[Case Studies] Rehabbing an ACL rupture non-surgically with Dr Kieran Richardson

[Case Studies] Rehabbing an ACL rupture non-surgically with Dr Kieran Richardson

Released Wednesday, 19th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
[Case Studies] Rehabbing an ACL rupture non-surgically with Dr Kieran Richardson

[Case Studies] Rehabbing an ACL rupture non-surgically with Dr Kieran Richardson

[Case Studies] Rehabbing an ACL rupture non-surgically with Dr Kieran Richardson

[Case Studies] Rehabbing an ACL rupture non-surgically with Dr Kieran Richardson

Wednesday, 19th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:03

On today's episode with Kieran Richardson,

0:05

we discuss a case of a professional

0:07

athlete who tore her ACL and succeeded

0:10

with non-operative rehabilitation. Kieran

0:12

is a specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapist

0:15

who has a special interest in ACL

0:17

tear non-surgical management and

0:19

runs national workshops and lectures on

0:22

this topic. He has formally mentored

0:24

many healthcare professionals for over 13

0:26

years, consulting to a number of private

0:28

practices, offering a second opinion, as

0:31

well as providing professional development lectures

0:33

He also

0:35

works as a sessional academic on the postgraduate

0:38

master's program at Curtin University.

0:41

Kieran has done a case study with PhysioNetwork

0:43

on this case where you can dive a lot

0:45

deeper into this area than we were

0:47

able to do in today's episode. You can

0:49

click the link in the show notes to watch

0:52

Kieran's case study with a seven-day free

0:54

trial. You're going to love this episode

0:56

as you can get a glimpse into how Kieran's

0:58

teachings can have a profound role in

1:00

your clinical reasoning. I'm Sarah

1:03

Yule. And this is Case Studies. Welcome

1:08

to the PhysioNetwork Case Study

1:11

podcast, Kieran. Thanks so much for joining

1:13

us.

1:14

Thanks for having us on again, Sarah. It's great

1:16

to be here.

1:17

Fabulous. Well, we'll launch straight

1:19

into it. We're talking all things ACL

1:22

today, so I might trouble you

1:24

to kick us off with a

1:26

bit of an overview of the case you've got for

1:29

us today. Yeah,

1:30

look, this is a pretty exciting case. We've

1:32

shared it online in various platforms.

1:35

But if you want to follow this particular

1:37

patient, she's given her consent. Her name's Corbin

1:40

Harvey. You can follow her on Instagram at C-O-R-B-A-N-H-A-R-V-E-Y.

1:45

And it's a story of someone who injured

1:48

the ACL. Playing sport, professional athlete,

1:50

this one, she wasn't too keen

1:53

on going into aggressive non-weight-bearing

1:55

fixed flexion at 90 degrees, a la

1:57

the cross protocol, and she didn't really

2:00

want a reconstruction. We

2:02

used a modified approach with her, and we

2:04

had multiple follow-up images, which ultimately

2:07

showed an intact ACL. She's

2:10

returned to play or to

2:12

fight, has won fights. And

2:14

yeah, so I think her story is one that we

2:17

need to be getting out there because I think there's a large

2:19

cohort of patients that fit her

2:21

criteria. And yeah, I think

2:23

it's from a physiotherapy and clinician

2:26

point of view, we can reason through these cases quite

2:28

nicely.

2:29

Fantastic. And I think as is

2:32

going to be relevant in these case studies podcasts,

2:35

it's that concept of we don't learn from experience,

2:37

we learn from reflecting on the experience.

2:40

So Go back to the very beginning,

2:42

if that's okay, right back to her subjective

2:45

history.

2:46

Yeah, so going through her history, look, she

2:48

was basically sparring in November

2:51

22. She had an

2:53

incident where her knee gave way, which is the classic

2:56

symptom, that sign often in patients will

2:58

have a knee that swells up, they'll feel pain straight away.

3:01

She had an MRI shortly after,

3:03

which confirmed a full thickness rupture.

