Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hi, welcome to today's episode of
0:02
the Selman podcast, Q and A
0:04
edition. As always, we have the,
0:06
I think every week I'm going
0:08
to use a different word to
0:10
describe your Liam. This way we
0:12
have the lovely Liam, who's going
0:15
to be throwing some questions by
0:17
the way, and also answering some
0:19
questions himself. So without Liam, how's
0:21
it? Thank you, Will. I'm flattered by
0:23
your spontaneity and your, you're
0:25
just, your willingness to, to
0:27
flatter, to you know. cut a little
0:29
something over the weekend. My pretty much
0:32
my whole family had something so yeah
0:34
it just they just passed it on
0:36
to me that's one of my inheritance
0:38
for this weekend but yeah everything's good
0:40
overall. Good man. All right then again I
0:42
said this last time for the audience last
0:45
week I have a baby class that I've
0:47
got to go to after this recording and
0:49
so let's not faf around let's jump straight
0:51
into it before I then go and learn
0:53
how to change an happy in baby class.
0:56
the audience. Half the audience, like what the
0:58
heck? He's talking about the other half
1:00
the audience, probably parents, and like, oh
1:02
yeah, he does know what he's in for.
1:04
And so we're not letting him tell us,
1:06
tell us the first question, who's it come
1:08
from? And I know, what are we diving
1:10
into? Well, as always to the people
1:13
listening at home, these are questions we
1:15
gather from our communities, our YouTube channel,
1:17
emails that we get, and then here
1:19
we obviously tackle them, we get into
1:21
them, we get into them. name of the
1:24
person anonymous just to protect
1:26
everybody's privacy and with that
1:28
setless kids straight into it. Hey
1:30
team, I've been thinking about how buyers
1:33
actually make decisions. We always assume
1:35
it's based on logic, ROI, features,
1:37
cost, but I'm starting to feel like
1:39
it's way more emotional than we give
1:42
it credit for. I've seen deals won
1:44
or lost just because someone felt
1:46
better about one option over the
1:48
other. How do you tap into the
1:50
emotional side of buying decisions
1:52
without being manipulative?
1:54
I would advise people to not to
1:57
deal with the emotions up front
1:59
and then... down a logical, to
2:01
push the sale towards a logical conclusion.
2:03
Because emotions are flipped, emotions are all
2:05
over the place. You have a bit
2:08
of a cold, which is totally, you're
2:10
probably feeling a bit like them there.
2:12
You'll make different decisions today than you
2:14
will next week when you fully recover
2:16
from your cold. That is not very
2:19
productive to have a sustainable pipeline and
2:21
to make a bunch of money in
2:23
BTP sales. What we want is, does
2:25
it make sense to do this? Yes,
2:27
it does make sense, okay. deal closed.
2:30
Does it make sense to do this?
2:32
Yes, it does make sense. Deal closed.
2:34
So we can address the question in
2:36
two ways, I guess, or in two
2:38
steps. First off is to deal with
2:41
the emotion. If someone feels something, you
2:43
should ask them, why do you feel
2:45
that? Most of the time, people live,
2:47
you and I as well, and you're
2:50
the personalist to this episode as well,
2:52
we live in this bubble, where we
2:54
feel stuff, but that is our perception
2:56
of reality. we're almost playing this like
2:58
super intense VR computer game where everything
3:01
in front of us is not real
3:03
it's just a series of inputs that
3:05
we interpret and so your feelings are
3:07
via the very nature typically quite illogical
3:09
so if someone feels something about a
3:12
software product for example why do you
3:14
feel that way? Oh well it's not
3:16
really the product it's the person or
3:18
it's the company or it's the prestige
3:20
of this or this or this person's
3:23
giving me a discount, it's going to
3:25
make me look good from my bus.
3:27
So now that we know what the
3:29
actual reality is that we have to
3:31
compete with or improve upon, then we
3:34
can move to the logical next step
3:36
of, okay, we also want from that
3:38
feature, we also have that outcome, we
3:40
can potentially compete on pricing or we
3:42
can negotiate either way in that we
3:45
can do them of value for the
3:47
price that we offer. And now you're
3:49
in the tangible world, now you're in
3:51
the logical world, and now it rather
3:53
than feeling... the by feeling the way
3:56
through making a decision, you can help
3:58
them decide and make those make logical
4:00
decisions to take that next step and
4:02
take that. next step. And you typically
4:04
find that when you do this from
4:07
a position of I'm just trying to
4:09
help the person get the best result
4:11
as opposed to I'm using it as
4:13
a way to manipulate or trick them
4:15
or influence them or push them one
4:18
way or another. When your intention is
4:20
well for you probably get into the
4:22
logical next step or the logical end
4:24
conclusion is the best thing for you
4:26
to do. I'll help you do that.
4:29
You'll find that buyers will fight you
4:31
for it. They might not know what's
4:33
happened. and you don't necessarily need to
4:35
tell them that you were, they were
4:38
an emotional mess for the 30 minutes,
4:40
for the 30 minutes at the beginning
4:42
of the call. As you're doing obviously
4:44
a lot of the calls now at
4:46
salesman.com and as I do them as
4:49
well, a lot of people jump on
4:51
the calls, I'm overwhelmed, this isn't working,
4:53
my boss is on my back, I've
4:55
got this problem, very quickly, the goal
4:57
is to calm everything down, I go
5:00
okay, well are you doing called outreach,
5:02
what are your conversion rates, for that
5:04
initial discovery call, people aren't even showing
5:06
up for it. How do we get
5:08
people to show up for that meeting?
