Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hey folks, Jeff Berman here. If
0:02
your business is driving innovation, delivering
0:04
exceptional experiences, or making real impact
0:06
on society, or maybe all three,
0:08
we want you to apply for
0:11
the Masters of Scale Business Awards.
0:13
These awards celebrate bold organizations of
0:15
all sizes and across all industries.
0:18
Award recipients don't just get a
0:20
trophy, although yes, there are trophies.
0:22
They get a spotlight at the
0:24
Masters of Scale Summit and a
0:26
seat at the table with the very best
0:29
in business. Don't wait. Head
0:31
to Masters of scale.com/business
0:34
awards dash apply. That's
0:36
Masters of scale.com/business awards
0:39
dash apply. Hey
0:43
everyone we have a special
0:45
episode today with Catherine Marr
0:47
CEO of NPR. Catherine has
0:49
been called to Capitol Hill
0:51
tomorrow Wednesday March 26th to
0:53
answer questions before a Doe
0:55
subcommittee in Congress along with
0:58
the CEO of PBS. You'll
1:00
hear an exclusive preview of
1:02
how Catherine plans to face
1:04
the congressional grilling and how
1:06
she hopes to reposition NPR's
1:08
liberal brand identity appealing instead
1:10
to all Americans and hopefully
1:12
winning not only their
1:14
trust but their continuing
1:17
tax dollars. Whether you're
1:20
a regular NPR listener
1:22
or not, we're at
1:25
an inflection point in
1:28
American society as questions
1:30
about impartiality and
1:32
information and truth come
1:35
fast and furious. I'm Bob
1:37
Safian and this is Rapid
1:39
Response. It's great to see
1:41
you again. When you joined NPR
1:43
last year, the organization faced
1:46
plenty of business challenges, audience,
1:48
engagement, business model. Since then,
1:51
the environment just got a whole
1:53
lot more fraught. There was a
1:55
high-profile criticism about newsroom bias last
1:58
spring from an editor on the
18:59
The lobatical is just one
19:01
of the ways that local ensures
19:03
their employees feel appreciated and cared
19:05
for. And feeling appreciated is a
19:07
principle that is shared by their
19:09
partnership with Capital One business.
19:12
We love our 2% cash back
19:14
card. We can use the rewards
19:16
to care for our employees. My
19:18
favorite thing about Capital One, whenever
19:20
I need to call, there's always
19:22
a caring helpful voice on the
19:24
other end. You can't manufacture care,
19:26
especially in a big company, and
19:28
Capital One cares. Your
20:55
predecessor, John Lansing, said that diversifying
20:57
NPR staff was critical to help,
20:59
you know, attract younger more diverse
21:01
listeners, that this was kind of
21:03
the company's North Star was his
21:05
phrase. When your DEA officer retires
21:07
in May, you said you won't
21:09
be replacing the position. Was that
21:11
North Star Mission misplaced? piece of
21:13
work for us to do. And
21:15
we look at our staff today
21:17
and we do have a very
21:19
diverse staff both in terms of
21:21
racial and ethnic diversity, but also
21:23
in terms of generational diversity. That
21:25
was really important work for us
21:27
as an organization that was 50
21:29
years into our existence. You have
21:31
to have the ability to have
21:33
that refresh, to have new voices
21:35
come in, people from different backgrounds,
21:37
people who perhaps didn't have a
21:39
non-traditional approach to their journalistic career.
21:41
It's imperative that we continue to
21:43
do that work, not just in
21:45
the lens of say racial and
21:47
ethnic diversity or gender diversity. but
21:49
also in terms of socioeconomic diversity,
21:51
for example. I think that that
21:54
is the sort of thing that
21:56
often gets lost in these conversations.
21:58
Political diversity is another important piece
22:00
of it. I think it's great
22:02
when we have people who can
22:04
sit around a room in an
22:06
editorial meeting and challenge one another
22:08
to see different aspects of a
22:10
story. Group Think doesn't help anyone,
22:12
and it certainly doesn't lead to
22:14
great reporting. That to me is
22:16
a important piece of the work.
