly those who feel disempowered by

2:03:11

traditional educational systems, and it can

2:03:14

inspire an interest in language itself.

2:03:16

If you've ever met an Esperanto

2:03:18

speaker, you know that they are

2:03:21

very passionate about linguistics, more often

2:03:23

than not. Many of its speakers

2:03:25

go on to study linguistics, language

2:03:28

politics. or even lesser known languages.

2:03:30

It's also a great way to

2:03:33

develop translation skills in a friendly

2:03:35

cooperative environment. For monolingual English speakers,

2:03:37

using Esperanto can be an eye-open

2:03:40

experience. It puts them the shoes

2:03:42

of those who never got to

2:03:44

rely on their native language in

2:03:47

international settings. Rather viewing Esperanto as

2:03:49

a competitor to other languages, perhaps

2:03:52

a more productive approach is to

2:03:54

see it as a tool for

2:03:56

promoting multilingualism. cultural exchange, and a

2:03:59

more cosmopolitan mindset. Within the Esperanto-speaking

2:04:01

community, opinions on its future vary

2:04:03

widely. But one thing is clear.

2:04:06

The question of how we communicate

2:04:08

across linguistic divides is still very

2:04:10

much alive, and Esperanto offers but

2:04:13

one possible answer. However, as I

2:04:15

alluded to earlier, Esperanto is not

2:04:18

without its critiques, as covered by

2:04:20

Firth. Let's start with one of

2:04:22

the most frequent critiques. Esperanto is

2:04:25

an artificial language. Unlike the so-called

2:04:27

natural languages which evolved organically over

2:04:29

time, Esperanto is deliberately constructed. But

2:04:32

here's the thing. Since the rise

2:04:34

to the nation-state, the line between

2:04:37

natural and artificial languages has become

2:04:39

increasingly blurry. Many national languages, like

2:04:41

standard German or standard French, have

2:04:44

been shaped by deliberate standardization, legal

2:04:46

regulations, and media influence. In that

2:04:48

sense, every language is to some

2:04:51

degree engineered. Authors, storytellers and ordinary

2:04:53

speakers continuously influence language development, meaning

2:04:56

that Esperanto is not as different

2:04:58

after all. It does continue to

2:05:00

evolve. And here's where I think

2:05:03

James C. Scott had a rather

2:05:05

negative characterization of Esperanto as a

2:05:07

purely high modernist endeavor, as though

2:05:10

all Esperanto is sought to make

2:05:12

Esperanto the official international language. In

2:05:14

seeing like a state, he claims

2:05:17

that Esperanto was created to replace

2:05:19

the dialects and vernacular of Europe.

2:05:22

But... Such was never the case.

2:05:24

It was always meant to be

2:05:26

a language used to facilitate communication.

2:05:29

There was more than one motivation

2:05:31

for Esperanto's use, and boiling such

2:05:33

an exercise in human creativity in

2:05:36

attempting to the connection down to

2:05:38

just that status focus, to me,

2:05:41

seems needlessly reductive. He also calls

2:05:43

it, quote, an exceptionally thin language

2:05:45

without any of the resonances, connotations,

2:05:48

ready metaphors, literatures, oral histories, idioms,

2:05:50

and traditions of practical use that

2:05:52

any socially embedded language already had,

2:05:55

end quote. Which may be true,

2:05:57

when I began, but is not

2:06:00

true now. with over a century

2:06:02

of use and evolution. His analogies

2:06:04

between Esperanto and planned cities also

2:06:07

miss the mark for me, as

2:06:09

Esperanto has clearly operated as a

2:06:11

self-organized and grassroots movement for most

2:06:14

of its history and has never

2:06:16

really received the backing of states

2:06:18

or their enforcement. It's a weird

2:06:21

angle from Scott because normally he'd

2:06:23

advocate for like what he calls

2:06:26

like the anarchist squint, right? seeing

2:06:28

history through a perspective of anarchism,

2:06:30

I guess, like an anarchist lens.

2:06:33

And I feel like this is

2:06:35

very applicable with Esperanto, like the

2:06:37

only language which is inherently tied

2:06:40

to any state or nation or

2:06:42

ethnicity. Exactly. When I saw that,

2:06:45

I remember reading, seeing like a

2:06:47

state some years ago, and I've

2:06:49

already glossed over that, but in

2:06:52

doing the research for this I

2:06:54

ended up, you know, stumbling upon

2:06:56

it again, and I was like,

2:06:59

hmm. after reading the history is

2:07:01

like this wasn't quite accurate. Yeah,

2:07:04

yeah, that's a bummer. Yeah, Germany

2:07:06

likes Scott. Me as well. Yeah,

2:07:08

recently some listeners, very kindly, James

2:07:11

C. Scott passed away out of

2:07:13

this net, as I'm sure you

2:07:15

know Andrew. Yes. But his library

2:07:18

was donated to a local secondhand

2:07:20

book shop and some folks, I

2:07:23

asked online and they went and

2:07:25

got me some books and sent

2:07:27

them, which was really kind. So

2:07:30

I have some of his books

2:07:32

now. Oh, that's nice. Yeah. There's

2:07:34

another common claim about Esperanto, which

2:07:37

is that it's Eurocentric, right? And

2:07:39

linguistically there's some truth to this.

2:07:41

Esperanto originated in Eastern Europe and

2:07:44

it still carries structural elements to

2:07:46

resemble Indo-European languages. The majority of

2:07:49

Esperanto speakers today are European and

2:07:51

its vocabulary is largely drawn from

2:07:53

European languages. However, critics whom make

2:07:56

this argument often suggest alternatives like

2:07:58

English or Spanish, languages that are

2:08:00

just as, if not more, eccentric

2:08:03

in the historical and political reach.

2:08:05

Esperanto in contrast has evolved through

2:08:08

influence from non-European languages as well,

2:08:10

particularly through its development in China

2:08:12

and Japan. Its aggressive word formation,

2:08:15

a feature more common in languages

2:08:17

like Turkish or Japanese, are what

2:08:19

some call the Hungarian period of

2:08:22

Esperanto's history. So while Esperanto has

2:08:24

European roots, its global evolution challenges

2:08:27

the idea that is exclusively European

2:08:29

in character. Another critique is that

2:08:31

Esperanto is sexist. The argument goes

2:08:34

that because feminine forms are typically

2:08:36

created by adding in to a

2:08:38

base form, like laboristo, worker, become

2:08:41

a labristino, female worker, the language

2:08:43

assumes masculinity as a default. And

2:08:45

while this is a valid concern,

2:08:48

Esperanto differs from any European languages

2:08:50

in a key way. It is

2:08:53

not a sign chromatical gender in

2:08:55

an element objects. A chair isn't

2:08:57

arbitrarily feminine like in French or

2:09:00

masculine like in German. However, in

2:09:02

practice, gender bias can still creep

2:09:04

in. The basic form of a

2:09:07

noun is often assumed to be

2:09:09

masculine, even though Esperanto allows for

2:09:12

explicitly male forms as well. Like

2:09:14

in any language, reducing linguistic sexism

2:09:16

in Esperanto requires conscious effort in

2:09:19

how people actually use it. Yeah.

