Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Dear old work platform. It's not
0:02
you. It's us. Actually, it is
0:05
you. Endless onboarding? Constant IT bottlenecks?
0:07
We've had enough. We need a
0:09
platform that just gets us. And
0:12
to be honest, we've met someone
0:14
new. They're called monday.com. and it
0:16
was love at first onboarding. They're
0:19
beautiful dashboards, they're customizable workflows, got
0:21
us floating on a digital cloud
0:23
nine, so no hard feelings, but
0:26
we're moving on. monday.com, the first
0:28
work platform you'll love to use. Support
0:32
For this podcast and the following message is
0:34
brought to you by E-Trade for Morgan Stanley.
0:36
With E-Trade you can dive into the market
0:38
with easy to use tools, zero dollar commissions,
0:40
and a wide range of investments. And now
0:43
there's even more to love. Get access to
0:45
industry leading research and insights for Morgan Stanley
0:47
to help guide your decisions. Open an account
0:49
and get up to a thousand dollars or
0:52
more with a qualifying deposit. Get started
0:54
today at e-trade.com. Terms and other
0:56
fees apply, investing involves risks. Morgan
0:58
Stanley Smith Barney LLC member SIPICE trade
1:00
is a business of Picture
1:06
Look at this, you're halfway through
1:08
a DIY car fix, tools scattered
1:10
everywhere and boom, you realise you're
1:12
missing a part. It's okay, because
1:15
you know whatever it is, it's
1:17
on eBay. They've got everything, brakes,
1:19
headlights, cold air intakes, whatever you
1:21
need, and it's guaranteed to fit,
1:23
which means no more crossing your
1:26
fingers and hoping you ordered the
1:28
right thing. All the parts you
1:30
need at prices you'll love, guaranteed
1:32
to fit every time. eBay. Things
1:34
people love. Hello
1:42
everybody and welcome back to the P1
1:44
Podcast. I don't know why I
1:46
sound like a sheep there, but here
1:48
we are. It is Saudi Arabian
1:50
Grand Prix Qualifying Edition. Oh
1:53
my lord, we've got some
1:55
drama to talk about. Tommy
1:57
is - This is F1. Loving
1:59
life right now with the fact that
2:01
he flopped Verstappen and he's on pole. The
2:03
master plan has worked beautifully so far.
2:05
Utterly ridiculous. Since when does your big flop
2:07
have the same anti -powers as mine? Maybe
2:09
this is it, this is it, but
2:11
now, from now on - Max takes it
2:13
personally. It's twice now. Two poles. We've both
2:15
flopped in the two poles. Either that
2:18
or we just need to stop going for
2:20
the best drivers on the grid and
2:22
flopping them. Maybe. That's what I've kind of
2:24
learned so far this season. Anyway, a
2:26
lot of things to talk about. So let's
2:28
dive straight into Q1. The bottom five were
2:30
Stroll, Dewin, Holkenberg,
2:32
Ocon and Borteletto. First
2:35
question, HM Peach. Not a question. Great. So
2:37
there we go. Not a question. But seeing that
2:39
Lance Stroll now has the record for the
2:41
most Q1 exits ever, any thoughts, feelings? That's still
2:43
a question mark at the end, so therefore
2:45
it is a question. So Lance
2:47
Stroll, if you miss
2:49
this, has broken the record
2:52
for the most
2:54
Q1 exits in F1
2:56
history. 75
2:58
Q1
3:01
exits. That
3:04
is... I didn't
3:06
think it was that bad. In the sense
3:08
of, I didn't know how many Q1 exits he
3:10
would have had. If someone had asked me
3:12
how many has he had, I probably wouldn't have
3:14
gone over 50. 75.
3:20
75, yeah. And how many races has he done?
3:24
176. It's
3:26
at 170 starts at 75
3:28
Q and exits. And
3:30
this is the thing for like a
3:33
driver that might be a backmarker. Well,
3:35
he took the was it Magnuson? I
3:37
think I believe what I heard was
3:39
that he took the record from and
3:41
you understand that the KMAG, you know,
3:43
he's driven a lot of wheelie
3:45
bins in his career. He's been driving for
3:47
Hass a lot of the time who
3:49
are a backmarker. But
3:52
Lance Stroll. has been, I
3:54
know the Aston Martin
3:56
is bad and really
3:58
poor this season.
4:01
But of course, you know, Aston Martin,
4:03
they had that great year in
4:05
2023, where the car looked
4:07
very quick. He's driven a very
4:09
quick racing point in his career. And
4:12
he scored a good amount of points finishes
4:14
as well in his career. His qualifying is
4:16
just genuinely awful. He is one of We
4:18
go on about Charlotte Clarke being one of
4:21
the greatest qualifiers of all time. Lance Troll
4:23
is probably the worst qualifier of all time.
