Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
On today's episode with Kieran Richardson,
0:05
we discuss a case of a professional
0:07
athlete who tore her ACL and succeeded
0:10
with non-operative rehabilitation. Kieran
0:12
is a specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapist
0:15
who has a special interest in ACL
0:17
tear non-surgical management and
0:19
runs national workshops and lectures on
0:22
this topic. He has formally mentored
0:24
many healthcare professionals for over 13
0:26
years, consulting to a number of private
0:28
practices, offering a second opinion, as
0:31
well as providing professional development lectures
0:33
He also
0:35
works as a sessional academic on the postgraduate
0:38
master's program at Curtin University.
0:41
Kieran has done a case study with PhysioNetwork
0:43
on this case where you can dive a lot
0:45
deeper into this area than we were
0:47
able to do in today's episode. You can
0:49
click the link in the show notes to watch
0:52
Kieran's case study with a seven-day free
0:54
trial. You're going to love this episode
0:56
as you can get a glimpse into how Kieran's
0:58
teachings can have a profound role in
1:00
your clinical reasoning. I'm Sarah
1:03
Yule. And this is Case Studies. Welcome
1:08
to the PhysioNetwork Case Study
1:11
podcast, Kieran. Thanks so much for joining
1:13
us.
1:14
Thanks for having us on again, Sarah. It's great
1:16
to be here.
1:17
Fabulous. Well, we'll launch straight
1:19
into it. We're talking all things ACL
1:22
today, so I might trouble you
1:24
to kick us off with a
1:26
bit of an overview of the case you've got for
1:29
us today. Yeah,
1:30
look, this is a pretty exciting case. We've
1:32
shared it online in various platforms.
1:35
But if you want to follow this particular
1:37
patient, she's given her consent. Her name's Corbin
1:40
Harvey. You can follow her on Instagram at C-O-R-B-A-N-H-A-R-V-E-Y.
1:45
And it's a story of someone who injured
1:48
the ACL. Playing sport, professional athlete,
1:50
this one, she wasn't too keen
1:53
on going into aggressive non-weight-bearing
1:55
fixed flexion at 90 degrees, a la
1:57
the cross protocol, and she didn't really
2:00
want a reconstruction. We
2:02
used a modified approach with her, and we
2:04
had multiple follow-up images, which ultimately
2:07
showed an intact ACL. She's
2:10
returned to play or to
2:12
fight, has won fights. And
2:14
yeah, so I think her story is one that we
2:17
need to be getting out there because I think there's a large
2:19
cohort of patients that fit her
2:21
criteria. And yeah, I think
2:23
it's from a physiotherapy and clinician
2:26
point of view, we can reason through these cases quite
2:28
nicely.
2:29
Fantastic. And I think as is
2:32
going to be relevant in these case studies podcasts,
2:35
it's that concept of we don't learn from experience,
2:37
we learn from reflecting on the experience.
2:40
So Go back to the very beginning,
2:42
if that's okay, right back to her subjective
2:45
history.
2:46
Yeah, so going through her history, look, she
2:48
was basically sparring in November
2:51
22. She had an
2:53
incident where her knee gave way, which is the classic
2:56
symptom, that sign often in patients will
2:58
have a knee that swells up, they'll feel pain straight away.
3:01
She had an MRI shortly after,
3:03
which confirmed a full thickness rupture.
3:05
As is the place in Australia,
3:08
a lot of the time, she went and then saw a surgeon
3:10
and And the surgeon, unfortunately,
3:13
in essence, hemmed her in and said, look, your
3:15
only option is surgery. This is going to take
3:17
a year. She almost felt bullied in
3:19
a way that she didn't get
3:21
presented the options to her. And
3:24
by chance, we were
3:26
able to connect online over telehealth. And
3:29
I presented to her a classic
3:31
shared decision making. process. So I went
3:33
through her options. Again, I don't think
3:35
any physio in the world is anti-surgery,
3:38
but it's more just with these reconstructions
3:40
that it should be a delayed optional
3:43
reconstruction that there's an elective, it is
3:45
an elective surgery. So the patients can elect to have
3:47
it or like not to have it. And so we went through
3:49
that in the subjective and fortunately
3:51
for her as well, her knee hadn't given way
3:54
since the incident. Then I saw her two weeks post.
