Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
Secrets from a coach Thrive and maximise
0:06
your potential in the evolving workplace . Your
0:11
weekly podcast with Debbie Green of Wishfish
0:13
and Laura Thompson-Staveley of Phenomenal
0:15
Training . Debs
0:24
, laura , are you all right ? Yeah
0:26
, I'm all right . I'm currently sitting in a hotel
0:28
room .
0:29
Yeah , I thought you were in a very different venue . What
0:31
are you doing ?
0:32
Anything exciting , Well yes , I
0:34
am co-facilitating a workshop
0:36
with our Carlos looking
0:39
at what does it mean to be part of a high-performing
0:41
team , nice , and what's just been
0:43
really interesting is , you know , as you
0:45
know , we like to use insights , discovery , as
0:47
the kind of the tool to have those conversations
0:50
, and just how much in life
0:52
is to do with relationships
0:54
and having good quality , healthy
0:57
relationships . Yeah , I'm really looking forward
0:59
to this episode because this
1:01
is the fourth in our four part focus looking
1:03
at time to think about mind
1:06
health , how we deal with managing
1:08
our boss relationship and
1:11
how to plan and prioritise ourselves
1:13
. And this one , debs , is
1:15
all about the concept of time
1:17
to think about coercive control in
1:20
the workplace . So this
1:22
term I'm not particularly familiar
1:25
with it , so what has led
1:27
us to then think , actually we need to talk about
1:29
it , this idea of coercive control in the workplace
1:31
? So give us a bit of a headline . What is it
1:33
? Why is it of relevance now ? And
1:36
then we can then delve a bit deeper .
1:37
It is a really interesting one because we
1:40
hear a lot about coercive control outside of work
1:42
, but we have been hearing a lot about micromanaging
1:45
people , not maybe giving
1:47
people the right communication
1:49
, how giving them the heads up , giving them the right
1:52
expectation setting and position
1:54
and power is systemic I can never say that word Systematically
1:57
, there we go , I
2:05
got it out dominates or intimidates
2:08
people to maintain that control
2:10
. So you know , we've heard a couple
2:12
of people that have said you know , I think my boss is
2:14
a control freak . And whilst they're saying it
2:16
in jest , you actually go
2:18
. Maybe they are and then , when you question
2:20
them a little bit more , you can see
2:22
that maybe the signs of coercive
2:25
control in the workplace are very
2:27
subtly there , but people haven't
2:29
. They just feel it's not right . So to
2:31
talk about it , I think , and just bring out some
2:33
of that what are the characteristics , what
2:36
are the red flags around leaders , how do
2:38
they behave , what do they do ? It just
2:40
might make you go oh , now that makes perfect sense
2:42
and I can now know what to do about it . So
2:45
it's a real . It's one of those topics
2:47
I find people don't often
2:49
like to talk about it , but it's present
2:51
and you know most people , as
2:53
we know , Lord , don't they ? They leave , they leave
2:56
a job , but they're not leaving the job , they're leaving
2:58
the boss , and that
3:00
can be really hard .
3:01
I mean one of the things that brings us great joy when
3:04
we sort of chat with people who said , oh , I listened to that episode
3:07
and it really helped me feel normal
3:09
, reassured , comforted
3:11
. Turns out it's not just me that has
3:13
a challenge with this . Actually , there are other people as
3:15
well and it can just then means you can carry
3:17
yourself a bit lighter . I'm
3:25
also always very conscious that there's you know , it's not just bosses
3:27
that can turn a bit difficult . So to what extent is just the general
3:29
presence of coercive control from a colleague
3:32
point of view , so you don't have to be someone's boss
3:34
to be able to kind of have these control
3:36
issues with someone ? To what extent have you heard stories
3:39
of where it might be two peers that are working alongside
3:41
each other , and yeah . So
3:43
tell us a bit more about that so we can have a bit of a
3:45
general approach .
