Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Welcome to Public Health
0:02
on Call, a podcast from
0:04
the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
0:06
School of Public Health,
0:08
where we bring evidence,
0:10
experience, and perspective to
0:12
make sense of today's leading
0:15
health challenges. If you have
0:17
questions or ideas for us,
0:19
please send an email to
0:21
Public Health Question at JHU.EDU.
0:24
That's Public Health Question at
0:26
JHU. EDU. for future podcast
0:28
episodes. This is Lindsay Smith
0:30
Rogers. Today, the importance of
0:32
starting treatment for opioid addiction
0:34
in the emergency department. Arianna
0:36
Campbell is an emergency department
0:39
and addiction medicine physician assistant
0:41
at Marshall Medical Center in
0:43
Placerville, California. She's also the
0:45
co-founder of the Bridge Center
0:47
at the Public Health Institute,
0:49
a program that helps emergency
0:51
departments around the country build
0:53
addiction treatment programs. She speaks
0:55
to Dr. Josh Sharfstein about
0:57
how this work has evolved
0:59
over the last decade to
1:01
become the standard of care. Let's listen.
1:04
Ariana Campbell, thank you so much
1:06
for joining me today on Public Health
1:08
on call. How are you? I'm doing great.
1:10
Thank you so much for having me. I want
1:12
to talk to you about an effort
1:15
that I know you have personally
1:17
been deeply involved with, which is
1:19
getting emergency departments to provide more
1:22
treatment for people with opioid addiction.
1:24
Yeah, I mean this has been a big
1:26
goal for a long time, just to
1:29
have treatment for opioid use disorder as
1:31
a tool in my toolkit. And a
1:33
lot of this stems from feeling somewhat
1:36
helpless or just not having those tools
1:38
for... 17 years of my 25-year career,
1:40
and then making practice change, which I
1:42
mean, quite frankly, wasn't that challenging and
1:45
providing this as just a part of
1:47
practice. My daily routine when I see
1:49
a patient, just as if they had
1:51
high blood pressure, and I would address
1:54
that, if there's any indications of opioid
1:56
use disorder, or if that person feels
1:58
safe to disclose that. me, it's
2:00
something that I can help them
2:03
with. So take me back before
2:05
you started offering treatment. What was
2:07
that like? They came to see
2:09
you for something else, and how
2:11
did you experience that? You know,
2:13
there was a lot of unsaid
2:15
things, so there would be, I
2:17
think, on my part, a suspicion.
2:19
And then a feeling that this
2:21
person wasn't disclosing something to me.
2:23
In fact, I think it's always,
2:25
oh, they're lying to me. They're
2:27
not telling me that they're using
2:29
opioids in a non-prescribed way. Or
2:32
they're falling asleep and they told
2:34
me they don't use drugs. And
2:36
feeling this disconnect, actually, with a
2:38
patient, which actually makes me feel
2:40
uncomfortable. In the emergency department, I
2:42
need to make... really quick connections
2:44
with people and establish rapport and
2:46
trust rapidly. And when you get
2:48
that disconnect from the start, it's
2:50
uncomfortable and you feel like you're
2:52
not addressing the elephant in the
2:54
room. And how did that begin
2:56
to change for you? I was
2:58
asked to attend a meeting, you
3:01
know, as I think a lot
3:03
of us, you know, you attend
3:05
a meeting and I had a
3:07
moment of self-reflection where somebody was
3:09
asking if I would start a
3:11
medication, bupenorphan, if somebody was in
3:13
opioid withdrawal. I had a lot
3:15
of misinformed ideas actually. I just
3:17
didn't have a lot of training
3:19
in this. And when somebody proposed
3:21
that to me, I actually didn't
3:23
even think it was legal. And
3:25
of course it was. It's the
3:27
standard of care. It's a recommended
3:29
treatment. And once I took a
3:32
step back and looked at the
3:34
overall picture, which was, what am
3:36
I doing right now? for people
3:38
with opioid use disorder that I
3:40
am so proud of that I
3:42
wouldn't make a practice change. And
3:44
of course, that was nothing. I
3:46
was sending people to non-evidence-based treatment.
3:48
I was sending people to places
3:50
that wanted them to pay a
3:52
lot of money to stay for
3:54
three months and may not have
3:56
been prescribing medications and may have
3:58
been putting them at risk of
4:01
overdose when they left. I live
4:03
and work in a small community
4:05
and I would actually get feedback.
