Q/A: Focus on Buyer Emotions or Logic? Questions That Uncover the REAL Pain Points?

Q/A: Focus on Buyer Emotions or Logic? Questions That Uncover the REAL Pain Points?

Released Thursday, 13th February 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Q/A: Focus on Buyer Emotions or Logic? Questions That Uncover the REAL Pain Points?

Q/A: Focus on Buyer Emotions or Logic? Questions That Uncover the REAL Pain Points?

Q/A: Focus on Buyer Emotions or Logic? Questions That Uncover the REAL Pain Points?

Q/A: Focus on Buyer Emotions or Logic? Questions That Uncover the REAL Pain Points?

Thursday, 13th February 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hi, welcome to today's episode of

0:02

the Selman podcast, Q and A

0:04

edition. As always, we have the,

0:06

I think every week I'm going

0:08

to use a different word to

0:10

describe your Liam. This way we

0:12

have the lovely Liam, who's going

0:15

to be throwing some questions by

0:17

the way, and also answering some

0:19

questions himself. So without Liam, how's

0:21

it? Thank you, Will. I'm flattered by

0:23

your spontaneity and your, you're

0:25

just, your willingness to, to

0:27

flatter, to you know. cut a little

0:29

something over the weekend. My pretty much

0:32

my whole family had something so yeah

0:34

it just they just passed it on

0:36

to me that's one of my inheritance

0:38

for this weekend but yeah everything's good

0:40

overall. Good man. All right then again I

0:42

said this last time for the audience last

0:45

week I have a baby class that I've

0:47

got to go to after this recording and

0:49

so let's not faf around let's jump straight

0:51

into it before I then go and learn

0:53

how to change an happy in baby class.

0:56

the audience. Half the audience, like what the

0:58

heck? He's talking about the other half

1:00

the audience, probably parents, and like, oh

1:02

yeah, he does know what he's in for.

1:04

And so we're not letting him tell us,

1:06

tell us the first question, who's it come

1:08

from? And I know, what are we diving

1:10

into? Well, as always to the people

1:13

listening at home, these are questions we

1:15

gather from our communities, our YouTube channel,

1:17

emails that we get, and then here

1:19

we obviously tackle them, we get into

1:21

them, we get into them. name of the

1:24

person anonymous just to protect

1:26

everybody's privacy and with that

1:28

setless kids straight into it. Hey

1:30

team, I've been thinking about how buyers

1:33

actually make decisions. We always assume

1:35

it's based on logic, ROI, features,

1:37

cost, but I'm starting to feel like

1:39

it's way more emotional than we give

1:42

it credit for. I've seen deals won

1:44

or lost just because someone felt

1:46

better about one option over the

1:48

other. How do you tap into the

1:50

emotional side of buying decisions

1:52

without being manipulative?

1:54

I would advise people to not to

1:57

deal with the emotions up front

1:59

and then... down a logical, to

2:01

push the sale towards a logical conclusion.

2:03

Because emotions are flipped, emotions are all

2:05

over the place. You have a bit

2:08

of a cold, which is totally, you're

2:10

probably feeling a bit like them there.

2:12

You'll make different decisions today than you

2:14

will next week when you fully recover

2:16

from your cold. That is not very

2:19

productive to have a sustainable pipeline and

2:21

to make a bunch of money in

2:23

BTP sales. What we want is, does

2:25

it make sense to do this? Yes,

2:27

it does make sense, okay. deal closed.

2:30

Does it make sense to do this?

2:32

Yes, it does make sense. Deal closed.

2:34

So we can address the question in

2:36

two ways, I guess, or in two

2:38

steps. First off is to deal with

2:41

the emotion. If someone feels something, you

2:43

should ask them, why do you feel

2:45

that? Most of the time, people live,

2:47

you and I as well, and you're

2:50

the personalist to this episode as well,

2:52

we live in this bubble, where we

2:54

feel stuff, but that is our perception

2:56

of reality. we're almost playing this like

2:58

super intense VR computer game where everything

3:01

in front of us is not real

3:03

it's just a series of inputs that

3:05

we interpret and so your feelings are

3:07

via the very nature typically quite illogical

3:09

so if someone feels something about a

3:12

software product for example why do you

3:14

feel that way? Oh well it's not

3:16

really the product it's the person or

3:18

it's the company or it's the prestige

3:20

of this or this or this person's

3:23

giving me a discount, it's going to

3:25

make me look good from my bus.

3:27

So now that we know what the

3:29

actual reality is that we have to

3:31

compete with or improve upon, then we

3:34

can move to the logical next step

3:36

of, okay, we also want from that

3:38

feature, we also have that outcome, we

3:40

can potentially compete on pricing or we

3:42

can negotiate either way in that we

3:45

can do them of value for the

3:47

price that we offer. And now you're

3:49

in the tangible world, now you're in

3:51

the logical world, and now it rather

3:53

than feeling... the by feeling the way

3:56

through making a decision, you can help

3:58

them decide and make those make logical

4:00

decisions to take that next step and

4:02

take that. next step. And you typically

4:04

find that when you do this from

4:07

a position of I'm just trying to

4:09

help the person get the best result

4:11

as opposed to I'm using it as

4:13

a way to manipulate or trick them

4:15

or influence them or push them one

4:18

way or another. When your intention is

4:20

well for you probably get into the

4:22

logical next step or the logical end

4:24

conclusion is the best thing for you

4:26

to do. I'll help you do that.

4:29

You'll find that buyers will fight you

4:31

for it. They might not know what's

4:33

happened. and you don't necessarily need to

4:35

tell them that you were, they were

4:38

an emotional mess for the 30 minutes,

4:40

for the 30 minutes at the beginning

4:42

of the call. As you're doing obviously

4:44

a lot of the calls now at

4:46

salesman.com and as I do them as

4:49

well, a lot of people jump on

4:51

the calls, I'm overwhelmed, this isn't working,

4:53

my boss is on my back, I've

4:55

got this problem, very quickly, the goal

4:57

is to calm everything down, I go

5:00

okay, well are you doing called outreach,

5:02

what are your conversion rates, for that

5:04

initial discovery call, people aren't even showing

5:06

up for it. How do we get

5:08

people to show up for that meeting?