3:56
And so it was appropriate
3:59
for me to get her into some kind of a
4:01
stabilization protocol. So there's a
4:03
few ways we can do this, but one that I've settled
4:06
on is a restricted extension where
4:08
the patients have an extension block
4:10
at negative 30 degrees, but they can flex
4:13
their knee as much as they want and they can be weight-bearing
4:15
as tolerated. They don't have to be on anticoagulants
4:18
and they just really have to avoid pivot shift moments.
4:20
So that was a large part of the discussion. And
4:23
from her point of view, she also
4:25
had a competition coming up
4:27
the following year, which was last year in May. She
4:30
was very keen on participating in that.
4:33
That's always a tough one because you have
4:35
to go through the risks with the patients. This ACL
4:37
may not heal. You may not be competent
4:39
to fight. Again, we laid
4:41
that all out as a part of the discussion
4:43
in our initial consult. Really
4:47
from there, she was keen for us to have a look at her knee,
4:49
so we then went on to the physical exam over
4:51
telehealth.
4:52
And I think, Will, I'm very curious
4:54
as to the physical exam over telehealth,
4:57
but just touching back on that negative
4:59
30 degrees, what is your
5:02
justification around that both clinically
5:04
and then to her? Yeah.
5:07
When you've seen enough of these ACLs, which
5:09
I've done thousands now, you'll see
5:11
the patients almost homogeneously
5:14
come in with a flexed deformity. So then
5:16
it will be flexed. There's a few
5:18
reasons for that that are purported in the research.
5:21
That's that the hamstrings are co-contracting
5:23
to try to prevent their shin coming
5:26
forward. It's almost a reflexive action
5:28
of the body, a fear avoidant pattern,
5:30
if you will. So I tend
5:33
to roll with that as in I
5:35
see it as a part of the body's natural response. Also,
5:38
there's a few studies that have suggested that
5:40
having the knee in a degree of flexion can
5:42
improve the likelihood of healing. So there's a
5:45
French study that actually uses negative
5:47
30 specifically. That's
5:49
Delin from 2012. And they have pretty
5:51
high healing rates. Like we're talking 80, 85% healing,
5:54
particularly when the ligament is within
5:57
the condyles. So it's not flipped
5:59
outside of the condyles, which hers hadn't. And
6:01
so that's part of my
6:03
reason. There's also some Japanese studies from the early
6:05
2000s that suggests an extension block
6:08
as well as some Swiss studies where they have the
6:10
shin put into an anterior-posterior
6:13
position, so almost a reverse lockman's. And so
6:15
that's part of how I settled on it and
6:18
have been suggesting to patients, especially
6:20
if they don't want to be in non-weight-bearing for
6:22
an extended period of time, And a lot
6:24
of surgeons are actually open to it too, because in
6:27
their mind, it fits their stabilization
6:29
protocol. If someone's got an ACL and they want to get the MCL
6:32
to heal, if there's a concomitant MCL, they'll
6:34
put them in a negative 30 blocks. So that's the
6:36
research reasons, but also the clinical reasons why
6:39
I do it.
6:39
Fantastic. Hopefully your patient
6:41
also was happy with that as
6:44
well, not having to take Clexane and non-surgical.
6:47
Yeah, I think so. So with that,
6:50
obviously, if they're going to be in greater
6:52
than sort of 30, 40 degrees,
6:54
the risk of a DVT. Because once they're getting
6:56
into past 30, 40 degrees, their
6:59
foot will come off the ground essentially,
7:01
or they'll just be on toe weight bearing. And so
7:03
they're not going to have a normal lymphatic system
7:05
drain engine. So their risk of DVT does
7:08
increase. There's still a risk of DVT
7:10
with this kind of approach that I'm advocating
7:12
for, but it's far less
7:15
than post-stop or with like
7:17
a cross protocol. Again, we
7:19
can talk to the research, but without
7:21
a comparison arm, we really don't know what
7:24
the cross protocol degree of flexion is doing.
7:26
So, hopefully in future studies, we can look into that.
