Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
28:00
Have their moment, have their time. Exactly, exactly.
28:02
And it's trying to hold on to stuff
28:04
and not let it die that
28:07
actually puts us in precarious positions,
28:09
even for our species. This is
28:12
actually one of our biggest issues right now, is we're
28:14
so scared of death. Yeah. So
28:16
we think about how do we make people live
28:18
forever, and how do we look young forever and
28:20
do all this stuff instead of being like, oh,
28:22
no, how do I get good at dying? You
28:25
know, how to get to where I'll be at
28:27
peace when my time comes, because there's other generations
28:29
that need to survive off of the resources of
28:31
this place. You
28:33
know, it's in the design. I
29:00
guess something that's so on
29:02
my mind also as I read you, because, you know,
29:05
I think my kind of focus is, or
29:07
my lens on things is the
29:09
human condition, right? Yes. with
29:12
the human condition, and that also is very
29:14
much part of your world.
29:17
And I feel like there's a lot
29:19
of wisdom about the human condition, and
29:21
also really that you have to be wise about it in
29:24
order to work with it and help it
29:27
evolve generatively. You know, so
29:29
just drawing on what you were just saying, I
29:33
mean, emergence is change, right? Some place you said
29:36
emergence is our inheritance as a part of the
29:38
universe. It is how we change. And
29:42
emergence doesn't wait for us to be
29:44
ready for change, and we're really in
29:46
an accelerated moment of that right now.
29:49
But as you know, change
29:52
is really hard for human beings, right?
29:54
It's hard for us at a creaturely
29:56
level, and also we
29:58
all individually... Perhaps
38:00
it felt a little more true in
38:02
a more homogeneous society. Yeah,
38:04
and I also think it's like, again,
38:07
in the imagination, if you
38:09
are someone who would benefit from that
38:11
power system, right, then it
38:13
really behooves you to imagine the world as
38:15
that way. Yeah, that works. You know? Yeah.
38:19
It's like I'm just, you know, I, from a very young
38:21
age was like, but I'm just as smart as these white
38:23
men in my classes. And
38:26
yet the same opportunities are not available to me.
38:28
Can someone help me understand that? I
38:30
need a logic because it's not adding up. And
38:33
there is no logic. And there's no logic to
38:35
it, right? And often when there's no logic, then
38:37
that's when you know you're in someone's dream. You
38:42
know, I was looking up because I
38:44
also mistrusted my own, I
38:46
still mistrust my ability to define
38:48
fractals. There's this mathematician, great mathematician,
38:51
Mandelbrot, asked to define fractals, said,
38:55
beautiful, damn hard,
38:57
increasingly useful. Yes.
39:01
I love that. Yeah.
39:04
I feel like it, you know, there's so many things
39:06
like this, I will say, when I wrote
39:08
the book, I think in one of the footnotes, I was
39:10
like, if you're a scientist, you know,
39:14
just trying to help us make more sense. It
39:16
got me a little slack. Yeah. Or basically I
39:18
was just like, you know, because especially in the
39:20
sci-fi world, the science world, there's
39:22
already this battle over like, is that real
39:25
science fiction or fake science fiction? Like,
39:27
does it have enough hard science in it to count
39:29
as a story, right? And it's like, okay, if you
39:31
want to spend your life arguing about that, cool. But
39:34
for me, I was like, the point for
39:36
me is not to argue about the science
39:38
because science is actually still unfolding all the
39:40
time and we're, it's
39:42
a question-based methodology. So I want to be
39:45
asking questions. So I'm a scientist, so
39:47
what, you know, deal with it, right? But
39:50
then there's also like, don't come to just argue
39:52
the point, right? I feel like
39:54
our whole society right now spends so much time just
39:57
arguing for the sake of arguing. And I'm like, we
39:59
actually need solutions. So if fractals
40:01
is the wrong word, teach me a better one. But
40:03
what I want to talk about is this, right? You
40:05
know, I talk a lot about alpha versus more
40:09
collaborative creatures. Right. And,
40:11
you know, I can tell when I'm with the
40:13
devil's advocate folks, you know, they're like, well, what
40:16
about, you know, lions just eat everyone. Should we
40:18
learn that from nature? And I'm like, no, nature
40:20
does everything. Nature does everything.
40:22
There's not, it's actually the beauty
40:24
of releasing the right wrong paradigm. That's
40:27
not how nature is even operating. Like, is it wrong
40:29
to eat this deer? You know, it's
40:32
beyond that. It's like if nature
40:35
can show us everything, then we're the ones
40:37
who have agency. And
40:39
if the goal for our species is
40:41
not to cause harm to each other,
40:43
we could do that. There's
40:46
models from nature. And if the goal is to
40:48
make enough out of the
40:50
resources we have, there's incredible
40:52
models of creatures who are doing
40:54
that all the time every day and in very difficult
40:56
circumstances. If the goal
40:58
is to love each other, right, like Thich
41:01
Nhat Hanh said, such that we all feel
41:03
free, you know, that that's possible. Well, we
41:05
can see in nature who's
41:08
up to that. Right. We
41:10
can learn a lot from the bonobo monkeys, you know, and
41:12
so on and so forth. So it's really, you
41:14
know, asking people to be more intentional with, like,
41:17
we were given some things about the world from people who
41:19
knew less than we do now. So
41:22
what do we want to hold on to and what do we want to evolve?
