Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Here's a lesson I've been learning these past
0:02
few years. these past few are just not
0:04
having productive and thoughtful conversations about the
0:06
impact of Gen Z folks in the
0:08
workplace. the impact that's not a good thing. It's
0:10
not a good thing at all. And that's
0:12
all know I coach thing. of larger
0:14
good at all. often these folks at
0:16
the top fall into the gen and
0:19
often these the baby boomer demo. fall into
0:21
the Gen X what I
0:23
hear about boomer demo. Thus, really
0:25
skewed, Gen Z folks is really skewed, unflattering,
0:28
agist, biased. I've had
0:30
more than a few a directors tell
0:32
me they are at wit's end
0:34
are at that the level of entitlement
0:36
demonstrated by Gen Z employees is
0:38
so off the charts off the impacting
0:40
their job satisfaction. their job questioning
0:42
decisions, pushing leadership to weigh
0:44
in on topics to weigh in on topics
0:46
being disruptive in this pejorative
0:48
sense of the word. sense of the
0:51
word. if you ask me,
0:53
because folks get into nonprofit work
0:55
because they are fundamentally. are fundamentally
0:57
disruptors. These
0:59
same complaining leaders. are the
1:01
same the same people who
1:03
hired DEI consultants to try to
1:05
to try to create a
1:08
culture of belonging and inclusion
1:10
in their workplace. you kidding Are you
1:12
kidding me right now? that we are is
1:14
it that we a missing age as a core component
1:16
of diversity? And engaging
1:18
in bias and in
1:20
all age directions that would never
1:23
be tolerated when considering race,
1:25
gender, sexual orientation, identity or
1:27
ability. That's what I I talk about
1:29
today. today. So I'm I'm excited
1:31
to bring a woman who's focused
1:33
on diversity, equity, equity, who has been
1:35
vocal about the centrality of age
1:37
of diversity conversations. And
1:39
my other guest has played a
1:41
lot of positions in the
1:43
social sector field. She falls into
1:46
the Gen Z demographic Z and
1:48
is passionate about living out
1:50
the living out about us about us
1:52
motto of social justice movements. So,
1:54
today, let's change the question,
1:56
reframe the issue, move move us
1:58
all toward building a culture of. inclusion
2:00
for all, regardless of age. of
2:03
age. Greetings and welcome to
2:05
Nonprofits or Greetings and welcome
2:07
your host are messy. founder of the
2:09
your host, Joan Gary, Leadership Lab, where
2:11
we lab where we help
2:14
smaller I'm thrive. I'm
2:16
also a strategic advisor for executive
2:18
directors and boards of larger nonprofits.
2:20
non-profits. I'm a frequent keynote speaker, a
2:22
a blogger, and an author on
2:24
all things leadership and management.
2:26
You can learn more at Joan
2:29
Gary.com. I think of myself as
2:31
a woman with a mission with a fuel the leadership
2:33
of the non -profit sector. the My
2:35
goal with each episode is to dig
2:37
deep into an issue I know that I
2:39
-profit leaders are grappling with are finding just
2:41
the right person to offer you advice
2:43
to offer you advice and insights. Today
2:45
is no exception. So
2:48
our our first guest today
2:50
is Mustafa, the daughter of Bangladeshi daughter
2:52
of Bangladeshi Muslim Mustafa is
2:54
LaMisa Mustafa is an education
2:56
justice advocate in in
2:58
community organizing, social
3:01
science research, and strategic
3:03
consulting. As evaluation associate at
3:05
the Stanford Childhood, LaMisa
3:07
co -designs and conducts
3:09
mixed mixed methods studies. in
3:11
anti -racist, community and
3:14
equitable practices to help early care and
3:16
help early care gain a deeper
3:18
initiatives, of a deeper understanding of the
3:20
impact of the work. on the they serve.
3:22
Lemisa LaMisa collaborates with partners across
3:25
the social sector to drive program
3:27
and system level improvements for historically
3:29
and and marginalized
3:31
groups. groups. Throughout her
3:33
career, LaMisa has been grabbing
3:35
on to this. nothing about about
3:37
us to us. that all to ensure
3:39
that all children and families, providers
3:42
providers and educators in the United
3:44
States can thrive, not just survive. survive.
3:46
LaMisa let's go through this, shall
3:48
we? shall we, a of public policy, a
3:51
certification in in early
3:53
learning science and child
3:55
policy from UC Berkeley, and
3:57
a Berkeley, and a B.A. and a B.S. Southern.
3:59
Methodist University. That's
4:01
a long a long CV.
4:04
Welcome, Thanks so much, Joan. Thanks so
4:06
much, Joan. be glad to be here with
4:08
you and Bianca, and thanks for that kind
4:10
introduction. You're very
4:12
welcome. It has the added
4:14
benefit of being true. of being
4:16
The other partner in our
4:19
conversation is Bianca Casanova Anderson, educator, non-profit
4:21
leader, and social justice practitioner
4:23
with expertise in interpersonal communications,
4:25
racial equity facilitation, and human development.
4:28
As an educator for almost a decade,
4:30
a decade, Ms. found her passion for human
4:32
for change in the classroom. classroom. She
4:34
built a unique. background cultivating
4:36
inclusive learning environments, that
4:39
center relationships center voices
4:41
and disrupt racism. and
4:44
As the founding director for the
4:46
Dallas Fort Worth Center for the Center
4:48
for Racial for the Education, she
4:50
trained and advised over
4:52
3 ,000 community leaders
4:54
and educators around the
4:56
nation in effective racial
4:58
equity policies, practices, and
5:00
procedures. and In 2021, 2021. Bianco
5:02
has promoted to co
5:05
-CEO where supports non -profit
5:07
organizations and foundations with
5:09
accelerating racial equity from from
5:11
self to systems. Bianca, thanks
5:13
so much for taking time out to
5:15
engage in this conversation with us. us.
5:17
Great to be to be here. I'm
5:19
really excited for the conversation, Jim. So
5:22
let me me set a stage for you and
5:24
have each of you to react to it.