4:25
I'm going to say it right here on
4:27
this podcast. He is abysmal at qualifying and he
4:29
always has been. Okay. Well,
4:31
goodness gracious me. Don't mince your words there,
4:33
Tommy. But he has been a
4:35
very poor qualifier. But then just randomly pops
4:37
up occasionally in P9 and you go,
4:39
oh, Lance, how did you manage that? Other
4:41
drivers to talk about, Estaban Ocon. I
4:43
can't believe we're talking about him. And 19th,
4:46
which I think is the same as
4:48
last time we were talking about qualifying only
4:50
last week, where it just cannot get
4:52
the same performance out of that
4:54
has as Ollie Bearman. You
4:57
blink though in the race and Hass have
4:59
rolled the dice with an undercut and he's
5:01
right there fighting for the points again. But
5:03
it does make you wonder just how, whether
5:06
there is this massive discrepancy between
5:08
quality pace and race pace
5:10
in the Hass or if Esteban
5:12
just can't get that same feeling
5:14
as he does in the race because you
5:16
don't expect this from Ocon. I
5:18
would consider him, unlike
5:20
Lance Troll, as a good
5:22
qualifier. Ocon,
5:26
last week he crashed out, didn't he,
5:28
and did actually better than Ben, but
5:30
it was the week before where he qualified
5:32
really poorly. We've seen this. Yeah,
5:35
I know, there's so many races going on
5:37
at the moment. But we've seen so many moments
5:39
where one of the houses qualify well, the
5:41
other doesn't do very well. But Ocon, you'd expect
5:43
as the more kind of veteran
5:45
driver that's been in the sport a long time
5:47
now, would be the one that could get
5:49
a hold of it. And this form,
5:53
Maybe we'll be having a different
5:56
conversation when he spawns into P7
5:58
during the race again like he did last
6:00
week and gets another great result.
6:02
He's got a lot of points
6:04
on the board from those two
6:06
amazing results. But
6:08
he qualified very poorly, didn't he, at
6:10
the end of his kind of Alpine
6:13
career as well. And we were questioning,
6:15
oh, maybe it's just that, have
6:17
they just kind of... Don't care
6:19
about Ocon anymore. Goodbye. And it's
6:21
like a Red Bull situation, but it's
6:23
kind of taken that poor qualifying
6:25
form into his house career as well. Yeah,
6:28
but we have also seen some great qualifiers from
6:30
Ocon and it's not something that he, he
6:33
lacks in his locker, I would, I
6:35
would argue. And to be outqualified by
6:37
a Sauber is pretty much unforgivable,
6:39
sadly. So back row of the grid
6:41
for Ocon. Hulkenberg, as I mentioned,
6:43
18th, Jack Dillon, it's...
6:46
That's a bit of a worry when
6:48
Gassley is ninth. Yeah, it's not it's
6:50
not good enough for doing sadly around
6:52
a track that is incredibly grippy. He
6:54
himself came into this. I think I mentioned
6:56
this in the Friday podcast with a decent
6:58
amount of confidence. At least that's what he
7:01
was exuding in his interviews was that he
7:03
feels good around this track. He likes this
7:05
track. And so it just feels like perhaps
7:07
there isn't that level of confidence
7:09
and risk in doing laps that that
7:11
Gasly is able to to deliver
7:13
in the Alpine, so difficult for doing
7:15
again and he does need to
7:17
start taking a step up now, otherwise
7:20
his fate will be sealed. Maybe
7:22
it already is, we don't know. Let's
7:24
get to Q2 then! And
7:26
the bottom five in this
7:28
session were Albon, Lawson, Alonso,
7:30
Hajjar and Bearman. Not
7:33
the craziest of...
7:35
Sort of the lineup of drivers
7:37
that got out in Q2 there Albon
7:39
just about missing out in the
7:42
Williams the racing balls looking like they're
7:44
slipping further and further away over
7:46
one lap pace at least. And
7:48
Alonso it felt like at one point
7:50
was going to be popping in sort of
7:52
P7 P8. He was looking quite strong,
7:54
but I think his final Q2 lap just
7:56
wasn't what he was hoping for. No,
7:59
just disappointing in the end for
8:02
Alonso. He's still is still ahead
8:04
of. stroll again. But
8:06
yeah, not not going from Aston Martin.
8:08
And the thing the thing I look at
8:10
there is racing balls, who we had
8:12
this discussion in the watch along, they should
8:14
have a big amount of points on
8:16
the board based on and we even said
8:18
this as they were doing those terrible
8:20
strategies and we had about that rant about
8:22
them in China, I believe it was. They
8:26
have they had to kind of strike
8:28
while the iron was hot there. And
8:30
now they've kind of very much
8:32
kind of gone back as being that midfield team
8:34
that are very much just in the mid -pack.
