Public radio vs. DOGE: NPR CEO Katherine Maher previews her testimony

Public radio vs. DOGE: NPR CEO Katherine Maher previews her testimony

Released Tuesday, 25th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Public radio vs. DOGE: NPR CEO Katherine Maher previews her testimony

Public radio vs. DOGE: NPR CEO Katherine Maher previews her testimony

Public radio vs. DOGE: NPR CEO Katherine Maher previews her testimony

Public radio vs. DOGE: NPR CEO Katherine Maher previews her testimony

Tuesday, 25th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hey folks, Jeff Berman here. If

0:02

your business is driving innovation, delivering

0:04

exceptional experiences, or making real impact

0:06

on society, or maybe all three,

0:08

we want you to apply for

0:11

the Masters of Scale Business Awards.

0:13

These awards celebrate bold organizations of

0:15

all sizes and across all industries.

0:18

Award recipients don't just get a

0:20

trophy, although yes, there are trophies.

0:22

They get a spotlight at the

0:24

Masters of Scale Summit and a

0:26

seat at the table with the very best

0:29

in business. Don't wait. Head

0:31

to Masters of scale.com/business

0:34

awards dash apply. That's

0:36

Masters of scale.com/business awards

0:39

dash apply. Hey

0:43

everyone we have a special

0:45

episode today with Catherine Marr

0:47

CEO of NPR. Catherine has

0:49

been called to Capitol Hill

0:51

tomorrow Wednesday March 26th to

0:53

answer questions before a Doe

0:55

subcommittee in Congress along with

0:58

the CEO of PBS. You'll

1:00

hear an exclusive preview of

1:02

how Catherine plans to face

1:04

the congressional grilling and how

1:06

she hopes to reposition NPR's

1:08

liberal brand identity appealing instead

1:10

to all Americans and hopefully

1:12

winning not only their

1:14

trust but their continuing

1:17

tax dollars. Whether you're

1:20

a regular NPR listener

1:22

or not, we're at

1:25

an inflection point in

1:28

American society as questions

1:30

about impartiality and

1:32

information and truth come

1:35

fast and furious. I'm Bob

1:37

Safian and this is Rapid

1:39

Response. It's great to see

1:41

you again. When you joined NPR

1:43

last year, the organization faced

1:46

plenty of business challenges, audience,

1:48

engagement, business model. Since then,

1:51

the environment just got a whole

1:53

lot more fraught. There was a

1:55

high-profile criticism about newsroom bias last

1:58

spring from an editor on the

18:59

The lobatical is just one

19:01

of the ways that local ensures

19:03

their employees feel appreciated and cared

19:05

for. And feeling appreciated is a

19:07

principle that is shared by their

19:09

partnership with Capital One business.

19:12

We love our 2% cash back

19:14

card. We can use the rewards

19:16

to care for our employees. My

19:18

favorite thing about Capital One, whenever

19:20

I need to call, there's always

19:22

a caring helpful voice on the

19:24

other end. You can't manufacture care,

19:26

especially in a big company, and

19:28

Capital One cares. Your

20:55

predecessor, John Lansing, said that diversifying

20:57

NPR staff was critical to help,

20:59

you know, attract younger more diverse

21:01

listeners, that this was kind of

21:03

the company's North Star was his

21:05

phrase. When your DEA officer retires

21:07

in May, you said you won't

21:09

be replacing the position. Was that

21:11

North Star Mission misplaced? piece of

21:13

work for us to do. And

21:15

we look at our staff today

21:17

and we do have a very

21:19

diverse staff both in terms of

21:21

racial and ethnic diversity, but also

21:23

in terms of generational diversity. That

21:25

was really important work for us

21:27

as an organization that was 50

21:29

years into our existence. You have

21:31

to have the ability to have

21:33

that refresh, to have new voices

21:35

come in, people from different backgrounds,

21:37

people who perhaps didn't have a

21:39

non-traditional approach to their journalistic career.

