Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Your old or broken phone
0:02
can let you down when
0:05
you need it most. Perfect.
0:07
But at Verizon, trade in
0:09
any old phone from our
0:11
top brands and get the
0:13
most for it. Up to
0:15
$2,000 in value. For an
0:17
amazing new iPhone 16-Pro with
0:20
Apple Intelligence and a new
0:22
line and a new Apple
0:24
Intelligence and a new iPad
0:26
and Apple Intelligence and a
0:28
new iPad and Apple Watch.
0:30
To get people excited about Boost Mobile's new
0:32
nationwide 5G network, we're offering unlimited talk
0:34
text and data for $25 a month.
0:37
Forever. Even if you have a baby.
0:39
Even if your baby has a baby.
0:41
Even if you grow old and wrinkly
0:43
and you start repeating yourself. Even if
0:46
you start repeating yourself. Even if
0:48
you start repeating yourself. Even if
0:50
you start repeating yourself. Even if
0:53
you start repeating yourself. Even if
0:55
you start repeating yourself. Even if
0:57
you start repeating yourself. Even if
0:59
you're... plan. a month as long as they
1:01
remain This episode is sponsored
1:04
by F1 TV Premium where
1:06
you can get the ultimate
1:08
F1 live immersion. Picture this
1:10
200 mile an hour plus
1:12
speeds, razor sharp overtakes and
1:14
every heart-stopping moment. Streamed live
1:16
in stunning 4K UHD and
1:18
HDR. No more missing out,
1:20
no more blurry action. Just
1:22
pure, high definition adrenaline. And
1:24
here's the best part. You're
1:27
in the driver's seat with
1:29
F1 TV premium. your
1:33
race experience by choosing from 20
1:35
on-board driver cams, the live race
1:37
feed and live timing channel. Want
1:39
to ride along with Hamilton's first
1:42
race in Ferrari or see Max
1:44
and Lando's battle from their POV.
1:46
It's all up to you. Sign
1:48
up now for F1 TV premium
1:51
and get ready for the ultimate
1:53
F1 live immersion. F1 TV premium
1:55
is available on selected browsers devices
1:57
and in selected countries. only. Hello
2:07
everybody and welcome back to the
2:09
P1 podcast with Matt and Tommy.
2:11
It's driver ratings time where we
2:13
will grade each and every one
2:15
of the drivers from zero all
2:17
the way to 10. For the
2:19
weekend, not just for one, two
2:21
sessions, the whole thing mainly waited
2:23
towards the races. I know there's
2:25
been an influx of new wonderful
2:27
P1 listeners and watchers, so welcome
2:29
in. We're very excited to have
2:31
you. And this is, look, if
2:34
you're looking for a non-divisive, really
2:36
on the fence kind of series,
2:38
this is the one you want
2:40
to tune into, because this is
2:42
like a, it's like an agreement
2:44
circle that we've kind of got,
2:46
isn't it Tommy? Everyone agrees on
2:48
what grades each driver should get.
2:50
Exactly. No, everyone perfectly agrees with
2:52
literally everything, but joking aside. We
2:54
always love a sarcastic intro to
2:56
drive ratings. This is the beauty
2:58
of drive ratings and it's another
3:01
sprint weekend where how do you
3:03
weigh things because you know some
3:05
drivers had you can sometimes have
3:07
a terrible sprint really good race
3:09
but sometimes the race can be
3:11
so good that it doesn't matter
3:13
and the same thing is just
3:15
how you weigh it up really
3:17
isn't it? It certainly is. Let's
3:19
get into it and start with
3:21
Nico Holkenberg. started the sprint from
3:23
the pit lane finished 19th started
3:25
the main race from 12th and
3:27
finished 15th now it's worth mentioning
3:30
of course as well we are
3:32
including the finish as the finish
3:34
as in after all the disqualifications
3:36
this is where they are classified
3:38
you got qualified if you just
3:40
remind of you I was about
3:42
to say if you I'm going
3:44
living under a rock the drivers
3:46
that were disqualified were ghazley Hamilton
3:48
and Lecla. Thanks thank you for
3:50
making me spell that one out
3:52
Fennika Holkenberg. I have got for
3:54
a whopping 5 out of 10.
3:57
Straight down the middle, thank you
3:59
very much, Niko Holkenberg. It could
4:01
have been so much better for
4:03
Niko as well. However, he decided
4:05
to lose seven places at the
4:07
start, where he went wide in
4:09
turn 1 and turn 3, went
4:11
off the track, through the gravel,
4:13
caused damage to his floor, and
4:15
essentially just undid all the amazing
4:17
work that he did in qualifying.
4:19
Started in 12th, there was a
4:21
chance of something crazy. It was
4:24
a boring race. It was a
4:26
boring race. but he just undid
4:28
everything so that's why I'm going
4:30
straight back to a five. How
4:32
did he finish like, well I
4:34
know he's finished 15th but realistically
4:36
what it wasn't 15th, he might
4:38
have got a six but sadly
4:40
it didn't happen. Interesting because I
4:42
do not agree. I've gone for
4:44
a four out of ten Phineka
4:46
Okamberg and I was actually weighing
4:48
up a three as well. I
4:51
think he's had an awful weekend.
4:53
I can't believe that the kind
4:55
of... people are going straight down
4:57
the middle with this one because
4:59
he has had a really poor
5:01
weekend and he messed up in
5:03
the spring qualifying qualified 19th got
5:05
out qualified by his rookie teammate
5:07
finished dead last in the sprint
5:09
and then in the main race
5:11
he actually had a good grand
5:13
pre-qualifying and bottled it immediately at
5:15
the first corner and damaged his
5:17
car and then finished behind his
5:20
rookie teammate again so I think
5:22
it's a poor weekend. for Nika
5:24
Halkembeck. Well, thank you. Welcome to
5:26
my TED Talk. Oh no, I'm
5:28
like in it, Tommy. Just before
5:30
we start recording, you did say,
5:32
I'm tired, which usually means Sassy
5:34
Tommy comes out and it's come
5:36
out in the first grading. And
5:38
you know what? You've convinced me.