5:11
Okay, great. Our service can help you
5:13
with that, risk via some training. And
5:15
people then have clarity, if you're less
5:17
overwhelmed, and it's then easier for them
5:19
to make a decision. Because there's not
5:22
all this big cloud of ambiguity that
5:24
they're swing through, they get to go,
5:26
okay, well, this is the problem, this
5:28
is a potential solution. The risk is
5:30
this, the upside is that, yes. to
5:33
move forward with. And I guess just
5:35
to clarify, this is for B2B sales,
5:37
where there's more than one person involved
5:39
in the buying process typically and it's
5:41
somewhat complex. If you're buying a Ferrari,
5:44
it's 100% emotional because logically it makes
5:46
no sense. Absolutely. And no matter how
5:48
you try and trick yourself, it makes
5:50
no sense whatsoever to buy an expensive
5:52
car for the road. It is dupe.
5:55
It is complete waste of money. And
5:57
then the time and the energy that
5:59
comes into maintaining it, maintaining it. unless
6:01
you've got a staff that can manage
6:03
your portfolio. cars, perhaps a different game
6:06
then, but yeah, it's absolutely, it's absolutely
6:08
an emotional decision to spend more than
6:10
40 grand on a car. So if
6:12
that's what you're doing, fine. We need
6:15
to manage your emotions. The BTC sales
6:17
process often differs from that perspective. But
6:19
in B2B sales, understand their emotions, hear
6:21
them out, help them see the logic,
6:23
and then put the logical next step
6:26
in front of them. And if you
6:28
do that enough times, the eventual logical
6:30
next step will be... Yes, said the
6:32
invoice over, let's get started. That was
6:34
a bit of a bit of a
6:37
rant there Liam, but did that make
6:39
sense? No, I loved it, but I
6:41
do have one objection, but Will, the
6:43
Lambeau is really going to help me
6:45
out with my networking. So, I give
6:48
you an example. Here in Leeds, I
6:50
think it's Yorkshire, there is a surf
6:52
car club, right? Okay, nice. And you
6:54
have to have to have, the minimum
6:56
car to join the club is a
6:59
Porsche 9-11. Nice. So if that is
7:01
your goal, which is not an unreasonable
7:03
goal right to hang out over a
7:05
bunch of local entrepreneurs, you should buy
7:07
the cheapest, crappiest 9-11 you can possibly
7:10
find, and sure you may not have
7:12
status in the group, at least before
7:14
you stop speaking to people, but you're
7:16
in the door. Alternatively, you could do
7:18
what I did, which is by mistake,
7:21
this is why I know this exists,
7:23
because it's kind of like a secret
7:25
club in Yorkshire. I was walking, I
7:27
wasn't walking the dog, I didn't have
7:29
the dog yet, I was just walking
7:32
before, because I worked from home, I
7:34
always worked from home, with seldom.com, I
7:36
always go for a walk in the
7:38
mornings. So I was walking round round
7:40
hay up in Leeds, anyone round here
7:43
would know round hay, and there was
7:45
just like 30 Ferrari parks in a
7:47
car park by the, the, the, the,
7:49
kind of like, green grassland and park
7:51
that we're having round hay. There's like,
7:54
like, like, like, what the heck's going
7:56
on, what the heck's going on, I
7:58
just went on, I just went on,
8:00
I went over, I went over, I
8:03
went over, I went over, I just
8:05
went over and started, I started, I
8:07
started, I started, I started, I started,
8:09
I started, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting,
8:11
starting, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting,
8:14
starting, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting,
8:16
starting, different questions and different things. So
8:18
you don't even have to have the
8:20
car, you can hack the process. So
8:22
yeah, that's how you logically kind of
8:25
get around that. But yeah, I, the
8:27
only, if you, obviously you've been, you're
8:29
joking about, but there is, even with
8:31
social media, like if you have a
8:33
nice car, perhaps a little bit of
8:36
social proof, but the time and energy
8:38
that you've spent on that, if you
8:40
spend on your offer for the product,
8:42
that's probably still better time spent. Obviously
8:44
if you love cars and stuff, buy
8:47
what you want, buy what you can
8:49
afford. but just appreciate it's a complete
8:51
waste of money and it's an emotional
8:53
decision. Coming from someone who's had lots
8:55
of nice fast cars. Yeah, I'm a
8:58
sucker for it as well. Nice, no,
9:00
absolutely. To that I would add, I
9:02
think definitely you want to be able
9:04
to mix the emotional with the logical,
9:06
especially in B2B cells. You do want,
9:09
you do tend to, like you said,
9:11
lead with the emotion and then finalize,
9:13
you know, closing details with more logic,
9:15
ROI, getting the right people involved. One
9:17
thing that has worked for me is
9:20
having the ability to, because the person
9:22
is asking here, how can we tap
9:24
more into the emotional side, right, without
9:26
being manipulative? And for me, there's a
9:28
way of tapping the emotional side in
9:31
a logical way, if that makes sense.
9:33
Now, let me expand on that for
9:35
a second. Let's say, for example, we
9:37
are talking to a CFO and we
9:39
are talking maybe through some of the...
9:42
logical hurdles that they're facing in their
9:44
business right now as we typically do
9:46
in BTB sales. Asking a side effect
9:48
question can be a logical thing to
9:51
ask that is very business appropriate, but
9:53
it is tapping into something emotional about
9:55
the CFO. Asking a question, you know,
9:57
we call these impact questions like curious,
9:59
Mr. CFO, how is this impacting your
10:02
bottom line? Right so we can start
10:04
there and just interweaving brief questions like
10:06
okay, you know some people this may
10:08
be a priority some others not so
10:10
much I'm just curious, how do you
10:13
feel about this? Right, so that's more
10:15
of an emotional question, but I'm weaving
10:17
it in a more logical, practical way.
10:19
It doesn't have to be always like
10:21
some weird, super emotional, like how is
10:24
this going to impact your family type
10:26
of question. You know, those type of
10:28
questions are always super weird. But you
10:30
can do so in a practical, logical
10:32
way still. What do you think? Sure.