8:37
They're going to be kicking themselves that
8:39
they didn't grab a bucket load of
8:41
points in those first few races when
8:43
they looked like the fifth best car
8:45
and Yuki Sonoda was popping it P5
8:47
and 6 and qualifying and Hadja was
8:49
up in P7. Yeah,
8:52
huge kind of missed
8:54
opportunity. The only kind of
8:56
positive there
8:59
really is Lawson maybe picking up his
9:01
form after what's been an absolute stinker
9:03
to outqualify Hajar, maybe more what we
9:05
kind of have expected from him because
9:07
he has been one of the poorest
9:09
drivers of the year, even after going
9:12
into the racing bulls. So it's a
9:14
bit more positive from him, but it's
9:16
still disappointing for them not to be
9:18
in Q3. Yeah, it's a really
9:20
important qualifying session actually, as you mentioned,
9:23
for Lawson to get the upper hand on
9:25
Hajar that you would expect. of Lawson
9:27
in terms of experience -wise. He has more
9:29
experience than Hadjar, albeit not a
9:31
huge amount more. So yeah,
9:33
that might be a confidence settler for
9:35
Lawson. And finally, I just want
9:37
to talk about Oli Bearman because I
9:39
thought he might well be cooking
9:41
for a little Q3 appearance and then
9:44
had a very scrappy final Q2
9:46
lap, which then puts him 15th. I
9:49
was feeling so confident about this good
9:51
surprise. He gets into Q2. I think
9:53
he was quite easily into Q2 as
9:55
well after the first session. And
9:58
then just wasn't able to
10:00
deliver when it
10:02
counted. Perhaps that has, you
10:04
know, we were seeing with Ocon
10:06
quite a difficult car to qualify with. That's
10:08
at least what we're seeing. But
10:11
it's race trim. That's all it's all.
10:13
It doesn't matter about quality. When good surprise comes
10:15
in and he finishes P10, I
10:17
ain't going to be complaining. I
10:19
don't know if I even buy
10:22
the house isn't that good in
10:24
qualifying. I think he's left, you
10:26
know, he was slower actually in
10:28
Q2 than he was in Q1
10:30
by a tenth. You do wonder actually,
10:32
after watching testing, where they literally toodled
10:34
around the back, the entire test didn't
10:36
bother really ever doing fast laps. Yeah.
10:38
And then they're like, why are we
10:40
not quick and... Why not? Why are
10:42
we quick and qualifying? Yeah, it is
10:44
so true. Yeah,
10:47
this is the nature of Formula
10:49
One now and that midfield battle,
10:51
you know, the people that did the kind
10:53
of same time. You
10:56
know, if I look at, say, like,
10:58
Gasly, who ended up in P9 and
11:00
made it through, who was only
11:02
a tenth ahead of Bearman in
11:05
Q1. So the time is there,
11:07
just little mistakes here and there
11:09
can cost you so much, because
11:11
Bearman is another one that's
11:14
kind of had these... performances and then
11:16
he'll put in a brilliant performance and
11:18
that has, yeah, the performance does seem
11:20
to be a little bit all over
11:22
the place or maybe it's just how
11:24
close that midfield is and a mistake
11:26
here and there or a really good
11:28
performance can rocket you up the standings. Right,
11:31
let's get into the big one then. This is what you've
11:33
all been waiting for. Q3,
11:35
the top 10, as of
11:37
right now, stands for
11:39
Stappen, Piastri, Russell, Leclerc, Antonelli,
11:41
Sines, Hamilton, Sonoda, Gasly,
11:43
Norris. Okay, first
11:45
question, first question, first question in
11:48
this Q3 segment. How
11:52
can Lando iron out the mistakes as
11:54
these are costing him in what is looking
11:56
to be a tight championship? especially
12:02
for just generic formula
12:04
one punters like myself and
12:06
Tommy. Lando
12:15
is going to be struggling slightly more
12:17
in terms of just locking in compared
12:19
to Piastri that I would say is ice
12:21
cold He had that mistake in Australia,
12:23
but apart from that Piastri is performing to
12:25
the level that he can For Lando
12:27
and I will maintain this
12:29
opinion no matter what anyone says Lando
12:31
is a quicker driver than Oscar
12:33
over one lap if his true potential
12:35
is shown But the problem is
12:37
mistakes creep in and this is where
12:39
we've seen Q3 track limits. We've
12:42
seen this crash today and and it is
12:44
I feel like it is Lando looking
12:46
to the garage next to him in
12:48
Oscar and going, I've
12:50
got a proper championship fight on my
12:52
hands against my teammate. And we'll
12:54
get on to Mac shortly, where he's
12:56
feeling like he needs to go to a
12:58
level that he can get to, but it
13:00
brings in mistakes. And this is
13:02
such a costly one, not to even have
13:04
a lap time on the board to
13:06
start 10th. Yes, he's in
13:09
the fastest car, but this is not a given that
13:11
he's going to fly through. Of course,
13:13
he had a great start in Bahrain, but then
13:15
he got the penalty because he was in misplaced in
13:17
his grid box. It's
13:19
not an absolute disaster if, when we
13:21
said this again, where if he can
13:23
come through in the fastest car, but
13:26
he has to be beating Piastri. He
13:28
does at this stage of the
13:30
season because I fully see in
13:32
Oscar's future with how impressive he's
13:34
been at the start that he's still
13:36
only going to get better is Piastri.
