Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This episode of recording studio rock
0:02
stars is brought to you by
0:04
isotope native instruments. Roswell Pro audio
0:06
and Adam audio. You're hearing my
0:09
voice right now through the beautiful
0:11
Roswell Pro audio Aztec tube microphone
0:13
mixed through isotope, ozone, Rx, and
0:16
neutron all on Adam audio monitors
0:18
and headphones. Please check out our
0:20
awesome sponsors using the links in
0:23
the show notes. Also, please remember
0:25
to like and subscribe to our
0:27
YouTube channel because it's a great
0:30
way for you to help support this
0:32
show. Now get ready to rock. The
0:34
biggest thing I want to say is...
0:36
a vinyl record is literally an analog
0:38
hard drive. It's just encoded information, like
0:40
the grooves are information that gets encoded
0:42
in, and then you have to have
0:44
a playback system to play that back
0:46
out. So I call it the caveman
0:48
hard drive. Instead of spinning at, you
0:50
know, like, what is it, 7,000 and.
0:52
you know, our PM, it spins at
0:54
33 and a third RPM, yeah, or
0:56
45. If you just have a disk
0:58
alone without the Encode system and the
1:00
playback system, they're useless. Like, you have
1:03
to have a way to encode it
1:05
and decode it, just like we do
1:07
with computers. It's the same idea, right? Welcome
1:19
to Recording Studio Rockstars. I'm
1:21
Liz Shaw and this is
1:23
the podcast created to help
1:26
you become a rock star
1:28
of the recording studio. At
1:34
isotope, tone shaping is topping
1:36
the charts. Meet the catalyst
1:39
series. Plasma, Aurora, and Cascadia.
1:41
Plasmus Flux Saturation Technology brings
1:44
dynamic warmth and depth tier
1:46
mix. Aurora takes spatial audio
1:49
to new heights with lush
1:51
adaptive reverb, while Cascadia adds
1:54
exciting delays to your mix.
1:56
Retaining clarity through its smart
1:59
unmasking feature. 10% off Plasma,
2:01
Aurora, Cascadia, or any of the isotope
2:03
plugins with the special code Rock10 and
2:05
make your mixes rock at isotope.com. Howdy
2:08
Rockstars! It's your host, Lid Sean. Welcome
2:10
to Recording Studio Rockstars bringing you into
2:12
the studio to learn from recording professionals
2:15
so that you can make your best
2:17
record ever and be a rock star
2:19
of the studio yourself. My guest today
2:21
here at Podzila Studios, actually for... Our
2:24
first ever video interview right here at
2:26
Podsilla is Duncan Ferguson, a mastering engineer
2:28
based in East Nashville with a true
2:31
passion for critical listening and collecting all
2:33
kinds of recordings. Duncan got into mastering
2:35
naturally and has earned the nickname the
2:37
music librarian from his close friends. Over
2:40
the years, he honed his skills to
2:42
bring music to life across all listening
2:44
applications. Duncan's Mastering Studio, the voltage exchange,
2:47
which is right around the corner from
2:49
here, is all about solving problems for
2:51
clients. After seeing the shifts in the
2:53
music industry over the past decade, he's
2:56
focused on offering solutions for artists, producers,
2:58
and mixing engineers while making the process
3:00
as seamless as possible. Duncan believes in
3:03
collaboration and transparent relationships. Fascinating. He loves
3:05
having clients present during sessions and sharing
3:07
his techniques, equipment, and choices to ensure
3:09
their true vision shines through. It all
3:12
sounds very like all-encompassing, but I totally
3:14
get it in the whole process of
3:16
working and making records. As someone who
3:19
also collects vinyl, Duncan offers a full-service
3:21
in-house vinyl mastering and disc cutting. with
3:23
the new Aceletow Lave. We'll have to
3:25
find out what that's all about. Duncan's
3:28
Mastering Studio, as I said, is right
3:30
nearby here in East Nashville. I met
3:32
Duncan, I think the first time around
3:35
was. an event that was happening there.
3:37
And then we got to spend an
3:39
amazing weekend with a group of rock
3:41
stars here, hanging out at the Toy
3:44
Box Studio with Colin Dupuy for an
3:46
awesome mixing weekend, which was a lot
3:48
of fun too. It was so much
3:51
fun. So please welcome Duncan Ferguson recording
3:53
studio rock stars. Duncan, are you ready
3:55
to rock, dude? Oh man, I was
3:58
born ready. It's awesome to have you
4:00
here, man. Again, this is this is
4:02
our first test run here in the
4:04
studio. You look great. I'm looking. I'm
4:07
checking us out on the video Make
4:09
sure we look right on the on
4:11
the playback and it seems to be
4:14
all role and rock stars drop a
4:16
comment in and let us know what
4:18
you think of the look of the
4:20
whole new studio How have you been,
4:23
dude? I think you just got off
4:25
like a power weekend. I mean, this
4:27
will show up later, so we don't
4:30
have to get too granular on the
4:32
date or something, but. We just finished
4:34
the, well, I just came off of
4:36
the Welcome to 1979 recording summit, and
4:39
that was my seventh year going, and
4:41
they, you know, Chris Mara and Yolemara,
4:43
at Welcome to 1979, put on this
4:46
awesome weekend, full of just industry professionals
4:48
and other. networking opportunities. You've been to
4:50
a few, I think, right? Yeah, I've
4:52
been to a few. I've been on
4:55
some panels there too, and I've just
4:57
gone and watched it. There's something. So
4:59
it's an event rock stars that takes
5:02
place at Welcome to 1979 Studio here
5:04
in Nashville, and they will annually in
5:06
the month of November host a weekend
5:08
with a group of panelists in different
5:11
rooms. They can set up. I guess
5:13
there's two big rooms, plus there's a
5:15
mastering room, so there might be a
5:18
few different little panels or clinics going
5:20
on, but it'll be up to 60
5:22
people. I think they limited it at
5:24
60. Yeah, yeah, you can sign up
5:27
over the year and it's a weekend.
5:29
Yeah, you can sign up over the
5:31
year and it's a weekend just full
5:34
of awesome things. They do a live
5:36
to disc recording on Friday night and
5:38
then there's like, there's some panels over
5:41
the course of each day that each
5:43
day that you can. trying to forget
5:45
what to do next. Yeah. And then
5:47
they do like a listening party on
5:50
Saturday nights where they pick a record,
5:52
you listen to the record, and then
5:54
somebody who worked on the record extensively
5:57
talks about their time, you know, working
5:59
on the record and tells how they
6:01
made it. Yeah, it's pretty. Yeah, that's
6:03
a fun part. So yeah, that's the
6:06
Saturday night one. Yeah. It's like you,
6:08
it's more of a. Listening party listen
6:10
to the record, but then the producer
6:13
or the engineer just tells the whole
6:15
story of what it was like to
6:17
make that record Yeah, which I'll be
6:19
honest. That's something I always thought would
6:22
be really fun to do for the
6:24
podcast here But I was terrified of
6:26
the copyright stuff where I'm like I
6:29
don't even want to mess with it
6:31
to like You know have a team
6:33
of lawyers to clear the rights on
6:35
something they because it's published you know
6:38
because this is published they go Chris
6:40
goes out of his way just you
6:42
know to say like I think his
6:45
saying is don't tweet the deets, you
6:47
know, like it's it's like you're paying
6:49
to be there and have the experience
6:51
and it stays, the experience stays there
6:54
and it allows that person to be
6:56
able to talk about things transparently, not
6:58
in, you know, not in any weird
7:01
way, but like they are able to
7:03
talk about the experience and how they
7:05
had to like problem solve to make
7:07
the record. Yeah, totally. And they can
7:10
do that openly without being worried about
7:12
somebody posting it on social media. or
7:14
anything like that. And it's really, for
7:17
us, industry professionals, you know, it's like
7:19
really, you know, we have, either you're
7:21
assimilating to something, this experience that you've
7:24
had similar, and they're talking about like
7:26
large record, like very large records, you
7:28
know, or you're like, you learn something
7:30
that you can bring home and use
7:33
to try and get somebody's record across
7:35
the finish line, you know? Yeah, yeah,
7:37
and similar to this podcast. I started
7:40
it because I always loved all the
7:42
stories you would hear in the control
7:44
room hanging out with people. And of
7:46
course when you're working with people and
7:49
you're making records together, it can be
7:51
a pretty intimate experience, which means that
7:53
people really open up and you really
7:56
start telling some stories and you hear
7:58
some great behind the scenes stories. And
8:00
you're absolutely right for like a video
8:02
podcast for a live one. It's like
8:05
you can only get so deep, you
8:07
know, at least until everybody's dead. Yeah,
8:09
when I was revealed. When I do
8:12
a tennis such a suit, I tell
8:14
the artist a big thing about my
8:16
whole thing is I say, like, think
8:18
of me like, this is like, thinking
8:21
of me like a lawyer. My dad's
8:23
was an attorney and you like, when
8:25
you're in my mastering space, the record's
8:28
not out yet. So. and everything that's
8:30
here is it's like you kind of
8:32
have lawyer that confidentiality like the lawyer
8:34
yeah like that I'm blanking on the
8:37
term but oh yeah attorney client privilege
8:39
yes you have like mastering client privilege
8:41
yeah mastering client yeah master like studio
8:44
client privilege as like the record's not
8:46
out yet everything we say and doing
8:48
here you know you this is a
8:50
safe place like like like I you
8:53
may see me you know like shift
8:55
something or do something or you know
8:57
like But it, you know, like, you
9:00
are the boss and, you know, like,
9:02
you can say anything you want. Like,
9:04
I say, like, you know, was there
9:07
anything, I always ask attended people who
9:09
come in for attendance, I was just
9:11
like, is there anything in this process
9:13
that you were, that really, like, bugged
9:16
you, you know, like, and you were
9:18
having fighting the whole way? Or was
9:20
there anything in this process that was
9:23
just super easy? state to get it
9:25
into the format and it's actually really
9:27
those sort of questions are really helpful
9:29
but sometimes people are afraid to like
9:32
you know like these are the politics
9:34
of some things or whatever they're not
9:36
afraid to talk about it so I
9:39
just always say hey this is a
9:41
this is a safe place you know
9:43
and I Chris really goes I think
9:45
with in you know tying that all
9:48
back and Chris really goes out of
9:50
his way to like You know try
9:52
to have the summit feel that way
9:55
as well. This right now is not
9:57
a city. I'm just totally like I'm
9:59
just trying to like trip us up
10:01
the whole time. Yeah, it's no just
10:04
kidding. Yeah, but the but but I
10:06
agree with that and I know that
10:08
the Process that you're describing of making
10:11
a record with people like your website
10:13
your language you're really do focus on
10:15
that kind of communication, you use the
10:17
term safe space. Just this concept of
10:20
when you make music, there's like a,
10:22
well, great music at least, I believe,
10:24
and hopefully great music for any one
10:27
of us who are making music is
10:29
a process of being comfortable enough to
10:31
be vulnerable and like open yourself up
10:33
because I think we we can create
10:36
and communicate better emotional creativity, we have
10:38
better ideas when we can just really
10:40
let ourselves through. And because of that,
10:43
right, would you say that there's a
10:45
tendency for people to be protective? Yeah,
10:47
they're a bit guarded about like how
10:50
they get perceived by the outside world,
10:52
I think, and we as, you know,
10:54
like people who are helping them create
10:56
their vision have to be. you know,
10:59
like, hope, you have to be mindful
11:01
of that, but then also help them
11:03
communicate it to at the same time.
11:06
So. And one of the things that
11:08
is interesting to me too is this
11:10
idea that there are all kinds of
11:12
music creators out there. There's all kinds
11:15
of artists and bands and there's different
11:17
styles and you know, you can have
11:19
on the one hand, you could have
11:22
an artist that comes in as like,
11:24
I don't care what people think on
11:26
this on the other thing. And that's
11:28
totally appropriate for the music. It can
11:31
be like bombastic and loud and like
11:33
irreverent and impervious to criticism. But then
11:35
on the other hand, you can have
11:38
a style of music and an artist
11:40
that is totally has a fragility to
11:42
it. Yeah. that it could just like
11:44
come apart really easily if it's if
11:47
it's done the wrong way. I think
11:49
everybody's got to have a pretty tough
11:51
skin to get out there in public
11:54
and perform. Sure. That's a different topic
11:56
too. The record-making process is about is
11:58
when you say that there's a difference
12:00
in that respect. Like when you're in
12:03
the studio, you need to be
12:05
able to make the mistake and it's
12:07
okay. I think with sort of like,
12:09
I've spent a lot of time sort
12:11
of writing in about like how
12:14
the studio has really become an
12:16
instrument on its own. And I
12:18
think writing about it like blog
12:20
writing. It was kind of my
12:22
thesis in my undergraduate. I did
12:25
like a. a long paper like a hundred
12:27
page like sort of it was part
12:29
of my as part of That was
12:31
a long time ago. I have to
12:33
like remember what you but I wrote
12:35
a thing about how the The recording
12:38
studio sort of became its own
12:40
instrument like the recording studio
12:42
as a as a as
12:44
an actual production like a tool
12:46
for creation. Yeah, you know, and I
12:49
wrote it I used examples from
12:51
1980 to 1995 and stuck
12:53
to those specific years of
12:55
like the modern recording
12:58
studio coming into existence
13:00
as known as the
13:02
modern recording studio.
13:04
Yeah. But I think the tools
13:06
that we have nowadays have
13:09
allowed us to create this. We
13:11
can go beyond reality, you
13:13
know, in performance. So
13:15
like we can we can express
13:18
things. Which is what's so exciting
13:20
we can express things that are,
13:22
you can't necessarily express on stage.
13:24
Just, you know what I mean?
13:26
Like we have all these tools to
13:28
now like expand, like a virtual reality,
13:31
even just with stereo, you know. And
13:33
it's been that way for, you know,
13:35
like, we've been pushing the envelope
13:37
for, you know, 40 years doing that. But,
13:39
but that sort of thing is
13:41
people can be expressed themselves in different
13:44
ways that they can express. you
13:46
know, like just with one single
13:48
performance. Yeah, and you can discover.
13:51
Yeah, discovery. Yeah, I mean, you
13:53
can discover on stage too, but yeah.
13:55
Well, so, so rewinding a little bit,
13:57
that process of talking about year.
14:00
importance of communication and stuff like that
14:02
in your mastering studio and process. Yeah,
14:04
seems very related to, you know, potentially
14:06
certain styles of music that you might
14:09
work with or certain types of artists
14:11
that you work with. Do you think
14:13
that's, that's, also I wanted to point
14:15
something out so you can't quite see
14:18
it on the video, but now that
14:20
we're on video we can show stuff
14:22
on like, check out my nice mug,
14:25
you know, but, um... Duncan when he
14:27
was here for the the mixing mastermind
14:29
weekend that we do with Colin Dupuis
14:31
at the toy box. Yeah, he brought
14:34
what he's holding right now, which is
14:36
this great. I think he brought that
14:38
right? Yeah. It's this great. Like what
14:40
is it? It looks like a piece
14:43
of paper, but it's really like a
14:45
tablet. It's man. It's changed my life
14:47
completely. It's the remarkable pro pad. Yeah.
14:50
Hold it up to the camera. And
14:52
then you can write. It's literally just
14:54
it's the same I think I just
14:56
made you hold your personal notes up.
14:59
No you're fine. I don't have that
15:01
totally The it's the same I think
15:03
it's the same don't quote me on
15:06
this I think it's the same technology
15:08
as a Kindle but it's got a
15:10
writeable. Oh yeah digital ink. Yeah. And
15:12
it's like an etch a sketch sort
15:15
of a really complicated etch a sketch
15:17
technology. So it's got like a feel
15:19
to it when you run. Yeah. So
15:21
it looks like it's kind of feels
15:24
like paper. The black thing's sort of
15:26
a pencil. Yeah. Yeah. So you just
15:28
write on it and it feels almost
15:31
like paper. I think it's a little
15:33
more slippery. But it's if you ever
15:35
try to write with an iPad pencil,
15:37
that's really slippery because the screen's so
15:40
smooth. And but this I can actually
15:42
capture my handwriting pretty accurately. What if
15:44
what if you're like me in your
15:47
handwriting kind of sucks? Is that still
15:49
a good thing? No, I think you
15:51
could you could work on it. I
15:53
could do the cursive I still I
15:56
mean I went through this thing in
15:58
high school where I my handwriting got
16:00
so atrocious that I got in my
16:02
OCD sort of kicked in and like
16:05
I gotta fix this. Did you go
16:07
back to your first grade? No books.
16:09
I was like. like practice. I like,
16:12
I like made my handwriting actually like
16:14
will look really nice just because it
16:16
was bothering me. So, well, I kind
16:18
of stuck to that. So, so I
16:21
have an iPad in the studio with
16:23
the Apple pencil and it's not the
16:25
latest one. You know, probably generation ago
16:28
or whatever. But I was doing an
16:30
audio book recently and it was. Totally
16:32
great for that. I had to follow
16:34
along on a manuscript the whole time,
16:37
and then take these real-time notes during
16:39
the entire reading for every time there
16:41
was a stop and this do-over and
16:43
all this, you know, take numbers and
16:46
all that. And it was really handy
16:48
for that, but also occasionally, I'm like,
16:50
ah, it's not working, you know, it's
16:53
like the Wi-Fi will stop or whatever
16:55
Bluetooth thing that it's using. And so,
16:57
you know, like... I'm all about the
16:59
pencil and the podcast just because I'm
17:02
like, it almost never fails. That never,
17:04
yeah, they don't, it's kind of a
17:06
solid redundancy, it just doesn't break, right?
17:08
Right, right. Does that one actually, is
17:11
it pretty reliable? It's been fairly reliable.
17:13
There's been a few little things to
17:15
sort of overcome, but I haven't had,
17:18
like I spent the whole, I used
17:20
it for my notes this weekend, you
17:22
know, like in it, it, and it,
17:24
it, and it, I'm on three. it's
17:27
got those little five, I haven't charged
17:29
it yet, and I'm still like half,
17:31
I've got a half a battery left,
17:34
so it's pretty awesome. What it's really
17:36
changed my life for is I really
17:38
struggled personally, and this is maybe a
17:40
personal thing, maybe other people don't struggle
17:43
with this, but using a digital calendar.
17:45
This is a safe space. Okay. I
17:47
struggle using a digital calendar, and when
17:49
I put things in the calendar, my
17:52
brain doesn't want to go back and
17:54
look at it. There's some sort of
17:56
disconnect. But when I write it down,
17:59
I can remember, you know, and then
18:01
I have to go back and look
18:03
and it's just like it causes me
18:05
to like be on top of that
18:08
sort of this sort of physical interaction
18:10
causes me to be on top of
18:12
it. So I used to in a
18:15
really nerdy way, I used to just
18:17
carry. three ring binders around with day
18:19
pages. I used to do the day
18:21
planner that was back in the day
18:24
before we had the phone version of
18:26
everything. And anyway, yeah, so my doodles
18:28
were much better when I had a
18:30
day planner. I have no doodles in
18:33
my iPhone. Totally. I got no doodles.
18:35
And so now I just, I upload
18:37
a, you can upload PDFs to this
18:40
and then I just write over it.
