Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hey folks Ralph here was something
0:02
that could seriously upgrade your top
0:05
of funnel ad game If you've
0:07
been a PT listener for any period
0:09
of time you know that we talk
0:11
about top of funnel all the time
0:13
and how challenging it is For you
0:15
to get quality top of funnel clients
0:17
or leads or customers and then
0:20
convert them typically at bottom of
0:22
funnel Well TV advertising is one
0:24
of those areas that we haven't
0:26
discussed here on PT all that
0:28
much. But our friends over at
0:31
ad critter have figured this stuff
0:33
out. They do connect to TV
0:35
ads, so you can be everywhere
0:37
without spending millions on Super Bowl
0:39
ads, but they parrot with display
0:41
retargeting. So you're hitting the
0:44
audiences with a complete approach.
0:46
You reach them, then you remind
0:48
them, and then you collect the revenue.
0:50
It's a strategy designed to deliver. And
0:52
let me tell you, it really works.
0:55
We're testing this at Tier 11 and
0:57
so far, the results have been
0:59
very impressive. Now with ad critter,
1:01
creating custom audiences are so easy.
1:03
You don't need to reformat files.
1:05
You don't need to mess around
1:07
with complex spreadsheets. You just upload
1:09
any file in any format and
1:11
you're ready to go. And the match rate
1:14
is awesome. They make it easy to
1:16
connect with the right people, the actual
1:18
people that have interacted with your ads
1:20
in the past and then allow them
1:22
to... naturally flow through your funnel so
1:24
you can convert them at bottom of
1:26
funnel. Now the folks at ad crater
1:29
we twisted their arm to get us
1:31
a great deal for you the PT
1:33
listener they are offering a special deal
1:35
for y'all and that is you can
1:38
get a $500 campaign credit meaning $500
1:40
in free money to test out the
1:42
platform. or dollar for dollar matching on
1:44
any TV campaign up to five grand.
1:47
Imagine the impact of that match. Spend
1:49
five grand, they'll add another five grand
1:51
in display. That's a huge opportunity here.
1:53
Now it's only offered to you,
1:55
the PT listener, head over to
1:58
adcritter.com/PT and check it out. Hey,
2:00
it's Ralph here. Let me tell
2:03
you about a lifestyle brand that
2:05
we recently worked with where they
2:07
grew their revenue by 49.8% year
2:09
over year and hit eight figures
2:11
in top line revenue for the
2:13
very first time in their history
2:16
and they are now on track
2:18
for 25 million in revenue. in
2:20
2025. We're so excited to be
2:22
working with this company. And the
2:24
reason why is they started using
2:26
Tier 11 Data Suite about a
2:28
year ago. It reduced their unattributed
2:31
traffic by 90%. That's
2:33
right. They're unattributed, direct,
2:35
unknown traffic that probably frustrates
2:37
the hell out of you over
2:39
in GA4 or one of those
2:42
other crappy attribution tools. We reduced
2:44
that unattributed traffic by 90% uncovered
2:47
$850,000 in hidden revenue and scaled
2:49
their ad spend by over 3X.
2:51
These results are not magic. The
2:54
results of clean, accurate data and
2:56
a system designed for today's privacy
2:59
world where everybody is trying to
3:01
block your data. If you want
3:03
to see these kinds of results
3:06
for your business. reach
3:08
out and let's make
3:10
it happen over at
3:12
tour11.com forward slash apply
3:14
and discover how tour
3:17
11 data suite can
3:19
finally allow you
3:21
to scale your business
3:24
acquiring new customers at
3:26
a cost you can
3:28
afford. Head on
3:30
over to
3:33
tier11.com/apply. Hello and
3:35
welcome to the perpetual traffic podcast.
3:37
This is your host Ralph Burms
3:40
and the founder and CEO of
3:42
Tier 11 alongside my amazing co-host
3:44
Lauren E. Petula the founder of
3:46
Mongoose Media. It never fails
3:48
to get that smile. Everything
3:50
is a amazing or unbelievable
3:52
today is an unbelievable show by
3:55
the way because we've got an
3:57
incredible guest. One that we've hinted
3:59
at. I think for at least two
4:01
months. Finally, we could get them. This
4:03
is a continuation of our show right
4:06
after the first of the year,
4:08
if you haven't listened to it, back
4:10
on January 17th, episode 663. We'll leave
4:12
links in the show notes, which was
4:15
how to make your present better by
4:17
making your future bigger. One of the
4:19
big things and big takeaways of that,
4:21
as well as multiple shows prior to
4:24
that one, where we talk about
4:26
outsourcing, we talk about. hiring, we
4:28
talk about how to scale your
4:31
business, build your team to ultimately
4:33
operate the 20% that is your
4:35
unique ability, and then figure
4:37
out that 80% of the
4:39
tasks that you're doing today,
4:41
hire someone who's better than you
4:44
at those other tasks to scale
4:46
and grow the business. And
4:48
this could also be very
4:51
relevant to. Let's say you're a marketing
4:53
director, you're a VP of marketing of
4:55
a marketing team. How are you going
4:57
to scale and grow the business? Is
4:59
it something that you're doing now that
5:01
maybe you should be hiring another individual
5:04
to do? Maybe it's headlines, maybe it's copy,
5:06
maybe it's Google ads, maybe it's Facebook
5:08
ads, maybe you should hire an agency.
5:10
You know, hint, hint, terror 11. The
5:12
point is, is all of this is
5:14
related back to that episode, episode 663.
5:16
And then we did talk about this
5:18
a little bit more just a few
5:21
weeks back on our four C's episode.
5:23
And that's the reason why we have
5:25
today, our HR guy. Although now he
5:27
calls himself the VP of employee
5:29
success. Just when I got used to
5:32
calling him the VP of people in
5:34
culture, he now goes and changes his
5:36
title. Today we actually have Josh Hill.
5:38
from Tier 11 all the way from
5:41
Adelaide Australia, by the way, on perpetual
5:43
traffic. Welcome to the show. Thanks,
5:45
ma'am. It has been too long. I'm getting
5:47
this stuff. And I do keep changing my total
5:50
just to keep you on your toes, Ralph.
5:52
That's true. You're just going to be our
5:54
HR guy. So, and of course, you pronounce
5:56
HR in a very distinct way, which we're
5:59
going to just... make fun of you the
6:01
entire show for. So, I'm used to it.
6:03
He's used to it. Just keep
6:05
it coming. Anyway, Josh is just
6:07
a little bit of bragging about
6:09
Josh. First off, Josh, military background.
