Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Drew and Jonathan Scott here reminding
0:03
you that a lot of life's
0:05
firsts are better with help from
0:07
American Family Insurance. Like your first
0:10
home expansion or your first big
0:12
lightning strike. There's a first for
0:14
everything. Get the right home policy
0:16
at the right price with the
0:19
right help from American families agents.
0:21
Life's better when you're under American
0:23
Families roof. Insure carefully, dream fearlessly.
0:26
Get a quote and find an
0:28
agent at AmFam.com. Products. Take an
0:30
Amix card with you on your morning coffee
0:32
run and earn cash back. On a weekend
0:34
trip, earn miles. See if you pre-qualify for
0:37
an American Express card with no impact on
0:39
your credit score. Learn more at American Express.com/check-4-offers.
0:41
Your credit score may be impacted if you
0:43
accept a card. Terms apply. Give yourself a
0:46
reason to look forward to going to the
0:48
mailbox each week with a CW torch newsletter
0:50
paper copy subscription subscription. Details at
0:52
p.w.torch.com/paper copy. It's 12 pages
0:54
every week packed with my
0:56
TV reports along with exclusive
0:58
features such as my cover
1:00
story on the top story
1:03
of the week. Our pay-per-view
1:05
roundtable reviews from the torch
1:07
staff. Exclusive feature-length columns from
1:09
Greg Parks, Rich fan, Sean
1:11
Radakin, Alan Kunahan, and Zach
1:13
Hadorn, Torchtalk transcripts, the latest news,
1:15
and more. p.w. torch.com/paper copy. Take
1:18
a break from screen time. and
1:20
settle in every week with a
1:22
mega dose of wrestling news and
1:24
analysis with a pro wrestling torch
1:27
newsletter paper copy edition in the year
1:29
2022 you can get a full
1:31
year of home delivery for just
1:33
$99 or try us for an
1:35
eight-week trial subscription. P.W.torch.com/paper
1:37
copy. Take an Amex
1:39
card with you on your morning copy
1:41
run and earn cash back on a
1:44
weekend trip. Earn miles. See if you
1:46
pre-qualified for an American Express card with
1:48
no impact on your credit score. Learn
1:50
more at American Express.com/check-4-4-Dash offers. Your credit
1:52
score may be impacted if you accept
1:54
a card. Terms apply. If you work
1:56
in quality control at a candy factory,
1:58
you know strict safety regulations. come with
2:00
the job. It's why you partner
2:02
with Granger. Granger helps you find
2:05
the high quality and compliant products
2:07
your business needs to inspect, detect,
2:09
and help correct issues. And the
2:11
sweetest part is, everyone gets a
2:13
product that's as safe to eat
2:16
as it is delicious. Call 1-800
2:18
Granger, click Granger or just stop
2:20
by. Granger for the ones who
2:22
get it done. If
2:25
your job at a health care
2:27
facility includes disinfecting against viruses, you
2:29
know prevention is the best medicine.
2:31
And maintaining healthy spaces starts with
2:33
a healthy cleaning routine. Granger's world-class
2:36
supply chain helps ensure you have
2:38
the quality products you need when
2:40
you need them. From disinfectants and
2:42
cleaning supplies to personal protective equipment,
2:44
so you can help deliver a
2:47
clean bill of health. Call one
2:49
800 Granger, click Granger.com or just
2:51
stop by. Granger for the ones
2:53
who get it done. Welcome
3:05
to the P.W. Torch Dailycast
3:07
Monday Best of Edition where
3:09
we flashed back five years
3:11
to the P.W. Torch live
3:13
cast with Greg Parks and
3:15
Brandon the Claire, an episode
3:17
of Wrestling Night in America,
3:19
one week after. Wrestlemania five
3:21
years ago when the COVID-era,
3:23
they break down W.W.E.E.'s decision
3:25
to return to live tapings.
3:27
They also talked about Russimania
3:29
fallout from Ron Smackdown. Reducing
3:31
the number of world titles
3:33
that it recognizes, PWAI, pro,
3:35
single-strated, is a long history
3:37
of curating which titles they
3:39
consider world titles, and they
3:41
talked about that history, and
3:43
more. So let's get to
3:45
it. This is the PWA
3:47
George Dailycast Best of Edition
3:49
for Monday, April 14th, 2025,
3:51
jumping back to the April
3:53
12th, 2020 episode. If
4:02
it's Sunday, it's wrestling night in
4:05
America here on p.w. torch dailycast.com
4:07
Good Sunday evening I am for
4:09
wrestling torch columnist Greg Parks here
4:11
with you for Sunday April 12th
4:13
2020 and This is wrestling night
4:15
in America as we are Every
4:18
Sunday night we are here on
4:20
p.w. torch daily cast.com 8 p.m.
4:22
Eastern you can find us on
4:24
most Sunday nights. Of course, there's
4:26
a pay-perview as was the case
4:28
last weekend. You might have heard
4:31
of it, WrestleMania. We go on
4:33
the air right after that show
4:35
goes off the air, talking all
4:37
about your reaction, your feedback from
4:39
that paper view. If you want
4:41
to call and talk, 515-605-9-345 is
4:43
the number to call, if you
4:46
would like to send us an
4:48
email. W-N-I-A live cast@gmail.com and we've
4:50
got five emails in the hopper
4:52
right now. And to handle that
4:54
business with me tonight, making a
4:56
second appearance here on Wrestling Night
4:59
in America, it is pwtorch.com contributor
5:01
Brandon, Brandon, thanks for joining me
5:03
here once again on Wrestling Night
5:05
in America. Happy to be here
5:07
Greg. And Brandon we start out
5:09
with the big news of the
5:12
week and that is WWE continuing
5:14
their live events beginning tomorrow despite
5:16
the state of Florida being on
5:18
a 30 day lockdown basically starting
5:20
back on April 1st and despite
5:22
the concerns of many and there
5:24
have been a wide range of
5:27
reactions online as you can imagine
5:29
from people who support the decision
5:31
by W.W.E. a lot of derision
5:33
out there from the critics of
5:35
W.W.E. and Vince McMahon for making
5:37
this decision. Wording of the statement
5:40
WUE issued ESPN says, quote, we
5:42
believe it is now more important
5:44
than ever to provide people with
5:46
a diversion from these hard times.
5:48
We are producing content on a
5:50
closed set with only essential personnel
5:53
and attendance following appropriate guidelines while
5:55
taking additional precautions to ensure the
5:57
health and well. of our performers
5:59
and staff. As a brand that
6:01
has been woven into the fabric
6:03
of society, W.W.E. and its superstars,
6:05
bring families together, and deliver a
6:08
sense of hope determination and perseverance.
6:10
End quote. That is the statement
6:12
W.W.E. released to E.S.P.N. on their
6:14
decision to go forward with taping.
6:16
So they're going to go live.
6:18
They had enough in the can
6:21
before Wrestlemania to get through the
6:23
post-Russelmania week. but I believe starting
6:25
tomorrow night they'll be back with
6:27
live tapings which you know some
6:29
might say okay well what's the
6:31
difference if they do it live
6:34
and if they do it taped
6:36
well you know you're flying people
6:38
in more frequently you are endangering
6:40
them to the virus a lot
6:42
more frequently, if that's the case.
6:44
You know, there are a whole
6:46
lot of other dominoes that tend
6:49
to fall when you do live
6:51
taping spread. And so, just your
6:53
initial reaction to WWE not only
6:55
forging ahead with providing content for
6:57
Fox in the USA Network in
6:59
the, you know, under the SmackDown
7:02
and Raw Umbrellas, but doing so
7:04
live. What did you think of
7:06
that decision? Yeah,
7:08
so there's been a lot of
7:10
sort of conflicting information over the
7:12
last few days. I was curious,
7:14
coverings back down for the torch.
7:17
I started writing about the show
7:19
on Friday and noticing that there
7:21
was a different vibe to the
7:23
show. And very quickly, I was
7:25
kind of looking during commercials to
7:27
see, hey, was this shot, you
7:29
know, back when they shot WrestleMania?
7:31
Was it in the can that
7:33
that far? And it appeared as
7:35
though it wasn't. And I don't
7:37
think that Friday show was live,
7:39
but from the information that I
7:41
could gather, it may have been
7:43
taped sometime during the week. And
7:45
I thought that made sense because
7:47
the show felt markedly different. And
7:49
in actuality, I thought that it
7:51
came off as the best show,
7:53
the best TV show that WWE
7:55
had put on during this. era
7:57
of performance center shows. As far
8:00
as the idea of them continuing
8:02
to do this and actually going
8:04
alive again, I'm not a fan
8:06
of the idea. On one hand,
8:08
I think that it's going to
8:10
make for better content. But I
8:12
don't really think that content is
8:14
king here in this particular scenario
8:16
to use a phrase that's used
8:18
in that world very often. content
8:20
usually is king but right now
8:22
the king should be you know
8:24
keeping their talent healthy and setting
8:26
a good example for other other
8:28
sports leagues and also for fans
8:30
watching at home I think I've
8:32
seen on Twitter throughout the week
8:34
a lot of a lot of
8:36
backlash to this and one of
8:38
the big points that I think
8:40
people from the torch were raising
8:43
was just that not only does
8:45
this this set a bad precedent
8:47
and set a bad example and
8:49
put their own talent at risk
8:51
but It does send the wrong
8:53
message to the fans too. It
8:55
sends the message that, hey, if
8:57
WWE says it's fine to go
8:59
out and gather and produce these
9:01
shows, then why isn't the NBA
9:03
doing it? Why isn't the NHL
9:05
doing it? Why isn't the NHL
9:07
doing it? Why aren't other major
9:09
sports doing it? Why aren't we
9:11
able to do it? And I
9:13
don't think that that's the message
9:15
that they should be sending, whether
9:17
they're intending to do that or
9:19
not. Yeah, this doesn't surprise me.
9:21
I mean, it kind of falls
9:24
in line with what, and how
9:26
Vince McMahon has operated. You know,
9:28
I know there are people speculating
9:30
or suggesting WEE just shut down.
9:32
And because they have, Lord knows,
9:34
they have the tape library to
9:36
throw stuff on or on Smackdown
9:38
during this time period. And, you
9:40
know, that's just never been Vince
9:42
McMahon's MO. When he has seen
9:44
an opportunity for... his brand to
9:46
be in. I think that's how
9:48
he sees this. He sees this
9:50
as an opportunity for his brand
9:52
to be the last one left
9:54
standing. Really, you know, there's no
9:56
other sports leagues going on. right
9:58
now. Most entertainment genres have shut
10:00
down for the time being and
10:02
they've found a way and an
10:04
AEW has done this as well,
10:07
but they've found a way to
10:09
keep that train moving forward and
10:11
McMahon and you know if there
10:13
are any supporters of this idea
10:15
within WUE I'm sure their idea
10:17
is look we're going to be
10:19
the ones that are going to
10:21
be talked about. we're going to
10:23
be the ones that are viewed
10:25
because there's no other options out
10:27
there for sports and or entertainment.
10:29
We've seen that not to be
10:31
the case with the ratings. I
10:33
mean, the lack of competition from,
10:35
you know, this is the time
10:37
of year where the NBA games
10:39
start to matter more, and those
10:41
are constant competitions for WWE on
10:43
Monday and Friday nights. And even
10:45
without that competition, WWE is not
10:48
seen an uptick in the ratings.
10:50
In fact, fallen both were on
10:52
smackdown recently so you know I
10:54
understand that W.W.E. and Vince may
10:56
be concerned about their contracts with
10:58
Fox and USA that you know
11:00
there's a certain amount of live
11:02
programming they have to provide every
11:04
year and then there's the other
11:06
discussion of well would Fox and
11:08
USA really try to get out
11:10
of this deal based on not
11:12
going live during an epidemic and
11:14
then there's thought of well you
11:16
know a Fox doesn't like the
11:18
early returns that they've seen for
11:20
smackdown in terms of viewership numbers
11:22
they may use that as a
11:24
loophole to get out so W.
11:26
E and Vincent Man may be
11:28
clinging tight to that contract in
11:31
an effort to keep that money
11:33
rolling in so there are just
11:35
a lot of tentacles to the
11:37
this thing and one we haven't
11:39
even talked about yet is WWEE
11:41
did confirm that one on-air talent,
11:43
no name has been released, but
11:45
it's tested positive for COVID-19. There
11:47
were claims that they had no
11:49
interaction with wrestlers during that time
11:51
period that they were positive. So,
11:53
you know, the thought was all
11:55
it takes is one wrestler to
11:57
test positive and they basically got
11:59
to shut the whole thing down.
12:01
They had an on-air talent apparently.
12:03
that did test positive though was
12:05
not enough to get things shut
12:07
down but I mean what's the
12:09
risk here Brandon I know you're
12:12
not a doctor or medical personnel
12:14
as far as I know or
12:16
anything like this but you know
12:18
the risk WEE is taking by
12:20
putting their shows out there and
12:22
you know if one wrestler gets
12:24
this virus I mean how do
12:26
they... Is that an automatic shutdown
12:28
in your mind? Or are they
12:30
going to be able to say,
12:32
no, he's only in contact with
12:34
these people, we can keep going
12:36
with this other side of the
12:38
roster? If you work in quality
12:40
control at a candy factory, you
12:42
know strict safety regulations come with
12:44
the job. It's why you partner
12:46
with Granger. Granger helps you find
12:48
the high quality and compliant products
12:50
your business needs to inspect, detect,
12:52
and help correct issues. And the
12:55
sweetest part is, everyone gets a
12:57
product that's as safe to eat
12:59
as it is delicious. Call 1-800-granger,
13:01
click-granger.com or just stop by, Granger,
13:03
for the ones who get it
13:05
done. For the ones who get
13:07
it done, the ones who get
13:09
it done, the most important part
13:11
is the one you need now,
13:13
and the best partner is the
13:15
one who can deliver. That's why
13:17
millions of maintenance and repair pros
13:19
trust Granger, because we have professional
13:21
grade supplies for every industry, even
13:23
hard to find products. and we
13:25
have same day pickup and next
13:27
day delivery on most orders. But
13:29
most importantly, we have an unwavering
13:31
commitment to help keep you up
13:33
and running. Call, clickgranger.com or just
13:36
stop by. Granger for the ones
13:38
who get it done. If you
13:40
work in quality control at a
13:42
candy factory, you know strict safety
13:44
regulations come with the job. It's
13:46
why you partner with Granger. Granger
13:48
helps you find the high quality
13:50
and compliant products your business needs
13:52
to inspect, detect, and help correct
13:54
issues. And the sweetest part is,
13:56
everyone gets a product that's as
13:58
safe to eat as it is
14:00
delicious. Call 1-800 Granger, click Granger.com
14:02
or just stop by. Granger for
14:04
the ones who get it done.
14:06
You can support us on Patreon
14:08
and get these shows with ads
14:10
and plugs removed. The Weight Killer
14:12
Prozing podcast, Weight Killer Prozing post
14:14
shows, and the PWA torch Dailycast
14:16
throughout the week with ads and
14:19
plugs removed. Plus a few bonus
14:21
VIP shows throughout the month for
14:23
just $4.99.99 cents a month. Check
14:25
it out, Patreon.com/PWA torch VIP. That's
14:27
patron.com/p.w. torch VIP and you can
14:29
also upgrade two other tiers and
14:31
receive even more benefits through patron.
14:33
For the ones who get it
14:35
done, the most important part is
14:37
the one you need now and
14:39
the best partner is the one
14:41
who can deliver. That's why millions
14:43
of maintenance and repair pros trust
14:45
Granger because we have professional grade
14:47
supplies for every industry, even hard
14:49
to find products. And we have
14:51
same day pickup and next day
14:53
delivery on most orders. But most
14:55
importantly, we have an unwaveringavering commitment.
14:57
to help keep you up and
15:00
running. Call click Ranger.com or just
15:02
stop by. Granger, for the ones
15:04
who get it done. If
15:06
your job at a health care
15:08
facility includes disinfecting against viruses, you
15:10
know prevention is the best medicine
15:13
and maintaining healthy spaces starts with
15:15
a healthy cleaning routine. Granger's world-class
15:17
supply chain helps ensure you have
15:19
the quality products you need when
15:21
you need them. From disinfectants and
15:23
cleaning supplies to personal protective equipment
15:25
so you can help deliver a
15:27
clean bill of health. Call one
15:29
800 Granger, click Ranger.com or just
15:31
stop by. Granger for the ones
15:33
who get it done. For the
15:35
ones who get it done, the
15:37
most important part is the one
15:39
you need now, and the best
15:41
partner is the one who can
15:43
deliver. That's why millions of maintenance
15:45
and repair pros trust Granger, because
15:47
we have professional grade supplies for
15:49
every industry, even hard to find
15:51
products. And we have same day
15:53
pickup and next day delivery on
15:55
most orders. But most importantly, we
15:58
have an unwavering commitment to help
16:00
keep you up and running. Call,
16:02
click Ranger.com, or just stop by.
16:04
Granger, for the ones who get
16:06
it done. Well, I think you're
16:08
sort of seeing Vince play the
16:10
mental gymnastics that he needs to
16:12
in order to justify this already.
