Where is the ‘Je suis Salman’ movement?, with Mick Hume

Where is the ‘Je suis Salman’ movement?, with Mick Hume

Released Thursday, 18th August 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Where is the ‘Je suis Salman’ movement?, with Mick Hume

Where is the ‘Je suis Salman’ movement?, with Mick Hume

Where is the ‘Je suis Salman’ movement?, with Mick Hume

Where is the ‘Je suis Salman’ movement?, with Mick Hume

Thursday, 18th August 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

bridgestone tires strolled into

0:02

midas and if you roll in, we've

0:04

got an exclusive deal for you get

0:06

$70 back and bridgestone rebates

0:09

plus a $50 reward card with paid

0:11

installation tires at its dot com

0:21

with each following instant the support for

0:23

free speech gets less than less mean where is the just

0:26

, salmond a movement where's the demonstrations

0:28

in new york or paris or london about

0:30

that know what so the

0:33

support for for get

0:35

weaker the cowardice comes more

0:37

obvious every one of these incidents and i think that

0:39

it's basically a bigger and bigger and brighter

0:41

and brighter green light to anybody who wants

0:43

to have a go if you say oh

0:46

i see what critics are free speech do each day

0:48

words of violence than you

0:50

know using violence against worth it comes

0:54

to

0:59

hello welcome back to the brendan o'neill

1:01

so with me brendan o'neill and

1:03

my special guest this week making

1:05

make welcome to the show thank you for having me

1:07

brendan our pleasure and i want to go on

1:09

for a long time and it's

1:12

grimly timely to have you on

1:14

now given what's happened over

1:16

the past two days or months

1:18

salty about the rusty affair and the

1:20

rusty attack and about

1:23

an issue that use been writing on

1:25

for decades now which is

1:27

freedom of speech and the right to ascend

1:30

which you been writing about in spite and before

1:32

that in living marxism numerous

1:34

other publications and of course and your books

1:37

on freedom of speech that me i'm freedom

1:39

of the press and then you'll book trigger warning

1:42

is the same of being offensive killing

1:44

free speech which salman rushdie himself

1:46

described as an incredibly important defense

1:49

of freedom of speech so there's

1:51

a lot for us to dig into dig think on this

1:54

a grim development in

1:56

development in rusty affair but i want to start

1:58

off by asking you what the whole

2:00

when you heard the news last friday

2:03

that rusty had been stabbed in new

2:05

york state had you thought like

2:07

many of us and like rusty himself

2:09

that the saslaw had become a bit

2:11

of a relic kind of a bit for so

2:14

on iran's paul and therefore this

2:16

horrible attacks seem to come slightly out

2:18

of the blue it did burden of i suppose

2:20

what i thought was of it was a terrible

2:22

show

2:24

what you thought about it not

2:26

such a great surprise because

2:28

it affects well as you say was over so

2:30

see is old and even the iranian

2:32

regime kind of semi to sunday

2:35

more recently and rusty had

2:38

, up with an event without security in

2:40

which was at would have been unheard of on sorts

2:42

of and telephones use against him

2:45

and at the same time we have seen

2:47

the intensifying born free

2:49

speech in the west charlie

2:52

upto massacre the the

2:55

merger that french teacher in the streets even

2:58

in this country the badly grammar school

3:00

teacher force into hiding for so his class

3:03

torrents of bahamas so we had we

3:05

have this kind of them the

3:07

movement against free speech i think you've described

3:09

as were on the one hand you have other

3:11

islamist extremists who

3:13

are who want to kill free space literally

3:16

and on the other side i'm the

3:18

kind of was the culture war

3:21

warriors who wants to cancel and

3:23

who are gonna say see such a cowardly

3:26

lack of defensive free speech in response

3:28

to the is it isn't it's access

3:30

is kind of invitation the any

3:32

not so he was have a go at received oh

3:35

it was an open invitation i think okay

3:37

to point them for years by the six se since

3:39

they charlie up to attack

3:42

the really these islamist attacking [unk] people

3:45

for offending the profit or

3:47

allah in the west

3:49

oh

3:50

really should be understood not only is

3:52

the gonna represent sassoon old eastern religion

3:55

but also as the com arms militant

3:57

wing of a very modern western

3:59

movement

3:59

it's just a offensive speech

4:02

but has no rights be expressed in should be rubbed

4:04

out one way or another

4:06

terrible shock but when you think about it in

4:08

the concepts of the free speech go in the west he

4:10

shouldn't have been such a terrible surprise yeah

4:13

absolutely and just

4:15

on that unholy marriage

4:17

between i really worry as on one side

4:20

and the council culture mob on the other get

4:22

a both of whom are driven by the

4:25

same the instinct in different

4:27

ways which is to crush that which offends

4:29

them as i wanted trace with you

4:32

how that comes about and the

4:35

it's historical origins if we go back to

4:37

nineteen eighty eight and nineteen eighty nine

4:39

when this attack the satanic verses was first

4:42

published and then and then was issued

4:44

in eighty nine i

4:46

want i want to see what the atmosphere was like

4:48

by back then because when i read some of the

4:50

coverage of the response

4:53

to the software even now

4:55

i'm still shocked when i read a if you

4:57

have liberals who were sailing

4:59

to stand with salman rushdie and actually called

5:02

him a troublemaker and suggested that he was bringing

5:04

all this trouble on himself conservative

5:07

politicians were also fairly quick

5:09

to write him off as a bit of problem and

5:13

you know jimmy carter infamously write a

5:15

piece in the us i think for the new york times

5:17

yeah basically saying it's a rusty

5:20

is offensive and and and causing this all

5:22

this trouble the that

5:25

was fairly widespread of the time wasn't it but then

5:27

and it's getting my indicated

5:29

very early on the kindness and you've just

5:31

talked about which is that there was already

5:34

in those in that early period emerging

5:37

together of the intolerance else islamist

