RSR490 - Duncan Ferguson - Mastering for Vinyl at Voltage Exchange Studio in East Nashville

RSR490 - Duncan Ferguson - Mastering for Vinyl at Voltage Exchange Studio in East Nashville

Released Friday, 24th January 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
RSR490 - Duncan Ferguson - Mastering for Vinyl at Voltage Exchange Studio in East Nashville

RSR490 - Duncan Ferguson - Mastering for Vinyl at Voltage Exchange Studio in East Nashville

RSR490 - Duncan Ferguson - Mastering for Vinyl at Voltage Exchange Studio in East Nashville

RSR490 - Duncan Ferguson - Mastering for Vinyl at Voltage Exchange Studio in East Nashville

Friday, 24th January 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This episode of recording studio rock

0:02

stars is brought to you by

0:04

isotope native instruments. Roswell Pro audio

0:06

and Adam audio. You're hearing my

0:09

voice right now through the beautiful

0:11

Roswell Pro audio Aztec tube microphone

0:13

mixed through isotope, ozone, Rx, and

0:16

neutron all on Adam audio monitors

0:18

and headphones. Please check out our

0:20

awesome sponsors using the links in

0:23

the show notes. Also, please remember

0:25

to like and subscribe to our

0:27

YouTube channel because it's a great

0:30

way for you to help support this

0:32

show. Now get ready to rock. The

0:34

biggest thing I want to say is...

0:36

a vinyl record is literally an analog

0:38

hard drive. It's just encoded information, like

0:40

the grooves are information that gets encoded

0:42

in, and then you have to have

0:44

a playback system to play that back

0:46

out. So I call it the caveman

0:48

hard drive. Instead of spinning at, you

0:50

know, like, what is it, 7,000 and.

0:52

you know, our PM, it spins at

0:54

33 and a third RPM, yeah, or

0:56

45. If you just have a disk

0:58

alone without the Encode system and the

1:00

playback system, they're useless. Like, you have

1:03

to have a way to encode it

1:05

and decode it, just like we do

1:07

with computers. It's the same idea, right? Welcome

1:19

to Recording Studio Rockstars. I'm

1:21

Liz Shaw and this is

1:23

the podcast created to help

1:26

you become a rock star

1:28

of the recording studio. At

1:34

isotope, tone shaping is topping

1:36

the charts. Meet the catalyst

1:39

series. Plasma, Aurora, and Cascadia.

1:41

Plasmus Flux Saturation Technology brings

1:44

dynamic warmth and depth tier

1:46

mix. Aurora takes spatial audio

1:49

to new heights with lush

1:51

adaptive reverb, while Cascadia adds

1:54

exciting delays to your mix.

1:56

Retaining clarity through its smart

1:59

unmasking feature. 10% off Plasma,

2:01

Aurora, Cascadia, or any of the isotope

2:03

plugins with the special code Rock10 and

2:05

make your mixes rock at isotope.com. Howdy

2:08

Rockstars! It's your host, Lid Sean. Welcome

2:10

to Recording Studio Rockstars bringing you into

2:12

the studio to learn from recording professionals

2:15

so that you can make your best

2:17

record ever and be a rock star

2:19

of the studio yourself. My guest today

2:21

here at Podzila Studios, actually for... Our

2:24

first ever video interview right here at

2:26

Podsilla is Duncan Ferguson, a mastering engineer

2:28

based in East Nashville with a true

2:31

passion for critical listening and collecting all

2:33

kinds of recordings. Duncan got into mastering

2:35

naturally and has earned the nickname the

2:37

music librarian from his close friends. Over

2:40

the years, he honed his skills to

2:42

bring music to life across all listening

2:44

applications. Duncan's Mastering Studio, the voltage exchange,

2:47

which is right around the corner from

2:49

here, is all about solving problems for

2:51

clients. After seeing the shifts in the

2:53

music industry over the past decade, he's

2:56

focused on offering solutions for artists, producers,

2:58

and mixing engineers while making the process

3:00

as seamless as possible. Duncan believes in

3:03

collaboration and transparent relationships. Fascinating. He loves

3:05

having clients present during sessions and sharing

3:07

his techniques, equipment, and choices to ensure

3:09

their true vision shines through. It all

3:12

sounds very like all-encompassing, but I totally

3:14

get it in the whole process of

3:16

working and making records. As someone who

3:19

also collects vinyl, Duncan offers a full-service

3:21

in-house vinyl mastering and disc cutting. with

3:23

the new Aceletow Lave. We'll have to

3:25

find out what that's all about. Duncan's

3:28

Mastering Studio, as I said, is right

3:30

nearby here in East Nashville. I met

3:32

Duncan, I think the first time around

3:35

was. an event that was happening there.

3:37

And then we got to spend an

3:39

amazing weekend with a group of rock

3:41

stars here, hanging out at the Toy

3:44

Box Studio with Colin Dupuy for an

3:46

awesome mixing weekend, which was a lot

3:48

of fun too. It was so much

3:51

fun. So please welcome Duncan Ferguson recording

3:53

studio rock stars. Duncan, are you ready

3:55

to rock, dude? Oh man, I was

3:58

born ready. It's awesome to have you

4:00

here, man. Again, this is this is

4:02

our first test run here in the

4:04

studio. You look great. I'm looking. I'm

4:07

checking us out on the video Make

4:09

sure we look right on the on

4:11

the playback and it seems to be

4:14

all role and rock stars drop a

4:16

comment in and let us know what

4:18

you think of the look of the

4:20

whole new studio How have you been,

4:23

dude? I think you just got off

4:25

like a power weekend. I mean, this

4:27

will show up later, so we don't

4:30

have to get too granular on the

4:32

date or something, but. We just finished

4:34

the, well, I just came off of

4:36

the Welcome to 1979 recording summit, and

4:39

that was my seventh year going, and

4:41

they, you know, Chris Mara and Yolemara,

4:43

at Welcome to 1979, put on this

4:46

awesome weekend, full of just industry professionals

4:48

and other. networking opportunities. You've been to

4:50

a few, I think, right? Yeah, I've

4:52

been to a few. I've been on

4:55

some panels there too, and I've just

4:57

gone and watched it. There's something. So

4:59

it's an event rock stars that takes

5:02

place at Welcome to 1979 Studio here

5:04

in Nashville, and they will annually in

5:06

the month of November host a weekend

5:08

with a group of panelists in different

5:11

rooms. They can set up. I guess

5:13

there's two big rooms, plus there's a

5:15

mastering room, so there might be a

5:18

few different little panels or clinics going

5:20

on, but it'll be up to 60

5:22

people. I think they limited it at

5:24

60. Yeah, yeah, you can sign up

5:27

over the year and it's a weekend.

5:29

Yeah, you can sign up over the

5:31

year and it's a weekend just full

5:34

of awesome things. They do a live

5:36

to disc recording on Friday night and

5:38

then there's like, there's some panels over

5:41

the course of each day that each

5:43

day that you can. trying to forget

5:45

what to do next. Yeah. And then

5:47

they do like a listening party on

5:50

Saturday nights where they pick a record,

5:52

you listen to the record, and then

5:54

somebody who worked on the record extensively

5:57

talks about their time, you know, working

5:59

on the record and tells how they

6:01

made it. Yeah, it's pretty. Yeah, that's

6:03

a fun part. So yeah, that's the

6:06

Saturday night one. Yeah. It's like you,

6:08

it's more of a. Listening party listen

6:10

to the record, but then the producer

6:13

or the engineer just tells the whole

6:15

story of what it was like to

6:17

make that record Yeah, which I'll be

6:19

honest. That's something I always thought would

6:22

be really fun to do for the

6:24

podcast here But I was terrified of

6:26

the copyright stuff where I'm like I

6:29

don't even want to mess with it

6:31

to like You know have a team

6:33

of lawyers to clear the rights on

6:35

something they because it's published you know

6:38

because this is published they go Chris

6:40

goes out of his way just you

6:42

know to say like I think his

6:45

saying is don't tweet the deets, you

6:47

know, like it's it's like you're paying

6:49

to be there and have the experience

6:51

and it stays, the experience stays there

6:54

and it allows that person to be

6:56

able to talk about things transparently, not

6:58

in, you know, not in any weird

7:01

way, but like they are able to

7:03

talk about the experience and how they

7:05

had to like problem solve to make

7:07

the record. Yeah, totally. And they can

7:10

do that openly without being worried about

7:12

somebody posting it on social media. or

7:14

anything like that. And it's really, for

7:17

us, industry professionals, you know, it's like

7:19

really, you know, we have, either you're

7:21

assimilating to something, this experience that you've

7:24

had similar, and they're talking about like

7:26

large record, like very large records, you

7:28

know, or you're like, you learn something

7:30

that you can bring home and use

7:33

to try and get somebody's record across

7:35

the finish line, you know? Yeah, yeah,

7:37

and similar to this podcast. I started

7:40

it because I always loved all the

7:42

stories you would hear in the control

7:44

room hanging out with people. And of

7:46

course when you're working with people and

7:49

you're making records together, it can be

7:51

a pretty intimate experience, which means that

7:53

people really open up and you really

7:56

start telling some stories and you hear

7:58

some great behind the scenes stories. And

8:00

you're absolutely right for like a video

8:02

podcast for a live one. It's like

8:05

you can only get so deep, you

8:07

know, at least until everybody's dead. Yeah,

8:09

when I was revealed. When I do

8:12

a tennis such a suit, I tell

8:14

the artist a big thing about my

8:16

whole thing is I say, like, think

8:18

of me like, this is like, thinking

8:21

of me like a lawyer. My dad's

8:23

was an attorney and you like, when

8:25

you're in my mastering space, the record's

8:28

not out yet. So. and everything that's

8:30

here is it's like you kind of

8:32

have lawyer that confidentiality like the lawyer

8:34

yeah like that I'm blanking on the

8:37

term but oh yeah attorney client privilege

8:39

yes you have like mastering client privilege

8:41

yeah mastering client yeah master like studio

8:44

client privilege as like the record's not

8:46

out yet everything we say and doing

8:48

here you know you this is a

8:50

safe place like like like I you

8:53

may see me you know like shift

8:55

something or do something or you know

8:57

like But it, you know, like, you

9:00

are the boss and, you know, like,

9:02

you can say anything you want. Like,

9:04

I say, like, you know, was there

9:07

anything, I always ask attended people who

9:09

come in for attendance, I was just

9:11

like, is there anything in this process

9:13

that you were, that really, like, bugged

9:16

you, you know, like, and you were

9:18

having fighting the whole way? Or was

9:20

there anything in this process that was

9:23

just super easy? state to get it

9:25

into the format and it's actually really

9:27

those sort of questions are really helpful

9:29

but sometimes people are afraid to like

9:32

you know like these are the politics

9:34

of some things or whatever they're not

9:36

afraid to talk about it so I

9:39

just always say hey this is a

9:41

this is a safe place you know

9:43

and I Chris really goes I think

9:45

with in you know tying that all

9:48

back and Chris really goes out of

9:50

his way to like You know try

9:52

to have the summit feel that way

9:55

as well. This right now is not

9:57

a city. I'm just totally like I'm

9:59

just trying to like trip us up

10:01

the whole time. Yeah, it's no just

10:04

kidding. Yeah, but the but but I

10:06

agree with that and I know that

10:08

the Process that you're describing of making

10:11

a record with people like your website

10:13

your language you're really do focus on

10:15

that kind of communication, you use the

10:17

term safe space. Just this concept of

10:20

when you make music, there's like a,

10:22

well, great music at least, I believe,

10:24

and hopefully great music for any one

10:27

of us who are making music is

10:29

a process of being comfortable enough to

10:31

be vulnerable and like open yourself up

10:33

because I think we we can create

10:36

and communicate better emotional creativity, we have

10:38

better ideas when we can just really

10:40

let ourselves through. And because of that,

10:43

right, would you say that there's a

10:45

tendency for people to be protective? Yeah,

10:47

they're a bit guarded about like how

10:50

they get perceived by the outside world,

10:52

I think, and we as, you know,

10:54

like people who are helping them create

10:56

their vision have to be. you know,

10:59

like, hope, you have to be mindful

11:01

of that, but then also help them

11:03

communicate it to at the same time.

11:06

So. And one of the things that

11:08

is interesting to me too is this

11:10

idea that there are all kinds of

11:12

music creators out there. There's all kinds

11:15

of artists and bands and there's different

11:17

styles and you know, you can have

11:19

on the one hand, you could have

11:22

an artist that comes in as like,

11:24

I don't care what people think on

11:26

this on the other thing. And that's

11:28

totally appropriate for the music. It can

11:31

be like bombastic and loud and like

11:33

irreverent and impervious to criticism. But then

11:35

on the other hand, you can have

11:38

a style of music and an artist

11:40

that is totally has a fragility to

11:42

it. Yeah. that it could just like

11:44

come apart really easily if it's if

11:47

it's done the wrong way. I think

11:49

everybody's got to have a pretty tough

11:51

skin to get out there in public

11:54

and perform. Sure. That's a different topic

11:56

too. The record-making process is about is

11:58

when you say that there's a difference

12:00

in that respect. Like when you're in

12:03

the studio, you need to be

12:05

able to make the mistake and it's

12:07

okay. I think with sort of like,

12:09

I've spent a lot of time sort

12:11

of writing in about like how

12:14

the studio has really become an

12:16

instrument on its own. And I

12:18

think writing about it like blog

12:20

writing. It was kind of my

12:22

thesis in my undergraduate. I did

12:25

like a. a long paper like a hundred

12:27

page like sort of it was part

12:29

of my as part of That was

12:31

a long time ago. I have to

12:33

like remember what you but I wrote

12:35

a thing about how the The recording

12:38

studio sort of became its own

12:40

instrument like the recording studio

12:42

as a as a as

12:44

an actual production like a tool

12:46

for creation. Yeah, you know, and I

12:49

wrote it I used examples from

12:51

1980 to 1995 and stuck

12:53

to those specific years of

12:55

like the modern recording

12:58

studio coming into existence

13:00

as known as the

13:02

modern recording studio.

13:04

Yeah. But I think the tools

13:06

that we have nowadays have

13:09

allowed us to create this. We

13:11

can go beyond reality, you

13:13

know, in performance. So

13:15

like we can we can express

13:18

things. Which is what's so exciting

13:20

we can express things that are,

13:22

you can't necessarily express on stage.

13:24

Just, you know what I mean?

13:26

Like we have all these tools to

13:28

now like expand, like a virtual reality,

13:31

even just with stereo, you know. And

13:33

it's been that way for, you know,

13:35

like, we've been pushing the envelope

13:37

for, you know, 40 years doing that. But,

13:39

but that sort of thing is

13:41

people can be expressed themselves in different

13:44

ways that they can express. you

13:46

know, like just with one single

13:48

performance. Yeah, and you can discover.

13:51

Yeah, discovery. Yeah, I mean, you

13:53

can discover on stage too, but yeah.

13:55

Well, so, so rewinding a little bit,

13:57

that process of talking about year.

14:00

importance of communication and stuff like that

14:02

in your mastering studio and process. Yeah,

14:04

seems very related to, you know, potentially

14:06

certain styles of music that you might

14:09

work with or certain types of artists

14:11

that you work with. Do you think

14:13

that's, that's, also I wanted to point

14:15

something out so you can't quite see

14:18

it on the video, but now that

14:20

we're on video we can show stuff

14:22

on like, check out my nice mug,

14:25

you know, but, um... Duncan when he

14:27

was here for the the mixing mastermind

14:29

weekend that we do with Colin Dupuis

14:31

at the toy box. Yeah, he brought

14:34

what he's holding right now, which is

14:36

this great. I think he brought that

14:38

right? Yeah. It's this great. Like what

14:40

is it? It looks like a piece

14:43

of paper, but it's really like a

14:45

tablet. It's man. It's changed my life

14:47

completely. It's the remarkable pro pad. Yeah.

14:50

Hold it up to the camera. And

14:52

then you can write. It's literally just

14:54

it's the same I think I just

14:56

made you hold your personal notes up.

14:59

No you're fine. I don't have that

15:01

totally The it's the same I think

15:03

it's the same don't quote me on

15:06

this I think it's the same technology

15:08

as a Kindle but it's got a

15:10

writeable. Oh yeah digital ink. Yeah. And

15:12

it's like an etch a sketch sort

15:15

of a really complicated etch a sketch

15:17

technology. So it's got like a feel

15:19

to it when you run. Yeah. So

15:21

it looks like it's kind of feels

15:24

like paper. The black thing's sort of

15:26

a pencil. Yeah. Yeah. So you just

15:28

write on it and it feels almost

15:31

like paper. I think it's a little

15:33

more slippery. But it's if you ever

15:35

try to write with an iPad pencil,

15:37

that's really slippery because the screen's so

15:40

smooth. And but this I can actually

15:42

capture my handwriting pretty accurately. What if

15:44

what if you're like me in your

15:47

handwriting kind of sucks? Is that still

15:49

a good thing? No, I think you

15:51

could you could work on it. I

15:53

could do the cursive I still I

15:56

mean I went through this thing in

15:58

high school where I my handwriting got

16:00

so atrocious that I got in my

16:02

OCD sort of kicked in and like

16:05

I gotta fix this. Did you go

16:07

back to your first grade? No books.

16:09

I was like. like practice. I like,

16:12

I like made my handwriting actually like

16:14

will look really nice just because it

16:16

was bothering me. So, well, I kind

16:18

of stuck to that. So, so I

16:21

have an iPad in the studio with

16:23

the Apple pencil and it's not the

16:25

latest one. You know, probably generation ago

16:28

or whatever. But I was doing an

16:30

audio book recently and it was. Totally

16:32

great for that. I had to follow

16:34

along on a manuscript the whole time,

16:37

and then take these real-time notes during

16:39

the entire reading for every time there

16:41

was a stop and this do-over and

16:43

all this, you know, take numbers and

16:46

all that. And it was really handy

16:48

for that, but also occasionally, I'm like,

16:50

ah, it's not working, you know, it's

16:53

like the Wi-Fi will stop or whatever

16:55

Bluetooth thing that it's using. And so,

16:57

you know, like... I'm all about the

16:59

pencil and the podcast just because I'm

17:02

like, it almost never fails. That never,

17:04

yeah, they don't, it's kind of a

17:06

solid redundancy, it just doesn't break, right?

17:08

Right, right. Does that one actually, is

17:11

it pretty reliable? It's been fairly reliable.

17:13

There's been a few little things to

17:15

sort of overcome, but I haven't had,

17:18

like I spent the whole, I used

17:20

it for my notes this weekend, you

17:22

know, like in it, it, and it,

17:24

it, and it, I'm on three. it's

17:27

got those little five, I haven't charged

17:29

it yet, and I'm still like half,

17:31

I've got a half a battery left,

17:34

so it's pretty awesome. What it's really

17:36

changed my life for is I really

17:38

struggled personally, and this is maybe a

17:40

personal thing, maybe other people don't struggle

17:43

with this, but using a digital calendar.

