Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. I
0:03
don't know if you knew this, but
0:05
anyone can get the same premium wireless
0:07
for $15 a month plan that I've
0:09
been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities,
0:11
so do like I did, and have
0:13
one of your assistance assistance to switch
0:15
you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told
0:17
it's super easy to do at mintmobile.com/switch.
0:19
Up front payment of $45 for three-month
0:21
plan equivalent to $15 per month
0:23
required. Intro rate for three months
0:25
only. Then full price plan options
0:27
available. Taxes and fees extra. See
0:29
full terms at mintmobile.com. This
0:32
episode is brought to you by LifeLock.
0:34
It's tax season, and we're all a
0:36
bit tired of numbers. But here's one
0:38
you need to hear. $16.5 billion. That's
0:41
how much the IRS flagged
0:43
for possible identity fraud last
0:45
year. Now here's a good
0:47
number. 100 million. That's how
0:49
many data points LifeLock monitors
0:51
every second. If your identity
0:53
is stolen, they'll fix it.
0:56
Guaranteed. Save up to 40%
0:58
your first year at lifelock.com/podcast.
1:00
Terms apply. Welcome
1:05
back to Asken Advisor. I'm Krista Divias
1:07
here with Wes Moss. Hey Chris,
1:10
Adebias. Aspen Advisor is where we
1:12
go deeper on all things investing. We
1:14
here at Team Clark, I hope to
1:16
serve you in every way we can
1:18
with Clark Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and West
1:20
with us on Tuesdays. And if you
1:22
have a question for Clark or West,
1:24
you can go to clark.com/ask. And people
1:26
have questions and they're getting more
1:29
and more complex. They're getting tougher.
1:31
feels like we're kind of on a
1:33
roller coaster right now with the stock
1:35
market and everything and today you're going
1:37
to talk about a couple of things
1:39
that are affecting us a lot that
1:41
and then inflation right inflation we need
1:44
to talk about inflation we've I don't
1:46
think we've done a segment around that
1:48
it's always around us and it's scary
1:50
but it's necessary so we'll talk about
1:52
that too but okay but maybe we
1:54
just start with the market I was
1:56
watching I didn't watch this whole movie but
1:58
for some reason it was on, I don't
2:00
know if it was Netflix or one
2:02
of the many subscription video on demand
2:04
apps on our television and the movie
2:06
was Brother Where Art thou? Have you
2:09
ever seen that? I have not seen
2:11
that one. I'm not going to say
2:13
it's George Clooney's finest role but he's
2:15
kind of the main guy in it
2:17
and there's this kind of hapless group
2:19
of guys going around and I don't
2:22
remember exactly what they're trying to do
2:24
but they're walking on this riverbank and
2:26
I think I remember this because of
2:29
the song. So powerful in this and
2:31
I I think I had the brother
2:33
where art thou soundtrack and This
2:35
goes back to the song of
2:37
safety that comes from sirens as
2:40
in this alluring Song that you
2:42
might lead you astray just like
2:44
in the movie brother where art
2:46
there all these guys are walking
2:49
down the riverbank and they there's
2:51
these three women kind of kind
2:53
of rise out of the water
2:55
and they sing this magical magically
2:58
seductive alluring song. It's like, wait
3:00
a minute. Oh, wow. And the
3:02
actual singers, they're not in the
3:04
movie, but it's Allison Kraus and
3:07
he's a phenomenal singer and I
3:09
think Jillian Welch and Emmy Lou
3:11
Harris. So they're like the most
3:13
beautiful country voices of all time.
3:15
And this is this song and they
3:17
are sirens and what happens is these
3:19
three call them hapless guys that are
3:21
on this adventure. ending up down
3:24
by the riverbank. They end up getting
3:26
passed out. They wake up, dazed and
3:28
confused. One of their buddies is missing.
3:30
I think it's peed, he's gone. And
3:32
they listen to the song of the sirens,
3:35
which is kind of, it seems like a
3:37
good idea, but you end up in a
3:39
bad spot. And I think that's what
3:41
happens when we go through market turmoil.
3:43
And there's been a lot of market
3:45
turmoil. in 2025. I mean, you cannot
3:48
go more than five minutes if you're
3:50
watching the news, which I don't always
3:52
recommend always watching the news. You're going
3:55
to have heard about tariffs and tariffs
3:57
and tariffs and the stock market's been
3:59
reacting. like a roller coaster. And
4:01
there's been some real fear created
4:03
in 2025. We've had a couple
4:05
really placid years in the stock
4:07
market, some really strong gains, not
4:09
a lot of big pullbacks, but
4:11
2025 we've seen that. So what
4:13
happens is that when we go
4:15
into these tougher times and they
4:17
get a little scared and worried
4:19
about the economy and we're worried
4:22
about the stock market, that siren
4:24
song of come to safety. really
4:26
starts to be louder and louder.