4:07
that the information I was giving
4:09
people wasn't helpful, that they were
4:11
having trouble accessing the kind of
4:13
care that I was trying to
4:15
connect them to. So you go
4:17
to this meeting and you hear,
4:19
well actually there's a treatment you
4:21
can provide in the emergency department
4:23
and you begin to offer that
4:25
treatment. You get trained, you begin
4:27
to offer that. How does that
4:30
change the dynamic that we were
4:32
talking about before for patients who
4:34
are showing up? I mean, I
4:36
had a moment of humility in
4:38
practice and that I thought, how
4:40
did I not know that this
4:42
existed? And then it really changed
4:44
my interaction with people who use
4:46
drugs. I started, it's like I
4:48
opened a small door into what's
4:50
possible when you make this, you
4:52
know, practice change. And my patients
4:54
started talking to me about a
4:56
lot of things. In fact, many
4:59
people disclosed that they had never
5:01
talked to a health care professional
5:03
about their substance use. They didn't
5:05
feel comfortable. telling somebody because they
5:07
thought they would be mistreated. And
5:09
once they realized that as part
5:11
of their visit in the emergency
5:13
department, we could talk about this
5:15
and provide a reasonable set of
5:17
options, it just completely changed, not
5:19
just my practice, but it changed,
5:21
I think, the view of our
5:23
emergency department even in the community.
5:25
Did it change the view of
5:28
the staff towards the patients? That's
5:30
a great question. That happened through
5:32
time. So initially, I'll admit, I
5:34
didn't tell many nurses that we
5:36
were doing this or our staff.
5:38
I was actually afraid somebody would
5:40
tell us we couldn't do it
5:42
and I knew it was the
5:44
right thing to do. And that
5:46
was a mistake because I put
5:48
signage in the emergency department in
5:50
like the lobby in the waiting
5:52
room. And when I did that,
5:54
a nurse came to me and
5:57
said, wait, what are we doing?
5:59
And I explained it and there
6:01
was also, I mean, coming from
6:03
the same place, there was a
6:05
lot of misinformation that, you know,
6:07
people thought, are we just substituting
6:09
one opioid for another? Are we
6:11
enabling this behavior? And this is
6:13
from just an antiquated set of
6:15
ideas. that wasn't based in medicine,
6:17
and I knew I had a
6:19
lot of work to do, actually.
6:21
We did a stigma intervention in
6:23
our hospital that made a massive
6:26
difference in people's understanding of what
6:28
we could offer, what we could
6:30
do, and why it mattered. So
6:32
you're now treating patients, and you
6:34
realize that what you've gone through,
6:36
the process you've gone through, can
6:38
actually help other emergency departments change
6:40
too. Yeah, I think, you know,
6:42
I stood this program up in
6:44
a rural hospital, community hospital, single
6:46
hospital system, and I don't think
6:48
I realized it was supposed to
6:50
be really hard. So then when
6:52
I realized that there was a
6:55
lot of pushback, there was a
6:57
lot of people saying that this
6:59
can't happen anywhere, I think I
7:01
took that as a challenge maybe
7:03
that I actually thought this could
7:05
happen anywhere. You know, we started
7:07
this. prescribing in a matter of
7:09
four to six weeks of just
7:11
learning about what we could do
7:13
and how we could change that.
7:15
And now it's on a quality
7:17
improvement spectrum. We're always looking to
7:19
improve our program. But we started
7:21
working in other hospitals and realized
7:24
maybe there's some resources that can
7:26
be helpful. We realize that we
7:28
could teach people how to do
7:30
this. We could create champions who
7:32
can lead these efforts and that
7:34
it would work. And then we
7:36
worked with urgency realizing, you know,
7:38
really the massive scale of the
7:40
overdose epidemic, and that if we
7:42
worked with urgency, we could create
7:44
a whole system, and this is
7:46
the dream, that you see an
7:48
H on the freeway, and you,
7:50
just like if you're experiencing chest
7:52
pain, and you would say, I
7:55
should go to a hospital because
7:57
I'm really worried that I'm having
7:59
a heart attack, that you could
8:01
see an H on the freeway,
8:03
and you could go to that
8:05
hospital and have a reasonable expectation
8:07
of receiving... high quality evidence based
8:09
care for opioid use disorder and
8:11
opioid patrol. Since you started doing
8:13
this work with other hospitals, how
8:15
many hospitals have you been engaged
8:17
with? 276 in California, now that's
8:19
more than, we've worked deeply in
8:21
more than 17 states, and that
8:24
those numbers continue to grow. So
8:26
more than 300 hospitals total and
8:28
growing. That is a large number
8:30
of hospitals. That must mean thousands
8:32
of patients. Yeah, hundreds of thousands
8:34
of patients actually. It can be
8:36
done. It can be done rapidly.