5:40

on one side and liberals

5:42

on the other

5:43

most definitely bread and i'm is absolutely key

5:45

moment in starkville a sighting

5:48

that divide between those who were

5:50

weren't prepared to stand up for free speech in

5:52

the west not just a divide between to

5:55

a store islam and the west but the divine with

5:57

divine the west him between and those

5:59

who were signed up for free speech it really

6:01

brought that to the surface in the most shocking kind of way

6:04

it was the first time

6:06

for me to i really realized how

6:09

shallow and how safe is to support free

6:11

speech in the west especially in the upper

6:13

echelons of of western society how

6:15

they will pay to pay lip service to it but

6:18

actually when it came to it whenever

6:20

a little mobile misread burning

6:23

books burning british cities and

6:25

people shied away from it wanted to bury the she

6:27

didn't want to talk about it comes to say yes

6:30

we agree with you this topic on so far you

6:33

know we believe in freedom of speech favorite the press

6:35

box and the butts get bigger and bigger

6:37

and for

6:40

the his offensive we completely understand why people

6:42

are very upset even that's

6:45

a government which actually extended

6:47

the police protection to receive well developed factor

6:51

and dosage geoffrey howe was a single cell phone secretary

6:53

the time made the point that the book was

6:56

offensive when i

6:58

am was over stuffing the mark and

7:00

a rather reluctantly gonna protect it's costly

7:02

and the list were just

7:04

terrified of the prospect of appearing racist

7:07

or a me as i don't think islam a so they could become

7:09

erm a popular phrase that but it would

7:11

it would be demoted modern equipment effects

7:14

didn't want to appear racist in response to and so

7:16

decisive pretend it would go away and

7:18

to say with complete appreciate and understand how

7:21

upset you are how hurt your feelings on that

7:23

device we know we're

7:25

wimps pets and of freedom of speech and how

7:28

do with the people actually on the liberal leftwing

7:31

side of that divisions were taken

7:33

out and stance freedom of speech starkly

7:36

the site nipple i'm to me and many other people

7:38

to , important about and for free

7:41

speech was going to be which we've seen

7:43

more more important also c o two years

7:45

and the i think the the

7:48

division of the of the of fact wire

7:50

and and the novel itself and the response the

7:52

novel as an explosive moment in

7:54

in politics and western culture

7:57

is really important and eighty to think

7:59

about the time that it came out right at the end

8:01

of the cold war when there was there was

8:03

in global politics as well as

8:05

a domestically to it

8:08

really became a flashpoint

8:10

in so many of those different issues

8:12

and questions and another way that happened you mention their

8:14

the mobs burning the book you

8:17

look back on photographs of some of those they are genuinely

8:19

shocking unit , mob

8:22

in bradford for example the

8:24

mainly muslim men who

8:26

were point gleefully

8:28

burning the book and damning it as an act of blasphemy

8:31

and that was that turning point to wasn't it in turns

8:33

off at firstly the moment at which it happens

8:35

which is after decades of

8:38

at the left sailing and changing

8:40

sailing different ways and you have this explosive

8:42

moment where people seem to embrace a far more

8:44

regressive identity korean

8:47

form of politics a religious form of politics

8:49

yep through which to express

8:51

the anger all that intolerance

8:53

or whatever else who might be but that was a shift

8:56

to wasn't a towards the new

8:58

politics of victimhood the politics of offence

9:00

taking and people defining themselves

9:03

much more through identity rather than anything else

9:05

completely and i think you know you mentioned to see

9:08

if the less and that's really what happened that the

9:10

less than the anti racists mint have

9:12

been defeated and of and the vacuum was kind

9:14

of field this new

9:16

muslim identity or islamic identity

9:19

politics was wasn't really to do with an upsurge

9:21

of religious beliefs too much as a feeling of a gap

9:23

of people who wanted something to to believe

9:25

in and as you say that the became define

9:27

fine by the idea of victim his victimhood

9:29

by idea of being offended

9:32

by the idea of and the to protect your sensibilities

9:35

and so that is a mike eisner those

9:37

you fit it in drink with , identity

9:39

politics that was that was coming to dominate

9:42

left wing politics in in the when britain in

9:44

the west it's gonna british illustrates to have a of

9:46

a global trend obviously of issue with

9:48

amounts and as you mentioned at the time

9:51

which ah to mind off younger

9:54

viewers and listeners was them

9:56

a magazine publisher the referees see communist

9:58

party the feast we

10:01

really wants to as lm because

10:03

a in which you , i worked i'm

10:05

brendan and they will be los l a magazine when it closed

10:08

off a libel case case and or

10:10

in a few people launch spikes that to sit msnbc

10:12

kind of antecedent the where we are now

10:14

and all response to the rusty affairs

10:16

in living monks and i just looked it up this week was

10:18

we publisher and editor in april nineteen

10:20

eighty nine to defend the rights

10:22

be offensive the thing is absolutely

10:25

key marker in some might even the first time

10:27

expressing with actually use simply by made

10:29

up probably fucks anywhere in in and been

10:32

defending , rights be offensive defend the rights

10:34

bless v defend the right to question everything

10:37

to go against orthodoxies stand

10:39

up for freedom of speech and store even

10:41

for those ideas that you disagree with with

10:43

that was a crucial marker for us as well laying

10:45

down the line saying we are going to fight

10:47

the free speech we're gonna defend the right to

10:49

be offensive and offensive think that we've

10:52

improve right that's been the aptly crucial issue

10:54

that the friedman which all other freedoms defend them

10:56

it's and fruit be the christmas or the past three decades

10:59

how work one, the new spike book

11:02

by joanna williams is out now it

11:04