5:26
Now of course, I'm in the open, I think
5:28
think I I I a stage and saw some
5:30
nodding heads. The The landscape in the nonprofit sector
5:32
is changing. changing and for us to consider
5:34
this narrowly, that there are more
5:36
Gen Z folks entering the workforce, mark
5:39
off the mark because studies show of
5:41
the age of non employees is actually
5:43
shifting at both ends. both ends. The Washington
5:45
Post reported that Americans are
5:47
working into their 60s and 70s
5:49
because of longer and 70s financial
5:52
incentives to retire financial incentives to retire and
5:54
the need to make ends
5:56
meet. ends So we got more folks
5:58
in the the bracket. bracket. age and
6:00
power that have been historically intersected,
6:02
we've got older people at the top
6:04
and in power. the top And then
6:06
we look at And then we the
6:08
growing section of the workforce, of
6:10
the By workforce, right? By 2030, it's it's
6:12
estimated that 30 % of the
6:15
workforce Gen will be Gen Z
6:17
employees. that So think about that
6:19
for a moment. And the prevailing
6:21
wisdom about Gen Z employees. of
6:23
an the values of an organization
6:25
matter, to the ability to drive meaning
6:27
and purpose from their professional lives
6:29
matter. lives matter. They come not
6:31
just. hoping there's there's diversity,
6:33
equity, and inclusion in
6:35
racial equity conversations. They
6:37
come expecting it. Gen
6:39
Z employees have less trust
6:41
in institutions? in and
6:44
they see power. differently.
6:46
Further, Further, I would just
6:48
say say they are the first
6:50
generation of digital natives, and
6:52
they are the most diverse
6:54
demographic group we have. have. So let's
6:56
take that set up, and
6:58
start with you. and What
7:00
does that mean, does right? mean,
7:03
As we work to
7:05
build something better and stronger
7:07
because of all of that,
7:09
rather than in spite
7:11
of it? Thoughts? I Yeah,
7:13
I definitely resonate with
7:16
the background you just shared.
7:18
shared. I think there there is
7:20
a sense among or a belief
7:22
among me me my peers that
7:24
the way things have always been,
7:26
doesn't have to be the
7:28
way that things continue to
7:30
be. to the status quo,
7:32
I think, quo, I think, oftentimes been
7:34
built to privilege certain folks
7:36
and keep certain folks in
7:38
power. so I think so I think
7:40
there's a lot of potential
7:42
with gency folks like coming coming
7:44
into leadership and coming into
7:46
the sector the do things
7:49
differently. differently. Bianca, what would you add? you
7:51
add? Yeah, you know, know, one of
7:53
the things that I think sometimes
7:55
is maybe missing from the conversation
7:57
around Gen Z what they provide is hope.
8:00
When I think about the things
8:02
that they are looking for,
8:04
values, they're being able to live
8:06
and work holistically, say, believing that
8:08
organizations will. their their ex -spouse
8:11
values through their policies and their practices.
8:13
to me To me that says, I believe
8:15
that this place can be different. I
8:17
I have hope for our sector. so so
8:19
when I think about it, I really
8:21
get encouraged because they're kind of calling
8:23
us in to be who we say
8:25
we are. we are. Yeah, I I
8:27
also think to Bianca, to your point,
8:29
I believe that people who are
8:31
in power like to hold to to
8:33
it. They don't like to share it
8:35
very much, right? very and I
8:37
really feel like. like This
8:39
generation is bringing something new.
8:41
It's bringing a different
8:44
kind of energy, a
8:46
different kind of relationship to power.
8:48
It's bringing a creativity. a that
8:50
I think. that I think ago
8:53
ago, when some of those
8:55
boomers started these organizations in
8:57
the 1970s, Right? They they
8:59
evolved away from some of
9:01
that, and that if
9:03
we can actually create organizations
9:06
where all these voices learn
9:08
from one another, like there's
9:10
just so much potential. much you think?
9:12
Lemisa? Don't you think, definitely. Yeah,
9:15
I think there often
9:17
is a hesitation around
9:19
hiring folks folks, of in
9:21
terms of a not
9:23
being a culture fit, but
9:26
I think there's a lot of potential
9:28
to see. see Gen Z folks as
9:30
culture ads and rather than just
9:32
a rather than just a culture
9:34
fit because can see that
9:36
as can see that as
9:39
opportunities for improvement and just in
9:41
in fresh new perspectives to act
9:43
in act in alignment with
9:45
what they say they're about. he
9:47
probably has some of these
9:50
stats stats mean, mean, we have a a have
9:52
a work force shortage in the
9:54
nonprofit sector. not like, like, gee, it
9:56
would be, be, know, should
9:58
we hire some Gen Z. It's
10:00
like we need Gen Z folks
10:02
in our workplace. Nearly three out
10:05
of every four non-profits reported job
10:07
vacancies. More than half of them
10:09
have more vacancies now compared to
10:11
before the pandemic, right? Like not
10:13
only do we need to make
10:15
this work, but here we have
10:18
Gen Z folks who are looking
10:20
for meaning and purpose. who want
10:22
values aligned organizations, the social impact
10:24
sector offers that better than anyone
10:26
else or should, and we need
10:28
more people, right? So it feels
10:31
to me that the stars are
10:33
aligned, we just actually are creating
10:35
a lot of tension among our
10:37
stars. I don't know, what do
10:39
you think, Bianca? Yeah, you know,
10:41
going back to your earlier point
10:43
around power and folks who have
10:46
power not wanting to relinquish it.
10:48
I think one of the other
10:50
nuances there is that there are
10:52
more people of color in particular
10:54
women of color in power today
10:56
at holding executive leadership positions than
10:59
there were in the past. Yes.