18:42
So this is like my day, I
18:44
have like my, my, uh, my studio
18:46
logo. That looks cool. That looks cool.
18:49
So by the way, if you want
18:51
your camera to focus on it, you
18:53
have to cover your eyes. Okay. It's
18:55
very, very nerdy. There you go. Yeah.
18:58
So I have like my studio logo
19:00
and then I have a day to-do
19:02
list where I write in and then
19:05
I have like my week outlook. And
19:07
I just write in what I want.
19:09
Right. Just after I told you it's
19:11
a safe space. I'm like, cover your
19:14
face. Yeah. I think the Rock Stars
19:16
will appreciate the challenge of organization note-taking
19:18
calendars and stuff like that. What do
19:21
you want to say about operating your
19:23
studio? So your studio is, you know,
19:25
I know we're just like jumping right
19:27
into stuff. Not about the video podcast.
19:30
Makes me want to just get right
19:32
to it. Yeah. But like the voltage
19:34
exchange is your mastering studio. Yes. Beautiful,
19:36
beautiful place. Lots to talk about that.
19:39
But organizing and scheduling and knowing what's
19:41
what and as you said communication is
19:43
an important part. So what are some
19:46
tools or tips for you that you
19:48
use that help you manage? Let's just
19:50
say the calendar to start. Sure. Actually,
19:52
this is kind of like my central
19:55
hub. You know, like I get up,
19:57
it's actually more of, it's not so
19:59
much any, there are, there are a
20:02
million tools out there, right? Like we
20:04
live in the age of, you know,
20:06
being. blasted with like you like productivity
20:08
like slogans yeah yeah yeah yeah but
20:11
just getting up in the morning and
20:13
then writing out my day before I
20:15
start you know like I'm an early
20:17
riser and and I actually go into
20:20
my studio really early while my ears
20:22
are fresh and just knock out the
20:24
audio stuff and then I do my
20:27
admin in the afternoon. That's a fascinating
20:29
idea. You know, back when I built
20:31
my studio and I had analog tape
20:33
machines, I had this mixing console that
20:36
did Hotel California that was designed by
20:38
G. Parnad. And when I acquired that,
20:40
his widow, Carla Harnad, said, messaged me
20:43
and said, oh, by the way. I
20:45
have Jeep's personal two-track machine and you
20:47
know, that comes with the deal. So
20:49
if you want to come get it,
20:52
you can come pick it up. So
20:54
I did a four-day drive out to
20:56
Colorado, Durango Colorado from Nashville with a
20:58
minivan and picked it up and picked
21:01
it up and picked it up and
21:03
drive home the next day. And I
21:05
got to see Jeep's grave. was right
21:08
there at the house with the gravestone
21:10
that is made from an MCI 24
21:12
track. Oh my gosh. Like actually sent
21:14
there. What an amazing piece of history
21:17
to have that all. I'm a history
21:19
nerd. So I love that stuff. I
21:21
absolutely love that stuff. Well, so so
21:23
Carla was just incredibly organized. I couldn't
21:26
believe it. Like it immediately struck me
21:28
when I was in the house. Just
21:30
even walking through the garage. I was
21:33
like, wow. Every wall is like high
21:35
wire shelves with clear storage bins on
21:37
them that are all labeled. I'm like,
21:39
this is like, I'm getting excited. I
21:42
have a little tech shop in the
21:44
garage and my tech shop is exactly
21:46
that I have to be that way
21:49
because I have all these like little.
21:51
you know especially with getting the lathe
21:53
now I have to do my own
21:55
servicing you know so it's like all
21:58
the all the you know soldering iron
22:00
like all that stuff so yeah yeah
22:02
yeah yeah and I think I maybe
22:04
I saw that over your place to
22:07
is a cool spot native instruments introduces
22:09
the new complete fifth steam bundle featuring
22:11
contact eight offering versatile scents, sampled instruments
22:14
and innovative effects. Perfect for creating everything
22:16
from emotional scores to dance floor grooves.
22:18
Contact 8 includes exciting new creative tools
22:20
like chords and phrases for inspiration, the
22:23
leap tool for dynamic looping, and conflicts,
22:25
a hybrid instrument blending organic and synth
22:27
sounds. The Complete 15 bundle also includes
22:30
updated Massive X and Guitar Rig 7
22:32
Pro, and AI enhanced isotope Ozone Ozone
22:34
11. Use the code Rock 10. for
22:36
10% off at Native Instruments.com. And I
22:39
desperately need that because I have just
22:41
so much stuff. You know, I have
22:43
collectitis. But I wanted to finish this
22:46
thought too. So with Carla, in the
22:48
morning when I met her for, you
22:50
know, coffee, orange, she's breakfast or whatever,
22:53
I noticed like the table was set
22:55
out and then she had this little list
22:57
of paper right next to her breakfast thing.
22:59
Yes. And it just had a list of
23:01
stuff she was going to do that day.
23:03
And I was like. Wow, that's cool.
23:05
That's like, you know exactly what
23:08
you're going to be doing up
23:10
early and it's like, there's my
23:12
day. Yeah, that's, that's literally has
23:14
the only, like it's not anything special,
23:16
not any, I mean, other than this,
23:18
you know, like, using a piece of
23:20
technology to do it, but
23:23
that's the, that's the key is, is just
23:25
having, I'm really nerdy, I'm a space
23:27
nerd. Oh, like, like, yeah, just like,
23:29
like, I love the history of like.
23:31
Yeah, the NASA and all that. But
23:33
we're so close to Huntsville, Alabama. Yeah,
23:35
with the museum and all the I
23:37
call that this little template my
23:40
flight plan for the morning, you know,
23:42
for the day. So that's that's my
23:44
flight plan. And so I make a
23:46
flight plan almost exactly like you would
23:48
make a flight plan as a pilot.
23:51
Uh, uh, and I it's labeled flight plan,
23:53
you know, and it just makes me feel
23:55
a little more like, oh, I'm doing
23:57
something important, you know, you know, you
23:59
know, How do you balance the flight
24:01
plan you need to have today? You
24:04
need to know it today about next
24:06
Tuesday versus waking up Tuesday morning and
24:08
making your flight plan. Correct. So like
24:10
I, you know, I have a today
24:12
to do list of like in the
24:15
morning, I kind of prioritize like this
24:17
has to be done today. And then
24:19
if it doesn't, I have like a
24:21
week outlook and like, oh, maybe I
24:23
can move that to tomorrow or I
24:25
have these appointments. So I can kind
24:27
of like look at the week outlook. And
24:29
then kind of like the cool thing
24:31
about this technology is I can it
24:34
doesn't get lost on a piece of
24:36
paper or and then I can like
24:38
copy paste yesterday over to today if
24:40
I don't like that's like been the game
24:42
changers I don't have to like
24:44
rewrite everything and it so And even if
24:46
you lost that whole thing like let's
24:48
say you just left it here at
24:51
the studio back and I was like
24:53
no I didn't see anything it could
24:55
get another one and then you just
24:57
log in there's an iPhone app that
25:00
like everything sinks to the apps and
25:02
then it's like then there's a desktop
25:04
app and what was the most amazing
25:06
thing is I was online teaching which
25:08
we'll probably talk about in a bit
25:11
but I drew something like a
25:13
diagram of trying to explain like
25:15
some room acoustic stuff and I
25:17
drew it on this pad and it synced
25:20
in like a few seconds and then
25:22
I went on the desktop app and
25:24
I'm on zoom and I grabbed I
25:26
grabbed the drawing. and just export it
25:28
as a PDF off of the app and
25:30
then just opened it up on zoom and
25:32
like I did it in like 30 seconds
25:34
that's pretty good after drawing and
25:37
it was like it was like well and
25:39
I did it like untested like I think
25:41
I can do this and I just did
25:43
it and I was like oh my gosh
25:45
like it was yeah so I'm gonna beat
25:47
that watch this yeah I just drew a
25:49
smiley face yeah it's already up yeah it's
25:52
like that the analog you couldn't probably can
25:54
you know yeah yeah yeah No, that's that's
25:56
really cool. And I and I do
25:58
love that now. What about um What about
26:00
your calendar? What are the tools that
26:02
you find are really useful as far
26:05
as something in your calendar? I do
26:07
have a Google calendar that so on
26:09
my website I have like you can
26:11
you can book a session and I
26:13
have like four different calendars
26:15
on there that you can choose from and
26:17
then they're all sort of like funneled. down
26:19
and that goes into my Google calendar and
26:21
that's just like I look at the big
26:24
things there and then I just transfer that
26:26
over to I have like a monthly calendar
26:28
on this with my flight plan and then
26:30
I just have a day sheet that then has a
26:32
as a day outlook and a week outlook and I
26:34
just sort of like sort of start with that
26:36
big thing and funnel it down. So the
26:38
calendar stuff goes on the calendar as far
26:40
as sessions yeah and then the then what you
26:43
write down is more the the granular
26:45
level of what you know what does
26:47
that mean for today kind of it's
26:49
it's not like revolutionary I don't think
26:51
but it's it's a way that I can
26:53
kind of like step by step keep
26:55
it organized I gotta be honest
26:57
I don't think revolutions are not
26:59
what we want with yeah I
27:01
mean I know that sounds counterintuitive
27:03
but when I say that what I'm referring
27:05
to is this idea of like When I
27:07
go to use reliable tools for things
27:10
like an email or a calendar, I
27:12
kind of don't want the newest
27:14
latest thing because I don't know if
27:16
it's going to be there next year.
27:18
That is an amazing point. And that
27:21
actually is what I've struggled with too
27:23
of like with a paper and pen,
27:25
you know, it's like, well, that's just
27:27
always going to be there. But
27:29
like, yeah, I've really struggled with
27:31
like, I think my wife and I,
27:34
we had like a. an app that
27:36
reminds us to do certain things around
27:38
the house and the app doesn't exist
27:40
anymore. Right, I've dealt with that too.
27:43
Yeah, so like, yeah, some kind of
27:45
special list app. Yeah, it's almost like,
27:47
I mean, sometimes I'm like, whichever one
27:50
is doing the most promotion, I'm like,
27:52
I don't know if they're going to
27:54
be there. Yeah, that's probably not fair.
27:56
But the, but I've messed with all
27:59
that stuff. And You know, I find, so
28:01
I use an app for calendar
28:03
stuff called Fantastic Cal. Fantastic Cal,
28:05
okay. And it is pretty flexible.
28:08
I think it's a company called
28:10
Flex Bits. But it's, it's
28:12
pretty flexible and it works.
28:14
It works pretty flexible
28:17
and it works. It works pretty
28:19
great, but what it, and it'll collect
28:21
calendars from different things. And the
28:23
reason I got it and started
28:26
using it a while ago on
28:28
my iPhone was because. You can
28:30
just verbally say into the thing,
28:32
you know, like 5 a.m. Monday, do this
28:34
thing, whatever. And it kind of, you see
28:36
all the things like go down into the
28:38
different zones, so automatically like populates
28:40
it, because I would find that
28:43
when I tried to use the
28:45
built-in one on my phone, it
28:47
wasn't fast enough. I just need
28:49
like, because I'm in the car.
28:51
Like somebody just called and they're
28:53
like, yeah, let's do it next
28:55
Tuesday at seven. You're like, you
28:57
know. It's a goner and I'm going
28:59
to blow that whole thing. I
29:01
mean, the writing down is like,
29:03
if I don't write it down
29:05
the second, it's gone. And I
29:07
can do, I can write down
29:09
fast and I can like type,
29:11
you know, or find the
29:14
app or all that, you
29:16
know, it's like, it's just
29:18
there. Yeah. I'm really interested.
29:20
The voice thing is really,
29:22
really interesting because I'm really
29:24
getting intrigued by the voice.
29:26
the mobile app has the voice thing
29:28
now with right yeah you can
29:30
just have a conversation back and
29:32
forth I know I spent more
29:35
time trying to explain that it
29:37
shouldn't keep being so long-winded and
29:39
replying to me I was like
29:42
you're telling it to be sure
29:44
I'm just like you gotta you gotta
29:46
shut up dude I can't I can't
29:48
I can't think about what you just gave
29:51
me as an answer because you're still talking.
29:53
The scary thing is that they tell you
29:55
to talk to it like a real person.
29:57
Yeah. And so it's like, it's, it's, it's.
30:00
little like eerie to be like I know
30:02
I'm not talking to a person but I
30:04
can talk to it like a person and
30:06
it's like it's yeah so I think
30:08
it's fascinating it's fun so
30:10
the chatchee PT topic not a brand
30:13
new one by the time this video
30:15
comes out however my use of it
30:17
is kind of more brand new for
30:19
me I find it incredibly
30:21
helpful in in assisting me on the
30:24
stuff that I don't think I'm all
30:26
that great at. You may or may
30:28
not notice that I've got reading glasses
30:30
here. Yeah. So it's actually a challenge
30:32
for me to write and read without
30:35
it being kind of exhausting and
30:37
easy for me to make mistakes. Yes.
30:39
And so I've started doing things like
30:41
I'll write an email or I'll try
30:43
the voice to text and then I'll
30:45
copy that put it in chat cheapity and
30:47
say like, you know, I don't even have
30:49
to ask anymore. I'm just like just pace
30:51
it and just like, oh yeah, you want
30:53
me to clean it up again. That
30:55
it just makes it look better.
30:58
Yeah, for some reason like I'm
31:00
moving so fast that my
31:02
spelling is just her absolutely
31:04
horrendous. So that's like
31:06
for 101 like email, you know,
31:09
like don't change the email just,
31:11
you know, all that sort of,
31:13
you know, like just clean this
31:15
up. Yeah, you know, all right.
31:17
Well, this is being as this
31:19
is not strictly a like how
31:21
to be productive in your home
31:24
business office. Sure. Like good takeaways. I
31:26
like that writing down the list at
31:28
the beginning of the day thing. That's
31:30
a cool idea. It just clarifies the
31:33
day and you remember it. Yeah, so
31:35
let's let's jump over to the voltage
31:37
exchange. Sure. When we go to the
31:39
website, we've actually got it up here on
31:42
the, I'll try, you know it, at the
31:44
risk of blowing it on the video. I'll
31:46
try the screen share. Let's do it. I'm
31:48
with you. And hopefully I don't share the
31:50
wrong one. So, so. Not that one
31:52
not that one not that
31:54
one not that one Anyway,
31:57
I'll start describing your website
31:59
while I'm figuring out where to
32:01
find it. Is that home new? Maybe that's
32:03
it. Yeah, that looks like that's
32:05
it. Okay, great. So Rockstar is hopefully
32:07
you can see. This is like
32:10
what his website looks like right
32:12
here for the voltage exchange.
32:14
Gorgeous looking. Really nice. You
32:16
got a great photo, you organize stuff.
32:18
It kind of. I have to get new
32:20
photos. Those are starting to get keeping
32:22
up with your own like over the
32:25
years. Oh yeah. Especially when you look
32:27
like me and you've got these crazy
32:29
beards. long hair and stuff
32:31
and then you shave it all off and
32:33
people are like, wait, is that the same
32:35
guy? But like here you've got a couple
32:37
of buttons on your website immediately, says book
32:40
a session, send a message, and
32:42
a rock stars for a listening
32:44
on the podcast. I'll explain everything
32:46
we're looking at too. But talk a
32:48
little bit about, you know, your
32:50
thoughts on creating a website, what
32:52
did you learn about how the
32:54
rock stars could do that themselves
32:56
for their studio and then... your
32:58
intention with the process because I
33:01
see there's this big button at
33:03
the top. The website is really
33:05
just like my my whole experience
33:07
is I'm sort of transitioning from
33:09
being word-to-mouth into being searchable and all
33:11
you know like if you don't know me
33:13
you can still book me and find me
33:16
I'm sort of in that crazy transition of
33:18
I've always been word-to-mouth and
33:20
then now I'm transitioning hard
33:22
over you don't like you're trying
33:25
to you're trying to level up
33:27
yeah and what I've found is
33:29
just having the the website is
33:31
really just a quick business card
33:33
and you want to create on the
33:35
front page immediately just create
33:38
something where people can just access
33:40
you you have just a bit
33:42
of information but then like and
33:44
the way that I have branded
33:46
the company my business not company
33:49
but myself is you know, like I
33:51
want you to have transparent access in
33:53
some way shape or form professionally, you
33:55
know, so like just having stuff immediately
33:57
available where you can, you feel comfortable.
34:00
I can dive right in and do X, Y,
34:02
and Z is really, really important, not
34:04
having to like dig through things at all.
34:06
So, yeah. So to reiterate that, it might
34:08
be common for people to have
34:10
an experience where they're like masterings, a
34:12
little bit of a mystery. Yes. I'm
34:15
not sure what it is, but I know
34:17
that I need it. I feel like that's
34:19
a topic you would hear. And so maybe
34:21
your attitude is when you come to my
34:23
website. I want to take the mystery out
34:26
of it instead of leaving you feeling like
34:28
it's like... You should help me. You should
34:30
help me curate the website. That's
34:32
perfect. Very cool. Then the button
34:35
book a session. What would happen
34:37
next for somebody? If you
34:39
click on that it brings you
34:42
to four calendars and I offer
34:44
it for slightly different services and
34:46
with each one of those calendars
34:48
is a slightly different form that
34:51
you can fill out. One of the
34:53
calendars is just for digital
34:55
mastering. And then the few, for a
34:57
single, you know, like if you're doing
34:59
just a single song, and there's a
35:02
form for that that just is curated
35:04
to just doing one song. And
35:06
then there's a calendar that's there
35:08
with a slightly different form for
35:10
doing whole albums or longer EPs.
35:13
And there's a slightly different form
35:15
where it has intake, you know, different
35:17
songs. And if you have IS or
35:19
C codes, those sort of other, other,
35:21
parameters that are catered to
35:23
more longer format albums or
35:25
more groupings of songs. And
35:28
then there are, there's one
35:30
calendar for vinyl mastering that
35:32
encompasses the complexity
35:34
of the details that we need to
35:36
get your, get a product on the
35:38
lacquer. So to say that back, yeah,
35:40
you've got some people that just
35:42
need a digital master for a
35:45
single song for a single song.
35:47
Some people have a whole record.
35:49
Some people have a whole record.
35:51
Some people want to make a vinyl
35:53
record. Yeah. And what was the other
35:56
one? The fourth one is I'm actually
35:58
considering it whereas everything's always. experiment. The
36:00
fourth one is actually creating a
36:02
reference lacquer to as well. And
36:04
I'm actually considering getting rid of
36:06
that calendar because I can encompass
36:08
it in the other other calendars,
36:10
you know. What would be the
36:12
reason for them to have different
36:14
calendars? And if it just gets
36:16
to forget if the questions are
36:18
getting too into the weights, we
36:20
don't need to go there. But
36:22
it's actually to help me organize
36:25
each calendar has a slightly different
36:27
form that you can click into
36:29
and they all like for vinyl
36:31
information for vinyl. If I'm doing
36:33
if I'm just Most a lot
36:35
of times for the vinyl stuff
36:37
that I work on I'm actually
36:39
the mastering engineer and I I
36:41
walk the The client or the
36:43
artist or whoever it may be
36:45
through the whole process all the
36:47
way through I go all the
36:49
way up to plating And then
36:51
I hand them over and I
36:53
help them through the test pressing
36:55
process, but I hand them I
36:57
hand the client to a pressing
36:59
plan of their choice and and
37:01
I have some two really great
37:03
pressing plants here in town that
37:05
I work with equally. There's PMP,
37:07
physical music products. I think you've
37:09
had Piper on the show before.