22:18
So yes, I think that we
22:20
did good work there. And now
22:22
the question is, how do we
22:24
translate into serving all audiences in
22:26
a way that feels reflective of
22:28
the American public as a whole?
22:30
So not replacing that DEI position.
22:32
It's not, I mean, one of
22:34
the things I worry about of
22:36
there's conversations about is sort of
22:38
the chilling effects of some of
22:40
pullbacks or decisions, you know, I
22:42
wonder how much you have to
22:44
sort of balance like... What is
22:46
practical for you to keep moving
22:48
forward today versus whether you're being
22:50
impacted by some of these, you
22:52
know, as you talk about one
22:54
of your listeners feeling like, oh,
22:56
it's not safe for me to
22:58
listen to NPR. Well, I didn't
23:00
say safe. I said that they
23:02
didn't feel like they had a
23:04
home. We want people to feel
23:06
like they belong in public radio.
23:08
And now the truth is, in
23:10
the past, lots of Americans, perhaps
23:12
people of color didn't necessarily feel
23:14
like they belonged in public radio.
23:16
So... I think that we have
23:18
to make sure that as we
23:20
expand that tent, we're expanding that
23:22
tent in a way that we're
23:24
keeping everyone in it. I was
23:26
talking to somebody who said, it's
23:28
not that I want to hear
23:30
my view all the time, I
23:32
just want to make sure I
23:34
hear my view some of the
23:36
time. And I'm like, yeah, that's
23:38
a reasonable thing. So we need
23:40
to make sure that we're bringing
23:42
on newsmakers, we need to make
23:44
sure that we're bringing on newsmakers,
23:46
we need to make sure that
23:48
we're interviewing people from across the
23:50
political spectrum, this administration that we're
23:53
covering, that's a reasonable thing. information
23:55
takes us. We'll cover the good,
23:57
we'll cover the unintended consequences. consequences
23:59
will cover the impact on day
24:01
to day. That's our job. But
24:03
I do want to come back,
24:05
I think you asked this question
24:07
about, you know, where do we
24:09
go? I want to be very
24:11
thoughtful about this. care very deeply
24:13
about ensuring that our staff represents
24:15
the nation, to make sure that
24:17
people feel welcome, and that they
24:19
can do their best work here.
24:21
I think that it is important
24:23
as an employer of people that
24:25
we continue to serve our people
24:27
well. And as we think about
24:29
what does diversity look like in
24:31
all of its forms, the work
24:33
that we're doing is about how
24:35
do we integrate that into our
24:37
our planning and our strategy and
24:39
our goals so that our audience
24:41
reflects the full range of the
24:43
way that we think about diversity
24:45
in the country as a whole.
24:47
And so we're just as we
24:49
make this transition with our chief
24:51
diversity officer retiring, we're moving some
24:53
of his colleagues to sit in
24:55
our chief operating officers function so
24:57
that all of their work is
24:59
also incorporated in how we think
25:01
about well, how do we know
25:03
that we're successful when we say
25:05
we want to reach all Americans.
25:07
What does that look like? What
25:09
do we need to know? How
25:11
do we need to plan and
25:13
resource for that? Some of your
25:15
old social media posts from 2018
25:17
have gotten attention supporting Black Lives
25:19
Matter, calling Trump racist. Now you
25:21
run the business side of NPR,
25:23
not its content, but it seems
25:25
increasingly risky to have business leaders
25:27
share opinions in any format, unless
25:29
your name is Elon Musk, in
25:31
which case you can say whatever
25:33
you want. What messages to some
25:35
of your personal opinions of the
25:37
past? How does that impact the
25:39
way you're trying to sort of
25:41
re-imagine, or I guess remind people
25:43
about what NPR stands for now
25:45
and into the future? Well, I
25:47
mean, those are tweets that I
25:49
sent more than half a decade
25:52
ago. It was a different time.