3:46
Yeah , I think also there's a bit around isolating
3:49
somebody out of any decisions , so
3:51
they're not part of the team . So even though
3:53
the colleague , their peer , has maybe called
3:55
a meeting or had a conversation about
3:57
something that's going on , they haven't
3:59
necessarily included that person
4:01
or they've made them feel
4:03
intimidated . Or sometimes
4:06
you can go , they might , you might hear
4:08
them call them out on something . No , I didn't say that
4:10
, you know . And then this person said yeah , but you
4:12
did . No , I didn't say that . And then it
4:14
feels like , well , which one
4:16
of you is is telling the
4:18
truth or not ? So again , it
4:20
can be , it can show up like that way . So
4:22
the other person starts to doubt themselves
4:25
and go no , I'm sure we had that conversation about
4:27
this and the you know the other person
4:29
is going no , we definitely didn't . You know
4:31
, I would have remembered , and that that
4:33
part can be really sticky to navigate
4:36
because it normally gets brought up in
4:38
a group , a meeting . It's very rarely
4:40
done one-on-one . So the other
4:42
person goes no , I did do that , I did what
4:44
you asked or we were working together on
4:46
it . But so the other person feels a bit silly
4:49
because it's normally brought up in a
4:51
group where people they can't necessarily
4:53
argue . It's a bit like he said
4:55
. She said then , and it's a bit , yeah , it's a
4:57
bit petty , so it
4:59
gets just oh well , maybe
5:05
I was wrong , yeah , and then it gets moved on . But that might happen again and again and that person
5:07
might have fear around it or feel intimidated by that individual
5:09
or doesn't know how to address
5:11
that coercive control . That's been going
5:14
on Very subtle , very subtle
5:16
, but it's there .
5:17
One of the really good sessions
5:20
we had today was talking about you
5:22
know what makes a high performing team and to
5:24
what extent trust is the
5:26
sort of the pyramid you know . If there's a pyramid of . You
5:28
know , if you've got trust , people are prepared to then
5:30
challenge and innovate because they're fully
5:32
committed to the results
5:34
, because they're fully in , and then you've just got
5:36
a team that is only there to
5:38
do what he wants to do , rather than kind of any infighting
5:41
or anything sort of like that . So
5:48
we then looked at a list of all right , what for you , are some trust makers and some trust breakers
5:50
. So I love that exercise from you to be able to get that stuff out . What's interesting when you look
5:52
at trust breakers is you know I'm sure you've seen it countless times
5:54
as well Things like doing what you say you're going
5:57
to do , not calling people out in front of others
5:59
. So you look at this list and you think
6:01
, all
6:05
right , well , is that just everybody else , or are there some times where we might
6:07
accidentally do that ? So I love the stat about how , apparently
6:10
, 86% of people think they're an above
6:12
average driver . It's them
6:14
lot out there that are the ones that are bad
6:16
. But statistically you can't have 86%
6:19
of people who think that they're above
6:21
average because it just doesn't work . So
6:23
at some point you might be the driver
6:25
that forgot to say thank you because you
6:27
were busy dealing with something else and then suddenly
6:30
you're one of those bad drivers . That's sort
6:32
of really rude . So to what extent
6:34
does sometimes coercively controlling
6:36
behaviour might be
6:38
unintentional ? It's a bit of a blind
6:40
spot . So that sort of mirror moment , almost just doing a mirror check , rather than it
6:43
being a bit of a blind spot , so that sort of mirror moment , almost just doing a mirror
6:45
check , rather than it being
6:47
a sort of a species of a certain type of person
6:49
that is coercively controlling what
6:52
might be some things that you've
6:54
seen where perfectly rational people have started
6:56
acting out stuff like this , and
6:58
it's an awareness check for us all .
7:00
It is . I think that's such a good point actually
7:02
, Laura , Because until we
7:04
went on our driver speed awareness courses
7:06
, we thought we were average , right it's
7:08
them lot over there who aren't adhering to the
7:10
limit I don't speed , but yeah remember that .
7:13
Do you realise the variable speed limit actually
7:16
was a legal limit ?