6:11
He was captain in the Australian
6:13
military, had 150 plus soldiers under
6:15
his command, and one of the
6:18
things that he actually did is
6:20
we actually recruited him from the
6:22
Australian military to be a mediabire
6:24
at Tier 11, and then somehow
6:26
persuaded him to leave the military
6:28
and come here. I don't know how the
6:30
hell that happened, but now he is our
6:33
HR guy. He's ascended through the ranks and
6:35
has taken what was always a really good
6:37
hiring process. And we've talked about our
6:39
hiring process here quite a bit. Today
6:41
we're going to get into it a
6:43
little bit deeper because it's easy to
6:45
say go hire somebody. It's easy to
6:47
say go find somebody. But how do
6:49
you actually do it? That's the hard
6:51
part. And so today we're going to give
6:53
you a framework that Josh has perfected.
6:55
through the years based on an original way
6:57
in which we hired way back when which
7:00
was sort of an eight-step formula when we
7:02
first started for 11 as a virtual company
7:04
now it's even better than it ever was
7:06
and now we're even recruiting and other countries.
7:09
So there's a lot going on here. So
7:11
hopefully you'll be able to have some takeaways
7:13
from today's show as you continue to operate
7:16
in your 20% and figure out the 80%
7:18
that you don't want to be doing
7:20
and get somebody else to do it because
7:22
there are people that are out there that
7:25
want to do the stuff that you don't
7:27
want to do. And that's how you
7:29
scale. Anyway, Josh, maybe we can sort
7:31
of take a step back here. We
7:33
talked a little bit about the framework
7:35
that we use, but we also discussed
7:37
before we hit record. one of the core
7:39
elements before even the framework itself. So maybe
7:41
we can talk about that. I know it's
7:43
something that's near and dear to your heart,
7:46
which is core values. Yeah, for sure. I
7:48
think the tendency for a lot of companies,
7:50
business owners, I mean, it doesn't really matter
7:52
what size of a team you're operating on,
7:54
but the tendency to jump straight to
7:56
a result and hire, I mean, to resist
7:58
that urge, is difficult. It's a result that
8:01
a lot of people chase. They see
8:03
a problem and they go, okay, we
8:05
need a body. Right. And it's one
8:07
of a myriad of different ways that
8:09
you can enhance your capability as a
8:12
company or add resource, drive change, increase
8:14
momentum. Like, whatever your goal is, the
8:16
first thing that comes to mind is
8:18
let's throw a body at it. No
8:20
worries. However, I guess that the system
8:22
that we build at 2-11 and I
8:24
think the way we approach a lot
8:27
of problems and I think is the
8:29
way we approach. We do have a
8:31
lengthy kind of foundational component of our
8:33
recruitment process, which is looking first at
8:35
why are we hiring? What do we
8:37
need? What matters to Tier 11? What
8:40
matters to our team? What matters to
8:42
our culture? If you believe that in
8:44
the recruitment process, the cultural component, the
8:46
cultural fit, is one of the most
8:48
important things, as well as skills and
8:50
everything else, then it will naturally lead
8:52
you to be thinking about, okay, what
8:55
are our values as a company? What's
8:57
our vision? What's our purpose? What's the
8:59
current status of how engaged our people
9:01
are? And how do we get more
9:03
people like them? Who are your best
9:05
players? Who are your best people on
9:08
the team? And how do you replicate
9:10
those? But understanding why they're your best
9:12
players on the team and how do
9:14
you replicate those? But understanding why they're
9:16
your best players and starting with core
9:18
values is one of corporate environments, which
9:20
I was involved. Your experience is obviously
9:23
in the military. My experience is primarily
9:25
in the corporate world, where there were
9:27
core values, but they weren't adhered to
9:29
these dusty old maxims that sat on
9:31
a wall somewhere at the corporate office.
9:33
And nobody paid attention to them. And
9:36
I think when you start your own
9:38
organization or your own department, like you
9:40
can have core values in your own
9:42
department to a certain degree that roll
9:44
up to the company. And I think
9:46
that's a very important place to start.
9:48
And when I talk on this quite
9:51
a bit, is that nobody does that
9:53
they just go right to the result
9:55
like a let me throw a body
9:57
at it and that exactly what you're
9:59
saying and that just leads to. a
10:01
bad result. It's like you fill the
10:04
void, but you have not found the
10:06
right person, the right seat, right role,
10:08
that also is in alignment with your
10:10
vision as an organization or as a
10:12
department. And when we started hiring, we
10:14
were very, very intentional about that. And
10:16
we just got lucky that we hired
10:19
a bunch of people that sort of
10:21
knew what they were doing and were
10:23
really good before we had a real
10:25
system. And then all we did is
10:27
we took the best person and then
10:29
wrote down like, like, What are the
10:32
core characteristics? What do they have specifically?
10:34
And it was a long list and
10:36
we boiled it down to like three
10:38
or four things. And those became our
10:40
core values. And it was sort of
10:42
this, what I always referred to way
10:44
back then, this is, you know, seven
10:47
or eight years ago now, as our
10:49
character diamond. But it's really in essence,
10:51
it was four things. And I think
10:53
that's a good place to start. You
10:55
haven't done that yet as an organization.
10:57
I think none of the stuff that
11:00
we say in the next part of
11:02
the episode really matters all that much.
11:04
Am I incorrect in saying that? I
11:06
agree, completely. I think when you're looking
11:08
to scale, you need the common threat
11:10
in the company. You need the common
11:12
DNA. And I think if you would
11:15
cross compare a lot of successful companies
11:17
or startups, they would have similar attributes
11:19
in their values and they would drive
11:21
their values in very specific ways to
11:23
not only just have them on the
11:25
wall, like you were saying. That's vanity,
11:28
right? Like, that's, again, like, what we're
11:30
talking about here is not just about
11:32
having values, and, oh, these are the
11:34
values, that's also a result. Being able
11:36
to articulate a set of guiding principles,
11:38
these values, they need to be linked
11:40
to what you expect to observe through
11:43
behavior, right? So, when we say a
11:45
value is hunger, what does that behavior
11:47
look like? How is that actually observable
11:49
in the business? How do you set
11:51
that expectation? How do you reward for
11:53
it? Again, that's foundational, right? So what
11:56
we're talking about here isn't just, oh,
11:58
these are our values tick done. It's
12:00
a hard, lengthy, brain-consuming
12:02
process to come up with values
12:04
that matter. And then connecting it
12:06
to your operations and the journey
12:08
that you have as a company,
12:11
that's even more difficult because now
12:13
you need to live the values
12:15
and you need to inculcate them.
12:17
There you go. Oh, that's it.
12:19
That's the word. It's for you, Ralph.