41:27
Thank you. This
41:57
is Christa Tippett, comes from the Fetzer Institute. supports
42:00
a movement of organizations that are
42:02
applying spiritual solutions to society's toughest
42:04
problems. Learn more at fetsa.org.
42:22
The language of transformative
42:24
justice and resilience. Talk
42:28
to me about putting
42:30
the word transformative there. Transformative
42:35
justice, transformative resilience. For
42:38
me, when I add the word
42:41
transformative to anything, what I mean
42:43
is let's get
42:46
to the root of the problem. I
42:48
think Angela Davis said this is how she talks
42:50
about radical. Let's go all
42:52
the way to the root. Yeah, and that's the meaning of
42:54
the word radical, right? Exactly. It's not
42:56
something on the edges. It's not the edges, right?
42:58
It's like, what's at the core, the root, the
43:00
essence of it? For me,
43:03
when I speak about transformative, it's like I
43:06
don't want to dance around on the surface
43:08
rearranging deck chairs. I
43:11
want to get down into the root system and
43:13
really understand what's happening and what it would
43:16
take to create a change if a change
43:18
is needed. For
43:21
example, we have a crisis
43:24
of sexual assault, a crisis of
43:26
sexual harm. I don't
43:28
want to be in a situation where we punish
43:30
one person at a time, which
43:33
doesn't seem to have worked at all in
43:35
terms of eliminating the problem. And
43:38
yet we continue doing it and building bigger and bigger
43:40
prison systems and jails and other stuff, but it's not
43:42
stopping the problem, right? So transformative
43:44
justice says, actually,
43:47
that's not working. Why
43:49
don't we get to the root system? What's
43:52
causing people to enact sexual
43:54
harm against each other? And
43:57
can we turn and look at that without
43:59
holding on? anything back? Can we really get
44:02
honest with ourselves and look at it? Because
44:04
we all have some experience of someone
44:07
crossing those boundaries. And we're talking about
44:09
the level. How badly did
44:11
they cross them rather than did
44:13
it happen or not? That's wild.
44:17
So for me, I'm like, how do we get
44:19
transformative about it? How do we go to the
44:21
root system? And I learned this, there's a group
44:23
called Generation 5, who was
44:25
really starting to have this conversation of like,
44:28
what would it look like over five generations
44:30
to end child sexual abuse? And
44:33
it's like, oh, that's a radical
44:35
vision. The other aspect of
44:37
transformative is it often doesn't rely
44:39
on the existing structures
44:41
or mechanisms. So in
44:44
organizer speak, we might say the state,
44:46
right? Like it doesn't rely on what
44:49
we already think of as the solution, because we
44:51
know that that's already not working. And
44:54
actually, we want to
44:56
never try to solve a problem
44:59
with something that we know will cause more harm if
45:02
we can avoid it, right? So in
45:05
a lot of our communities, say
45:07
that a domestic violence incident is happening, we
45:10
don't want to solve that by calling the
45:12
police because the police
45:15
in our communities tend to escalate the harm
45:18
rather than deescalate the harm. Not
45:21
only do we have this domestic violence situation happening,
45:23
but now we have someone
45:25
being possibly removed from their community, removed from
45:27
their home. We have
45:29
kids possibly being removed from their parents and other things
45:31
that are actually not necessary,
45:34
nor are they helpful to solving the
45:36
problem. So let's not add to the
45:38
problem. Let's figure out how
45:40
we can resolve it within our communities through mediation,
45:43
through setting clear boundaries,
45:46
through healing circles. Is
45:50
there therapy needed? Let's
45:52
get as creative as
45:54
we can about what needs to actually
45:57
happen to stop the harm cycle. And,
46:01
you know, this is emergent,
46:03
right? This whole way
46:06
of seeing, this whole way of
46:08
imagining is emergent in our world
46:10
right now. And there's
46:13
struggle around it. There are different ways
46:16
of seeing, but I think perhaps
46:18
more definingly the conditions
46:20
aren't all there, right? That's right. You
46:23
know, one of the things that you
46:25
also talk about is how there
46:28
is going to be important conflict
46:31
and contradiction that
46:34
is part of the process of ending
46:36
cycles of harm. And
46:39
so one of the things we also have to be
46:41
working on, and it's back to our human condition, I
46:44
mean, here's some ways you've talked about it. How
46:46
do we fight fair? How do we struggle in
46:48
principled ways? How do
46:50
we practice accountability beyond
46:52
punishment with each other? Because the
46:55
structures are not there right now
46:57
in most of our communities to
47:00
just move to what you just described. And that's
47:02
where a lot of, and there's all kinds, there
47:04
are all kinds of friction points, right? But
47:07
that's one of them. That's right. Well, and, you know,
47:09
one of my teachers around this is a writer
47:12
and a thinker named Miriam Kaba. And
47:15
she's an exquisite human being,
47:17
exquisite thinker. I want everyone to learn from
47:20
her. How do you spell the last name?
47:23
Kaba, K-A-B-A. She put out a book
47:25
last year, We Do This Till We
47:27
Free Us. And
47:29
one of the things that she often
47:31
reminds me of, because like, I think
47:33
what would be so comforting to us
47:36
is if we could be like, we're
47:38
going to end the prison system and
47:40
automatically move to a very well organized,
47:42
centralized system where like, instead
47:44
of everyone going to prison, like you just go
47:46
straight to a mediator and it's all handled, right?