7:17
Okay , but
7:20
going back to your point , I think it's there because
7:22
they could have been creating this culture of fear
7:24
and things like well , it's just the way things are around
7:27
here . You might hear people say stuff like
7:29
that and they might go yeah , well
7:31
, it's no point talking about it because HR
7:33
always get involved , so it's always the blame
7:35
, and people don't necessarily
7:37
recognize them saying that same
7:40
thing Well , it's just the way it is . That's how it
7:42
is around here . If you want anything done , you
7:44
have to go and see so-and-so or so-and-so yeah
7:46
, go and raise that with HR . And it's that pattern
7:49
of behavior , communication
7:51
style that you hear all the time . So
7:53
they might not have that awareness that
7:55
the impact they can have on people is fear
7:57
. So they put the fear into people
8:00
about oh no , you don't want to go
8:02
to HR if you've got to raise a complaint , they don't do
8:04
anything anyway . And then they might say
8:06
it to someone else and say it to someone else . So then
8:08
it's like oh yeah , maybe I won't
8:10
. So it's really interesting that
8:12
people do it out of consciousness
8:15
sometimes , but it's just those scripts
8:17
, they've got used to it , so people avoid
8:19
saying anything or taking it further . So
8:21
, yeah , again , it's very subtle
8:23
and those people that say don't
8:25
recognize it within themselves at all and
8:28
it's only when somebody might raise it or
8:30
they get offensive about it or
8:32
they can say that's not me , what do you
8:34
mean ? It's definitely a blind spot for some
8:37
people because that's the way
8:39
they've always behaved and always created
8:41
and no one's called them on it . It is so
8:43
. I say it's underground
8:45
, that's my word , that's not how it is
8:47
, but it's just very subtle
8:49
and you don't . You sort of doubt
8:51
yourself and think maybe that's me
8:54
, have I got that wrong ? So what happens is
8:56
if you're doubting yourself about something
8:58
, then potentially there
9:00
is some coercive control going on by
9:03
either a colleague or your superior
9:06
or team leader , whatever . But it's
9:08
when you start doubting yourself , that's when
9:10
it's a bit of a warning sign to check that out
9:12
with someone and go . Is it me
9:14
or am I ? Am I going mad or
9:16
what ? How is it around
9:18
here ? Is it right that we can't go and speak to
9:20
somebody else and somebody might say , oh god
9:22
, where'd you get that from , you know ? So it's really
9:24
interesting that if we're curious
9:26
about our feeling , something
9:28
feels off , then check that feeling
9:31
out as a way of overcoming that really
9:33
. But the micromanagement is the
9:35
interesting one , but withholding information
9:38
is also a big , big
9:40
red flag as well for people , because
9:42
the language people use around
9:44
it , the way that people are behaving
9:46
, the way that they're not bringing you in
9:49
like that , gaslighting you oh , I'm sure I sent
9:51
it to you . No
9:53
, you didn't . And go yeah , I'm sure I did . And
9:56
you're doubting all of the
9:58
time whether they did or didn't . And you're
10:00
, you may be new into an organization where
10:02
you feel like you can't challenge that properly yet
10:05
, but I would say people are very
10:07
smart at this
10:09
coercive control , this manipulation , maybe
10:11
gaslighting , and it's never them . It
10:13
never them . It's always you are
10:15
the one that's caused it , or , yeah , you must be mad
10:18
. What makes you think that ? So you go ? Oh
10:20
, okay , maybe it's me .
10:23
What I think is really interesting just listening to you
10:25
sort of say those terms gaslighting
10:27
, coercive control and the manipulation
10:30
stuff . Of course we see this on reality
10:32
TV programs
10:34
, and reality TV programs love them or hate them , there
10:36
are millions upon millions of people who
10:39
find it interesting to watch these dramas
10:41
kind of play out , and I guess you know
10:43
it's using that entertainment to then almost
10:45
kind of empower yourself with . Well , we might
10:47
not be talking about , you know , some kind of romantic
10:50
sort of scenario , but actually in a professional scenario
10:52
where there's some behavior that , as you said
10:54
, it
10:59
might be really subtle , but there's just something that's left a bit of an edge and
11:01
I think , sometimes understanding the origins of these terms . So am I
11:03
right in thinking gaslighting ? That comes from the Victorian
11:05
play Gaslight , where
11:08
the husband made the wife
11:10
feel like she was going mad by
11:12
changing things and basically
11:15
unseating her power
11:17
, to then just become so wracked with
11:19
paranoia and doubt that
11:21
it then kind of sort of ruined her .