2:09:21

That's an interesting one. We see

2:09:23

this in Spanish too, right? Like,

2:09:26

with attempts to create, like, gender

2:09:28

neutral forms. the presumptive masculine or

2:09:31

if you're addressing a mixed gender

2:09:33

group then you would you would

2:09:35

use the masculine but like people

2:09:38

who are first language of valid

2:09:40

speakers can correct me I'm sure

2:09:42

you will on the subreddit if

2:09:45

you want to so like When

2:09:47

I hear in English language media,

2:09:49

it's referred to as Latin X,

2:09:52

but like, that's kind of a

2:09:54

word that I struggle to say

2:09:57

in Spanish, like is it Latinicus

2:09:59

or like, is it Latinics? And

2:10:01

so that this very kind of

2:10:04

clumsy gender neutral form, which seems

2:10:06

to be easier to say in

2:10:08

English and Spanish. Yeah, I've seen

2:10:11

Latin used in some circles. Yeah,

2:10:13

Latiné. speak to non-binary people in

2:10:16

Spanish that's what they prefer to

2:10:18

use of this relatively small sample

2:10:20

size given that there are probably

2:10:23

millions of non-binary Spanish-speaking people I

2:10:25

haven't obviously spoken to all or

2:10:27

most of them but like it's

2:10:30

very interesting to see this like

2:10:32

outside critique of the language which

2:10:35

seems to also ignore an inside

2:10:37

movement within people who are Spanish

2:10:39

first language speakers to create a

2:10:42

organic like gender neutral form, which

2:10:44

could also happen in any language,

2:10:46

right? Like just because Esperanto has

2:10:49

a certain form doesn't mean that

2:10:51

people within that language, you don't

2:10:53

feel represented by them, can create

2:10:56

forms within that language, or better

2:10:58

represent them. Exactly. And it's easier

2:11:01

because you don't have like a

2:11:03

government telling you you can't use

2:11:05

it or whatever. Exactly, exactly. Esperanto

2:11:08

is and continues to be a

2:11:10

grassroots movement. And that has actually

2:11:12

been a subject of critique critique

2:11:15

for some. You know, perhaps one

2:11:17

of the biggest critiques of Esperanto

2:11:20

is that it never achieved its

2:11:22

original goal of becoming a universal

2:11:24

second language. Zamenhof, its creator, envisioned

2:11:27

a world where Esperanto would bridge

2:11:29

linguistic divides. But for many, linear

2:11:31

language that relatively few people spoke,

2:11:34

simply wasn't practical. But the rise

2:11:36

of the internet changed the game

2:11:39

for Esperanto. What was once difficult

2:11:41

to learn and use daily has

2:11:43

become far more accessible. For example,

2:11:46

Esperanto is actually one of the

2:11:48

most overrepresented languages on the internet.

2:11:50

The Esperanto Wikipedia has around 240,000

2:11:53

articles, putting it in the same

2:11:55

league as languages spoken by tens

2:11:58

of millions of people, like Turkish

2:12:00

and Korean. Google and Facebook have

2:12:02

offered Esperanto versions of their platforms

2:12:05

for years, and language learning services

2:12:07

like Doolingo have helped introduce it

2:12:09

to a new generation of learners,

2:12:12

like myself. In fact, the people

2:12:14

who developed Esperanto courses for Doolingo

2:12:16

did so voluntarily, simply because they

2:12:19

believed in the language's potential. Esperanto

2:12:21

has fostered a unique online community,

2:12:24

and there's even a free hospitality

2:12:26

network called Pasporta Servo, where Esperanto

2:12:28

speakers can stay with each other

2:12:31

around the world. No money required.

2:12:33

Just a shared language and a

2:12:35

common philosophy of global connection. Not

2:12:38

everyone learns Esperanto for the same

2:12:40

reasons. Some people seek intellectual challenge,

2:12:43

some want a sense of unique

2:12:45

community, and others are drawn to

2:12:47

its political neutrality. As communications lecturer

2:12:50

Sarah Marino points out in the

2:12:52

BBC article, people engage in Esperanto

2:12:54

for many different motivations, whether it's

2:12:57

personal fulfillment, social inclusion, civic engagement,

2:12:59

or just the simple joy of

2:13:02

learning a new language. It's important

2:13:04

not to reduce Esperanto learners to

2:13:06

a stereotype. Their reasons for participating

2:13:09

are as diverse as the language

2:13:11

itself. So, where's Esperanto stand today?

2:13:13

It would never replace English as

2:13:16

the global lingua franca, but perhaps

2:13:18

there was never the point. Instead,

2:13:20

it serves as a tool for

2:13:23

promoting bilingualism, fostering cross-cultural connections, and

2:13:25

encouraging people to think differently. about

2:13:28

language itself. And I think that

2:13:30

is worthy of its own reward.

2:13:32

That's what I have for today.

2:13:35

All power to all the people,

2:13:37

peace. Hey

2:13:54

kids it's me Kevin Smith and it's

2:13:56

me Harley Quinn Smith. That's my daughter

2:13:58

man who my wife has always said

2:14:01

is Just a beardless, dicless version of

2:14:03

me, and that's the name of our

2:14:05

podcast. Beardless, was me. I'm the old

2:14:07

one. I'm the young one. And every

2:14:10

week we try to make each other

2:14:12

laugh really hard. Sounds innocent, doesn't it?

2:14:14

A lot of cussing, a lot of

2:14:16

bad language. It's for adults only. Or,

2:14:19

listen to it with your kid. Could

2:14:21

be a family show, we're still figuring

2:14:23

it out. It's a work in progress.

2:14:26

Listen to beardless, me on the I

2:14:28

heart radio app, Apple Podcast, Apple podcast,

2:14:30

Apple Podcast, Apple Podcast, Apple Podcast, Apple

2:14:32

Podcast, or wherever, or wherever. You get

2:14:35

your, you get your podcast, you get

2:14:37

your podcast, you get your podcast, you

2:14:39

get your podcast, you get your podcast,

2:14:42

you get your podcast, you get your

2:14:44

podcast, you get your podcast, you, you

2:14:46

get your podcast, you, you, you, you,

2:14:48

you, you get your podcast, you, you,

2:14:51

you, you, you, you How goes lower?

2:14:53

From Blumhouse TV, I-Hart podcast, and Ember

2:14:55

20 comes in all new fictional comedy

2:14:57

podcast series. Join the flighty Damien Hearst

2:15:00

as he unravels the mystery of his

2:15:02

vanished boyfriend. And Santee was gone. I've

2:15:04

been spending all my time looking for

2:15:07

answers about what happened to Santee. And

2:15:09

what's the way to find a missing

2:15:11

person? Sleep with everyone he knew, obviously.

2:15:13

Hmm, pillow talk. the most unwelcome window

2:15:16

into the human psyche. Follow our out

2:15:18

of his element hero as he engages

2:15:20

in a series of ill-conceived investigative hookups.

2:15:23

Mama always used to say, God gave

2:15:25

me gumption in place of a gag

2:15:27

reflex. And, as I was about to

2:15:29

learn, no amount of showering can wash

2:15:32

your hands of a bad hookup. Listen

2:15:34

to the hookup on the iHeart Radio

2:15:36

app, Apple podcast, or wherever you listen

2:15:39

to your favorite shows. Are your ears

2:15:41

bored? Yeah. Are you looking for a

2:15:43

new podcast that will make you laugh,

2:15:45

learn, and say, gee? Yeah! Then tune

2:15:48

in to Locatora Radio, season 10, today.

2:15:50

Okay! I'm Diosa. I'm Mala. The host

2:15:52

of Locatora Radio, a radio fan of

2:15:54

Novella. Which is just a very extra

2:15:57

way of saying, a podcast. We're launching

2:15:59

this season with a mini-series, totally nostalgic.

2:16:01

A four-part series about the Latinos who

2:16:04

shaped pop culture in the early 2000s.

2:16:06

It's Lala checking in with all things.

2:16:08

Y2K 2000s, my favorite memory honestly was

2:16:10

us having our own media platforms like

2:16:13

Mundos and MTV Tres. You could turn

2:16:15

on the TV, you see Talia, you

2:16:17

see Jalo, Nina Sky, Ivy Queen, all

2:16:20

the girlies doing their things, all of

2:16:22

the beauty reflected right back at us.

2:16:24

It was everything. Tune in to Locatora

2:16:26

Radio Season 10. Now that's what I

2:16:29

call a podcast. Listen to Locatora Radio

2:16:31

Season 10 on the I-Hart Radio app,

2:16:33

Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your

2:16:35

podcasts. I'm Israel Gutierrez, and I'm hosting

2:16:38

a new podcast, dubbed dynasty. The story

2:16:40

of how the Golden State Warriors have

2:16:42

dominated the NBA for over a decade.

2:16:45

Once again, our NBA champions. From the

2:16:47

building of the core that included Clay

2:16:49

Thompson and Drey Mon Green, to one

2:16:51

of the boldest coaching decisions in the

2:16:54

history of the sport. I just felt

2:16:56

like the biggest thing was to earn

2:16:58

the trust to the players and let

2:17:01

the players know that we were here

2:17:03

to try to help them take the

2:17:05

next step, not tear anything down. Today,

2:17:07

the Warriors dynasty remains alive. In large

2:17:10

part because of a scrawny six-foot two-two

2:17:12

hooper. who everyone seems to love. So

2:17:14

what Steph is done for the game?

2:17:16

He's certainly on that like Mount Rushmore

2:17:19

for guys that have changed it. Come

2:17:21

revisit this magical Warriors ride. This is

2:17:23

Dub Dynasty. The Dubs dynasty is still

2:17:26

very much alive. Listen to Dub Dynasty

2:17:28

on the I-Hart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

2:17:30

or wherever you get your podcast. This

2:17:42

is it could happen here executive disorder

2:17:44

our weekly newscast covering what's happening in

2:17:46

the White House the crumbling world and

2:17:49

what it means for you I'm Garrison

2:17:51

Davis today. I'm joined by Mia Wong

2:17:53

James Stout and Robert Evans This week

2:17:55

we're covering the week of April 3rd

2:17:58

to April 9th We have recovered from

2:18:00

liberation day, fully liberated. Yeah. And now

2:18:02

the economy is back to normal, right?