10:35
I consider that, like reinforcement of the
10:37
logic. Right. So how does that affect
10:39
your bottom line? It'll make, to put,
10:41
thinking machine, machine, whereas bottom line goes
10:43
up. Okay, great. How does that affect
10:46
whatever it is? It's not, it's almost
10:48
the same question but to build status
10:50
quo on top of, to build more
10:52
weight into the previous question. Because if
10:54
you're especially we dealing with executives, if
10:57
you're dealing with people, could of your...
10:59
you know above the line of the
11:01
of the kind of executive board or
11:03
of the middle management essentially into the
11:05
executive suite they only care about four
11:08
things three things really more money more
11:10
efficiency reduction in legislative risk or legal
11:12
risk that is it so everything is
11:14
good to come back to that but
11:16
what you're describing of once we get
11:19
to that point reinforcing it of how
11:21
would that make you feel which is
11:23
a question you asked that I asked
11:25
all the time which is on the
11:28
right side of you know, you don't
11:30
want to talk about how it's going
11:32
to, unless they're over to, we don't
11:34
want to talk about how it affects
11:36
their family or, you know, it's just,
11:39
it's very weird, very quickly. That can
11:41
come further down the line, right, when
11:43
you know in the person for years
11:45
and, you perhaps have a better understanding
11:47
about them. But I might ask, especially
11:50
with sales people that we work with
11:52
at sales. It's a, well, you could
11:54
ask that to a CFO. they may
11:56
not tell you. They might be pissed
11:58
that you're asking about the salary, but
12:01
you've got to do its... from the
12:03
context of the person that you're engaging
12:05
with. So it's absolutely a probate thing
12:07
to ask a salesperson. And then what
12:09
is your goal? Well, I'm trying to
12:12
get to 500K. Why do you want
12:14
to get to 500K? Because I want
12:16
to, I've got some debt, I'm trying
12:18
to get rid of the debt, and
12:20
I would like to pay off my
12:23
mortgage, so I feel more secure. Oh,
12:25
well, what makes you feel unsecured? Okay
12:27
great so maybe I won't go any
12:29
deeper than that I wouldn't be asking
12:31
of how this is going to affect
12:34
the kids future because again as you
12:36
said you can't start getting a little
12:38
bit weird at a certain point and
12:40
but that reinforcement of yes the goals
12:42
half a million how do we get
12:45
there is it possible and that then
12:47
becomes the next step of the process
12:49
so if I was to draw this
12:51
out it would be logical step reinforcement
12:53
logical step reinforcement So the emotion is
12:56
almost getting piled on top of the
12:58
logic as you go through the process.
13:00
That looks nice. I love that. Next
13:02
question here. I will. I keep hearing
13:04
that top sales people ask a better
13:07
question, but what does that actually mean?
13:09
I ask plenty of questions, but I
13:11
don't always feel like I'm getting to
13:13
the real pain points. How do you
13:16
ask questions in a way that makes
13:18
prospects open up and actually tell you
13:20
what's on their mind? So there are
13:22
good questions and there are bad questions.
13:24
And there are little gray area in
13:27
between. There is pretty binary. Bad question
13:29
is something that you know that they
13:31
know you know that you're asking anyway.
13:33
So are you having success? Or are
13:35
you asking almost any BSP salesperson? Are
13:38
you, well this shouldn't be the case
13:40
but unfortunately is, are you hitting quotes
13:42
right now? Almost everyone's not in quota.
13:44
So there's a dumb question to ask.
13:46
You might add, another bad question might
13:49
be, tell me how long you've been
13:51
in business. You can just go on
13:53
the LinkedIn profile and you can look
13:55
at these questions, right? So immediately all
13:57
them get cold. So now you're 50.
14:00
50% better asking questions like that for
14:02
30, 40 years. Then we've got an
14:04
iceberg effect of good questions, because
14:06
a good question could, and a question
14:08
that could get a deal done, could be
14:10
as simple as, you know, what do you
14:12
need to happen for this to close? It's
14:14
not original. It's been, people have been
14:17
saying questions like that for 30, 40
14:19
years. It's well ingrained, it should be
14:21
well ingrained to most of the people
14:23
listening to this episode, to ask questions
14:25
like that for out of the process.
14:27
you're helping the buyer coach you on what
14:30
they think the solution is and if they know
14:32
what the solution is or they've got strong opinions,
14:34
they're going to tell you if you can deliver
14:36
it and you're like great, I think we can
14:38
help with that. But then you start going down the
14:40
iceberg and then you start to get questions
14:43
that drive curiosity in the individual
14:45
or you've got questions that include
14:47
an insight. So hey, for example,
14:49
Selham.com Academy, we've got our sales code
14:51
assessment, it was public facing, I just
14:53
gobbledbled everyone's data to data to be
14:55
quite frank. 30,000 people have been in
14:57
it, have been through it. So we
14:59
know pretty precisely at this point, the
15:02
traits that make up a high performing
15:04
sales person. So if I was working with
15:06
EP of sales, I could say, okay, great.
15:08
How do you know if the people that
15:10
you are hiring are going to have success?
15:12
And it's a loaded question because I
15:14
know what the answer is. Oh, I'm not
15:16
sure. Okay, well, we've got this assessment.
15:19
Would it make sense if I explain
15:21
the three or four key traits that
15:23
all top professionals have? Yes, please tell
15:25
me? So now we're sharing an insight within
15:28
a question that is obviously a leading
15:30
question to take so on on the
15:32
pathway that we want to take them
15:34
on. So then you get like
15:36
layers upon layers of sophistication with questions,
15:39
but really you should be looking at two
15:41
things. One, is this question going to
15:43
help the buyer move to the next
15:45
step of the sales process? Does it
15:47
make sense to do this? The microclosing
15:50
process that we talk about all the
15:52
time? And then the other question is, the
15:54
other type of questions are questions that make
15:56
the buyers stop and think. So questions
15:59
that make the buyer go... Oh, I hadn't considered
16:01
that before. Well, now you mentioned that.
