Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:06
Welcome to the Making Sense podcast. This
0:09
is Sam Harris. Just a
0:11
note to say that if you're hearing this, you're not
0:13
currently on our subscriber feed and we'll
0:15
only be hearing the first part of this conversation. In
0:18
order to access full episodes of the
0:20
Making Sense podcast, you'll need to subscribe
0:22
at samharris.org. There you'll also
0:24
find our scholarship program where we offer free accounts
0:26
to anyone who can't afford one. We
0:29
don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore it's
0:31
made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers.
0:34
So if you enjoy what we're doing here, please
0:36
consider becoming one. I
0:46
am here with Simon Sebag-Mattefiore. Simon, thanks
0:48
so much for joining me. It's
0:50
great to be with you finally.
0:52
Yeah, yeah. We've been on a
0:54
WhatsApp thread together for quite some time.
0:58
We won't divulge the other attendees,
1:00
but it's great to finally meet
1:02
you, however, remotely. You
1:04
have written these just marvelous
1:08
magisterial histories. I'm
1:10
reading two simultaneously, but you've written many
1:12
others. But the two I'm reading, Stalin,
1:16
the Court of the Red Tsar,
1:18
and Jerusalem, the biography, really
1:21
combined, they offer just an amazing lens
1:23
through which to look at the present.
1:26
My interest in talking to you as a historian is
1:29
to help me worry about
1:31
the present and the near future. And I
1:33
think you're uniquely well-placed to do that, given
1:36
your expertise in both Russian history and the
1:38
history of the Middle East. Before
1:40
we jump in, can you just give me kind
1:42
of a potted intellectual biography? What do you consider
1:44
your areas of focus
1:48
as a historian? You know, my background
1:50
was I did history at Cambridge
1:52
University. Then bizarrely, I went
1:54
into banking for a
1:57
short disastrous career. And then
1:59
I... went out to
2:01
the Soviet Union as it
2:03
disintegrated in the early 90s.
2:05
And so that was really my
2:07
training ground. That was a brilliant
2:10
place, a fascinating place
2:12
to see an empire falling
2:14
apart. And I think for
2:16
a young historian to see
2:18
with their own eyes an empire falling apart
2:21
is the best training you can have better
2:24
than books. And
2:26
so that was a very interesting time.
2:28
And then from that, I started to
2:30
write about Russia, which I'd
2:32
started really when I was at university.
2:34
And I started writing about Catherine the
2:37
Great and Potemkin. And
2:39
that's a subject that's become very
2:41
relevant, of course, because apart
2:43
from their very colorful sex
2:45
life and amazing letters and
2:47
their place in the Enlightenment,
2:50
the Russian Enlightenment, they were
2:52
also empire builders. And
2:54
of course, they conquered South Ukraine and
2:57
Crimea and built all the cities
2:59
that are now being fought over,
3:01
Odessa, Sebastopol, Dniep Pro, and so
3:03
on. And that led
3:05
through a weird favor to
3:07
me, in a way, from Vladimir
3:09
Putin himself to
3:12
having access to Stalin's archives
3:15
and being one of the first
3:17
people to be able to work in
3:19
those archives. And of course, that was
3:21
the big thrill, really, being starting
3:24
to work on Stalin. And that's
3:27
the book you're reading, Stalin the Court
3:29
of the Red Tsar. Yeah, not a
3:31
cheerful subject. It's quite unbelievable how horrific
3:34
history gets. One
3:36
hopes one is not living in a period of
3:38
history like some of the periods
3:40
you've written about. But increasingly, our
3:43
present starts to
3:45
begin to feel like we've
3:47
entered the stream of history. And I remember
3:50
the first period of my life where I felt
3:52
all of a sudden, OK, this is
3:55
history with all of its dangers.
3:57
It was immediately after 9-11.
6:00
and of course historians are
6:02
terrible prophets as, you
6:04
know, the end of history and many other, you know,
6:07
pieces by brilliant historians have shown. But
6:09
I think the thing to understand at
6:11
the moment is how exceptional
6:13
the period that we were living through,
6:16
that we grew up in, was,
6:18
how extraordinary. And of course
6:20
we didn't realize it when we were in it so much.