4:28
And that song of safety is,
4:30
hey, just sit this thing out
4:32
and go into just wait this
4:34
whole thing out in cash. As
4:36
investors, we don't always think of
4:38
it as, well, maybe I'll have
4:40
some cash. It's really, we naturally
4:42
go to, I just want to
4:44
protect everything. I want to just
4:46
make everything safe because this whole
4:48
safety thing sounds really good right
4:50
now. And it's just a human
4:52
emotion that drives us. And that's
4:54
why we've seen, and there's been
4:56
multiple reports throughout the year, and
4:58
I'm sure this is only going
5:00
to be exacerbated as the tariff
5:02
worries kind of accelerate, more and
5:04
more people are taking money out
5:06
of just regular balance. Yes, they're
5:08
taking money out of stocks and
5:10
putting them to money markets or
5:12
cash. They're also taking out balanced
5:14
accounts or targeted funds have been,
5:17
we've seen money pulled out of
5:19
even a balanced account and just
5:21
go to cash. And that feels
5:23
okay for the really short run.
5:25
But what happens is when we
5:27
listen to that song and it
5:29
says, well, A, the world is
5:31
scary, go to cash. B, hey,
5:33
this time is different. It's another
5:35
real theme in that song. And
5:37
that is what makes every correction
5:39
character character characteristically scary. Is that
5:41
the sirens are saying, go to
5:43
safety. And they're also saying, because
5:45
this time it's different, and this
5:47
time it's worse than ever, and
5:49
this thing is gonna be harder
5:51
to come back from, and we
5:53
just naturally extrapolate to, wait a
5:55
minute, maybe they're right, maybe they're
5:57
right. So maybe it would feel
5:59
good to go to cash, and
6:01
it does feel good to cash.
6:03
The problem is that. Markets inevitably
6:05
recover, or they at least have
6:07
in the past. There's no guarantee
6:09
of that, but the American economy
6:12
figures a way out to kind
6:14
of move forward, and then markets
6:16
recover. In fact, a lot of
6:18
the best days in the market
6:20
we see, biggest gains, usually come
6:22
right around the biggest losses. So
6:24
it's fear, wait a minute, it's
6:26
not that bad. And sitting anything
6:28
out ends up... really having our
6:30
money stagnant and then we don't
6:32
build wealth. And here's how I
6:34
think we avoid those sirens and
6:36
avoid that allure to just go
6:38
to cash and keep everything in
6:40
safety. One, and hopefully I think
6:42
a lot of our listeners probably
6:44
have the following one. If you
6:46
have some sort of plan, remember
6:48
your financial plan is not predicated
6:50
on the market steadily and perfectly
6:52
going up every year. It's just
6:54
not. It's part of financial planning
6:56
as the understanding that markets do
6:58
go up and down. and there
7:00
is volatility. So if you have
7:02
a plan, I think it helps
7:04
you avoid the riverbank here and
7:06
avoid the song of the sirens.
7:09
Number two, you're already diversified. If
7:11
you're listening to this show, you're
7:13
probably not like a hedge fund
7:15
that went all in on one
7:17
specific sector, didn't get all in
7:19
on a few stocks that were
7:21
doing really well, only to have
7:23
that unravels so quickly that you
7:25
see really big losses. So that
7:27
just simple diversification. really goes a
7:29
long way to helping you avoid
7:31
that alluring song that ends up
7:33
putting you into cash, missing out
7:35
on markets. And then three, I
7:37
think it's always a good reminder,
7:39
corrections are really normal. They are
7:41
a fundamental part of the market.
7:43
Really without them, you wouldn't have
7:45
the average nine, 10, 11% rate
7:47
of return we've seen. There's really
7:49
no asset that's just a nice,
7:51
easy guarantee walk in the park
7:53
to have that bigger rate of
7:55
return. So along with. these great
7:57
returns we see over time naturally
7:59
comes some volatility in a little
8:01
bit of pain otherwise everyone would
8:04
participate so this time even though
8:06
the situation, every time is different
8:08
and the market goes down for
8:10
a new reason, it's not different
8:12
fundamentally because markets do eventually recover.
8:14
So the sirens job is to
8:16
shake you out of the market,
8:18
scare you, and we just have
8:20
to remember the long term of
8:22
the market. If you go back
8:24
to the early part of the
8:26
20, the year 2000, right after
8:28
dot com, the SB of 100
8:30
was at 1, 1,400. here we
8:32
are today around 5500. That's an
8:34
incredible more than double, more than
8:36
tripling of the market over that
8:38
period of time with lots of
8:40
ups and downs. So we just
8:42
remember that and we have to
8:44
stay, we have to stay patient
8:46
and participate and that's how we
8:48
build wealth. We've got to be
8:50
able to cover our ears to
8:52
not listen to that song of
8:54
safety that's sung by the sirens
8:56
because they're there to make sure
8:59
you don't grow your wealth over
9:01
time. All right, well we have
9:03
some questions and of course you're
9:05
going to have some related ones
9:07
with everything going on This came
9:09
in from Catherine in North Carolina.