3:05

As is the place in Australia,

3:08

a lot of the time, she went and then saw a surgeon

3:10

and And the surgeon, unfortunately,

3:13

in essence, hemmed her in and said, look, your

3:15

only option is surgery. This is going to take

3:17

a year. She almost felt bullied in

3:19

a way that she didn't get

3:21

presented the options to her. And

3:24

by chance, we were

3:26

able to connect online over telehealth. And

3:29

I presented to her a classic

3:31

shared decision making. process. So I went

3:33

through her options. Again, I don't think

3:35

any physio in the world is anti-surgery,

3:38

but it's more just with these reconstructions

3:40

that it should be a delayed optional

3:43

reconstruction that there's an elective, it is

3:45

an elective surgery. So the patients can elect to have

3:47

it or like not to have it. And so we went through

3:49

that in the subjective and fortunately

3:51

for her as well, her knee hadn't given way

3:54

since the incident. Then I saw her two weeks post.

3:56

And so it was appropriate

3:59

for me to get her into some kind of a

4:01

stabilization protocol. So there's a

4:03

few ways we can do this, but one that I've settled

4:06

on is a restricted extension where

4:08

the patients have an extension block

4:10

at negative 30 degrees, but they can flex

4:13

their knee as much as they want and they can be weight-bearing

4:15

as tolerated. They don't have to be on anticoagulants

4:18

and they just really have to avoid pivot shift moments.

4:20

So that was a large part of the discussion. And

4:23

from her point of view, she also

4:25

had a competition coming up

4:27

the following year, which was last year in May. She

4:30

was very keen on participating in that.

4:33

That's always a tough one because you have

4:35

to go through the risks with the patients. This ACL

4:37

may not heal. You may not be competent

4:39

to fight. Again, we laid

4:41

that all out as a part of the discussion

4:43

in our initial consult. Really

4:47

from there, she was keen for us to have a look at her knee,

4:49

so we then went on to the physical exam over

4:51

telehealth.

4:52

And I think, Will, I'm very curious

4:54

as to the physical exam over telehealth,

4:57

but just touching back on that negative

4:59

30 degrees, what is your

5:02

justification around that both clinically

5:04

and then to her? Yeah.

5:07

When you've seen enough of these ACLs, which

5:09

I've done thousands now, you'll see

5:11

the patients almost homogeneously

5:14

come in with a flexed deformity. So then

5:16

it will be flexed. There's a few

5:18

reasons for that that are purported in the research.

5:21

That's that the hamstrings are co-contracting

5:23

to try to prevent their shin coming

5:26

forward. It's almost a reflexive action

5:28

of the body, a fear avoidant pattern,

5:30

if you will. So I tend

5:33

to roll with that as in I

5:35

see it as a part of the body's natural response. Also,

5:38

there's a few studies that have suggested that

5:40

having the knee in a degree of flexion can

5:42

improve the likelihood of healing. So there's a

5:45

French study that actually uses negative

5:47

30 specifically. That's

5:49

Delin from 2012. And they have pretty

5:51

high healing rates. Like we're talking 80, 85% healing,

5:54

particularly when the ligament is within

5:57

the condyles. So it's not flipped

5:59

outside of the condyles, which hers hadn't. And

6:01

so that's part of my

6:03

reason. There's also some Japanese studies from the early

6:05

2000s that suggests an extension block

6:08

as well as some Swiss studies where they have the

6:10

shin put into an anterior-posterior

6:13

position, so almost a reverse lockman's. And so

6:15

that's part of how I settled on it and

6:18

have been suggesting to patients, especially

6:20

if they don't want to be in non-weight-bearing for

6:22

an extended period of time, And a lot

6:24

of surgeons are actually open to it too, because in

6:27

their mind, it fits their stabilization

6:29

protocol. If someone's got an ACL and they want to get the MCL

6:32

to heal, if there's a concomitant MCL, they'll

6:34

put them in a negative 30 blocks. So that's the

6:36

research reasons, but also the clinical reasons why

6:39

I do it.

6:39

Fantastic. Hopefully your patient

6:41

also was happy with that as

6:44

well, not having to take Clexane and non-surgical.

6:47

Yeah, I think so. So with that,

6:50

obviously, if they're going to be in greater

6:52

than sort of 30, 40 degrees,

6:54

the risk of a DVT. Because once they're getting

6:56

into past 30, 40 degrees, their

6:59

foot will come off the ground essentially,

7:01

or they'll just be on toe weight bearing. And so

7:03

they're not going to have a normal lymphatic system

7:05

drain engine. So their risk of DVT does

7:08

increase. There's still a risk of DVT

7:10

with this kind of approach that I'm advocating

7:12

for, but it's far less

7:15

than post-stop or with like

7:17

a cross protocol. Again, we

7:19

can talk to the research, but without

7:21

a comparison arm, we really don't know what

7:24

the cross protocol degree of flexion is doing.