7:29
But yeah, I find a lot of patients are happy
7:31
to sit with us. It's kind of like a middle ground and
7:33
allows them to get back to work and allows
7:35
them to get around, drive and
7:37
still function and stabilize their
7:39
knee. And also take the whole
7:42
non-surgical process seriously because
7:44
A lot of patients with the non-surgical approach
7:47
feel really good really quickly. They'll start
7:49
to feel like, hey, I can take over the
7:51
world, but maybe their knee could be
7:53
unstable. And so having the brace there
7:55
as a reminder, I think is really good. That's
7:58
another reason why I like to employ it if we
8:00
can catch the patients early like we did with Corbin.
8:02
Yeah, great point. And sorry, how
8:05
early was it that you were seeing her?
8:07
So I first consulted her
8:09
essentially two weeks to the day after injury
8:12
and So she had actually already, but
8:15
in the physical exam when I looked at her, she couldn't straighten
8:17
her knee fully, which is commonplace. As I
8:19
see these patients almost always, they'll struggle
8:22
to get their extension back. Unfortunately,
8:24
a lot of patients, especially
8:26
overseas, but also in Australia, if they've seen
8:29
a physio who's pre-having them in
8:31
air quotes, they will be starting to work on extension
8:34
range. And so if they're starting
8:36
to If they want to consult to us, we
8:38
almost have to go against that or then counsel
8:40
the therapist that maybe we want to hold back
8:43
on getting this range full early,
8:45
especially into extension. That can be
8:47
an additional challenge.
8:49
For sure. Well, I think we've got
8:51
plenty to get to with treatment, but
8:53
I'm very curious, how did you go with the objective
8:56
treatment or the objective assessment on
8:58
telehealth?
8:59
I think before COVID, I really
9:01
hadn't done too many of these. I would just
9:04
maybe once in a blue moon, a few times a
9:06
year, I would do telehealth or video. Skype
9:09
consult, I actually used to do a lot more of. But
9:11
when COVID kicked off and a lot
9:13
of elective waitlists burgeoned out,
9:16
it became natural that patients were
9:18
just reaching out. It's more
9:20
normal, I think, for us as a society to do
9:22
video calls. And so, since
9:24
that time, I've I'm probably doing 15 to 20
9:26
a week. And so it's quite normal to do a physical
9:29
exam. But the first time you do it, it's a bit weird.
9:31
But really all the same things that you would
9:33
do in person, you would do over video.
9:35
So you're looking at the knee from front, back,
9:38
side. You get the patient to do some functional tasks.
9:40
You can get them into non-weight bearing, looking at their range
9:42
of motion. You can get them to do some repeated
9:45
functional strength tests. You can do some
9:47
muscle length tests. You can even get them to
9:49
self-palpate. and self-mobilize their
9:51
kneecap, which is what I do. And oftentimes
9:53
your city patients will have patellofemoral symptoms.
9:56
And so they might be pinning that on the ACL.
9:58
They'll say, oh, that's my ACL. But then when you get them to
10:00
do repeated self-mobilization of their kneecap,
10:03
their range of motion can improve and their pain can go away.
10:05
So it's all the same principles that we
10:07
would use in person you can actually use
10:09
on telehealth. And there's actually some studies from Melbourne
10:11
you may have read recently that show that
10:13
some patients are even more satisfied with telehealth,
10:16
which is quite interesting. So in
10:18
my mind... We don't have to ditch
10:20
face-to-face, and I think there's always going to be a place for
10:22
both. But in the physical exam,
10:25
you're really wanting to affirm a lot of the stuff that
10:27
you've concluded in the, or
10:29
hopefully concluded in the subjective, which is what we
10:32
did with Corbyn.
10:33
Fantastic. So she's
10:35
come in, she's within a couple of weeks of
10:38
ACL rupture. You've done your
10:40
objective. She's described... a
10:43
moment where she's obviously
10:45
ruptured her ACL, but as you mentioned, no
10:47
mentions of unstable moments since.
10:50
What did your treatment plan look
10:52
like from that point?