25:54
I had a very different role.
25:56
I was a private citizen at
25:58
the time. I had no sort
26:00
of public, facing a facing role.
26:02
between my role in the business
26:04
side as you rightly note and
26:06
our editorial function. So I don't
26:08
direct our reporting, I don't shape
26:10
our reporting, I'm not involved in
26:12
the way that we think about
26:14
reporting in any way. So my
26:16
personal views do not enter into
26:18
my work. Looking back at sort
26:20
of... something that I may have
26:22
said more than half a decade
26:24
ago feels as though it is
26:26
trying to muddy the waters around
26:28
the work that we're here to
26:30
do. Would I send those again?
26:32
I would not. You know, I
26:34
have a different role now. I
26:36
would never say something like that.
26:38
I set aside all of my
26:40
political views to take on this
26:42
role and that in and of
26:44
itself, I think, is how I
26:46
show up every single day is
26:48
with the sort of open-mindedness to
26:50
what does it really mean to
26:52
be able to be present for
26:54
the whole nation in this moment.
26:56
What do you think about how
26:58
Jeff Bezos has impacted content policy
27:00
at the Washington Post? Like, should
27:02
those who fund a media organization
27:04
have input into the content that's
27:06
produced? Well, I mean, the post
27:08
is the post, and so obviously
27:10
it's a private company, and they
27:12
have the opportunity to do what
27:14
they want there. I think the
27:16
big thing about public media and
27:18
public radio... What we do at
27:20
NPR is for starters we don't
27:22
have opinion programming. So I think
27:24
one of the things that was
27:26
a part of the conversation about
27:28
the post was the change in
27:30
terms of its op-ed pages to
27:32
a focus on free markets and
27:34
personal liberties. We don't do op-eds
27:36
at NPR. We are not an
27:38
opinion journalism organization. We are a
27:40
news organization that reports the news
27:42
and does so from a nonpartisan
27:44
perspective and our opinions don't come
27:46
into it. Now, that being said,
27:48
I never would interfere. with any
27:51
of our programming. I would never
27:53
interfere with the story. I believe
27:55
that it is imperative that the
27:57
chief executive of a media organization
27:59
stays out of the newsroom entirely.
28:01
I mean, I can walk through
28:03
the newsroom, of course, and say
28:05
hi to folks. But the idea
28:07
that that would be something that
28:09
I would do is just anathema
28:11
to how we operate as an
28:13
organization and frankly the newsroom would
28:15
have no patience for me if
28:17
I did even try to have
28:19
an opinion on that. So I
28:21
think that's a critical thing, I
28:23
think it's a critical distinction, I
28:25
know it's a hard distinction right
28:27
now because so many media organizations
28:29
do feel as though they reflect
28:31
their ownership but I don't own
28:33
NPR. You know, NPR is owned
28:35
by the American public. We are
28:37
a non-profit media organization that serves
28:39
the public interest, and this is
28:41
a very hard and bright line
28:43
in terms of how we operate.
28:45
A lot of Americans today say
28:47
they don't trust the media or
28:49
certainly don't trust parts of the
28:51
media, right? Like, what can you
28:53
do about that? First of all,
28:55
I think that Americans are really
28:57
smart, and I think that it
28:59
is important for us to start
29:01
from a position of respect for
29:03
our audience. believe that we have
29:05
the right to ask that they
29:07
just trust us blindly. I think
29:09
that it is our responsibility to
29:11
wake up every morning and seek
29:13
to be worthy of their trust.