13:38
He's in the start of his third
13:40
season. He's not the finished product. I
13:43
can't believe we're in this situation
13:45
where after the last race, you
13:47
know, Norris, we said, you know,
13:49
we were kind of critical of
13:51
him in drive ratings. And despite
13:53
the P3, he made a lot
13:55
of mistakes during that. You
13:57
go back to Australia, and it
13:59
was Piastri was the one that went off the road,
14:02
made the mistake. Lando
14:04
withheld the pressure of Max Verstappen
14:06
in a race that threw multiple safety
14:08
cars. And the narrative after
14:10
that race was, okay, Lando can fight
14:12
for this championship, and he can
14:14
deal with the mental pressure. This is
14:16
coming off the back of the
14:18
Abu Dhabi Grand Prix as well, where,
14:20
you know, realistically, that constructor championship
14:22
was all on him to win, and
14:24
he drove a brilliant race. But
14:26
since then, he's had the, you
14:28
know, the problems in the sprint
14:31
in China, then we're going
14:33
to Bahrain where he's had a difficult
14:35
race as well. And
14:38
this is just a
14:40
huge error and it's kind
14:42
of, he's making headlines for
14:44
all the wrong reasons.
14:46
And it's becoming a thing, sadly,
14:48
for Lando. You know,
14:50
I think when this started happening, I
14:52
thought people were maybe being overcritical of
14:54
him and jumping on him as someone
14:57
that makes a lot of mistakes, but
14:59
it is becoming a thing now. And
15:01
I don't know how he can kind
15:03
of change that. I don't know whether
15:05
it's the way he approaches his racing
15:07
or maybe he needs. I
15:09
don't know, like the mental side of the
15:12
sport is such a big thing as
15:14
well. I thought it was fascinating in the
15:16
last qualifying podcast we did where Alex
15:18
was talking about how he shouldn't be beating
15:20
himself up after the session because you
15:22
had more pressure on yourself and that kind
15:24
of thing. And you do wonder these
15:26
champions where. You know,
15:28
Piastri's got that mentor in Mark
15:31
Webber and Lewis Hamilton has surrounded
15:33
himself with like Angela, for example,
15:35
who, you know, gets him in
15:37
a great headspace and things like
15:39
that. And does Lando need someone
15:41
like that or kind of can
15:43
he work on himself on
15:46
that side? Because these mistakes are creeping
15:48
in and he's such a good driver and
15:50
he's a quick driver. He just
15:52
needs to iron out these mistakes. And
15:54
unfortunately at the moment, they're happening too
15:56
frequently. Next question, people on Patreon
15:58
remember Savage Monkey 3 .0, how is it
16:00
possible for Norris to keep making these types
16:02
of mistakes after being in his seventh season while
16:04
Piastri is in his third and being a
16:06
way more completed driver for the championship? No
16:09
hate, it says at the end as well, just to
16:11
clarify. How is it possible? Look,
16:13
I think that we're forgetting they're all humans, they
16:15
all have their own characteristics, they all have their
16:17
own strengths and weaknesses, just because
16:19
Piastri is performing probably at a
16:21
level that we didn't expect at
16:23
this point in his career. does
16:27
not necessarily mean that Lando Norris
16:29
will never win a championship
16:31
or that he is the anomaly
16:33
here. We've seen drivers
16:35
make mistakes for championships across
16:37
most seasons. Vettel, for
16:39
example, when he was fighting at Ferrari, just
16:41
one thing that comes to mind where mistakes
16:43
slip in. Piastri's
16:46
in a great part of his career.
16:48
There's no doubt about that. He
16:51
has solidified himself as a fantastic driver.
16:54
But we don't know how he deals
16:56
with pressure in the sense of leading the
16:58
championship, getting all those questions, becoming the
17:00
favourite which he now is. He's now the
17:02
favourite for the championship, I think, in
17:04
the bookies and all this sort of stuff.
17:07
We don't know yet. But all
17:09
we can judge him on is what he's done
17:11
so far. And what he's done is less
17:13
mistakes, I still will say.
17:15
He is marginally slower than
17:18
Lando if they're both on good
17:20
days. That doesn't
17:22
matter if Lando has these
17:24
mistakes creeping in where he
17:26
loses handful of points every
17:28
so often. The Oscar Piastri
17:30
slightly slower but also still delivering at a
17:32
very high level and consistently being there.