11:23
So I'm thinking that's where the phrase gaslight
11:25
came from . Yeah , that's my understanding of where it came
11:27
from as well . And it's as you say , it's
11:29
very subtle and that
11:31
person makes you think that you're the
11:33
one that's just losing it and you
11:36
go no , I'm sure . And if you're in a position of either
11:38
lack of confidence or you might be
11:40
in a position of vulnerability , or
11:43
you might find that maybe you've
11:45
lost your job and your confidence is low
11:47
because of redundancy , and so you're
11:49
, you really got a level of self-doubt maybe
11:51
going on anyway , and if
11:53
somebody then adds to that by
11:55
, you know , if you're like saying , well , yeah
11:57
, no , I definitely told you that , did you ? Or
12:00
I'm sure you left it over there and they've
12:02
moved it , and it's very subtle
12:04
, and you start doubting , and I think that's
12:07
the thing we don't always recognize the
12:09
early warning signs around it and
12:11
whether we can call it or not , because that
12:13
people go , what are you talking about ? You know , what
12:16
do you think ? Do you think I would do that to you
12:18
? You know you can hear it coming
12:20
out . And if they've either increased
12:22
your workload as well . So if you are in work and
12:24
say somebody is , how can you have that
12:26
conversation with diplomacy , where you
12:28
know it's how you approach it with
12:30
the eye . You know I've noticed
12:33
my workload has increased
12:35
significantly compared to others
12:37
. And could we discuss how
12:39
teams are assigned work , because that
12:41
will make me feel like it's
12:43
fair , so that could be something . Or
12:47
when my work is closely monitored or
12:49
you're checking everything about it beyond
12:52
what is expected , I feel it impacts
12:54
on my confidence . So can we discuss
12:56
a way to build some mutual trust ? So it's calling
12:58
it in a diplomatic way rather than going
13:01
what are you on about ? You like controlling
13:03
everything or you're ruining
13:05
my job . You know , don't you trust me ? This doesn't
13:07
feel fair , so it's . I
13:09
is holding that direct
13:11
but very respectful language around it
13:14
. It's quite . You have to be brave
13:16
to step into that space , but you have
13:18
to do it . Otherwise , as we said , most people will
13:20
leave the job because of
13:22
someone , not because of the job . And that's
13:24
where it's so hard really to I
13:27
suppose , to identify that there is
13:29
coercive control going on in
13:31
the workplace because not everybody
13:33
sticks around to explore it
13:36
, whereas I , statements can
13:38
make a big difference . I feel
13:40
uncomfortable . No one can take away how you feel
13:42
, but it's really difficult sometimes
13:45
because they will play a game with you and I know
13:47
we talk about game playing and
13:50
bring you into the drama triangle . So
13:52
we always say if you're not sure something
13:55
doesn't feel right , either talk
13:57
to someone else , keep records
13:59
of the incidents and so you're not going mad
14:01
, if you like , and just dates and conversations
14:04
you've had , because ideally , if
14:06
it's really impacting on you , you've got to
14:08
be able to produce some form of evidence
14:10
, which is really sad to say
14:12
. I don't know , I could be completely wrong , but this is what's
14:14
been happening and somebody will say
14:17
to you wow , that's not normal
14:19
or whatever normal might be . But
14:21
I think you need to know when it's the right time
14:23
to step away from stuff if it's not helping
14:25
your mental mind , health
14:27
as well , your wellbeing , self-care
14:30
is you know , because if you're going home and ruminating about
14:32
it and confidence is low and you're
14:34
feeling undervalued and
14:36
unworthy and lacking in confidence
14:39
and self-belief , then that's not good for
14:41
you physically , mentally , emotionally
14:43
. So , recognizing that
14:45
maybe things won't change at work . So you have a choice
14:47
to stay or go . But you also
14:49
have a choice to maybe raise it if you feel
14:51
that and getting people to help and support you
14:54
can be a really good
14:56
way of exploring it in a little bit more
14:58
detail . Really .
15:00
I think what else is a way to kind of use
15:02
some of these difficult situations , challenges
15:04
we might have had , is to sort of make it a commitment
15:06
to yourself never again . So if
15:09
you found yourself sort of falling into a pattern
15:11
and you think , all right , well , I'm listening to these great ways
15:13
to have conversations , but it's been like 13
15:16
years now that it's been , that you know
15:18
when is the part to have that conversation and
15:21
you know if at some point there's a choice where you're going to
15:23
be in a new scenario , it's then spotting that red
15:25
flag quickly and just making a commitment
15:27
to yourself . You know , I recognise that
15:29
there are some patterns that potentially could
15:31
be familiar ones that I fall back into , but not
15:34
this time . I'm going to spot it . Yeah , I'm going
15:36
to have that diplomatic way
15:38
to approach into
15:40
it to then be able to make
15:42
it a healthier relationship . Yeah , when
15:45
I listen to you sort of talking , you know , I know
15:47
we're all interested in how do you create
15:50
psychological safety . Yes , in
15:52
the workplace Now that's become quite a buzzword
15:54
sort of recently . Yes , in the workplace Now
15:56
that's become quite a buzzword sort of recently . And you know I've
16:02
found the whole world of health and safety just the most inspiring space to be in . Because
16:04
what is more important than making sure that there is incident and accident prevention and
16:07
bad things sort of kind of happening ? And
16:09
in order to have a safe cycle
16:11
, you know , in order to have a safe workplace you've got to have
16:14
an environment that feels just yes . So
16:16
if I speak up and I blow the whistle , I
16:18
can do so without fear of retribution or
16:21
punishment . So it might be that you
16:23
don't have a safety critical role , but you have
16:25
a role where actually it's really important that everyone
16:27
feels safe to speak up . So , from your
16:29
coach perspective and from what you're picking up , what
16:31
is this idea of having a psychologically safe workplace
16:34
and how does that link to coercive
16:37
control and just to sort of
16:39
join the dots up ?