17:45

This is a safe space. Okay. I

17:47

struggle using a digital calendar, and when

17:49

I put things in the calendar, my

17:52

brain doesn't want to go back and

17:54

look at it. There's some sort of

17:56

disconnect. But when I write it down,

17:59

I can remember, you know, and then

18:01

I have to go back and look

18:03

and it's just like it causes me

18:05

to like be on top of that

18:08

sort of this sort of physical interaction

18:10

causes me to be on top of

18:12

it. So I used to in a

18:15

really nerdy way, I used to just

18:17

carry. three ring binders around with day

18:19

pages. I used to do the day

18:21

planner that was back in the day

18:24

before we had the phone version of

18:26

everything. And anyway, yeah, so my doodles

18:28

were much better when I had a

18:30

day planner. I have no doodles in

18:33

my iPhone. Totally. I got no doodles.

18:35

And so now I just, I upload

18:37

a, you can upload PDFs to this

18:40

and then I just write over it.

18:42

So this is like my day, I

18:44

have like my, my, uh, my studio

18:46

logo. That looks cool. That looks cool.

18:49

So by the way, if you want

18:51

your camera to focus on it, you

18:53

have to cover your eyes. Okay. It's

18:55

very, very nerdy. There you go. Yeah.

18:58

So I have like my studio logo

19:00

and then I have a day to-do

19:02

list where I write in and then

19:05

I have like my week outlook. And

19:07

I just write in what I want.

19:09

Right. Just after I told you it's

19:11

a safe space. I'm like, cover your

19:14

face. Yeah. I think the Rock Stars

19:16

will appreciate the challenge of organization note-taking

19:18

calendars and stuff like that. What do

19:21

you want to say about operating your

19:23

studio? So your studio is, you know,

19:25

I know we're just like jumping right

19:27

into stuff. Not about the video podcast.

19:30

Makes me want to just get right

19:32

to it. Yeah. But like the voltage

19:34

exchange is your mastering studio. Yes. Beautiful,

19:36

beautiful place. Lots to talk about that.

19:39

But organizing and scheduling and knowing what's

19:41

what and as you said communication is

19:43

an important part. So what are some

19:46

tools or tips for you that you

19:48

use that help you manage? Let's just

19:50

say the calendar to start. Sure. Actually,

19:52

this is kind of like my central

19:55

hub. You know, like I get up,

19:57

it's actually more of, it's not so

19:59

much any, there are, there are a

20:02

million tools out there, right? Like we

20:04

live in the age of, you know,

20:06

being. blasted with like you like productivity

20:08

like slogans yeah yeah yeah yeah but

20:11

just getting up in the morning and

20:13

then writing out my day before I

20:15

start you know like I'm an early

20:17

riser and and I actually go into

20:20

my studio really early while my ears

20:22

are fresh and just knock out the

20:24

audio stuff and then I do my

20:27

admin in the afternoon. That's a fascinating

20:29

idea. You know, back when I built

20:31

my studio and I had analog tape

20:33

machines, I had this mixing console that

20:36

did Hotel California that was designed by

20:38

G. Parnad. And when I acquired that,

20:40

his widow, Carla Harnad, said, messaged me

20:43

and said, oh, by the way. I

20:45

have Jeep's personal two-track machine and you

20:47

know, that comes with the deal. So

20:49

if you want to come get it,

20:52

you can come pick it up. So

20:54

I did a four-day drive out to

20:56

Colorado, Durango Colorado from Nashville with a

20:58

minivan and picked it up and picked

21:01

it up and picked it up and

21:03

drive home the next day. And I

21:05

got to see Jeep's grave. was right

21:08

there at the house with the gravestone

21:10

that is made from an MCI 24

21:12

track. Oh my gosh. Like actually sent

21:14

there. What an amazing piece of history

21:17

to have that all. I'm a history

21:19

nerd. So I love that stuff. I

21:21

absolutely love that stuff. Well, so so

21:23

Carla was just incredibly organized. I couldn't

21:26

believe it. Like it immediately struck me

21:28

when I was in the house. Just

21:30

even walking through the garage. I was

21:33

like, wow. Every wall is like high

21:35

wire shelves with clear storage bins on

21:37

them that are all labeled. I'm like,

21:39

this is like, I'm getting excited. I

21:42

have a little tech shop in the

21:44

garage and my tech shop is exactly

21:46

that I have to be that way

21:49

because I have all these like little.

21:51

you know especially with getting the lathe

21:53

now I have to do my own

21:55

servicing you know so it's like all

21:58

the all the you know soldering iron

22:00

like all that stuff so yeah yeah

22:02

yeah yeah and I think I maybe

22:04

I saw that over your place to

22:07

is a cool spot native instruments introduces

22:09

the new complete fifth steam bundle featuring

22:11

contact eight offering versatile scents, sampled instruments

22:14

and innovative effects. Perfect for creating everything

22:16

from emotional scores to dance floor grooves.

22:18

Contact 8 includes exciting new creative tools

22:20

like chords and phrases for inspiration, the

22:23

leap tool for dynamic looping, and conflicts,

22:25

a hybrid instrument blending organic and synth

22:27

sounds. The Complete 15 bundle also includes

22:30

updated Massive X and Guitar Rig 7

22:32

Pro, and AI enhanced isotope Ozone Ozone

22:34

11. Use the code Rock 10. for

22:36

10% off at Native Instruments.com. And I

22:39

desperately need that because I have just

22:41

so much stuff. You know, I have

22:43

collectitis. But I wanted to finish this

22:46

thought too. So with Carla, in the

22:48

morning when I met her for, you

22:50

know, coffee, orange, she's breakfast or whatever,

22:53

I noticed like the table was set

22:55

out and then she had this little list

22:57

of paper right next to her breakfast thing.

22:59

Yes. And it just had a list of

23:01

stuff she was going to do that day.

23:03

And I was like. Wow, that's cool.

23:05

That's like, you know exactly what

23:08

you're going to be doing up

23:10

early and it's like, there's my

23:12

day. Yeah, that's, that's literally has

23:14

the only, like it's not anything special,

23:16

not any, I mean, other than this,

23:18

you know, like, using a piece of

23:20

technology to do it, but

23:23

that's the, that's the key is, is just

23:25

having, I'm really nerdy, I'm a space

23:27

nerd. Oh, like, like, yeah, just like,

23:29

like, I love the history of like.

23:31

Yeah, the NASA and all that. But

23:33

we're so close to Huntsville, Alabama. Yeah,

23:35

with the museum and all the I

23:37

call that this little template my

23:40

flight plan for the morning, you know,

23:42

for the day. So that's that's my

23:44

flight plan. And so I make a

23:46

flight plan almost exactly like you would

23:48

make a flight plan as a pilot.

23:51

Uh, uh, and I it's labeled flight plan,

23:53

you know, and it just makes me feel

23:55

a little more like, oh, I'm doing

23:57

something important, you know, you know, you

23:59

know, How do you balance the flight

24:01

plan you need to have today? You

24:04

need to know it today about next

24:06

Tuesday versus waking up Tuesday morning and

24:08

making your flight plan. Correct. So like

24:10

I, you know, I have a today

24:12

to do list of like in the

24:15

morning, I kind of prioritize like this

24:17

has to be done today. And then

24:19

if it doesn't, I have like a

24:21

week outlook and like, oh, maybe I

24:23

can move that to tomorrow or I

24:25

have these appointments. So I can kind

24:27

of like look at the week outlook. And

24:29

then kind of like the cool thing

24:31

about this technology is I can it

24:34

doesn't get lost on a piece of

24:36

paper or and then I can like

24:38

copy paste yesterday over to today if

24:40

I don't like that's like been the game

24:42

changers I don't have to like

24:44

rewrite everything and it so And even if

24:46

you lost that whole thing like let's

24:48

say you just left it here at

24:51

the studio back and I was like

24:53

no I didn't see anything it could

24:55

get another one and then you just

24:57

log in there's an iPhone app that

25:00

like everything sinks to the apps and

25:02

then it's like then there's a desktop

25:04

app and what was the most amazing

25:06

thing is I was online teaching which

25:08

we'll probably talk about in a bit

25:11

but I drew something like a

25:13

diagram of trying to explain like

25:15

some room acoustic stuff and I

25:17

drew it on this pad and it synced

25:20

in like a few seconds and then

25:22

I went on the desktop app and

25:24

I'm on zoom and I grabbed I

25:26

grabbed the drawing. and just export it

25:28

as a PDF off of the app and

25:30

then just opened it up on zoom and

25:32

like I did it in like 30 seconds

25:34

that's pretty good after drawing and

25:37

it was like it was like well and

25:39

I did it like untested like I think

25:41

I can do this and I just did

25:43

it and I was like oh my gosh

25:45

like it was yeah so I'm gonna beat

25:47

that watch this yeah I just drew a

25:49

smiley face yeah it's already up yeah it's

25:52

like that the analog you couldn't probably can

25:54

you know yeah yeah yeah No, that's that's

25:56

really cool. And I and I do

25:58

love that now. What about um What about

26:00

your calendar? What are the tools that

26:02

you find are really useful as far

26:05

as something in your calendar? I do

26:07

have a Google calendar that so on

26:09

my website I have like you can

26:11

you can book a session and I

26:13

have like four different calendars

26:15

on there that you can choose from and

26:17

then they're all sort of like funneled. down

26:19

and that goes into my Google calendar and

26:21

that's just like I look at the big

26:24

things there and then I just transfer that

26:26

over to I have like a monthly calendar

26:28

on this with my flight plan and then

26:30

I just have a day sheet that then has a

26:32

as a day outlook and a week outlook and I

26:34

just sort of like sort of start with that

26:36

big thing and funnel it down. So the

26:38

calendar stuff goes on the calendar as far

26:40

as sessions yeah and then the then what you

26:43

write down is more the the granular

26:45

level of what you know what does

26:47

that mean for today kind of it's

26:49

it's not like revolutionary I don't think

26:51

but it's it's a way that I can

26:53

kind of like step by step keep

26:55

it organized I gotta be honest

26:57

I don't think revolutions are not

26:59

what we want with yeah I

27:01

mean I know that sounds counterintuitive

27:03

but when I say that what I'm referring

27:05

to is this idea of like When I

27:07

go to use reliable tools for things

27:10

like an email or a calendar, I

27:12

kind of don't want the newest

27:14

latest thing because I don't know if

27:16

it's going to be there next year.

27:18

That is an amazing point. And that

27:21

actually is what I've struggled with too

27:23

of like with a paper and pen,

27:25

you know, it's like, well, that's just

27:27

always going to be there. But

27:29

like, yeah, I've really struggled with

27:31

like, I think my wife and I,

27:34

we had like a. an app that

27:36

reminds us to do certain things around

27:38

the house and the app doesn't exist

27:40

anymore. Right, I've dealt with that too.

27:43

Yeah, so like, yeah, some kind of

27:45

special list app. Yeah, it's almost like,

27:47

I mean, sometimes I'm like, whichever one

27:50

is doing the most promotion, I'm like,

27:52

I don't know if they're going to

27:54

be there. Yeah, that's probably not fair.

27:56

But the, but I've messed with all

27:59

that stuff. And You know, I find, so

28:01

I use an app for calendar

28:03

stuff called Fantastic Cal. Fantastic Cal,

28:05

okay. And it is pretty flexible.

28:08

I think it's a company called

28:10

Flex Bits. But it's, it's

28:12

pretty flexible and it works.

28:14

It works pretty flexible

28:17

and it works. It works pretty

28:19

great, but what it, and it'll collect

28:21

calendars from different things. And the

28:23

reason I got it and started

28:26

using it a while ago on

28:28

my iPhone was because. You can

28:30

just verbally say into the thing,

28:32

you know, like 5 a.m. Monday, do this

28:34

thing, whatever. And it kind of, you see

28:36

all the things like go down into the

28:38

different zones, so automatically like populates

28:40

it, because I would find that

28:43

when I tried to use the

28:45

built-in one on my phone, it

28:47

wasn't fast enough. I just need

28:49

like, because I'm in the car.

28:51

Like somebody just called and they're

28:53

like, yeah, let's do it next

28:55

Tuesday at seven. You're like, you

28:57

know. It's a goner and I'm going

28:59

to blow that whole thing. I

29:01

mean, the writing down is like,

29:03

if I don't write it down

29:05

the second, it's gone. And I

29:07

can do, I can write down

29:09

fast and I can like type,

29:11

you know, or find the

29:14

app or all that, you

29:16

know, it's like, it's just

29:18

there. Yeah. I'm really interested.

29:20

The voice thing is really,

29:22

really interesting because I'm really

29:24

getting intrigued by the voice.

29:26

the mobile app has the voice thing

29:28

now with right yeah you can

29:30

just have a conversation back and

29:32

forth I know I spent more

29:35

time trying to explain that it

29:37

shouldn't keep being so long-winded and

29:39

replying to me I was like

29:42

you're telling it to be sure

29:44

I'm just like you gotta you gotta

29:46

shut up dude I can't I can't

29:48

I can't think about what you just gave

29:51

me as an answer because you're still talking.

29:53

The scary thing is that they tell you

29:55

to talk to it like a real person.

29:57

Yeah. And so it's like, it's, it's, it's.

30:00

little like eerie to be like I know

30:02

I'm not talking to a person but I

30:04

can talk to it like a person and

30:06

it's like it's yeah so I think

30:08

it's fascinating it's fun so

30:10

the chatchee PT topic not a brand

30:13

new one by the time this video

30:15

comes out however my use of it

30:17

is kind of more brand new for

30:19

me I find it incredibly

30:21

helpful in in assisting me on the

30:24

stuff that I don't think I'm all

30:26

that great at. You may or may

30:28

not notice that I've got reading glasses

30:30

here. Yeah. So it's actually a challenge

30:32

for me to write and read without

30:35

it being kind of exhausting and

30:37

easy for me to make mistakes. Yes.

30:39

And so I've started doing things like

30:41

I'll write an email or I'll try

30:43

the voice to text and then I'll

30:45

copy that put it in chat cheapity and

30:47

say like, you know, I don't even have

30:49

to ask anymore. I'm just like just pace

30:51

it and just like, oh yeah, you want

30:53

me to clean it up again. That

30:55

it just makes it look better.

30:58

Yeah, for some reason like I'm

31:00

moving so fast that my

31:02

spelling is just her absolutely

31:04

horrendous. So that's like

31:06

for 101 like email, you know,

31:09

like don't change the email just,

31:11

you know, all that sort of,

31:13

you know, like just clean this

31:15

up. Yeah, you know, all right.

31:17

Well, this is being as this

31:19

is not strictly a like how

31:21

to be productive in your home

31:24

business office. Sure. Like good takeaways. I

31:26

like that writing down the list at

31:28

the beginning of the day thing. That's

31:30

a cool idea. It just clarifies the

31:33

day and you remember it. Yeah, so

31:35

let's let's jump over to the voltage

31:37

exchange. Sure. When we go to the

31:39

website, we've actually got it up here on

31:42

the, I'll try, you know it, at the

31:44

risk of blowing it on the video. I'll

31:46

try the screen share. Let's do it. I'm

31:48

with you. And hopefully I don't share the

31:50

wrong one. So, so. Not that one

31:52

not that one not that

31:54

one not that one Anyway,

31:57

I'll start describing your website

31:59

while I'm figuring out where to

32:01

find it. Is that home new? Maybe that's

32:03

it. Yeah, that looks like that's

32:05

it. Okay, great. So Rockstar is hopefully

32:07

you can see. This is like

32:10

what his website looks like right

32:12

here for the voltage exchange.

32:14

Gorgeous looking. Really nice. You

32:16

got a great photo, you organize stuff.

32:18

It kind of. I have to get new

32:20

photos. Those are starting to get keeping

32:22

up with your own like over the

32:25

years. Oh yeah. Especially when you look

32:27

like me and you've got these crazy

32:29

beards. long hair and stuff

32:31

and then you shave it all off and

32:33

people are like, wait, is that the same

32:35

guy? But like here you've got a couple

32:37

of buttons on your website immediately, says book

32:40

a session, send a message, and

32:42

a rock stars for a listening

32:44

on the podcast. I'll explain everything

32:46

we're looking at too. But talk a

32:48

little bit about, you know, your

32:50

thoughts on creating a website, what

32:52

did you learn about how the

32:54

rock stars could do that themselves

32:56

for their studio and then... your

32:58

intention with the process because I

33:01

see there's this big button at

33:03

the top. The website is really

33:05

just like my my whole experience

33:07

is I'm sort of transitioning from

33:09

being word-to-mouth into being searchable and all

33:11

you know like if you don't know me

33:13

you can still book me and find me

33:16

I'm sort of in that crazy transition of

33:18

I've always been word-to-mouth and

33:20

then now I'm transitioning hard

33:22

over you don't like you're trying

33:25

to you're trying to level up

33:27

yeah and what I've found is

33:29

just having the the website is

33:31

really just a quick business card

33:33

and you want to create on the

33:35

front page immediately just create

33:38

something where people can just access

33:40

you you have just a bit

33:42

of information but then like and

33:44

the way that I have branded

33:46

the company my business not company

33:49

but myself is you know, like I

33:51

want you to have transparent access in

33:53

some way shape or form professionally, you

33:55

know, so like just having stuff immediately

33:57

available where you can, you feel comfortable.

34:00

I can dive right in and do X, Y,

34:02

and Z is really, really important, not

34:04

having to like dig through things at all.

34:06

So, yeah. So to reiterate that, it might

34:08

be common for people to have

34:10

an experience where they're like masterings, a

34:12

little bit of a mystery. Yes. I'm

34:15

not sure what it is, but I know

34:17

that I need it. I feel like that's

34:19

a topic you would hear. And so maybe

34:21

your attitude is when you come to my

34:23

website. I want to take the mystery out

34:26

of it instead of leaving you feeling like

34:28

it's like... You should help me. You should

34:30

help me curate the website. That's

34:32

perfect. Very cool. Then the button

34:35

book a session. What would happen

34:37

next for somebody? If you

34:39

click on that it brings you

34:42

to four calendars and I offer

34:44

it for slightly different services and

34:46

with each one of those calendars

34:48

is a slightly different form that

34:51

you can fill out. One of the

34:53

calendars is just for digital

34:55

mastering. And then the few, for a

34:57

single, you know, like if you're doing

34:59

just a single song, and there's a

35:02

form for that that just is curated

35:04

to just doing one song. And

35:06

then there's a calendar that's there

35:08

with a slightly different form for

35:10

doing whole albums or longer EPs.

35:13

And there's a slightly different form

35:15

where it has intake, you know, different

35:17

songs. And if you have IS or

35:19

C codes, those sort of other, other,

35:21

parameters that are catered to

35:23

more longer format albums or

35:25

more groupings of songs. And

35:28

then there are, there's one

35:30

calendar for vinyl mastering that

35:32

encompasses the complexity

35:34

of the details that we need to

35:36

get your, get a product on the

35:38

lacquer. So to say that back, yeah,

35:40

you've got some people that just

35:42

need a digital master for a

35:45

single song for a single song.

35:47

Some people have a whole record.

35:49

Some people have a whole record.

