Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hello Googlers,
0:02
and welcome to issue 4275
0:07
of the world's foremost
0:11
source of reliably unreliable
0:21
half-truth speculation and analysis
0:23
of the latest developments in the human race's fierce
0:25
battle with itself in the evolutionary
0:28
race. I am Andy Zaltzman, lord of all I
0:30
survey, albeit that the only surveys
0:32
I do are of me, and it's time to
0:34
do this week's survey right now in fact. Here's
0:37
the first question of the survey, do you think Andy
0:39
Zaltzman should remain as host of the Google podcast?
0:42
I think I'll put down don't know, no change
0:44
in the polling on that one. It is
0:46
the 25th of September 2023 and today I'm
0:49
joined from the unremittingly utopian harmony
0:51
fest and glittering beacon of mutual tolerance
0:54
and respect that is the United States of America
0:56
by Josh Gondelman. Josh, welcome back
0:58
to the Bugle, how are you? I'm
1:00
well thank you, happy to be a utopian correspondent.
1:04
And also joining us here in London in the enduring
1:06
land of grudgery and recriminational stroppledom
1:09
that is the UK, it's the one last
1:11
best hope for a brighter future, Ian Smith.
1:13
Ian, can you live up to that hype? Oh I don't know,
1:15
it's a lot of pressure isn't it? It
1:18
is. I think you're up
1:20
to it. What worries
1:22
me is why no one, I've only just
1:24
found out about this now. Right, okay, yeah.
1:27
I'm on the committee and we've picked you as our last, one
1:30
last best hope for a brighter future.
1:32
Oh right, I'd better start doing some prep. Um,
1:37
Josh you join us on, well, an exciting
1:39
day, it seems that the... Yonkipore!
1:41
Oh yes of
1:43
course, thanks for the reminder. Um,
1:47
the writers strike is coming to an end,
1:49
can you just fill us in on what's happened and
1:51
why?
1:52
It seems that way, it seems like the Writers
1:55
Guild of America and the AMPTP,
1:57
the Alliance of Studios, has come to
1:59
a tended...
1:59
of agreement. So there aren't a ton
2:02
of details yet but it is really
2:04
exciting news and hopefully more good
2:06
news to come. It's been 146
2:10
days and so I think people are
2:12
really excited to hear that we've
2:15
reached this tentative agreement. SAG-AFTRA
2:17
is still on strike and hopefully that will get resolved soon
2:19
as well and then I'm excited to go back to being just
2:21
regular unemployed and that's what's on the horizon
2:23
for me. And
2:27
I mean how do you think this is going to change writing
2:29
because people have been you know they've
2:32
got 146 days of pure
2:34
quality backed up in them. This is going to just all come
2:36
splurging out into the greatest television
2:39
ever created. That's right. It's going to be
2:41
like uncrimping the garden hose for
2:44
just 11,000 writers brains all
2:47
at once and it is going to be yeah
2:49
it's going to be a geyser of excitement
2:51
and quality. Ian
2:54
since you were lost on the bugle you've been to the
2:57
Edinburgh Festival where you lost
3:01
the festival. Yeah. Hard
3:03
luck. I mean you announced as one of the
3:05
near runners up so congratulations for that
3:08
but I mean how has that defeat weighed
3:10
on you?
3:11
Yeah well because
3:14
I guess it's quite good. I was nominated
3:16
for
3:17
three varying
3:19
quality awards and didn't
3:22
win any of them so there's
3:24
a moment where you feel very proud of yourself
3:26
but you know that there's an inevitable crushing
3:29
defeat coming not once but three
3:31
times. So it's quite
3:34
a testing month a bit of a roller
3:36
coaster. Well writing on
3:38
the bugle as a serial loser that's why
3:40
we have you on this show. In
3:42
more positive news though I got
3:45
a text message from my voiceover agent today
3:47
saying I might be able to audition for
3:49
a role in the CBB's
3:52
animated series Dog Squad. So
3:56
yeah maybe in a few months time I'll be too big
3:58
to be coming on this. podcast.
4:03
Who's the real winner now? Ian's
4:06
last performance in The Shed, Andy,
4:08
in DMA featured Ian
4:11
Panicking about what he should
4:13
do for his Edinburgh show this year. It's nice
4:15
to see the full narrative after that show. Well,
4:20
yeah, congratulations on doing so well. And we
4:22
will give you a chance to plug your imminent run at Soho
4:25
Theatre later in the show. But first,
4:27
as I said, we are recording on the 25th of September 2023. On this
4:30
day in 1690, the first
4:33
ever newspaper to appear in America
4:36
was published. Public occurrences,
4:38
both foreign and domestic, lasted
4:41
one issue in 1690, before it was closed
4:43
down by
4:46
the British colonial authorities. Very unlucky
4:49
for public occurrences, both foreign and domestic,
4:51
to launch on one of the very few
4:53
momentary micro periods of British history
4:56
when a remorseless commitment to free speech has
4:58
not been on the British core values list.
5:00
It was shut down for reasons
5:03
that the 1690s
5:06
could probably share with us at some point. It
5:08
does raise an interesting question. Should all newspapers
5:10
be restricted to a maximum of one issue?
5:13
Would that lead to a healthier
5:16
media landscape if they weren't allowed to
5:18
kind of just keep festering the
5:21
society from within? I'd be in favour of that.
5:23
But the problem with only ever having one issue
5:26
on the 25th of September 1690 was that we never found
5:29
out the answers to the daily quiz in
5:31
that first issue. But luckily I can share them
5:33
now, the answers to the quiz. Question
5:36
one, Ferdinand III preceded
5:38
Leopold I as Holy Roman Emperor. It
5:40
was, of course, the New York bunny-wangers
5:43
who won the inaugural 1689 season
5:45
of the American Rabbit-Hirling Championship.