16:40
Yeah , that's . Oh my God , Laura . It's
16:43
so complex as well , isn't it ? Because , as
16:45
you said , from a health and safety
16:47
point of view , you know what's right
16:49
and wrong . Right , you either wear a hard
16:51
hat or you don't , and then there's consequences
16:53
if you don't . But from this psychological
16:55
safety , it's really interesting to see that you
16:58
know . How do we ensure that you
17:00
know ? We know that , if
17:07
you like , our followers , if you like , we need to know what they need in order to feel safe at work psychologically
17:09
safe and they are based on hope , trust , compassion and stability
17:11
. So , when we're thinking about knowing
17:13
ourselves , knowing them , what do they like
17:15
? How do they do it ? They need to be
17:17
clear on how they provide that
17:19
environment that enables people to feel safe
17:22
, psychologically safe at work . And
17:24
I did some work with one of our clients
17:26
about this and we did some research around it
17:28
, and I cannot remember where I got this , but I
17:30
will find it and let you know , because it's not my
17:32
stuff . It was something we picked up and
17:35
they said there are four quadrants of psychological
17:37
safety in the workplace there's collaborator
17:40
safety , inclusion safety
17:42
, challenger safety and learner
17:44
safety . And when you think about
17:46
especially the collaborator safety
17:49
could be , how do we engage in
17:51
an unconstrained way ? How do we interact
17:54
with our colleagues ? What's our behaviors ? And
17:56
if you think about you know if we're micromanaging
17:59
or we are challenging . We're in an unconstrained
18:01
way . How do we interact with our colleagues ? What's our behaviours
18:03
? And if you think about you know if we're micromanaging or we are challenging
18:05
. We're not enabling people to challenge ideas without fear of retribution
18:08
. So
18:10
there might be some fear-based control already present . So therefore , that's not a psychologically
18:12
safe place to be . So , therefore , to create that psychological safety
18:14
of open communication can make
18:17
a huge difference . Maintaining
18:19
open dialogue is fostering
18:21
constructive debate , enabling
18:23
people to say what they want to say in a safe
18:25
space without judgment . So that collaborator
18:27
safety plays really well against
18:30
that coercive control . One because
18:32
it's all down to communication and
18:34
, as you mentioned earlier , that one about trust builders
18:36
and trust breakers . It's that . How
18:39
do we move from , I suppose , the power
18:41
and control to trust and empowerment , and
18:43
that has to have some form of inclusion
18:46
within that . So you know , people know
18:48
that they're valued and they're treated fairly and
18:50
consistently . They feel that their
18:52
experience matters and their ideas are
18:54
listened to and they include
18:56
others , regardless of their
18:59
title or position , and
19:01
that is interesting . We did a workshop today
19:03
, laure , with one of our other people and
19:05
we got them to have . They had
19:07
three main questions , concepts that they were
19:09
exploring . So the three leads
19:11
took the conversation and then , randomly
19:14
, we just mixed the group up . So there was
19:16
all sorts of you know the director to
19:18
the you know admin clerk to the
19:21
person that is the booker . All of that was really
19:23
mixed , but what they did was they created
19:25
that inclusion safety space
19:27
, so psychologically safe , from
19:29
an inclusion where everybody's ideas were heard
19:31
. There was no hierarchy . In that moment
19:34
, the difference you could feel , the energy
19:36
was incredible and they all went . Oh my
19:38
God , that's one of the best conversations we've ever had
19:41
. But because we created a psychologically
19:43
safe environment for them to feel
19:45
like they mattered and they could be included
19:47
in it , so that was like really
19:50
cool . Really cool to watch it and and
19:52
to I suppose subconsciously did
19:55
not connect it to that , but now we're talking about
19:57
it I went . Oh yeah , we did that without
19:59
thinking . So the safety space was created
20:01
for them to talk and therefore they
20:03
felt trusted and they therefore felt empowered
20:06
. So the shift was
20:08
moving towards them rather
20:10
than them having to ask permission or
20:12
can't make a decision because
20:15
they have to run it past their team
20:17
leader or their boss and everything else , so
20:19
that's a really important one
20:21
around it .