16:03
I've always wondered how that works. They're
16:05
the other questions that I consider good
16:07
questions and you don't need lots of
16:09
them. One or two per conversation is
16:11
often enough. And that shows the gap
16:13
between where the buyer is, where they
16:15
could be if they work with you
16:18
and that's typically what we need to
16:20
make that sale, right? What the current
16:22
reality is and the future reality when
16:24
I stretch it so far apart, we
16:26
want to breathe a bridge from one
16:28
side to the other. And if we
16:30
have inside a knowledge or industry knowledge
16:32
that they need to make that leap,
16:35
we want to communicate that via a
16:37
question so that we can demonstrate that
16:39
knowledge without telling them that we're the
16:41
best. So no one wants to hear
16:43
that, right? No one wants to engage
16:45
with someone who's broke. Absolutely
16:48
and along that same trail, what
16:50
would you say are the most
16:52
important questions that we, that typically
16:55
bring the best success in these
16:57
types of calls that, just to
16:59
give the people listening at home
17:01
practical questions that they can take
17:03
and ask on the next call.
17:05
Cool, so super basic. What is
17:07
the timeframe for this project? Is
17:09
there a budget for this project?
17:11
The obvious kind of like banned
17:13
questions or meant to pick questions
17:15
or medic questions. There's a gazillion
17:17
acronyms for this, right? Maybe we
17:20
talked about this last week because
17:22
I'm not asking you to remind
17:24
me the word acronym. So yeah,
17:26
maybe I'm slightly more caffeinated today.
17:28
That's the key to find a
17:30
bit quicker. But yeah, they're the
17:32
basics you've got to ask them.
17:34
It's gotta be done. If you
17:36
go into a conversation, if you
17:38
go into conversation three with the
17:40
buyer, the meeting number three or
17:42
four, whatever the mean is, and
17:45
you don't know the timeframes that
17:47
they need to solve this problem
17:49
by, or yeah, because I was
17:51
gonna say, or there is no
17:53
timeframe because you only know that
17:55
as you ask the question, then
17:57
you are terrible at sales. Sorry
17:59
to call you out. as you're listening to
18:01
this show and you're looking for some good
18:03
vibes as you're driving to your
18:06
next meeting and you're wanting to
18:08
be positively reinforced, reinforced. If you're
18:10
not asking the basic qualification questions you
18:12
saw and you need to read a
18:14
book or join our training programme or
18:16
watch one of the many sales experts that
18:18
are on YouTube or all continue listening
18:21
to this podcast. So that's a bit
18:23
tough love for you. Once you pass those
18:25
kind of questions... There's a couple of
18:27
questions I'd like to ask, one of
18:29
which I ask on, almost every single
18:31
call, you should be asking this
18:34
question as well, Liam, when you are
18:36
doing, hosting calls for sales.com
18:38
Academy, when people want to
18:40
join, the question is, what's stopping you
18:42
from doing this yourself? And what
18:45
we're trying to pull out of the buy here,
18:47
or the potential buy is the
18:49
DIY objection, which holds, show me deals
18:51
back, and it is complete, it is
18:53
complete nonsense. could do this
18:55
myself, but, and what we're looking for is the
18:57
but. So we want to, because we want
18:59
to work with capable people. We want
19:02
to work people who probably could sort
19:04
this out themselves eventually. They're the best
19:06
buyers, because they're the ones that are
19:08
going to put in the effort and
19:10
the resources to get the job done. Correct.
19:12
But we want to hear that but,
19:14
but, I don't have the expertise, but
19:16
there is some insider knowledge that you
19:18
specifically have, I can't get from anywhere
19:20
else. Why don't you get that but? then the
19:23
deal at that point, as long as
19:25
everything else falls in line with budget
19:27
time frames, you speak to the right person,
19:29
all that good stuff, then the deal
19:31
is almost done. The buyer has almost
19:34
made a decision then of I can do
19:36
this, which means that they've at
19:38
least considered whether it should be done,
19:40
so they are probably at least
19:42
considering that it should be done,
19:44
which is obviously the first hurdle
19:47
of convincing someone the value of
19:49
the implementation service. They're
19:51
thinking, oh, could do this, but I can't,
19:53
I need help. And that's, I don't know what
19:56
you, Liam, and I think it might also be
19:58
a bit of a bloke thing, but I... have
20:00
a problem asking for help and I've
20:02
had feedback on the podcast in the
20:04
past from different guests saying that I
20:07
should ask for more help but I'm
20:09
I will just sit there like an
20:11
idiot and bang the head against the
20:13
wall trying to solve them problem myself
20:15
but there's lots of people around in
20:18
both the business community the sales community
20:20
and that and you obviously you're part
20:22
of the team now you might see
20:24
this moving forward and so feel free
20:27
to offer to help when your expertise
20:29
are a good fit and I'll probably
20:31
refuse them. And it's not like ego,
20:33
I don't think it's pride, I think
20:35
it's almost like a control freak thing.
20:38
But most people are wired at least
20:40
somewhat like that. So when they admit
20:42
to you, oh yeah, I can't do
20:44
this because I need it done now,
20:47
and rather time, I don't have the
20:49
extra time in my calendar to make
20:51
this happen, then you go, okay, well
20:53
would you like me to help you?
