Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
1:59
seeks to kind of group the critique
2:03
of Zionists of their colonialism in with the
2:05
critique of Judaism and Jewish values.
2:07
And we need to push back against that very strongly.
2:09
So I want to think about Zionism a little bit more.
2:12
We can acknowledge, of course, that within Jewish
2:14
liturgy and culture there's references to Israel
2:17
as a place and there has been mourning
2:20
before the Roman displacement of Jews which
2:22
occurred in the wake of the Jewish rebellion against the
2:24
Romans. But these cultural
2:26
and religious aspects here have not,
2:28
you know, historically been interpreted
2:31
as a nationalist project which should be
2:33
actualized through violence and occupation until
2:36
relatively recently. Zionism
2:38
was from the beginning a secular project.
2:41
It was grounded in nationalism and colonialism.
2:44
Zionism emerged at a time
2:46
of nationalist fervor in which imperialist
2:48
nations themselves started to deploy the
2:50
language of self-determination to justify their
2:52
actions. In the late 19th century
2:54
and early 20th century we saw many groups
2:57
around the globe begin to conceptualize themselves as
2:59
nations and demand national autonomy.
3:02
Theodore Herzl, who we got into in our main
3:04
episode, was clearly impacted by these perspectives.
3:07
Herzl's early writings on the necessity
3:09
of a Jewish state are actually remarkably secular
3:12
with references to Jewish religion largely
3:15
focused on ensuring in his adherence that
3:17
the Jewish state would be a modern secular
3:19
state which would keep religion in its rightful
3:21
place. And in addition to kind
3:24
of being a secular nationalist project, Zionism
3:26
was also colonial in origin. The
3:28
Zionist project was enabled constantly
3:31
by the intervention of colonial powers
3:34
such as Britain and the language of
3:36
early Zionism was the language of settlement
3:38
and colonialism. You could see this in organizational
3:41
names such as the Jewish colonial fund for
3:43
example and in the language adopted an
3:45
early Zionist pamphlets. Colonialism
3:48
has always, you know, cynically
3:50
deployed whatever ideology that needs including
3:52
religious ideals in order to justify itself.
3:55
But as Marxists we need to understand
3:57
that this is merely an ideological
4:00
deployment of dominant ideas. This
4:02
is what ideology always is. The source
4:04
of colonialism is never religion or whatever
4:06
ideology it grounds itself in. It's
4:09
the material relations of capital that
4:11
create global competition for spheres
4:13
of influence and ongoing resource extraction
4:16
or land theft. So we know
4:18
as Marxists that colonialism doesn't come
4:20
from ideas. It comes from material
4:22
relations. What should be very
4:25
clear for us is that Zionism
4:27
was not historically understood as a religious
4:29
ideal founded in Judaism, but as
4:31
a secular nationalist project. Despite
4:34
this, we have to acknowledge
4:36
Zionism has since adopted religious
4:38
ideology. Israeli politics
4:40
has become dominated by
4:43
a coalition of far-right secular revisionist
4:45
Zionists as well as far-right religious
4:47
Zionists. And this coalition has increasingly
4:50
grounded their defense of Zionism in
4:52
religious values. But we should understand
4:54
this as a cynical move to secure power
4:57
from as broad of a base as possible rather than
4:59
an accurate statement about the relationship
5:01
between Jewish teaching, Jewish identity, and
5:04
Zionism. What was important to
5:06
emphasize that Zionism was a secular
5:08
nationalist project, we also have to point out
5:10
that it wasn't the only such project. One
5:13
other project that I'm sure some of our listeners
5:15
are familiar with is the general Jewish labor
5:18
bond. And we're going to spend a little bit of time looking
5:20
at this group and its history in detail.
