0:00

Can

0:06

I

0:09

get

0:13

out?

0:16

Oh

0:20

yeah!

0:27

Which has been nice because

0:29

I could read Finnegan's

0:31

wake bunch of nonsense

0:33

and And then the name

0:35

of the rose which is

0:38

actually a great book that

0:40

I've enjoyed reading and at

0:42

this point in time They

0:44

are speculating or at this

0:46

point in my reading of

0:48

the book there are two monks

0:51

Who come to this abbey

0:53

where a monk has been

0:55

murdered and the monk is

0:57

kind of like the Colombo of his

0:59

day, I guess. He's sort of, you

1:01

know, not really playing his cards

1:03

too heavily, keeping his cards close

1:05

to his chest and gathering as

1:07

much information as he can at

1:09

this point of the book. But

1:12

there's been a couple of things

1:14

that have come up that I

1:16

think are really interesting and connect

1:18

to what we talk about here,

1:20

and then also... demonstrate

1:23

that the author, Umberto Echo,

1:25

clearly had some pretty high-level

1:28

knowledge that he is putting

1:30

into his book, the name

1:32

of the Rose, which I

1:35

thought, you know, the Rose

1:37

obviously is going to have

1:40

some kind of occult situation

1:42

symbolism going on, but they

1:44

were talking about the various

1:47

poisons that the Abby's...

1:49

The monk, there's a monk that specializes, I

1:51

forget what they call it, it's like toxic,

1:53

it's not toxicology, but they have some

1:55

kind of Latin name for what he

1:58

does, apothecary or something like that. and

2:00

they're talking to him

2:02

about different esoteric herbs that

2:05

can be combined and potentially

2:07

cause somebody to hallucinate snakes

2:09

and then it was interesting

2:11

because there's like distinctions it

2:14

was like this plant makes

2:16

you hallucinate snakes this plant

2:18

makes you hallucinate birds this

2:21

plant makes you hallucinate birds

2:23

this plant you hallucinate birds

2:25

this plant you what each

2:27

plant can do and he

2:30

wouldn't tell the priest which

2:32

plant was which because he

2:34

was like that's only for

2:37

you know an adept to

2:39

know otherwise people could misuse

2:41

this and poison people but

2:43

yeah that's it's kind of

2:45

where I've been recently just

2:47

reading and then just working

2:49

on the podcast how about

2:51

you dude yeah I'm on

2:53

chapter two of that particular

2:55

book and Nothing crazy has

2:58

happened really so far and

3:00

But I was kind of following

3:02

long. I'm halfway through chapter

3:04

two But omeh, umverto echo

3:07

he he's written a lot

3:09

of like Is it folk-called

3:11

pendulum I think is the

3:13

name of the other book? Yeah, he

3:15

goes deep into like the homunculus

3:18

and everything well this

3:20

dude was like deep

3:22

into the esoteric and

3:24

not only that

3:26

but I'm gonna share

3:28

my screen here but the

3:31

monks dude there's

3:33

this book by the scholar

3:35

Sophie Page I'm gonna

3:37

share my screen here

3:39

by Sophie Page that

3:41

she felt it's called

3:44

Magic and the cloister

3:46

and it's about the

3:48

history of monks and

3:51

Their interest in a lot of

3:53

the occult bro, like they had

3:55

the Liber vacay. They had a

3:57

lot of different books that the

3:59

Liber vac- being about the artificial

4:01

creation of life. And yeah, bro,

4:03

the monks were hardcore into this stuff, but

4:05

at the end of the day, it was

4:08

all about Christian magic, right? So

4:10

they didn't, right here, so during

4:12

the late 13th and early 14th

4:14

centuries, which is when this book

4:16

they were talking about takes place,

4:18

a group of monks with a

4:20

cult interest donated what became a

4:22

remarkable collection of more than 30

4:24

magic text. to the library of the

4:27

Benedict Abbey of St. Augustine's and

4:29

Canterbury. Analysis of their manuscripts in

4:31

the monastic environment in which they

4:34

lived suggests that they were a

4:36

coherent group with shared aims and

4:38

interests whose occult studies were

4:40

stimulated by their religious vocation

4:42

and protected by the relatively

4:44

enclosed environment of the Abbey. There

4:47

is evidence that magic was practiced

4:49

in order to meet the communal

4:51

needs of the abbey and the

4:54

relative protection from scrutiny. There also

4:56

existed other monasteries in medieval England.

4:59

So this particular book she goes

5:01

in bro. Amongst at St. Augustine's

5:03

collective text that provided positive

5:05

justifications for the practice of

5:08

magic and there were the

5:10

named. And they were the name

5:12

donors and in some cases compliers

5:14

of books in which works of

5:16

magic were copied side by side

5:18

with the works of more listed

5:21

genres. So a lot of the times

5:23

they would take books on like

5:25

medicine. How you're talking about

5:27

like toxicology and I guess

5:30

what would you call the

5:32

study of poisons like herbology

5:34

or something toxicology,

5:36

right? Would be the study of

5:38

poisons. I think it

5:40

was herbology. It might have

5:43

just been herbology an herbologist,

5:45

but yeah, that's interesting because

5:47

they're taking the approach that

5:49

that was uncommon for the

5:52

church, but I think it was

5:54

a lot more common than we

5:56

think that these churches were actually

5:58

practicing this stuff. and felt

6:00

like they had some sort

6:03

of elected privilege to do

6:05

so because they were more just

6:07

than others even though it

6:09

doesn't seem to be the

6:12

case if you really study

6:14

history if you look at

6:16

the goaisha for example and

6:18

I keep bringing up the

6:20

pseudonym and arquium that I

6:23

did a talk on with

6:25

homey-romi actually and the

6:27

whole premise of being able to

6:29

even though it was a work

6:31

of satire by the way the

6:33

whole premise of the book was

6:35

you're supposed to invoke God

6:37

and when you summon these

6:39

demons the go Asia they're

6:42

supposed to do your bidding the

6:44

bidding of God so technically

6:46

you're not worshipping the

6:48

demons you are invoking the

6:51

name of God to control them

6:53

to do what you want them

6:55

to do. Now, that can get

6:57

loss in translation because obviously

6:59

any work with demons is no way no

7:01

when it comes to the eyes of the

7:04

church, right? But technically that's

7:06

what it is. You're not worshiping

7:08

the demons. You're controlling them

7:11

to do God's bidding. That's

7:13

the way it's put. Now that's

7:15

very convenient, right? Hey, I'm gonna

7:17

work with demons in the name of

7:20

God. And then you're protected.

7:22

Right. You're protected. It sounds

7:24

a lot like what the people

7:27

who founded New Haven in my

7:29

research believe, like they were the

7:31

elected elites and they could kind

7:33

of, because God chose them, they

7:35

could kind of break the rules

7:37

and sin and it would all be

7:40

forgiven. Yeah. So right here, the

7:42

monks at St. Augustine chose

7:44

to view their magic text

7:46

as compatible with their religious

7:48

vocation. but they were nonetheless

7:50

have been but they would nonetheless

7:52

have been aware of the text

7:55

classification as magic and the condemnation

7:57

of many of the practices they

7:59

described. of this study is to

8:01

explore how these educated members of

8:03

religious orders sought to fit magic

8:06

text into their belief system and

8:08

worldview. For example, they did not

8:10

believe that their vocation protected them

8:12

from harm or oprium when they

8:14

acquired red or practice from magic

8:16

text. Did they think that magical techniques

8:19

could be employed for pious

8:21

ends combined with orthodox rituals

8:23

or used to gain knowledge of the cosmos

8:25

or induced visions or induced visions

8:27

or induced Learn magic texts

8:29

in medieval Europe or

8:31

syncretic and were often

8:34

exotic fusions of magical,

8:36

philosophical, and cosmological elements

8:38

from the Greco-Roman, Arabic,

8:40

and Jewish traditions mediated

8:43

through their translation into

8:45

land and adapted by Christian

8:47

authors. So as a

8:49

consequence, they often required

8:51

a looselessness and ambiguity

8:53

in their rationales, mythologies,

8:55

and cosmological foundations. We

8:57

make it fit because we're,

8:59

hey, we're studying this stuff, man.

9:02

We're just reading because we're

9:04

curious. But you don't think that

9:06

if they were to have acquired

9:08

some power, let's say that magic

9:10

is real and that you can

9:12

acquire powers from it. You don't

9:14

think that they use that to

9:17

their benefit? Hey, you know what I'm

9:19

saying? Power, what's that one saying?

9:21

Power corrupts absolutely or

9:23

something or something or other? Yeah,

9:26

well knowledge is power,

9:28

absolute power corrupts, or

9:30

power corrupts and absolute

9:32

power corrupts absolutely, I

9:35

think, is the full

9:37

phrase. But yeah, knowledge

9:39

is power and this

9:41

is the thing. It's

9:43

like this blurry line

9:45

between, oh, we're protecting

9:47

you from the information

9:50

that you are not careful enough.

9:52

to handle right we can't

9:55

you can't be trusted to

9:57

use this information responsibly so

9:59

we're gonna protect it. We're

10:01

going to choose who gets to

10:03

protect it with us throughout time

10:06

and we're going to carry this

10:08

information on. That's the that's the

10:11

sympathetic interpretation that it seems like

10:13

this author is taking where she's

10:15

like oh yeah the church was

10:18

very right wing and very bad

10:20

and very evil and then these

10:22

really left thinking forward thinking people

10:25

sort of got the bravery to

10:27

come forward and explore the occult

10:30

within the safety of this you

10:32

know place which maybe the truth

10:34

like this place might have been

10:37

unique in perspective to the churches

10:39

immediately next to it next to

10:41

it. I think that was the

10:44

case throughout the Renaissance is that

10:46

the families that had sway aligned

10:48

with the church in order to

10:51

protect themselves from any sort of

10:53

negative consequences from practicing this stuff

10:56

and then found out, oh wow,

10:58

you guys are practicing this stuff

11:00

too. Like the elites and the

11:03

church. Yeah, exactly. It's like the

11:05

Vatican priests and their Kabul and

11:07

then the elites and their Kabul,

11:10

yeah, they kind of like, dude,

11:12

an enemy of my enemy is

11:15

a friend, right? Like that's kind

11:17

of the same thing, Mark. Well,

11:19

I just talked to this guy

11:22

Johnny Cerucci who wrote this book

11:24

called Romans of mass destruction and

11:26

he gets into how the Vatican

11:29

Church and the Catholic Church have

11:31

enabled monstrous serious serial killers. For

11:33

example, Guy Diyra who... Was the

11:36

bishop of Nantes? Or no, let's

11:38

see. So, okay. So Duke Jean

11:41

and Jean de Malestrite, Bishop of

11:43

Nantes, brought Guy to the stake.

11:45

The church had to lead because

11:48

the civil power dared not risk

11:50

arousing the susceptibilities of the whole...

11:52

Okay, so they basically allowed this

11:55

guy... Have you ever heard of

11:57

Bluebeard? The pirate? I don't know

12:00

if this is Bluebeard, the pirate.

12:02

There might be two Bluebeard. Let's

12:04

look them up. Blue, type in

12:07

Bluebeard and see if Guy Derai,

12:09

De Ross comes up. French folk

12:11

tale, the most famous surviving version

12:14

of what was written of Charles

12:16

Para and the first published by

12:18

Arbin in Paris, the... tale tells

12:21

the story of a wealthy man

12:23

in the habit of murdering his

12:26

wives in the attempts of the

12:28

present one to avoid the fate

12:30

of her predecessors. Look at look

12:33

at who the folk tales based

12:35

on though because they say it's

12:37

based on this guy named Guy

12:40

but it's not spelled Guy it's

12:42

spelled G-I yeah there he lists

12:45

the rice yeah this is the

12:47

guy that was doing the murder

12:49

all those children with Joan of

12:52

Arc. Pretty sure the name is

12:54

pronounced guy even though it looks

12:56

like it would be pronounced Gil.