7:26

So, hopefully in future studies, we can look into that.

7:29

But yeah, I find a lot of patients are happy

7:31

to sit with us. It's kind of like a middle ground and

7:33

allows them to get back to work and allows

7:35

them to get around, drive and

7:37

still function and stabilize their

7:39

knee. And also take the whole

7:42

non-surgical process seriously because

7:44

A lot of patients with the non-surgical approach

7:47

feel really good really quickly. They'll start

7:49

to feel like, hey, I can take over the

7:51

world, but maybe their knee could be

7:53

unstable. And so having the brace there

7:55

as a reminder, I think is really good. That's

7:58

another reason why I like to employ it if we

8:00

can catch the patients early like we did with Corbin.

8:02

Yeah, great point. And sorry, how

8:05

early was it that you were seeing her?

8:07

So I first consulted her

8:09

essentially two weeks to the day after injury

8:12

and So she had actually already, but

8:15

in the physical exam when I looked at her, she couldn't straighten

8:17

her knee fully, which is commonplace. As I

8:19

see these patients almost always, they'll struggle

8:22

to get their extension back. Unfortunately,

8:24

a lot of patients, especially

8:26

overseas, but also in Australia, if they've seen

8:29

a physio who's pre-having them in

8:31

air quotes, they will be starting to work on extension

8:34

range. And so if they're starting

8:36

to If they want to consult to us, we

8:38

almost have to go against that or then counsel

8:40

the therapist that maybe we want to hold back

8:43

on getting this range full early,

8:45

especially into extension. That can be

8:47

an additional challenge.

8:49

For sure. Well, I think we've got

8:51

plenty to get to with treatment, but

8:53

I'm very curious, how did you go with the objective

8:56

treatment or the objective assessment on

8:58

telehealth?

8:59

I think before COVID, I really

9:01

hadn't done too many of these. I would just

9:04

maybe once in a blue moon, a few times a

9:06

year, I would do telehealth or video. Skype

9:09

consult, I actually used to do a lot more of. But

9:11

when COVID kicked off and a lot

9:13

of elective waitlists burgeoned out,

9:16

it became natural that patients were

9:18

just reaching out. It's more

9:20

normal, I think, for us as a society to do

9:22

video calls. And so, since

9:24

that time, I've I'm probably doing 15 to 20

9:26

a week. And so it's quite normal to do a physical

9:29

exam. But the first time you do it, it's a bit weird.

9:31

But really all the same things that you would

9:33

do in person, you would do over video.

9:35

So you're looking at the knee from front, back,

9:38

side. You get the patient to do some functional tasks.

9:40

You can get them into non-weight bearing, looking at their range

9:42

of motion. You can get them to do some repeated

9:45

functional strength tests. You can do some

9:47

muscle length tests. You can even get them to

9:49

self-palpate. and self-mobilize their

9:51

kneecap, which is what I do. And oftentimes

9:53

your city patients will have patellofemoral symptoms.

9:56

And so they might be pinning that on the ACL.

9:58

They'll say, oh, that's my ACL. But then when you get them to

10:00

do repeated self-mobilization of their kneecap,

10:03

their range of motion can improve and their pain can go away.

10:05

So it's all the same principles that we

10:07

would use in person you can actually use

10:09

on telehealth. And there's actually some studies from Melbourne

10:11

you may have read recently that show that

10:13

some patients are even more satisfied with telehealth,

10:16

which is quite interesting. So in

10:18

my mind... We don't have to ditch

10:20

face-to-face, and I think there's always going to be a place for

10:22

both. But in the physical exam,

10:25

you're really wanting to affirm a lot of the stuff that

10:27

you've concluded in the, or

10:29

hopefully concluded in the subjective, which is what we

10:32

did with Corbyn.

10:33

Fantastic. So she's

10:35

come in, she's within a couple of weeks of

10:38

ACL rupture. You've done your

10:40

objective. She's described... a

10:43

moment where she's obviously

10:45

ruptured her ACL, but as you mentioned, no

10:47

mentions of unstable moments since.