47:48
And one of the things she points out is
47:50
like, we would have the foundation for that. We
47:52
just move from one place to the other. We
47:54
just move from one straight to the other, right?
47:56
And she's like, it won't be like a huge,
47:58
overarching, centralized system. like transformative justice
48:01
will be a lot of us learning
48:04
the skills to hold
48:06
conflict within our communities, within
48:08
our families, within
48:10
our schools and institutions. We're
48:12
learning ourselves to hold it in different ways.
48:15
So she has another book
48:18
out called Fumbling Towards Repair with my friend
48:20
Shira Hassan, which
48:22
I love because it's a workbook that's like, okay, how
48:24
do, if I wanted to do, you know, a
48:27
process like this and like not have to
48:30
call in punitive devices, you know, what would
48:33
that look like? And it's
48:35
like, yeah, we have to actually learn
48:38
how to do something that feels new.
48:41
But also I always love to point out that this
48:44
is some of the most ancient technology also.
48:47
If we listen to indigenous communities
48:49
around ways that they have resolved
48:51
conflict over, you know, thousands
48:53
and thousands and thousands of years, a
48:55
lot of it is these same practices
48:57
and they're still practicing them, right? So
49:00
it's being in a circle,
49:02
it's listening, it's being able to let one
49:04
person speak at a time, it's
49:06
identifying what are the consequences, right?
49:09
Not the punishments, but what are
49:11
the reasonable consequences, the boundaries, you
49:13
know, how do we make this
49:16
right? What does that actually look like? And
49:19
relinquishing the idea that, you know, we'll
49:21
all end up as best friends at the end or whatever, right?
49:23
The kind of fairy tale
49:25
Disney version of conflict mediation. Instead,
49:28
being with what is the human condition, it
49:30
says, it might be hard. You
49:32
might never get back to that, but you can get
49:34
to a just place. You
49:37
can get to a just place, you can get to a
49:39
place where you're not walking around carrying the anger of knowing
49:41
that person, that that's not
49:43
the primary experience you're having. You
49:46
know, it's like I was hurt and now I've been able to move forward and
49:51
here's what moving forward looks like and I was able
49:53
to define some of that for myself. You
49:57
know, there was a, I
49:59
just want to read a book. beautiful, some
50:02
beautiful sentences you wrote, so, so
50:04
powerful. And I'm, and I think
50:06
this is in, we
50:09
will not cancel us. Okay. We
50:12
are brilliant at survival, but brutal
50:14
at it. We tend to
50:17
slip out of togetherness the way we
50:19
slip out of the womb, bloody and
50:21
messy and surprised to be alone, and
50:24
clever, able to learn with our
50:26
whole bodies the way of this
50:28
world. And the
50:30
context of that was talking
50:32
about how your default position is
50:35
wonder. And you have
50:38
to carry around a lot of
50:41
disappointment and frustration and critique with
50:43
humanity. And, and that you also,
50:45
that that is especially true when
50:48
you look at social justice
50:50
movements, where you expect so much, right,
50:52
and desire so much.
50:54
And you're being honest, and
50:57
you're actually saying that from a place of
50:59
love, right? And, and
51:02
of high, brilliant
51:04
expectations and, and
51:07
so countercultural in
51:10
this context, in
51:12
which to call
51:14
for accountability, to express
51:17
honest critique, even to
51:19
kind of acknowledge imperfection
51:23
is leapt on as
51:25
failure. Yeah. So
51:27
you really walked into a
51:30
brave and hazardous space.
51:34
That's right, Krista.
51:38
Yeah. Yeah. You
51:40
know, I, I
51:42
always think about how that, that book came
51:44
out, I had been away on sabbatical and
51:47
the pandemic was unfolding and I
51:49
returned from sabbatical and there was
51:51
like, everyone was canceling each other
51:53
is what it felt like. I
51:55
had been away from social media for not even that
51:58
long. And so I know this was
52:00
happening. before I stepped away, but
52:02
I was normalized to it because I was
52:04
in it every day. And then when I
52:06
stepped away and came back, I was like,
52:08
Oh my goodness. Like this is all we're
52:10
doing on the internet now. Um,
52:12
you know, it just felt like, it just felt
52:14
like so intense and it didn't
52:16
feel, it didn't feel like
52:18
what we're supposed to be up to. You know,
52:20
like I felt like sometimes when I sitting
52:24
around, I feel like I can feel, I'm
52:26
not sure if it's ancestors or future spirit
52:28
or whatever it is, but I just feel
52:30
this, this beyond energy,
52:33
sit with me like that's not the way, that's
52:36
not the way. And sometimes
52:38
there's a like, try this or take
52:41
a look over here, you know, look
52:43
up, you know, look at
52:45
these starlings and just see if they
52:48
offer you something, you know, and it
52:51
felt like that. I was looking
52:53
at this cancellation wave and
52:56
then I was feeling for mushrooms,
53:00
you know, and feeling for like,
53:02
who does know how to process
53:04
toxic energy? Who does
53:06
know how to process toxic happenings?
53:08
You know, can we do
53:11
it a different way? Can we do it with love? And
53:15
can we be honest, at least honest that there's
53:17
not love in the way we're doing it now?
53:19
Because I think that was also what was hurting my heart
53:21
was people being like, yeah, we just have to
53:23
love each other. And then we're doing
53:26
the most awful, awful
53:28
dismissals and disposals of each other.
