New York State Has a Budget Deal

New York State Has a Budget Deal

Released Tuesday, 29th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
New York State Has a Budget Deal

New York State Has a Budget Deal

New York State Has a Budget Deal

New York State Has a Budget Deal

Tuesday, 29th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Brian Lehrer Show is supported by

0:02

Progressive Insurance. Do you ever

0:04

find yourself playing the budgeting game? Well,

0:07

with the Name Your Price tool from

0:09

Progressive, you can find options that fit

0:11

your budget and potentially lower your bills.

0:13

Try it at Progressive.com. Progressive Casualty

0:15

Insurance Company and Affiliates, price and

0:17

coverage match limited by state law, not

0:19

available in all states. Listener

0:25

Supported, WNYC

0:27

Studios. It's

0:40

the Brian Larra Show on

0:42

WNYC. Good morning, everyone. So

0:44

yeah, it's the day 100. It's the

0:46

day 100 of the Trump administration, which maybe

0:48

you're already sick of hearing about, and

0:51

it's only 10 o 'clock in the morning. And

0:54

it's also day one of

0:56

some consequential new policies in New

0:58

York State that the governor and

1:00

legislature just agreed to last night in

1:02

their annual budget agreement. You may

1:04

not have heard about these things yet,

1:06

so we'll start there today. We'll

1:08

go on to Trump and authoritarianism and

1:10

Trump and public health. later

1:12

in the hour, but we're going to

1:14

start in New York State with all these new

1:17

policies on masks, on cell phones

1:19

and schools, on medical aid and

1:21

dying for certain people who are terminally ill

1:23

and want to choose that, on

1:25

removing people involuntarily from the

1:27

streets, and also, yes, on

1:29

some actual budget items in the budget. Many of

1:31

you will be getting a check in the mail.

1:34

from the state of New York,

1:36

it looks like. Some of you

1:38

with kids will be getting a

1:40

bigger break on your state income

1:42

taxes, and there's more. So let's

1:44

go down this checklist and also

1:46

invite some of your first reactions

1:48

with John Campbell and Chris Albany

1:50

for us here at WNYC and

1:52

on Gothamist. Thanks for coming on

1:54

on quick turnaround to follow this

1:57

news this morning, John. Happy April

1:59

29th. Happy April 29th, Brian. 29

2:01

days. The state budget's late. So

2:03

let's just dive right in. Cell phones and

2:05

schools. Way to wind up. Well,

2:08

this is one that has been pretty

2:10

much settled since mid -March, but it

2:12

was finalized as part of this agreement

2:14

yesterday. And it's going

2:16

to be what's known as a

2:18

bell to bell. ban on smartphone

2:20

use in public schools in

2:22

New York State. And that means

2:25

from opening bell to closing bell,

2:27

students won't be allowed to

2:29

use their smartphones or similar internet -enabled

2:31

devices. That bell -to -bell nature

2:33

of it was very important to

2:35

Governor Hockel and the teachers unions.

