Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Attention, DC, Boston, Toronto
0:03
and any place that can fly to those cities.
0:06
We're gonna be live on stage doing
0:08
our thing again. I'm May fourth,
0:10
fifth, and sixth this year. That's
0:12
right. And I gotta say, we've done this topic a few
0:14
times already and it's a real banger
0:17
and we can't wait to come to your city and have you
0:19
see it with us. We're so excited
0:22
and we just can't hide it. So go to link
0:24
tree slash sysk and
0:26
get your tickets today. Welcome
0:29
to Stuff you Should Know, a production of
0:32
iHeartRadio. Hey,
0:39
and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh and there's
0:41
Chuck and Jerry's here too, in low
0:43
data mode and this is stuff you should know.
0:46
What does that mean? I just got a message
0:48
flashed on my screen that Jerry's in low data
0:50
mode. Oh really, it
0:52
means she's low key. Olivia
0:56
helped us with this one. And you know what Olivia has
0:58
gotten great at lately is titling
1:00
these episodes in fun ways. Yeah, for
1:02
sure, you want to. You want to say this one too, Yeah,
1:04
And it's generally just for us, which I appreciate. But
1:07
this is about dousing aka
1:09
water witching, the practice
1:12
of using sticks
1:14
or metal rods or something to walk
1:16
around and have
1:19
and tell you whether or not there is water underground
1:21
or iron ore or
1:24
body being buried or
1:26
whatever. So we'll get into all that. But Olivia
1:31
titled it the surprisingly long lasting
1:33
art of dousing, and
1:36
I think it's appropriate she called it an art
1:38
because it's definitely not a science, although
1:40
people have tried to apply science to it
1:42
in interesting ways. Yeah, and
1:45
a lot of people say it's pure bunk. I
1:49
just think it's very interesting and I've never known
1:51
much about it. And that's how I'm kind of
1:53
choosing topics these days, is what
1:55
do I want to learn about? You
1:58
know? Sure me
2:00
first, that's right, and through me we
2:02
can be the conduit to others too,
2:05
amazing new ideas
2:08
like dowsing. And actually we shouldn't say this
2:10
is a new idea for us, because this um
2:12
we actually did a chapter in our book, remember I dowsing,
2:15
that's right, And in that chapter
2:17
I went back and reread it and I
2:20
was very satisfied that we
2:22
basically took the stance that
2:24
we're taking today, that you just took that basically.
2:27
You know, some people call it bunk. I don't
2:29
know enough about it to say either way,
2:31
and just to keep our minds open.
2:33
And even though it is
2:36
bunk in a lot of ways, we're not like
2:38
gonna poop poo or tear it down like we did
2:40
crop circles, you
2:43
know. Yeah, I agree.
2:45
Um, it's something that people have been doing for over
2:48
five hundred years and
2:50
and like we said, it's got a bunch of different names,
2:53
but dowsing, basically as
2:55
we think of it today is
2:58
something that started in sixteen century what
3:01
would now be Germany and the
3:03
mining industry there, which was a new thing
3:05
that was really growing fast, and
3:08
they were looking for or underground
3:10
veins of ore. And it looks
3:12
like as early as fifteen thirty there was somebody,
3:15
a mining expert name Yorg Ericola
3:19
who talked about dowsing and divining
3:21
rods in a way that he wasn't like, hey,
3:23
this is what this is like, as if people understood
3:25
what it was right in his book De ray
3:28
Metallica, is that
3:30
really what it was called? Yeah, that's a
3:32
great name. So yeah,
3:35
the Germans are pretty much unambiguously
3:38
the people who created dowsing at
3:40
least in the roughly modern era, and
3:42
it got imported to England pretty quickly
3:45
and France also, So in England
3:48
they were using it for mining, just like they were in
3:50
Germany to discover or but
3:52
France also adopted it and they said, hey, we're
3:54
going to use this for water instead. I
3:57
didn't see where they got that idea from
3:59
or why, but they I
4:01
don't know. There's like supposed references in the Bible
4:04
which may or may not reflect housing. Who
4:06
knows. It's possible that they thought that's
4:08
what it was used for in France.
4:10
I'm not sure. But by the sixteenth
4:13
and early seventeenth century you
4:15
had people a lot of people in Western Europe
4:18
walking around with forked sticks looking
4:20
for ore and water and
4:22
basically being like this, this really works. This is
4:24
how we're going to find water. And back then
4:26
it made a lot of sense because
4:29
there wasn't any other way to find water, so
4:31
why not walk around with a forked stick? Yeah,
4:34
and the idea we'll get into sort
4:36
of how people do it later on, but
4:39
is that you hold a forked stick. Back
4:41
then, at least that was sort of what they were using exclusively,
4:45
and it would dip down when there was something
4:47
underneath you of note, there
4:49
was a man named Robert Boyle, known
4:51
as a father of chemistry in the seventeenth century,
4:54
who described it as a forked hazel
4:56
twig. I believe there were other woods
4:58
used hazel as one. It's kind of mentioned
5:00
a lot. Yeah, what was one of the other ones
5:03
I've seen peach rowan,
5:06
which I am not familiar with
5:08
the rowan tree, but apparently there's plenty
5:10
of them here and they bear fruit, but
5:13
it's a it's like a fruit wood that's supposedly
5:15
really good for it. Um, which hazel is another
5:17
one. And then willow um,
5:20
which makes a lot of sense because willow trees
5:22
tend to grow where there's water near the surface,
5:25
so it would kind of make sense that you would use
5:27
the willow branch. And then you'd turn around
5:30
and point to the willow tree and say down
5:32
there, that's right. And then if
5:34
it's the nineteen fifties through seventies,
5:36
you could switch your child with it.