37:11
She runs that and she's another
37:13
wonderful mastering engineer and her Piper
37:15
Pain. She has another, her lead
37:17
press operators, Colby, who's her, also
37:19
her mastering assistant. I just want
37:21
to give a shout out to
37:23
them. There's absolutely wonderful people to
37:25
work with and work through things.
37:27
And then also the vinyl lab
37:29
here in Nashville as well with
37:31
Scotland Masters and his team, also
37:33
an exceptional team as well. And
37:35
each pressing plant offers slightly different
37:37
products and different types of service,
37:39
depending on what you're looking for.
37:42
And I don't think there's like
37:44
a one size fits all. And
37:46
depending on what your needs are,
37:48
one may have. a product that
37:50
works really well for your needs
37:52
and the other may have a
37:54
product that works really well for
37:56
what you need. Piper does a
37:58
lot of like really customized colors.
38:00
on their vinyl, so like that
38:02
would be the place to go
38:04
if you're looking for like, like
38:06
if you just want to customize
38:08
something deeply. Whereas the vinyl lab
38:10
is, they have other, in terms
38:12
of like efficiency things that allow
38:14
you to get through the, like
38:16
if you just want to, like
38:18
I need X, Y, and Z,
38:20
and I need it, you know,
38:22
like they really really have some
38:24
awesome systems set up. So it's
38:26
like a customized versus like. A
38:28
system thing is yeah, anyway, so
38:30
yeah, okay, I hope that's helpful
38:32
I don't want to and I
38:34
don't want to like they're they're
38:36
both awesome No, it's great. Yeah,
38:38
this is great. Let's um yeah,
38:40
let's let's pick a real world
38:42
scenario. Sure. I have a record
38:44
out called Skidush. Yes. It's my
38:46
instrumental album. Yeah, it's all the
38:48
music that I've put on this
38:50
podcast now took me a while
38:52
to actually release it as a
38:54
record. We had had over two
38:57
million downloads of the podcast so
38:59
far, and I'd put the music
39:01
in it, but I hadn't released
39:03
it. So I was like, okay,
39:05
now that I'm double platinum, I
39:07
might as well release the record.
39:09
That's amazing. So I did that,
39:11
which was a lot of fun,
39:13
and we did a weekend here
39:15
where, well, I had mixed it
39:17
myself, but then we did a
39:19
mastermind weekend here where a group
39:21
came in and we went over
39:23
to Sterling sound and actually mastered
39:25
the record with Ryan Smith. and
39:27
got to sit there and he
39:29
showed us how it was done
39:31
and it was a lot of
39:33
fun and the record came out
39:35
sounds awesome but next stage for
39:37
me would be like okay I
39:39
think I should do a vinyl
39:41
copy of it and make that
39:43
available for you the rock stars
39:45
and so if we were if
39:47
I was to do that What
39:49
would that process look like? Let's
39:51
see, this is, I'm showing up,
39:53
I'm like, I've already mastered it
39:55
as digital. Do, do, would we
39:57
use that master? Would we start
39:59
over? How does that stuff? I
40:01
actually, I can be, as transparent,
40:03
I don't create a, technically I
40:05
don't create like a separate master
40:07
for vinyl, but I do. have
40:09
a slightly separate one. Like I
40:11
keep my, like if I make
40:14
any Q moves or compression moves
40:16
or like the general sonics of
40:18
the record, I keep the same,
40:20
whatever goes up digitally and whatever
40:22
goes on the vinyl, sonically are
40:24
as close as possible. So I
40:26
try to, I believe in that
40:28
one thing of one master if
40:30
it's all trying to, but to
40:32
get stuff onto a lacquer is
40:34
a little more trickier than just.
40:36
you know, making a digital file.
40:38
So I actually have a, I
40:40
skip, I don't skip, I don't,
40:42
my vinyl masters don't have the,
40:44
the, the heavy limiting that we
40:46
do just to, um, have things
40:48
to be loud for, for digital
40:50
release. Right. So I just, I
40:52
have a process that I work
40:54
on where, um, I do all
40:56
of the sonic shaping up to
40:58
a certain point and then just
41:00
the loudness stuff is, is, is
41:02
different between the two. If you're
41:04
just not, people don't understand, like
41:06
a lacquer is just, you're sort
41:08
of in the tape world, where
41:10
you're working at a zero VU
41:12
level and not at a zero
41:14
DBFS level, and those are drastically
41:16
different, different scales. So like, disk
41:18
level is centered around zero VU,
41:20
which in the real world, depending
41:22
on what you're working with, you
41:24
know, is your minus 14 on
41:26
a a DFS meter meter. Right,
41:29
right. So if you sent me.
41:31
a digitally allowed file for me
41:33
to cut, I have to turn
41:35
it down 14, you know, turn
41:37
it down to minus 14 to
41:39
even start. So right yeah, are
41:41
you recording your own music or
41:43
other people's music in your studio?
41:45
But you're having trouble figuring out
41:47
how to get your mixes to
41:49
sound great. Do they sound weak
41:51
and distant or lack punch and
41:53
clarity? Well, I've got a gift
41:55
for you to help you take
41:57
your mixes from sounding like basement
41:59
demos to sounding a lot more
42:01
like professional mixes And it's my
42:03
free course called Mix Master bundle.
42:05
This course will show you how
42:07
to get pro sounding mixes from
42:09
your home studio with free and
42:11
stock plugins and pro tools. And
42:13
the best part is, these mixing
42:15
techniques will work for you in
42:17
any dog, whether you're in Logic,
42:19
Cubase, Pre-Sona Studio One, Reaper, or
42:21
anything you can think of. Are
42:23
you ready to make your best
42:25
record ever? Then go to MixMasterbundel.com
42:27
to get started for free now
42:29
and you can find the clickable
42:31
link in the show notes of
42:33
this episode. Preferably. You want one
42:35
that's not quite digitally loud. Like
42:37
maybe it's pre-limited. Do you think
42:39
a typical, in my example, where
42:41
it was mastered, do you think
42:44
that part of the process would
42:46
have been sculpting it and then
42:48
at the last stage going through
42:50
a final limiting which makes things
42:52
louder and maybe it's possible to
42:54
undo that back step one level.
42:56
That's kind of in general what
42:58
I'm doing. There's a little more
43:00
finesse. to that too, because some
43:02
of the times the limiting can
43:04
add something, you know, that some
43:06
excitement, you know, like depending on
43:08
what we're doing. Well, it definitely
43:10
did in my writing, because it
43:12
sounds pretty awesome. At least I
43:14
love it. And some, you know,
43:16
like because we're lopping off, at
43:18
the end, we're lopping off a
43:20
fair amount of transient information, sometimes
43:22
the way that we lop that
43:24
off can actually be pleasing in
43:26
some way, shape or form, like...
43:28
resemble each other in some way
43:30
shape or form. Yeah. And so
43:32
there's exactly that that process in
43:34
general is sort of what I'm
43:36
finding out now. This is all.
43:38
Nothing is right and wrong. And
43:40
my process may be different in
43:42
three years as I experiment more.
43:44
Well, I think that that's an
43:46
important part of what we do
43:48
in making records is we just
43:50
keep, you know, iterating and evolving
43:52
and trying to level up how
43:54
we do stuff, you know. I
43:56
think that's what I enjoy about
43:58
this too is like it. In
44:01
the end, everything's subjective. Yeah. So,
44:03
so let's see. So I, so
44:05
I or somebody who's already got
44:07
something, they're like, well, want to
44:09
come make a vinyl record with
44:11
you, would potentially have created a
44:13
master for digital release. And if
44:15
we were smart, in the same
44:17
way that we might create a
44:19
no vocal mix, if we were
44:21
smart, we might actually create a
44:23
no limited master. Yeah, that's essentially
44:25
what? Like in our back pocket
44:27
in the same way that. when
44:29
we turn in a mix to
44:31
mastering, we might have a limited
44:33
mix that we listen to, but
44:35
then we do a no-limit mix
44:37
that goes to mastering, so it's
44:39
a little more room to breathe.
44:41
Correct. That's sort of what I've
44:43
found is kind of the now
44:45
that the vinyl world is sort
44:47
of like ramped up again. People
44:49
are, I found that that's becoming
44:51
a common, common trend for the
44:53
guys, for the people who are
44:55
cutting blacker is... is that sort
44:57
of workflow a little bit. Yeah.
44:59
And now I say that there
45:01
may be, I may get an
45:03
email from a few lacquer cutters
45:05
who are like, that's not all
45:07
at all what I do. Right,
45:09
right. But yeah. Well, hopefully everybody
45:11
has talked to their own style
45:13
and their own way of doing
45:16
things. That's something that I've found.
45:18
And I've found it in a
45:20
few other situations that have been
45:22
really helpful for me learning how
45:24
to do this as well. it
45:26
can't cut a square wave like
45:28
it's it's it's just like magnetic
45:30
tape where like your your current
45:32
is all you know all moving
45:34
moving from 180 degrees up to
45:36
180 degrees down and that's a
45:38
that's an arc you know and
45:40
and a cutterhead's designed to cut
45:42
the arc as opposed to cutting
45:44
like a just a squared off
45:46
version of it's really difficult to
45:48
To because it's a can't you
45:50
just get a better cutter? It's
45:52
a nonlinear medium. So it's analog.
45:54
You know, it's it's it's smoother.
45:56
You know, it's that's it's difficult
45:58
for us to cut really really
46:00
limited material. and have it sound
46:02
like the original material is in
46:04
digital and have it be enveloping
46:06
and exciting. Yeah. We can, I
46:08
mean, I can cut heavy limited
46:10
material that's square wave, but I
46:12
gotta cut it in a way
46:14
where it won't be exciting. Right.
46:16
You know, so if something already
46:18
is limited and has been mastered
46:20
once. then what would you do?
46:22
What if you couldn't go back
46:24
and get the unlimited version? With
46:26
my own stuff, and if I
46:28
have a little bit of flexibility,
46:30
and if it's coming from another
46:33
mastering engineer, I'm working on this
46:35
thing where I'm working with other
46:37
mastering engineers that I know really
46:39
well, and a lot of them
46:41
are in town, they're great colleagues,
46:43
and I'm kind of working, I'll
46:45
take their master. and I'll look
46:47
at it and say, okay, how
46:49
do I match this, but how
46:51
do I make it in a
46:53
way that I can cut it
46:55
easier? And so, like, I've been
46:57
diving a lot into, like, expansion
46:59
for, you know, like, some ways
47:01
to get transient space. Right, to
47:03
bring a little dynamic back into
47:05
recording. And there's this thing of,
47:07
like, you can turn stuff down
47:09
and recue it and you add
47:11
it, just by doing that alone
47:13
and you print it, you'll see,
47:15
like a transient, like, like, like,
47:17
a hack, you know, it's like
47:19
a transient comeback from that processing,
47:21
you know. What are some, are
47:23
there any particular tools that are
47:25
really helpful when it comes to
47:27
expanding stuff like that? Oh man,
47:29
I'm transparent and I'll reveal everything.
47:31
I've really been, I mean, we
47:33
all know that an expander and
47:35
a compressor are exactly the same
47:37
thing. They just work in reverse
47:39
of each other, right? You have
47:41
an attack and release and... you're
47:43
just, and in theory, and this
47:45
is how like Dolby noise reduction
47:48
works, is in theory, this is
47:50
what Compansion is, and it's how
47:52
all of our RF microphones work
47:54
as well, you'd use what's called
47:56
Compansion, where you compress down the
47:58
signal really, really heavily to try
48:00
and get it over a radio
48:02
wave, you know, like with RF.
48:04
and then you expand it out
48:06
exactly the way it was compressed
48:08
to then get it back out
48:10
to a usable audio signal and
48:12
that's like DBX and that's how
48:14
that's how noise reduction well noise
48:16
reductions are slightly different but it
48:18
this same idea right and so
48:20
in theory what I was trying
48:22
to get to is you can
48:24
compress if you know the exact
48:26
way you compress something In theory,
48:28
you can uncompress it with the
48:30
exact same settings with expansion, and
48:32
it will be exactly the same
48:34
thing. I just talked about that
48:36
with Dave Durer on a previous
48:38
interview. Oh, amazing. Well, I was
48:40
talking about how excited I was
48:42
to first discover the distressor. Yeah.
48:44
And of course, I did what
48:46
many people would do, which is
48:48
just put it on whatever. I
48:50
wanted to be more exciting, and
48:52
I had it on a snare
48:54
drum, but I overcompressed the snare
48:56
in the recording stage. And then
48:58
when we were mixing with Steve
49:00
Albini. expand this back out to
49:03
bring back some of the dynamic
49:05
and punch of the snare. And
49:07
that was the first time I'd
49:09
ever experienced that. But that's essentially
49:11
what he was doing, I think,
49:13
because he was trying to like
49:15
reverse engineer the compression I'd done.
49:17
That's, man, that's the guy to
49:19
talk to you about set stuff
49:21
though. If you want to go
49:23
way deep, that's amazing. That's really
49:25
cool. Yeah, it would have been.
49:27
Well, so, okay, cool. So... expanding
49:29
stuff to try and get a
49:31
little bit more dynamic out of
49:33
it. Yeah. And then bringing the
49:35
level down and now you can
49:37
start. So why don't you describe
49:39
to the rock stars some of
49:41
the basics of like what does
49:43
it mean to cut a lacquer
49:45
and what is the what is
49:47
the silito lathe and all that?
49:49
Because you have a bit of
49:51
a robot going on over there.
49:53
I do. Well, and it's we're
49:55
kind of an uncharted territory with
49:57
the lathe community. So the. The
49:59
lathe community, people who are cutting,
50:01
are at this point, most of
50:03
the people are cutting on machines
50:05
that... were made prior to 1982.
50:07
And they were made absolutely beautifully
50:09
and they sound amazing. You know,
50:11
you have the old Neumann machines
50:13
of different iterations, VMS 80s, VMS
50:15
70s, and then some custom built
50:17
stuff from older platforms. And then
50:20
you have another company called Scully,
50:22
which was the competitor company. And
50:24
those are usually the two layers.
50:26
There's one other. but you don't
50:28
see very many of those out
50:30
there, but these are the two
50:32
that people are cutting on this
50:34
day and age. But there's only
50:36
like a handful of people in
50:38
the world that can service these
50:40
things, and it's really, really expensive
50:42
to service them, and the parts
50:44
are becoming few and far between.
50:46
It's kind of like trying to
50:48
restore a model T, you know,
50:50
like trying to find parts. At
50:52
this point, a lot of people
50:54
are just custom building new parts,
50:56
and it just becomes... It's just
50:58
becoming really really cumbersome to really
51:00
keep these older machines up and
51:02
running. But that's not showing any
51:04
shade at them. There are wonderful
51:06
machines and they sound incredible and
51:08
trying to try to make a
51:10
new machine to get back up
51:12
to their standard is probably the
51:14
most difficult thing because they were
51:16
so well engineered. The Neumanns have,
51:18
you know, have this computer system
51:20
that allows the, you know, to
51:22
look ahead one revolution and it
51:24
adjusts pitch in depth of the
51:26
groove. so that you don't you
51:28
don't run into you don't have
51:30
grooves running into each other and
51:32
then also you can fit more
51:35
time on a side because you
51:37
can collapse the grooves when you
51:39
don't you can you can bring
51:41
the glues really close together when
51:43
you don't have a lot of
51:45
certain certain information you know you
51:47
know so and there's these computer
51:49
these analog computers on these machines
51:51
that can do that calculation it's
51:53
all program like so if there's
51:55
not as much program you can
51:57
you can close things things you
51:59
have to open them up to
52:01
make that space. We call it
52:03
vertical and lateral. And it's, you
52:05
want to think of it as
52:07
mono and anti phase. So everything
52:09
that's, you know, like just. stereo
52:11
information, if you don't have the
52:13
mono information, it's the information that's
52:15
exactly out of phase of itself.
52:17
So like right is out of
52:19
phase of left, right? And all
52:21
purposes from a schooling thought is,
52:23
you know, understand it by mid-side,
52:25
but we don't really refer to
52:27
it that way in the cutting
52:29
world, because it's a little, it's
52:31
just, we have to be more
52:33
technical about, you know, in, this
52:35
is my history nerd kicking in,
52:37
Alan Blumline invented this process in
52:39
the 1930s. And we're still using
52:41
that technology. But what's happening is
52:43
the way to encode and decode
52:45
the mono information and the side
52:47
information separately. And so, like, with
52:49
the needle moving left and left
52:52
and right, that's your mono information.
52:54
And the needle moving up and
52:56
down is your anti-phase, your side
52:58
information is, you know, sort of
53:00
in general. But getting something to
53:02
move up and down on left
53:04
and right is... almost an impossible
53:06
thing to do physically. So Alan
53:08
Blumline figured out a way to
53:10
make them move at a 45
53:12
degree angle, like left and right
53:14
and up and down. So it
53:16
kind of moves, instead of moving
53:18
up and down and left and
53:20
right the same time, we sort
53:22
of have this 45 degree movement,
53:24
this sort of fire 40 degree
53:26
movement, which is why our groove,
53:28
you know, and I may get
53:30
a bunch of cutting engineers that,
53:32
you know, rake rake me over
53:34
the colt. I make it a
53:36
bunch of cutting-edge engineers or that
53:38
may rake me over the coals
53:40
for describing it this way. So
53:42
I'm doing my best. I apologize.
53:44
But that's why our groove is
53:46
looks V-shaped. You know, like it's
53:48
because it's moving 45 degrees both
53:50
directions up and down left and
53:52
right. And it was the way
53:54
that they could get that encoded
53:56
properly. The biggest thing that I
53:58
want to say is like a
54:00
vinyl record is literally an analog
54:02
hard drive. It's just encoded information.
54:04
our information that gets encoded in
54:07
and then you have to have
54:09
a playback system to play that
54:11
back out so it's I call
54:13
it the caveman hard drive like
54:15
and it instead of spinning at
54:17
you know like two you know
54:19
like what is it seven seven
54:21
thousand and seven thousand two hundred
54:23
you know our p.m. It spins
54:25
at 30 33 and a third
54:27
r p.m. you know or 45
54:29
or whatever you know yeah yeah
54:31
and and and if you just
54:33
have a disk alone without the
54:35
play without the end code system
54:37
in the playback system they're useless
54:39
the information on it doesn't. You
54:41
know, like you have to have
54:43
a way to encode it and
54:45
decode it, just like we do
54:47
with computers. It's the same idea,
54:49
right? You know, so on my
54:51
machine, so I'm in New Charter,
54:53
or I have a machine that,
54:55
I call a silly-toe cutting lathe.