9:11
Hi West. I'm really enjoying Ask
9:13
West Moss. I'm 55 and my
9:15
husband is 56 I would like
9:17
to retire this year But with
9:19
the recent market downturn my husband
9:21
is reluctant to stop working We're
9:23
100% in equities in stock. We
9:25
should have shifted to a less
9:27
aggressive portfolio sooner. We had about
9:29
two million dollars in retirement assets
9:31
earlier this year. We were advised
9:33
to start shifting about 20% to
9:35
cash money market. Right now, we
9:37
only have 41K in cash. My
9:39
husband can't bring himself to sell
9:41
stocks at a loss to convert
9:43
to cash. Therefore, he thinks he
9:45
needs to keep working and wait
9:47
for the market to recover. Next,
9:49
I have a pension that I'm
9:51
eligible to draw on this year
9:54
with. different options. $1,600 per month
9:56
for life or $3,000 until age
9:58
62, then it decreases to $800.
10:00
$3,000 until age 65, then it
10:02
decreases to $2.50. My pension is
10:04
not adjusted for inflation. An
10:06
advisor said, we're okay to retire
10:08
and we could withdraw more than
10:10
4% using guardrails. Our living expenses
10:13
are around 60 to 70,000 a
10:15
year. We would like to spend
10:17
more time traveling, home
10:19
improvements, etc. I plan on
10:21
working part-time, which will bring in about
10:24
25 to 30K a year. I would
10:26
love to hear your opinion. Whoa, Catherine,
10:28
in North Carolina, there's a lot there.
10:31
A couple of things. So right out
10:33
of the gate, it makes me think,
10:35
is I'm kind of taking some notes
10:37
here as you're reading this through Chris,
10:39
so you guys are young. They're really
10:41
young. And sounds like you've, getting
10:43
to that 2 million number when
10:46
you're doing some planning, that number
10:48
works for you. Just like we
10:50
were saying earlier, financial plans are
10:52
not predicated on a perfect straight
10:54
line as these assets going up.
10:57
So a financial plan knows that
10:59
you're going to have these big dips.
11:01
The only catch to that, and
11:03
this is I think what you
11:05
were trying to accomplish by having
11:07
some balance, is that you don't
11:09
want to go into retirement 100%
11:12
inequities. For this exact reason, because
11:14
then you almost get beholden, you
11:16
become... kind of a prisoner of
11:18
how well the market does. I mean,
11:20
you're trying to plan your life
11:22
and the next 30 years, 40 years,
11:24
the market could care less about
11:26
your plants. So the market says, oh,
11:29
well, we're down 20% or your assets
11:31
are down from what, 2 million down
11:33
to 1.8. They could go to 1.7,
11:35
1.6, depending on how big of a
11:37
correction we have. And then now, all of
11:39
a sudden, you're totally beholden to that.
11:42
And the market just says, oh,
11:44
oh, sorry, sorry. you were supposed
11:46
to retire and now those numbers
11:48
just don't work anymore. That's why
11:50
you really do need that balance going
11:53
in and that's why having 30 or
11:55
40% or even 50% now you're I
11:57
think you're pretty young to have 50%
11:59
in safety. assets. But even having
12:01
a couple years worth of dry
12:04
powder and thinking about your
12:06
spending need of 70,000 you're going
12:08
to be making 25 so you
12:10
really only have a need of
12:12
50,000? Three years of dry powder is
12:14
$150,000. So on two million that's
12:17
only a seven or eight percent
12:19
waiting towards that. So it's
12:21
almost as you started to
12:23
get some balance this market
12:26
didn't cooperate. I would lean towards
12:28
the following. Your husband, I think
12:30
his instinct is similar to what my
12:33
instinct would be, which is, hey, we
12:35
planned on having about 2 million. It's
12:37
not just the number, but also
12:39
a diversified 2 million, where at least
12:42
some significant portion of it is
12:44
in safety. So if I were Catherine, I
12:46
would probably say, hey, let's just
12:48
postpone this, let's keep working, keep
12:50
saving, and allow the market to
12:52
recover. You don't want to go right
12:54
in retirement in the middle of... kind
12:57
of economic turmoil if you haven't
12:59
already had balance. Balance would have
13:01
solved for this, but you got caught a
13:03
little quickly here or just a little bit
13:05
too late. So I like the idea of
13:07
just working a little while, it gives time
13:10
for the market to recover, save a little bit
13:12
more, and then I think you're in good
13:14
shape. If I think about the bigger picture
13:16
spending numbers, and I did some math
13:18
here, you've got this low pension amount
13:20
that goes forever, something like $1650 for
13:22
the rest of your life. And then
13:25
you have these tricky options of $3,000
13:27
or $3,500 until 62, and then the
13:29
number goes down. Or till 65, and
13:31
the number goes way down. Really
13:33
depends on how long you live. If
13:36
you're only planning for the next
13:38
10 years, just take the highest
13:40
number that lasts for seven to
13:42
10 years. But if you're going to
13:45
live till 90, and you're trying to
13:47
have some longer term protection,
13:49
that a lower number times, call it 30
13:51
or 35 years to get to 90. That
13:54
of the options that you cited has
13:56
the largest amount of cash that's
13:58
given to you even if you
14:00
adjust it for inflation. So it's got
14:02
the highest net present value as well.