6:23
But the period from 45, 48, 50, to... to,
6:29
okay, 9-11 or the election
6:31
of Donald Trump or whatever,
6:34
you know, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, even
6:37
October 7th. How
6:39
exceptional was that period where, you know,
6:42
the leaders of... Actually, you
6:44
know, every president of the United States had
6:47
kind of similar views of the world,
6:49
you know, give or take, small differences.
6:52
They had a view of an internationalist view of an omission
6:54
to the world. And
6:56
where Soviet leaders, despite believing
6:59
in world revolution and
7:01
their mission to change the world, were
7:03
also extremely conservative, really. And
7:06
where, you know, people did respect the
7:08
United Nations that was a
7:11
supranational sanctuary of
7:13
something called international law, which
7:15
existed because people believed it
7:17
existed. And where
7:20
various views became taboo in
7:23
most liberal democracies, anti-Semitism,
7:27
where a great liberal reformation happened with
7:29
gay rights and that, and
7:31
other advances, the pill, the right to abortion, all these
7:33
things were kind of won in this kind of period
7:35
which I call in my world history the
7:38
great liberal reformation, because it was so radical. But
7:40
of course we took it for granted. And
7:43
of course, all of these things will
7:45
have to be fought for again and are now
7:48
under threat. And that exceptional period,
7:50
it's hard to think of a period where
7:52
anything like that really existed. You know,
7:54
maybe the Roman Empire, when
7:57
the Roman Empire faced the Persians and
7:59
the Sassaic, There were
8:01
these kind of two polar powers
8:03
that really kind of kept a sort
8:05
of peace, but of course it was a much more
8:08
brutal world. And of course the rest
8:10
of the world was not included in
8:12
those two powers. It was really just
8:14
Mediterranean and the Near East. So
8:18
the end of this world is a
8:20
sort of return to the way things
8:22
have always been with massive number of
8:24
powers. I guess you'd say
8:26
the sort of the 70
8:28
year piece is what was coming
8:30
to an end, what you were witnessing coming to an
8:32
end, beginning to end with 9-11, which included a sort
8:35
of chess
8:37
game between two great powers. Then
8:40
25 years of American paramountcy,
8:43
a sort of game of solitaire. And now suddenly,
8:46
fascinatingly, a sort
8:48
of multiplayer game where smaller powers
8:50
follow their own interests in ways
8:52
that we don't understand.
8:56
And then of course, the success, the key
8:59
thing about this was the success of liberal
9:01
democracy, which again was extraordinary. And
9:03
one forgets that half of
9:05
Europe was under dictatorship until 91. Even
9:11
Western Europe was under dictatorships until 1974-75.
9:16
So again, one just forgets, a lot of
9:18
it is perception. We've just forgets how recent
9:20
all this is. Yeah.
9:23
So, do you think we've reached
9:25
a point where the unraveling of
9:27
liberal world order, as we've
9:30
come to know it, has
9:32
reached a point of no return, where you're
9:35
expecting America to
9:37
pull back, that multilateralism will
9:40
be less and less effectual,
9:42
and we're going to see a
9:44
period of greater chaos
9:46
globally? Or you do think we can
9:49
pull back from the brink here
9:51
and return to what we in
9:53
our lifetime have considered
9:55
more normal? If
9:59
we can't get quite to... all the
10:01
way to Fukuyama, we can get to something like,
10:04
the expectation going forward is that
10:07
liberal democracy and
10:09
it's however many discontents it
10:11
has will prevail or at least
10:13
be the expected norm
10:15
globally. And that there'll be
10:18
enough power on that side
10:20
of the equation so that despotism will
10:22
still seem both pathological
10:25
and anomalous. I think
10:27
that, first of all, I don't think history
10:29
ever repeats itself exactly, it never goes back.