20:55
So now the entire sales process has
20:58
been flipped on its head. You're no
21:00
longer pushing your pitch at someone. You're
21:02
literally just saying to someone who's just
21:04
said that they need a hand, would
21:07
you like me to help? And that's,
21:09
you know, I kind of went down
21:11
the rabbit hole with that question. That's
21:13
one question that I like to ask,
21:16
and I consider that a, it's not
21:18
even particularly sophisticated, but I consider that
21:20
a good question to ask. No, absolutely.
21:22
And, you know, a common pattern that
21:24
I see is these fundamental questions that
21:27
are not too fancy that, you know,
21:29
that get you most of the result
21:31
for, you put that you put in.
21:33
And I love that DIY question because
21:36
there are many times where you have
21:38
a complete evaluation with a client and
21:40
then maybe you go through six meetings,
21:42
you integrate multiple decision makers, and then
21:44
at the end of the call you've
21:47
been running this deal cycle for three
21:49
months and then they say, you know
21:51
what, we're just, we think we're going
21:53
to do it in-house, right? And you
21:56
could have just saved yourself so much
21:58
time if you would have asked that
22:00
that purposeful question that you asked earlier.
22:02
and I don't know the percentage, 80%
22:05
of the time it doesn't work and
22:07
they come back to you three years.
22:09
Yeah, it's a mess. Anyway, so yeah,
22:11
so asking that question up front, allowing
22:13
them to work it out, is it
22:16
possible? And I'm being open to being
22:18
told, no, I don't know if this
22:20
is going to be a good fit,
22:22
because at least you've got the objection
22:25
then, and you can try and deal
22:27
with it, if you choose to. And
22:29
the other thing that we'll just kind
22:31
of wrap this question upon is, and
22:33
I've started doing this more, and I
22:36
feel like it has. So you got
22:38
to build reports, I mean you can't
22:40
do this straight out of the gate,
22:42
and once you build reports on it,
22:45
they say something that's pretty dumb, which,
22:47
you know, we're all talking in real
22:49
time, on this podcast episode itself, I
22:51
probably said something that's pretty dumb, but
22:54
you're unaware of it, because you're saying
22:56
it, right? So you've probably got a
22:58
clip in your mind right now, Liam,
23:00
that we're going to make a YouTube
23:02
video, whereas me saying something dumb and
23:05
then I don't realize that I don't
23:07
realize that I've said something, I've said
23:09
something, I've said something, I've said something,
23:11
I've said something dumb. half-truths, or it's
23:14
a belief as opposed to fact, but
23:16
we present it as fact. When someone
23:18
says something like that, I often just
23:20
said, I've done this again, started it
23:22
more and more often, I just repeat
23:25
it back to them. So they might
23:27
say, oh yeah, you know, I believe
23:29
I can do this myself. I might
23:31
go, you can do this yourself? And
23:34
they go, how I do it myself?
23:36
I'm not sure. And it's the fact
23:38
that the brainer said something. Maybe we
23:40
go into the... left and right hemispheres
23:42
and an experiment they did in the
23:45
70s to kind of outline some of
23:47
this in a second if you think
23:49
it'd be interesting but the it's almost
23:51
like your brain has to hear back
23:54
what it said from a different source
23:56
to really evaluate it and the theory
23:58
behind it and there's not a great
24:00
amount of research on this because it's
24:03
terribly unethical to do but I think
24:05
maybe it was the 60s they had
24:07
a bunch of... Unfortunately, mentally ill people
24:09
who had like bipolar, like severe bipolar,
24:11
and what they did was basically sever
24:14
the two. two hemispheres of the brain.
24:16
They just plucked them apart. So the
24:18
person was still fully functioning, but the
24:20
experiments were to see if the brains
24:23
were, you know, dependent on each other.
24:25
And one of the things they were
24:27
also looking for as well was can
24:29
they remove parts of a brain and
24:31
do those neurons kind of rebuild elsewhere,
24:34
which is true. You can have a
24:36
traumatic brain injury and part of your
24:38
brain can essentially die off. the function
24:40
from that part of the brain can
24:43
be picked up by other parts of
24:45
the brain. Obviously it's very complex. It's
24:47
more complex in practice that I'm outlying
24:49
out there. But one of the experiments
24:52
they did, this experiment is on YouTube.
24:54
It's crazy. They have persons sat with
24:56
a magic board from their nose going
24:58
forward. So which splits both vision on
25:00
both sides and the body parts on
25:03
either side. and they'll have then sworn
25:05
looking forward at them and there's a
25:07
pile of different fruits on the table.
25:09
And they'll say to the person, pick
25:12
your favourite fruit. And each hand will
25:14
pick up a different fruit. Wow. Right?
25:16
It's, I said, well, link in the
25:18
show into this episode. So that suggests
25:20
perhaps, and again, the psychology, there's plenty
25:23
of psychology on this and philosophy. There's
25:25
not a lot of actual data, because
25:27
obviously it's hard. we know now that
25:29
severing people's hemispheres is terrible. It is
25:32
not a medical procedure that leads to
25:34
kind of positive outcomes. So that experiment
25:36
can't really be done anymore. Although those
25:38
experiments can't really be done anymore. But
25:41
what they found was it's almost like
25:43
one hemisphere of your brain is linked
25:45
to speech and language. I think that's
25:47
what we considered the emotional side of
25:49
your brain, the logical side of your
25:52
brain isn't connected with speech and language.