5:48
Question three, she was his cousin. Question
5:50
four, probably a witch. Question
5:52
five, definitely a witch. And
5:54
question six, the best-selling children's book of 1689 was,
5:57
of course, that's not my pope. So
6:00
that on this day in 1690, the only
6:02
ever issue of the greatest newspaper of all
6:04
time. As always, while we're on the subject of newspapers,
6:07
a section of this audio newspaper is going straight
6:09
in the bin and it's featuring
6:12
a man who's published a lot of newspapers,
6:14
Rupert Fox Murdoch, so
6:17
called because of the stench he leaves behind in the
6:19
detritus of public discourse after he's rummaged
6:21
around with it, is stepping down as
6:23
the boss of Fox and News Corp
6:25
and our section in the bin looks at where now for
6:28
Rupert Murdoch. What next for
6:31
him? He did say as he stepped down the bottle for freedom
6:33
of speech and ultimately the freedom of thought has never been
6:35
more intense and he can certainly take a lot of credit
6:37
for quite how intense that battle
6:39
has become. And you can
6:41
decide what side of that battle you think he was on. Murdoch,
6:44
of course, is best known for being in charge of News
6:46
Corp when Times Online launched the Bugle podcast.
6:50
Rupels didn't have a particularly hands-on role though,
6:52
as I remember. But what
6:54
next for him? Well, of course, he has been linked with the
6:56
Man United job with Eric Penn Hargun, the
6:58
pressure and experienced leader such as Rupert Murdoch
7:00
could be what the Red Devils need to turn round
7:02
their faltering season. Alternatively, he might
7:05
open a coffee shop and or fair trade sustainable
7:07
fashion boutique. Option three,
7:09
to pursue his childhood dream of a career in interpretive
7:12
dance. He is apparently working on a solo ballet
7:15
based on the Australian mythological frog Tiddelik,
7:17
one of the star amphibians of Aboriginal creation stories,
7:19
teaming up with tennis star Pat Rafter
7:22
to save a distressed platypus called Mildred from
7:24
being kidnapped by aliens. Can't wait to see
7:26
that. Option four is that he could be put
7:28
out to stud to breed the next generation of democracy
7:31
skewing media billionaire truth splatter as
7:34
some suggest that might already have happened. Another
7:36
option is to start a new news empire from scratch.
7:39
Rupert apparently looking at starting up a local newspaper
7:41
in the rural Bolivian town of Bermako.
7:44
Good challenge for Rupert. See if he's still
7:46
got those skills at the age of 92. Another
7:49
option is to run for elected office. Not
7:51
particularly efficient way of wielding power. In fact,
7:53
let me do the math. It's 0.03% as effective
7:56
as what he's done previously. So he might not be interested in
7:58
that. And of course the most. is
8:01
the belated formation of his prog folk
8:03
band of quite literal 90s music
8:05
with fellow non-agenarians Buzz, honestly
8:07
the moon israel, Aldrin, Henry, Kissy,
8:09
Kissinger and retired monocons
8:11
celebrity own death faker The Queen. Tour
8:14
dates imminent. Well,
8:16
I mean whatever he does, he's
8:18
really been in an intense position for
8:21
a long time. He's really just probably whatever
8:23
it is going to take a step back and enjoy a
8:25
little period of transition before his, what
8:27
clearly is his ultimate goal of hell, eternal
8:30
hell. Yeah,
8:33
I mean I guess you don't want to rush into that, do you? No,
8:36
you don't want to move from one big thing right into the next
8:39
big thing.
8:41
But I mean maybe that's what hell needs. We
8:43
will actually touch on hell
8:46
later in the show Ian Smith and Chris about hell
8:49
correspondence. We'll have
8:51
all the latest from there. What
8:58
sort of a swoop
8:59
opening gates use? Well, life
9:02
is in many ways if you want it to be. All about opening
9:04
gates, closing gates and choosing whether or not
9:06
to open or close gates. Both literal
9:09
and of course metaphorical gates and if you're a surgeon
9:11
specialising in tech billionaires, Bill Gates is too.
9:14
But one gate I've generally been sceptical of
9:16
opening is the gates of hell. But
9:18
it turns out they have now been officially opened
9:21
according to the UN Secretary General, Antonio,
9:24
go with your guterres. Humanity
9:27
has opened the gates of
9:29
hell. Ian, I mean generally
9:32
people have been opposed to opening the gates of hell. Do
9:35
you think this is a good move or not on behalf of humanity?
9:38
Well, I think I just assumed this must have happened ages ago.
9:41
Right. It
9:43
doesn't feel like a shocking
9:45
development, just more like a reminder.
9:51
Yeah, he said as well that we're heading
9:53
towards a dangerous and unstable
9:55
world and we're not in that now. what
10:00
is coming
10:03
up. To say something that's going to make us
10:05
feel scared, it would have to
10:08
get to sort of Cormac McCarthy,
10:11
the road levels. They
10:13
have to come on stage and say, we're
10:17
heading towards a world where we're carrying
10:19
all our possessions around in a trolley trying
10:21
to protect our children from cannibals. And
10:25
I think even then some people would see that as quite
10:27
an aspirational lifestyle.
10:31
There's two sides to that, right? Some people
10:33
might hear that and go, I'm going to have to protect my children to be a cannibal.
10:36
And then other people might think, I'm going to get
10:38
to eat a kid. Two sides to every coin. Yeah,
10:44
that's that. That's that. Positive America and Astid you
10:46
bring, Josh. Yeah, that's right.