5:23
The Jewish labor bond was first founded
5:25
in Lithuania in 1897. And
5:28
while the bond would become intensely
5:30
anti-Zionist later in its development,
5:32
its origins are somewhat more complex. To
5:35
understand the emergence of the bond, we
5:37
need to understand the experience of the Jewish communities
5:40
in Russia and Eastern Europe. In
5:42
Russia, the Jewish people had largely been
5:45
segregated from the rest of the population
5:47
and forced to live in an area referred to
5:49
as the Pale of Settlement. Eastern
5:51
Europe also saw similar tendencies leading
5:54
to the development of a fairly distinct Jewish
5:56
community within Europe and Eastern Europe
5:58
and Russia Much of this geographical
6:01
area, the Jewish community spoke Yiddish in
6:03
addition to whatever local languages were predominant,
6:06
further leading to the development of a distinct
6:08
Ashkenazi Jewish culture, which also
6:11
was preserved due to anti-Semitic hostility
6:14
that prevented, really, any sort of large-scale
6:16
assimilation. By the
6:18
late 1800s, Jewish workers in
6:21
Eastern Europe in the Pale of Settlement had
6:23
already begun to organize along working class
6:25
lines. There was already the beginning
6:28
of an ideological movement to
6:30
understand Jewish experience alongside
6:32
working class experience, often through
6:34
an explicitly Marxist or socialist lens.
6:37
The 1880s in particular saw
6:39
a proliferation of Jewish working
6:42
class organizing with study groups, mutual
6:44
aid societies, all developing along
6:46
Marxist or socialist lines. The
6:49
radicalization of these Jewish workers
6:51
was, of course, a product of extreme
6:54
exploitation shared among the working class
6:56
as a whole, but also the uniquely
6:59
intense forms of anti-Semitic violence
7:01
which occurred in the area. These
7:03
conditions produced some of the early precursors
7:06
to Zionism, such as the Hovebi
7:08
Zion, which translates to the lovers of
7:10
Zion and was represented by several different
7:12
groups. These groups did eventually
7:15
advocate leaving behind Eastern Europe
7:17
for immigration to Palestine. These
7:19
movements were extremely influential, for example,
7:21
in the development of the First and Second
7:23
Aliyah, which we talked about in our main episode.
7:26
Despite the reorientation of some
7:28
Jewish radicals towards Palestine, other
7:30
Jewish revolutionaries developed a nationalist
7:33
focus which understood their nationalism
7:36
as rooted in Eastern Europe
7:38
and Russia. These socialist radicals
7:40
would begin to conceptualize their socialism
7:43
in terms of nationalism as well as international
7:45
solidarity between all workers. Their
7:47
focus was on the development of a Jewish
7:50
socialism which would not demand assimilation
7:53
into the cultures around them while still fighting
7:55
for solidarity with non-Jewish
7:57
workers and revolutionary movements. This
8:00
development of this ideology came
8:02
alongside a sort of cultural revival
8:04
with the revival of the Yiddish language
8:07
in particular, serving as a very good example
8:09
of what this looked like. By the
8:11
time of November 1897, when
8:15
the Bund was founded, all of these conditions
8:17
were ripe for more formal organization.
8:21
And so in that year, we saw the creation
8:23
of the Bund. And the Bund pretty much immediately
8:26
ingrained itself within the broader Russian
8:28
socialist movement. The Jewish Virtual
8:30
Library writes that, quote, at
8:32
the founding convention of the Russian Social
8:35
Democratic Labor Party in March 1898, three
8:39
of the nine delegates were Bundists, end quote.
8:41
And again, this really shows how integrated at this
8:43
time within Marxism and revolutionary
8:46
organizing more broadly, these Bundists
8:48
were. The Bund quickly
8:51
developed union and strike infrastructure,
8:53
mutual aid groups, and also study
8:55
circles. And importantly, the Bund
8:57
also undertook the development of Jewish self-defense
9:00
infrastructure. Anti-Semitic kogroms
9:03
became a growing problem in the 20th
9:05
century, and the Bund responded by
9:07
advocating for armed self-defense. And
9:09
this was a very clever move strategically,
9:11
and the Bund was ultimately able to significantly
9:14
grow its base through this advocacy.
9:17
Within the broader Russian revolutionary movement,
9:20
though, the Bund began to distinguish itself
9:22
by demanding that the future socialist republic,
9:25
which would be built, should exist as a
9:27
federation of autonomous nations
9:29
based on national self-determination.
9:32
And this was a Marxist argument in many
9:34
ways, although it would come to butt heads with
9:36
other Marxists. This position would become
9:39
controversial within the RSDLP
9:41
due to concerns that such nationalistic
9:44
impulses would lead to chauvinism and divisions
9:46
among the workers. And unfortunately,
9:48
as a result, the Bund would eventually find itself
9:50
having to split from the RSDLP
9:53
over this and having to become an independent organization.