8:38
And, you know, emergency clinicians, I
8:40
think, are natural to make practice
8:42
change quickly. We're asked to do
8:44
that often because the work that
8:46
we do, you know, there's life
8:48
and death consequences as with what
8:50
many of us do, but in
8:53
real time. And so I think
8:55
we are able to make change
8:57
pretty rapidly to meet. the standards
8:59
that are set in communities and
9:01
to to really meet the demands
9:03
of high-risk patients you know people
9:05
who are experiencing high-risk conditions. So
9:07
when you go into a hospital
9:09
that is just signed up to
9:11
start to do this you you
9:13
must run into some resistance sometimes?
9:15
Yeah a lot of the resistance
9:17
is that we're too busy you
9:19
know and we are we're all
9:22
too busy. I am too busy.
9:24
I am seeing people in the
9:26
waiting room, I am seeing people
9:28
in triage, I am making up
9:30
rooms to see my patients, and
9:32
what I think is really important
9:34
is that When you do this,
9:36
and you start adopting this practice,
9:38
you're actually addressing some underlying conditions
9:40
that make a difference for people
9:42
so that they don't need to
9:44
come back over and over again
9:46
for the same reason. You know,
9:48
we're addressing sort of a root
9:51
cause of many of the medical
9:53
challenges that people face. And at
9:55
the same time, we are kind
9:57
of putting the underlying issue on
9:59
the table. We're making it safe
10:01
for people to disclose. a highly
10:03
stigmatized condition. And so where you
10:05
may, to me, may come in
10:07
saying they have abdominal pain, and
10:09
that means I'm going to do
10:11
a lot of things that you
10:13
know, include. a CT scan, you
10:15
know, something that is a lot
10:17
of radiation, right? And if they
10:20
feel safe just telling me that
10:22
they're an opioid withdrawal, I can
10:24
very easily treat that with a
10:26
medication that dissolves under their tongue,
10:28
and they don't need a lot
10:30
of these other interventions because we
10:32
just created a safe space to
10:34
have a therapeutic relationship and to
10:36
discuss what's really going on. So
10:38
it's actually the opposite. When people
10:40
say, but I'm too busy not.
10:42
to make this practice change actually.
10:44
And that's what we found. Let
10:46
me ask you about evidence. You
10:49
know, you have worked in all
10:51
these different hospitals. How can you
10:53
tell you're making a difference? Well,
10:55
we track it, you know, as
10:57
any good public health professional. We
10:59
look at the data. So this
11:01
is what was really surprising to
11:03
me. You only know the data
11:05
that you are looking at and
11:07
collect. And we were never looking
11:09
at or collecting data on opioid
11:11
use disorder. And... We actually weren't
11:13
doing that because people weren't making
11:15
the diagnosis, and we just didn't
11:18
know to look at this. So,
11:20
you know, in terms of what
11:22
we've done in the state of
11:24
California, we've been looking at overall
11:26
data, and you can do this
11:28
from your local hospital to like
11:30
a statewide initiative, right? So, let
11:32
me describe this in my local
11:34
hospital. We just look at how
11:36
much pupanorphan are we prescribing? Because
11:38
if we take a drop in
11:40
bupenorphine prescribing, this is a medication
11:42
to treat opioid use disorder, then
11:44
we know that there may be
11:47
some barriers, there may be some
11:49
gaps in education, because we know
11:51
that there are a lot of
11:53
people out there with opioid use
11:55
disorder. So we start looking at
11:57
why. We also look at the
11:59
variability, who is getting bupenorphine. Are
12:01
there people who are invisible in
12:03
our communities? And then we look
12:05
at other things like how we
12:07
can affect... For example, readmissions. Are
12:09
people leaving without finishing treatment? Are
12:11
people needing to be readmitted because
12:13
we didn't provide them the right
12:15
medication at the right time? So
12:18
we've really put this into a
12:20
category like other high-risk conditions on
12:22
a local level. And we look
12:24
at our data, we look at
12:26
it monthly, and then we look
12:28
for any change that means our
12:30
system could be better. We also
12:32
look at follow-up rates. You know,
12:34
are people making it to treatment
12:36
from our emergency department? We've maintained
12:38
very high follow-up rates. And then
12:40
on a statewide level, we had
12:42
ways people were reporting it for
12:44
a long time, but we found
12:47
out good objective data, watching... our
12:49
PDMP, you know, watching how much
12:51
pupanorphin is being prescribed and by
12:53
who, I think is really important
12:55
on a statewide level. That's great.