16:14
So, yeah, I think your second
16:16
option there is likely the strategy
16:18
that Vince would take if faced
16:20
with... That situation is the name
16:22
of the person who was infected
16:24
actually got out and we found
16:26
out that he was in fact
16:28
taking part in recent shows. I
16:30
know that there was talk that
16:32
the Ms. was showing symptoms and
16:34
that was the reason that he
16:36
was pulled from the WrestleMania card,
16:38
though he appeared on Smackdown this
16:41
week just fine, claiming it was
16:43
an injury. So of course we
16:45
don't know what actually happened there.
16:47
Perhaps he was just feeling under
16:49
the weather and tested negative. We
16:51
don't have that information as far
16:53
as I know. So yeah, I
16:55
think I think Vince would probably
16:57
just bulldoze ahead with the thought
16:59
that, you know, the exposure was
17:01
limited. We know who that wrestler
17:03
came in contact with and were
17:05
able to mitigate the situation. I
17:07
don't know that short of Fox
17:09
or USA. for the sake of
17:11
their reputation in the sense of
17:13
airing this product that could be
17:15
viewed as irresponsible and reckless right
17:17
now, short of them saying we
17:19
don't want live content right now,
17:21
I don't know that there's anything
17:23
that will stop Vince from trucking
17:26
on. Yeah, and that's exactly what
17:28
happened with the UFC and Dana
17:30
White had purchased this island that
17:32
he was going to Have these
17:34
fights on and finally Disney stepped
17:36
in and said no, that's not
17:38
going to happen So I think
17:40
you're right short of and I'm
17:42
sure Vince didn't go to Fox
17:44
and say hey You know, I
17:46
know we have this caveat in
17:48
our deal where we can only
17:50
have three tapes here, but you
17:52
know Can we work something out
17:54
to where we can? I'm sure
17:56
he did not go to Fox
17:58
and do that. I'm sure he
18:00
kind of stuck his fingers in
18:02
his ears and say, you know,
18:04
we're just going to plow ahead
18:06
and do what we need to
18:08
do. So yeah, that's that's the
18:11
topic. Sure. Sort of the idea.
18:13
Yeah, it's sort of the idea
18:15
that he doesn't want to acknowledge
18:17
the exemplary circumstance. In other words,
18:19
he views the contract as the
18:21
contract is and doesn't. you know
18:23
if he if he doesn't ask
18:25
for permission then he doesn't feel
18:27
the need to actually go through
18:29
with it so i mean it's
18:31
it's it's it's it's not something
18:33
if you're if you're a long-time
18:35
viewer of the every we and
18:37
and a long-time student of the
18:39
way that Vince McMahon runs his
18:41
company this isn't surprising no not
18:43
at all and in fact i'm
18:45
surprised at the number of people
18:47
who are surprised by this honestly
18:49
You know, the number of people
18:51
who have followed this business and
18:54
have followed W.W.E. and Vince McMahon
18:56
for 20, 30 years and people
18:58
are kind of, you know, taken
19:00
a back by this and I'm
19:02
thinking, well, what did you expect?
19:04
You know, the breadcrumbs are all
19:06
there in terms of Vince's career
19:08
and what he's done and things
19:10
like that and the decisions he's
19:12
made. So, yeah, that's not surprising.
19:14
Let's take a bit of a
19:16
left turn here. WrestleMania fallout. We
19:18
continue or about a week removed
19:20
from Wrestlemania as we sit here
19:22
tonight. Still a lot of discussion
19:24
about some of the things, the
19:26
decisions made, booking decisions, and some
19:28
of the matches that took place
19:30
at WrestleMania. I want to go
19:32
to an email that I got
19:34
before we go to the phones.
19:36
and this is from louis from
19:39
new jersey he sent this uh...
19:41
last week and and i didn't
19:43
get to it because he actually
19:45
sent to my personal email which
19:47
uh... you know it's great i
19:49
don't mind questions being sent there
19:51
but i would prefer if there
19:53
are questions for wrestling night in
19:55
america remember wnia live cast@gmail.com is
19:57
where you want to send them
19:59
i can get to him in
20:01
a more timely fashion that way
20:03
so i was going through the
20:05
emails uh... on that Gmail account
20:07
during the show and of course
20:09
I missed this one because this
20:11
was sent during the show to
20:13
or after the before the show
20:15
to my my personal account. So
20:17
this is a question from Louise.
20:19
He says very simply it came
20:21
off like Ria was giving it
20:24
100% while Charlotte was phoning it
20:26
in. What were your thoughts? Watching
20:28
Charlotte flare versus Ria Ripley did
20:30
you get that sense that that
20:32
Ria had it kind of turned
20:34
up a little bit but Charlotte
20:36
wasn't giving that effort? No, for
20:38
the most part, if there's one
20:40
thing that I can't criticize WrestleMania
20:42
for, I think there's a lot
20:44
to criticize about those shows, it
20:46
was the level of effort from
20:48
from all the talent. I thought
20:50
everybody kind of put their best
20:52
foot forward and that includes Charlotte
20:54
who I do often think kind
20:56
of flies under the radar for
20:58
kind of... kind of working a
21:00
little low-key, so to speak. I
21:02
often find that she doesn't seem
21:04
all that motivated. And I don't
21:07
necessarily always blame that on her
21:09
because the last eight to ten
21:11
months of her booking has just
21:13
been really, really poor. But no,
21:15
I thought it was a solid
21:17
match. I thought it was one
21:19
of the better matches on night
21:21
two. I did think it was
21:23
a little long, especially being the
21:25
opener. But no, I thought both
21:27
women worked hard. Yeah, I agree.
21:29
I didn't get that sense at
21:31
all from from that match that
21:33
that Charlotte was dogging it in
21:35
any way And you know, again,
21:37
I agree with you that I
21:39
thought it was one of the
21:41
stronger matches of night two You
21:43
know, this was a big step
21:45
up in competition for Rippley to
21:47
not only be have one of
21:49
her first main roster matches, but
21:52
to have it against someone like
21:54
Charlotte Flair who is One of
21:56
the top dogs of the women's
21:58
division in W.W.E. So, you know,
22:00
a lot of pressure on Rhea
22:02
and if Charlotte really wanted to...
22:04
make Ria look bad or whatever
22:06
the reason that Louise felt that
22:08
Charlotte wasn't giving it at all,
22:10
she could have really done it
22:12
in a lot more obvious fashion
22:14
than putting on a three and
22:16
a half four star match with
22:18
Ria in my opinion as to
22:20
what it was. So yeah I'm
22:22
with you there I thought it
22:24
was a strong match I didn't
22:26
get that sense at all either.
22:28
Really impressed with and to be
22:30
honest you know both there there's
22:32
some Similarities to Ria's situation in
22:34
her match with Charlotte and Shana
22:37
Baseler with Becky Lynch and you
22:39
know it was a big Statement
22:41
match for both of these women
22:43
in their first big singles matches
22:45
on the main roster first WrestleMania's
22:47
I thought both there were different
22:49
matches for sure, but I thought
22:51
both came out ahead and I
22:53
think both Have some positive and
22:55
I'm going to use this word
22:57
but they've got some positive momentum
22:59
building in their favor as far
23:01
as how they're viewed probably within
23:03
W.W.E. and by the fan base.
23:05
So, you know, that's one of
23:07
the positives, I think, to take
23:09
out of the two nights of
23:11
WrestleMania. We'll go to the phones
23:13
here, 515-605-9-3-4, and we start with
23:15
Ryan from Cumberland, Maryland. Ryan, you
23:17
are on Wrestling Night in America.
23:19
What's your first question for us
23:22
tonight? How
23:24
in W.C.W. there was a graveyard
23:26
match and I know Jeremy Bordash
23:28
used to work for W.C.W. So
23:30
is there any correlation with that?
23:32
Yeah, maybe. You know, I think,
23:34
you know, you're talking Borash's involvement
23:37
would have been more heavy toward
23:39
the latter days of W.C.W. when
23:41
they didn't really get much right,
23:43
I would say, but... For the
23:45
most part, I think the consensus
23:47
seems to be that the graveyard
23:49
match was pretty well done and
23:52
I think the credit has gone
23:54
to the... XT Department for handling
23:56
that. And I would believe that
23:58
Borash would be involved in that
24:00
grouping. So, you know, it wouldn't
24:02
surprise me if he had something
24:05
to do with it. But yeah,
24:07
I don't know. Brandon, what was
24:09
your impression of the graveyard match
24:11
at WrestleMania? I thought it was
24:13
really well done. It's not typically
24:15
my vision for wrestling and I...
24:17
I struggled with it in ways
24:20
because I was still adjusting to
24:22
the being Russell Media and this
24:24
being the main event of Night
24:26
One. In hindsight, I think I
24:28
like it a little better than
24:30
I actually did as it was
24:33
playing out, but I do think
24:35
it was probably the best use
24:37
of the undertaker at this stage
24:39
of his career and under these
24:41
circumstances. AJ Stiles, I think AJ
24:43
Stiles would have been a great
24:45
actual opponent for taker in the
24:48
ring. just because of the movement
24:50
he can create and in the
24:52
days since we've heard how much
24:54
respect taker has for styles uh...
24:56
saying you know he could get
24:58
a four-star match out of a
25:01
brand what he was quoted as
25:03
saying sometime this week so uh...
25:05
it's obvious that taker has a
25:07
ton of respect for styles and
25:09
i think that styles could have
25:11
gotten a really good actual match
25:13
out of him but that would
25:16
have been in in the confines
25:18
of an actual show with with
25:20
fans in the arena i don't
25:22
think that you want to put
25:24
taker ring with no bells and
25:26
whistles on a you know a
25:29
fanless show in the performance center
25:31
so i understand why they did
25:33
what they did and and inside
25:35
i like it better than then
25:37
how it came off originally but
25:39
i could tell right from the
25:41
get-go even if i wasn't totally
25:44
into it myself you know how
25:46
much work went into it and
25:48
also just the manpower that it
25:50
likely took with a small crew
25:52
to pull something like that off
25:54
on relatively short notice. And I
25:57
think it was... Just seeing some
25:59
tweets here and there, some congratulatory
26:01
tweets throughout the week, I think
26:03
it was just primarily that NxT
26:05
crew, a pretty small crew, I
26:07
saw some names pulled out in
26:09
particular. I don't know how high
26:12
it went up in NxT, if
26:14
Triple H was involved in any
26:16
way, or if Borash was even
26:18
in that department, but it seemed
26:20
like it was a pretty tight-knit
26:22
crew that put it together and
26:25
not really a lot of names
26:27
that we recognized. Yeah. For
26:29
the ones who get it done, the
26:31
most important part is the one you
26:33
need now. And the best partner is
26:36
the one who can deliver. That's why
26:38
millions of maintenance and repair pros trust
26:40
Granger. Because we have professional grade supplies
26:42
for every industry, even hard to find
26:44
products. And we have same day pickup
26:46
and next day delivery on most orders.
26:48
But most importantly, we have an unwavering
26:51
commitment to help keep you up and
26:53
running. Call, click Ranger.com or just stop
26:55
by. Granger for the ones who get
26:57
it done. If
27:00
you work in quality control at
27:02
a candy factory, you know strict
27:04
safety regulations come with the job.
27:06
It's why you partner with Granger.
27:08
Granger helps you find the high
27:11
quality and compliant products your business
27:13
needs to inspect, detect, and help
27:15
correct issues. And the sweetest part
27:17
is, everyone gets a product that's
27:19
as safe to eat as it
27:21
is delicious. Call 1-800 Granger, click
27:24
Granger.com or just stop by. Granger
27:26
for the ones who get it
27:28
done. If your job
27:30
at a health care facility includes
27:32
disinfecting against viruses, you know prevention
27:34
is the best medicine. And maintaining
27:37
healthy spaces starts with a healthy
27:39
cleaning routine. Granger's world-class supply chain
27:41
helps ensure you have the quality
27:43
products you need when you need
27:45
them. From disinfectants and cleaning supplies
27:48
to personal protective equipment, so you
27:50
can help deliver a clean bill
27:52
of health. Call one 800 Granger,
27:54
click Ranger.com or just stop by.
27:56
Granger for the ones who get
27:58
it done. Need an extra
28:01
dose of positivity in your wrestling
28:03
podcast? Well, come join me. I'll
28:05
Nforil over in the Pro Rest
28:07
Paradise at Peter George VIP as
28:09
we mask on the bright side
28:11
of wrestling and focus on some
28:13
of the great matches and shows
28:15
from around the world, be it
28:18
the US, Japan, Europe, or Mexico.
28:20
There's always a place for Restings
28:22
Past in the Paradise too, and
28:24
we've done fun historical shows such
28:26
as the We Love Liger series,
28:28
celebrating the glorious career of Jusian
28:30
Thunder Liger. And our I Was
28:32
There When shows, where our guests
28:34
will join me to talk about
28:36
a classic bout that they were
28:39
in attendance for. We Love Variety,
28:41
and you can expect lots of
28:43
it at the Pro Rest Paradise.
28:45
Detailed PW torch, VIP subscription information,
28:47
and a list of all the
28:49
VIP benefits is available at PW
28:51
Torch and the PW Torch VIP
28:53
In. And yes, all the IP
28:55
podcasts are compatible with popular podcast
28:57
apps on iPhone and Android devices.
29:00
Or you can stream them directly
29:02
from our ad-free VIP mobile site.
29:04
See you in the Paradise. For
29:06
the ones who get it done,
29:08
the most important part is the
29:10
one you need now. And the
29:12
best partner is the one who
29:14
can deliver. That's why millions of
29:16
maintenance and repair pros trust Granger,
29:18
because we have professional great supplies
29:20
for every industry, even hard to
29:23
find products. and we have same
29:25
day pickup and next day delivery
29:27
on most orders. But most importantly,
29:29
we have an unwavering commitment to
29:31
help keep you up and running.
29:33
Call, clickgranger.com or just stop by.
29:35
Granger for the ones who get
29:37
it done. If you work in
29:39
quality control at a candy factory,
29:41
you know strict safety regulations come
29:44
with the job. It's why you
29:46
partner with Granger. Granger helps you
29:48
find the high quality and compliant
29:50
products your business needs to inspect,
29:52
detect, and help correct issues. And
29:54
the sweetest part is, everyone gets
29:56
a product that's as safe to
29:58
eat as it is delicious. Call
30:00
1800 Granger. Click Ranger.com or just
30:02
stop. by Granger for the ones
30:05
who get it done. Hi Drew
30:07
and Jonathan Scott here reminding you
30:09
that a lot of life's firsts
30:11
are better with help from American
30:13
family insurance like your first home
30:15
expansion or your first big lightning
30:17
strike. There's a first for everything.
30:19
Get the right home policy at
30:21
the right price with the right
30:23
help from American families agents. Life's
30:25
better when you're under American families
30:28
roof. Insure carefully, dream fearlessly. Get
30:30
a quote and find an agent
30:32
at amfam.com. Products not available in
30:34
every state. American Family Mutual Insurance
30:36
Company, S-S-I, and it's operating company,
30:38
6,000 American Parkway, Madison, Wisconsin. Yeah,
30:40
second question, would it surprise you
30:42
if this man attempted to buy
30:44
an island like, you know, away
30:46
from doing, up to that odd.
30:49
You know, that would be the
30:51
next step in the super villainification
30:53
of Vince McMahon, would be to
30:55
buy an island. I think he's
30:57
got just about every other space
30:59
on that super villain bingo card
31:01
covered. I don't know how much
31:03
it costs to buy a small
31:05
island, so it's hard to say,
31:07
but you know, the fact that
31:10
WUE is going ahead basically defying
31:12
orders or maybe they've got some
31:14
under the table permission from the
31:16
state of Florida or from, you
31:18
know, whatever county, Hillsborough County or
31:20
whatever County Tampa is in, or
31:22
Orlando where they're running the performance
31:24
center. You know, maybe they've got
31:26
permission from that county to run
31:28
it, I don't know. But as
31:31
long as they're still able to
31:33
run shows, you know, Dana White
31:35
bought the island because no one
31:37
would let him run shows. You
31:39
know, he still wanted to run
31:41
him and Vince is still able
31:43
to run them. So, Brad, I
31:45
don't see that happening yet. Maybe
31:47
one day. Maybe one day. Yeah,
31:51
when I saw the news that
31:53
Data White was purchasing an island,
31:55
my first thought was that Vince
31:57
was going to be upset and
32:00
he beat him to it. that
32:02
he beat him for that idea.
32:04
But I think overall you're right.