10:32
But that doesn't mean that liberal
10:34
democracies can't resurge and
10:36
triumph. And, but that needs
10:39
changes within liberal democracies. I mean, America
10:42
is still the greatest power that's ever
10:44
existed in terms of military power, economy
10:46
and all sorts of other tests and
10:48
measures. And American
10:51
power is still the most
10:53
dynamic force in
10:55
the world game, if you like. But
10:57
the democracies are having a huge crisis within
10:59
themselves. And, as
11:02
Ibn Khaldun, the great Arab
11:04
North African historian in the
11:06
14th century said, he said, great
11:08
kingdoms don't fall because of military
11:11
defeats or economic defeats, they fall
11:13
because of psychological defeats. Which
11:15
is a very interesting concept. And he
11:17
said, the loss of assabiyel, forgive
11:21
my pouring Arab pronunciation, but
11:24
the loss of cohesion of solidarity, of
11:26
values that hold together a society
11:29
in a common goal. And this, of
11:31
course, brings us to stuff that Fukiyaum
11:33
has written very well about, about overqualified,
11:38
over entitled population, et cetera, et cetera,
11:40
which, of course, these are things that
11:42
are stopping democracies behaving with confidence. And
11:44
if America regained its confidence, America
11:47
has a huge power to
11:49
change things. But we should be under
11:52
no illusion. The success of liberal democracy was
11:54
not because there was, you know, liberal democracy
11:56
was, was not just because liberal democracy is
11:59
a very nice. live under. It
12:01
was also because liberal democracies
12:03
were successful. And
12:06
the biggest influence, I mean, people,
12:08
when I wrote my world history, people said, why is there so much
12:10
war in your world history? This is
12:12
full of violence. And I said,
12:14
well, of course, wars are when everything
12:17
is speeded up and intensified,
12:19
you know, inventions, ingenuity, all
12:21
of it happens during warfare.
12:24
And we were seeing that now with drone
12:26
warfare and all this, all that's happening in
12:28
the Middle East and Ukraine. That's another thing
12:30
we can talk about. But the point is,
12:33
the reason why there was such liberal democracy
12:35
was so successful. Everyone wanted to have a
12:37
system that looked like a liberal democracy, even
12:39
if it wasn't a liberal democracy, was
12:41
because of the victory of World War II of 45. I
12:44
mean, started with 1918, but then again in 1945, which was
12:46
really a sort
12:50
of Soviet victory, but it was widely
12:53
regarded as a victory of America,
12:55
of American power. And that
12:58
made, if you look at all the new
13:01
states created after 1945 in the sixties, they
13:05
all looked like America. I mean,
13:07
even China today, even Russia have
13:09
presidencies, legislatures, when it's all based
13:11
on America, because America set this
13:15
standard, even though they
13:17
were never democracies and certainly never liberal
13:19
democracies. But the point was everyone wanted
13:21
to look like America. And
13:24
of course, a lot of these countries that
13:26
we presumed were democracies, maybe weren't
13:29
as democratic as we thought all along
13:31
anyway. And one only has to look
13:33
at all the states created in Africa,
13:35
for example, which are now disintegrating. That's
13:37
another subject to discuss perhaps later. But
13:39
it was a great compliment to America that
13:42
many states became liberal democracies. It was a
13:44
great compliment to the success of America in
13:46
wars that were incredibly consequential
13:48
and mattered. And also
13:50
wars, let's be clear, that had clear
13:53
victories. Right. It's very hard to achieve
13:55
now. Yeah.
13:57
Yeah. Well, so I think we can
13:59
focus. focus many of our concerns through
14:02
the nexus of the
14:04
city of Jerusalem. I mean, so much
14:06
of what ails us in terms of
14:09
the past shattering and possible
14:12
future shattering of our world can be, it
14:15
doesn't capture everything, but it captures a
14:17
lot when you look at the fixation
14:22
of the three monotheisms on that
14:24
single city. I remember reading Gershom
14:27
Gornberg's book, the end of days, maybe 20
14:29
years ago or so. And
14:31
this would be obvious to you as a
14:34
historian, but this was the first time I
14:36
realized that the destruction of a single building,
14:38
the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount, could
14:41
produce World War III. Right,
14:44
I mean, the level of religious
14:46
fanaticism aimed at that single piece
14:48
of real estate is such that
14:51
the world's Muslims and Christians and
14:53
Jews view it as a,
14:55
I mean, it
14:57
is a sacred symbol, but it is a non-negotiable
15:00
one, right? I mean, it's not at
15:02
all fungible. It seems there's nothing you
15:04
could offer the world's 2. billion Muslims
15:07
in trade for that, that single
15:09
building that would be
15:11
satisfactory. And so it is
15:13
with the millennial expectations of
15:15
evangelical Christians, perhaps even Christians
15:17
more widely who expect that
15:20
the Messiah will return and they're
15:22
joined by Orthodox Jews in
15:25
this expectation once the temple is rebuilt by
15:28
the Jews there. And you
15:30
go into this history in some detail
15:32
in your book, Jerusalem, but
15:34
let's talk about that because
15:36
it is amazing when
15:38
you step back, certainly from a secular perspective,
15:41
to realize that our world
15:43
is essentially rigged to explode
15:46
based on the millenarian
15:49
superstitions of billions of people
15:52
focused on a single building
15:55
and certain, you know, patently
15:57
absurd details like the production of a...