10:49
Yeah, America, opening the gates
10:51
of hell is pretty much a
10:53
summary of American politics 2016 and
10:55
following years. I mean, are people concerned
10:58
about what might come out of the gates of hell or are they hoping
11:01
for an improvement if the forces
11:03
of evil from within the bowels of hell actually
11:06
come out and start working in American
11:08
politics? Will this improve things for
11:10
America as a nation? Well, I do
11:12
think there is about half the country that
11:15
is against opening the gates of
11:17
hell pretty firmly, or like we should
11:19
at least means test what it would do to
11:21
open the gates of hell. And then we've
11:24
got the other half that wants to kind of kiss the
11:26
end of the world right on the apocalypse. And
11:28
I, I do
11:31
think that climate change, right? It
11:34
is hell is an apt metaphor
11:36
for what's happening, because if it gets warmer,
11:39
it will be spring break everywhere
11:41
all the time. And I can't imagine
11:44
a more torturous set of circumstances
11:47
under which to live other than Cormac
11:49
McCarthy's spring break. His last novel.
11:55
Yeah, so he was, Gutierrez was specifically
11:57
referring to the environment. I
12:00
don't know what you think of the environment if you're for
12:02
or against it, but it's proved to be a very irritating opponent
12:05
for us humans. And particularly now as we find
12:07
ourselves forced into
12:10
cowtowing to the woke agenda of wanting the planet
12:12
to remain inhabitable beyond the economically
12:14
crucial next five to 10 years. And
12:17
obviously there's those who think the environment is a hoax
12:20
or that the reason we get one-to-the-millennium weather events about
12:22
once every three months is not because the environment
12:24
has changed, but because time has changed and millenniums
12:26
are in fact only 12 weeks long these days, or
12:29
even who think there was the point of having a planet to live on in 200 years
12:31
time if your course of the economic figures don't
12:34
start improving now. So I mean it's
12:36
not quite as clear cut an issue as
12:39
destroying the environment and the planet is
12:41
bad. And you know maybe the UN
12:43
needs to have a little more flexibility on
12:45
that. It is alarming to hear
12:48
diplomats invoke biblical
12:50
imagery, right? That's not their purview. That's
12:53
truly like if a priest is like you
12:55
have a 0.7% chance of survival
12:57
and you're like whoa you really shifted to paradigm
12:59
father. And
13:02
he made these comments at a one-day
13:05
climate summit and I was
13:07
very relieved that there was a one-day
13:09
climate summit because I think what the world needs in these times
13:11
of global boiling is another summit.
13:14
Not just any summit but a one-day summit
13:16
that is preparing for another summit later
13:18
in the year because there is no problem too
13:20
big than it cannot be solved by throwing
13:22
good summits after bad to get it
13:24
fixed at some point in the next 300 years. The
13:27
next summit as well COP 28 is in Dubai. So
13:32
they're worried about things getting hotter. Just
13:34
hold it in Norway. What would make things seem better? That's a
13:36
good thing. It would feel cooler. Right. Yeah.
13:40
I think I've had a good work. I was
13:43
going to say
13:45
how do you get a climate summit in Dubai? That
13:48
feels like a World Cup level of
13:50
bribery must have been involved. It's
13:54
not that obvious place to
13:56
have it, is it? And I was always with climate
13:58
summits. It will involve A lot of people
14:01
feel I'm not doing a long way for not very
14:03
much time and not doing a great deal with it. I
14:05
did feel a little sorry for Guterres. I mean his face,
14:08
as you'd expect I guess from the UN Secretary General, his
14:10
face very much says, I hate my job.
14:13
And there must be a day when he just thinks, can
14:17
we just talk about something less depressing
14:19
than all the stuff I have to talk about? So I
14:21
do feel a bit sorry for him. Do
14:23
you think at the UN conferences they have a
14:26
silly story at the end, like on the
14:28
news? What
14:31
would you, if you were a delegate
14:34
at the UN conference, and that's surely just a matter of timing,
14:38
what kind of thing would you tag onto the end just
14:40
to perk things up? Usually it's
14:43
like a record-breaking size
14:45
bit of food. You have
14:48
to crowd please it to come on and say,
14:50
well, we've made the world's longest
14:53
baguette, so it can't be all
14:55
bad. Speaking
14:58
of warming, this
15:01
world record sized pizza was cooked in an oven
15:03
that kept you 550 degrees. There
15:08
was an article here about the
15:11
impact that these things are having on
15:13
the younger generation. And a survey for
15:15
the Prince's Trust in the UK found that young people
15:18
are now abandoning their
15:21
dreams and ambitions because of a range of factors
15:23
including the cost of living crisis, but also the doom-laden
15:25
state of the environment. And
15:28
this was presented as a bad news story. And
15:31
to me, this is one of the few silver
15:33
linings
15:33
from this because it used to be that
15:36
it took, I don't know,
15:38
a decade, two decades, sometimes even
15:40
three decades for society
15:42
in life to crush the spirit of the young until
15:45
they just give up all hope. But now we're getting
15:47
it done by the time people are in their mid-20s. It's
15:50
just a rare example of efficiency
15:53
in the modern economy and I'm absolutely right
15:55
on board with it. I agree. I think the last
15:57
few generations have been encouraged to live their
15:59
dreams. And that's what got us into this mess, right?
16:02
Agree? In
16:07
Britain, there's been, well,
16:10
interesting moods in the environment
16:12
debate. Ian Ritchie-Soudnak, the
16:14
interim prime minister, has jumped
16:17
once more into the burning breach and chucked some more
16:19
soothing matches into the fire. He's
16:21
announced various rollbacks
16:24
of British environmental commitments. He's
16:27
delaying the phase-out of gas boilers and petrol
16:29
cars. And he also announced
16:31
he was scrapping a lot of things that weren't
16:34
going to happen anyway, but had kind
16:36
of been mentioned so that if they were
16:38
to happen, which they never were going to happen,
16:41
then they could easily have happened.