12:21
Wait a second. What $20 word are
12:23
you trying to drop right now? That's
12:25
there. It's an action line. Now you've
12:28
seen a deployed. you and your military
12:30
language. Oh my goodness. You've now seen
12:32
it deployed. I'm sure like everyone else
12:34
is like, okay, Josh is too smart
12:37
for me right now. Can you explain
12:39
what that word mean? We have no
12:41
idea what that word is. The definition
12:43
is to instill an idea attitude or
12:45
habit by persistent instruction. He just googled
12:48
it. He didn't know that after this
12:50
head. I've got it enough because I
12:52
knew one of you would ask me,
12:54
right? So I've got it up here,
12:57
inculcate, inculcate, verb. It's like,
12:59
yeah, you need a foundation,
13:01
an ingrained, that's funny. It's
13:03
infiltrating an idea. Yeah. Basically,
13:06
it's like really intentionally
13:08
nurturing something. And yeah, when
13:10
it comes to hiring, it's like, yeah,
13:12
you need a foundation, you need
13:15
a vision, you need, you need
13:17
values. But that in and of
13:19
itself is a whole podcast episode,
13:21
right? Like just how to develop
13:23
and come to terms of what
13:25
your values are. But if you
13:27
have. these mapped out. It sets
13:29
you up really well for all sorts
13:31
of other things, not just the hiring,
13:33
but it sets you up to build
13:35
a workforce that is aligned to
13:37
exactly what you're trying to
13:39
achieve. So I guess the core
13:41
values are undercurrent of everything. By
13:43
the time that the candidate gets
13:45
to me, I'm really thinking, all
13:48
right, do they embrace those core values?
13:50
And I have specific questions around
13:52
those core values, because I'm sort
13:54
of the one that as the
13:56
last interview or we've already made
13:58
the hire because you guys. exactly
14:00
what to look for. And then my thing
14:02
is just sort of either a tick in
14:05
the box or it's after they've already been
14:07
hired just to sort of make sure because
14:09
I know the job has already been done.
14:11
The point is, is like once you have core
14:13
values, you need to, you need to be
14:15
like layered upon or like, I look at
14:17
all the steps that we're going to talk
14:19
about here today. It's like it's the oil
14:21
that kind of makes the engine go. and
14:24
you have to constantly be thinking about
14:26
it. It's not just I am hiring
14:28
for the skill. I need a media
14:30
buyer. I need somebody who is, who
14:32
knows how to do Facebook ads. Great.
14:35
That's one thing. But do they embrace
14:37
our core values as well? Do
14:39
they have hunger? Like the initial
14:41
ones where humble hungry, smart, and
14:43
the last one is marketing IQ.
14:46
Like those were our four core
14:48
values. When we first started. humble
14:50
hungry smart marketing IQ because
14:52
everyone had to know something
14:54
about marketing that's now changed.
14:56
So it's much more simple the point
14:58
is is we had something and so we
15:01
hired for all those things we promoted for
15:03
all those things we trained for all those
15:05
things we trained for all those things we
15:07
fired for all those things we fired for all
15:10
those things too yeah that's right at the end
15:12
of the day like that is the essence of
15:14
the inculcates that idea inculcates all of your
15:16
steps Not to use your term or
15:18
anything, but I guess I just did.
15:21
So take us through the steps. You've
15:23
got your core values. Cool, good.
15:25
You do that as an organization. How
15:27
do you go about hiring? Like where does
15:29
it sort of start? What step number one?
15:31
And let's sort of go all the way
15:33
through. And do you have numbered steps here
15:35
in your mind or is it just like
15:38
how do you look at it? Well, I mean,
15:40
I guess if we take a step back, you
15:42
can kind of divide it up into three phases.
15:44
I mean at least that's how I look at
15:46
it. You've got the preliminary like phase one which
15:48
is all the stuff we're talking about now.
15:51
It's like the foundational components that will
15:53
feed into hiring and are super important
15:55
like the values and you know getting
15:57
an understanding of exactly what.
16:00
type of person, common thread that you
16:02
want throughout the company in terms of
16:04
like their behavior and the way they
16:06
show up, right? Like some companies are
16:09
all about fast moving change, some companies
16:11
are about stability, and then it matters
16:13
intra-team as well. So yes, I think
16:15
it's important to have a look
16:17
at the agency wide or company wide,
16:19
kind of the values and the culture
16:21
that you're trying to nurture, but
16:23
teams have their certain dynamics as
16:25
well, certain roles that you're hiring
16:27
for, certain parts of the business.
16:30
do you want to nail it down even
16:32
more? Like depending on the project that they're
16:34
likely to take on if they're a senior
16:36
member or something, there's nuance that you need
16:38
to work out first on what is their
16:40
experience going to look like and demand and
16:42
mapping that out. And that kind of feeds into,
16:44
I guess, more on that first phase, which is
16:47
regarding, you know, having a clear idea
16:49
of your accountability chart or your
16:51
organizational structure. You don't just want to
16:53
be hiring people. randomly and just
16:55
throwing them into your organizational structure.
16:58
You wouldn't have an idea of
17:00
the seats that you have on the bus.
17:02
But we always do that. I don't
17:04
think we've done that at least once.
17:06
We throw people at problems. Totally. It
17:08
seems like it's the best solution. I see
17:10
you, you can fix this. Right. I didn't
17:13
train you whatsoever, but how are you therefore?
17:15
I know you can do it. Yeah, every company
17:17
does. Yeah, that's right. So that's
17:19
being a seat-based organization. And there's
17:22
always a push and pull between these
17:24
things I found. There's a lot of
17:26
advocacy for if the person is right
17:28
and they're a cultural fit and you have
17:30
a need and you don't just quite know where
17:32
they fit yet, get them on the bus
17:35
anyway, because they'll figure it out. Even if
17:37
the processes and systems are sloppy, they
17:39
will rise to the challenge and they
17:41
will get shit done. That's a mantra,
17:43
that's a perspective, but it also needs
17:45
to be balanced with the fact that
17:47
you should. not full go or forsake the
17:49
need to have a clear idea on your
17:51
accountability structure and why you're hiring a seat
17:53
and how to define that seat. So that
17:56
is really the first phase. It's all that
17:58
due diligence that needs to happen. and having
18:00
a clear idea of the organizational structure,
18:02
and then developing the role itself, like
18:04
the job map, which we call it
18:06
at 211, which is really like the
18:08
Bible of the seat. It has expectations,
18:11
the vision for the role, core account
18:13
abilities, competency levels, like it's a comprehensive
18:15
document, standalone, that you should be able
18:17
to give someone, and they should be
18:19
able to know exactly what they need
18:21
to do, how they're going to be
18:23
measured, what's expected of them, just from
18:25
a single document. And creating that as
18:28
an as an early exercise as an
18:30
early exercise. gets the juices flying with
18:32
why we hire in the seat, what
18:34
are the expectations, what are the measures
18:36
of success. And that's another kind of
18:38
foundational component I would wrap into this
18:40
first pre-lim phase. And then once you
18:42
clear on all of those things, you've
18:44
got a very good idea of what
18:47
you need, why you need it, what
18:49
value they're going to drive. Then we
18:51
start getting into the meat of like
18:53
actual sourcing and recruitment and interviews and
18:55
selection, simulation, simulation tasks, like cultural fit
18:57
assessments, like I mean... Wait, you do
18:59
simulation tasks before someone gets hired on
19:01
all positions? Yes, that's brought, yeah, yeah.