5:39
It's right. My grandmother, oh, my dear
5:42
sweet, my
5:44
dad's mom opal, she
5:47
would make us go pick out our switch,
5:49
no, which is I think was a tradition. This ouf
5:51
like, go pick out the switch that I'm gonna use, And
5:54
that was the punishment that was the fear, and
5:56
you would you go out there and you pick
5:58
the flimsy twig that you
6:01
could find and come back.
6:03
And then she she never touched us. She didn't.
6:05
Oh that's good, she didn't do that. Similarly,
6:08
when you were really bad, Grandma Opal
6:10
would make you dig your own grave in the backyard,
6:14
really get to you. But she never. Oh
6:19
man, I miss her. She was great, lived
6:21
to one hundred and one. I know, that's
6:24
amazing, not bad. So
6:26
we mentioned other things that you could find underground,
6:28
like dead bodies. This
6:31
happened for a while in the late seventeenth
6:33
centuries. They started getting
6:35
into things like, hey, we could find treasure
6:37
using these y rods. We could find we
6:41
could find the bodies that we were talking about. We could
6:43
find a property boundary
6:45
that no one can agree on. Yeah,
6:47
that one's really out there. Well, and
6:49
that's very like, I mean,
6:52
you better agree on who's doing doing that
6:55
job between two neighborhoods who
6:57
are at dispute with one another. You know, yeah, for sure,
6:59
it's called the best dowser in your area. Let's
7:01
use my guy. He'll show you show us where the property
7:03
line is exactly. But there was
7:05
a French peasant named Jacques Amar,
7:09
who in the latest seventeenth
7:11
century, as the story goes,
7:13
was water dowsing, and
7:16
the rod pointed down very sharply,
7:18
and he said, hey, let's get some guys
7:20
out here, dig down and get this water. And
7:23
before you knew it, they struck body and
7:26
it was a murdered woman. And he
7:28
not only found the body, but then
7:30
went to the widower
7:33
and the family basically and
7:35
said, I'm going to point this thing at you guys, and
7:38
the thing dipped at her former
7:40
husband. He fled the scene
7:43
and was found out to be the murderer. And so
7:45
now all of a sudden, dowsing rods
7:47
are, for a while at least, and
7:50
for this guy, for sure, a way
7:53
to root out
7:55
murderers and dead bodies. So
7:57
much so that in leone Um there
7:59
was a group of like I think,
8:01
a husband and wife who owned a wine shop there who
8:03
were murdered four years later
8:06
after he discovered that first body, and
8:08
they actually contacted jack Amar
8:11
and said, can you come help us find who
8:13
did this? And so he set about
8:15
with his dowsing stick looking. I
8:17
think he actually got into a boat at one point and sailed
8:20
around looking for a murderer,
8:22
rooted one out, he found one in another
8:25
town, and that guy actually
8:27
confessed and then fingered two other
8:29
accomplices who had fled France by
8:31
that time. So you're
8:34
like, well, that guy was very special.
8:36
As far as dowsing goes, there's
8:38
a lot of ways to interpret it to if you're
8:41
going to be a skeptic, where you
8:43
could say, like, this is the sixteenth
8:45
century or seventeenth century in France, and if
8:47
people thought that you were a murderer, it didn't
8:50
matter whether you were a murder or not. You
8:52
were in big trouble, and so
8:54
you might flee France if you got
8:56
worried that people were coming to look for you. Who
8:58
knows, Or you could also believe
9:00
that Jacques amar had some special talent
9:03
or gift that allowed him to douse
9:06
murder suspects, among other things.
9:08
And that's that's actually a point that
9:10
kind of underpins the
9:12
entire dowsing tradition. Most
9:15
dowsers believe that it's
9:17
innate in them,
9:19
maybe innate in everybody, and they're
9:21
just a little more their sense is a little
9:23
more refined, but that it's not like you're picking
9:26
up some magic stick. It's the
9:28
stick is somehow an instrument that
9:30
you're you're special innate
9:32
ability is using to kind of guide
9:34
you. Yeah, and you also forgot the
9:36
last possibility there, which is through
9:39
a rock in the seventeenth century France, and
9:41
you're probably gonna hit two people who murdered
9:43
wine shoff owners. Right, Yeah,
9:45
that's a good point too. Eighteenth
9:48
century dousing was not
9:51
so much a thing for mining anymore in Europe
9:54
because science had improved
9:56
such that they were like, now we've got better,
9:59
better ways to discover or this or under our
10:01
feet. And into the twentieth
10:03
century, we'll get to kind of where it stands
10:05
today later. But of course the Nazis got
10:07
involved because they were into all sorts of weird
10:10
esoteric methods of doing anything, and
10:14
the stupid Nazis and Himmler
10:16
of course said hey, let's look for explosives,
10:18
let's look for water, let's look for
10:20
gold, or just get some
10:23
Nazis out there with dowsing rods and tell me what
10:25
happens. Yeah, apparently they trained whole
10:27
units, because again
10:29
the Nazis were very stupid. And
10:31
then in the twentieth century, chuck, if
10:34
you were educated by
10:36
or employed at Harvard in the nineteen fifties,
10:39
there was a good chance you were going to study dowsing.