16:43
And he's presented this as him jumping
16:46
to the defence of ordinary British people and
16:48
stopping things that weren't going to happen happening to
16:51
them. And with the Conservatives riding so
16:53
low in the poll, Soudnak clearly is jumping
16:55
between environmental bandwagons in an effort
16:57
to steer his government's Titanic to a slightly
16:59
less deep and soggy section of
17:02
the electoral seabed. Do you think this will
17:04
prove effective? I mean, he
17:06
is relying on people just ignoring
17:08
the fact that he is making shit up that
17:11
he's going to stop from happening that
17:13
wasn't going to happen. Like people being forced to
17:15
have seven different bins in
17:18
their homes, which wasn't going
17:20
to happen. Do you think
17:22
this is the way for politicians now
17:24
to just make things up that
17:26
weren't going to happen and then present themselves as heroes
17:29
for stopping them happening? It probably is
17:31
the best way to get an electorate
17:33
enthusiastic because I mean,
17:35
most people don't lock these things up. Most
17:39
people don't fact check anything. So if you say
17:41
a thing happened and I stopped it,
17:44
you're probably just going to believe someone. I
17:48
think if I told my friends, I
17:50
saw a woman getting her handbag
17:53
stolen and I chased after the person
17:55
I gave her a handbag back, my
17:58
friends aren't going to be checking the seat. TV cameras
18:01
of the area I said it was going to happen. They're
18:05
just going to believe me. I'll maybe give myself a black eye,
18:07
just punch myself in the face.
18:11
So yeah, it's very – I believe
18:13
it's seven bins. I can't think of
18:15
seven categories of waste
18:18
that could go in bins. I
18:20
tried to list it and I got recycling
18:23
food waste, garden waste, human
18:25
waste. Then
18:28
all I could do was miscellaneous and
18:30
then I've gone whites and yolks. It
18:37
doesn't feel right. I mean
18:40
that's a lot of bins, isn't it? Seven
18:43
different bins that we'd have been forced to
18:46
have. Similarly, there were other suggestions.
18:50
The number of passengers you were going to be allowed
18:52
to have in your car. These weren't so much concrete
18:55
proposals. They were things that have been vaguely
18:57
floated as ideas for
19:00
putative moments in the future. But
19:03
it was presented by Sue now because if we were going to be forced to share
19:05
cars with people we'd never met who were going in completely
19:08
different directions to us and were legally entitled to sit
19:10
in the back seat, threateningly revving
19:12
a chainsaw. So
19:14
I mean it's a weird thing, isn't it? I mean
19:16
you can't scrap something that wasn't going to happen and say, well I can't
19:19
and would not accuse the Prime Minister of losing credibility
19:21
or authority or legitimacy. I
19:23
mean similarly on those grounds, I couldn't say that. I
19:26
mean Josh, I don't know if you've been following
19:29
this story over
19:31
here. But again, the environment seems to become
19:33
this sort of political issue
19:35
where it's almost
19:37
sort of being performatively
19:40
wrong on the environment seems
19:42
to be electrically effective. Oh
19:44
yeah. I mean you're talking about this is the
19:47
future and I'm saying this is last year's
19:49
old news for us. That's classic.
19:53
Although I do think there's
19:55
no better way to fulfill
19:58
campaign promises than to promise to solve
20:00
problems that don't exist. That's,
20:03
you're batting a thousand, easy, right? Oh,
20:06
hey, no extra-chorustrials
20:08
are gonna come down to earth and launch
20:10
nuclear weapons at our heads
20:14
of state.
20:15
Done,
20:16
done, 100% done. Joe
20:18
Biden, interestingly, we got some
20:20
good climate news over here. Joe Biden
20:23
started a climate
20:25
core, the American climate core, which will employ 20,000
20:28
Americans in green energy and environmental restoration
20:31
jobs. And on one hand, I am happy
20:33
to see any concrete step
20:35
in the right direction, but on the other hand,
20:39
by employing 20,000 people
20:41
in this climate core, it's like saying, oh, you want
20:43
a livable climate? You can do
20:45
it. What do you think about that? Sunak
20:49
also said, for too many years, politicians
20:51
and governments of all stripes have not been
20:54
honest about the costs and
20:56
trade-offs. And he was talking about the environment,
20:58
but in a country that voted for
21:01
Brexit, in which he supported Brexit,
21:04
and it was entirely founded on
21:06
not being honest about costs and trade-offs. It was
21:09
the heroic levels of hypocrisy
21:11
that the politicians reach for now. In a way, you
21:15
have to admire it. It's like watching Armand di Planteis
21:17
do the pole vault. You think, I mean, he shouldn't be
21:19
able to go as high as he does, but somehow he keeps
21:21
finding, well, he stood in front of a lectern,
21:24
as he made this speech, with
21:26
a new slogan on the front, saying, long-term
21:28
decisions for a brighter future. I
21:31
don't know if that was the first instance of a party managing
21:33
to get two screeching U-turns into one
21:35
pithy slogan, or just
21:38
to show the dangers of lecterns not being wide
21:40
enough to fit the whole slogan on, and
21:42
that they missed off the words at the end, long-term
21:44
decisions for a brighter future, are absolutely not on
21:46
the f***ing agenda, or are the kind
21:48
of woke shit we won't have any truck with, to
21:51
ram the final nail into the coffin of the future.
21:54
Also, I think when they'd be being unfair,
21:56
because when, I think
21:59
a conservative, leader doesn't
22:02
mean what we mean when they say long term
22:04
because the life expectancy
22:07
in that job is about three months. So
22:10
they're probably saying long term is like a six-week
22:12
plan. Right, butterfly policies. Right,
22:16
they're on the Andy Salzman 12-week millennium.
22:19
I can't tell you the concept of time.