54:57
So after I shape up everything
54:59
and get things mastered, I have
55:01
actually a computer, another computer program
55:03
called Space and Time Control, which
55:05
is proprietary and connected to my
55:07
lathe. And it also does all
55:09
of the predictions. So instead of
55:11
having a computer like on the
55:13
old Neumann Lays that does those
55:15
like pitch in depth predictions in
55:17
real time, my program actually does,
55:19
I drop the files from my
55:22
mastering program into this program and
55:24
it does like a calculation of
55:26
what, depending on what I have
55:28
the parameter set at, you know.
55:30
like how much how loud it
55:32
is versus like how much land
55:34
I want which is the space
55:36
between the groves and how much
55:38
how what's my basic depth of
55:40
those groves yeah yes land is
55:42
the the the the the dead
55:44
space in between what we call
55:46
they call it either dead wax
55:48
or they call it the dead
55:50
space in between groves you know
55:52
and how much we can control
55:54
how much there is you know
55:56
So I load that into my
55:58
computer and then my software makes
56:00
a prediction and it actually gives
56:02
me a readout like I get
56:04
a visual disc of what my
56:06
groove should look like based on
56:08
what my files are. And then
56:10
that. That information is then sent
56:12
to the lathe while it's cutting
56:14
as a prediction. And then the
56:16
lathe follows that prediction. Isotope is
56:18
truly amazing for mixing and mastering
56:20
your music, like the new Isotope
56:22
plasma plugging featuring flux saturation, which
56:24
helps you sculpt the harmonics in
56:26
your sound, enhancing the excitement and
56:28
clarity of your tracks and mixes.
56:30
And Ozone, with its built-in mastering
56:32
mastering assistant, helps you analyze your
56:34
mix, suggesting all the settings you
56:36
need for a professionally mastered result
56:39
based on your chosen style of
56:41
music and EQ curve, or reference
56:43
a specific song if you want.
56:45
Ozone features sophisticated yet simple modules
56:47
like clarity and impact, low-end focus,
56:49
stabilizer, imager, exciter, and spectral shaping
56:51
along with powerful dynamic EQ, compression,
56:53
and limiting, allowing you to adjust
56:55
the settings to your taste so
56:57
it sounds incredible. And with the
56:59
magic of master rebalance, you can
57:01
even manipulate the vocal, bass, and
57:03
drums separately at the mastering stage.
57:05
Use the code Rock 10. to
57:07
get 10% off plasma, ozone, RX,
57:09
or any of the fantastic plugins
57:11
at isotope.com. How do rock stars?
57:13
We're back now for the Jam
57:15
session, aka the second half of
57:17
the show, joining you right here
57:19
at Podzilla Studios at my place
57:21
in East Nashville. My guess today
57:23
is Duncan Ferguson. Duncan, are you
57:25
ready to jam, dude? Yes, Jam's
57:27
my favorite. Awesome, man. Well, let's
57:29
hear more about your studio, too.
57:31
So, um. The voltage exchange beautiful
57:33
place really has a gorgeous look
57:35
to it. There's a video that
57:37
I found online where you did
57:39
an interview with Wilson Harwood. Yeah.
57:41
The sound proof is what is
57:43
the sound proof your studio show
57:45
if I'm saying that correctly. And
57:47
I don't know did you guys
57:49
did you work with Wilson to
57:51
do that or did he come
57:54
over and sort of take a
57:56
look at what you had done?
57:58
and you guys talked about it.
58:00
We, he, because he's, he's helping
58:02
people, uh, soundproof, their studio, like
58:04
he's, that's what he said. He's
58:06
going to guess on the show,
58:08
too. Oh, yes, yeah. Yeah, I,
58:10
yeah, it was fun. He just
58:12
want to come over and, and
58:14
take a look and be like,
58:16
what have you done? And kind
58:18
of show off, you know, like
58:20
this is what other people are
58:22
doing and thinking there you said.
58:24
I started with an empty shell
58:26
and I smarted the room. So
58:28
what is smarting a room? It's
58:30
smart as a program. It's made
58:32
by a company called Rational Acoustics.
58:34
And a lot of, it's really,
58:36
really popular use in the in
58:38
the live sound world for tuning
58:40
large liner APA systems. And you
58:42
can get all sorts of data
58:44
analysis from our from RTA microphones
58:46
or putting up, you know, omni
58:48
directional microphones and. just analyzing noise
58:50
in your space and you can
58:52
see all sorts of data you
58:54
can see if you can see
58:56
early reflections you can see phase
58:58
information that it's really easy if
59:00
you want to get really deep
59:02
into it's really easy way to
59:04
you know see if you have
59:06
any drivers out of phase it's
59:08
it's a really expensive program so
59:11
it wouldn't be a great use
59:13
of that but for basics but
59:15
uh so I was able to
59:17
when I built my room I
59:19
put up an RTA mic, I
59:21
shot a bunch of, I put
59:23
my speakers in place and just
59:25
shot a bunch of weird noise,
59:27
you know, pink noise and tones
59:29
and sweeps. So there's just an
59:31
empty box of a space at
59:33
this point. Just echo-y, nothing about
59:35
it sounds good yet. And sort
59:37
of figured out exactly where my
59:39
problem thoughts are going to be.
59:41
And I had some pretty extreme
59:43
restrictions with my room just based
59:45
on its dimensions. And how would
59:47
you describe a problem spot when
59:49
you're when you're shooting that out?
59:51
Let's say you've got the software
59:53
and you see something you're like
59:55
that's a problem just modes and
59:57
standing waves where where things are
59:59
collecting. in areas in the room and then
1:00:01
where things are canceling. And what does
1:00:03
that mean? When you look at a
1:00:05
chart, does that mean there's like a
1:00:07
huge peak in one spot? When things
1:00:09
are summing together in one area of
1:00:12
the room, they're summing together and you
1:00:14
get like a big bump, you know,
1:00:16
in a certain frequency area. And then
1:00:18
the direct opposite, usually with standing
1:00:21
waves, it's like a really drastic
1:00:23
like dip. in one area and we
1:00:25
had you had Carl Tats over and
1:00:27
he explained one big problem area for
1:00:29
a lot of people is around 120
1:00:31
hertz area and it's kind of like
1:00:33
has to do with like the architecture
1:00:35
that were just you know like
1:00:38
standard-sized rooms speaker technology that just ends
1:00:40
up being a huge problem spot you
1:00:42
know when you do this smarting the
1:00:44
room test you already have to have
1:00:47
your speakers in a in position right
1:00:49
otherwise you don't know what you're testing
1:00:51
and I can also like use I
1:00:53
get them in a relative position. I
1:00:55
know I'm going to do some fine
1:00:57
adjustments based on some of what I'm
1:00:59
seeing too. You know, like if you, um, uh,
1:01:01
so if you have a big base boost,
1:01:03
you might move them away from the
1:01:06
wall a little bit or something. Yeah,
1:01:08
well, there's like quarter wavelength, depending on,
1:01:10
you know, like, I have the big
1:01:12
PMC IB ones, which are transmission line.
1:01:15
So there's not a lot of base coming
1:01:17
off the back of the back of
1:01:19
those speakers. But still I made some
1:01:21
softets behind them. I mean, I could go
1:01:23
really deep. Yeah, that was cool. Yeah,
1:01:26
you want to, yeah, and the angles
1:01:28
of your speaker, while there's the
1:01:30
AES standard of having them
1:01:32
at 30 degrees, I've found
1:01:34
that the 30 degrees is
1:01:37
sometimes too tight for near
1:01:39
field monitors. So having them
1:01:41
a bit wider actually really
1:01:43
helps, you know, not have
1:01:45
too much buildup in the
1:01:47
center of your image. What is
1:01:49
30, when you say at 30 degrees, what
1:01:51
does that mean? It's the equilateral triangle of
1:01:53
the listener at the point of the triangle
1:01:56
and then the speakers at the two other
1:01:58
ends of the triangle. Isn't that? I'm
1:02:00
remembering this wrong. Isn't that 60,
1:02:02
60 makes an equal triangle? Yeah,
1:02:04
because that's the half, the 30
1:02:06
degrees is the half of the
1:02:08
triangle. I get 60, yeah, yeah,
1:02:10
so all right. Sorry, my brain
1:02:12
moves fast and I, you know,
1:02:14
it's good. You got to slow
1:02:16
it down. Slow it down and
1:02:18
break it down for us. And because
1:02:20
we, the other thing I was talking
1:02:23
to, I want to give a shout
1:02:25
out to Ryan Smith and Joe over
1:02:27
at Sterling. I was talking about.
1:02:29
teaching and the things that have to remind
1:02:31
myself because we live in it every day and
1:02:33
then you get so used to it you don't
1:02:36
think about it anymore that's something that I you
1:02:38
know like when you say oh isn't it 60
1:02:40
degrees oh yeah 30 but it's only half of
1:02:42
the triangle and then like everybody who's listening to
1:02:44
you is like what are they talking about like it's
1:02:47
you don't remember that you're moving so fast
1:02:49
because you live in it every day that
1:02:51
you you have to remind yourself some
1:02:53
of the basics so an equal lateral triangle
1:02:55
essentially to describe it for the podcast
1:02:57
Picture a triangle with three equal
1:02:59
sides, right? Yeah. And one side
1:03:02
is the speaker in, speakers in
1:03:04
front of you from tweeter to
1:03:06
tweeter, I guess. And then the
1:03:08
other sides are the tweeter pointing
1:03:10
to your head from the left side
1:03:12
and from the right side. Yeah.
1:03:14
So that it creates a triangle in
1:03:16
your head sort of in the apex
1:03:18
of that triangle, right? Correct. Yeah. And
1:03:21
I've actually found that. There's
1:03:23
a famous studio designer in town called
1:03:25
named Steve Durr. Yes, Steve's great. He's
1:03:27
been on the show too. Oh, has
1:03:29
he? Oh, awesome. He had said that
1:03:31
like even like you, they found that
1:03:33
like stepping back from that triangle
1:03:35
a little bit, you feel like it's
1:03:38
more natural as well. So I feel like
1:03:40
that equal out of triangle is
1:03:42
sort of like a really good like, like
1:03:44
center point for yourself, but you're
1:03:47
going to then manipulate it a
1:03:49
little bit to your liking. to
1:03:51
like make stuff feel like if it feels
1:03:53
too close together you make them wider
1:03:55
yeah feels too wide you bring them close
1:03:57
I was just in a friend's room the
1:03:59
other and helping him get his speakers.
1:04:01
Like he was, he was, he was
1:04:04
said he was sort of struggling to
1:04:06
get his mix. You have friends? Yeah,
1:04:08
friends. No, I just, I don't. I
1:04:11
thought we just lived in our studios
1:04:13
by ourselves. That was the joke this
1:04:15
weekend of like, the only time I
1:04:17
get out is the recording summit. Right.
1:04:20
It's like I just live in a
1:04:22
cave all day with my studio assistant
1:04:24
buster, my dog, and then it's like,
1:04:27
it's our one time that we can
1:04:29
nerd out, you know, you know, Buster
1:04:31
makes me feel good. There you go.
1:04:33
Yeah, that's amazing. That's All right. So
1:04:36
back to back to dead seriousness here.
1:04:38
So you've set up your your equilateral
1:04:40
triangle you got your speaker set up
1:04:42
you shoot out your room with your
1:04:45
smart and then it starts to tell
1:04:47
you that there's problems in certain modes.
1:04:49
When you treat the room there's there's
1:04:52
you know what I remember learning is
1:04:54
that there's frequency zones, there's everything below
1:04:56
300 hertz, enters the zone of room
1:04:58
modes and, you know, pile-ups of frequencies
1:05:01
or cancellations of frequencies that we need
1:05:03
to try and address, and then everything
1:05:05
above 300 gets into sort of ray
1:05:08
theory, which is like... It sounds just
1:05:10
bouncing around the walls into your ears
1:05:12
and so you're trying to address those
1:05:14
things. Yeah, it's all early reflections kind
1:05:17
of in the 30 millisecond to 60
1:05:19
millisecond range is sort of like what
1:05:21
we perceive as early reflections. So that's
1:05:23
like what you were talking about, what
1:05:26
the frequency range, like 500 hertz and
1:05:28
up or you know, sort of that.
1:05:30
And there, it's sort of like you
1:05:33
address those different things with different sort
1:05:35
of like low end. A lot of
1:05:37
times you're creating base traps, base traps.
1:05:39
you know in air in mostly all
1:05:42
the time corners or or like a
1:05:44
solid wall of some kind on the
1:05:46
usually it's a back wall or like
1:05:49
you can have some soft fits on
1:05:51
your front walls some of a typical
1:05:53
a typical design. And there's again, it's
1:05:55
subjective, there's no right way to do
1:05:58
it. They just have all these little
1:06:00
techniques of trying to like problem solve
1:06:02
like a chess game. Right. So it's
1:06:04
like the reflection stuff is you think
1:06:07
about sound going from the source of
1:06:09
the speaker. and trying to get to
1:06:11
your ear, but then you think, okay,
1:06:14
but it can also go from the
1:06:16
speaker and bounce off the wall and
1:06:18
then reach my ear. And so now
1:06:20
you've got a slight delay on it
1:06:23
and it's adding together. And so in
1:06:25
those cases, you can think about, well,
1:06:27
I should put a treatment where it's
1:06:30
going to bounce off the wall, and
1:06:32
so it doesn't bounce off the wall,
1:06:34
right? It's kind of like basic thinking
1:06:36
like that. The sound moving about the
1:06:39
room is not as relevant anymore, right?
1:06:41
It's like, it's more like there's low
1:06:43
end in the room everywhere, even though
1:06:46
it's not entirely accurate. There's low end
1:06:48
in the room, and so we're going
1:06:50
to try and soak it up rather
1:06:52
than thinking about it bouncing off something.
1:06:55
But it really is bouncing off. It's
1:06:57
like the low end accumulates. on the
1:06:59
wall surfaces and the floor and the
1:07:01
ceiling, right? Yeah, and it just sums
1:07:04
together in certain places and cancels in
1:07:06
other places as it's, you know, and...
1:07:08
Depending on the frequency. Yeah, and this
1:07:11
is where this gets mind-boggling, and this
1:07:13
is what really helped me was like
1:07:15
diving into the live sound world and
1:07:17
tuning these giant liner APAs, and understanding
1:07:20
like we used to do sub-over arrays
1:07:22
where we would position subs, you know,
1:07:24
to then actually create a beam. you
1:07:27
know, like, or cancel beams, or, you
1:07:29
know, like, you could, like, you could
1:07:31
create a cardioid pattern with subs, you
1:07:33
know, and cancel out everything that's blowing
1:07:36
back to the stage so those, so
1:07:38
the musicians don't get hit with a
1:07:40
tunnel low end off the back of
1:07:42
the subs. There's all sorts of, all
1:07:45
sorts of things you can do to
1:07:47
control that. And what I, what really
1:07:49
hit me hard when I was learning
1:07:52
how to do all that. was that
1:07:54
no frequency is created equal. So like
1:07:56
if you're trying to think about like,
1:07:58
oh, I would focus in on like,
1:08:01
I gotta control, I gotta think about
1:08:03
80 hertz, so if I do this
1:08:05
one thing, I'll do that, but then
1:08:08
70 hertz is now doing a completely
1:08:10
different thing. Like it's like a waterbed,
1:08:12
you're trying to like, you know, like,
1:08:14
we think of things that singularity, I
1:08:17
think when you start off as an
1:08:19
audio student or. You think of things
1:08:21
singular, like, oh, I hear 3K, but
1:08:23
what is 3.5K doing? Or what is
1:08:26
2? Yeah, like, we can't encompass everything
1:08:28
in our head, but what's happening in
1:08:30
rooms is like it's this gradient of
1:08:33
all these things. So like if you
1:08:35
have a problem in one area, you're
1:08:37
going to have something else in another
1:08:39
area, but you can't focus on one
1:08:42
singular thing. You have to figure out
1:08:44
this sort of overarching. Right, so you
1:08:46
don't you don't see the problem right
1:08:49
at one spike frequency and then say,
1:08:51
okay, I'm only addressing that. You just
1:08:53
think about it in a general. Yeah,
1:08:55
it's like a wide, wide bandy Q
1:08:58
is the way you treat this. Yeah,
1:09:00
yeah, you sort of have to like,
1:09:02
it, yeah, you, it's, we, we tend
1:09:04
to start to think singularity, but in
1:09:07
reality, there's just a whole lot of,
1:09:09
a lot of things happening, and they're
1:09:11
all, dominoesos that are connected to each
1:09:14
other, Well, it's interesting to think about
1:09:16
studios and spaces as instruments, too. It's
1:09:18
like there's a resonance to it all,
1:09:20
and that's what makes it sound interesting.
1:09:23
If you just move your speakers outside
1:09:25
and put them on two stands and
1:09:27
listen to them outside, you would have
1:09:30
none of these problems. Yeah. Because it
1:09:32
might not sound interesting. Well, they would
1:09:34
sound, you'd measure them and it would
1:09:36
sound great. And then you'd listen to
1:09:39
them and be like, this is an
1:09:41
interesting. Right. Right. And that's fascinating too,
1:09:43
because I wonder if it's just, I
1:09:45
mean, so much of our experiences, how
1:09:48
we programmed our brain to understand things.
1:09:50
And I wonder if, you know, if
1:09:52
you just grew up. up to listening
1:09:55
to music outside on speakers all the
1:09:57
time. Yeah. Maybe we would have made
1:09:59
different music and had a different understanding
1:10:01
of what sounds good to us. Yeah.
1:10:04
You know, it's fascinating. All right. Well,
1:10:06
so let's, let's, um. So now you
1:10:08
figured out your studio and you figured
1:10:11
out where the speakers were going to
1:10:13
go and you did some treatments, but
1:10:15
you also made it look really great.
1:10:17
So talk a little bit about some
1:10:20
of the aesthetic choices that you made
1:10:22
that sort of make your space feel
1:10:24
beautiful. I had been in a number,
1:10:27
over the course of my career, I've
1:10:29
been in some really wonderful spaces and
1:10:31
I noticed early on and also the
1:10:33
live sound company that I worked for,
1:10:36
there was a business philosophy that if
1:10:38
you present yourself in a cleanly... nice
1:10:40
way. It really goes a long way.
1:10:42
And while you may have the... Especially
1:10:45
when you're doing a video podcast. Yeah.