10:42
Well, a lot of Harvard people did, weirdly
10:46
sure, but
10:48
I mean, how many really were there out there at the
10:50
time. This is probably a significant people, probably
10:52
like a dozen. So
10:55
yeah, a full third of Harvard
10:57
educated people were studying dowsing
11:00
in the fifties. One guy Raid
11:02
Hyman and another Elizabeth G. Cohen,
11:05
they worked together. They were sociologists from Harvard,
11:07
and they studied dowsing by by
11:09
surveying agricultural extension agents,
11:12
the people who were the conduit
11:17
between education and you
11:19
know, the rural areas, right, So
11:22
these people had a foot in each camp,
11:24
so they were they were a really good group to
11:26
study dowsing or dowsing beliefs.
11:29
They found that every single state
11:31
head dowsers, mostly in the rural areas,
11:34
and that in those rural areas where the dowsers
11:36
were most densely concentrated.
11:39
There was about an average in the United States
11:41
in the nineteen fifties about thirty five dowsers
11:43
per one hundred thousand people. That's
11:46
a huge number of dowsers
11:48
in the twentieth century. Middle twentieth
11:50
century, still working in these rural
11:52
areas. Yeah, I would agree, that's a lot.
11:54
Uh. Yeah. They also did a bunch of, like
11:57
you said, interviews with these agricultural
11:59
agents, and it was basically
12:01
like a little more than half thought it was bunk.
12:05
About twenty percent said they believed in it,
12:07
about twenty four percent said they were open minded
12:09
to it, kind of on the fence. And
12:12
one thing that they discovered that Hymen and
12:15
Elizabeth Cummen discovered was basically
12:18
people it's
12:22
not that they so much believed in dowsing
12:25
as being like this foolproof thing, but
12:28
more like, hey, we can't get
12:30
a lot of guidance on where to find water, and
12:32
like it doesn't cost a lot to hire a dowser,
12:35
so it's better than nothing. If I can pay someone
12:37
in the nineteen fifties like five bucks
12:40
to walk around my field for a good place to drill,
12:42
it's better than zero, right. And it's
12:44
not like they just tapped like todd
12:48
to go out there and like use a stick
12:50
to be like drill here. These
12:52
dowsers that they were employing had some
12:55
sort of success in their track
12:57
record, so yeah, there it
12:59
made it a little easier to be like I'll
13:01
just give this a try, because what else,
13:04
what opportunity? What other alternatives
13:06
do I have? Yeah, there was another
13:08
Harvard or named Ivan zee
13:11
Vacht who did some
13:13
studying of this, and like
13:15
he said, he found that there were certain people who
13:18
just seemingly were more gifted than others at
13:20
it. It was a part time thing. Usually
13:23
people did make some pretty good money doing it, and
13:26
it was almost always something that men did
13:28
and not women. And
13:30
like you mentioned, they they generally
13:33
believed it wasn't like a snake oil thing
13:35
where they were like, let me see how many people I can rip off
13:37
with this stick. Um, they believed
13:39
in what they were doing. It seems like about
13:41
across the board. Yeah, he said, universally
13:44
basically. Um. He so he studied
13:46
specifically Homestead, New Mexico, U
13:49
and he found that Um that
13:52
he well, he basically lumped it in with folk
13:55
magic, which I think is that's
13:57
fair. Um. And he said that that DAL
14:00
is the most commonly used type
14:02
of folk magic and agriculture in these rural
14:05
areas. Like another type would
14:07
be using the zodiac to predict
14:09
when to do certain farming like
14:11
harvesting or planting or something like that.
14:14
But you're more much more likely to find
14:17
find people who were willing to believe in dowsing
14:19
than than that. Yeah, and
14:21
that even educated people believed
14:24
in it in the area. And one
14:27
reason you can kind of give for that is that
14:29
these areas were hard up for water,
14:32
so it kind of I would
14:34
guess that like the lack
14:37
of availability of water
14:40
or at least easy access to it
14:42
would kind of help suspend your disbelief
14:44
more than somebody who you know has
14:47
a municipal water supply running into their
14:49
house, you know. Yeah, yeah, for sure. Speaking
14:53
of VAT, he continued his work into
14:57
the late sixties along with his colleague Linda
14:59
K. Barrett, and they started
15:02
researching Urban Dowsers, which
15:04
is a pretty good band name. Yeah
15:08
it is. What are they? What
15:11
kind of music? I
15:14
know this is your specialty. I'm
15:17
going to just go fall back on the standby
15:19
of math rock. I
15:21
would say Pavement, like maybe a Pavement
15:23
tribute band. Even that's
15:25
kind of what it sounds like to me. But yeah,
15:29
I'm gonna just go with math rock, Okay.
15:32
They study the American Society
15:34
of Dowsers the ASD. They
15:38
were founded in Vermont in the early nineteen
15:40
sixties. I think they're about a thousand strong.
15:43
And these are people that lived, you
15:45
know, these are urban dowsers. They live where they have city water
15:47
systems and plenty of water, and
15:50
they used dowsing for other things,
15:52
sometimes to detect if you had a medical
15:55
problem, sometimes to look
15:57
for something that someone lost. They
16:01
basically argued like, hey, you should be using us
16:03
all over the world where people don't have water,
16:05
Like why is everyone against dousing
16:08
when you should be enlisting us?
16:11
Right, And the ASD still
16:13
survives today. They have multiple chapters all
16:15
over the world. As a matter of fact, even
16:19
though it's the American Society of Dowsers,
16:21
they do have other chapters in
16:23
other countries and they still
16:26
dowse. They still meet, they share
16:28
tips and tricks with one another. I believe
16:30
they have newsletters. So they're
16:33
still around for sure. So
16:36
should should we take a break and then talk about how to
16:38
do it? Definitely? Okay,
16:40
we're gonna take a break, We're gonna get our coat
16:42
hangers out, and we're gonna get going right after this. I've
16:56
still stumped. There's a about
16:58
ten percent of my brain is still working out what
17:00
music urban dowsers play. I'll
17:03
come up with it. I can't that's a that's a
17:05
tough one. So
17:07
I mean, if it were like, if they were clever and
17:09
they wanted to kind of engage in a bit
17:11
of word play, then I would say they're like neo
17:15
country pop, you know what I mean, like
17:17
Billboard chart pop Urban Dowsers,
17:19
like they can their music can be enjoyed in
17:21
the city or the country. You mean, like
17:24
the guys that sing about tailgating and stuff
17:26
like that. Precisely, I
17:29
mean, what you got, Luke Bran
17:32
or Urban Dowsers? Which one you're gonna do?