5:40
I'm going to go for a
5:42
four. No, thank you. This is
5:44
what happens sometimes. The argument is
5:47
offered. and I accept that. I'm
5:49
not even going to argue it.
5:51
I think that is a very
5:53
good shout. They're just so anonymous
5:55
that sometimes they slip through the
5:57
cracks. Gaggenberg, we'd both go for
5:59
a four for that one, which
6:01
makes sense, because I think when
6:03
we grade the next teammate, it
6:05
will be a little bit fairer
6:07
for him. The fans gave Nika
6:09
Holkenberg a five. Gabriel Bortoletto started
6:11
the sprint in 14th, finished the
6:14
race in 19th, finished 14th. I've
6:16
gone for a six out of
6:18
10 for Gabriel Bortoletto. He had,
6:20
you know, at the end of
6:22
the day he is driving the
6:24
worst car on the worst car
6:26
on the grid. I think we
6:28
saw that again it looked like
6:30
steak were very much at the
6:32
back again. And I can't just
6:34
go straight down the middle a
6:36
bit like Nico Holkenberg here when
6:38
it's very easy to just go,
6:41
oh five for both of them
6:43
because they're at the back and
6:45
it's a steak. But the guy
6:47
has basically beaten his very experienced
6:49
teammate in both the sprint and
6:51
the main race. He finished ten
6:53
seconds clear of him. He had
6:55
a great sprint qualifying where he
6:57
made it into SQ2 and yeah
6:59
it's unfortunately had that spin at
7:01
the start like a teammate but
7:03
he kind of recovered and made
7:05
it back ahead of him in
7:07
the end and he is showing
7:10
a bit of a bit of
7:12
promise I think it's no mean
7:14
feat to jump in as a
7:16
rookie straight alongside Nika Holkenberg and
7:18
essentially like out race him and
7:20
qualify very well against him as
7:22
well so I've gone for six.
7:24
Wow, Tommy is feeling very fruity
7:26
when it comes to the rookies.
7:28
I can go straight down the
7:30
line because I am going to
7:32
go for a five out of
7:34
ten for Gabriel Bortoletto. And that's
7:37
why I think it reflects better,
7:39
you know, in terms of his
7:41
weekend it was a better weekend
7:43
than Nico Holkenberg over the course
7:45
of when you think of, especially
7:47
as well, like we grade, taking
7:49
into account. the drivers and their
7:51
current career paths and statuses and
7:53
things like that. It's very hard
7:55
to grade the salbers because they
7:57
are so far back, but the
7:59
spin at the start has sort
8:01
of ruined any chances of him.
8:04
making a massive name for himself
8:06
both the salbers were out of
8:08
contention pretty much immediately Gabriel was
8:10
forced into a pit stop right
8:12
at the beginning and then just
8:14
had to to wing it on
8:16
the hard tires for a couple
8:18
of stints so yeah it's I
8:20
don't think it's it's difficult I'm
8:22
trying to figure out whether it
8:24
is Nika Holkenbo just performing really
8:26
badly slash not really caring because
8:28
he knows he's driving a dustbin.
8:31
or Gabrielle's doing quite well against
8:33
him because Nico is one of
8:35
the most highly rated midfield drivers.
8:37
Let's not say most highly rated
8:39
drivers, I don't think that's fair
8:41
because he isn't compared to some
8:43
of the drivers on the grid,
8:45
but he is a very consistent
8:47
midfield runner. Perhaps it just doesn't
8:49
switch on in his brain because
8:51
he's like, well the car's not
8:53
a P7, so can't be bothered.
8:55
Oh God, wow, Jesus. Anyway, Border
8:57
Letter gets a five from me
9:00
and a five from the fans
9:02
as well. On to Alex Albon,
9:04
started sprinting ninth, finished 11th, started
9:06
the main race in 10th, finished
9:08
7th. I am going to go
9:10
four, an eight out of 10
9:12
for Alexander Albon. I thought he
9:14
was well on the way to
9:16
a nine or a 10 at
9:18
some point, especially when he came
9:20
down the team radio and basically
9:22
just sounded like he was the
9:24
big dog. And I really enjoyed
9:27
that from Alex. I want more
9:29
of that. Basically, basically, I'll leave
9:31
me alone, I know what I'm
9:33
doing, but in a lot longer
9:35
and a bit more of a
9:37
confident vibe. And I've never really
9:39
heard that from Alex's album before
9:41
and I want more of it.
9:43
So it was still a really
9:45
good performance, don't get me wrong.
9:47
Obviously ended up finishing seventh with
9:49
the disqualifications, a good hall of
9:51
points for Williams. But yeah, I
9:54
think eight kind of reflects his
9:56
whole weekend. Yeah, I've gone for
9:58
an eight as well for Alex
10:00
Alvin. It's another good performance from
10:02
him. Maybe he could have got
10:04
a bit more out of the
10:06
car, particularly in the sprint because
10:08
we know that, well, himself is
10:10
showing the pace. in it and
10:12
we kind of are thinking of
10:14
Williams now as being able to
10:16
deliver it in that midfield but
10:18
a very respectable and a good
10:21
weekend all-round for Alex again and
10:23
he's having a great start to
10:25
the year. Certainly as the fans
10:27
gave Alexander Bonn an eight. Carlos
10:29
Sines started this winter 13th finished
10:31
17th, started the main race in
10:33
15th, finished 10th. for a five
10:35
out of ten for Carlos science,
10:37
expected a lot more from him,
10:39
I know he's learning, but again
10:41
a bit of an anonymous weekend,
10:43
didn't qualify well in both sessions,
10:45
obviously the sprint, he had a
10:47
problem and had to box, which
10:50
is why he finished so far
10:52
down the order, but just not
10:54
up to pace with Alex Alpen
10:56
just yet, so gone for a
10:58
five. I've also gone for a
11:00
five out of ten for Carlos.