5:11

Okay, great. Our service can help you

5:13

with that, risk via some training. And

5:15

people then have clarity, if you're less

5:17

overwhelmed, and it's then easier for them

5:19

to make a decision. Because there's not

5:22

all this big cloud of ambiguity that

5:24

they're swing through, they get to go,

5:26

okay, well, this is the problem, this

5:28

is a potential solution. The risk is

5:30

this, the upside is that, yes. to

5:33

move forward with. And I guess just

5:35

to clarify, this is for B2B sales,

5:37

where there's more than one person involved

5:39

in the buying process typically and it's

5:41

somewhat complex. If you're buying a Ferrari,

5:44

it's 100% emotional because logically it makes

5:46

no sense. Absolutely. And no matter how

5:48

you try and trick yourself, it makes

5:50

no sense whatsoever to buy an expensive

5:52

car for the road. It is dupe.

5:55

It is complete waste of money. And

5:57

then the time and the energy that

5:59

comes into maintaining it, maintaining it. unless

6:01

you've got a staff that can manage

6:03

your portfolio. cars, perhaps a different game

6:06

then, but yeah, it's absolutely, it's absolutely

6:08

an emotional decision to spend more than

6:10

40 grand on a car. So if

6:12

that's what you're doing, fine. We need

6:15

to manage your emotions. The BTC sales

6:17

process often differs from that perspective. But

6:19

in B2B sales, understand their emotions, hear

6:21

them out, help them see the logic,

6:23

and then put the logical next step

6:26

in front of them. And if you

6:28

do that enough times, the eventual logical

6:30

next step will be... Yes, said the

6:32

invoice over, let's get started. That was

6:34

a bit of a bit of a

6:37

rant there Liam, but did that make

6:39

sense? No, I loved it, but I

6:41

do have one objection, but Will, the

6:43

Lambeau is really going to help me

6:45

out with my networking. So, I give

6:48

you an example. Here in Leeds, I

6:50

think it's Yorkshire, there is a surf

6:52

car club, right? Okay, nice. And you

6:54

have to have to have, the minimum

6:56

car to join the club is a

6:59

Porsche 9-11. Nice. So if that is

7:01

your goal, which is not an unreasonable

7:03

goal right to hang out over a

7:05

bunch of local entrepreneurs, you should buy

7:07

the cheapest, crappiest 9-11 you can possibly

7:10

find, and sure you may not have

7:12

status in the group, at least before

7:14

you stop speaking to people, but you're

7:16

in the door. Alternatively, you could do

7:18

what I did, which is by mistake,

7:21

this is why I know this exists,

7:23

because it's kind of like a secret

7:25

club in Yorkshire. I was walking, I

7:27

wasn't walking the dog, I didn't have

7:29

the dog yet, I was just walking

7:32

before, because I worked from home, I

7:34

always worked from home, with seldom.com, I

7:36

always go for a walk in the

7:38

mornings. So I was walking round round

7:40

hay up in Leeds, anyone round here

7:43

would know round hay, and there was

7:45

just like 30 Ferrari parks in a

7:47

car park by the, the, the, the,

7:49

kind of like, green grassland and park

7:51

that we're having round hay. There's like,

7:54

like, like, like, what the heck's going

7:56

on, what the heck's going on, I

7:58

just went on, I just went on,

8:00

I went over, I went over, I

8:03

went over, I went over, I just

8:05

went over and started, I started, I

8:07

started, I started, I started, I started,

8:09

I started, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting,

8:11

starting, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting,

8:14

starting, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting, starting,

8:16

starting, different questions and different things. So

8:18

you don't even have to have the

8:20

car, you can hack the process. So

8:22

yeah, that's how you logically kind of

8:25

get around that. But yeah, I, the

8:27

only, if you, obviously you've been, you're

8:29

joking about, but there is, even with

8:31

social media, like if you have a

8:33

nice car, perhaps a little bit of

8:36

social proof, but the time and energy

8:38

that you've spent on that, if you

8:40

spend on your offer for the product,

8:42

that's probably still better time spent. Obviously

8:44

if you love cars and stuff, buy

8:47

what you want, buy what you can

8:49

afford. but just appreciate it's a complete

8:51

waste of money and it's an emotional

8:53

decision. Coming from someone who's had lots

8:55

of nice fast cars. Yeah, I'm a

8:58

sucker for it as well. Nice, no,

9:00

absolutely. To that I would add, I

9:02

think definitely you want to be able

9:04

to mix the emotional with the logical,

9:06

especially in B2B cells. You do want,

9:09

you do tend to, like you said,

9:11

lead with the emotion and then finalize,

9:13

you know, closing details with more logic,

9:15

ROI, getting the right people involved. One

9:17

thing that has worked for me is

9:20

having the ability to, because the person

9:22

is asking here, how can we tap

9:24

more into the emotional side, right, without

9:26

being manipulative? And for me, there's a

9:28

way of tapping the emotional side in

9:31

a logical way, if that makes sense.

9:33

Now, let me expand on that for

9:35

a second. Let's say, for example, we

9:37

are talking to a CFO and we

9:39

are talking maybe through some of the...