14:04
I think that's the choice you have
14:06
to make. If you've got a bunch
14:08
of, if you think you're going to
14:10
be living into your mid 80s or
14:13
90s, I wouldn't discount that option one,
14:15
which was the lower amount, but it
14:17
lasts forever. The last piece of the
14:19
equation here, from what I can tell,
14:21
even if I inflate you're spending to
14:23
80, and you're going to have Social
14:25
Security and in 10 years or so.
14:27
Call it 50 between you and your
14:29
husband that that covers most of the
14:31
spending and the gap is only 30,000
14:33
Let's call it 40,000 Well, even if
14:36
your portfolio only gets back to two
14:38
million forty thousand dollars on two million
14:40
per year It's super low withdrawal rate.
14:42
So I think, and that's probably why
14:44
you guys are thinking about retiring so
14:46
early already, is that your withdrawal need,
14:48
if you really start doing the math,
14:50
it's pretty low on a percentage basis.
14:52
And that's an awesome place to be
14:54
when you head into retirement. So I
14:56
think you're really close anyway. If it
14:59
were me, I would, you hadn't quite
15:01
finished your retirement and investment planning because
15:03
you really want to diversified portfolio by
15:05
the time you start having to pull
15:07
a little bit from it. Maybe work
15:09
a little longer, I think your withdrawal
15:11
rates in a super safe place. And...
15:13
I can't answer all the questions perfectly
15:15
here, but I think that gives you,
15:17
at least I think I'm giving you
15:20
my opinion on most of these. Don't
15:22
discount that lower option that lasts for
15:24
life. And I would just add in
15:26
a little something. If you do keep
15:28
working, your husband keeps working, don't put
15:30
off the home improvements in travel. I
15:32
mean, while you have the higher income,
15:34
maybe now is the time to do
15:36
some of those things because people put
15:38
off travel and things like that until
15:40
they're older. And I've actually done research
15:43
on this Krista where the home improvements
15:45
are, here's one retirement more than a
15:47
pothole. This is like one. of those
15:49
jungle traps that you're running along and
15:51
you fall through and there's a bunch
15:53
of bamboo spikes here. It's called a
15:55
renovation in retirement. That is the worst
15:57
possible thing you can do after you've
15:59
stopped working. If you're going to do
16:01
housework and it's going to be kitchen
16:03
and bath, which you think you have
16:06
a budget, it never works out exactly
16:08
that way. It can bleed higher and
16:10
more expensive. Happy retirees, one of the
16:12
things that they know to do is
16:14
take care of the bigger costs while
16:16
you're still working. All right, we'll go
16:18
to another question from Roger and Connecticut.
16:20
Hi, Wes, I often hear advisors, in
16:22
my opinion, overly pushing Roth and Roth
16:24
conversions. Don't get me wrong. I'm all
16:27
for Roth's. We've personally done Roth conversions.
16:29
But I cringe when I hear advisors
16:31
talking about converting overtime, everything to Roth.
16:33
I think it's better to have a
16:35
balance of Roth and tax deferred accounts.
16:37
If you converted everything, you would be
16:39
at least... throwing away the standard deduction
16:41
and low first brackets. Also, to qualify
16:43
for ACA insurance, you need some income
16:45
or you would need to go on
16:47
Medicaid. With the balance of Roth and
16:50
tax deferred money, you can choose your
16:52
tax bracket and have a lot of
16:54
flexibility. Beyond my own finances, should we
16:56
be lucky enough to have excess money,
16:58
I can QCD some qualified money into
17:00
charity of my choice, avoiding tax completely.
17:02
In my opinion, Roth and Roth conversions
17:04
are awesome, but you should never convert
17:06
it all. Am I wrong? And if
17:08
so, how am I wrong? Roger, you're
17:10
becoming like a Jedi night when it
17:13
comes to managing your tax bracket. And
17:15
I love hearing that. I think part
17:17
of it is just to get heard
17:19
sometimes in financial media. Roger, you got
17:21
to take a really strong position. You
17:23
know, there's people that I've interviewed on
17:25
my show that write books about Roth
17:27
conversions and... They write an entire book
17:29
about why it's the only option you
17:31
should ever consider. And the real world
17:33
is it's really rarely ever like that.