is all about work takeover of our institutions

11:06

and how we as older people

11:08

can fight back i cannot

11:11

recommend it enough make sure

11:13

you order your copy now you

11:15

can get it on amazon or go to spite

11:17

hi from online.com shop

11:21

that's spite hyphen online.com

11:24

shop, near

11:26

university is tackling ohio's,

11:28

nursing shortage by getting individuals

11:31

with non nursing bachelor's degrees and

11:33

opportunity to celebrate into the profession

11:36

what are you studied accounting college in marketing

11:45

if you're hauling now the time

11:48

the emperor it in role for one of three

11:50

turns that our location in cincinnati

11:52

cleveland or columbus their savior

11:54

abs and to apply

11:56

you mentioned that blasphemy and i want to

11:59

do a little bit blasphemy which

12:01

you've written about on spike the the

12:03

central importance of the right

12:05

to blast same to the broader project

12:08

of expanding freedom of speech is

12:11

historically historically often the the

12:13

struggle for the right to be a heretic or the right to

12:15

hold heretical police and to blast seem against

12:17

certain gods or profits that really

12:19

propelled society forward

12:22

in terms of freedom and

12:24

the first one to ask you about his

12:27

subsequent to the

12:29

, wire and and the response in

12:31

the west as well as in iran's and and

12:33

india india actually some to

12:35

to rusty's novel what

12:37

happened in the west is the the think we witnessed

12:40

a settler ization of blasphemy

12:42

so it's quite soon after that

12:44

schwab we do start here in discussions

12:47

about islam as i be as he say wasn't instantly

12:49

and eighty eight and or eighty nine but

12:51

certainly it was in nineteen ninety seven that the running

12:54

mate trust first put forward one

12:56

of the most important definitions of

12:58

islam or say bs which included things

13:01

like presuming

13:03

the western values are superior

13:05

to the values of islamic countries and

13:07

so it was all it was included not

13:09

just what everyone would recognize as racist

13:12

comments about muslim communities but

13:14

also moral judgments political

13:16

speech political criticism and

13:18

, on so through that process

13:21

through in it wasn't one of the my

13:23

striking things that shortly

13:25

after the fact was shortly after this man

13:27

was singled out hi a tyrannical

13:29

regime as deserving of death

13:32

soul blasphemy against islam we

13:34

institutionalized our own version of they are

13:36

only we called it is i'm a phobia

13:38

absolutely extraordinary and you

13:40

know you to think that think that time everyone would say

13:42

oh for me that's that solo

13:45

tax day in britain last

13:47

prosecution for for me in britain

13:49

not you seventy seven private prosecution by

13:51

mary whitehouse felt a moral campaigner

13:54

crusader who took a nice

13:56

to court and wanna as and

13:58

private i'm

14:00

from publishing a power in which a

14:02

roman centurion emotions having a

14:05

gay sex with dejesus as

14:07

also guy and that's gonna just seemed like

14:09

he does history and indeed

14:11

by two thousand two thousand when tony blair divided

14:13

had been that's a promise that blasphemy laws

14:16

was you say they striking thing was that was very different

14:18

celebrate about that what i was it necessary steps

14:21

because they were replacing at the same song with this

14:23

kind of secular i'm a lot hate

14:26

speech laws which defines

14:28

the any that could be called a phobia

14:31

which is why i'm a phobia became one of essential

14:33

marx was the secular

14:37

modern equivalent of blasphemy saying what

14:39

couldn't be sites and should be punished that's

14:41

not by deficit we bobbing silence in corpus

14:44

we will be locked so we have

14:46

completely secularized at the blasphemy

14:48

laws in this country and they're very promises to across

14:50

the west you find blasphemy

14:53

law was now basically

14:55

the muslim world the

14:57

crossfire where's the motor very few

14:59

old fashioned blasphemy laws but there are almost

15:02

all societies have ice sheets or some of them

15:04

and europe much harder the nose which defines

15:06

something like anything , that

15:08

anything that be called denial is now the and

15:11

with his genocide denial or climate change denial

15:13

tyson market griffin of of blasphemy

15:16

and isn't it's hate speech that isn't and monica

15:18

venice heresy things as cannot be said most

15:21

dishonest and funny so very

15:23

powerful secular plus me loss as comes

15:25

with razzi one of the major barriers to free speech

15:28

at now so we shouldn't imagine for imagine moment that

15:30

this moment that kind of a swiss device you

15:33

know that you don't in in pakistan or the middle

15:35

east the people kept on the suit for plus we have

15:37

our own six of us who lot and they're very

15:39

powerful and restrictions

15:41

on freedom of speech here yeah absolutely

15:43

and we've seen people be

15:45

suspended or sacked from their jobs

15:47

for actually making fun of islam

15:50

and you mentioned earlier the badly grammar

15:52

school teacher who who talks about the bachelor

15:54

grammar school seats the ice that once owner we have free

15:56

speech he was really the who's defending the batley

15:58

grammar school teacher was still in high the a year later

16:00

persona can't seem to also school gets

16:02

his extraordinary and i think

16:04

so as i wanted to touch on a point you made earlier

16:07

in relation precisely to this question which

16:10

is the green light that

16:12

his son when our society

16:14

sales to stand up for people's right to speak

16:16

freely yet so if we take the badly grammar

16:18

example so as you say the school teacher

16:22

is as far as we know still in hide in

16:24

keeping his head down apparently have to move out of his

16:26

home with his young family all

16:28

because he showed some images of

16:31

muhammad in as classroom discussion

16:33

on blasphemy and freedom of speech in a sense

16:36

and an intolerant mob gathered

16:38

outside gathered school and picked up a storm

16:40

and demanded his sacking isn't

16:43

the liberal cowardice central

16:45

to all of this because if

16:47