2:37

They pushed for that while

2:39

administrators pushed for a little more

2:41

flexibility and maybe allowing for students

2:43

to use their phones during

2:45

recess or lunch. They didn't get

2:48

that. opening bell to

2:50

closing bell, smartphone ban in

2:52

public schools. Public schools

2:54

will have to come up with,

2:56

each district will have to come up

2:58

with a plan to implement this

3:00

and you know maybe they have pouches

3:02

for kids, maybe they have lockers,

3:04

maybe they have kids keep them in

3:06

their regular lockers. They're going to

3:08

have to implement this by September by

3:10

the next school year. That's in

3:12

the budget agreement. Next item on the

3:14

checklist a ban on wearing masks

3:16

in some circumstances. Where did it wind

3:18

up? this wound

3:20

up in They created a new

3:22

crime I or they're about

3:24

to create because they have to

3:26

pass the budget still and

3:28

put into legislation, but this was

3:30

a big one for for

3:33

governor huckle after There were concerns

3:35

from the the Jewish community

3:37

in particular after there were these

3:39

viral images of anti

3:41

-Israel demonstrators on a train

3:43

last year with masks

3:45

on, asking about Zionists on

3:48

the train. She

3:50

at first had talked about,

3:52

perhaps, restrictions on wearing masks

3:54

in public. That got pared

3:56

down to what we ended

3:58

up with, which is a

4:00

new crime, which is essentially

4:02

evading arrest while masking or

4:04

concealing your face. And

4:06

what that means is you can be

4:09

charged with a Class B misdemeanor,

4:11

which is a lower level misdemeanor. if

4:13

you are concealing your face

4:16

wearing a mask with the intent

4:18

to conceal your identity while

4:20

committing a separate crime. So there's

4:22

a lot there. So it's

4:24

essentially a secondary offense that you

4:27

can be charged with that

4:29

is implemented if you commit a

4:31

class A misdemeanor or a

4:33

felony. Got all that

4:35

that's that's confusing, but it's that's

4:37

where they landed and part go

4:39

ahead. I'm sorry Well, I was

4:42

just gonna say here's here's kind

4:44

of the tension around that or

4:46

some of it you talked about

4:48

those incidents Or an incident where

4:50

people seem to be wearing masks

4:52

while engaged in what might have

4:54

been anti -Semitic harassment, right? At least

4:57

anti -Israel but in the case

4:59

you described it sound like sounded

5:01

like also anti -Semitic But among those

5:03

concerned about any kind of mask

5:05

ban are specifically college students and

5:07

others engaged in political protests. They

5:09

say the masks are in the

5:12

vast majority of cases not to

5:14

conceal their identities while they're being

5:16

violent or committing other crimes or

5:18

harassing people that are protecting the

5:20

identities of peaceful protesters, especially pro

5:22

-Palestinian ones, who've been getting doxxed.

5:24

when they're not wearing masks, right?

5:27

That is opponents of their position,

5:29

take their photos and post them

5:31

on social media sites. And then

5:33

it's the protesters who might be

5:35

subject to organized harassment campaigns or

5:37

even become victims of violence or

5:39

now with Trump, maybe get deported

5:42

even if they're green card holders. So

5:44

with what you just described,

5:46

can people wear masks at

5:48

protests if they're not committing

5:51

crimes? The answer

5:53

is yes, they can wear them

5:55

at protests if they're not

5:57

committing crimes, but if it were

5:59

to escalate into some sort

6:01

of property damage or something where

6:03

they could get charged with

6:05

a class A misdemeanor or above,

6:08

and they were wearing, this is

6:10

another key part, if they

6:13

have to have been wearing

6:15

the mask with the intent of

6:17

concealing their identity. And in

6:19

that case, you probably could make

6:21

that case. But yes, I

6:23

mean, you have to commit a

6:25

crime, allegedly commit a crime

6:27

first to be charged with the

6:29

secondary crime, which is concealing

6:31

your identity to a beta breast.