29:15
So my my word on this
29:17
is trustworthy, not trusted. I think
29:19
we have to earn it. every
29:21
single day. I think that when
29:23
we make a mistake, we have
29:25
to acknowledge it. I think that
29:27
we have to be reflexive in
29:29
taking in criticism and assessing how
29:31
we continue to adapt and engage
29:33
with that criticism. You know, the
29:35
institutions that people trust most right
29:37
now are institutions that are agile
29:39
and responsive and can engage with
29:41
that kind of criticism, or they're
29:43
not institutions at all, they're individuals,
29:45
right? I mean, just the role
29:47
of sort of individual voices and
29:50
reporting the news is a huge
29:52
piece of the story right now
29:54
in terms of the number of
29:56
Americans who get their news from
29:58
influencers on social media. The key
30:00
piece here is that there's a
30:02
personal relationship, whether it's with the
30:04
institution, the company, or the individual,
30:06
and there's honesty in the transaction
30:08
of information or, you know, the
30:10
way in which the... talking to
30:12
your audience. I think that that's
30:14
where you build trust in this
30:16
moment. I expect that tomorrow you're
30:18
going to get versions of some
30:20
of these questions, so they'll probably
30:22
pose in slightly more confrontational language.
30:24
How do you prepare for that?
30:26
You know, I think that Congress
30:28
has a right. to ask questions
30:30
and it's my obligation to respond.
30:32
We receive federal funds. We're steward
30:34
of taxpayer dollars. It's my role
30:36
to walk in and answer those
30:38
questions. My hope is that it
30:40
is an opportunity to talk about
30:42
what some of the things I've
30:44
just talked about with you in
30:46
terms of our goals, our values,
30:48
the bright line between editorial and
30:50
business, the impartiality or nonpartisan nature
30:52
of what we do, the importance
30:54
of local journalism. But ultimately, you
30:56
know, I will answer the questions
30:58
that Congress asks and I will...
31:00
be there to be respectful of
31:02
their oversight function. How's the mood
31:04
and morale on your team these
31:06
days? Like they're here to go
31:08
to work. I just walked through
31:10
the newsroom to get here to
31:12
the studio and everyone's heads down.
31:14
They're working, they're reporting, they're producing,
31:16
they're getting ready to file their
31:18
story for all things considered or
31:20
they're getting ready for whatever band
31:22
is coming in for a tiny
31:24
desk next. I think that the
31:26
overall environment right now is that
31:28
people really want to. do the
31:30
work. There's a lot of news
31:32
in the world today, whether we're
31:34
thinking about the, you know, as
31:36
I said, transformative administration, whether we're
31:38
thinking about questions of space exploration,
31:40
we just had four astronauts come
31:42
back, that we have a great
31:44
science desk who loves to cover
31:46
that sort of stuff. So I
31:49
think people feel as though, of
31:51
course this is a different moment
31:53
in time and it is really
31:55
important that we show up and
31:57
are responsive to people's questions. about
31:59
the value of our work. I
32:01
come back to the fact that
32:03
when we talk about efficiency, public
32:05
radio is remarkably efficient. The cost
32:07
for public media on a... you
32:09
know, per American is $1.60. It's
32:11
basically, you know, when you go
32:13
to check out at CVS and
32:15
you're asked to round up to
32:17
a good cause, that's like, that's
32:19
us. That's what we cost. Public
32:21
radio costs less than a dollar
32:23
60, but public media as a
32:25
whole is a dollar 60 per
32:27
American per year. You know, as
32:29
I said, for every dollar federal
32:31
funding, seven dollars of private funding.