10:55
Yeah, great question. So look,
10:58
really what I like to do if
11:00
the patients are able to consult with me
11:02
early or one of my team early is
11:05
I like to get them in the brace for six
11:07
weeks. So I like to restrict their extension for six
11:09
weeks minimum. And then
11:12
I will have, after six weeks, we'll
11:15
get them into unrestricted flexion
11:17
extension, ideally with the brace still
11:19
on. Some patients are completely over
11:22
it. After the first six weeks, they're like, they're
11:24
done. They're wearing it to bed. And other than
11:26
really for exercise, if they can take it off
11:28
and showering, they just, they want to ditch it. But
11:31
I prefer them to keep it on, especially when they're
11:33
from six weeks, if they're walking around outside.
11:35
And also just the advice of
11:38
not twisting too much on their knee, avoiding
11:40
uneven surfaces, certainly
11:43
no drunken dancing, which can be commonplace
11:45
in Australia, hopping, change of direction.
11:47
These are the kind of things that they need to be avoiding. And
11:50
I tend to lay out, Sarah,
11:52
the treatment plan in three phases. So,
11:55
you'll have phase one is
11:57
trying to heal this ACL and then
11:59
do a repeat image and
12:01
either do some kind of physical
12:04
test via telehealth. So, you can do
12:06
a Levis test over a roller,
12:09
so you can sort of do a quasi-anterior-posterior
12:12
ligament test in long sitting.
12:14
Or if they're seeing a local PT, they can see
12:16
someone who can, a local physio,
12:19
they can do ligament tests. Or even if they're due
12:21
to see a surgeon, the surgeon can do the ligament tests as well.
12:23
And hopefully that all corroborates with, on
12:26
scan, subjectively, the patients
12:28
are feeling great. And then physically,
12:30
if we do ligament tests, it's feeling stable.
12:33
And then we basically move them into phase two,
12:35
which is strength and conditioning program. We
12:37
want to bulletproof this knee. And then really
12:40
we would be looking at return to play
12:42
in the phase three and prevention, which
12:45
as you would know that a lot of these
12:47
injuries can be prevented and
12:50
a lot of the injuries recur and there's
12:52
a risk of recurrence. So at
12:54
least the patients I see, a lot of them
12:56
when they first have it happen prior
12:59
to that have done no strength and conditioning. So
13:01
it's really a fresh canvas. So you can crank
13:03
these patients up heavy with rehab and
13:05
prevention exercises. And a lot
13:08
of the times I've had patients, they'll say to me, look, I actually
13:10
feel honestly stronger than I did previously.
13:12
I feel like in a weird way, I'm
13:14
actually better off having had the injury.
13:17
Philosophically, you wouldn't have wanted it to happen,
13:19
but they end up in a better place. So it can
13:21
be a silver lining, I think.
13:23
Ever wished you could see how experts treat
13:26
real patients of theirs? With Case
13:28
Studies by PhysioNetwork, now you can.
13:30
It's amazing
13:36
how sometimes
13:38
those
13:48
sorts
13:51
of injuries do seem to be the catalyst for
13:53
reinvention of what their S&C
13:56
looks like, doesn't it?
13:58
Yeah, I think so. And so Look, I
14:00
would say almost all of the cases
14:02
I see, including some elite athletes, I'm
14:04
privileged in second opinion where you're looking
14:06
at the previous rehab program, and if you've
14:09
done any of this, you're looking for basically
14:11
blind spots and seeing where it's being missed.
14:14
The classic thing I see is that the functional strength
14:16
and conditioning is insufficient, especially single leg,
14:18
and particularly female. We
14:21
can really crank it up heavy,
14:23
hard, and there's new research which is affirming
14:25
that the harder and heavier we go, the better.
14:28
I'm pretty open and honest with the patients. And
14:31
sometimes I'll call it out early. I said, look, I think this
14:34
previous exercise program was too easy. Or
14:36
if I'm seeing them early on and
14:38
I've already started seeing another physio and I'm liaising
14:40
with the physio, I'll really want to
14:43
set the expectation that the patient's going to have to commit
14:45
to an intense program.
14:47
Just on that, in terms of heavy
14:49
and hard, are you talking in the realms of
14:52
like 80% 1RM?
