Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
As I record this episode,
0:01
we've just emerged from Tropical
0:05
Cyclone Alfred hitting the shores
0:05
of Southeast Queensland and Northern
0:08
New South Wales here in Australia. In the lead up to the event, most
0:11
people did what you'd expect them to do.
0:14
We stockpiled water, organised
0:14
sandbags in case of flooding,
0:18
taped windows, and so on. And while there was an expected shortage
0:21
of bottled water and fresh fruit and
0:24
vegetables in supermarkets, there was
0:24
one other item that was in short supply.
0:30
Toilet paper. People have been buying it up in bulk.
0:34
And we saw the same thing happen
0:34
a few years ago during COVID 19.
0:37
Videos emerged of people fighting over
0:37
rolls of toilet paper in supermarkets.
0:42
It was ridiculous. It is highly unlikely we're
0:44
going to defecate more than usual
0:47
when in a lockdown situation. So what drove this bizarre
0:49
behavior and why did it happen?
0:53
And importantly, What can this teach
0:53
us about communication and change?
0:58
That's what today's episode is all about.
1:01
Hi, friends, and welcome to a new episode
1:05
of Less Chatter, More Matter,
1:08
the communication podcast. I'm your host, Mel Lloyd, and
1:10
I'm recording this episode on the
1:13
lands of the Yuggera and Turrbal
1:13
people here in Meanjin, brisbane.
1:16
And as I said in the intro,
1:16
we've just experienced a tropical
1:20
cyclone here, which is very unusual
1:20
for one to hit this far South.
1:25
So I just want to say upfront
1:25
that I know many people had
1:28
homes and belongings damaged. They lost power and so on.
1:32
And this episode is in no way
1:32
making light of that impact.
1:36
But instead, I did want to focus
1:36
on some of the behaviours we
1:39
saw leading up to the storm. Behaviours that we've seen in other
1:41
situations too, because it's worthwhile
1:46
unpacking them to understand why
1:46
humans do the things we do, but
1:49
also how we can apply those lessons
1:49
to our communication and change.
1:54
So today I'm going to share four
1:54
reasons why people hoard toilet paper
1:58
during disasters and what we can learn.
2:00
Let's get into it. The first influential
2:04
factor is uncertainty.
2:07
Uncertainty breeds fear, fear breeds poor
2:07
behaviours, or just weird behaviours.
2:12
We react poorly to uncertainty
2:12
because our brains hate it.
2:16
Our brains are these old things
2:16
that are living in modern worlds.
2:20
They were designed to keep us safe. So certainty is very comforting to us.
2:25
When we don't have certainty, sometimes
2:25
we just don't know what to do.
2:29
And we see this all the time in
2:29
workplaces, particularly during change.
2:33
If we can't provide all the
2:33
answers, people tend to resist.
2:37
This uncertainty is also linked to
2:37
the status quo bias, which basically
2:42
means we like things to stay the
2:42
way they are, even if sometimes
2:46
it's not in our best interest. And again, this goes back to that idea
2:48
that The status quo provides safety.
2:53
If we move outside of that status
2:53
quo, we are taking on risk, and
2:57
we are hardwired to avoid risk.
3:00
So, when we see people hoarding
3:00
toilet paper, part of that is just
3:04
a response to uncertainty, and
3:04
a desire to control what we can.
3:08
What does this mean for your
3:08
communication and change practices?
3:12
Well, firstly, Try to create
3:12
as much certainty as possible.
3:16
That means very clear communication,
3:16
not using the vague corporate
3:19
speak or vague timelines and so on.
3:23
And secondly, I know we don't
3:23
always have all the information.
3:26
So say so be upfront about what
3:26
you know and what you don't.
3:31
And that's always appreciated. And another tip that I always
3:33
share is to talk about the
3:36
things that aren't changing. So, for example, Yes, we're changing
3:38
this technology, but our process
3:41
remains the same, and so do our roles. Sometimes you have to anchor people
3:43
to things that are certain to
3:46
help them manage the uncertain. So that's number one, uncertainty
3:49
and the status quo bias.
3:53
The second reason why we see toilet paper
3:53
flying off the shelves is social proof.