11:01
And, you know, that part of
11:03
it I do think could be
11:05
explored a little bit more around
11:07
why being in the seat and
11:09
being feeling like you're respected in
11:11
the seat or feeling like you
11:14
know folks are listening to your
11:16
decision making not over scrutinizing your
11:18
work is important particularly as it
11:20
relates to women of color who
11:22
have worked really really hard to
11:24
get to these positions but I
11:27
think where the disconnect and the
11:29
tension begins to happen is we're
11:31
not listening to each other's lived
11:33
experience. So if I, you know,
11:35
if I as a woman of
11:37
color leader don't share my story
11:40
with my team, if I don't
11:42
stop and listen to the stories
11:44
of the young folks who are
11:46
in our organization, we're not ever
11:48
going to really see eye to
11:50
eye and understand what one another
11:52
needs. So I think it's being
11:55
able to perspective take and stories
11:57
held that might help us with
11:59
that tension. on that.
12:01
And in this research that
12:03
I've recently been doing, there's
12:05
a sociologist, a guy by
12:07
the name of Carl Mannheim,
12:09
and he talks about the
12:11
historical, so how did the,
12:13
how did different generations actually
12:16
get created? And that often,
12:18
one of the primary ways
12:20
that it happens is that
12:22
by historical events, and historical
12:24
events that occurred during the
12:26
young adulthood, of that particular
12:28
cohort of humans, right, that
12:30
shape what that demographic, how
12:32
that demographic operates and lives
12:34
in the world, right? So,
12:36
and this goes to your,
12:38
this goes to your point,
12:40
because I, there's a story,
12:42
you know, I have here
12:45
on my notes, a 2024
12:47
study, and I want you
12:49
to react to this, A
12:51
2024 study said that other
12:53
generational groups saw Genzies as,
12:55
wait for it, less capable,
12:57
more opinionated, and more selfish
12:59
than other generations. So hold
13:01
that thought for a second.
13:03
And then think about what
13:05
I just said about Mannheim's
13:07
theory about historical events. Think
13:09
about Genzies have never known
13:12
life on the internet. Gen
13:14
Z's have never known terrorism,
13:16
have never known school shootings,
13:18
have never, right, the murder
13:20
of George Floyd. All of
13:22
these things shaped who Gen
13:24
Z people are, and we
13:26
don't think about that. We
13:28
think, right, the 2024 study
13:30
says, less capable, more opinionated,
13:32
and more selfish. And I
13:34
want to know, let me
13:36
say, is that how it
13:39
feels to you? And you
13:41
get to speak for all
13:43
Gen Z's people today, by
13:45
the by the way. Yeah,
13:49
so I'm interested in your reaction
13:51
to all of that. I think
13:53
folks maybe have that perspective of
13:56
people and gender. opinionated and all
13:58
the other adjectives you used. And
14:01
I think what comes up is
14:03
this like idea of individual blame
14:05
versus systemic issues. And I honestly
14:08
think that a lot of what
14:10
Gen Z folks are wanting in
14:12
their workplaces and in their work
14:15
experiences is changing how those places
14:17
function. And I could see how
14:19
from a leadership perspective that that
14:22
comes off as that person not
14:24
wanting to work as hard and
14:27
maybe not caring enough and being
14:29
very entitled, but really what we're
14:31
calling for is that we need
14:34
workplaces that see us as human
14:36
beings and that allow us to
14:38
like thrive and tend to our
14:41
well-being. We shouldn't like have to
14:43
sacrifice those things for the work
14:45
we do. Yeah, Bianca. Do you
14:48
want to do you want to
14:50
jump in? Yeah, you know, I
14:53
also believe there has been a
14:55
decrease in mentorship within the workplace.
14:57
When I'm talking to Gen Ziers,
15:00
particularly in the nonprofit sector, they're
15:02
saying, I want to learn more.
15:04
I want to you know, gain
15:07
these skills, but I don't really
15:09
have anyone reaching out to be
15:11
a mentor. How do you get
15:14
a mentor? And so when I
15:16
think about some of the complaints,
15:19
you know, folks may have around
15:21
their Gen Z employees. One of
15:23
my questions becomes, well, what type
15:26
of relationships have you built with
15:28
them? How are they learning or
15:30
seeing, experiencing something different? Right? Because
15:33
if you're new to the workforce,
15:35
of course you got some demands.
15:38
Of course you have some things
15:40
you want to be different. And
15:42
that's what we need, right? That's
15:45
what the energy we need. But
15:47
sometimes we do need to harness
15:49
that energy with some wisdom. And
15:52
I think that mentorship allows for
15:54
that generational wisdom to be shared
15:56
as well. Do you agree with
15:59
my premise? Bianca that
16:01
that people think DEA I work
16:03
and they do not think about
16:05
age absolutely yeah absolutely and I
16:08
think it's on both sides right
16:10
there's like when you're doing like
16:12
DEA training as a practitioner we
16:14
talk about ageism and we talk
16:16
about there's like just a sweet
16:19
spot in the workforce it's between
16:21
like 30s and 40s where you're
16:23
the perfect age and then after
16:25
that you're too old and before
16:28
that you're too young you know
16:30
And yes, I think it has
16:32
to do a lot with our
16:34
productive mentality or our biases around
16:37
what productivity looks like. But yeah,
16:39
I definitely think that there is
16:41
agism that happens and it's just
16:43
compounded by other identifications, other ways
16:46
that people identify that they could
16:48
be marginalized for as well. Yeah,
16:50
I came across another statistic that
16:52
really made my, had a head
16:54
explosion of Boji, which is at
16:57
77% of Gen Z employees are
16:59
looking for work all the time.
17:01
Does that number surprise you, Lemisa?