21:41

It's imperative that we continue to

21:43

do that work, not just in

21:45

the lens of say racial and

21:47

ethnic diversity or gender diversity. but

21:49

also in terms of socioeconomic diversity,

21:51

for example. I think that that

21:54

is the sort of thing that

21:56

often gets lost in these conversations.

21:58

Political diversity is another important piece

22:00

of it. I think it's great

22:02

when we have people who can

22:04

sit around a room in an

22:06

editorial meeting and challenge one another

22:08

to see different aspects of a

22:10

story. Group Think doesn't help anyone,

22:12

and it certainly doesn't lead to

22:14

great reporting. That to me is

22:16

a important piece of the work.

22:18

So yes, I think that we

22:20

did good work there. And now

22:22

the question is, how do we

22:24

translate into serving all audiences in

22:26

a way that feels reflective of

22:28

the American public as a whole?

22:30

So not replacing that DEI position.

22:32

It's not, I mean, one of

22:34

the things I worry about of

22:36

there's conversations about is sort of

22:38

the chilling effects of some of

22:40

pullbacks or decisions, you know, I

22:42

wonder how much you have to

22:44

sort of balance like... What is

22:46

practical for you to keep moving

22:48

forward today versus whether you're being

22:50

impacted by some of these, you

22:52

know, as you talk about one

22:54

of your listeners feeling like, oh,

22:56

it's not safe for me to

22:58

listen to NPR. Well, I didn't

23:00

say safe. I said that they

23:02

didn't feel like they had a

23:04

home. We want people to feel

23:06

like they belong in public radio.

23:08

And now the truth is, in

23:10

the past, lots of Americans, perhaps

23:12

people of color didn't necessarily feel

23:14

like they belonged in public radio.

23:16

So... I think that we have

23:18

to make sure that as we

23:20

expand that tent, we're expanding that

23:22

tent in a way that we're

23:24

keeping everyone in it. I was

23:26

talking to somebody who said, it's

23:28

not that I want to hear

23:30

my view all the time, I

23:32

just want to make sure I

23:34

hear my view some of the

23:36

time. And I'm like, yeah, that's

23:38

a reasonable thing. So we need

23:40

to make sure that we're bringing

23:42

on newsmakers, we need to make

23:44

sure that we're bringing on newsmakers,

23:46

we need to make sure that

23:48

we're interviewing people from across the

23:50

political spectrum, this administration that we're

23:53

covering, that's a reasonable thing. information

23:55

takes us. We'll cover the good,

23:57

we'll cover the unintended consequences. consequences

23:59

will cover the impact on day

24:01

to day. That's our job. But

24:03

I do want to come back,

24:05

I think you asked this question

24:07

about, you know, where do we

24:09

go? I want to be very

24:11

thoughtful about this. care very deeply

24:13

about ensuring that our staff represents

24:15

the nation, to make sure that

24:17

people feel welcome, and that they

24:19

can do their best work here.

24:21

I think that it is important

24:23

as an employer of people that

24:25

we continue to serve our people

24:27

well. And as we think about

24:29

what does diversity look like in

24:31

all of its forms, the work

24:33

that we're doing is about how

24:35

do we integrate that into our

24:37

our planning and our strategy and

24:39

our goals so that our audience

24:41

reflects the full range of the

24:43

way that we think about diversity

24:45

in the country as a whole.

24:47

And so we're just as we

24:49

make this transition with our chief

24:51

diversity officer retiring, we're moving some

24:53

of his colleagues to sit in

24:55

our chief operating officers function so

24:57

that all of their work is

24:59

also incorporated in how we think

25:01

about well, how do we know

25:03

that we're successful when we say

25:05

we want to reach all Americans.