17:36
Sure, having one in a raw...
17:38
of course we know
17:40
is great because
17:42
it's tax -free money,
17:44
grows tax -free, comes
17:46
out tax -free, but
17:48
there's a really high
17:50
cost to put
17:52
money into a Roth
17:54
and you are
17:57
throwing away some things.
17:59
You brought up
18:01
a couple of good
18:03
points. If you
18:05
have zero income, then
18:07
you're right. First
18:09
of all, you don't
18:11
need income to
18:13
pay for a supplemental
18:15
plan or a
18:17
healthcare plan. You can
18:20
be on ACA,
18:22
healthcare. As long as
18:24
you can pay for it, you
18:26
can be on it. But if
18:28
you have zero income, and that's
18:30
hard to do too because you're
18:32
gonna at some point have social
18:34
security. you have zero income, then
18:36
you do run the risk of
18:38
ending up looking at Medicaid. So
18:40
I think that being able to
18:42
control your income, having a regular
18:44
IRA can help with that. Now
18:46
I don't think you need to
18:48
manufacture your income because there's gonna
18:50
be enough in retirement with social
18:52
that you're not gonna have zero
18:54
income. The second part is that
18:56
the two things that really stand
18:58
out is when you're managing your
19:00
tax bracket, the standard deduction does
19:02
work. Now this is gonna be
19:05
different for everybody. Consult your CPA
19:07
for your particular situation. I'm not
19:09
a CPA, but I'm always looking
19:11
at my tax brackets. And I
19:13
have definitely known families that I've
19:15
worked with that let's say somebody
19:17
was in a student year or
19:19
have very little income. They were
19:21
way away from social security. The
19:23
standard deduction help them do a
19:25
Roth conversion. So you're right in
19:27
a big sense that that standard
19:29
deduction kind of gets wasted if
19:31
you have zero income. And you
19:33
can utilize that if you keep
19:35
your tax brackets really low to
19:37
even do future Roth conversions because
19:39
you can utilize that. The other
19:41
piece here is if you're charitable
19:43
minded, the QCD, the qualified charitable
19:45
deduction that you can start at
19:47
70 and a half from your
19:49
regular IRA, that goes away if
19:51
there's no IRA money. So you
19:53
don't wanna imagine the amount of
19:55
money you're saving by doing a
19:57
charitable gift from your IRA. You
20:00
don't need taxes on that. Everything's
20:02
in a Roth. You've kind of guaranteed
20:04
that you're going to pay taxes on
20:07
the money to get it into the
20:09
Roth, and then you're giving the money
20:11
away. So just for that reason alone,
20:13
you may want to keep some regular
20:15
IRA money if you're cheerably
20:18
inclined, and you're going to
20:20
give away dollars after age 70 and
20:22
a half. So short answer, you're not
20:24
wrong at all. Roth is great, but
20:26
the balance here absolutely can
20:28
work for you long term. Help
20:30
us understand inflation, which has been
20:32
frustrating so many people. So frustrating.
20:35
Today's episode is sponsored by Smart
20:37
Travel, a new podcast from Nurd Wallet.
20:39
Want to travel like a savvy jet
20:41
setter? No, that doesn't mean monogramming your
20:43
passport means making smart decisions every step
20:46
of your trip, which means knowing your
20:48
options. Smart Travel impacts the facts, like
20:50
which booking sites actually save money. How
20:52
to fly first class using points, and
20:54
if that fancy travel card is a
20:57
smart investment, all so you can save
20:59
more on your next adventure. Stay tuned
21:01
at the end of the episode to
21:03
hear the Smart Travel trailer, and be
21:05
sure to follow Smart Travel from Nurdwalt,
21:08
so you can start traveling like a
21:10
pro. Tax season comes down to three things.
21:12
Preparation, preparation, and preparation. Like most
21:14
people prepping for taxes, you're likely
21:16
struggling with keeping all your financial log-ins
21:19
and documents secure and accessible
21:21
and accessible and accessible and
21:23
accessible and accessible. One password can
21:25
help with that, all in one place. Along
21:28
with creating and securing passwords,
21:30
one password deters fake tax prep
21:32
sites by only auto-filling log-ins on
21:34
sites you've saved. Plus, easily auto-fill
21:37
form fields like emails, addresses, and
21:39
more in a single click. And
21:41
what about wrangling all of those
21:43
financial documents? One password has
21:45
encrypted sharing and storage space to
21:48
secure things like receipts, W-2s, and
21:50
IRS forms year-round. Your accountant just
21:52
smiled hearing that. Look. Taxes will
21:55
probably always be a drag, but failure
21:57
to prepare is preparing to fail. So
21:59
let one pass... protect your
22:01
sensitive information and bring
22:03
order to the tax
22:05
prep chaos. Right now
22:07
you get 25% off
22:09
your first year of
22:11
one password individual or
22:14
50% off your first
22:16
year of one password
22:18
families at one password.com/advisor.