9:42

logical hurdles that they're facing in their

9:44

business right now as we typically do

9:46

in BTB sales. Asking a side effect

9:48

question can be a logical thing to

9:51

ask that is very business appropriate, but

9:53

it is tapping into something emotional about

9:55

the CFO. Asking a question, you know,

9:57

we call these impact questions like curious,

9:59

Mr. CFO, how is this impacting your

10:02

bottom line? Right so we can start

10:04

there and just interweaving brief questions like

10:06

okay, you know some people this may

10:08

be a priority some others not so

10:10

much I'm just curious, how do you

10:13

feel about this? Right, so that's more

10:15

of an emotional question, but I'm weaving

10:17

it in a more logical, practical way.

10:19

It doesn't have to be always like

10:21

some weird, super emotional, like how is

10:24

this going to impact your family type

10:26

of question. You know, those type of

10:28

questions are always super weird. But you

10:30

can do so in a practical, logical

10:32

way still. What do you think? Sure.

10:35

I consider that, like reinforcement of the

10:37

logic. Right. So how does that affect

10:39

your bottom line? It'll make, to put,

10:41

thinking machine, machine, whereas bottom line goes

10:43

up. Okay, great. How does that affect

10:46

whatever it is? It's not, it's almost

10:48

the same question but to build status

10:50

quo on top of, to build more

10:52

weight into the previous question. Because if

10:54

you're especially we dealing with executives, if

10:57

you're dealing with people, could of your...

10:59

you know above the line of the

11:01

of the kind of executive board or

11:03

of the middle management essentially into the

11:05

executive suite they only care about four

11:08

things three things really more money more

11:10

efficiency reduction in legislative risk or legal

11:12

risk that is it so everything is

11:14

good to come back to that but

11:16

what you're describing of once we get

11:19

to that point reinforcing it of how

11:21

would that make you feel which is

11:23

a question you asked that I asked

11:25

all the time which is on the

11:28

right side of you know, you don't

11:30

want to talk about how it's going

11:32

to, unless they're over to, we don't

11:34

want to talk about how it affects

11:36

their family or, you know, it's just,

11:39

it's very weird, very quickly. That can

11:41

come further down the line, right, when

11:43

you know in the person for years

11:45

and, you perhaps have a better understanding

11:47

about them. But I might ask, especially

11:50

with sales people that we work with

11:52

at sales. It's a, well, you could

11:54

ask that to a CFO. they may

11:56

not tell you. They might be pissed

11:58

that you're asking about the salary, but

12:01

you've got to do its... from the

12:03

context of the person that you're engaging

12:05

with. So it's absolutely a probate thing

12:07

to ask a salesperson. And then what

12:09

is your goal? Well, I'm trying to

12:12

get to 500K. Why do you want

12:14

to get to 500K? Because I want

12:16

to, I've got some debt, I'm trying

12:18

to get rid of the debt, and

12:20

I would like to pay off my

12:23

mortgage, so I feel more secure. Oh,

12:25

well, what makes you feel unsecured? Okay

12:27

great so maybe I won't go any

12:29

deeper than that I wouldn't be asking

12:31

of how this is going to affect

12:34

the kids future because again as you

12:36

said you can't start getting a little

12:38

bit weird at a certain point and

12:40

but that reinforcement of yes the goals

12:42

half a million how do we get

12:45

there is it possible and that then

12:47

becomes the next step of the process

12:49

so if I was to draw this

12:51

out it would be logical step reinforcement

12:53

logical step reinforcement So the emotion is

12:56

almost getting piled on top of the

12:58

logic as you go through the process.

13:00

That looks nice. I love that. Next

13:02

question here. I will. I keep hearing

13:04

that top sales people ask a better

13:07

question, but what does that actually mean?

13:09

I ask plenty of questions, but I

13:11

don't always feel like I'm getting to

13:13

the real pain points. How do you

13:16

ask questions in a way that makes

13:18

prospects open up and actually tell you

13:20

what's on their mind? So there are

13:22

good questions and there are bad questions.

13:24

And there are little gray area in

13:27

between. There is pretty binary. Bad question

13:29

is something that you know that they

13:31

know you know that you're asking anyway.

13:33

So are you having success? Or are

13:35

you asking almost any BSP salesperson? Are

13:38

you, well this shouldn't be the case

13:40

but unfortunately is, are you hitting quotes

13:42

right now? Almost everyone's not in quota.

13:44

So there's a dumb question to ask.

13:46

You might add, another bad question might

13:49

be, tell me how long you've been

13:51

in business. You can just go on

13:53

the LinkedIn profile and you can look

13:55

at these questions, right? So immediately all

13:57

them get cold. So now you're 50.

14:00

50% better asking questions like that for

14:02

30, 40 years. Then we've got an

14:04

iceberg effect of good questions, because

14:06

a good question could, and a question

14:08

that could get a deal done, could be

14:10

as simple as, you know, what do you

14:12

need to happen for this to close? It's

14:14

not original. It's been, people have been

14:17

saying questions like that for 30, 40

14:19

years. It's well ingrained, it should be

14:21

well ingrained to most of the people

14:23

listening to this episode, to ask questions

14:25

like that for out of the process.

14:27

you're helping the buyer coach you on what

14:30

they think the solution is and if they know

14:32

what the solution is or they've got strong opinions,

14:34

they're going to tell you if you can deliver

14:36

it and you're like great, I think we can

14:38

help with that. But then you start going down the

14:40

iceberg and then you start to get questions

14:43

that drive curiosity in the individual

14:45

or you've got questions that include

14:47

an insight. So hey, for example,

14:49

Selham.com Academy, we've got our sales code

14:51

assessment, it was public facing, I just

14:53

gobbledbled everyone's data to data to be

14:55

quite frank. 30,000 people have been in

14:57

it, have been through it. So we

14:59

know pretty precisely at this point, the

15:02

traits that make up a high performing

15:04

sales person. So if I was working with

15:06

EP of sales, I could say, okay, great.

15:08

How do you know if the people that

15:10

you are hiring are going to have success?

15:12

And it's a loaded question because I

15:14

know what the answer is. Oh, I'm not

15:16

sure. Okay, well, we've got this assessment.

