Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:30
Save big money on your
0:32
next bathroom upgrade. Now at
0:34
Menards. Check out our great
0:36
selection of shower heads from
0:38
Waterpick. They have innovative sleek
0:40
designs with power pulse, therapeutic
0:42
massage for your comfort. Enjoy
0:44
a better shower experience today
0:46
with Waterpick. Get a sick
0:48
spray handheld showerhead on sale
0:50
now through April 6th. Plus
0:52
check out our weekly flyer
0:54
on menards.com for all the
0:56
great deals big money at
0:58
the nards Hi, it's
1:00
Lauren Smith here, the producer of the
1:02
Brendan O'Neill show. I just want to
1:05
let you all know that Spike's internship
1:07
program is now open for applications. We're
1:09
looking for an aspiring journalist to join
1:11
our team on a six-month paid full-time
1:13
placement. You'd be working with us at
1:16
the Spike Office in London, helping us
1:18
with all our output, including articles, blogs,
1:20
videos and podcasts like this one. You
1:22
don't need any prior experience to apply.
1:24
But if you have worked in journalism
1:26
before, or you know your way around
1:29
video, audio and social media management, then
1:31
do make this clear in your application.
1:33
Above all we're looking for someone who
1:35
has a passion for our pro- freedom
1:37
freedom, pro- freedom. who's got a good
1:40
eye for a story and a flare
1:42
for journalism. Everything else you can learn
1:44
on the job. I started at Spike
1:46
as an intern so I can highly
1:48
recommend applying for this. It's an amazing
1:50
experience and you get to earn while
1:53
doing something you love. There really is
1:55
nowhere better to kick start your career
1:57
in journalism. To find out more into
1:59
apply go to spike-online.com/intern. You have until
2:01
Sunday the 23rd of February
2:04
to apply. Good luck. And
2:06
the whole narrative that, you
2:08
know, we're in... sort of economic
2:10
decline where the EU is sort
2:13
of sailing off confidently without us.
2:15
Of course that relies on us
2:17
not looking too closely at what's
2:20
going on across the channel. We've
2:22
got Germany now sort of reintroducing
2:24
border controls. Hungary is built of
2:27
Donald Trump-style razor-wire fence on its
2:29
southern border to keep out the
2:31
migrants. Europe seems stuck in this
2:34
sort of pretty suicidal energy policy
2:36
where it's putting net zero.
2:38
above all economic considerations and
2:41
is sort of happy to
2:43
lose its manufacturing industries and
2:45
sort of impoverish its people
2:48
as a result. Hello, welcome
2:50
back to the Brendan O'Neill show
2:52
with me, Brendan O'Neill, and my
2:55
special guest this week, Ross, welcome
2:57
to the show. Hello, Brendan. It's
2:59
great to have you back on and
3:01
we need to talk about your new
3:04
book. Your new book is called Far
3:06
From E. Eutopia. why Europe is failing
3:08
and how Britain could do better. The
3:10
thing I really like about this book
3:12
is like a kind of hand-grenade of
3:14
facts thrown into the discussion about
3:16
post-Brexit Britain and post-Brexit Europe in
3:19
fact. And it really kind of
3:21
explodes some of the narrative we've
3:23
been told, especially from certain sections
3:25
of the media, which is that after
3:28
Brexit, Britain became the sick man of
3:30
Europe, we became poorer. crazier, more hateful,
3:32
less democratic, whereas Europe carried on being
3:35
wonderful and lovely. And your book says,
3:37
that's not quite true, that's not really
3:39
what has happened. So let's get into
3:42
the meat of some of that, but
3:44
I guess I want to start off by asking
3:46
you why you thought it was important
3:48
to challenge that narrative. What was it
3:50
that compelled you? I mean, you've obviously
3:52
been following this for some time, like
3:54
lots of other people, but what compelled
3:56
you to think, right, I've got to
3:59
sit down and actually tackle Are
14:11
you looking for a Columbus car dealership
14:14
built on tradition and trust? Biers Auto
14:16
has been family-owned and operated since 1897,
14:18
evolving from horse-drawn carriages to the horsepower
14:21
of today's leading vehicles. We're known for
14:23
our new cars, but we also offer
14:25
an... Are
14:44
you looking for a Columbus car dealership
14:46
built on tradition and trust? Biers Auto
14:49
has been family-owned and operated since 1897,
14:51
evolving from horse-drawn carriages to the horsepower
14:53
of today's leading vehicles. We're known for
14:56
our new cars, but we also offer
14:58
an... that
20:05
plays in, I guess being an
20:07
albatross around the neck of this
20:10
institution. And you give a couple
20:12
of examples where the EU seems,
20:14
often seems very reluctant to embrace
20:16
new technologies or new ideas and
20:18
has this instinct to over-regulate them
20:20
or to be very wary of
20:23
them. You give the example of
20:25
genetic modification, genetically modified food stuffs, which
20:27
the EU was... scared off for a
20:29
very long time and you give the
20:31
more current example of AI and artificial
20:33
intelligence which the EU seems to be
20:35
wary off as well whereas other parts
20:38
of the world are kind of pushing
20:40
forward with this new technology. What do
20:42
you think motors that you refer to
20:44
as regulating to death? What do
20:46
you think motors that and how
20:49
damaging is that for the European
20:51
Union and its member states? I
20:53
think the EU takes a sort
20:55
of heritage approach to industry. It
20:58
looks at an industry in Europe
21:00
and the jobs and surrounds it
21:02
and thinks, first thing, this has
21:05
to be preserved and defended against
21:07
competition from abroad and competition from
21:09
things which are new. And, you
21:11
know, the US, where economic growth
21:14
has been sort of twice that
21:16
of Europe for the past 25
21:18
years, you know, has taken a
21:20
very different approach. It's of embraces
21:23
new things, and if that kills
21:25
off the old industries, well, so
21:27
be it. That's just what happens.