6:34

got it so listeners which of

6:36

these items in the budget agreement

6:38

do you have a strong opinion

6:40

about or a question about for

6:42

john cambell or albany reporter two

6:44

one two four three three wnyc

6:46

two one two four three three

6:48

nine six nine two call or

6:50

text on this consequential policy day

6:52

in new york state With

6:54

the backdrop, I guess we

6:57

should say, of Governor

6:59

Hockel trying to set herself

7:01

up for reelection next

7:03

year, including a possible primary

7:05

from the left and

7:07

possible November challenge if she

7:10

gets the nomination from

7:12

Republicans like Mike Lawler or

7:14

Elise Stefanik. 212 -433 -WNYC -433

7:16

-9692. Let's keep going down

7:18

this list of policies agreed to

7:20

last night. Medical aid and

7:22

dying, did that pass? That's

7:25

separate from the budget actually

7:27

that's that's not being debated as

7:29

part of the budget But

7:31

there it is there is some

7:34

stuff happening on that. That's

7:36

so you're referring to a bill

7:38

that would excuse me allow

7:40

terminally ill patients who Only have

7:42

a little little time left

7:44

to live to request Essentially medication

7:47

from it from a doctor

7:49

that would end their life This

7:51

has been a controversial

7:53

topic in Albany for well

7:55

over a decade. Every

7:58

single year you have demonstrators in

8:00

the halls pushing for this and pushing

8:02

for this. It's never gotten a

8:04

vote. It's looking like it's going to

8:06

get an assembly vote perhaps even

8:08

today, which is a big step. That

8:10

is not something that has happened

8:12

before. It is, the

8:15

Senate has always been viewed as

8:17

perhaps the bigger roadblock and the Senate

8:19

has not committed to taking that bill

8:21

up, but the fact that the Assembly

8:23

is taking it up could be a

8:25

sign that they think there's a chance

8:27

the Senate could, because otherwise why would

8:30

you take that vote and put, you

8:32

know, your members in a, perhaps a

8:34

politically vulnerable position if it's not going

8:36

to get approved. But yeah, there could

8:38

be a vote on that as soon

8:40

as today, in the Senate. So I

8:43

should say as a correction to myself,

8:45

I overstated in the intro then what

8:47

happened on this. I saw a headline

8:49

that said, medical aid and dying bill

8:51

moves forward in Albany. And I thought,

8:53

oh, that got wrapped into the budget

8:55

too. But you're saying it got out

8:58

of committee in the assembly. And that's

9:00

the first of several steps. That's further

9:02

than it's gotten before. But to be

9:04

clear, that has not passed. And

9:07

it's looking like it's going to get

9:09

a full assembly vote. But no, it hasn't

9:11

been wrapped up in the budget negotiations

9:13

in the sense that it hasn't been negotiated

9:15

with the governor. We don't know where

9:17

the governor stands on that. And obviously, if

9:19

the assembly passes it, the Senate's got

9:22

to pass it. The governor's got to sign

9:24

any law. And the Catholic Church is

9:26

against and some advocates for people

9:28

with disabilities or other vulnerable

9:30

groups who fear that they

9:32

may be pressured into requesting

9:35

aid and dying early termination

9:37

of their lives when they're

9:39

terminally ill, that

9:41

those are some of the groups opposed. All

9:43

right, next item then. There

9:45

was another rollback from the 2019

9:48

law, generally called the bail

9:50

reform bill, but this rollback is

9:52

not about bail itself, rather

9:54

it's about when prosecutors have to

9:56

share the evidence they have

9:58

with the defense. Now this can

10:00

sound legalistic and wonky and

10:02

make people's eyes glaze over, but

10:04

tell us briefly John, what's it

10:06

really about and why did prosecutors and

10:08

some politicians want this so much? Yeah,

10:11

this is this is about what's

10:13

known as criminal discovery and that is

10:15

that's the the rules and the

10:17

deadlines for when prosecutors and defense have

10:19

to share evidence prior to a

10:22

trial and the idea is You know

10:24

if you are charged with a

10:26

crime and you are weighing whether to

10:28

go to trial or whether to

10:30

take a plea You have the right

10:32

to see the evidence against you.

10:34

You you have the right to know

10:36

essentially the pillars of the case

10:38

against you from a from an evidentiary

10:40

basis, so In 2019,

10:42

they passed some reforms to

10:44

tie those deadlines to

10:47

speedy trial deadlines and essentially

10:49

get the evidence to

10:51

the defense in a quicker

10:53

manner. Prosecutors have claimed,

10:55

with some evidence, that These deadlines

10:57

have been difficult to meet and

11:00

have led to an increase in

11:02

dismissals because they forgot this piece

11:04

of evidence or they missed this

11:06

piece of evidence. They didn't get

11:08

it until after the deadline. So

11:11

essentially the governor and district

11:13

attorneys, largely from New York City,

11:15

insisted on changes to that

11:17

to make it a little easier

11:19

on prosecutors. That was

11:21

a big fight with the

11:23

legislature, which stood behind these

11:26

2019 reforms. where they

11:28

ended up is they they made

11:30

a few changes we still haven't

11:32

seen language but as the governor

11:34

laid it out last night you

11:36

know they're adding in more leeway

11:38

for judges to to consider the

11:40

totality of the evidence and you

11:42

know if maybe a piece of

11:44

evidence wasn't handed over that wasn't

11:46

terribly wasn't super critical to the

11:49

case. Maybe they can allow the

11:51

case to continue rather than dismiss

11:53

it. And they also are going

11:55

to allow the judges to determine

11:57

whether there was any prejudice against

11:59

the defendant, whether the defendant was

12:01

harmed by this lack of by

12:03

a piece of evidence that wasn't

12:05

shared in deciding whether to allow

12:08

the case to go on. We'll

12:10

get into some of the actual budget

12:12

items in the budget. in a minute, but

12:14

some people are calling and texting about

12:16

some of the non -budget items at the

12:19

budget that we've touched on so far. And

12:21

I think Tristan in Brooklyn is

12:24

not happy with this masking compromise.