15:19

Would it make sense if I explain

15:21

the three or four key traits that

15:23

all top professionals have? Yes, please tell

15:25

me? So now we're sharing an insight within

15:28

a question that is obviously a leading

15:30

question to take so on on the

15:32

pathway that we want to take them

15:34

on. So then you get like

15:36

layers upon layers of sophistication with questions,

15:39

but really you should be looking at two

15:41

things. One, is this question going to

15:43

help the buyer move to the next

15:45

step of the sales process? Does it

15:47

make sense to do this? The microclosing

15:50

process that we talk about all the

15:52

time? And then the other question is, the

15:54

other type of questions are questions that make

15:56

the buyers stop and think. So questions

15:59

that make the buyer go... Oh, I hadn't considered

16:01

that before. Well, now you mentioned that.

16:03

I've always wondered how that works. They're

16:05

the other questions that I consider good

16:07

questions and you don't need lots of

16:09

them. One or two per conversation is

16:11

often enough. And that shows the gap

16:13

between where the buyer is, where they

16:15

could be if they work with you

16:18

and that's typically what we need to

16:20

make that sale, right? What the current

16:22

reality is and the future reality when

16:24

I stretch it so far apart, we

16:26

want to breathe a bridge from one

16:28

side to the other. And if we

16:30

have inside a knowledge or industry knowledge

16:32

that they need to make that leap,

16:35

we want to communicate that via a

16:37

question so that we can demonstrate that

16:39

knowledge without telling them that we're the

16:41

best. So no one wants to hear

16:43

that, right? No one wants to engage

16:45

with someone who's broke. Absolutely

16:48

and along that same trail, what

16:50

would you say are the most

16:52

important questions that we, that typically

16:55

bring the best success in these

16:57

types of calls that, just to

16:59

give the people listening at home

17:01

practical questions that they can take

17:03

and ask on the next call.

17:05

Cool, so super basic. What is

17:07

the timeframe for this project? Is

17:09

there a budget for this project?

17:11

The obvious kind of like banned

17:13

questions or meant to pick questions

17:15

or medic questions. There's a gazillion

17:17

acronyms for this, right? Maybe we

17:20

talked about this last week because

17:22

I'm not asking you to remind

17:24

me the word acronym. So yeah,

17:26

maybe I'm slightly more caffeinated today.

17:28

That's the key to find a

17:30

bit quicker. But yeah, they're the

17:32

basics you've got to ask them.

17:34

It's gotta be done. If you

17:36

go into a conversation, if you

17:38

go into conversation three with the

17:40

buyer, the meeting number three or

17:42

four, whatever the mean is, and

17:45

you don't know the timeframes that

17:47

they need to solve this problem

17:49

by, or yeah, because I was

17:51

gonna say, or there is no

17:53

timeframe because you only know that

17:55

as you ask the question, then

17:57

you are terrible at sales. Sorry

17:59

to call you out. as you're listening to

18:01

this show and you're looking for some good

18:03

vibes as you're driving to your

18:06

next meeting and you're wanting to

18:08

be positively reinforced, reinforced. If you're

18:10

not asking the basic qualification questions you

18:12

saw and you need to read a

18:14

book or join our training programme or

18:16

watch one of the many sales experts that

18:18

are on YouTube or all continue listening

18:21

to this podcast. So that's a bit

18:23

tough love for you. Once you pass those

18:25

kind of questions... There's a couple of

18:27

questions I'd like to ask, one of

18:29

which I ask on, almost every single

18:31

call, you should be asking this

18:34

question as well, Liam, when you are

18:36

doing, hosting calls for sales.com

18:38

Academy, when people want to

18:40

join, the question is, what's stopping you

18:42

from doing this yourself? And what

18:45

we're trying to pull out of the buy here,

18:47

or the potential buy is the

18:49

DIY objection, which holds, show me deals

18:51

back, and it is complete, it is

18:53

complete nonsense. could do this

18:55

myself, but, and what we're looking for is the

18:57

but. So we want to, because we want

18:59

to work with capable people. We want

19:02

to work people who probably could sort

19:04

this out themselves eventually. They're the best

19:06

buyers, because they're the ones that are

19:08

going to put in the effort and

19:10

the resources to get the job done. Correct.

19:12

But we want to hear that but,

19:14

but, I don't have the expertise, but

19:16

there is some insider knowledge that you

19:18

specifically have, I can't get from anywhere

19:20

else. Why don't you get that but? then the

19:23

deal at that point, as long as

19:25

everything else falls in line with budget

19:27

time frames, you speak to the right person,

19:29

all that good stuff, then the deal

19:31

is almost done. The buyer has almost

19:34

made a decision then of I can do

19:36

this, which means that they've at

19:38

least considered whether it should be done,

19:40

so they are probably at least

19:42

considering that it should be done,

19:44

which is obviously the first hurdle

19:47

of convincing someone the value of

19:49

the implementation service. They're

19:51

thinking, oh, could do this, but I can't,

19:53

I need help. And that's, I don't know what

19:56

you, Liam, and I think it might also be

19:58

a bit of a bloke thing, but I... have

20:00

a problem asking for help and I've

20:02

had feedback on the podcast in the

20:04

past from different guests saying that I

20:07

should ask for more help but I'm

20:09

I will just sit there like an

20:11

idiot and bang the head against the

20:13

wall trying to solve them problem myself

20:15

but there's lots of people around in

20:18

both the business community the sales community

20:20

and that and you obviously you're part

20:22

of the team now you might see

20:24

this moving forward and so feel free

20:27

to offer to help when your expertise

20:29

are a good fit and I'll probably

20:31

refuse them. And it's not like ego,

20:33

I don't think it's pride, I think

20:35

it's almost like a control freak thing.

