Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This is planet money from and care.
0:05
Have run during woods here. So because
0:08
of the season of giving were sharing
0:10
a few of our favorite bonus episodes.
0:12
These are ones that were previously shared
0:14
with our planet. Money Plus Support is
0:16
a few months back. And though
0:18
I knew about. Here has to do with
0:20
hybrid work and. If you do it,
0:22
How to do a better. According to economic. Research
0:25
and. Before we get. To it. Let
0:27
me just tell you that bonus ipsos
0:29
like this one come out every couple
0:32
of weeks and their Planet Money feed
0:34
sometimes they come out from the indicated
0:36
team, which I'm part of. The indicator
0:38
of course is Planet Money's Daily Economics
0:41
Podcast and Planet Money Plus. Listeners also
0:43
get to hear both shows without sponsor
0:45
messages. and if that's you, thank you
0:47
so much for your support, especially now
0:49
and stay tuned next week when got
0:52
something special to have you in an
0:54
episode out on Christmas Day! And
0:57
so although that I hope you enjoy this by this
0:59
episode. if you've not heard it before the Planet My
1:01
team is back with a regular episode of the show
1:03
at the usual time later this week. So
1:12
the other day I called up
1:14
one of the world's top experts
1:16
in working from home, and he
1:18
himself was fittingly working from home.
1:20
Hello Jose and there are you
1:22
don't Very good yourself. Great. Banks
1:24
and. Was. A Marry A Better Arrow as
1:26
an assistant professor of Finance at a Time
1:28
university in Mexico City. He
1:30
says that before the pandemic, he
1:33
used to go into the office
1:35
every day, despite a fairly long
1:37
commute, now has mindsets changed. On.
1:39
Campus. Really? I'm on campus for a
1:41
reason and either for a seminar, to
1:44
talk to colleagues or to meet with
1:46
students and I cherish my working from
1:48
home difference lot more. kind of quiet
1:50
individual work. Dave I was spending it
1:52
talking with an Mp up August I
1:54
because Jose just came out with a
1:56
working paper coauthored with Nicholas Bloom and
1:59
Steven. Davis. Which reviews some
2:01
of the more recent evidence on
2:03
remote work and employees productivity. So
2:05
many of us on to know
2:07
right it like is working from
2:09
home better or worse than working
2:11
in the office and it's a
2:13
debate that's heated up during the
2:15
pandemic. It's touched businesses, employees and
2:17
even researchers trying to study this
2:19
year and get so measuring productivity
2:21
for many of the people who
2:23
can work from home as is
2:25
very very hard. Knowledge.
2:27
Jobs like Consulting like lawyers like
2:29
Engineers and kind of measuring the
2:32
productivity of these sorts of workers.
2:34
This is extremely hard, so I
2:36
think that's a big for to
2:38
provide. As a huge debate in
2:40
this literature. Earlier in the
2:42
pandemics, some of the research that Hussein
2:44
his colleagues conducted seem to suggest that
2:46
people who work for the remotely might
2:48
be just as productive or even more
2:50
productive them people who works in the
2:52
office. Now couple of years later, more
2:54
evidence has come in from around the
2:57
world that, oh, say it is, courses
2:59
of looks out for their favor And
3:01
there's a say when it comes to
3:03
fully remote work and productivity, it's not
3:05
so great. Is that
3:07
conversation? Thanks as always listening and for your
3:09
support of ton of money Plus. So.
3:13
I'm super interested in whether working from
3:15
home is more or less productive than
3:17
working on sites you have done. This
3:20
literature of the I kind of a
3:22
survey of the evidence so fire with
3:24
your courses. So from your rid of
3:26
the research one of the main findings.
3:29
And get so a lot of the
3:31
evans that we have about productivity while
3:33
working from home is coming from fully
3:35
remote and they're kind of. The evidence
3:37
is is not that positive on the
3:39
productivity of work from home and and
3:41
that to me some of the key
3:43
papers in that literature or include the
3:45
one Buy It In Italia Manual and
3:47
Emma Harrington that look at call center
3:50
workers basically comparing. Colleagues in the
3:52
same from some of them who were working
3:54
from home before the pandemic and continued to
3:56
do so, and others who were forced to
3:58
sift. When. Basically. we
4:00
closed down in 2020 from working physically at
4:02
the workplace to working from home. And then
4:04
kind of basically what they find is that
4:07
there seems to be a negative productivity effect.