20:29
This isn't just about avoiding
20:31
being coercively controlling , because it stops
20:34
bad things happening . No , what this
20:36
also enables is it enables all of
20:38
that untapped opportunity , so
20:41
that ability to create a psychologically safe
20:43
place where people felt safe to be able
20:45
to actually say well , actually , in my experience
20:47
, this is what our clients are really enjoying . So how
20:49
about if we did X or Y ?
20:50
Yeah .
20:51
Then suddenly you've got a whole load of insight
20:53
that might have just sat there silently
20:56
, kind of someone sitting on it , because they don't feel safe
20:58
to be able to speak up . And what's
21:00
interesting to join the dots up , debs , is I'm
21:03
having some interesting conversations with people that
21:05
work in the quality space
21:07
in a certain industry and one of the big calls
21:09
to action that they're looking to shift
21:11
in is involve us sooner in the design
21:14
process , not just because
21:16
you have to , and it's sort of a begrudging requirement
21:18
, because if you involve us sooner
21:21
at the design stage you'll be able to
21:23
make more money , have less errors at
21:25
the end stage .
21:26
Yeah .
21:26
And it's a little bit like the safety teams have
21:28
sort of battled for the last 30 years of
21:30
get us involved at the design stage
21:32
rather than waiting for accidents to happen and then
21:34
we make patches after . Get us
21:37
in right at the start and we'll be able
21:39
to collaborate and to be able to challenge
21:41
some things that might look like it makes us money
21:43
but actually it might not work or
21:45
it might not be safe . But involvement
21:47
earlier on in the process , whereas
21:50
if it feels like , oh well , they just do
21:52
that over there and then we just inherit all
21:54
of this stuff that we then just have to sort of make
21:56
, do and move . But from a win
21:58
point of view , I guess the win
22:00
here is create an environment where people
22:02
feel safe to speak up , and
22:05
what potential could you untap
22:07
? And if you're in an industry or profession
22:09
that is currently feeling a bit embattered
22:11
at the moment , then that even
22:14
more is a call to action , of reach
22:16
out and connect and work with each other , because there might
22:18
be someone over there who's got a fantastic
22:20
idea that could really
22:22
make the difference .
22:24
Yeah , definitely Laura , and I think if
22:26
we can create that inclusive inclusion
22:29
safety , if you like , and then the
22:31
learner safety , so it's okay to ask questions
22:33
, it's okay to experiment with new ways
22:35
of doing and working , learning from
22:37
mistakes and creating new opportunities . I
22:40
think that transparency
22:42
piece around normalizing feedback
22:44
, even upwards , sideways , downwards
22:46
, whatever , so it's not just being
22:48
done to . So normalizing feedback
22:50
and we always say , don't we , laura ? Whenever we mentioned
22:52
the F word , people go please don't say
22:54
I'm going to give you some feedback , because everybody goes onto
22:57
the defensive and waiting for the rubbish
22:59
to come your way . So we make a
23:01
bit of a joke out of the
23:03
F word . But it should just be normal
23:05
conversation and if you've created
23:08
that psychologically safe space where it
23:10
can happen , then people will
23:12
feel trusted and there will be the sense
23:14
of safety to hold those
23:17
open conversations and hierarchies
23:19
get left at the door and it's
23:21
a safe space meeting , which is why we
23:24
always create a working together
23:26
agreement in any team environment
23:28
that we set up right , lord , because we know that
23:30
we have to encourage
23:32
that safe space and we don't always
23:34
know the people when we first walk into the
23:36
room and they've got to feel that
23:38
we've have done that and that
23:40
is massive when it comes to
23:42
creating the right culture of
23:44
transparency and that psychologically
23:47
inclusion , challenger safety
23:49
and so learner safety , collaborator
23:51
safety , by setting the right working agreement
23:54
.
23:54
And I think what's really interesting , when you just look very practically
23:57
, is just a tiny bit of disclosure
23:59
, a 20 second little bit of intro
24:01
as to why it's really important for you
24:03
this topic of X . Then people understand
24:06
it and then they know okay , it's not that you've got a problem with me
24:08
, it's just you're really passionate about this and
24:10
so that's why you're saying you know I
24:12
might be asking some challenging questions , yeah
24:15
. So a little bit of sort of disclosing
24:17
your context behind it , yeah , or
24:20
a bit of an explainer , and then , likewise
24:22
then to be able to sort of express
24:24
that and whether you're an introvert
24:26
, an extrovert .