25:07

What does that look like? What

25:09

do we need to know? How

25:11

do we need to plan and

25:13

resource for that? Some of your

25:15

old social media posts from 2018

25:17

have gotten attention supporting Black Lives

25:19

Matter, calling Trump racist. Now you

25:21

run the business side of NPR,

25:23

not its content, but it seems

25:25

increasingly risky to have business leaders

25:27

share opinions in any format, unless

25:29

your name is Elon Musk, in

25:31

which case you can say whatever

25:33

you want. What messages to some

25:35

of your personal opinions of the

25:37

past? How does that impact the

25:39

way you're trying to sort of

25:41

re-imagine, or I guess remind people

25:43

about what NPR stands for now

25:45

and into the future? Well, I

25:47

mean, those are tweets that I

25:49

sent more than half a decade

25:52

ago. It was a different time.

25:54

I had a very different role.

25:56

I was a private citizen at

25:58

the time. I had no sort

26:00

of public, facing a facing role.

26:02

between my role in the business

26:04

side as you rightly note and

26:06

our editorial function. So I don't

26:08

direct our reporting, I don't shape

26:10

our reporting, I'm not involved in

26:12

the way that we think about

26:14

reporting in any way. So my

26:16

personal views do not enter into

26:18

my work. Looking back at sort

26:20

of... something that I may have

26:22

said more than half a decade

26:24

ago feels as though it is

26:26

trying to muddy the waters around

26:28

the work that we're here to

26:30

do. Would I send those again?

26:32

I would not. You know, I

26:34

have a different role now. I

26:36

would never say something like that.

26:38

I set aside all of my

26:40

political views to take on this

26:42

role and that in and of

26:44

itself, I think, is how I

26:46

show up every single day is

26:48

with the sort of open-mindedness to

26:50

what does it really mean to

26:52

be able to be present for

26:54

the whole nation in this moment.

26:56

What do you think about how

26:58

Jeff Bezos has impacted content policy

27:00

at the Washington Post? Like, should

27:02

those who fund a media organization

27:04

have input into the content that's

27:06

produced? Well, I mean, the post

27:08

is the post, and so obviously

27:10

it's a private company, and they

27:12

have the opportunity to do what

27:14

they want there. I think the

27:16

big thing about public media and

27:18

public radio... What we do at

27:20

NPR is for starters we don't

27:22

have opinion programming. So I think

27:24

one of the things that was

27:26

a part of the conversation about

27:28

the post was the change in

27:30

terms of its op-ed pages to

27:32

a focus on free markets and

27:34

personal liberties. We don't do op-eds

27:36

at NPR. We are not an

27:38

opinion journalism organization. We are a

27:40

news organization that reports the news

27:42

and does so from a nonpartisan

27:44

perspective and our opinions don't come

27:46

into it. Now, that being said,

27:48

I never would interfere. with any

27:51

of our programming. I would never

27:53

interfere with the story. I believe

27:55

that it is imperative that the

27:57

chief executive of a media organization

27:59

stays out of the newsroom entirely.

28:01

I mean, I can walk through

28:03

the newsroom, of course, and say

28:05

hi to folks. But the idea

28:07

that that would be something that

28:09

I would do is just anathema

28:11

to how we operate as an

28:13

organization and frankly the newsroom would

28:15

have no patience for me if

28:17

I did even try to have

28:19

an opinion on that. So I

28:21

think that's a critical thing, I

28:23

think it's a critical distinction, I

28:25

know it's a hard distinction right

28:27

now because so many media organizations

28:29

do feel as though they reflect

28:31

their ownership but I don't own

28:33

NPR. You know, NPR is owned

28:35

by the American public. We are

28:37

a non-profit media organization that serves

28:39

the public interest, and this is

28:41

a very hard and bright line

28:43

in terms of how we operate.

28:45

A lot of Americans today say

28:47

they don't trust the media or

28:49

certainly don't trust parts of the

28:51

media, right? Like, what can you

28:53

do about that? First of all,

28:55

I think that Americans are really

28:57

smart, and I think that it

28:59

is important for us to start

29:01

from a position of respect for

29:03

our audience. believe that we have

29:05

the right to ask that they

29:07

just trust us blindly. I think

29:09

that it is our responsibility to

29:11

wake up every morning and seek

29:13

to be worthy of their trust.