19:03
Dang. We'll get to that in just
19:06
a second. That takes so much time
19:08
and patience. It does, I just want
19:10
to be clear, before we go on
19:12
to this, because I do think the
19:14
simulator task, when I explain it, when
19:16
I talk about it, like especially when
19:18
we went from six figures to seven
19:20
figures plus, it was an application to
19:23
a simulator to a simulator to a
19:25
bunch of other steps before they even
19:27
got to an interview, and it works
19:29
so well. It's a longer process, but
19:31
let's just take a step back here.
19:33
The accountability chart is super important. And
19:35
now that is, if you have not,
19:37
we talk about this so many times
19:39
on the show, nearly 700 episodes. I
19:42
think we talk about traction and EOS,
19:44
the entrepreneur, the operating system, like obviously
19:46
many, many times. And it's great to
19:48
see like when I go to some
19:50
conferences for agencies, there's a lot of
19:52
adoption on this system now, which is
19:54
great. It's great to see because it
19:56
wasn't that way five to 10 years
19:58
ago. When you talk about the accountability
20:01
show, we're really talking about an orch
20:03
chart, right? And I think when we've...
20:05
for a start where, to Lauren's point,
20:07
he said, oh, you're great, you fit
20:09
the company culture, just come on board,
20:11
great people, we'll find you a seat.
20:13
That works to a certain degree. And
20:15
one of the best business books that
20:17
I reread probably every single year, not
20:20
probably, because I know that I reread
20:22
it or listen to it is good
20:24
to great. It's like, find the right
20:26
people, get them on the bus, and
20:28
then figure out the seat on the
20:30
bus. So there's two schools of thought
20:32
here. So I don't think one is
20:34
wrong and the other is correct because
20:37
it depends on where you are in
20:39
your growth and in your business because
20:41
the first way just find the right
20:43
people and then we'll figure out the
20:45
seat worked for us at a later
20:47
point in time though we needed to
20:49
have more structure and accountability chart is
20:51
basically okay we have let's say CEO,
20:53
then we have leadership team and then
20:56
inside the leadership team that's going to
20:58
be managers and under those managers is
21:00
going to be all these individual people
21:02
that are going to be the ones
21:04
that are doing the skill or doing
21:06
the thing. That is an accountability chart.
21:08
That is like you have a, you
21:10
literally every quarter what we used to
21:12
do for EOS is we would surely
21:15
fire everyone in our brains and restructure
21:17
the organization and create a new accountability
21:19
chart. It's like, what do we really
21:21
need from a structure standpoint? Do we
21:23
have the right people in the right
21:25
seats? Do we even have the right
21:27
seats? So I don't think like you
21:29
talked about that, but I don't know
21:32
if that's necessarily something that people think
21:34
about quite as much because as you
21:36
become a million multi-million dollar organization, this
21:38
part becomes absolutely essential. Exactly. The term
21:40
that we use quite a bit, and
21:42
I'm not sure if it's Jim Collins,
21:44
maybe it is, but it's putting people
21:46
in the parking the parking lot, so
21:48
to so to so to speak. when
21:51
you're designing or reimagining or going through
21:53
this due diligence of like do I
21:55
need to hire this person or even
21:57
when you're doing reviews of the company's
21:59
structure. It's like the ability to emotionally
22:01
remove your from the situation because a
22:03
lot of the people that you work
22:05
with you're connected to them 100% you've
22:07
built relationships with your immediate team especially
22:10
if you're a business owner like it's
22:12
difficult to emotionally detach yourself. You have
22:14
personal relationships with these people. You're spending
22:16
more time with them than your partners
22:18
and family. Yeah, 100% Exactly. Spend more
22:20
time with Lauren than I do my
22:22
wife. So that's true. Actually, I think
22:24
that is true. I think you and
22:27
I've had more conversations than you and
22:29
Jen, which I'm not complaining about, but
22:31
it is funny. But the fact of
22:33
matter is that like, like you're saying,
22:35
these are people that you... personally invested
22:37
and especially through the business owner. But
22:39
then the other thing is like you
22:41
assume expectations because they're coming in to
22:43
what could be a well-oiled machine that
22:46
could be a culture that is working
22:48
really really well and I know this
22:50
is like a sidebar to it but
22:52
there's also been times where self-included and
22:54
I'm certain other people listening have hired
22:56
someone that's come in with a wrecking
22:58
ball and Miley Cyrus the team's groove
23:00
so eliminating that wrecking ball before it
23:02
comes in has to be accounted for
23:05
and what you're talking about helps vibe
23:07
check and groove check. Yeah I mean
23:09
hiring has the ability to destroy your
23:11
business and also has the ability to
23:13
take your business from good to great.
23:15
It's one of the things you just
23:17
can't forsake. When it gets to like
23:19
the 20 to 80 and removing yourself
23:21
from this as a business owner or,
23:24
you know, just if you need to
23:26
offload some of the work that's done
23:28
to get to this level of hiring
23:30
quality, because it does take a lot
23:32
of work. It's just important to remember
23:34
that like, I mean, in your case,
23:36
Ralph, for example, you built a hiring
23:38
process that worked, right, and it got
23:41
us to a certain position as a
23:43
company, but the amount of sheer time
23:45
it took for you to maintain to
23:47
maintain that, for you to maintain that,
23:49
like you have the ability to do
23:51
that as a business owner like you
23:53
proved it out you built it but
23:55
you get to a point where it's
23:57
just like you grow to the business
24:00
to a certain point and you need
24:02
to focus your efforts on other parts
24:04
of the business or even elevate as
24:06
a visionary and you can't let the
24:08
hiring process degrade or diminish from
24:10
that point. In fact what you need to do
24:12
is invest in it and increase its capacity
24:15
and its ability or at least maintain it
24:17
where you left it and to do that you
24:19
need to invest. Yeah and I think a
24:21
big component as well is this is this
24:23
emotional side that's not really talked about I
24:25
don't think too much. because hiring is
24:27
a process, it's a system, it's a
24:30
logical flow to get people into
24:32
the organization. But fundamentally
24:34
we're talking about humans, right?