you look at the mob the gathered outside the school firstly

16:49

they would do in what you would expect them to do

16:51

right this is what islam is do they

16:53

shout and they scream and they don't like it

16:55

when people offend their religious beliefs

16:59

they , fairly small in number even though

17:01

i'm sure that the threat was very serious

17:04

to but it was the other institutions

17:06

that was sailing to do what they should

17:09

be doing so the teaching unions didn't stand

17:11

by this teacher the political class didn't

17:13

say very much even the supposedly

17:15

liberal commentary up didn't put its neck

17:17

and above the parapet to say look we

17:19

have to rally around this guy so

17:21

it's how central do think that cowardice

17:24

is to events like this and

17:26

to emboldening these

17:28

intolerant elements these society

17:30

the complete essential when it because

17:33

in all these instances we only so she about

17:35

small numbers relatively

17:37

small numbers of of extremists in

17:40

the muslim community in britain the vast majority

17:42

of them are not supporters yeah

17:45

of stabbing salman rushdie in the neck know talking

17:47

about very simple numbers of of them extremists

17:49

in isn't , extremists and

17:51

the same way that the trans activists

17:54

soon see jk rowling who strikingly

17:56

was caught up in the and they receive

17:58

fair to sweep forcing

18:01

him a collie

18:03

timely innocent that they were very small my

18:06

noise they only have

18:09

any influence because of the absolute

18:11

cowardice and collapse of the establishment

18:13

and the and the liberal as seasons in

18:15

britain and the west that's what gives them the opportunity

18:18

to have such insolence said to have such a

18:20

voice is we were standing up

18:22

for all about freedom of speech

18:24

democracy tolerance they

18:26

, be on the friends you know sell cigarettes speakers

18:29

corner i thought rather than

18:31

in the center of all political and and

18:33

political cultural life which we've allowed them to become

18:36

and what's really saw him out this him out every time when

18:38

these incidents happened that seems to me the

18:40

response gets worse and worse gets

18:42

weaker and weaker if

18:44

you think a trolley upto twenty sixty

18:46

the massacre of from the journalists

18:49

causing this novice at the offices of that serious

18:52

magazine in paris there

18:54

was a huge outpouring of support

18:56

for charlie of to does she does your suis charlie

18:59

nathan when across europe and the in

19:01

the world in sense of demonstrations and so on and

19:03

we pointed out of the time and in my book trigger warning that you mentioned

19:05

i wrote a chapter about it actually how

19:07

thin that support for it was and how quickly

19:10

the back crashed on it and

19:12

if so i say yes but yeah charlie

19:14

up to go see full gosh

19:16

himself in a vote a very famous in some

19:18

in that because american ten the writers

19:21

organization after , shortly after

19:23

mascot i organize a special events

19:26

that income memory of the fallen and support

19:28

them several really leading

19:30

american writers receives suits and boycotted

19:32

it and announced they wouldn't do said it was totally

19:34

uptight was racist is lana phobic

19:36

the publication when she was absolutely

19:39

apoplectic you serious that that and for our

19:41

great site was about how we supposed

19:43

to be of his or ex president of americans and

19:45

we supposed to be seen express an

19:47

organization that he believes in free speech you

19:50

gobbling free speech i did you disagree

19:52

with that the house and kind of

19:54

of the principle of free speech so

19:57

even support for charlie up to [unk] was

19:59

actually almost superficial

20:01

and and we will it's leave at the time

20:03

then the a liberal establishment this time

20:06

we were these following incident to support

20:09

for free speech because less than less mean where is the just

20:11

we salman yeah movement right western

20:13

demonstrations in new york new york about

20:16

or london about that know what

20:18

so the support for free

20:21

speech gets weaker the cowardice

20:23

comes more obvious with every one of these instance

20:25

and i think that is this be a bigger and bigger

20:27

and brighter and brighter green light to anybody

20:30

he wants to advocates if you say oh

20:32

as the were critics of free speech to today's

20:35

words of violence then you

20:37

know using violence against was becomes

20:39

a console is just met response in some people's minds

20:42

i think that's so true about the

20:44

the lack of a an angry

20:46

clear principal response to what happened

20:49

to salman rushdie and i've noticed over the past few days

20:51

you think yourself out on his is already

20:53

fading from exactly the kind of

20:55

public that you know it's still in the news people want

20:57

to know how he's doing when it's going to be out of hospital

21:00

cause but is as it in

21:02

terms of being a a prominent

21:04

public concern the i mean

21:07

it's com a dog gonna be a reading of some

21:09

of his works in new york i think

21:11

but aside from that i've not seen anything

21:13

at all which is really startling and

21:16

i wanted to ask about one of those ideological

21:18

justification that are given for

21:20

this failure of people to stand with i'm

21:23

supposed heretics and others who exercise

21:25

that free free speech especially in relation

21:28

to issues to do with islam so you mentioned

21:30

that charlie have do and the shocking

21:33

response that came from sections of the western

21:35

literati so those i'm incredibly

21:38

prominent novelist who complained about the pen

21:40

award for charlie have to and a

21:42

what what was very striking about what they

21:44

said is the charlie have do the problem

21:46

with charlie have to that it too

21:48

often mocked a section of

21:51

the french population that is already marginalized

21:53

embattled and victimize said the idea

21:56

was charlie up that was punching

21:58

down it was p that's the phrase is used

22:00

and you see that all the time you know navarre

22:03

a media the kind of lefty corbyn esta

22:05

media outlet here in the uk write a piece

22:07

in which it said in a charlie have those computers