22:24
And it wasn't just Sunak, still surprising after
22:26
all this time, home secretary, Suella Bravman in
22:29
a rare shaft of honesty and accuracy said, we
22:31
are not going to save the planet. And then spoiled it all
22:34
by carrying on and finishing the sentence
22:36
by bankrupting the British people, which is
22:39
a real shame that that is not an option for
22:41
saving the planet. Because if you could save the planet
22:43
by bankrupting the British people, we
22:45
would have people in our government who are
22:47
genuinely world leading environmental
22:50
superheroes. And we would have to reinterpret
22:52
this prime ministership as an effective
22:55
if extreme just stop oil protest. And
22:57
I'm not saying I
22:59
agree with the technique she chose to
23:01
use. She shouldn't have inconvenienced ordinary people to make
23:03
that point as much as she did. But at least it
23:06
got the message across. And Bravman
23:08
also said that net zero targets were
23:10
goals, not straight jackets.
23:14
But let's not forget, you don't need to score a goal to win a
23:16
football match. And really, we just need
23:18
to grind out our nil-nil draw against the environment,
23:20
take it to a replay, maybe try and force it to penalties,
23:22
hope the environment bottles under pressure. And
23:24
if you're in a game it knows it should have won, it is the British way.
23:28
I'd also love to see a football game where
23:30
the team have to wear straight jackets. Just
23:34
trying to see someone get up after
23:36
a foul. Right. We would do away
23:38
with those controversial handball calls, wouldn't it? She's
23:40
really writing off the potential
23:42
joys of straight jacket. You and
23:45
straight. Yeah, I don't know if there's a single
23:47
sport that wouldn't be more entertaining
23:49
to watch if everyone involved wasn't wearing a
23:51
straight jacket. Oh, snooker? I
23:55
don't know. It'd be funny. It's
23:58
always good to look to. for ways to improve
24:00
sport. The chair of Ford UK
24:03
said she wanted only three things from the British government,
24:06
ambition, commitment and consistency,
24:09
which is a request which, based
24:11
on the record of this government, has as much chance of
24:14
successors asking your pet anaconda
24:16
for legs, well-researched tennis punditry
24:18
and a fine baritone voice. Anacondas
24:22
really, they only make a singular demand
24:25
and that's buns, huh? I was a
24:29
P. McWharstons who had a, so it
24:31
makes a lot of reference, well, Lord makes a lot now, of course,
24:34
I think he's an oldie.
24:40
On a related topic,
24:43
we've talked a bit about the HS2 rail line over the
24:45
years on the view of a flagship new
24:47
rail line that was supposed to revolutionise
24:49
transport across the nation, in
24:52
particular across the north of England, where
24:55
there's been so little investment in the rail network
24:58
over recent decades, and it was going to revolutionise
25:01
rail transport in the north of England by
25:03
making it about 10 minutes quicker to get from London
25:05
to Birmingham. Now, I know
25:07
Ian, you grew up in the north of England, you must
25:09
have been hugely excited about the prospect
25:12
of the slightly shorter time, train times to
25:15
Birmingham, just absolutely
25:18
rocketing the northern economy into
25:20
another dimension. But it turns out now that
25:23
this rail line will not reach
25:25
either end of its planned
25:28
route, it's not going to reach as far as the north,
25:30
and it's not even going to reach all the way into central
25:33
London, they're now talking about stopping it, but
25:35
old oak common and then people have to get
25:37
on the tube. So basically
25:39
take just as long, but
25:42
with tens of billions of pounds
25:44
wasted for no fucking reason. This, I mean, obviously,
25:47
as a representative of the north of England,
25:49
you must be honoured and delighted that
25:52
this has been bequeathed to your people. I mean, yeah,
25:54
the slight consolation of it
25:57
not going to the north is that
25:59
it's not going to be. that also isn't going to
26:01
London. The
26:05
thing of like when you
26:08
realise when you live in London that the further
26:10
out a train stop is, the
26:13
more obscure and like
26:15
a sort of children's book the
26:17
train station names become. So
26:20
although common you're like right
26:23
that's not central at all. Some
26:26
of the ones on the outskirts there's Chalfont
26:29
and Latimer on
26:31
the Metropolitan line which sounds like a kind
26:34
of ITV2 detective drama. Or
26:38
they become sort of vaguely sexual innuendos
26:40
like Northwood, Bushey, Bellsized
26:43
Park and Rodding Valley. But
26:47
also so I read that... Well
26:49
by the way for not bringing cock fosters into that list
26:51
that was remarkably disciplined. Yeah
26:53
well I've sort of... I see it
26:56
as a mark of becoming a Londoner when you can
26:58
hear cock fosters on the tube and you don't giggle
27:00
anymore. You
27:03
can spot the tourists by people who are
27:06
like... But I'm still
27:09
there, I'm still giggling. I
27:12
mean yeah I'm not happy that that joy
27:14
has gone from my life. But
27:18
they're going to come into all that common and then
27:20
they're going to have to get the Elizabeth line.
27:23
And there was an article that said that's going to put an
27:25
unbelievable amount of strain on the Elizabeth
27:28
line. And it just made me think
27:31
we can't have the Elizabeth line dying
27:34
in the same way that Queen Elizabeth
27:36
died. Being ridden by far too many people
27:38
from Birmingham until she stops working.
27:43
Family showing.
27:47
I
27:51
think that might be the most revolting thing anyone said in the
27:53
entire history of the beautiful. Well done. I
27:58
rushed it down. I felt I
28:00
felt giddy. I had to say it. No, I
28:03
thought it was beautiful It's
28:07
like mathematically like I saw all
28:09
the pieces to that joke hovering behind
28:11
my head Just as a beautiful
28:14
mathematical equation and was like he's
28:17
done it. He's cracked it Yeah,
28:21
and and the I think the funniest
28:23
thing about them Kind of doing this to
28:25
the north is like a big part of how they won
28:28
The last election was getting that the red
28:30
belt of Northern Previously
28:33
labor voting towns and then we've
28:36
not long For a general
28:38
election to go they're sort of announcing
28:40
basically we don't care about the north And
28:44
the conservatives are doing this immediately
28:46
before they have their conference in Manchester
28:49
They're gonna cancel the trains to
28:51
Manchester and then go to
28:54
Manchester Seems
28:57
I mean if you're gonna sort of do that to them You
28:59
think surely a clever person would have the conference
29:01
in Manchester Tell them the cat worked
29:04
for HS2 to come and then the next week go.