2:18:04

Yes. Everything's really good. Everyone's 401ks have

2:18:07

been normal. And stable, and stable. And

2:18:09

stable, that's what's important. Just line go

2:18:11

up. The economy runs from stability. I

2:18:13

mean, one of the things the line

2:18:16

did was go up. So yeah, lines

2:18:18

go on. Why should anyone complain? Yeah,

2:18:20

lines go on in a few different

2:18:22

directions this week. Among the different directions

2:18:25

the line went up was, you know,

2:18:27

a portion of that time. Yes, yeah.

2:18:29

The only direction it hasn't gone is

2:18:31

left, I guess, which, you know, we're

2:18:33

waiting for that one. In related news,

2:18:36

a dead cat can bounce. I don't

2:18:38

know why they... picked a cat for

2:18:40

the dead animal to bounce to refer

2:18:42

to that stock market term. I think

2:18:45

this is a term that's new to

2:18:47

garrison just judging by their facial expression.

2:18:49

You don't know what that is? No.

2:18:51

So basically when when a stock price

2:18:54

for a company or whatever collapses, right,

2:18:56

there will generally be it will straight

2:18:58

a line down and then it will

2:19:00

bump back up and it will look

2:19:03

like it's rallying. But this isn't generally

2:19:05

a rally. What it is is that

2:19:07

when people like short a stock there's

2:19:09

a point at which they have to

2:19:12

like buy back the share like shares

2:19:14

and that artificially inflates it briefly before

2:19:16

it then begins to decline again so

2:19:18

it's not a real it's the result

2:19:21

of how short selling works that there

2:19:23

has to be this thing that makes

2:19:25

it temporarily look like it's rallying, but

2:19:27

that's really not what's happening. Yeah, yeah,

2:19:29

yeah. I feel like with this concept,

2:19:32

which is why- And they call it

2:19:34

a dead cat. Yeah, it's referred to

2:19:36

as a dead cat bounce, yeah. I

2:19:38

don't know why it's referred to as

2:19:41

a dead cat bounce, yeah. I don't

2:19:43

know why it's referred to as a

2:19:45

dead cat bounce, but it's, that's probably

2:19:47

why it's called that, like, like, like,

2:19:50

yeah, yeah, yeah, like, like, I've thrown

2:19:52

a lot of, I've thrown a lot

2:19:54

of corpse. Speaking of corpses, Robert, you

2:19:56

have some exciting news on the army.

2:19:59

It's pronounced coal, Garrison. Yes, yes. The

2:20:01

good news is the army is going

2:20:03

to be more lethal and efficient than

2:20:05

ever before. which President Trump announced while

2:20:08

sitting in the White House next to

2:20:10

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had

2:20:12

to take roughly at twice the length

2:20:14

of trip he normally has to take

2:20:17

to go here because so many countries

2:20:19

that he would normally fly over or

2:20:21

stop in, have arrest warrants out for

2:20:23

him for all of the war crimes.

2:20:26

But you know, it's not about the

2:20:28

journey. It's about, you know, the people

2:20:30

you journey too. And Netanyahu Yahoo met

2:20:32

with Trump, you know, someone whom he

2:20:34

clearly... feels very safe and and you

2:20:37

know I dare I say loving with

2:20:39

and the two of them shared the

2:20:41

most intimate bond that two elderly men

2:20:43

who have committed war crimes can share

2:20:46

which is announcing a record budget for

2:20:48

the United States military of one trillion

2:20:50

dollars. Well I should say Trump stated

2:20:52

it would be in the vicinity of

2:20:55

one trillion dollars. Now does that mean

2:20:57

possibly that very little is changing about

2:20:59

the military budget? Yes it does and

2:21:01

we'll get to that in a second.

2:21:04

Peg Seth, our Secretary of Defense, made

2:21:06

a post on Twitter right after, saying

2:21:08

Trump is rebuilding our military and fast.

2:21:10

He also really bragged about that trillion

2:21:13

dollar amount and said, PS, we intend

2:21:15

to spend every taxpayer dollar wisely on

2:21:17

lethality and readiness. Now, here's the thing,

2:21:19

trillion dollars, shit load of money. Current

2:21:22

amount of funding allocated to national defense

2:21:24

programs, $892 billion. So trillion dollars, about

2:21:26

a 10% bump. right for you know

2:21:28

the national defense programs but it's actually

2:21:31

unclear the way in which he phrased

2:21:33

things and the way in which we

2:21:35

like talk about the funding for national

2:21:37

security this could mean that basically the

2:21:39

military will have pretty much the same

2:21:42

you know something of an increase but

2:21:44

not a mass not really a significant

2:21:46

difference from what it has now, and

2:21:48

there will be more money into other

2:21:51

defense related programs. So this is not

2:21:53

like as massive a thing as it

2:21:55

might necessarily sound like. I think one

2:21:57

thing that's sort of significant here is

2:22:00

like how this comports with the way

2:22:02

a lot of the folks on what

2:22:04

we'll call the shithead left had talked

2:22:06

about, where there was this discussion that

2:22:09

Trump's actually going to be, you know,

2:22:11

bad for imperialism and the war machine

2:22:13

and, you know, there was even talk

2:22:15

as of a couple of months ago

2:22:18

that they were going to like half

2:22:20

the Pentagon budget and like, you know,

2:22:22

you know, all these, whatever else happens,

2:22:24

you know, it's worth it if the

2:22:27

military budget comes down and this, you

2:22:29

know, Imperial, uh, juggernaut of hell gets

2:22:31

finally neutered and just all of those

2:22:33

people are always wrong. They were always

2:22:35

going to put more money into... hands

2:22:38

of defense contractors, like anyone who knows

2:22:40

anything about these people or about how

2:22:42

Republicans have worked, knew that was going

2:22:44

to happen. There was never any chance

2:22:47

that they were going to cut the

2:22:49

actual amount of money. They're probably going

2:22:51

to cut the number of people in

2:22:53

the military because despite what Hexeth said,

2:22:56

there's a lot of evidence that a

2:22:58

shitload of this is going to go

2:23:00

towards modernization and in fact armed services,

2:23:02

each branch is being, our armed services

2:23:05

are all being asked to cut about

2:23:07

8% of their individual budgets in order

2:23:09

to put money into modernization efforts, which

2:23:11

obviously any military needs to regularly modernize

2:23:14

different systems, but This is also a

2:23:16

thing where if your country is run

2:23:18

entirely by grifters and conmen trying to

2:23:20

shotgun money to their political supporters who

2:23:23

have a lot of money in different

2:23:25

defense companies, what this means to me

2:23:27

is you are probably going to see

2:23:29

them continue to trim numbers of actual

2:23:32

troops and put more money into bullshit

2:23:34

that gets a lot of money to

2:23:36

contractors. Yeah, that's that is my expectation.

2:23:38

That is what I see happening more

2:23:40

than anything here. We'll see, but I

2:23:43

think a lot of this additional money

2:23:45

is going to go towards buying shit

2:23:47

that may or may not be useful,

2:23:49

but the primary purpose of putting the

2:23:52

money into that shit is because somebody

2:23:54

who is somebody gets a vague. Yeah,

2:23:56

I mean if we look at fascism

2:23:58

as a concept too, it kind of,

2:24:01

it has this troubled relationship with modernity,

2:24:03

but one of the things it likes

2:24:05

to do is flex its new little

2:24:07

weapon systems and toys. And we're going

2:24:10

to see some guys posing with some

2:24:12

weapon systems that probably never get used,

2:24:14

right? Like probably some AI targeting shit,

2:24:16

stuff like that. Yeah. We've got to

2:24:19

find some way to reallocate the alleged

2:24:21

150 billion dollars in doge cuts, which

2:24:23

is certainly a fake number. Absolutely a

2:24:25

fake number. We may as well send

2:24:28

over 200 billion more to the Defense

2:24:30

Department. Based on early IRS filings, there's

2:24:32

something like half a trillion dollars that

2:24:34

we might be losing in tax income

2:24:37

this year. So, you know, net, I

2:24:39

don't think we're doing great. I should

2:24:41

also note here. a big part of

2:24:43

the money that they're going to get

2:24:45

from modernization is coming from cutting 50

2:24:48

to 60,000 civilian jobs, many of whom

2:24:50

are veterans, but also just in terms

2:24:52

of like military readiness. Guys like Hexeth,

2:24:54

who's primarily a push-up dude, and people

2:24:57

who don't know anything about the military,

2:24:59

see it as like, well, you know

2:25:01

the military you just want as many

2:25:03

door kickers as you possibly can and

2:25:06

you actually need very few of those

2:25:08

guys would need a lot of is

2:25:10

guys that can move things to different

2:25:12

places and fix things when they break

2:25:15

and do a lot of the paperwork

2:25:17

that's necessary to make both of those

2:25:19

things possible which is why you need

2:25:21

those jobs and cutting a shit load

2:25:24

of them is not likely to increase

2:25:26

readiness it's also worth noting that the

2:25:28

US Army is looking at a force

2:25:30

reduction of up to 90,000 active duty

2:25:33

soldiers This is based on an article

2:25:35

from April 4th, which is a significant

2:25:37

reduction. And again, like, we're not... Is

2:25:39

that real? Yes. Why? Why are they

2:25:41

doing a 90% reduction? In part because

2:25:44

it's very hard for them to find...