1:10:47
We, you know, we always were, we're,
1:10:49
I almost felt like we, when the
1:10:52
Lifetime Company was looking for, we always
1:10:54
had to like repaint our cases, you
1:10:56
know, like, stuff on the road gets
1:10:58
banged up a lot. And we used
1:11:01
to, a lot of clients would, would
1:11:03
come to that company because we were
1:11:05
the clean looking company. We didn't look
1:11:08
like a rock and roll. tour that
1:11:10
had just finished. Right, there's an appealed
1:11:12
console tape or a case. And I
1:11:14
kind of took all that to, and
1:11:17
then all my favorite studio spaces that
1:11:19
I've been in, worked in prior to
1:11:21
that, like, with, you know, I come
1:11:23
from the classical world too, so it's,
1:11:26
that just, that just kind of goes
1:11:28
a long way, aside from your own
1:11:30
skill set. and people are feel more
1:11:33
comfortable in those spaces. And I just
1:11:35
want to design a space that felt
1:11:37
that way. Well, I would say listening
1:11:39
to your discography and Rockstars, we have
1:11:42
a playlist of Duncan's work, which you
1:11:44
can check out. It's going to be
1:11:46
in the show notes. You just click
1:11:49
right through and go listen to some
1:11:51
of his records. But they sound great
1:11:53
and there is a quality of attention
1:11:55
to detail in them that I picked
1:11:58
up on right away. There's a there's
1:12:00
a sonic. consistency to low end and
1:12:02
width and you know the EQ and
1:12:04
all that that's really nice. there's also
1:12:07
just like there's a you know they
1:12:09
sound cleaned up they don't sound like
1:12:11
there's there's a mess in there you
1:12:14
know it's not a I don't know
1:12:16
have you had a chance to do
1:12:18
any punk rock kind of stuff I
1:12:20
just I just cut something for for
1:12:23
Piper that was like full-on like punk
1:12:25
rock and it was really it was
1:12:27
really fun yeah and but I didn't
1:12:30
master that I just cut it so
1:12:32
okay but it's fun to yeah I
1:12:34
I've worked on a lot of, it's
1:12:36
fun to like take, I love that
1:12:39
intersection of Lofy Me, Thai, you know,
1:12:41
sort of, I think the, the Black
1:12:43
Keys Brothers album was an amazing example
1:12:45
of that. Yeah. It was really, really
1:12:48
fun and it's really, really well presented,
1:12:50
but then there are these Lofy elements
1:12:52
that, so I work on a lot
1:12:55
of things like that, you know, sort
1:12:57
of like, from, from, from, from DIY,
1:12:59
you know, you know, and, lost the
1:13:01
train, what was, remind me the exact.
1:13:04
We were just talking about punk rock
1:13:06
records. We're also talking about like, you
1:13:08
know, oh, audio that sounds really cleaned
1:13:11
up or whatever. I think, man, some
1:13:13
of my favorite records are like, you
1:13:15
work really hard to make things dirty
1:13:17
or like have an energy and vibe.
1:13:20
And then as a mastering engineer, I
1:13:22
can take that and put it in
1:13:24
a really nice palette and it's, you
1:13:27
can digest it in a way that.
1:13:29
that feels, you know, like feels consumable.
1:13:31
I don't know, that's sort of the
1:13:33
way that I kind of look at
1:13:36
that low-fi and high-fi energy. I come
1:13:38
from the classical world, and I did
1:13:40
a lot of jazz sessions as well
1:13:42
in my undergraduate and graduate work. And
1:13:45
so maybe that's just a voice that
1:13:47
I'm just used to being, you know,
1:13:49
I, you know how we all can't
1:13:52
like, we all can't help but put
1:13:54
our, like, like, subconsciously like, like, I
1:13:56
mean the reason why people hire you
1:13:58
is for someone of a little thing
1:14:01
that you understand and can do
1:14:03
to to to achieve a vision
1:14:05
that they're thinking right? Yeah. So
1:14:07
like I think as much as
1:14:09
I try as a mass engineer
1:14:11
try to avoid having any sort
1:14:13
of voice onto something I work
1:14:15
really hard not to. I think
1:14:17
sometimes that sort of can seep
1:14:19
out you know of. Well and
1:14:21
that's an interesting because I've
1:14:23
heard variations on mastering.
1:14:25
And I've heard people describe
1:14:28
mastering as a process that
1:14:30
should have a transparency to
1:14:32
it, like the mix did what was
1:14:34
supposed to be done, and it's
1:14:36
a question of, you know, bringing
1:14:38
it over the finish line, but not
1:14:41
changing the creative vision. But
1:14:43
then I've also heard mastering. I
1:14:45
mean, Richard Dodd once I heard
1:14:48
of Master that he did for, I
1:14:50
came out of his one of the songs
1:14:52
I mixed, but he threw a slap
1:14:54
back onto it. Oh, amazing. It sounded
1:14:56
amazing. That's awesome. It was the right.
1:14:58
It was the right thing for the
1:15:00
right. It was the right moment. Yeah.
1:15:03
Yeah. And then recent stuff that we've
1:15:05
been getting mastered with Chris Chamnes. Yeah.
1:15:07
He's working with somebody new. I'll have
1:15:09
to come back with the with the name.
1:15:11
But there's a quality to it that
1:15:14
sounds bold and and like willing
1:15:16
to. you know, expand the vision of it and
1:15:18
I love that stuff too in the right
1:15:20
setting. I think there's like one not one
1:15:22
size fits all like and I kind of
1:15:24
choose depending on what the project needs
1:15:27
and actually cutting lacquers for
1:15:29
other mastering engineers has been a
1:15:31
real sort of revealing of that a
1:15:33
bit. So like when a project comes in
1:15:35
I'll evaluate like, okay, do I need to
1:15:37
be hands off with this and like just
1:15:40
transfer the mixes and you know. do is
1:15:42
like Ian Shepard like Ian Shepard says
1:15:44
do a little harm right do no
1:15:46
harm right or there are other projects
1:15:48
where I said oh you know like the mix can
1:15:50
really use X Y or Z and
1:15:52
I think this is actually their intention
1:15:54
so I can take it a bit further
1:15:57
with enhancement sometimes and in the right
1:15:59
and then reading those sort
1:16:01
of street smart cues of
1:16:03
like I think they were going
1:16:05
this direction so I can like
1:16:07
I can help them get there.
1:16:09
Yeah, you know, and I think
1:16:12
maybe that was the Richard Dodge,
1:16:14
you know, so there was a
1:16:16
feeling in that, you know. Yeah,
1:16:18
I think it definitely just was
1:16:20
following whatever his instinct was
1:16:22
and just going for trying
1:16:25
to like trying to preserve what
1:16:27
they did. on the lacquer as
1:16:29
much as possible, like that's a
1:16:32
completely hands-off, you know, and then
1:16:34
getting it the lacquer to translate
1:16:36
to the digital, you know, so.
1:16:38
Rock your music production with the
1:16:40
updated Complete 15 bundle for native
1:16:43
instruments featuring the new Contact 8.
1:16:45
This comprehensive collection includes a fantastic
1:16:47
range of versatile synths, sampled instruments,
1:16:49
and innovative studio effects, giving you
1:16:51
everything you need to bring your
1:16:54
music to life. Whether you're composing
1:16:56
emotional scores, deep dance floor grooves,
1:16:58
or experimenting with sound design, Complete
1:17:00
15 has you covered. Discover powerful
1:17:02
plugins and instruments that guide
1:17:04
you from the initial idea
1:17:07
all the way through. to
1:17:09
the final mix. The included
1:17:11
Contact 8 introduces exciting new
1:17:13
tools like chords and phrases
1:17:15
for instant inspiration, the leap
1:17:17
tool for dynamic looping, and
1:17:19
conflicts. cutting-edge hybrid instrument that
1:17:21
merges organic and synth sounds
1:17:23
in real-time. Plus, enjoy revamped
1:17:25
versions of Massive X and
1:17:28
Guitar Rig 7-Pro to take
1:17:30
your sound to the next
1:17:32
level. Then Polish your mixes
1:17:34
off with the A.I. enhanced
1:17:36
isotope Ozone 11 included in
1:17:38
complete 15 bundle. Use the
1:17:40
code Rock 10 for 10%
1:17:42
off at Native Instruments.com. Well, so
1:17:44
let's talk about the... tools some
1:17:46
of the tools that help sort
1:17:48
of clean up a recording to
1:17:50
sure yeah is isotope and rx
1:17:52
one of the things that would be
1:17:55
a typical part of the process I
1:17:57
use it every day and it's
1:17:59
amazing Amazing how powerful those tools
1:18:01
have gotten. Like I go in
1:18:04
and if there's certain, even on
1:18:06
the mastering stage, and I am
1:18:08
open and transparent about all this,
1:18:10
but even if there's even some
1:18:12
mouth ticks or pops that I
1:18:14
feel on the mastering side get
1:18:17
brought out, you know, like as you
1:18:19
start cleaning things up, just, you know,
1:18:21
I go in and take those out with eyes
1:18:23
dope. I do make sure to like make sure
1:18:25
that. to tell the artist, hey, I'm doing
1:18:28
this. You know, like, if you wanted that
1:18:30
in there as for, like, authenticity, I'll leave
1:18:32
it, you know, but this feels distracting. You
1:18:34
know, like, sometimes even like, yeah, you know,
1:18:37
like the, there's high frequency things that
1:18:39
sound like edits, but they're actually like
1:18:41
mouth. Just mouth. Yeah. Because the reason
1:18:43
is because the mouth gets so amplified
1:18:45
through the mix process. Yeah. That just
1:18:47
a little bit of spit and, you know,
1:18:49
you know, you know, moving your. or whatever.
1:18:52
And a lot of times I'm catching edit,
1:18:54
like some some edit stuff, like you know,
1:18:56
when a tracking engineer or mix engineer listens
1:18:58
to things over and over and over, they,
1:19:01
your brain glosses over some of that
1:19:03
stuff too, which is not any, they're focused
1:19:05
on other things too. They're focused
1:19:07
on getting it to like have this sort
1:19:09
of thing. And so it's sort of like a,
1:19:12
it's like a mini proof read of like, you
1:19:14
know, like, we spelled that one little word,
1:19:16
you know, or that whole thing. A lot of
1:19:18
times I don't even send the
1:19:20
mixback. I can clean it. I
1:19:23
can clean the edit up
1:19:25
with spectral editing. Yeah, between
1:19:27
wave lab and in our X, you
1:19:29
know. Yeah, yeah, let me see
1:19:31
if I can see if there's
1:19:33
anything fun to look at RXYs.
1:19:35
Oh, my internet's not really working,
1:19:37
so might have to blow that idea
1:19:39
off. Well, so when you. Use Rx
1:19:41
in a mastering process. Is it
1:19:44
like the first move? Yeah. Is
1:19:46
it like later on? I do
1:19:48
it with my first listen simultaneously
1:19:50
trying to be efficient as I
1:19:52
loaded into our standalone Rx first.
1:19:54
And this is just my, um, I loaded
1:19:57
into Rx first and then I do
1:19:59
an analysis. I sort of listened to
1:20:01
it, make some notes and then try
1:20:03
to catch that stuff before I started,
1:20:06
before I loaded in the wave lab,
1:20:08
which is my messaging program. So first
1:20:10
you just do, you do like an
1:20:13
audit of the music and just sort
1:20:15
of listen carefully, which is a big
1:20:17
part of what you describe on your
1:20:19
website to you, the critical listening. But
1:20:22
in other words, you don't just automatically
1:20:24
do stuff. You listen to see what,
1:20:26
where it needs to go. Yes, yeah.
1:20:29
And I actually with my handy dating
1:20:31
notepad, you know, like I just make
1:20:33
some notes and, you know, like that
1:20:35
first listen is so critical. Like my
1:20:38
first impression basically takes care of 80%
1:20:40
of what I'm going to, you know,
1:20:42
like if I don't get that first
1:20:45
listen and be completely objective to it,
1:20:47
then I can. I feel like I'm
1:20:49
not as a physician as a mastering
1:20:51
engineer to really evaluate what it needs
1:20:54
from my background or it's true. It's
1:20:56
true for me and mixing too and
1:20:58
other things where it's easy to keep
1:21:01
getting. It's like we're so good at
1:21:03
hearing things that we could do. Yes.
1:21:05
That as soon as we come up
1:21:07
with an idea and it's presented to
1:21:10
us. we just follow that path. It
1:21:12
feels like, you know, the equivalent would
1:21:14
be like doom-scrolling social media on your
1:21:17
phone or something. Like, oh, that's interesting.
1:21:19
Oh, click on that, you know. Sure.
1:21:21
And we fall into that trap in
1:21:23
making music, whether we're recording or overdubbing
1:21:26
or mixing or, you know, sound checking
1:21:28
a kick drum, you know, the early
1:21:30
stages or mastering at the last stage.
1:21:33
So... that process of just saying, you
1:21:35
know what, I'm just going to sit
1:21:37
down and passively listen and then make
1:21:39
a note when I hear something that
1:21:42
needs to be addressed. It gives us
1:21:44
a little roadmap to then go in
1:21:46
and just go do those things first.
1:21:49
And I find that can be very
1:21:51
powerful because, especially as you say, if
1:21:53
we have the strength. of a first
1:21:55
impression in that moment, and we've taken
1:21:58
notes, then we can just go address
1:22:00
those things that we thought we needed.
1:22:02
Sometimes the things that we address, I
1:22:05
go address them and I come back
1:22:07
and I'm like, well, that's not better.
1:22:09
That's, I still don't like it or
1:22:11
something. But a lot of times, it
1:22:14
really can do a cool thing. And
1:22:16
it really does help us cross the
1:22:18
finish line too efficiently. Yes, yeah, it's
1:22:21
actually kind of like the note taking
1:22:23
that I was talking about earlier, where
1:22:25
like I'm laying out my day, I'm
1:22:27
doing that with a song for a
1:22:30
recording, you know, it's just laying out
1:22:32
exactly what I think needs to be
1:22:34
addressed. The biggest thing in is to
1:22:37
like, you know, like the biggest things
1:22:39
that we can do is what we
1:22:41
don't do, right? Like it's like in
1:22:44
the music, like when somebody's writing a
1:22:46
song or making a recording, it's like
1:22:48
sometimes the best, you know what's like
1:22:50
what's in between the notes as opposed
1:22:53
to the notes themselves. So like in
1:22:55
mastering I found that that actually rains
1:22:57
true. Like some of the biggest things
1:23:00
that I can do is not do
1:23:02
certain things at all, you know, and
1:23:04
it kind of lets the mix breathe
1:23:06
through. And then if I make the,
1:23:09
I think it's all about making the
1:23:11
exact right decisions that it needs, and
1:23:13
that can get really, really complicated, you
1:23:16
know, like how do I not, how
1:23:18
do I do as little as possible,
1:23:20
but do what it needs. And that's
1:23:22
like the million dollar question. Yeah, really.
1:23:25
Do you find, so when you're mixing,
1:23:27
making a change to one thing that
1:23:29
you think you're getting right can actually
1:23:32
affect something else and cause the other
1:23:34
thing to start to feel wrong. Is
1:23:36
that similar in the mastering process? It's
1:23:38
even more similar. Like it's even more
1:23:41
deeper because like if I if I
1:23:43
feel like something has an issue. And
1:23:45
I say, oh, I'm going to correct
1:23:48
for this. Like, well, the snare drum
1:23:50
is just poking through too much and
1:23:52
sort of hitting me in the wrong
1:23:54
way. But the snare drums in the
1:23:57
center and the vocals in the center.
1:23:59
change a frequency in the snare drum,
1:24:01
there is a huge likely chance that
1:24:04
that frequency is going to overlap in
1:24:06
the vocal. And so like if I
1:24:08
pull that down, then I'm changing something
1:24:10
in the vocal. So you really, I
1:24:13
think it's even more like a hundred
1:24:15
times more in mastering because we're just
1:24:17
dealing with the two track, right? Or
1:24:20
the some down mix, and we're changing
1:24:22
things within that. Yeah, I remember my
1:24:24
first, one of my first cars when
1:24:26
I would install my own stereo stereo
1:24:29
systems. I had a
1:24:31
graphic equalizer that I got at one
1:24:33
point and I put that in there.
1:24:35
And it was a lot of fun
1:24:38
actually to go down and like tweak
1:24:40
it and saw into song and I
1:24:42
felt like it was one of the
1:24:45
first learning moves for mixing is like
1:24:47
adjusting the EQ settings in the car.
1:24:49
Have you ever found that, you know,
1:24:51
and I know we have digital ones,
1:24:54
you know, my Tesla has a, you
1:24:56
know, a little graphic EQ, I could
1:24:58
mess with that I usually just leave
1:25:00
it flat, you know. But do you
1:25:03
think that's a kind of a fun
1:25:05
way for people to begin to explore?
1:25:07
What does mastering mean? It's like start
1:25:09
taking a finished thing and just ekewing
1:25:12
it and seeing what happens. I think
1:25:14
that's great because it can reveal a
1:25:16
lot of things, especially like, like, actually
1:25:18
that's a great way to help understand
1:25:21
low end and how low end affects
1:25:23
you and how it moves around a
1:25:25
different spaces, especially like when you're dealing
1:25:28
with like base notes, you know, like
1:25:30
the biggest thing that a lot of.
1:25:32
times what I deal with in in
1:25:34
with mastering is uneven base notes that
1:25:37
pop or uneven not base notes from
1:25:39
the bass guitar but like like when
1:25:41
the mix gets sum together and the
1:25:43
mix engineer may not be in an
1:25:46
environment where they can hear that very
1:25:48
well we get a lot of like
1:25:50
inconsistent motion in the base of like
1:25:52
different things that are summing together and
1:25:55
so like I can go through and
1:25:57
like keep the mix relatively solid as
1:25:59
they intended and then just kind of
1:26:02
like get that to feel more consistent
1:26:04
in the decade. that have, and it
1:26:06
makes the mix more enveloping in my
1:26:08
opinion. So sometimes there are, you know,
1:26:11
with bass instruments and bass guitars and
1:26:13
things like that, there are certain chords
1:26:15
and notes sound huge in the low
1:26:17
end and other ones seem to like
1:26:20
the low end can seem to go
1:26:22
away and stuff like that. How would
1:26:24
you talk about that and how would
1:26:26
you possibly address some of those things
1:26:29
at a mastering stage to? or how
1:26:31
do you even advise the mixer to
1:26:33
go back and address it? I try
1:26:35
to, I try to not sense stuff.
1:26:38
If I have, actually, I'm gonna answer
1:26:40
that with a different, almost a different
1:26:42
topic. Developing trust, you know, like I
1:26:45
have a lot of return mix engineers
1:26:47
who enjoy what I do, and it
1:26:49
really becomes a symbiotic relationship where you
1:26:51
build that trust between each other. And
1:26:54
then you kind of like that safe
1:26:56
space that you open up. You can
1:26:58
really talk about, hey, when I do
1:27:00
this, how do you feel about that?
1:27:03
And then the mix engineer will be
1:27:05
like, when I do this, how does
1:27:07
this translate? And then you kind of
1:27:09
go back and forth. And that's having
1:27:12
a client in the room with you.
1:27:14
Or a mix engineer who I just,
1:27:16
we can communicate over email or phone,
1:27:18
you know, like who's, who sent me
1:27:21
stuff a lot. You like I get
1:27:23
like something from them once a month.