22:10

are all white middle class

22:12

mostly male and therefore they have a certain

22:15

privilege a visa v the

22:17

muslim population this is all stuff ten

22:20

of them had been slaughtered in their offices which is very

22:22

strange forget privilege i think i'm

22:24

and then you have the despicable islamic human

22:26

rights commission which gave i'm sorry

22:29

have died the islamic obe of the year award

22:32

just a few weeks after they were killed

22:34

in our offices which is just a new

22:36

low in terms of that kind of identity

22:38

or in politics but the justification

22:40

is often used is the one about pissing

22:42

down now in relation

22:44

so charlie either that simply gets it wrong charlie

22:47

had they punches everywhere up down

22:49

left right all religions or political

22:51

so so they just wrong about french

22:53

satire and charlie have their satire particular

22:55

sport he makes of that term

22:57

this notion that if you

22:59

criticize islam you're hurting of hon community

23:02

or as you criticize any aspect of transgender

23:04

islam you're hurting a marginalized

23:07

community is often

23:08

that weaponization of suppose it viability

23:11

isn't as it's used against freedom of speech

23:13

absolutely well and i thought was looking up at

23:16

without getting into specifics of any of those you

23:18

to do with us as citizens of community

23:21

this a major principal at stake in this

23:24

which is that you'd have free speech you don't have we have

23:26

it is it's an indivisible glyphosate

23:29

and you can't say you can have free speech

23:31

if you agree with me that's not free speech that's you

23:33

know joseph stalin would have in tallinn suppose it free

23:35

speech on that on on that basis

23:39

you to support free speech we don't and as

23:41

you know it's all as i do buy them for spend as free

23:43

speech campaigners once about word

23:45

or rises who for our size issue

23:48

free speech and most of all

23:50

time defending free

23:52

speech for i did we don't want to hear the

23:54

joke is only the extreme

23:56

and the out the idea

23:58

is that needs sending on the grass

24:00

free speech and the mainstream in the

24:02

mediocre can look after itself

24:05

so the first one the

24:08

issue is really important to remember

24:10

this is suing history on it's head to

24:13

sister free speech to somehow a problem repressed

24:15

a marginalized groups free speech

24:17

has been the absolute center of every

24:20

stock of liberation by anybody anywhere

24:22

in the world without the support free

24:24

speech so be no national liberation movements

24:26

that when his advice movie so gala race movies

24:28

though anti racist top

24:31

secret excited and and slavery campaigner

24:33

to me to point the free speech is absolutely

24:35

to supplicants slavery it was

24:37

freedom of speech slavery wouldn't have lasted five

24:40

years in the southern states america your he

24:42

understood that it was essential think so

24:45

if you want to send celebration at a cost to society

24:47

than free speech will be the sense of your of your demands

24:49

and stop trying to make excuses and

24:52

qualifications for wise free

24:54

speech is is roman certain such circumstances

24:56

of a certain people even defend as

24:58

a universal roy and if we do would all be that

25:01

rafa

25:02

if you're a regular listening to this show or

25:04

a regular reader a spiked why not become

25:06

a slight support a spike

25:08

supporters is all thriving community

25:10

of people who donate to snaked anyone

25:13

who gives five pounds or more a month or

25:15

fifty pounds or more a year can

25:17

become a spike supporter and get access

25:19

to lots of exciting pucks spice

25:22

supporters can comment on articles

25:24

get free and discounted tickets to

25:26

events get a discount on all items

25:29

in our shop and bookmark articles

25:31

as you browse this is all way of

25:33

saying thank you to all of you who fund

25:35

our work spiked is completely

25:37

free and yet you still hand over

25:39

your hard-earned cash to make sure that anyone

25:42

anywhere can read of and listen to

25:44

us we're incredibly grateful for

25:46

your generosity if you don't give

25:48

to spite yet now is the perfect time

25:50

to start just go to spiked

25:53

hyphen online dot com

25:55

slash supporters to set

25:57

up your donation and you'll spike supporters

25:59

count but spite of the hyphen

26:02

online dot com slash

26:04

supporters

26:06

that's incredibly important point about the

26:08

the power freedom of speech

26:10

precisely for the most vulnerable marginalized

26:13

people in society it's how they have

26:15

liberated themselves historically so

26:17

the been a complete transformation in how the idea

26:19

is understood i wanted to go back go back

26:21

bit more in time even before

26:24

frederick douglass time a you wrote

26:27

spite about rusty been

26:29

at a heretical heroes and and

26:31

part of a long line of people to

26:33

have to to stand up against orthodoxies

26:36

to to withstand accusations

26:39

of blasphemy and also the i think

26:41

the most admirable thing about what rushdie has done is

26:43

that he has made freedom of speech one of his core

26:45

beliefs absolutely and not very

26:47

time in that very period that he was under attack

26:49

he didn't skulk away and defend his

26:52

book only when i said before that we

26:54

spend most of us on defending people we don't listen to

26:56

i don't include ross yeah he's he's he's genuinely

26:58

hero restrict my favorite thing that nobody said this week

27:00

was one who's sunset the free speech

27:02

is life yeah a holiday yeah

27:05

free speech is life itself thought to have his whole

27:07

life is about i think that's what you know michael

27:10

how many people all the and puppet loss of register

27:12

to stand up and say that today yeah absolutely

27:14

not really agree but just gotten back a little bit

27:16

more in relation to the spike pc wrote

27:18

about i'm which is headlined without

27:21

blasphemy the west would have no free speech

27:23

so , just remind just how important

27:26

the how important of people

27:28

to blaspheme against orthodoxies

27:31

or to stand up against a the

27:33

core beliefs of society how in how

27:35