11:02
anonymous race for somewhat of his
11:04
caliber. Surprised, I think is one
11:06
of the words, for a full
11:08
dry race, nothing as chaotic or
11:10
crazy as we saw in Australia.
11:12
And he was just the slower
11:14
driver in comparison to Alex Albon.
11:17
He himself said post race that
11:19
he's a bit puzzled because since
11:21
he jumped in the car in
11:23
testing in Abu Dhabi and Bahrain,
11:25
he was quick straight away. but
11:27
he doesn't know where the pace
11:29
and that feeling with the car
11:31
has gone, which doesn't bode particularly
11:33
well, does it, for Carlos, but
11:35
it's very much a 5 out
11:37
of 10 performance and I really
11:39
hope for his sake he can
11:41
he can pick it up in
11:44
the coming races. The fans gave
11:46
him a 6. Yugi Sinoda started
11:48
the sprint in 8th, finished 16th.
11:50
I have gone 4. An
11:52
8 out of 10 for
11:55
Yuki Sonoda. He was
11:57
doing almost everything right. The
12:00
sprint was brilliant. The start of
12:02
the main weekend was great in
12:04
terms of the main qualifying session,
12:06
into Q3 again, made a mistake
12:08
on his final lap, which meant
12:11
that Hadjar qualified him. But then
12:13
he had a very good start,
12:15
got ahead of Hadjar at the
12:17
beginning, and you're thinking, all right,
12:19
all right, race symbols. What have
12:21
you got up your sleeve? Turns
12:23
out they had no sleeves and
12:26
went for two stops. and they
12:28
just completely threw it away. I
12:30
do think in some, like I'm
12:32
not blaming Yuki's note at all,
12:34
I think this is definitely down
12:36
to Arby in the strategy department,
12:38
but Yuki I think needs to
12:41
take a little bit more of
12:43
a stranglehold on what is a
12:45
good strategy and what isn't because
12:47
clearly Arby make more mistakes than
12:49
I think any team on the
12:51
grid when it comes to strategy.
12:53
He said post-race is a very
12:56
kind of PR-friendly-ish kind of the
12:58
strategy is the thing that probably
13:00
we have to improve. No, no,
13:02
you do. You really do. So
13:04
what I'd love to see from
13:06
Yuki is no, no, no, no,
13:08
we're not. No way are we
13:11
doing a two-stop strategy. That will
13:13
just put us in the pack.
13:15
It's difficult to overtake. Snowder as
13:17
well. Even the... the fan boy
13:19
in me was trying to justify
13:21
a nine is difficult because his
13:23
sprint was absolutely sensational you know
13:26
he beat a McLaren in the
13:28
in the sprint which was amazing
13:30
and then in the main race
13:32
until the V cut until basically
13:34
that that second pit stop he
13:36
was running ahead of Antinelli and
13:38
Occon so if they'd done the
13:41
one stop you never know and
13:43
this is why it's an eight.
13:45
because you know his tires might
13:47
have fallen off you can't just
13:49
say he would have finished there
13:51
but that's where he was at
13:53
that point and if he had
13:56
finished there he's finishing p5 and
13:58
we're probably giving him a 10
14:00
out of 10 but he's just
14:02
so unfortunate with the strategy. Obviously
14:04
the wing wasn't his fault. I
14:06
did panic when I saw it
14:08
thinking, oh no, is he kind
14:11
of clipped the back of someone
14:13
when trying to get back through
14:15
an overtake but wasn't his fault.
14:17
But it's just so disappointing to
14:19
see how many points he has
14:21
scored. And yeah, we now find
14:23
out whether he's going to be
14:26
in that. the big team in
14:28
the next race for Japan. There's
14:30
a lot of rumours now about
14:32
it. So that's the murmurs, isn't
14:34
it? For his home race, gets
14:36
to go in the Red Bull.
14:38
Is that going to be a
14:41
blessing or a curse? We will
14:43
have to wait and see. The
14:45
fans gave Yuki an eight. Isaac
14:47
Hadjar started this month, finished 13th.
14:49
The main race in 7th, finished
14:51
11th. I've gone for a seven
14:53
out of 10 out of 10
14:56
for Hadjar, much more solid job.
14:58
his highlight was you know the
15:00
the qualifying amazing job to qualify
15:02
seventh and he was running well
15:04
in the race behind Ocon and
15:06
Antonelli before of course that doomed
15:08
V carb strategy and very unlucky
15:11
not to not to get points
15:13
because one V carb definitely should
15:15
be and I don't think Hadjar
15:17
drove a bad race at all.
15:19
And yeah, he's actually showing some
15:21
good promise. I'm looking forward to
15:23
seeing what he can do for
15:26
the rest of the year actually.
15:28
I'm in complete agreement. And also
15:30
with the grade as well, I've
15:32
gone for a 7 out of
15:34
10. The sprint was nothing to
15:36
write home about, but he showed
15:38
glimmers of hope with a sensational
15:41
qualifying. The hype of him starting
15:43
right behind his idol, Lewis Hamilton.
15:45
And thankfully for him, he didn't
15:47
go spearing into the back of
15:49
the Ferrari either, so that was
15:51
a very good thing for him.