12:26

Tristan, you're on WNYC. Thank you

12:28

for calling in. Hi,

12:31

yeah. Thanks for having me. So

12:34

what are you thinking? Yeah, so I've been, yeah,

12:36

I've been Really disappointed to see

12:38

the masking stuff make it into

12:40

the budget process. I call both

12:43

my representatives Got my displeasure with

12:45

it. I'm glad I got watered

12:47

down But you know, I really

12:49

see this as a pattern with

12:51

Kathy Huckle where she's trying to

12:53

be some sort of I don't

12:55

know tough on crime person and

12:57

it in very like to me

12:59

honestly fascistic ways she's You know

13:01

trying to make it a crime

13:03

to wear a mask she you

13:05

know CUNY added

13:07

someone for Palestinian studies added a

13:09

position in the CUNY system and

13:11

she stepped in to quash that

13:13

and You know just a lot

13:16

of other things she's done that

13:18

I see her running the government

13:20

and just incredibly disappointed with her

13:22

as governor I don't know if

13:24

I could vote for her again

13:26

in a general election if you

13:28

had to choose between Kathy Hockel

13:31

say Elise Stefanik or abstaining a

13:33

nightmare scenario. Would you take that

13:35

risk? from your point of view? You

13:39

know, it's hard. Maybe I wouldn't if

13:41

at least a phonic, but, you know,

13:43

I've really just lost complete support for

13:45

her as governor. I'm really hoping someone

13:47

else runs against her in the primary.

13:50

Tristan, thank you very much for your call. So,

13:52

John, you think he speaks for

13:54

a lot of progressives who are

13:57

unhappy with even this compromise on

13:59

the masks or even the fact

14:01

that she tried in the first

14:03

place, even if she failed to

14:05

go further on the masks. I

14:07

don't know if you know the

14:10

CUNY situation that Tristan referred to.

14:12

Did she impose a faculty member

14:14

or cancel a faculty member? And

14:17

is she going to get primaried from

14:19

the left next year on issues like these?

14:22

Well when you brought up Elise Stefanik

14:24

there I could hear Tristan's heart sink

14:26

right through the radio I mean that

14:28

was that I could tell that that

14:30

was a difficult one for him, but

14:32

you know Tristan said You know that

14:34

the governor is trying I can't remember

14:36

his exact words But he said something

14:38

in the effect of you know public

14:40

safety measures and and you know she's

14:42

trying to be this public safety governor

14:44

and that is accurate. Yes.

14:46

And why is that? It's

14:48

because in 2022, Lee

14:50

Zeldin, the Republican candidate, used

14:53

the issue of public safety and

14:55

the perception of a lack

14:57

of public safety against the governor

14:59

in a really targeted, calculated,

15:01

expert way, and only lost by

15:03

five and a half points

15:05

to the governor in a deep

15:07

blue state. So since then, Kathy

15:10

Hockel has been trying, she would

15:12

quibble with me saying she's trying

15:14

to shore up her record on

15:17

public safety, but she's certainly trying

15:19

to sell her record on public

15:21

safety. And, you know, these issues

15:23

with the mask issue is part

15:25

of that, the discovery reform issue

15:27

is part of that, involuntary commitment

15:30

changes, which we haven't discussed yet.

15:32

That's part of this budget agreement

15:34

as well. That's part of, you

15:36

know, presenting herself as the public

15:38

safety governor. And that is intended

15:40

to help ward off challenges from

15:43

the right when she's up for

15:45

reelection next year, if she gets

15:47

through a Democratic primary. Craig

15:50

in Brooklyn is calling about

15:53

the changes to the discovery laws.

15:55

Craig's a lawyer. Craig, you're

15:57

on WNYC. Hello. Hi,

15:59

thank you for having me. Yeah, one of

16:01

the things that was a major, major

16:03

blow, and I think that we're going to

16:05

feel, is this change to this discovery

16:07

reform that was thrown through plus part of

16:09

this budget. Really, what disturbs

16:11

me here is that most people in

16:13

New York do not even realize

16:16

the limited amount of discovery we were

16:18

given in criminal defense, oftentimes taking

16:20

pleas without really knowing what the case

16:22

was, how good the plaintiff's case

16:24

was, sorry, the DA's case

16:26

was. We wouldn't get grand jury

16:28

minutes until basically we were

16:30

being sent out to trial and

16:32

having to review files literally

16:34

and needing to pick a jury

16:36

very quickly. Really, really a

16:38

terrible setback, especially at the time

16:40

when we're seeing defense counsel

16:42

being attacked on all fronts now.