17:35
It's going to win the championship nine times
17:37
out of ten. So
17:39
Norris I still believe
17:41
will continue to learn about this
17:43
not just from a driving perspective
17:45
but also from a how does
17:48
he prepare himself for a championship
17:50
fight. He does need
17:52
the support around him. He needs the
17:54
team around him. He needs whatever it
17:56
might be, sports psychologist or however
17:58
it is. That's McLaren's job as
18:00
well as Lando's to find
18:03
the right solution there. Yeah,
18:05
he absolutely needs something like that, I think,
18:07
and whether that's something he'll look into. It's
18:12
not over because anything can
18:14
happen in the race
18:16
tomorrow. Who knows what can
18:18
happen when we've seen things completely like
18:20
flip on its head between qualifying and the
18:22
race and you never know Lando What while
18:24
we're looking at now thinking there's
18:26
no chance he could still well
18:28
lead the championship at the end
18:30
of this this triple header and
18:33
stranger things have happened but He's
18:36
having a poor run and I think
18:38
it's something that he needs to look
18:40
into in this kind of break and
18:42
kind of you know get
18:44
back in a good headspace because
18:46
it's been a difficult start when
18:49
Oscar was the one that made
18:51
that mistake in the first race
18:53
and Lando had a brilliant race
18:55
and we were thinking how
18:57
costly is that error going to be
18:59
for Oscar but instead here we are
19:01
now looking at the fact that Lando
19:03
is the one making loads of errors
19:05
and Lando is the one still leading
19:07
the championship but by a very minimal
19:09
margin now. I will also add into
19:11
that that, you know, we say that
19:13
Oscar makes that mistake in Australia. It's
19:15
exactly the same mistake, but just about
19:17
half a car length less deep. And
19:20
Lando could have been in exactly the
19:22
same situation as Oscar. I
19:24
will say that Oscar, of course, it
19:26
was a mistake in Australia, but
19:28
there was a serious level of just
19:30
unluckiness to that as well, for sure.
19:32
Because the way he got beached on the
19:35
grass and things like that. Oh, yeah, I'm
19:37
not denying it's more it's more worrying that
19:39
that Lando's mistakes have all been kind of
19:41
dry qualified. I mean, it's qualified qualifying
19:43
is is is the big one here.
19:46
I know he had a poor
19:48
poor bar in Grand Prix, getting through
19:50
the field and made mistakes there. But
19:53
how many we've gone into this
19:55
weekend, mentioning that Lando
19:57
it feels like for the
19:59
entire year hasn't ever managed to get two
20:01
qualifying laps in. There always seems to be one
20:03
with a mistake, and then he does the
20:05
other. And this time
20:07
he's crashed in Q3 when
20:09
the pressure is on. This is the bit where
20:11
you do need to deliver. I
20:14
know it's drive to survive,
20:16
but he even spoke about
20:19
it in that kind of mentioning
20:21
that he can get in his own
20:23
head a bit. So that's something he needs to
20:25
work on a bit. Dear
20:33
Dear old work platform. It's not
20:35
you. It's us. Actually, it is
20:38
you. Endless onboarding? Constant IT bottlenecks?
20:40
We've had enough. We need a
20:42
platform that just gets us. And
20:45
to be honest, we've met someone
20:47
new. They're called monday.com. and it
20:49
was love at first onboarding. They're
20:52
beautiful dashboards, they're customizable workflows, got
20:54
us floating on a digital cloud
20:56
nine, so no hard feelings, but
20:59
we're moving on. monday.com, the first
21:01
work platform you'll love to use. If
21:03
your job at a health care
21:05
facility includes disinfecting against viruses, you
21:07
know prevention is the best medicine.
21:09
And maintaining healthy spaces starts with
21:12
a healthy cleaning routine. Granger's world-class
21:14
supply chain helps ensure you have
21:16
the quality products you need when
21:18
you need them. From disinfectants and
21:20
cleaning supplies to personal protective equipment
21:22
so you can help deliver a
21:24
clean bill of health. Call one
21:26
eight hundred Granger, click granger.com or
21:29
just stop by. Granger for the
21:31
ones who get it done. For
21:34
this podcast and the following message is brought
21:36
to you by E-Trade for Morgan Stanley. With
21:38
E-Trade you can dive into the market with
21:40
easy to use tools, zero dollar commissions, and
21:42
a wide range of investments. And now there's
21:45
even more to love. Get access to industry
21:47
leading research and insights for Morgan Stanley to
21:49
help guide your decisions. Open an account and
21:51
get up to a thousand dollars or more
21:54
with a qualifying deposit. Get started
21:56
today at e-trade.com. Terms and other
21:58
fees apply, investing involves risks. Morgan
22:00
Stanley Smith Barney LLC member SIPICE trade
22:02
is a business of Next
22:08
question. Joe Winom. How did Max do
22:10
that? People don't want to call Max
22:12
a generational talent, but I think the
22:14
lap in Suzuka in today shows just
22:16
what difference he can make in a
22:18
car. I'm sorry. Who on earth is
22:20
calling Max not a generational talent? I
22:22
would love to know because he is... Categorically
22:26
a generational talent. I don't
22:28
care what anybody says on that,
22:30
because what more does he need
22:32
to do? He's in an S -Box
22:34
delivers. He's in a dominant car. He
22:36
breaks every record known to man
22:38
in terms of length of win streak,
22:40
et cetera, et cetera. Max
22:42
is the best driver on the grid. We
22:45
have a, I know we've joked about
22:47
him obviously, Lance Stroll breaking the Q1 exit.