25:54
So it can't, it doesn't have literally
25:56
a voice. And so again when, currently
25:58
going down the rabbit hole here, but
26:01
I. find myself personally and this is
26:03
what the research indicates but isn't kind
26:05
of provable that I almost have
26:07
this at this inner voice going on
26:09
and on for like you didn't do
26:12
this so that was cheap. That's the
26:14
emotional part of you. There's almost
26:16
like another voice at above it
26:19
that observes the emotional voice so
26:21
hopefully this makes sense. People listening
26:23
as well. And so that could
26:25
be the logical side of your
26:28
brain, the logical hemisphere, and it
26:30
could be the emotional hemisphere that
26:32
has the voice that can speak. And so,
26:34
when you, with this questioning technique,
26:37
when someone says something, often
26:39
it's an impulsive response, it
26:41
is something that comes out and it's
26:43
an emotional response of, oh, I don't
26:45
feel good about this or don't like
26:48
the way that works or, however it's
26:50
phrased, when you repeat it back to them.
26:52
Perhaps, and again, we're now definitely
26:54
getting into the realm of pseudoscience
26:57
as I apply kind of
26:59
self-process to this, and perhaps their
27:01
logical brain is hearing it back,
27:03
and then that is then what's
27:06
responding via the emotional brain moving
27:08
forward. And it's the same reason why
27:10
journaling is useful. You get, I find
27:12
I get all my garbage out onto
27:15
the pure. Then when I read it,
27:17
I'm like, well, that's just crazy. That's
27:19
not even the reality that you
27:21
live it. And then my logical brain
27:24
goes, okay, now we can forget about
27:26
that now, because this didn't actually happen,
27:28
or the way that I perceived
27:30
this thing was perhaps incorrect. And
27:32
it's probably, again, now we're definitely in
27:34
the realm of the pseudo science, it's
27:37
probably, it's probably to do with
27:39
the two hemispheres, how they're connected
27:41
to our kind of speech and
27:43
language skills, but all that's kind of
27:45
irrelevant, because practically, I find
27:47
when I repeat back something that is
27:50
a dull statement, people tend to
27:52
then rebut. themselves the dump statement,
27:54
versus if you tell them that
27:56
they're wrong, they'll fight you over it.
27:59
Absolutely. I think this goes
28:01
hand in hand with, I'm sure you've
28:03
read the book by Daniel, I'm gonna
28:05
butcher his last name, Daniel Hineman, but
28:07
it's about thinking fast and slow, right?
28:09
And how we typically have this automatic
28:12
responses that we don't even think about,
28:14
they're unconscious really, that just come out,
28:16
for example. You could be, you know,
28:18
I love the mall analogies. Well, so
28:20
let's say you're in the, you're, you're,
28:23
you're. you're in the mall and you're
28:25
shopping for some clothes and then the
28:27
clerk comes up to you and says
28:29
and you've probably been looking for this
28:31
specific item for the last 17 minutes
28:33
but the person comes up to you
28:36
and they say say they say this
28:38
to me all the time sir can
28:40
we help you and automatically what do
28:42
most people say no I'm good I'm
28:44
just looking even though you've been wandering
28:47
around for the last 23 minutes and
28:49
to tie it back to these powerful
28:51
questions that we need to use during
28:53
our sales calls especially the DIY and
28:55
how you mention echoing these questions or
28:57
these answers to them like, so can
29:00
you do it? Can you do this
29:02
yourself? Yeah, yeah, I can definitely do
29:04
this for myself. And then you kind
29:06
of echoing how you mention. So yeah,
29:08
so you can really do this yourself
29:10
and kind of makes people think and
29:13
go from thinking fast to thinking about
29:15
it a bit slower and we're kind
29:17
of overcoming that automatic response that people
29:19
have. And then they maybe think about
29:21
it and say, you know what? I
29:24
don't know if I could do this
29:26
myself so that kind of reminded me
29:28
of that briefly so I thought that
29:30
was incredibly interesting and I would love
29:32
to see that that link to their
29:34
YouTube channel that today YouTube video about
29:37
that experiment because that was really creepy.
29:39
Do Liam, you're basically the host of
29:41
this show I'm just kind of answering
29:43
the question, I'll answer some of the
29:45
questions, so do you drop me message
29:48
on slack? We're kind of pulling the
29:50
the third wall, the third curtain, however
29:52
to describe it. back here but yeah
29:54
message beyond slack and it'll go in
29:56
there in the show notes because otherwise
29:58
I'll forget because I will as I
30:01
said go off to baby cost in
30:03
in 40 minutes and be changing nappies
30:05
and not be thinking about left and
30:07
right atmospheres. Absolutely. Well, I wanted to
30:09
run something by you. So I came
30:12
across this. So there's a little bit
30:14
of some. So Google, I think I
30:16
brought this up to you the other
30:18
day. We touched on it really briefly,
30:20
but I kind of wanted to run
30:22
this by you on the show, and
30:25
I think it's going to be helpful
30:27
to everybody, especially everybody listening at home.
30:29
And I think this is particular. It
30:31
says a lot about the new buyer's
30:33
journey, right. Right. A little bit of
30:36
research from Google here. It says that,
30:38
so they did, obviously, Google has massive
30:40
amounts of data. So they crunched a
30:42
lot of their data and they came
30:44
up with the 7-Eleven-4 rule. So they
30:46
say here, in the buying journey, comes
30:49
from Google's research on consumer decision making
30:51
and digital marketing. It was first introduced
30:53
as Google's zero moment of truth, blah,
30:55
blah, blah, blah, blah. Okay. But the
30:57
7-114 rule is this. It says that
30:59
in order for a consumer to make
31:02
a purchasing decision, it takes seven interactions
31:04
with a brand, right? Sorry, they need
31:06
to spend seven hours consuming content from
31:08
a brand, and they need to interact
31:10
with that brand 11 times, and they
31:13
need to do it across four different
31:15
platforms before they can make a decision.
31:17
And I think that says a lot
31:19
about the new buyer's journey, the modern.
31:21
buyer's journey and how you know sales
31:23
is slowly becoming more of kind of
31:26
the last step in the buyer's journey
31:28
to make a final purchasing decision. What
31:30
are your thoughts on this data? I
31:32
thought it was very interesting specifically because
31:34
it's coming from Google and didn't you
31:37
know that says legit as it gets.