21:29
But genetically modified crops
21:32
as a prime example of
21:34
this, because 25 years ago,
21:36
and Britain in particular... you
21:38
know, were very well placed to take
21:40
a lead in that then emerging industry.
21:43
And it was effectively killed
21:45
off by EU regulations, which
21:47
made carrying out field trials
21:49
virtually impossible. So the industry
21:51
left, it went to the
21:53
United States, went to the
21:55
Far East, went to South
21:57
America's where a lot of
21:59
the... field trials and someone were
22:01
carried out. But at the same
22:04
time, you know, this was all
22:06
done, sort of supposedly in the
22:08
name of consumers, food safety for
22:11
consumers. But in the event, we've
22:13
ended up eating GM foods anyway,
22:15
because, you know, if you want
22:18
to buy Sawyer, and Sawyer's a
22:20
sort of product which is used,
22:22
particularly in vegetarian foods, I have
22:25
to say, well, you cannot buy
22:27
non-GM food sort of on the
22:29
non-GM Sawyer on the global markets,
22:31
because it's just all mixed together
22:34
as one commodities, commodities. So Europeans
22:36
often unknowingly consume. It's genetically modified
22:38
foods anyway. And they don't grow
22:41
extra eaters and develop cancer as
22:43
a result. The other scare stories
22:45
we were told at the time.
22:48
But what has resulted from that,
22:50
we've just lost an industry which
22:52
we could have been enriching us.
22:54
Similar thing went on with fracking.
22:57
didn't quite outlaw it but it
22:59
made it very very difficult to
23:01
conduct fracking in Europe with the
23:04
result now is we are we
23:06
are absolutely reliant on fracked gas
23:08
from the US which we're importing
23:11
in refrigerated ships liquefied natural gas
23:13
which has helped save our economies
23:15
you know, following the Ukraine war
23:17
when the gas taps were turned
23:20
off from Russia. So again, you
23:22
know, we're consuming shale gas, frat
23:24
gas. So we can't claim to
23:27
be sort of environmentally pure in
23:29
that respect, but we're just not
23:31
making money from it. And, you
23:34
know, our balance of payments as
23:36
a result is, you know, not
23:38
helped by importing a commodity which
23:41
we could be producing ourselves. And,
23:43
you know, there's so many things
23:45
like that which Europe has sort
23:47
of sought to smother and US
23:50
has embraced. And as you say,
23:52
AI is the sort of... big
23:54
battleground that Europe is currently fighting
23:57
through it sort of how to
23:59
regulate AI and again you know
24:01
it's taking this very very precautionist
24:04
approach which you know it's smothering
24:06
its smothering innovation. In relation to
24:08
Brexit Britain then because I think
24:10
your description of the European Union's
24:13
regulatory system is very well put
24:15
it's very well put in the
24:17
book as well. What do you
24:20
think explains Brexit, Britain's failure thus
24:22
far to make the most of
24:24
the fact that it has escaped
24:27
that smothering as you refer to
24:29
it? Because you talk in the
24:31
book, you quote Larry Elliot from
24:33
The Guardian who makes the point
24:36
that our economic performance since Brexit
24:38
has been mediocre, but it hasn't
24:40
been the full-on horror show that
24:43
was promised by the kind of
24:45
mystic megs of the think tank
24:47
world. You go on to say
24:50
that... It hasn't been a disaster.
24:52
Brexit Britain is not going down
24:54
the toilet economically, but we haven't
24:56
made the most of the opportunities
24:59
that Brexit might present to us.