17:03
It doesn't surprise me. I don't
17:06
know what like the root of
17:08
this is, but I have a
17:10
sense like in my parents' generation,
17:12
for example, I think it was
17:15
a lot more common for folks
17:17
to stick with the same company
17:19
for as long as possible and
17:21
to try to work toward upward
17:24
mobility and promotions like within the
17:26
same organization. But I also wonder
17:28
if part of that was just
17:30
less leeway, less opportunity to like
17:32
demand things to be different and
17:35
better. And I think that that
17:37
is part of the like always
17:39
searching for what's next that happens
17:41
among a lot of my peers
17:44
is like we shouldn't have to
17:46
tolerate like, you know, different experiences
17:48
where we're like not valued and
17:50
we're not. work isn't valued as
17:53
much as it should be or
17:55
our voice isn't included or other
17:57
things too, especially with like our
17:59
kind of hybrid work environment now
18:01
in this like time of the
18:04
pandemic and organizations may be not
18:06
building in the flexibility that folks
18:08
are looking for. for safety reasons
18:10
or for other reasons. So I
18:13
think there's just a sense of,
18:15
I don't have to accept that
18:17
this, whatever the current environment is
18:19
in my workplace, is the only
18:22
option. Like I can look for
18:24
something better. So I think that
18:26
is maybe something that drives that
18:28
kind of always searching for another
18:31
opportunity. Yeah, as I have actually
18:33
been doing a lot more research
18:35
on the Gen Z demographic. There
18:37
is also probably built into that
18:39
77% is issues of pay equity
18:42
and looking for side hustles. Like
18:44
I think there's some of that
18:46
in there too. Bianca and would
18:48
you agree with that? Yes, I
18:51
think that it, particularly as we
18:53
think about the influence of technology
18:55
and social media on this, what
18:57
I call maybe an age of
19:00
discontent. is that you know this
19:02
social media causes comparison, right? Like
19:04
so we can share all this
19:06
information and I'm comparing. If I'm
19:09
looking at my social media feed,
19:11
there is an intrinsic thing that
19:13
begins to happen where you compare
19:15
your life or your situation to
19:17
someone else's or whatever you're seeing.
19:20
I invited almost to like online
19:22
dating, you know, you're on your
19:24
app, you're like, swipe site, ooh,
19:26
wait, but I want to keep
19:29
looking. You know, and so I
19:31
do wonder how things like technology
19:33
for all of us have kind
19:35
of created this discontentment or continuing
19:38
to seek and look for more
19:40
as opposed to understanding what satisfaction
19:42
may be like for a season
19:44
of our lives, you know, or
19:46
taking the time to really get
19:49
clear on, what is the difference
19:51
I'm looking for in my next
19:53
career step and why? And then
19:55
again seeking that's with it, whether
19:58
it's in your current workplace. And
20:00
the last thing I'll say on
20:02
that is, I do think the
20:04
nonprofit sector could do a better
20:07
job with creating growth pathways for
20:09
leaders who are like emerging leaders.
20:11
Most of the time, our organizations
20:13
don't have clear growth pathways. So
20:16
if you're someone who is really
20:18
achievement oriented or growth oriented, you're
20:20
going to keep looking because you
20:22
can feel when you're about to
20:24
hit that seal. Yeah,
20:27
leadership development and investing in
20:29
the people on our teams
20:31
is sadly, it's seen as
20:33
general operating expense that is
20:35
hard to fund, and it
20:37
is a systemic issue in
20:39
our sector that people are
20:42
not given the tools and
20:44
skills they need. in order
20:46
to be the best they
20:48
can be in their jobs
20:50
and grow and develop. Right?
20:52
And you see leadership transitions
20:54
all the time where someone
20:57
says, well, is there any
20:59
viable internal candidate? Like, no,
21:01
no, definitely not. Why not?
21:03
Why? Why? Why does it
21:05
have to be like that?
21:07
All right, now I'm mad.
21:10
Why did it come back
21:12
to something you mentioned around
21:15
like side hustle culture and
21:17
that thing that is really
21:19
common now among Gen Z
21:21
folks? I think it's really
21:24
important to acknowledge how just
21:26
like economic well-being and the
21:28
struggles to just like make
21:30
ends meet and pay for
21:33
basic necessities is a part
21:35
of this. Yes. I think
21:37
a lot of my peers
21:39
and I, we maybe don't
21:42
even have home ownership as
21:44
like an aspiration in our
21:46
lives because it feels so
21:48
unattainable. Whereas that, you know,
21:51
I feel like owning a
21:53
home, white picket fence, like
21:55
that is still like such
21:57
a big part of like
22:00
American culture and what folks
22:02
dream toward. that's really sad,
22:04
actually, you know, if you
22:06
think about it. And so
22:09
I think just needing to
22:11
have more than one job
22:13
is also a part of
22:15
living and surviving. Yes. In
22:18
fact, actually, you are spot
22:20
on is that there is
22:22
a certain degree of pessimism
22:24
that runs through Gen Z
22:27
folks because inflation. They don't
22:29
see homeownership. as something to
22:31
aspire. They see that as
22:33
more fantastical than aspirational. So
22:36
I think it's legit and
22:38
therefore the hunger for pay
22:40
equity and the agency of
22:42
the voices sort of create
22:45
a bit of a perfect
22:47
storm. The Nonprofit Leadership Lab
22:49
is led by Joan Gary
22:51
and is the world's best
22:54
online community for leaders of
22:56
small nonprofits. Learn how to
22:58
raise more money, build the
23:00
board of your dreams, grow
23:03
a large audience of supporters
23:05
and so much more. To
23:07
learn more and request an
23:09
invitation to become a member,
23:12
please go to non-profit leadership
23:14
lab.com/podcast. That's non-profit leadership lab.com/podcast.
23:18
We are having a conversation
23:20
about, so you think we
23:23
were talking about navigating Genzies
23:25
in the workplace, but that's
23:27
actually not what we're talking
23:29
about at all. We're talking
23:32
about diversity, equity, and inclusion.
23:34
We're talking about creating a
23:36
real sense of belonging in
23:38
your workplace. for everyone who
23:41
works there, and that includes
23:43
people of different ages. And
23:45
we are talking with Bianca
23:47
Anderson, and we are also
23:49
talking with Lemisa Mustafa. Their
23:52
very impressive bios are in
23:54
the show notes. Lemisa is
23:56
a member of the Gen
23:58
Z demographic. Bianca has been
24:01
in the world of education.
24:03
She's been a nonprofit leader
24:05
and a social justice practitioner
24:07
and has trained and advised
24:10
thousands of community leaders around
24:12
the nation on effective racial
24:14
equity policies practices and procedures.