22:20
That's 25% or 50%
22:22
off your first year
22:24
at one P-A-S-S-W-O-R-D-O-R-D-com slash
22:26
advisor. This podcast is
22:29
brought to you by Progressive Insurance,
22:31
fiscally responsible, financial geniuses, monetary magicians.
22:33
These are things people say about
22:36
drivers who switch their car insurance
22:38
to progressive and save hundreds. Because
22:40
Progressive offers discounts for paying in
22:43
full, pony at home, and more.
22:45
Plus, you can count on their
22:47
great customer service to help you
22:50
when you need it. So your
22:52
dollar goes a long way. Visit
22:55
progressive.com to see if you could
22:57
save on car insurance. Progressive Casualty
22:59
Insurance Company and affiliates, potential savings
23:02
will vary. Not available in all
23:04
states and situations. Bet you didn't
23:06
know that Discover is accepted at
23:09
99% of places that take credit
23:11
cards nationwide. You know what's a
23:13
little less accepted? Taking financial advice
23:16
from random user names and avatars
23:18
you found on some forum. That's
23:21
just sketchy. No offense to all
23:23
the finance bros out there on
23:25
the internet, based on the February
23:28
2024 Nielsen Report. Learn more at
23:30
discover.com/credit card. Welcome back
23:32
to Ask and Advisor, West Moss, along
23:34
with the Krista Divias. So much fun
23:37
to be here with you. You're such
23:39
a pro when it comes to
23:41
all this stuff. Oh my gosh, no
23:43
I am not. I feel like you
23:46
should just answer the questions. Absolutely. You
23:48
really could. You could probably answer a
23:50
lot of these. I don't think so,
23:53
but I do learn something for
23:55
sure every week, and I've gotten some
23:57
great feedback from other people who are
23:59
absolutely enjoying. yourself. So we're going to
24:02
get into a controversial topic and it's
24:04
called inflation and we all know about
24:06
it. We all think about it.
24:08
I just remember the last couple of
24:11
years I do a radio show in
24:13
Atlanta called Money Matters and at some
24:15
point I think we started calling inflation
24:18
matters because that's the only topic inflation
24:20
inflation. So I want to talk
24:22
here for a minute about how to
24:24
beat inflation, how to think about inflation
24:27
and how to protect yourself from inflation
24:29
when it comes to retirement. So first
24:31
of all, we had this long stretch
24:34
where we didn't really worry about
24:36
inflation. We had about a 10-11-year stretch
24:38
after the great financial crisis where we
24:40
had really low inflation because we had
24:43
a rough, not a great economy. But
24:45
it lasted for a really long time.
24:47
You can call it globalization or whatever
24:50
the, there's a lot of reasons for
24:52
it. And we almost forgot that
24:54
inflation was a problem. It was so
24:56
mild. I think even in 2009 we
24:59
actually had one year of deflation prices
25:01
went down about a half a percent
25:03
for just that one year. And then
25:06
we have a bunch of years
25:08
where it was one, one and a
25:10
third, one and a quarter. I think
25:12
this also manifested when it came to
25:15
Social Security. You know, we had big
25:17
inflation back in 2022 and 23 and
25:19
people got big raises for Social
25:22
Security and it was because we had
25:24
big inflation. And people had forgotten that
25:26
their Social Security was even tied to
25:29
inflation because we didn't even notice a
25:31
1.1% bump in your Social Security check,
25:33
right? It was just, we just
25:35
got lulled to sleep for almost a
25:38
decade that there was almost no inflation.
25:40
It was actually below at the Federal
25:42
Reserve even once, which brings me the
25:45
point that inflation is absolutely necessary. It's
25:47
like salt, right? If you, you're
25:49
the right, a little bit of salt
25:51
in a biscuit. makes for a great
25:54
biscuit. A little bit of salt in
25:56
a stew makes for an amazing stew
25:58
without it. Like remember we used to
26:01
have wars over salt. It's a big
26:03
deal. But the minute you dump salt.
26:05
into a stew or into a
26:07
biscuit. It ruins everything. So it's very
26:10
much something, it's an ingredient we want
26:12
to manage and that's exactly what the
26:14
Federal Reserve does. They don't have a
26:17
target of zero inflation, they have a
26:19
target of 2% inflation. Because if
26:21
you have steadily rising prices in a
26:23
manageable way, they price stability, but it's
26:26
price stability at 2% every year. And
26:28
it kind of has this gentle nudge
26:30
for all of us to go out
26:33
and spend because we know that
26:35
things are going up in price. We're
26:37
not rushing to the store to get
26:39
avocados because we think they're going to
26:42
go up by 2% over the course
26:44
of the year. But we have this
26:46
general sense of things get a
26:48
little bit more expensive. So it's very
26:51
healthy for the economy to have this
26:53
pinch of inflation. Now as another example,
26:55
and I'm not going to say this
26:58
is a good thing, but... We see
27:00
if you go back to the
27:02
beginning of 2025, the tariff worries of,
27:04
hey, wait a minute, I think prices
27:07
are going to jump a lot for
27:09
X, Y, Z car. We saw sales
27:11
for cars go through the roof because
27:14
people are trying to get ahead of
27:16
the inflation. And just as an example,
27:18
it motivates us to go spend
27:20
today. So it's a really good thing
27:23
to have. We just don't want a
27:25
salt block in our stew. It kind
27:27
of ruins everything. So we need it.