9:56
It's with the emergence of this form
9:58
of Bundist national work, that we can
10:00
begin to see the way that the Bund was distinct
10:03
from what would ultimately
10:06
come into conflict with Zionism. Again,
10:09
we're going to quote from the Jewish Virtual Library,
10:11
who writes that, quote, The Bund did not
10:13
consider the Jews a worldwide national
10:15
entity, and was opposed to a global
10:17
Jewish policy, limiting its demands
10:20
for rights and autonomy with reference
10:22
to the Russian Jewry. The Bund
10:24
rejected in the name of class war
10:26
principles any collaboration with other
10:29
Jewish parties, even in the organization
10:31
of self-defense against pogroms, end
10:33
quote. And so here we can see the way that the Bund
10:36
is walking this complicated line, distinguishing
10:38
itself from the other Jewish political groups on
10:40
the basis of its Marxism, but also
10:42
distinguishing itself from the RDSDLP
10:45
on the basis of its nationalism. And
10:48
this is where things become somewhat tricky. The
10:50
Bund was actively opposed
10:53
to the emergence of Zionism by this period in time, and
10:55
Bund is propagandized significantly against
10:58
Zionism as a reactionary movement. The
11:01
ideology of the Bund began to focus
11:03
on a notion of doykiet, which means
11:05
hereness. The idea behind
11:07
this concept was summarized, I think, quite well
11:10
by Mishka Bargaman, an Australian Bundist
11:12
who wrote, quote, The only way to
11:14
truly build Jewish life is to follow
11:17
the principle of doykiet, of believing
11:19
in the life force, permanence and rootedness
11:21
of the Jews there where they live,
11:24
end quote. This concept
11:26
of hereness and this demand for national recognition
11:29
in Eastern Europe and Russia clearly
11:31
was at odds with the design's desire to move
11:33
to Palestine. The Bundists were critical
11:35
designers for choosing to abandon a region
11:38
where a vibrant, if oppressed Jewish
11:40
culture had emerged and for abandoning
11:42
the Ashkenazi culture of Eastern Europe. The Zionist
11:45
choice to revive modern Hebrew
11:47
instead of Yiddish was one source of particular
11:50
ire that we can see here. Now,
11:52
as time moved on, the Bund participated in
11:54
radical organizing throughout Russia between
11:57
the 1905 revolution and the October revolution. in 1917,
12:01
but the organization had begun to shrink
12:04
from its earlier prominence and size.
12:06
By the early 1920s, the majority
12:09
of the Bundist organizations throughout
12:11
the USSR had either dissolved
12:14
or merged with the predominant communist parties,
12:16
and it was the official position of the common
12:18
turn that the Buns ought to merge into these communist
12:21
parties throughout the world. And so
12:23
we saw really the end of the Bund as
12:25
an organized Jewish nationalist movement.
12:28
So
12:29
why does the story of the Bund matter? What's
12:32
ultimately important to understand
12:34
about the Bund's nationalism is that
12:37
it shows that Zionism was one
12:39
of several secular national projects
12:41
of its time. The existence of
12:43
the Bund contests the Zionist claim
12:46
that Zionism is the sole and only
12:48
organic expression of Jewish self-determination,
12:51
while simultaneously contesting the anti-Semitic
12:54
arguments that Jewish ideals and nationalism
12:57
had to end the genocidal supper colonialism.
12:59
The ideology of the Bund is
13:02
of course complex, and we never saw its
13:04
nationalism transformed into an actual project
13:06
of nation-building, and it's possible that
13:08
such a project could have encountered serious problems,
13:11
but the organized agitation for such a project
13:14
does a lot to shatter the common ideological
13:17
justifications for Zionism. We
13:19
might, and I would even say we must, be critical
13:21
of some of the ideology of the Bund at the same time.
13:25
Bundism spread throughout the world, with an American
13:27
Bund forming as well, but given,
13:29
as we talked about in our main episode, that America
13:32
is itself a settler colony, we might
13:34
push back against the appropriateness of
13:36
the concept of hereness on stolen land.
13:39
Now, these are largely hypothetical considerations
13:42
as the project of the Bund never materialized.
13:45
The Bundist ambitions gave way to the communist
13:48
position of the common turn, and that was
13:50
kind of the end of that story. We
13:52
do have to recognize, of course, that many anti-Zionists
13:54
use today to draw serious inspiration from
13:57
the Bund, and that these histories have been revived.