1:27:25
or just out a few albums over
1:27:28
the year. Like you can really develop
1:27:30
this. You've developed a relationship where it's
1:27:32
not so much like the ideas that
1:27:34
I have. It's like, oh, I'm hearing
1:27:37
this. And then the mix is just
1:27:39
like, well, I did this. And then
1:27:41
I said, well, if I do this,
1:27:43
does that help this? You know, does
1:27:46
that help this? You know, you're sort
1:27:48
of working as a team back and
1:27:50
you're doing that for the artist. What
1:27:52
a lot of things get missed in
1:27:55
the music industry with production teams is
1:27:57
they don't work together Yeah, and it's
1:27:59
like I've really worked really hard to
1:28:02
say hey, this isn't isn't my record,
1:28:04
you know, like I'm a service and
1:28:06
I'm your team member and we all
1:28:08
got to like have some sort of
1:28:11
connection to get this you know like
1:28:13
all my favorite records are these giant
1:28:15
teams you know yeah like so I
1:28:17
sort of I didn't mean to steer
1:28:20
us off topic there I didn't know
1:28:22
we were off topic it felt pretty
1:28:24
on topic me okay but when I
1:28:26
think about the team thing too I
1:28:29
think about what it's like to be
1:28:31
somebody turning over music For somebody to
1:28:33
mix or turning it over for somebody
1:28:35
to master sure Probably the same feeling
1:28:38
for somebody who just comes in and
1:28:40
sings and they're turning over their voice
1:28:42
to the recording engineer and the producer
1:28:45
in the studio You know where somebody
1:28:47
over doing a guitar part and then
1:28:49
saying and then they hear it back
1:28:51
through the speakers or like the drummer
1:28:54
comes in and plays a drum part
1:28:56
and then here's how do the drums
1:28:58
play back? You know, there's a there's
1:29:00
a level of Trust in letting go
1:29:03
that is part of the whole process.
1:29:05
Right. Yeah. And with that is often,
1:29:07
it's very easy to just have an
1:29:09
accompanying sense of self-doubt, you know. So
1:29:12
like you turn over a, you turn
1:29:14
over a finished mix to a mastering
1:29:16
engineer and then it comes back and
1:29:19
you know, you might. hear
1:29:21
things that don't hit you right or
1:29:23
do or don't or whatever. And then
1:29:25
you're like, and then you're like in
1:29:28
this state of like, oh gosh, did
1:29:30
I, I don't even say gosh, oh
1:29:32
God, did I screw it up? Yeah.
1:29:35
Okay, sometimes I say gosh. But, you
1:29:37
know, you're wondering like, did I screw
1:29:39
it up or is this the mastering
1:29:42
thing that's doing it? And you get
1:29:44
you immediately in a sense of potential
1:29:46
self-doubt. And so that's where like. That
1:29:49
ability to communicate and that ability to
1:29:51
feel like you're on the same wavelength
1:29:53
is so helpful. I've been in that
1:29:56
situation in both directions. But that's why
1:29:58
I've created just this open, safe environment
1:30:00
to, like not, I don't, I don't
1:30:03
want the mixed engine to feel that
1:30:05
way. Also, I want the mixed engine
1:30:07
to be really excited about what they've
1:30:10
done and when I give it back
1:30:12
to them and be like, wow, you,
1:30:14
my mix feels like it's my mix,
1:30:17
but man, we got this to a
1:30:19
place that it needed to get to.
1:30:21
Yeah. And I mean, granted, we're not
1:30:24
all the same. We're all like artists
1:30:26
with different styles with different styles. I
1:30:28
don't think that we have to assume
1:30:31
that whatever system we create is going
1:30:33
to automatically be perfect for everybody. We
1:30:35
have to also be ready for the
1:30:37
fact that like, you know, you, I'll
1:30:39
just use the example of like bringing
1:30:42
in a singer to sing on a
1:30:44
track. I mean, the voice is so
1:30:46
personal. It's like you're going to bring
1:30:48
in one singer. And you might have
1:30:50
the greatest communication in the world, and
1:30:53
they might do a fantastic job. But
1:30:55
in the end, you're like, that's just
1:30:57
not the voice we're looking for, you
1:30:59
know. Yeah, it doesn't fit the situation
1:31:02
or you're feeling, I guess, right? And
1:31:04
or an artist working with a producer
1:31:06
or something, you know, I'm looking for
1:31:08
a different kind of style. Same thing
1:31:10
with a mixing engineer or a mastering
1:31:13
engineer or a mastering engineer. But through
1:31:15
that process, but through that process, for
1:31:17
there to be a great. process of
1:31:19
feeling like we're on the same page,
1:31:21
it's a great team, when we talk
1:31:24
to each other, I feel like you
1:31:26
understand me kind of thing. Yeah. So
1:31:28
that you can get to that point
1:31:30
of making the best version of the
1:31:32
record that you're trying to make. Yeah,
1:31:35
I couldn't agree with that 100% I've
1:31:37
tried to foster that environment. Well you
1:31:39
couldn't agree with that 100%? Or like...
1:31:41
That's just messing with you. The English
1:31:44
language is just so confusing. That's all
1:31:46
right. That's all right. That's all right.
1:31:48
It's like, oh man. It's like, there
1:31:50
are phrases that I say when I'm
1:31:52
like, why do I, like, where did
1:31:55
that come from? Right. Like, yeah. Oh,
1:31:57
I was looking on Google. I'm like,
1:31:59
what's the derivation of. like some expression
1:32:01
you know it's like yeah yeah we
1:32:03
use words that don't logically work in
1:32:06
the situation but it's the whole culture
1:32:08
has moved at that direct yeah yeah
1:32:10
speaking of having to get up and
1:32:12
use words a lot one of the
1:32:14
things you do is you also teach
1:32:17
at SAE right yes yeah tell us
1:32:19
a little bit about that what's what
1:32:21
SAE what do you what do over
1:32:23
there so I have a master's degree
1:32:25
which allows me to teach at the
1:32:28
bachelor's courses at the level which is
1:32:30
part of their accreditation and it's I
1:32:32
teach the, I, I teach a few
1:32:34
different classes, but my, the main thing
1:32:37
that I was brought in to work
1:32:39
on was the, the mastering class at
1:32:41
SAE, so I'm a, an SAE is,
1:32:43
they're a school here in Nashville that,
1:32:45
was a school of audio engineering? School,
1:32:48
yeah. They, they're, they have multiple campus
1:32:50
around, around the US, and they're owned
1:32:52
by a large parent company in Australia.
1:32:54
called Novatas, that's an educational company. But
1:32:56
it serves a demographic of students who
1:32:59
maybe wouldn't have the opportunity to go
1:33:01
to a major university. I teach night
1:33:03
classes and I feel like it's a
1:33:05
really great way that I can give
1:33:07
back to the community. And I was
1:33:10
always looking for something where I could
1:33:12
do that. And their philosophy is, is
1:33:14
they don't want academics who are tenured
1:33:16
working. They want like actual people who
1:33:19
are working in the field that can
1:33:21
give students. They can give students the
1:33:23
real time on the ground, like what's
1:33:25
happening. And that feels really authentic. And
1:33:27
I'm able to just say, hey, this
1:33:30
is what I do every day. And
1:33:32
these are the things to think about.
1:33:34
And if you know. sort of in
1:33:36
classes, you know. Yeah, I like essays.
1:33:38
It's a cool spot. I think that
1:33:41
it does have a feel of like
1:33:43
it's like a working, sort of a
1:33:45
working class. Shout out to Matt Boudron.
1:33:47
working class audio but essay feels like
1:33:49
like a like a working class audio
1:33:52
education program even down to the thing
1:33:54
of like I was like I went
1:33:56
to them and say hey could I
1:33:58
you know like do we have an
1:34:01
avenue for publishing like something you know
1:34:03
like because I know in major universities
1:34:05
like if you're tenured you're required to
1:34:07
publish you know things and the the
1:34:09
person who's running it is one of
1:34:12
my supervisor said Oh no, we don't
1:34:14
want you, we don't have evidence for
1:34:16
that because we want you to just
1:34:18
give what you, like we hired you
1:34:20
because you're working in mastering every day.
1:34:23
You know, like, like, like, like, don't
1:34:25
worry about publishing, just, you know, give
1:34:27
them what you're doing every day, you
1:34:29
know, and what you're working on, what
1:34:31
you've, you know, all that sort of
1:34:34
thing. So it's kind of like counterintuitive
1:34:36
because they come from the academic world
1:34:38
where that's like... Yeah, settings as well.
1:34:40
So I do half of my classes
1:34:43
in person and half of my classes
1:34:45
online and I do it from the
1:34:47
math, my Mastering Studio. So that nobody
1:34:49
gets a full class, you just do
1:34:51
a half a class? Just kidding. Our
1:34:54
classes, we have four hours. The cool
1:34:56
thing about SAE is you can do
1:34:58
a bachelor's degree in about half the
1:35:00
time because we run, they run their
1:35:02
semesters all year around and the semesters
1:35:05
are like condensed into seven weeks. and
1:35:07
you are immersed in like only two
1:35:09
classes per semester. So they've- Right, so
1:35:11
you really focus on it. Like an
1:35:13
accelerated program. That's good. That tends to
1:35:16
be good for me. I do well
1:35:18
when I can just focus on one
1:35:20
thing at a time. But I also
1:35:22
have learned that so often we don't
1:35:24
get, we only get to focus on
1:35:27
one thing at a time for a
1:35:29
little bit and then you gotta put
1:35:31
it down and go focus on something
1:35:33
else. And so for me, a big
1:35:36
challenge has always been like, okay, how
1:35:38
do you learn the shit out of
1:35:40
something. up to this point and then
1:35:42
put it away and know that you
1:35:44
don't even get to come back and
1:35:47
relearn it again for six months. Yes.
1:35:49
And then how do you pick up
1:35:51
where you left off? Yeah, I struggled
1:35:53
with that because I just always wanted
1:35:55
to like if I don't have a
1:35:58
I'm not in it all the time.
1:36:00
It's like a language. You use it
1:36:02
or use it or lose it, right?
1:36:04
Yeah. It's like, I don't know. I do
1:36:06
things like stuff like this, like figuring out
1:36:09
how to do a video podcast. I'll deep
1:36:11
dive, learn something for a while. And then
1:36:13
I try and at the point at which
1:36:15
I got it figured out and I have
1:36:17
to put it away and go focus on
1:36:19
something else. I'll just. do like a video
1:36:21
walk through note to myself. I'll just
1:36:23
take my phone and just like walk
1:36:26
around pointed everything explained it all to
1:36:28
myself like I was saying like here's
1:36:30
how you do this yeah and here's
1:36:32
why that you know works who doesn't
1:36:34
and that kind of helps but then
1:36:36
the problem for me is then I'm
1:36:38
like where did I put that video
1:36:41
yes yeah six months later yeah no
1:36:43
that's yeah fine um digital organization oh
1:36:45
my gosh like That's a whole other
1:36:47
topic. Well, and we did hit a little bit
1:36:49
of that, all right? So that's good. But when
1:36:51
you're teaching the mastering class at SAE, what do
1:36:54
you find are some of the common questions
1:36:56
that the students have about it? And
1:36:58
you find you're always having to answer
1:37:00
over and over. I've developed, from what
1:37:03
I've learned through that teaching that class
1:37:05
is like, the biggest thing is not
1:37:07
so much like the nitty gritty technical
1:37:09
detail. It's teaching people how to like
1:37:11
develop their own critical critical critical listening.
1:37:14
And that's why I put critical listening
1:37:16
in sort of like my bio is what
1:37:18
I got from my master's degree in
1:37:20
studying with some of the people who
1:37:22
I studied with is how to
1:37:24
truly critical listening and then what
1:37:27
critical listening actually is. And then
1:37:29
how do you translate that over
1:37:31
to like subjectively the subjective art?
1:37:33
You know, how do I stay
1:37:35
a mastering engineer and work on
1:37:37
things technically but then understand what's
1:37:40
happening artistically? Yeah. And I
1:37:42
feel like students come in and they're like,
1:37:44
how do I do this? And it's, then
1:37:46
they say like, well, I can do all
1:37:49
the, like, how do I do all these
1:37:51
technical things? And you look at what they're
1:37:53
really asking. It's like, how do
1:37:55
I actually listen? Right. And so I kind
1:37:57
of have taken, I have a system.
1:38:00
in these classes that I've developed
1:38:02
myself that I sort of stole
1:38:04
from my McGill background at McGill
1:38:06
University and then taken from some
1:38:08
AES white papers of how to
1:38:11
like evaluation, how to evaluate recordings
1:38:13
and kind of sum that all
1:38:15
together. Oh, and there's also
1:38:17
another textbook from a guy named
1:38:20
Jason Corey who runs the University
1:38:22
of Michigan program and he wrote
1:38:24
a book on critical listening as
1:38:26
well, a really awesome textbook. I
1:38:28
asked. Everybody should check that out.
1:38:30
And he was, he's another McGill
1:38:32
alumni. He got his, I
1:38:35
think he got his PhD from
1:38:37
McGill. McGill's up in Canada. Yeah,
1:38:39
McGill, Quebec. Yeah, in Montreal. Were
1:38:42
you studying under George Massenberg? Yes,
1:38:44
George, George Massenberg, Richard King, Martha
1:38:47
D. Francisco, and Vyslav Voicheck. It's
1:38:49
hard to say, it's Polish. It's trying
1:38:51
to say, pronounce his last name and
1:38:53
spell it is. Those are the four
1:38:55
people that were there. George has since
1:38:57
retired from teaching and he's back in
1:39:00
Nashville now as well. So, and I know
1:39:02
you've had him on the podcast before.
1:39:04
He was in the podcast. Yeah. Yeah.
1:39:06
Yeah. He joined us remotely at the
1:39:08
time. And then of course I've been
1:39:10
in his room at Blackburg. Yes, the
1:39:12
diffusion room. The diffusion room. Yeah. We
1:39:15
discussed that a lot in class. So
1:39:17
that was fun. That's a cool thing.
1:39:19
Yeah. Do you feel like the time
1:39:21
that you've spent watching YouTube videos, trying
1:39:23
out mixed tricks and tweaking version after
1:39:25
version of your mixes has gotten you
1:39:27
nowhere? Have you been looking for more
1:39:29
of a simple and straightforward step-by-step process
1:39:31
for creating a pro mix that
1:39:34
won't take years to learn? What
1:39:36
if you could have a Grammy-winning
1:39:38
mix engineer who understood all of
1:39:40
your struggles and could coach you
1:39:42
through them? If you struggle with
1:39:44
any of these questions, then the
1:39:47
ultimate mixing masterclass is just... for
1:39:49
you. Now you can discover the
1:39:51
proven step-by-step mixing system from Grammy-winning
1:39:53
mix engineer Craig Alvin for consistently
1:39:55
creating a pro-quality mix in your
1:39:57
home studio that will sound great.
1:40:00
Listen to this quote from one of
1:40:02
our students, David. That was absolutely the
1:40:04
most helpful and informative block of information
1:40:06
and mentoring on the mixing process that
1:40:08
I have ever been a part of.
1:40:10
That was like sitting behind a mix
1:40:12
engineer for years, watching and picking up
1:40:15
pro tips along the way, condensed into
1:40:17
a six to seven hour session. Look,
1:40:19
I'm so confident that this will help
1:40:21
you take your mixes to the next
1:40:23
level, that if you can't get a
1:40:25
killer mix in 30 days, I'll give
1:40:28
you a refund, no questions asked. ready
1:40:30
to take your mixes to Grammy winning
1:40:32
quality, then go to Ultimate Mixing Masterclass.com
1:40:34
and start now by checking out the
1:40:37
free preview of the Ultimate Snare Mixing
1:40:39
Trick. And hopefully, I'll see you in
1:40:41
the front row of the Grammys. Yeah,
1:40:44
the ability to listen. So one of
1:40:46
the things that I think of when
1:40:48
I imagine learning critical listening
1:40:51
is like, you're learning to listen for
1:40:53
things that you didn't. know what they
1:40:55
were before and some of that comes
1:40:57
just with experience and time I mean
1:41:00
like I hear things in a
1:41:02
recording in music and production that
1:41:04
I'm sure I couldn't have heard
1:41:06
initially but I but I hear
1:41:08
them immediately and there's there's
1:41:11
stuff that there's that that is
1:41:13
a level of technical stuff
1:41:15
where you could probably put a name
1:41:17
to it and explain it and
1:41:19
then there's also stuff where you
1:41:21
have like this internal Gut meter
1:41:23
that you know it's not right, you
1:41:26
know, and that's probably the balance of
1:41:28
like the the text side versus
1:41:30
the personal creative side as well
1:41:32
But but I imagine there's also You
1:41:34
know, do you find that there's
1:41:36
a Universal language that is useful
1:41:39
in terms of critical listening
1:41:41
and being able to describe
1:41:43
what something needs and then there's
1:41:45
also like the the importance of
1:41:48
having a personal language for yes
1:41:50
Describing this is This is the
1:41:52
topic where the students, this has
1:41:55
like been the my deepest topic
1:41:57
of like being a mastering
1:41:59
engineers. it's it's really I've developed
1:42:02
a system of like okay we have our
1:42:04
own way of like internalizing things and
1:42:06
a lot of times people can't
1:42:08
put that in the words right
1:42:10
how how do we take that
1:42:12
and then internalize it and communicate
1:42:15
to the artists in the mixed
1:42:17
engineers or or the production team
1:42:19
of that we're working with so like
1:42:21
how many times have you heard like somebody
1:42:24
say like oh that was warm right well
1:42:26
like My warm and your warm are
1:42:28
probably vastly different. You know, or
1:42:30
like, I had this, this, this
1:42:33
revelation. And I take ice baths
1:42:35
for fun. So probably, yeah. When
1:42:37
I had this situation and my
1:42:39
master's agree, a buddy of mine and
1:42:41
I were going back and forth and
1:42:43
we were discussing like, oh, that
1:42:46
sounds really bright. And I'm like
1:42:48
thinking like, it doesn't sound bright.
1:42:50
And then I opened up the
1:42:52
conversation and be like, okay, what
1:42:54
is your bright? you know like
1:42:56
I'm like oh shoot my bright is
1:42:58
like 12k you know everybody has this
1:43:00
you know and those are vastly
1:43:03
different different different textures
1:43:05
you know in in a recording vastly
1:43:07
different you know so we
1:43:09
can refer to actual frequencies although
1:43:11
I well I sort of find
1:43:14
that helpful and useful in the studios
1:43:16
and other times I'm like yeah I've
1:43:18
come up with a what I've teaching
1:43:20
my students is before at the beginning
1:43:22
of every mastering class around teaching. We
1:43:25
go into like technical stuff and I
1:43:27
have technical things of like how to
1:43:29
make a DDP and you know like
1:43:31
like how to do actual technical
1:43:34
mastering things but at the beginning of
1:43:36
every class the first hour of every class
1:43:38
we sit down and we listen to something
1:43:40
and we evaluate it on a set
1:43:42
of criteria that I've kind of I've taken
1:43:45
from Jason Corey's book, I've taken
1:43:47
from George when I was in class
1:43:49
with him, I've taken Vislov and then there's
1:43:51
an AES white paper and they all kind
1:43:53
of have these six pieces
1:43:56
of why I've added a they
1:43:58
all have these. six pieces
1:44:00
of criteria that kind of
1:44:02
accumulate a way that you
1:44:04
can kind of house everything
1:44:07
under some categories and be
1:44:09
able to listen consistently, especially
1:44:11
in a professional setting, like if
1:44:13
you're having to work for somebody
1:44:15
else, and then communicate that
1:44:17
out to somebody. And the categories
1:44:20
are, first category is spectral
1:44:22
content, like how do I translate
1:44:24
what I'm hearing into frequency
1:44:26
analysis? And under that category,
1:44:29
and Bob Katz puts it perfectly
1:44:31
in his book, you know, like micro
1:44:33
dynamics versus macro dynamics, you
1:44:36
know. And there's, I have subcategories
1:44:38
under all these of like things you
1:44:40
got to think about. The third
1:44:42
category is spatial impression, which is
1:44:44
how wide, you know, how why am I
1:44:46
hearing things versus how deep, you know, like
1:44:48
mixes have a front and back to them.