27:30
Back in the vernacular in America, investors
27:32
who didn't talk about it for
27:34
a really long time and forgot about
27:36
it, the reality here is that even
27:39
at two, two and a quarter, two
27:41
and a half percent inflation rate, it
27:43
wilts the purchasing power by 20, 30,
27:46
40% depending on how long your
27:48
retirement is. And I think of it
27:50
through, go back to a car example,
27:52
if you only had dollars for specific
27:55
items, imagine if you only had a
27:57
wallet for food. And so you had
27:59
food dollars and you had gasoline
28:01
dollars and you had car dollars and
28:04
you had and if you let's you
28:06
go back to 2020. And I think
28:08
about where inflation was for. cars. We
28:11
had a decade of car prices not
28:13
going up. It actually went down
28:15
a little bit. If I had $30,000
28:17
in my car wallet and I was
28:20
eyeing let's say a entry-level Lexus, that's
28:22
a happy retiree car so I used
28:24
that. If I waited for two years,
28:27
imagine it's we're talking about dollars in
28:29
your wallet. They're not invested in anything.
28:31
They're actual, it's in your car
28:33
wallet. Now, two years later, because of
28:36
all the supply chain disruptions in the
28:38
pandemic, now that same car went from
28:40
30 to 40. But your wallet still
28:43
only has 30 grand in it. So
28:45
your car dollars, they didn't change,
28:47
but they became way less affected. They
28:49
essentially wilted by 25%. But now that
28:52
was a rapid example. We had big
28:54
inflation in just a two-year period. But
28:56
it happens to almost every category. and
28:59
it happens pervasively over time. So
29:01
I want us to remember that it's
29:03
a part of the equation. It's not
29:05
as though we didn't have inflation. Now
29:08
we had inflation, we're gonna go back
29:10
to no inflation. That's not the case.
29:12
It's always there. Hard of the
29:14
Fed's mandate. So what do we do?
29:17
The very simple answer is you have
29:19
to invest your assets in areas that
29:21
inflate along with inflation. Your main quarterback
29:24
for this probably the best historical example.
29:26
of something has given us a
29:28
rate of return above the rate of
29:30
inflation. So remember, if stocks are up
29:33
10% and inflation up three, your real
29:35
rate of return is only seven. So
29:37
the main quarterback in being able to
29:40
fight and get a rate of return
29:42
above inflation has been historically broadly diversified
29:44
equities. I think of it in
29:46
terms of categories to see how that
29:49
works. Why do stocks protect us from
29:51
inflation? Think about these sectors like health
29:53
care. Think about sectors of utilities. As
29:56
their cost goes up, they pass. it
29:58
on to you and we just
30:00
have to keep paying more as consumers
30:02
that goes back into earnings companies now
30:05
have more money because they've passed on
30:07
the price to us. Well we can
30:09
now be the beneficial owner of that
30:12
company that continues to have more
30:14
earnings because they're inflating their prices along
30:16
with inflation. Potato chip company if you're
30:18
making potato chips and potatoes become 10%
30:21
more expensive and now your end chip
30:23
costs. 10% more, what do you do?
30:25
That yellow bag of potato chips
30:27
is just 10% higher. And if you
30:30
don't own the potato chip company, then
30:32
you've now been hit from inflation with
30:34
no sort of recourse. So we've got
30:37
to own the potato chip company, if
30:39
that makes sense. And we've got
30:41
to own a broadly diversified basket of
30:43
companies that are able to inflate their
30:46
prices along with inflation. And we've got
30:48
to be the owner of those companies
30:50
to benefit from that. And that's how
30:53
we protect. Stocks are your main
30:55
quarterback. I would put real estate into
30:57
that same category. That's been very effective
30:59
to hedging its inflation. And I think
31:02
about there's a recent billionaire list. I
31:04
don't know, have you seen this? No.
31:06
Bruce Springsteen is on the list. Okay,
31:09
the boss. The boss is on the
31:11
list. The boss is on the
31:13
list. His royalties from those. Hit movies
31:16
like terminators You think that yeah? Terminators
31:18
franchise. You think that really gone there?
31:20
No, supposedly back when he was Mr.