53:31
And because of my facilitation background, I
53:34
was also catching some of those disposals,
53:36
like people would show up and
53:38
just be like, hey, you probably saw
53:40
this, but I just got canceled. And
53:42
almost always, I was like, I didn't even see it. Like I
53:44
can't even keep up with all of it. So
53:47
I was like, I had no idea,
53:49
but this person was devastated and sometimes
53:51
suicidal, like it was having an impact.
53:53
And I want us to at least
53:55
not pretend like it's not having an
53:57
impact, at least that, you know. Let's
54:01
take responsibility. And then the
54:04
other pattern I noticed was often
54:06
it was people who were fairly young in
54:08
movement themselves or fairly young inside of whatever
54:11
their political analysis was. I'm like, I
54:13
can kind of remember before
54:15
you thought that. I can remember when
54:18
you might have made the same mistake. And
54:22
my heart just was like, do y'all
54:24
remember that everyone was
54:26
transphobic last week? All
54:30
of y'all were saying this horrific stuff
54:32
and like, we need to unlearn this.
54:34
Like together we need to unlearn it. And
54:36
I think it felt like people
54:38
were starting to skip the step
54:40
of actually decolonizing and unlearning these
54:43
oppressive systems and just being like,
54:46
I'll just punish anyone who missed steps
54:49
and that'll be how I do my action.
54:51
And it's almost like that's people's activism now.
54:54
And I'm like, so now we're in a
54:56
true bind because punishment doesn't work. It's
55:00
like we're aligning ourselves with the state and
55:03
we're depressed. We're losing leaders left and right
55:05
because people are making mistakes and now there's
55:07
no room for making mistakes. So it just
55:09
felt like a total crisis to
55:11
me that needed a different kind of attention. And
55:13
because I'd been away on sabbatical, I think I
55:15
was brave enough to do it in
55:18
that moment. Yeah. What
55:20
is it? You mentioned Tick Nodhan
55:22
talking about being free. He says, fresh, solid
55:25
and free. You came back from sabbatical. Okay.
55:29
We will not cancel this. Do you have the little book by you? I
55:31
do. I do. So
55:33
on page 58, what you've
55:35
been talking about on the previous page is kind
55:37
of the harm that is created.
55:41
But what I really think you get at
55:44
here is again, we
55:46
started with the cake, right? The layer cake.
55:48
And the election isn't going to change very
55:50
much if it's just the icing.
55:53
And so you're looking at the layers of this and
55:56
I feel like this page is
55:58
such an acute analysis. of
56:00
what cancel culture, and I
56:02
mean all around, right, across
56:04
the spectrum, what it says about
56:07
our culture, which is
56:10
kind of the opposite of, I
56:12
mean, honoring emergence,
56:14
right? So
56:16
would you just read that, you know, but one
56:18
layer under that, what I hear is. We
56:22
cannot change. We do
56:25
not believe we can create compelling
56:27
pathways from being harm doers to
56:29
being healed and to growing. We
56:32
do not believe we can hold
56:34
the complexity of a gray situation.
56:37
We do not believe in our own
56:39
complexity. We do not believe
56:41
we can navigate conflict and struggle in principled
56:43
ways. We can only
56:45
handle binary thinking, good, bad, innocent,
56:48
guilty, angel, abuser, black,
56:51
white, et cetera, et cetera.
56:55
Cancer attacks one part of the body at a time. I've seen it. Oh,
56:58
it's in the throat. Now it's in the lungs. Now
57:00
it's in the bones. When
57:03
we engage in knee-jerk call-outs as a conflict resolution
57:05
device, or
57:08
issue instant consequences with no process,
57:10
we become a cancer unto ourselves,
57:13
unto movements and communities. We become
57:15
the toxicity we long to heal.
57:19
We become a tool of harm when we were
57:21
trying to be, and I think meant to be,
57:23
a balm. Oh,
57:28
unthinkable thoughts. Now that I have thought
57:30
you, it becomes clear to me that all of you are rooted in
57:32
a singular longing. I want us to
57:34
live. I
57:37
want us to want to live in this world,
57:39
in this time, together. What's
57:44
it like to read that back to yourself? You
57:48
know, I mean, I
57:51
deeply believe it. Yeah. Like,
57:53
I really want us to live. And I also,
57:56
I feel less lonely now. When
58:01
I was writing this, I felt very alone.
58:03
You know, like I was just like, I'm
58:05
scared for us and for
58:08
movement spaces. Like I want us to
58:10
hold each other as so precious. And
58:13
when I was writing it, that was in me,
58:15
thrumming through me, you know, such a loud longing.
58:19
But I feel so much less alone now than I
58:21
did when this came out. Because
58:24
it came out and I've had so many people like, oh,
58:28
yeah, you know, just like, yes,
58:31
now I see what you mean. A
58:34
lot of people have been called out in
58:37
the time since this book came out, who've reached out to me
58:39
and been like, I didn't know. It
58:42
happened to me. So
58:45
yeah, that's the main thing that strikes me now
58:47
is I feel like a lot more people are
58:49
like, oh, it's part
58:51
of the political toxicity of
58:53
the moment that we've been
58:55
all tricked into participating
58:57
in. You
59:25
know, one thing I don't want
59:27
to end without getting to is
59:33
pleasure activism. I
59:36
think it's been so fascinating. It's
59:38
been fascinating for me because I have this
59:40
kind of cumulative conversation, right? And
59:42
at some point in the last couple of years,
59:45
over and over and over again, people kept
59:48
making this very clear,
59:50
very insistent connection between justice
59:52
and joy. Yes.