25:01
And escaping from some of that
25:03
regulatory system is a good example
25:06
of something that we might make
25:08
more off, you know, that liberation
25:10
from a pretty sclerosis economic and
25:13
regulatory system. Why do you think
25:15
that is? I mean, partly, I
25:17
presume it's because we currently live
25:20
under a pretty depressing... ambitionless labour
25:22
government but across the political class
25:24
there doesn't seem to be that
25:26
hunger to remake Britain in a
25:29
new direction following our leaving of
25:31
the EU. What do you think
25:33
explains that failure? Well I mean
25:36
it's always the case that the
25:38
negative consequences of Brexit, the greater
25:40
friction in trade and so on
25:43
would come up front immediately when
25:45
we left. Whereas the... potential benefits
25:47
of Brexit would come in the
25:49
longer run and even then they
25:52
would only come if we had
25:54
a government which was prepared to
25:56
take advantage of its freedoms. And
25:59
you're right, we don't have. We've
26:01
had a conservative government. Now we've
26:03
got a labor government. And neither
26:06
have really shown much inclination to
26:08
seize advantage. There are a few
26:10
things. We've had trade deals with
26:12
Australia and New Zealand. We've also
26:15
joined the trans-Pacific. partnership with free
26:17
trade area which are you know
26:19
based around Pacific rim countries but
26:22
there's no reason why Britain shouldn't
26:24
join as well and what we
26:26
have joined. We've also made it
26:29
a little easier for gene editing
26:31
technology which is the sort of
26:33
the onward development of genetic modification
26:36
if you like is the sort
26:38
of new new version of that
26:40
science but you know that's probably
26:42
about all, you know, we haven't
26:45
deregulated. On the contrary, in some
26:47
ways, we've gone further than the
26:49
EU in its regulation, and the
26:52
zero emission vehicle mandate is a
26:54
prime example of that. I'm, you
26:56
know, that insists that 28% of
26:59
cars sold this year are pure
27:01
electric, and that rises to 80%
27:03
by 2030. Well, I mean, if
27:05
we were in the EU, and
27:08
that's the regulation, by the way
27:10
which was blamed for, um... Stelantis,
27:12
the parent company of Vauxhall, announcing
27:15
the closure of the Luton factory
27:17
in December. But, you know, if
27:19
we're still in the EU, we
27:22
wouldn't be under that system. We
27:24
would be under a slightly more
27:26
relaxed timetable of turning to electric
27:28
cars. So, you know, in some
27:31
ways, we've, our governments have actually
27:33
loaded extra regulation on which we
27:35
wouldn't have had if we're in
27:38
the EU. And that's sort of
27:40
really quite... bizarre given that you
27:42
know one of the prime reasons
27:45
for leaving was to escape the
27:47
over regulation and of energy policy
27:49
generally we're stuck in this um
27:51
you know a you framework You
27:54
know, another little example, if you
27:56
buy and sell a house, you've
27:58
got to have a thing called
28:01
an energy performance certificate. It's a
28:03
complete fast because they're complete guess
28:05
work and you can get two
28:08
properties. well no you get two
28:10
EPCs done on the same property
28:12
and you get a very different
28:15
result because they're not really telling
28:17
you how energy efficient of property
28:19
is it is just sort of
28:21
based on some assumptions and so
28:24
on which which are often incorrect
28:26
now we could quite easily now
28:28
do away with the EPC regime
28:31
it was introduced on you know
28:33
as a condition of EU directive
28:35
we could now abolish it but
28:38
we don't and I don't understand
28:40
why we can't go through all
28:42
these you know regulations one by
28:44
one and sort of rip them
28:47
up as we go along. The
28:49
last government did sort of, you
28:51
know, announce a bonfire of EU-era
28:54
regulations, but then it sort of
28:56
pulled back on it. COVID was
28:58
partly to blame, I suppose, in
29:01
the sense that 2020 Boris Johnson
29:03
and his government were probably all
29:05
primed to seize the initiative and
29:07
take advantage of our departure from
29:10
the EU. And then within weeks,
29:12
of course, we were sort of
29:14
in the middle of this... crisis
29:17
once in a century pandemic and
29:19
I suppose that stole the initiative
29:21
but even so we're you know
29:24
we're five years on now and
29:26
there's no reason why we shouldn't
29:28
be taking advantage of we just
29:31
have not had a government which
29:33
is minded to do so and
29:35
it seems that perversely big state
29:37
big government high public spending, high
29:40
regulations, that sort of perversely come
29:42
into fashion a little more since
29:44
we've left the EU. So it'll
29:47
be a while yet I think
29:49
before we have a government which
29:51
is actually prepared to take advantage
29:54
of. Brexit. Yeah and that's really
29:56
interesting and I wonder if you
29:58
think it speaks to I guess
30:00
the underlying issue with EU membership
30:03
to begin with in my view
30:05
as someone who's who's been Eurosceptic
30:07
for a very long time which
30:10
is that in some ways it
30:12
was you know that outsourcing that
30:14
all the member states partake in
30:17
the outsourcing of you know authority
30:19
to Brussels in relation to regulation
30:21
or freedom of movement questions or
30:23
custom issues or even certain forms
30:26
of lawmaking you know states have
30:28
been have quite happily outsourced authority
30:30
on some of those matters to
30:33
European commissioners do you think that
30:35
speaks that really sprung from a
30:37
sense of decay within individual states
30:40
themselves so I guess the question
30:42
I'm asking is where would you
30:44
put the emphasis? Is it that
30:46
the European Union was a kind
30:49
of... a huge burden on our
30:51
shoulders and it wasn't until we
30:53
wriggle free of it that we'd
30:56
be able to do what we
30:58
wanted to do? Or is it
31:00
that the EU became a kind
31:03
of excuse for a British political
31:05
class and a British state that
31:07
didn't really want to do much
31:10
of that stuff anyway and had
31:12
lacked spark for some time both
31:14
economically and politically? So how would
31:16
you put the emphasis in relation
31:19
to the role that the EU
31:21
plays for individual states? Well,
31:23
it depends what sort of individual
31:26
state you are. Of course, you
31:28
know, if you were an Eastern
31:31
European country, just free of the
31:33
yoke of communism, then the EU
31:35
offered a quick route to the...