3:58
It basically means that what our
3:58
peers, colleagues, Friends and
4:01
families think about something or
4:01
what they do has the power to change
4:05
how we think and behave as well.
4:08
Social proof was a term coined by
4:08
a psychologist, Robert Cialdini.
4:12
So if you don't know about Cialdini, look
4:12
up his books, uh, they are incredible.
4:16
And he found that people are likely
4:16
to do what they observe others doing.
4:20
And it's even more powerful when the
4:20
people we are observing are like us.
4:25
So for example, if the messenger
4:25
is your team leader or a colleague.
4:30
So this is what we call the representative
4:30
bias, and it's where people evaluate
4:34
probabilities based on the degree
4:34
to which someone is similar to them,
4:37
or the degree to which a situation
4:37
represents your pre established view.
4:42
And whether we like it or not,
4:42
we are getting sucked in by
4:44
social proof all the time. E-commerce sites tell you how many
4:47
other people have bought the item you're
4:50
looking at, or that people who bought
4:50
that item also bought this other item.
4:55
They're great examples of social proof
4:55
to influence purchasing decisions.
4:59
We also use testimonials when
4:59
we promote courses and products
5:02
or even using new technology. We rely on peer reviews on
5:04
e commerce sites, Google,
5:07
TripAdvisor to make decisions.
5:09
We look at how busy a cafe is to judge
5:09
how good it is, even if we haven't
5:13
looked at the menu or the reviews. Because if it's so much busier
5:16
than the one next door, then
5:18
in my mind, it must be better. A 2012 study found social proof
5:21
can be so powerful, it can even
5:25
change our minds when it comes
5:25
to intentionally hurting others.
5:28
So there was this study called Opposing
5:28
Torture, and basically the researchers
5:32
spoke to different groups of university
5:32
students, and asked if they were against
5:36
the use of torture in interrogations. Now as you would expect, I hope,
5:38
most of the students responded that
5:42
they opposed the use of torture. But, when they were told that
5:44
most of their peers were in
5:47
favour, the tables turned.
5:50
80 percent of them then saw
5:50
torture as morally acceptable.
5:54
So in times like these, when we
5:54
see other people hoarding toilet
5:57
paper, we tend to follow the crowd.
6:00
There's a part of our brains thinking,
6:00
if they're buying up toilet paper, there
6:03
must be a reason for it, so I should too.
6:06
So how do we apply social
6:06
proof to communication?
6:09
Got a couple of ways you can think about it. The first is who the
6:11
communication comes from.
6:14
If your trusted colleague is saying
6:14
the new cafe downstairs is great,
6:18
you're more likely to go and try it. Or if a couple of team members are
6:20
raving about this new AI tool at
6:24
work, you are more likely to use it. So this is where change champions can
6:26
really help your internal comms, and it
6:30
doesn't necessarily work if the social
6:30
proof is coming from a senior leader.
6:34
So just think about who the messenger is.
6:37
And the second way you can use it is
6:37
think about how you write the subject
6:41
line or the title of your communication,
6:41
because including social proof in
6:46
a headline or your key messages can
6:46
make a big difference to whether a
6:49
person decides to engage with your
6:49
message or not, and if they believe it.
6:53
So for example, you could use a subject
6:53
line like, 20 of your team members
6:57
have already completed this survey. That's going to be much more
6:59
persuasive than complete this survey.
7:03
So that's social proof. The third one related to
7:05
uncertainty is loss aversion.
7:09
So this is a bias where
7:09
we tend to feel losses.
7:13
More than equivalent gains, even
7:13
if those losses are only potential
7:17
losses, we don't actually know. So in fact, the pain of a loss
7:19
can be twice as powerful as the
7:24
joy from an equivalent gain. So for example, we'd rather
7:25
not lose $10 than find $10.
7:31
And this is linked to Prospect Theory,
7:31
which was developed by Daniel Kahneman and
7:35
Amos Ky back in the sixties and seventies.
7:37
And it basically means we weigh up
7:37
potential outcomes from decisions we
7:41
have to make based on cost and risk.
7:44
So for example. We might be much more willing to
7:45
pay for an outcome that's a sure
7:48
thing rather than pay less for
7:48
an outcome that's not as sure.