17:34
I predict Luke Bryan's gonna change his name
17:36
to Urban Dowsers in the next five years. Hey,
17:38
I'm not gonna not Luke Bryan. I
17:41
don't know it's music, but he seems like a good guy from
17:44
what I understand he is. All right,
17:46
So, how did dows you take the Well,
17:49
there's a couple of ways. You can have that y
17:52
shaped rod and
17:54
you hold it by the why
17:56
and have the the single stem pointing
17:59
out with your palms upward, the
18:02
why pointed upward. In fact, that about a
18:04
forty five degree angle. Then you
18:06
walk around and you wait for that thing
18:08
to I guess to move
18:10
in your hands. You will you wait
18:12
for it to make a barrier on your own
18:14
son, and it difts down. Like
18:17
we said, we mentioned the different kind of sticks that were
18:19
used. The kind of dowsing I see a lot
18:22
on YouTube because I did a lot of watching of this
18:24
stuff is the coat hanger.
18:26
One where they take and it's not always coat hangers, but just
18:28
two metal L shaped
18:30
rods and you hold it by the
18:33
small side of the L in each hand
18:35
and walk around and then these rods, you
18:38
know, come together and cross one another at
18:40
a place where you're standing. Right.
18:44
Apparently, the American Society of Dowsers
18:46
says, far and away the most frequent
18:48
tool these days to use for dowsing is the
18:51
pendulum. Yeah, which can be anything
18:53
from a crystal on a piece of hemp string
18:55
to a paper clip on some leftover
18:57
thread or down flossy even who
18:59
knows it doesn't matter because again, remember this
19:02
this is a tool that the human is
19:04
a conduit for. It's not
19:06
like the tool itself is super
19:08
important. Yeah, it's
19:10
just it just kind of points out what the human
19:13
can sense innately. And
19:15
with the pendulum, they basically
19:18
say, if it's swinging forward to backward,
19:20
that's yes meaning okay, there's some water
19:23
here, or it swings from side to side
19:25
for no. And because you
19:27
can get a yes or a no out of
19:29
this pendulum, you can use it for plenty of other
19:31
stuff. In fact, there's something
19:33
called information dowsing, which is essentially
19:36
like fortune telling. You ask
19:38
the dows the dowsing
19:40
rod or dowsing pendulum certain
19:43
questions in the way it responds will give you the
19:45
answer you're looking for. Yeah, it's
19:47
interesting to think. It just kind of hit me today
19:49
that they said that this is usually man, and
19:52
this is sort of the one area there where
19:54
that's true. Like, have you ever
19:56
heard of a of a man that's
19:58
a fortune teller or palm reader? It
20:01
seems like that's usually women, right,
20:04
Yeah, there are plenty of women dowsers these
20:06
days. I think it was just in that fifties
20:08
survey though. Yeah,
20:11
yeah, because I've seen interviews
20:13
with multiple women who are dowsers.
20:16
All right, all right, so that that clears that up.
20:19
We talked about walking across the field
20:21
and stuff. That's sort of what everyone
20:23
usually thinks of when they think of dowsing or
20:25
water witching is something they call it here in
20:27
the States, but there's also map dowsing,
20:30
which that pendulum comes in handy, or
20:33
you might just use like a pencil or something where
20:36
you go to like a map and
20:39
do the same thing to narrow down what field
20:41
you should walk in to find whatever you're
20:43
looking for. The pencil
20:45
one. I think there's a
20:47
writer named Robert Ader who
20:50
wrote a pamphlet that's on the American Society
20:52
of Dowser website where he talks about
20:55
using that pencil to find whatever,
20:57
and you'll hold that pencil over a map, try
21:00
and tune in whatever that means
21:02
to what you're trying to find and
21:05
feel for the location. And he's
21:07
like, listen, I've looked for water on the
21:09
moon with my Moon maps. I've
21:11
looked for the grave side of Bigfoot, and
21:14
I didn't big dig a Bigfoot up,
21:16
but I found a spot on the map where
21:18
there are definitely some large humps
21:21
of earth right
21:23
full stop, so exactly so
21:26
um. Also in that pamphlet,
21:28
Robert he basically
21:30
says like how you ask the question
21:32
and how you word it is really important.
21:35
And he gave an anecdote about when
21:37
he was looking for water on the moon with the map
21:39
of the Moon. He asked the he
21:42
asked the pencil, like, show me where
21:44
water on the moon is, and he said
21:46
the pencil started to float over in
21:48
his hand over, don't be ridiculous
21:50
here over his shoulder and point
21:53
toward the moon behind him out the window, and
21:55
he realized, oh no, I had
21:57
to ask it where on the map?
21:59
Show me on the map where there's water on the moon.