31:38
the world of capitalism free trade
31:40
and so on if you're a
31:42
southern European country the EU provided
31:45
a source of funds for investment
31:47
and you know for many years
31:50
Spain and Portugal Greece and so
31:52
on did very well from the
31:54
transfer of money from northern European
31:57
countries but I think there never
31:59
was really any obvious reason why
32:01
Britain should have wanted to be
32:04
part of a free trade area
32:06
certainly and we were prior to
32:08
the being in the EU of
32:11
course we were in the European
32:13
free trade area which was a
32:16
rival group of countries at the
32:18
time who were proposing free trade
32:20
but without the you know political
32:23
you know the political aspects of
32:25
it and I think no government
32:27
ever really came to the terms
32:30
with the idea of surrendering sovereignty
32:32
no UK government that is and
32:34
you know it came to a
32:37
head numerous times during our membership
32:39
and but I think it's left
32:42
its imprint in that you know
32:44
having been subject to these external
32:46
imposition of rules for 46 years
32:49
we then we find it very
32:51
hard to you know go our
32:53
own way and you know I
32:56
think in the minds of the
32:58
sort of British civil servants, you
33:01
know, we've never really left the
33:03
EU and they still want to
33:05
be within the sphere of influence
33:08
of its regulations, which is sort
33:10
of why we don't really get
33:12
anywhere. Let's face it, hunger hits
33:15
hard. But at Charlie's cheese steaks
33:17
and wings, we're here to keep
33:19
your appetite in check. With sizzling
33:22
hot cheese steaks fresh off the
33:24
grill, crispy saucy wings that pack
33:27
a punch. and fries that are,
33:29
let's be honest, downright delicious. Charlie's
33:31
will crush your cravings in style.
33:34
Stop in Charlie's or order on
33:36
the Charlie's Rewards app to score
33:38
rewards while you feast. Charlie's cheese
33:41
steaks and wings, always fresh and
33:43
packed full of flavor. We've been
33:45
dreaming about a perfect kitchen, but
33:48
where do we even start? The
33:50
Creative Kitchen Company. We're your complete
33:53
design. Find Build Company for custom
33:55
kitchens and bathrooms. From initial planning
33:57
to installation, we'll help you realize
34:00
your vision. And no surprise fees
34:02
are endless upselling? Never. We provide
34:04
realistic upfront costs and clear communication
34:07
through our mobile app so you
34:09
can track every detail. Don't just
34:12
settle for any kitchen or bathroom.
34:14
Call us today at 6149713448 for
34:16
a free and home consultation or
34:19
visit the Creative kitchenco.com.com. At Audi
34:21
Columbus we have the perfect luxury
34:23
vehicle for you. Our award-winning service
34:26
ensures a premium experience when buying
34:28
or maintaining your car. The car
34:30
buying process is entirely digital, whether
34:33
you're buying online or in store.
34:35
Right now get a 2025 Audi
34:38
A3 lease for 379 a month
34:40
for 36 months with 3,725 down.