central was that to the development of freedom

27:38

of speech over the past see hundred years in terms

27:40

of the relative

27:42

freedom of speech that we enjoy today and how that came

27:44

about completely central brandon what's a

27:46

day off some if we look at the rusty to going to was

27:48

a piece that religion is the enemy of free

27:51

, this is the problem when wittingly free speech

27:53

is important to remember that when free

27:55

speech actually emerged

27:57

the modern for

27:59

for

27:59

the hundred years ago and as an issue in western

28:02

society the demand was for

28:04

religious freaks the freedom to

28:06

think right and speak and

28:09

worse as you saw fit the protestant

28:11

reaction against the catholic church

28:13

the demand to be able to publish a bible

28:16

in your own language and we need to sell for up and being

28:18

told by priests what it said with essential

28:20

demands of of the protestant reformation and

28:23

was it about demand for freedom of thought conscience

28:25

and speech and you know people

28:27

like tinder would burn at the state the

28:30

a daring to translate the bible into

28:32

english only a few years before by the way

28:34

it became a state policies have a boyfriend

28:36

every church which the on

28:38

the streets today is

28:40

blasphemy be some smallest orthodoxy

28:42

books people standing up fighting

28:45

for blasphemy the right to question

28:47

the orthodoxies of society the

28:49

the right to be a heresy also and

28:52

census the struggle for freedom of speech i am i

28:54

think i made for their the m you go back to

28:56

the meaning of terrorist the was defined

28:58

by an early christian leader in greek the

29:01

he said he sees were orthodox

29:03

from , greek favourite police police

29:06

his opponents these were heresy from

29:08

the greek for toys to toys so

29:10

choosing what you believe that is simply that

29:13

is the origins of the world harrison and that's

29:15

what be inherently could always meant standing up for your

29:17

freedom to think and write as soon as you see

29:19

fit so one of the great paris texas a

29:21

of the a spinoza

29:24

he was from now see two screens in amsterdam

29:26

as a as a bus fema i think

29:29

have to the issue perfectly when he said that

29:31

in perfectly free state any man and we will

29:33

see at any woman or anybody else may

29:36

think what you like some say what you think anti

29:39

blasphemy fighting for that person census

29:41

of of free speech over the last four five hundred

29:43

years first , so as

29:46

religion and and and state comptroller the printing

29:48

press and today against

29:50

at the kind of modern blasphemy laws

29:52

that we've it's disgusting and sense of a speech

29:54

in the right to question i just thought as

29:57

well as islam yeah and i wanted to come on

29:59

to that into

29:59

those the new orthodoxies and

30:02

guess the new accusations of blasphemy

30:05

oh which obviously the language

30:07

has changed no one would openly described

30:09

that political belief as an orthodoxy that you must

30:11

and question that use other language no

30:14

one would accuse you of blasphemy but i might you keep

30:16

accuse you of hate speech or raising

30:19

people are problematic for

30:21

that's a favorite were too so the languages

30:23

changed but the instinct is the same which is too

30:26

shut down questioning of certain ideas but

30:28

of course the ideas now tend to be i

30:31

don't carry on ones that iran's

30:33

one is central to a lot of their sins it's very

30:35

interesting how phrases like trans women

30:37

are women are often repeated as

30:39

it almost as a religious mantra that they

30:42

never explained is just repeated and are

30:44

only role is to repeat them back in a dutiful

30:46

sasson rather than to choose our own

30:49

belief which is to say that is not true so

30:51

awesome when you raise questions like this and make

30:54

comparisons so i made a comparison between

30:56

a salman rushdie and jk rowling

30:58

in the sense of both have been subjected

31:00

to death threats both has been at their books

31:03

burn in very different contacts both

31:05

, been demonized by sections

31:08

of the liberal supposedly liberal establishment

31:11

for having wrong thing to for being offensive

31:13

and of course the thing that set against me as the

31:16

how can you compare these two thing salman rushdie's

31:18

been in hiding for years he's not been stabbed

31:21

and of course the level of threat is

31:23

very threat is and what salman

31:25

rushdie has experience is different to what any

31:27

other modern writer has experienced and

31:29

no one would deny that but there is a commonality

31:32

isn't there between i guess

31:34

is another expression of the crushing

31:37

together of the islamic intolerance with identity

31:39

politics which means that they do sounds

31:42

creepily similar yes

31:44

absolutely i mean

31:45

as we sit there is a difference between islamic

31:48

extremists who wants to kill you for free fh

31:51

and while culture wars you just want to cancel

31:53

the dumbest a difference but you

31:55

know one where you lose you can lose your life

31:57

the other way you can lose your license livelihood

32:00

in your your career your your

32:02

future posts and your voice in public and

32:04

and i think it was absolutely

32:06

the user or that me for it's no coincidence

32:08

that jk rowling the also

32:11

received it's a death threat this week's

32:13

apparently from someone who isn't this leanings a

32:15

in this phone to her support for rush

32:17

you in such sang it to your next

32:20

why wouldn't they be off the j k rowling

32:22

what do they care about the trends debate and

32:24

it's a it's almost like an unconscious merging

32:27

of those yeah wish used to say you

32:29

can't say that that's basically the the the

32:31

couch with anything with in in different forms

32:33

and different positions from different language what's being

32:35

said is you can't say that and

32:38

it's terribly unholy alliance

32:41

between islamist militants periods

32:44

which some of them once he silence

32:46

and others just want to use at the blue senses

32:49

paint but this effect on free speech

32:51

is pernicious of satellites and

32:53

as he talked about before the

32:56