16:00
perfect red heifer to be sacrificed
16:02
so as to sanctify the implements
16:04
that would rebuild the
16:06
temple. What are your thoughts
16:08
on the Temple Mount, Simon? Simon
16:11
Well, the Temple Mount is the
16:13
most intensely revered piece of land.
16:16
It's a compound, an esplanade. It's a
16:18
platform actually built by Herod the Great,
16:20
created by Herod the Great during his
16:23
reign. It took most of his reign
16:25
to build it. And Herod
16:27
the Great actually sort of formed what
16:30
we now think of as the
16:32
Temple Mount, probably on a
16:34
much rougher structure. And
16:37
the actual sort of space of the platform has
16:40
not changed much since he built it. He was
16:43
basically made King of Judea in 40 BC
16:46
by Antony and
16:49
Octavius, the future
16:51
Augustus. And they
16:53
walked with him through Rome and they said, go
16:56
back and conquer Jerusalem and
16:59
we'll give you some troops to do that.
17:01
It had been taken by the Parthians. And
17:03
so that's the sort of origin of
17:06
the actual space as we see it
17:08
now on which the two beautiful Islamic
17:11
shrines stand. And you're
17:13
absolutely right. I mean, all of the expectations
17:16
of fundamental believers of all
17:18
the three Abrahamic religions are
17:20
focused on that space. And
17:23
many of them believe that outside the
17:25
Golden Gate, which is the Eastern war,
17:27
beautiful structure, probably built
17:29
by Heraclius, by Zantine
17:31
April on the on the on the Eastern
17:34
side, believe that that is the place that
17:37
the apocalypse will happen. And
17:39
you're absolutely right. I mean, when I was writing
17:42
about Jerusalem and I sort of
17:44
realized, you know, so many things could go this
17:46
could be shared, this could there could be a
17:48
peace process that could lead to
17:50
this being a sort of international, the
17:52
holy basin, as it's called by American
17:54
peacemakers, that it could turn into a
17:57
place, a sort of Vatican almost for all
18:00
three. religions, but it could
18:02
also, anything that goes wrong
18:04
there could ignite
18:06
a catastrophe, a Holocaust,
18:09
and a World War III
18:11
that would involve everybody, because everybody
18:13
is involved in the
18:15
future of that place, and that's
18:17
why it's an extraordinary thing. And
18:20
I guess one of the realizations today is that
18:22
for years we thought again, going back to our
18:24
sort of view of the world until
18:27
9-11, we knew there were religious
18:29
people, there were many
18:31
evangelicals in America and West
18:33
Africa, there were Islamic fundamentalists and
18:35
so on, there were Jewish fanatics,
18:39
but we felt that along with liberal democracy,
18:41
a sort of secularity was kind of
18:43
spreading across the world and we were beyond
18:45
that sort of religiosity.