29:06
Oh, no, actually we're not gonna do it They're
29:08
not even timing their lies The
29:12
way they're doing it now they're they're basically
29:14
banking on like well, how are you gonna catch us when
29:16
we leave You
29:19
know, there's no transportation because
29:22
I do think this is Andy hit on this I think this
29:24
is an environmentally friendly move,
29:27
right? What's more? environmentally
29:29
friendly than getting across the country
29:32
on Rapid widely
29:34
available green public transportation and
29:36
that's staying still not going
29:38
anywhere And I think by
29:40
encouraging the public to this stay where you
29:43
are initiative the kind of a
29:45
shelter in place Indefinitely. I think
29:47
that is gonna be huge for carbon
29:49
emissions. Yeah, it's very
29:51
very exciting time Also, you said this this
29:54
HS2 line now, I think has become that
29:56
rare Infrastructure projects
29:59
that better all parts of
30:01
the United Kingdom equally, all the different
30:04
countries, all the different regions of the United
30:06
Kingdom are getting as much from
30:08
this HS2 project as all the
30:10
others because it's going to be absolutely
30:14
useless to everyone and that is the kind of equality
30:17
we've been asking for for years. It
30:19
feels a bit like the,
30:22
if I'm getting the name right, the Sagrada
30:25
Familia in Barcelona, the
30:29
unfinished cathedral, that it might
30:31
become a tourist attraction where people
30:33
will just come and look at the HS2
30:35
tracks and
30:37
go, well the architect said this was going to reach
30:40
Manchester and we keep
30:42
chipping away at it over the years and
30:45
none of us are going to admit that it
30:48
does look terrible to be honest. Another
30:56
positive environmental story, one animal
30:58
that is doing very well is rhinoceroses,
31:01
which have roared, if indeed a rhinoceros
31:03
can roar, back up in population
31:06
to 27,000, which is way more
31:09
than the half a million that were
31:11
at large in the 20th century, if I've
31:13
done the maths right, before people decided
31:15
that it might be a good idea to see if
31:17
killing almost half a million rhinoceroses would be fun
31:20
or not. And of course Lego started
31:22
their luxury rhino horn limited edition.
31:27
I know they did the hippo toger edition, I don't know if the
31:29
rhino horn one got canned or
31:31
not but well there has been a
31:34
bit of a recovery in the
31:36
rhino population, is this
31:38
good or bad? I mean it's because they are an evolutionary
31:40
threat as discussed, we discussed with
31:42
a number of species that we're supposed to be excited about being
31:45
safe but the rhino is one of our
31:47
competitor species, they could easily horn
31:49
us into submission and now
31:52
we're actively helping them climb back up the ranking.
31:54
Yeah I think 27,000 feels
31:56
like plenty. Right.
31:59
Totally agree. Right. You say you want a global rhino
32:01
quota, but you cannot go. A
32:05
one child policy. That's
32:08
kind of how many people – that's about how many people
32:11
live in the town that I grew up in, and that's
32:13
plenty. Right, okay. I don't need
32:15
more rhinoceros than people I grew up around. But
32:20
I mean, what if – so you're saying
32:22
should we put all 27 rhinoceroses in
32:24
a single town and see
32:27
if that helps, or would they just
32:29
all want to leave like you and you end up with a
32:32
New York full of rhinoceros?
32:35
Rhinoceros is pursuing their dreams because we all
32:37
know it's environmentally catastrophic. Well,
32:40
this is it, right? Our good environmental
32:42
news is like, hey, there's more monsters.
32:45
Big horned monsters are making you come back. She's
32:49
like, oh, it couldn't be something fluffy? I
32:51
guess the message of this podcast is the rhinoceros
32:54
is for the good of society and the environment.
32:58
I don't think they're really back until we
33:00
know what one tastes like. Right. That's
33:03
when I think we'll know that they've like – they're
33:06
back enough that we don't have to worry, and you
33:08
can casually be like, oh, this tastes like rhino. And
33:10
I mean normal people because
33:13
I think Jeff Bezos knows what rhinoceros tastes
33:15
like. But
33:18
I don't think they're back enough
33:20
until regular people, like
33:22
until Burger King has a rhinoceros
33:25
whopper called the Rhy-Woper-us.
33:29
Right. So this now
33:31
is a goal. For the conservationists, you
33:34
will not have succeeded until
33:37
the rhinoceros – what did you call it? The rhinoceros? The
33:41
rhinoceros is on the menu at Burger
33:43
King's. You would have failed rhinoceros
33:46
conservationists until – and to aim for
33:49
that, reach for the stars. Burger
33:53
King, reach for the stars. American
34:00
news now and what's been a bit of a tough week
34:02
for Joe Biden, the president,
34:05
who's, well, had a, well, what seems
34:07
to be most of his weeks now in which various
34:09
things have not gone quite as well as they would
34:11
ideally have gone for a president,
34:14
raising the question, is he too old?
34:16
To which the answer is, is the Pope a Catholic? And
34:19
the answer to that is yes. And both
34:21
are that way because their followers have chosen them to
34:23
be so, because American politics
34:25
has struggled, it's fair to say, Josh, to embrace
34:28
the new, as we mentioned on the bugle before.
34:31
Since Bill Clinton was born, the only person to
34:33
be born who's gone on to be president is Barack
34:35
Obama. And it's now heading towards
34:37
a quarter of a century since Clinton was president.