2:25:46

new active duty soldiers. It is not

2:25:48

easy to get people to do this

2:25:50

and it is not the priority of

2:25:53

anybody in charge of anything to actually

2:25:55

get more soldiers. The priority is to

2:25:57

put more money into systems and AI

2:25:59

and all this shit like I don't

2:26:02

think they have a vested interest in

2:26:04

actually helping with that. How are we

2:26:06

going to take Greenland with drones? What

2:26:08

do we do it? Yeah probably. I

2:26:11

mean there's not a lot of people

2:26:13

in Greenland garrison. Excited for the naval

2:26:15

blockade of Greenland to kick off in

2:26:17

about two months. Yeah, it's gonna be

2:26:20

great. Anyway, they're gonna make, part of

2:26:22

why I think they feel confident trying

2:26:24

to make, you know, they're calling this

2:26:26

making the army smaller and more agile,

2:26:29

is because Trump is doing his best

2:26:31

to make friends with Russia and we're

2:26:33

certainly not going to whatever happens with

2:26:35

Taiwan, the US military is not gonna

2:26:38

be involved. Yeah, we ain't gonna go

2:26:40

back for them. You know, his attitude

2:26:42

is like, what do we need this

2:26:44

for? We need an agile military that

2:26:46

we can use to fuck with Greenland

2:26:49

and Panama. Like, that's what we're going

2:26:51

to be doing. Two very similar biomes

2:26:53

where like everything is very similar. Yeah.

2:26:55

And there's a lot of people like,

2:26:58

you know, the folks running Palantir who

2:27:00

have an increasing amount of say in

2:27:02

what happens to the military and, you

2:27:04

know, what Trump does who are basically

2:27:07

advocating for like, we're going to have

2:27:09

this whole kill chain automated soon. We

2:27:11

barely need people. You can't trust people.

2:27:13

You know how trustworthy your generals have

2:27:16

proved, Donald. Cool. Well, I'm excited for

2:27:18

some more Arctic Camo surplus to hit

2:27:20

the market once the Greenland situation is

2:27:22

resolved. I'm excited to be fucking around

2:27:25

wondering who a drone is going to

2:27:27

kill next. That has been a really

2:27:29

life-affirming experience for me, and I'm excited

2:27:31

to have it again soon. It's going

2:27:34

to be great. Robbie, you mentioned the

2:27:36

IRS, and IRS maybe get less money.

2:27:38

So I want to talk a little

2:27:40

bit about the IRS. I guess let's

2:27:43

start with like a little... summary of

2:27:45

this week immigration news. This week, Chair

2:27:47

Rachik, who is the person who runs

2:27:49

Lives of TikTok, joined ICE on a

2:27:51

raid. She is, shall we say, the

2:27:54

Julius Striker of our modern fashion. Yeah.

2:27:56

Yeah. I guess you're right, damn. Sorry,

2:27:58

I'm just... Yeah, no, I mean, like,

2:28:00

I wasn't joking about that. That's the

2:28:03

most direct comparison to that. Sorry, I

2:28:05

just took a moment to reflect on

2:28:07

that, and it's not a great thing

2:28:09

to reflect on. It's really not, no,

2:28:12

it doesn't make me feel good. Yeah,

2:28:14

no. Other things that make me feel

2:28:16

good are the 16 minutes report, 75%

2:28:18

of people, Cintesikot had no criminal conviction,

2:28:21

which seems to leave open the possibility

2:28:23

of the possibility of there being the

2:28:25

possibility of there being a possibility of

2:28:27

there being a crime of there being

2:28:30

a crime of there being a crime

2:28:32

of there being a crime of there

2:28:34

being a crime for which being a

2:28:36

crime for which it being a crime

2:28:39

for which it being a crime for

2:28:41

which would be a crime for which

2:28:43

it would be a crime for which

2:28:45

would be a crime for which it

2:28:47

would be a crime for which it

2:28:50

would be a crime for which it

2:28:52

would be a crime for which it

2:28:54

would be a crime for which would

2:28:56

be a crime to be sent to

2:28:59

a foreign gulag with no hope of

2:29:01

return, which I don't believe is the

2:29:03

case. I'm very disappointed at any reporting

2:29:05

which focuses on guilt as if one

2:29:08

could ever be guilty of anything which

2:29:10

would make this justifiable. You can't. The

2:29:12

government is also soliciting for proposals this

2:29:14

week to massively increase migrant detention, which

2:29:17

again is not surprising, where we talked

2:29:19

about this last November, but it's also

2:29:21

not great. But we're going to focus

2:29:23

today is on the IRS and the

2:29:26

Abrego Garcia case that we spoke about

2:29:28

last week. So you will have seen

2:29:30

some reporting that the IRS has said

2:29:32

it will hand over information of people

2:29:35

who are subject to criminal investigation to

2:29:37

DHS or ICE, right? ICE being under

2:29:39

DHS. So they say they what happened

2:29:41

here is that part of court filings

2:29:44

a memorandum of understanding between ICE and

2:29:46

the IRS was released in the MOU

2:29:48

or in the court filing actually they

2:29:50

cite an offense. of failure to depart

2:29:52

the United States after being ordered removed.

2:29:55

So essentially anyone who they're saying like

2:29:57

you have to go, right, you don't

2:29:59

look, that they could they could then

2:30:01

ask for their tax return information. Exactly

2:30:04

what the IRS will disclose to ICE

2:30:06

is covered by a big black reduction

2:30:08

in the court documents. So we don't

2:30:10

know that. The entire U.A. but like

2:30:13

there's significant reactions in it. Ice has

2:30:15

to hand, one thing that's not redacted

2:30:17

is the ice has to hand over

2:30:19

the person's name, address, and the crime

2:30:22

for which they're investigating. And it has

2:30:24

to be a non-tax crime, not that

2:30:26

that matters usually. This is more limited

2:30:28

than a lot of people have feared,

2:30:31

and it's more limited than a lot

2:30:33

of the reporting I've seen. It's possible

2:30:35

that there's something else going on. I

2:30:37

saw the acting director and Ice was

2:30:40

going to quit over this morning. But

2:30:42

the fact that they have to have

2:30:44

their address suggests that they couldn't locate

2:30:46

them using the tax return form, which

2:30:49

is a good thing, like it is

2:30:51

one less step towards fascism I guess.

2:30:53

I'm also aware of ICE having memorandums

2:30:55

of understanding with other agencies to include

2:30:57

HUD, housing and urban development. All of

2:31:00

this is going to reduce the amount

2:31:02

that migrant communities engage with the federal

2:31:04

government to any degree, right? Contrary to

2:31:06

what you might have heard... undocumented people

2:31:09

do pay their taxes. It's actually relatively

2:31:11

rare for them not to do that.

2:31:13

And this might change if the IRS

2:31:15

starts handing over people's tax return and

2:31:18

information to ICE, right? Obviously, if HUD

2:31:20

starts handing over people's information, that's going

2:31:22

to lead to people not being as

2:31:24

willing to take housing benefits and we'll

2:31:27

be planning up living on the street,

2:31:29

right? On the other hand, Houston, city

2:31:31

in Texas, for those you who aren't

2:31:33

familiar, have I pronounce that right, Robert,

2:31:36

Robert. Tehaus? Yeah. Houston. Oh, Houston. Understood.

2:31:38

It's a place we just don't go.