15:53
Yeah, just fell foul to RB
15:56
strategy. Also drop back a little
15:58
bit in comparison to Sinoda. just
16:00
maybe lack of experience on, well I
16:02
mean literally was technically his first race
16:04
I guess in terms of will to will
16:06
combat in Formula One because he didn't actually
16:09
make it to the Australian race as we
16:11
all know. So yeah I think seven out of ten. Too
16:13
soon did you say? Yeah it is
16:15
sad but he's bounced back I
16:17
think well enough that we start
16:19
to see a bit of his
16:21
potential that is a brilliant qualifying
16:23
again and you know he might
16:25
well end up being a one-lap
16:27
specialist and he's even got Max
16:29
Verstappen questioning whether he could be
16:32
winning the world title in this
16:34
racing bulls car. So very interesting
16:36
the fans gave Isaac a seven.
16:38
Esteban Okon. started this print
16:40
in 18th finished 16th started
16:42
the main rest in 11th
16:44
and finished fifth it is
16:46
a 10 out of 10 for Esteban
16:48
Ocon and I will not hear anything
16:51
else than a straight stone cold
16:53
10 out the top of the
16:55
freezer draw that was unbelievable
16:57
in so many ways of course it
16:59
was seventh on the road
17:01
then two friars got disqualified
17:04
in front of him To
17:06
go from where they were in
17:08
Australia to hear, and even in
17:10
the sprint, for Ocon to deliver
17:13
that kind of performance,
17:15
is an absolute worldy. It
17:17
really is. And they've clearly
17:19
taken a step forward of
17:21
Haas. We thought they were the
17:23
10th fastest team, and then Ocon
17:26
just gets 10 points from
17:28
the Chinese Grand Prix. Beats
17:30
Antonelli, you know, Tommy's goat,
17:32
and... It's a phenomenal performance from
17:34
Ocon. So anything other than the
17:37
10 and also driver of the
17:39
day. What on earth? I know Antonelli,
17:41
Antonelli's wonderfully wholesome radio of being just
17:44
as surprised as we were that he
17:46
got drive of the day, but Ocon
17:48
was robbed. I've gone for a 10 out
17:51
of 10, of course I have. Yeah,
17:53
I was about to get sassy on.
17:55
No, no chance, and anyone that gives
17:57
him anything other than a 10 is
17:59
just delusional. Your
22:13
old or broken phone can
22:15
let you down when you
22:18
need it most. Perfect. But
22:20
at Verizon, trade in any
22:22
old phone from our top
22:24
brands and get the most
22:26
for it. Up to $2,000
22:28
in value. For an amazing
22:30
new iPhone 16-Pro with Apple
22:33
Intelligence and a new line
22:35
and a new Apple Intelligence
22:37
and a new iPad and
22:39
Apple Intelligence and a new
22:41
iPad and Apple Watch. Picture
22:44
this, you're halfway through a DIY
22:46
car fix, tools scattered everywhere, and
22:49
boom! You realise you're missing a
22:51
part. It's okay, because you know
22:53
whatever it is, it's on eBay.
22:56
They've got everything. Breaks, headlights, cold
22:58
air intakes, whatever you need. And
23:00
it's guaranteed to fit, which means
23:02
no more crossing your fingers and
23:05
hoping you've ordered the right thing.
23:07
All the parts you need at
23:09
prices you'll love. Guarantee to fit
23:12
every time. Things people love. Ryan
23:15
Reynolds here for Mint Mobile.
23:17
The message for everyone paying
23:19
big wireless way too much.
23:22
Please for the love of
23:24
everything good in this world,
23:26
stop. With Mint you can
23:28
get premium wireless for just
23:30
$15 a month. Of course if
23:32
you enjoy overpaying, no judgments,
23:35
but that's joy overpaying.
23:37
No judgments, but that's
23:39
weird. Okay, one judgment.
23:41
Anyway, give it a
23:43
try at mintmobile.com, Pierre
23:48
Gazley started this winter 17th finished
23:50
12th started the main race in
23:52
16th disqualified but finished the seventh
23:54
on track. Hmmmm. Don't give him
23:56
a six out of ten Pierre
23:58
Gazley. I think that the alpine
24:00
is actually, they've gone backwards, they've
24:02
gone backwards since last year. Are
24:04
they, are they the first ones
24:06
to throw the talon and go
24:08
straight to 26? Do they genuinely
24:10
believe, you know, with Flavio Briatoree
24:12
there, whipping away at that team,
24:15
trying to get them to be
24:17
winners? Forget 25, we're after 26.
24:19
Either, whatever it is. They're not
24:21
that quick. So Gazzy to be
24:23
right on the outskirts of the
24:25
points in P11, obviously gets disqualified
24:27
for being underweight. It's a six
24:29
out of ten. Pagazzy, I've gone
24:31
for a six out of ten
24:33
as well. Such a shame to
24:35
see Alpine where they are. The
24:37
car seems rubbish. Gazzy did a
24:39
decent job 11th on the road.
24:41
It's pretty good. But nothing insanely
24:43
kind of special, particularly as doing.
24:45
wasn't a million miles from him
24:47
as well, the inexperience of Jack
24:50
Dewin who thought Gazley would comfortably,
24:52
you know, beat him and be
24:54
really strong. And I do think,
24:56
even though the alpine doesn't look
24:58
that good, there is a chance
25:00
in the midfield when it's also
25:02
close and, you know, a really
25:04
good performance can bump you up
25:06
quite a lot of places, but
25:08
just didn't work out for Gazley
25:10
this weekend. The fans gave Pia
25:12
Gazley A5. Jack Dewin started sprinting
25:14
16th finished 20th got a 10
25:16
second post race time penalty for
25:18
causing a collision and then in
25:20
the main race started 18th finished
25:22
13th and also got a 10
25:25
second penalty for forcing had jar
25:27
off. I've gone for a four
25:29
out of 10 for Jack Dewin
25:31
and it's a disappointing four out
25:33
of 10 of kind of kind
25:35
of bit of sadness because I
25:37
think he's actually shown some pretty
25:39
good potential when he's not making
25:41
headlines for the wrong reasons of
25:43
you know. hunting Bartletto off for
25:45
absolutely no reason at the end
25:47
of the spread. and maybe being
25:49
a bit too aggressive with Hadjar
25:51
when he's not a million miles
25:53
off ghazly and sometimes even in
25:55
beating him so if he just
25:57
had a clean race I think
26:00
he would impress a lot of
26:02
people but again it was a
26:04
messy a messy weekend from him
26:06
and he's just getting an instance
26:08
that he doesn't need to be
26:10
in. Yeah the qualifying in particular
26:12
is pretty impressive when you compare...