22:01
And then the pencil pointed it out. So I
22:04
feel like here we kind of reached like the point
22:06
between finding water on the moon and finding
22:09
bigfoot graves where most people
22:11
are going to take their leave of dowsing and
22:13
be like this, this doesn't work. But if
22:15
you step back and kind of strip away all the add
22:17
ons and stuff that's been you know,
22:19
put onto it over the years, and just go back to searching
22:23
for oars or water using
22:25
this stuff, um, you
22:27
can kind of not regain
22:30
credibility. That's not the word I'm looking
22:32
for. The phrase. It's more it
22:34
comes it's yes, sure, it's
22:36
at least less loony. How about that? Yeah?
22:39
Did that guy also in the pamphlet say I found
22:41
the Tykondo Rogan number two to be quite
22:44
cheeky. Man,
22:47
that's an arcane pencil reference right
22:49
there. Shout out to David Reese. Yeah,
22:51
he got that all, but he's slapping
22:53
his knee right now. So how
22:56
does this um supposedly work?
22:58
You know, it's not like they're just like, hey,
23:00
this is magic or whatever. There have been
23:02
people that have tried to explain like how
23:05
this might work, and
23:07
some of the explanations, you know, early on were obviously
23:09
some kind of magnetism
23:11
or magnetic field or something that
23:13
people can pick up on on planet
23:16
Earth. There was a
23:19
a German alchemist name Johann Tolde
23:23
who wrote under the pen name Basilius
23:26
Valentius, great name,
23:29
and put out this theory that the metals
23:31
in the earth basically breathe a
23:33
breath that rises out from the earth that attracts
23:36
the rod, and that you
23:39
know, the trembling rod would would shake when
23:41
it hits that breath. Yeah,
23:43
and this is back in the day, right, And the
23:45
German miners of his day were like, we
23:48
think it's just magnetism, right, that's
23:50
a kind of a convoluted theory
23:53
you got there, Valentis. But um, yeah,
23:56
So I feel like there
23:58
have been people over the years who've kind added
24:01
unnecessarily to the mystique. Because
24:03
if you think about it, you're like, Okay, this is
24:05
just magnetism. Somehow we're picking up magnetism.
24:08
That makes sense, that that's logical.
24:10
It doesn't. We don't have any way to explain it.
24:13
But it's a lot better than breath coming up. But
24:15
if you stop and think about it, you know,
24:17
maybe this guy was just basically using a different
24:19
word or a different term, or embellishing on
24:21
the idea of magnetism or something
24:24
like that. And if you kind of read into
24:26
the explanations over
24:28
the years buy dowsers for
24:30
what dowsing is or how it works, you
24:33
kind of get the same premise
24:35
that somehow the person
24:37
is picking up on something that's
24:40
invisible to us, but that person
24:42
can still sense. Yeah. I watched
24:44
this school YouTube. There was this guy. It
24:48
had one hundred and eighty five thousand music. I don't know
24:50
if he even said his name, but he's a YouTube
24:52
dowser guy who came on to kind
24:55
of talk about it, and he just he had a very nice demeanor.
24:57
He had this big beard and he was just sort of like, listen,
25:00
this coat hanger isn't magic. I'm
25:02
not magic, he said. I just believe
25:04
that there are certain people who can sense
25:08
voids in the earth
25:10
under their feet, and some people are
25:12
better at this than others. Other
25:15
people have pointed to like certain animals that could
25:17
do this. I know that, of course he's are all anecdotal,
25:19
but like mister ed, like, hey,
25:24
put peanut butter in that guy's teeth and he'll say anything you
25:26
want. Or but
25:28
like you know, animals like mules plowing
25:30
fields would there are anecdotal
25:33
stories of them like stopping at places and
25:35
like refusing to sort of walk over an area
25:37
that later turns out there was something
25:39
buried underground that would have like harmed the plow or
25:41
something like that. To say, but
25:44
this YouTuber was he was a good guy and he
25:46
was just like, listen, you believe it or not. I'm
25:48
not saying you should go do this stuff or you should
25:50
believe it, but this is just
25:52
what I feel like people, there are certain
25:54
people who can sense avoid in the earth.
25:57
I was waiting for you initially to say
25:59
where he was saying, like the
26:01
rod's not magic. I'm not magic, my
26:04
beard, that's magic. No.
26:08
He turned out to be fairly sensible, And
26:11
this is something I remember from childhood though from
26:14
church, is that Christians have
26:16
long sort of had this. You know, it's kind
26:18
of the dark arts in a way, and
26:20
so anytime it's something in that realm, Christians
26:22
are going to be very much like, no, no, no, I
26:25
don't remember specifically what it was, but I
26:27
have some vague recollection
26:29
from my childhood of hearing
26:32
about water witching
26:34
and someone saying I
26:37
don't know who it was, but someone in my life could have been someone
26:39
at church and in my family even saying like no,
26:41
no, no, that's like, that's like, you
26:43
know, black magic basically, right,
26:45
exactly, call it folk magic, call
26:47
it whatever it's. It's still not
26:50
it's still not God performing a miracle.
26:52
It's you exactly yet, and therefore it's
26:54
blasphemous and demonic and the devils somehow
26:57
involved. We just know it. I'm
26:59
sure it's you, just priest's fault to
27:01
some degree. That's that same
27:04
impulse, So we don't understand it, so
27:06
it must be demonic. The irony here
27:08
is that what they're afraid of and don't understand
27:10
probably doesn't even exist. It's not even necessarily
27:13
real. So they're afraid of chance
27:15
happenings, of people
27:17
just randomly getting something right once
27:19
in a while. Yeah, Martin
27:22
Luther apparently was not a big fan of dowsing.