12:57
A lot of different measures. You
12:59
recently had a major study published.
13:01
Yeah, we just published some some
13:03
great researchers published on our program
13:05
in JAMA a few weeks ago
13:07
that was led by Annette Decker.
13:09
And that paper showed that just
13:11
Emergency department clinicians giving prescriptions for
13:13
a buponorphin makes a big difference.
13:16
So we found that one in
13:18
three people who were given a
13:20
prescription for a buponorphin from the
13:22
emergency department received a second prescription,
13:24
right? So this is a big
13:26
deal because this medication can, you
13:28
know, over a period of time
13:30
can cut a person's risk of
13:32
dying in half. So, you know,
13:34
any period of time in treatment
13:36
with medications for opioid use disorder
13:38
is... a really good thing, and
13:40
that one in nine of those
13:42
people actually had continuous treatment for
13:45
six months. I mean, that's a
13:47
really good number. If you think
13:49
of, I mean, I initiate treatment
13:51
for asthma, for emphysema, for diabetes,
13:53
for, I mean, hypertension, high blood
13:55
pressure, you know, all sorts of
13:57
medical conditions, and often people do
13:59
face disruptions in treatment for a
14:01
variety of factors. So these are
14:03
pretty astounding numbers, actually. providing this
14:05
treatment yourself for many years to
14:07
providing it for your patients in
14:09
a small emergency department to sharing
14:11
your knowledge. with hundreds of other
14:14
hospitals to finding evidence that it's
14:16
making a difference at a large
14:18
scale. That's really remarkable. Yeah, I
14:20
would say it's of course my
14:22
proudest work in medicine. If you
14:24
asked me 10 years ago, if
14:26
I would be doing this, I
14:28
could have never predicted that. But
14:30
I think I saw a massive
14:32
gap in medicine, you know, this
14:34
massive gap where we could be
14:36
doing so much more. And then
14:38
as the overdose crisis escalated, there's
14:40
urgency associated with that. Why aren't
14:43
we doing more when we have
14:45
answers and we have tools? And
14:47
then working through all of the
14:49
challenges, you had mentioned, you know,
14:51
different emergency departments come to us
14:53
with different challenges of why this
14:55
may be, you know, why this
14:57
is hard in their setting, working
14:59
through that and figuring out ways
15:01
and doing it. with urgency and
15:03
doing it with creativity. I think
15:05
that that is, that's the proudest
15:07
work I've ever done in medicine.
15:09
It's really been important and can
15:12
impact whole populations in that, you
15:14
know, I started thinking about things
15:16
more from that public health population
15:18
health perspective and I think this
15:20
program, this project opened my eyes
15:22
up to the impact we can
15:24
have when you see a wrong
15:26
and you work to write that
15:28
wrong in medicine. Thank you so
15:30
much for having me. This has
15:32
been fun. I appreciate you. Public
15:34
Health on Call is a podcast
15:36
from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School
15:38
of Public Health, produced by Joshua
15:41
Sharfstein, Lindsay Smith Rogers, Stephanie Desmond,
15:43
and Grace Fernandez Sissieri. Audio production
15:45
by J. B. Arbogast, Michael Bonfills,
15:47
Spencer Greer, Matthew Martin, and Philip
15:49
Porter, with support from Chip Hickey.
15:51
Distribution by Nick Moran. Production Coordination
15:53
by Catherine Ricardo Social Media run
15:55
by Grace Fernandez Sassieri Analytics by
15:57
Elisa Rosen if you have question
15:59
or ideas for
16:01
us, please send
16:03
an email to to
16:05
Public Health .edu. That's Public
16:07
Health .edu for future
16:10
podcast episodes. Thank
16:12
you for listening.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More