26:14
him to Pierre Gazley, of course
26:16
he outqualified him in the sprint
26:18
and I think that if he's
26:20
able to tidy up his races
26:22
a little bit, maybe he does
26:24
have a shout of completing the
26:26
season which feels really like harsh
26:28
to say but like that's kind
26:30
of what we've been coming into
26:32
the season expecting is that he
26:34
will lose his seat to Colopinto
26:37
because Alpine want him in. But
26:39
Duan perhaps has surprised a few
26:41
people that... He has got some
26:43
potential locked in there. The races
26:45
is clearly where he falters a
26:47
little bit more. The will-to-will combat
26:49
definitely needs polishing. Very late defensive
26:51
moves. Obviously getting a couple of
26:53
penalties along the way for collisions
26:55
and not driving fairly. So yeah,
26:57
four out of ten for me.
26:59
I can't remember if you've said
27:01
four out of ten if I
27:03
just went straight into it. But
27:05
I've gone for a four out
27:07
of ten as well for Jack
27:09
Doing. So there you go. The
27:12
fans gave Jack Doing a four
27:14
as well. Lance Stroll, start the
27:16
sprint in 10th, finish 9th, start
27:18
the main race in 14th, finish
27:20
9th. Seven out ten for Lance
27:22
Stroll. Being the number one Aston
27:24
Martin driver has a lot of...
27:26
It bears down on some people,
27:28
but not Lance Stroll. Fernando Lonzo
27:30
is down there in 20th in
27:32
the championship. Lance can barely see
27:34
him all the way down there.
27:36
And Lance scoring points again. It's
27:38
a decent job. It's a seven
27:40
out of ten. It's nothing crazy.
27:42
People genuinely were saying that he
27:44
was the driver of the day
27:47
because he hadn't stopped. and was
27:49
running in 7th, then pit for
27:51
fresh mediums, and then didn't really
27:53
make that much progress after doing
27:55
that. And everyone was, oh land,
27:57
but what am I land stroll,
27:59
guys? What am I land stroll?
28:01
He literally finished in 12th without
28:03
the disqualifications. However, that being said,
28:05
he's doing all right. You know,
28:07
in the sprint, he was finishing
28:09
in 9th. Of course, he still
28:11
picked up a couple of points
28:13
after the disqualifications as well in
28:15
the race. So yeah, it's nothing
28:17
crazy. We're not talking tens, but
28:19
it's a seven and I'm I'm
28:22
respecting the fact he's the only
28:24
driver scoring points that has to
28:26
Martin right now I've gone for
28:28
a seven out of ten four
28:30
Lance roll. No bite at all,
28:32
Tommy. No, no by a new
28:34
viewers. They might be like what?
28:36
Matt? Why are you saying it
28:38
like that? Because Tommy is a
28:40
fan of Alonzo Stan and I've
28:42
got to get my own back
28:44
somehow. Fair fair fair. And yeah
28:46
Lance a seven out of ten.
28:48
A seven out of ten. I've
28:50
gone four. I've gone four. Your
36:52
old or broken phone can
36:54
let you down when you
36:56
need it most. Perfect. But
36:58
at Verizon, trade in any
37:00
old phone from our top
37:02
brands and get the most
37:05
for it. Up to $2,000
37:07
in value. For an amazing
37:09
new iPhone 16-Pro with Apple
37:11
Intelligence and a new line
37:13
and a new Apple Intelligence
37:15
and a new iPad and
37:17
Apple Intelligence and a new
37:20
iPad and Apple Watch. Switching
37:22
to the new Boost Mobile Risk
37:24
Free, we're offering a 30-day money-back
37:26
guarantee. So why wouldn't you
37:28
switch from Verizon or T-Mobile?
37:31
Because you have nothing to
37:33
lose. Boost Mobile is offering
37:35
a 30-day money-back guarantee. No,
37:37
I asked why wouldn't you switch
37:39
from Verizon or T-Mobile? Oh. Wouldn't
37:42
you switch from Verizon or
37:44
T-Mobile? Oh. Wouldn't. Because you
37:46
love wasting in stores may
37:49
be charged non-refundable activation fees.
38:00
It's an 8 out of 10
38:02
for Max Eustapin from me. He's
38:04
doing what seems to be a
38:07
great job in that car. You
38:09
compare to his teammate who was
38:11
trundling around at the back. Max
38:13
is doing things that we expect
38:15
Max Eustapin to do. Just lacked
38:17
pace in the race. He came
38:19
back towards the end. I think
38:22
he said that, yeah, the second
38:24
half phase seemed a bit more
38:26
competitive, which was a bit more
38:28
promising at least for them and
38:30
for Max. But yeah, I can't
38:32
really give him any higher than
38:34
an eight for this weekend. I
38:37
got for a nine out of
38:39
ten for months to happen. I
38:41
think his sprint was very impressive
38:43
to end up in the top
38:45
three, deliver somehow almost get pole
38:47
position. And I think the pace
38:49
in that car, particularly in the
38:52
race, was pretty poor, particularly at
38:54
the start. So I think P4
38:56
would almost feel like a win
38:58
for him based on how it
39:00
was looking at the start where
39:02
we very much thought he's hoping
39:04
for P6. Obviously the Ferraris got
39:07
disqualified anyway and he would have
39:09
just inherited it, but he did
39:11
beat them on the road anyway
39:13
and put in that move on
39:15
Charles. So yeah, they come for
39:17
a nine. Shalln't have the broken
39:19
front wing. The fans gave. Shouldn't
39:22
have crashed in something? I thought
39:24
you're gonna say you shouldn't have
39:26
been underweight, but that one was,
39:28
that was easy, wasn't it? Max
39:30
got an eight from the fans.