24:27
Yeah .
24:27
This isn't about dominating airspace , but it's just
24:29
a little bit of insight so
24:34
people understand . I see that surface behavior and I understand what
24:36
sits beneath the iceberg . So now I
24:38
don't have to worry over the weekend thinking
24:40
that my card is marked because of a comment
24:42
you said to me on the Friday catch up . You
24:45
said that comment on the Friday catch up because I know
24:47
this is a really important project for you , so
24:49
I can rest easier over the weekend because
24:52
I know that slightly snippy remark was
24:54
just you being passionate about
24:56
that project , not having a
24:58
problem with me , and so that little bit of
25:00
an explainer can just then mean
25:03
from a communication point of view , so many people over
25:05
the years have said you know , the problem is our business
25:07
or our organisation doesn't communicate . And
25:09
then they say we're inundated with emails . So
25:12
, it's not about volume of communication
25:14
. I think we've got that licked .
25:16
There's enough email going around .
25:18
It's actually , I think , what people are understanding is help me
25:20
understand the nuances behind it so
25:23
I can read into what you're saying , so
25:25
I can know what I need to focus on and what's
25:27
in and out or out of my control .
25:29
Yeah , oh , my God , a hundred percent . I'm with you , laura
25:31
, because I think you know , healthy workplaces
25:33
thrive on trust , not fear , and
25:35
the way we can communicate that is
25:38
down to us . Our communication is everything
25:40
, because you know we shouldn't be
25:42
working in a place where trust
25:49
and respect and
25:51
empowerment and autonomy to
25:54
some extent thrive , because
25:56
that means that you know we can help
25:58
with small changes
26:00
. You know , and small actions can create
26:02
big changes in a culture and an
26:04
environment if we want to . So
26:06
you know it's making sure that we
26:09
can , I suppose , have
26:11
that healthy workplace . It's making sure
26:13
that . Are we in
26:15
a place where it's coercively controlled
26:17
? Have I witnessed that in my previous workplace
26:20
or in my current one ? And then , what small
26:22
steps can I take to either push back or
26:24
speak up or foster a sense of
26:26
change as to how we work around
26:29
here and reset the working environment
26:31
or the perceived control that's going on ? And
26:35
I think , also as a responsibility
26:37
as a leader and a manager
26:40
, that it's your responsibility to prevent
26:42
those behaviors , I think , from creeping
26:44
in , because that's not
26:46
great , and I think the more we talk
26:48
about it and get recognized by it , we
26:51
should be guiding , not controlling , and
26:54
providing that ongoing training around emotional
26:56
intelligence and ethical management and
26:58
all of that stuff . So how we can
27:00
train people to work
27:03
in a I suppose , foster a transparent
27:06
and psychologically safe workspace . Yeah
27:08
, I think that has to come from the top as well
27:10
, but we also can influence it from whatever position
27:13
we're in , by how we show up , never
27:15
underestimate the impact you
27:17
can have in a room .
27:19
And yeah , and just just how you know , just other
27:21
people have been able to watch . Oh , actually I really admire
27:23
the way that they asked that question
27:25
there , because we were all thinking it , but actually
27:28
they asked that question and actually
27:30
that that switched the game around , you know , that
27:32
kind of that kind of shifted the energy a bit . So
27:34
, debs , a lot of this stuff is
27:37
kind of looking inward and
27:39
being quite reflective . What would be a practical
27:42
action that you think would
27:44
be a good one to focus on for anyone for
27:46
whom is listening and they're thinking yeah , actually
27:48
I can hear a bit about what they're saying
27:51
and I can see some of that stuff here . What would
27:53
be a call to action ?
27:54
Oh , that's such a good one . I think , yeah
27:56
, what am I thinking ? What would be ? My call to action would
27:58
be to know don't face it alone . If
28:01
you feel that something's not quite right
28:03
, then find your trusted ally , find
28:06
a source , speak to somebody else to check
28:08
in . I might have got this completely
28:10
wrong , but this is what I'm feeling . I might go , oh , no
28:12
, you're right . Yeah , you're right . Oh
28:14
, that's exactly that's how it is around here . And
28:17
then we have a choice . So I think , yeah
28:19
, check it out first , because if
28:21
you talk to your friends , they're going to tell you get
28:23
out . That's not a place to be , but
28:25
it might be that subtle shifting
28:28
that gives you that opportunity to go . No
28:30
, I am going to have a conversation about it
28:32
and step into that , because I actually
28:34
love what I'm doing and I love the people . It's just maybe
28:37
one person . So , yeah
28:39
, checking it out , sussing out what you can do
28:41
, speaking to other people , maybe having
28:43
a bit of a plan for a script and a conversation
28:46
going , but don't let it fester
28:48
, because that's not healthy .