35:51

Some people want to make a vinyl

35:53

record. Yeah. And what was the other

35:56

one? The fourth one is I'm actually

35:58

considering it whereas everything's always. experiment. The

36:00

fourth one is actually creating a

36:02

reference lacquer to as well. And

36:04

I'm actually considering getting rid of

36:06

that calendar because I can encompass

36:08

it in the other other calendars,

36:10

you know. What would be the

36:12

reason for them to have different

36:14

calendars? And if it just gets

36:16

to forget if the questions are

36:18

getting too into the weights, we

36:20

don't need to go there. But

36:22

it's actually to help me organize

36:25

each calendar has a slightly different

36:27

form that you can click into

36:29

and they all like for vinyl

36:31

information for vinyl. If I'm doing

36:33

if I'm just Most a lot

36:35

of times for the vinyl stuff

36:37

that I work on I'm actually

36:39

the mastering engineer and I I

36:41

walk the The client or the

36:43

artist or whoever it may be

36:45

through the whole process all the

36:47

way through I go all the

36:49

way up to plating And then

36:51

I hand them over and I

36:53

help them through the test pressing

36:55

process, but I hand them I

36:57

hand the client to a pressing

36:59

plan of their choice and and

37:01

I have some two really great

37:03

pressing plants here in town that

37:05

I work with equally. There's PMP,

37:07

physical music products. I think you've

37:09

had Piper on the show before.

37:11

She runs that and she's another

37:13

wonderful mastering engineer and her Piper

37:15

Pain. She has another, her lead

37:17

press operators, Colby, who's her, also

37:19

her mastering assistant. I just want

37:21

to give a shout out to

37:23

them. There's absolutely wonderful people to

37:25

work with and work through things.

37:27

And then also the vinyl lab

37:29

here in Nashville as well with

37:31

Scotland Masters and his team, also

37:33

an exceptional team as well. And

37:35

each pressing plant offers slightly different

37:37

products and different types of service,

37:39

depending on what you're looking for.

37:42

And I don't think there's like

37:44

a one size fits all. And

37:46

depending on what your needs are,

37:48

one may have. a product that

37:50

works really well for your needs

37:52

and the other may have a

37:54

product that works really well for

37:56

what you need. Piper does a

37:58

lot of like really customized colors.

38:00

on their vinyl, so like that

38:02

would be the place to go

38:04

if you're looking for like, like

38:06

if you just want to customize

38:08

something deeply. Whereas the vinyl lab

38:10

is, they have other, in terms

38:12

of like efficiency things that allow

38:14

you to get through the, like

38:16

if you just want to, like

38:18

I need X, Y, and Z,

38:20

and I need it, you know,

38:22

like they really really have some

38:24

awesome systems set up. So it's

38:26

like a customized versus like. A

38:28

system thing is yeah, anyway, so

38:30

yeah, okay, I hope that's helpful

38:32

I don't want to and I

38:34

don't want to like they're they're

38:36

both awesome No, it's great. Yeah,

38:38

this is great. Let's um yeah,

38:40

let's let's pick a real world

38:42

scenario. Sure. I have a record

38:44

out called Skidush. Yes. It's my

38:46

instrumental album. Yeah, it's all the

38:48

music that I've put on this

38:50

podcast now took me a while

38:52

to actually release it as a

38:54

record. We had had over two

38:57

million downloads of the podcast so

38:59

far, and I'd put the music

39:01

in it, but I hadn't released

39:03

it. So I was like, okay,

39:05

now that I'm double platinum, I

39:07

might as well release the record.

39:09

That's amazing. So I did that,

39:11

which was a lot of fun,

39:13

and we did a weekend here

39:15

where, well, I had mixed it

39:17

myself, but then we did a

39:19

mastermind weekend here where a group

39:21

came in and we went over

39:23

to Sterling sound and actually mastered

39:25

the record with Ryan Smith. and

39:27

got to sit there and he

39:29

showed us how it was done

39:31

and it was a lot of

39:33

fun and the record came out

39:35

sounds awesome but next stage for

39:37

me would be like okay I

39:39

think I should do a vinyl

39:41

copy of it and make that

39:43

available for you the rock stars

39:45

and so if we were if

39:47

I was to do that What

39:49

would that process look like? Let's

39:51

see, this is, I'm showing up,

39:53

I'm like, I've already mastered it

39:55

as digital. Do, do, would we

39:57

use that master? Would we start

39:59

over? How does that stuff? I

40:01

actually, I can be, as transparent,

40:03

I don't create a, technically I

40:05

don't create like a separate master

40:07

for vinyl, but I do. have

40:09

a slightly separate one. Like I

40:11

keep my, like if I make

40:14

any Q moves or compression moves

40:16

or like the general sonics of

40:18

the record, I keep the same,

40:20

whatever goes up digitally and whatever

40:22

goes on the vinyl, sonically are

40:24

as close as possible. So I

40:26

try to, I believe in that

40:28

one thing of one master if

40:30

it's all trying to, but to

40:32

get stuff onto a lacquer is

40:34

a little more trickier than just.

40:36

you know, making a digital file.

40:38

So I actually have a, I

40:40

skip, I don't skip, I don't,

40:42

my vinyl masters don't have the,

40:44

the, the heavy limiting that we

40:46

do just to, um, have things

40:48

to be loud for, for digital

40:50

release. Right. So I just, I

40:52

have a process that I work

40:54

on where, um, I do all

40:56

of the sonic shaping up to

40:58

a certain point and then just

41:00

the loudness stuff is, is, is

41:02

different between the two. If you're

41:04

just not, people don't understand, like

41:06

a lacquer is just, you're sort

41:08

of in the tape world, where

41:10

you're working at a zero VU

41:12

level and not at a zero

41:14

DBFS level, and those are drastically

41:16

different, different scales. So like, disk

41:18

level is centered around zero VU,

41:20

which in the real world, depending

41:22

on what you're working with, you

41:24

know, is your minus 14 on

41:26

a a DFS meter meter. Right,

41:29

right. So if you sent me.

41:31

a digitally allowed file for me

41:33

to cut, I have to turn

41:35

it down 14, you know, turn

41:37

it down to minus 14 to

41:39

even start. So right yeah, are

41:41

you recording your own music or

41:43

other people's music in your studio?

41:45

But you're having trouble figuring out

41:47

how to get your mixes to

41:49

sound great. Do they sound weak

41:51

and distant or lack punch and

41:53

clarity? Well, I've got a gift

41:55

for you to help you take

41:57

your mixes from sounding like basement

41:59

demos to sounding a lot more

42:01

like professional mixes And it's my

42:03

free course called Mix Master bundle.

42:05

This course will show you how

42:07

to get pro sounding mixes from

42:09

your home studio with free and

42:11

stock plugins and pro tools. And

42:13

the best part is, these mixing

42:15

techniques will work for you in

42:17

any dog, whether you're in Logic,

42:19

Cubase, Pre-Sona Studio One, Reaper, or

42:21

anything you can think of. Are

42:23

you ready to make your best

42:25

record ever? Then go to MixMasterbundel.com

42:27

to get started for free now

42:29

and you can find the clickable

42:31

link in the show notes of

42:33

this episode. Preferably. You want one

42:35

that's not quite digitally loud. Like

42:37

maybe it's pre-limited. Do you think

42:39

a typical, in my example, where

42:41

it was mastered, do you think

42:44

that part of the process would

42:46

have been sculpting it and then

42:48

at the last stage going through

42:50

a final limiting which makes things

42:52

louder and maybe it's possible to

42:54

undo that back step one level.

42:56

That's kind of in general what

42:58

I'm doing. There's a little more

43:00

finesse. to that too, because some

43:02

of the times the limiting can

43:04

add something, you know, that some

43:06

excitement, you know, like depending on

43:08

what we're doing. Well, it definitely

43:10

did in my writing, because it

43:12

sounds pretty awesome. At least I

43:14

love it. And some, you know,

43:16

like because we're lopping off, at

43:18

the end, we're lopping off a

43:20

fair amount of transient information, sometimes

43:22

the way that we lop that

43:24

off can actually be pleasing in

43:26

some way, shape or form, like...

43:28

resemble each other in some way

43:30

shape or form. Yeah. And so

43:32

there's exactly that that process in

43:34

general is sort of what I'm

43:36

finding out now. This is all.

43:38

Nothing is right and wrong. And

43:40

my process may be different in

43:42

three years as I experiment more.

43:44

Well, I think that that's an

43:46

important part of what we do

43:48

in making records is we just

43:50

keep, you know, iterating and evolving

43:52

and trying to level up how

43:54

we do stuff, you know. I

43:56

think that's what I enjoy about

43:58

this too is like it. In

44:01

the end, everything's subjective. Yeah. So,

44:03

so let's see. So I, so

44:05

I or somebody who's already got

44:07

something, they're like, well, want to

44:09

come make a vinyl record with

44:11

you, would potentially have created a

44:13

master for digital release. And if

44:15

we were smart, in the same

44:17

way that we might create a

44:19

no vocal mix, if we were

44:21

smart, we might actually create a

44:23

no limited master. Yeah, that's essentially

44:25

what? Like in our back pocket

44:27

in the same way that. when

44:29

we turn in a mix to

44:31

mastering, we might have a limited

44:33

mix that we listen to, but

44:35

then we do a no-limit mix

44:37

that goes to mastering, so it's

44:39

a little more room to breathe.

44:41

Correct. That's sort of what I've

44:43

found is kind of the now

44:45

that the vinyl world is sort

44:47

of like ramped up again. People

44:49

are, I found that that's becoming

44:51

a common, common trend for the

44:53

guys, for the people who are

44:55

cutting blacker is... is that sort

44:57

of workflow a little bit. Yeah.

44:59

And now I say that there

45:01

may be, I may get an

45:03

email from a few lacquer cutters

45:05

who are like, that's not all

45:07

at all what I do. Right,

45:09

right. But yeah. Well, hopefully everybody

45:11

has talked to their own style

45:13

and their own way of doing

45:16

things. That's something that I've found.

45:18

And I've found it in a

45:20

few other situations that have been

45:22

really helpful for me learning how

45:24

to do this as well. it

45:26

can't cut a square wave like

45:28

it's it's it's just like magnetic

45:30

tape where like your your current

45:32

is all you know all moving

45:34

moving from 180 degrees up to

45:36

180 degrees down and that's a

45:38

that's an arc you know and

45:40

and a cutterhead's designed to cut

45:42

the arc as opposed to cutting

45:44

like a just a squared off

45:46

version of it's really difficult to

45:48

To because it's a can't you

45:50

just get a better cutter? It's

45:52

a nonlinear medium. So it's analog.

45:54

You know, it's it's it's smoother.

45:56

You know, it's that's it's difficult

45:58

for us to cut really really

46:00

limited material. and have it sound

46:02

like the original material is in

46:04

digital and have it be enveloping

46:06

and exciting. Yeah. We can, I

46:08

mean, I can cut heavy limited

46:10

material that's square wave, but I

46:12

gotta cut it in a way

46:14

where it won't be exciting. Right.

46:16

You know, so if something already

46:18

is limited and has been mastered

46:20

once. then what would you do?

46:22

What if you couldn't go back

46:24

and get the unlimited version? With

46:26

my own stuff, and if I

46:28

have a little bit of flexibility,

46:30

and if it's coming from another

46:33

mastering engineer, I'm working on this

46:35

thing where I'm working with other

46:37

mastering engineers that I know really

46:39

well, and a lot of them

46:41

are in town, they're great colleagues,

46:43

and I'm kind of working, I'll

46:45

take their master. and I'll look

46:47

at it and say, okay, how

46:49

do I match this, but how

46:51

do I make it in a

46:53

way that I can cut it

46:55

easier? And so, like, I've been

46:57

diving a lot into, like, expansion

46:59

for, you know, like, some ways

47:01

to get transient space. Right, to

47:03

bring a little dynamic back into

47:05

recording. And there's this thing of,

47:07

like, you can turn stuff down

47:09

and recue it and you add

47:11

it, just by doing that alone

47:13

and you print it, you'll see,

47:15

like a transient, like, like, like,

47:17

a hack, you know, it's like

47:19

a transient comeback from that processing,

47:21

you know. What are some, are

47:23

there any particular tools that are

47:25

really helpful when it comes to

47:27

expanding stuff like that? Oh man,

47:29

I'm transparent and I'll reveal everything.

47:31

I've really been, I mean, we

47:33

all know that an expander and

47:35

a compressor are exactly the same

47:37

thing. They just work in reverse

47:39

of each other, right? You have

47:41

an attack and release and... you're

47:43

just, and in theory, and this

47:45

is how like Dolby noise reduction

47:48

works, is in theory, this is

47:50

what Compansion is, and it's how

47:52

all of our RF microphones work

47:54

as well, you'd use what's called

47:56

Compansion, where you compress down the

47:58

signal really, really heavily to try

48:00

and get it over a radio

48:02

wave, you know, like with RF.

48:04

and then you expand it out

48:06

exactly the way it was compressed

48:08

to then get it back out

48:10

to a usable audio signal and

48:12

that's like DBX and that's how

48:14

that's how noise reduction well noise

48:16

reductions are slightly different but it

48:18

this same idea right and so

48:20

in theory what I was trying

48:22

to get to is you can

48:24

compress if you know the exact

48:26

way you compress something In theory,

48:28

you can uncompress it with the

48:30

exact same settings with expansion, and

48:32

it will be exactly the same

48:34

thing. I just talked about that

48:36

with Dave Durer on a previous

48:38

interview. Oh, amazing. Well, I was

48:40

talking about how excited I was

48:42

to first discover the distressor. Yeah.

48:44

And of course, I did what

48:46

many people would do, which is

48:48

just put it on whatever. I

48:50

wanted to be more exciting, and

48:52

I had it on a snare

48:54

drum, but I overcompressed the snare

48:56

in the recording stage. And then

48:58

when we were mixing with Steve

49:00

Albini. expand this back out to

49:03

bring back some of the dynamic

49:05

and punch of the snare. And

49:07

that was the first time I'd

49:09

ever experienced that. But that's essentially

49:11

what he was doing, I think,

49:13

because he was trying to like

49:15

reverse engineer the compression I'd done.

49:17

That's, man, that's the guy to

49:19

talk to you about set stuff

49:21

though. If you want to go

49:23

way deep, that's amazing. That's really

49:25

cool. Yeah, it would have been.

49:27

Well, so, okay, cool. So... expanding

49:29

stuff to try and get a

49:31

little bit more dynamic out of

49:33

it. Yeah. And then bringing the

49:35

level down and now you can

49:37

start. So why don't you describe

49:39

to the rock stars some of

49:41

the basics of like what does

49:43

it mean to cut a lacquer

49:45

and what is the what is

49:47

the silito lathe and all that?

49:49

Because you have a bit of

49:51

a robot going on over there.

49:53

I do. Well, and it's we're

49:55

kind of an uncharted territory with

49:57

the lathe community. So the. The

49:59

lathe community, people who are cutting,

50:01

are at this point, most of

50:03

the people are cutting on machines

50:05

that... were made prior to 1982.

50:07

And they were made absolutely beautifully

50:09

and they sound amazing. You know,

50:11

you have the old Neumann machines

50:13

of different iterations, VMS 80s, VMS

50:15

70s, and then some custom built

50:17

stuff from older platforms. And then

50:20

you have another company called Scully,

50:22

which was the competitor company. And

50:24

those are usually the two layers.

50:26

There's one other. but you don't

50:28

see very many of those out

50:30

there, but these are the two

50:32

that people are cutting on this

50:34

day and age. But there's only

50:36

like a handful of people in

50:38

the world that can service these

50:40

things, and it's really, really expensive

50:42

to service them, and the parts

50:44

are becoming few and far between.

50:46

It's kind of like trying to

50:48

restore a model T, you know,

50:50

like trying to find parts. At

50:52

this point, a lot of people

50:54

are just custom building new parts,

50:56

and it just becomes... It's just

50:58

becoming really really cumbersome to really

51:00

keep these older machines up and

51:02

running. But that's not showing any

51:04

shade at them. There are wonderful

51:06

machines and they sound incredible and

51:08

trying to try to make a

51:10

new machine to get back up

51:12

to their standard is probably the

51:14

most difficult thing because they were

51:16

so well engineered. The Neumanns have,

51:18

you know, have this computer system

51:20

that allows the, you know, to

51:22

look ahead one revolution and it

51:24

adjusts pitch in depth of the

51:26

groove. so that you don't you

51:28

don't run into you don't have

51:30

grooves running into each other and

51:32

then also you can fit more

51:35

time on a side because you

51:37

can collapse the grooves when you

51:39

don't you can you can bring

51:41

the glues really close together when

51:43

you don't have a lot of

51:45

certain certain information you know you

51:47

know so and there's these computer

51:49

these analog computers on these machines

51:51

that can do that calculation it's

51:53

all program like so if there's

51:55

not as much program you can

51:57

you can close things things you

51:59

have to open them up to

52:01

make that space. We call it

52:03

vertical and lateral. And it's, you

52:05

want to think of it as

52:07

mono and anti phase. So everything

52:09

that's, you know, like just. stereo

52:11

information, if you don't have the

52:13

mono information, it's the information that's

52:15

exactly out of phase of itself.

52:17

So like right is out of

52:19

phase of left, right? And all

52:21

purposes from a schooling thought is,

52:23

you know, understand it by mid-side,

52:25

but we don't really refer to

52:27

it that way in the cutting

52:29

world, because it's a little, it's

52:31

just, we have to be more

52:33

technical about, you know, in, this

52:35

is my history nerd kicking in,

52:37

Alan Blumline invented this process in

52:39

the 1930s. And we're still using

52:41

that technology. But what's happening is

52:43

the way to encode and decode

52:45

the mono information and the side

52:47

information separately. And so, like, with

52:49

the needle moving left and left

52:52

and right, that's your mono information.

52:54

And the needle moving up and

52:56

down is your anti-phase, your side

52:58

information is, you know, sort of

53:00

in general. But getting something to

53:02

move up and down on left

53:04

and right is... almost an impossible

53:06

thing to do physically. So Alan

53:08

Blumline figured out a way to

53:10

make them move at a 45

53:12

degree angle, like left and right

53:14

and up and down. So it

53:16

kind of moves, instead of moving

53:18

up and down and left and

53:20

right the same time, we sort

53:22

of have this 45 degree movement,

53:24

this sort of fire 40 degree

53:26

movement, which is why our groove,

53:28

you know, and I may get

53:30

a bunch of cutting engineers that,

53:32

you know, rake rake me over

53:34

the colt. I make it a

53:36

bunch of cutting-edge engineers or that

53:38

may rake me over the coals

53:40

for describing it this way. So

53:42

I'm doing my best. I apologize.

53:44

But that's why our groove is

53:46

looks V-shaped. You know, like it's

53:48

because it's moving 45 degrees both

53:50

directions up and down left and

53:52

right. And it was the way

53:54

that they could get that encoded

53:56

properly. The biggest thing that I

53:58

want to say is like a

54:00

vinyl record is literally an analog

54:02

hard drive. It's just encoded information.

54:04

our information that gets encoded in

54:07

and then you have to have

54:09

a playback system to play that

54:11

back out so it's I call

54:13

it the caveman hard drive like

54:15

and it instead of spinning at

54:17

you know like two you know

54:19

like what is it seven seven

54:21

thousand and seven thousand two hundred

54:23

you know our p.m. It spins

54:25

at 30 33 and a third

54:27

r p.m. you know or 45

54:29

or whatever you know yeah yeah

54:31

and and and if you just

54:33

have a disk alone without the

54:35

play without the end code system

54:37

in the playback system they're useless

54:39

the information on it doesn't. You

54:41

know, like you have to have

54:43

a way to encode it and

54:45

decode it, just like we do

54:47

with computers. It's the same idea,

54:49

right? You know, so on my

54:51

machine, so I'm in New Charter,

54:53

or I have a machine that,

54:55

I call a silly-toe cutting lathe.