24:36
We're talking about when we
24:38
hire people, it's not just about
24:40
a job or a seat, you
24:43
know, they're fundamentally changing their lives,
24:45
they're upheaving, you know, a lot of
24:47
the time that they spend with their
24:49
previous workforce and they're
24:51
subscribing to a new product
24:54
to Tier 11. the mentality that
24:56
we're starting to approach is looking
24:58
at employment or even just the
25:00
employee experience as a subscription product.
25:02
Why do our employees or contractors want
25:05
to subscribe to Tier 11? What's stopping
25:07
them from getting up and saying, you
25:09
know what, I'm going to change my
25:11
Netflix subscription to Amazon. I'm going to
25:14
change my Tier 11 subscription from this agency
25:16
to another agency. If we approach it
25:18
that way, then it forces the HR
25:20
team or leaders to think about
25:22
the employee experience first, then... you're
25:24
going to develop a better
25:27
hiring experience for them
25:29
and also for the managers. It's
25:31
a good way to frame it as well.
25:33
I mean hiring is I always sort
25:35
of think back to a hiring
25:37
manager that I worked with in the corporate
25:40
world where every hiring decision
25:42
for him was an emotional
25:44
decision because he just hired
25:46
on emotion he's like my
25:49
gut tells me this. Gut tells
25:51
me this guy is going to be a
25:53
great salesperson, like based upon what criteria. And
25:55
I think you have to have very very
25:57
specific criteria. You need a job map. So
25:59
it is. totally in his case he
26:02
was looking for just a gut
26:04
feel did not have a specific
26:06
checklist and he also looked at
26:08
and that this is one of the things
26:10
when I talk about this is
26:12
don't look for people that are
26:14
exactly like you so we once
26:16
had a joke this kid was
26:19
like a tall southern sort of
26:21
athletic talked and had a funny
26:23
sense of you know like actually
26:25
hysterically funny all the guys on his
26:27
team were exactly like him all dudes
26:29
all like him southern funny
26:32
six foot three you know where
26:34
they ranked in the company
26:36
out of 20 districts dead
26:38
last and he was a great
26:40
sales guy and I'll never forget
26:43
this was like that is
26:45
a cardinal sin of hiring
26:47
always trying to look for
26:49
the same person is you do
26:51
not look for the same person that
26:54
you are look complementary to your skills
26:56
not complementary like suck up kind of
26:58
thing you are the boss the thing
27:00
is that you don't do well They
27:03
should have that, especially if you're hiring
27:05
them for a task in your
27:07
80% that you don't want to
27:09
do anymore. They should not be like
27:11
you. Yeah. I was a joke
27:13
with our COO. He's like, programs
27:15
on the weekends and when he
27:17
has free time, he watches anime. He's
27:20
so completely different than me. I'm
27:22
like, that's exactly why I love
27:24
this guy, because he's like my
27:26
opposite. I don't want to hire me.
27:28
And I think that's... That's a hard thing
27:30
for a lot of people to get like
27:32
wrap their heads around or sort of understand
27:35
is and Brian Bircher was his name
27:37
and everyone in his district was the
27:39
exact same way I've never forgotten that
27:41
lesson and I did the opposite and
27:43
we were number one every single year
27:45
the point is that's not it wasn't
27:47
just that but I think there is something
27:50
to this is that. You have to take
27:52
that emotion out of it. You have
27:54
to be once or twice removed to
27:56
a certain degree. And also, very most
27:58
importantly, look for people who are... complementary
28:01
to your skills. I think it's hard though
28:03
because when you meet someone that's just
28:05
like you you connect so well and
28:07
then because you two connect you assume
28:09
everyone else on your team will connect
28:11
the same way but then all it
28:13
does is amplify all the things that they
28:15
don't like about you that they now
28:17
have to get it from two friends
28:19
but it's hard like you meet somebody like
28:21
oh my gosh you watch K dramas
28:23
you speak Italian you eat cookies as
28:25
its own nutritious food group, when I
28:27
need someone that has those three criteria.
28:30
And I'm like, show me your good
28:32
reads because you are my soulmate. I'm
28:34
like, you're on the bus, but it's
28:36
hard because when you're interviewing them,
28:38
you're like, oh my God, you're perfect.
28:40
Because our eagles see ourselves and the
28:42
other person. It's like, I'm looking in
28:45
a mirror. And I tell myself every
28:47
day, I'm perfect. I'm kind kidding. But.
28:49
In the reality, like when you see
28:52
those, it's hard. So anyone that's listening,
28:54
it's like, oh, I've totally hired
28:56
someone that's just like me,
28:59
it gets frustrating because you
29:01
as the business owner aren't hireable.
29:03
Right. So true. You know that.
29:05
You're not hireable. You know that.
29:07
You're not hireable. That's why you
29:10
started a business. And so then
29:12
you hire someone else that's like
29:14
you. Because you didn't apply for
29:16
your job. You created your job.
29:18
That can extend as well to just simply
29:21
having the same kind of interview styles
29:23
or being the same level of extrovert,
29:25
you know, or just jiving on the call
29:27
about similar hobbies or interests. It could have
29:30
nothing to do with necessarily their
29:32
suitability for the role that you've developed. I
29:34
think it's a very good point to
29:36
raise because it's very dangerous to go
29:38
into hiring and recruitment and being 100%
29:41
emotionally led. Like, it's an important component,
29:43
but it's important to be able to
29:46
insert that like a scaple. once you've done
29:48
all the due diligence that we were talking about
29:50
in that first phase, like you need to go
29:52
through and build the building blocks and the
29:54
foundation so that when you get to
29:56
a conversation, your intuition and your emotions
29:58
play an important part. And you want
30:00
to have that connection and that spark,
30:02
but it should not be the driving
30:04
force in your decision-making. And you need
30:07
to cross-reference and cross-check that with
30:09
the logical side of your brain. And you can't
30:11
do that if you haven't done the logical work
30:13
up front. Otherwise, you're just asking for a pain.
30:15
And you will end up building a team of
30:18
people that you simply can be friends
30:20
with and that you enjoy being around,
30:22
but can't make the hard decisions, can't
30:24
execute, according to the job maps that
30:26
you've developed, That's probably one of
30:28
the hardest things that I found
30:30
about recruitment because naturally I'm quite
30:32
an emotional individual that likes to connect
30:35
with people. I make friends with everyone.