20:38

But most people are wired at least

20:40

somewhat like that. So when they admit

20:42

to you, oh yeah, I can't do

20:44

this because I need it done now,

20:47

and rather time, I don't have the

20:49

extra time in my calendar to make

20:51

this happen, then you go, okay, well

20:53

would you like me to help you?

20:55

So now the entire sales process has

20:58

been flipped on its head. You're no

21:00

longer pushing your pitch at someone. You're

21:02

literally just saying to someone who's just

21:04

said that they need a hand, would

21:07

you like me to help? And that's,

21:09

you know, I kind of went down

21:11

the rabbit hole with that question. That's

21:13

one question that I like to ask,

21:16

and I consider that a, it's not

21:18

even particularly sophisticated, but I consider that

21:20

a good question to ask. No, absolutely.

21:22

And, you know, a common pattern that

21:24

I see is these fundamental questions that

21:27

are not too fancy that, you know,

21:29

that get you most of the result

21:31

for, you put that you put in.

21:33

And I love that DIY question because

21:36

there are many times where you have

21:38

a complete evaluation with a client and

21:40

then maybe you go through six meetings,

21:42

you integrate multiple decision makers, and then

21:44

at the end of the call you've

21:47

been running this deal cycle for three

21:49

months and then they say, you know

21:51

what, we're just, we think we're going

21:53

to do it in-house, right? And you

21:56

could have just saved yourself so much

21:58

time if you would have asked that

22:00

that purposeful question that you asked earlier.

22:02

and I don't know the percentage, 80%

22:05

of the time it doesn't work and

22:07

they come back to you three years.

22:09

Yeah, it's a mess. Anyway, so yeah,

22:11

so asking that question up front, allowing

22:13

them to work it out, is it

22:16

possible? And I'm being open to being

22:18

told, no, I don't know if this

22:20

is going to be a good fit,

22:22

because at least you've got the objection

22:25

then, and you can try and deal

22:27

with it, if you choose to. And

22:29

the other thing that we'll just kind

22:31

of wrap this question upon is, and

22:33

I've started doing this more, and I

22:36

feel like it has. So you got

22:38

to build reports, I mean you can't

22:40

do this straight out of the gate,

22:42

and once you build reports on it,

22:45

they say something that's pretty dumb, which,

22:47

you know, we're all talking in real

22:49

time, on this podcast episode itself, I

22:51

probably said something that's pretty dumb, but

22:54

you're unaware of it, because you're saying

22:56

it, right? So you've probably got a

22:58

clip in your mind right now, Liam,

23:00

that we're going to make a YouTube

23:02

video, whereas me saying something dumb and

23:05

then I don't realize that I don't

23:07

realize that I've said something, I've said

23:09

something, I've said something, I've said something,

23:11

I've said something dumb. half-truths, or it's

23:14

a belief as opposed to fact, but

23:16

we present it as fact. When someone

23:18

says something like that, I often just

23:20

said, I've done this again, started it

23:22

more and more often, I just repeat

23:25

it back to them. So they might

23:27

say, oh yeah, you know, I believe

23:29

I can do this myself. I might

23:31

go, you can do this yourself? And

23:34

they go, how I do it myself?

23:36

I'm not sure. And it's the fact

23:38

that the brainer said something. Maybe we

23:40

go into the... left and right hemispheres

23:42

and an experiment they did in the

23:45

70s to kind of outline some of

23:47

this in a second if you think

23:49

it'd be interesting but the it's almost

23:51

like your brain has to hear back

23:54

what it said from a different source

23:56

to really evaluate it and the theory

23:58

behind it and there's not a great

24:00

amount of research on this because it's

24:03

terribly unethical to do but I think

24:05

maybe it was the 60s they had

24:07

a bunch of... Unfortunately, mentally ill people

24:09

who had like bipolar, like severe bipolar,

24:11

and what they did was basically sever

24:14

the two. two hemispheres of the brain.

24:16

They just plucked them apart. So the

24:18

person was still fully functioning, but the

24:20

experiments were to see if the brains

24:23

were, you know, dependent on each other.

24:25

And one of the things they were

24:27

also looking for as well was can

24:29

they remove parts of a brain and

24:31

do those neurons kind of rebuild elsewhere,

24:34

which is true. You can have a

24:36

traumatic brain injury and part of your

24:38

brain can essentially die off. the function

24:40

from that part of the brain can

24:43

be picked up by other parts of

24:45

the brain. Obviously it's very complex. It's

24:47

more complex in practice that I'm outlying

24:49

out there. But one of the experiments

24:52

they did, this experiment is on YouTube.

24:54

It's crazy. They have persons sat with

24:56

a magic board from their nose going

24:58

forward. So which splits both vision on

25:00

both sides and the body parts on

25:03

either side. and they'll have then sworn

25:05

looking forward at them and there's a

25:07

pile of different fruits on the table.

25:09

And they'll say to the person, pick

25:12

your favourite fruit. And each hand will

25:14

pick up a different fruit. Wow. Right?

25:16

It's, I said, well, link in the

25:18

show into this episode. So that suggests

25:20

perhaps, and again, the psychology, there's plenty

25:23

of psychology on this and philosophy. There's

25:25

not a lot of actual data, because

25:27

obviously it's hard. we know now that

25:29

severing people's hemispheres is terrible. It is

25:32

not a medical procedure that leads to

25:34

kind of positive outcomes. So that experiment

25:36

can't really be done anymore. Although those

25:38

experiments can't really be done anymore. But

25:41

what they found was it's almost like

25:43

one hemisphere of your brain is linked

25:45

to speech and language. I think that's

25:47

what we considered the emotional side of

25:49

your brain, the logical side of your

25:52

brain isn't connected with speech and language.