54:57

So after I shape up everything

54:59

and get things mastered, I have

55:01

actually a computer, another computer program

55:03

called Space and Time Control, which

55:05

is proprietary and connected to my

55:07

lathe. And it also does all

55:09

of the predictions. So instead of

55:11

having a computer like on the

55:13

old Neumann Lays that does those

55:15

like pitch in depth predictions in

55:17

real time, my program actually does,

55:19

I drop the files from my

55:22

mastering program into this program and

55:24

it does like a calculation of

55:26

what, depending on what I have

55:28

the parameter set at, you know.

55:30

like how much how loud it

55:32

is versus like how much land

55:34

I want which is the space

55:36

between the groves and how much

55:38

how what's my basic depth of

55:40

those groves yeah yes land is

55:42

the the the the the dead

55:44

space in between what we call

55:46

they call it either dead wax

55:48

or they call it the dead

55:50

space in between groves you know

55:52

and how much we can control

55:54

how much there is you know

55:56

So I load that into my

55:58

computer and then my software makes

56:00

a prediction and it actually gives

56:02

me a readout like I get

56:04

a visual disc of what my

56:06

groove should look like based on

56:08

what my files are. And then

56:10

that. That information is then sent

56:12

to the lathe while it's cutting

56:14

as a prediction. And then the

56:16

lathe follows that prediction. Isotope is

56:18

truly amazing for mixing and mastering

56:20

your music, like the new Isotope

56:22

plasma plugging featuring flux saturation, which

56:24

helps you sculpt the harmonics in

56:26

your sound, enhancing the excitement and

56:28

clarity of your tracks and mixes.

56:30

And Ozone, with its built-in mastering

56:32

mastering assistant, helps you analyze your

56:34

mix, suggesting all the settings you

56:36

need for a professionally mastered result

56:39

based on your chosen style of

56:41

music and EQ curve, or reference

56:43

a specific song if you want.

56:45

Ozone features sophisticated yet simple modules

56:47

like clarity and impact, low-end focus,

56:49

stabilizer, imager, exciter, and spectral shaping

56:51

along with powerful dynamic EQ, compression,

56:53

and limiting, allowing you to adjust

56:55

the settings to your taste so

56:57

it sounds incredible. And with the

56:59

magic of master rebalance, you can

57:01

even manipulate the vocal, bass, and

57:03

drums separately at the mastering stage.

57:05

Use the code Rock 10. to

57:07

get 10% off plasma, ozone, RX,

57:09

or any of the fantastic plugins

57:11

at isotope.com. How do rock stars?

57:13

We're back now for the Jam

57:15

session, aka the second half of

57:17

the show, joining you right here

57:19

at Podzilla Studios at my place

57:21

in East Nashville. My guess today

57:23

is Duncan Ferguson. Duncan, are you

57:25

ready to jam, dude? Yes, Jam's

57:27

my favorite. Awesome, man. Well, let's

57:29

hear more about your studio, too.

57:31

So, um. The voltage exchange beautiful

57:33

place really has a gorgeous look

57:35

to it. There's a video that

57:37

I found online where you did

57:39

an interview with Wilson Harwood. Yeah.

57:41

The sound proof is what is

57:43

the sound proof your studio show

57:45

if I'm saying that correctly. And

57:47

I don't know did you guys

57:49

did you work with Wilson to

57:51

do that or did he come

57:54

over and sort of take a

57:56

look at what you had done?

57:58

and you guys talked about it.

58:00

We, he, because he's, he's helping

58:02

people, uh, soundproof, their studio, like

58:04

he's, that's what he said. He's

58:06

going to guess on the show,

58:08

too. Oh, yes, yeah. Yeah, I,

58:10

yeah, it was fun. He just

58:12

want to come over and, and

58:14

take a look and be like,

58:16

what have you done? And kind

58:18

of show off, you know, like

58:20

this is what other people are

58:22

doing and thinking there you said.

58:24

I started with an empty shell

58:26

and I smarted the room. So

58:28

what is smarting a room? It's

58:30

smart as a program. It's made

58:32

by a company called Rational Acoustics.

58:34

And a lot of, it's really,

58:36

really popular use in the in

58:38

the live sound world for tuning

58:40

large liner APA systems. And you

58:42

can get all sorts of data

58:44

analysis from our from RTA microphones

58:46

or putting up, you know, omni

58:48

directional microphones and. just analyzing noise

58:50

in your space and you can

58:52

see all sorts of data you

58:54

can see if you can see

58:56

early reflections you can see phase

58:58

information that it's really easy if

59:00

you want to get really deep

59:02

into it's really easy way to

59:04

you know see if you have

59:06

any drivers out of phase it's

59:08

it's a really expensive program so

59:11

it wouldn't be a great use

59:13

of that but for basics but

59:15

uh so I was able to

59:17

when I built my room I

59:19

put up an RTA mic, I

59:21

shot a bunch of, I put

59:23

my speakers in place and just

59:25

shot a bunch of weird noise,

59:27

you know, pink noise and tones

59:29

and sweeps. So there's just an

59:31

empty box of a space at

59:33

this point. Just echo-y, nothing about

59:35

it sounds good yet. And sort

59:37

of figured out exactly where my

59:39

problem thoughts are going to be.

59:41

And I had some pretty extreme

59:43

restrictions with my room just based

59:45

on its dimensions. And how would

59:47

you describe a problem spot when

59:49

you're when you're shooting that out?

59:51

Let's say you've got the software

59:53

and you see something you're like

59:55

that's a problem just modes and

59:57

standing waves where where things are

59:59

collecting. in areas in the room and then

1:00:01

where things are canceling. And what does

1:00:03

that mean? When you look at a

1:00:05

chart, does that mean there's like a

1:00:07

huge peak in one spot? When things

1:00:09

are summing together in one area of

1:00:12

the room, they're summing together and you

1:00:14

get like a big bump, you know,

1:00:16

in a certain frequency area. And then

1:00:18

the direct opposite, usually with standing

1:00:21

waves, it's like a really drastic

1:00:23

like dip. in one area and we

1:00:25

had you had Carl Tats over and

1:00:27

he explained one big problem area for

1:00:29

a lot of people is around 120

1:00:31

hertz area and it's kind of like

1:00:33

has to do with like the architecture

1:00:35

that were just you know like

1:00:38

standard-sized rooms speaker technology that just ends

1:00:40

up being a huge problem spot you

1:00:42

know when you do this smarting the

1:00:44

room test you already have to have

1:00:47

your speakers in a in position right

1:00:49

otherwise you don't know what you're testing

1:00:51

and I can also like use I

1:00:53

get them in a relative position. I

1:00:55

know I'm going to do some fine

1:00:57

adjustments based on some of what I'm

1:00:59

seeing too. You know, like if you, um, uh,

1:01:01

so if you have a big base boost,

1:01:03

you might move them away from the

1:01:06

wall a little bit or something. Yeah,

1:01:08

well, there's like quarter wavelength, depending on,

1:01:10

you know, like, I have the big

1:01:12

PMC IB ones, which are transmission line.

1:01:15

So there's not a lot of base coming

1:01:17

off the back of the back of

1:01:19

those speakers. But still I made some

1:01:21

softets behind them. I mean, I could go

1:01:23

really deep. Yeah, that was cool. Yeah,

1:01:26

you want to, yeah, and the angles

1:01:28

of your speaker, while there's the

1:01:30

AES standard of having them

1:01:32

at 30 degrees, I've found

1:01:34

that the 30 degrees is

1:01:37

sometimes too tight for near

1:01:39

field monitors. So having them

1:01:41

a bit wider actually really

1:01:43

helps, you know, not have

1:01:45

too much buildup in the

1:01:47

center of your image. What is

1:01:49

30, when you say at 30 degrees, what

1:01:51

does that mean? It's the equilateral triangle of

1:01:53

the listener at the point of the triangle

1:01:56

and then the speakers at the two other

1:01:58

ends of the triangle. Isn't that? I'm

1:02:00

remembering this wrong. Isn't that 60,

1:02:02

60 makes an equal triangle? Yeah,

1:02:04

because that's the half, the 30

1:02:06

degrees is the half of the

1:02:08

triangle. I get 60, yeah, yeah,

1:02:10

so all right. Sorry, my brain

1:02:12

moves fast and I, you know,

1:02:14

it's good. You got to slow

1:02:16

it down. Slow it down and

1:02:18

break it down for us. And because

1:02:20

we, the other thing I was talking

1:02:23

to, I want to give a shout

1:02:25

out to Ryan Smith and Joe over

1:02:27

at Sterling. I was talking about.

1:02:29

teaching and the things that have to remind

1:02:31

myself because we live in it every day and

1:02:33

then you get so used to it you don't

1:02:36

think about it anymore that's something that I you

1:02:38

know like when you say oh isn't it 60

1:02:40

degrees oh yeah 30 but it's only half of

1:02:42

the triangle and then like everybody who's listening to

1:02:44

you is like what are they talking about like it's

1:02:47

you don't remember that you're moving so fast

1:02:49

because you live in it every day that

1:02:51

you you have to remind yourself some

1:02:53

of the basics so an equal lateral triangle

1:02:55

essentially to describe it for the podcast

1:02:57

Picture a triangle with three equal

1:02:59

sides, right? Yeah. And one side

1:03:02

is the speaker in, speakers in

1:03:04

front of you from tweeter to

1:03:06

tweeter, I guess. And then the

1:03:08

other sides are the tweeter pointing

1:03:10

to your head from the left side

1:03:12

and from the right side. Yeah.

1:03:14

So that it creates a triangle in

1:03:16

your head sort of in the apex

1:03:18

of that triangle, right? Correct. Yeah. And

1:03:21

I've actually found that. There's

1:03:23

a famous studio designer in town called

1:03:25

named Steve Durr. Yes, Steve's great. He's

1:03:27

been on the show too. Oh, has

1:03:29

he? Oh, awesome. He had said that

1:03:31

like even like you, they found that

1:03:33

like stepping back from that triangle

1:03:35

a little bit, you feel like it's

1:03:38

more natural as well. So I feel like

1:03:40

that equal out of triangle is

1:03:42

sort of like a really good like, like

1:03:44

center point for yourself, but you're

1:03:47

going to then manipulate it a

1:03:49

little bit to your liking. to

1:03:51

like make stuff feel like if it feels

1:03:53

too close together you make them wider

1:03:55

yeah feels too wide you bring them close

1:03:57

I was just in a friend's room the

1:03:59

other and helping him get his speakers.

1:04:01

Like he was, he was, he was

1:04:04

said he was sort of struggling to

1:04:06

get his mix. You have friends? Yeah,

1:04:08

friends. No, I just, I don't. I

1:04:11

thought we just lived in our studios

1:04:13

by ourselves. That was the joke this

1:04:15

weekend of like, the only time I

1:04:17

get out is the recording summit. Right.

1:04:20

It's like I just live in a

1:04:22

cave all day with my studio assistant

1:04:24

buster, my dog, and then it's like,

1:04:27

it's our one time that we can

1:04:29

nerd out, you know, you know, Buster

1:04:31

makes me feel good. There you go.

1:04:33

Yeah, that's amazing. That's All right. So

1:04:36

back to back to dead seriousness here.

1:04:38

So you've set up your your equilateral

1:04:40

triangle you got your speaker set up

1:04:42

you shoot out your room with your

1:04:45

smart and then it starts to tell

1:04:47

you that there's problems in certain modes.

1:04:49

When you treat the room there's there's

1:04:52

you know what I remember learning is

1:04:54

that there's frequency zones, there's everything below

1:04:56

300 hertz, enters the zone of room

1:04:58

modes and, you know, pile-ups of frequencies

1:05:01

or cancellations of frequencies that we need

1:05:03

to try and address, and then everything

1:05:05

above 300 gets into sort of ray

1:05:08

theory, which is like... It sounds just

1:05:10

bouncing around the walls into your ears

1:05:12

and so you're trying to address those

1:05:14

things. Yeah, it's all early reflections kind

1:05:17

of in the 30 millisecond to 60

1:05:19

millisecond range is sort of like what

1:05:21

we perceive as early reflections. So that's

1:05:23

like what you were talking about, what

1:05:26

the frequency range, like 500 hertz and

1:05:28

up or you know, sort of that.

1:05:30

And there, it's sort of like you

1:05:33

address those different things with different sort

1:05:35

of like low end. A lot of

1:05:37

times you're creating base traps, base traps.

1:05:39

you know in air in mostly all

1:05:42

the time corners or or like a

1:05:44

solid wall of some kind on the

1:05:46

usually it's a back wall or like

1:05:49

you can have some soft fits on

1:05:51

your front walls some of a typical

1:05:53

a typical design. And there's again, it's

1:05:55

subjective, there's no right way to do

1:05:58

it. They just have all these little

1:06:00

techniques of trying to like problem solve

1:06:02

like a chess game. Right. So it's

1:06:04

like the reflection stuff is you think

1:06:07

about sound going from the source of

1:06:09

the speaker. and trying to get to

1:06:11

your ear, but then you think, okay,

1:06:14

but it can also go from the

1:06:16

speaker and bounce off the wall and

1:06:18

then reach my ear. And so now

1:06:20

you've got a slight delay on it

1:06:23

and it's adding together. And so in

1:06:25

those cases, you can think about, well,

1:06:27

I should put a treatment where it's

1:06:30

going to bounce off the wall, and

1:06:32

so it doesn't bounce off the wall,

1:06:34

right? It's kind of like basic thinking

1:06:36

like that. The sound moving about the

1:06:39

room is not as relevant anymore, right?

1:06:41

It's like, it's more like there's low

1:06:43

end in the room everywhere, even though

1:06:46

it's not entirely accurate. There's low end

1:06:48

in the room, and so we're going

1:06:50

to try and soak it up rather

1:06:52

than thinking about it bouncing off something.

1:06:55

But it really is bouncing off. It's

1:06:57

like the low end accumulates. on the

1:06:59

wall surfaces and the floor and the

1:07:01

ceiling, right? Yeah, and it just sums

1:07:04

together in certain places and cancels in

1:07:06

other places as it's, you know, and...

1:07:08

Depending on the frequency. Yeah, and this

1:07:11

is where this gets mind-boggling, and this

1:07:13

is what really helped me was like

1:07:15

diving into the live sound world and

1:07:17

tuning these giant liner APAs, and understanding

1:07:20

like we used to do sub-over arrays

1:07:22

where we would position subs, you know,

1:07:24

to then actually create a beam. you

1:07:27

know, like, or cancel beams, or, you

1:07:29

know, like, you could, like, you could

1:07:31

create a cardioid pattern with subs, you

1:07:33

know, and cancel out everything that's blowing

1:07:36

back to the stage so those, so

1:07:38

the musicians don't get hit with a

1:07:40

tunnel low end off the back of

1:07:42

the subs. There's all sorts of, all

1:07:45

sorts of things you can do to

1:07:47

control that. And what I, what really

1:07:49

hit me hard when I was learning

1:07:52

how to do all that. was that

1:07:54

no frequency is created equal. So like

1:07:56

if you're trying to think about like,

1:07:58

oh, I would focus in on like,

1:08:01

I gotta control, I gotta think about

1:08:03

80 hertz, so if I do this

1:08:05

one thing, I'll do that, but then

1:08:08

70 hertz is now doing a completely

1:08:10

different thing. Like it's like a waterbed,

1:08:12

you're trying to like, you know, like,

1:08:14

we think of things that singularity, I

1:08:17

think when you start off as an

1:08:19

audio student or. You think of things

1:08:21

singular, like, oh, I hear 3K, but

1:08:23

what is 3.5K doing? Or what is

1:08:26

2? Yeah, like, we can't encompass everything

1:08:28

in our head, but what's happening in

1:08:30

rooms is like it's this gradient of

1:08:33

all these things. So like if you

1:08:35

have a problem in one area, you're

1:08:37

going to have something else in another

1:08:39

area, but you can't focus on one

1:08:42

singular thing. You have to figure out

1:08:44

this sort of overarching. Right, so you

1:08:46

don't you don't see the problem right

1:08:49

at one spike frequency and then say,

1:08:51

okay, I'm only addressing that. You just

1:08:53

think about it in a general. Yeah,

1:08:55

it's like a wide, wide bandy Q

1:08:58

is the way you treat this. Yeah,

1:09:00

yeah, you sort of have to like,

1:09:02

it, yeah, you, it's, we, we tend

1:09:04

to start to think singularity, but in

1:09:07

reality, there's just a whole lot of,

1:09:09

a lot of things happening, and they're

1:09:11

all, dominoesos that are connected to each

1:09:14

other, Well, it's interesting to think about

1:09:16

studios and spaces as instruments, too. It's

1:09:18

like there's a resonance to it all,

1:09:20

and that's what makes it sound interesting.

1:09:23

If you just move your speakers outside

1:09:25

and put them on two stands and

1:09:27

listen to them outside, you would have

1:09:30

none of these problems. Yeah. Because it

1:09:32

might not sound interesting. Well, they would

1:09:34

sound, you'd measure them and it would

1:09:36

sound great. And then you'd listen to

1:09:39

them and be like, this is an

1:09:41

interesting. Right. Right. And that's fascinating too,

1:09:43

because I wonder if it's just, I

1:09:45

mean, so much of our experiences, how

1:09:48

we programmed our brain to understand things.

1:09:50

And I wonder if, you know, if

1:09:52

you just grew up. up to listening

1:09:55

to music outside on speakers all the

1:09:57

time. Yeah. Maybe we would have made

1:09:59

different music and had a different understanding

1:10:01

of what sounds good to us. Yeah.

1:10:04

You know, it's fascinating. All right. Well,

1:10:06

so let's, let's, um. So now you

1:10:08

figured out your studio and you figured

1:10:11

out where the speakers were going to

1:10:13

go and you did some treatments, but

1:10:15

you also made it look really great.

1:10:17

So talk a little bit about some

1:10:20

of the aesthetic choices that you made

1:10:22

that sort of make your space feel

1:10:24

beautiful. I had been in a number,

1:10:27

over the course of my career, I've

1:10:29

been in some really wonderful spaces and

1:10:31

I noticed early on and also the

1:10:33

live sound company that I worked for,

1:10:36

there was a business philosophy that if

1:10:38

you present yourself in a cleanly... nice

1:10:40

way. It really goes a long way.

1:10:42

And while you may have the... Especially

1:10:45

when you're doing a video podcast. Yeah.