34:42
It is in an extraordinary state,
34:44
American politics, and it's
34:46
quite hard to look ahead to the next, what,
34:49
year and a bit without feeling
34:51
that humanity
34:54
is entirely doomed. So, I mean,
34:56
how do you see the, well, the week Biden's
34:59
had and what that tells us about American politics
35:01
now? It's
35:04
bad, right? Because our choices are Joe Biden,
35:06
who spent the week, he bumped into a flag, he's getting
35:08
people's names wrong, he's forgetting to shake hands with
35:10
foreign leaders. And as the president,
35:13
you have to do, for in America,
35:15
you have to do one of two things. You can be right, right?
35:17
You can get things right, you can be astute, or you
35:19
can do what Donald Trump has always been doing
35:22
and been wrong on purpose. He just
35:24
says whatever. And even if he
35:26
accidentally calls someone the wrong name, he just
35:28
rolls with it and decides that's their name now. And
35:31
it's Bob DeSantis. Doesn't he look more like a
35:33
Bob? He'd be right at home in a bucket full of apples
35:35
on Halloween going up and down, wouldn't he folks?
35:38
And so I think Biden's going to
35:40
pick a lane. Is he going to keep
35:42
it sharp, right? Do a couple crossword puzzles, memorize
35:45
the clock, or is he going
35:47
to do what Trump does and just say whatever
35:49
and lean into it? Biden does seem
35:51
like kind of normal for a man of his age, but the
35:53
problem is when you're relying on your peers
35:56
and you're 80 years old, there is an enormous
35:58
likelihood that space out
36:00
and write in Jimmy Carter or Howdy Duty for
36:02
president and that's going to take your whole campaign.
36:06
So you're just walking
36:08
into flagpoles, getting people's names wrong, forgetting
36:10
to shake people's hands. I mean, I would say
36:12
that's probably the worst things an American president has
36:14
done in living memory. I would say that
36:17
is way worse than encouraging insurrection and
36:19
an attack on the heart of American democracy. He
36:21
walked into a flagpole. For f*** sake
36:23
gosh, are you going to accept that? So
36:25
there's a new poll, right? It feels like it's
36:27
making an undue impact, Andy. The
36:30
same poll has been widely criticized. There's
36:32
a new poll that says Biden's approval rating
36:35
is 37%, which is definitely a
36:37
bad sign when you're a sitting president's approval
36:39
rating is less than the half of their age.
36:41
That's terrifying. But
36:44
the same poll has been criticized for using an
36:46
unrepresentative sample of Americans.
36:49
It showed that Trump's leading Biden by 10% nationally,
36:52
which seems highly unlikely considering
36:55
what a huge percentage of Trump's supporters
36:57
are now in jail for storming the Capitol.
37:00
You'd think that would tip the scales
37:02
a little bit. There's
37:04
no chance, right, that Trump wins by that big
37:06
a margin. Our elections aren't usually
37:08
that divided in the U.S. If Trump
37:11
retakes the presidency, it'll be the old fashioned
37:13
way that his Republican predecessors did. In
37:15
fact, he did himself, losing by millions
37:17
of votes and taking power because of a map for
37:20
cheating, creating flavors 250 years ago.
37:23
I don't know if
37:26
you're planning to vote in the American election next
37:28
year. I
37:30
know you'd love democracy and you vote as often as you can
37:32
in as many different places as possible. Would
37:35
you be wary of voting
37:37
for a man displaying quite
37:40
such noticeable signs of age? Which
37:44
one? Well,
37:50
Trump said that there's quite a lot of electoral
37:52
fraud. So
37:54
according to Trump, who I always believe,
37:57
I should be able to vote quite easily. my
38:01
fake American passport Jose
38:04
Rodriguez will be casting his votes. I was trying
38:06
to look up
38:10
because I'm always really fascinated
38:13
by the US elections and
38:16
so with the last one I guess it was
38:18
during lockdown I was
38:20
going to stay up and do like an all-nighter
38:23
and I baked a cheesecake
38:26
and made some sort of like
38:29
American food and
38:31
I was like this is going to be fun man we're going to watch
38:35
Trump get ousted and
38:37
then I couldn't stay at work
38:39
any longer and then it was
38:41
still like four or five days before it was confirmed
38:44
and at that point the cheesecake had long gone. I
38:48
think it started off as like jokes about him
38:50
being old and now
38:53
it's hard to make those jokes because he's
38:55
doing stuff that just makes you genuinely
38:57
worried. Like
39:01
there was a thing I read that he told
39:03
the same story twice at
39:06
the same event like in a speech
39:09
and I was mortified when I
39:11
apparently did that on the first and second
39:14
dates with my girlfriend. I
39:16
started telling a story and she had to tell me
39:18
that I'd already told her that
39:21
and we'd only met once before. But
39:25
are you still together with that girlfriend Ian? Yes
39:28
and I've told her that maybe ten times. Four
39:31
more years. More and more
39:33
years of blueprints. In
39:40
more exciting news from America, NASA
39:42
has had a huge success this week by stealing a bit of
39:45
an asteroid. It
39:47
filched a bit of the Bennu asteroid as it flew
39:50
relatively close to Earth and has brought the samples
39:53
back. I mean this is very
39:55
exciting news for fans of little bits of asteroid
39:57
Josh. I mean how has it been received in the past?