14:00
and reconsidered and wrestled with in truly
14:02
inspiring ways, so it is something
14:04
that we still need to think through. The
14:07
Bund, of course, was only one instance
14:09
of Jewish opposition to Zionism, and
14:12
the Bundist opposition to Zionism, again, it
14:14
was rooted in similar secular and nationalist
14:16
ambitions to those held by the Zionists
14:19
themselves, but these are not the
14:21
only groups upon which are the only
14:23
grounds upon which Jewish anti-Zionism
14:26
would be developed. So let's take a
14:28
little bit of time and think about one of the other
14:30
organizations that kind of approached anti-Zionism
14:32
from a different perspective. One
14:35
example that I think we can look at is the American
14:37
Council for Judaism, which was rooted
14:40
in the ideals of Reform Judaism.
14:43
Zionism had received, you know,
14:45
near instantaneous opposition from
14:47
Reform Judaism upon its development,
14:50
with Herzl actually struggling to even
14:52
find a venue for the first Zionist congress
14:54
due to Reform rabbis
14:57
trying to stop the congress from taking place.
14:59
Reform Judaism within Europe
15:02
and the United States had largely
15:04
embraced a view of Judaism as a
15:06
religious movement rather than a national
15:09
identity. Reform Jews focused
15:11
on seeking rights for Jewish people within
15:13
the frameworks of European liberalism and
15:15
human rights and democracy, and
15:18
we can already see here how distinctly
15:20
this position differs from the Bundist position,
15:23
despite the fact that during the height of the Bund,
15:25
both groups would have been opposed to Zionism.
15:28
Over time, the Reform movement
15:31
would give way to more positive views
15:33
on Zionism, with most major
15:35
organizations adopting neutrality towards
15:38
Zionism by the late
15:40
1930s. Today, Reform Judaism is largely
15:43
Zionist in orientation, you know, there
15:45
has been almost a 180 in terms of the general
15:48
position on Zionism. Still, the
15:50
history of this 180 and this development of
15:52
the modern movement wasn't simple,
15:55
and it was marked by internal dissent and
15:57
anti-Zionism. In 1940, to
16:00
reform Judaism was caught up in a particular
16:03
controversy and debate around the
16:05
idea of developing a specifically
16:07
Jewish army in the British Mandate
16:09
Palestine to fight alongside the
16:11
British during World War II. While
16:14
many reform rabbis would come to support
16:16
this position, the American Council
16:18
for Judaism was founded to oppose
16:21
the foundation of this Jewish army. The
16:23
position of the ACJ in opposition to
16:26
Dubundism and Zionism was distinctly
16:28
anti-nationalist. The ACJ
16:30
was opposed to political Zionism as
16:32
a project and argued that, Jewish
16:35
nationalism tends to confuse our
16:37
fellow men about our place and function
16:40
in society, and diverts our attention
16:42
from the historic role to live as a religious
16:45
community wherever we may dwell.
16:49
This statement might superficially
16:51
sound similar to the Bundist notion of heerness,
16:54
but it's important to note that there's a key distinction
16:56
in as much as the notion of heerness
16:58
was meant to be the basis of
17:00
nationalism, whereas the ACJ
17:03
meant to emphasize the role of Jewish people within
17:05
the nations in which they resided. Unfortunately,
17:08
this led the ACJ to grounding its
17:11
Zionism in a liberal support
17:13
for the nationalist ideals of whatever
17:15
nation the Jewish people found themselves in.
17:18
Examples of this can be seen when the ACJ
17:20
argued for examples that, quote,
17:23
the flag of Americans of the
17:25
Jewish faith is the stars and stripes, end
17:28
quote. In this statement, we can
17:30
see a sort of assimilationist
17:32
impulse alongside kind of a lack
17:34
of criticism of European and American
17:37
nationalisms themselves. Still,
17:39
despite these problems, the ACJ was
17:42
a major voice of anti-scientist
17:44
opposition, and they did bravely demand
17:46
that any state which would replace the
17:48
British mandate in Palestine would have to
17:50
be based upon universal equal rights
17:53
for Jews, Muslims, and Christians rather
17:55
than partition. When the UN
17:57
partition was ACJ
18:00
stood in opposition arguing for
18:02
a single state that equally represented the
18:05
interests of Jews and Palestinians. The
18:08
ACJ was also highly critical
18:10
of the terror campaigns carried out by groups
18:12
such as the Ergun who we discussed in
18:14
our main episode. ACJ insisted
18:17
that the Jewish community must denounce these actions.