32:33
So I think we've got a
32:35
good story to tell and 75%
32:37
of Americans want to see public
32:39
media maintain or increase or increase
32:41
its current. funding levels. So again
32:43
that's I think that's the story
32:45
we're here to tell. Well Catherine
32:47
this was great thank you. Thanks
32:49
up. Tathrin seems
32:51
well prepared for the Doesh hearing,
32:54
emphasizing the breadth of NPR's audience
32:56
and a mission to impartially serve
32:58
all Americans, but I expect a
33:01
session titled Anti-American Airways will be
33:03
less forgiving about her old tweets
33:05
than she'd like, and more skeptical
33:08
about her assurances that she and
33:10
NPR are non-political and nonpartisan, which
33:12
would be a shame from a
33:15
fiscal perspective, a public-private venture that
33:17
brings in $7 for every $1
33:19
in government. support is a pretty
33:22
good model. I'm not a fan
33:24
of media that's 100% government supported,
33:26
that's a bit like a propaganda
33:29
machine to me, but I do
33:31
see a public interest in local
33:33
and community coverage that's predominantly backed
33:35
by donors and members. Plus for
33:38
the business community any further splintering
33:40
of media and information might escalate
33:42
U.S. divisions which creates More commercial
33:45
headwind than tailwind. Is all that
33:47
PBS and NPR and other public
33:49
media do worth $1.60 a year
33:52
in taxes? It is to me,
33:54
but I'm not part of the
33:56
Doge Committee. I'm Bob Safian. Thanks
33:59
for listening. Meet
34:07
Romeo Regali, a capital-one business customer
34:09
and chef and CEO of Ross,
34:11
a plant-based restaurant with two locations
34:13
in New York. We started talking
34:15
about our own restaurant. I don't
34:17
know if she thought I was
34:19
serious. Well, she said, you know,
34:21
let's just do it. Let's just
34:23
start our own brand from scratch.
34:25
Romeo's recalling the moment when he
34:27
and his wife and co-founder Milka
34:29
Regali decided to take a leap
34:32
of faith. I started working
34:34
as a server at Milk's Mom's
34:36
restaurant. I fell in love so
34:38
much with the industry, and that's
34:40
what sparked it. Romeo and Milka
34:42
weren't certain how they would bring
34:44
their dream to fruition, but they
34:46
were certain of one thing, their
34:48
passion. We knew we had a vision,
34:50
and we found a space. We
34:52
had to gut the entire space
34:54
and build everything from scratch. The kitchen,
34:57
gas piping, and the restroom, the
34:59
sound system, everything. We really believed
35:01
every detail matters. As they broke
35:03
ground on their first raw's location, Romeo
35:05
and Milkas soon faced the financial
35:07
reality of building something from scratch.
35:09
They looked to Capital One business
35:11
to help navigate the fiscal burden of
35:13
making their dreams come true. We
35:15
used a spark cash plus card
35:17
from Capital One. The no preset
35:19
spending limit really had a big role
35:22
in helping us finish the project.
35:24
We're very happy with what we
35:26
have accomplished. We want to expand more.
35:28
To learn more, go to capital1.com/business
35:30
cards. AI's impact on the environment
35:32
is one of the most pressing
35:34
issues facing the tech industry today. People
35:36
want to know, what's the carbon
35:38
footprint of a chat cheapity query?
35:40
What does it mean to innovate
35:43
sustainably? And can AI actually be used
35:45
to solve the climate crisis? I'm
35:47
Rana El Calumi on my podcast.
35:49
and of of AI, we
35:51
we bring questions
35:53
like this to
35:55
some of the
35:57
leading thinkers and builders
36:00
working in AI.
36:02
working Join me
36:04
each week as
36:06
we explore how this
36:08
technology is leaving
36:10
its mark on
36:12
humanity its our
36:14
planet. Find pioneers
36:16
of AI on Apple AI on
36:18
Apple Spotify, Spotify, or
36:20
wherever you get your
36:22
podcasts. your podcasts. Rapid
36:31
Response is Aweight What
36:34
I'm Bob Bob Safian. Our
36:36
executive producer is
36:38
Eve Tro. is Our
36:41
producer is Alex Morris.
36:43
Morris. Associate is is Mashumaku Tonina.
36:45
Mixing and mastering by Aaron Our
36:47
theme music is by
36:50
Ryan is by Ryan Our head
36:52
of Our is Letal is For
36:54
more For more, visit.com show.com.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More