cowardice and the anti free speech culture

32:58

in the west and down simply gives the green

33:00

light to those who want to take it further attacks

33:02

or if you say your speech

33:05

is violence than why

33:07

didn't someone conclude this is just muddies violence

33:09

to stop them for yeah absolutely

33:11

yeah and the common phrase these days

33:13

is that if you express yourself my day you're

33:16

a raising my identity and it's

33:18

as active structural violence against my

33:20

identity and you feed into this constant notion

33:23

that

33:23

words are attacking me and therefore i have

33:25

the right to attack but this is why you know

33:28

it wouldn't when i wrote that isro search your choosing the

33:30

right to be offensive that with that's been has a key

33:32

element of everything of whitman said ever since

33:34

it is the right see offensive or what would it didn't

33:37

circumstances dakota rights plus fees

33:39

if we don't have that we don't have free speech

33:42

if we only allowed to say things that one defend

33:44

somebody one upset anybody and we miles

33:46

little keep your mouth shut because they're free speech is

33:48

completely meaningless yeah absolutely and

33:50

and that that have that chilling phrase chilling signed his

33:53

and free speech has consequences

33:55

now in a sense it's perfectly logical

33:57

from be should have the consequences staring

33:59

up discussion

33:59

maybe sometimes changing the world

34:02

making people think differently but

34:04

if we're talking about free speech having the consequences

34:07

you losing your job all

34:09

losing your life then that is not

34:11

consequences that punishment and i've often

34:13

thought the one thing that binds together the

34:15

kind of woke mall been and the

34:18

more violent islamist mall there's

34:20

this idea that free speech has consequences

34:23

and

34:23

i'm sure the charlie have died killers had the in their

34:25

mind you know a com your consequences

34:28

this is what we're going to do to you as a consequence

34:30

of you are exercising your freedom of

34:32

speech is that it's a very chilling phrase when

34:34

you look at the context in which is typically used

34:36

absolutely a it's you say that

34:38

that's going to be a serious type out for yes

34:41

these people are both wings or something in my books according

34:43

to outsiders that we live in the eyes of the reverse

34:45

voters if you take photos classic

34:47

phrase or phrases cbt it to him by

34:49

his biographer i discreetly what

34:51

what you say but i'll defense death your right

34:54

to say it prevents reverse photos is i

34:56

disagree with what you say i hate what you say

34:59

on i will fight to the death of free speech to

35:01

my right to stop you saying this you

35:03

tell me on were on that basis there was

35:05

a disagreement between the islamist and

35:07

the identity area winks against free speech movement

35:09

that they're all in the same but whether they lots of

35:11

missy or not and more

35:13

, on a day to day basis it's the i didn't tear

35:16

in the workouts where is that we're fighting against

35:18

and also of free speech and these

35:20

and is coming once in a while to get tickets aren't

35:22

sophistication by crisis or

35:24

six his time but we got to get angry

35:26

about this the mindless that

35:29

you've written brilliantly eloquently about this from

35:31

of the holders and a thing about tank look back in anger

35:33

is time to get angry about this about what's been

35:35

done to free speech and also sought not

35:37

only by handful of of isn't this

35:39

box bomb far more powerful how

35:42

ugly the free speech section

35:45

at all liberal establishment and sponsor

35:47

plus seem as if the world to you know it's and

35:50

sort of in support of several

35:52

by critical free speech heroes

35:54

love salmon rustic yeah absolutely

35:56

i couldn't agree more i was thinking the other day that

35:58

it's time to of the

35:59

he did another along the other side

36:02

is already upped the ante quite dramatically

36:04

especially with this attack and it's time for

36:07

for those of us who believe in freedom to respond a

36:09

by upping the ante in all way to in terms

36:11

of the sense that we put forward of this crucial

36:14

liberty me come up just to more questions

36:16

see the first is about the

36:18

response in the uk to what

36:20

had happened to rusty which i just found to be

36:22

sold limb and blame and

36:25

already fizzling out and you said

36:27

earlier that there is no she's just three

36:29

salmond movement and so on which is true

36:32

what is striking those that the response

36:34

in france has been far more from and

36:36

or if you look at president microns response

36:39

to the stabbing it was a very

36:42

solid from clear response

36:44

talking about how salman rushdie has always stood up

36:46

against the forces of barbarism

36:48

and obscurantism lots of

36:50

french intellectuals who you've always had

36:53

a stronger critical line

36:55

on problems to do with islam is thinking lots

36:57

of french intellectuals came out very strongly in said

36:59

we have to stand with freedom of speech against

37:02

loomis terror on islamist

37:04

intolerance in the uk the response

37:07

was far more week or even

37:09

boris johnson's response which did mention freedom

37:11

of speech was a bit wet hasn't

37:14

really been followed up particularly well

37:16

kissed arma two i dunno

37:18

twenty four hours or something to respond which

37:20

is pretty extraordinary considering that

37:22

salman rushdie is a not born in

37:24

britain but he's a british citizen and a british

37:27

night of the realm how do

37:29

you explain the weakness of the response

37:31

in britain to visit because there's a say that

37:34

people will accuse you of being part of a culture

37:37

will he be talk about issues like this

37:39

or people will accuse you of ascending

37:41

the muslim community why is there that

37:44

reluctance here in particular

37:46

to take to take from line along the lines

37:48

that we just been talking about the a remarkable

37:51

are it's been going on for a long time getting worse

37:53

and worse the absolute cowardice

37:55

in the liberal establishment in britain of being

37:58

seen to offend islam often

38:00

seem to offend anybody with their opinions