32:06
Right now there's no reason to
32:09
do it, but if Florida says
32:11
no more, don't put it past
32:13
him. Yep. And Ryan your third
32:16
question for us. Yeah, third question
32:18
with the dark side of the
32:20
ring featuring the bra forl. If
32:22
that was on the main roster
32:25
he would you see winning now
32:27
in 2020? You know, I did
32:29
a column and I don't know
32:31
how long ago, maybe a year
32:34
ago, in the Torch newsletter where
32:36
I looked at a potential modern
32:38
day brawl for all. So if
32:41
you are, that's going to be
32:43
my hook. If you are not
32:45
a subscriber to the torch and
32:47
you want my answer on that,
32:50
go via P-W-torch-v-I-P-I-P-N-4.com, go back in
32:52
the archives, find my brawl for
32:54
all article, and maybe I'll even
32:56
pull it up and give you
32:59
the date here while we're on
33:01
the air so that you can
33:03
find it a little easier. But
33:05
I did do a modern day
33:08
brawl for all potential lineup, and
33:10
I'm going to stick to that.
33:12
Brandon, what do you think? Modern,
33:15
date, brawl, for all, amongst WWEs,
33:17
roster, who takes it? I don't
33:19
have anything to add here. It's
33:21
been, I didn't, I haven't seen
33:24
the Dark's, that Dark's Side of
33:26
the Ring episode yet. I actually,
33:28
I would like to, I've only
33:30
seen the Benoit episode this year,
33:33
just up for this season so
33:35
far, which I thought was, was,
33:37
I mean, incredibly fascinating, also, you
33:40
know, obviously, very, very, very heartbreaking,
33:42
I do plan to check it
33:44
out for sure. So I'm abstaining
33:46
from the folk. Oh, well you've
33:49
disappointed Ryan. He gets no answer
33:51
from this unless he's able to
33:53
go back in the archives of
33:55
the Torch newsletter. So Ryan, nevertheless,
33:58
thank you for the phone call
34:00
this week and look forward to
34:02
hearing from you again soon. because
34:04
that would be cheating because he
34:07
is an XD. Well I may
34:09
have included an XD. I'd have
34:11
to go back and look and
34:14
see exactly how I did it.
34:16
So I'll try to do that
34:18
again before this show is over
34:20
and get somebody at least a
34:23
date or a newsletter number of
34:25
the issue that you can find
34:27
that in. So anyway Ryan thank
34:29
you again for the call. Speaking
34:32
of NxT, Brandon, some big NxT
34:34
news happening on Wednesday night, it
34:36
was two major matches that were
34:39
scheduled for the pre-Russelmania takeover show,
34:41
with that being canceled, they... opted
34:43
instead to stretch out those matches
34:45
over several weeks of NxT television
34:48
and we got two of the
34:50
biggest matches this past Wednesday night
34:52
or Eo Shirei, won the latter
34:54
match to determine the number one
34:57
contender to the NxT women's title
34:59
currently held by Charlotte Flair and
35:01
Johnny Gargano defeating Tamas Champa with
35:03
an assist from Candis Larre. So,
35:06
you know, Brandon... Tell
35:08
me, let's talk about Eosharai first.
35:10
Eosharai, Charlotte Flair, is this going
35:12
to be heel-on-heel match, do you
35:14
think? Or, you know, is this
35:16
going to be another Charlotte Flair
35:18
baby-faced turn? Are they going to
35:20
be able to make her baby
35:23
face in NXT, when she's sort
35:25
of the outsider who's coming in
35:27
and invading, I mean, do you
35:29
think they do a heel-on-heel match
35:31
here? I don't know if... See,
35:33
here's the thing. If it were,
35:35
if it were main roster, you
35:37
could pretty much just assume that
35:39
they're going to throw the match
35:41
out there and Charlotte is going
35:43
to be who she is, be
35:45
that full-on heel or somewhere in
35:47
between. Because if you think about
35:49
it, Charlotte never really officially turns
35:51
heel again. She just sort of
35:54
is. And that's sort of what
35:56
I was alluding to early. when
35:58
I talked about Charlotte's shortcomings over
36:00
the last 10 months or so,
36:02
much of that is due to
36:04
her booking. And I think that
36:06
of all the women, and you
36:08
could point to a lot of
36:10
women on the roster, have been
36:12
handled very poorly over the last
36:14
year, but I think Charlotte ranks
36:16
near the top of that list.
36:18
And that's not to say that
36:20
she's not treated well in the
36:22
sense that she's always on the
36:24
show, she's always booked, she's usually
36:27
booked a win. It's that... We
36:29
still don't really have a grasp
36:31
of who the Charlotte character is.
36:33
We've never really had a grasp
36:35
of who the Charlotte character is.
36:37
And I mean, her rate of
36:39
turn at this point is going
36:41
to put her in big show
36:43
territory before too long. And that's
36:45
really unfortunate for someone that talented
36:47
and for someone who is that
36:49
representative and put at the forefront
36:51
of the women's division the way
36:53
that she is. She's sort of
36:55
a heel. and and i guess
36:57
that's kind of the character that
37:00
she's been playing an nx t
37:02
just de facto because of the
37:04
character that rea ripply plays against
37:06
the oshirai who's who's definitely a
37:08
much clearer heel i don't know
37:10
if they try to transition Charlotte
37:12
into just being the arrogant champion
37:14
who isn't necessarily talking down to
37:16
the rest of the roster and
37:18
talking down to the fans but
37:20
rather is focusing sort of her
37:22
vitriol and her her her shots
37:24
specifically at the oshurai that may
37:26
be the route to go and
37:28
that may be the route that
37:30
that you know someone like triple
37:33
H takes or they could pull
37:35
on Turner again which I just
37:37
don't I just don't think is
37:39
the right move I think You
37:41
got to pick a direction for
37:43
Charlotte and stick with it for
37:45
a year or two at least.
37:47
I guess I wave her on
37:49
the side of them just kind
37:51
of keeping her in the in
37:53
the general field that she's been
37:55
in for the last couple of
37:57
months. But it also I think
37:59
that also changes if you hold
38:01
off this match for the next
38:04
the next couple of months and
38:06
wait until they're potentially in front
38:08
of audiences Because I think an
38:10
Nx T audience is going to
38:12
naturally gravitate toward the ocean ride
38:14
Despite her being looked like a
38:16
heel. They've already really liked her
38:18
sort of you know the sort
38:20
of dark badass character. So I
38:22
think it I think it depends
38:24
on a number of circumstances What
38:27
do you think of the decision to go
38:29
with Sharai here? There were other women in
38:31
that match who, you know, would have been
38:33
really good choices to face Charlotte Flau. The
38:35
NxT women's division is very deep. Is there
38:38
someone right now? I think we can both
38:40
agree that E.O. Sharai is talented and deserves
38:42
an NxT title shot. You know, I don't
38:44
think there's any arguing with that, but is
38:46
there anyone who you think maybe is hotter
38:49
than her right now and should have gotten
38:51
that spot or, you know, do you quibble
38:53
with the decision to go with Sharai here
38:55
or do you think that was the right
38:57
choice? No,
38:59
I think it was the right choice
39:02
for right now. I think that they've
39:04
got other they've got other they've got
39:06
other women waiting in the wings. I
39:09
think, you know, Dakota Kai is sort
39:11
of working her way into a viable
39:13
position to be a title challenger. And
39:16
my initial thought would have been Candace
39:18
L'ray. I think an undersized Candace L'R
39:20
against a fully heel shark. It could
39:23
be a really, really good story to
39:25
tell, but of course they had other
39:27
plans for Candace later on the night.
39:30
So yeah. Thanks for downloading today's show.
39:32
Take it to the next level with
39:34
a VIP membership. Get shows like this,
39:36
the Way Killer Pro Sink podcast, Way
39:39
Killer Pro Sing Post show, and the
39:41
PWA torch Daily Casts on our PWA
39:43
torch VIP podcast feed. with ads and
39:46
plugs removed from the shows for a
39:48
streamlined listening experience. And also here, the
39:50
VIP exclusive shows that I host with
39:53
Rich Fan and Todd Martin, everything with
39:55
Rich Fan, and the Fix with Todd
39:57
Martin signature VIP series that you're missing
40:00
out without a VIP membership. So go
40:02
VIP here in. and enjoy all the
40:04
benefits, all the bonus content, and the
40:07
ad-free listening experience. P.W.torch.com slash, go VIP.
40:11
Yeah, I like the choice of
40:13
Yocharai. It's a little unconventional, but
40:15
she's been doing great work. And,
40:17
you know, since the heel turn,
40:19
she's managed to keep her head
40:21
above water without being in the
40:23
title hunt lately, which is very
40:25
tough to do in NXT, especially
40:27
in the women's division when there's
40:30
so much focus on the... Women's
40:32
title is kind of like the
40:34
main roster. There's so much focus
40:36
on the women's title and there's
40:38
not always a lot of undercard
40:40
stuff. There is here and there.
40:42
You know, they did the Dakota
40:44
Kitegan Knox thing. They've done some
40:46
other things with the women there.
40:48
But if you don't really have
40:50
a strong program, it's tough to...
40:52
still stay hot, especially with the
40:54
two hours of weekly TV they
40:56
have, and that's it. And Eosharai
40:59
has done that. You know, she
41:01
hasn't lost any of that M
41:03
word that I'm not going to
41:05
say, because WWE uses it too
41:07
much, and I don't want to
41:09
use it too much, but she
41:11
hasn't lost much of that in
41:13
this run. So, yeah, I think
41:15
that that's an interesting choice. I'm
41:17
interested to see where they go
41:19
with it. Johnny Gargano, helping him
41:21
out of the arena. A couple
41:23
things here. This match was shot
41:25
in a similar fashion to the
41:28
boneyard match in the Firefly Fun
41:30
House match in that it had
41:32
a cinematic feel. You know, you
41:34
had the cuts, you had the
41:36
edits, you had things like that
41:38
to it. Where does this match
41:40
in your mind stack up with
41:42
those other two Wrestlemania matches that
41:44
were shot in a similar way?
41:46
They're also drastically different. I mean,
41:48
obviously, Gargano and Champlace. Was presented
41:50
more more as an actual fight
41:52
more as a closer to a
41:54
wrestling match than any of the
41:57
other than the other two I
41:59
think that it In terms of
42:01
in terms of presentation, I thought
42:03
it was more or less on
42:05
par with the other two and
42:07
we can, you know, we can
42:09
also get into the the Firefly
42:11
Fun House match, which I think
42:13
if given, if given the choice
42:15
between the three, I think I
42:17
would vote as my favorite, but
42:19
I also understand why it's as
42:21
divisive as it is. Gargano and
42:23
Champa felt, it felt like a
42:26
proper, I don't want to say
42:28
a, It felt like a proper
42:30
close to their story under the
42:32
current circumstances. I'm a little disappointed
42:34
that they didn't get their big
42:36
official blow-off match in front of
42:38
a crowd. I think it could
42:40
have been really special. I think
42:42
both of those guys deserve it.
42:44
I've made the case to wait
42:46
before on the post shows that
42:48
I think that when we look
42:50
back at Johnny Gargano versus Tomasso-Champa,
42:52
it's going to be one of
42:55
the best... feuds under the W.W.E.
42:57
umbrella, main roster or N.X.T. of
42:59
the last 10 years and maybe
43:01
more. I think that that feud
43:03
and the way that it's been
43:05
woven throughout both of their careers
43:07
for the last three years in
43:09
and out, W.W.E. just doesn't tell
43:11
those stories very often. And for
43:13
them to have told this one
43:15
as successfully as they did, I'm
43:17
not saying every step or every
43:19
chapter was was a home run.
43:21
But overall, I think it's hard
43:24
to compete with the level of
43:26
storytelling that those two have had
43:28
over the last three years. So
43:30
I felt a little bit of
43:32
disappointment watching them go through this
43:34
match and do it with no
43:36
fans there and do it the
43:38
way that it had to be
43:40
done. Very similar to the disappointment
43:42
I felt watching Russell Maybe. Just
43:44
kind of a natural reaction to,
43:46
you're watching these guys have these...
43:48
what are supposed to be huge
43:50
matches and they just don't feel
43:53
huge because of the circumstances. So
43:55
I wish that... uh... they maybe
43:57
put up had put a pause
43:59
on it and held it held
44:01
it off until they were in
44:03
front of a live audience again
44:05
but i get it there we
44:07
don't know when that's going to
44:09
be and we you know that
44:11
the storyline wise they had to
44:13
move on so i get why
44:15
they did it i liked it
44:17
for what it was i thought
44:19
it was a fitting conclusion given
44:22
the circumstances and i i i i
44:24
thought overall it it held up to
44:26
the other two Yeah, and I
44:28
think one of the main complaints
44:30
about the Firefly Funhouse match and
44:32
the Bonyard matches, they weren't, more
44:34
so the Firefly Funhouse match, they
44:36
weren't matches. They weren't fights, they
44:38
were many movies, and I think
44:41
you're right that Gargano versus Chapa
44:43
could have... that was a fight, you
44:45
know, and I think it was
44:47
smart that they did it a
44:49
different way because we had just
44:51
saw Edge versus Randy Orton at
44:53
WrestleMania which was fought in a
44:55
similar fashion similar sort of blood
44:57
feud that you know went all
44:59
over the place and and that
45:01
was not all that well received.
45:03
So at least this was something
45:06
different but the same. I guess
45:08
that's what I'm saying. They presented
45:10
the same idea, the same concept
45:12
of a, you know, last man
45:14
standing type of match where they brawl
45:16
all over the place, but having shot
45:18
it cinematically, at least it was presented
45:20
in a different manner. And to some
45:23
people, maybe that doesn't matter. You know,
45:25
to some people, it's still too similar,
45:27
but... I think that was the one
45:29
thing that's had going for it,
45:31
is that it was a match
45:33
and that it was, and really,
45:35
you know, without a crowd, you
45:37
can experiment with that kind of
45:39
stuff. You know, that's not the
45:41
kind of match they may have
45:43
done in front of a live
45:45
crowd. So that's another thing to
45:47
think about. The very end when
45:49
Candace Luray and Johnny Gargano were
45:52
walking out, we saw if you stopped your
45:54
TV and paused it. You could see
45:56
Killer Cross and Scarlet Bordeaux or what would
45:58
appear to be those two... in a
46:00
car in the background. We
46:03
saw what appeared to be
46:05
Killer Cross interrupting AAA segment
46:07
with Gargano and Champa a
46:09
couple weeks ago. There was
46:12
really no follow-up done to
46:14
that. What part does Killer
46:16
Cross play in the immediate
46:19
future for either Champa or
46:21
Gargano? I guess it depends on
46:23
what role they want him in.
46:25
If he's coming in as a
46:27
heel, then... I would imagine he
46:29
goes for Champa and if he's
46:31
coming into the baby face, then
46:33
I guess he gets Gargano. But
46:35
it seems clear that that's the
46:38
first program for him one way
46:40
or another. It's just a matter
46:42
of what his designation is. I
46:44
thought that the promo that interrupted
46:46
the triple H segment with Champa
46:48
and Gargano had him coming off
46:50
much more like he alike. So that
46:52
would say to me. uh... that that champa
46:54
is is the way that he's gonna go
46:56
but uh... but who knows yeah as a
46:58
character and i i was
47:00
really impressed with his run in impact
47:03
wrestling i mean he's He exudes heel,
47:05
you know, so I'm hoping to see
47:07
him come in. I'm hoping to see
47:09
him, you know, potentially shoot right to
47:12
the top and face a Tamasa Tampa
47:14
and then have Gargana move on to
47:16
someone else. So there's some real potential
47:19
there, I think, for that. I want
47:21
to go to the emails again before
47:23
we move back to the calls and
47:26
this one is from Scott. He says,
47:28
even Greg, now that WWE is starting
47:30
qualifying matches for money in the bank,
47:32
I'm giving you my choices for both
47:35
men's and women's matches. For the ladies,
47:37
Sasha Banks with Bailey Champion, it will
47:39
be a fun ride doing Sasha Stabs
47:41
Bailey in the back and takes the
47:44
title. For the men, it's AJ Stiles.
47:46
I don't think AJ has won the
47:48
briefcase before plus. After getting buried alive
47:50
by Undertaker, he needs a fresh start.
47:53
What do you think? Thank you, thank
47:55
you. Thank I think the idea of
47:57
Sasha winning is a stronger idea than
48:00
A.J. winning or the stronger potential to
48:02
happen. I think it would be, I
48:04
think it's, it's a nice, it would
48:06
be a nice way to rehabilitate A.J.
48:08
Styles to have him win the Money
48:11
in the Bank Championship. I think that
48:13
would be, I wouldn't be against that.