34:42
Located by the airport you can
34:45
easily drop by or visit Audi
34:47
columbus.com. Discover the services sets us
34:49
apart. Come see why it's better
34:52
to buy at buyers. Yeah,
34:54
I agree. I think that's well
34:57
put. In the book, you say
34:59
that Europe is at risk of
35:01
becoming a backwater. In fact, it's
35:03
become a backwater. And you talk
35:06
about how if you want to
35:08
see economic dynamism, you've got to
35:10
look to the United States or
35:12
to parts of Asia, if you
35:15
want to see cultural and educational
35:17
excellence, you've got to look to
35:19
Southeast Asia and Australia, other parts
35:21
of the southern hemisphere. whereas Europe
35:24
is kind of lingering behind on
35:26
those incredibly important things but then
35:28
I guess the point people would
35:31
have made in the past is
35:33
that well at least Europe has
35:35
got great culture and great history
35:37
and wonderful cities and an attachment
35:40
to the ideals of freedom and
35:42
democracy but in the book almost
35:44
chapter by chapter you kind of
35:46
pick apart some of those myths
35:49
that Europe is still a shining
35:51
beacon of those kinds of values
35:53
and that kind of culture. And
35:55
I did want to ask you
35:58
about some of that because sometimes
36:00
the Remainer argument enters, you know,
36:02
the zone of fairy tales, the
36:04
way in which they talk about...
36:07
about the European Union as this
36:09
kind of, you know, the apex
36:11
of culture and civilization and democracy,
36:14
and none of which is particularly
36:16
true. And I did want to
36:18
ask you about the racism and
36:20
crime issue in particular, because that's
36:23
one thing we were told about
36:25
Brexit Britain, that it would become
36:27
a hate crime, hellhole, there would
36:29
be a general destabilization, things would
36:32
go horribly wrong. But if you
36:34
look across the channel at Europe...
36:36
They have a worse racism problem
36:38
than ours by most polling accounts.
36:41
Crime is worsening in some countries,
36:43
even in Sweden, where gang crime
36:45
is spinning ever so slightly out
36:47
of control. Sweden haven't previously been
36:50
the kind of social democratic dream
36:52
of guardian columnists. What is the
36:54
situation like in Europe in relation
36:57
to, I guess, general social peace?
36:59
I mean, things do seem to
37:01
be unraveling in some countries there.
37:03
Well they are I mean we've
37:06
seen I mean go back a
37:08
year and you remember there's a
37:10
great protest by farmers and sort
37:12
of Brussels ministries being besieged by
37:15
tractors and so on and what
37:17
I found remarkable there was that
37:19
French farmers in particular when they
37:21
started sort of putting roadblocks on
37:24
motorways is they were objecting to
37:26
food imports from Spain and from
37:28
Italy. And nothing if you look
37:30
at those, what a poll that
37:33
is quoted in the book I
37:35
forget who carried it out, but
37:37
just to simply ask people whether
37:40
they were prepared to eat foreign
37:42
food or not. And Britain came
37:44
sort of... top of the list
37:46
of European countries. We were very
37:49
happy to eat our food from
37:51
imported food from other countries. Whereas
37:53
Italy, I think, particular was worse.
37:55
You know, few Italians, it seemed,
37:58
were prepared to eat tomatoes which
38:00
were grown outside of Italy. You
38:02
see this of, you know, the
38:04
single market has been held up.
38:07
this great symbol of civilisation where
38:09
culture of products, produce and people
38:11
are shared from one country to
38:13
another, you've got free movement and
38:16
everything. And you know it seems
38:18
that large numbers of Europeans that
38:20
actually believe that. They feel frightened
38:23
of the idea of buying products
38:25
from other countries. Free movements, another
38:27
issue of course, you know, another
38:29
great... cornerstone of European civilization we're
38:32
told. The idea that you can
38:34
go and live and work in
38:36
another country if you feel like
38:38
it. But I mean look what's
38:41
happened since... Brexit, you know, we've
38:43
got Germany now sort of reintroducing
38:45
border controls quite against the spirit
38:47
of the Schengen agreement. We've got
38:50
Hungary's built Donald Trump-style razor-wire fence
38:52
on its southern border to keep
38:54
out the migrants. We've got, you
38:56
know, Spanish towns sort of rising
38:59
up against tourism, tourists go home
39:01
and all those sort of slogans
39:03
we're getting. You know, Europe is
39:06
not exactly, it's bousing those, those,
39:08
civilised values that we told are
39:10
peculiar to EU membership. And I
39:12
don't think we have many people
39:15
in Britain sort of waving pitch
39:17
forks at tourists. We're very happy
39:19
to import our food even if
39:21
we're not a part of the
39:24
EU and so on. So, you
39:26
know, I think Britain in some
39:28
ways actually is more a keeper
39:30
of the sort of civilised values
39:33
that we told peculiar to EU
39:35
membership. while many European countries sort
39:37
of fall short on these ideals
39:39
in many ways. Yeah, absolutely. And
39:42
in relation to the questions of
39:44
freedom and democracy, which are questions
39:46
I take very seriously indeed, we
39:49
are often told that modern Europe,
39:51
post-war Europe as these kind of
39:53
Europe-wide institutions have been... growing and
39:55
then they kind of formed into
39:58
the EU, we're often told that
40:00
they embody those values in particular.