29:15

So my my word on this

29:17

is trustworthy, not trusted. I think

29:19

we have to earn it. every

29:21

single day. I think that when

29:23

we make a mistake, we have

29:25

to acknowledge it. I think that

29:27

we have to be reflexive in

29:29

taking in criticism and assessing how

29:31

we continue to adapt and engage

29:33

with that criticism. You know, the

29:35

institutions that people trust most right

29:37

now are institutions that are agile

29:39

and responsive and can engage with

29:41

that kind of criticism, or they're

29:43

not institutions at all, they're individuals,

29:45

right? I mean, just the role

29:47

of sort of individual voices and

29:50

reporting the news is a huge

29:52

piece of the story right now

29:54

in terms of the number of

29:56

Americans who get their news from

29:58

influencers on social media. The key

30:00

piece here is that there's a

30:02

personal relationship, whether it's with the

30:04

institution, the company, or the individual,

30:06

and there's honesty in the transaction

30:08

of information or, you know, the

30:10

way in which the... talking to

30:12

your audience. I think that that's

30:14

where you build trust in this

30:16

moment. I expect that tomorrow you're

30:18

going to get versions of some

30:20

of these questions, so they'll probably

30:22

pose in slightly more confrontational language.

30:24

How do you prepare for that?

30:26

You know, I think that Congress

30:28

has a right. to ask questions

30:30

and it's my obligation to respond.

30:32

We receive federal funds. We're steward

30:34

of taxpayer dollars. It's my role

30:36

to walk in and answer those

30:38

questions. My hope is that it

30:40

is an opportunity to talk about

30:42

what some of the things I've

30:44

just talked about with you in

30:46

terms of our goals, our values,

30:48

the bright line between editorial and

30:50

business, the impartiality or nonpartisan nature

30:52

of what we do, the importance

30:54

of local journalism. But ultimately, you

30:56

know, I will answer the questions

30:58

that Congress asks and I will...

31:00

be there to be respectful of

31:02

their oversight function. How's the mood

31:04

and morale on your team these

31:06

days? Like they're here to go

31:08

to work. I just walked through

31:10

the newsroom to get here to

31:12

the studio and everyone's heads down.

31:14

They're working, they're reporting, they're producing,

31:16

they're getting ready to file their

31:18

story for all things considered or

31:20

they're getting ready for whatever band

31:22

is coming in for a tiny

31:24

desk next. I think that the

31:26

overall environment right now is that

31:28

people really want to. do the

31:30

work. There's a lot of news

31:32

in the world today, whether we're

31:34

thinking about the, you know, as

31:36

I said, transformative administration, whether we're

31:38

thinking about questions of space exploration,

31:40

we just had four astronauts come

31:42

back, that we have a great

31:44

science desk who loves to cover

31:46

that sort of stuff. So I

31:49

think people feel as though, of

31:51

course this is a different moment

31:53

in time and it is really

31:55

important that we show up and

31:57

are responsive to people's questions. about

31:59

the value of our work. I

32:01

come back to the fact that

32:03

when we talk about efficiency, public

32:05

radio is remarkably efficient. The cost

32:07

for public media on a... you

32:09

know, per American is $1.60. It's

32:11

basically, you know, when you go

32:13

to check out at CVS and

32:15

you're asked to round up to

32:17

a good cause, that's like, that's

32:19

us. That's what we cost. Public

32:21

radio costs less than a dollar

32:23

60, but public media as a

32:25

whole is a dollar 60 per

32:27

American per year. You know, as

32:29

I said, for every dollar federal

32:31

funding, seven dollars of private funding.