1:10:47

We, you know, we always were, we're,

1:10:49

I almost felt like we, when the

1:10:52

Lifetime Company was looking for, we always

1:10:54

had to like repaint our cases, you

1:10:56

know, like, stuff on the road gets

1:10:58

banged up a lot. And we used

1:11:01

to, a lot of clients would, would

1:11:03

come to that company because we were

1:11:05

the clean looking company. We didn't look

1:11:08

like a rock and roll. tour that

1:11:10

had just finished. Right, there's an appealed

1:11:12

console tape or a case. And I

1:11:14

kind of took all that to, and

1:11:17

then all my favorite studio spaces that

1:11:19

I've been in, worked in prior to

1:11:21

that, like, with, you know, I come

1:11:23

from the classical world too, so it's,

1:11:26

that just, that just kind of goes

1:11:28

a long way, aside from your own

1:11:30

skill set. and people are feel more

1:11:33

comfortable in those spaces. And I just

1:11:35

want to design a space that felt

1:11:37

that way. Well, I would say listening

1:11:39

to your discography and Rockstars, we have

1:11:42

a playlist of Duncan's work, which you

1:11:44

can check out. It's going to be

1:11:46

in the show notes. You just click

1:11:49

right through and go listen to some

1:11:51

of his records. But they sound great

1:11:53

and there is a quality of attention

1:11:55

to detail in them that I picked

1:11:58

up on right away. There's a there's

1:12:00

a sonic. consistency to low end and

1:12:02

width and you know the EQ and

1:12:04

all that that's really nice. there's also

1:12:07

just like there's a you know they

1:12:09

sound cleaned up they don't sound like

1:12:11

there's there's a mess in there you

1:12:14

know it's not a I don't know

1:12:16

have you had a chance to do

1:12:18

any punk rock kind of stuff I

1:12:20

just I just cut something for for

1:12:23

Piper that was like full-on like punk

1:12:25

rock and it was really it was

1:12:27

really fun yeah and but I didn't

1:12:30

master that I just cut it so

1:12:32

okay but it's fun to yeah I

1:12:34

I've worked on a lot of, it's

1:12:36

fun to like take, I love that

1:12:39

intersection of Lofy Me, Thai, you know,

1:12:41

sort of, I think the, the Black

1:12:43

Keys Brothers album was an amazing example

1:12:45

of that. Yeah. It was really, really

1:12:48

fun and it's really, really well presented,

1:12:50

but then there are these Lofy elements

1:12:52

that, so I work on a lot

1:12:55

of things like that, you know, sort

1:12:57

of like, from, from, from, from DIY,

1:12:59

you know, you know, and, lost the

1:13:01

train, what was, remind me the exact.

1:13:04

We were just talking about punk rock

1:13:06

records. We're also talking about like, you

1:13:08

know, oh, audio that sounds really cleaned

1:13:11

up or whatever. I think, man, some

1:13:13

of my favorite records are like, you

1:13:15

work really hard to make things dirty

1:13:17

or like have an energy and vibe.

1:13:20

And then as a mastering engineer, I

1:13:22

can take that and put it in

1:13:24

a really nice palette and it's, you

1:13:27

can digest it in a way that.

1:13:29

that feels, you know, like feels consumable.

1:13:31

I don't know, that's sort of the

1:13:33

way that I kind of look at

1:13:36

that low-fi and high-fi energy. I come

1:13:38

from the classical world, and I did

1:13:40

a lot of jazz sessions as well

1:13:42

in my undergraduate and graduate work. And

1:13:45

so maybe that's just a voice that

1:13:47

I'm just used to being, you know,

1:13:49

I, you know how we all can't

1:13:52

like, we all can't help but put

1:13:54

our, like, like, subconsciously like, like, I

1:13:56

mean the reason why people hire you

1:13:58

is for someone of a little thing

1:14:01

that you understand and can do

1:14:03

to to to achieve a vision

1:14:05

that they're thinking right? Yeah. So

1:14:07

like I think as much as

1:14:09

I try as a mass engineer

1:14:11

try to avoid having any sort

1:14:13

of voice onto something I work

1:14:15

really hard not to. I think

1:14:17

sometimes that sort of can seep

1:14:19

out you know of. Well and

1:14:21

that's an interesting because I've

1:14:23

heard variations on mastering.

1:14:25

And I've heard people describe

1:14:28

mastering as a process that

1:14:30

should have a transparency to

1:14:32

it, like the mix did what was

1:14:34

supposed to be done, and it's

1:14:36

a question of, you know, bringing

1:14:38

it over the finish line, but not

1:14:41

changing the creative vision. But

1:14:43

then I've also heard mastering. I

1:14:45

mean, Richard Dodd once I heard

1:14:48

of Master that he did for, I

1:14:50

came out of his one of the songs

1:14:52

I mixed, but he threw a slap

1:14:54

back onto it. Oh, amazing. It sounded

1:14:56

amazing. That's awesome. It was the right.

1:14:58

It was the right thing for the

1:15:00

right. It was the right moment. Yeah.

1:15:03

Yeah. And then recent stuff that we've

1:15:05

been getting mastered with Chris Chamnes. Yeah.

1:15:07

He's working with somebody new. I'll have

1:15:09

to come back with the with the name.

1:15:11

But there's a quality to it that

1:15:14

sounds bold and and like willing

1:15:16

to. you know, expand the vision of it and

1:15:18

I love that stuff too in the right

1:15:20

setting. I think there's like one not one

1:15:22

size fits all like and I kind of

1:15:24

choose depending on what the project needs

1:15:27

and actually cutting lacquers for

1:15:29

other mastering engineers has been a

1:15:31

real sort of revealing of that a

1:15:33

bit. So like when a project comes in

1:15:35

I'll evaluate like, okay, do I need to

1:15:37

be hands off with this and like just

1:15:40

transfer the mixes and you know. do is

1:15:42

like Ian Shepard like Ian Shepard says

1:15:44

do a little harm right do no

1:15:46

harm right or there are other projects

1:15:48

where I said oh you know like the mix can

1:15:50

really use X Y or Z and

1:15:52

I think this is actually their intention

1:15:54

so I can take it a bit further

1:15:57

with enhancement sometimes and in the right

1:15:59

and then reading those sort

1:16:01

of street smart cues of

1:16:03

like I think they were going

1:16:05

this direction so I can like

1:16:07

I can help them get there.

1:16:09

Yeah, you know, and I think

1:16:12

maybe that was the Richard Dodge,

1:16:14

you know, so there was a

1:16:16

feeling in that, you know. Yeah,

1:16:18

I think it definitely just was

1:16:20

following whatever his instinct was

1:16:22

and just going for trying

1:16:25

to like trying to preserve what

1:16:27

they did. on the lacquer as

1:16:29

much as possible, like that's a

1:16:32

completely hands-off, you know, and then

1:16:34

getting it the lacquer to translate

1:16:36

to the digital, you know, so.

1:16:38

Rock your music production with the

1:16:40

updated Complete 15 bundle for native

1:16:43

instruments featuring the new Contact 8.

1:16:45

This comprehensive collection includes a fantastic

1:16:47

range of versatile synths, sampled instruments,

1:16:49

and innovative studio effects, giving you

1:16:51

everything you need to bring your

1:16:54

music to life. Whether you're composing

1:16:56

emotional scores, deep dance floor grooves,

1:16:58

or experimenting with sound design, Complete

1:17:00

15 has you covered. Discover powerful

1:17:02

plugins and instruments that guide

1:17:04

you from the initial idea

1:17:07

all the way through. to

1:17:09

the final mix. The included

1:17:11

Contact 8 introduces exciting new

1:17:13

tools like chords and phrases

1:17:15

for instant inspiration, the leap

1:17:17

tool for dynamic looping, and

1:17:19

conflicts. cutting-edge hybrid instrument that

1:17:21

merges organic and synth sounds

1:17:23

in real-time. Plus, enjoy revamped

1:17:25

versions of Massive X and

1:17:28

Guitar Rig 7-Pro to take

1:17:30

your sound to the next

1:17:32

level. Then Polish your mixes

1:17:34

off with the A.I. enhanced

1:17:36

isotope Ozone 11 included in

1:17:38

complete 15 bundle. Use the

1:17:40

code Rock 10 for 10%

1:17:42

off at Native Instruments.com. Well, so

1:17:44

let's talk about the... tools some

1:17:46

of the tools that help sort

1:17:48

of clean up a recording to

1:17:50

sure yeah is isotope and rx

1:17:52

one of the things that would be

1:17:55

a typical part of the process I

1:17:57

use it every day and it's

1:17:59

amazing Amazing how powerful those tools

1:18:01

have gotten. Like I go in

1:18:04

and if there's certain, even on

1:18:06

the mastering stage, and I am

1:18:08

open and transparent about all this,

1:18:10

but even if there's even some

1:18:12

mouth ticks or pops that I

1:18:14

feel on the mastering side get

1:18:17

brought out, you know, like as you

1:18:19

start cleaning things up, just, you know,

1:18:21

I go in and take those out with eyes

1:18:23

dope. I do make sure to like make sure

1:18:25

that. to tell the artist, hey, I'm doing

1:18:28

this. You know, like, if you wanted that

1:18:30

in there as for, like, authenticity, I'll leave

1:18:32

it, you know, but this feels distracting. You

1:18:34

know, like, sometimes even like, yeah, you know,

1:18:37

like the, there's high frequency things that

1:18:39

sound like edits, but they're actually like

1:18:41

mouth. Just mouth. Yeah. Because the reason

1:18:43

is because the mouth gets so amplified

1:18:45

through the mix process. Yeah. That just

1:18:47

a little bit of spit and, you know,

1:18:49

you know, you know, moving your. or whatever.

1:18:52

And a lot of times I'm catching edit,

1:18:54

like some some edit stuff, like you know,

1:18:56

when a tracking engineer or mix engineer listens

1:18:58

to things over and over and over, they,

1:19:01

your brain glosses over some of that

1:19:03

stuff too, which is not any, they're focused

1:19:05

on other things too. They're focused

1:19:07

on getting it to like have this sort

1:19:09

of thing. And so it's sort of like a,

1:19:12

it's like a mini proof read of like, you

1:19:14

know, like, we spelled that one little word,

1:19:16

you know, or that whole thing. A lot of

1:19:18

times I don't even send the

1:19:20

mixback. I can clean it. I

1:19:23

can clean the edit up

1:19:25

with spectral editing. Yeah, between

1:19:27

wave lab and in our X, you

1:19:29

know. Yeah, yeah, let me see

1:19:31

if I can see if there's

1:19:33

anything fun to look at RXYs.

1:19:35

Oh, my internet's not really working,

1:19:37

so might have to blow that idea

1:19:39

off. Well, so when you. Use Rx

1:19:41

in a mastering process. Is it

1:19:44

like the first move? Yeah. Is

1:19:46

it like later on? I do

1:19:48

it with my first listen simultaneously

1:19:50

trying to be efficient as I

1:19:52

loaded into our standalone Rx first.

1:19:54

And this is just my, um, I loaded

1:19:57

into Rx first and then I do

1:19:59

an analysis. I sort of listened to

1:20:01

it, make some notes and then try

1:20:03

to catch that stuff before I started,

1:20:06

before I loaded in the wave lab,

1:20:08

which is my messaging program. So first

1:20:10

you just do, you do like an

1:20:13

audit of the music and just sort

1:20:15

of listen carefully, which is a big

1:20:17

part of what you describe on your

1:20:19

website to you, the critical listening. But

1:20:22

in other words, you don't just automatically

1:20:24

do stuff. You listen to see what,

1:20:26

where it needs to go. Yes, yeah.

1:20:29

And I actually with my handy dating

1:20:31

notepad, you know, like I just make

1:20:33

some notes and, you know, like that

1:20:35

first listen is so critical. Like my

1:20:38

first impression basically takes care of 80%

1:20:40

of what I'm going to, you know,

1:20:42

like if I don't get that first

1:20:45

listen and be completely objective to it,

1:20:47

then I can. I feel like I'm

1:20:49

not as a physician as a mastering

1:20:51

engineer to really evaluate what it needs

1:20:54

from my background or it's true. It's

1:20:56

true for me and mixing too and

1:20:58

other things where it's easy to keep

1:21:01

getting. It's like we're so good at

1:21:03

hearing things that we could do. Yes.

1:21:05

That as soon as we come up

1:21:07

with an idea and it's presented to

1:21:10

us. we just follow that path. It

1:21:12

feels like, you know, the equivalent would

1:21:14

be like doom-scrolling social media on your

1:21:17

phone or something. Like, oh, that's interesting.

1:21:19

Oh, click on that, you know. Sure.

1:21:21

And we fall into that trap in

1:21:23

making music, whether we're recording or overdubbing

1:21:26

or mixing or, you know, sound checking

1:21:28

a kick drum, you know, the early

1:21:30

stages or mastering at the last stage.

1:21:33

So... that process of just saying, you

1:21:35

know what, I'm just going to sit

1:21:37

down and passively listen and then make

1:21:39

a note when I hear something that

1:21:42

needs to be addressed. It gives us

1:21:44

a little roadmap to then go in

1:21:46

and just go do those things first.

1:21:49

And I find that can be very

1:21:51

powerful because, especially as you say, if

1:21:53

we have the strength. of a first

1:21:55

impression in that moment, and we've taken

1:21:58

notes, then we can just go address

1:22:00

those things that we thought we needed.

1:22:02

Sometimes the things that we address, I

1:22:05

go address them and I come back

1:22:07

and I'm like, well, that's not better.

1:22:09

That's, I still don't like it or

1:22:11

something. But a lot of times, it

1:22:14

really can do a cool thing. And

1:22:16

it really does help us cross the

1:22:18

finish line too efficiently. Yes, yeah, it's

1:22:21

actually kind of like the note taking

1:22:23

that I was talking about earlier, where

1:22:25

like I'm laying out my day, I'm

1:22:27

doing that with a song for a

1:22:30

recording, you know, it's just laying out

1:22:32

exactly what I think needs to be

1:22:34

addressed. The biggest thing in is to

1:22:37

like, you know, like the biggest things

1:22:39

that we can do is what we

1:22:41

don't do, right? Like it's like in

1:22:44

the music, like when somebody's writing a

1:22:46

song or making a recording, it's like

1:22:48

sometimes the best, you know what's like

1:22:50

what's in between the notes as opposed

1:22:53

to the notes themselves. So like in

1:22:55

mastering I found that that actually rains

1:22:57

true. Like some of the biggest things

1:23:00

that I can do is not do

1:23:02

certain things at all, you know, and

1:23:04

it kind of lets the mix breathe

1:23:06

through. And then if I make the,

1:23:09

I think it's all about making the

1:23:11

exact right decisions that it needs, and

1:23:13

that can get really, really complicated, you

1:23:16

know, like how do I not, how

1:23:18

do I do as little as possible,

1:23:20

but do what it needs. And that's

1:23:22

like the million dollar question. Yeah, really.

1:23:25

Do you find, so when you're mixing,

1:23:27

making a change to one thing that

1:23:29

you think you're getting right can actually

1:23:32

affect something else and cause the other

1:23:34

thing to start to feel wrong. Is

1:23:36

that similar in the mastering process? It's

1:23:38

even more similar. Like it's even more

1:23:41

deeper because like if I if I

1:23:43

feel like something has an issue. And

1:23:45

I say, oh, I'm going to correct

1:23:48

for this. Like, well, the snare drum

1:23:50

is just poking through too much and

1:23:52

sort of hitting me in the wrong

1:23:54

way. But the snare drums in the

1:23:57

center and the vocals in the center.

1:23:59

change a frequency in the snare drum,

1:24:01

there is a huge likely chance that

1:24:04

that frequency is going to overlap in

1:24:06

the vocal. And so like if I

1:24:08

pull that down, then I'm changing something

1:24:10

in the vocal. So you really, I

1:24:13

think it's even more like a hundred

1:24:15

times more in mastering because we're just

1:24:17

dealing with the two track, right? Or

1:24:20

the some down mix, and we're changing

1:24:22

things within that. Yeah, I remember my

1:24:24

first, one of my first cars when

1:24:26

I would install my own stereo stereo

1:24:29

systems. I had a

1:24:31

graphic equalizer that I got at one

1:24:33

point and I put that in there.

1:24:35

And it was a lot of fun

1:24:38

actually to go down and like tweak

1:24:40

it and saw into song and I

1:24:42

felt like it was one of the

1:24:45

first learning moves for mixing is like

1:24:47

adjusting the EQ settings in the car.

1:24:49

Have you ever found that, you know,

1:24:51

and I know we have digital ones,

1:24:54

you know, my Tesla has a, you

1:24:56

know, a little graphic EQ, I could

1:24:58

mess with that I usually just leave

1:25:00

it flat, you know. But do you

1:25:03

think that's a kind of a fun

1:25:05

way for people to begin to explore?

1:25:07

What does mastering mean? It's like start

1:25:09

taking a finished thing and just ekewing

1:25:12

it and seeing what happens. I think

1:25:14

that's great because it can reveal a

1:25:16

lot of things, especially like, like, actually

1:25:18

that's a great way to help understand

1:25:21

low end and how low end affects

1:25:23

you and how it moves around a

1:25:25

different spaces, especially like when you're dealing

1:25:28

with like base notes, you know, like

1:25:30

the biggest thing that a lot of.

1:25:32

times what I deal with in in

1:25:34

with mastering is uneven base notes that

1:25:37

pop or uneven not base notes from

1:25:39

the bass guitar but like like when

1:25:41

the mix gets sum together and the

1:25:43

mix engineer may not be in an

1:25:46

environment where they can hear that very

1:25:48

well we get a lot of like

1:25:50

inconsistent motion in the base of like

1:25:52

different things that are summing together and

1:25:55

so like I can go through and

1:25:57

like keep the mix relatively solid as

1:25:59

they intended and then just kind of

1:26:02

like get that to feel more consistent

1:26:04

in the decade. that have, and it

1:26:06

makes the mix more enveloping in my

1:26:08

opinion. So sometimes there are, you know,

1:26:11

with bass instruments and bass guitars and

1:26:13

things like that, there are certain chords

1:26:15

and notes sound huge in the low

1:26:17

end and other ones seem to like

1:26:20

the low end can seem to go

1:26:22

away and stuff like that. How would

1:26:24

you talk about that and how would

1:26:26

you possibly address some of those things

1:26:29

at a mastering stage to? or how

1:26:31

do you even advise the mixer to

1:26:33

go back and address it? I try

1:26:35

to, I try to not sense stuff.

1:26:38

If I have, actually, I'm gonna answer

1:26:40

that with a different, almost a different

1:26:42

topic. Developing trust, you know, like I

1:26:45

have a lot of return mix engineers

1:26:47

who enjoy what I do, and it

1:26:49

really becomes a symbiotic relationship where you

1:26:51

build that trust between each other. And

1:26:54

then you kind of like that safe

1:26:56

space that you open up. You can

1:26:58

really talk about, hey, when I do

1:27:00

this, how do you feel about that?

1:27:03

And then the mix engineer will be

1:27:05

like, when I do this, how does

1:27:07

this translate? And then you kind of

1:27:09

go back and forth. And that's having

1:27:12

a client in the room with you.

1:27:14

Or a mix engineer who I just,

1:27:16

we can communicate over email or phone,

1:27:18

you know, like who's, who sent me

1:27:21

stuff a lot. You like I get

1:27:23

like something from them once a month.