4:10
And the reasons that they highlight is
4:12
that basically there's it's harder
4:14
to communicate with your colleagues when you need
4:17
kind of quick feedback from others. That'll
4:19
slow things down kind of even in this
4:21
occupation that it's fairly easy to do remotely
4:24
and in the sense that kind of you
4:26
don't really need to make big decisions and
4:28
have discussions and do creative stuff. You don't
4:30
want to write an email to say, do
4:32
I click on this button or that button?
4:34
Exactly. So you might just try to
4:36
work it out yourself might take another five minutes just
4:38
to not embarrass yourself. That delay
4:40
seems to be kind of what is
4:43
what is dropping the productivity kind of
4:45
these frictions to communication. Same thing kind
4:47
of in in the paper about an
4:49
Asian multinational firm looking at kind of remote
4:51
knowledge workers that were forced to lock down in
4:53
2020. It seemed that
4:55
they had to use kind of more email,
4:58
more Microsoft Teams in order to communicate with
5:00
each other. And so kind of even though
5:02
they were completing their job kind of to
5:04
the same level of satisfaction to their managers,
5:07
they had to do it over more hours kind
5:09
of because their schedules were more jam packed. And
5:11
I think kind of being able to knock on
5:14
on your colleagues door if you're a knowledge worker
5:16
and again asked for a quick clarification
5:19
rather than kind of scheduling a Microsoft Teams
5:21
meeting getting on it and making sure the microphone
5:23
is working is a bit more efficient. So these
5:25
are the sorts of frictions that kind of you
5:27
just can't get around when you're fully remote. Whereas
5:30
when you're in hybrid, you can kind
5:32
of make sure that that at least
5:35
some of those activities that require interaction
5:37
collaboration are done on site where kind
5:39
of these communication frictions are a bit
5:41
less significant. Okay, so
5:43
communication, what else? So
5:46
there's collaboration and idea generation.
5:49
There's this paper looking at idea
5:51
generation and experimental settings. So both
5:53
in kind of a multinational firm,
5:55
and I believe this was an online experiment
5:58
looked at how people interact in general. generated ideas
6:00
when they're interacting basically via video
6:03
conference versus in person. And
6:05
it seemed that there were also cognitive frictions
6:08
to this process when people are virtual.
6:10
And then kind of one of the
6:12
hypotheses that they laid out was that
6:15
when you're interacting virtually, you're
6:17
being forced to kind of
6:19
focus your gaze on a screen and
6:22
that limits a little bit of your cognitive
6:24
processes. And so kind of the number of
6:26
ideas that get generated and the number of
6:28
creative ideas that get generated are
6:30
basically fewer when you're interacting virtually than
6:32
when you're interacting in person. What
6:35
kind of magnitude are we looking at
6:37
with the drop in productivity for fully remote
6:39
workers? Yeah, so that's a great question. I
6:41
think for the sorts of
6:43
jobs where you can measure this accurately,
6:46
it's anywhere up to
6:48
a negative 10% effect on
6:50
productivity. That's significant. I
6:53
mean, that is significant, but what's important to keep in mind,
6:55
and I think so this
6:57
is very clear in the paper
6:59
by Emma Harrington and Natalia Manuel,
7:02
is that if a firm
7:04
goes fully remote, and remember this negative 10% is
7:06
for fully remote, the firm
7:08
can basically make that up in other
7:10
dimensions. And so in particular in saving
7:12
up on floor space costs. Offices
7:15
or websites and air conditioning
7:18
and heating. Exactly. And Emma
7:20
and Natalia's paper, they actively
7:22
calculate kind of what
7:24
the savings are versus the productivity
7:26
costs are from basically shutting down
7:29
a call center. And
7:31
they find that it can easily turn out
7:33
to be a positive for the employer to
7:35
basically kind of get rid of their call
7:37
centers, maybe take a small hit
7:39
on productivity, but kind of get cost savings that
7:41
are even bigger. And I think
7:43
there's gonna be some occupations in which that makes sense. That's
7:46
probably not the case for most knowledge workers for
7:48
whom kind of interaction is still a big deal
7:51
and it would be potentially significantly hindered
7:53
if you went fully remote. And
7:56
so I think this Leads me on to talk
7:58
a little bit about hybrid work. And then
8:00
so kind of what we sound and in terms of kind
8:02
of the dynamics of working from home is that hybrid work.