18:20
Even after the founding of the State of Israel, the
18:22
ACJ continued its agitation,
18:24
albeit in a less intense form. Unfortunately,
18:27
this agitation would take more and more
18:29
American nationalist tones with a strong
18:31
emphasis on the need for Jews to integrate
18:33
into American society. Following
18:36
the Six-Day War, the ACJ began to lose
18:38
popular support and began to shrink
18:40
rather significantly. And this has led
18:43
to a further retreat from previous anti-Zionism
18:45
with the current ACJ significantly
18:48
softening its critique of the State of
18:50
Israel. The reason that the
18:52
story of the ACJ matters at the end of the
18:54
day is because it
18:56
further contests this idea that Zionism
18:59
is a self-evident expression of Judaism
19:01
or a self-evident expression of Jewish self-determination.
19:05
In the ACJ, we saw religious rabbis
19:07
stand in opposition to Zionism. Their
19:09
opposition was not grounded in the radicalism
19:11
and Marxism of the Bund, but rather
19:14
in the predominant liberal ideas of Europe
19:16
and the United States. These ideals,
19:19
obviously, and I think we can be very clear about this,
19:21
imposed serious limits on the politics
19:23
of the ACJ. But the ACJ
19:25
still deserves recognition for being a consistent
19:28
voice of dissent during a period when
19:30
reform Judaism began to move into
19:32
an overwhelmingly Zionist position.
19:35
But the ACJ was not the only form of
19:37
anti-Zionism among Jewish thinkers and
19:39
leaders during this period of time. Alongside
19:42
the ACJ and the Bund, there
19:44
were also independent left-wing critiques
19:46
made by Jewish intellectuals. Historian
19:49
Benjamin Balthazar writes in an exceptional
19:52
article that we can put in the show notes that,
20:00
of Zionism came from two quarters, a
20:02
critique of nationalism and a critique of colonialism.
20:05
They understood Zionism as a right-wing
20:07
nationalism, and in that sense, bourgeois.
20:10
They saw it as a line with other
20:12
forms of nationalism, an attempt to align
20:14
the working class with the interests of the bourgeoisie.
20:17
There was at the time a well-known
20:20
takeover of Vladimir Jabotinsky
20:22
in the New Masses in 1935, and
20:24
which Marxist critic Robert Gessner
20:27
called Jabotinsky a little Hitler on
20:29
the Red Sea. Gessner called the
20:31
Zionists Nazis, and the left
20:33
in general saw Jewish nationalism as a right-wing
20:36
formation, trying to create a unified
20:38
militaristic culture that aligns
20:40
working class Jewish interests with the
20:42
interests of the Jewish bourgeoisie. And
20:45
then continues on. In any case, the
20:47
Jewish left in the 1930s and
20:50
1940s understood critically that the only
20:52
way that Zionism would be able to emerge
20:55
in Palestine was through a colonial project
20:57
and through the expulsion of indigenous Palestinians
21:00
from the land. In a speech by
21:02
Earl Browder, chairman of the Communist Party
21:04
in Manhattan's Hippodrome, he declared
21:06
that a Jewish state can only be formed through
21:09
the expulsion of a quarter million Palestinians,
21:12
which attendees thought was very shocking at the
21:14
time, but it actually ended up being a
21:16
dramatic undercount. Although
21:19
Balthazar did not get into this history, unfortunately
21:22
the Communist Party in the United States would
21:24
eventually shift its position from opposition
21:27
to Zionism to support for Zionism.
21:30
Another article that is fantastic that you
21:32
can look at that we'll link to goes into the history
21:34
of how this reversal took place and
21:36
how the Communist Party USA unfortunately
21:39
found itself in a position of supporting
21:41
the settler colonial displacement of the Palestinian
21:43
people. While all of this has
21:46
focused really heavily throughout this
21:48
little mini episode on the history
21:50
of Jewish anti-Zionism, I think it's important
21:53
for us to recognize that we are also living in
21:55
a moment when Jewish opposition to Zionism
21:57
is beginning to re-emerge. Although
22:00
many key institutions within contemporary
22:02
Judaism, such as the Union for Reform Judaism,
22:05
have thoroughly capitulated to the Zionist position,
22:08
young Jews have begun increasingly
22:10
mobilizing en masse against Zionist
22:12
violence against Palestinians. Just
22:15
this month, the organization, if not
22:17
now, held a direct action demonstration
22:19
outside the headquarters of the Union for Reform
22:21
Judaism in order to demand that
22:24
Reform Jews, in their own words, quote,
22:27
"...reckon with the dispossession and displacement
22:29
of Palestinians and stop funding it."