7:52
We're willing to spend
7:52
more to get certainty.
7:55
Now what all of this means is that we
7:55
tend to do whatever we can to avoid
7:59
incurring a loss, which means we often
7:59
avoid taking even well calculated risks.
8:05
It's also linked to regret aversion
8:05
where we tend to do things to avoid
8:09
feeling... disappointed later on. It's like FOMO.
8:12
And when we think about
8:12
toilet paper in supermarkets,
8:15
people don't want to miss out. They see other people buying it,
8:16
and they don't want to regret
8:19
not buying it themselves later. So even if supermarkets hiked up
8:21
the prices on toilet paper, and
8:25
you probably still had enough
8:25
stocks at home, you are likely to
8:28
go and try and buy some yourself. We are so irrational like that.
8:33
Now, what does all of this mean
8:33
for communication and change?
8:35
Well, firstly, people want to avoid loss.
8:38
So if they perceive the change as a
8:38
loss in some way, they will resist it.
8:43
This is where hyping up the benefits
8:43
in your messaging is really important.
8:48
Genuinely hyping up, of course. Your messaging might also need to very
8:50
carefully position the gains against
8:55
the perceived losses to help people
8:55
gain that perspective, that what they're
8:59
getting is going to be so much bigger
8:59
and better than what they're losing.
9:03
So, for example, yes, we're replacing
9:03
system X with an AI system, but that
9:07
means you'll be saving on average
9:07
10 hours a week on this repetitive
9:11
work with this clunky system. And that's 10 hours you can use
9:13
to focus on X, Y, and Z instead.
9:17
So that's loss aversion. If something is perceived as being rare.
9:23
People want it more, and that's the
9:23
gist of scarcity, which is a fourth
9:28
reason why people buy toilet paper when
9:28
they don't need it during disasters.
9:32
Scarcity is one of Cialdini's six
9:32
psychological principles of persuasion.
9:37
It's why people line up for days outside
9:37
of shoe stores when there's a limited
9:41
edition version of a sneaker dropping;
9:41
or a new iPhone is coming, even though
9:46
they probably already have a perfectly
9:46
functioning iPhone or they already have
9:50
10 million pairs of sneakers at home. It's why people drop thousands of dollars
9:52
on designer handbags or waste a whole day
9:57
monitoring their devices in an attempt
9:57
to get Taylor Swift concert tickets,
10:01
not looking at anyone in particular. There was a lovely experiment in 1975
10:03
that demonstrated this scarcity principle.
10:09
So in this research, they
10:09
asked participants to rate
10:12
chocolate chip cookies. And to me, this sounds like a
10:13
experiment I can get behind.
10:17
Now there were two jars. One had 10 cookies in
10:18
it, the other had just 2.
10:22
And they were all exactly the same cookie.
10:25
People just had to taste a
10:25
cookie from each jar and rate it.
10:28
And even though they're exactly the same
10:28
cookie - The cookies in the two cookie
10:32
jar were consistently rated higher
10:32
than those from the 10 cookie jar.
10:37
Basically, scarcity drove a perception
10:37
that those cookies were more delicious
10:42
and more valuable because there was only
10:42
a few of them in that two cookie jar.
10:47
In the case of the great toilet
10:47
paper, hoarding, scarcity was
10:50
a big driver of behaviour.
10:53
People saw toilet paper was getting
10:53
scarce, and so they wanted it
10:56
more, even if they didn't need it. And again, it's a little bit like FOMO.
11:00
Marketing, it uses scarcity all the time.
11:04
You see it when they use phrases like,
11:04
there's limited tickets available, or
11:07
limit of one product per customer, or
11:07
there's only one seat left on this flight.
11:12
E commerce sites use it all the time.
11:14
You can see how many of a particular
11:14
item is left in stock, how
11:18
quickly they're selling and so on. But there are a few
11:21
caveats about scarcity.
11:23
And the first is that scarcity due to
11:23
high demand, like Taylor Swift tickets,
11:28
is much more effective than scarcity due
11:28
to limited supply, like a coin collection.
11:34
Luxury items that last a long time, like
11:34
a diamond necklace, are more appealing
11:38
compared to what they call fleeting
11:38
luxuries, like a limited edition book.