10:50

What did your treatment plan look

10:52

like from that point?

10:55

Yeah, great question. So look,

10:58

really what I like to do if

11:00

the patients are able to consult with me

11:02

early or one of my team early is

11:05

I like to get them in the brace for six

11:07

weeks. So I like to restrict their extension for six

11:09

weeks minimum. And then

11:12

I will have, after six weeks, we'll

11:15

get them into unrestricted flexion

11:17

extension, ideally with the brace still

11:19

on. Some patients are completely over

11:22

it. After the first six weeks, they're like, they're

11:24

done. They're wearing it to bed. And other than

11:26

really for exercise, if they can take it off

11:28

and showering, they just, they want to ditch it. But

11:31

I prefer them to keep it on, especially when they're

11:33

from six weeks, if they're walking around outside.

11:35

And also just the advice of

11:38

not twisting too much on their knee, avoiding

11:40

uneven surfaces, certainly

11:43

no drunken dancing, which can be commonplace

11:45

in Australia, hopping, change of direction.

11:47

These are the kind of things that they need to be avoiding. And

11:50

I tend to lay out, Sarah,

11:52

the treatment plan in three phases. So,

11:55

you'll have phase one is

11:57

trying to heal this ACL and then

11:59

do a repeat image and

12:01

either do some kind of physical

12:04

test via telehealth. So, you can do

12:06

a Levis test over a roller,

12:09

so you can sort of do a quasi-anterior-posterior

12:12

ligament test in long sitting.

12:14

Or if they're seeing a local PT, they can see

12:16

someone who can, a local physio,

12:19

they can do ligament tests. Or even if they're due

12:21

to see a surgeon, the surgeon can do the ligament tests as well.

12:23

And hopefully that all corroborates with, on

12:26

scan, subjectively, the patients

12:28

are feeling great. And then physically,

12:30

if we do ligament tests, it's feeling stable.

12:33

And then we basically move them into phase two,

12:35

which is strength and conditioning program. We

12:37

want to bulletproof this knee. And then really

12:40

we would be looking at return to play

12:42

in the phase three and prevention, which

12:45

as you would know that a lot of these

12:47

injuries can be prevented and

12:50

a lot of the injuries recur and there's

12:52

a risk of recurrence. So at

12:54

least the patients I see, a lot of them

12:56

when they first have it happen prior

12:59

to that have done no strength and conditioning. So

13:01

it's really a fresh canvas. So you can crank

13:03

these patients up heavy with rehab and

13:05

prevention exercises. And a lot

13:08

of the times I've had patients, they'll say to me, look, I actually

13:10

feel honestly stronger than I did previously.

13:12

I feel like in a weird way, I'm

13:14

actually better off having had the injury.

13:17

Philosophically, you wouldn't have wanted it to happen,

13:19

but they end up in a better place. So it can

13:21

be a silver lining, I think.

13:23

Ever wished you could see how experts treat

13:26

real patients of theirs? With Case

13:28

Studies by PhysioNetwork, now you can.

13:30

It's amazing

13:36

how sometimes

13:38

those

13:48

sorts

13:51

of injuries do seem to be the catalyst for

13:53

reinvention of what their S&C

13:56

looks like, doesn't it?

13:58

Yeah, I think so. And so Look, I

14:00

would say almost all of the cases

14:02

I see, including some elite athletes, I'm

14:04

privileged in second opinion where you're looking

14:06

at the previous rehab program, and if you've

14:09

done any of this, you're looking for basically

14:11

blind spots and seeing where it's being missed.

14:14

The classic thing I see is that the functional strength

14:16

and conditioning is insufficient, especially single leg,

14:18

and particularly female. We

14:21

can really crank it up heavy,

14:23

hard, and there's new research which is affirming

14:25

that the harder and heavier we go, the better.

14:28

I'm pretty open and honest with the patients. And

14:31

sometimes I'll call it out early. I said, look, I think this

14:34

previous exercise program was too easy. Or

14:36

if I'm seeing them early on and

14:38

I've already started seeing another physio and I'm liaising

14:40

with the physio, I'll really want to

14:43

set the expectation that the patient's going to have to commit

14:45

to an intense program.