48:15
But yeah, you know, the T's started
48:17
with Sasha and Bailey at Wrestleania. And
48:20
now, you know, it could be full-fledged
48:22
a month from now at Money in
48:24
the Bank. But for the men's side,
48:26
I mean, it truly is really wide
48:29
open, I think. I don't have a
48:31
really good feel. And granted, we're a
48:33
month away from the paper view, but
48:35
I don't really have a really good
48:38
feel for who might win it. I
48:40
mean, there are tons of guys who
48:42
you could make a very good case
48:44
for winning that brief case. Brandon, do
48:47
you have any kind of six
48:49
cents right now as we're sitting
48:51
here on April 12th? win it
48:53
or in lieu of that who
48:55
you think should win for the
48:57
men's side? Who I think
48:59
and who I want would
49:01
be Alistair Black. I think
49:04
that Alistair Black has been
49:06
a featured player on main
49:08
roster TV for the last
49:10
several weeks. He's sort of
49:13
been my personal NVP in
49:15
these performance center shows because
49:17
He has the type of
49:20
offense that can come off
49:22
well with no audience present
49:24
because he's just so crisp
49:27
and so clean and his
49:29
kicks and his offense are
49:31
unique and they're able to
49:33
sound real, look real, feel
49:36
real. So I think Black has
49:38
been a huge, huge upside
49:40
to these shows. I think that
49:42
they got him on the WrestleMania
49:44
card for a reason. That match
49:46
with Bobby Lashley really had no
49:48
reason to happen other than to
49:50
get Black on the show and
49:52
get him a win. He's been
49:55
featured weekly at this point. I think
49:57
Black is the way to go and I think
49:59
you tell the... story of him earning wins
50:01
and defeating bigger challenges
50:03
and then eventually taking
50:05
on you know whoever the champion may
50:08
be at that point I assume Drew
50:10
McIntyre is is going to be a
50:12
long-term champion I hope are I don't
50:14
necessarily see the same for Braun Stroman
50:16
but either way I think Alice are
50:18
black working his way up the roster
50:21
with the potential of facing one of
50:23
these two giants is a really good
50:25
story to tell and you just tell
50:27
the story that hey it doesn't matter
50:29
how big you are that black mass
50:31
will talk you out for a shot.
50:34
So I think that is that's a
50:36
really cool story that they can tell
50:38
and well to be in that position
50:40
right now. That's sort of my pick if
50:43
they go with the up and comer
50:45
but if they're looking for because
50:47
you know money in the bank
50:49
usually goes one of. You either
50:51
put it on that up in
50:53
Comer Guy or you get it
50:55
on an established talent who either
50:57
had the briefcase before or had
50:59
the title before as a means
51:02
of transitioning the title to that
51:04
guy and perhaps just to get on
51:06
to another guy. With that idea in
51:08
mind, I could see something like, man,
51:10
I could even see like, I
51:13
don't even want to speak it
51:15
into existence, but I could see
51:17
something like Randy Morton. Orton, it
51:20
feels like Orton is always lingering
51:22
around the briefcase. Shamis is a
51:24
possibility. They reintroduced him on TV
51:26
this week, and it seems like
51:29
they want to get him back
51:31
up and running in a more
51:33
prominent position. So I would think
51:35
that Shamis is certainly a
51:37
possibility. Other than that, I don't
51:40
know if there's many guys that
51:42
stand out right now, especially knowing
51:44
that. We're working with somewhat of a
51:46
limited roster going forward because we haven't
51:48
been seeing the full roster. So I
51:50
guess you have to also throw in
51:52
maybe like Seth Rollins, Kevin Owens in
51:54
there, but they don't really seem like
51:57
they're hot enough to put the briefcase
51:59
on. searching
52:02
for more great pro wrestling talk.
52:04
Then join me, Jason Powell, host
52:06
of the three weekly Pro Wrestling
52:08
Boom podcast. Each week you'll hear
52:11
the latest news and analysis from
52:13
me and my team at Pro
52:15
Wrestling.net along with other Pro Wrestling
52:17
media members. Plus, the Pro Wrestling
52:20
Boom podcast features long form interviews
52:22
with notable names in the pro
52:24
wrestling industry. Subscribe an iTunes stitch
52:26
shirt, downcast, and all your favorite
52:28
secondary apps or visit us directly
52:31
at P.W. Boom. Yeah,
52:34
Shamus is an interesting guy to me
52:36
because I think it was Pat McNeil
52:39
who brought it up on the WrestleMania
52:41
preview show here on Wrestling Night America
52:43
that Shamus would be a potential contender
52:45
before they had officially announced Braun Stroman
52:48
to face Goldberg or WrestleMania. Shamus would
52:50
have been a contender for that spot.
52:52
And I was thinking, you know, the
52:55
way they had built him up on
52:57
Smackdown, returning, getting some wins over Shortie
52:59
Gable, and just looking dominant, you
53:01
know, if you want to continue to...
53:04
have him shoot up the card as
53:06
he comes back and makes his return.
53:08
I mean that's one way to do
53:11
it. So I would continue to think
53:13
along that train of thought with
53:15
him as a money in the
53:17
bank contender. He'd seem fresh because
53:19
he's been out of action for
53:22
so long. So yeah, a lot of
53:24
guys who could potentially win the money
53:26
in the bank letter match for the
53:29
men. My
53:31
primary concern with someone like Shamus
53:34
is just that I every time
53:36
I'm actually I'm actually a pretty
53:38
big fan of Shamus and his
53:40
work, but it seems like every
53:43
time he winds up in a
53:45
main event position it goes really
53:47
poorly. Yeah. He seems like a
53:49
guy who is well suited in the
53:51
midcard to upper midcard or even
53:53
in the tag division with a
53:55
guy like Cizarro. I love that team.
53:58
I thought that Shamus would good
54:00
when he was about at
54:02
the United States intercontinental level
54:04
and every single time they've
54:06
they've leaped frog him into
54:08
the main event it's felt unnatural
54:10
and forced and it never failed
54:13
he winds up falling back down the
54:15
car. Yeah yeah I mean we'll have to
54:17
see you know he earned a lot of
54:19
praise for his work in that tag team
54:21
with Cicero that might make WWE we want to
54:23
take another look at him at the top of
54:25
the card and right now to be honest smackdown
54:27
and you know from covering the show i mean
54:29
their top of the card is not Very heavy,
54:31
you know, they're not a top heavy
54:33
show Especially if Roman Reigns is going
54:35
to continue to be out for for
54:37
a while and you know That leaves
54:39
another big hole at the top of
54:41
the card. So they could see Shamest
54:44
and they could say you know He's
54:46
had experience as a main eventer we
54:48
can trust him He seems like a
54:50
fresh face right now because a he's
54:52
been away from the main events for
54:54
so long and b he's been out
54:56
with injury for so long They may
54:58
decide to take a chance on up
55:00
so Yeah. Yeah, I mean, like I said,
55:02
the field is pretty wide open.
55:04
The field is pretty wide
55:06
open. The field is pretty wide
55:09
open and we sit here right
55:11
now, but we'll have to see.
55:13
Back to the phones now, the
55:16
1011 area code, I believe.
55:18
This is Craig from Toledo.
55:20
Craig, is that you? Yes, sir it
55:22
is. How are you, Greg and
55:24
Brandon? Doing well. What's
55:26
on your mind tonight? APW
55:29
has been shut down for,
55:31
you know, longer than us
55:33
in America have. And they've
55:35
been really active in
55:38
putting together some stuff for
55:40
like they've had Kevin Kelly
55:42
dubbing English commentary over older
55:45
stuff. And I think that's
55:47
really cool. But one of
55:49
the coolest things is all
55:52
the pictures they keep putting
55:54
up of the LIGA all
55:57
together with all their titles
55:59
and so... Sonata is sitting on
56:01
the side with nothing. And
56:03
I'm wondering if this is the
56:06
time, because they've been teasing
56:08
like little breakups for the
56:10
last few years. Is this
56:12
the time? Sonata is just
56:15
like, I'm out. Yeah, and I think,
56:17
look, I like Sonata more than
56:19
I think some people do. He's
56:22
really impressed me any time. He's
56:24
had major singles matches. I think
56:26
he's come through. very strongly. You
56:28
know, the question kind has always
56:31
been personally, can he break through
56:33
as a personality, you know, and
56:35
really... show that charismatic side to
56:38
the point where he's a top
56:40
guy. And can he do it?
56:42
Can he do the in-ring stuff
56:45
consistently as a top guy? Because
56:47
if you watch Hokata, if you
56:49
watch Tanahashi, you know, they were consistent
56:51
as all get out in their major
56:53
matches. Not so much in the tag
56:56
matches, but you know, in the major
56:58
matches they were asked to do. And
57:00
I think there's some question about Sinata
57:02
as far as that goes as well.
57:04
So yeah, I'm an advocate for that.
57:07
be something different? With New Japan and
57:09
ghetto, booking things out long term and
57:11
having long term plans in place, you
57:13
wonder how much this time off is
57:15
going to affect those plans? Are there
57:17
changes being made? Are there rewrites? Are
57:19
they just kind of going to reset
57:22
from where they left off when they
57:24
start back up again? So Brandon, it's
57:26
going to be interesting to see not
57:28
only what happens with Sinata in New
57:30
Japan, but when they do get started,
57:32
you know, are they going to try
57:34
to come back with, you know, this
57:37
isn't... W-W-E-W-W-They've been running shows and
57:39
they've been advancing storylines throughout
57:41
this whole process, they're really
57:43
kind of restarting when they
57:45
get back to it, whenever
57:47
that might be. So it'll be interesting
57:49
to see if they come out with
57:51
a bang on that first show, again,
57:54
whenever that might be, to kind of
57:56
grab fans' attentions again and get them
57:58
back in the new Japan mode. Yeah,
58:01
I don't follow I don't follow
58:03
new Japan super super closely I'm
58:05
familiar with the talent and obviously
58:08
familiar with with Gato's booking structure
58:10
and just the way that they
58:12
the way that they run their
58:15
business and and I think they've
58:17
earned the the trust of fans
58:19
far far more than most American
58:21
promotions have and I think that
58:24
you know if if if if any if any
58:26
company is going to be able to
58:28
pick up right where they left off
58:30
i think that i would trust it
58:32
to be new japan i i'm certainly
58:35
curious to see you know if they
58:37
sort of fast track some plans if
58:39
that means maybe throwing something by the
58:41
way side like it like something for
58:43
sonata for example or if it means
58:46
just sticking to the plan and and
58:48
pushing things out six months or a
58:50
year or whatever the case may be
58:52
i'm not sure uh... maybe maybe if
58:54
you know greg if you if you
58:56
are a closer follower of new japan
58:59
you may have a better uh... sort
59:01
of grasp as to what kind of
59:03
uh... what kind of prediction you can
59:06
make with regard to what you
59:08
think data was more likely to
59:10
do or if he's if he's
59:12
more likely to push out his
59:14
plans or sort of scrap the
59:16
plans and and sort of get to
59:18
where he wanted to be at, say,
59:20
you know, January of next year, for
59:22
Russell Kingdom. I don't have a sense
59:25
one way or the other, but it's
59:27
interesting. Yeah, just based on
59:29
his... booking style, you kind of think they're
59:31
just going to pick up where they left
59:33
off. I don't see Gado hot-shotting anything to
59:35
get to where he wanted to go, just
59:38
to have things in place, you know, I
59:40
think. Certainly tweaks and adjustments are probably being
59:42
made right now, but I don't see them
59:44
jumping ahead too far or anything like that.
59:47
I think, you know, slow and steady has
59:49
always kind of won the race for new
59:51
Japan and I think they'll continue in that
59:53
direction. Anytime
59:56
you're watching W.W.E. Raw or Smackdown
59:58
or A.E.W. Dynamite in particular, send
1:00:00
us an email if you've got thoughts
1:00:03
on the show or a topic you
1:00:05
want us to address or a question
1:00:07
for us. Wade Keller podcast at pwtorch.com
1:00:09
Wade Keller podcast at p.w.torch.com If
1:00:11
there's anything else going on in
1:00:14
pro wrestling that you want us
1:00:16
to address on our main podcast
1:00:18
during our mail bag segments that
1:00:21
same email applies Wade Keller podcast
1:00:23
at p.w torch.com We invite that
1:00:25
interaction Let us know what you
1:00:28
think of what we're saying and
1:00:30
let us know what you want
1:00:32
us to talk about and ask
1:00:34
us specific questions Wade
1:00:36
Keller podcast at p.w torch.com
1:00:39
The early 90s steroid sex
1:00:41
scandals Trash most
1:00:43
of wrestling all the wrestling
1:00:46
got smeared Even though it
1:00:48
was mainly a WWF thing
1:00:50
and They're coming up on
1:00:52
that on the VIP retro
1:00:55
radio stuff. So if you
1:00:57
want to go VIP now
1:00:59
is a good time to do
1:01:01
that, but I'm wondering if
1:01:03
the Folly and I know
1:01:06
a W is far from innocent
1:01:08
and all this and I think
1:01:10
they've even they've even been more
1:01:12
egregious in a lot of the
1:01:14
stuff they've been doing as far
1:01:16
as social distancing and stuff like
1:01:18
that But they have all their
1:01:20
taping in the book apparently until
1:01:22
like the end of May and
1:01:24
they're not doing any live stuff
1:01:26
it but W W is
1:01:28
in the limelight right now for
1:01:31
making this decision. Do you
1:01:33
think that'll smear AW on the
1:01:36
way in all of wrestling like
1:01:38
Indies and stuff like that in
1:01:40
this climate with all the
1:01:42
information we have right now
1:01:44
as compared to the early
1:01:46
90s when we basically
1:01:49
had like a couple magazines or newsletters?
1:01:51
I don't think that will be
1:01:53
the case for a couple reasons.
1:01:55
First of all, I think the
1:01:57
people who are hip to what
1:02:00
what's going on, know this is a
1:02:02
WWE thing and not an AEW thing.
1:02:04
And by that I mean, you know,
1:02:06
the analysts on Twitter and things like
1:02:08
that. But to a larger point, you
1:02:10
know, the mainstream, because that's kind of
1:02:13
Craig what you were referencing as far
1:02:15
as the early 90s and the mainstream
1:02:17
sort of smearing wrestling with a broad
1:02:19
brush, despite many of the problems, at
1:02:21
least that were... public coming from WWF
1:02:23
side, I don't think so. And I
1:02:26
don't think it's going to happen for
1:02:28
the sole reason that no one seems
1:02:30
to be paying attention to this. You
1:02:32
know, I don't see this as a
1:02:34
big of story. You know, it's not
1:02:37
being reported on the nightly news, network
1:02:39
nightly news like the sex scandals were
1:02:41
and the steroid scandals were. I think
1:02:43
there are... comparisons
1:02:46
you can make to those kind
1:02:48
of actions by those within W.W.
1:02:50
and you know Vince McMahon and
1:02:52
covering up the steroids and you
1:02:54
know to a certain extent covering
1:02:56
up some of the things that
1:02:58
were going on in the tawdry things
1:03:01
that were going on at the time
1:03:03
or allegedly covering them up and then
1:03:05
you know what's going on today? Obviously
1:03:08
two very different situations but
1:03:10
it could cast W.W.E. in
1:03:12
a poor light reputation wise.
1:03:14
But I don't think that's
1:03:16
really a concern for Vince
1:03:19
McMahon. It's very rarely ever
1:03:21
been a concern for him.
1:03:23
How the public sees him only
1:03:25
that the dollars keep rolling in.
1:03:27
And that's kind of how he
1:03:29
seems to have settled in. And
1:03:32
the fact is, you know, with
1:03:34
so much going on and so
1:03:36
much mainstream media attention being paid
1:03:38
to... you know how to slow this thing
1:03:40
down and this virus down and everybody
1:03:42
being so concerned with it and rightfully
1:03:45
so I think W. E. Is to
1:03:47
a certain extent flying under the radar
1:03:49
and as far as mainstream press Brandon
1:03:51
in a way that they weren't in
1:03:53
the early 90s. Yeah for sure my first my
1:03:55
first my first comment was going to
1:03:57
be they're flying under the radar and
1:04:00
are going to be able to
1:04:02
continue to do so. There just
1:04:04
isn't enough space on news coverage,
1:04:06
be that, you know, the nightly
1:04:08
news that, you know, most, most
1:04:10
Americans are probably watching more now
1:04:12
than they have in a long
1:04:14
time or the wall-to-wall cable news
1:04:16
networks. There just isn't space for
1:04:18
this kind of thing. There's too
1:04:20
much happening. There's too much to
1:04:22
be concerned with and the time that's
1:04:24
not being filled with telling people. how
1:04:27
to prep and how to deal and
1:04:29
how not to go too crazy and
1:04:31
what to expect going forward the
1:04:34
remainder of the time is
1:04:36
spent on on light-hearted segments
1:04:38
trying to make you forget
1:04:40
for a minute so there
1:04:42
just isn't room to talk
1:04:44
about this and I think
1:04:46
that's gonna stay I think
1:04:48
it's gonna stay that way
1:04:50
through throughout the course unless
1:04:52
we just become so immune
1:04:54
to COVID-19 coverage that they're fishing
1:04:57
for other stories and I just
1:04:59
don't see that happening. I think
1:05:01
the wrestling world is still very
1:05:03
much existing in its own bubble
1:05:05
and you may get some some
1:05:08
people here and there who are
1:05:10
outside the wrestling world journalists who
1:05:12
might step in and say a
1:05:14
little something here or there but
1:05:17
by and large I think this
1:05:19
is the wrestling world policing itself
1:05:21
and not really getting anywhere. And
1:05:23
Craig back to you for your
1:05:26
final point for us tonight. And
1:05:28
I'm so glad you guys like
1:05:30
led down this road because that
1:05:32
was my third point and I
1:05:34
disagree. I think that that statement
1:05:36
they made at the end of
1:05:39
their little statement where they said
1:05:41
they were part of the fabric
1:05:43
of America is going to bite
1:05:45
him in the ass because
1:05:47
there are actually fabrics
1:05:49
of America that aren't playing
1:05:52
right now. like opening days that
1:05:54
didn't happen you know championships
1:05:56
that matter that aren't happening
1:05:58
and there are people there
1:06:00
are all of sports media I
1:06:03
don't know if you guys listen
1:06:05
to a lot of sports like
1:06:07
talk radio shows stuff like that
1:06:10
they have been ESPN put on
1:06:12
WWE Wrestlemania just because they
1:06:14
were starved for content and
1:06:16
I think that they're gonna
1:06:19
be so starved for content
1:06:21
they're gonna latch on to
1:06:23
this they're gonna say and and
1:06:26
then also those other organizations, NFL
1:06:28
and MOB, NBA and stuff like
1:06:30
that. I always forget Angel, even
1:06:33
though it's my favorite sport. They're
1:06:35
going to latch on to it
1:06:37
and say, wait a minute, they
1:06:39
can play, but we can't. Yeah, I
1:06:42
don't think that's going to happen.