27:24
That doesn't surprise me. And there was a guy
27:27
named Johann Gottfried Ziedler. He
27:29
wrote a book that was basically like, Hey, these
27:32
people are tapping into something called the world spirit,
27:35
and if you tap into that, man, you can
27:37
find out anything you want, like whether
27:39
somebody who died went to heaven or hell. You're
27:41
not supposed to know that, you're not God. He's
27:45
keep away from dowsing. Essentially, what Zidler's
27:48
message was, Yeah, I'm sure there was a lot of Christian
27:50
pushback on that guy. So
27:55
as as science kind of progressed people,
27:57
there's a really long tradition of people trying
28:00
to apply science to explaining
28:03
dowsing UM. And I
28:05
say we take our second break and come
28:07
back and get into some of those because there,
28:10
this is where it gets super fascinating to me. Let's
28:12
do it all
28:24
right. So we were going to talk a little bit about
28:26
the beginnings of UM, sort
28:29
of the modern take on things, and
28:31
uh, well, I guess this is less modern because this
28:33
is the seven late seventeen hundreds. But in
28:36
sixteen ninety three there was a French priest and a
28:38
doctor of divinity named
28:41
Ley Lorraine de Valmont. Great
28:43
book, great name, but not a
28:46
good hotel name at all. He really attract
28:48
attention to you. I think it's a great book, great
28:50
name. I wrote a book about um
28:52
Amar. Remember Amar who found the I
28:55
think the murderer Jacques Amar
28:57
the probably the most famous dowser of all time.
29:00
I think, Well, did he have a one hundred and eighty five
29:02
thousand views on YouTube? Would?
29:06
He would? He was quite a showman. So
29:09
he wrote a book when he basically wrote
29:11
about Amar success where he claimed that certain
29:13
particles um arose
29:16
from water underground, from treasure,
29:19
from a dead body, let's say, and
29:21
they would enter the body through the pores and
29:24
that some people, like this YouTube dowser
29:26
said, were just particularly sensitive
29:29
and that seems to be the sort of the refrain that,
29:31
like he said earlier, some people just
29:34
claimed to be more sensitive to this either
29:37
magnetic field or these this
29:40
energy coming out from the ground or these voids
29:42
in the earth, right um. And
29:45
this is about where science starts
29:48
to kind of try to be applied to explaining
29:51
dowsing. And that Dave Almont
29:55
termed these particles lays at tombs
29:57
because Robert Boyle, the father of chemistry,
29:59
had already identified
30:02
that they're probably something called
30:04
adams in the world and that
30:07
they are just out and about.
30:09
And so what low Lorraine de Almont
30:12
was saying was that we're some people are sensitive
30:14
to those last homes, and that
30:16
kind of kicked off that tradition of like, oh, there's
30:18
this new science. Let's figure out how it applies
30:20
to dowsing, right, or
30:22
hey, let's I believe In
30:25
the nineteen hundreds there were French priests that
30:27
practice what they called radiaesthesia, which
30:30
was let's use dousing to detect a
30:32
radiation a various kind. Let's find
30:34
it to diagnosed disease.
30:38
And this, you know this again is when
30:40
it veers away from like water and iron
30:42
ore or something right to a little
30:44
more of the hokey
30:47
pokey. But again, radiation had
30:49
just been discovered, and in no time, three French
30:51
priests are applying it, saying like, that's really
30:53
detecting. That explains it.
30:56
Some other people have said, oh, it's electricity.
30:58
Some people say yeah, it actually is radiation, or it
31:00
is magnetism or something like that, and then
31:03
you've got the other camp that's like, no, it's esp or
31:05
these people are conduits for God
31:08
or something like that. Um, what was
31:10
the thing you found that I in reply sent
31:12
you a picture of Professor Frank. I
31:15
don't remember where I saw that, but it was a
31:17
really neat explanation of it. Um.
31:20
So it was basically saying that we
31:22
have, like our cells
31:24
are capable of accepting electricity
31:27
or some sort of charge or whatever, and that
31:30
that ores in water
31:33
emanate things that can charge
31:35
those cells, and that that's kind of how
31:37
we pick it up. Okay, it's
31:40
I mean, it's just another way of putting it. It's just again,
31:43
we know about cells. We know that cells currency
31:46
is electricity or that they can
31:48
transmit electricity. So therefore
31:51
maybe those that were on a cellular
31:53
level, some people are picking it up. And that's what dowsing
31:55
is. It's it's that same tradition. Now
31:57
we understand something a little more about the universe's
32:00
figure out how it applies to dowsing. Right, perhaps
32:02
it is the when in terms of human bodies, it
32:04
is the soul. Perhaps
32:08
you know, maybe that's dowsing is the is
32:10
the window to the soul. I
32:12
thought the eyes were Nope, that's wrong.
32:14
It's dowsing as
32:17
far as modern science goes. And
32:19
this is something that you reminded
32:21
me that we talked about in our Wigia Boards
32:23
episode, is that people
32:26
were doing this with
32:28
their hands with something that's
32:30
called idiomotor movements, which
32:33
is your muscles are twitching
32:35
because of some kind of subconscious
32:37
mental activity that's going on. Yes,
32:41
and that ties into that last explanation
32:43
I was mentioning about the cells and the electricity.
32:45
They were basically saying like, yeah,
32:48
that's totally correct. The ideomotor
32:50
movements are triggered by the emanations
32:52
from the ground that enter your cells
32:55
and trigger your muscle movement unconscious
32:57
to you. Yeah,
33:00
someone may be good at finding water because
33:02
they've spent a lot of time in a particular
33:05
area finding water, and there they
33:07
have this subconscious thing to
33:09
where they're picking up on the vegetation or the
33:11
way the ground is and they don't
33:13
realize it. So then they'll stop at
33:15
a place that their body is saying, here is water, and
33:18
it's translating to that idiomotor
33:20
movement making the rod dip. Right.