18:49
That's turned out to be completely false, and
18:52
actually religious people have a
18:54
sort of force and a
18:56
focus that secular people
18:58
don't have, but which secular
19:00
people are afraid of and
19:03
are extremely impressed by. And
19:06
so we're seeing that on the sides taken by
19:08
different people in the Middle East right now. Of
19:12
course, it's not a coincidence
19:14
that that space is revered
19:16
by the three religions, because each
19:18
one led to another in a
19:20
succession, and the
19:22
holiness of each was borrowed,
19:25
commandeered, stolen, reinvented,
19:27
re-channeled by its successor,
19:30
and each successor retooled,
19:33
relaunched, and sort of
19:35
slightly changed those
19:37
stories in order
19:39
to contribute to
19:42
the heritage, to the ancientness
19:45
that is essential for legitimacy in
19:47
religion. And then of course, that's
19:49
why when you look at texts like the Bible,
19:51
for example, the Quran, others, some
19:54
of the texts sort of seem like
19:56
very clear writing, some of it is
19:58
literally history that we can check. And
20:00
some of it is unintelligible
20:03
or weirdly detailed like the famous red heifer
20:06
in Jerusalem. But the point is these
20:09
texts are a mixture
20:11
of a library of
20:13
ancient texts that have
20:15
been superimposed on each other. And
20:18
the most holy thing is the
20:21
revelation that builds on
20:23
an ancient story that already exists, an
20:26
ancient holiness that already exists. And
20:29
this concept of holiness is redoubled,
20:32
multiplied many times by
20:35
the destruction of those places. So the
20:37
destructions of Jerusalem, two most
20:39
famous destructions, Nebuchadnezzar in 586 and
20:42
Titus in 70, but there were
20:44
many, many catastrophic events there. But
20:47
especially those are so mythic
20:49
in scale and so total that
20:51
the very ruins became holier than
20:53
the buildings that they'd replaced. And
20:56
of course, they became hallowed by
20:59
the legitimacy, by the authority, by the
21:03
ancientness of what had gone before.
21:06
So the revelation of the…
21:09
It was a coincidence that Jerusalem became
21:11
the holy city. It could
21:13
have been many different places. The religious
21:15
person wouldn't say that, of course. But
21:17
historically, talking about geostrategy, there was no
21:20
reason why Jerusalem should become such a
21:22
significant place. It wasn't a
21:24
port, it wasn't on a trade route.
21:26
It was a small hilltop, a mountain
21:28
top in the blistered
21:31
Judean mountains in Canaan,
21:33
what became known as Judea. But
21:35
once the Jews had made it their
21:38
holy city, once they'd
21:40
written, the decisive thing that
21:42
happened was not the decision, I think,
21:44
not just the decision to make it at the holy
21:47
place and to build a temple there, but
21:49
to write it down. And that
21:51
was what was special about it because Jerusalem
21:54
gained a biography, the Bible,
21:56
and that biography meant that other people
21:58
could read it. read it, could find
22:00
out about it, could be translated, it
22:02
could be known by successors. And
22:05
so the early Christians were of course
22:07
Jews, despite what you might read on
22:10
Twitter these days or on X these
22:12
days. And... Actually, that's a
22:14
point that I hadn't thought to
22:16
raise with you, but I've
22:18
always found it fascinating that the
22:21
certainly theological versions
22:23
of antisemitism are a kind
22:26
of reductio ad absurdum of
22:28
themselves when you realize that
22:30
Jesus and Mary
22:33
and all of Jesus' disciples
22:36
were Jews, living as Jews, acting
22:38
as Jews, thinking of themselves as Jews.
22:41
It's amazing that you can get a genocidal
22:44
antisemitism out of that piece
22:46
of legacy code somehow in
22:49
a Christian context. It's probably less surprising
22:52
in a Muslim context. But
22:54
perhaps we can just talk
22:57
about the roots of this
22:59
intersection of religious belief
23:02
on the Holy Land more broadly. One
23:05
thing that was also surprising to learn in your book
23:08
is that Jerusalem itself has been abandoned
23:10
or effectively abandoned at various periods
23:12
in history. It became essentially a
23:14
little village of ruins.