12:59

But yeah. Well, maybe in Spanish,

13:01

but in French That's French Giles

13:03

He was French. He was French.

13:06

Well, he was in the French

13:08

army with the Joan of Arc

13:11

Yeah, I don't know I get

13:13

I've heard him called guy I

13:15

don't know maybe that's a nickname

13:18

for someone with the name Gere's

13:20

guy But either way this guy

13:22

was the basis for the bluebeard

13:25

folk tale, but he was a

13:27

real dude that was just, yeah,

13:30

killing all these people and it

13:32

got to this point where the

13:34

church couldn't keep it under wraps

13:37

anymore so they brought him to

13:39

the stake. Whoa. So he's saying

13:41

that the church helped create... murders

13:44

essentially yeah so like some MK

13:46

Ultra stuff well and and you

13:48

know it seems like they were

13:51

they were kind of not only

13:53

facilitating it but helping these people

13:56

or they were sort of accomplices

13:58

until it couldn't couldn't be hidden

14:00

anymore and then they would yeah

14:03

turn on them and put them

14:05

on at the stake and claim

14:07

like they had no connection to

14:10

them so what would the purpose

14:12

be for that though why would

14:15

they do that because they're trying

14:17

to commit these occult crimes. They're

14:19

doing rituals, they need a scapegoat,

14:22

they need, you know, a bunch

14:24

of people are going to start

14:26

getting murdered. It's only a matter

14:29

of time, especially in maybe in

14:31

the Middle Ages when it's a

14:33

more isolated sociological landscape, you know,

14:36

it's only a matter of time

14:38

before people start to catch on.

14:41

So you need a scapegoat. So

14:43

if the church wants... blood for

14:45

whatever reason, a cult ritual or

14:48

they want to murder somebody, they

14:50

want a sacrificial person, they need

14:52

a scapegoat to blame it on

14:55

when the, you know, the village

14:57

comes for the killer's head with

15:00

a pitchfork and torches, you know,

15:02

it's the classic, it's a classic

15:04

thing with Frankenstein where they create

15:07

the monster, but the monster was

15:09

their friend the whole time. Well

15:11

it's funny because I just did

15:14

an episode on with Larry Hancock

15:16

who he is written about JFK

15:18

for over 35 years and he

15:21

just recently put out a book

15:23

about Lee Harvey Oswald right speaking

15:26

of plants and potentially the CIA

15:28

or FBI or whoever the NSA

15:30

whoever it was that planted this

15:33

whole conspiracy because the honestly I

15:35

didn't know a lot about the

15:37

JFK I still don't know a

15:40

lot. about the JFK. But it's

15:42

a deep rabbit hole bro, like

15:45

there's so many connections and there's

15:47

so many players in the whole

15:49

thing It's easy. No wonder it's

15:52

a conspiracy dude. It goes way

15:54

deep and the fact that We

15:56

still don't know till this day

15:59

like they just used this guy's

16:01

escape going guess what he got

16:03

off to You know about the

16:06

JD Tibet body? No, who's that?

16:08

so around Dallas there was a

16:11

police officer that everybody said looked

16:13

like John F. Kennedy they said

16:15

you know you you bear striking

16:18

real resemblance to JFK right which

16:20

he kind of does like his

16:22

picture maybe not perfect but at

16:25

least his eyes he has kind

16:27

of a similar eyes and and

16:29

mouth as Kennedy had a much

16:32

more distinct face but either way

16:34

the theory is that JD Tibbit

16:37

was shot by which he was

16:39

that it's not that's not theorized

16:41

but the theory is the reason

16:44

why he was shot on the

16:46

same day as john f kennedy

16:48

was because they had used his

16:51

body as a sort of stand

16:53

in to basically throw people off

16:56

so what was the big theory

16:58

back into the left right the

17:00

bullet came at him from the

17:03

front and and jf k's head

17:05

went back into the left is

17:07

what they would say up until

17:10

The Zapruder film, which proved that

17:12

JFK's head did in fact not

17:14

go back into the left and

17:17

that it doesn't make sense that

17:19

Lee Harvey Oswald from that position,

17:22

would have fired that shot. So

17:24

it brought the whole thing into

17:26

question, but before the footage came

17:29

out, the cover story was that

17:31

JFK got shot in the head,

17:33

which is not... the case when

17:36

you look at the Zapruder film

17:38

so they needed a body of

17:41

stand-in for the autopsy so they

17:43

killed this man shot him in

17:45

the face at like a traffic

17:48

stop He pulled over somebody who

17:50

was, somebody reported a crime, JD

17:52

came, you know, reported on the

17:55

scene and he was shot in

17:57

the head, shot in the face

17:59

and in the chest too. And

18:02

then his body was used in

18:04

the autopsy, allegedly, people say that

18:07

his body was sort of, yeah,

18:09

stand in to cover up the

18:11

fact that JFK was shot from

18:14

the angle that he was actually

18:16

shot at, right? So to further

18:18

obscure the case and keep people

18:21

guessing and confused as to what

18:23

really happened when you know now

18:26

with all the information that's come

18:28

out is pretty obvious there was

18:30

more than one shooter or the

18:33

shooter was firing from an angle

18:35

that Could not have possibly been

18:37

Lee Harvey Oswald in the position

18:40

that the Warren report talks about

18:42

so Hold on I've never heard

18:44

about so apparently Lee Harvey Oswald

18:47

was charged with this and Then

18:49

with the with the JFK stuff

18:52

right they they they tried to

18:54

pin it all on him bro,

18:56

what? That's wild and that's what

18:59

the official record still says it

19:01

says that that he look it

19:03

says it right there by Lee

19:06

Harvey Oswald which makes no sense

19:08

that Lee Harvey Oswald I think

19:11

Forget the guy's name, but I

19:13

had him on my podcast Matt

19:15

Crumpton He did a pretty good

19:18

job of breaking down how it

19:20

would have been impossible for Lee

19:22

Harvey Oswald to have killed both

19:25

JD Tibet and JFK and it

19:27

could be that Lee Harvey Oswald

19:29

just killed JD JD Tibet you

19:32

know, like maybe Lee Harvey Oswald

19:34

actually killed JD Tippett and then,

19:37

or Tippett, and that's why they,

19:39

you know, that's why they had

19:41

him as the Patsy. He was

19:44

involved but not technically involved in

19:46

the actual crime. But that's funny.

19:48

Twilight language. Tip it. Tip it

19:51

off. Tip of the hat. Tip

19:53

of the head. Right? Tip it.

19:56

That's an interesting. This is a

19:58

tip-off. That Twilight language is coming

20:00

through with JD Tippit's name. Tip

20:03

it. So as Oswald was killed

20:05

before he was tried for either

20:07

crime, President Lyndon B. Johnson commissioned

20:10

a committee of U.S. Senators, Congressman,

20:12

and Elder Statesmen to investigate the

20:14

events surrounding the death of Kennedy,

20:17

Tippett and Oswald in an effort

20:19

to answer questions regarding the events,

20:22

President Johnson also hoped to quell

20:24

rumors that arose after Oswald was

20:26

shot by Ruby that the assassination

20:29

and subsequent shootings were part of

20:31

a conspiracy. The committee, which obviously

20:33

we know now, it was all

20:36

one big conspiracy, right? And the

20:38

fact that the Warren Commission is

20:41

888 pages? I mean, what the

20:43

hell is that supposed to me?

20:45

Yeah, I had no idea. Which

20:48

is the number six, by the

20:50

way, because eight plus eight equals

20:52

24 and two plus four equals

20:55

six. So geomet, geomettetrachically. You're getting

20:57

me spitting, dude. You bring up

20:59

the JFK thing and I'm like,

21:02

you know, part of my brain

21:04

activates. It goes so deep. I

21:07

had zero clue about this until

21:09

you were all like, who the

21:11

hell is this? And literally he

21:14

was charged with that and then

21:16

Kennedy. And then allegedly he went

21:18

from one scene to the other.

21:21

Three people, it's like what people

21:23

say about 9-11 when you're like,

21:26

hey, did you know that... There

21:28

were more than just two towers

21:30

that fell that day. It's like,

21:33

hey, did you know that there

21:35

were three people that died on

21:37

JFK's assassination in the immediate vicinity

21:40

the day of JD Tippett, then

21:42

JFK, and then Lee Harvey Oswald.

21:44

The person who supposedly killed the

21:47

other two. Is it weird he

21:49

looks like Kennedy? He kind of

21:52

looks like Kennedy. Well, that's what

21:54

I said at the beginning, the

21:56

whole premise. is that JD Tippett

21:59

was a look-alike. So before JFK

22:01

was assassinated, the talk around Dallas

22:03

when it came to JD Tippett

22:06

was, hey, this guy kind of

22:08

looks like the president. Isn't that

22:11

neat? You know, that was his

22:13

nickname, Jack. Because he had the

22:15

same name as the... They switched

22:18

the bodies because like I was

22:20

saying, you were reading is probably

22:22

why you didn't hear me say

22:25

this, but the gunshot comes in

22:27

at a certain angle, right? They're

22:30

saying it's coming in from the

22:33

front. That's what they want everyone

22:35

to believe But obviously that's not

22:37

what happened. So they needed a

22:39

body double which had the same

22:42

Oh my god you know what

22:44

I'm saying and if Lee Harvey

22:46

Oswald was the one who shot

22:49

him? Maybe that's part of it

22:51

like maybe Lee Harvey Oswald didn't

22:53

even know What was going on?

22:55

Maybe he thought that he was

22:58

helping stop the assassination of JFK

23:00

and that's why he shot JD

23:02

Tibbitt like he could have had

23:05

bad info and this cabal was

23:07

like hey Lee Harvey you know

23:09

you're a patriot we need you

23:11

to save the president go and

23:14

kill this dirty cop you know

23:16

he's he's a part of the

23:18

assassination plot I mean if you're

23:21

Lee Harvey Oswald you're a guy

23:23

who's according to the official record

23:25

he was super patriotic yeah he

23:27

was a guy who went to

23:30

Russia to be a spy. He

23:32

wanted to learn how to be

23:34

a spy, which he wasn't qualified

23:37

for. So he, I think he

23:39

did some, you know, clandestine work

23:41

as a sort of lower tier

23:43

clandestine operator, and these are the

23:46

types of guys that become scapegoats.

23:48

Because they're not, you know, valuable

23:50

assets. He was an asset. He

23:53

was a loose asset. And he

23:55

got patsied, scapegoated. as the most

23:57

famous assassin in American history almost,

23:59

I mean, next to maybe John

24:02

Wilkes' booth, but equally, you know,

24:04

the two of them. With the

24:06

whole three three named thing to

24:09

John Wilkes Booth Lee Harvey Oswald

24:11

Mark David Chapman. Why is it

24:13

always a three named person that

24:15

takes a shot? Well who who

24:18

shot Martin Luther King on the

24:20

official record because it was it

24:22

wasn't Martin Luther King didn't you

24:25

himself so well apparently he didn't

24:27

even die from that he died

24:29

at the hospital allegedly where the

24:31

family was able to sue. The

24:34

CIA or something and when? Well,

24:36

if he died in the hospital,

24:38

then he died from the gunshots.

24:41

You're saying that they killed him

24:43

in the hospital? Yeah. Oh shit.

24:45

You didn't hear about that? Bro,

24:47

we're teaching each other things. This

24:50

is why we got a podcast

24:52

more. I'm okay, Junior suffocated. So

24:57

apparently it goes

24:59

he was alive

25:01

in the hospital

25:03

and Let's see

25:06

here Allegation so

25:08

MLK your family

25:10

Suze wasn't it

25:12

like a black

25:14

Israelite guy that?