1:06:44
I don't think they're going to
1:06:46
say that. You know, it's not
1:06:48
a time for finger pointing, and
1:06:50
I think that major sports know
1:06:52
that they're not going to win
1:06:54
any... arguments by punching down at
1:06:57
WWE? Which is... No, no, no.
1:06:59
No. Greg, you got to understand
1:07:01
what I'm saying. I'm not saying
1:07:03
they're saying we want to play
1:07:06
because they're playing. I'm saying we
1:07:08
want to play because they're
1:07:10
playing. I'm saying we can't
1:07:12
play. They can't play. Well,
1:07:14
again, I don't think they're
1:07:16
even going to get into
1:07:18
that argument. There's no reason
1:07:21
to even acknowledge WWE. Why, why
1:07:23
would they even do that? the
1:07:25
media. The sports media, I
1:07:27
think the sports media, it's, there's,
1:07:29
WWE, and I understand that it's
1:07:31
been on ESPN and things like
1:07:33
that, but the, the WUE is so
1:07:35
far off the sports media radar, I
1:07:38
think it would take, you know,
1:07:40
and maybe there's some expose that's
1:07:42
going to, you know, be printed
1:07:44
on the athletic and it's going
1:07:46
to take off, but, you know,
1:07:48
if they're partnering with ESPN, you
1:07:50
know, isn't going to question these
1:07:52
decisions. most visible voices in sports
1:07:54
media are. So ESPN is going
1:07:56
to be hands-off. Fox Sports isn't
1:07:58
going to question. And that's where
1:08:01
the second most loudest voices in
1:08:03
sports media are because Fox has
1:08:05
the deal with the W.W.E. and
1:08:08
they do W.W.E. backstage. So it's
1:08:10
not going to come from either
1:08:12
of those two entities. So I
1:08:15
don't think if it doesn't come
1:08:17
from either of those two it's
1:08:20
going to reach a snowball effect
1:08:22
enough to really have any major
1:08:24
impact on how people view W.
1:08:28
But you saw Dana White, I'm sorry,
1:08:30
Brandon, you saw Dana White get
1:08:32
crushed last week, right? Yeah. And
1:08:34
you've seen that WUE? They have
1:08:36
a bigger partnership. No, no, no,
1:08:38
no, they have a bigger partnership
1:08:41
with ESPN than WWA does. Yeah,
1:08:43
and that's why ESPN stepped in
1:08:45
and asked him not to do
1:08:47
it. Because ESPN's not running, you
1:08:49
know, WWA's live shows. They're running
1:08:51
tape shows. So they have no
1:08:53
real reason to step in and
1:08:55
say, hey, don't do this. because
1:08:57
it's not airing on ESPN's platform
1:08:59
the way UFC was. And like
1:09:01
it or not, UFC is seen as
1:09:03
a sport much more than WUE is.
1:09:05
It's covered in much more detail than
1:09:08
WUE is by many more legitimate sites
1:09:10
and legitimate writers than WUE is. So
1:09:12
yeah, it's going to get a lot
1:09:14
more. And I think the craziness of
1:09:16
Dana White buying in his own island.
1:09:18
uh... to do these fights contributed to
1:09:20
the press u f c got on
1:09:22
this let's let's not forget that like
1:09:24
if if data white had tried to
1:09:27
buy his own island or had bought
1:09:29
it as far as i know i
1:09:31
don't think this would be getting the
1:09:33
press they would be getting but
1:09:35
because of that whole crazy situation
1:09:37
yeah it's getting blown up branded jump
1:09:39
in with uh... what you want to say
1:09:41
there well so i i think that
1:09:43
in order for in order for the
1:09:46
sports media to grab onto it you're
1:09:48
going to have to have some sort
1:09:50
of reporter expose come out from an
1:09:53
independent journalist or an independent source who
1:09:55
doesn't have any from W. E. E.
1:09:57
at all. And I say that because
1:09:59
You look at a place like
1:10:02
ESPN, like yes, they don't
1:10:04
have a direct deal in
1:10:06
place with WWME, but they
1:10:08
do like to have their
1:10:10
talent on there. They do
1:10:12
like to use their tape
1:10:14
shows, their old Wrestlemenias for
1:10:16
content while they're struggling right
1:10:18
now. They have had a pretty
1:10:21
good relationship with them in the
1:10:23
past, with them in the past.
1:10:25
That rosy position that they have with
1:10:28
them goes away when this when this
1:10:30
sort of dissipates whenever that may
1:10:32
be You have to look the same
1:10:34
kind of deal with Fox Sports
1:10:36
Fox Sports is already in bed
1:10:38
with W. W. E. They don't
1:10:41
want to undermine their cash cow
1:10:43
You have NBC Sports, part of
1:10:45
NBC Universal, which owns the USA
1:10:47
Network, they don't want to undermine
1:10:50
their cash cow. So at that
1:10:52
point, you're looking at independent sites
1:10:54
like Leacher Report, CBS News, CBS
1:10:56
Sports, something like that. And then
1:10:58
you think, okay, well, all of
1:11:01
those sites end up, thing, exclusives
1:11:03
during Wrestlemania season for Hall of Fame
1:11:05
announcement. So W.W.E. has really put
1:11:07
themselves in dead in one way or
1:11:10
another with all of the major sports
1:11:12
networks. So that's why I say like
1:11:14
it's going to take some sort of
1:11:16
independent source or a company that
1:11:18
doesn't care about their relationship
1:11:20
with W. E. Or just isn't making
1:11:22
enough money off of their relationship with
1:11:25
W. E. To be the one to
1:11:27
blow the whistle. And I don't know
1:11:29
if there's going to be one of
1:11:31
those one of those networks. It's certainly
1:11:33
possible that there is. But I think
1:11:36
that's that's sort of my thought process
1:11:38
in thinking that it won't happen.
1:11:40
Craig. All right, well, I'm actually
1:11:42
throw it back to you
1:11:45
Greg because I think you
1:11:47
might be a gambling
1:11:49
man You might be a
1:11:52
gambling man, and I I
1:11:54
want to bet you By May
1:11:56
1st there will be no such
1:11:58
thing as live backdowns and
1:12:00
Ross. And the bet is that
1:12:03
the winner, the loser of the
1:12:05
bet has to wear gloves for
1:12:07
an entire month. So I'm not a
1:12:09
betting man, unfortunately, Craig,
1:12:11
so I will not take your
1:12:14
bet. I don't, I'd have to
1:12:16
look over my PW torch contract
1:12:18
because I'm not sure it even
1:12:21
allows betting with, with, uh, with
1:12:23
colors of the live cast. So
1:12:25
I don't want to, uh, accidentally
1:12:27
avoid my contract. That weight Keller
1:12:30
is a shrewd one. Don't let
1:12:32
him lull you into thinking he's
1:12:34
not. So... It's on the record
1:12:37
though. I challenged you. If all
1:12:39
the legal documents come in, that
1:12:41
excessive challenge, unless you're a
1:12:43
big old wuss. Well, I...
1:12:45
You don't want to wear
1:12:48
gloves during month. I've been
1:12:50
called worse, Craig, so I'm
1:12:52
an adult so I can
1:12:54
handle it. As always Craig,
1:12:56
thank you for the call,
1:12:58
appreciate hearing from you this
1:13:00
week. Love you guys, thank you.
1:13:05
Are you a nostalgic wrestling fan? Do
1:13:08
you want to hear about shows
1:13:10
you haven't seen in 10, 20,
1:13:12
maybe even 30 years? Well, I
1:13:14
have the show for you. I'm
1:13:16
Pwtorch.com, contributor Frank Petiani, and since
1:13:18
December of 2020, I've hosted pro
1:13:20
wrestling then and now. Together with
1:13:22
a rotating chair of co-hosts, we
1:13:25
go back and review old shows
1:13:27
from top to bottom. Talk about
1:13:29
where the wrestlers were at the
1:13:31
time and compare what's taking place
1:13:33
now to what took place then.
1:13:35
Pw Torch VIP membership
1:13:37
with exclusive podcast
1:13:40
just for members
1:13:42
compatible with the
1:13:44
Apple Podcast app.
1:13:46
Visit Pw torch.com/
1:13:49
go VIP for details
1:13:52
and sign up for him.
1:13:54
Brandon, for the record, yes.
1:13:56
If there was a situation
1:13:59
where a report did come out.
1:14:01
I would actually err on the side
1:14:03
of wanting that to happen so long
1:14:05
as it doesn't hurt pro wrestling as
1:14:08
a whole in the long term. But
1:14:10
if an article or a
1:14:12
reporter knabs onto this story and
1:14:14
all that it does is force
1:14:16
WEE to suspend operation for a
1:14:18
little bit while this gets sorted
1:14:20
out, then I would be I
1:14:22
would be all for it. I
1:14:24
would prefer that they did. kind
1:14:26
of you know go into hibernation for
1:14:28
a bit here while we get this
1:14:30
whole thing sorted out. And who knows?
1:14:33
But I certainly don't want to see
1:14:35
it hurt the company long term. Yeah,
1:14:37
and who knows? I mean, these journalists need
1:14:39
content to churn out while there's
1:14:41
no sports. They may run out
1:14:43
of, you know, running their tenth
1:14:45
predicted depth chart for the St.
1:14:48
Louis Cardinals during this downtime. They
1:14:50
may decide, you know, hey. Let's look
1:14:52
for something else to write about and
1:14:54
they may come across what WWE is
1:14:56
doing. So, I mean, there's always a
1:14:59
possibility as small of a possibility as
1:15:01
I think that might be. On
1:15:03
raw this week, Brandon, we had
1:15:05
Nia Jacks making her illustrious return
1:15:07
Bianca Bel Air, officially debuting as
1:15:09
part of the raw roster. The
1:15:11
big show, challenged Drew McIntyre
1:15:13
post-restlemania. We saw that in
1:15:16
the main event slot and we
1:15:18
saw Ricochet and Cedric Alexander as
1:15:20
a tag team. I want to talk
1:15:22
about the returns and debuts. Jack's
1:15:24
Bel Air was on WrestleMania, but
1:15:27
we also had the forgotten sons
1:15:29
on Smackdown. So this was not
1:15:31
the usual post-restlemania raws and Smackdown's
1:15:33
full of pomp and circumstance. We
1:15:35
did have some debuts, but it
1:15:38
was much more muted than it
1:15:40
has been in the past. A
1:15:42
team like the Forgotten Sons or
1:15:44
a return like Naya Jacks, do
1:15:46
you think it helps? Is weird as
1:15:48
this sounds? Do you think it helps
1:15:51
debuting in front or returning in front
1:15:53
of no audience? So that, you know,
1:15:55
if you're the forgotten sons and you're
1:15:58
making your debut and the fans... turn
1:16:00
on you out of the gate, your
1:16:02
DOA. And I don't mean the disciples
1:16:04
of Apocalypse. In some ways, maybe I
1:16:06
do. But you know, your push is
1:16:08
done right then. So this gives them
1:16:10
time to build up some credibility on
1:16:12
the main roster and sort of lucking
1:16:15
out going to Smackdown where they have
1:16:17
some very good tag teams to play
1:16:19
off of in the USO's in the
1:16:21
new day as far as the baby
1:16:23
face teams there. So they could be
1:16:25
made to look good before the fans
1:16:27
return. I mean is that... in a
1:16:29
weird way an advantage for some of
1:16:32
these wrestlers? I think this
1:16:34
was the best case scenario
1:16:37
for the forgotten sons and
1:16:39
I won't say worst case
1:16:41
but not not great for
1:16:43
Bianca Bel Air. She would
1:16:45
have been over. Sons were
1:16:47
very... yeah for sure. Bianca
1:16:49
Bel Air would have been
1:16:51
over huge with... post-restlemania
1:16:54
crowd that would have been a
1:16:56
very very big very successful debut
1:16:59
for her now whether or not
1:17:01
that would have worked uh... long-term
1:17:03
who knows i mean we've seen
1:17:06
we've seen talent who was incredibly
1:17:08
over on night one fizzle out
1:17:10
within within weeks after restlemania but
1:17:12
Belair seems driven, she seems determined,
1:17:15
she seems hungry, so no reason
1:17:17
to, you know, suspect that she
1:17:19
wouldn't be successful. So I feel
1:17:22
for her, I think that that
1:17:24
would have been a much bigger,
1:17:26
much better debut on a post-restlemania
1:17:29
raw in front of an audience.
1:17:31
For the Forgotten Sons, this couldn't
1:17:33
be better for them because they
1:17:36
are with no audience to... expose themselves expose
1:17:38
their characters to the to the crowds before
1:17:40
the crowds get a hold of them and
1:17:42
I think if the crowds were able to
1:17:44
get a hold of them right away they
1:17:47
they like you said could very well be
1:17:49
dead in the water because forgotten sons was
1:17:51
not a successful gimmick in an XT the
1:17:53
crowd did not take to them at any
1:17:56
point I don't think they had any memorable
1:17:58
matches I don't think they was really
1:18:00
anything about that gimmick that screamed, this
1:18:02
team needs to go to the main
1:18:04
roster right now. So in one sense,
1:18:06
I like that they moved them up
1:18:08
because it was clear that there was
1:18:10
nothing for them to do on an
1:18:13
XT and a team like that can
1:18:15
also can often get a fresh look
1:18:17
on the main roster and become useful.
1:18:19
I think we've seen that with some
1:18:21
acts in the past that didn't quite
1:18:23
click on an XT. And I think it
1:18:25
is highly beneficial for them to be
1:18:27
able to get some exposure on these
1:18:30
no-crowd shows before being put in front
1:18:32
of a live audience because I don't
1:18:34
think, I think if you had thrown
1:18:36
that team out there in front of
1:18:38
a post-restlemania crowd expecting a big debut
1:18:41
or a big return on Smackdown, they
1:18:43
would have been dead in the water
1:18:45
right out of the gate. Cedric
1:18:47
and Alexander and Ricochet as
1:18:50
a tag team. This was
1:18:52
discussed by the announcers as
1:18:54
if they're going forward as
1:18:57
a full-time tag team. What's
1:18:59
your take on the potential
1:19:02
of Cedric and Ricochet as
1:19:04
a tag team? I don't like
1:19:06
the pairing out of the gate.
1:19:08
I'm a person who generally has
1:19:10
a, I want to say like,
1:19:12
I sort of have negative opinions
1:19:14
out of the gate of,
1:19:16
two wrestlers thrown together for no real
1:19:19
reason and put an attack here. Now
1:19:21
that's two ways I can continue to
1:19:23
feel that they don't really belong
1:19:25
together or I can become a
1:19:28
huge fan like something like Shamison
1:19:30
Cesaro for example. So I'm
1:19:32
certainly willing to give it a chance.
1:19:34
It's two very very athletic guys who
1:19:37
are not being utilized correctly on
1:19:39
the roster and right now that's
1:19:41
their only connection. So I need
1:19:44
to see more and I need
1:19:46
to develop into more than 200
1:19:48
utilized guys who weren't doing anything.
1:19:51
Yeah, I'm kind of cautiously optimistic.
1:19:53
It gets them out of that
1:19:56
jobber to the stars position where
1:19:58
they kind of work. where they
1:20:00
weren't really doing anything but losing
1:20:02
each and every week and their
1:20:04
stock was dropping significantly. At least
1:20:06
in the short term, they'll have
1:20:09
some wins to get them over
1:20:11
as a tag team to establish
1:20:13
their tag team, bona fide so
1:20:15
to speak. So that's one thing
1:20:17
they have going for them, that
1:20:19
they'll be moved away. I think.