22:49
But generally speaking, the grid is a
22:51
very strong one in 2025 as well. Yeah,
22:53
very. So how did Max
22:55
do that? Because he, when the
22:57
car is alive, which it became, and
23:00
they were surprised to see it, alive in
23:02
Q3 especially, he will deliver.
23:04
You don't see mistakes from Max Verstappen,
23:06
hardly ever. So
23:09
how did he do it? It's Verstappen.
23:11
And the car, he's put what, nine
23:13
tenths on Sonoda, I think, who I
23:15
think made a mistake as well. That's
23:17
the thing. People will be quick to
23:19
jump on. Oh, the car's good then.
23:21
He's nine tenths clearing his teammate. Nine
23:24
tenths. And I know I think Yuki did make a mistake on his
23:26
final lap. It doesn't matter. He made a mistake. You
23:29
have to just judge them. Why
23:32
do people make excuses about why Max
23:34
is quick other than the fact that
23:36
he is just an incredible driver that
23:38
we might not have on the grid
23:40
in five years time because he's always
23:42
ever, he's only ever said, you
23:44
know, I want to spend time with my family,
23:46
this, that and the other. Please appreciate
23:48
what he's doing. I
23:50
know that... don't like dominance, for
23:52
example. In the last few years, Max was always
23:54
winning. Blah, blah, blah. He's got the best
23:56
car. He doesn't have the best car now,
23:58
and we're seeing utterly brilliant performances.
24:01
Just enjoy it. God,
24:04
I sound like a Max fan. You do.
24:06
You do. I thought... I'll reverse them. I
24:08
really this t -shirt tomorrow. It's
24:11
true, though. You have
24:13
to appreciate we're witnessing, you
24:17
know... If Max some
24:19
miracle wins this championship, it would
24:21
be one of it would be like
24:23
Fernando Alonso in 2012, but he
24:25
actually goes on and wins the thing
24:27
because he should not be
24:29
there and somehow
24:32
we're five races
24:34
in and Max has happened
24:36
has got two pole positions
24:38
and We're talking about
24:40
hit the car being nowhere. Just
24:43
think as well. We're talking
24:45
about about pressure and all that
24:47
kind of side of the
24:49
sport and how difficult it is.
24:52
This whole Formula One weekend going into this
24:55
was all about Max Verstappen. Is he going
24:57
to leave Red Bull? Oh, the car's terrible,
24:59
isn't it? What are you going
25:01
to do? you going to leave? you going to
25:03
go twice for mine? All bombarded with questions in the
25:05
press conferences. And then he delivers a lap
25:07
like that. Yeah, it is the ultimate mic
25:09
drop. And it's just the
25:11
sign of an unbelievable driver. And
25:14
one of the best drivers we'll
25:16
ever see in Formula One whether you
25:18
think he's the best or not you
25:20
can't argue that he's not one of
25:22
the best we've ever seen it in
25:24
Formula One. Next question at Northence Hammer
25:27
was it all a massive overreaction
25:29
last week when people were saying
25:31
how poor the Red Bull is.
25:33
P1 in Japan and P1 again
25:35
today Bahrain was likely an anomaly. Bahrain
25:39
very aggressive on the tyres. We
25:42
know that McLaren are incredibly
25:44
good at keeping their tires in
25:46
a good window. And that's
25:48
why we saw Oscar just dominate the
25:50
race and drive away from pole position. I
25:54
think it is likely to see when
25:56
tracks have a higher grip, like a
25:58
really lovely surface like we have in
26:00
Saudi, that's when the car becomes
26:02
a lot better. I think we will
26:04
see Peaks and Troshford Red Bull. I don't think
26:06
we're going to go, yeah, Bahrain's the only anomaly here,
26:09
done and dusted. Max is back, he's
26:11
winning the championship. I'm not convinced
26:13
of that at all. But I think
26:15
it's more likely that he will
26:17
be able to thrust that car into
26:19
the top three, top four than
26:21
perhaps these outliers like Barron. The Red
26:23
Bull is poor because it doesn't
26:26
have a great window. And that is
26:28
the thing here. We
26:30
see McLaren are brilliant at every
26:32
circuit. And even the Mercedes now
26:34
and George Russell has again put
26:36
in a brilliant lap and has
26:38
been consistently one of the
26:40
best drivers this season. I think he's the
26:42
only driver to be in the top five
26:45
in every competitive session. Hello. Someone read the
26:47
graphic in practice. Beautiful stuff.