2:31:40

That's how I refer to Houston. Okay,

2:31:42

beautiful. So this Texas No Man's Land

2:31:45

Town has turned over information, including addresses

2:31:47

and license page, for people charged with

2:31:49

driving without a license, even though some

2:31:51

of this under Texas law is supposed

2:31:53

to remain confidential. So that's great. They're

2:31:56

also now making immigration detentions at regular

2:31:58

traffic stops. Some of where one incident

2:32:00

where a man was arrested after being

2:32:02

stopped for a cracked windscreen and he's

2:32:05

now in ice detention. So that there

2:32:07

was, I presumably an ice warrant for

2:32:09

this person, that the... Houston police then

2:32:11

acted upon. I mean, and this is,

2:32:14

this can just be racial profiling, right?

2:32:16

Like, if they could just pull someone

2:32:18

over and then send them to ice,

2:32:20

like, they're just gonna start pulling over

2:32:23

as many people that they don't want

2:32:25

to be in Houston. Yeah. Like, we

2:32:27

already know that police departments have a

2:32:29

tendency to pull over people who aren't

2:32:32

white more often, right? And then, like,

2:32:34

if you give them this. that's just

2:32:36

going to exacerbate that further. Again, it's

2:32:38

also going to stop migrant communities interacting

2:32:41

with the police in any way, right?

2:32:43

This obviously has, look, not a big

2:32:45

police fan, but like in cases like

2:32:47

domestic violence, right, sometimes people need to

2:32:50

go to the police to be safe

2:32:52

and then not going to do so

2:32:54

if they think that means they or

2:32:56

people they love will be deported. And

2:32:58

this will have negative consequences. And specifically

2:33:01

in cases like domestic violence. And we

2:33:03

know this, there is plenty of evidence

2:33:05

for this nonetheless. continuing anyway. What's also

2:33:07

continuing is our obligation to pivot to

2:33:10

at, which we should do now. Okay,

2:33:12

we are back. We're back. And it's

2:33:14

time to talk about the Supreme Court.

2:33:16

We have to. Yes we do guys

2:33:19

in because it's the biggest court, it's

2:33:21

the big one and they've been crushing

2:33:23

it all week just sending down decisions.

2:33:25

The two big ones I guess I

2:33:28

want to talk about are a 5-4

2:33:30

ruling. that it was vacating Bozberg's TRO.

2:33:32

Bozberg being the judge who had initially

2:33:34

told the United States government that had

2:33:37

to stop sending people to set court,

2:33:39

right, and then the US had ignored

2:33:41

Bozberg and done it anyway, and then

2:33:43

they had this whole case about how

2:33:46

they hadn't ignored him, and anyway, it

2:33:48

was a secret, even they were tweeting

2:33:50

it. You can go back a couple

2:33:52

of EDs and hear about that. In

2:33:55

this decision, the court was unanimous in

2:33:57

asserting that people removed under the alien

2:33:59

enemies' act do have a right to

2:34:01

due process, but... that they have to

2:34:03

bring a habeas petition. So like the

2:34:06

reason they vacated a TRO was that

2:34:08

the case shouldn't have gone to Bozburg,

2:34:10

right? That they should have bought this

2:34:12

habeas petition. In practice, that's going to

2:34:15

be very hard, given the fact that

2:34:17

many migrants, even under the current system,

2:34:19

even under Biden, most migrants who didn't

2:34:21

speak English, didn't have access to legal

2:34:24

representation. So this ruling is still pretty

2:34:26

bad. The only thing the people in

2:34:28

the court case wanted to stop was

2:34:30

their rendition to El Salvador, right. It

2:34:33

wasn't even like opposed to other forms

2:34:35

of removal, it was specific to this

2:34:37

El Salvador situation. The court also cited

2:34:39

criminal cases as precedent, which is a

2:34:42

very different thing, and it gives this

2:34:44

very narrow ruling of the due process

2:34:46

available to migrants, right? And it relies

2:34:48

on migrants having access to a legal

2:34:51

team, which could be expensive and complicated

2:34:53

for them. So this ruling allows Trump

2:34:55

administration to send people to El Salvador,

2:34:57

as long as the... have the quote

2:34:59

unquote right to due process which is

2:35:02

narrowly defined as something that not many

2:35:04

people will have access to anyway? Yes,

2:35:06

yeah, well summarized, yeah, you would need

2:35:08

to have like a lawyer on retainer

2:35:11

to file your habeas right, like straight

2:35:13

away. So if that just doesn't get

2:35:15

filed then you are basically in their

2:35:17

view for fitting your due process and

2:35:20

they can deport you anyway? Well, they

2:35:22

can deport you anyway, yeah, I guess

2:35:24

you have the right to appeal it,

2:35:26

like, like by saying like... I'm going

2:35:29

to file this habeas petition, but most

2:35:31

people aren't going to do that. So

2:35:33

in practice, they haven't explicitly ruled on

2:35:35

the secote thing, right? The Aprago-Garcia case,

2:35:38

which is the other case, a fourth

2:35:40

circuit judge required the US to return

2:35:42

Aprago-Garcia to the US, and then Chief

2:35:44

Justice Roberts, on his own, issued a

2:35:47

administrative stay. So he is effectively telling

2:35:49

them that fourth circuit judge, you can't

2:35:51

order them to have him return right

2:35:53

now. We need to take a time

2:35:56

out. We need everybody to get their

2:35:58

evidence in order and then bring that

2:36:00

to us. So that case, like, remains

2:36:02

ongoing, right? In the brief for

2:36:04

that case, the government referred to

2:36:06

Abilgo Garcia as an enemy alien,

2:36:09

but I don't think MS-13 is

2:36:11

covered by the evocation of the

2:36:13

Alien Enemies Act. I think it

2:36:15

was specific to Trin der Agua.

2:36:17

And then they also claimed that

2:36:19

they removed him under the Immigration

2:36:22

and Nationality Act, not that alien

2:36:24

enemies act. So, like... None of

2:36:26

this I guess is hugely surprising.

2:36:28

We're seeing just like sort of

2:36:30

post hoc justification of what they

2:36:32

did, right, which is kind of how they

2:36:34

operate. But that case still remains ongoing.

2:36:36

So we're still, we're still going to

2:36:38

hear that one which presumably will reflect

2:36:41

on the constitutionality of sending people to

2:36:43

Secott, but like the fact that yeah,

2:36:45

they ruled the other case, right, the

2:36:47

one that was five to four, it wasn't

2:36:49

about whether Secott was legal, it was about

2:36:52

whether Bozburg had the right to make a

2:36:54

decision on this particular case. But it's still

2:36:56

not great, like it looks like the Supreme

2:36:58

Court is doing everything it can to

2:37:00

avoid a face-to-face showdown with the executive

2:37:03

branch because they don't want to deal

2:37:05

with the consequences of ignoring them. And

2:37:07

like we said before, like maybe the

2:37:09

only court that they were listening to as

2:37:11

a Supreme Court, whether the Supreme Court doesn't

2:37:13

make them they won. So that's where we're

2:37:15

out with that we're out with that. So that.

2:37:17

Not great. Not

2:37:20

exactly great at all.

2:37:22

Oh, well, do you know

2:37:24

what is doing great

2:37:26

the economy? And for

2:37:29

more on that I

2:37:31

think it's time for

2:37:34

tariff talk with Mia

2:37:36

Wong. Wait, wait, tariff

2:37:39

talk. Yeah,

2:37:46

every day, every time we

2:37:49

do it. The only band

2:37:51

that matters is the only

2:37:53

band that matters. The narcissist

2:37:55

cookbook doing a very brief

2:37:58

refrain from rock the... as

2:38:00

far. The worst clash song.

2:38:02

By a white margin. Yeah,

2:38:04

the only clash song to

2:38:07

have been played during Operation

2:38:09

Desert Storm, which made Joe

2:38:11

Stummer cry. a real catastrophe.

2:38:14

You know what isn't a

2:38:16

catastrophe? The economy! Yeah, how's

2:38:18

it going? So I just

2:38:21

saw a wonderful chart where

2:38:23

someone was like, ah, this

2:38:25

is this is one of

2:38:28

the eight best days the

2:38:30

S&P has ever had and

2:38:32

every single other one of

2:38:35

those days is like 1929,

2:38:37

1931, 2008. Yeah. 2020! Yeah.

2:38:39

Yeah. It's so good. So,

2:38:42

all right, the tariff situation

2:38:44

as of 243 p.m. Pacific

2:38:46

time on April 9th is

2:38:49

that there is a... Fine.