16:46

And again, the other thing that disturbed

16:48

me about it is that these

16:50

discovery forms were being put through without

16:52

any real consultation with any of

16:54

the major criminal defense bars, even New

16:56

York City and New York State,

16:58

or even federally. So it's really, really

17:00

a strong arm tactic that I

17:02

think that's being unfairly put forth, and

17:04

really gonna hurt defendants. The argument

17:06

here, and this too, of course, is

17:08

part of Kathy Hockel, public safety

17:10

governor. The argument that I've

17:12

heard from proponents of this

17:14

change is that so many

17:16

cases that would have

17:18

resulted usually in plea bargains

17:20

and guilty pleas have now

17:22

not been able to get

17:24

there and the cases have

17:26

been dismissed because the prosecutors

17:28

were given too short a

17:30

time frame to gather and

17:32

present their evidence to the

17:34

defense and that's and you

17:36

know hurt public safety that

17:38

there's then been recidivism repeat

17:40

offenses by some of the

17:42

same people as a result.

17:44

What's your response to that?

17:47

Well, my thing is that there

17:49

are other states that are known

17:51

for being very strong on crimes

17:53

such as Florida, but Florida actually

17:55

always has had much more liberal

17:57

discovery policies in place, which is

17:59

shocking, basically, where we have someone

18:02

who's liberties at stake. And

18:04

again, I can understand the question

18:06

becomes is that why are there

18:08

prosecutors bringing cases immediately to trial

18:10

that they really have a thin

18:12

file on or don't have enough

18:14

on? And I understand that some

18:16

prosecutors feel that they're rushed and

18:18

maybe there's been a few cases

18:20

where there may have been something

18:22

dismissed on the 30 -30 grounds because

18:25

of failure to abide with the

18:27

discovery laws. But again, we

18:29

really do owe a duty to protect

18:31

the innocent or the wrongly accused. It

18:34

goes back to saying that many

18:36

times the pleas that were being given

18:38

to us that we were forced

18:40

into were being given without us having

18:43

full information and discovery on the

18:45

defendant's side, and that's the real problem

18:47

here. We're being told to zealously

18:49

defend our clients, and yet at the

18:51

same time, not being given anything

18:53

that the prosecutor has and being rushed.

18:56

Thank you very much for your call. We appreciate

18:58

it. I guess we will see how this

19:00

plays out once it gets implemented. A

19:02

few more minutes with our Albany reporter,

19:05

John Campbell, on the many budgetary and

19:07

non -budgetary items that got agreed to

19:09

in the annual New York State budget

19:11

bill announced by Governor Hockel

19:13

last night. And,

19:15

you know, just as you say, John,

19:17

that Hockel wants to be a

19:19

public safety governor now, based on what

19:22

happened nationally in the elections last

19:24

year, as well as in New York.

19:26

She also wants to be the

19:28

affordability governor, right, based on

19:30

another thing that helped Trump get elected

19:32

and some Republicans get elected. So let's

19:34

go to some of the actual budget

19:36

items in the budget. many

19:38

new yorkers will be getting a

19:40

check in the mail from the

19:42

state yeah that's right uh it

19:45

she's calling it an inflation refund

19:47

check and these these checks will

19:49

cost new york state about two

19:51

billion dollars and she says they're

19:53

gonna go to to more than

19:55

eight million new yorkers checks would

19:57

be up to four hundred dollars

19:59

per family $200 for individual filers

20:02

now that is scaled down from

20:04

what the governor originally proposed in

20:06

January when she proposed $500 and

20:08

$300 checks that would have cost

20:10

about three billion dollars She cut

20:12

a billion dollars off of that

20:14

as part of this final deal

20:16

lawmakers were kind of mixed on

20:19

the the idea from the start

20:21

The governor insisted on it paired

20:23

it back. We don't have the

20:25

exact Eligibility requirements yet.