38:03

, the reluctance to take a stand is

38:05

this is gonna blow mom's like mess

38:07

that the british fiscal establishment has done a site

38:10

itself to be be more starkly

38:12

actually as he say than the even then it didn't

38:14

didn't other parts of the west so it's a remarkable statement

38:16

by angela rayner the definitely to

38:18

the labour party so i think with the first labor

38:21

leaders tweet in response to the rusty

38:24

fair to set them condemned

38:26

fair attack she said this

38:28

farmers is an attack on free speech and

38:30

can never be the answer sorry

38:34

interestingly strong statements might never be the answer to

38:36

what what's the question

38:38

how do we i'm trying to censor free

38:40

speech summit your is just the wrong thing

38:42

to say completely the wrong response

38:44

to it completely in the wrong

38:46

side of the arguments to the article published

38:48

on one of the main the news sites

38:51

almost as soon as they suck it happens headlines

38:53

why salman rushdie so controversial

38:56

as , rossi was the problem money

38:58

issue here this is how far we've gone down the

39:00

slope of this terror of of overstepping

39:02

am also also british establishment in

39:04

very weakness for some for a long time by

39:07

at by western standards western

39:09

, getting worse and worse as now revealing

39:11

itself spy all of it's pretensions

39:14

to be yeah britain is the is the

39:16

home of free speech and democracy which is much

39:18

historical truth in that but today it's

39:20

and it seems to be the opposite to be in western standards

39:22

and the eighth itself as a real

39:24

weeks is that when it comes to standing up for

39:26

the principal's office artists and built

39:29

okay so my phone a question is is on those

39:31

principles that our society supposed

39:33

to be built on

39:35

and why they're in pulsar nine some ways this

39:37

feels like very obvious

39:39

question i guess to to you

39:41

and i because we've in

39:43

writing about freedom of speech very

39:46

long time and talking about it for a long time as

39:48

well and i did once was he just say

39:50

something on why freedom of speech is important

39:53

and a you touched on the earlier of course

39:55

in relation to a the use of freedom

39:57

of speech the deployment of freedom of speech at

39:59

the means of liberate and oneself from there

40:02

any and making the case for one's own freedom

40:05

it does strike me that there are younger

40:07

generations in particular who probably have

40:09

never been exposed to the argument for why freedom

40:12

of speech is such an important principle

40:14

in a civilized society i noticed

40:16

the lots of people sharing great quotes from salman

40:18

rushdie over the past week one of my

40:20

favorites is the moment you declare you declare

40:22

of ideas to be immune from criticism

40:25

satire division or content freedom

40:27

a sport becomes impossible and i

40:30

decide true you know a and all the good stuff

40:32

is in they're not only criticism but also contempt

40:35

the causing offense ridicule

40:37

mockery so there

40:40

are people in society salman rushdie

40:42

is salman chief among them who understand

40:45

them importance of freedom importance thought and freedom of speech

40:47

but isn't it was just reiterate in that case

40:49

that fresh all the time so that

40:52

people remember why the sweet i'm should never be curtailed

40:54

where the by crazed men

40:56

with knives or governments with laws

40:58

or months laws or i think that's that's really

41:00

important brendan i mean when i wrote a

41:03

terrible whatever access to the quickness using see

41:05

score about free speech which is that

41:07

some so so as to be free and secondly

41:09

it's speech as and be confused

41:11

with with violence in those kind of seemingly

41:14

obvious principles we do have to keep of and

41:16

be facing under surgery

41:18

we certainly from about his is the most

41:20

important liberty on which all others sand

41:22

and i think it is to the a lot of young

41:25

people don't understand that but it isn't because

41:27

they are some counties in a new generation

41:29

of of for a liberal reactionaries is

41:32

because they've hardly ever heard the argument if he

41:34

was speech and in my experience

41:36

not only in britain but recently and and hungry

41:38

and finland other european countries and

41:41

sweet experience the same thing when you don't have an argument

41:43

people about why free speech simple he

41:45

conceded girls whole from half

41:47

the people young people's eyes and maybe some

41:49

very excited by it's something we've got to keep

41:51

reiterating that free speech is the lifeblood

41:54

of democracy they do not have the right

41:56

to argue for what you believe what

41:59

does democracy where is the choice that way

42:01

that we might have free speech

42:04

even more fundamental my is the basis

42:06

of human autonomy of all

42:08

sizes as individuals who can think for

42:10

ourselves as for those who says think

42:13

what we like and say what we think that's

42:16

a whole by sipping a free individual sipping

42:18

a society that you don't have that that you are not

42:20

that free human and it's success and

42:22

in and practical sense as you already talked

42:24

about free speech is absolutely fundamental

42:26

to every struggle the quality

42:29

for freedom for liberation older things which

42:31

young people would say they really leaving

42:34

if they're not prepared signed up for free speech the

42:36

absolute freedom of speech and none of those

42:38

struggles off can be one we cannot

42:41

live in a free and equal society where people

42:43

com think what they like and say

42:45

what they think the sort of free speech

42:47

has always been since also sub

42:49

woofer free society in the west and even more

42:51

now when such a fundamental

42:53

freedom which everything else in

42:56

our lives depends is at risk

42:58

when there is a nice with the throats of

43:00

free speech in a not only imputing

43:02

russia or the ass gonna sit on the taliban

43:10

apparently illustrate mccain

43:12

thank you very much thank you reddit

43:36

thank you for listening to the brendan o'neill

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features