59:57
And you, and you talk about... pleasure
1:00:00
activism. And so, yeah,
1:00:02
so describe that. Yeah,
1:00:05
I mean, I want to make justice
1:00:07
and liberation the most pleasurable
1:00:10
experiences that we can have as
1:00:12
a species. I want
1:00:14
to make it feel like, when
1:00:17
I make the best choice, it feels good
1:00:19
and I know it from my bones up
1:00:22
and out. And I
1:00:25
know that that means a
1:00:27
deep reclamation, especially for those of us
1:00:30
who have experienced depression or trauma, that
1:00:33
what gets taken from us often
1:00:36
is the sense that we deserve pleasure, that
1:00:38
we know how to feel it, that we're
1:00:40
allowed to feel it. So
1:00:43
one of the things I say is
1:00:45
pleasure is not a frivolous thing. Actually,
1:00:47
it's a measure of freedom, that
1:00:50
when you are free, one
1:00:52
of the ways you know that is that you
1:00:54
can feel pleasure, you can feel the present moment.
1:00:56
For most people, it's really just being
1:00:59
able to feel the erotic aliveness of
1:01:01
a moment and the erotic
1:01:03
like, yes, I am alive, I'm here
1:01:05
right now and this is how
1:01:07
I want this moment to go, this is good. And
1:01:10
I have to shout out the Queen
1:01:12
Mother of our lineage.
1:01:15
Her pleasure activism is Audre Lorde.
1:01:17
She wrote an essay in 1978
1:01:20
called The Uses of the Erotic as Power. And
1:01:22
I highly recommend listening to
1:01:25
it. You can actually listen to her read it. I
1:01:28
did not know that. Yes, there's a video
1:01:30
clip on YouTube of her reading it. And
1:01:32
I'm like, it's always good
1:01:34
medicine, it'll always get you right back in
1:01:37
your alignment. Yeah. And
1:01:40
you point out when you write
1:01:42
about pleasure activism that so much
1:01:45
of how we try to
1:01:47
organize and mobilize and even
1:01:50
inspire, orient and yes,
1:01:52
in social justice
1:01:54
work, but in journalism as well
1:01:56
is about planting facts and guilt
1:01:59
and shame, even though, I mean,
1:02:01
if we go back to that
1:02:04
list of, you know,
1:02:06
if we go back to Octavia Butler and
1:02:08
the way you've talked about what is successful
1:02:10
life, right? It's that, that does not create
1:02:12
change. But you're talking
1:02:14
about how do we create practices
1:02:17
and communities that everybody see, that
1:02:19
are magnetic, that you want to
1:02:21
run towards. Yeah. And Tony Cape
1:02:23
and Barra said we have to
1:02:26
make the revolution irresistible. Yeah. Right?
1:02:29
And I think about that, she's quoted, and
1:02:31
there's a whole essay from Alexis Pauline Gumbs
1:02:33
in the book about her
1:02:35
work. But I think about that, you
1:02:38
know, because I'm like, we need, and
1:02:41
it's all connected, you know, to me, is
1:02:43
the radical imagination work, the emergent strategy work,
1:02:45
the pleasure activism work. It all
1:02:47
connects because it's like we are trying to create
1:02:51
a future in which we can actually survive
1:02:53
and we want to make it feel good,
1:02:55
smell good, taste good. We
1:02:58
want to make sure that everyone feels like they could
1:03:00
belong in it. Yeah. We want to
1:03:02
make sure that everyone feels like their needs could be met in there. And
1:03:05
we know that we can't get there through punishment,
1:03:07
right? And there's
1:03:09
a pleasure, and I
1:03:12
promise it, I always love to promise it
1:03:14
to people because I'm just like, I know
1:03:16
that this, everyone can experience this. There's
1:03:19
a pleasure from being present, truly
1:03:22
present, where
1:03:24
you're like, I'm with the people I want to be with.
1:03:27
I'm doing what I want to do. It
1:03:29
only comes from being really present. And
1:03:32
capitalism has us socialized to think we
1:03:34
constantly have to be looking elsewhere for
1:03:36
it. So we're running around,
1:03:40
not satisfied, not satisfiable, no sense
1:03:43
of what that would be like. And
1:03:46
in our justice movements, that's not a good look, right?
1:03:48
Because if we have no idea what it feels like
1:03:50
to be satisfied, we won't know when we win. So
1:03:54
I'm always like, we need to be
1:03:56
satisfiable. We need
1:03:58
to know what that feels like. And one
1:04:00
of the fastest ways to know what that feels like is
1:04:02
to be satisfied in the body. Yeah. Right?
1:04:05
Like, you know what an orgasm feels like? Most
1:04:08
of us do. And even if we can't
1:04:10
feel an orgasm, we can feel pleasure.
1:04:13
We can feel the beauty. Ease, right?