39:32
Liam Lawson, started this winter 19th,
39:34
finished 14th, started the main race
39:36
from the Pit Lane, finished 12th.
39:39
After all that 12th. I've gone
39:41
for a one out of 10.
39:43
It's so... difficult because he is
39:45
a capable driver and I will
39:47
keep saying this. It's clearly not
39:49
all down to Lawson's ability, but
39:51
you have to adapt and he's
39:54
been given the opportunity at Red
39:56
Bull. So, whatever you say about
39:58
the car and how it's clearly
40:00
not just the driver, he's still
40:02
the one that's qualifying P20 in
40:04
both sessions. He's the one in
40:06
the car turning the steering wheel.
40:09
He's the one racing a Sauber
40:11
and making absolutely no progress in
40:13
the race. And it's just so
40:15
poor, like no pace at all,
40:17
miles off Max every single lap.
40:19
And even, even... in a race
40:21
where three people have been disqualified
40:24
is absolutely nowhere near the point.
40:26
Yeah, shocking. I have also gone
40:28
for a one out of ten
40:30
for Lawson. It's tough to watch.
40:32
As you say, we know he
40:34
is a driver that can produce
40:36
results. The racing bulls team probably
40:39
looks like the red ball team
40:41
now to Lawson in the sense
40:43
of please just go there. That
40:45
would be great. If you wouldn't
40:47
mind, just let me go. Can
40:49
I go back? Is that possible?
40:51
Because this car is not something
40:54
that Lawson can drive. I think
40:56
it's as simple as that. And
40:58
I don't think Red Bull are
41:00
going to give him the time
41:02
in order to learn that. You
41:04
can't learn on the job in
41:06
this sport, especially in a top
41:09
team like Red Ball. It just
41:11
doesn't work that way. And as
41:13
hard as the car is, we
41:15
have to judge him on his
41:17
performances. And he's being beaten by
41:19
everyone in qualifying. Everyone. In a
41:21
Red Ball. I know
41:24
that he can't find the window
41:26
of balance and he said it
41:28
was one lap in the race
41:30
and it was gone again and
41:32
can't get the tires in the
41:34
right window etc etc etc etc.
41:36
Yeah these are reasons excuses whatever
41:38
you want to call them but
41:40
it is still a one out
41:42
of ten performance sadly for Lawson
41:44
and you can tell it's seeing
41:46
the interviews it's not nice to
41:48
watch because that red ball second
41:50
seat just saps the life out
41:53
of you. So yeah, Lawson, one
41:55
out of ten, the fans also
41:57
gave him a one out of
41:59
ten. Lewis Hamilton started sprinting first,
42:01
finished first, started the main race
42:03
in fifth, and got just qualified.
42:05
I've gone for an eight out
42:07
of ten for Lewis Hamilton. The
42:09
sprint was the most stone-cold ten
42:11
out of ten you can ever
42:13
see in your entire life, obviously.
42:15
Sadly, the waiting of our ratings
42:17
go more towards the main stuff.
42:19
And the main stuff, quality was
42:21
all right, nothing to write home
42:23
about for either Ferrari, but he
42:25
was in the mix. And then
42:28
in the race just really struggled.
42:30
He just didn't have... the pace
42:32
despite his teammate having a broken
42:34
front wing he just couldn't really
42:36
get close and of course went
42:38
on that two-stop strategy which turned
42:40
out not to be the right
42:42
call either but overall it was
42:44
about to say it was a
42:46
reasonable weekend of course it wasn't
42:48
he was disqualified but I'm not
42:50
we're not factoring in I think
42:52
this is worth as a reminder
42:54
we're not going to give Hamilton
42:56
a two out of ten or
42:58
a three out of ten or
43:01
a five out of ten because
43:03
he was disqualified that's not his
43:05
fault that the rear skid plank
43:07
has worn away by more than
43:09
half a millimetre that it should
43:11
be. That's not down to Hamilton
43:13
in my opinion and that's why
43:15
an eight out of ten I
43:17
think is fair. I've gone for
43:19
an eight out of ten for
43:21
Lewis Hamilton as well. His sprint,
43:23
well his whole sprint I think
43:25
massively over-delivered to put in you
43:27
know pole position in the sprint
43:29
particularly against you know Charlotte Claire
43:31
who's been... so good in qualifying.
43:33
And then yes, he had the
43:36
clean air, but his drive was
43:38
amazing. And to deliver a win,
43:40
I know it's a sprint win,
43:42
but a win for Ferrari in
43:44
only a second race, as it
43:46
were, is really, really impressive and
43:48
shows that when the car is
43:50
there, even at his kind of
43:52
age and everything, he still got
43:54
it absolutely. and will be able
43:56
to deliver no doubt in my
43:58
mind whatsoever. Main race, a bit
44:00
more disappointing of course, don't think
44:02
Ferrari had the pace and probably
44:04
slid into where they normally were.