22:33
This grassroots opposition to occupation has
22:35
been growing, although it has not always taken
22:37
a distinctly anti-Zionist tone. Part
22:40
of the problem, according again to Benjamin
22:42
Balsazar, is with the place
22:44
that Jewish anti-Zionism has been left in
22:46
after all of these histories. He writes,
22:49
quote, "...today we're in a much more
22:51
fragmented space. On the same note,
22:53
though, we're seeing the rebirth, or maybe continuity,
22:56
of Palestinian civil rights movements with Palestinian
22:58
civil society putting out a call
23:00
for decolonization, both out of their
23:02
own traditions of liberation but also looking
23:05
to models from South African freedom
23:07
struggles. For contemporary Jews
23:09
who are progressive and see themselves on the left,
23:11
they're suddenly realizing that there really is no
23:14
center anymore. There is no liberal
23:16
Zionist position any longer. The
23:18
center has really fallen away. And
23:21
we're faced with this very stark decision that
23:23
either you're going to be on the side of liberation
23:26
or you're going to be on the side of the Israeli right,
23:28
which has eliminationist and genocidal intent
23:31
that has always been there but is
23:33
nakedly apparent now. And so I think
23:35
people are waking up and saying, I don't
23:37
want to be on the side of the executioners."
23:40
End quote. While, if not now,
23:43
the organization we mentioned previously does not explicitly
23:45
define their position as anti-Zionist, their
23:47
work has been influential in pushing back
23:49
against institutional support for Zionism
23:52
and occupation within reform Judaism.
23:55
If not now, describes their mission as, quote,
23:57
organizing every day to expose
23:59
the occupation as a moral crisis to
24:01
American Jews, end the weaponization
24:04
of anti-Semitism in our political debate over
24:06
Israel, and create political spaces
24:08
for leaders to stand up for the freedom and dignity
24:11
of all Israelis and Palestinians."
24:14
The focus noted here on the end about equal
24:17
dignity and freedom for Israelis and Palestinians
24:20
does kind of reveal the extent
24:22
to which their criticism is not really opposition
24:24
to Israel, which would be crucial for an anti-scientist
24:27
politics, but rather an opposition to
24:29
the most egregious instances of Israeli
24:32
violence. And while this is certainly better than
24:34
tacit support for Zionism, it also
24:36
tries to walk a somewhat centrist line that's increasingly
24:39
untenable. Balthazar does seem
24:41
to be correct to point out that the center has fallen
24:43
out, and that the choice now
24:46
is to oppose occupation, imperialism,
24:48
and colonialism by opposing Zionism,
24:51
and supporting the decolonization of
24:53
Palestine. We can hope of course that if not
24:55
now, we'll keep up pressure against the egregious
24:58
instances of violence, but we also
25:00
can hope that they'll come to connect this position
25:02
with the necessity of anti-Zionism as many
25:04
generations of anti-Zionist Jewish struggle
25:07
from the past have, because the struggle
25:09
against anti-Zionism is a global
25:11
struggle against colonialism that should link
25:13
all people together into man for decolonization.
25:17
Another organization that's worth mentioning here
25:19
is Jewish Voice for Peace, who do actually
25:21
commit to taking the actual committal
25:23
position of seeing themselves as anti-Zionist.
25:26
The organization states that quote, Jewish
25:29
Voice for Peace is guided by a vision of
25:31
justice, equality, and freedom for all people.
25:34
We unequivocally oppose Zionism
25:36
because it is counter to those ideals,
25:38
end quote. During the most recent
25:41
increase in colonial violence that we've seen around
25:43
Sheikh Jarrah and the continued bombing
25:45
of Palestine, JVP has been present
25:47
at many solidarity actions standing
25:50
alongside the struggle for Palestinian liberation,
25:52
and this is highly commendable and deserves
25:54
recognition. JVP is also
25:57
in their writings focused on these histories
25:59
of anti-Zionism. among the Jewish
26:01
population in order to understand
26:03
where this kind of opposition can draw inspiration
26:06
from. Outside of these organizations,
26:08
I know that over the last week I, and
26:10
I'm sure many of you listening to this, have
26:13
seen a new level of openness in terms of critiques
26:15
of Zionism and even anti-Zionism itself.