24:16
Okay, so we've outlined the
24:18
issues. Let's talk about motivation.
24:21
Right? So I believe that
24:23
tapping into what really motivates
24:25
someone is essential to their
24:27
job satisfaction, essential to their
24:30
retention. And someone like Daniel
24:32
Pink will tell you that
24:34
the motivating drivers are usually
24:36
autonomy, mastery, purpose. Right, but
24:39
there's lots of schools of
24:41
thought about that, but I
24:43
want to ask Lemisa and
24:45
then Bianca. Where do you
24:47
think the motivators are for
24:50
folks in the Gen Z
24:52
demographic? And I'll start with
24:54
Lemisa and then we'll go
24:56
to Bianca. Yeah, I think
24:59
in your intro, you were
25:01
doing a reframe away from
25:03
navigating around Gen Z and
25:05
the workforce. And I wanted
25:08
to go back to that
25:10
because I think it's really
25:12
important to reframe that. It
25:14
kind of positions Gen-Z folks
25:16
as something to deal with.
25:19
And I think it puts
25:21
the onus to have to
25:23
change and to have to
25:25
do something to make our
25:28
experiences better versus putting the
25:30
onus on the organization to
25:32
create a culture where we
25:34
can thrive and belong. And
25:37
I think motivation is tied
25:39
to this as well because
25:41
I think if there's a
25:43
culture where sharing feedback means
25:45
that that feedback will actually
25:48
be heard and even if
25:50
what we suggest can't be
25:52
implemented. will still be a
25:54
closed feedback loop. Like that
25:57
feels kind of like a
25:59
low bar. But a lot
26:01
of organizations don't have mechanisms
26:03
for closing feedback loops, which
26:06
can make people feel deflated.
26:08
And I think that can
26:10
also impact motivation. So I
26:12
want to make sure that
26:14
we're also thinking about what
26:17
organizations can do and not
26:19
necessarily like things that are
26:21
personal or intrinsic to like
26:23
Genzi employees themselves. if I
26:26
can just play that back,
26:28
is what should organizations be
26:30
doing, regardless of whether we're
26:32
talking about Gen Z or
26:35
we're talking about people with
26:37
different abilities, right? All of
26:39
these things are universal, right?
26:41
The feedback thing is really
26:43
interesting, and then I'm going
26:46
to go to Bianca, because
26:48
another thing that I really,
26:50
I found really interesting in
26:52
my research is that, and
26:55
again, We are making sort
26:57
of generalizations by an entire
26:59
demographic. I get that. But
27:01
for the purpose of this
27:04
conversation, I think it's a
27:06
value. Feedback is this is
27:08
big. It's big for everyone.
27:10
Gen Z's really want it
27:12
and they want it fast.
27:15
And by the way, Why
27:17
shouldn't they? And why shouldn't an organization
27:20
be organized in such a way? But
27:22
yes, the feedback on how I'm doing
27:24
and not like waiting for a week
27:27
and a half for a meeting, as
27:29
I have learned more about your demographic,
27:31
Lemisa, which has been such a gift
27:33
to me to actually be digging into
27:36
this, that's something that's really, really a,
27:38
that is a motivator. Right. So Bianca
27:40
jump in here. What do you think?
27:42
Yeah. Motivators. Yeah. This piece around motivation.
27:45
Tell a quick little story. About two
27:47
years ago, I was, we were doing
27:49
some hiring. And one of our final
27:52
candidates was a Gen And
27:54
there's this question I
27:56
always like to
27:58
ask, know, I tell
28:01
me about your dream
28:03
job. you know, tell me I
28:05
asked this question, and he I
28:07
ask this I don't dream of
28:09
and they say, I don't dream my gosh!
28:11
Oh my gosh. And you
28:14
know what? They were higher. Because this
28:16
is what we talk is what we
28:18
talk about right? So for right? So
28:20
for me, as someone who has
28:22
been, you know, taught that
28:24
my work is in my productivity
28:26
my my dreams need to be
28:28
constricted like what will I do
28:30
and provide for others? others. I've
28:32
often like not been able to imagine my
28:34
life without labor, And right? And
28:36
so that to me that to me
28:38
really taught me a little
28:40
bit more about what motivates them.
28:42
I And what I found that
28:44
motivates them is impact, right? right? do I
28:46
see the I see the impact that
28:49
I'm having and voice heard and when
28:51
we think And when we think about
28:53
just the workplace in general, that's
28:55
all people need. need. So as
28:57
we go back to
28:59
like like culture. particular in to
29:01
have an inclusive space, to
29:03
have a space of belonging, of
29:05
we have to think about the
29:07
needs that other people may
29:10
have and try to create structures
29:12
that can support those needs. can
29:14
support know, leaning on niceties on
29:16
a lack of feedback culture harms
29:18
us all. So if we we
29:20
hear from our younger employees, I
29:22
need feedback I I need it in
29:24
a timely way. way. How How we
29:26
we consider? that could be be useful
29:28
for us all, right? So they're
29:30
showing us things about our culture
29:32
and about the way nonprofits are moving
29:35
that might need to be shifted
29:37
to could actually benefit actually benefit
29:39
the full definitely could benefit the
29:41
whole workforce. could benefit the
29:43
But whole workforce, different
29:45
demographic groups to groups
29:47
to exercise exercise different
29:50
muscles. So whenever
29:52
we're thinking thinking about
29:55
feedback. it's not It's
29:57
not just feedback for
29:59
employees, but also feedback from
30:01
employees for leadership for
30:03
for organizational change I
30:06
well. in I think. maybe
30:08
hesitate leadership maybe hesitate of
30:10
receiving that kind of feedback
30:12
about how the organization can
30:14
do better. really But it's
30:16
really important to in that in
30:18
that culture of continuous improvement
30:20
and learning and growing, especially
30:23
if that's what we expect
30:25
of our employees. Can
30:27
I just speak to that a little
30:29
bit? bit? Yeah. I I
30:31
appreciate your name in that, Lemisa
30:33
because it needs to be to be
30:35
reciprocal. I think one of
30:37
the fears leaders, nonprofit
30:40
leaders, executive leaders we haven't if we
30:42
haven't taken the time to perspective
30:44
take. If you don't know what
30:46
my full workload entails, if you if
30:48
you don't understand the things that
30:50
were here before you, and that we're that
30:52
we're trying to already adjust about
30:55
the culture. it feels really feels really
30:57
scary want to to want to get that
30:59
feedback, particularly person of you are a
31:01
person of color or someone from a
31:03
marginalized community has has just gotten into
31:05
that seat. Because so many of
31:07
us, for so long we're taught, if
31:10
you make one mistake, you're out. You
31:12
gotta be twice as good. good. so
31:14
to seek out feedback from folks
31:16
who who don't feel like understands our
31:18
experience or we haven't done the perspective
31:20
taking, it really makes it
31:22
more challenging. So I think the root
31:25
of it is being in right relationship right
31:27
relationship with building the trust the
31:29
that we can have the
31:31
feedback exchanges. So
31:33
have a team of about
31:35
15 folks between my coaching
31:37
practice and my membership my membership site
31:40
for and staff leaders of small
31:42
to mid -sized leaders of small to we
31:44
have been on
31:46
a journey to become
31:48
a much more
31:50
culturally intelligent organization. intelligent organization.