1:04:15
Ease of being present. That is actually not so accessible
1:04:18
to so many of us, just that. You
1:04:21
know, yes, there's the, there's
1:04:25
capitalism that is constantly making us not
1:04:27
present. There's also a
1:04:31
world of fear, right? Totally. You
1:04:34
know, again, kind of circling back,
1:04:36
it is a time of unstoppable
1:04:38
change, and change is so unsettling,
1:04:40
and different kinds of people are
1:04:42
on the losing end of this
1:04:45
change, or fear that they are. And
1:04:48
fear has, right? Fear is also, fear is
1:04:51
the greatest example
1:04:53
of the power of imagination, because
1:04:55
even a perceived threat, right? Lambs
1:04:58
with the power of threat. Mostly
1:05:00
it's imagined. So I appreciate
1:05:04
a piece that you wrote, I
1:05:07
think this is on your blog, a word for white
1:05:09
people in two parts. And
1:05:11
you talked about, you know,
1:05:15
first of all, you speak as a mixed race black woman,
1:05:17
that you think about, you know,
1:05:20
you understand that you are connected to
1:05:22
lineages of harm, and as
1:05:25
you are harmed by these lineages
1:05:28
in your body. And you,
1:05:30
this, I appreciate this sentence so much,
1:05:32
which is just humanizing this. Supremacy
1:05:35
is our ongoing pandemic. It
1:05:38
partners with every other sickness
1:05:40
to tear us from life,
1:05:43
or from lives worth living. I
1:05:45
mean, to me, that kind of, you're
1:05:48
saying, let's move towards lives
1:05:50
worth living. Lives worth living. I really love
1:05:52
that. At the beginning of that blog post,
1:05:54
you put a word for white people in
1:05:56
two parts. Part one, what a time to
1:05:59
be alive. Which is true and which is
1:06:01
another way to frame it, right? And I
1:06:03
feel like we should almost put that sentence
1:06:05
at the beginning of so many of our
1:06:07
conversations, right? What a time to be alive
1:06:09
that we are in
1:06:11
this total paradigm shift, right?
1:06:14
And that we are tasked
1:06:16
with standing before these existential,
1:06:18
potentially transformative junctures
1:06:20
for our species. Exactly. I mean, this
1:06:22
is to me the most exciting thing
1:06:24
right now, right? It's
1:06:27
like, we are aware, if we wake up, we
1:06:30
are in a place where we can create so
1:06:32
much history and so much change. Everything
1:06:34
is falling apart, but also new things are
1:06:37
possible. And Octavia said that there's nothing new
1:06:39
under the sun, but there are new suns.
1:06:41
We're in a time of new suns. Right,
1:06:43
right. We're in a time of new suns.
1:06:46
Like we have no idea what we could
1:06:48
be, but everything that we have been
1:06:50
is falling apart. So
1:06:52
it's time to change. And we
1:06:54
can be mindful about that. That's exciting. Yeah.
1:06:59
It's buckle your seatbelt, exciting, right?
1:07:01
Yeah. It's like, this is
1:07:03
weird that action heroes, you know, I always say that
1:07:05
for organizers, but I'm like, really to be a human,
1:07:07
once you wake up and recognize like, oh, I can
1:07:09
shape everything. I don't have to
1:07:12
be a victim of someone else's vision for
1:07:14
my subjugation. I actually get to be a
1:07:16
powerhouse in the story of my own
1:07:18
life and my people's lives. Oh, that's
1:07:20
a different invitation. I'd much rather live in that
1:07:22
scenario. And so I do. And
1:07:26
you do it as part of an ecosystem, not
1:07:32
as a bold individual, right?
1:07:34
So that on the days that you can't carry
1:07:36
that, on the days that it's not hope that
1:07:38
you feel, but despair or exhaustion, you're
1:07:42
not standing there alone with those.
1:07:45
And I've been thinking about this a lot.
1:07:47
A friend of mine, Alexis Pauline Gumbs, who I mentioned,
1:07:49
I think already, but she's such
1:07:51
an incredible poet, an incredible writer, but she
1:07:54
also has been teaching me a lot lately
1:07:56
about how just the idea of being an
1:07:58
individual, that. is a
1:08:00
ridiculous idea. Right? Yeah. Which
1:08:03
is like, that's a mythology. Like, we're not individuals. And,
1:08:05
you know, the more I think about the
1:08:07
ecosystems and emergent strategy and like what nature
1:08:10
is trying to teach us, the more I
1:08:12
hear like, we are one. And
1:08:15
when I think back to the first thing I felt
1:08:17
like I understood, it was that. It's
1:08:19
like, we are one. Whenever
1:08:22
I have a spiritual awakening, all
1:08:24
of it resonates with that same song. We
1:08:26
are one. We are one. We
1:08:29
are one. I think that's what we're supposed to be
1:08:31
figuring out is so then if we
1:08:33
are one, how do we do that? How
1:08:36
do we be one interconnected living
1:08:40
organism? How do we do that? And
1:08:42
I think that's our big human question for this time. And
1:08:45
I think it's a really good one to spend life on.
1:08:48
So if you look around, if
1:08:50
you think about this generative landscape,
1:08:53
this emergent world that you're part
1:08:55
of and that you are speaking
1:08:57
to and where there are conversations
1:08:59
happening that social media can't
1:09:01
imagine. I've
1:09:04
seen you talk about unthinkable thoughts
1:09:07
and favorite questions,
1:09:09
right? And I feel like
1:09:11
you are constantly, there's always fresh thought that's
1:09:13
emerging in you. But I also see that
1:09:15
it is, it's coming
1:09:18
out of presence, right? Not
1:09:20
just to what's going on inside your head, but to
1:09:22
what you see happening around you, what you're
1:09:24
part of and also always other teachers. I'm
1:09:27
curious, like, you know, sometimes I ask people at the
1:09:29
end of an interview about what is
1:09:32
making you despair and
1:09:35
what is giving you hope right now today.