26:18
I'm seeing many of my friends, both Jewish and
26:20
non-Jewish, pushing back against ideologies
26:22
of Zionism that are so predominant
26:24
in the United States. Even people who are
26:27
unorganized are starting to look to histories
26:29
of anti-Zionism and alternative
26:32
tellings of the main story we've been told
26:34
our whole life in order to understand the
26:36
violence. And all of this is hopeful
26:38
and it's important and it's crucial that this opposition
26:41
can develop and link itself with Palestinian
26:43
anti-Zionism and global demands
26:46
for decolonization in Palestine in
26:48
the United States, in Australia, and throughout
26:50
the world.
26:51
So
26:52
why did I decide to talk about
26:54
all of this for today's Patreon
26:57
episode? Well, because as
26:59
we're all confronting the question of
27:01
Zionism, the question of settler colonialism, the
27:04
question of occupation, it's
27:06
essential that we disrupt Zionist
27:08
ideologies which conflate critiques of Zionism
27:11
with anti-Semitism. But
27:13
also it's absolutely crucial
27:15
that we oppose anti-Semitic ideologies
27:18
which equate Zionism with Judaism.
27:20
Jewish opposition to Zionism in
27:23
all of its forms, despite whatever limitations
27:25
those forms may have opposed, has always
27:28
existed as long as Zionism has existed
27:30
and has always been there to push back both
27:33
against abhorrent ideologies of Zionism
27:35
and abhorrent ideologies of anti-Semitism.
27:38
Our main episode for this month went into the history
27:40
of Palestinian Zionism as well as the
27:42
various forms of Palestinian resistance
27:45
to Ottoman, British, and Israeli occupation.
27:47
And these histories are central. We have to study them,
27:49
we have to learn them, and you need to go beyond what
27:51
we covered in this episode to reading primary
27:54
texts and accounts from Palestinians yourself.
27:56
We really have to wrestle with these. But
27:59
to have a complete understanding of the debates
28:01
around Zionism and settler colonialism, we
28:03
also have to acknowledge and understand
28:05
the long and complex history of Jewish
28:08
anti-Zionism. So this
28:10
episode is an attempt to kind of give you
28:12
some of that history. We're coming in at a little
28:14
under 30 minutes, and no history
28:16
in 30 minutes is ever going to be sufficient for
28:18
you to learn what you need to learn about
28:20
something. But hopefully this is a starting point
28:23
that can help, and hopefully that as
28:25
we move forward, we can craft
28:28
and build an international opposition
28:30
to colonialism that understands anti-Zionism
28:33
as part of a broader opposition that
28:35
everyone has an obligation to participate
28:38
in in opposition to genocide and
28:40
exploitation. So
28:43
I don't really have much more to say beyond that. I hope this
28:45
is helpful. Again, this kind of comes from my notes
28:47
that were going to be in the main episode, but some
28:49
of it I took out and then I expanded on a lot here.
28:52
You obviously need to go do some reading for yourself.
28:55
There are countless resources available
28:57
from the history of the Bund, the ACJ, or
28:59
these various other groups. I would highly
29:01
encourage all of our listeners to go do that. Thank
29:03
you so much for your continued support for Red Minis
29:06
as a project. You know, I say this all
29:08
the time, but it blows my mind that people
29:10
get something out of this project and support it
29:12
the way and as much as they do. And I appreciate
29:15
it. And I know that Brett appreciates it a lot.
29:18
I think between this episode and the main episode,
29:20
we put together maybe almost 15,000 words
29:22
worth of notes, but we just say a lot of
29:24
writing and takes a lot of time. And the financial
29:26
support that we get from our patrons is part
29:28
of what allows us to take the time to do that. So
29:31
really,
29:31
this episode, the main episode, none
29:33
of what we do would exist without the support
29:35
from all of you, our patrons. And that
29:37
means the absolute world to us. Thank you
29:39
for your support. We're excited for our episode
29:42
next month. And as always, solidarity.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More