2:38:51

Going good. It's gotta be

2:38:53

cool guys, don't worry about

2:38:56

it. Oh God. Okay, so

2:38:58

there there is an 125% tariff on

2:39:00

all goods from China. Is that bad?

2:39:02

You know, there's a bit that I

2:39:05

cut here. where I was going to

2:39:07

say about how like at 54% I

2:39:09

was like we've entered the part of

2:39:12

the map where it just says here

2:39:14

there be dragons at 125% there's not

2:39:16

even dragons there they didn't even think

2:39:18

to put that on the map as

2:39:21

an unknown region. Hi this is Mia

2:39:23

from the future it is now Thursday

2:39:25

one of the problems with attempting to

2:39:28

do this episode is that we are

2:39:30

learning the tariff rate from Twitter in

2:39:32

real time so it turns out that

2:39:35

the actual tariff rate on China, as

2:39:37

clarified by Donald Trump today, is 145%.

2:39:39

And also it has become clear for

2:39:42

the 25% turf tariffs on both Mexico

2:39:44

and Canada are also still in effect.

2:39:46

So, yay! In medical terms, it means

2:39:49

what happened to the global economy is

2:39:51

equivalent to you getting hit directly in

2:39:53

the spine by an F-250 going 45

2:39:56

miles an hour. That's what's happened to

2:39:58

the base of the global economy. Yes.

2:40:00

And I mean, it is very funny

2:40:03

that like a lot of people have

2:40:05

been focusing on the bond stuff because

2:40:07

you can just look at the tariff

2:40:09

numbers and it's like, like, yeah, okay,

2:40:12

seeing a 125% tariff on all goods

2:40:14

from China and then looking at the

2:40:16

bond markets to figure out if that's

2:40:19

bad or not is like walking outside

2:40:21

into a blizzard and being like, whoop,

2:40:23

I need the weather around to tell

2:40:26

me if it's snowing here. The reason

2:40:28

I'll explain, like briefly, Treasury bonds are

2:40:30

the underpinning of every country, the entire

2:40:33

global economy, every single country has a

2:40:35

shitload of money in US Treasury bonds,

2:40:37

because they are the most reliable thing.

2:40:40

And what a Treasury bond is, is

2:40:42

you give money to the US government,

2:40:44

and they say in a period of

2:40:47

time you can take this out, and

2:40:49

it will have grown by a set

2:40:51

percentage. Because... Treasury bonds have been for

2:40:54

the last basically a century so incredibly

2:40:56

stable. This is where you put your

2:40:58

money that you don't want to gamble.

2:41:00

So you have, you know, money that

2:41:03

is in stocks and stuff that can

2:41:05

go up and down, but you also

2:41:07

head your bets by having a bunch

2:41:10

of this. And, you know, generally Treasury

2:41:12

bonds are hopefully enough to about keep

2:41:14

pace with inflation or beat it by

2:41:17

a little bit, but usually the rate

2:41:19

is not all that high because there's

2:41:21

a shit load of demand. People are

2:41:24

always buying Treasury bonds. when the treasury

2:41:26

bond rate, which is the percentage you

2:41:28

get back raises, that may look good,

2:41:31

right? They're like, wow, you get 5%

2:41:33

now on if you put money into

2:41:35

a 30-year T bond. But what that

2:41:38

means is that everyone is selling their

2:41:40

treasury bonds. So demand is down and

2:41:42

the rate is higher and everyone is

2:41:45

selling them because entire countries at a

2:41:47

time are pulling their money out of

2:41:49

the US economy. It's great. Yeah, and

2:41:52

we are going to get more into

2:41:54

how the Trump... wants to fuck with

2:41:56

that later. But first off, programming note,

2:41:58

programming note, I am going to be

2:42:01

from this episode forward referring to all

2:42:03

of these as the turf tariffs because,

2:42:05

fuck them, and because these tariffs are

2:42:08

in a large part also about a

2:42:10

bunch of really weird fucking masculinity bullshit,

2:42:12

so... God, excited for that. Yeah, and

2:42:15

when you make most of your election

2:42:17

ads being about trans people... And then

2:42:19

the economy goes to the toilet. This

2:42:22

is what was voted for. Like if

2:42:24

you want a transphobia, this is what

2:42:26

you wanted. You wanted to lose your

2:42:29

job. You wanted everyone to lose their

2:42:31

fucking homes. Speaking of T-bonds, am I

2:42:33

right? Let's skip over that immediately. No,

2:42:36

no, I don't know. No, no. No

2:42:38

one laughs at him. I'm going to

2:42:40

go away. Okay, okay. So the most,

2:42:43

the most chaotic thing happening happening here

2:42:45

other than Robert randomly saying things is

2:42:47

that. Nobody knows what the tariff situation

2:42:49

is going to be. Just even just

2:42:52

on Friday when you're listening to this.

2:42:54

Right? No. Like the time you're listening

2:42:56

to this, there could be 200% tariffs

2:42:59

on Indonesia. There could be 4,000% terrorists

2:43:01

on Vietnam. We don't know. No, Trump

2:43:03

could have dissolved the US dollar and

2:43:06

we're all using the fucking decan or

2:43:08

whatever. Like I don't know. I don't

2:43:10

know. Yeah. You know, so it's all

2:43:13

really unstable. We can talk about the

2:43:15

other things that are still in effect.

2:43:17

So there's a general 10% tariff on

2:43:20

all countries, except for China, are just

2:43:22

supposed to have a general 10% tariff.

2:43:24

There's also the per Megan Cassella, as

2:43:27

a CNBC reporter. There are 25% tariffs

2:43:29

on steel, aluminum, and cars. There's... probably

2:43:31

going to be more, he keeps talking

2:43:34

about more tariffs and it's like who

2:43:36

knows where they're going to happen, like

2:43:38

maybe pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, but the liberation day

2:43:41

tariffs, tariff tariffs are currently on hold.

2:43:43

For 90 days, at least as of

2:43:45

right now. Yeah, yeah. And the quote-unquote

2:43:47

reciprocal tariffs have been low. to 10%

2:43:50

for me at least it's unclear as

2:43:52

of recording on Wednesday. Trump said that

2:43:54

this is a fact, this is in

2:43:57

effect immediately. It's unclear if those 10%

2:43:59

tariffs are also on hold for 90

2:44:01

days. No, I think the 10% ones

2:44:04

are in effect right now, but it's

2:44:06

really hard to tell because he's just

2:44:08

saying shit. Yes, it's very hard to

2:44:11

tell, which is. He ain't saying it.

2:44:13

He's truthing it. He's true social. Yeah,

2:44:15

so okay, and one of the things

2:44:18

that's been happening with the turf tariffs

2:44:20

is that like, the media is just

2:44:22

reporting things as true that are just

2:44:25

clearly obviously a lie. So one of

2:44:27

the ones that's been going around, that's

2:44:29

been going around, and that the media

2:44:32

is reporting that Trump has said, is

2:44:34

that he's going to pause tariffs on

2:44:36

countries that don't retaliate, except we know

2:44:38

that's a lie because the EU already

2:44:41

imposed retaliatory tariffs, right, is like already

2:44:43

down to 10% just like everyone else.

2:44:45

So we know that Trump is lying

2:44:48

about his rationale for the rollback of

2:44:50

the turf tariffs, right? And every single

2:44:52

fucking media outlet is still just reporting

2:44:55

it because nobody fucking knows how to

2:44:57

do fucking reporting anymore. We should move

2:44:59

to what this is going to do

2:45:02

to the supply chain and to put

2:45:04

this in perspective. When I learned about

2:45:06

the 104% tariff on China, that was

2:45:09

before it was 125% where it's at

2:45:11

now. I was writing an episode called

2:45:13

The Old Economy is Dead, which will

2:45:16

probably be still be coming out on

2:45:18

Monday. Again, that was the 54% rate.

2:45:20

I was writing a thing called The

2:45:23

Old Economy is Dead at 104% like...