23:17
But let's talk about the roots here because I'm
23:19
going to want to lead you in this conversation to
23:22
an analysis of what's happened post-October
23:25
7th with
23:27
notions of settler colonialism
23:29
and the illegitimacy of Jewish
23:31
claims to that particular piece
23:33
of real estate and the
23:36
view worldwide that the Jews
23:38
and the nation of Israel
23:40
are interlopers of a
23:42
kind and a remnant of
23:44
colonialism. So knowing that we're going to get
23:46
there, let's talk a little bit about the
23:49
history of the
23:51
region, of Jews in the region,
23:53
and of the emergence of Christianity
23:55
and Islam out of that
23:57
region. The Judeans. which
24:00
was the word Jew comes from Judean. The
24:03
Judeans were one of the Levantine
24:05
people who emerged in Canaan
24:09
and controlled between about
24:12
1000 BC and
24:14
about the beginning of the New for
24:17
about a thousand years, or about 10
24:19
centuries, lived in kingdoms
24:21
that they mainly ruled in
24:24
the small land that was
24:26
around Jerusalem. If you
24:28
were a believing Jew, you'd say that
24:30
they were the chosen people who came
24:32
out of Egypt in the Passover story,
24:35
and you would believe that they were the
24:37
chosen people. If you were a
24:39
secular person and look at history, you
24:42
would say that they were one of the
24:44
peoples that emerged from Levantine
24:46
Canaanite peoples who lived in the
24:48
region, that
24:51
they created kingdoms in
24:53
the north, a kingdom called Israel in the south, a
24:56
kingdom ruled by a house of
24:58
David, which appears on
25:00
the tail down steel. So we know that
25:02
there was a house of David, and
25:05
that David and his successors in
25:07
the house of David, a dynasty,
25:10
ruled from Jerusalem that they built
25:12
a temple there at some point,
25:15
maybe not as early as it's impossible to prove
25:17
when it was exactly built, but it was built,
25:19
and that was the first temple. It
25:22
was built on what
25:24
is now the temple, Mount Moriah in
25:27
Jerusalem, and there
25:29
was a northern kingdom, Israel.
25:32
They were tiny kingdoms that really
25:35
prospered during a period
25:37
when the great powers of the region,
25:40
Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, and
25:42
so on, were in times
25:44
of crisis. When
25:46
those big empires
25:50
woke up again and were
25:52
restored to power, they swept down
25:54
and conquered these kingdoms.
25:57
The peoples of Israel were
25:59
removed to power. Babylonian exile.
26:01
Jerusalem was destroyed in 586, but
26:05
the Judean people remained there. In
26:07
63, well, in the 320s, Alexander the Great arrived.
26:09
His successors, two kingdoms, the Seleucids
26:17
and the Assyrians, ruled
26:20
Syria and Egypt and
26:22
fought for about a hundred years
26:24
for control of Judea and Jerusalem.
26:26
In about 164, they rebelled
26:29
against the Assyrians, created
26:33
a new kingdom, the Maccabean Kingdom,
26:36
the Hasmonean Kingdom. We're
26:38
still in BC here, right? Yes,
26:40
which is celebrated by Jews
26:42
in the festival of Hanukkah.
26:45
And they ruled for about a hundred years, and
26:48
then they broke up in civil war. Some
26:50
people make parallels with Israel today,
26:54
with that process where that
26:56
kingdom disintegrated. And then
26:59
the Romans arrived in about 63 in the
27:02
person of Pompey the Great, a great
27:04
Roman warlord. And
27:06
then his successors gave
27:09
Judea to Herod the Great, who was a
27:11
fascinating character, a key character,
27:13
because his mother was
27:16
Arab. She was an Apertian, which was the
27:18
Arab kingdom in what is now Jordan and
27:20
northern Saudi Arabia. And
27:22
his father was an Idumean, an Edomite,
27:25
a recent convert to Judaism.
27:28
And so he's an interesting person, half
27:30
Arab, half Jew, half Judean, if
27:33
you like. And he created
27:35
a dynasty that lasted for five generations,
27:38
ruling various bits of
27:41
Roman dominated near and
27:44
in 66, there was a
27:46
huge rebellion against the Romans during
27:48
the reign of Nero, partly
27:50
caused by Nero's managerial
27:53
incompetence in his rule of the
27:55
Empire. And winning personality. And
27:57
winning personality. general
28:01
sinister character. And,
28:04
you know, he was one of, Nero's interesting, because he's
28:06
one of those politicians who merge
28:09
entertainment and politics, which
28:12
we should be familiar with today, and
28:15
use the power of entertainment and
28:17
the power of politics to feed on each other, to
28:20
promote himself. But moving aside
28:23
from that, there was the Jewish revolt
28:26
run by, led by fundamentalist Jewish
28:28
fanatics, I think we'd say now.
28:31
And many of the Judean people backed the Romans.
28:33
And in fact, the Herod
28:36
family were one of the, you know,
28:38
and the historian Josephus actually, in
28:40
the end backed the Romans, thinking Roman, Roman
28:43
Hellenic life was preferable to life under
28:45
a Jewish religious state. These
28:47
were the Maccabees? These weren't
28:49
the Maccabees. These were
28:51
different sects and factions
28:53
that fought each other murderously.