33:23
That's one explanation, right, that
33:26
they have some sort of what's called non conscious
33:29
intelligence. Okay,
33:32
Um. The other explanation I was saying. Is
33:34
like they were saying, No, the
33:36
water or the ore itself is putting
33:38
something up from the ground that's triggering
33:40
your muscles to engage
33:43
in the idiomotor movement. So they're
33:45
both saying, yes, there's idiomotor movement. The
33:47
dows or the people the person holding the
33:49
dowsing rod is causing
33:52
these movements without being aware of it.
33:54
But the different explanations of why is
33:57
that either the person is noticing some vegetation
33:59
that they're out of where they have linked to water
34:02
unconsciously, right, or the other
34:04
one is that the water itself
34:06
is emanating something that's triggering
34:08
that idea motor movement in the person.
34:11
It's a little more than potato potato that there's
34:13
a pretty big difference between those two, even
34:15
though they share the majority of the explanation
34:18
in common. No, I agree, they're quite
34:20
different. I mean, if you're out there
34:22
screaming at your phone, guys,
34:26
there's water under the ground all over
34:28
the place, So anyone can take a couple
34:30
of coat hangers and dig down twelve
34:33
feet and find water. Probably the
34:35
YouTuber acknowledges this and says,
34:38
yeah, there's water all over the place. He
34:40
said, but some places are better to get
34:42
water than others because you don't just go dig
34:44
a well anywhere on your property.
34:47
You try and home in on a place that has got
34:50
you know, better water, more readily
34:52
available to pool and where
34:54
you can get it easier. That's why
34:56
people bring in geologists. That's why people bring in
34:58
dowsers. They have done experiments
35:02
where I think BBC
35:04
Science Focus reported on them, where
35:06
they did like randomized experiments
35:09
with water pipes underground, they
35:11
found that dowsers had no success at finding the
35:13
water. There have been other
35:15
experiments under control conditions where
35:18
they find that dowsers don't do any better
35:20
at finding water than chance would.
35:23
Our old buddy James Randy offered
35:26
a million dollars to anyone that could prove it. That
35:29
has not gone claimed to my knowledge,
35:32
No, and not
35:34
just proved that, but proved like any real paranormal
35:37
ability. Proving dowsing would have probably
35:39
won that prize for sure. Yeah.
35:41
The thing is is um if
35:44
you're a if you're a dowser, if you're a geologist,
35:46
you poop poo dowsing. If you're
35:48
a dowser, you probably poopoo
35:50
geology. And if you're involved
35:53
in excavating um wells,
35:56
you probably poop poo both um. There
35:59
was a there was a guy interviewed
36:01
in an Aon article that Olivia
36:04
turned up written by Lois Parshley,
36:06
to where the guy this guy whose job it
36:08
was was to excavate wells in California.
36:12
As part of his job
36:15
it was to hire either a geologist or
36:17
a dowser or both, and
36:19
he was saying, neither one's particularly
36:22
good at at reliably
36:24
finding a good water source.
36:27
They're both used different techniques, but neither
36:29
one's you know, dead on. So it's not
36:32
like in this guy's mind, geology is
36:34
just supplanted dowsing in rural water
36:36
thirsty areas because
36:40
the geologists you pay a
36:42
lot more for a geologist and
36:44
then they may or may not turn up water,
36:46
whereas the dowser you pay I think
36:49
I saw about a tenth of what you pay a geologist
36:51
for a day, and they may
36:53
or may not turn up water. So it
36:56
just kind of makes sense in that rural
36:58
area, like, hey, if neither one's
37:00
going to reliably turn up water, but there's a
37:03
chance either one will, I'm
37:05
gonna go with the person who charges away.
37:09
There was also the case of this science blogger
37:11
from the UK, Sally Lapage, who
37:14
was having a water pipe installed, and
37:18
I believe the UK
37:20
company, the water company sent
37:22
out at dowser and Sally
37:25
was like, wait a minute, what
37:27
is going on here? Like what century
37:30
are we living in? And the UK
37:32
water company kind of shrugged and Lapage
37:35
did a little investigating and found that ten out
37:37
of twelve water companies in the UK
37:41
use water dowsing, and
37:43
one of them, I believe, the one that did her parents' house
37:45
said in a tweet a we found
37:47
that some of the older methods are just as
37:50
effective as the new ones. We also use
37:52
drones and satellites. But
37:54
you know, a little
37:56
bit of money spent toward dowsing is no
37:58
big deal, whereas a lot of other people were
38:00
like, you shouldn't be spending any of our money
38:03
on this. Yeah, because again
38:05
it's pseudoscience, right, So
38:09
yeah, you can understand how people would be upset about
38:12
that, and then at the same time it really
38:14
kind of undermines a lot of geologists
38:17
work. If water companies are using dowsers
38:19
still too, I have a question.
38:22
I'm naive. I don't know a lot about machinery.