1:20:21
You know the downside obviously is that
1:20:23
the tag team is kind of
1:20:25
a no no go nowhere division
1:20:27
especially on raw There just isn't
1:20:29
really an upside to that division
1:20:32
as much as there is to
1:20:34
smackdown So they're kind of stuck
1:20:36
Being you know potentially the highest
1:20:38
they could go is big fish
1:20:40
in a small pond And and
1:20:42
that's not necessarily a great way
1:20:44
to go, but it's Sort of
1:20:47
better than the alternative, which is,
1:20:49
you know, running around chasing the
1:20:51
24-7 title, I guess. So they've
1:20:53
got that going for them. So
1:20:55
cautiously optimistic, I fully anticipate
1:20:58
being proven wrong on this
1:21:00
one. But the final segment
1:21:03
on raw, big show, challenging
1:21:05
Drew McIntyre post-restrestlemania. So the deal
1:21:07
here was, as it was presented,
1:21:09
Drew McIntyre was being interviewed
1:21:12
in the ring. after his
1:21:14
WrestleMania match and Big Show
1:21:16
came out and challenged him. This was
1:21:18
all shown on raw and Big Show
1:21:20
challenged him to a match right then
1:21:23
and there. The match took place, Drew
1:21:25
McIntyre beat him. A lot of plot
1:21:27
holes seemingly with this whole idea, Brandon.
1:21:29
But there were others that thought, hey,
1:21:32
you know, it continues to get Drew
1:21:34
McIntyre over. Not only does he beat
1:21:36
Brock Lesnar, but he beats Big Show
1:21:38
in the same night. It cemented him
1:21:40
as a top guy in W.W.E. and
1:21:43
on raw. And the fans will take
1:21:45
notice of that. What side did you
1:21:47
fall on on this segment? Yeah, so
1:21:49
I was kind of debating this with
1:21:51
a couple people. I think Zach and
1:21:53
Frank Bo from The Torch on Twitter.
1:21:55
we were trying to figure out you
1:21:57
know what was the what was the
1:21:59
reasoning for having it fall as a
1:22:01
throwback segment to the night before under
1:22:04
the WrestleMania banner. And the conclusion that
1:22:06
I reached, which I, I, I, maybe
1:22:08
it's not right, but my assumption was
1:22:11
simply that, uh, that they only had
1:22:13
show and McIntyre for those, for,
1:22:15
for, for whatever days that they
1:22:17
were taking WrestleMania, and they didn't
1:22:19
want to simply change out the
1:22:21
graphics and put raw there because
1:22:23
then the Wrestlemania sign would have
1:22:25
still been in the crowd to
1:22:27
the crowd to the left. So I
1:22:30
think they may be thought, well, we just
1:22:32
got to go with it as it is
1:22:34
and we've got to present it this way.
1:22:36
It was a little awkward. It came off
1:22:38
a little strange, but I mean, you know, a
1:22:41
lot of things have come off strange in
1:22:43
this month or so at the PC. So
1:22:45
for sure, it was what it was. It's
1:22:47
a good clean win for McIntire. I'm
1:22:49
all for that. I'm always going
1:22:51
to be a proponent of giving
1:22:54
Drew McIntire strong clean wins
1:22:56
now that he's the champion. uh...
1:22:58
especially over legacy acts uh... i think
1:23:00
too often uh... legacy acts are brought in
1:23:02
to be put over current generation talent so
1:23:04
anytime you get to see a guy like
1:23:07
the big show put over a guy like
1:23:09
mac entire strong i think that's a net
1:23:11
positive uh... was a little strange to
1:23:13
see big show just show up out of any
1:23:15
out of nowhere but hey when you got got
1:23:17
when you what when you're when you're in a
1:23:20
situation like this and you've got a body in
1:23:22
the building i guess you you you use it
1:23:24
so yeah It was what it was. It was
1:23:26
a, I thought the math was better than
1:23:29
it really had any right to
1:23:31
be. I thought it was better
1:23:33
than the math for Lesnar, which
1:23:35
is sort of saying a lot.
1:23:37
So net positive for me, but
1:23:39
definitely a little awkward. You
1:23:47
don't have to wait for the Wait Killer
1:23:49
Pro Wrestling Post show to find out what
1:23:51
I thought of Monday Night Raw and Smackdown
1:23:54
each week. You can check out my reports
1:23:56
that are updated live throughout raw and Smackdown
1:23:58
at p.w.torch.com by written reports. We'll tell you
1:24:00
what's happening in detail in case you
1:24:03
miss the show and it'll also analyze
1:24:05
key segments and give my random thoughts
1:24:07
and quips on what I am watching
1:24:10
as it airs So check it out
1:24:12
every Monday night and Tuesday night at
1:24:14
p.w torch.com That also applies to W.
1:24:16
E pay previews I cover those live
1:24:19
at pw torch.com with a detailed written
1:24:21
report with star ratings and of course
1:24:23
you can find other TV reports from
1:24:25
other contributors to pw torch such as
1:24:28
nxt roh impact wrestling and more check
1:24:30
it out pw torch.com
1:24:32
your first stop for
1:24:35
t.v. and pay-per-view written
1:24:37
reports and we go
1:24:40
back to the emails before
1:24:42
we go back to the
1:24:44
phones this one is from
1:24:47
via p member Pranil he
1:24:49
says Do you agree with
1:24:51
Pro Wrestling Illustrated only recognizing
1:24:53
the WWE Universal Championship, WWE
1:24:55
Championship, AEW World Championship, and
1:24:58
the IWS Heavyweight Championship, would
1:25:00
you include any other world
1:25:02
titles on the list? I
1:25:04
kind of get why some
1:25:06
promotions are omitted from the
1:25:08
list. I'd personally include the
1:25:11
MLW World Heavyweight Championship, the
1:25:13
Ring of Honor World Championship, and
1:25:15
the NWA World's Heavyweight Championship. I would
1:25:17
argue that as long as there is
1:25:19
an NWA World's heavyweight champion it should
1:25:21
be recognized at the top with the
1:25:24
others. I consider that championship to be
1:25:26
the holy grail of professional wrestling and
1:25:28
Nick Aldis carries it as such. What
1:25:30
do you think? I and this kind of
1:25:32
got some buzz on Twitter earlier in the
1:25:35
week pw i announcing that they were only
1:25:37
going to recognize those four major titles as
1:25:39
world championships and you had you know guys
1:25:41
coming out of the woodwork for all these
1:25:43
independent and smaller promotions saying hey this isn't
1:25:46
fair hey why is this the case and
1:25:48
so there were a lot of unhappy wrestlers
1:25:50
on Twitter when that news broke but to
1:25:52
be honest like to me Brandon and correct
1:25:55
me if I'm wrong or I'm looking at
1:25:57
this the wrong way but there's a pretty
1:25:59
steep drop-off. from those four championships
1:26:02
and the companies that they are
1:26:04
in to whatever would be the
1:26:06
next tier, whether you consider MLW,
1:26:08
ROH, Impact Wrestling, even the NWA.
1:26:11
I mean, you know, as far
1:26:13
as their reach on YouTube. And
1:26:15
I don't know what went into
1:26:17
PWA's decision. I don't know if
1:26:19
they had any criteria that they
1:26:21
used. for these and for making
1:26:24
the cutoff where they made it,
1:26:26
but to be honest, I don't
1:26:28
really have a problem with the
1:26:30
decision PMI made there. Yeah, I
1:26:32
don't really have a strong
1:26:34
enough opinion to argue it,
1:26:36
to argue against their decision.
1:26:38
I think if there's one
1:26:41
omission that seems most glaring
1:26:43
to me, it's the NXC
1:26:45
championship. I mean, next year is
1:26:47
now a national promotion on national
1:26:49
American television and it's treated as
1:26:52
a third brand for W.W.E. So,
1:26:54
I mean, that's my, that's the
1:26:56
most glaring omission to me. I
1:26:59
mean, especially if you want, again,
1:27:01
like you were saying, I don't
1:27:04
know their criteria, but if you
1:27:06
want to talk about, you know, if
1:27:08
you want to raise the, if you want
1:27:10
to raise the point about
1:27:13
the NWA championship being excluded.
1:27:15
uh... then perhaps they're not considering lineage because
1:27:17
obviously if you're talking lineage then the
1:27:20
nw a title has the strongest of
1:27:22
any yeah but uh... on the basis
1:27:24
of lineage i would think you'd want
1:27:26
to include the nx t title simply
1:27:29
because so many current w w roster
1:27:31
members who have held the world and
1:27:33
universal titles are former nx t champions
1:27:35
so that has an impressive lineage as
1:27:38
well but uh... i guess i don't
1:27:40
have an opinion strong enough one way
1:27:42
or the other I'm less inclined to
1:27:45
consider the impact title, the ROH
1:27:47
title, the MLW title as
1:27:49
being omissions as much as
1:27:51
the NXT title, and I
1:27:53
guess certainly, if we're considering
1:27:56
lineage, then the NWA. Yep.
1:27:58
All right, let's cool. back
1:28:00
to the phones 305 erico this
1:28:02
is DJ from Miami DJ welcome
1:28:05
to the show and what's your
1:28:07
first thought for us tonight
1:28:09
okay I got a couple things I
1:28:11
guess okay well I mean I assume
1:28:13
you did you called in and wanted
1:28:16
to talk so that's why I put
1:28:18
you on the air so let us
1:28:20
know what I mean I mean I'm
1:28:23
not too excited you know it's like
1:28:25
okay you know so now that somebody
1:28:27
else got it going into like we
1:28:29
were talking about last week now that's
1:28:32
somebody else got it like do you
1:28:34
think like i understand that they did
1:28:36
do all the taping but there still
1:28:38
have to work are they still gonna
1:28:40
work on production all this stuff because
1:28:42
whoever had it wasn't a talent it
1:28:45
was somebody you know I don't know
1:28:47
did they ever say who was a
1:28:49
cameraman or whoever got it but I
1:28:51
mean If somebody got it, then do
1:28:53
you think anybody else has it because
1:28:56
they haven't been tested or do you
1:28:58
think Vince will eventually buy tests
1:29:00
for all these guys or what
1:29:02
do you think he's forcing him
1:29:04
to get tested or what do
1:29:06
you think? I'm talking about the
1:29:08
testing. So what do you think
1:29:10
about that? That's my first thing.
1:29:12
Well, from what was what I
1:29:14
read, it was called on-air talent.
1:29:16
So I don't think a cameraman
1:29:18
would be considered on-air talent. It
1:29:20
sounded like it was either an
1:29:22
interviewer or an announcer. And so, you
1:29:24
know, the way it had been worded
1:29:27
by WUE, I believe, was that they
1:29:29
weren't really around any of the wrestlers
1:29:31
once they got it. And they were
1:29:33
quarantined and they were kept away from
1:29:35
everybody. So... The way it sounds is
1:29:38
that no one was really at risk,
1:29:40
although we can only take WWEs word
1:29:42
for it, I don't know that Vince
1:29:44
McMahon can buy tests. I don't know
1:29:47
if as a private citizen he can
1:29:49
do that, or if it has to
1:29:51
come from any kind of medical facility,
1:29:53
would have to be providing those.
1:29:55
But I know that they were
1:29:58
taking people's temperatures before they... They
1:30:00
entered the performance center trying
1:30:02
to keep people away from each
1:30:04
other as much as possible. You
1:30:07
know, when you're in that environment,
1:30:09
Brandon, there's still only so much
1:30:11
you can do when ultimately you're
1:30:14
sending two to four wrestlers out
1:30:16
there to fight in a ring
1:30:18
where sweat is flying, where there's
1:30:20
potential for blood flying, there's saliva
1:30:23
flying, and you know, you can only
1:30:25
prevent the risk so much. when
1:30:27
the bottom line is guys are
1:30:29
going out there in wrestling? Yeah,
1:30:32
there's an inherent risk
1:30:35
in this no matter what. I
1:30:37
don't know if Vince has
1:30:39
an ability to require tests
1:30:41
for all of his wrestlers,
1:30:43
but here's the thing. The
1:30:45
test is only good for
1:30:47
the show that they're performing
1:30:50
on. So if they are
1:30:52
working, you know, every week
1:30:54
and flying home in between.
1:30:56
Well then they need to be tested
1:30:59
the next time they come into the
1:31:01
building because that's a whole week of
1:31:03
additional exposure. And for a lot of
1:31:06
these guys they may be traveling by
1:31:08
plane so that's even more risky. I
1:31:10
don't think that the testing each challenge
1:31:12
seems feasible just because I mean you're
1:31:15
literally talking having to test them multiple
1:31:17
times over. There's an inherent risk and
1:31:19
I don't think that there's any way
1:31:21
around that risk. You can attempt
1:31:24
to mitigate it as much
1:31:26
as possible and you can
1:31:29
use all the corporate buzzwords
1:31:31
in the press releases and
1:31:33
statements, CESBN, about the working
1:31:36
environment you're attempting to create,
1:31:38
but the risk is there and
1:31:40
there's no way to remove it at
1:31:42
the end of the day. Yeah. I just
1:31:45
hope that you know now that the you
1:31:47
know the taping is done like do you
1:31:49
know what else they're going to do or
1:31:52
do you think that this time hey now
1:31:54
that you get a free to get the
1:31:56
test then I'll go to my second question.
1:31:58
Well the taping are done. because they're
1:32:00
going to be taping live from
1:32:02
here on out. So that's the
1:32:05
other thing about taping live is
1:32:07
that, you know, if you had
1:32:09
tests that you could use, you
1:32:11
could say, okay, you know, we'll
1:32:13
test in this one batch because
1:32:15
we're taping 10 hours of TV
1:32:17
today, but having to keep bring
1:32:19
them back week after week and
1:32:21
show after show. That's going to
1:32:23
get exponentially more expensive for testing
1:32:25
or whatever the case may be
1:32:27
for that. So that's another reason
1:32:29
if they had the ability to
1:32:32
test would be to tape in
1:32:34
bunches and not tape live, but
1:32:36
I don't think they have the
1:32:38
ability to test anyway. So DJ,
1:32:40
your second point for us. Yeah, and
1:32:42
then did you guys touch on the
1:32:44
basler thing or you guys didn't get
1:32:46
into that? Can you be more specific?
1:32:49
What basler thing. Yeah, what the
1:32:51
Charlotte, about, was Charlotte,
1:32:53
because like, I'm confused
1:32:55
on this, like, when she beat
1:32:57
him, when she, when Charlotte beat
1:33:00
her, like, dead, they were saying,
1:33:02
like, the next day, all of
1:33:04
a sudden, like, her visa was
1:33:06
going to be aspired, or work
1:33:08
visa, like, they don't, like, oh, okay.
1:33:11
Yeah, I was sorry, I got the
1:33:13
wrong person, I'm so sorry. So then
1:33:15
I was so, I was, I don't,
1:33:18
I don't, I don't know. So I'm
1:33:20
confused, like, I thought, like, like, I
1:33:22
thought that she was definitely gonna,
1:33:25
you know, win and blah blah
1:33:27
blah. I mean, do you think
1:33:29
because of the quarantine or whatever
1:33:31
this thing is going on, is
1:33:33
that because she didn't win or
1:33:35
do you, what would, what hurts
1:33:37
her license up or what was, what's
1:33:39
the, So I know that there were
1:33:42
people who were looking for a reason
1:33:44
for Charlotte Flair to have beaten, now
1:33:46
you got me saying it, to have
1:33:48
beaten Ria Ripley at WrestleMania and some
1:33:50
people are saying, well, you know, her
1:33:53
visa was expired so she had to
1:33:55
go back and you know, that's why,
1:33:57
you know, Charlotte won and then there
1:33:59
were... pictures on, I don't know
1:34:01
if it was Instagram or Twitter, of
1:34:04
Ria Ripley in Orlando, so obviously she
1:34:06
was still in the States. Bottom
1:34:08
line, Brandon, it seems to me
1:34:10
that people are looking for reasons
1:34:12
to explain Ria Ripley losing to
1:34:15
Charlotte Flair other than the fact that
1:34:17
W.W.E. wanted Charlotte to win. and they
1:34:19
think there are more potential stories to
1:34:21
tell for Charlotte at least for now
1:34:23
going down to NxT being away from
1:34:25
Becky Lynch on raw and kind of
1:34:27
creating her own island onto herself there
1:34:29
where she's not sort of in Becky
1:34:32
Lynch's shadow. I mean is that is
1:34:34
that really all there is to it?
1:34:36
I don't think there's any other giant
1:34:38
conspiracy to it. Yeah, I
1:34:40
just read it as they thought
1:34:42
Charlotte was the better of the
1:34:44
better of the the better of
1:34:46
the two choices and thought they
1:34:48
had more stories to tell there.
1:34:51
I had seen and heard some
1:34:53
rumblings that perhaps moving Charlotte
1:34:55
to NXT was some sort
1:34:57
of direct response to the
1:35:00
the falling ratings of NXT
1:35:02
versus AEW. And that read
1:35:04
to me as the most
1:35:06
logical of scenarios. But it also,
1:35:08
it's still, that didn't make a ton
1:35:10
of sense to me because Charlotte's not
1:35:13
a ratings draw. I mean, she never
1:35:15
really has been. So there's no reason
1:35:17
to suspect that moving Charlotte to NXT
1:35:19
is going to somehow give them a leg up
1:35:21
on AEW. So I just, as at the end
1:35:23
of the day, they thought that they had more
1:35:26
stories to tell with Charlotte. I'm
1:35:33
Kelly Wells, host of PTT Talks
1:35:35
Next-T, the longest running Nxt-T podcast
1:35:37
anywhere. Join me along with Nate
1:35:39
Lindbergh, Bruce Lee Hazlewood, and special
1:35:41
guests live every Tuesday night, just
1:35:43
minutes after Nxt-T, where we cover
1:35:45
the good, the bad, and the
1:35:47
ugly on the way to becoming
1:35:49
a star in W-W-E. Check us
1:35:52
out live on YouTube or stream
1:35:54
later, wherever you get your podcast.