26:49
Someone's got the confidence. They've
26:52
got the confidence that their car will work
26:54
at every track. Red Bull don't. And it is
26:56
so similar to the end of last year,
26:58
where they would win a race and then be
27:00
nowhere, sometimes even between the sprint
27:02
and the main race. It's
27:04
such a fine margin. And we
27:06
know that when Max can get that
27:08
car where he likes it. He
27:11
will deliver and can even somehow
27:13
put it on pole and even win
27:15
races. But it's such
27:17
a, it's such a kind of
27:19
narrow margin that I would not
27:21
be surprised if we go into
27:23
the next race and they're literally
27:25
fighting for sixth again. Or I
27:27
say them, literally Max, because again,
27:29
he is miles ahead of his
27:31
teammate. And
27:33
yeah, that's just how Red Bull,
27:36
I think, are going to
27:38
go. So it just needs to
27:40
keep picking up points until
27:42
that change and whether that helps
27:44
them, we have to find
27:46
out. Fire
28:03
the wrong driver, yada, yada, yada. But
28:05
this is of course linked with the
28:07
fact that Hamilton is starting behind Carlos Sainz,
28:09
which is factual evidence. Sainz
28:12
starts sixth, Hamilton starts seventh. And
28:15
Hamilton, over
28:17
half a second off Charles Leclerc, and
28:20
the struggles from Bahrain
28:22
have continued into Saudi,
28:25
but more... I guess apart from Hamilton
28:27
in China, which may well turn out
28:29
to be an outlier or Ferrari got
28:31
it very right with him in the
28:33
car and he got it very right
28:35
to do a phenomenal job at the
28:37
China Sprint. Don't get me wrong. He
28:39
did an incredible job there. But apart
28:41
from that, yeah, his poor form from
28:44
just last year, the Mercedes in qualifying
28:46
has carried over to Ferrari now that
28:48
it seems Charles has got a handle
28:50
of the car and how he likes
28:52
it. It's
28:54
sad to see. I want to see
28:56
Hamilton right there with Leclerc, ideally half
28:58
a tenth behind. But
29:00
still, they're fighting around the top
29:02
five. But he's back -to -back
29:05
weekends now, seem to struggle at
29:07
very different tracks in terms
29:09
of the abrasiveness of the circuit,
29:11
et cetera, et cetera. But
29:13
we've also said in Friday, practice
29:15
when we spoke about Hamilton
29:17
even then, is that he's just
29:19
never really been that good
29:21
around here. It really isn't.
29:23
I'm particularly in qualifying. It feels
29:26
like it is becoming one of
29:28
his bogey tracks, especially in qualifying.
29:30
And as you mentioned, he never
29:32
qualified. He's been really struggling with
29:34
qualifying. That's the thing that he's
29:36
really struggled with recently. So it's
29:38
just continued. And I
29:40
think a lot of this, you
29:43
don't need to like put a driver
29:45
down. Just some respect on Carlos Sainz
29:47
for doing a brilliant job. And this
29:49
is more where we thought he was
29:51
going to be this year. It hasn't
29:53
happened for him so far. We saw
29:55
glimpses of it in Bahrain. And
29:58
yeah, he's done an amazing job. I
30:00
just wish he'd, even though
30:02
it had been over the expense
30:04
of Antonelli, got into P5.
30:07
So I could have replied some comments
30:09
that were saying, what was I smoking when
30:11
I put in P5 in the top
30:13
five? But alas, he did
30:15
not. But a great performance from
30:17
Science. And this is what we
30:19
were expecting him to do this
30:21
year. Exactly. A phenomenal performance from
30:24
Sines and Hamilton left questioning what's
30:26
going on. Next question, P1Patreon member,
30:28
CaptainObs3420. I know Matt won't want
30:30
to hear this. I love starting
30:32
a question with that in the
30:34
first part of it. But should
30:36
Ferrari throw in the towel and
30:39
focus on 2026? Yep,
30:41
chuck it in there. Guys, the white
30:43
flag is being waved from both... Wow. The
30:45
drivers and also the fans. I am
30:48
sick and tired of just believing that
30:50
maybe this year's our year and I
30:52
know it's a meme, I know it's
30:54
a joke, but how can
30:56
Ferrari, the most historical, winningest team
30:58
in the history of Formula One,
31:00
not deliver again for another year?