40:02
From the ashes of the horrors
40:04
of Nazism, Europe created this kind
40:07
of citadel of liberal ideals and
40:09
democratic ideals and you talk in
40:11
your book about how that is
40:13
not quite true. One of the
40:16
main reasons I have been a
40:18
long-term Eurosceptic is because of Europe's
40:20
attitude towards democracy in particular the
40:22
way in which it quite cavalierly
40:25
will brush aside votes that it
40:27
doesn't like, for example, when the
40:29
Irish voted against the Nies Treaty
40:32
and then against the Lisbon Treaty,
40:34
when Greek people have voted for
40:36
governments that the Europe disapproves of.
40:38
I mean, there are various examples
40:41
where the European Union has wielded
40:43
its power almost to punish national
40:45
populations for voting in a way
40:47
that it doesn't like. And in
40:50
your book you talk about the
40:52
example of the law and justice
40:54
party. In Poland, they were in
40:56
power until the end of 2023,
40:59
I think, and the EU was
41:01
quite fond of wrapping their knuckles
41:03
and telling them that there were
41:05
certain laws that they had to
41:08
pass and certain laws that they
41:10
shouldn't pass. There are numerous examples
41:12
of that happening in the EU
41:15
over the past few years, and
41:17
it really gives the lie, doesn't
41:19
it, to this notion that the
41:21
European Union is this... happy clappy
41:24
protector of democracy when even within
41:26
its own boundaries it actually often
41:28
behaves in a quite undemocratic way.
41:30
Yeah, if you want to understand
41:33
the difference between the European approach
41:35
to democracy and the American approach
41:37
to democracy, I recommend going and
41:39
reading the UN Universal Declaration of
41:42
Human Rights and compare it with
41:44
the European Convention on Human Rights.
41:46
The two documents, quite similar in
41:48
many ways, which were drafted around
41:51
about the same time, late 40s,
41:53
early 50s, but the first of
41:55
them, the UN document. was heavily
41:58
influenced by American lawyers and the
42:00
European document of course was drawn
42:02
up by British and other European
42:04
lawyers and there's one phrase which
42:07
appears in the UN document which
42:09
appears absolutely nowhere in the European
42:11
document and that is government shall
42:13
be by the will of the
42:16
people and ever since the foundation
42:18
of the EU and prior to
42:20
that the EU and prior to
42:22
that the European recovery from Second
42:25
World War if you like through
42:27
such things as the European Convention
42:29
on Human Rights. That's all, the
42:31
basic difference is that the Europeans
42:34
were sort of frightened of democracy
42:36
because they looked at what happened
42:38
in Nazi Germany and they said
42:41
well look this is what democracy
42:43
gives us and they started to
42:45
construct institutions which would protect against
42:47
against people power too much, which
42:50
would sort of put this accordant
42:52
sanitary around governments and institutions to
42:54
stop them being influenced by populist
42:56
movements. And Americans have never seen
42:59
the need to do that. There's
43:01
a much greater trust in the
43:03
will of the people. And it
43:05
really does explain, you know, why
43:08
we've ended up with this. democratic
43:10
deficit in Europe which you know
43:12
is much less evident in the
43:14
United States and you know the
43:17
examples you gave you know a
43:19
very good the EU doesn't trust
43:21
you know if a country votes
43:24
against a referendum which it wants
43:26
them to vote for you know
43:28
they'll go and ask them to
43:30
vote again sorry that was the
43:33
wrong result you know have another
43:35
go have another try you know
43:37
like a teacher giving a kid
43:39
a sort of tell him go
43:42
and do your homework again and
43:44
you know that is why we
43:46
ended up with a referendum with
43:48
us and the campaign to leave
43:51
with the slogan take control because
43:53
that absolutely summed up the problem
43:55
of EU membership was that the
43:57
democratic deficit was you know was
44:00
removing the will of people from
44:02
from government. I think you know
44:04
it's long been my view that
44:07
the institutions of the EU are
44:09
primarily designed to insulate decision-making from
44:11
publics. rather than to really open
44:13
up democracy in a new or
44:16
interesting way. And I think the
44:18
European Commission in particular sums up
44:20
that process of kind of insulating
44:22
political life from pesky people really
44:25
is what that's about. Just a
44:27
couple more questions for you Ross.
44:29
I wanted to ask you about
44:31
whether you think the EU's days
44:34
might be numbered or it's years
44:36
numbered rather because it's not going
44:38
to collapse any time soon. But
44:40
it does seem to me that
44:43
there's a contradictory process going on
44:45
at the moment. So on the
44:47
one hand, there has been what
44:49
is sometimes referred to as a
44:52
vibe shift. There is now a
44:54
growing interest in the idea of
44:56
sovereignty and protecting our borders, as
44:59
you've said, countries in Europe are
45:01
taking measures to ring fence themselves
45:03
from out of control immigration and
45:05
food imports or whatever else it
45:08
might be. And we see this
45:10
reflected in... political life. Lots of
45:12
ordinary people, for example, are very
45:14
keen that Britain gets control of
45:17
its borders and in America they
45:19
want control of the southern border.