1:36:03
And DJ back to you for
1:36:05
your third point for us tonight.
1:36:07
My last thing is what you
1:36:09
guys were touching on. If I
1:36:11
like to really see that the
1:36:14
Drew McIntyre and Black, that would
1:36:16
be a great match. But going
1:36:18
into that, who would be the
1:36:20
heel? I mean, do you think,
1:36:22
because everybody likes Alex the Black,
1:36:24
you know, and everybody likes, you
1:36:26
know. So who, go into it?
1:36:28
Who do you think it would
1:36:30
be in the heel? Like, do
1:36:32
you think Black would definitely go
1:36:34
into being in the heel? Or
1:36:36
do you think, if he's gonna
1:36:38
win the belt, do you think
1:36:40
that Drew would turn back to
1:36:43
a heel? Well, they've spent
1:36:45
so much time building up Drew
1:36:47
McIntyre as a baby face and
1:36:49
had him do this big crowning
1:36:51
WrestleMania moment as a baby face.
1:36:53
I don't think he's an option
1:36:55
for a heel. I think if
1:36:57
you look at these two characters
1:36:59
side by side, Alistair Black clearly
1:37:01
is the better option for a
1:37:03
heel. And Alistair Black clearly is
1:37:05
the better option for a heel.
1:37:07
And it's easier. I mean, he's
1:37:09
kind of right on that line
1:37:11
in the bank briefcase. and they
1:37:13
end up feuding, I think it's
1:37:15
a lot easier to make Alistair
1:37:17
black to heal in that feud,
1:37:19
keep Drew McIntyre as the baby
1:37:21
face. You know, Brandon, do you
1:37:23
see that turning out any other
1:37:25
way besides that? I think it
1:37:27
can work. I think like a
1:37:29
lot of, this issue kind of
1:37:32
presents itself fairly frequently with Drew
1:37:34
McIntyre. He's a natural baby face
1:37:36
because of his likability and... sort
1:37:38
of the the natural role that
1:37:40
he plays and and how much
1:37:42
you can tell he just loves
1:37:44
the business. But the problem is
1:37:46
is Drew McIntire is really really
1:37:48
big and a lot of the
1:37:50
guys that W. W. E. Have
1:37:52
on the main roster are not
1:37:54
up to size with him. And
1:37:56
so when they're in the ring
1:37:58
with him, it's easy for Drew
1:38:00
to look like the dominates. heel.
1:38:02
So they're going to run into
1:38:04
that at some point. I think
1:38:06
that Alistair Black can overcome that
1:38:08
if he is in the heel
1:38:10
role just because he's such a
1:38:12
dominant striker and his offense is
1:38:14
so unique I think that he
1:38:16
can be sold as McIntyre's equal
1:38:18
even if he's undersized compared to
1:38:20
McIntyre. But I don't even think
1:38:22
that they have to necessarily go
1:38:24
heel versus heel with a baby
1:38:26
face versus heel. with these two
1:38:28
i mean we're we're operating under
1:38:30
the assumption that in order to
1:38:32
get to this match alister black
1:38:35
wins money in the bank so
1:38:37
usually money in the bank contracts
1:38:39
are cashed in uh... on a
1:38:41
win uh... you know after uh...
1:38:43
as a title whatever the case
1:38:45
may be so if you didn't
1:38:47
want to turn either of them
1:38:49
and you wanted to just let
1:38:51
the fans aside or kind of
1:38:53
being to both you could pretty
1:38:55
easily uh... have black passion on
1:38:57
mack entire and tire say, hey,
1:38:59
you know, I respect that you've
1:39:01
done here. I can't fault you
1:39:03
for using the briefcase the way
1:39:05
it was intended. And then you
1:39:07
launch into a few where McIntyre
1:39:09
says, but hey, you know, one
1:39:11
on one, I'm going to be.
1:39:13
And they go from there. I
1:39:15
think you can do a situation
1:39:17
where you don't turn either character.
1:39:19
But I think it could go
1:39:21
either way and work pretty well.
1:39:24
D.J. Thank you for the call
1:39:26
tonight. Appreciate hearing from you and
1:39:28
I'll look forward to hearing from
1:39:31
you again soon. Yep. One more
1:39:33
thing real quick. I really do
1:39:35
like him as a heel better.
1:39:37
Through Magentire, I love him as
1:39:40
a heel. Okay. Yeah, Drew has
1:39:42
more range as a heel than
1:39:44
what we saw on raw. and
1:39:46
I think that was the problem.
1:39:49
They had kind of typecast him
1:39:51
as this brooding heel and it
1:39:53
got very boring very quickly. And
1:39:55
I think... we've seen in other
1:39:58
places where he can, I mean
1:40:00
he's fine as a baby face,
1:40:02
but I think he could be
1:40:04
a really strong heel if given
1:40:07
the opportunity, but that was not
1:40:09
the case. So we go to
1:40:11
dynamite this week, really the only
1:40:13
major match of consequence, Cody and
1:40:15
Sean Spears. for the spot in
1:40:18
the TNT championship title finals. Cody
1:40:20
getting the victory, not a surprise
1:40:22
there on Smackdown. Alexa Bliss and
1:40:24
Nicki Cross retaining the women's tag
1:40:27
team titles against the Kabuki Warriors
1:40:29
in a WrestleMania rematch. Next week
1:40:31
it'll be Jay Uso versus the
1:40:33
Miz versus Biggie in a triple
1:40:36
threat match for the tag titles.
1:40:38
You know it was kind of
1:40:40
a novelty and they were forced
1:40:42
into this at Wrestlemania having a
1:40:45
triple threat match. triple threat singles
1:40:47
match for the tag titles, but
1:40:49
I guess they liked it so
1:40:51
much now they're doing it again.
1:40:54
The Forgotten Sons debut Tamina appears
1:40:56
to be possibly next in line
1:40:58
for a Smack Donald Women's title
1:41:00
match. I guess just taking advantage
1:41:03
of her being healthy while they
1:41:05
can. And then it looks like
1:41:07
the potential for the fiend to
1:41:09
be next in line for Braun
1:41:12
Stroman. Brandon, I want to ask
1:41:14
you about that last point before
1:41:16
we go to a couple emails
1:41:18
to wrap up here. The Fiend
1:41:20
being next in line for Braunstrom
1:41:23
and the title, does that speak
1:41:25
of the lack of top tier
1:41:27
talent on Smackdown when we're already
1:41:29
cycled around to the fiend who
1:41:32
was just unceremoniously lost quickly to
1:41:34
Goldberg and Saudi Arabia? And you
1:41:36
know, there were people reading the
1:41:38
eulogy for the fiend character at
1:41:41
that point. And that was, you
1:41:43
know, just over a month ago.
1:41:45
Or does it speak of how
1:41:47
well the firefly fun house rehabilitated
1:41:50
rehabilitated? the fiend's character in getting
1:41:52
a win over john scene at
1:41:54
russlemania i think it's hard to
1:41:56
tell with with no crowd reaction
1:41:59
i mean we see how people
1:42:01
react on twitter but we're not
1:42:03
seeing week to week how the
1:42:05
crowd is feeling about this segment
1:42:08
uh... if it's really hard to
1:42:10
gauge. I think that the answer
1:42:12
probably lies somewhere in the middle.
1:42:14
I think there is definitely a
1:42:17
lack of top baby face talent.
1:42:19
On SmackDown you've seen the very
1:42:21
very conscious demotion of Daniel Bryan.
1:42:23
You've seen Kofi the very conscious
1:42:25
emotion of Kofi back to the
1:42:28
midcard. Part of that you know
1:42:30
just due to wood being out
1:42:32
for an extended period of time.
1:42:34
And another part, because I think
1:42:37
that's more where WWEs him long
1:42:39
term. So Smackdown is, Smackdown is
1:42:41
in a very, in a very
1:42:43
kind of rough spot in the
1:42:46
main event, really. I mean, they're
1:42:48
down Roman rains, they're down Goldberg,
1:42:50
you know, for, even though he
1:42:52
was a temporary fixture, they're down
1:42:55
Brock Lesner, who was originally slated
1:42:57
to be part of that show
1:42:59
when it debuted on Fox. And
1:43:01
they've moved Daniel Bryan and Kofi
1:43:04
Kingston out of contention. So it
1:43:06
leaves Bray Wyatt coming back around
1:43:08
to challenge Braun Stroman, who I
1:43:10
think you can make a case
1:43:13
for not being at that level
1:43:15
either. I mean, don't forget, just
1:43:17
a month ago. Strowman was losing
1:43:19
in a three on one handicap
1:43:22
match against guys who have been
1:43:24
severely defined down as midcarders lower
1:43:26
midcarders at that. Although we have
1:43:28
seen Zane and Nakamura and Cesaro
1:43:30
see quite a resurgence in recent
1:43:33
weeks simply out of necessity because
1:43:35
they've been three. 90 seconds available
1:43:37
to W.E. at these performance center
1:43:39
shows. So it sort of forced
1:43:42
their hand and forced them to
1:43:44
make those three guys much more
1:43:46
of a central figure. on the
1:43:48
show than they have been prior.
1:43:51
But I think it's definitely due
1:43:53
to necessity. Just Roman is needing
1:43:55
rehabilitation now as the universal champion
1:43:57
coming off. Again, a week feud
1:44:00
with Vain. Bray is coming off.
1:44:02
I guess you call it an
1:44:04
impressive win against Sina, although it
1:44:06
wasn't really a win, more so
1:44:09
just a sideshow attraction. So it
1:44:11
seems like it was a necessity
1:44:13
to put this match together. I
1:44:15
think though, they're going to run
1:44:18
into the problem that they often
1:44:20
do with Bray Wyatt and his
1:44:22
pair of characters and that is...
1:44:24
Bray Wyatt is in a match
1:44:27
where he really needs to win,
1:44:29
but the problem is is his
1:44:31
opponent does too Yeah, I don't
1:44:33
think you want to immediately take
1:44:35
the title off of Stroman After
1:44:38
just putting it on and I
1:44:40
don't think that you want Stroman
1:44:42
to beat the scene clean by
1:44:44
any means So I think that
1:44:47
either means you sacrifice one character
1:44:49
and fortunately in that scenario is
1:44:51
usually Wyatt or you go with
1:44:53
a non-finish and get out of
1:44:56
the program. We got a
1:44:58
couple more emails here. This is from
1:45:00
The Great. He says, how's his go,
1:45:02
how's, oh I assume it's he, maybe
1:45:05
it's a she. Going, hope all as
1:45:07
well and you're staying safe. Was wondering
1:45:09
what your thoughts on guys winning the
1:45:11
WWF or WWE championship on pay-per-view only
1:45:14
to lose it on the next night
1:45:16
on raw. It happened often in the
1:45:18
late 90s with guys such as Kane,
1:45:20
mankind, and Big Show and Big Show
1:45:23
coming to mind. Why do you think
1:45:25
this would happen? Could booking someone like
1:45:27
that nowadays go over with fans? Me
1:45:29
personally I hated it, especially for a
1:45:32
guy like Kane who felt could have
1:45:34
really been a great champion in that
1:45:36
era. His 2010 reign seemed way past
1:45:38
due and he was a shell of
1:45:41
himself in my opinion. Love to hear
1:45:43
your thoughts, take care and be safe.
1:45:45
You know I think the Zach Rider
1:45:47
thing encapsulates why you would do this
1:45:50
and the reason is first you want
1:45:52
to give fans... a moment in the
1:45:54
sun for a very popular character, which
1:45:56
is what Zach Rider was. But Zach
1:45:59
Rider... also in WWEs mind did not
1:46:01
have a long shelf life and was
1:46:03
not a long term credible champion. So
1:46:05
instead of having just a month or
1:46:08
two month rain, you know, what's the
1:46:10
difference in month or two month or
1:46:12
a day? You know? So he's still
1:46:14
a popular character. Take advantage of this
1:46:17
while he's still... super popular, have a
1:46:19
heel, beat him the next night on
1:46:21
raw, and transfer all that heat to
1:46:23
the heel. So now the heel is
1:46:26
super over, because now they've just beaten
1:46:28
the fans' favorite, who's only now had
1:46:30
a one-day title reign. So psychologically, that's
1:46:32
really the only reason I would advocate
1:46:35
for such a thing. I'm someone who
1:46:37
believes in longer title reigns, not only
1:46:39
to strengthen the person holding it, but
1:46:41
to strengthen the worth of the championship.
1:46:44
We're about to go to a
1:46:46
commercial break. Why listen to commercial
1:46:49
breaks when you can go VIP
1:46:51
and experience our shows with the
1:46:53
ads and plugs removed? Pwtorch.com/GoVIP. That's
1:46:55
Pwtorch.com/GoVIP for full details. Or go
1:46:57
to patron.patreon.com/Pwtorch VIP. Rate start as
1:46:59
low as... 4.99 cents to remove
1:47:01
the ads and plugs through patron,
1:47:03
full VIP membership starts at $9.99.
1:47:05
Treat yourself to a streamlined ad
1:47:07
and plug-free listening experience with a
1:47:09
VIP or patron membership. But you
1:47:11
know Brandon what's your take on
1:47:13
those one day title reigns winning
1:47:15
it on and a lot of
1:47:17
times you know realistically a lot
1:47:20
of the time just under proper
1:47:22
rating on on raw you know
1:47:24
advertise a title match is happening
1:47:26
you know get a title change
1:47:28
for people talking and and they
1:47:30
may tune in next week in
1:47:32
hopes to see the same thing
1:47:34
so practicality wise that's really sort
1:47:36
of more why they do it
1:47:38
but psychologically the example that I
1:47:40
give is the one that I
1:47:42
can really get behind is a
1:47:44
reason Yeah, I think in the
1:47:46
attitude area you saw it a
1:47:48
lot because there was just a
1:47:50
lot of hot shop. Okay. I
1:47:53
mean that wasn't the only thing
1:47:55
that they did on a semi-regular
1:47:57
basis that probably wasn't conducive to
1:47:59
long term storytelling. So I think
1:48:01
you can kind of. that error
1:48:03
of them doing it on just
1:48:05
the way that their mindset was
1:48:07
and the way that they were
1:48:09
booking shows back then. When it
1:48:11
happened more recently, the example you
1:48:13
cite or he cited with Zach
1:48:15
Rider. If I remember correctly, Greg,
1:48:17
you remember, was it WrestleMania 32
1:48:19
that they did that? That seems
1:48:21
to ring a bell for me.
1:48:24
I know it was a WrestleMania.
1:48:26
Sometimes it's hard to keep these
1:48:28
later day Russellmanias all straight as
1:48:30
to what happened on which one,
1:48:32
but yeah, that sounds about right.
1:48:34
Well, yeah, so the reason that
1:48:36
I'm thinking it was WrestleMania 32
1:48:38
is because that show was much
1:48:40
maligned for having a patchwork card
1:48:42
that kind of fell apart. Of
1:48:44
course, the undertaker and Shane McMahon,
1:48:46
you had the situation with AAA
1:48:48
rains that no one really wanted
1:48:50
to see that match. You had
1:48:52
the what ended up being the
1:48:54
debacle between broccoli or the Ambrose.
1:48:57
So there was a lot of
1:48:59
stuff on that card that wasn't
1:49:01
particularly interesting or exciting and I
1:49:03
seem to remember it being a
1:49:05
show that was dominated both by
1:49:07
heel wins and baby faces who
1:49:09
weren't over as baby faces. So
1:49:11
I remember thinking at the time
1:49:13
that giving Zach Rider that feel-good
1:49:15
win was sort of the present
1:49:17
to the fans that night because
1:49:19
I always felt going into that
1:49:21
show that Vince McMahon and Company
1:49:23
knew that Vince. that the show
1:49:25
that they had booked that night
1:49:28
was not going to please that
1:49:30
audience. And I thought that the
1:49:32
Zach Rider moment was specifically tailored
1:49:34
to do that and the next
1:49:36
night they just got out of
1:49:38
it. Yep. Yeah, that's also good
1:49:40
reasoning as well and you have
1:49:42
a much better memory for what
1:49:44
happened at WrestleMania than I do
1:49:46
so I will defer to you
1:49:48
on that. Our final email will
1:49:50
run through it real quick. This
1:49:52
is from JB. He says hi,
1:49:54
Greg, and guest. It's JB from
1:49:56
Detroit. I read a report that
1:49:58
the Smackdown on Friday would be
1:50:01
the last taped show for the
1:50:03
immediate future and that the WWE
1:50:05
was going back live starting Monday
1:50:07
for raw. The theories that there
1:50:09
is worry in the WWE that
1:50:11
the lack of live shows would
1:50:13
jeopardize their TV contracts with Fox
1:50:15
and USA That is the only
1:50:17
legitimate reason I can think of
1:50:19
Having multiple live shows per week
1:50:21
is completely and unnecessarily dangerous with
1:50:23
the entire crew working and interacting.