40:00
on the streets of New York. Oh, this is huge. People
40:03
are out on the streets. They're chipping up little bits of
40:05
the sidewalk, holding them up
40:08
as mock asteroids. Asteroid
40:10
fever has swept New York City. This
40:15
is a seven year mission that resulted in the biggest
40:17
sample of an asteroid ever being removed
40:19
from space. And I think that's so great, but
40:22
I do think it was a huge missed opportunity
40:24
to call this mission Apollo 13's 11. I'm
40:32
worried about the scope of this honestly, because you've got to worry
40:34
about what you bring back when you go out into space,
40:37
right? Because the professor from the National
40:39
History Museum in London said that she was feeling quite emotional
40:42
and tearful about this mission, which made me
40:44
pause because a British professor feeling tearful,
40:46
I'm like, oh no, she's for sure been replaced
40:49
by an alien body double. But I do, I love,
40:51
I mean this so much. I
40:57
love that we still let NASA
40:59
solve space problems. There's
41:02
so many people whose job is just like, how
41:04
do we land a thing on a thing? And
41:06
it's so complicated and they work so
41:09
hard at it. And then they come back with this little
41:11
piece of asteroid and we, like
41:13
America just reacts like they just saw the coolest
41:16
skateboard trick. Like it's so
41:18
amazing that there's a department of our
41:20
government employing the most qualified
41:22
scientists and their mission statement
41:25
is just like, sick, brah. I
41:27
mean, it is, you know, with
41:31
the stories we've looked at today with regards
41:33
to America, they sort of sum up America as a
41:35
nation. This incredible scientific
41:38
achievements and the most inane,
41:40
insane politics that
41:43
you could devise, strange place.
41:46
Ian, were you excited by this
41:49
asteroid story? And what else would you like to see hauled
41:51
in from space? I
41:53
was very nervous for them about,
41:57
they had to keep it sort of completely uncontaminated.
42:00
So I was kind of worrying that
42:02
there'd be like a crack or something. But
42:04
I think it would be funny if when
42:06
they looked at the sample and amongst
42:09
the dust there was like a half a
42:11
like Kinder Bueno wrapper or
42:14
something like that and they're just like, ah, for God's
42:16
sake. Well,
42:19
the remnants of like of a Soviet space dog. Thank
42:22
you. Well, do you know, I mean, this is like a real big
42:24
undertaking to keep it uncontaminated. You know how hard it is
42:26
with those big astronaut gloves to roll the
42:28
condom all the way over the asteroid? I'm
42:34
just worried that, you know, the asteroids, you
42:36
know, parent is going to be obviously as you've
42:38
seen any any film like this,
42:41
it's going to be bigger and angrier. It's going to come together.
42:43
I think that's probably what
42:45
we've brought upon ourselves and that's like the dinosaurs all over
42:47
again. It'd be horrible if an
42:50
asteroid was coming towards Earth and you just
42:53
looked up at it and everyone's like,
42:54
I said, this is for my son.
43:08
Well, that brings the end of
43:09
this week's bugle. Thank you
43:12
for listening. Thanks to Ian and Josh for joining
43:14
us. Ian, tell us about your Soho Theatre run of
43:16
your very nearly a triple
43:18
award winning show. Yeah,
43:21
there's such a fine line between it winning so
43:23
many awards and absolutely
43:25
nothing. Yeah, I'm
43:28
on it. So from
43:30
the second to the seventh of
43:33
October at 9
43:35
15 in this very cool fancy
43:38
kind of downstairs cabaret vibe room.
43:42
But yeah, I'd love you to come along. I think I shout
43:44
consistently for 55 minutes. What
43:47
more could you want in a show? I
43:50
am also going on tour like
43:53
a little sort of UK tour as well. So I'm coming
43:55
to a number of places that
43:57
I probably won't be able to remember. Things
44:00
like Manchester, Glasgow,
44:05
you know, that sort of vibe. Yeah, okay.
44:08
If you're in a place like Manchester or Glasgow,
44:11
do go and see Ian's show. Josh,
44:14
what have you got coming up? I'm on
44:16
the road a little bit. I've got all
44:18
my tour dates you can find in my weekly
44:21
newsletter, That's Marvelous. That's joshgondelman.substack.com
44:24
or if you don't want to hear from me every week,
44:26
just joshgondelman.com. I
44:29
am this weekend, depending on how fast
44:31
they go back to work, I might do a couple
44:34
of dates opening for Frenemy
44:36
of the Bugle, John Oliver. Oh, yeah,
44:39
yeah. In Milwaukee and Bloomington,
44:42
Indiana. And then the next weekend, I'm
44:44
back out in that same part of the country
44:47
in Cincinnati and Indianapolis, Indiana on
44:49
the Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me stand up tour. And then a few
44:51
more scattered dates, Rhode Island next week
44:53
with Adam Pally, Pittsburgh
44:55
coming up, hopefully some more dates
44:58
soon, or maybe at some
45:00
point in the future, I will be employed again. So
45:03
we'll see. Well, say hello to John
45:05
if you do those shows. I will for sure.
45:09
You can hear me on the News Quiz. Ian will
45:11
be doing another one or
45:13
two of the News Quiz of this series, I think. Yeah, I
45:15
think at the end of the month, yeah. Well,
45:17
end of October, yeah. Do
45:19
tune in for that. That's available on
45:21
BBC Sounds and eventually after
45:24
a cooling off period
45:26
on other podcast platforms. Don't
45:29
forget that you can join the Bugle voluntary subscription
45:31
scheme. We have a new offering for our Premium Revel
45:33
voluntary subscribers. There will be a monthly
45:36
Ask Andy show. You can find
45:38
me any questions that you want answered
45:41
and I will answer some of those
45:43
questions. The first one we
45:45
are going to record next week with questions
45:47
submitted by the audience at the live show
45:50
we did in London that was last week's
45:52
Bugle. But you will be able to submit
45:54
your questions for Ask Andy as well via
45:57
an email address. What's the email address, Chris?
46:00
Hello Buglers at the buglepodcast.com
46:03
Alright there we go. Maybe we should set up
46:05
an ask Andy at the buglepodcast.com Oh
46:07
don't make me do that. Alright. Ha
46:10
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha I'll
46:12
ask Andy in the subject line. Yeah,
46:14
OK, that's a good idea. Put ask Andy in the subject line
46:17
and we'll find them better. So, do
46:19
join the Bugle voluntary subscription scheme. To
46:21
give a one-off or a current contribution, go to
46:23
the buglepodcast.com to help keep
46:25
this show free, flourishing and
46:28
independent. Until next week,
46:29
goodbye.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More