25:17

shot Mark or

25:19

Martin Luther King

25:21

like it was

25:23

like a radical

25:27

I don't, I honestly, I

25:29

don't know who, who did,

25:31

uh, ooh, shot JFK. Yeah,

25:33

James Earl Ray. Oh, so

25:35

it wasn't a black guy,

25:37

but yeah, James Earl Ray,

25:39

another three named person. Look

25:41

at that, dude. It's never,

25:43

it's never a Dave Smith

25:45

or like a John Doe

25:48

or it's always a three

25:50

named person. I think that

25:52

has something to do with

25:54

like the pneumonics of Twilight

25:56

language where like, like, you

25:58

know it's the number three

26:00

but it's also like maybe

26:02

more memorable. Then I mean,

26:04

I guess everybody has three

26:06

names if you have a

26:08

middle name, but like how

26:11

often somebody in the news

26:13

reported and they read their

26:15

full name, including their middle

26:17

name. It's always assassins. They

26:19

have either double last name

26:21

or they read their middle

26:23

name. So this is Mandela

26:25

effect where allegedly he was

26:27

so he was fatally shot

26:29

and then he was rushed

26:32

where he was pronounced dead

26:34

at 7. And apparently the

26:36

conspiracy goes that he was

26:38

actually suffocated there. And the

26:40

family actually sued and won.

26:42

Uh, wow, I'm trying to,

26:44

obviously, again, I'm searching on

26:46

Google. That's probably not going

26:48

to tell me, you know,

26:50

the whole thing, but have

26:52

you seen the MLK blackmail

26:55

letters? No, but yeah, I'm

26:57

familiar a little bit. I

26:59

just haven't read them myself

27:01

I know that there's all

27:03

sorts of stuff that MLK

27:05

was into that he probably

27:07

doesn't wouldn't want public right

27:09

which he was still alive

27:11

That was one of the

27:13

things that recently came out

27:15

right that they were doing

27:18

Partiesies and stuff and he

27:20

was very honest I have

27:22

a dream that one day

27:24

black women, black women and

27:26

white women will be twirking

27:28

together in my bedroom. Pretty

27:30

much. So apparently the FBI

27:32

King sushi side letter or

27:34

blackmail package was an anonymous

27:36

1964 letter and package by

27:39

the Federal Bureau of Investigation,

27:41

which was allegedly meant to

27:43

blackmail. Dr. Martin Luther King

27:45

Jr. into committing sushi side.

27:47

Okay, and they wrote him

27:49

a whole letter. Bro. But

27:51

here's what I don't understand.

27:53

Like, if these people are

27:55

so powerful, right? Let's say

27:57

that they are, maybe they

27:59

aren't worshipping the devil, but

28:02

they're powerful and we know

28:04

that organized, organ, I have

28:06

to speak lightly if I

28:08

put this on YouTube because

28:10

I just got ping for

28:12

this stuff for praising certain

28:14

organizations. Do you see that

28:16

in the first, in the

28:18

first, sorry, in the first

28:20

paragraph they call him, they

28:22

compare him to King Henry

28:25

the eighth? Really in your

28:27

in view of your low-grade

28:29

abnormal personal behavior I will

28:31

not dignify your name with

28:33

either a mister or Reverend

28:35

or doctor and your last

28:37

name calls to mine only

28:39

a type of king such

28:41

as King Henry the eighth

28:43

and his countless acts of

28:46

adultery and immoral conduct lower

28:48

than that of a beast

28:50

what was King Henry doing,

28:52

huh? Well King Henry the

28:54

eighth I think was the

28:56

one that was was the

28:58

Catholic King of England after

29:00

the Protestants and people really

29:02

hated him I think because

29:04

he was he was like

29:06

basically just your classic aristocrat

29:09

greedy pig type but I

29:11

think he has something to

29:13

do with the Catholic Church

29:15

versus the Protestant Church and

29:17

their battle over England. A

29:22

traumatic injury. This kind of

29:24

falls in line what we

29:26

were talking a little bit

29:28

about earlier where the church

29:30

was using these characters to

29:32

kind of sort of make

29:34

them into these killers because

29:36

right this is one of

29:38

the major things like look

29:40

at the whole football the

29:42

CTE stuff with Aaron Hernandez

29:44

I think it was where

29:47

they kind of go crazy

29:49

because of their quote unquote

29:51

head be their head you

29:53

know trauma that they receive

29:55

throughout their career and some

29:57

historians believe that a traumatic

29:59

brain injury from jousting play

30:01

to major role in his

30:03

personality change. Did it? You

30:05

go and I'm you see

30:07

what I'm getting at like

30:09

it's like the the narrative.

30:12

He became very cruel petty

30:14

and tyrannical. He was forgetful

30:16

and prone to rages and

30:18

impulsive decisions. He was paranoid

30:20

and had political misjudgments. He

30:22

was self-pitting and Van glorious

30:24

never heard that before he

30:26

was vicious and motivated by

30:28

self interest Van glorious That's

30:30

like when somebody's like obsessed

30:32

with their own Like Elon

30:34

Musk or Trump could be

30:37

considered like Van glorious in

30:39

a way like at least

30:41

the way people detract, you

30:43

know, they're like they they

30:45

think of themselves so highly

30:47

like they're like they are

30:49

like these glorious people and

30:51

I think that's what it

30:53

means. Give me once I

30:55

But look at this, but

30:57

we have to throw out

30:59

some modern concepts. Henry was

31:01

not delusional because he thought

31:04

that God spoke to him

31:06

directly. Interesting that again, it

31:08

always goes back to having

31:10

some divinity. You're appointed by

31:12

divinity. So I was saying

31:14

Mark that he was not

31:16

delusional because he thought God

31:18

spoke to him directly. He

31:20

believed himself to be appointed

31:22

by God to be king

31:24

to be guided by God

31:26

in his decision decisions and

31:29

be prompted by God in

31:31

his desires. So again, what

31:33

a better way than hey,

31:35

what if dude for one

31:37

second? And I think I've

31:39

heard this before. What if

31:41

JFK's head just did that? Is

31:43

that a thing? It

31:47

sounds like what Joe Rogan

31:49

and Ian Carroll were just

31:51

talking about on JRE. Yeah,

31:53

what do you mean though?

31:55

Like is it possible that

31:57

the... bullet hit his head

31:59

and he there wasn't a

32:01

bullet and I'm talking like

32:03

directed energy weapons like laser

32:05

beam have you seen this

32:07

approved our footage recently I

32:09

don't want to watch it

32:11

right now but have you

32:13

ever seen it the one

32:15

where he's riding and then

32:17

it happens Yeah, that's

32:20

the footage yes Where it

32:22

happens you mean where he

32:24

gets killed? Yeah, it's very

32:26

bloody like when you look

32:28

at it now It's very

32:30

bloody. Yeah, we point a

32:32

laser in your head and

32:34

it Would a laser cause

32:36

you to have that kind

32:38

of like? Impact if there's

32:40

sodomy by directed energy weapon

32:42

you don't think that there

32:44

would be Hold on, head

32:46

explosion. Where is there, where

32:48

is there sodomy by energy

32:50

weapon? Who's in, who's creating

32:52

the direct energy bottle cannon?

32:55

No, I'm serious, bro. This

32:57

is in, uh, how to

32:59

create an Illuminati mind-controlled slave

33:01

by, uh, what's his, what's

33:03

his face? Fritz Springmire Fritz

33:05

Springmire talks about sodomy by

33:07

directed energy weapon in his

33:09

book and this is a

33:11

book from the 90s like

33:13

the gray alien probing type

33:15

stuff or what are we

33:17

talking about here well according

33:19

to Fritz Springmire anyone who

33:21

has an alien abduction story

33:23

was actually assaulted sexually by

33:25

the government or some sort

33:27

of governmental entity and they

33:29

had false memories implanted in

33:32

their head what a better

33:34

story than the alien people

33:36

touch me down there and

33:38

because it's embarrassing and people

33:40

won't want to admit it

33:42

no who's gonna believe it

33:44

you go on saying like

33:46

who's gonna even believe So

33:48

the idea and the concept

33:50

of one like a child

33:52

is like, yeah, Mickey Mouse

33:54

and Donald Duck were in

33:56

my room last night and

33:58

they did stuff. Sometimes that's

34:00

an actual thing that happened

34:02

where it's so incredible, it's

34:04

unbelievable. And therefore, these agencies

34:06

can pop off whatever they

34:09

want to pop off and

34:11

stay under the guise of,

34:13

oh, crazy kids. You know

34:15

crazy person who thinks that

34:17

they were abducted by aliens

34:19

when in reality was a

34:21

whole MK ultra thing done

34:23

by these organizations to extract

34:25

information or do something or

34:27

other to where you know

34:29

it's it's just an unbelievable

34:31

case because let's be honest

34:33

Mark. Do you believe in

34:35

aliens? without getting complicated? Yes.

34:37

Okay. Do you believe someone

34:39

and I'm sure you've had

34:41

them on your show who

34:44

said that they have had

34:46

an alien abduction? Do you

34:48

believe those people? 30 to

34:50

40% of the time? Not

34:52

saying that nothing happened to

34:54

them. Maybe something did happen

34:56

to them as to the

34:58

extent of what happened. Maybe

35:00

they believed that that's what

35:02

happened to them. So the

35:04

experience is still valid because

35:06

now we're getting into phenomenology

35:08

where they experience something real.

35:10

Now what I'm getting at

35:12

is that maybe that was

35:14

an implanted memory of some

35:16

sort because let's be honest

35:18

we know PTSD is the

35:21

thing we know memory works

35:23

very weirdly consciousness well we

35:25

don't even know what consciousness

35:27

is but the human brain

35:29

and human anatomy is a

35:31

very mysterious thing and we

35:33

know it can be fractured

35:35

to a certain extent. We

35:37

know this because the government

35:39

has programs just for torturing

35:41

and how to survive torture

35:43

and how to do all

35:45

these things. So it's not

35:47

too far-fetched to say that

35:49

you could hypothetically condition... somebody

35:51

to be, you know, like

35:53

one of these silent cell,

35:55

splinter cell, whatever they call

35:58

them, assassins, if you will,

36:00

right? That was the whole

36:02

thing with the assassins, what

36:04

they call them, the secret

36:06

order of the assassins, where

36:08

they were made believe that

36:10

they were in some other

36:12

area and he was taking

36:14

all these young men and

36:16

brainwashing them essentially. And they

36:18

usually would start off with

36:20

like some sort of religious...

36:22

background of like hey you

36:24

know like the sign taller

36:26

the Mormons believe that you're

36:28

gonna have your own planet

36:30

for every single one of

36:32

your wives or whatever it

36:35

is that they believe and

36:37

it's like again I'm using

36:39

Mormonism as a bad example

36:41

but let's look at one

36:43

of the more extreme or

36:45

radical religions that quite literally

36:47

do sushi side bombings in

36:49

the name of Allah right

36:51

like in the name of

36:53

God they're doing this thing

36:55

To try because they believe

36:57

that on the other side

36:59

they're going to be promised

37:01

what is it 72 virgins

37:03

or something like that You

37:05

know so here let me

37:07

pull up the order of

37:09

the assassin story So the

37:12

order of the assassins here

37:14

we go I'm sure you've

37:16

heard of this before Order

37:18

the assassins are simply the

37:20

assassins was a nizari is

37:22

Maili order that existed between

37:24

1090 and 1275 founded by

37:26

Hassan al-Sabath during that time

37:28

they lived on in the

37:30

mountains of Persia and the

37:32

11th and held a strict

37:34

subterfuge policy through the Middle

37:36

East posing a substantial strategic

37:38

threat to Fatimid. Basid authority

37:40

in killing several Christian leaders

37:42

over the course of nearly

37:44

200 years they killed hundreds

37:46

who were considered enemies. The

37:49

modern term assassination is believed

37:51

to stem from the tactics

37:53

used by the assassins. Contraparaneous,

37:55

how do you say that

37:57

word bro? Well, you almost

37:59

got it there. Let me

38:01

just correct you on the

38:03

first one you got wrong.