11:43
And a scarce item that shows your
11:43
status like a pair of Gucci sunglasses
11:47
is even more effective because
11:47
you layer on top of that, our need
11:50
for this social gratification. So how do you use scarcity to make
11:53
your communication more effective?
11:58
Here's a few examples. When promoting a training course for
11:59
employees, you could say something like:
12:03
Spaces are filling up fast for this hugely
12:03
popular, unique learning opportunity.
12:07
Don't miss out. If you're selling a product,
12:08
you could say: Hundreds already
12:10
sold and only a few remaining. Get in quick.
12:13
You'll never
12:13
have the chance to buy this again.
12:17
If you are selling a service like a
12:17
training course, you could say something
12:21
Gain exclusive access to our annual
12:21
leadership communications course, usually
12:25
reserved for C suite executives only.
12:28
You could even use visuals to show how
12:28
many places on a course have already been
12:32
taken, for example, as long as that visual
12:32
shows that there are only a few left.
12:37
So layering scarcity with social
12:37
proof can also be really powerful.
12:41
So for example, a testimonial from
12:41
someone who attended a training course,
12:46
they might say how great it was, how
12:46
happy they were, they were one of the
12:49
few people who got to do the course,
12:49
and then they encourage others to
12:52
do it before the course books out. That could be a very powerful message.
12:57
Alrighty, it is time
12:57
for your episode recap.
12:59
So in today's episode, we explored the
12:59
behavioural science behind people's
13:03
stocking up on toilet paper in times of
13:03
disaster and how we can apply some of
13:07
those lessons to our own communication. There were four ideas I shared.
13:12
Firstly, uncertainty
13:12
and the status quo bias.
13:15
We really like things to
13:15
stay the way they are.
13:18
And when faced with uncertainty
13:18
that creates fear and fear
13:21
creates poor behaviour. In times of change, use your
13:23
communication to try and alleviate
13:26
some of that uncertainty by
13:26
pointing to what is certain and also
13:30
talking about what's not changing.
13:33
Number two was social proof. Basically, we tend to follow the crowd.
13:37
So if everybody else is buying toilet
13:37
paper, then we will buy toilet paper too.
13:42
Imagine if nobody actually ever
13:42
started hoarding it, there would
13:45
still be plenty left in the shelves.
13:47
And so for your change in comms,
13:47
social proof can also be used as
13:51
a powerful driver of behaviour.
13:53
So use testimonials from change champions
13:53
and think about using messengers
13:57
who are liked and representative of
13:57
the audience you're trying to reach.
14:02
Number three, loss aversion. We hate the idea that we might
14:04
experience a loss and that we
14:08
might regret taking an action. The pain of a perspective loss
14:10
is felt twice as strongly as
14:13
the joy from a potential gain. So we have to reframe perceived
14:16
losses as benefits where we can.
14:20
And finally, scarcity. The more rare something
14:22
is, the more we want it.
14:25
So when toilet paper becomes scarce,
14:25
we want it, even if we don't need it.
14:29
In change and comms, we can use
14:29
scarcity to help drive behaviour.
14:33
Like attending a training session
14:33
or participating in a new program.
14:38
All right, team. So that is our episode for today.
14:42
I am so excited because in the next few
14:42
weeks, we've got more, uh, extra guests
14:46
coming on board, I'm traveling a bit
14:46
too and attending a few conferences.
14:49
So I'll be sharing that back with
14:49
you to find out what I've learned
14:52
from around the globe around what
14:52
are the trends that we're seeing and
14:55
what are people working on in the
14:55
comms and change sector more broadly.
14:59
So I'm super excited for that. Also super excited that in November
15:00
this year, I will be running a retreat
15:05
with my friend Petra Zink over in
15:05
Queenstown, very exclusive, very limited.
15:09
We are maxing out at 20
15:09
people to this retreat.
15:13
It's two days. You're going to walk away with so
15:13
many tools and practical things for
15:18
your own business, your own brand.
15:20
You do not want to miss this. I promise you we have a big
15:22
focus on practicality and also
15:25
why not do it in Queenstown. So for more info on that, check
15:27
out the link in the show notes.
15:30
In the meantime, keep doing
15:30
amazing things and bye for now.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More