25:54

So it can't, it doesn't have literally

25:56

a voice. And so again when, currently

25:58

going down the rabbit hole here, but

26:01

I. find myself personally and this is

26:03

what the research indicates but isn't kind

26:05

of provable that I almost have

26:07

this at this inner voice going on

26:09

and on for like you didn't do

26:12

this so that was cheap. That's the

26:14

emotional part of you. There's almost

26:16

like another voice at above it

26:19

that observes the emotional voice so

26:21

hopefully this makes sense. People listening

26:23

as well. And so that could

26:25

be the logical side of your

26:28

brain, the logical hemisphere, and it

26:30

could be the emotional hemisphere that

26:32

has the voice that can speak. And so,

26:34

when you, with this questioning technique,

26:37

when someone says something, often

26:39

it's an impulsive response, it

26:41

is something that comes out and it's

26:43

an emotional response of, oh, I don't

26:45

feel good about this or don't like

26:48

the way that works or, however it's

26:50

phrased, when you repeat it back to them.

26:52

Perhaps, and again, we're now definitely

26:54

getting into the realm of pseudoscience

26:57

as I apply kind of

26:59

self-process to this, and perhaps their

27:01

logical brain is hearing it back,

27:03

and then that is then what's

27:06

responding via the emotional brain moving

27:08

forward. And it's the same reason why

27:10

journaling is useful. You get, I find

27:12

I get all my garbage out onto

27:15

the pure. Then when I read it,

27:17

I'm like, well, that's just crazy. That's

27:19

not even the reality that you

27:21

live it. And then my logical brain

27:24

goes, okay, now we can forget about

27:26

that now, because this didn't actually happen,

27:28

or the way that I perceived

27:30

this thing was perhaps incorrect. And

27:32

it's probably, again, now we're definitely in

27:34

the realm of the pseudo science, it's

27:37

probably, it's probably to do with

27:39

the two hemispheres, how they're connected

27:41

to our kind of speech and

27:43

language skills, but all that's kind of

27:45

irrelevant, because practically, I find

27:47

when I repeat back something that is

27:50

a dull statement, people tend to

27:52

then rebut. themselves the dump statement,

27:54

versus if you tell them that

27:56

they're wrong, they'll fight you over it.

27:59

Absolutely. I think this goes

28:01

hand in hand with, I'm sure you've

28:03

read the book by Daniel, I'm gonna

28:05

butcher his last name, Daniel Hineman, but

28:07

it's about thinking fast and slow, right?

28:09

And how we typically have this automatic

28:12

responses that we don't even think about,

28:14

they're unconscious really, that just come out,

28:16

for example. You could be, you know,

28:18

I love the mall analogies. Well, so

28:20

let's say you're in the, you're, you're,

28:23

you're. you're in the mall and you're

28:25

shopping for some clothes and then the

28:27

clerk comes up to you and says

28:29

and you've probably been looking for this

28:31

specific item for the last 17 minutes

28:33

but the person comes up to you

28:36

and they say say they say this

28:38

to me all the time sir can

28:40

we help you and automatically what do

28:42

most people say no I'm good I'm

28:44

just looking even though you've been wandering

28:47

around for the last 23 minutes and

28:49

to tie it back to these powerful

28:51

questions that we need to use during

28:53

our sales calls especially the DIY and

28:55

how you mention echoing these questions or

28:57

these answers to them like, so can

29:00

you do it? Can you do this

29:02

yourself? Yeah, yeah, I can definitely do

29:04

this for myself. And then you kind

29:06

of echoing how you mention. So yeah,

29:08

so you can really do this yourself

29:10

and kind of makes people think and

29:13

go from thinking fast to thinking about

29:15

it a bit slower and we're kind

29:17

of overcoming that automatic response that people

29:19

have. And then they maybe think about

29:21

it and say, you know what? I

29:24

don't know if I could do this

29:26

myself so that kind of reminded me

29:28

of that briefly so I thought that

29:30

was incredibly interesting and I would love

29:32

to see that that link to their

29:34

YouTube channel that today YouTube video about

29:37

that experiment because that was really creepy.

29:39

Do Liam, you're basically the host of

29:41

this show I'm just kind of answering

29:43

the question, I'll answer some of the

29:45

questions, so do you drop me message

29:48

on slack? We're kind of pulling the

29:50

the third wall, the third curtain, however

29:52

to describe it. back here but yeah

29:54

message beyond slack and it'll go in

29:56

there in the show notes because otherwise

29:58

I'll forget because I will as I

30:01

said go off to baby cost in

30:03

in 40 minutes and be changing nappies

30:05

and not be thinking about left and

30:07

right atmospheres. Absolutely. Well, I wanted to

30:09

run something by you. So I came

30:12

across this. So there's a little bit

30:14

of some. So Google, I think I

30:16

brought this up to you the other

30:18

day. We touched on it really briefly,

30:20

but I kind of wanted to run

30:22

this by you on the show, and

30:25

I think it's going to be helpful

30:27

to everybody, especially everybody listening at home.

30:29

And I think this is particular. It

30:31

says a lot about the new buyer's

30:33

journey, right. Right. A little bit of

30:36

research from Google here. It says that,

30:38

so they did, obviously, Google has massive

30:40

amounts of data. So they crunched a

30:42

lot of their data and they came

30:44

up with the 7-Eleven-4 rule. So they

30:46

say here, in the buying journey, comes

30:49

from Google's research on consumer decision making

30:51

and digital marketing. It was first introduced

30:53

as Google's zero moment of truth, blah,

30:55

blah, blah, blah, blah. Okay. But the

30:57

7-114 rule is this. It says that

30:59

in order for a consumer to make

31:02

a purchasing decision, it takes seven interactions

31:04

with a brand, right? Sorry, they need

31:06

to spend seven hours consuming content from

31:08

a brand, and they need to interact

31:10

with that brand 11 times, and they

31:13

need to do it across four different

31:15

platforms before they can make a decision.

31:17

And I think that says a lot

31:19

about the new buyer's journey, the modern.