28:56
And in the end, were
28:59
stormed by Titus Caesar, the
29:02
son of the emperor of Spacing, who emerged
29:04
out of the civil war of 68, the
29:06
year of three emperors, and
29:09
stormed Jerusalem and destroyed it for the second
29:11
time completely. Many Jews
29:13
then went into exile, but
29:15
many Jews remained there. And
29:18
in the 130s, another
29:20
emperor, Hadrian, decided to
29:23
build a Roman temple on top
29:25
of the ruins of the Jewish
29:27
temple in Jerusalem, of the second
29:29
temple which had been destroyed. And
29:31
this caused a second huge Jewish
29:34
revolt led by Simon Bar Kokhba.
29:37
And once again, this led to
29:39
what everyone agrees is it was
29:42
a genocidal war against the Judeans.
29:44
They were banned from Jerusalem. Jerusalem
29:46
was renamed Aelia Capitolina and
29:48
remained under a new name for
29:50
300 years. But
29:53
the Jews or Judeans always
29:55
revered it, prayed round its ruins,
29:58
but were spread around the Mediterranean for
30:00
the first time. So there was a
30:02
glut of Judean slaves, for example, in
30:04
Rome. It's funny to think of Jews
30:06
as slaves, but there
30:08
were most of the many of the slaves in
30:11
the Roman Empire were Judean, of course, because
30:13
after these wars. And out
30:16
of this came a new Jewish religion
30:18
that was always linked to look back
30:20
to Jerusalem, but also
30:22
looked to the Torah
30:24
as a kind of portable Jerusalem almost,
30:27
which they carried with them always. And
30:30
the religion changed fundamentally. Before then,
30:33
Jewish religion had been based on
30:35
sacrifices on the Temple Mount outside
30:37
the Temple to God. And
30:40
since they no longer had the Temple and they
30:42
no longer had access to the Temple Mount itself,
30:44
a new sort of religion developed,
30:46
which were Jews prayed in synagogues,
30:49
and they lived in Spain, in
30:51
Italy, in Cyprus, in North
30:53
Africa. So that was
30:56
a new era. And at the same time, the
30:59
Christian religion had separated itself from
31:03
Judaism. Jesus, Joseph,
31:06
Mary, their family were
31:08
Jews, the Judeans were Judeans,
31:10
but they lived in…they
31:12
were known as Nazarenes because they
31:15
came from Galilee. And
31:17
in the early part of the
31:19
Christian story, they were
31:21
really a Jewish sect. They prayed, they
31:24
followed one of Jesus' brothers
31:26
or cousins, James, they prayed
31:28
in the Temple like other
31:30
Jews. And
31:32
it was
31:34
only really after 70, after
31:37
the destruction of the
31:39
Temple, had shown many that God
31:43
had withdrawn his blessing from
31:45
the Jews. Again, war, failure in
31:47
war, is so decisive
31:49
in history. And that
31:52
many decided that actually
31:54
they needed to embrace a new revelation in
31:56
the revelation of Christianity.
31:59
And of course, It was the
32:01
preaching of Christianity to non-Jews, and
32:03
the fact that Christianity would open
32:06
their arms completely to non-Jews, partly
32:08
made it so successful. But it
32:10
was also a rebellion
32:13
against the class
32:16
structure in the Roman Empire,
32:18
enslavement, and also it
32:20
had a new concept, which was, if
32:22
you behave well in this life, you'd
32:24
go to heaven in the next one.
32:26
So salvation was
32:28
a promise. And so it contained
32:30
new things that have really affected us right
32:34
until this day. And
32:36
the conversion of Constantine
32:38
in the fourth century,
32:40
Constantine the ruler of the
32:42
whole Roman Empire, the conversion
32:45
to Christianity was a
32:47
decisive moment in world history and
32:50
made and really allied Christianity
32:52
with power, with state, with
32:54
empire, and Jesus
32:57
with war and
32:59
victory. Three hundred
33:01
years later in Arabia emerged
33:04
the revelation of the prophet Muhammad.