31:39
What do you think of this 70
31:41
level four rule? It's interesting. You're going
31:43
to be slightly careful in the way
31:45
this is framed right of right? That's
31:47
the average amount of time interactions impressions
31:50
impressions. for the average purchase. Right right
31:52
right. So in the best example a
31:54
guy came around the house the other
31:56
day and the UK would call them
31:58
sugars, charity muggers and he did the
32:01
salesperson like that represents a charity. It's
32:03
not affiliated with the charity anymore than
32:05
that. But the charity was something that
32:07
I have an interest in and I
32:09
don't even mention this on the podcast
32:11
before but sales.com gives a percentage of
32:14
its profit to charity. So don't talk
32:16
about it. I'm not trying to plug
32:18
it right now. But that's the context
32:20
of this conversation of he was like,
32:22
well, okay, do you want to get
32:24
signed up? I was like, I think
32:27
we can potentially work together on something,
32:29
but it won't be me, it'll be
32:31
the business, and so I can't give
32:33
you my card. And obviously he just
32:35
wants to make a commission, right? He
32:38
gets commissioner on everyone, I get signed
32:40
up. So we took me in my
32:42
address, and they never got back to
32:44
me, so I'll reach myself to work.
32:46
But it was an interesting charity to
32:48
help. charity to help homeless people to
32:51
help homeless people to help homeless people
32:53
get back on the people get back
32:55
on the people get back on the
32:57
people get back on their back on
32:59
their back on their feet. It was
33:02
just a novel approach which I was
33:04
like, that's interesting, it's important, and so
33:06
essentially want to be involved. So with
33:08
that said, I'd never heard this charity
33:10
before. This was the first interaction I
33:12
have with the person. They are probably,
33:15
if we do some due diligence on
33:17
the charity, they're likely to get thousands
33:19
and thousands of dollars offers over the
33:21
next 12 months or so. And so
33:23
in which case, the rules of engagement
33:26
of getting a deal of the line
33:28
that... Google outlined completely completely completely broken.
33:30
So if we're talking about complex B2B
33:32
sales, it could be 50 meetings, it
33:34
could be 100 hours, it could be
33:36
whatever it is. So again, back to
33:39
your question a second, but I just
33:41
thought it was important to frame up
33:43
with the context of the context. That's
33:45
an average. But yes, absolutely. I won't
33:47
name him. Chap got signed up to
33:49
you, you know who, you might know
33:52
what I'm talking about as we go
33:54
through this. He's been on the group
33:56
coaching calls recently and he is a
33:58
legend and he is full of passion
34:00
and he's full of energy and he,
34:03
his boss, he was telling me on
34:05
the call before, he booked a call
34:07
with me and then no showed. Then
34:09
he booked another call with me, showed
34:11
up, and he was kind of excited
34:13
to work with me, but then the
34:16
deal didn't happen. And I totally forgot
34:18
about it. And then he was telling
34:20
me before three months later, he booked
34:22
a call for weeks ago and got
34:24
his team signed up, and he's very
34:27
excited. And in the background, he's been
34:29
watching all our content, trying to implement
34:31
it. And the reason you didn't get
34:33
signed up in the first place is
34:35
that the salespersoning hide wasn't a good
34:37
fit. So he wanted to hire another
34:40
salesperson and he wanted to have that
34:42
individual in place before the engaged with
34:44
us. But there's been masses of impressions
34:46
of just my face, your face, the
34:48
content, the kind of the theory, the
34:51
kind of the frameworks that we provide,
34:53
going on behind the scenes that I
34:55
didn't even know what happened. I didn't
34:57
even know what happened. And so it's
34:59
the easiest sale of all time. And
35:01
that's what the Google Research is encouraging
35:04
us to do. It is to have
35:06
multiple touch points across multiple platforms so
35:08
that we can surround our potential customers
35:10
so that we've, and again, with good
35:12
intentions as opposed to just trying to
35:14
bully them into speaking with us, where
35:17
good intentions are trying to help them,
35:19
educate them, inform them, share insights that
35:21
we have that are competitors that don't,
35:23
so that we appear at. kind of
35:25
peer subjectively but hopefully are the experts
35:28
in the space and so that when
35:30
they do want to have a conversation
35:32
and perhaps commit one way or another
35:34
to work with us they want to
35:36
find out a few more things that
35:38
they can only get from call call
35:41
with us and it might be five
35:43
calls because there might be ten people
35:45
that are involved obviously but at that
35:47
point they're so far down the buyer's
35:49
journey and you've done you've created the
35:52
content once you have built that webinar
35:54
or you've been publishing on LinkedIn LinkedIn
35:56
or you've done your cold outreach and
35:58
scaled it over time. you know, maybe
36:00
that person's had four emails from you,
36:02
they've seen 27 of your LinkedIn posts,
36:05
they listen to a podcast that you're
36:07
featured on because you're an expert in
36:09
your field, and where you're trying to
36:12
build, at least build the credibility that
36:14
you're an expert in your field, all of
36:16
that allows the buyer to make a much
36:18
quicker and easier decision further down
36:20
the sales process. And this is happening
36:22
where we like it or not. This, this,
36:24
this, this, this can't be counteracted, to do
36:26
their own research. whether you give them
36:29
all of the information they need, they're
36:31
still going to go and look at other
36:33
sources. And so if you can position
36:35
yourself that you are in all those places
36:37
that they're looking, you've got
36:40
an incredible competitive advantage versus
36:42
everyone else. So I read
36:44
that Google research paper, well I
36:46
read the abstract and the conclusion,
36:49
and the main thing I took it
36:51
from is impressions. My face and that
36:53
salesman logo, right? The red circle, the
36:55
white S in it, just needs to be...