31:52
I have 6 ,000
31:54
members of a members
31:57
of a membership with leaders,
31:59
leaders, right, I've that. to be
32:01
a place to be a place of
32:03
belonging for all leaders. who I
32:05
want people who are of different
32:07
backgrounds, who are younger people in
32:09
leadership, leadership, folks of leadership to say,
32:11
I would like to go to Leadership
32:13
Leadership Lab I know I know I'm
32:15
gonna be be there. And so
32:18
we have done a lot of
32:20
work in this regard, but we
32:22
started with our own selves, own right?
32:24
I was like, can we please
32:26
do a survey of the members
32:28
members? the folks that we brought
32:30
in like, like, no. Actually, we're going to start with
32:32
you. with you. We're gonna start with
32:34
you with you. And in in addition to
32:36
building a DEI business case, I
32:38
mean, I am a for -profit
32:40
business, we created a
32:43
a accountability matrix so
32:45
that there is something that is is
32:47
as a bell. as a bell who
32:49
is accountable to whom and
32:51
for what, for what And that
32:53
includes me know the founder
32:55
of the company, of the And
32:57
so you come in, you whether
32:59
you are a Gen X or
33:01
a or a Gen Z
33:03
person, you come in, that's
33:05
one of the first things
33:07
you see the you see how
33:09
you see, organization, how we, how and
33:11
again, it's only 15 people,
33:13
how we expect you to
33:15
hold us accountable and vice
33:17
versa. vice versa. So it is accountability is not a
33:20
or pejorative word, it is
33:22
about is do you actually you
33:24
actually right? you're on the right
33:26
track because you're absolutely right.
33:28
You're absolutely right, Bianca. Many of us
33:31
who have been part of marginalized
33:33
communities of one sort or another, one
33:35
false move and you're cooked. of
33:38
one sort able to, and
33:40
if you cannot create a
33:42
culture And if promotes failing. that
33:45
promotes innovate. innovate.
33:48
Yeah. So in the I In
33:50
to I wanna just spend
33:52
the last part of
33:54
our conversation here. What needs
33:56
to be different, right?
33:59
how How do you this. I'm I'm
34:01
not gonna lie. I have I run
34:03
a for I company And
34:05
I brought in folks
34:07
who have been so valuable
34:10
to us. so Right?
34:12
Not everybody can afford that.
34:14
everybody How do we make
34:16
this different? You know, and right?
34:18
we shift the power dynamics? Like, You
34:20
is that what you, you know, I we
34:22
to myself, let me say, you must
34:24
want the power dynamics to be different
34:26
in some way. Like, why does it
34:28
have to be hierarchical? Right? Like, I'm climbing
34:30
inside inside your head. Maybe you
34:32
should speak for yourself. I think that would be a
34:34
good idea. that would be a
34:36
I'm also thinking about
34:39
Bianca uplifting lived experiences
34:41
and lived experiences
34:43
and us we mean
34:45
by someone being. being
34:47
experienced. What do
34:49
ha, ha. as What do
34:51
we see as qualifications for
34:53
a leadership role? how I
34:56
wonder about how different
34:58
things could be if who are
35:00
members are members of directly
35:02
impacted communities were in
35:04
leadership roles. roles. I think think
35:06
that's That should be like a
35:08
goal of the nonprofit sector is,
35:11
you know, in an ideal world, an ideal
35:13
world. But some of
35:15
our organizations shouldn't need to
35:17
exist, this kind Because this kind of
35:19
advocacy that we provide, hopefully a
35:21
point get to a point where
35:23
that advocacy wouldn't be needed
35:25
because folks would already have everything
35:27
they need to thrive. And
35:29
our systems and structures would be
35:31
built to support that. to And
35:34
I wonder about how,
35:36
as a sector, we can
35:38
move more move more toward power
35:40
and resources to the
35:42
communities our work is about. about. Bianca,
35:45
so you taking notes. note. Yeah, you know, you
35:47
know, you when you first asked the
35:49
question, the first thing that dropped
35:52
in my spirit. my spirit love?
35:54
love. We need need just a
35:56
little bit more and I I don't mean
35:58
it in just the soft cushy know, I
36:00
I it in the accountable way, right? I mean
36:02
I mean it in the way in
36:04
which we really live out our values
36:06
and we are willing to have some
36:09
generative struggle with one another because we
36:11
believe what's on the other side is
36:13
better than where we are, right? So
36:15
we will demonstrate love for one another.