28:50
Don't not call it out , you know , is what I would say
28:52
, and I think sometimes that sense of relief
28:54
when you think , oh , I'm not the only one , so my share , the
28:56
secret would be if you've got a friend or a colleague
28:58
who you know , this is a bit of a familiar topic , you
29:01
know . Our goal in all of this is to sort of help
29:03
support us in this ever evolving world
29:05
of work , and it's been a pretty full
29:07
on first five years in this decade
29:10
, and I'm sure there's more joys to come
29:12
, and sometimes change and uncertainty
29:14
can impact even the nicest
29:16
people . In some ways that means we have
29:18
some blind spots . You know we all intend to drive
29:20
well , but there'll be some times where your eyes
29:22
off the ball and you might have forgotten to say thank you
29:25
. And so , yeah , if the general intention is we
29:27
work well with each other , just sometimes it can misfire
29:29
. So get someone to listen to this and just
29:31
give some handy hints , for you're not alone
29:33
. There
29:38
are some practical things you can do . It doesn't mean it's easy . It sounds so simple when you sort of
29:40
think about this stuff , but just kind of gearing yourself up to
29:42
do something to make it better , because
29:44
if you're stuck in traffic , you're
29:46
part of traffic . If you're there
29:48
in a culture and it's feeling all a bit
29:50
icky , then you're part of that culture
29:52
and you could start making a difference . So I think
29:55
that would be my share of the secret
29:57
.
29:57
Oh my God , I love that . Yeah , it's such a broad
29:59
topic , laura , we could talk about it , and I know we're going
30:01
to get one of our previous guests
30:03
to come back and talk about this in another later
30:06
episode because it is so
30:08
vast and it covers so many different
30:10
aspects of it . So , yeah , I'm looking forward
30:12
to that as well , but it's been a great month of
30:14
talking about time too , hasn't
30:16
it ?
30:17
Yeah , it really has , and of
30:19
course , what this means is we've got a new
30:22
topic and
30:24
our next four-part focus is looking at
30:26
book review yes , we
30:28
did this a little while ago , didn't we ? With some
30:30
of our other books . Yeah , we did , we
30:32
, we got good people going .
30:34
Oh my God , it was just I didn't realise that
30:36
they went out and read the book or just
30:39
got there what they needed from it to understand it
30:41
. So , yeah , we thought we'd bring it back , didn't we , laure ?
30:43
Yeah , we did so for all you people who like
30:45
the idea of reading a book you just don't have time to
30:47
. Then we've
30:50
done the hard work for you , we've scoured through
30:52
them and then we're going to just kind of give a
30:54
bit of a light touch on each of those
30:56
four books in the pursuit of just increasing
30:58
our level of continuing professional development and
31:01
being able to open up even more
31:03
alternatives and choices when you're looking
31:05
at some of the opportunities and challenges ahead
31:07
. So , devs , have a wonderful
31:09
week . You too , laura , have a good
31:12
rest of a workshop yes , thank you
31:14
, and I hope you're not going to send me any of those snidey
31:16
comments where you BCC all the team
31:18
in as you go about your coercively
31:20
controlling little ways , my coercively controlling little ways
31:23
of going .
31:23
Hmm , am I being disrespectful and
31:25
not transparent ? Yes , I'm just going to drop
31:28
it in there , thompson are you
31:30
joining us on this meeting . Yeah , come on
31:32
. Sorry , mrs Green . Where are you , rather
31:36
than just bloody turn up ?
31:40
I love it . Oh my God , it's a good one to talk
31:42
about , isn't it ?
31:42
Because we just do it and don't
31:45
realise sometimes the impact that it
31:47
can have , especially if someone's not in a great place
31:49
. So , yeah , we'll talk more about this
31:51
topic because it's a hot one .
31:52
It is Right , debs . Well , have a fantastic
31:55
week .
31:55
Yes , you too , lots of love , love
31:57
you .
32:02
Bye . We
32:07
hope you've enjoyed this podcast . We'd love to hear from you . Email us at contact , at
32:09
secretsfromacoachcom , or follow us on Insta or
32:11
Facebook . If you're a Spotify listener
32:13
, give us a rating , as it's easier for
32:15
people to find us , and if you want to know
32:17
. Thank you , work .
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More