8:05
As. An Twenty Twenty Three as the dominant
8:07
form of of working from home, at least
8:09
in in advanced economies. So in
8:11
the Us I think of recent number say that
8:14
it's about three times as many people are are
8:16
in the hybrid mode coming into the last couple
8:18
of days a week. Then are
8:20
fully remote. And. And we think it's
8:22
because exactly kind of for and and in particular
8:24
for jobs that require lots of interaction. kind of
8:27
doing those interactions and person. Is
8:29
better than doing them are most. And
8:31
so my A coauthor Nick Bloom has
8:33
a nice paper where they basically ran
8:35
an experiment to try out hybrid work
8:37
among knowledge workers at a at a
8:39
company in China. So so this was
8:41
basically workers who are on the engineering,
8:44
the marketing in the finance departments. And
8:46
a randomized them to being either hybrid
8:49
are being fully in person. And.
8:51
Basically with will be found as people really
8:54
like Hybrid so they avoid the commute they
8:56
get to kind of were comfortably from home
8:58
a couple of days a week, especially if
9:00
they have the right equipment in the right
9:02
setup. And. With
9:05
a copy of that, it's very hard to measure
9:07
the productivity of of these sorts of workers. It
9:09
seemed that there was no kind of clear effect
9:11
on productivity. And. So with
9:13
hybrid sounds like this, we
9:15
don't know the exact magnitude.
9:18
Boats doesn't really seem to
9:20
be a quantifiable productivity loss.
9:23
So. Why?
9:25
Would accompany even want to do hybrid? I mean, if it
9:27
doesn't really matter, So. I think it
9:29
might not. Really matter for the
9:31
company in from the productivity but it might
9:34
matter and other dimensions and and and for
9:36
one in particular and I think this is
9:38
very real in next paper. The
9:41
big difference is kind of job
9:43
satisfaction and attrition rate rise. Basically
9:45
workers really like working from home
9:47
so can kind of in our.
9:49
Surveys. Running back to Twenty Twenty, people
9:51
consistently tell us that they would really like
9:53
to work from home and that that they would
9:56
like to do some more often on average
9:58
than their employer. Is. Planning. Them
10:00
to do so and. Basically not
10:02
offering working from home and can therefore
10:04
potential be. Be. A big cost
10:06
to companies as they want to attract talent.
10:09
So if your competitor is offering somebody any
10:11
they're fully or a motor a hybrid job
10:13
and you are not, You're forcing people to
10:15
come into the office every day. You're. Getting
10:18
the employee kind of potentially an objective li
10:20
worse set up for them in the sense
10:22
about commutes five days a week, but you're
10:24
also kind of failing to compete with the
10:27
from across the street. So. Sounds
10:29
like for people who are able to your
10:31
big fan of hybrid ones. Yeah.
10:33
So I think that's that's been our position
10:35
in that it seems to work very well
10:37
in and I mean this is kind of
10:39
taking opinion based on what we see on
10:41
the Saxon and visited. The fact that we
10:43
see is that people. Really
10:46
like working from home, it
10:48
seems to work reasonably well
10:50
in many jobs, in particular
10:52
for knowledge jobs. That. The
10:54
college graduates have. And. You
10:56
can do a little bit of the best
10:58
of both worlds. Maybe What I haven't quite
11:00
emphasized that as much as that. Companies.
11:03
Tend to say over going to be
11:05
hybrid and and kind of stop there
11:07
they they need to think about this
11:09
and design a hybrid and manage a
11:11
hybrid workforce kind of in i'm in
11:13
a more deliberate way. So for example,
11:15
asking you have a whole organization to
11:17
come in. at the same
11:19
time or asking. For
11:21
teams to come in at the same time as
11:23
key because this is exactly what generates kind of.