38:05

It's Levant. It's the Levant.

38:07

It's the Levant. It's pretty

38:09

common thing that people say.

38:11

And then contemporaneous stories, which

38:13

means people who were alive

38:15

during that time. Okay, so

38:17

let's look at the brainwashing

38:19

activities that were going on

38:21

here. Well, you know, this

38:24

is all in the video

38:26

game Assassin's Creed, right? Yes.

38:28

You ever played that? I

38:30

have. And then the, I

38:32

love the concept of being

38:34

able to go back in

38:36

time through the use of

38:38

DNA. That's such a cool

38:40

concept to me, like to

38:42

be able to go back

38:44

in time. Well, that whole

38:46

subtext is like the most

38:48

interesting, because I feel like

38:50

they have... They're like whistleblowing

38:52

something that DARPA has with

38:54

that video game, but if

38:56

you play that game at

38:58

least the first three or

39:01

four versions of it That

39:03

you're literally showing the whole

39:05

Secret Society history and they

39:07

kind of start at the

39:09

order of the assassins, but

39:11

they do take it like

39:13

the real Crescendo of the

39:15

game is learning about the

39:17

Golden Apple The Apple and

39:19

the Garden of Eden is

39:21

in the game, this Golden

39:23

Apple, which is actually some

39:25

sort of technology that creates

39:27

realities, right? And that's what

39:29

these futuristic factions are fighting

39:31

over, and each futuristic faction

39:33

has its ancient connection to

39:35

either the assassins or the

39:38

Templars. So I love those

39:40

video games, because they teach

39:42

you all about this shit.

39:44

Right here. They would also

39:46

and this was a crucial

39:48

factor need to be readily

39:50

willing to die if necessary

39:52

the methods Hasan and later

39:54

Grandmasters of the order who

39:56

were all referred to as

39:58

old the old man of

40:00

the mountain used to inspire

40:02

fanatical devotion have been lost

40:04

to the midst of history.

40:06

Marco Polo, who supposedly visited

40:08

Alamute Castle, claimed that it

40:10

was through a brainwashing process.

40:12

According to Polo, young men

40:15

often orphans obtained for the

40:17

specific purpose of becoming assassins,

40:19

would be heavily drugged and

40:21

taking to a lush garden

40:23

full of beautiful women and

40:25

told that it was the

40:27

paradise they would inhabit. After

40:29

death, if they served faithfully, of

40:32

course there was no evidence that

40:34

this was actually done, but neither

40:36

is any evidence to suggest that

40:38

these methods were not used. Bro,

40:41

that is so what... Think about

40:43

this, right? This is not too

40:45

far-fetched. This idea here? That's not

40:47

far-fetched. Now, you tell me that

40:49

they had some ascended master come

40:52

from... from another dimension and tell

40:54

them like hey you need to

40:56

do this because you will be

40:58

a rewarded handsomely okay but the

41:01

we know we were talking about

41:03

toxicology and things right earlier we

41:05

know that's a thing you know

41:07

these orders probably use concoctions if

41:10

they're assassins that's the whole premise

41:12

behind assassins like hey let's let's

41:14

poison you know this political figure

41:16

or something like that's political figure

41:18

or something like that the activities

41:21

of any organizations that want to

41:23

do this just to be clear

41:25

so I don't get pinged again

41:27

on YouTube and I am permanently

41:30

demonetized by the way so I

41:32

won't ever be able to that

41:34

happen last week from what from

41:36

a 13-second clip on YouTube shorts

41:39

yes what was it it showed

41:41

It's a Mia Mario that guy

41:43

that did the whole CEO stuff

41:45

his yeah Mario's brother that guy

41:47

in handcuffs Being walked by the

41:50

feds and they said that I

41:52

was praising Those organizations the word

41:54

T right the letter T starts

41:56

with the letter T that I

41:59

was praising that activity and that

42:01

I was Supporting direct in a

42:03

third second clip that I said

42:05

nothing in and it was just

42:07

a meme Is there a reason

42:10

why his brother got arrested? He

42:12

did the whole CEO thing bro?

42:14

Well, I know that but you're

42:16

saying that Is Luigi's brother now

42:19

getting arrested? Mario. Mario. Oh, okay.

42:21

Yeah, to me, Mario. Yeah, all

42:23

right, I got you now. Okay.

42:25

Yeah, all right. Yeah, all right.

42:28

Yeah, well, that sucks. YouTube sucks.

42:30

This isn't gonna go on YouTube,

42:32

is it? I'll probably censor it.

42:34

If anyone wants to listen to

42:36

listen to this uncensored, sign up

42:39

for the Patreon. Add free. all

42:41

that stuff right patron.com/the one on

42:43

podcast and patron.com/my family MFTIC yeah

42:45

and well it's MFTIC because you

42:48

can't do the whole 21 characters

42:50

so long you know the one-on-one

42:52

podcast you know you know what

42:54

it's like you have a long

42:57

podcast name too but but again

42:59

it's been too long I've already

43:01

linked it so many times I

43:03

just got to leave it on

43:05

there because you know it's been

43:08

three or four years now but

43:10

Yeah, if people want to listen

43:12

to this uncensored, they know where

43:14

to go. They know where to

43:17

go. Okay, it'll be censored for

43:19

the YouTube. They know where to

43:21

go. They ping me, bro. They

43:23

ping me. So what are we

43:26

getting out here? This is, this

43:28

is ancient mind control, but I

43:30

feel like Marco Polo, you know,

43:32

he's kind of somebody that we

43:34

should be suspicious of too, because

43:37

he's connected to these Italian nobles

43:39

and all them and they... probably

43:41

knew about all this stuff just

43:43

as well as the mr. e.s.

43:46

al-Bassani or whoever the head assassin

43:48

has she seen guy which apparently

43:50

they were using cannabis as one

43:52

of their major lures to get

43:54

people, but I feel like that's

43:57

kind of like, I don't know,

43:59

maybe that would work in that

44:01

time period if you had like

44:03

less cultural stimulus, but I don't

44:06

even think that tracks. So I

44:08

don't know. I have a hard,

44:10

as somebody who smokes wheat all

44:12

the time, I have a hard

44:15

time believing that. You know, they're

44:17

just going to get you hooked

44:19

on weed and then all of

44:21

a sudden you're going to kill

44:23

people for them. Like weed makes

44:26

you super sensitive. You smoke weed,

44:28

you're not going to want to

44:30

kill anybody. Like you're, you know,

44:32

unless you're like some kind of

44:35

crazy, already like the type of

44:37

person who's got some kind of

44:39

issue, maybe weed could, you know,

44:41

maybe more severe. Yeah, aggravated, but

44:44

I think overall. Cannabis kind of

44:46

mellows you out I have a

44:48

hard time believing like that would

44:50

work maybe like heroin because you

44:52

get so addicted that you'll do

44:55

anything for it and if you've

44:57

never had access to these plants

44:59

other than in this cult then

45:01

you know I guess you're their

45:04

slave at that point but so

45:06

it makes more sense to me

45:08

that it would be like poppy

45:10

but even then like they didn't

45:13

have the ability to you know

45:15

shoot it But that's the

45:17

thing though, it's like I'm saying, hash,

45:19

it's the same thing as cannabis. You

45:22

smoke it. Is it a stronger though?

45:24

Is it like a more concentrated form

45:26

of it? Yeah, but that's just going

45:29

to make you more of a sap.

45:31

And you're lazy too when you smoke

45:33

weed. Like weed, for most people, makes

45:35

you tired, sleepy, you know, so it

45:38

just doesn't make sense to me unless

45:40

that was just like a privilege, like,

45:42

oh yeah, you'll get to relax and

45:45

get high. you ever want to feel

45:47

that way again you got to go

45:49

kill somebody maybe but I feel feel

45:52

like that's more the case with like

45:54

poppy like you get addicted from smoking

45:56

the poppy and you want more of

45:59

it either way it's interesting

46:01

right the concept of how I

46:03

was mentioning or being able to

46:05

fracture someone's mind and be able

46:07

to make them do things like

46:10

think of a good salesman right

46:12

everyone has experienced this to where

46:14

they're able to not make you

46:16

but influence you enough to buy

46:18

this new car by whatever it

46:20

is like I am not a

46:23

good salesman like I cannot think

46:25

that usually what ends up happening

46:27

with me is I end up

46:29

saying too much And I end

46:31

up just like messing the sale

46:33

up, you know what I'm saying?

46:35

Like, that's, but there's some people.

46:38

That's why you're a podcaster. Yeah,

46:40

I say too much, I just

46:42

talk too much, and I just

46:44

end up messing up the sale,

46:46

right? But again, I find it

46:48

super interesting that people can be,

46:51

there's, you know, there's NLP and

46:53

things like that. The whole catcher

46:55

and the right situation, right? And

46:57

that whole thing to where there's

46:59

a secret code within this book

47:01

that triggers people and it makes

47:04

them wanna, you know, become this

47:06

man-turing candidate sort of thing. And

47:08

it's like, I believe words are

47:10

that powerful, dude, because again, going

47:12

back to this salesman concept, even

47:14

though he's not influencing you to

47:17

do anything crazy, but let's take

47:19

the resources that these organizations have

47:21

into consideration. And what if they

47:23

do, what if it is like

47:25

a clockwork orange or something where

47:27

they put you in front of

47:29

this screen? Hold your eyelids open

47:32

and they make you watch all

47:34

these movies and stuff like that.

47:36

Think about that in the, in

47:38

the modern day, you know, we're

47:40

talking about assassins creed. You know,

47:42

video games like Call of Duty

47:45

and all these, like, Grant Theft

47:47

Auto, all it would do was

47:49

go around killing people, bro. That's

47:51

what I found fun in those

47:53

games. What do you think is

47:55

going to happen when the next

47:58

one comes out and it's even

48:00

more realistic than ever, you know?

48:02

Yeah, well I think what if

48:04

it's the inverse, you know, not

48:06

that what you're saying doesn't happen.

48:08

Yeah, that happens, but what if

48:10

the opposite happens where they put

48:13

the book out there and most

48:15

people read it and they're like,

48:17

whatever, this is high flute nonsense.

48:19

I'm not a literary critic. I

48:21

don't get it or whatever. But

48:23

then that like 5% of people

48:26

who have whatever archetype they're looking

48:28

for. is like they're like activated

48:30

some way by reading the book

48:32

and then they have some network

48:34

through which they can kind of

48:36

figure out who has been subtly

48:39

implanted but it just it seems

48:41

like that's more realistic nowadays where

48:43

they can track everything with social

48:45

media I have a hard time

48:47

believing that you know they could

48:49

just publish a book make everyone

48:52

in public schools read it and

48:54

then Find the well, you know

48:56

handful of crazies that but I

48:58

guess it's happened with Mark David

49:00

Chapman and all those and the

49:02

other couple people have Use the

49:04

catcher in the rise a calling

49:07

card you remember the whole gifted

49:09

Did you have gifted in your

49:11

school? Yeah, yeah, that's what that

49:13

is. It's a recruiting program bro.