1:27:25

or just out a few albums over

1:27:28

the year. Like you can really develop

1:27:30

this. You've developed a relationship where it's

1:27:32

not so much like the ideas that

1:27:34

I have. It's like, oh, I'm hearing

1:27:37

this. And then the mix is just

1:27:39

like, well, I did this. And then

1:27:41

I said, well, if I do this,

1:27:43

does that help this? You know, does

1:27:46

that help this? You know, you're sort

1:27:48

of working as a team back and

1:27:50

you're doing that for the artist. What

1:27:52

a lot of things get missed in

1:27:55

the music industry with production teams is

1:27:57

they don't work together Yeah, and it's

1:27:59

like I've really worked really hard to

1:28:02

say hey, this isn't isn't my record,

1:28:04

you know, like I'm a service and

1:28:06

I'm your team member and we all

1:28:08

got to like have some sort of

1:28:11

connection to get this you know like

1:28:13

all my favorite records are these giant

1:28:15

teams you know yeah like so I

1:28:17

sort of I didn't mean to steer

1:28:20

us off topic there I didn't know

1:28:22

we were off topic it felt pretty

1:28:24

on topic me okay but when I

1:28:26

think about the team thing too I

1:28:29

think about what it's like to be

1:28:31

somebody turning over music For somebody to

1:28:33

mix or turning it over for somebody

1:28:35

to master sure Probably the same feeling

1:28:38

for somebody who just comes in and

1:28:40

sings and they're turning over their voice

1:28:42

to the recording engineer and the producer

1:28:45

in the studio You know where somebody

1:28:47

over doing a guitar part and then

1:28:49

saying and then they hear it back

1:28:51

through the speakers or like the drummer

1:28:54

comes in and plays a drum part

1:28:56

and then here's how do the drums

1:28:58

play back? You know, there's a there's

1:29:00

a level of Trust in letting go

1:29:03

that is part of the whole process.

1:29:05

Right. Yeah. And with that is often,

1:29:07

it's very easy to just have an

1:29:09

accompanying sense of self-doubt, you know. So

1:29:12

like you turn over a, you turn

1:29:14

over a finished mix to a mastering

1:29:16

engineer and then it comes back and

1:29:19

you know, you might. hear

1:29:21

things that don't hit you right or

1:29:23

do or don't or whatever. And then

1:29:25

you're like, and then you're like in

1:29:28

this state of like, oh gosh, did

1:29:30

I, I don't even say gosh, oh

1:29:32

God, did I screw it up? Yeah.

1:29:35

Okay, sometimes I say gosh. But, you

1:29:37

know, you're wondering like, did I screw

1:29:39

it up or is this the mastering

1:29:42

thing that's doing it? And you get

1:29:44

you immediately in a sense of potential

1:29:46

self-doubt. And so that's where like. That

1:29:49

ability to communicate and that ability to

1:29:51

feel like you're on the same wavelength

1:29:53

is so helpful. I've been in that

1:29:56

situation in both directions. But that's why

1:29:58

I've created just this open, safe environment

1:30:00

to, like not, I don't, I don't

1:30:03

want the mixed engine to feel that

1:30:05

way. Also, I want the mixed engine

1:30:07

to be really excited about what they've

1:30:10

done and when I give it back

1:30:12

to them and be like, wow, you,

1:30:14

my mix feels like it's my mix,

1:30:17

but man, we got this to a

1:30:19

place that it needed to get to.

1:30:21

Yeah. And I mean, granted, we're not

1:30:24

all the same. We're all like artists

1:30:26

with different styles with different styles. I

1:30:28

don't think that we have to assume

1:30:31

that whatever system we create is going

1:30:33

to automatically be perfect for everybody. We

1:30:35

have to also be ready for the

1:30:37

fact that like, you know, you, I'll

1:30:39

just use the example of like bringing

1:30:42

in a singer to sing on a

1:30:44

track. I mean, the voice is so

1:30:46

personal. It's like you're going to bring

1:30:48

in one singer. And you might have

1:30:50

the greatest communication in the world, and

1:30:53

they might do a fantastic job. But

1:30:55

in the end, you're like, that's just

1:30:57

not the voice we're looking for, you

1:30:59

know. Yeah, it doesn't fit the situation

1:31:02

or you're feeling, I guess, right? And

1:31:04

or an artist working with a producer

1:31:06

or something, you know, I'm looking for

1:31:08

a different kind of style. Same thing

1:31:10

with a mixing engineer or a mastering

1:31:13

engineer or a mastering engineer. But through

1:31:15

that process, but through that process, for

1:31:17

there to be a great. process of

1:31:19

feeling like we're on the same page,

1:31:21

it's a great team, when we talk

1:31:24

to each other, I feel like you

1:31:26

understand me kind of thing. Yeah. So

1:31:28

that you can get to that point

1:31:30

of making the best version of the

1:31:32

record that you're trying to make. Yeah,

1:31:35

I couldn't agree with that 100% I've

1:31:37

tried to foster that environment. Well you

1:31:39

couldn't agree with that 100%? Or like...

1:31:41

That's just messing with you. The English

1:31:44

language is just so confusing. That's all

1:31:46

right. That's all right. That's all right.

1:31:48

It's like, oh man. It's like, there

1:31:50

are phrases that I say when I'm

1:31:52

like, why do I, like, where did

1:31:55

that come from? Right. Like, yeah. Oh,

1:31:57

I was looking on Google. I'm like,

1:31:59

what's the derivation of. like some expression

1:32:01

you know it's like yeah yeah we

1:32:03

use words that don't logically work in

1:32:06

the situation but it's the whole culture

1:32:08

has moved at that direct yeah yeah

1:32:10

speaking of having to get up and

1:32:12

use words a lot one of the

1:32:14

things you do is you also teach

1:32:17

at SAE right yes yeah tell us

1:32:19

a little bit about that what's what

1:32:21

SAE what do you what do over

1:32:23

there so I have a master's degree

1:32:25

which allows me to teach at the

1:32:28

bachelor's courses at the level which is

1:32:30

part of their accreditation and it's I

1:32:32

teach the, I, I teach a few

1:32:34

different classes, but my, the main thing

1:32:37

that I was brought in to work

1:32:39

on was the, the mastering class at

1:32:41

SAE, so I'm a, an SAE is,

1:32:43

they're a school here in Nashville that,

1:32:45

was a school of audio engineering? School,

1:32:48

yeah. They, they're, they have multiple campus

1:32:50

around, around the US, and they're owned

1:32:52

by a large parent company in Australia.

1:32:54

called Novatas, that's an educational company. But

1:32:56

it serves a demographic of students who

1:32:59

maybe wouldn't have the opportunity to go

1:33:01

to a major university. I teach night

1:33:03

classes and I feel like it's a

1:33:05

really great way that I can give

1:33:07

back to the community. And I was

1:33:10

always looking for something where I could

1:33:12

do that. And their philosophy is, is

1:33:14

they don't want academics who are tenured

1:33:16

working. They want like actual people who

1:33:19

are working in the field that can

1:33:21

give students. They can give students the

1:33:23

real time on the ground, like what's

1:33:25

happening. And that feels really authentic. And

1:33:27

I'm able to just say, hey, this

1:33:30

is what I do every day. And

1:33:32

these are the things to think about.

1:33:34

And if you know. sort of in

1:33:36

classes, you know. Yeah, I like essays.

1:33:38

It's a cool spot. I think that

1:33:41

it does have a feel of like

1:33:43

it's like a working, sort of a

1:33:45

working class. Shout out to Matt Boudron.

1:33:47

working class audio but essay feels like

1:33:49

like a like a working class audio

1:33:52

education program even down to the thing

1:33:54

of like I was like I went

1:33:56

to them and say hey could I

1:33:58

you know like do we have an

1:34:01

avenue for publishing like something you know

1:34:03

like because I know in major universities

1:34:05

like if you're tenured you're required to

1:34:07

publish you know things and the the

1:34:09

person who's running it is one of

1:34:12

my supervisor said Oh no, we don't

1:34:14

want you, we don't have evidence for

1:34:16

that because we want you to just

1:34:18

give what you, like we hired you

1:34:20

because you're working in mastering every day.

1:34:23

You know, like, like, like, like, don't

1:34:25

worry about publishing, just, you know, give

1:34:27

them what you're doing every day, you

1:34:29

know, and what you're working on, what

1:34:31

you've, you know, all that sort of

1:34:34

thing. So it's kind of like counterintuitive

1:34:36

because they come from the academic world

1:34:38

where that's like... Yeah, settings as well.

1:34:40

So I do half of my classes

1:34:43

in person and half of my classes

1:34:45

online and I do it from the

1:34:47

math, my Mastering Studio. So that nobody

1:34:49

gets a full class, you just do

1:34:51

a half a class? Just kidding. Our

1:34:54

classes, we have four hours. The cool

1:34:56

thing about SAE is you can do

1:34:58

a bachelor's degree in about half the

1:35:00

time because we run, they run their

1:35:02

semesters all year around and the semesters

1:35:05

are like condensed into seven weeks. and

1:35:07

you are immersed in like only two

1:35:09

classes per semester. So they've- Right, so

1:35:11

you really focus on it. Like an

1:35:13

accelerated program. That's good. That tends to

1:35:16

be good for me. I do well

1:35:18

when I can just focus on one

1:35:20

thing at a time. But I also

1:35:22

have learned that so often we don't

1:35:24

get, we only get to focus on

1:35:27

one thing at a time for a

1:35:29

little bit and then you gotta put

1:35:31

it down and go focus on something

1:35:33

else. And so for me, a big

1:35:36

challenge has always been like, okay, how

1:35:38

do you learn the shit out of

1:35:40

something. up to this point and then

1:35:42

put it away and know that you

1:35:44

don't even get to come back and

1:35:47

relearn it again for six months. Yes.

1:35:49

And then how do you pick up

1:35:51

where you left off? Yeah, I struggled

1:35:53

with that because I just always wanted

1:35:55

to like if I don't have a

1:35:58

I'm not in it all the time.

1:36:00

It's like a language. You use it

1:36:02

or use it or lose it, right?

1:36:04

Yeah. It's like, I don't know. I do

1:36:06

things like stuff like this, like figuring out

1:36:09

how to do a video podcast. I'll deep

1:36:11

dive, learn something for a while. And then

1:36:13

I try and at the point at which

1:36:15

I got it figured out and I have

1:36:17

to put it away and go focus on

1:36:19

something else. I'll just. do like a video

1:36:21

walk through note to myself. I'll just

1:36:23

take my phone and just like walk

1:36:26

around pointed everything explained it all to

1:36:28

myself like I was saying like here's

1:36:30

how you do this yeah and here's

1:36:32

why that you know works who doesn't

1:36:34

and that kind of helps but then

1:36:36

the problem for me is then I'm

1:36:38

like where did I put that video

1:36:41

yes yeah six months later yeah no

1:36:43

that's yeah fine um digital organization oh

1:36:45

my gosh like That's a whole other

1:36:47

topic. Well, and we did hit a little bit

1:36:49

of that, all right? So that's good. But when

1:36:51

you're teaching the mastering class at SAE, what do

1:36:54

you find are some of the common questions

1:36:56

that the students have about it? And

1:36:58

you find you're always having to answer

1:37:00

over and over. I've developed, from what

1:37:03

I've learned through that teaching that class

1:37:05

is like, the biggest thing is not

1:37:07

so much like the nitty gritty technical

1:37:09

detail. It's teaching people how to like

1:37:11

develop their own critical critical critical listening.

1:37:14

And that's why I put critical listening

1:37:16

in sort of like my bio is what

1:37:18

I got from my master's degree in

1:37:20

studying with some of the people who

1:37:22

I studied with is how to

1:37:24

truly critical listening and then what

1:37:27

critical listening actually is. And then

1:37:29

how do you translate that over

1:37:31

to like subjectively the subjective art?

1:37:33

You know, how do I stay

1:37:35

a mastering engineer and work on

1:37:37

things technically but then understand what's

1:37:40

happening artistically? Yeah. And I

1:37:42

feel like students come in and they're like,

1:37:44

how do I do this? And it's, then

1:37:46

they say like, well, I can do all

1:37:49

the, like, how do I do all these

1:37:51

technical things? And you look at what they're

1:37:53

really asking. It's like, how do

1:37:55

I actually listen? Right. And so I kind

1:37:57

of have taken, I have a system.

1:38:00

in these classes that I've developed

1:38:02

myself that I sort of stole

1:38:04

from my McGill background at McGill

1:38:06

University and then taken from some

1:38:08

AES white papers of how to

1:38:11

like evaluation, how to evaluate recordings

1:38:13

and kind of sum that all

1:38:15

together. Oh, and there's also

1:38:17

another textbook from a guy named

1:38:20

Jason Corey who runs the University

1:38:22

of Michigan program and he wrote

1:38:24

a book on critical listening as

1:38:26

well, a really awesome textbook. I

1:38:28

asked. Everybody should check that out.

1:38:30

And he was, he's another McGill

1:38:32

alumni. He got his, I

1:38:35

think he got his PhD from

1:38:37

McGill. McGill's up in Canada. Yeah,

1:38:39

McGill, Quebec. Yeah, in Montreal. Were

1:38:42

you studying under George Massenberg? Yes,

1:38:44

George, George Massenberg, Richard King, Martha

1:38:47

D. Francisco, and Vyslav Voicheck. It's

1:38:49

hard to say, it's Polish. It's trying

1:38:51

to say, pronounce his last name and

1:38:53

spell it is. Those are the four

1:38:55

people that were there. George has since

1:38:57

retired from teaching and he's back in

1:39:00

Nashville now as well. So, and I know

1:39:02

you've had him on the podcast before.

1:39:04

He was in the podcast. Yeah. Yeah.

1:39:06

Yeah. He joined us remotely at the

1:39:08

time. And then of course I've been

1:39:10

in his room at Blackburg. Yes, the

1:39:12

diffusion room. The diffusion room. Yeah. We

1:39:15

discussed that a lot in class. So

1:39:17

that was fun. That's a cool thing.

1:39:19

Yeah. Do you feel like the time

1:39:21

that you've spent watching YouTube videos, trying

1:39:23

out mixed tricks and tweaking version after

1:39:25

version of your mixes has gotten you

1:39:27

nowhere? Have you been looking for more

1:39:29

of a simple and straightforward step-by-step process

1:39:31

for creating a pro mix that

1:39:34

won't take years to learn? What

1:39:36

if you could have a Grammy-winning

1:39:38

mix engineer who understood all of

1:39:40

your struggles and could coach you

1:39:42

through them? If you struggle with

1:39:44

any of these questions, then the

1:39:47

ultimate mixing masterclass is just... for

1:39:49

you. Now you can discover the

1:39:51

proven step-by-step mixing system from Grammy-winning

1:39:53

mix engineer Craig Alvin for consistently

1:39:55

creating a pro-quality mix in your

1:39:57

home studio that will sound great.

1:40:00

Listen to this quote from one of

1:40:02

our students, David. That was absolutely the

1:40:04

most helpful and informative block of information

1:40:06

and mentoring on the mixing process that

1:40:08

I have ever been a part of.

1:40:10

That was like sitting behind a mix

1:40:12

engineer for years, watching and picking up

1:40:15

pro tips along the way, condensed into

1:40:17

a six to seven hour session. Look,

1:40:19

I'm so confident that this will help

1:40:21

you take your mixes to the next

1:40:23

level, that if you can't get a

1:40:25

killer mix in 30 days, I'll give

1:40:28

you a refund, no questions asked. ready

1:40:30

to take your mixes to Grammy winning

1:40:32

quality, then go to Ultimate Mixing Masterclass.com

1:40:34

and start now by checking out the

1:40:37

free preview of the Ultimate Snare Mixing

1:40:39

Trick. And hopefully, I'll see you in

1:40:41

the front row of the Grammys. Yeah,

1:40:44

the ability to listen. So one of

1:40:46

the things that I think of when

1:40:48

I imagine learning critical listening

1:40:51

is like, you're learning to listen for

1:40:53

things that you didn't. know what they

1:40:55

were before and some of that comes

1:40:57

just with experience and time I mean

1:41:00

like I hear things in a

1:41:02

recording in music and production that

1:41:04

I'm sure I couldn't have heard

1:41:06

initially but I but I hear

1:41:08

them immediately and there's there's

1:41:11

stuff that there's that that is

1:41:13

a level of technical stuff

1:41:15

where you could probably put a name

1:41:17

to it and explain it and

1:41:19

then there's also stuff where you

1:41:21

have like this internal Gut meter

1:41:23

that you know it's not right, you

1:41:26

know, and that's probably the balance of

1:41:28

like the the text side versus

1:41:30

the personal creative side as well

1:41:32

But but I imagine there's also You

1:41:34

know, do you find that there's

1:41:36

a Universal language that is useful

1:41:39

in terms of critical listening

1:41:41

and being able to describe

1:41:43

what something needs and then there's

1:41:45

also like the the importance of

1:41:48

having a personal language for yes

1:41:50

Describing this is This is the

1:41:52

topic where the students, this has

1:41:55

like been the my deepest topic

1:41:57

of like being a mastering

1:41:59

engineers. it's it's really I've developed

1:42:02

a system of like okay we have our

1:42:04

own way of like internalizing things and

1:42:06

a lot of times people can't

1:42:08

put that in the words right

1:42:10

how how do we take that

1:42:12

and then internalize it and communicate

1:42:15

to the artists in the mixed

1:42:17

engineers or or the production team

1:42:19

of that we're working with so like

1:42:21

how many times have you heard like somebody

1:42:24

say like oh that was warm right well

1:42:26

like My warm and your warm are

1:42:28

probably vastly different. You know, or

1:42:30

like, I had this, this, this

1:42:33

revelation. And I take ice baths

1:42:35

for fun. So probably, yeah. When

1:42:37

I had this situation and my

1:42:39

master's agree, a buddy of mine and

1:42:41

I were going back and forth and

1:42:43

we were discussing like, oh, that

1:42:46

sounds really bright. And I'm like

1:42:48

thinking like, it doesn't sound bright.

1:42:50

And then I opened up the

1:42:52

conversation and be like, okay, what

1:42:54

is your bright? you know like

1:42:56

I'm like oh shoot my bright is

1:42:58

like 12k you know everybody has this

1:43:00

you know and those are vastly

1:43:03

different different different textures

1:43:05

you know in in a recording vastly

1:43:07

different you know so we

1:43:09

can refer to actual frequencies although

1:43:11

I well I sort of find

1:43:14

that helpful and useful in the studios

1:43:16

and other times I'm like yeah I've

1:43:18

come up with a what I've teaching

1:43:20

my students is before at the beginning

1:43:22

of every mastering class around teaching. We

1:43:25

go into like technical stuff and I

1:43:27

have technical things of like how to

1:43:29

make a DDP and you know like

1:43:31

like how to do actual technical

1:43:34

mastering things but at the beginning of

1:43:36

every class the first hour of every class

1:43:38

we sit down and we listen to something

1:43:40

and we evaluate it on a set

1:43:42

of criteria that I've kind of I've taken

1:43:45

from Jason Corey's book, I've taken

1:43:47

from George when I was in class

1:43:49

with him, I've taken Vislov and then there's

1:43:51

an AES white paper and they all kind

1:43:53

of have these six pieces

1:43:56

of why I've added a they

1:43:58

all have these. six pieces

1:44:00

of criteria that kind of

1:44:02

accumulate a way that you

1:44:04

can kind of house everything

1:44:07

under some categories and be

1:44:09

able to listen consistently, especially

1:44:11

in a professional setting, like if

1:44:13

you're having to work for somebody

1:44:15

else, and then communicate that

1:44:17

out to somebody. And the categories

1:44:20

are, first category is spectral

1:44:22

content, like how do I translate

1:44:24

what I'm hearing into frequency

1:44:26

analysis? And under that category,

1:44:29

and Bob Katz puts it perfectly

1:44:31

in his book, you know, like micro

1:44:33

dynamics versus macro dynamics, you

1:44:36

know. And there's, I have subcategories

1:44:38

under all these of like things you

1:44:40

got to think about. The third

1:44:42

category is spatial impression, which is

1:44:44

how wide, you know, how why am I

1:44:46

hearing things versus how deep, you know, like

1:44:48

mixes have a front and back to them.