45:21
There is this renewed belief that
45:23
a sovereign state should have to
45:26
protect the right to protect its
45:28
sovereign territory. And that's happening in
45:30
Europe too, but at the same
45:32
time there is a reluctance even
45:35
among some of the populist parties
45:37
in Europe, even with marine lopen
45:39
and Maloney in Italy and other
45:42
organizations, they... are very good at
45:44
criticizing the EU but there is
45:46
a reluctance to really break away
45:48
from it in the way that
45:51
we in the UK did. What
45:53
do you think explains that kind
45:55
of contradiction? process and what do
45:57
you think will win out? Will
46:00
eventually, will the renewed belief in
46:02
sovereign independence win out against the
46:04
kind of globalist instincts of the
46:06
European Union? Yeah it is very
46:09
interesting the way with the sort
46:11
of national front as it was,
46:13
national rally as it is now
46:15
and the you know the AFD
46:18
in Germany for example and freedom
46:20
party in the Netherlands they all
46:22
began or they went through phrases
46:25
of being very very anti-Europe was
46:27
standing for advocating leaving the EU
46:29
and sort of one by one
46:31
they to sort of soften and
46:34
then drop that stance and I
46:36
think one of the factors is
46:38
that, you know, I think their
46:40
strategy now is to sort of
46:43
change the EU and rather than
46:45
to simply leave it and to
46:47
sort of seize the initiative to,
46:49
you know, in the way we've
46:52
seen over the Schengen Agreement, for
46:54
example, the way that, you know,
46:56
it's supposed to mean open borders,
46:58
but it turns out that countries
47:01
can, if they fancy, actually override
47:03
it, and the sort of national
47:05
concerns, nation states are a little
47:08
more powerful than often we were
47:10
perhaps led to believe they were
47:12
during the Brexit debate. And, you
47:14
know, I've often thought, and this
47:17
is one of the reasons why
47:19
I... voted remain in the end.
47:21
I mean it was about sort
47:23
of 50-50 for me. I was
47:26
one of those few, but sometimes
47:28
the only person in Britain who
47:30
thought there were good arguments on
47:32
both sides. But I mean one
47:35
reason as I ended up voting
47:37
remain was I thought well actually
47:39
some of these things we can
47:41
achieve without going through the turmoil
47:44
of leaving the EU and without
47:46
leaving, losing some of the nice
47:48
things like free movement, you know,
47:51
the right to go and live
47:53
in another country, was that, you
47:55
know, you looked at, say, Ireland,
47:57
which managed to have a 12.5%
48:00
corporation tax rate in spite of
48:02
being in the EU and the
48:04
way that some countries are managing
48:06
to keep their migration levels very
48:09
low illegal migration. rates very low,
48:11
hungry for example, hardly takes any
48:13
illegal migrants, and they're still members
48:15
of the EU. And, you know,
48:18
I think it was perhaps sort
48:20
of underestimated during the Brexit campaign,
48:22
the Leave campaign, that actually some
48:24
of the things that we wanted
48:27
to achieve... by getting out the
48:29
clutches of the EU, we might
48:31
be able to achieve actually without
48:34
leaving the EU. And I think
48:36
over time since Brexit, countries have
48:38
become a lot more muscular in
48:40
standing up to the EU, whether
48:43
it's the Law and Justice Party
48:45
in Poland, whether it's... German government
48:47
reintroducing border controls and so on.
48:49
There is now a much stronger
48:52
approach to dealing with the EU
48:54
and not allowing it sort of
48:56
stretches and directives to wholly to
48:58
dictate what individual countries do. And
49:01
I mean it was always the
49:03
case of course that Britain took
49:05
a lot of these directives a
49:07
lot more literally than some other
49:10
countries did. But I think... the
49:12
EU's probably not going to implode
49:14
in the way that I think
49:17
some of us thought it might
49:19
do in the immediate wake of
49:21
Brexit but I do think it's
49:23
going to weaken it's going to
49:26
continue to weaken and you know
49:28
in the end we might even
49:30
end up with a sort of
49:32
EU which we were happy to
49:35
be part of you know if
49:37
it were to be returned to
49:39
the free trade area that we
49:41
thought that many people hoped it
49:44
would be and nothing else then
49:46
probably something that we would rejoin
49:48
but that's going to happen any
49:50
time soon not for a generation
49:53
at least. Okay Ross my last
49:55
question for you is about I
49:57
guess the elephant in the room
50:00
whose name is Donald Trump and
50:02
I want to ask you what
50:04
impact you think the pretty tumultuous
50:06
events in the United States might
50:09
have on I guess Brexit Britain
50:11
and also Europe and it's you
50:13
know just watching what's happening this
50:15
week you know with a kind
50:18
of bonfire of the bureaucracy that
50:20
is taking place in the US
50:22
and seems to me almost like
50:24
the kind of slightly ruthless dismantling
50:27
of an entire ruling class ideology,
50:29
everything from DEI to net zero
50:31
to border issues, everything that has
50:33
been a kind of fashionable belief
50:36
of the Western elites for the
50:38
past two or three decades has
50:40
just been put to the fire.