49:15

Like they they have certain kids

49:17

that are above the level and

49:20

need to be challenged more. Bro,

49:22

that's stranger things. That's a, what's

49:24

that one movie, Akira, you know,

49:26

where they have these group of

49:28

children and then somewhere in an

49:30

underground bunker, they're teaching them how

49:33

to do telekinesis and all this

49:35

stuff, you know, for a secret

49:37

government organization, and then they end

49:39

up making like some sort of

49:41

God that's able to transcend time

49:43

and space and able to destroy

49:45

realities and stuff like that. I

49:48

mean, dude. I

49:50

think that when it comes to

49:52

like the whole nuclear weapons and

49:55

atomic bombs, I think that's what

49:57

that is. I think that that

50:00

was some sort of... of technology

50:02

like if you look at the

50:04

paintings I've talked about this before

50:07

we look at the paintings of

50:09

the Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors bro

50:11

they were in another in another

50:14

dimension dog I'm gonna show you

50:16

the the screenshots here of the

50:19

paintings from the survivors paintings from

50:21

survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki what

50:23

up my nagas The people's record

50:26

of Hiroshima check check out these

50:28

paintings. These paintings are wild and

50:30

I think that these people were

50:33

Put into another reality and that's

50:35

what the experience so check this

50:38

out This is from 1945 Right

50:40

so there's people drinking this black

50:42

stuff. There's something raining everyone's skin

50:45

is falling off. So people drinking

50:47

black stuff. There's something raining everyone's

50:49

skin is falling off so people

50:52

drinking black rain when the black

50:54

rain fell thirsty people drink it

50:56

unaware of its radio activity and

50:59

this is one of the survivors

51:01

from that so if you keep

51:04

going here we find another one

51:06

that's super creepy check this out

51:08

look at that flash on an

51:11

instant I saw light like a

51:13

rainbow this is what this person

51:15

is recalling look at that's a

51:18

that's a portal dude you know

51:20

they opened up like in again

51:23

we're talking about video games uh...

51:25

doom you ever seen doom bro

51:27

you know i'm saying like you

51:30

ever what happens in doom uh...

51:32

they open up a portal to

51:34

hell and all the demons radar

51:37

reality like this this is what

51:39

this person painted bro from what

51:41

they saw like red devils three

51:44

days later the burn bodies in

51:46

the fire sister and had turned

51:49

red like demons i instinctively turned

51:51

away Okay, look

51:53

at this again. This

51:56

is it hurts you

51:58

know how Bro

52:01

alternate reality it was a

52:03

13 year old person look

52:05

at this you what is

52:07

this their clothes ripped to

52:09

shreds their skin hanging down

52:11

on the river make I

52:13

saw figures that seem to

52:15

be from another world ghost

52:17

like their hair falling falling

52:19

over their faces their clothes

52:21

ripped to shreds their skin

52:23

hanging from another war another

52:25

dimension okay so I think

52:27

That atomic bombs are Now

52:29

what we are presenting now.

52:31

I'm not saying that they're

52:33

fake and gay Okay, but

52:35

I'm saying that they might

52:37

work a little bit differently

52:39

I'm just saying mark. All

52:41

right. I see your face

52:44

sounds crazy, but the truth

52:46

is stranger than fiction I

52:48

my face is reacting to

52:50

the grotesqueness of those paintings

52:52

that's all But you know,

52:54

you're also coming from a

52:56

different cultural perspective. So what

52:58

looks psychedelic and trippy to

53:00

you might not necessarily look

53:02

that way to a Japanese

53:04

person. They look like ghosts

53:06

from another. No, I get

53:08

that. I get that. Does

53:10

it necessarily have to be

53:12

that there's a portal, you

53:14

know, I mean, death, people

53:16

dying. are all that's all

53:18

connected to the symbols that

53:20

they're evoking in that in

53:22

that painting so yeah it's

53:24

dark stuff man I mean

53:26

I guess you can interpret

53:28

it that way I can

53:30

see you know the connections

53:32

but yeah I don't know

53:34

what's to say as far

53:37

as comments on that I'm

53:39

looking up the doom video

53:41

game I forgot how it

53:43

is that they open up

53:45

the open video game I

53:47

forgot how it is that

53:49

they open up the How

53:51

do they open up the

53:53

portal in there? How do

53:55

they open the portal in

53:57

doom? Story Let's see here

53:59

they in the doom story

54:01

portals to hell are typically

54:03

open through the use of

54:05

advanced technology often involving energy

54:07

sources that can tap into

54:09

the demonic dimensions usually requiring

54:11

a specific device or ritual

54:13

to activate and create a

54:15

rift between dimensions allowing demons

54:17

to enter the human world

54:19

This is actually a new

54:21

doom coming out too. I

54:23

think it's called doom medieval

54:25

or something or other and

54:27

I want to Play it

54:30

because it looks sick dude

54:32

this guy's got like a

54:34

Like this chainsaw gun like

54:36

it looks wild, bro Doom

54:38

is is probably one of

54:40

my favorite franchises because it's

54:42

like it's repetitive, but you

54:44

never get tired of it

54:46

of like killing demons who

54:48

doesn't want to kill demons

54:50

Right Yeah,

54:52

I'm sure it's a lot of

54:55

fun. I can't really want to.

54:57

I'm not a big video game

54:59

guy anymore, so, but I do,

55:02

I can't say I like Grand

55:04

Theft Auto, that game was fun.

55:06

Speaking of demons, tactics to divert

55:09

suspicion from the corpus of magic

55:11

texts that St. Augustine's included prudently

55:14

avoiding demons, compiling magic texts along...

55:16

side less censored genres and placing

55:18

manuscripts with occult context and more

55:21

orthodox sections of the library. So

55:23

Again, they were hiding it in

55:26

other things. I found a copy

55:28

of the Liber vacay, which is

55:30

a grim more on how to

55:33

create an artificial humanoid essentially in

55:35

a copy of a medical text

55:38

from 15 something new so they

55:40

took again if you're looking you

55:42

go look at all these medical

55:45

texts right like oh I don't

55:47

want to look through all this

55:49

this is just about the anatomy

55:52

of the human and then within

55:54

those pages Hey, you ever hear

55:57

of a little thing called the

55:59

homunculus? Yeah, here's how you create

56:01

one and here's how you extract

56:04

magical powers from it, bro. And

56:06

these medical text, bro. So again,

56:09

I think it's super interesting and

56:11

I'm leaning more towards the side

56:13

that I think that all of

56:16

the occult and all the stories

56:18

that we heard about. It's all

56:21

about espionage, right? And guys like

56:23

Crowley who are an MI5 or

56:25

MI6, whatever it was, the reason

56:28

that they were recruited as a

56:30

cultist is because you could set

56:32

up a lodge, which is like

56:35

a religious organization in a foreign

56:37

land and recruit people there who

56:40

usually people who are joining these

56:42

lodges are people who are higher

56:44

in society, right? Freemasons. are usually

56:47

people of wealth of the elite

56:49

or whatever it is so what

56:52

a better way to infiltrate a

56:54

government if you send some occultists

56:56

over there who happens to know

56:59

how to speak in code because

57:01

of occultism and the nature of

57:04

occultism which is all about speaking

57:06

in code right but I think

57:08

that the occult is occulting the

57:11

fact that it's fake and gay

57:13

that's what I think is happening

57:15

and it's just another facet of

57:18

like hey you can use it

57:20

Think about it bro, blackmail is

57:23

the most powerful form of information,

57:25

not the information that you get

57:27

from the devil by invoking him.

57:30

Tell the CIA, you invoke the

57:32

devil and he told you the

57:35

secrets of reality. Go ahead. They're

57:37

not gonna care. Now Tom, I

57:39

have the real Jeffrey list and

57:42

they're gonna come a knock. You

57:44

get what I'm saying? Yeah, yeah,

57:47

no, that's a good point. Yeah,

57:49

it's all political. I think that's

57:51

kind of the... The thing with

57:54

the book I was talking about

57:56

earlier, Romans of mass destruction, like

57:58

they used different political figures and

58:01

a neighbor. them to commit heinous

58:03

crimes if it served them and

58:06

then of course we all know

58:08

about the inquisition and different people

58:10

getting burned at the stake well

58:13

as you're pointing out like these

58:15

church fathers these people who are

58:18

you know the holiest of holies

58:20

are practicing this stuff that they

58:22

themselves are then you know putting

58:25

people to death for for practicing

58:27

because they're doing it. outside of

58:30

a church. Meanwhile, they're doing the

58:32

same thing inside of a church

58:34

worse and, you know, you know

58:37

the deal. As far as we

58:39

know, monks at the St. Augustine's

58:41

were never publicly investigated or accused

58:44

of practicing magic or possessing illicit

58:46

books, though occult texts appeared to

58:49

have remained in the abbey until

58:51

it's dissolution in 1538. Eighteen years

58:53

later, many found their way into

58:56

the into the collection of the

58:58

English Renaissance mathematician, astrologer, astrologer, and

59:01

magician John D. What was John

59:03

D also involved? Oh Espiano, he

59:05

was the original double O7 who

59:08

drew upon the magical ideas in

59:10

his St. Augustine's manuscripts to construct

59:13

his own integrations of magic with

59:15

scientific ideas and mainstream religious practice.

59:17

Huh. So a lot of this

59:20

information that these monks were putting

59:22

out, our boy John D here

59:24

got a hold of. looked into

59:27

that guy sent you the the

59:29

substock I gave you a membership

59:32

to no I I ended up

59:34

opening it remind me again what

59:36

was about was about somebody being

59:39

a homosexual or something like that.

59:41

Well it's a lot more than

59:44

that there's one article about how

59:46

Shakespeare's gay and all the Shakespeare

59:48

stuff is has led to where

59:51

we're at now and culture. where

59:53

everyone's faking gaze, you put it.

59:56

But yeah, John D supposedly didn't

59:58

have much correspondence. with Francis Bacon

1:00:00

as far as the official record

1:00:03

goes, but when I talked to

1:00:05

Robert Frederick about it, he was

1:00:07

like, yeah, it seems like they

1:00:10

would have definitely interacted with each

1:00:12

other, but in a secret context,

1:00:15

because there's really not much in

1:00:17

the written record that other than

1:00:19

the suggestion that they were in

1:00:22

the same court, which, you know,

1:00:24

so that there's a suggestion that

1:00:27

they would have. probably been working

1:00:29

together to some capacity but they

1:00:31

weren't like oh hey like let's

1:00:34

collaborate on this project openly. Did

1:00:36

you have you ever known about

1:00:39

the William Shakespeare and John D

1:00:41

connection? Well that's what we're talking

1:00:43

about because the according to Robert

1:00:46

Frederick John D or Francis Bacon

1:00:48

wrote the Shakespeare work and then

1:00:50

pinned it on William Shakespeare to

1:00:53

make it like a you know,

1:00:55

secret thing that because they didn't

1:00:58

want, you know, everyone realizing that

1:01:00

these secret societies put out all

1:01:02

this Shakespeare stuff. So that's part

1:01:05

of it is John D. Francis

1:01:07

Bacon and Edward Devere, these other

1:01:10

figures collaborated on the Shakespeare material

1:01:12

and then put it out saying

1:01:14

like, oh, we didn't, you know,

1:01:17

this William Shakespeare guy made it.

1:01:19

you know and in truth the

1:01:21

actual living William Shakespeare the guy

1:01:24

that was supposedly William Shakespeare when

1:01:26

they did research on him they

1:01:29

found out that he wasn't even

1:01:31

literate and his children like didn't

1:01:33

read or write so like this

1:01:36

is the most influential writer of

1:01:38

this time and and his own

1:01:41

children don't even read and write

1:01:43

like it just doesn't make sense

1:01:45

so yeah the whole thing sketchy

1:01:48

you know people the official record

1:01:50

is oh he was this name

1:01:53

William Shakespeare from Stratford upon Avon

1:01:55

but that guy just it doesn't

1:01:57

make sense so yeah I mean

1:02:00

this is like a 200 year

1:02:02

old conspiracy theory though because this

1:02:04

Shakespeare is like three four hundred

1:02:07

years old now but John D

1:02:09

would have been connected to it

1:02:12

because he was like the elder

1:02:14

of Francis Bacon I think that

1:02:16

Shakespeare was his own person. I

1:02:19

think Bacon was his own person.