44:06
And again, like you said, just
44:09
the fact that he got disqualified
44:11
is not, you know, if his
44:13
skid block was the width of
44:15
a credit card more, he's not,
44:17
he's not suddenly finishing like... P9
44:19
or something. It doesn't really make
44:21
that much of a difference. It's
44:23
just an unfortunate miscalculation and it's
44:25
driver ratings. So Hamilton is getting
44:27
an eight from me. That's very
44:29
fair. The fans gave Hamilton an
44:31
eight as well. So they agree,
44:33
Tommy. All good. Charlotte Claire, start
44:35
the sprint in fourth, finished fifth,
44:37
started the main race in sixth,
44:39
and was disqualified. I've gone for
44:41
a seven out of ten for
44:44
Charlotte Claire. Disappointing sprint, of course.
44:46
looked much better in the main
44:48
race and maybe had the pace
44:50
compared to Hamilton that we expect.
44:52
He wasn't miles quicker than Hamilton,
44:54
but was the quicker driver, of
44:56
course had the damage as well.
44:58
And we saw more of kind
45:00
of what we expect from from
45:02
Charlotte this year, but unfortunately for
45:04
him disqualified, but again, it's not
45:06
getting downgraded for the disqualification. He
45:08
just had a pretty decent but
45:10
not hugely spectacular weekend. I've also
45:12
gone for a seven out of
45:14
ten for Charles, the contact with
45:16
Hamilton at the start I am
45:19
putting more down to him just
45:21
purely because he was aggressive, eager,
45:23
wanting to get on the inside,
45:25
didn't anticipate where Hamilton was going
45:27
to position his car, very lucky
45:29
that we didn't see both Ferraris
45:31
out of the race or at
45:33
least with punctures or more front
45:35
wing damage. And then from there,
45:37
like it honestly, it pains me
45:39
to think or to hear from
45:41
Charlotte Claire afterwards that... He felt
45:43
like there was the potential to
45:45
win the race, which is... I
45:47
don't even want to think about
45:49
that, actually, no. I'm really glad
45:52
because then he would have won
45:54
the race and then been disqualified
45:56
and you would have never seen
45:58
me ever again. But he said
46:00
he did some changes to the
46:02
car and he was optimistic with
46:04
today, but they lost 30 points
46:06
of down force which was a
46:08
big chunk of performance. So, Charles
46:10
had a huge amount left in
46:12
the tank for today and sadly
46:14
we can't, I can't give him
46:16
any more than the seven for
46:18
ifs, what's maybe's, and everything else
46:20
in between. because sadly it was
46:22
slightly self-inflicted from the first lap
46:24
and then in the sprint of
46:27
course as well he was slower
46:29
than Hamilton. So seven out of
46:31
ten and the fans gave Charles
46:33
a seven as well. Oscar Piastri.
46:35
Start the sprint in third, finish
46:37
second, start the main racing first,
46:39
finish first. Ten out of ten.
46:41
Ten out of ten, ten, ten,
46:43
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
46:45
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
46:47
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
46:49
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
46:51
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
46:53
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
46:55
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
46:57
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
47:00
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
47:02
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
47:04
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
47:06
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten,
47:08
wonderful lovely performance to be putting
47:10
in so early in the season.
47:12
Don't need any of this ramping
47:14
up, don't need to kind of
47:16
settle yourself into the middle of
47:18
the season when Oscar performed last
47:20
year. To put in this kind
47:22
of performance, getting pole position, being
47:24
the one to make less mistakes
47:26
on that side of the garage,
47:28
and then to win the race
47:30
as well. It shows that if
47:32
he can put himself in that
47:35
position against Lando, I still think
47:37
Lando is the overall quicker driver
47:39
at the moment. when he delivers,
47:41
but if Oscar delivers more often
47:43
and more consistently to his level,
47:45
it could be very very close,
47:47
if not Oscar having the advantage.
47:49
So, brilliant performance from Oscar, it
47:51
was a 10. I've also gone
47:53
for a 10 out of 10
47:55
for Oscar Piastri, a brilliant race
47:57
from Oscar. Perfect race has to
47:59
be said he was great in
48:01
the sprint as well, obviously finishing
48:03
second. And if he keeps his
48:05
format... He's absolutely challenging for the
48:07
championship 100% because he's he's showed
48:10
that he's got the racecraft, he's
48:12
got every, he's kind of ice
48:14
cold, he is a proper like
48:16
ice man when it comes to
48:18
his driving and his attitude which
48:20
I, which I love. And yeah,
48:22
he is impressed so much even
48:24
despite the unfortunate race in Melbourne,
48:26
even impressed there, just caught out
48:28
by, you know, one, one corner
48:30
where a lot of people went
48:32
off. what a start to the
48:34
season he's had and that that
48:36
race was a proper I'm here
48:38
and I will challenge for this
48:40
this championship and it's very exciting.
48:43
Exactly the weekend he needed after
48:45
Australia where a huge amount of
48:47
points were lost and he could
48:49
very much easily be leading the
48:51
championship at the moment but he's
48:53
not but the fans gave Oscar
48:55
at 10 as well. Landonaurus started
48:57
the sprint in 6th, started the
48:59
main race in third, finished second.
49:01
I have gone for an 8
49:03
out of 10 for Land O'
49:05
Norris. It's a high 8, but
49:07
it's an 8. The reason for
49:09
the 8, you know, the main
49:11
race, he did a great job
49:13
of course. Not on his teammate's
49:15
pace, didn't ever look like he
49:18
was really going to win, but
49:20
got the car over the line
49:22
despite the issues, begged a lot
49:24
of points for the championship, which
49:26
is great. There were
49:28
some worrying signs that I think
49:30
crept in during that that weekend
49:32
again. I know the sprint isn't
49:34
where the big points are scored
49:36
and he kind of put it
49:38
behind him for the main race
49:40
to finish second and that's the
49:42
one way you want to have
49:44
the better result. But it can't
49:46
kind of be underplayed that, you
49:48
know, he did go off, he
49:50
made mistakes, he messed up both
49:52
qualifying sessions, it has to be
49:54
said. and the sprint. step behind
49:56
an Aston, finish behind an RB,
49:58
an Antonelli to be 8th when
50:00
it was a car that should
50:02
be winning that race and we
50:04
know is should be kind of
50:06
finishing one to every race now.