31:02
Now I will take a Monaco
31:04
slash Monza win and it will
31:06
feel like a championship win once
31:09
again. However, I need more
31:11
than that at some point and it's just
31:13
not... not there, and it hasn't even looked
31:15
close this weekend. I feel like Charles Leclerc
31:17
has put in a stonking lap in that
31:19
Ferrari to even get fourth. He's
31:21
looked off the pace for most of
31:23
it, struggled to put a lap
31:25
together. But it
31:27
comes back to what you
31:29
were saying, Tommy, in the
31:31
pre -season predictions that if Ferrari
31:33
aren't quick, they should
31:36
just chuck the towel in. And
31:38
I would much rather them be
31:40
really good in 26. than
31:42
even try to claw back what
31:44
is a massive deficit to McLaren
31:46
in my eyes. I know it's
31:48
what three -tenths to back to
31:51
Piastry or Piastry's in front to
31:53
Charlotte Clair, but in the race
31:55
trim, they just don't have it
31:57
either. So, yeah, I need to
31:59
go and cry in a dark
32:01
corner because, you know, we both
32:03
predicted Charlotte Clair pole position round
32:05
here. I thought maybe a front
32:07
row coming into it would be
32:09
possible, but no chance. Fourth
32:11
seems kind of over delivering doesn't it
32:13
from from what that car has had
32:15
which is pretty depressing reading You kind
32:17
of beat me to it there. I
32:19
was gonna say do I need to say
32:21
anything here? Or can you just go
32:23
on? After listening to
32:25
this podcast click on preseason predictions
32:27
before we saw any testing and
32:30
I said that Ferrari biggest flop
32:32
they're gonna why have they changed
32:34
their car? Completely into a
32:36
new season and they will basically
32:38
sack it in immediately after the
32:40
first four races when they're not
32:42
winning in McLaren and Clare. So
32:44
you're welcome. Broken Clock is right
32:46
twice a day. There you go,
32:49
Tommy. Well done. So happy. And
32:51
what a way to end this podcast. Really
32:53
enjoyed that. You best believe.
32:55
Tomorrow, watch along. Charlotte Clair gets Russell at
32:57
the start podium on. For Stappen and Piastri
32:59
have a little ding -dong. Charlotte Clair comes through.
33:01
There we go. Love
33:03
to see it. Tommy, what are
33:05
your final thoughts? I
33:07
love how... Just gone from yeah, it's
33:10
it's over to actually maybe maybe
33:12
we're back and and and it's funny
33:14
because not it's not it's not
33:16
the same I'm not I'm not gonna
33:18
pretend it isn't but I'm almost
33:20
getting a little taste of that that
33:22
Ferrari lifestyle but maybe slightly opposite
33:25
the other way around rather than it
33:27
being one race it's just it's
33:29
just that kind of like. Yeah.
33:31
Oh, bad race. And you're trying to say that
33:33
you've had a taste of story. That's right. I
33:35
mean, it's the opposite. It's the opposite way around
33:37
where you have one good race and you go
33:40
championship back on. I should have one bad race
33:42
and go, yeah, Max is out of it. It's
33:44
never happening. And now I'm like, could he? Could
33:46
he? But now you
33:48
haven't tasted anywhere near the
33:50
pain and depression I have of
33:52
being a Charlotte Claire fan.
33:54
It's definitely more enjoyable, though, watching
33:56
him be the underdog and
33:58
deliver those moments because they feel
34:00
you know, massive to be
34:03
able to take the fight to
34:05
McLaren and just a great
34:07
qualifying again. And I can't wait
34:09
for the race. Yeah, it's set up
34:11
the race beautifully. So we'll be
34:13
live on Twitch and YouTube as always. Come and
34:15
watch along to the race with us. And that
34:17
is it. We'll see you very soon. Lots of
34:19
love. Take care. Adios. Oh,
34:27
dear. My chore is I'm going
34:29
to eat dinner because it's outside my
34:31
door. So, lots of love. Bye,
34:33
everybody. Goodbye. Picture
34:46
this. You're in the garage hands covered
34:48
in grease. Just finish tuning up your
34:50
engine with the part you found on eBay
34:53
and you realise, you know what, I
34:55
could also use new brakes. So where
34:57
do you go next? Back to
34:59
eBay. You can find
35:01
anything there. It's unreal. Wipers, headlights, even
35:03
cold air intakes. It's all there.
35:05
And you've got eBay guaranteed fit. You
35:07
order a part and if it
35:10
doesn't fit, send it back. Simple as
35:12
that. Look, DIY fixes can
35:14
be major. Doesn't matter if it's just
35:16
maintenance or a major mod. You
35:18
got it. Especially when things are guaranteed
35:20
to fit. So when you dive
35:22
into your next car project, start with
35:24
eBay. All the parts you
35:26
need at prices you'll love. Guaranteed
35:28
to fit every time. eBay. Things
35:31
people love. quality
35:39
control at a candy factory. You
35:41
know strict safety regulations come with
35:43
the job. It's why you partner
35:45
with Granger. Granger helps you find
35:47
the high quality and compliant products
35:49
your business needs to inspect, detect,
35:51
and help correct issues. And the
35:54
sweetest part is, everyone gets a
35:56
product that's as safe to eat
35:58
as it is delicious. Call one
36:00
eight hundred granger.com, click ranger.com or
36:02
just stop by. Granger for the
36:04
one. done.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More