20:27

That's something that we'll see when

20:29

the the bills are printed and we

20:31

see it in the the actual

20:33

bill But yeah, no a whole bunch

20:36

of New Yorkers are gonna be

20:38

getting getting checks mailed straight to them

20:40

as part of this budget and

20:42

bigger child tax credits to Yeah, it

20:44

is the child tax credit in

20:46

New York is would be increased to

20:48

a thousand dollars for kids younger

20:51

than four $500 for kids

20:53

four to 16. That

20:55

basically doubles the credit for

20:57

the average family. That

20:59

was another big thing for

21:01

the governor. Now that

21:03

said, also, this

21:05

is the budget, but if there

21:07

are big federal cuts... might

21:09

have to come back later this

21:11

year and rejigger the budget

21:13

to account for that. So some

21:15

of these things, it's like,

21:17

okay, it's in there now, but

21:19

if three months from now,

21:22

the Trump administration and Congress cut,

21:24

make big federal cuts to

21:26

New York, New York's budget has

21:28

more than $90 billion in

21:30

federal funding in it, who

21:32

knows what's gonna happen? right in the

21:34

Trump era there's nothing more certain than

21:36

uncertainty and that's certainly true in the

21:38

case of funding for the states funding

21:40

for all kinds of things as we

21:42

know so yes there may be revisions

21:44

in the middle of the new york

21:46

state fiscal year when they figure out

21:48

what's going to happen in the next

21:51

federal fiscal year kind of to that

21:53

point we had republican Hudson

21:55

Valley congressman and likely gubernatorial hopeful

21:57

Mike Lawler on the show

21:59

last week. And he walked an

22:01

interesting line on the size

22:03

of the New York state budget.

22:05

Listen to this clip in

22:07

which he starts by distancing himself

22:09

from Elon Musk's term for

22:11

how he's approaching the federal budget.

22:13

Musk famously said he's taking

22:15

a chainsaw to it, but we'll

22:17

hear where else Lawler goes. It

22:20

doesn't mean that you take a chainsaw to it.

22:22

It doesn't mean that you slash and burn But

22:25

it does mean

22:27

that there needs to

22:29

be a level

22:31

of introspection and really

22:33

verifying that the

22:35

dollars being spent are

22:37

necessary and effective. Do

22:40

you think that sets up a

22:42

big debate on the budget for

22:44

next year John Lola also said

22:47

in our interview New York spends

22:49

more than Texas and Florida state

22:51

governments combined Despite having tens of

22:53

millions fewer people has Huckle been

22:55

asked yet to defend this much

22:57

spending per person and whether it's

22:59

wasteful and comes with too much

23:01

of a tax burden I don't

23:03

know that she's been asked directly

23:05

like that, but she's certainly been

23:07

asked a lot about Medicaid

23:11

in New York is, along

23:13

with education, they are the

23:15

two biggest cost drivers in the

23:17

New York state budget. This

23:20

budget is

23:22

$254 billion. That's

23:25

more than a quarter trillion dollars.

23:27

It is very, very big. It grows. every

23:30

single year. And a

23:32

big driver of that is

23:34

increases in Medicaid costs,

23:36

which that is generally split

23:38

between the state and

23:41

federal government. And New

23:43

York offers a lot

23:45

of Medicaid services that, for

23:47

example, Florida does not

23:50

provide dental services, for example.

23:53

And so the question is, how

23:55

do you rein in those costs?

23:57

There is an acknowledgement from the

23:59

governor's office and from the state

24:02

budget director that, specifically the state

24:04

budget director, that the growth in

24:06

Medicaid is unsustainable in New York.

24:08

Now the question is, how do

24:10

you make structural changes so the

24:12

long term you get those back

24:14

into back into whack, so to

24:16

speak. So Yeah, I mean, the

24:18

governor has faced some of those

24:21

questions and has acknowledged that the

24:23

growth is unsustainable, but But I

24:25

you know, I think critics would

24:27

say that there's probably not enough

24:29

done to, you know, make those

24:31

structural changes necessary going forward to

24:34

know, get things in line here.

24:36

John Campbell, our Albany reporter. Hear

24:39

more about the budget through the day

24:41

on the radio or read his article on

24:43

Gothamist, our local news website. John, thanks

24:45

a lot for hopping on. Thank

24:47

you so much, Brian.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features