1:09:37
And I kind of feel like for you,
1:09:39
the question is, what is your unthinkable thought?
1:09:42
And what is your favorite generative
1:09:44
question today? Well,
1:09:50
my unthinkable thought lately has
1:09:52
been, will
1:09:55
I be okay if
1:09:58
humans don't continue? for
1:10:01
such a long time, I've been
1:10:03
really driven by the idea that we have
1:10:05
to continue. Like, we simply must. We're so
1:10:07
miraculous and incredible. But
1:10:11
lately, yeah, my unthinkable thought has been like, and,
1:10:13
you know, but we might not. So
1:10:16
far, we're not making the kind of decisions that
1:10:18
would lead to continuation. And
1:10:21
what does that mean? And how do
1:10:23
I still live a really meaningful life? And,
1:10:27
you know, fight till the end, because I do
1:10:29
feel like that, you know, I'm like,
1:10:31
it is miraculous enough that I want to give
1:10:33
it my whole life effort. But
1:10:36
also, can I also
1:10:38
be at peace with what is? Which
1:10:40
might be that we're not willing to
1:10:42
change. Yeah. So that's
1:10:45
the unthinkable thought. And it's unthinkable
1:10:48
because it's so, it
1:10:50
really brings up so much grief for me. You know,
1:10:52
like I really love life. And
1:10:57
then the question, which is actually
1:10:59
from one of my teachers, Grace
1:11:02
Lee Boggs, that she would
1:11:04
always ask when we showed up to
1:11:06
sit down and talk with her, is what
1:11:08
time is it on the clock of the world? And
1:11:11
I like this
1:11:13
question. It always makes me kind of
1:11:15
deconstruct time. When I, you
1:11:17
know, I'm like, oh, we're in
1:11:19
these like looping patterns actually. And
1:11:23
we're in a pattern that feels familiar in these
1:11:25
ways and new in these other ways. So
1:11:28
like we're in this interesting
1:11:30
moment in Black movement where
1:11:34
we came through this first massive
1:11:36
wave of Black Lives Matter and
1:11:39
lots of Black organizing happening. And there's
1:11:41
a moment right now that's really tense
1:11:43
and intense. And it
1:11:46
feels like, you know, a lot of internal
1:11:48
tension coming out into the light. But
1:11:50
for me, this is also a moment
1:11:53
of deep learning. And
1:11:55
what we've never had before are
1:11:57
the tools of communication and mediation.
1:12:00
And there's just so many people who
1:12:02
are calling each other and being like,
1:12:04
I don't wanna see us struggle
1:12:07
in this way. So the tension
1:12:09
feels like a time loop. The
1:12:11
tension feels super time loop. It's
1:12:14
super familiar every time any movement,
1:12:18
so it's like not just true for black movement, but like any
1:12:21
movement that starts to get national acclaim
1:12:23
and attention, there's going
1:12:25
to then be that backlash that happens
1:12:27
within of like, well, who are you
1:12:29
to? And
1:12:31
also the growing pains within the
1:12:33
human drama, right? The growing pains
1:12:35
of something that grows. So
1:12:38
that's the loop, right? But then
1:12:40
the different tools that we have
1:12:42
this time around, first of all,
1:12:45
is so many more people are paying
1:12:47
attention to black movement, period, right? And
1:12:50
I think the vast majority of them
1:12:52
are not getting caught up in that
1:12:55
sort of movement internal stuff. I think
1:12:57
the vast majority are just like, okay,
1:13:00
black lives matter. So
1:13:02
I need to orient around that. And I think
1:13:04
there's so much beautiful work coming
1:13:06
out of the movement for black lives and
1:13:10
Southerners on New Ground and the
1:13:12
Catalyst Project and Surge for white
1:13:14
folks and allies. And it's just
1:13:16
a different time of talking about
1:13:18
racial justice and thinking about racial
1:13:20
justice that is full of
1:13:22
complexity. There's so many people asking
1:13:25
the questions of what does blackness even
1:13:27
mean? Like, can we interrogate this in
1:13:29
a new way? And how do
1:13:31
we keep it intersectional? How do we bring in
1:13:34
all aspects of ourselves? So I'm
1:13:36
finding it a very exciting time, right?
1:13:39
But it's also a fraught time
1:13:41
and we're able to
1:13:43
look at it historically more. You
1:13:46
know, when I talked, I got to be in a
1:13:48
conversation with Angela Davis and she was like, yeah, like
1:13:50
we dealt with a
1:13:52
lot of the same stuff, right? But now y'all know
1:13:54
how to take care of each other and take care
1:13:57
of yourselves. And now,
1:14:00
there's therapy.
1:14:02
I have so many people who are like movement folks
1:14:04
so I'm like I don't know where you'd be if
1:14:06
you didn't have therapy but with therapy you could be
1:14:08
like oh I don't need to take all this personally.
1:14:10
So there's just more tools. Yeah
1:14:13
you mentioned Grace Lee Boggs and I'm so
1:14:16
glad that I sat with her in Detroit
1:14:19
in her last years and also just sat
1:14:21
with that community around her and
1:14:25
you quote her on this matter of
1:14:27
transformative justice and transformation right? What is
1:14:30
it that she says? We
1:14:32
must transform ourselves to transform the world.