36:17
And when I think about love, I
36:19
think about knowing that we are all
36:21
valuable. all And so I value what you
36:23
have to say. You are worth me
36:26
listening to. to. You're worth being supported. So
36:28
not only only having these transactions. relationships
36:30
within the workplace but seeing each
36:32
other as full human beings
36:34
that have something to contribute really
36:36
really working to make our decisions
36:39
from a place that reflects
36:41
that. will And I will also
36:43
say and of in and of itself
36:45
is not just inherently
36:47
harmful, I say all right? as Cause I
36:49
say that as someone who does social
36:52
justice, racial justice work, our organization has
36:54
hierarchy. And what I do think I
36:56
do think to your point, Lameesa,
36:58
around the folks who are closest to
37:00
the work, making the decisions, every every
37:02
decision does not have to be
37:04
made by senior leadership, right? so And
37:06
so we, do we, just like we
37:08
talk about accountability, how do
37:10
we stop and say, and say, let's, pan
37:13
out our making. What What decisions are
37:15
we making? Because most decisions have have
37:17
multi layers, right? And how do we get
37:19
voice in to different components of this
37:21
one decision? And let let folks say,
37:23
to get to decide this part
37:25
or you get to decide that
37:27
part because there is something to
37:29
be said about the person who
37:31
is doing the work, being able
37:33
to decide what the work looks
37:35
like in connection to the strategic direction
37:37
and the vision for the organization.
37:39
So I think if we learned
37:41
how to make decisions how to make decisions
37:43
more would also help. that
37:46
would I wonder what I wonder
37:48
what think about about that
37:50
are are of large enough
37:53
to have, and depending depending
37:55
on what the topic is,
37:57
but sort of cross-functional, cross level
37:59
working group. aren't necessarily
38:02
led by the the
38:04
person with the. the quote unquote power. I
38:07
will say that as we
38:09
we have done our
38:11
DEI work, we have
38:13
a working group. and
38:15
we've been changing it
38:17
every year. And I I think probably the
38:19
first year, I led it. And
38:21
then I thought, it. And I don't think
38:24
so. don't And then the second year
38:26
we had it, we had
38:28
people who had we had run
38:30
any kind of, working group at
38:32
all. of a to your
38:34
point, all. Bianca, your we provided them
38:36
with a coach. them
38:38
with a coach. how
38:41
to how to actually run
38:43
a meeting and and make an an
38:45
impactful working group is
38:47
a skill. a skill, right? and
38:49
I have it because I've done
38:51
it a lot a lot, right? But we
38:53
can do these can And so these things.
38:55
And so I just wonder
38:57
what you think about this, but
38:59
you know, my thinking know, my thinking
39:01
is, you can. You can't just
39:03
put somebody in the
39:06
deep end without end without swimies. And
39:08
because that's that's just a right?
39:10
right? can But can you
39:12
create opportunities for leadership and
39:14
and invest? so in this know,
39:16
so in this case, yes, we got a
39:18
coach, but it could be someone else on
39:21
the staff who could provide coaching, right?
39:23
right? There's all kinds of ways
39:25
to do this do this that benefit
39:27
to all parties. So I
39:29
was was wondering what you thought
39:31
about in a a hierarchy, the the idea
39:33
of working groups. And maybe I'll
39:35
start with Bianca on that. that.
39:38
Yeah, I I think working groups are
39:40
a great idea. One of the
39:42
things that I also also to
39:44
remind us is that takes time. that
39:46
does. If we got we got folks I
39:48
won't won't be off on Friday, only
39:50
want to work six hours a
39:52
day. a day. mean, because to create
39:55
these things does take time. that's
39:57
often the the work that
39:59
we do. time time that is then
40:01
not spent on delivering the services, in
40:03
being in alignment with the mission,
40:05
doing the work that the social impact
40:08
organization is meant to do. meant to do.
40:10
So, you know, I I think that. parsing
40:12
out the out the change and being
40:14
very results that is something that would
40:16
help our So we see all the we see
40:18
all the things that we want to
40:20
do differently. But right now, now,
40:22
what is the thing we're gonna focus
40:25
on? on? What is the intended result, how
40:27
know we're getting there, and bringing
40:29
a more a more approach to our
40:31
internal work dynamics, similar to what
40:33
we do externally. You know,
40:35
think that that is one way that
40:37
we can address some of the misuse
40:39
of hierarchy. Yeah, and I and
40:41
let let me see in on this, but
40:43
I I wanted to respond to that
40:46
and say, and say, heard it a million
40:48
times, sometimes you gotta go slow to
40:50
go fast, right? got And the same is
40:52
exactly true, Bianca. the If you wanna
40:54
actually really understand the people who work
40:56
with you, you actually have to invest
40:58
time in knowing them in have to That's
41:00
not something in look at them in you know,
41:02
you look at their resumes and that's
41:04
all I know about them or you
41:06
remember the name of their dog, so
41:09
they ask them about their weekend. their weekend.
41:11
Like it's be deep. deep, right? It's
41:13
it's got to be deep. mean,
41:15
that's why I was really
41:17
thinking about all of like the
41:19
the contextual experience of a experience of
41:21
a Z person is so
41:24
radically different lived the lived experience
41:26
and historical context of the
41:28
person a who's a millennial X.
41:30
X. It's just they're all different.
41:32
but it all takes time. time. So me
41:35
just, I'm gonna give you the
41:37
last word here you the on this idea
41:39
of of. do you create this environment
41:43
environment of trust, mutual
41:45
respect, build leadership
41:47
among younger employees. employees?
41:51
I'm you have all of the all
41:53
the answers. Okay, that
41:55
was a joke, a joke. I
41:57
bet you have some! some. Yeah,
42:00
I definitely can't speak for everybody,
42:02
but I think something that's
42:04
coming to mind for me is
42:06
mind for me safety and the need
42:08
for everyone to feel that,
42:10
especially in a working group, group that
42:12
it, you know, crosses different hierarchies in
42:14
terms of who's in the room.