2:45:25

things are going to break in the

2:45:27

supply chain that only seven people on

2:45:30

earth have ever heard of before like

2:45:32

entire sectors of the economy are going

2:45:34

to be annihilated we're going to see

2:45:36

right now we're probably going to see

2:45:39

everyone attempt to root like all shipping

2:45:41

from China there's there's going to be

2:45:43

a massive effort to try to reboot

2:45:46

it through like literally any other country

2:45:48

but again that's only a solution for

2:45:50

like you know 90 days. And again,

2:45:53

it's not even clear that that can

2:45:55

work. I mean, I'm already seeing a

2:45:57

bunch of reports of small businesses being

2:46:00

like, yeah, we're fucked because, and that

2:46:02

was at the 54% tariffs, and at

2:46:04

125% entire industries are non-viable. Now, it's

2:46:07

maybe possible that if it was just

2:46:09

these tariffs and all Chinese shipping was

2:46:11

able to be routed through some other

2:46:14

country, maybe... we would only have a

2:46:16

regular economic collapse like a like you

2:46:18

know like an early 2000s tech bubble

2:46:21

collapse and not like a 2008 one

2:46:23

but again that's assuming that no more

2:46:25

or more tariffs go into effect now

2:46:27

the problem is that we went through

2:46:30

this with the 90-day pauses on the

2:46:32

Mexican tariffs and the Canadian tariffs and

2:46:34

then after 90 days everyone assumed that

2:46:37

they weren't going to go to effect

2:46:39

again they just went into effect so

2:46:41

The odds are that the absolutely catastrophic

2:46:44

turf tariffs from like liberation day are

2:46:46

going to go into effect. Like in

2:46:48

about 90 days, right? That's probably what's

2:46:51

going to happen. There's probably going to

2:46:53

be some attempts to negotiate them down,

2:46:55

but like again, those absolutely catastrophic tariffs,

2:46:58

which are going to just fucking annihilate

2:47:00

the entire world economy, are probably going

2:47:02

to go into effect. And you know,

2:47:05

part of what's happening here, right, is

2:47:07

that... So the markets are doing this,

2:47:09

they're like dead cap bounds, right. And

2:47:12

a lot of this is because they

2:47:14

haven't because they haven't actually... stop to

2:47:16

think about like how much American manufacturing

2:47:18

and contrary every argument everyone is making

2:47:21

about this. There is actually a lot

2:47:23

of manufacturing still in the US but

2:47:25

all of it relies on Chinese imports

2:47:28

and various stages of infiduous stage of

2:47:30

production and they're fucked. And I haven't

2:47:32

even mentioned yet, by the way, the

2:47:35

sort of capstone to all of this

2:47:37

is that China is doing an 84%

2:47:39

retaliatory tariff on all American goods, which

2:47:42

is going to just fuck massive portions

2:47:44

of American agriculture. We've talked a lot

2:47:46

on the show about soybean exports. It's

2:47:49

going to be absolutely catastrophic. We're going

2:47:51

to go more into this on Monday.

2:47:53

But the thing that's clear from this

2:47:56

is that these people... don't see the

2:47:58

economy as real in the way that

2:48:00

you and I do, right? They simply

2:48:03

don't. We look at the economy as

2:48:05

something where we have to have a

2:48:07

fucking job so we can go to

2:48:10

work, so we can come home and

2:48:12

buy food for families and pay our

2:48:14

rent, and they think it's a fucking

2:48:16

joke, right? They think it's a fucking

2:48:19

masculinity signifier, and they think it's like

2:48:21

they look at tariff rates and they

2:48:23

go, this is just a number on

2:48:26

a fucking page, and that's why the

2:48:28

tariff rate, is now, and that's why

2:48:30

the tariff rate, Now, do you know

2:48:33

what is real? No. I... The products

2:48:35

and services? Let's support this. Yes, yes,

2:48:37

yes, yep, yep. We

2:48:50

are back. Now, okay, one of

2:48:52

the things that I've been seeing

2:48:54

a lot of is there are

2:48:56

a lot of arguments about whether

2:48:58

there is some kind of plan

2:49:01

here. Trump has claimed that he

2:49:03

was going to roll back the

2:49:05

terrace all along. And no, he

2:49:07

wasn't. Just, no, he's just going

2:49:09

by the seat of his pants.

2:49:11

And I can prove that there

2:49:13

is no plan here. By moving

2:49:15

on to the second thing that

2:49:17

I want to talk about here,

2:49:19

which is a speech given by

2:49:21

Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Steve

2:49:23

Mirren at the Hudson Institute, so

2:49:25

this is again, the Council of

2:49:27

Economic Advisers is a federal agency

2:49:30

that is like their job is

2:49:32

to provide economic advice to the

2:49:34

president, right? And their chair gave

2:49:36

a speech where he argues, and

2:49:38

this is something that like, I...

2:49:40

Jesus fucking Christ we were talking

2:49:42

about okay the fact that every

2:49:44

fucking country on earth has US

2:49:46

treasury bonds We're talking about this

2:49:48

earlier right the status of the

2:49:50

US dollar as the global reserve

2:49:52

currency This guy is arguing that

2:49:54

that is actually a public good

2:49:57

that other countries should pay us

2:49:59

for He wants to force countries

2:50:01

to fucking pay taxes to the

2:50:03

United States for holding US Treasury

2:50:05

bonds. And again, if any nation

2:50:07

on earth could pay to have

2:50:09

their currency be the global reserve

2:50:11

currency, there's no amount they wouldn't

2:50:13

pay. Like, the degree to which

2:50:15

this benefits you is ridiculous. Like

2:50:17

the fact that you want to

2:50:19

charge other people for it is

2:50:21

nice. It is like, look, how

2:50:24

this like actually works, right? Is

2:50:26

that every single other country on

2:50:28

earth is forced to buy American

2:50:30

debt? which is what a bond

2:50:32

is, right? Yeah. And this allows

2:50:34

the US to carry out even

2:50:36

more spending without inflationary effects. Every

2:50:38

single other country... Everything is based

2:50:40

on this. Yes, it's all forced

2:50:42

on like other countries having to

2:50:44

stockpile US dollars. Like the literally

2:50:46

the entire global economy, the US

2:50:48

has advantages in the entire global

2:50:51

economy is that every single other

2:50:53

fucking country on earth needs US

2:50:55

dollars. Part of this is to

2:50:57

buy oil and part of this

2:50:59

is again because the dollar is

2:51:01

the fucking reserve currency it's the

2:51:03

currency that fucking trade is done

2:51:05

in and the asset that you

2:51:07

hold. Is, is, like, is the

2:51:09

fucking US bond? The anthropologist David

2:51:11

Graber called this in his book,

2:51:13

Debt, the first 5,000 years, a

2:51:15

tribute system, that, again, every country

2:51:17

in the world is forced up

2:51:20

by US bonds, the US government

2:51:22

has just, like, fairly explicitly, like,

2:51:24

the Reagan administration does this other

2:51:26

times, like, has just fairly explicitly

2:51:28

leaned on countries and been like

2:51:30

you're buying a fucking bunch of

2:51:32

US bonds now, right? Like, this

2:51:34

is, this system, the status of

2:51:36

the dollar of the world reserve

2:51:38

reserve currency. is the entire lattice

2:51:40

that supports and spreads the American

2:51:42

Empire. And these fucking clowns want

2:51:44

people to pay taxes on the

2:51:47

tribute that they are paying to

2:51:49

us. This is not Donald Trump,

2:51:51

but Elon Musk, right? This is

2:51:53

the guy, these people brought in

2:51:55

to be their economist, to do

2:51:57

economic policy. Yeah. There is no

2:51:59

limit. to their stupidity. There is

2:52:01

no rock of sanity upon which

2:52:03

the tide of madness will crash.

2:52:05

Absolutely not. We have seen so...

2:52:07

is just a prelude to an

2:52:09

infinite abyss of stupidity so mind-numbingly

2:52:11

incomprehensible it will shatter our minds

2:52:14

like a snowflake at a hurricane

2:52:16

you can no longer think to

2:52:18

yourself they cannot possibly be this

2:52:20

stupid they are thinking thoughts even

2:52:22

gods could not comprehend they are

2:52:24

attempting to drain the sea by

2:52:26

shouting at the moon. They are

2:52:28

trying to wipe their ass with

2:52:30

pine cones. There is no five-dimensional

2:52:32

plan here. There is not even

2:52:34

a man behind the fucking curtain.

2:52:36

There was only an infinite sea

2:52:38

of cruelty, malice, and stupidity, trying

2:52:41

to drown us all for the

2:52:43

crime of attempting to exist in

2:52:45

the world we were born in.

2:52:47

The reality of the men who

2:52:49

ruled the American Empire. is this,

2:52:51

it is so terrifying that everyone

2:52:53

from the most powerful CEOs on

2:52:55

the planet to the fucking day

2:52:57

traders running the stock markets to

2:52:59

broke left the shit posters, recoil

2:53:01

in horror, and try to construct

2:53:03

meaning, and some kind of like,

2:53:05

anything, any kind of strategy, any

2:53:07

kind of strategic reason why anyone

2:53:10

could possibly be doing this. Because

2:53:12

the existence of a plan, literally

2:53:14

any plan, no matter how evil

2:53:16

it is, is preferable to this,

2:53:18

which is that the largest economy...