14:47

Just on that, in terms of heavy

14:49

and hard, are you talking in the realms of

14:52

like 80% 1RM?

14:55

That's a massive topic. But specifically,

14:59

you would be looking at minimum,

15:01

ideally three to four days a week in that phase two

15:04

of lower limb individualized

15:07

single leg strengthening. So

15:09

we've got functional strengthening, but then also isolated

15:12

muscle groups. I mean, you said 80%,

15:15

I think so, but ideally you would

15:17

be wanting to get as close to, if not

15:19

better than the other side. Considering the other

15:21

side, as we know, gets weaker, that

15:23

also has to be taken into account. A

15:25

lot of these recent strength and conditioning principles, you're

15:27

looking for high RPE.

15:30

So you're wanting the patients to intensely

15:32

work out and then you want their sets

15:35

and rep range to be around

15:37

that five reps and they don't have a lot

15:39

left to give in the tank. The problem

15:41

is sometimes Sarah, the physios,

15:44

if I'm looking at a case on second opinion,

15:46

they might be doing those principles too

15:48

early. So absolutely you want the

15:50

patient to have a quiet knee. You don't want them in

15:52

pain when they're in phase two. So

15:54

I do want them to get to

15:56

that phase two, but if it's like 12

15:59

weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks in phase

16:01

one, that's fine. But eventually

16:03

we will need to get them. I mean, obviously depending

16:06

on their goals, but yeah, this

16:08

is ideally where I think we need to take the

16:10

cases.

16:11

That's a fantastic point. And as you say, the S&C

16:14

side of things can be a whole episode

16:16

on its own. But on what you said before

16:19

with a quiet knee, what

16:21

sort of discussions do you have with your patients

16:23

about self-monitoring as they're progressing

16:26

through their S&C program?

16:28

One of the risks of doing non-surgical, obviously

16:30

it applies to surgery as well, but one

16:33

of the absolute risks is the risk of infusion, which

16:36

is something that happened with Corbyn actually,

16:38

that on her follow-up MRI at three months,

16:40

her ACL was looking wicked. It

16:42

looked like it was in alignment. It was

16:44

a gold standard heel,

16:47

as perfect as we could get at three months.

16:49

But she also had additional

16:52

bone bruise, like her bone bruise looked worse than

16:54

the first MRI. And she had,

16:56

unbeknownst to us, started doing a bit of

16:58

jogging a week before her MRI. So

17:01

I like to say the patients don't go rogue

17:03

because sometimes they can.

17:04

No choosing your own adventure.

17:06

No choosing your own adventure. They

17:08

can almost be like an unbridled horse. So

17:11

yeah, you need to keep

17:13

the reins on them a bit. And so that's why I like

17:16

the research talks about regular check-ins, like really

17:19

every two weeks. But particularly this whole

17:21

concept of an effusion. So

17:23

an effusion or... stress

17:26

response, bone bruise. This

17:28

probably happens about 1% to 2% of cases. And

17:31

so, yeah, this is something that happened with Corbin.

17:33

And in fact, I had another case yesterday. Same deal

17:35

happened. Another physio started working

17:38

with one of my clients, and he'd started doing some plyometrics.

17:40

And that was just on the end of phase one, and it

17:42

was too soon. And the patient's on

17:44

follow-up MRI. ACL looks okay,

17:47

but the bone bruise hasn't settled. So it's

17:49

a low percentage chance, but it is something you need

17:51

to be monitoring from a patient point of view. It'll

17:53

normally manifest in swelling in the

17:55

front of the knee, a low-grade ache, mild

17:58

effusion. Maybe it will get warm. And

18:00

sometimes they'll lose range. So they

18:02

may, typically by 12 weeks, they've

18:05

got almost full range. So from six to

18:07

12 weeks, you're looking to get their range of motion better.

18:09

But they may just have a reduction

18:12

in range. They realize that they can't

18:14

sit back onto their heels. They may have gained

18:16

full extension, but then they lose that

18:18

again. So those would be the things I'd be looking out for.

18:21

That's fantastic. It's a really nice

18:24

program that offers a nice in-between.

18:26

So, in your thoughts, what

18:28

went well, what didn't go well? What can

18:30

we learn from it?