50:08
And yeah, it's a shame that
50:10
that happened because it kind of
50:12
has put a little bit of
50:14
a question mark again of, oh
50:16
I thought it sorted this out
50:18
after his mega drive in Australia.
50:20
But he did turn it around
50:22
in the main race of course
50:24
and that's the one where you
50:26
get the big points and hopefully
50:28
it's just one little blip. I've
50:30
also gone for an 8 out
50:32
of 10 for Lando. The downgrades
50:34
for me come from obviously the
50:36
sprint, finishing 8th, making that mistake
50:38
on lap 1. Just putting himself
50:40
on the back foot really like
50:42
it was it was it was
50:45
genuinely just driver error He positioned
50:47
his car wrong dipped a wheel
50:49
and in the sort of gravelly
50:51
grassy area and from there on
50:53
around China You can't really make
50:55
up for your mistakes all that
50:57
much because it's so difficult to
50:59
overtake like we saw and of
51:01
course their entire conservation as well
51:03
because they couldn't pit and then
51:05
also yeah the qualifying being behind
51:07
Russell showing his pace, like there
51:09
is so much raw pace in
51:11
Lando Norris when it is hooked
51:13
up, we saw that in Q2
51:15
of main qualifying. And then he
51:17
didn't improve into Q3 and that's
51:19
why he didn't get pole position.
51:21
And of course he was slightly
51:23
unlucky towards the end of the
51:25
main race as well with his,
51:27
where he was unlucky with his
51:29
break going long, because he felt
51:31
like he could challenge Piastri for
51:33
the win in the last sort
51:35
of 10-15 laps and I would
51:37
have loved to have seen if
51:39
he could genuinely have caught him.
51:41
and that's why I've gone for
51:43
an 8 out of 10 and
51:45
the fans have gone for an
51:47
8 as well and that is
51:49
it we are done wrapped up
51:51
driver ratings locked away I hope
51:53
you've enjoyed it episode 2 in
51:55
the bag 22 to go and
51:57
plenty more podcast coming your way
51:59
as well. Tommy what are your
52:01
final thoughts please? My final thoughts
52:03
are for the second week in
52:05
a row not put who is
52:07
our P1 in the sheet so
52:09
of course you didn't remember. That's
52:11
crazy. My P1 whilst you do
52:13
that Tommy my P1 has to
52:15
be Esther Banokon because he was
52:17
drive of the day he was
52:19
robbed of that and it's the
52:21
only 10 I've given so it
52:23
has to be. No I gave
52:25
it to us well as well.
52:27
But no, it is going to
52:29
be Esteban Okon because I do
52:31
feel like he was robbed of
52:33
not getting drive of the day.
52:35
So he's getting P1 of the
52:37
day from me. I will go
52:39
for... Oh, it's difficult. I think
52:41
I'm going to go for Pastri
52:43
just because he delivered in the
52:45
sprint as well and it was
52:47
a proper, I think it was
52:49
a proper statement weekend from him
52:51
to be like I am here
52:53
to challenge for this world title.
52:55
Ocon. for me no doubt the
52:57
star of the race but the
52:59
start of the weekend and go
53:01
for Piaestri. Okay, well there you
53:03
go. Thank you everybody for watching
53:05
and listening. As always, I'm sure
53:07
you've left your comments of why
53:09
you believe that you have got
53:11
out of 10 grades and we
53:13
look forward to reading them. Leave
53:15
a like, don't say that often
53:17
on the YouTube video if you
53:19
enjoyed it, or on Spotify. Drop
53:21
us little five-star rating if you
53:23
enjoy this podcast and that is
53:25
it. We'll see you very soon,
53:27
Japan in a couple of a
53:29
couple of a couple of weeks.
53:31
Hopefully we get a more exciting
53:33
race than we saw in China.
53:35
Hopefully we get less excitement after
53:37
the race in terms of FIA
53:39
drama. And that is it. Bye
53:41
everyone! Bye! My chore is to
53:43
just go to sleep. I cannot
53:45
wait to just get all myself
53:47
to sleep. Yeah, my sleeping patterns
53:49
obviously been absolutely destroyed. and I
53:51
cannot wait to just rest, although
53:54
I'm flying to Sweden tomorrow. I'm
53:56
flying to Sweden tomorrow for the
53:58
F1 Sim Racing Championship. It starts
54:00
on Tuesday. all the way through
54:02
the Thursday. This is not sponsored,
54:04
sure part of the podcast. So
54:06
yeah, not a lot of sleep
54:08
to be had, but Tommy are
54:10
you going to be sleeping? I
54:12
will be going to bed immediately
54:14
and catching up on some sleep.
54:16
Yeah, because it's been quite the
54:18
crazy one, sleep schedule wise, doesn't
54:20
it? It certainly has. Sweet dreams,
54:22
everybody. And if you are listening
54:24
to this podcast whilst going to
54:26
bed, because you find us soothing
54:28
and comforting, you're welcome. Your
54:44
old or broken phone can
54:46
let you down when you
54:48
need it most. Perfect. But
54:50
at Verizon, trade in any
54:52
old phone from our top
54:54
brands and get the most
54:56
for it. Up to $2,000
54:59
in value. For an amazing
55:01
new iPhone 16-Pro with Apple
55:03
Intelligence and a new line
55:05
and a new Apple Intelligence
55:07
and a new iPad and
55:09
Apple Intelligence and a new
55:11
iPad and Apple Watch. Verizon.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More