2:53:20

In the world, the most powerful

2:53:22

empire the world has ever seen

2:53:24

is being run by the dumbest

2:53:26

people who have ever fucking lived.

2:53:28

And they are doing this because

2:53:30

they are evil and they're stupid.

2:53:32

Yes. Yes. There's absolutely like, yeah,

2:53:34

no, nothing else to say really.

2:53:37

I think one of the things

2:53:39

that is underpinning this, which you

2:53:41

can like pick up on if

2:53:43

you are cursed enough to listen

2:53:45

to enough of these speeches and

2:53:47

enough of their... of their talking

2:53:49

heads and podcasts is like this

2:53:51

reoccurring trend in which these people

2:53:53

really need to be victims in

2:53:55

order to in order to politically

2:53:57

succeed which is an accusation that's

2:53:59

usually thrown against you know woke

2:54:01

SDW's but like before the election

2:54:04

right it was this idea that

2:54:06

that because because of the dem

2:54:08

corrupt elite establishment you know everyday

2:54:10

Americans are victims of this of

2:54:12

this hidden cabal of Democrats that

2:54:14

are ruining everything. But now that

2:54:16

these people are in charge of

2:54:18

the United States, the people who

2:54:20

are victimizing us is just the

2:54:22

entire world, right? The entire world

2:54:24

is ripping off the United States

2:54:26

by using our dollar, by doing

2:54:28

trade with us. They are somehow

2:54:31

ripping us off. Like we are

2:54:33

the victims of this global scheme,

2:54:35

and it's hurting you at the

2:54:37

average blue-collar worker. and it's making

2:54:39

women adopt managerial positions, and this

2:54:41

is what's actually is the core

2:54:43

of your oppression. And even when

2:54:45

they win, even when they control

2:54:47

the country, they can't let go

2:54:49

of this victim's status. They have

2:54:51

to have someone ripping them off

2:54:53

in order to justify them doing

2:54:55

just incomprehensible stupid power grabs. And

2:54:57

it is very much linked to

2:55:00

like this like masculine signifier. It's

2:55:02

very odd, like the way that

2:55:04

people are trying to justify losing

2:55:06

so much money in the stock

2:55:08

market is by reposting a clip

2:55:10

of some like Australian women. Dancing

2:55:12

on... Dancing on... Dancing on... Dancing

2:55:14

on Tiktok in like an office

2:55:16

building and they're like, well, you

2:55:18

know, tariffs are much better than

2:55:20

having to deal with women in

2:55:22

the office. Am I right, fellows?

2:55:24

Women having a joke. This is

2:55:27

how this is how they justify

2:55:29

it. At least we don't have

2:55:31

woke. It's worth it. to not

2:55:33

be able to afford food if

2:55:35

the woke is gone. The global

2:55:37

long house. Yeah, that's a deep

2:55:39

cut there. Long house is burnt

2:55:41

down. Sure, because the long house

2:55:43

is burnt down, we're now exposed

2:55:45

to the elements and all of

2:55:47

our food stores are gone and

2:55:49

it's about to snow 18 feet.

2:55:51

Yeah. But at least the long

2:55:54

house that's gone. Yeah, the long

2:55:56

house with your they, them, nephew.

2:55:58

it's a correct non-binary appellation. In

2:56:00

other news, last week, President Trump

2:56:02

said that he would be, quote,

2:56:04

unquote, honored for the president of

2:56:06

El Salvador to take U.S. citizens,

2:56:08

which he calls American grown and

2:56:10

born criminals, and put them into

2:56:12

CCOT, the Terrorism Confignment Center, which

2:56:14

is essentially a prison work camp.

2:56:16

Yep. No one gets released from.

2:56:18

Yeah. Trump said, quote, why should

2:56:21

it stop just at people that

2:56:23

cross the border illegally? Unquote. shouldn't

2:56:25

stop there. It shouldn't be there

2:56:27

at all and as James already

2:56:29

mentioned 75% of the immigrant's sentencing

2:56:31

caught don't have a criminal conviction.

2:56:33

These people are not criminals. Now

2:56:35

a few days later the White

2:56:37

House Press Secretary reiterated that this

2:56:39

is something that Trump is seriously

2:56:41

discussing both publicly and privately. So

2:56:43

the president has discussed this idea

2:56:45

quite a few times publicly. He's

2:56:47

also discussed it privately. You're referring

2:56:50

to the president's idea for American

2:56:52

citizens to potentially be deported. These

2:56:54

would be heinous violent criminals who

2:56:56

have broken our nation's laws repeatedly.

2:56:58

And these are violent repeat offenders

2:57:00

in American streets. The president has

2:57:02

said if it's legal, right? If

2:57:04

there is a legal pathway to

2:57:06

do that, he's not sure. We

2:57:08

are not sure if there is.

2:57:10

It's an idea that he has

2:57:12

simply floated in. has discussed very

2:57:14

publicly as in the effort of

2:57:17

transparency. Now one of the last

2:57:19

things we're going to discuss is

2:57:21

an update on DHS and ICE

2:57:23

efforts to deport students across the

2:57:25

country. Me and James did an

2:57:27

episode last week, which is still

2:57:29

pretty relevant, but all of the

2:57:31

numbers have increased dramatically since that

2:57:33

episode. As of Tuesday night, April

2:57:35

8th. 92 student visas have been

2:57:37

revoked at California universities, 50 at

2:57:39

U.C. campuses, and 36 at California

2:57:41

State University campuses, with six more

2:57:44

at Stanford. Also, as of April

2:57:46

8th, 50 student visas have been

2:57:48

revoked at Arizona State University, with

2:57:50

multiple students now in ICE detention.

2:57:52

Lawyers for these students believe that

2:57:54

upwards of a thousand visas have

2:57:56

been revoked across the country. A

2:57:58

map on Inside Higher ed.com shows

2:58:00

for... 119 confirmed instances of student

2:58:02

visas or in some cases green

2:58:04

cards being revoked by Secretary of

2:58:06

State Mark Rubio across 34 states.

2:58:08

And as of Wednesday, April 9th,

2:58:11

visas for 18 international students have

2:58:13

been revoked at the University of

2:58:15

Utah. These students and recent graduates

2:58:17

received letters from the Trump administration

2:58:19

instructing them to quote unquote self-deport

2:58:21

immediately. At Utah State University, more

2:58:23

than 30 students have been impacted

2:58:25

according to the university administration. Yeah,

2:58:27

I'm aware of at least one

2:58:29

UCSC student who was detained at

2:58:31

the border and immediately deported. I'm

2:58:33

also aware that UCOP, UC Office

2:58:35

of the President, right, made a

2:58:37

statement about the impact of service

2:58:40

terminations across its campuses. But the

2:58:42

UCSD Guardian, in a dub for

2:58:44

student journalism, reported that UCSD convened

2:58:46

an emergency meeting before this of

2:58:48

faculty, and it knew about the

2:58:50

revocations or the service changes, right?

2:58:52

the revocation of their student status.

2:58:54

And it was reluctant to act

2:58:56

because it hadn't received guidance from

2:58:58

UCOP yet. So we're seeing this

2:59:00

from a lot of university, like

2:59:02

administrations, right? They don't know how

2:59:04

to respond. I did see that

2:59:07

the University of Arizona was helping

2:59:09

fund some of the legal fees

2:59:11

of their students, which is more

2:59:13

than many universities are doing. As

2:59:15

of now, there seems to be

2:59:17

no patent of prior arrest for

2:59:19

the people who have had their

2:59:21

status changed. But in some cases

2:59:23

it seems that in some university

2:59:25

systems all of the people who

2:59:27

have lost their status are either

2:59:29

Chinese, India, nor from majority Muslim

2:59:31

countries. One other thing I want

2:59:34

to close out this episode on,

2:59:36

so we have an episode out

2:59:38

about this already, but one of

2:59:40

the things that ICE has been

2:59:42

doing has been targeting migrant farm

2:59:44

worker labor organizers. They have... I

2:59:46

mean, basically just kidnapped, like, just

2:59:48

straight up broke this guy's window

2:59:50

in his car and dragged him

2:59:52

out. A guy named Alfredo Quares,

2:59:54

he's known as Lalo. He's an

2:59:56

organizer for Famillas Unidas for Lejusticia

2:59:58

in Washington.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features