31:21

buyer's journey and how you know sales

31:23

is slowly becoming more of kind of

31:26

the last step in the buyer's journey

31:28

to make a final purchasing decision. What

31:30

are your thoughts on this data? I

31:32

thought it was very interesting specifically because

31:34

it's coming from Google and didn't you

31:37

know that says legit as it gets.

31:39

What do you think of this 70

31:41

level four rule? It's interesting. You're going

31:43

to be slightly careful in the way

31:45

this is framed right of right? That's

31:47

the average amount of time interactions impressions

31:50

impressions. for the average purchase. Right right

31:52

right. So in the best example a

31:54

guy came around the house the other

31:56

day and the UK would call them

31:58

sugars, charity muggers and he did the

32:01

salesperson like that represents a charity. It's

32:03

not affiliated with the charity anymore than

32:05

that. But the charity was something that

32:07

I have an interest in and I

32:09

don't even mention this on the podcast

32:11

before but sales.com gives a percentage of

32:14

its profit to charity. So don't talk

32:16

about it. I'm not trying to plug

32:18

it right now. But that's the context

32:20

of this conversation of he was like,

32:22

well, okay, do you want to get

32:24

signed up? I was like, I think

32:27

we can potentially work together on something,

32:29

but it won't be me, it'll be

32:31

the business, and so I can't give

32:33

you my card. And obviously he just

32:35

wants to make a commission, right? He

32:38

gets commissioner on everyone, I get signed

32:40

up. So we took me in my

32:42

address, and they never got back to

32:44

me, so I'll reach myself to work.

32:46

But it was an interesting charity to

32:48

help. charity to help homeless people to

32:51

help homeless people to help homeless people

32:53

get back on the people get back

32:55

on the people get back on the

32:57

people get back on their back on

32:59

their back on their feet. It was

33:02

just a novel approach which I was

33:04

like, that's interesting, it's important, and so

33:06

essentially want to be involved. So with

33:08

that said, I'd never heard this charity

33:10

before. This was the first interaction I

33:12

have with the person. They are probably,

33:15

if we do some due diligence on

33:17

the charity, they're likely to get thousands

33:19

and thousands of dollars offers over the

33:21

next 12 months or so. And so

33:23

in which case, the rules of engagement

33:26

of getting a deal of the line

33:28

that... Google outlined completely completely completely broken.

33:30

So if we're talking about complex B2B

33:32

sales, it could be 50 meetings, it

33:34

could be 100 hours, it could be

33:36

whatever it is. So again, back to

33:39

your question a second, but I just

33:41

thought it was important to frame up

33:43

with the context of the context. That's

33:45

an average. But yes, absolutely. I won't

33:47

name him. Chap got signed up to

33:49

you, you know who, you might know

33:52

what I'm talking about as we go

33:54

through this. He's been on the group

33:56

coaching calls recently and he is a

33:58

legend and he is full of passion

34:00

and he's full of energy and he,

34:03

his boss, he was telling me on

34:05

the call before, he booked a call

34:07

with me and then no showed. Then

34:09

he booked another call with me, showed

34:11

up, and he was kind of excited

34:13

to work with me, but then the

34:16

deal didn't happen. And I totally forgot

34:18

about it. And then he was telling

34:20

me before three months later, he booked

34:22

a call for weeks ago and got

34:24

his team signed up, and he's very

34:27

excited. And in the background, he's been

34:29

watching all our content, trying to implement

34:31

it. And the reason you didn't get

34:33

signed up in the first place is

34:35

that the salespersoning hide wasn't a good

34:37

fit. So he wanted to hire another

34:40

salesperson and he wanted to have that

34:42

individual in place before the engaged with

34:44

us. But there's been masses of impressions

34:46

of just my face, your face, the

34:48

content, the kind of the theory, the

34:51

kind of the frameworks that we provide,

34:53

going on behind the scenes that I

34:55

didn't even know what happened. I didn't

34:57

even know what happened. And so it's

34:59

the easiest sale of all time. And

35:01

that's what the Google Research is encouraging

35:04

us to do. It is to have

35:06

multiple touch points across multiple platforms so

35:08

that we can surround our potential customers

35:10

so that we've, and again, with good

35:12

intentions as opposed to just trying to

35:14

bully them into speaking with us, where

35:17

good intentions are trying to help them,

35:19

educate them, inform them, share insights that

35:21

we have that are competitors that don't,

35:23

so that we appear at. kind of

35:25

peer subjectively but hopefully are the experts

35:28

in the space and so that when

35:30

they do want to have a conversation

35:32

and perhaps commit one way or another

35:34

to work with us they want to

35:36

find out a few more things that

35:38

they can only get from call call

35:41

with us and it might be five

35:43

calls because there might be ten people

35:45

that are involved obviously but at that

35:47

point they're so far down the buyer's

35:49

journey and you've done you've created the

35:52

content once you have built that webinar

35:54

or you've been publishing on LinkedIn LinkedIn

35:56

or you've done your cold outreach and

35:58

scaled it over time. you know, maybe

36:00

that person's had four emails from you,

36:02

they've seen 27 of your LinkedIn posts,

36:05

they listen to a podcast that you're

36:07

featured on because you're an expert in

36:09

your field, and where you're trying to

36:12

build, at least build the credibility that

36:14

you're an expert in your field, all of

36:16

that allows the buyer to make a much

36:18

quicker and easier decision further down

36:20

the sales process. And this is happening

36:22

where we like it or not. This, this,

36:24

this, this, this can't be counteracted, to do

36:26

their own research. whether you give them

36:29

all of the information they need, they're

36:31

still going to go and look at other

36:33

sources. And so if you can position

36:35

yourself that you are in all those places

36:37

that they're looking, you've got

36:40

an incredible competitive advantage versus

36:42

everyone else. So I read

36:44

that Google research paper, well I

36:46

read the abstract and the conclusion,

36:49

and the main thing I took it

36:51

from is impressions. My face and that

36:53

salesman logo, right? The red circle, the

36:55

white S in it, just needs to be...