36:57
chuffing plastered all over every platform
36:59
that we can find. I know,
37:01
hopefully it's associated and tied
37:04
with valuable insights or free training or,
37:06
you know, to build that goodwill
37:08
and that trust in that
37:10
reputation that we can deliver on
37:12
our promises. But probably 80% of
37:14
it is just, are you the most recognizable
37:16
brand? You're at least going
37:18
to be in the conversation in the
37:21
runics for the deal, right? And
37:23
your background with Salesforce, I'm sure
37:25
is the same with... with you as well.
37:27
You were probably going up against
37:29
other competitors and saying, oh, we've got
37:32
to speak to sales force. You might
37:34
have been their marketing was terrible, it
37:36
probably was, it was probably really good,
37:38
but it could have been that their
37:40
marketing was terrible, but its sales force.
37:42
So we've got to speak to them. And
37:45
so I'm sure you, I'm assuming this, but
37:47
I'm assuming you leverage a lot of that
37:49
and the brand recognition to kind of get
37:51
deals over the line and book those initial
37:53
means as well, right. Going back to
37:55
what you said earlier about, when you're
37:58
having this impression, you're essentially
38:00
what you're doing. The reason why people
38:02
are watching in the first place is
38:05
because you're providing value. You're solving specific
38:07
problems that they are having, so they're
38:09
consuming your content because you're providing them
38:11
and you're helping them solve specific problems.
38:14
Going back to that example of the
38:16
student example that you mentioned earlier about
38:18
how maybe in the past he was
38:20
not ready to make a decision. But
38:23
he continued watching the content. Now why
38:25
did he continue watching the content? Because
38:27
he was offering value to him. And
38:29
then that value eventually helped him make
38:32
that decision to rebook the call and
38:34
move forward. So yeah, I thought that
38:36
that statistic was really interesting. Wanted to
38:39
run it by you. But yeah, thank
38:41
you so much for kind of expanding
38:43
on that. Take us through that. Next
38:45
question here. Well, we'll have to wrap
38:48
up up with early. I'm conscious of
38:50
time, mate. Okay, no, no, we'll wrap
38:52
up with that. Whenever the question is
38:54
that we're wrapping up now, we'll start
38:57
with next week. But with that, Liam,
38:59
I appreciate you mixing up the format.
39:01
It's supposed to be Q&A show. Now
39:03
you're just poking me with curiosity and
39:06
see how I feel. Because some of
39:08
this is obviously subjective, some of it's
39:10
objective. Yeah, yeah. But I appreciate the
39:12
also mate. That's awesome. No, I just,
39:15
I genuinely thought that was super interesting
39:17
and was super interesting and obviously super
39:19
relevant to sales, the sales process in
39:21
the buyers journey. So no, I thought
39:24
we definitely had to cover it in
39:26
some ways somehow. Nice. More of that
39:28
moving forward. I think that's cool. So
39:30
with that, mates, I appreciate you. Appreciate
39:33
you listening to this episode. And I
39:35
will speak of you again on next
39:37
week's episode of the settlement podcast Q&A.
39:39
And we probably need a better title
39:42
for this as well. Probably. Yeah, we'll,
39:44
we'll, we'll, we'll mix it. We'll find
39:46
something. Then listen closely. After interviewing her
39:48
thousand sales experts on the world most
39:51
downloaded sales podcast with data from over
39:53
14,000 sellers completing our sales code assessment
39:55
I've uncovered a step-by-step sales process that
39:57
works so well that it's a me
40:00
to help over 2,000 sellers beat their
40:02
sales quotas whilst working less hours with
40:04
less overwhelmed and far far less stress.
40:06
I've used the same process myself to
40:09
build our training business to over a
40:11
million dollars in revenue selling many of
40:13
the world's top brands like Salesforce, LinkedIn,
40:16
Microsoft or media sponsorships. So if it
40:18
works for me I know it can
40:20
work for you. In fact, I am
40:22
so confident that we can help you
40:25
find and close more deals in the
40:27
next 30 days. That if you qualify
40:29
to work with us, I guarantee that
40:31
you will find and close more deals
40:34
in the next 30 days or you
40:36
can ask for your money back. It's
40:38
really that simple. I've used the cellomates
40:40
simple method to help over 2,000 sellers
40:43
smash their quotas and have generated over
40:45
262 million in personal bonuses and commissions
40:47
since working with us. I've helped sellers
40:49
like you not just fly past their
40:52
sales quotas but to do it consistently,
40:54
confidently and without feeling old salesy and
40:56
slimy. the selling made simple method works
40:58
fast. It doesn't require you to grind
41:01
out sales activities or make thousands upon
41:03
thousands of boring cold calls. We will
41:05
overhaul and simplify your entire sales process
41:07
from value proposition to creating the reliable
41:10
meeting booking machine to leveraging a closing
41:12
framework that makes you rejection proof. Remember
41:14
we guarantee in writing that if you
41:16
follow our process exactly that you'll find
41:19
in closed more deals in the next
41:21
30 days or your money back. And
41:23
if you don't... I will personally continue
41:25
to work with you for free until
41:28
you do find and close some more
41:30
deals. So head over to salesman.com/call that
41:32
salesman.com/C-A-L-L. Right now on Book a call
41:34
with me personally and we'll see if
41:37
you're a good fit for our process.
41:39
That's right. No weird high-pressure sales team
41:41
or other shenanigans you'll speak with me
41:44
directly. And if I think we can
41:46
help you then I'll explain the process,
41:48
how it works and you can let
41:50
me know if you want to get
41:53
started. So head over to salesmam.com/call right
41:55
now and this is a limited time
41:57
offer so don't miss out.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More