33:06
He claimed to speak as a
33:09
messenger of God, but
33:11
he was knowledgeable about both
33:14
Christian and Jewish religion. And
33:17
whether he read it or he heard of it,
33:19
he'd certainly traveled with members of
33:22
his family who were merchants to
33:24
Syria, to Judea, to
33:27
Palestine. And
33:30
so he encompassed, he embraced
33:32
these stories as prophets. He
33:35
embraced Moses and David,
33:38
he embraced Mary, he
33:40
embraced these people, Jesus, as prophets
33:43
in his new third and final
33:45
revelation. And part
33:47
of the success of Muhammad was
33:50
based on what seemed like an
33:52
eclipse of the Roman Empire in
33:54
a time that must have seemed
33:56
like a sort of world disaster. He
34:01
died in 632, but in
34:04
the early part of that
34:06
century, the Sassanian Persians invaded
34:08
the Eastern
34:10
Roman Empire, defeated it, took Egypt,
34:13
Jerusalem, and fought their way
34:15
all the way close
34:17
to Istanbul. The
34:20
world seemed to be tilting in
34:22
an extraordinary way. No one knew what would happen. During
34:26
that period, the two great
34:29
powers, the Sassanian Persian Shars
34:31
and the emperors in Constantinople,
34:34
had formally financed
34:36
proxy kingdoms of Arabs that
34:38
fought as their border proxies
34:41
in the Middle East. They
34:44
discontinued these pensions that they paid
34:46
to these local kings, these Arab
34:48
kings. So there's
34:50
always been a great mystery. How
34:53
come these Arabs from great
34:55
obscurity managed to conquer so much
34:57
of the world? Part
35:00
of it was religious fervor. Part of
35:02
it was military toughness. Part
35:04
of it was sort of military
35:06
efficiency, a centrality of belief. Part
35:10
of it may have been that there were these
35:12
kind of actually experienced
35:14
and trained warriors around, trained
35:17
by both superpowers, if you like, who
35:19
were available. But anyway, Muhammad
35:21
was not only the founder of a
35:23
religion like Jesus Christ, but he was
35:25
also a head of state
35:27
and a commander who created a new
35:29
community and a new state. His
35:32
successors sent their troops out
35:34
into the world and a world
35:37
that was completely destabilized. It
35:41
seems like nothing is certain of
35:43
that period. It's such a misty period, but
35:46
it seems like they very
35:48
shrewdly offered all mono-atheists the
35:50
chance to join this religion,
35:52
which at the time had rules that
35:55
were unclear, that were
35:57
inchoate, that were developing. And
36:00
there are, for example, in Jerusalem, there are
36:02
very clear records that when they took Jerusalem,
36:04
first of all, it was surrendered to them
36:07
by Christian bishop without fighting
36:10
and in return for tolerance. But
36:12
secondly, that when they arrived there, they
36:15
immediately went up to the Temple Mount, which
36:17
had been left empty as a sign of
36:19
Christian disdain for the Jews. And
36:22
they built an early mosque there on
36:26
the site of the Al-Aqsa. And
36:28
they also later built the
36:30
Dome of the Rock in
36:32
691 on
36:35
the site, almost certainly on the site
36:37
of the Judean or Jewish Temple. But
36:41
in those early mosques and the early Dome of
36:43
the Rock, Christians and Jews were
36:45
allowed, it's believed, to pray there
36:47
as well. And of course, the
36:49
rules hardened later as
36:51
the religion became a formal faith of
36:54
the Great Arab Empire.
36:57
But all that time, Jews had been there in
37:00
that region, had prayed around the
37:02
walls. And when the Muslims came,
37:04
they allowed the Jews to return to live
37:06
there, providing, as Demi,
37:09
they recognized the
37:13
supremacy of the Islamic religion and the Islamic state.
37:16
And that was the basis in which Jews
37:18
lived there for many centuries to come. So
37:22
how do you understand the
37:24
roots of anti-Semitism? I
37:27
guess the simplest theological
37:29
rationale for it is that the
37:32
persistence of Jews as Jews
37:35
is just logically. If
37:38
you'd like to continue listening to this
37:40
conversation, you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org.
37:43
Once you do, you'll get access to all
37:45
full-length episodes of The Making Sense podcast. The
37:48
podcast is available to everyone through our scholarship
37:50
program. So if you can't afford a
37:52
subscription, please request a free account
37:54
on the website. The Making
37:56
Sense podcast is ad-free and relies
37:58
entirely on listeners. support, and
38:01
you can subscribe now at samharris.org.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More