1:02:21

I think that they were all

1:02:24

their own people. You know that

1:02:26

whole if one was the other

1:02:28

You know whatever Bacon have you

1:02:31

looked at the have you looked

1:02:33

at anything? Are you just saying

1:02:36

that? No, I've looked at some

1:02:38

of it. I've looked at some

1:02:40

of the ideas William Shakespeare was

1:02:43

a real person. Yes Okay, but

1:02:45

do you think that he was

1:02:47

the person who was involved in

1:02:50

the Shakespeare stuff? Or

1:02:54

do you think he was just

1:02:56

a fall guy a scapegoat? The

1:02:58

guy who took the the front

1:03:01

man rather it could have been

1:03:03

a group of people You know

1:03:05

it could have been a group

1:03:07

of people But the reason I

1:03:10

think that He was a real

1:03:12

person Was because allegedly he was

1:03:14

traveling I'm not saying he was

1:03:17

fake. I'm saying that the guy

1:03:19

who they say is William Shakespeare

1:03:21

was just like like a like

1:03:24

a Patsy yeah idiot a fool

1:03:26

that they used as like the

1:03:28

because they didn't want it to

1:03:31

be traced back to them for

1:03:33

whatever reason yeah he did exist

1:03:35

he just wasn't the author I

1:03:38

mean you're saying that a guy

1:03:40

traveled around the world as William

1:03:42

Shakespeare no no so when he

1:03:44

traveled around with John D it

1:03:47

was him and allegedly his brother

1:03:49

and they were called the Garland

1:03:51

brothers and there are records of

1:03:54

them being with John D traveling

1:03:56

around Europe being a part of

1:03:58

their seances and their workings and

1:04:01

that's how allegedly William Shakespeare learned

1:04:03

about the occult and their a

1:04:05

connection between the tempest, which is

1:04:08

a story that kind of reflects

1:04:10

and mimics John D in a

1:04:12

sort of way, right, conjuring storms.

1:04:15

And then that one guy with

1:04:17

the tower that you went to,

1:04:19

I think in Rhode Island or

1:04:21

whatever, he wrote a book on

1:04:24

or wrote a piece on how

1:04:26

John D could have helped write

1:04:28

the tempest play. with the whole,

1:04:31

even tempest, that whole name and

1:04:33

that every, you know, 10 letters.

1:04:35

Well, yeah, Francis Bacon and John

1:04:38

D were in the same court.

1:04:40

So they were like co-workers, essentially.

1:04:42

Not that, that word really makes

1:04:45

the perfect definition. But yeah, they

1:04:47

were peers. They knew each other.

1:04:49

So, whereas William Shakespeare was a

1:04:51

guy who, like, literally his name

1:04:54

wasn't even Shakespeare. And he lived

1:04:56

in like a, like a hut.

1:04:58

Like he was not like a

1:05:01

noble, he would not have been

1:05:03

someone who would have hung out

1:05:05

with John D. That's for sure.

1:05:08

Francis Bacon would have, definitely. So

1:05:10

William Shakespeare is a whole different

1:05:12

guy? Well, it's a it's a

1:05:15

creation. It's like they took this,

1:05:17

they took the name because Shakespeare

1:05:19

has some sort of occult symbolism.

1:05:22

The spear of long, longness who

1:05:24

pierced the side of Christ as

1:05:26

he was on the, so... that's

1:05:28

what Shakespeare refers to. So they

1:05:31

created this character and so they've

1:05:33

done computer analysis on the Shakespeare

1:05:35

writings and they found that not

1:05:38

only is it not William Shakespeare

1:05:40

but it's more than one person.

1:05:42

So you're absolutely right that John

1:05:45

D could have collaborated on the

1:05:47

Tempest or at least this guy

1:05:49

you're talking about could be right.

1:05:52

In his hypothesis that But yeah,

1:05:54

there's a lot of evidence. And

1:05:56

again, this is like a 200

1:05:59

year old conspiracy. Like people have

1:06:01

been talking about this for a

1:06:03

long time like because Francis Bacon

1:06:05

the other thing. There's a

1:06:07

lot of really strange stuff

1:06:09

about him. Oh Man, well, I guess

1:06:12

I'll just shut up then Yep, there

1:06:14

you go bro take put that in

1:06:16

your in your pipe and smoke that

1:06:18

dude Well, you know, nobody nobody

1:06:20

likes when people are smart-ass

1:06:22

is it? So maybe even

1:06:24

Google it just wants to put

1:06:26

me in my place right now

1:06:29

There are no original manuscripts not

1:06:31

so much as a couple of

1:06:33

written in Shakespeare's own hand has

1:06:35

been proven to exist. In fact,

1:06:37

there's no hard evidence that will

1:06:40

Shakespeare of Stratford upon

1:06:42

Avon revered as the greatest

1:06:44

author in the English language

1:06:46

could even write a complete

1:06:49

sentence. Yeah, this is what

1:06:51

I'm telling you, dude. This

1:06:53

is not like run-of-the-mill, tick-tock

1:06:55

conspiracy. This conspiracy theory, like

1:06:58

Mark Twain believed in this

1:07:00

conspiracy theory. Or Sunwell's believed

1:07:02

in this conspiracy theory. Well,

1:07:04

here's the thing, Mark. Sigmund

1:07:07

Freud believed in this conspiracy

1:07:09

theory. Manly Pihaw believed it.

1:07:11

Listen, here's the thing. The point

1:07:14

is we have writings of a group

1:07:16

or... Bacon, whoever the hell it

1:07:18

was. We have, you know, the writings,

1:07:20

it's a real thing. And

1:07:22

allegedly, you know, William Shakespeare

1:07:24

was also a secret agent.

1:07:26

He was also a spy. So again,

1:07:28

and think about it. If he

1:07:31

was Francis Bacon, then yeah, he

1:07:33

definitely was a spy. We know

1:07:35

Francis Bacon was a spy. So

1:07:37

like to say William Shakespeare was

1:07:39

this and that is like saying,

1:07:41

yeah. Francis Bacon was this and

1:07:43

that because according to this theory

1:07:45

they're the same person and what

1:07:47

you're talking about makes total sense

1:07:49

if it was Francis Bacon or

1:07:51

any of his friends because they're

1:07:54

all working for the coin so

1:07:56

they were all well but think

1:07:58

about this too so what is

1:08:00

the Royal Society really

1:08:02

all about? The Royal

1:08:04

Society is an information

1:08:06

gathering operation. It's an

1:08:09

intelligence agency. It's one

1:08:11

of the world's first

1:08:13

intelligence agencies. So, okay. the

1:08:15

world's first intelligence agency goes around

1:08:18

the world they gather all this

1:08:20

information as much as they can

1:08:22

and then they publish in the

1:08:25

English language which becomes the global

1:08:27

language pretty much it's the world's

1:08:29

most common language now thanks to

1:08:31

the British Empire which as you

1:08:34

know John D first uttered that

1:08:36

phrase and was a part of

1:08:38

this group. So like these information

1:08:41

gathers go around the world and

1:08:43

then they just so happened

1:08:45

to come up with like

1:08:47

the biggest most influential literary

1:08:49

work. Like it's obviously a

1:08:52

plant. It's obviously they've there

1:08:54

it's a secret society and

1:08:57

if you're in the club

1:08:59

you smell your Brothers Farts

1:09:01

and you say they smell great

1:09:03

because that's what you're supposed to

1:09:05

do in the club and this

1:09:07

is like the the biggest most

1:09:09

gassed up thing in English history

1:09:11

is Shakespeare and why? It's because

1:09:13

of what you're just talking about

1:09:15

with the Heshashins It's mind control

1:09:17

is taking people away from the

1:09:19

Christian mindset and into this new

1:09:22

mindset Which is more easy to control

1:09:24

because they were having all

1:09:26

these fights and arguments, Protestant,

1:09:28

ever since Luther, Protestant versus

1:09:30

Catholic, and then Anglican, and

1:09:32

all these other denominations fighting

1:09:34

with each other. So what

1:09:37

do they do? They say

1:09:39

we're gonna just completely get

1:09:41

out of the game of

1:09:43

fighting over what religion is,

1:09:45

which, what, and the third,

1:09:47

and we're gonna just focus

1:09:49

on the material and the

1:09:51

science, and that's how they

1:09:53

created, Shakespeare was all about

1:09:56

mocking the traditions that

1:09:58

I guess now days it's

1:10:00

very hard to relate to

1:10:03

because we're not in the

1:10:05

medieval mindset but for the

1:10:07

people in the medieval mindset

1:10:09

the Shakespeare stuff was like

1:10:12

it was like a complete

1:10:14

slap in the face to

1:10:16

anybody who was like a

1:10:19

traditional type of person there's

1:10:21

like gay sex there's lesbians

1:10:23

doing this and that there's

1:10:26

magic the occult you know

1:10:28

aristocrats up to no good

1:10:30

the friar turns Juliet into

1:10:33

a gold idol, you know,

1:10:35

like there's all kinds of

1:10:37

weird stuff in Shakespeare. Honorificability

1:10:39

and nittibus. Honorificability and nittitiditibus.

1:10:42

I think I kind of

1:10:44

nailed it. What does that

1:10:46

have to do with anything?

1:10:49

So I'm reading it. What

1:10:51

does that word mean? It's

1:10:53

a word that means the

1:10:56

state of being able to

1:10:58

achieve honors and it's mentioned

1:11:00

in one of William Shakespeare's

1:11:03

plays and 18 honorific ability

1:11:05

to the Nitibis Let's see

1:11:07

here comprise numerous of Bacon's

1:11:09

oratories and dis disquisitions and

1:11:12

had also apparently held copies

1:11:14

of the play Richard the

1:11:16

second Richard the third the

1:11:19

out dogs but these had

1:11:21

been removed on the outer

1:11:23

she was scrawled repeatedly the

1:11:26

names of Bacon and Shakespeare

1:11:28

along with the name of

1:11:30

Thomas Nash there were several

1:11:32

quotations from Shakespeare and a

1:11:35

reference to the word honor

1:11:37

fivic-cilibaba which appears in Shakespeare's

1:11:39

love labors law give it

1:11:42

a try honorific ability then

1:11:44

you already got yeah you

1:11:46

already lost it but that's

1:11:49

okay yikes yeah My poor

1:11:51

looking brain can't even comprehend

1:11:53

that. So... Try Finnegan's wake.

1:11:56

Oh no, Finnegan's wake is

1:11:58

interesting. I like... Terrence

1:12:00

McKenna's interpretation of it because I

1:12:02

didn't know Terrence McKenna had an

1:12:04

interpretation of it. I'm gonna blow

1:12:07

your mind. I'm gonna send it

1:12:09

to you so you can listen

1:12:11

to it. Can I tell you

1:12:13

what I was telling Thomas about?

1:12:15

I don't think he put the

1:12:18

episode out yet, but I was

1:12:20

telling Thomas that I kind of

1:12:22

think that it's meant to put

1:12:24

you in a trance. Like you

1:12:26

start reading all these words that...