14:55
That's a massive topic. But specifically,
14:59
you would be looking at minimum,
15:01
ideally three to four days a week in that phase two
15:04
of lower limb individualized
15:07
single leg strengthening. So
15:09
we've got functional strengthening, but then also isolated
15:12
muscle groups. I mean, you said 80%,
15:15
I think so, but ideally you would
15:17
be wanting to get as close to, if not
15:19
better than the other side. Considering the other
15:21
side, as we know, gets weaker, that
15:23
also has to be taken into account. A
15:25
lot of these recent strength and conditioning principles, you're
15:27
looking for high RPE.
15:30
So you're wanting the patients to intensely
15:32
work out and then you want their sets
15:35
and rep range to be around
15:37
that five reps and they don't have a lot
15:39
left to give in the tank. The problem
15:41
is sometimes Sarah, the physios,
15:44
if I'm looking at a case on second opinion,
15:46
they might be doing those principles too
15:48
early. So absolutely you want the
15:50
patient to have a quiet knee. You don't want them in
15:52
pain when they're in phase two. So
15:54
I do want them to get to
15:56
that phase two, but if it's like 12
15:59
weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks in phase
16:01
one, that's fine. But eventually
16:03
we will need to get them. I mean, obviously depending
16:06
on their goals, but yeah, this
16:08
is ideally where I think we need to take the
16:10
cases.
16:11
That's a fantastic point. And as you say, the S&C
16:14
side of things can be a whole episode
16:16
on its own. But on what you said before
16:19
with a quiet knee, what
16:21
sort of discussions do you have with your patients
16:23
about self-monitoring as they're progressing
16:26
through their S&C program?
16:28
One of the risks of doing non-surgical, obviously
16:30
it applies to surgery as well, but one
16:33
of the absolute risks is the risk of infusion, which
16:36
is something that happened with Corbyn actually,
16:38
that on her follow-up MRI at three months,
16:40
her ACL was looking wicked. It
16:42
looked like it was in alignment. It was
16:44
a gold standard heel,
16:47
as perfect as we could get at three months.
16:49
But she also had additional
16:52
bone bruise, like her bone bruise looked worse than
16:54
the first MRI. And she had,
16:56
unbeknownst to us, started doing a bit of
16:58
jogging a week before her MRI. So
17:01
I like to say the patients don't go rogue
17:03
because sometimes they can.
17:04
No choosing your own adventure.
17:06
No choosing your own adventure. They
17:08
can almost be like an unbridled horse. So
17:11
yeah, you need to keep
17:13
the reins on them a bit. And so that's why I like
17:16
the research talks about regular check-ins, like really
17:19
every two weeks. But particularly this whole
17:21
concept of an effusion. So
17:23
an effusion or... stress
17:26
response, bone bruise. This
17:28
probably happens about 1% to 2% of cases. And
17:31
so, yeah, this is something that happened with Corbin.
17:33
And in fact, I had another case yesterday. Same deal
17:35
happened. Another physio started working
17:38
with one of my clients, and he'd started doing some plyometrics.
17:40
And that was just on the end of phase one, and it
17:42
was too soon. And the patient's on
17:44
follow-up MRI. ACL looks okay,
17:47
but the bone bruise hasn't settled. So it's
17:49
a low percentage chance, but it is something you need
17:51
to be monitoring from a patient point of view. It'll
17:53
normally manifest in swelling in the
17:55
front of the knee, a low-grade ache, mild
17:58
effusion. Maybe it will get warm. And
18:00
sometimes they'll lose range. So they
18:02
may, typically by 12 weeks, they've
18:05
got almost full range. So from six to
18:07
12 weeks, you're looking to get their range of motion better.
18:09
But they may just have a reduction
18:12
in range. They realize that they can't
18:14
sit back onto their heels. They may have gained
18:16
full extension, but then they lose that
18:18
again. So those would be the things I'd be looking out for.
18:21
That's fantastic. It's a really nice
18:24
program that offers a nice in-between.
18:26
So, in your thoughts, what
18:28
went well, what didn't go well? What can
18:30
we learn from it?