1:44:50

Some people say they have a, they actually

1:44:53

have some height too, but that's really

1:44:55

dependent on the system you know, you

1:44:57

know. And then the next category is

1:44:59

what we call transparency. And we should

1:45:01

clarify, we're probably talking about listening on

1:45:04

stereo speakers at this point, too. Yeah,

1:45:06

yeah. But you can translate that, you

1:45:08

can translate all this to immersive really

1:45:10

easily. Well, in immersive you clearly have

1:45:13

height, because the speakers love your height

1:45:15

too. Yeah, actually, yes, that very much

1:45:17

so. Yeah, that was speaking specifically with

1:45:19

the height on stereo, but in immersive

1:45:22

now we have real height, right, which

1:45:24

is incredible. It is pretty cool. Have

1:45:26

you dabbled and immersive yourself yet?

1:45:28

Yes, I have just dabbled.

1:45:31

And I'm looking for me

1:45:33

personally, I'm looking for a

1:45:35

practical application where the

1:45:37

second that I start, I

1:45:40

haven't gotten projects yet

1:45:42

to justify the expense. And

1:45:44

the second that that happens,

1:45:47

I personally will be really

1:45:49

excited when I can truly.

1:45:51

dive really deep into

1:45:53

it. So, back to the,

1:45:56

the, I was on spatial

1:45:58

oppression. which is, oh, once

1:46:00

we talk about spatial impression,

1:46:02

I dive into what's called transparency. When

1:46:05

we're listening, do we hear a lot

1:46:07

of processing on the recording that we're

1:46:09

listening to or does it feel really

1:46:11

raw? And there's kind of a transparency

1:46:13

meter. Like how transparent does it feel

1:46:16

versus how process does it feel? And

1:46:18

how transparent do we want it? Sometimes

1:46:20

we want it processed. Well, and then

1:46:22

it kind of can. The whole thing, the

1:46:25

list of things that I'm giving you right

1:46:27

here is like, is a way to reverse

1:46:29

engineer a recording from a math, like the

1:46:31

way that I've found a way that like,

1:46:33

when I'm working on something and I get

1:46:35

a mix that I feel is not transparent,

1:46:37

as there's a lot of

1:46:39

processing on it, I'm probably gonna

1:46:42

choose a route or some processing

1:46:44

on it, or some processing on

1:46:46

it, or some processing on it,

1:46:48

whereas like if something's really raw

1:46:50

and transparent. it may need a little more, you

1:46:52

know, may need a may, I say may,

1:46:54

everything's situational, like I may be

1:46:56

able to get away with more

1:46:59

processing because it doesn't have as

1:47:01

much on, you know, sort of, I'm thinking

1:47:03

of it that way in a mastering

1:47:05

mind, but when you're working in

1:47:07

any stage, this is really good

1:47:09

things to take notes on, like,

1:47:11

you know, like if you're working

1:47:13

on an individual sound versus a

1:47:16

whole mix, you know, that sort of thing.

1:47:18

And now that falls into there can

1:47:20

be an artistic noise insertion or there

1:47:22

can be like technical problems and being

1:47:24

able to listen for technical problems and

1:47:26

and decide whether a technical problem

1:47:28

whether something is artistically done in

1:47:30

a way that or it's an actual technical

1:47:33

problem that you need to change you know

1:47:35

right sometimes you just can't sometimes you hear

1:47:37

problems and there's just nothing you can do

1:47:39

about it yeah that's frustrating yeah just like

1:47:42

and then the last thing the the the

1:47:44

gut thing that you're talking about that we

1:47:46

can't describe I made a I made, I

1:47:48

stole this from the AES white paper, but

1:47:50

I kind of like changed it a little

1:47:52

bit is like, what's your gut

1:47:54

feeling? Like what, all those things,

1:47:56

that list of things combined, what

1:47:59

are you getting? getting like what is

1:48:01

emotionally, what are all those things triggering

1:48:03

in you emotionally? And I think that's

1:48:05

really, really important at the end of

1:48:07

like what does it all boil down

1:48:09

to. Because that's the only experience anybody's

1:48:11

actually gonna have. Correct. Yeah, but those

1:48:13

categories are a way that we can

1:48:15

like, as a industry professional, I

1:48:17

can turn around to an artist and

1:48:19

say, hey, I'm feeling this and this is

1:48:22

a way that I can technically describe

1:48:24

it to you without telling you that

1:48:26

some vague terminology that's like this is

1:48:28

warm. or this is right or this is like

1:48:30

you know and it's or or I can talk

1:48:32

to another mixed engineer and say hey you know

1:48:34

like in this category I'm hearing I'm

1:48:36

I'm dealing it with this this way you know

1:48:39

and so I'm sort of trying to impart on

1:48:41

a student that like having a

1:48:43

consistent way to critically listen and

1:48:45

evaluate a recording in a way

1:48:47

that you can you can translate

1:48:49

that out universally. I find that's

1:48:51

useful too in the production process

1:48:53

in the studio where I'm like working

1:48:56

with an artist and I hear something,

1:48:58

I hear the tags too long, or

1:49:00

I hear that the base, you know,

1:49:02

something doesn't go away and come

1:49:04

back in, it doesn't leave a

1:49:07

space, or, you know, the base is

1:49:09

playing a pie on the neck instead of

1:49:11

low in the neck, you know, all

1:49:13

kinds of things like that, or

1:49:15

vocals, you know, there's a harmony,

1:49:17

or there's a double, or there

1:49:20

isn't in a moment, and I'll

1:49:22

think about, there's a, since I've

1:49:24

done this. well don't do that

1:49:26

you need to do this yeah

1:49:28

but when I communicate to that

1:49:30

to the artist I've learned that

1:49:32

it's helpful to start breaking

1:49:34

down like well why is that the right

1:49:36

choice to make or suggest and so

1:49:38

I'll try and present it that way

1:49:40

now say like you know like well if

1:49:43

you do it like this and then you

1:49:45

know you go up high on the neck

1:49:47

on the base then the fundamental on the

1:49:49

low end sort of disappears from the

1:49:51

mix for a second yeah and if

1:49:54

you decide to play a loan out right

1:49:56

there, you know, you may discover that

1:49:58

there's more impact. it feels bigger

1:50:00

in that moment. And so then, like, if you'd

1:50:02

like the song to feel big in that moment,

1:50:05

that might be the right choice. If you'd like

1:50:07

the song to not feel so big in that

1:50:09

moment or suspended, you might like the high

1:50:11

note there, you know, explaining it, breaking it

1:50:13

down for like, what is the, what is

1:50:15

the experience when you make that

1:50:18

particular choice? I love that because you're

1:50:20

still giving the artists a chance to

1:50:22

like create, you're just giving them the...

1:50:24

the tools to choose and create

1:50:26

what they want their experience. Yeah,

1:50:29

and then hopefully I'm not too

1:50:31

long-winded where they're like, let's just

1:50:33

record. I'm just gonna play it.

1:50:36

I'm just gonna play it. I'm

1:50:38

just gonna play it. I'm just gonna

1:50:40

play it. I'm just gonna play it.

1:50:42

But I do love that too. I love

1:50:44

one. I'll make suggestions to

1:50:46

an artist sometimes about a lyric

1:50:48

or something. Yeah. And then they

1:50:50

just come back and they just

1:50:52

like one better. recording a vocal

1:50:55

and she was like I'm really

1:50:57

struggling with this and I just

1:50:59

changed one word for her and she's

1:51:01

like oh my gosh that like opened

1:51:04

everything like it kind of it kind

1:51:06

of broke the the roadblock yeah and

1:51:08

she's like I'm giving you a pointer

1:51:10

a credit and I'm like I don't

1:51:13

give me a pointer credit for one

1:51:15

word this is it's like it's like

1:51:17

she's like you get publishing I was

1:51:19

like no no no I'm I'm here to

1:51:22

Yeah, like please don't go that deep,

1:51:24

you know. Right. Yeah. I've probably co-written

1:51:26

a lot of songs in the

1:51:28

studio that I never got any

1:51:30

writing credit for. And I don't

1:51:32

know whether those songs went off to

1:51:34

make much money that it would

1:51:36

have mattered anyway, but maybe they

1:51:38

did. Yeah. Let's talk about, let's,

1:51:40

you know, I mentioned low end and base.

1:51:43

Low end does seem to be

1:51:45

an important part of making records

1:51:47

because it's sort of where the... the body

1:51:49

of the sound is, you know, a lot

1:51:51

of times it's where the weight and impact

1:51:54

of what we're doing can be. So let's see,

1:51:56

so one of the questions I wanted to

1:51:58

ask you is just like. like, you

1:52:00

know, should low-end seem big in a

1:52:02

mastering playback system? I was wonder,

1:52:04

like, does this, does the playback

1:52:07

in your mastering studio feel

1:52:09

this similar or different to

1:52:11

what it might feel in a

1:52:13

mixing environment or in a studio

1:52:15

environment when you're creating or

1:52:18

even in a consumer environment when

1:52:20

you go back and listen in

1:52:22

the car and you're like, yeah,

1:52:24

it feels great. I think my

1:52:26

mastering environment and this is just

1:52:29

me personally. needs to reflect the

1:52:31

bell curve of all those situations. So

1:52:33

like I need to be able to make

1:52:35

decisions and translate those

1:52:37

decisions out to every playback system.

1:52:40

So I need to have a system that

1:52:42

kind of falls, for me personally,

1:52:44

I need to have a system that kind

1:52:46

of falls in the middle of all that.

1:52:48

Does that make sense? Yeah. So like cars

1:52:50

tend to have a ton of

1:52:52

low end because you're just stuck

1:52:55

in a box and it builds

1:52:57

up. right like you're you're forcing

1:52:59

low-end into a space it can't

1:53:01

fit you know so like cars

1:53:03

are going to be have more

1:53:05

low-end whereas you know like our

1:53:07

clock radios are out you know

1:53:09

our little earbuds or stuff there's

1:53:11

not going to have any low

1:53:13

end there well the wall a

1:53:15

certain point although the Apple pods

1:53:17

are getting better every year or better

1:53:19

you know I so I need to have like

1:53:21

a system that fits in the middle

1:53:23

of all of that and then be

1:53:25

able to judge you know calibrate one

1:53:28

direction or another and understand what's

1:53:30

happening in all those spaces

1:53:32

that's my personal opinion but at

1:53:34

some point everything is relative like you

1:53:36

get to know your system so well that

1:53:38

you then learn how it translates yeah other

1:53:40

ways but I mean I find the cars

1:53:43

always been a super super important part of

1:53:45

the equation for me yeah but of course

1:53:47

I've been making records since before headphones were

1:53:49

worth listening to it's like we're our media

1:53:51

you know like everybody used to just listen

1:53:53

to music in the car you know like

1:53:55

on road trips or drive from work or

1:53:57

you know like that was like a huge

1:54:00

So, like, of course, we're gonna sort

1:54:02

of lean that direction, right? And we

1:54:04

also had a weird mix of, like,

1:54:06

our reference was radio. Yes. Which was,

1:54:09

like, not even apples to apples. Correct.

1:54:11

Because of all this stuff. We're listening

1:54:13

to radio, and that's what it sounds

1:54:16

like. And then we're making something, printing

1:54:18

it to a cassette or a CD,

1:54:20

and then playing that back in the

1:54:23

car. And radio had all this crazy

1:54:25

compression. Yeah. So that's why that that

1:54:27

car listen became so popular right like

1:54:29

and now we're shifting you right like

1:54:32

we're shifting like people well people are

1:54:34

listening in their cars they're like this

1:54:36

is what's controlling you know what's what's

1:54:39

on you know like we're shifting all

1:54:41

of our our playback to that I

1:54:43

love it this area of my references

1:54:46

now are coming from my phone to

1:54:48

my car. And I love the fact

1:54:50

that in my this particular car, the

1:54:53

audio quality when you stream from the

1:54:55

phone to the car seems to be

1:54:57

totally high res to me. I don't

1:54:59

know if it 100% is or if

1:55:02

there's some limitation, but it sounds freaking

1:55:04

great. It's probably not. But the gap

1:55:06

of, you know, like medium doing digitally

1:55:09

is is we're shrinking the like the.

1:55:11

the the Codex, you know, like if

1:55:13

you're for the streaming Codex are just

1:55:16

every, you know, every progression. We're just

1:55:18

getting, they're just getting better and better.

1:55:20

We're able to get more information into

1:55:23

those Codex. Yeah. Now, um, one of

1:55:25

the challenges can be that, um, the

1:55:27

streaming services now, you know, well, not

1:55:29

even finally, it's been. this way for

1:55:32

a while, but the normalization of song

1:55:34

levels from track to track. So we

1:55:36

used to have the loudness wars. Everything

1:55:39

next, one thing was louder, so you

1:55:41

try and make your stuff louder to

1:55:43

compete with that. Now the streaming services

1:55:46

balance out those levels so that everything...

1:55:48

stays in a consistent zone, although there's

1:55:50

still a loudness within that. Yes. But

1:55:52

then when you bring your mix on

1:55:55

the phone out to the car and

1:55:57

press play, there's new challenges where your

1:55:59

mix actually might sound louder than what's

1:56:02

playing back because if you have normalization.

1:56:04

It doesn't have the normalization coming back

1:56:06

off of your phone. So maybe talk

1:56:09

a little bit about that if you

1:56:11

want. And then do you, I guess

1:56:13

this could be the other part of

1:56:16

the question. You use some of the

1:56:18

tools like maybe file pass or sample

1:56:20

to deliver masters people and get feedback

1:56:22

and comments. And then along with that,

1:56:25

do you have any file naming stuff

1:56:27

that you want to throw into that

1:56:29

mix about keeping that organized so you

1:56:32

know what everybody's talking about. That's a

1:56:34

huge, the file name is a big

1:56:36

piece of my, what I took away

1:56:39

from from George and the archiving stuff.

1:56:41

So I don't know where you, what's

1:56:43

the. It's all one in the same.

1:56:46

You basically think about it like this.

1:56:48

You've. Hand it over something. Somebody's, it's

1:56:50

on their phone, they're, they're playing it

1:56:52

off their phone on into their car,

1:56:55

trying to decide how it sounds. Yeah.

1:56:57

You know, what are they faced with?

1:56:59

And then they want to give you

1:57:02

feedback and, you know, the file naming

1:57:04

is part of that, making sure they

1:57:06

know what the, you know, you're both

1:57:09

talking about the same thing. I like

1:57:11

file pass. More so than I like

1:57:13

because of I The delivery is really

1:57:15

easy. It doesn't it's very generic It

1:57:18

doesn't look like anything. I just have

1:57:20

my little logo in the corner and

1:57:22

right I feel like it's a blank

1:57:25

slate So the artist isn't seeing like

1:57:27

colors and you know, you don't want

1:57:29

to influence people's perception And and then

1:57:32

the my invoicing is all connected into

1:57:34

that. So it's all one-stop. It's like

1:57:36

a one-stop place. I haven't found anything

1:57:39

that works Better for exactly what I

1:57:41

do right in mastering yeah delivery is

1:57:43

often a single file. Yeah. And so

1:57:45

the invoicing means you can upload a

1:57:48

file, people can hear it, they can

1:57:50

approve it, and then they hit the

1:57:52

buy now button to download. Correct. Yeah.

1:57:55

And it really makes the handoff, the

1:57:57

cash, you know, like the handoff of

1:57:59

like, hey, I've done this work and,

1:58:02

you know, like, I need to be

1:58:04

compensated for my time. It kind of

1:58:06

makes that hand shake really, really, really,

1:58:09

really nice. Yeah. I have some friends

1:58:11

who just require payment up front. And

1:58:13

I feel like I have a free

1:58:15

revision policy for everything I do. And

1:58:18

if we get to in the weeds,

1:58:20

we have conversations. But I want you

1:58:22

to walk away from what I work

1:58:25

on with feeling proud of it. And

1:58:27

if I can't achieve that, then maybe

1:58:29

we aren't a great fit. So I

1:58:32

don't want to. cause pain to somebody

1:58:34

who doesn't like my product or it's

1:58:36

not even a product. It's like I'm

1:58:38

helping them achieve what they want, you

1:58:41

know. So I feel like the handshake

1:58:43

right where a file pass puts it

1:58:45

is like really, really respectful to both

1:58:48

sides. Yeah. You know, well, one of

1:58:50

the cool things about the delivery of

1:58:52

music through the buy now to download

1:58:55

button. is it also removes the need

1:58:57

to send a client an invoice and

1:58:59

then send them a reminder about it

1:59:02

and send them. I don't have to

1:59:04

remind. Yeah, it kills like, it's a

1:59:06

time saver and then it also doesn't

1:59:08

have, you don't have to have those

1:59:11

awkward conversations with like, hey, you haven't

1:59:13

paid yet. You know, like I just

1:59:15

wanted to check follow up. Yeah, yeah.

1:59:18

And also like that, I feel like

1:59:20

that sort of sometimes can damper some

1:59:22

damper. some of the excitement of like

1:59:25

a great like a great project, you

1:59:27

know, it is some subconsciously, but at

1:59:29

the same time it's like we're all

1:59:32

professionals, we need to be, you know,

1:59:34

like we need to be paid for

1:59:36

our time and, you know, like we're

1:59:38

adding something to your, to, to, to,

1:59:41

a, value to the project. For 15

1:59:43

years, I had a famous MCI console

1:59:45

at my studio that originally came from

1:59:48

Criteria Studio C in Miami, where it

1:59:50

made some of the most iconic Grammy-winning

1:59:52

records of the 1970s, and it sounded

1:59:55

incredible. When I was ready to upgrade

1:59:57

my studio to a full digital mixing

1:59:59

setup, I teamed up with Rick Carson

2:00:02

at Make Believe Studio metricalo and Golden

2:00:04

Ear producer Bill Simsick to recreate the

2:00:06

legendary MCI console as the new MBSI

2:00:08

plug-in. The MBSI captures the same iconic

2:00:11

sound used on multi-million selling records like

2:00:13

Hotel California for the Eagles, Saturday Night

2:00:15

Fever, and Stayin' Alive for the Bee

2:00:18

Geez. I shot the Sheriff for Eric

2:00:20

Clapton, Where an American Band for Grandfunk

2:00:22

Railroad, and the soundtrack to Greece, the

2:00:25

movie, all for legendary producers like Tom

2:00:27

Dow, Todd Rungren, and Bill Sims. The

2:00:29

MBSI. and not only delivers the authentic

2:00:31

sound of the original MCI console faithfully,

2:00:34

but it also adds new features like

2:00:36

a top-notch compressor, overdrive, and a dual

2:00:38

EQ filter switch, adding tools that Bill

2:00:41

Simsick said he would have loved to

2:00:43

have in the original console. Now you

2:00:45

too can get that Grammy-winning MCI sound

2:00:48

in your home studio. Whether you're recording

2:00:50

or mixing, you can experience the sound

2:00:52

of Miami 1976. in your sound at

2:00:55

make-believe studio.com/MBSI. So talk a little bit

2:00:57

about the naming of files so that

2:00:59

you everybody knows which version we're talking

2:01:01

about and how to discuss it. Yes,

2:01:04

so this is a really big, how

2:01:06

did they give you comments? This is

2:01:08

a big, big thing that I have

2:01:11

really dove, really deep into in terms

2:01:13

of. How do I organize my hard

2:01:15

drives? How do I like mastering? We

2:01:18

deal with so many files And we

2:01:20

have to keep track of everything and

2:01:22

we have to be able to pull

2:01:25

up in my opinion I I keep

2:01:27

every you know like if you're an

2:01:29

artist who works with me I have

2:01:31

every session I've ever worked on backed

2:01:34

up in numerous places and I can

2:01:36

pull that at a moments notice if

2:01:38

they need somebody if I worked on

2:01:41

something in 2016 Somebody can call me

2:01:43

in 2024 and say, hey, can I

2:01:45

get five? Oh, perfect case in point.