30:37
I love people. That's why I'm in
30:39
HR. That's why I'm in this role.
30:41
This job is because I'm biased but you
30:43
know without people you do not have a
30:45
business period. You need good people. And
30:47
I look at everyone and I'm like
30:49
opportunity, potential. Yes, go you. And that if
30:51
you have too much of that in
30:54
hiring process. it's like let's hire everyone
30:56
because everyone's amazing and then you get
30:58
to a point where you're like that
31:00
person's actually really shit you know so
31:02
but if they were like you you can't
31:05
admit that because then you feel that you
31:07
are shit because then you're looking in the
31:09
mirror and you're like well wait they were
31:11
perfect why aren't they better because it's
31:13
either you have a identity crisis or
31:15
you take it personally a hundred percent
31:18
yeah and then you get to a point where
31:20
you get into this protecting your
31:22
decision and not considering it as a
31:24
sunk cost that you've hired the wrong
31:26
person and that's a whole not a kind
31:28
of situation when you you put the time
31:30
and F into hiring and it was a
31:32
misfire and that will happen especially with
31:35
the way that recruitment's heading with
31:37
with AI and I mean that's a
31:39
separate conversation but like the amount of applications
31:41
you can get now for jobs where
31:43
people look amazing and the tendency
31:45
for people to yeah People lie and
31:48
they can manipulate it and like even
31:50
like on socials they can. There's so many
31:52
AI tools available there to make you sound
31:54
and look better than you actually are that
31:56
if you're not leveraging those you're
31:59
on disadvantage. are leveraging those you have
32:01
to be like inspector gadget and make sure
32:03
you ask what I mean there's tons of
32:05
videos on the internet where you'll see even
32:07
at Coder so I'm not a developer I
32:09
don't do software engineering at all but I've
32:12
seen interviews where people are recording themselves being
32:14
interviewed and then they have AI open on
32:16
the screen right to the right of them telling
32:18
them all the answers that they mean like even at
32:20
like a recent conversation I had with a bunch of
32:22
CTOs they were talking about how they have to do
32:24
like live coding prompts where they have to
32:27
share their screen and they have to hire
32:29
specific software to make sure that they're the
32:31
ones doing the coding because I had found
32:33
this too. I've hired someone that didn't do
32:36
the work. I hired someone who did really
32:38
well interview style and then they had their
32:40
partner or someone living with them that did
32:42
the work and I got caught like that was that
32:45
happens when you hire remotely like those
32:47
things are like so true and oh I know
32:49
someone else listening has a horror story.
32:51
Tell me you've had this experience
32:54
experience experience too. Oh yeah, absolutely. I mean
32:56
less so now, but yes, absolutely. It's
32:58
a natural thing. It's almost like you
33:00
have to go through that. And the
33:02
only way for you to understand the value
33:05
of what we're talking about here, I
33:07
know we're talking a lot on sort
33:09
of step, really step one here in
33:11
a lot of ways, and then we
33:13
talked about it. We're like at step
33:15
zero almost, to a certain degree, is
33:17
to experience the pain of having the
33:20
wrong hire. So I think it's actually,
33:22
it's a blessing in a lot of ways
33:24
to. do it the wrong way because then
33:26
you experience the pain of getting somebody
33:28
on board and you never want to
33:30
repeat that mistake ever again. I didn't
33:32
need those blessings. I would have been okay. Yeah,
33:34
I mean if you keep repeating the same mistake
33:36
then you're just an idiot and you should
33:39
be listening to this show I suppose or
33:41
reading some book on how to hire. The
33:43
point is is that everyone's going to make
33:45
those mistakes and you can make them once
33:48
twice three times but after like the third
33:50
time you've made a bad hiring decision. It's
33:52
not them it's you it is you
33:54
100% it definitely is and I think
33:56
that the old maxim is true here
33:59
you know when you follow a process you
34:01
do hire slow and fire fast you
34:03
immediately figure out what your mistakes are
34:05
and let those people go quickly
34:07
but it's almost like you have to
34:09
hire bad people in order to realize I
34:11
really do need a system and maybe
34:13
I need a better way which is
34:16
hopefully what we're explaining here. Well would you
34:18
agree to be true like for me it's
34:20
every person I hire is an expense for
34:22
me for six months so when they join
34:24
my team I have to know that six
34:26
months of their salary is pure
34:28
investment. Because if they leave
34:30
or they're fired within six months,
34:32
they became an expense, not an
34:34
investment. Yeah, 100%. Yeah. All of these
34:37
components that will eventually go into,
34:39
they're all foundational, like they're
34:41
all important, they're all interlinked.
34:43
They all contribute to a
34:45
successful hire. Phase zero is foundational, but
34:48
also at the tail end of this
34:50
whole process, the onboarding. Yeah. The
34:52
process in which you onboard someone, you
34:54
welcome them in, you give them the
34:56
tools. the structure, the processes, the support,
34:58
the nurturing to succeed, that is one
35:00
of the strongest indicators of success. You
35:03
can do everything right. You can
35:05
even hire the right person objectively,
35:07
right? If they come in and they've got
35:09
a really poor onboarding experience,
35:12
you're severely undermining and
35:14
diminishing everything that you've done. And
35:16
there's principles of onboarding and there's
35:18
so many different ways to do
35:21
it, but ultimately it's like
35:23
they're in the company. Now everything
35:25
is geared towards mobilizing them and
35:27
getting them up to speed as
35:29
quickly as possible and getting
35:31
them living their job map. So
35:33
let's get into, we're on step zero
35:35
a bit, we talked about the accountability
35:38
chart, we talked about job maps, we
35:40
talked about the importance of core values,
35:42
let's get into sourcing candidates. Like you've
35:45
got all that stuff laid out, most
35:47
of that is pretext here. So how
35:49
do you start? This is the biggest
35:51
question I always get. Where do you
35:53
guys find the best people? Always the
35:55
biggest question. How would you answer that? How do you
35:57
do it? I know you've got sort of a
35:59
very specific... which you do it, which was
36:01
led to some incredible hires. Let's talk
36:03
about that. Well, I'm a big advocate of
36:06
your employees first and foremost
36:08
being ultimately your best hiring
36:10
managers. Right. So I think they have the
36:12
best understanding. I mean, okay,
36:14
it's taking a step back, sourcing
36:16
and ultimately selling the company that you're
36:19
offering as that subscription product
36:21
to a candidate is the essence
36:23
of how to attract the best talent. Like
36:25
you need to sell your company to
36:27
someone. It's not a case of. You're in
36:29
a position of power and I can have anyone
36:32
I want. You need to come at it from
36:34
an inverted perspective. What is it going
36:36
to take for you to steal the
36:38
attention to convince someone that you
36:40
are the defining career change, the
36:42
defining career move that is right for
36:44
them? And it may not be right.