1:14:36
I feel like that is something
1:14:39
that this generation in time you
1:14:42
know and your generation and the ones coming
1:14:44
after of no
1:14:47
and that is new that is
1:14:49
a new thing to internalize. Maybe
1:14:51
that's kind of what Angela Davis was talking about to
1:14:53
you. Yeah like I feel like
1:14:56
there is this sense of it's
1:14:58
not either-or right? It's
1:15:00
just that you are a personal frontline.
1:15:06
What's happening in your life and
1:15:08
in the relationships you have with your family and
1:15:10
how you treat people when you're upset with
1:15:12
them. You know I always ask
1:15:15
people that when I when I talk about
1:15:17
transformative justice like are you punishing anyone right
1:15:19
now? And
1:15:22
could that punishment be shifted into a
1:15:24
boundary or a request? Is
1:15:27
there a courageous conversation that needs to be
1:15:29
had? How do
1:15:31
you personally begin to practice
1:15:33
whatever is in alignment with your
1:15:35
largest vision? Abolition
1:15:37
is something we practice every day in our lives
1:15:40
right? Liberation, emergent strategy all of these
1:15:42
are things to practice every day and
1:15:46
I guess maybe to bring it back to the first question
1:15:49
of spiritual practice right? To me that's
1:15:51
the ultimate spiritual practice as well. It's
1:15:54
not about the bombastic meditation retreat.
1:15:58
It's about can you... sit
1:16:00
every day. Can you
1:16:02
bring mindfulness into every
1:16:04
activity? Which
1:16:08
also brings us back to fractals. Yes.
1:16:13
Isn't it beautiful? Isn't
1:16:15
it absolutely beautiful? Yeah,
1:16:17
I mean, you're really, I
1:16:20
keep using this so much, how do we
1:16:22
really internalize in our bodies? That this is
1:16:24
what it's about, that what you do, what
1:16:26
you practice in your every day is
1:16:29
a pattern that is part of that larger pattern that
1:16:31
you want to see. That's right.
1:16:33
I mean, then there's so much awakening. I
1:16:36
always tell people that you're always practicing things. So
1:16:40
it's not like you go from not
1:16:42
practicing to practicing, but
1:16:44
it's, are you practicing things on purpose? Are
1:16:47
you practicing things you would wanna practice or are
1:16:49
you practicing what someone else has told you is
1:16:53
the right way to do stuff? And once you
1:16:55
start practicing on purpose, then you
1:16:57
can actually practice liberation and
1:16:59
justice and freedom. And then I think
1:17:02
you begin to have this contentment
1:17:04
that comes from practice. Like
1:17:08
I know that I won't see total liberation in
1:17:10
my lifetime, but I also
1:17:12
feel very satisfied with how I'm practicing
1:17:14
liberation every single day and in every
1:17:17
relationship. And
1:17:19
moving towards life. And
1:17:21
moving towards life, yeah. Life
1:17:25
moves towards life, that's the trick. And
1:17:31
the reason
1:17:34
I do
1:17:36
the put
1:17:38
time and emotion on your mind. And
1:17:41
that I'm a recognized that
1:17:43
all my work and
1:17:46
valueraff Fiennial
1:17:49
is a
1:17:57
go-in book that I learned and pleasure.
1:18:00
activism. More recently,
1:18:02
she's the author of Maroons, a
1:18:04
work of speculative fiction, and
1:18:06
she co-edited the anthology Octavia's
1:18:09
Brood, Science Fiction from Social
1:18:11
Justice Movements. She
1:18:13
co-hosts the podcast How to Survive the
1:18:15
End of the World. And
1:18:18
a special heads up. In
1:18:20
late summer 2024, she
1:18:23
is publishing a new book
1:18:25
that I am so excited
1:18:27
about. It's phenomenal, called Loving
1:18:29
Corrections. The
1:18:41
on-being project is Chris
1:18:43
Heigle, Laurenne Drummerhausen, Eddie
1:18:45
Gonzalez, Lucas Johnson, Zach
1:18:47
Rose, Julie Seipel, Padre
1:18:49
Gautuma, Gautam Srikishin, Cameron
1:18:51
Musar, Kayla Edwards, Tiffany
1:18:53
Champion, Andrea Pravo, and
1:18:56
Carla Zanoni. On-Being
1:18:58
is an independent, non-profit production
1:19:01
of the On-Being Project. We
1:19:03
are located on Dakota land. Our
1:19:06
lovely theme music is provided and composed
1:19:08
by Zoe Keating. Our closing
1:19:11
music was composed by Gautam Srikishin.
1:19:13
And the last voice you hear singing at the
1:19:16
end of our show is Cameron Kinghorn. Our
1:19:19
funding partners include the Harseland
1:19:21
Foundation, helping to build
1:19:23
a more just, equitable, and connected
1:19:25
America one creative act at
1:19:27
a time. The Fetzer
1:19:29
Institute, supporting a movement of
1:19:32
organizations applying spiritual solutions to
1:19:34
society's toughest problems. Find
1:19:37
them at fetzer.org. Caliopeia
1:19:40
Foundation, dedicated to
1:19:43
reconnecting ecology, culture, and
1:19:45
spirituality, supporting organizations and
1:19:47
initiatives that uphold a sacred
1:19:49
relationship with life on earth.
1:19:52
Learn more at caliopeia.org. And
1:19:55
the Osprey Foundation, a catalyst
1:19:57
for empowered, healthy, and fulfilled.
1:20:00
lives.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More