32:33

So I think we've got a

32:35

good story to tell and 75%

32:37

of Americans want to see public

32:39

media maintain or increase or increase

32:41

its current. funding levels. So again

32:43

that's I think that's the story

32:45

we're here to tell. Well Catherine

32:47

this was great thank you. Thanks

32:49

up. Tathrin seems

32:51

well prepared for the Doesh hearing,

32:54

emphasizing the breadth of NPR's audience

32:56

and a mission to impartially serve

32:58

all Americans, but I expect a

33:01

session titled Anti-American Airways will be

33:03

less forgiving about her old tweets

33:05

than she'd like, and more skeptical

33:08

about her assurances that she and

33:10

NPR are non-political and nonpartisan, which

33:12

would be a shame from a

33:15

fiscal perspective, a public-private venture that

33:17

brings in $7 for every $1

33:19

in government. support is a pretty

33:22

good model. I'm not a fan

33:24

of media that's 100% government supported,

33:26

that's a bit like a propaganda

33:29

machine to me, but I do

33:31

see a public interest in local

33:33

and community coverage that's predominantly backed

33:35

by donors and members. Plus for

33:38

the business community any further splintering

33:40

of media and information might escalate

33:42

U.S. divisions which creates More commercial

33:45

headwind than tailwind. Is all that

33:47

PBS and NPR and other public

33:49

media do worth $1.60 a year

33:52

in taxes? It is to me,

33:54

but I'm not part of the

33:56

Doge Committee. I'm Bob Safian. Thanks

33:59

for listening. Meet

34:07

Romeo Regali, a capital-one business customer

34:09

and chef and CEO of Ross,

34:11

a plant-based restaurant with two locations

34:13

in New York. We started talking

34:15

about our own restaurant. I don't

34:17

know if she thought I was

34:19

serious. Well, she said, you know,

34:21

let's just do it. Let's just

34:23

start our own brand from scratch.

34:25

Romeo's recalling the moment when he

34:27

and his wife and co-founder Milka

34:29

Regali decided to take a leap

34:32

of faith. I started working

34:34

as a server at Milk's Mom's

34:36

restaurant. I fell in love so

34:38

much with the industry, and that's

34:40

what sparked it. Romeo and Milka

34:42

weren't certain how they would bring

34:44

their dream to fruition, but they

34:46

were certain of one thing, their

34:48

passion. We knew we had a vision,

34:50

and we found a space. We

34:52

had to gut the entire space

34:54

and build everything from scratch. The kitchen,

34:57

gas piping, and the restroom, the

34:59

sound system, everything. We really believed

35:01

every detail matters. As they broke

35:03

ground on their first raw's location, Romeo

35:05

and Milkas soon faced the financial

35:07

reality of building something from scratch.

35:09

They looked to Capital One business

35:11

to help navigate the fiscal burden of

35:13

making their dreams come true. We

35:15

used a spark cash plus card

35:17

from Capital One. The no preset

35:19

spending limit really had a big role

35:22

in helping us finish the project.

35:24

We're very happy with what we

35:26

have accomplished. We want to expand more.

35:28

To learn more, go to capital1.com/business

35:30

cards. AI's impact on the environment

35:32

is one of the most pressing

35:34

issues facing the tech industry today. People

35:36

want to know, what's the carbon

35:38

footprint of a chat cheapity query?

35:40

What does it mean to innovate

35:43

sustainably? And can AI actually be used

35:45

to solve the climate crisis? I'm

35:47

Rana El Calumi on my podcast.

35:49

and of of AI, we

35:51

we bring questions

35:53

like this to

35:55

some of the

35:57

leading thinkers and builders

36:00

working in AI.

36:02

working Join me

36:04

each week as

36:06

we explore how this

36:08

technology is leaving

36:10

its mark on

36:12

humanity its our

36:14

planet. Find pioneers

36:16

of AI on Apple AI on

36:18

Apple Spotify, Spotify, or

36:20

wherever you get your

36:22

podcasts. your podcasts. Rapid

36:31

Response is Aweight What

36:34

I'm Bob Bob Safian. Our

36:36

executive producer is

36:38

Eve Tro. is Our

36:41

producer is Alex Morris.

36:43

Morris. Associate is is Mashumaku Tonina.

36:45

Mixing and mastering by Aaron Our

36:47

theme music is by

36:50

Ryan is by Ryan Our head

36:52

of Our is Letal is For

36:54

more For more, visit.com show.com.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features