1:12:28

are put together and words from

1:12:31

different languages and multi-syllable words and

1:12:33

it kind of puts you in

1:12:35

a trance state. I don't know,

1:12:37

maybe Terrence McKenna would have thought

1:12:39

the same thing since he was

1:12:42

all about psychedelics and stuff. I

1:12:44

just send it to you. Listen

1:12:46

to that and we'll do another

1:12:48

episode because it's mind-blowing and essentially

1:12:50

McKenna says that this book is

1:12:52

meant to if all of humanity

1:12:55

is wiped out To be able

1:12:57

to recreate the human language over

1:12:59

again with Finnegan's wake Okay, and

1:13:01

I and you're absolutely right With

1:13:03

the thing of putting you in

1:13:05

a sort of trance and you

1:13:08

know this ties into Williams Burrows,

1:13:10

you know, cut-up method and using

1:13:12

words as a sort of, you

1:13:14

know, invocation or sort of again

1:13:16

kind of MK ultra like that

1:13:19

that's the whole thing that we're

1:13:21

talking about like in words influence

1:13:23

you, right? You were talking about

1:13:25

William Shakespeare and the fact that

1:13:27

he has attributed so many words

1:13:29

to the English language. Let's go

1:13:32

into this link I just sent

1:13:34

you real quick and then maybe

1:13:36

we'll stop there and come back

1:13:38

to this conversation after I look

1:13:40

at the link you sent me,

1:13:43

but this kind of puts a

1:13:45

crescendo on what your... talking about

1:13:47

overall I think and maybe this

1:13:49

is a good intro for you

1:13:51

to get into Robert Frederick's work

1:13:53

because I sent you a sub

1:13:56

stack so you should be able

1:13:58

to see the whole article. So

1:14:00

yeah they... He kind of talks

1:14:02

about this whole theater of the

1:14:04

mind, which is a big concept

1:14:07

in our conspiracy world, where we

1:14:09

talk about these figures like Trump

1:14:11

and Obama and Biden and all

1:14:13

the other, you know, people that

1:14:15

take the stage, the political stage,

1:14:17

and captivate the hearts and minds

1:14:20

of people in this way where,

1:14:22

you know, we as conspiracy theorists

1:14:24

have to keep our head on

1:14:26

a swivel, because we're like, oh

1:14:28

my God, Trump. he's draining the

1:14:31

swamp and then we're like oh

1:14:33

my god Trump he's in the

1:14:35

Israel Kabul and it's like oh

1:14:37

my god Trump is starting World

1:14:39

War three oh my god Trump

1:14:41

is ending World War three like

1:14:44

you don't know which way to

1:14:46

look and I think this is

1:14:48

a part of what was created

1:14:50

through Shakespeare and not just Shakespeare

1:14:52

but like the whole education system

1:14:55

around Shakespeare too because you know

1:14:57

this is big this a big

1:14:59

deal like every College has a

1:15:01

drama department and what do they

1:15:03

talk about first and foremost in

1:15:05

those in that sector of education

1:15:08

Shakespeare right language what do they

1:15:10

talk about Shakespeare Shakespeare right here

1:15:12

Yeah, that literally what it was

1:15:14

it was like a bunch of

1:15:16

smart nerdy guys who knew they

1:15:19

weren't cooler popular found like the

1:15:21

good-looking kind of dofy dumb idiot

1:15:23

guy in town who's tall and

1:15:25

maybe has like your report for

1:15:27

duty that's right these plays because

1:15:29

we got yeah influenced the English

1:15:32

language well and if he was

1:15:34

a real person he was an

1:15:36

actor which who better to pick

1:15:38

as your person to lead this

1:15:40

big hoax than an actor Right

1:15:42

like yes, I don't know which

1:15:45

a perfect guy for the role

1:15:47

I've seen these conspiracies You know

1:15:49

these conspiracy videos floating around Instagram

1:15:51

were on you know like Donald

1:15:53

Trump's IMDB or whatever shows that

1:15:56

he's an act J.D. Vance, actor,

1:15:58

what's the guy for me? Salinsky,

1:16:00

actor. Yeah, Zalinsky. Actor. And it's

1:16:02

interesting, right? Because you see Zalinsky

1:16:04

dancing in high heels in that

1:16:06

music video? I've seen that before,

1:16:09

yes. Oh my God. I just

1:16:11

saw that last week. I was

1:16:13

like, what the fuck? That's the

1:16:15

fact that he was actually in

1:16:17

like all these comedy movies and

1:16:20

stuff like that. That's pretty bizarre.

1:16:22

I'm not gonna lie. Be played

1:16:24

a president in the movie in

1:16:26

a movie and then became the

1:16:28

president of Ukraine. They literally used

1:16:30

that movie as propaganda to get

1:16:33

him in office. That's crazy. Which

1:16:35

I don't think they really need

1:16:37

that in Ukraine. It's not like

1:16:39

they're like the, you know, their

1:16:41

reputation of having a huge democracy.

1:16:44

Donald Trump has been in movies.

1:16:47

Yeah, he's in one of

1:16:49

like the most classic Christmas

1:16:51

movies of all time home

1:16:54

alone. Yeah, so All the

1:16:56

world to stage right this

1:16:58

model of the globe theater

1:17:01

did you know that the

1:17:03

globe theater is actually one

1:17:05

of the most famous theaters

1:17:08

To have ever existed which

1:17:10

is attributed to William Shakespeare

1:17:12

But did you know that

1:17:15

we have zero evidence of

1:17:17

it? Yes, that's kind of

1:17:19

weird. There's a town next

1:17:22

to where I grew up

1:17:24

called Stratford and they had

1:17:26

the Shakespeare World Theater Globe

1:17:29

Theater. They had a theater

1:17:31

named after Shakespeare and some

1:17:33

kids burned it down a

1:17:36

couple years ago. That's interesting

1:17:38

because the original one burned

1:17:40

down and they they rebuilt

1:17:43

it from memory. There are

1:17:45

plans for reconstructing the original

1:17:47

globe theater, but it's not

1:17:49

possible to make an exact

1:17:52

replica and the reason for

1:17:54

that is because There doesn't

1:17:56

exist any there. There is

1:17:59

only two pictures of it

1:18:01

pre fire and post fire

1:18:03

from a picture from a

1:18:06

drawing of a skyline of

1:18:08

London or whatever the hell

1:18:10

it was yeah naturally so

1:18:13

you're saying that it's only

1:18:15

the only image of it

1:18:17

is an illustration there's no

1:18:20

photo of it there's nothing

1:18:22

of it and they believe

1:18:24

that they may find the

1:18:27

picture here they Have

1:18:30

found the remnants of a

1:18:32

piece of the globe theater,

1:18:34

which you can go and

1:18:36

see in person But we

1:18:38

don't actually know what it

1:18:40

even looked like Let me

1:18:43

see if I can find

1:18:45

this so Is it possible

1:18:47

that this is like a

1:18:49

Rosicrucian larp kind of thing

1:18:51

where it's like the theater

1:18:53

of the mind, the globe

1:18:55

theater that never existed, like

1:18:58

the theater in your head?

1:19:00

If you get into Robert

1:19:02

Flood, you know, you were

1:19:04

talking about memory and mine

1:19:06

and stuff like that, if

1:19:08

you get into Robert, and

1:19:10

I did a whole short

1:19:12

on this, and all these

1:19:15

guys that we're using. You

1:19:17

know the mnemonic techniques to

1:19:19

you know memory and everything

1:19:21

there is this belief that

1:19:23

memory that the mind Can

1:19:25

sort of give you sort

1:19:27

of special powers and some

1:19:29

again. I haven't deciphered it

1:19:32

I still don't understand it,

1:19:34

but what I do understand

1:19:36

is that how you said

1:19:38

that perhaps these theaters which

1:19:40

by the way this this

1:19:42

theater the globe theater is

1:19:44

the original archetype of what

1:19:46

we now have as you

1:19:49

know the main stage and

1:19:51

eventually it evolved into the

1:19:53

movie theater okay so it's

1:19:55

all an evolution that essentially

1:19:57

Shakespeare and all these guys

1:19:59

this group of people they

1:20:01

influence quite literally reality through

1:20:03

writing I mean any major

1:20:06

world religion is just writing

1:20:08

that has affected the reality

1:20:10

of people I mean that's

1:20:12

that's the reality of it

1:20:14

but yeah this Francis Yates

1:20:16

writes about it Francis Yates

1:20:18

the art of memory and

1:20:20

also the Shakespeare's theater which

1:20:23

it's called theater of the

1:20:25

world and she gets into

1:20:27

the whole thing that maybe

1:20:29

perhaps the theater was made

1:20:31

in certain geometric proportions to

1:20:33

kind of sort of elevate

1:20:35

your consciousness in this sort

1:20:37

of weird way. You have

1:20:40

Robert Flood in there, but

1:20:42

point being right here, Francis

1:20:44

Yates, the theater of the

1:20:46

world, point being is that

1:20:48

technically we don't have any

1:20:50

evidence that this thing existed.