50:43
And it's fascinating to watch and
50:45
I wonder what impact you think
50:47
that might make, there's obviously quaking
50:49
in Brussels over the prospect of
50:52
a Trump ruled America, there's lots
50:54
of concern. Do you think a
50:56
Trumpist, the United States will have
50:58
a positive or negative impact on
51:01
Europe and on the problems that
51:03
you outlined so well in the
51:05
book? Well it's going to deepen
51:07
the gulf between the US and
51:10
the EU way of doing things.
51:12
particularly on the energy issue. You
51:14
know, Europe seems stuck in this
51:16
pretty suicidal energy policy where it's
51:19
of putting net zero against all
51:21
above all economic considerations and is
51:23
sort of happy to lose its
51:26
manufacturing industries and sort of impoverish
51:28
its people as a result. Well,
51:30
America was never going to do
51:32
that but and even during the
51:35
Biden years it. followed a very
51:37
aggressive policy of national energy security
51:39
through the exploitation of fossil fuels.
51:41
Well, you know, that's going to
51:44
become even more evident now, isn't
51:46
it? Energy is already, you know,
51:48
about a quarter of the price
51:50
in US as it is for
51:53
industrial users in Britain. Well, that
51:55
goal is going to increase and
51:57
that is going to benefit. on
51:59
the US relative to Europe. As
52:02
for trade, now that's something which
52:04
you... we're going to have to
52:06
wait and see a bit because
52:09
Trump obviously does fire from the
52:11
hip on these kind of issues
52:13
and last time he threatened tariffs
52:15
and global trade wars and so
52:18
on but within months he was
52:20
sitting in a G8 summit proposing
52:22
why don't we go to zero
52:24
tariffs everywhere and he puts up
52:27
these sort of things as opening
52:29
negotiating positions and I suspect he
52:31
doesn't really intend to impose those
52:34
very high tariff rates. he's advocating
52:36
at the moment. If he did,
52:38
it would be, you know, very
52:41
dark time for the world as
52:43
a whole because trade barriers always
52:46
make people poorer ultimately. But, you
52:48
know, if he's more sensible, we
52:50
will have a bit of competition
52:53
between EU and the US, we
52:55
will have a sort of a...
52:58
germishes on the trade front, but
53:00
I don't think we will probably
53:02
have an all-out trade war. So
53:04
in that sense, and I hope
53:06
I'm right in saying so, there
53:08
won't be a huge consequence of
53:11
the Trump presidency. Ross, thank
53:13
you very much. Thank you.
53:29
Thank you for listening to
53:31
the Brendan O'Neill Show. We'll
53:33
be back with another guest and
53:36
more discussion. Don't forget
53:38
to subscribe and in
53:40
the meantime keep reading
53:42
spiked at www. spiked
53:44
hyphen online.com. Imagine
53:46
Imagine the kitchen of your dreams. It's
53:49
a call away at the Creative Kitchen
53:51
Company. We specialize in designing stunning kitchens
53:53
that are not only functional but perfect
53:55
for hosting. We completely transform your kitchen
53:57
to fit how you live and entertain. From
53:59
beautiful kitchen islands to clever storage solutions.
54:01
They make every meal in gathering a
54:04
special experience. Let them bring your vision
54:06
to life. The Creative Kitchen
54:08
Company. Visit the Creative
54:10
kitchenco.com or call us
54:13
at 614-971-3448 for a
54:15
free in-home consultation. Imagine
54:47
the kitchen of your dreams. It's
54:49
a call away at the Creative
54:51
Kitchen Company. We specialize in designing
54:53
stunning kitchens that are not only
54:56
functional, but perfect for hosting. We
54:58
completely transform your kitchen to fit
55:00
how you live and entertain. From
55:02
Beautiful Kitchen Islands to Clever Storage
55:04
Solutions. They make every meal in
55:06
gathering a special experience. Let them
55:08
bring your vision to life. The
55:10
Creative Kitchen Company. Visit the Creative
55:12
Kitchen co.com. Or call us at
55:14
614.971 3448 for a free in-home
55:17
consultation. consultation.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More