11:26
The. In person interactions. That he
11:28
wants to have in the office. So. We
11:30
the kind of the worst form of hybrid. I think that.
11:33
That. I could think of would be one where
11:35
it where there's a company that allows people to
11:37
choose how many days and what days they come
11:39
into the office. Every week. We're
11:42
there's basically no coordination kind of people want
11:45
to be in the office when their colleagues
11:47
and and are in the Us. Is
11:49
as you let everybody choose what state they come
11:52
in. You might end up with lot of people
11:54
who are in the office and who are on
11:56
zoom meetings with her colleagues who are Florida. And
11:58
that's exactly what you don't want. That's what I
12:00
did. I come into the office every day
12:03
to go on to Zoom, which feels a
12:05
little strange, almost as if I've. I've
12:08
got. I've got the computer plus the
12:10
zoom cause it's a well yeah so
12:12
it's a. I
12:14
talk to my colleagues on Zoom
12:16
at work. the answers that produces
12:18
the interns they're in different cities
12:20
scattered across America allow it says
12:22
he say I had to the
12:24
zebra August arrested for his for
12:27
us. I mean as. So
12:29
the media I was a little too negative but
12:31
I think as as you want people to interact
12:34
and. And and and to build
12:36
rapport with each other, That's. I
12:38
mean that's a set of the doesn't lend itself
12:40
to to that's earth and at it can work
12:42
from some job that seems to work for you
12:44
but for many jobs it's it has the least
12:46
probability of success. Okay, so
12:49
the pandemic changed everything in
12:51
regards to do work, especially
12:53
for knowledge workers. Do.
12:56
You think we're in a better world Now
12:58
I do And and and I think the
13:00
main reason for that is is is in
13:03
some sense we were. In twenty
13:05
nineteen caught in a equilibrium were.
13:08
More. Or less everybody. regardless of what your
13:10
job was, You went into the workplace five
13:12
days a week basically because that's what everybody
13:14
did and kind of. Trying.
13:16
To break that equilibrium and you doing
13:18
something different just wasn't gonna work. Kind
13:20
of the example that we asked give
13:23
people it's think about lawyers. Lawyers are
13:25
people who do. Knowledge Work.
13:27
But. They typically require an internet connection and
13:30
and then a computer. And they
13:32
could easily do their job remotely. And
13:34
and twenty Nineteen or or Hybrid. And
13:36
twenty and key. They didn't why, because
13:38
it would have been weird for them
13:41
for up a imagineer big law firm
13:43
in New York. All
13:45
of your competitors and your clients are coming
13:47
into the office five days a week. you
13:50
start not doing that and and it's just
13:52
weird and you're probably going to lose out
13:54
on business is you might be signaling the
13:57
in not taking the job as seriously as
13:59
your competitors Yeah, I think that's how
14:01
people would have interpreted it. And
14:04
exactly, the pandemic sort of broke that
14:06
equilibrium, kind of reduced the stigma associated
14:08
with working from home significantly, and in
14:11
the process probably taught us that working from
14:13
home is actually more productive than we expect,
14:15
that saving the commute time that we save
14:17
is probably kind of more productive
14:19
than coming in and having to chit chat
14:21
with your colleagues over the break room while
14:23
you're sitting down and so on. And
14:26
it opened our eyes to this possibility. The
14:29
fact that the pandemic was long was obviously a terrible event
14:31
for humanity, but I think it helped
14:33
ingrain some of these new dynamics of working
14:35
from home a bit better and really
14:38
helped us open our eyes and see kind of
14:40
both the good things about working from home and
14:43
later when we came back, kind of what we were
14:45
missing from being in person. Thank
14:50
you again to Jose Maria Barrero. Once
14:53
again, we make episodes like this one every
14:55
other week for our Planet Money Plus supporters,
14:58
two extra episodes a month, and usually
15:00
they're a bit more wonky, a bit more nerdy,
15:02
but not always. Sometimes we talk about
15:04
how Planet Money and The Indicator come together behind the
15:07
scenes. You can sign up for
15:09
Planet Money Plus at plus.npr.org. I'm
15:11
Darian Woods. Thank you so much for listening to Planet
15:13
Money from NPR.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More