2:01:48

I have an artist who's doing re-release

2:01:50

and he needed, I worked on two

2:01:52

albums for this artist and he was

2:01:54

like, he's an older gentleman and he's

2:01:57

used to sort of life before digital

2:01:59

and he said, what is it going

2:02:01

to take to pull up my albums

2:02:04

and I need to re-release? I'm finding

2:02:06

a new distributor and... Can I get

2:02:08

the masters for this, this, and this?

2:02:11

And then I'm thinking about at most,

2:02:13

you know, like, well, you know, all

2:02:15

these sort of things. And I said,

2:02:18

it's only going to take me like

2:02:20

four mouse clicks. And he's like, what?

2:02:22

So it's not going to take like

2:02:24

a week to gather all that stuff?

2:02:27

I was like, no, I have the

2:02:29

stuff, like, everything's not going to take

2:02:31

like a week to gather all that

2:02:34

stuff. I was like, like, like, everything,

2:02:36

everything, like, like, everything. and I put

2:02:38

it up on file pass and that

2:02:41

was, you know, so having a naming

2:02:43

scheme that allows you to do that

2:02:45

and be able to find things really

2:02:48

quickly and have it all archived nicely,

2:02:50

really, really important. So like, you know,

2:02:52

like, it's really, really detailed, but I,

2:02:54

typically when I send something to an

2:02:57

artist, it's, you know, it's artist name,

2:02:59

album name, like if I'm sending you

2:03:01

an individual file, like, and it's on

2:03:04

and out, like, it's artist name, The

2:03:06

nomenclature is artist name, album name, song.

2:03:08

song sequence and then a descriptor of

2:03:11

production master. What does song sequence mean?

2:03:13

Song sequence is the track order that

2:03:15

it is on the record. So the

2:03:17

number so that it's always like if

2:03:20

you throw it into a computer it'll

2:03:22

always the album will always stay in

2:03:24

its own order. Right. You know, it's

2:03:27

not like song number one because song

2:03:29

number one has a different alphabetical. It's

2:03:31

like your computer, you know jumbles them

2:03:34

right. And then song title. and then

2:03:36

there's there's a descriptor on it that

2:03:38

I put in parentheses like if I'm

2:03:41

just doing a test master for somebody

2:03:43

I'll I'll put a description that says

2:03:45

this is a test it says test

2:03:47

master or it says production master and

2:03:50

the words production master means that if

2:03:52

this is approved by the artists it

2:03:54

can go into production like meaning that

2:03:57

this can be the file that goes

2:03:59

to your distributor or goes on I

2:04:01

will take it and put it on

2:04:04

a lacquer or you know like that's

2:04:06

that if it gets that if it

2:04:08

gets approved if it gets approved And

2:04:11

then if we do revisions, there's always

2:04:13

right after that, or actually I've switched

2:04:15

it around before the production master, there's

2:04:17

a revision number. So R01, R02. And

2:04:20

if there is, if there wasn't a

2:04:22

revision, they're just, that distancing. Would it

2:04:24

say like R03 base up or would

2:04:27

it just say RZero? No, I just,

2:04:29

for the sanity of everybody and the

2:04:31

length of file names, I just, it's

2:04:34

just, it's just R0, like it just,

2:04:36

and that tells me when we finalize

2:04:38

something exactly what. I know, I always

2:04:40

have a record of what goes into

2:04:43

production. So if you're talking to a

2:04:45

client, they're saying, the vocal's still low,

2:04:47

and you're like, really? I just, Bruce,

2:04:50

are you sure you're commenting on the

2:04:52

right one? Then you just say, are

2:04:54

you looking at R03? Yeah, that's exactly.

2:04:57

Yeah, yeah. So it keeps, I want

2:04:59

it short, but I want it enough

2:05:01

that we can pinpoint exactly what we're

2:05:04

doing. And then when the project had

2:05:06

finalized, I just, I indicate indicate which

2:05:08

one went into production went into production.

2:05:10

Now the name is since it sounds

2:05:13

like like a pretty long name. Yeah,

2:05:15

it's not just like, you know, fire

2:05:17

is the name of the track or

2:05:20

something. Yeah, fire v one or something.

2:05:22

Do you, do you find that in

2:05:24

some places, it all gets truncated and

2:05:27

you can't see, like on a drop

2:05:29

box, I imagine, maybe it's hard to

2:05:31

see the R's zero three or something.

2:05:34

That's the only downfall of this system,

2:05:36

but if you just click on it,

2:05:38

you can see the, the nomenclature for

2:05:40

everything of like it expanded, like it

2:05:43

expanded. about some of that and I

2:05:45

for me it's the only way that

2:05:47

I can archive things appropriately and be

2:05:50

able to call on things in a

2:05:52

moment's notice you know so it's like

2:05:54

a it's like a it's the best

2:05:57

of both worlds it's like it's clear

2:05:59

enough for artists to communicate back to

2:06:01

you but it's also clear enough for

2:06:03

your finding a year from now and

2:06:06

being able to know exactly which file

2:06:08

was and to make the file even

2:06:10

longer right at the end I always

2:06:13

put sample rate bit rate Right of

2:06:15

the file in the file name so

2:06:17

you don't even have to go look

2:06:20

it's just there so you can tell

2:06:22

what's the high-res what's going to CD

2:06:24

what's you know what is every all

2:06:27

the way down you know the different

2:06:29

resolutions and you mentioned the AAS white

2:06:31

paper I think yeah just give a

2:06:33

shout out to that for the rock

2:06:36

stars I think there's a file out

2:06:38

there that tells you what to do

2:06:40

if you want to go there's an

2:06:43

AAS white paper that was actually George

2:06:45

George and Chuck Ailey were on Chuck

2:06:47

Ailey were on the There's like 50

2:06:50

people on it, but George Massenberg was

2:06:52

on it. And I think it's Chuck,

2:06:54

Chuck, Amy, they hear and yeah, I

2:06:57

may get that wrong. I apologize. No,

2:06:59

I think that's correct. Yeah, yeah. And

2:07:01

the paper goes into like how it

2:07:03

was really designed to like how are

2:07:06

we sending stems, you know, in the

2:07:08

production world, and how do we label

2:07:10

those file, how do we label folder

2:07:13

sets? And this paper kind of like

2:07:15

spells out, you know, like they're basically

2:07:17

they just said like we don't have

2:07:20

a standard for this. How do we

2:07:22

create a standard that they tried, you

2:07:24

know, like in the film production. world

2:07:27

and in like, especially when you're dealing

2:07:29

with like immersive audio, like how do

2:07:31

we label all these things to then

2:07:33

send a different engineers back and forth

2:07:36

as you're working on things. And I

2:07:38

kind of stole all that from that

2:07:40

paper. I've created my own like smaller

2:07:43

different iteration of it with like dates

2:07:45

and like the larger file for for

2:07:47

sets that I make that not the

2:07:50

things that I'm sending to the clients,

2:07:52

but I always include a specific date

2:07:54

and then I also have what's called

2:07:56

a project ID. that's just like a

2:07:59

number that every project gets that that

2:08:01

is also becomes my invoice number. So

2:08:03

like if I have to go look

2:08:06

up an invoice I can then coordinate

2:08:08

that number with the file set on

2:08:10

the folder for everything. So it's really

2:08:13

really efficient. And that's why I can

2:08:15

call things up at a moment's notice.

2:08:17

If somebody calls if somebody says, hey,

2:08:20

I need my I need this. I

2:08:22

need my master. I don't have my

2:08:24

masters from four years ago. Can I,

2:08:26

you know. And that's just a service

2:08:29

that like when you when you go

2:08:31

I don't charge for that anything like

2:08:33

that I mean I I kind of

2:08:36

think it's kind of included in my

2:08:38

my actual mastering rate it's kind of

2:08:40

like this future proof that I do

2:08:43

but I think it's just a courtesy

2:08:45

you know from a mastering side now

2:08:47

I think if I was a mixed

2:08:50

engineer I might that might be a

2:08:52

different story because of the amount. Yeah

2:08:54

yeah but from a mastering standpoint it's

2:08:56

I feel like that's part of our

2:08:59

I always say that we're the librarian

2:09:01

of the librarian of the project. You

2:09:03

know, or where the, where, where the,

2:09:06

where the archivist of that project, you

2:09:08

know, I look at, Larry Crane is

2:09:10

like the, oversees the executive of Elliot

2:09:13

Smith. And I, I mean, what's, what's

2:09:15

a cool responsibility, you know, to be

2:09:17

the archivist of that estate. And so

2:09:19

like, I try to organize myself in

2:09:22

that line of thinking, you know. Like

2:09:24

well and I think about there are

2:09:26

other artists that we talk about sometimes

2:09:29

in the show Frank Zappa and that

2:09:31

catalog you know the Grateful Dead there's

2:09:33

there's artists with huge catalogs that somebody

2:09:36

to be archiving to make sure that

2:09:38

the stuff stays organized. Yes, yeah, and

2:09:40

yeah, I do that with everything I

2:09:43

work with. And it's really, actually, it's

2:09:45

really nerdy and fun. I don't know,

2:09:47

other people may say that's not fun,

2:09:49

but I, my brain. Well, it does

2:09:52

give the client that you're working with

2:09:54

a sense of feeling important too. Yeah.

2:09:56

Like if you, if I was to

2:09:59

come back to you and you had

2:10:01

done a project for me five years

2:10:03

ago, and you were like, yeah, yeah,

2:10:06

yeah, here it, here it is. that

2:10:08

would probably make me feel like, wow,

2:10:10

I'm that important, which is a good

2:10:13

feeling. And again, it's that process of

2:10:15

connecting with clients and making sure everybody

2:10:17

feels great. So let me jump to

2:10:19

this question. This is a question I

2:10:22

like to ask all of our guests

2:10:24

on the podcast. We're going to take

2:10:26

the Wayback Studio Machine and you go

2:10:29

back in time and you find young

2:10:31

Duncan who's, I don't know, thinking about

2:10:33

going off to school and getting a

2:10:36

master's degree or who knows what. But

2:10:38

you say, listen dude, I've come back

2:10:40

to give you this one bit of

2:10:42

advice. Here's a single most important thing

2:10:45

that you need to know to be

2:10:47

a rock star of the studio yourself

2:10:49

one day. What advice would you go

2:10:52

back and give yourself if you could?

2:10:54

Oh, I would tell myself. At the

2:10:56

end of my master's degree, I was

2:10:59

really scared of missing opportunities. And I

2:11:01

worked myself, I overworked myself and burned

2:11:03

myself out a bit. And I would

2:11:06

tell my past self to be like,

2:11:08

it's okay to miss some things to

2:11:10

really work hard to do some big

2:11:12

things slowly. Right. You know, and it's

2:11:15

okay. Like I tell myself it's okay.

2:11:17

You know, like because I didn't feel

2:11:19

like it was at the time. Like

2:11:22

I was worried I was gonna miss,

2:11:24

you know, like, I always wanted to

2:11:26

like. like I need to gain this

2:11:29

skill and I need to do this

2:11:31

and I need to like we always

2:11:33

put so much pressure on like not

2:11:36

that I guess it's a boy is

2:11:38

down to like don't put so much

2:11:40

pressure on yourself like you're you're doing

2:11:42

just fine you know Yeah, no, I

2:11:45

agree. I think about, I think about

2:11:47

that a lot where there are certain

2:11:49

elements of what we do in our

2:11:52

process that require a great deal of

2:11:54

focus and dedication. And, you know, like

2:11:56

you got to put your nose down

2:11:59

and go forward in a straight line.

2:12:01

And that means inevitably not taking a

2:12:03

right hand turn and a left hand

2:12:05

turn along the way. And you might

2:12:08

have to let go of certain opportunities.

2:12:10

You know, for me, I mean, here

2:12:12

I am. launching a video podcast. It's

2:12:15

not like that's a brand new idea.

2:12:17

You know, video podcast has been a

2:12:19

great place to be for a while,

2:12:22

but I had to accept it. Like,

2:12:24

you know what, I got to stay

2:12:26

focused on putting the show out and

2:12:29

keeping it consistent and making sure it

2:12:31

sounds great, despite the occasional time where

2:12:33

I mute my microphone. We'll find out

2:12:35

what I did about that. But the,

2:12:38

you know, like, accepting that, like, okay,

2:12:40

I'll get to it when I get

2:12:42

to it, you know, there's probably a

2:12:45

quality of that for you too. Yeah,

2:12:47

I think in the, I always relate

2:12:49

everything back to my, what I do

2:12:52

exactly is like in the mastering world,

2:12:54

you get like what I finish goes

2:12:56

out and maybe makes a bunch of

2:12:59

copies. So like. there's pressure there and

2:13:01

it's you have to remind yourself like

2:13:03

like if you don't relieve that pressure

2:13:05

you'll never You'll never actually sign off

2:13:08

on it. Yeah, I want, yeah, you

2:13:10

just keep going back and it's like,

2:13:12

it's like, it's like, it's like, making

2:13:15

records that never finished, they're just abandoned.

2:13:17

Right, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's the, that's

2:13:19

the age old, like, I love that

2:13:22

quote, that's, I got that quote from

2:13:24

this podcast, I think. Yeah, yeah, that's,

2:13:26

I got that quote from this podcast,

2:13:29

and it really, really gives us permission

2:13:31

to just go ahead and do stuff.

2:13:33

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah. Well dude,

2:13:35

thank you so much for being on

2:13:38

the podcast with us. Let the rock

2:13:40

stars know where can they go? Find

2:13:42

out more about you. voltage exchange? How

2:13:45

should they connect with you if they're

2:13:47

ready to make their next hit record?

2:13:49

I don't, I have a personal Facebook,

2:13:52

but I don't, I've sort of abandoned

2:13:54

Facebook, but I have a studio Instagram,

2:13:56

the at the voltage exchange.com, or sorry,

2:13:58

at the voltage, the Instagram is at

2:14:01

the voltage exchange, okay, and then my

2:14:03

website, you can contact me either, either

2:14:05

place, I'm on the, and my website

2:14:08

is just the voltage exchange.com. Both places

2:14:10

are great to get in contact with

2:14:12

me. I'm happy to answer D.M's and

2:14:15

emails appropriately. Awesome, awesome. Well, I'm thinking

2:14:17

that maybe, I want to come over

2:14:19

there and just listen to some vinyl

2:14:22

records with you. Let's do it. Maybe

2:14:24

it's time to release Cadoo Sean Vinyl

2:14:26

and Rock Stars. What would you think

2:14:28

about that? You want to come to

2:14:31

Nashville and we go hang out and

2:14:33

go to Duncan's and go watch the

2:14:35

robot. cutting. Yeah, that would absolutely, that

2:14:38

would be an absolute pleasure. I mean,

2:14:40

I love the fact that it's called

2:14:42

a silly tow. Well, actually, the thing

2:14:45

is, is, it's, I, I, this, we

2:14:47

didn't get in the story of, I

2:14:49

flew to Australia to pick up the

2:14:52

machine and the guy who created the

2:14:54

machine is called James, his name is

2:14:56

James Silly tow, and I thought that

2:14:58

Silly tow was a, was sort of

2:15:01

like a stage name, and he goes,

2:15:03

no, that's actually my last name, that's

2:15:05

actually, that's actually, that's actually, that's actually,

2:15:08

that's actually, that's actually, that's actually, that's

2:15:10

actually, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's,

2:15:12

that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's,

2:15:15

that's, that's, that's, that's, Awesome. Do well,

2:15:17

thanks for joining us. Rocksters, thanks for

2:15:19

watching. Drop a comment on below and

2:15:21

let us know what you thought. And

2:15:24

if there's any, if you got any

2:15:26

questions for, for Duncan or for me,

2:15:28

and we'll, we'll try and jump in

2:15:31

there and answer them. Thank you so

2:15:33

much. My name, good to see you.

2:15:35

Cheers. Thanks

2:15:41

so much for listening to recording studio

2:15:43

rock stars. If you enjoyed the show

2:15:45

and want to help make it better,

2:15:48

then please share this episode with your

2:15:50

friends on social media and leave a

2:15:52

rating and review on iTunes to help

2:15:54

the podcast reach more rock stars like

2:15:56

yourself. You can click directly over to

2:15:58

iTunes or go to R.S.rockstars.com/review. for an

2:16:00

easy explanation. And remember to hit the

2:16:02

subscribe button to keep up with weekly

2:16:05

episodes. And if you're ready to make

2:16:07

your best record ever now, then head

2:16:09

over to Recording Studio Rockstars Academy, where

2:16:11

you can start with my free course

2:16:13

at MixMasterbundle.com. Thanks so much for listening

2:16:15

and thanks for being a rock star.

2:16:17

I'm Liz Shaw and this is Recording

2:16:19

Studio Rockstars. Now, go make great music.

2:16:22

Recording studio rock stars would like

2:16:24

to give a big thank you

2:16:26

to our awesome sponsors who helped

2:16:28

make this episode possible. Isotope, Native

2:16:30

Instruments. Roswell Pro audio and Adam

2:16:32

audio. And remember to take advantage

2:16:34

of our special coupon codes at

2:16:36

isotope.com and native instruments.com. Use the

2:16:38

coupon code Rock 10 for 10%

2:16:40

off any plug-in. If you enjoyed

2:16:42

recording Studio Rockstars, please check out

2:16:44

our sponsors using the links in

2:16:46

our show notes. These are all

2:16:48

things that I highly recommend for

2:16:50

your studio because they're going to

2:16:52

help you make your best record

2:16:54

ever. Like and subscribe to our

2:16:57

YouTube channel. This is new for

2:16:59

us here and it's a great

2:17:01

way for you to help support

2:17:03

this show, so I greatly appreciate

2:17:05

it. I would also like to

2:17:07

thank our fantastic team here at

2:17:09

recording studio rock stars Vlad Wessel

2:17:11

Chenko and Liz Huletskaya. Thanks so

2:17:13

much for watching and for listening.

2:17:15

My name is Liz Shaw and

2:17:17

I'll see you in the next

2:17:19

episode. Cheers.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features