18:33
Look, it's a bit of a cherry pick
18:35
study because you can't ever
18:37
promise the patient 100%, but it
18:40
went well because it highlights
18:42
a lot of what we're seeing now in research literature,
18:45
but also it has been revealed
18:47
that There's studies from the mid-90s
18:49
and subsequently multiple cohort
18:52
studies since then showing that ACL has a high capacity
18:54
to heal. It was a good
18:56
example of what's possible without
18:59
necessarily involving a lot of medical intervention,
19:02
whether it be blood thinners, whether
19:04
it be surgical intervention, injectables,
19:07
she didn't need any medication, that kind of thing.
19:09
Imaging was obviously key. I think it shows
19:11
what's possible with a physio-led approach. And
19:14
so I think There is a large cohort
19:16
of patients that can do very well with a physio-led
19:18
approach. And then you'll see it in healthcare
19:21
systems. So there's a large movement
19:24
towards physios triaging these kind
19:26
of cases. And I think really we have a role
19:28
in that, both in the public sector and
19:30
private sector, working within the multidisciplinary
19:33
team. So I think Corbyn's example
19:36
is what's possible. Another
19:38
positive was I was able to plug her in with
19:41
a local physio, Michael
19:43
Ingle, who's an advanced scope physio. And
19:45
he was able to do a lot of the work on the ground.
19:47
And we had intermittent check-ins as well.
19:50
And we collaborated on that case. So that was cool
19:52
too. I think to get that virtual
19:54
support as well as in-person for
19:57
the patients. The patients love it. They like getting
19:59
a bit of a team around them, I think. And then obviously
20:01
returning to play and successfully long-term
20:04
is unreal. That's what you want. It
20:06
probably couldn't have gotten any better from that point of view. It
20:08
possibly could have been a bit better if we'd
20:10
been clearer on the
20:13
risks if she bolted, if
20:15
the horse bolted too soon, which
20:18
you can see. It's a bit of a cross
20:20
talk, like maybe we haven't ultimately
20:22
communicated as well as we thought or the patient
20:24
misinterpreted it. And I think these things can happen.
20:27
So that probably could have been a bit tighter. Hopefully
20:30
in the future, we can have, and
20:32
I'm finding this more and more, we
20:34
call them, in Australia, we call them surgeon heroes,
20:38
but basically they're surgeons who actively
20:40
advocate and both in person and online
20:43
for physiotherapy input and non-surgical.
20:46
So, I think in future,
20:48
it would have been good to potentially see that patient
20:50
before. And so, we could,
20:53
if they're due to see a surgeon, give them a heads
20:55
up and say, look, this is what we're thinking. And
20:57
hopefully, we can be on the same page. And
21:00
yeah, we're probably never going to agree on everything, but at
21:03
least we can find common ground. So, maybe
21:05
if we'd have been able to see Colton earlier, that
21:07
would have been ideal. But yeah, Other than that,
21:10
I think it really does show how
21:12
non-surgical management, from a research
21:14
point of view, we're talking at least 50% of these patients,
21:16
up to 75% of these patients can
21:18
do very well with a rehabilitation
21:21
alone approach, which I think is pretty
21:23
exciting.
21:24
That's very exciting. And I think those are some
21:26
fantastic takeaways. And just to touch
21:29
on your point, I think patients love
21:31
a multidisciplinary team, but I also believe
21:33
as clinicians, we can all benefit from
21:36
the growth that a multidisciplinary approach
21:38
creates. does offer as well.
21:41
I think so. Yeah, I think so. And probably
21:43
what's happened with me personally is I've
21:46
found like-minded professionals
21:50
extra professionally. So I've kind
21:52
of found a team of sports doctors and surgeons
21:55
I know that agree with us, not
21:57
on everything again. And I think it's probably silly
21:59
to think that we'll always get along perfectly,
22:02
but we want to advance this topic
22:04
forward and identify the cases
22:06
who truly need surgery, who truly
22:08
are for not surgery in a way we don't know and we can agree
22:11
together on that. And I think the patients, they
22:13
love that team approach. They want that
22:15
and I think they need it.
22:16
Absolutely. Well, thank you so much
22:18
for your wisdom today, Kieran. I think many
22:21
of us can learn and apply that to our
22:23
next ACL that walks through the door.
22:25
That's great, Sarah. It's great to share these cases
22:27
and I hope it's beneficial to the clinicians
22:29
as well.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More