36:57

chuffing plastered all over every platform

36:59

that we can find. I know,

37:01

hopefully it's associated and tied

37:04

with valuable insights or free training or,

37:06

you know, to build that goodwill

37:08

and that trust in that

37:10

reputation that we can deliver on

37:12

our promises. But probably 80% of

37:14

it is just, are you the most recognizable

37:16

brand? You're at least going

37:18

to be in the conversation in the

37:21

runics for the deal, right? And

37:23

your background with Salesforce, I'm sure

37:25

is the same with... with you as well.

37:27

You were probably going up against

37:29

other competitors and saying, oh, we've got

37:32

to speak to sales force. You might

37:34

have been their marketing was terrible, it

37:36

probably was, it was probably really good,

37:38

but it could have been that their

37:40

marketing was terrible, but its sales force.

37:42

So we've got to speak to them. And

37:45

so I'm sure you, I'm assuming this, but

37:47

I'm assuming you leverage a lot of that

37:49

and the brand recognition to kind of get

37:51

deals over the line and book those initial

37:53

means as well, right. Going back to

37:55

what you said earlier about, when you're

37:58

having this impression, you're essentially

38:00

what you're doing. The reason why people

38:02

are watching in the first place is

38:05

because you're providing value. You're solving specific

38:07

problems that they are having, so they're

38:09

consuming your content because you're providing them

38:11

and you're helping them solve specific problems.

38:14

Going back to that example of the

38:16

student example that you mentioned earlier about

38:18

how maybe in the past he was

38:20

not ready to make a decision. But

38:23

he continued watching the content. Now why

38:25

did he continue watching the content? Because

38:27

he was offering value to him. And

38:29

then that value eventually helped him make

38:32

that decision to rebook the call and

38:34

move forward. So yeah, I thought that

38:36

that statistic was really interesting. Wanted to

38:39

run it by you. But yeah, thank

38:41

you so much for kind of expanding

38:43

on that. Take us through that. Next

38:45

question here. Well, we'll have to wrap

38:48

up up with early. I'm conscious of

38:50

time, mate. Okay, no, no, we'll wrap

38:52

up with that. Whenever the question is

38:54

that we're wrapping up now, we'll start

38:57

with next week. But with that, Liam,

38:59

I appreciate you mixing up the format.

39:01

It's supposed to be Q&A show. Now

39:03

you're just poking me with curiosity and

39:06

see how I feel. Because some of

39:08

this is obviously subjective, some of it's

39:10

objective. Yeah, yeah. But I appreciate the

39:12

also mate. That's awesome. No, I just,

39:15

I genuinely thought that was super interesting

39:17

and was super interesting and obviously super

39:19

relevant to sales, the sales process in

39:21

the buyers journey. So no, I thought

39:24

we definitely had to cover it in

39:26

some ways somehow. Nice. More of that

39:28

moving forward. I think that's cool. So

39:30

with that, mates, I appreciate you. Appreciate

39:33

you listening to this episode. And I

39:35

will speak of you again on next

39:37

week's episode of the settlement podcast Q&A.

39:39

And we probably need a better title

39:42

for this as well. Probably. Yeah, we'll,

39:44

we'll, we'll, we'll mix it. We'll find

39:46

something. Then listen closely. After interviewing her

39:48

thousand sales experts on the world most

39:51

downloaded sales podcast with data from over

39:53

14,000 sellers completing our sales code assessment

39:55

I've uncovered a step-by-step sales process that

39:57

works so well that it's a me

40:00

to help over 2,000 sellers beat their

40:02

sales quotas whilst working less hours with

40:04

less overwhelmed and far far less stress.

40:06

I've used the same process myself to

40:09

build our training business to over a

40:11

million dollars in revenue selling many of

40:13

the world's top brands like Salesforce, LinkedIn,

40:16

Microsoft or media sponsorships. So if it

40:18

works for me I know it can

40:20

work for you. In fact, I am

40:22

so confident that we can help you

40:25

find and close more deals in the

40:27

next 30 days. That if you qualify

40:29

to work with us, I guarantee that

40:31

you will find and close more deals

40:34

in the next 30 days or you

40:36

can ask for your money back. It's

40:38

really that simple. I've used the cellomates

40:40

simple method to help over 2,000 sellers

40:43

smash their quotas and have generated over

40:45

262 million in personal bonuses and commissions

40:47

since working with us. I've helped sellers

40:49

like you not just fly past their

40:52

sales quotas but to do it consistently,

40:54

confidently and without feeling old salesy and

40:56

slimy. the selling made simple method works

40:58

fast. It doesn't require you to grind

41:01

out sales activities or make thousands upon

41:03

thousands of boring cold calls. We will

41:05

overhaul and simplify your entire sales process

41:07

from value proposition to creating the reliable

41:10

meeting booking machine to leveraging a closing

41:12

framework that makes you rejection proof. Remember

41:14

we guarantee in writing that if you

41:16

follow our process exactly that you'll find

41:19

in closed more deals in the next

41:21

30 days or your money back. And

41:23

if you don't... I will personally continue

41:25

to work with you for free until

41:28

you do find and close some more

41:30

deals. So head over to salesman.com/call that

41:32

salesman.com/C-A-L-L. Right now on Book a call

41:34

with me personally and we'll see if

41:37

you're a good fit for our process.

41:39

That's right. No weird high-pressure sales team

41:41

or other shenanigans you'll speak with me

41:44

directly. And if I think we can

41:46

help you then I'll explain the process,

41:48

how it works and you can let

41:50

me know if you want to get

41:53

started. So head over to salesmam.com/call right

41:55

now and this is a limited time

41:57

offer so don't miss out.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features