42:16
the room. If an employee and also
42:18
their supervisor are in that
42:21
working group, that that might, you you know,
42:23
impact how that employee can show
42:25
up or not show up in
42:27
that working group. So it's it's important
42:29
to make sure that, like, again
42:32
going again, going back to culture,
42:34
that a culture of psychological
42:36
safety where folks can show
42:38
up authentically and that can
42:40
also come up. come and
42:42
that can really have benefits for
42:45
the work that organizations do. Also,
42:47
do. Also I relatedly
42:49
unrelatedly I'd be remiss not
42:51
to voice like appreciation for
42:54
Bianca. I think think it's important
42:56
for listeners to know that
42:58
we're not strangers and that
43:00
we are like friends and
43:02
she's been such like an
43:04
important mentor in my own
43:06
journey. in my own I wish that
43:09
we senior leaders in the
43:11
sector like more like Bianca. She
43:13
is very responsive, which maybe
43:15
you wouldn't expect from a
43:17
co but that's but that's something
43:19
that I think Gen Z folks would
43:21
appreciate is just people making time
43:23
for them. them. You know, if I'm ever
43:25
in a senior leadership role, I
43:27
don't want to ever be inaccessible. Like
43:29
Like I want to have enough time
43:31
to reply to an email, an you
43:33
know, you know, and and Bianca has done
43:35
that for me. She's always been responsive.
43:37
responsive. And whenever she's been in
43:40
the in the which is where I'm
43:42
based, where I'm always makes time
43:44
to like time up with me. with
43:46
me. And invites me to different
43:48
gatherings and things she's a part
43:51
of, a which is really helpful
43:53
from a networking well. as well. And
43:55
just like, you know, know, opening up
43:57
doors to different connections and
43:59
not like, and just being
44:01
as supportive as possible. So I
44:03
just wanted to like voice gratitude. like
44:05
voice for her for her since think she
44:08
can be a real model for
44:10
other folks. Thank you so you
44:12
so much, That That means a lot.
44:14
And I know it takes courage to
44:16
reach out. yourself, I know it takes courage
44:18
to advocate for yourself, ask for what
44:20
you need. And so I'm glad that we've
44:22
been able to build that relationship because
44:25
we gotta support one another and we have
44:27
to support the next generation of leaders. There's
44:30
so much so rich here
44:32
in this conversation we've just
44:34
had. we've me, this is
44:36
my podcast. I get to kind
44:38
of decide what I think is in
44:40
your heads I think is in leaders. as I
44:42
try to curl into your heads
44:44
and think, to what should they be
44:46
thinking? What are they thinking about? And
44:48
sometimes I think, what should they
44:50
be thinking about? Today it sort of a
44:52
what should we be thinking about?
44:54
And we should be thinking about about
44:57
age as an asset. right? In the
44:59
same In the same way that
45:01
different abilities are an asset. asset, right?
45:03
And I just think we are
45:05
totally missing the boat on this. on
45:07
Totally missing the boat. If you
45:09
just If the last 40 minutes
45:12
listening to minutes you know you're
45:14
missing the boat. missing the boat.
45:16
If you bucket somebody in the
45:18
Gen Z category in a
45:20
certain way way that is pejorative,
45:22
shame on you. you. Shame
45:25
on you. you. It is all
45:27
of the differences that
45:29
make us stronger. We
45:31
all know that to be true.
45:33
be And many of us actually
45:35
work of hell every single day
45:37
in organizations that in us. to
45:39
that truth. that speak
45:42
to that truth, right? And
45:44
so think about your DEA
45:46
work your DEI work, and
45:48
think about whether you really are
45:51
factoring an age. that's
45:53
that's important. Think
45:55
about the time time it
45:58
takes to understand. and
46:00
people they they come
46:02
from, their lived experience, the
46:04
historical context in which they
46:07
have lived up to the point
46:09
they up to the point of
46:11
them in three
46:13
dimensions. in three dimensions. to them, to
46:15
provide opportunities for people to
46:17
lead, for people to lead. mentors, whether
46:19
they're outside the organization or
46:21
inside the organization, because you
46:24
just heard Lameesa talk about
46:26
Bianca, heard and I guarantee
46:28
you, Bianca gets as much
46:30
as she gives from that
46:32
relationship, as she gives And she's nodding
46:34
emphatically, and she's nodding emphatically
46:36
yes are the things you need to be
46:38
thinking about need to be thinking they take time. yes
46:41
they take time they do they are worth
46:43
every second. they're worth
46:45
every second from as it relates to
46:47
the psychological safety of the people
46:49
who work for you, the respect
46:51
you grant them, and the kind
46:53
of impact they will have they will
46:55
terms of how motivated they are
46:57
to be a part of your
47:00
work. work. So that said, I just I
47:02
say, want to say, thank you so
47:04
much for representing the entire, Z
47:06
demographic on my podcast today.
47:09
Yeah, great job, great job. I hope,
47:11
hope, yeah, that's a big responsibility.
47:13
So I hope my hope my peers
47:15
would resonate with what I shared
47:17
just just really grateful to be
47:19
in conversation with you both. both.
47:22
Thank you, Lomisa. And your work work covered
47:24
such a span of things. I
47:26
didn't know I didn't know you
47:28
were going to get such a
47:30
big Valentine from LaMisa, but
47:33
it sounds more than rightfully
47:35
deserved. And your insights today
47:37
were very, very thought -provoking
47:39
and inspiring as well. So
47:41
thank you so much for
47:43
joining us. us. Yes, thank you
47:45
both. It was a great conversation. Agreed.
47:48
So for for those of you who are listening,
47:50
you you can listen again if you want want,
47:52
you might actually have to listen to this
47:54
twice. In the meantime. In the Thank
47:56
you for your work. for Take good
47:58
care of yourselves. and the
48:00
people you work with with, and I hope to
48:02
see to to see you next time. Take good care.
48:04
care. Thanks so much for spending
48:07
much for spending time with me today. you
48:09
I hope you found the conversation valuable
48:11
as you navigate the messy world. messy world
48:13
of Check out Check
48:15
other resources resources at Joan Gehry.com.
48:18
Hope you find them helpful
48:20
too. Lastly, thank you. for
48:22
the work you do to repair the world.
48:24
in ways large and small. I'll see
48:26
you next time.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More