18:33

Look, it's a bit of a cherry pick

18:35

study because you can't ever

18:37

promise the patient 100%, but it

18:40

went well because it highlights

18:42

a lot of what we're seeing now in research literature,

18:45

but also it has been revealed

18:47

that There's studies from the mid-90s

18:49

and subsequently multiple cohort

18:52

studies since then showing that ACL has a high capacity

18:54

to heal. It was a good

18:56

example of what's possible without

18:59

necessarily involving a lot of medical intervention,

19:02

whether it be blood thinners, whether

19:04

it be surgical intervention, injectables,

19:07

she didn't need any medication, that kind of thing.

19:09

Imaging was obviously key. I think it shows

19:11

what's possible with a physio-led approach. And

19:14

so I think There is a large cohort

19:16

of patients that can do very well with a physio-led

19:18

approach. And then you'll see it in healthcare

19:21

systems. So there's a large movement

19:24

towards physios triaging these kind

19:26

of cases. And I think really we have a role

19:28

in that, both in the public sector and

19:30

private sector, working within the multidisciplinary

19:33

team. So I think Corbyn's example

19:36

is what's possible. Another

19:38

positive was I was able to plug her in with

19:41

a local physio, Michael

19:43

Ingle, who's an advanced scope physio. And

19:45

he was able to do a lot of the work on the ground.

19:47

And we had intermittent check-ins as well.

19:50

And we collaborated on that case. So that was cool

19:52

too. I think to get that virtual

19:54

support as well as in-person for

19:57

the patients. The patients love it. They like getting

19:59

a bit of a team around them, I think. And then obviously

20:01

returning to play and successfully long-term

20:04

is unreal. That's what you want. It

20:06

probably couldn't have gotten any better from that point of view. It

20:08

possibly could have been a bit better if we'd

20:10

been clearer on the

20:13

risks if she bolted, if

20:15

the horse bolted too soon, which

20:18

you can see. It's a bit of a cross

20:20

talk, like maybe we haven't ultimately

20:22

communicated as well as we thought or the patient

20:24

misinterpreted it. And I think these things can happen.

20:27

So that probably could have been a bit tighter. Hopefully

20:30

in the future, we can have, and

20:32

I'm finding this more and more, we

20:34

call them, in Australia, we call them surgeon heroes,

20:38

but basically they're surgeons who actively

20:40

advocate and both in person and online

20:43

for physiotherapy input and non-surgical.

20:46

So, I think in future,

20:48

it would have been good to potentially see that patient

20:50

before. And so, we could,

20:53

if they're due to see a surgeon, give them a heads

20:55

up and say, look, this is what we're thinking. And

20:57

hopefully, we can be on the same page. And

21:00

yeah, we're probably never going to agree on everything, but at

21:03

least we can find common ground. So, maybe

21:05

if we'd have been able to see Colton earlier, that

21:07

would have been ideal. But yeah, Other than that,

21:10

I think it really does show how

21:12

non-surgical management, from a research

21:14

point of view, we're talking at least 50% of these patients,

21:16

up to 75% of these patients can

21:18

do very well with a rehabilitation

21:21

alone approach, which I think is pretty

21:23

exciting.

21:24

That's very exciting. And I think those are some

21:26

fantastic takeaways. And just to touch

21:29

on your point, I think patients love

21:31

a multidisciplinary team, but I also believe

21:33

as clinicians, we can all benefit from

21:36

the growth that a multidisciplinary approach

21:38

creates. does offer as well.

21:41

I think so. Yeah, I think so. And probably

21:43

what's happened with me personally is I've

21:46

found like-minded professionals

21:50

extra professionally. So I've kind

21:52

of found a team of sports doctors and surgeons

21:55

I know that agree with us, not

21:57

on everything again. And I think it's probably silly

21:59

to think that we'll always get along perfectly,

22:02

but we want to advance this topic

22:04

forward and identify the cases

22:06

who truly need surgery, who truly

22:08

are for not surgery in a way we don't know and we can agree

22:11

together on that. And I think the patients, they

22:13

love that team approach. They want that

22:15

and I think they need it.

22:16

Absolutely. Well, thank you so much

22:18

for your wisdom today, Kieran. I think many

22:21

of us can learn and apply that to our

22:23

next ACL that walks through the door.

22:25

That's great, Sarah. It's great to share these cases

22:27

and I hope it's beneficial to the clinicians

22:29

as well.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features