38:26
Isn't there some kind of machine that can
38:29
look into the earth and find good water
38:31
pretty easily. I
38:33
would guess that there is as well, but I
38:35
don't necessarily think so, because
38:38
if I wouldn't geologists just be employing
38:40
that, And if so, why would they have a reputation
38:43
for not being able to find water
38:45
very reliably? I mean, the answer is
38:47
there can't be otherwise of course they'd
38:49
be using that, But like, I don't
38:51
know, it seems like some kind of seis mcgrab
38:54
and someone a lot smarter than me is going
38:56
to explain why, which I that's what I
38:58
love doing about the show. Someone's going to explain to me and
39:00
we'll read it on the air. I would guess,
39:02
though, Chuck at this point, So that really
39:04
cool tool where you put a shotgun shell in
39:06
and it stamps the earth and then it
39:09
gets an image back on radar or something. Yeah,
39:11
that's what I'm talking about, right. Those things are awesome,
39:14
but I think they only go so deep, and you're
39:16
probably looking for water much deeper
39:18
than that. That would be my guess. Like
39:20
if I was watching a movie and it was about
39:23
one part of it had a family trying to
39:25
dig a well and they called up
39:27
some guy, well, wells are us
39:29
came out and like just planted
39:32
some funky machine down on the earth
39:34
and and he said,
39:36
this thing's gonna it's on wheels, and it's gonna drive
39:38
around this acre of property and tell you exactly
39:40
where the water is. I would totally believe that's a thing. Sure
39:43
I would too. And in the
39:45
exact same way people
39:48
who hire dowsers and watch somebody walk
39:50
around their property with the stick believe what
39:52
they see too. Probably wouldn't be a very good movie,
39:54
but that is a huge, huge area
39:56
for improvement from what I can tell researching
39:59
this. Unless somehow dousing community has
40:01
managed to completely science silence
40:03
the geological community as
40:07
far as like water finding goes, I
40:09
don't. It just seems like the geologists
40:12
aren't like, of course we can find
40:14
water, and here's how. I just haven't
40:16
really seen it that where
40:18
there's like this reliable way to find
40:21
water. Yeah, I just don't understand
40:24
it. So if you're a geologist who
40:26
finds water, we would love to hear how
40:29
you do what you do and how reliable it
40:31
is. Yeah,
40:34
one more thing, chuck, before we go. In
40:36
that AEON article, there
40:39
was mention of a study that was
40:42
done at the University of British Columbia
40:44
by a psychologist named Helene Gaucho
40:48
and she is the one who
40:50
seems to have turned up that idea of non
40:52
conscious intelligence where people
40:55
using a Wuiji board we're
40:58
actually better at ants in
41:00
questions. They got more questions right when
41:02
they were using a Wuigi board than when they weren't
41:04
using a Wuiji board, which is really
41:06
really weird. And so Gaucheou explained
41:09
it by saying, like, we might
41:11
have some type of intelligence
41:14
or intellect or memory that
41:16
we can't access consciously, but
41:18
if we kind of put
41:21
the power of answering
41:24
off onto something else, like a Wuiji board,
41:26
were able to access it because I guess
41:28
we get our conscious mind out of the way
41:31
a little bit. And that kind
41:33
of was applied to this idea of dowsers
41:35
that these people, like you said, could
41:37
recognize vegetation in
41:40
the wild. There's certain kinds of rocks
41:42
that suggested there's water somewhere, and
41:44
they didn't realize that they've done
41:46
this, that they've made that connection, but it's still there.
41:49
It's non conscious intelligence, and when
41:51
they're holding those dowsing rods, they're
41:54
able to kind of put the power of explaining
41:56
into the dowsing rod and access that
41:58
nonconscious intel diligence, and that that's
42:01
how they'd turn up water when
42:03
they managed to turn up water. Interesting.
42:05
I thought that was pretty interesting too. Well,
42:08
I certainly don't have everything figured out, so who knows?
42:10
Who knows? Well,
42:13
if you're a member of the geological community,
42:16
let us know how you find water and how reliable
42:18
it is. We'd love to hear that. And since I
42:20
spoke to the geological community directly,
42:22
that means, of course it's time for listener mail. I'm
42:27
going to call this overdue read. This came in at the
42:29
end of last year, and this
42:31
is from Emily Kenyon and
42:34
the UK okay specifically
42:37
in England specifically,
42:39
and I know I'll always get these shires
42:41
mispronounced, but Leicestershire.
42:45
This is apparently we have gotten Emily
42:47
going on a lot of fun things because of our show.
42:49
I want to say thanks for all the excellent work. Let you know that
42:52
your podcast has I'm sure we'll continue
42:54
to make subtle and positive impacts on my life.
42:57
And Emily listened to some highlights and
42:59
now have an active post up here composting episode.
43:03
Very nice we now regularly
43:05
have breakfast for tea as I
43:07
wanted every breakfast you discussed in that episode,
43:10
but as we don't breakfast together as a family to
43:12
solve the problem. Okay,
43:14
okay. I asked for the book
43:17
Radium Girls by Kate Moore for Christmas from
43:19
the Dial Painters episode and
43:22
I've just finished it. It was stunning, rage
43:25
inducing, and inspiring all at once, and I just ordered
43:27
a copy for a friend. Very nice. I'm
43:30
planning on making the water Shed fried Chicken
43:32
recipe this week off the back of the
43:34
Fried Chicken episode. Nice. That's
43:36
gonna knock your socks off. And my
43:39
house has never been cleaner and my garden more
43:41
well kept since I found you guys
43:43
during Lockdown. You made pottering around
43:46
a joy, learning and chuckling at the same time,
43:49
although I'm with Chuck on the economic stuff, which
43:51
is to say, I guess no. Thank you, thanks
43:55
again for all these positive impacts on my life, and Happy
43:57
New Year to you guys and the team from Emily
44:00
Emily Kenyon. Thanks a lot, Emily.
44:02
That's fantastic. I'm glad we could have some positive
44:04
effects on your life. That
44:07
was very nice. Chuck, good good selection. It's
44:09
good. If you want to be like Emily and let
44:11
us know how we've impacted your life, hopefully for
44:14
the better, you can send us an email. It's stuff
44:16
podcast at iHeartRadio dot com. Stuff
44:21
you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.
44:23
For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit
44:26
the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
44:28
or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More