1:50:25
What do you think the ramifications
1:50:27
for this might be both in
1:50:29
terms of public opinion and for
1:50:32
the show themselves? Knowing what we
1:50:34
know, do you think this is
1:50:36
the right call by W.W.E. Love
1:50:38
the show. I'm assuming he's talking
1:50:40
about our show and not W.W.E.
1:50:42
shows, but thank you, J.B. We
1:50:44
talked about that one, you know,
1:50:46
up and down this show, so
1:50:48
I won't dwell on that much,
1:50:50
much, but... Yeah, but... Yeah. The
1:50:52
final, but... Also, what are your
1:50:54
thoughts on the news that the
1:50:56
XFL is likely done for good?
1:50:58
Again, how does it affect Vince
1:51:00
and the WWE moving forward? Jay,
1:51:02
I've avoided trying to talk about
1:51:05
this subject I'll show. I will
1:51:07
say that I'm not ready to
1:51:09
talk about this. Ask me again
1:51:11
in three weeks. Maybe then I
1:51:13
will be ready to discuss this.
1:51:15
Subject matter, all I can say
1:51:17
right now and all I can
1:51:19
think of going through my head
1:51:21
is fool me once, shame on
1:51:23
you, fool me twice, shame on
1:51:25
me. I don't think this will
1:51:27
affect Vince at all moving forward.
1:51:29
I think he's been as a
1:51:31
part of WWE in decision-making as
1:51:33
he has been over the months
1:51:36
before the XFL started, so I
1:51:38
don't really see this changing any
1:51:40
of Vince's day-to-day work in WEE.
1:51:42
Brandon, we'll wrap it up right
1:51:44
there, call tonight. I thank you
1:51:46
for joining me again here on
1:51:48
Wrestling Night in America. Before I
1:51:50
let you go, let me plug
1:51:52
your, or have you plug your
1:51:54
social media where people can follow
1:51:56
you and your work for the
1:51:58
torch. Sure, I actually, just a
1:52:00
quick question for you, Greg, I
1:52:02
know you don't want to get
1:52:04
too much into the XFL stuff,
1:52:06
but maybe you don't have an
1:52:09
answer for this yet, but maybe
1:52:11
you need a little bit more
1:52:13
time to think it over. them
1:52:15
deciding to go the direction that
1:52:17
they that they did is more
1:52:19
likely to be because of of
1:52:21
what they viewed as negative returns
1:52:23
coming out of the first several
1:52:25
weeks of the season? Or do
1:52:27
you feel like this decision is
1:52:29
based primarily on them having to
1:52:31
cut this season short and not
1:52:33
having that window of time to
1:52:35
really certify themselves as a brand?
1:52:37
I think it has more to
1:52:40
do with, you know, the first
1:52:42
season was going to be, they
1:52:44
were going to incur a lot
1:52:46
of losses. but not having the
1:52:48
revenue come in from the second
1:52:50
half of the season from the
1:52:52
gates and things like that really
1:52:54
hurt their bottom line. That's kind
1:52:56
of the impression I got. You
1:52:58
know, the impression that was given
1:53:00
as I've seen the reaction by
1:53:02
people who've worked for the league
1:53:04
and the teams on social media
1:53:06
is that this was 100% COVID-19.
1:53:08
that was the culprit here. You
1:53:10
know and it wasn't you know
1:53:13
they didn't feel they weren't getting
1:53:15
a foothold or you know Fox
1:53:17
or ESPN were getting cold feet
1:53:19
with the ratings it was nothing
1:53:21
to that extent it was just
1:53:23
you know at the financials weren't
1:53:25
going to they weren't going to
1:53:27
be able to make it even
1:53:29
with Vince putting as much money
1:53:31
as he was putting in they
1:53:33
just weren't going to make it
1:53:35
not having that second half the
1:53:37
season revenue that they were kind
1:53:39
of budgeted in for season two,
1:53:41
which kind of threw things out
1:53:44
of whack. You know, we're only
1:53:46
a couple days removed, so maybe
1:53:48
there'll be more news coming out
1:53:50
in the few days, but you
1:53:52
know, it's, it's, the, the spring
1:53:54
football league concept is doomed. Like,
1:53:56
I don't know how else you
1:53:58
can say it. Like, this was
1:54:00
the very best chance, and I'll,
1:54:02
this will be the last chance.
1:54:04
I honestly think this was the
1:54:06
last chance to make spring football
1:54:08
another league pop-up work. And they
1:54:10
had everything going for it. They
1:54:12
had the right people. off on
1:54:14
this and I didn't want to
1:54:17
talk about this but now I'm
1:54:19
going off on this and you
1:54:21
know they had the right people.
1:54:23
Yes they had the positive buzz
1:54:25
I mean they had everything going
1:54:27
for them and then like it
1:54:29
took a worldwide epidemic for this
1:54:31
league to not make it and
1:54:33
like when you think of yeah
1:54:35
I mean, that's just an act
1:54:37
of God. That's just like that,
1:54:39
that's God saying, no, this is,
1:54:41
this is not going to work.
1:54:43
You know, this was not incompetence,
1:54:45
which was what happened with the
1:54:48
AAF. This was not wrong marketing
1:54:50
and sleaze, which is what happened
1:54:52
to the first XFL. This was
1:54:54
not, you know, anything like that.
1:54:56
This was like a worldwide pandemic.
1:54:58
You know, because the idea was
1:55:00
the XFL would start to make
1:55:02
money in year, you know, after
1:55:04
year three, they would get a
1:55:06
TV contract that would pay them
1:55:08
hundreds of millions of dollars and,
1:55:10
you know, they'd be good. Well,
1:55:12
who knows if that's even going
1:55:14
to be the case now? Like,
1:55:16
even if they were to overcome
1:55:18
this hurdle, you know, is that
1:55:21
television money going to be there?
1:55:23
Because the economics of everything has
1:55:25
changed now are... ESPNs and Fox
1:55:27
Sports and are they going to
1:55:29
be able to shell out the
1:55:31
same amount of money or has
1:55:33
this pandemic affected them economically to
1:55:35
the point where maybe we've seen
1:55:37
the bubble burst on these contracts.
1:55:39
So you know there may not
1:55:41
have been a light at the
1:55:43
end of the tunnel that they
1:55:45
saw a year ago or two
1:55:47
years ago when they started this.
1:55:49
So I'll stop there. But yeah.
1:55:52
Anyway. Brandon I hand the football
1:55:54
back to you social media where
1:55:56
people can find you and your
1:55:58
work at the torch So you
1:56:00
can find me at B LeClaire
1:56:02
12 on Twitter. I tried to
1:56:04
be I've been a little bit
1:56:06
more active these last few weeks
1:56:08
given our state of quarantine, trying
1:56:10
to especially stay active within the
1:56:12
torch circles and whatnot. Talk a
1:56:14
lot about wrestling on there. I
1:56:16
also talk about some music, some
1:56:18
movies, those are my other two
1:56:20
major passions. And football as well,
1:56:22
although we're not in season anymore
1:56:25
right now. But we've got the
1:56:27
draft coming up, so that will
1:56:29
be something to talk about for
1:56:31
sure. And as far as my
1:56:33
work at the torch goes, you
1:56:35
can catch my alternative perspective perspective
1:56:37
write-ups. on Smackdown every Friday for
1:56:39
the torch. I cover the show
1:56:41
in tandem with Wade, separate reports.
1:56:43
We each see our own sort
1:56:45
of different things, pick up on
1:56:47
different things. I try to give
1:56:49
as much detail and analysis as
1:56:51
I can and enjoy doing it.
1:56:53
Excellent. Make sure to check out
1:56:56
Branded on Twitter and on the
1:56:58
torch he has picked up the
1:57:00
mantle of the... Smackdown Recap. He
1:57:02
has joined the Brotherhood of Smackdown
1:57:04
Recapers at the Tarches, a mantle
1:57:06
which I held for a year
1:57:08
in now. Okay, well you got
1:57:10
along, I holed it for 10
1:57:12
years, so do you think you
1:57:14
can do that? Yeah, I know.
1:57:16
I'm not committing, I'm not committing.
1:57:18
Okay, smart man, don't commit, don't
1:57:20
commit to that long, not here.
1:57:22
So, Brandon, thanks so much for
1:57:24
joining me, I really appreciate having
1:57:26
you on again. Yeah, definitely. Thanks,
1:57:29
great. Yep, thank you. So again,
1:57:31
folks, I am Greg Parks. You
1:57:33
can find me on Twitter at
1:57:35
Greg M. Parks. You can find
1:57:37
my newsletter in the torch column.
1:57:39
Torch, you can find my column
1:57:41
in the torch newsletter each and
1:57:43
every week on page 10. I
1:57:45
try to tweet as much as
1:57:47
I can wrestling as it's happening.
1:57:49
So follow me there for some
1:57:51
interactions. And follow me here. Each
1:57:53
and every Sunday night, 8 p.m.
1:57:55
Easter. Because if it's Sunday, it's
1:57:57
wrestling nightmare. A
1:58:33
PWA torch VIP membership doesn't just
1:58:35
give you ad-free access to these
1:58:37
shows and a ton of other
1:58:39
VIP exclusive podcasts throughout the week,
1:58:41
but you also gain access to
1:58:43
our unmatched vast library of wrestling
1:58:45
history. Our contemporaneous week-to-week coverage through
1:58:47
our pro-ressing torch weekly newsletters dating
1:58:50
back to the late 1980s, along
1:58:52
with streaming and download access to
1:58:54
hundreds of retro radio shows from
1:58:56
the 1990s, including some of my
1:58:58
interviews. with wrestling's top newsmakers in
1:59:00
the 90s. And also our podcast
1:59:02
library dating back to the year
1:59:04
2003. There's no larger, longer spanning
1:59:06
pro wrestling podcast library than that
1:59:08
that comes with a PWA torch
1:59:10
VIP membership. Now we're approaching 20
1:59:12
years of podcasting. Go VIP and
1:59:14
dive into our post pay-through-do roundtables.
1:59:16
Our coverage of some of your
1:59:19
favorite errors of wrestling, top name
1:59:21
long form interviews, and special format
1:59:23
podcasts. that we've done throughout the
1:59:25
years. P.W.torch.com/go VIP. We have a
1:59:27
streamlined sign-up form and you can
1:59:29
pay you with PayPal or directly
1:59:31
with your credit card or debit
1:59:33
card in one or two minutes.
1:59:35
From right now you can be
1:59:37
a VIP member and diving into
1:59:39
our library, P.W. torch.com/go VIP. Then
1:59:41
join me, Jason Powell, host of
1:59:43
the three weekly pro wrestling boom
1:59:45
podcast. Each week you'll hear the
1:59:48
latest news and analysis from me
1:59:50
and my team at pro wrestling.net
1:59:52
along with other pro wrestling media
1:59:54
members. Plus the pro wrestling boom
1:59:56
podcast features long form interviews with
1:59:58
notable names in the pro wrestling
2:00:00
industry. I'm a high-tuned stitcher, downcast,
2:00:02
and all your favorite secondary apps
2:00:04
or visit us directly at p-w-boom.com.
2:00:06
Once again, that's p-w-boom.com. Now you
2:00:08
can subscribe to our v-ip podcast
2:00:10
lineup within the Apple Podcast app
2:00:12
using your Apple account. That's new
2:00:14
as of March 2022. Just search
2:00:17
p-w-torch in your Apple podcast app
2:00:19
and you'll see the p-w-torch v-ip
2:00:21
podcast logo. There is a free
2:00:23
show every week, so subscribe, even
2:00:25
if you don't plan to go
2:00:27
VIP, and get a sample of
2:00:29
our VIP to your programming. But
2:00:31
if you click subscribe, then you'll
2:00:33
become a VIP member instantly with
2:00:35
a three-day free trial, after which
2:00:37
your Apple account will be charged.
2:00:39
So you don't need to take
2:00:41
out your credit card, debit card,
2:00:44
or go anywhere else. If you
2:00:46
listen to our free shows on
2:00:48
Apple Podcast, you are five seconds
2:00:50
away from being a VIP member.
2:00:52
with a three-day free trial. So
2:00:54
we invite you to check it
2:00:56
out. That includes dozens of VIP
2:00:58
shows throughout the week, including VIP
2:01:00
versions of the Weight Keller Provicing
2:01:02
Post Shows and Podcasts and Daily
2:01:04
Casts. All those episodes are presented
2:01:06
to VIP members with ads and
2:01:08
plugs removed, along with VIP exclusives
2:01:10
like our post-paper-view roundtables, the Weight
2:01:13
Keller Hotline, the Fix, everything with
2:01:15
Rich and Wade, and many other
2:01:17
VIP exclusive shows. Just search PW
2:01:19
Torch within the Apple Podcasts app.
2:01:21
Thanks for listening to our podcast.
2:01:23
Did you know we also have
2:01:25
a website? Pwtorch.com, daily news updates,
2:01:27
editorials, and my live TV coverage
2:01:29
covering raw dynamite and smackdown and
2:01:31
my live pay-per-view coverage for W-W-E-N-A-E-W.
2:01:33
Create a tab or bookmark, make
2:01:35
it a daily stop, visit us
2:01:37
throughout the day every day to
2:01:39
keep up on breaking news and
2:01:42
more. That's P-Wtorch.com. Need an extra
2:01:44
dose of positivity in your wrestling
2:01:46
podcast? Well, come join me. Alan
2:01:48
Forle over in the Pro Rest
2:01:50
Paradise at Peter George VIP as
2:01:52
we mask on the bright side
2:01:54
of wrestling and focus on some
2:01:56
of the great... matches and shows
2:01:58
from around the world be it
2:02:00
the US, Japan, Europe or Mexico.
2:02:02
There's always a place for Restons
2:02:04
past in the Paradise too, and
2:02:06
we've done fun historical shows such
2:02:08
as the We Love Liger series,
2:02:11
celebrating the glorious career of Jusian
2:02:13
Thunder Liger. And our I Was
2:02:15
There When shows, where our guests
2:02:17
will join me to talk about
2:02:19
a classic bout that they were
2:02:21
in attendance for. We love Variety,
2:02:23
and you can expect lots of
2:02:25
it at the Pro Rest Paradise.
2:02:27
Detailed PW torch, VIP subscription information,
2:02:29
and a list of all the
2:02:31
VIP benefits is available at PWO.
2:02:33
And yes, all VIP podcasts are
2:02:35
compatible with popular podcast apps on
2:02:37
iPhone and Android devices. Or you
2:02:40
can stream them directly from our
2:02:42
ad-free VIP mobile site. See you
2:02:44
in the Paradise. One benefit of
2:02:46
VIP membership is access to our
2:02:48
back-issue library, contemporaneous, in-depth, inside a
2:02:50
reporting on pro wrestling in real-time
2:02:52
over the past 30-plus years. And
2:02:54
throughout the year 2022, we're going
2:02:56
to begin our March through the
2:02:58
year 2002 with back issues posted
2:03:00
each week in PDF and all
2:03:02
text formats. You can read it
2:03:04
in a PDF format with our
2:03:06
original magazine slash newsletter style layout
2:03:09
on your screen and flip through
2:03:11
the pages, or you can read.
2:03:13
a straightforward all-text format on your
2:03:15
phone or tablet or laptop. The
2:03:17
back issues early in 2002 covered
2:03:19
the arrival of Scott Hall, Kevinash,
2:03:21
and Holkogan to W.W.E. and all
2:03:23
the controversy that came with them.
2:03:25
Plus my cover story that broke
2:03:27
the news on the planned launch
2:03:29
by Jerry and Jeff Jared of
2:03:31
a promotion called TNA. Also, the
2:03:33
early 2002 features are 2001 urine
2:03:35
review features, including ranking pro wrestling's
2:03:38
most influential... power brokers and our
2:03:40
torch year end awards the year
2:03:42
in quotes and the top 50
2:03:44
stories ranked in order from the
2:03:46
year 2001 so go VIP and
2:03:48
dive into our back issues we
2:03:50
have most of our back issues
2:03:52
available as soon as you sign
2:03:54
up with new back
2:03:56
issues week week from
2:03:58
the year the year
2:04:00
2002, at a
2:04:02
time time the year
2:04:04
the year 2022. P.W. pwtorch
2:04:07
.com go VIP. That's P.W. .com
2:04:09
slash govip. That's
2:04:12
P.W. torch.com/go VIP for full for
2:04:14
full information sign-up our more than It's
2:04:16
more than an It's an unmatched
2:04:18
library of wrestling history spending
2:04:21
more than three decades as soon
2:04:23
as you sign up with more
2:04:25
issues added throughout the year. year.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More