36:47
And you don't want to oversell. It's
36:49
about discovery. But initially to attract and
36:51
to source, you need to develop that
36:53
level of that mindset that this is
36:55
a game of attraction and selling the
36:58
opportunity. And the best salesmen in that
37:00
position are, of course, your hiring team
37:02
and yourself, your employees, they get the
37:04
business. And if they're advocates of your
37:06
culture and what you stand for, your
37:09
vision, and everything, they can articulate, especially
37:11
the people that are in the
37:13
teams, where this role would be employed.
37:15
They are the best articulators of what people
37:17
can expect, why it's worth their time, what
37:19
value that this company can provide them. So
37:22
whether it's the fact that you mobilize your
37:24
people to hire through their own sources
37:26
or networks or networks. Or even if you
37:28
do some discovery first to talk to your
37:31
employees to understand, why are you here? What
37:33
do you get from the subscription? What
37:35
do you get from Tier 11? Why is this your career
37:38
choice? If you do that level of discovery,
37:40
that sets you up well for sourcing and
37:42
those subsequent conversations that need to happen. But
37:44
that would be my first number one tip
37:46
is like, put your focus in turning on
37:49
the company before running to indeed and
37:51
job boards and LinkedIn recruiter and. Take
37:53
a step back again, it's the foundational
37:55
stuff that makes hiring great. It's the
37:57
phase zero, and it's before we jump
37:59
into anything. You take a step back, you think,
38:01
you be intentional, why am I going to
38:03
go to a job board when I've got
38:05
employees here that could advocate for this
38:08
company and help us hire really good
38:10
people? So that's the first step. And
38:12
usually from there, it's a combination of
38:14
head hunting and outreach and job boards. We
38:16
can dive into both of those if you
38:18
want. Yeah. But you're saying first
38:21
and foremost is referrals. From the
38:23
people that are working for you that are
38:25
like, I enjoy working for this company. I
38:27
know someone who's talented. They're willing to
38:29
bet their name and reputation. Because
38:31
we've done it. Some of the best PAC members
38:33
have come from referrals, like a thousand percent.
38:35
Like we had one girl who gave us
38:37
five referrals. It was like her whole friend
38:40
group had started working for us and her
38:42
mom joked and said, are you HR or
38:44
are you a copyrighter for this company? You just
38:46
hang out with your friends all day? Yeah, like
38:48
it was amazing. It was like, wow. I was
38:50
like, how else do we infect your friends? Anyone
38:53
else you know, because it was just brilliant talent
38:55
after brilliant talent. But the challenge comes in as
38:57
like, for us, it worked. We had a referral
38:59
incentive program. So when they had someone that was
39:01
a good fit, provided that they and the other
39:04
person were in good standing, they got paid out.
39:06
And then we set up a process where they
39:08
could take the payment 30 days, six months for
39:10
one year. depending on when they
39:13
wanted to take the payout, it got
39:15
bigger. So if you were willing to
39:17
be like, yeah, I know this person
39:19
will still be here in a year.
39:21
It was like three or four X,
39:24
the payout of six months. So it's
39:26
like, do you want to wait? Or
39:28
if you know, like, maybe it's not
39:30
good fit. That always signaled to us
39:32
if it was a good one, but
39:35
then the other times where it's happened,
39:37
and they were the first ones to
39:39
say, I refer the wrong person, please
39:41
don't want this damage, my relationship with
39:44
you guys. So in that referral capacity,
39:46
it's like, it's amazing, but it also
39:48
comes with that small risk, and you've
39:51
experienced that too. Right, and I think
39:53
what's important, if you stand up a
39:55
referral program like that, it's very important
39:57
to make sure that that's just a
39:59
pipeline. to go into your
40:01
already established very comprehensive recruitment
40:04
process, right? Like this person isn't
40:06
cutting the cue. They're not going to
40:08
the front of the line. It's just an
40:10
in to getting pushed front and center,
40:13
especially if it's a referral from
40:15
one of your best people. And that's
40:17
what I would encourage. It's like referrals
40:19
are going to vary in terms of
40:21
their quality, of course. I mean, typically
40:24
you could correlate better referrals from
40:26
your top-tier performance. If I've got
40:28
someone at the agency or in my
40:30
company that I believe to be one
40:33
of them, you know, alignment to core
40:35
values goes above and beyond, hungry, smart,
40:37
and says, hey, I've got someone that I
40:39
know that could do this job, instantly
40:41
I'm going to be like, okay, if there
40:43
anything like you, then I'm very excited.
40:45
And typically someone of that caliber
40:47
is not going to be referring someone
40:50
that could potentially jeopardize their
40:52
reputation or their performance or
40:54
anything like that. You're usually going
40:56
to find the best referrals from
40:59
your best people. And developing
41:01
incentives for that to proactively
41:03
happen is good. In absence of that,
41:05
you don't need to overcomplicate it. You
41:08
can just reach out to your best
41:10
performers and say, look, or even post
41:12
it publicly to your company. It's also
41:14
a good assessment and a good
41:17
indicator of, do people really like working
41:19
at your company? You know, because if
41:21
you're getting nothing back and you're
41:23
hearing crickets, why they're not hungry
41:26
to hire people like them, or
41:28
similar to bring them to your company.
41:30
People always ask me, like, how do
41:32
you guys recruit? I know you've
41:34
got sort of a secret sauce
41:36
recruiting, but also let's talk about
41:38
the paid services and where you
41:40
stand there as well as job boards. It's
41:43
a tough one because it does depend
41:45
on the role. It depends on
41:47
exactly who you're hiring and what
41:49
market. And I think our approach
41:51
typically... is to do both simultaneously. It's
41:53
always to go with the job boards.
41:56
We mean, we always do job boards
41:58
because there's just a big market. people
42:00
that are looking at job boards. And
42:02
we also do head hunting on the
42:04
side. So I've had mixed success with
42:06
both. We've hired great people from both
42:09
avenues. I think one thing to remember
42:11
is the circumstance in which the
42:13
engagement is happening, right? When you reach out
42:15
to someone, they're not looking.