1:44:50
Some people say they have a, they actually
1:44:53
have some height too, but that's really
1:44:55
dependent on the system you know, you
1:44:57
know. And then the next category is
1:44:59
what we call transparency. And we should
1:45:01
clarify, we're probably talking about listening on
1:45:04
stereo speakers at this point, too. Yeah,
1:45:06
yeah. But you can translate that, you
1:45:08
can translate all this to immersive really
1:45:10
easily. Well, in immersive you clearly have
1:45:13
height, because the speakers love your height
1:45:15
too. Yeah, actually, yes, that very much
1:45:17
so. Yeah, that was speaking specifically with
1:45:19
the height on stereo, but in immersive
1:45:22
now we have real height, right, which
1:45:24
is incredible. It is pretty cool. Have
1:45:26
you dabbled and immersive yourself yet?
1:45:28
Yes, I have just dabbled.
1:45:31
And I'm looking for me
1:45:33
personally, I'm looking for a
1:45:35
practical application where the
1:45:37
second that I start, I
1:45:40
haven't gotten projects yet
1:45:42
to justify the expense. And
1:45:44
the second that that happens,
1:45:47
I personally will be really
1:45:49
excited when I can truly.
1:45:51
dive really deep into
1:45:53
it. So, back to the,
1:45:56
the, I was on spatial
1:45:58
oppression. which is, oh, once
1:46:00
we talk about spatial impression,
1:46:02
I dive into what's called transparency. When
1:46:05
we're listening, do we hear a lot
1:46:07
of processing on the recording that we're
1:46:09
listening to or does it feel really
1:46:11
raw? And there's kind of a transparency
1:46:13
meter. Like how transparent does it feel
1:46:16
versus how process does it feel? And
1:46:18
how transparent do we want it? Sometimes
1:46:20
we want it processed. Well, and then
1:46:22
it kind of can. The whole thing, the
1:46:25
list of things that I'm giving you right
1:46:27
here is like, is a way to reverse
1:46:29
engineer a recording from a math, like the
1:46:31
way that I've found a way that like,
1:46:33
when I'm working on something and I get
1:46:35
a mix that I feel is not transparent,
1:46:37
as there's a lot of
1:46:39
processing on it, I'm probably gonna
1:46:42
choose a route or some processing
1:46:44
on it, or some processing on
1:46:46
it, or some processing on it,
1:46:48
whereas like if something's really raw
1:46:50
and transparent. it may need a little more, you
1:46:52
know, may need a may, I say may,
1:46:54
everything's situational, like I may be
1:46:56
able to get away with more
1:46:59
processing because it doesn't have as
1:47:01
much on, you know, sort of, I'm thinking
1:47:03
of it that way in a mastering
1:47:05
mind, but when you're working in
1:47:07
any stage, this is really good
1:47:09
things to take notes on, like,
1:47:11
you know, like if you're working
1:47:13
on an individual sound versus a
1:47:16
whole mix, you know, that sort of thing.
1:47:18
And now that falls into there can
1:47:20
be an artistic noise insertion or there
1:47:22
can be like technical problems and being
1:47:24
able to listen for technical problems and
1:47:26
and decide whether a technical problem
1:47:28
whether something is artistically done in
1:47:30
a way that or it's an actual technical
1:47:33
problem that you need to change you know
1:47:35
right sometimes you just can't sometimes you hear
1:47:37
problems and there's just nothing you can do
1:47:39
about it yeah that's frustrating yeah just like
1:47:42
and then the last thing the the the
1:47:44
gut thing that you're talking about that we
1:47:46
can't describe I made a I made, I
1:47:48
stole this from the AES white paper, but
1:47:50
I kind of like changed it a little
1:47:52
bit is like, what's your gut
1:47:54
feeling? Like what, all those things,
1:47:56
that list of things combined, what
1:47:59
are you getting? getting like what is
1:48:01
emotionally, what are all those things triggering
1:48:03
in you emotionally? And I think that's
1:48:05
really, really important at the end of
1:48:07
like what does it all boil down
1:48:09
to. Because that's the only experience anybody's
1:48:11
actually gonna have. Correct. Yeah, but those
1:48:13
categories are a way that we can
1:48:15
like, as a industry professional, I
1:48:17
can turn around to an artist and
1:48:19
say, hey, I'm feeling this and this is
1:48:22
a way that I can technically describe
1:48:24
it to you without telling you that
1:48:26
some vague terminology that's like this is
1:48:28
warm. or this is right or this is like
1:48:30
you know and it's or or I can talk
1:48:32
to another mixed engineer and say hey you know
1:48:34
like in this category I'm hearing I'm
1:48:36
I'm dealing it with this this way you know
1:48:39
and so I'm sort of trying to impart on
1:48:41
a student that like having a
1:48:43
consistent way to critically listen and
1:48:45
evaluate a recording in a way
1:48:47
that you can you can translate
1:48:49
that out universally. I find that's
1:48:51
useful too in the production process
1:48:53
in the studio where I'm like working
1:48:56
with an artist and I hear something,
1:48:58
I hear the tags too long, or
1:49:00
I hear that the base, you know,
1:49:02
something doesn't go away and come
1:49:04
back in, it doesn't leave a
1:49:07
space, or, you know, the base is
1:49:09
playing a pie on the neck instead of
1:49:11
low in the neck, you know, all
1:49:13
kinds of things like that, or
1:49:15
vocals, you know, there's a harmony,
1:49:17
or there's a double, or there
1:49:20
isn't in a moment, and I'll
1:49:22
think about, there's a, since I've
1:49:24
done this. well don't do that
1:49:26
you need to do this yeah
1:49:28
but when I communicate to that
1:49:30
to the artist I've learned that
1:49:32
it's helpful to start breaking
1:49:34
down like well why is that the right
1:49:36
choice to make or suggest and so
1:49:38
I'll try and present it that way
1:49:40
now say like you know like well if
1:49:43
you do it like this and then you
1:49:45
know you go up high on the neck
1:49:47
on the base then the fundamental on the
1:49:49
low end sort of disappears from the
1:49:51
mix for a second yeah and if
1:49:54
you decide to play a loan out right
1:49:56
there, you know, you may discover that
1:49:58
there's more impact. it feels bigger
1:50:00
in that moment. And so then, like, if you'd
1:50:02
like the song to feel big in that moment,
1:50:05
that might be the right choice. If you'd like
1:50:07
the song to not feel so big in that
1:50:09
moment or suspended, you might like the high
1:50:11
note there, you know, explaining it, breaking it
1:50:13
down for like, what is the, what is
1:50:15
the experience when you make that
1:50:18
particular choice? I love that because you're
1:50:20
still giving the artists a chance to
1:50:22
like create, you're just giving them the...
1:50:24
the tools to choose and create
1:50:26
what they want their experience. Yeah,
1:50:29
and then hopefully I'm not too
1:50:31
long-winded where they're like, let's just
1:50:33
record. I'm just gonna play it.
1:50:36
I'm just gonna play it. I'm
1:50:38
just gonna play it. I'm just gonna
1:50:40
play it. I'm just gonna play it.
1:50:42
But I do love that too. I love
1:50:44
one. I'll make suggestions to
1:50:46
an artist sometimes about a lyric
1:50:48
or something. Yeah. And then they
1:50:50
just come back and they just
1:50:52
like one better. recording a vocal
1:50:55
and she was like I'm really
1:50:57
struggling with this and I just
1:50:59
changed one word for her and she's
1:51:01
like oh my gosh that like opened
1:51:04
everything like it kind of it kind
1:51:06
of broke the the roadblock yeah and
1:51:08
she's like I'm giving you a pointer
1:51:10
a credit and I'm like I don't
1:51:13
give me a pointer credit for one
1:51:15
word this is it's like it's like
1:51:17
she's like you get publishing I was
1:51:19
like no no no I'm I'm here to
1:51:22
Yeah, like please don't go that deep,
1:51:24
you know. Right. Yeah. I've probably co-written
1:51:26
a lot of songs in the
1:51:28
studio that I never got any
1:51:30
writing credit for. And I don't
1:51:32
know whether those songs went off to
1:51:34
make much money that it would
1:51:36
have mattered anyway, but maybe they
1:51:38
did. Yeah. Let's talk about, let's,
1:51:40
you know, I mentioned low end and base.
1:51:43
Low end does seem to be
1:51:45
an important part of making records
1:51:47
because it's sort of where the... the body
1:51:49
of the sound is, you know, a lot
1:51:51
of times it's where the weight and impact
1:51:54
of what we're doing can be. So let's see,
1:51:56
so one of the questions I wanted to
1:51:58
ask you is just like. like, you
1:52:00
know, should low-end seem big in a
1:52:02
mastering playback system? I was wonder,
1:52:04
like, does this, does the playback
1:52:07
in your mastering studio feel
1:52:09
this similar or different to
1:52:11
what it might feel in a
1:52:13
mixing environment or in a studio
1:52:15
environment when you're creating or
1:52:18
even in a consumer environment when
1:52:20
you go back and listen in
1:52:22
the car and you're like, yeah,
1:52:24
it feels great. I think my
1:52:26
mastering environment and this is just
1:52:29
me personally. needs to reflect the
1:52:31
bell curve of all those situations. So
1:52:33
like I need to be able to make
1:52:35
decisions and translate those
1:52:37
decisions out to every playback system.
1:52:40
So I need to have a system that
1:52:42
kind of falls, for me personally,
1:52:44
I need to have a system that kind
1:52:46
of falls in the middle of all that.
1:52:48
Does that make sense? Yeah. So like cars
1:52:50
tend to have a ton of
1:52:52
low end because you're just stuck
1:52:55
in a box and it builds
1:52:57
up. right like you're you're forcing
1:52:59
low-end into a space it can't
1:53:01
fit you know so like cars
1:53:03
are going to be have more
1:53:05
low-end whereas you know like our
1:53:07
clock radios are out you know
1:53:09
our little earbuds or stuff there's
1:53:11
not going to have any low
1:53:13
end there well the wall a
1:53:15
certain point although the Apple pods
1:53:17
are getting better every year or better
1:53:19
you know I so I need to have like
1:53:21
a system that fits in the middle
1:53:23
of all of that and then be
1:53:25
able to judge you know calibrate one
1:53:28
direction or another and understand what's
1:53:30
happening in all those spaces
1:53:32
that's my personal opinion but at
1:53:34
some point everything is relative like you
1:53:36
get to know your system so well that
1:53:38
you then learn how it translates yeah other
1:53:40
ways but I mean I find the cars
1:53:43
always been a super super important part of
1:53:45
the equation for me yeah but of course
1:53:47
I've been making records since before headphones were
1:53:49
worth listening to it's like we're our media
1:53:51
you know like everybody used to just listen
1:53:53
to music in the car you know like
1:53:55
on road trips or drive from work or
1:53:57
you know like that was like a huge
1:54:00
So, like, of course, we're gonna sort
1:54:02
of lean that direction, right? And we
1:54:04
also had a weird mix of, like,
1:54:06
our reference was radio. Yes. Which was,
1:54:09
like, not even apples to apples. Correct.
1:54:11
Because of all this stuff. We're listening
1:54:13
to radio, and that's what it sounds
1:54:16
like. And then we're making something, printing
1:54:18
it to a cassette or a CD,
1:54:20
and then playing that back in the
1:54:23
car. And radio had all this crazy
1:54:25
compression. Yeah. So that's why that that
1:54:27
car listen became so popular right like
1:54:29
and now we're shifting you right like
1:54:32
we're shifting like people well people are
1:54:34
listening in their cars they're like this
1:54:36
is what's controlling you know what's what's
1:54:39
on you know like we're shifting all
1:54:41
of our our playback to that I
1:54:43
love it this area of my references
1:54:46
now are coming from my phone to
1:54:48
my car. And I love the fact
1:54:50
that in my this particular car, the
1:54:53
audio quality when you stream from the
1:54:55
phone to the car seems to be
1:54:57
totally high res to me. I don't
1:54:59
know if it 100% is or if
1:55:02
there's some limitation, but it sounds freaking
1:55:04
great. It's probably not. But the gap
1:55:06
of, you know, like medium doing digitally
1:55:09
is is we're shrinking the like the.
1:55:11
the the Codex, you know, like if
1:55:13
you're for the streaming Codex are just
1:55:16
every, you know, every progression. We're just
1:55:18
getting, they're just getting better and better.
1:55:20
We're able to get more information into
1:55:23
those Codex. Yeah. Now, um, one of
1:55:25
the challenges can be that, um, the
1:55:27
streaming services now, you know, well, not
1:55:29
even finally, it's been. this way for
1:55:32
a while, but the normalization of song
1:55:34
levels from track to track. So we
1:55:36
used to have the loudness wars. Everything
1:55:39
next, one thing was louder, so you
1:55:41
try and make your stuff louder to
1:55:43
compete with that. Now the streaming services
1:55:46
balance out those levels so that everything...
1:55:48
stays in a consistent zone, although there's
1:55:50
still a loudness within that. Yes. But
1:55:52
then when you bring your mix on
1:55:55
the phone out to the car and
1:55:57
press play, there's new challenges where your
1:55:59
mix actually might sound louder than what's
1:56:02
playing back because if you have normalization.
1:56:04
It doesn't have the normalization coming back
1:56:06
off of your phone. So maybe talk
1:56:09
a little bit about that if you
1:56:11
want. And then do you, I guess
1:56:13
this could be the other part of
1:56:16
the question. You use some of the
1:56:18
tools like maybe file pass or sample
1:56:20
to deliver masters people and get feedback
1:56:22
and comments. And then along with that,
1:56:25
do you have any file naming stuff
1:56:27
that you want to throw into that
1:56:29
mix about keeping that organized so you
1:56:32
know what everybody's talking about. That's a
1:56:34
huge, the file name is a big
1:56:36
piece of my, what I took away
1:56:39
from from George and the archiving stuff.
1:56:41
So I don't know where you, what's
1:56:43
the. It's all one in the same.
1:56:46
You basically think about it like this.
1:56:48
You've. Hand it over something. Somebody's, it's
1:56:50
on their phone, they're, they're playing it
1:56:52
off their phone on into their car,
1:56:55
trying to decide how it sounds. Yeah.
1:56:57
You know, what are they faced with?
1:56:59
And then they want to give you
1:57:02
feedback and, you know, the file naming
1:57:04
is part of that, making sure they
1:57:06
know what the, you know, you're both
1:57:09
talking about the same thing. I like
1:57:11
file pass. More so than I like
1:57:13
because of I The delivery is really
1:57:15
easy. It doesn't it's very generic It
1:57:18
doesn't look like anything. I just have
1:57:20
my little logo in the corner and
1:57:22
right I feel like it's a blank
1:57:25
slate So the artist isn't seeing like
1:57:27
colors and you know, you don't want
1:57:29
to influence people's perception And and then
1:57:32
the my invoicing is all connected into
1:57:34
that. So it's all one-stop. It's like
1:57:36
a one-stop place. I haven't found anything
1:57:39
that works Better for exactly what I
1:57:41
do right in mastering yeah delivery is
1:57:43
often a single file. Yeah. And so
1:57:45
the invoicing means you can upload a
1:57:48
file, people can hear it, they can
1:57:50
approve it, and then they hit the
1:57:52
buy now button to download. Correct. Yeah.
1:57:55
And it really makes the handoff, the
1:57:57
cash, you know, like the handoff of
1:57:59
like, hey, I've done this work and,
1:58:02
you know, like, I need to be
1:58:04
compensated for my time. It kind of
1:58:06
makes that hand shake really, really, really,
1:58:09
really nice. Yeah. I have some friends
1:58:11
who just require payment up front. And
1:58:13
I feel like I have a free
1:58:15
revision policy for everything I do. And
1:58:18
if we get to in the weeds,
1:58:20
we have conversations. But I want you
1:58:22
to walk away from what I work
1:58:25
on with feeling proud of it. And
1:58:27
if I can't achieve that, then maybe
1:58:29
we aren't a great fit. So I
1:58:32
don't want to. cause pain to somebody
1:58:34
who doesn't like my product or it's
1:58:36
not even a product. It's like I'm
1:58:38
helping them achieve what they want, you
1:58:41
know. So I feel like the handshake
1:58:43
right where a file pass puts it
1:58:45
is like really, really respectful to both
1:58:48
sides. Yeah. You know, well, one of
1:58:50
the cool things about the delivery of
1:58:52
music through the buy now to download
1:58:55
button. is it also removes the need
1:58:57
to send a client an invoice and
1:58:59
then send them a reminder about it
1:59:02
and send them. I don't have to
1:59:04
remind. Yeah, it kills like, it's a
1:59:06
time saver and then it also doesn't
1:59:08
have, you don't have to have those
1:59:11
awkward conversations with like, hey, you haven't
1:59:13
paid yet. You know, like I just
1:59:15
wanted to check follow up. Yeah, yeah.
1:59:18
And also like that, I feel like
1:59:20
that sort of sometimes can damper some
1:59:22
damper. some of the excitement of like
1:59:25
a great like a great project, you
1:59:27
know, it is some subconsciously, but at
1:59:29
the same time it's like we're all
1:59:32
professionals, we need to be, you know,
1:59:34
like we need to be paid for
1:59:36
our time and, you know, like we're
1:59:38
adding something to your, to, to, to,
1:59:41
a, value to the project. For 15
1:59:43
years, I had a famous MCI console
1:59:45
at my studio that originally came from
1:59:48
Criteria Studio C in Miami, where it
1:59:50
made some of the most iconic Grammy-winning
1:59:52
records of the 1970s, and it sounded
1:59:55
incredible. When I was ready to upgrade
1:59:57
my studio to a full digital mixing
1:59:59
setup, I teamed up with Rick Carson
2:00:02
at Make Believe Studio metricalo and Golden
2:00:04
Ear producer Bill Simsick to recreate the
2:00:06
legendary MCI console as the new MBSI
2:00:08
plug-in. The MBSI captures the same iconic
2:00:11
sound used on multi-million selling records like
2:00:13
Hotel California for the Eagles, Saturday Night
2:00:15
Fever, and Stayin' Alive for the Bee
2:00:18
Geez. I shot the Sheriff for Eric
2:00:20
Clapton, Where an American Band for Grandfunk
2:00:22
Railroad, and the soundtrack to Greece, the
2:00:25
movie, all for legendary producers like Tom
2:00:27
Dow, Todd Rungren, and Bill Sims. The
2:00:29
MBSI. and not only delivers the authentic
2:00:31
sound of the original MCI console faithfully,
2:00:34
but it also adds new features like
2:00:36
a top-notch compressor, overdrive, and a dual
2:00:38
EQ filter switch, adding tools that Bill
2:00:41
Simsick said he would have loved to
2:00:43
have in the original console. Now you
2:00:45
too can get that Grammy-winning MCI sound
2:00:48
in your home studio. Whether you're recording
2:00:50
or mixing, you can experience the sound
2:00:52
of Miami 1976. in your sound at
2:00:55
make-believe studio.com/MBSI. So talk a little bit
2:00:57
about the naming of files so that
2:00:59
you everybody knows which version we're talking
2:01:01
about and how to discuss it. Yes,
2:01:04
so this is a really big, how
2:01:06
did they give you comments? This is
2:01:08
a big, big thing that I have
2:01:11
really dove, really deep into in terms
2:01:13
of. How do I organize my hard
2:01:15
drives? How do I like mastering? We
2:01:18
deal with so many files And we
2:01:20
have to keep track of everything and
2:01:22
we have to be able to pull
2:01:25
up in my opinion I I keep
2:01:27
every you know like if you're an
2:01:29
artist who works with me I have
2:01:31
every session I've ever worked on backed
2:01:34
up in numerous places and I can
2:01:36
pull that at a moments notice if
2:01:38
they need somebody if I worked on
2:01:41
something in 2016 Somebody can call me
2:01:43
in 2024 and say, hey, can I
2:01:45
get five? Oh, perfect case in point.