1:20:52

William Globe Theatre remains so

1:20:54

they think that the Globe

1:20:57

Theatre that this piece here

1:20:59

is part was part of

1:21:01

the Globe Theatre that's always

1:21:03

the book by Francis Yates

1:21:05

called theater of the world

1:21:07

okay dude architecture I'm telling

1:21:09

you man this is like

1:21:11

where the rubber meets the

1:21:14

road with the occult because

1:21:16

the money it takes to

1:21:18

do these types of projects

1:21:20

is huge right and whenever

1:21:22

you have something like a

1:21:24

fabled building like this you

1:21:26

know it's kind of it

1:21:28

reminds me like they're creating

1:21:31

like a Solomon's temple legend

1:21:33

but around Shakespeare you know

1:21:35

what I mean and the

1:21:37

whole idea right here bro

1:21:39

with Solomon's temple that's the

1:21:41

only evidence of it yeah

1:21:43

like this is the foundation

1:21:45

line And what if, dude,

1:21:48

all right, look at that,

1:21:50

hold on, go back to

1:21:52

that picture. Imagine yourself, bird's

1:21:54

eye view completely. and that

1:21:56

circle is complete. Kind of

1:21:58

reminds me of the stuff

1:22:00

that John D was writing

1:22:02

in those notebooks like the

1:22:05

occult symbols with the circles

1:22:07

and the words going around

1:22:09

the circles like I don't

1:22:11

know that's just kind of

1:22:13

a stretch but it's what

1:22:15

we like to do right

1:22:17

that's why they call me

1:22:19

stretch steves but anyways here's

1:22:22

one of the pictures of

1:22:24

the skyline. Well think about

1:22:26

this. Think about this, what,

1:22:28

stick with me here. So

1:22:30

the globe theater, theater of

1:22:32

the mind, theater of the

1:22:34

world. What's Solomon's Temple? Solomon's

1:22:36

Temple is supposed to be

1:22:39

an anatomical. correspondence of

1:22:41

a human being, right? So the

1:22:43

building is built in a lot

1:22:45

of churches. Yeah, a lot of

1:22:47

churches are built like this too,

1:22:49

where there's a head, there's arms,

1:22:52

there's a body, and there's legs

1:22:54

of the building, literally, and it

1:22:56

creates this effect that, who knows,

1:22:58

maybe, what I start to think

1:23:00

of the effect it has on

1:23:02

the person inside of the... structure

1:23:04

but then also like what of

1:23:06

the structure itself what kind of

1:23:08

energy does it take on but

1:23:11

it kind of reminds me of

1:23:13

the Solomon Temple idea with this

1:23:15

you know circle globe theater if

1:23:17

it's supposed to be like an

1:23:19

orb I guess so that's what

1:23:21

you think when you think globe

1:23:23

the reason that they call it

1:23:25

the globe theater was because it

1:23:27

was a microcosm of the macro

1:23:30

and apparently there was like you

1:23:32

know the different layers and levels

1:23:34

of it you know the top

1:23:36

represent the sky the bottom represented

1:23:38

you know the earth and then

1:23:40

the bottom I forgot what it

1:23:42

represented but yeah the precise location

1:23:44

of the building remained unknown until

1:23:46

a small part of the foundation

1:23:49

including one of the original pier

1:23:51

bases was discovered in 1989 by

1:23:53

the Department of Greater London archaeology

1:23:55

beneath the park the car park

1:23:57

at the rear of anchor terrace

1:23:59

on par Street the shape of

1:24:01

the foundation is now replicated hold

1:24:03

on hold on hold on hold

1:24:06

on okay never right go ahead

1:24:08

the shape of the foundation is

1:24:10

now replicated on the surface as

1:24:12

the majority of the foundation lies

1:24:14

beneath the the street a listed

1:24:16

building no further excavations have been

1:24:18

permitted so it's like hey hey

1:24:20

hey hey no no no you

1:24:22

can't you can't know where it

1:24:25

actually is you want anchor is

1:24:27

right Like what

1:24:29

that symbolically represents? No So

1:24:31

the anchor is a supermasonic

1:24:33

symbol it connects to the

1:24:35

Phoenicians, but it's also a

1:24:37

biblical symbol That relates to

1:24:39

Noah So the fact that

1:24:41

this is in anchor terrorists

1:24:44

is not Totally regular like

1:24:46

there's some synchronic language going

1:24:48

on there I thought for

1:24:50

a second the way that

1:24:52

was written that they were

1:24:54

going to say that the

1:24:56

Globe Theater just so happens

1:24:58

to be right where the

1:25:00

museum is and I'm like,

1:25:02

oh, go figure, but that's

1:25:04

not the case. So right

1:25:06

here. Yeah. A modern reconstruction

1:25:09

of the theater name Shakespeare's

1:25:11

Globe opened in 1997 with

1:25:13

the production of Henry V.

1:25:15

It is an academic. Approximation

1:25:17

of the original design based

1:25:19

on available evidence of the

1:25:21

1599 and 1614 buildings and

1:25:23

is located approximately 750 feet

1:25:25

from the site of the

1:25:27

original theater. The globes detailed

1:25:29

dimensions are unknown, but its

1:25:31

shape and size can be

1:25:34

estimated from scholarly inquiry over

1:25:36

the last two centuries. Right

1:25:38

the evidence suggests that it

1:25:40

was a three-story open-air amphitheater

1:25:42

approximately a hundred feet in

1:25:44

diameter that could house up

1:25:46

to 3,000 spectators the globe

1:25:48

is showing around Holler's sketch

1:25:50

of the building later incorporated

1:25:52

blah blah blah. Dude check

1:25:54

this out so Do you

1:25:57

know what Alice? rally's family

1:25:59

was involved in? Well, beer?

1:26:01

They were brewers, right? And

1:26:03

brewing is very much connected

1:26:05

to the occult because you

1:26:07

need to have knowledge of

1:26:09

herbs and such, right? Which

1:26:11

at one point in time,

1:26:13

yeah, alchemy and so, so

1:26:15

where the Globe Theater just

1:26:17

so happens to be is

1:26:19

the site of Anchor Terrace,

1:26:22

but Anchor Terrace is listed

1:26:24

as a... listed building in

1:26:26

the UK which means it's

1:26:28

like a historical site in

1:26:30

America so they can't excavate

1:26:32

anchor terrorists because it's our

1:26:34

it's protected so go figure

1:26:36

it just so happens to

1:26:38

be under something that they'll

1:26:40

never be able to demolish

1:26:42

or excavate right but to

1:26:45

add you know a step

1:26:47

further it's anchor brewery so

1:26:49

again that symbolic masonic kind

1:26:51

of anchor symbolism mixed in

1:26:53

with the brewery I don't

1:26:55

see much about the family,

1:26:57

but it does say that

1:26:59

it was founded by John

1:27:01

Perkins and Robert Barclay of

1:27:03

the banking, the Barclay banking

1:27:05

family, which the Barclay family,

1:27:07

don't they own like the

1:27:10

Knicks or something? Like they

1:27:12

own like a huge basketball

1:27:14

team or they own the

1:27:16

center where the Knicks play

1:27:18

or something, the Barclay Center?

1:27:20

Is that in LA or

1:27:22

New York City? Where's the

1:27:24

Barclay Center? I think that's

1:27:26

in like LA or something.

1:27:31

New York. Oh, it is

1:27:33

in New York. Yeah, that's

1:27:35

where the Knicks play the

1:27:37

Barclay Center. I know nothing

1:27:39

about sports. So you got

1:27:41

me there. I don't know

1:27:44

much about sports either other

1:27:46

than what I hear colloquially.

1:27:48

So yeah, but think about

1:27:50

this because right this cost

1:27:52

$1 billion to make $1.37

1:27:54

in 2024. I recently went

1:27:56

to the Ben's Stadium in

1:27:58

Atlanta that also Hold on.

1:28:01

This brewery has been visited

1:28:03

by the Prince of Wales,

1:28:05

Otto von Bismarck, which was

1:28:07

like an important German aristocrat,

1:28:09

Napoleon Bonaparte, and then a

1:28:11

guy from Egypt, Ibrahim Pasha.

1:28:13

Have I showed you Bonaparte's

1:28:15

penis? We're going all over

1:28:18

the place. Is this like

1:28:20

an Assyrian type of thing?

1:28:22

No, they actually have Napoleon.

1:28:24

Bonaparte's penis, it's owned by

1:28:26

a family. Huh, but isn't

1:28:28

that weird though? Like, okay,

1:28:30

so the Globe Theater burns

1:28:33

down and then this Anchor

1:28:35

Terrace with these banking families

1:28:37

gets built right on the

1:28:39

side of it. Yeah. Whoo,

1:28:41

almost like it's got some

1:28:43

power, bro. Okay, so you

1:28:45

mentioned Napoleon and his member

1:28:47

and now you're showing me

1:28:50

a mountain that kind of

1:28:52

looks like a giant. Vigina,

1:28:54

what's going on here? This

1:28:56

is allegedly where the, no,

1:28:58

this is actually what they

1:29:00

claim is Noah's Ark. So

1:29:02

we're talking about things that,

1:29:04

you know, haven't really been

1:29:07

found because of, blah, blah,

1:29:09

well, Noah's Ark is another

1:29:11

one of those things. It's

1:29:13

like, where did it land?

1:29:15

I heard it's on Mount

1:29:17

Aerorat. Well, this, I don't

1:29:19

know where this is in

1:29:21

Turkey, but some people. error

1:29:24

out. How do I know

1:29:26

all this stuff? It doesn't,

1:29:28

nobody likes to know it

1:29:30

all one, you know? It's

1:29:32

funny, like our podcast listeners,

1:29:34

like they love us, but

1:29:36

for some reason, like... Nobody

1:29:39

likes to know it all.

1:29:41

But anyways, okay, so I

1:29:43

didn't know that. I was

1:29:45

just guessing. Mount error at,

1:29:47

good guess. Thanks, Juan. Cool.

1:29:49

Why, is this excavated? Is

1:29:51

that why it looks like

1:29:53

that? I kind of made

1:29:56

like a... I think joke

1:29:58

there I think they said

1:30:00

those kind of look like

1:30:02

that doesn't it? I think

1:30:04

they said it was a

1:30:06

natural formation last time I

1:30:08

checked that it's been debunked

1:30:10

but let me pull it

1:30:13

up so the idea of

1:30:15

Noah's Ark is looking in

1:30:17

Turkey based on the Bible

1:30:19

no definitive evidence has been

1:30:21

found archaeologists came to have

1:30:23

found the true location at

1:30:25

the Duru Pinar site on

1:30:27

Mount Tanduric in eastern Turkey

1:30:30

so I guess it's not

1:30:32

error. The area believed to

1:30:34

be the location. So they

1:30:36

found wood, they found wood

1:30:38

from a boat on that

1:30:40

mountain. Well, I don't know

1:30:42

if they found... I don't

1:30:45

think it's been proven that

1:30:47

that is actually... Yeah, see,

1:30:49

they found something petrified ruins.

1:30:51

Yeah, what they believe is,

1:30:53

right? They don't know what

1:30:55

it... Geologists assert that it

1:30:57

is an entirely natural formation

1:30:59

but have nominated as a

1:31:02

geological heritage So I don't

1:31:04

know if they've done Test

1:31:06

or anything there But apparently

1:31:08

earthquakes expose the formation in

1:31:10

1948 We know they say

1:31:12

the Garden of Eden is

1:31:14

over there too in Turkey.

1:31:16

No, it's in Florida, bro.

1:31:19

We got the receipts Yeah,

1:31:21

obviously pre-old world Florida's groundbreaking

1:31:23

conclusions. He was not the

1:31:25

one that created that though.

1:31:27

Where does that idea originate?

1:31:29

E.E. Callaway has been talking

1:31:31

about that since it's a

1:31:33

long time now. E.E. Callaway

1:31:36

was a... Yeah, we pull

1:31:38

it up here. I don't

1:31:40

doubt it. I like it.

1:31:42

I think the fertile crescent

1:31:44

definitely could be the Gulf

1:31:46

of America. Sounds a lot

1:31:48

cooler now. So the Garden

1:31:51

of Eden. He wrote in

1:31:53

the beginning. He claims that

1:31:55

Torres State Park is the

1:31:57

biblical garden of Eden and

1:31:59

he's been talking about this

1:32:01

since a long time now,

1:32:03

bro. This is where Gopher

1:32:05

Woods exists and like that's

1:32:08

part of the whole, you

1:32:10

know, biblical narrative, if you

1:32:12

will. You have the rivers

1:32:14

that flow through there. It's

1:32:16

at the Florida and Georgia

1:32:18

border, the F-A-G border, so

1:32:20

it might be fake and

1:32:22

gay, but that's the point.

1:32:25

You know, point being that

1:32:27

this is a good contender.

1:32:29

And maybe there was multiple

1:32:31

Garden of Eden's like, we

1:32:33

don't really know, right? Or

1:32:35

yeah, maybe it was the

1:32:37

Garden of Eden because they

1:32:39

came from the Fertile Crescent.

1:32:42

and then where they settled

1:32:44

after the cataclysm became known

1:32:46

as the garden of Eden

1:32:48

because that's where they were

1:32:50

from rather than that's where

1:32:52

they were you know what

1:32:54

I mean so it says

1:32:57

here that Victoria State Park

1:32:59

has trees that are among

1:33:01

the rarest oldest worldwide bro

1:33:03

so this guy let me

1:33:05

see since one he's been

1:33:07

talking about it here you

1:33:09

go Tyler, from the in

1:33:11

the mid 1900s. This dude's

1:33:14

been talking about for a

1:33:16

long. He even had the

1:33:18

Garden of Eden He told

1:33:20

in night. He's been talking

1:33:22

about since 1972, bro Well,

1:33:24

and it's not like, you

1:33:26

know, out of nowhere, you

1:33:28

know, a lot of people

1:33:31

who came to America have

1:33:33

considered this place. I mean,

1:33:35

that's what the whole Mormon

1:33:37

religion is based on so

1:33:39

it's not completely out of

1:33:41

nowhere but the Mormons talk

1:33:43

about I don't I think

1:33:45

the Mormons think it's out

1:33:48

where they are now in

1:33:50

Utah those two had signs

1:33:52

up where Adam and Eve

1:33:54

both their first home. Four

1:33:56

miles to the original garden

1:33:58

of Eden by Bristol. Well

1:34:00

that's the other thing too

1:34:03

like the you know the

1:34:05

whole East Coast was named

1:34:07

by these people who were

1:34:09

you know their whole lives

1:34:11

were revolved around what they