42:18
You're disrupting their life, their workflow,
42:20
their attention, and you are actively
42:22
putting an opportunity out in front
42:24
of them. And that goes back
42:26
to the selling component, right? to
42:28
really firmly understand what is
42:30
your company vision, your value,
42:33
your purpose, why are you
42:35
a better subscription product than
42:37
the company that they're currently
42:39
subscribed to. That's a selling
42:41
process, that's a negotiation process,
42:43
and you need to do that right.
42:45
And that's where the EQ comes in.
42:47
You cannot be a robot, you need
42:49
to be a salesman, and you
42:51
need to go in there and
42:53
you need to fight for that
42:55
candidate. This is so mind-boggling, by
42:58
the way. Like you're saying this,
43:00
I'm like, oh my God, this
43:02
is so obvious. And it's never
43:04
how I positioned it because I
43:06
have the assumption. Of course they
43:08
want to work with us, duh,
43:10
because they know everything about us.
43:12
But I'm coming into a conversation
43:15
halfway in the conversation
43:17
when they're like, what? Right.
43:19
Exactly. They're like, why are
43:22
you talking to me? Right. Like I'm
43:24
happy right now. What can you offer
43:26
me? and understand what matters to them.
43:28
And a lot of the people that we hire, it's a
43:31
lot of the same thing. I'm frustrated, I
43:33
can't make decisions, I can't get promoted, I
43:35
can't, you know, you're contacting people that have
43:37
potentially reached the ceiling of their company
43:39
or they're looking for growth, they're
43:42
looking for the next career-defining move,
43:44
and you're in a position to sell that
43:46
to them and to resubscribe them to a
43:48
culture or an environment that is more attractive
43:50
and can give them what is more attractive
43:52
and can give them what they need as a
43:55
professional. You know you've done you've done the job map
43:57
you've done the accountability chart you know very clearly what
43:59
they need to do and you know what to
44:01
expect from them and you can sell them that
44:03
clarity. You can sell them that opportunity that
44:05
you've already articulated and candidates love
44:08
it when you're confident and you
44:10
understand exactly what they're walking into
44:12
and you can speak to that and
44:14
you can speak to the challenges. I'm
44:17
incredibly candid and transparent, will be higher. That's
44:19
kind of how we approach it. Like I don't
44:21
sugar coat anything. There is a lot of change. This
44:23
is happening. You're going to run into these
44:25
problems. This is going to be a source
44:27
of frustration. If you pitch it as a
44:29
challenge, high performers love that. They lap it
44:32
up. Because high performers want growth, they
44:34
want challenge. And they're competitive. They're competitive,
44:36
100%. If you come at it like
44:38
that, the people that are not inclined
44:40
to be motivated by that will fall
44:43
to the wayside. So you're already doing
44:45
your initial screening in the initial conversations
44:48
you're having when you're outreaching
44:50
by how you communicate with
44:52
conviction and transparency around the
44:55
opportunity. So you can see like when you head
44:57
hunt. there's just a lot more
44:59
propensity to get higher quality because
45:01
it's more intentional and top top
45:04
performers are not looking well majority
45:06
of the time they're not looking
45:08
for jobs because they've locked in
45:10
probably to a well-paying job and
45:13
they're providing value they're loyal
45:15
to their company they're high
45:17
performing they're working hard and you're
45:19
coming along and saying I want your
45:21
loyalty your hard work your talent over
45:23
here whereas with a job board I'm
45:25
not saying that you don't find any amazing
45:28
talent on job boards. All of us have
45:30
been on job boards. It's more so that
45:32
you just have a higher chance of coming
45:34
across candidates that you just got
45:37
a wider spectrum of different people.
45:39
So there's more to sip through to get
45:41
to the needle, to get to the gold.
45:43
And your systems need to be set up
45:45
so you can do that sifting. There's so
45:47
much more to cover on this topic, like
45:49
I don't think we should stop the conversation
45:51
here. Like, no. I think we should come
45:53
back and keep the conversation going. But for
45:55
those that are listening and that's identifying with
45:57
a lot of this or like finding
45:59
can. usually like how do you
46:02
spell in cochulate for example? And
46:04
anyone that's listening that has questions
46:06
specifically that you want our head
46:08
of whatever his title will be
46:10
in two weeks because it's likely
46:12
gonna change, send us an email
46:14
to Josh at tier 11.com and
46:16
we'll we'll continue the conversation and
46:18
if someone's got some additional questions
46:20
we can bring that into the
46:22
conversation so we bring you the
46:24
perpetual traffic listener to the discussion.
46:26
So we have covered an awful
46:28
lot here on today's show, and
46:30
for you, the perpetual traffic listener,
46:32
I think this is one of
46:34
the most important episodes that we've
46:36
done in quite some time. So
46:39
in that vein, what we'd like
46:41
to do is do a part
46:43
two with Josh, myself, and Lauren,
46:45
going through the hiring process, and
46:47
then also get your feedback prior
46:49
to doing show to. We want
46:51
to know what your issues are
46:53
with hiring and how we can
46:55
troubleshoot them live and on the
46:57
air. So the best way to
46:59
do that is to email Josh
47:01
directly. It's Josh Hill and is
47:03
Josh at tier11.com. That's T-I-E-R, spell
47:05
out 11.com. Email him your questions
47:07
and make sure so that Josh
47:09
doesn't miss any of these in
47:11
the subject line of the email
47:13
at Josh at T-O-at-T-T-T-T-O-L-L-L-L-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O put in
47:16
the subject line of perpetual traffic
47:18
and he will will correlate all
47:20
of those questions and then we
47:22
will continue to go through the
47:24
11 step process on how to
47:26
hire superstars. So really appreciate you
47:28
all listening here today. Once again,
47:30
his email is Josh at Tier
47:32
11. Send him your questions, subject
47:34
line, perpetual traffic and we'll answer
47:36
them on the air. as we
47:38
record part two in a week
47:40
or so. So make sure that
47:42
where you're listening you do leave
47:44
a rating or a review especially
47:46
over on Spotify. Spotify is growing
47:48
like a weed for us right
47:50
now which is great to see
47:52
a lot of downloads over there
47:55
so I really appreciate all your
47:57
listening on Spotify. Leave us a
47:59
rating and review it really does
48:01
help us to get a wider
48:03
audio. here, help entrepreneurs, directors of
48:05
marketing, marketers like you, get better
48:07
at their craft and ultimately scale
48:09
and grow their businesses. So
48:11
I really do appreciate that.
48:13
And of course, check us
48:16
out over on our YouTube
48:18
channel over at perpetual traffic.com
48:20
forward slash YouTube. So on
48:22
behalf of my awesome amazing
48:24
co-host, Lauren E. Paturlo,
48:26
until next show, see ya.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More