2:01:48
I have an artist who's doing re-release
2:01:50
and he needed, I worked on two
2:01:52
albums for this artist and he was
2:01:54
like, he's an older gentleman and he's
2:01:57
used to sort of life before digital
2:01:59
and he said, what is it going
2:02:01
to take to pull up my albums
2:02:04
and I need to re-release? I'm finding
2:02:06
a new distributor and... Can I get
2:02:08
the masters for this, this, and this?
2:02:11
And then I'm thinking about at most,
2:02:13
you know, like, well, you know, all
2:02:15
these sort of things. And I said,
2:02:18
it's only going to take me like
2:02:20
four mouse clicks. And he's like, what?
2:02:22
So it's not going to take like
2:02:24
a week to gather all that stuff?
2:02:27
I was like, no, I have the
2:02:29
stuff, like, everything's not going to take
2:02:31
like a week to gather all that
2:02:34
stuff. I was like, like, like, everything,
2:02:36
everything, like, like, everything. and I put
2:02:38
it up on file pass and that
2:02:41
was, you know, so having a naming
2:02:43
scheme that allows you to do that
2:02:45
and be able to find things really
2:02:48
quickly and have it all archived nicely,
2:02:50
really, really important. So like, you know,
2:02:52
like, it's really, really detailed, but I,
2:02:54
typically when I send something to an
2:02:57
artist, it's, you know, it's artist name,
2:02:59
album name, like if I'm sending you
2:03:01
an individual file, like, and it's on
2:03:04
and out, like, it's artist name, The
2:03:06
nomenclature is artist name, album name, song.
2:03:08
song sequence and then a descriptor of
2:03:11
production master. What does song sequence mean?
2:03:13
Song sequence is the track order that
2:03:15
it is on the record. So the
2:03:17
number so that it's always like if
2:03:20
you throw it into a computer it'll
2:03:22
always the album will always stay in
2:03:24
its own order. Right. You know, it's
2:03:27
not like song number one because song
2:03:29
number one has a different alphabetical. It's
2:03:31
like your computer, you know jumbles them
2:03:34
right. And then song title. and then
2:03:36
there's there's a descriptor on it that
2:03:38
I put in parentheses like if I'm
2:03:41
just doing a test master for somebody
2:03:43
I'll I'll put a description that says
2:03:45
this is a test it says test
2:03:47
master or it says production master and
2:03:50
the words production master means that if
2:03:52
this is approved by the artists it
2:03:54
can go into production like meaning that
2:03:57
this can be the file that goes
2:03:59
to your distributor or goes on I
2:04:01
will take it and put it on
2:04:04
a lacquer or you know like that's
2:04:06
that if it gets that if it
2:04:08
gets approved if it gets approved And
2:04:11
then if we do revisions, there's always
2:04:13
right after that, or actually I've switched
2:04:15
it around before the production master, there's
2:04:17
a revision number. So R01, R02. And
2:04:20
if there is, if there wasn't a
2:04:22
revision, they're just, that distancing. Would it
2:04:24
say like R03 base up or would
2:04:27
it just say RZero? No, I just,
2:04:29
for the sanity of everybody and the
2:04:31
length of file names, I just, it's
2:04:34
just, it's just R0, like it just,
2:04:36
and that tells me when we finalize
2:04:38
something exactly what. I know, I always
2:04:40
have a record of what goes into
2:04:43
production. So if you're talking to a
2:04:45
client, they're saying, the vocal's still low,
2:04:47
and you're like, really? I just, Bruce,
2:04:50
are you sure you're commenting on the
2:04:52
right one? Then you just say, are
2:04:54
you looking at R03? Yeah, that's exactly.
2:04:57
Yeah, yeah. So it keeps, I want
2:04:59
it short, but I want it enough
2:05:01
that we can pinpoint exactly what we're
2:05:04
doing. And then when the project had
2:05:06
finalized, I just, I indicate indicate which
2:05:08
one went into production went into production.
2:05:10
Now the name is since it sounds
2:05:13
like like a pretty long name. Yeah,
2:05:15
it's not just like, you know, fire
2:05:17
is the name of the track or
2:05:20
something. Yeah, fire v one or something.
2:05:22
Do you, do you find that in
2:05:24
some places, it all gets truncated and
2:05:27
you can't see, like on a drop
2:05:29
box, I imagine, maybe it's hard to
2:05:31
see the R's zero three or something.
2:05:34
That's the only downfall of this system,
2:05:36
but if you just click on it,
2:05:38
you can see the, the nomenclature for
2:05:40
everything of like it expanded, like it
2:05:43
expanded. about some of that and I
2:05:45
for me it's the only way that
2:05:47
I can archive things appropriately and be
2:05:50
able to call on things in a
2:05:52
moment's notice you know so it's like
2:05:54
a it's like a it's the best
2:05:57
of both worlds it's like it's clear
2:05:59
enough for artists to communicate back to
2:06:01
you but it's also clear enough for
2:06:03
your finding a year from now and
2:06:06
being able to know exactly which file
2:06:08
was and to make the file even
2:06:10
longer right at the end I always
2:06:13
put sample rate bit rate Right of
2:06:15
the file in the file name so
2:06:17
you don't even have to go look
2:06:20
it's just there so you can tell
2:06:22
what's the high-res what's going to CD
2:06:24
what's you know what is every all
2:06:27
the way down you know the different
2:06:29
resolutions and you mentioned the AAS white
2:06:31
paper I think yeah just give a
2:06:33
shout out to that for the rock
2:06:36
stars I think there's a file out
2:06:38
there that tells you what to do
2:06:40
if you want to go there's an
2:06:43
AAS white paper that was actually George
2:06:45
George and Chuck Ailey were on Chuck
2:06:47
Ailey were on the There's like 50
2:06:50
people on it, but George Massenberg was
2:06:52
on it. And I think it's Chuck,
2:06:54
Chuck, Amy, they hear and yeah, I
2:06:57
may get that wrong. I apologize. No,
2:06:59
I think that's correct. Yeah, yeah. And
2:07:01
the paper goes into like how it
2:07:03
was really designed to like how are
2:07:06
we sending stems, you know, in the
2:07:08
production world, and how do we label
2:07:10
those file, how do we label folder
2:07:13
sets? And this paper kind of like
2:07:15
spells out, you know, like they're basically
2:07:17
they just said like we don't have
2:07:20
a standard for this. How do we
2:07:22
create a standard that they tried, you
2:07:24
know, like in the film production. world
2:07:27
and in like, especially when you're dealing
2:07:29
with like immersive audio, like how do
2:07:31
we label all these things to then
2:07:33
send a different engineers back and forth
2:07:36
as you're working on things. And I
2:07:38
kind of stole all that from that
2:07:40
paper. I've created my own like smaller
2:07:43
different iteration of it with like dates
2:07:45
and like the larger file for for
2:07:47
sets that I make that not the
2:07:50
things that I'm sending to the clients,
2:07:52
but I always include a specific date
2:07:54
and then I also have what's called
2:07:56
a project ID. that's just like a
2:07:59
number that every project gets that that
2:08:01
is also becomes my invoice number. So
2:08:03
like if I have to go look
2:08:06
up an invoice I can then coordinate
2:08:08
that number with the file set on
2:08:10
the folder for everything. So it's really
2:08:13
really efficient. And that's why I can
2:08:15
call things up at a moment's notice.
2:08:17
If somebody calls if somebody says, hey,
2:08:20
I need my I need this. I
2:08:22
need my master. I don't have my
2:08:24
masters from four years ago. Can I,
2:08:26
you know. And that's just a service
2:08:29
that like when you when you go
2:08:31
I don't charge for that anything like
2:08:33
that I mean I I kind of
2:08:36
think it's kind of included in my
2:08:38
my actual mastering rate it's kind of
2:08:40
like this future proof that I do
2:08:43
but I think it's just a courtesy
2:08:45
you know from a mastering side now
2:08:47
I think if I was a mixed
2:08:50
engineer I might that might be a
2:08:52
different story because of the amount. Yeah
2:08:54
yeah but from a mastering standpoint it's
2:08:56
I feel like that's part of our
2:08:59
I always say that we're the librarian
2:09:01
of the librarian of the project. You
2:09:03
know, or where the, where, where the,
2:09:06
where the archivist of that project, you
2:09:08
know, I look at, Larry Crane is
2:09:10
like the, oversees the executive of Elliot
2:09:13
Smith. And I, I mean, what's, what's
2:09:15
a cool responsibility, you know, to be
2:09:17
the archivist of that estate. And so
2:09:19
like, I try to organize myself in
2:09:22
that line of thinking, you know. Like
2:09:24
well and I think about there are
2:09:26
other artists that we talk about sometimes
2:09:29
in the show Frank Zappa and that
2:09:31
catalog you know the Grateful Dead there's
2:09:33
there's artists with huge catalogs that somebody
2:09:36
to be archiving to make sure that
2:09:38
the stuff stays organized. Yes, yeah, and
2:09:40
yeah, I do that with everything I
2:09:43
work with. And it's really, actually, it's
2:09:45
really nerdy and fun. I don't know,
2:09:47
other people may say that's not fun,
2:09:49
but I, my brain. Well, it does
2:09:52
give the client that you're working with
2:09:54
a sense of feeling important too. Yeah.
2:09:56
Like if you, if I was to
2:09:59
come back to you and you had
2:10:01
done a project for me five years
2:10:03
ago, and you were like, yeah, yeah,
2:10:06
yeah, here it, here it is. that
2:10:08
would probably make me feel like, wow,
2:10:10
I'm that important, which is a good
2:10:13
feeling. And again, it's that process of
2:10:15
connecting with clients and making sure everybody
2:10:17
feels great. So let me jump to
2:10:19
this question. This is a question I
2:10:22
like to ask all of our guests
2:10:24
on the podcast. We're going to take
2:10:26
the Wayback Studio Machine and you go
2:10:29
back in time and you find young
2:10:31
Duncan who's, I don't know, thinking about
2:10:33
going off to school and getting a
2:10:36
master's degree or who knows what. But
2:10:38
you say, listen dude, I've come back
2:10:40
to give you this one bit of
2:10:42
advice. Here's a single most important thing
2:10:45
that you need to know to be
2:10:47
a rock star of the studio yourself
2:10:49
one day. What advice would you go
2:10:52
back and give yourself if you could?
2:10:54
Oh, I would tell myself. At the
2:10:56
end of my master's degree, I was
2:10:59
really scared of missing opportunities. And I
2:11:01
worked myself, I overworked myself and burned
2:11:03
myself out a bit. And I would
2:11:06
tell my past self to be like,
2:11:08
it's okay to miss some things to
2:11:10
really work hard to do some big
2:11:12
things slowly. Right. You know, and it's
2:11:15
okay. Like I tell myself it's okay.
2:11:17
You know, like because I didn't feel
2:11:19
like it was at the time. Like
2:11:22
I was worried I was gonna miss,
2:11:24
you know, like, I always wanted to
2:11:26
like. like I need to gain this
2:11:29
skill and I need to do this
2:11:31
and I need to like we always
2:11:33
put so much pressure on like not
2:11:36
that I guess it's a boy is
2:11:38
down to like don't put so much
2:11:40
pressure on yourself like you're you're doing
2:11:42
just fine you know Yeah, no, I
2:11:45
agree. I think about, I think about
2:11:47
that a lot where there are certain
2:11:49
elements of what we do in our
2:11:52
process that require a great deal of
2:11:54
focus and dedication. And, you know, like
2:11:56
you got to put your nose down
2:11:59
and go forward in a straight line.
2:12:01
And that means inevitably not taking a
2:12:03
right hand turn and a left hand
2:12:05
turn along the way. And you might
2:12:08
have to let go of certain opportunities.
2:12:10
You know, for me, I mean, here
2:12:12
I am. launching a video podcast. It's
2:12:15
not like that's a brand new idea.
2:12:17
You know, video podcast has been a
2:12:19
great place to be for a while,
2:12:22
but I had to accept it. Like,
2:12:24
you know what, I got to stay
2:12:26
focused on putting the show out and
2:12:29
keeping it consistent and making sure it
2:12:31
sounds great, despite the occasional time where
2:12:33
I mute my microphone. We'll find out
2:12:35
what I did about that. But the,
2:12:38
you know, like, accepting that, like, okay,
2:12:40
I'll get to it when I get
2:12:42
to it, you know, there's probably a
2:12:45
quality of that for you too. Yeah,
2:12:47
I think in the, I always relate
2:12:49
everything back to my, what I do
2:12:52
exactly is like in the mastering world,
2:12:54
you get like what I finish goes
2:12:56
out and maybe makes a bunch of
2:12:59
copies. So like. there's pressure there and
2:13:01
it's you have to remind yourself like
2:13:03
like if you don't relieve that pressure
2:13:05
you'll never You'll never actually sign off
2:13:08
on it. Yeah, I want, yeah, you
2:13:10
just keep going back and it's like,
2:13:12
it's like, it's like, it's like, making
2:13:15
records that never finished, they're just abandoned.
2:13:17
Right, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's the, that's
2:13:19
the age old, like, I love that
2:13:22
quote, that's, I got that quote from
2:13:24
this podcast, I think. Yeah, yeah, that's,
2:13:26
I got that quote from this podcast,
2:13:29
and it really, really gives us permission
2:13:31
to just go ahead and do stuff.
2:13:33
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah. Well dude,
2:13:35
thank you so much for being on
2:13:38
the podcast with us. Let the rock
2:13:40
stars know where can they go? Find
2:13:42
out more about you. voltage exchange? How
2:13:45
should they connect with you if they're
2:13:47
ready to make their next hit record?
2:13:49
I don't, I have a personal Facebook,
2:13:52
but I don't, I've sort of abandoned
2:13:54
Facebook, but I have a studio Instagram,
2:13:56
the at the voltage exchange.com, or sorry,
2:13:58
at the voltage, the Instagram is at
2:14:01
the voltage exchange, okay, and then my
2:14:03
website, you can contact me either, either
2:14:05
place, I'm on the, and my website
2:14:08
is just the voltage exchange.com. Both places
2:14:10
are great to get in contact with
2:14:12
me. I'm happy to answer D.M's and
2:14:15
emails appropriately. Awesome, awesome. Well, I'm thinking
2:14:17
that maybe, I want to come over
2:14:19
there and just listen to some vinyl
2:14:22
records with you. Let's do it. Maybe
2:14:24
it's time to release Cadoo Sean Vinyl
2:14:26
and Rock Stars. What would you think
2:14:28
about that? You want to come to
2:14:31
Nashville and we go hang out and
2:14:33
go to Duncan's and go watch the
2:14:35
robot. cutting. Yeah, that would absolutely, that
2:14:38
would be an absolute pleasure. I mean,
2:14:40
I love the fact that it's called
2:14:42
a silly tow. Well, actually, the thing
2:14:45
is, is, it's, I, I, this, we
2:14:47
didn't get in the story of, I
2:14:49
flew to Australia to pick up the
2:14:52
machine and the guy who created the
2:14:54
machine is called James, his name is
2:14:56
James Silly tow, and I thought that
2:14:58
Silly tow was a, was sort of
2:15:01
like a stage name, and he goes,
2:15:03
no, that's actually my last name, that's
2:15:05
actually, that's actually, that's actually, that's actually,
2:15:08
that's actually, that's actually, that's actually, that's
2:15:10
actually, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's,
2:15:12
that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's,
2:15:15
that's, that's, that's, that's, Awesome. Do well,
2:15:17
thanks for joining us. Rocksters, thanks for
2:15:19
watching. Drop a comment on below and
2:15:21
let us know what you thought. And
2:15:24
if there's any, if you got any
2:15:26
questions for, for Duncan or for me,
2:15:28
and we'll, we'll try and jump in
2:15:31
there and answer them. Thank you so
2:15:33
much. My name, good to see you.
2:15:35
Cheers. Thanks
2:15:41
so much for listening to recording studio
2:15:43
rock stars. If you enjoyed the show
2:15:45
and want to help make it better,
2:15:48
then please share this episode with your
2:15:50
friends on social media and leave a
2:15:52
rating and review on iTunes to help
2:15:54
the podcast reach more rock stars like
2:15:56
yourself. You can click directly over to
2:15:58
iTunes or go to R.S.rockstars.com/review. for an
2:16:00
easy explanation. And remember to hit the
2:16:02
subscribe button to keep up with weekly
2:16:05
episodes. And if you're ready to make
2:16:07
your best record ever now, then head
2:16:09
over to Recording Studio Rockstars Academy, where
2:16:11
you can start with my free course
2:16:13
at MixMasterbundle.com. Thanks so much for listening
2:16:15
and thanks for being a rock star.
2:16:17
I'm Liz Shaw and this is Recording
2:16:19
Studio Rockstars. Now, go make great music.
2:16:22
Recording studio rock stars would like
2:16:24
to give a big thank you
2:16:26
to our awesome sponsors who helped
2:16:28
make this episode possible. Isotope, Native
2:16:30
Instruments. Roswell Pro audio and Adam
2:16:32
audio. And remember to take advantage
2:16:34
of our special coupon codes at
2:16:36
isotope.com and native instruments.com. Use the
2:16:38
coupon code Rock 10 for 10%
2:16:40
off any plug-in. If you enjoyed
2:16:42
recording Studio Rockstars, please check out
2:16:44
our sponsors using the links in
2:16:46
our show notes. These are all
2:16:48
things that I highly recommend for
2:16:50
your studio because they're going to
2:16:52
help you make your best record
2:16:54
ever. Like and subscribe to our
2:16:57
YouTube channel. This is new for
2:16:59
us here and it's a great
2:17:01
way for you to help support
2:17:03
this show, so I greatly appreciate
2:17:05
it. I would also like to
2:17:07
thank our fantastic team here at
2:17:09
recording studio rock stars Vlad Wessel
2:17:11
Chenko and Liz Huletskaya. Thanks so
2:17:13
much for watching and for listening.
2:17:15
My name is Liz Shaw and
2:17:17
I'll see you in the next
2:17:19
episode. Cheers.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More