31:23
Universe You got a little bit of
31:25
Mr. Universe money. What did he
31:27
do with it? He bought California real
31:29
estate Way back in the 70s So
31:32
the path to being a billionaire is
31:34
not saving. It's about investing and I
31:36
don't know the exact properties he bought
31:39
but I think he bought a
31:41
lot of it and it's worth a
31:43
ton of money today And that inflated
31:45
along with inflation for that 40-year period.
31:48
So real estate does that. And then
31:50
I would say more of your defensive
31:52
line. This is not a high-powered
31:54
offense, but owning bonds at least can
31:57
keep you. pace with inflation and maybe
31:59
a little bit of a real rate
32:01
of return. So if inflation is three
32:04
and bonds are paying you four and
32:06
a half, you're not only keeping
32:08
up of inflation, but you have a
32:10
little bit of a real rate of
32:13
return above that. So collectively you've got
32:15
your quarterback that stocks in real estate,
32:17
you've got your defensive line called that
32:20
fixed income or bonds, and collectively that
32:22
grouping should keep us ahead of inflation
32:24
because we own assets that inflate.
32:26
along with inflation, and it's not going
32:29
away. Okay, let's go to questions. Cal
32:31
and Georgia wrote in with this one.
32:33
I'm 28, married with two kids, and
32:36
my wife and I max out our
32:38
Roth-I-Rays and contribute 15% of our
32:40
income to 401ks. My parents recently retired
32:42
early, but my siblings and I are
32:45
concerned that they didn't account enough for
32:47
inflation and may run out of money
32:49
in their 70s or 80s. We want
32:52
to set up a long-term family
32:54
savings or brokerage account that we can
32:56
all contribute to over the next 15
32:58
to 20 years. This would create a
33:01
safety net in case they need financial
33:03
help later, which could also be when
33:05
my kids are starting college. What's
33:07
the best way to structure something like
33:10
this? Should we use a joint investment
33:12
account, trust, or something else? Any advice
33:14
on the managing contributions, investments, and tax
33:17
implications would be greatly appreciated. I just
33:19
have to say, wow, most people
33:21
would not think of doing this for
33:23
their parents and have the foresight to
33:26
realize this could be a huge problem.
33:28
It's pretty cool, it's interesting though, you
33:30
know, Cal's 28, Cal, you're now making
33:33
some good money or you're waxing out
33:35
some of your retirement plans, and you're
33:37
thinking about your folks who, it
33:39
sounds like they retired early, but without
33:42
a lot of money. So I don't
33:44
understand that one, but I'm all for
33:46
retiring sooner, but if we don't have
33:49
the money to do it, then it
33:51
really is gonna be the burden
33:53
would be on. the kids to help,
33:55
which is cool that he's able to
33:58
do that. And he's got siblings through
34:00
that. So you've got multiple people that
34:02
are able to... to this. So naturally
34:05
he's thinking, okay, well let's open
34:07
up an account, let's all put money
34:09
in, it'll grow over time, it's a
34:11
safety nap. And I'm just going to
34:14
assume, I don't think Cal said how
34:16
many siblings he had, but I'm going
34:18
to assume, I'm going to assume,
34:20
I'm from a family of four, I'll
34:23
assume he has two siblings. You have
34:25
three people to try to help with
34:27
this safety nap. And Cal has two
34:30
kids. and then Cal's sister's gonna have
34:32
kids that are middle school and
34:34
high school and then his brother's gonna
34:36
have kids in middle school and high
34:39
school. And one of them is gonna
34:41
say, I want my kids to go
34:43
to private school so I don't have
34:46
enough money right now to contribute to
34:48
the joint account for mom and dad.
34:50
And then one of the citizens
34:52
is to say, well, I'm not setting
34:55
my kids to private school. My kids
34:57
go to public school. So I have
34:59
more money. So that's your choice. So
35:02
you still have to contribute. And wait
35:04
a minute. We get this joint
35:06
tax return. And it's now three people
35:08
have to sign it. And somebody just
35:11
got a bunch of interest. And wait
35:13
a minute. I didn't realize it was
35:15
so tax expensive because we all are
35:18
on this joint account. And so
35:20
and so and so stopped contributing. Yikes.
35:22
Absolute nightmare. If you collectively with your
35:24
siblings, start a joint account, which sounds
35:27
awesome and noble, but it's also a
35:29
recipe for absolute sibling disaster. So how
35:31
do you do it right? As
35:33
though I've been speaking from experience from
35:36
this, I've seen this happen a lot.
35:38
I bet you have. Because what is
35:40
a guarantee. is that everyone's life will
35:43
change financially and everyone's financial priorities change
35:45
and everyone's different kids. But the
35:47
priority to take care of the parents
35:49
still remains. Question is who's most responsible?
35:52
How do you keep it fair? How
35:54
do you keep it equitable? A couple
35:56
ways to do it. One, in my
35:59
opinion, you never would want to do.
36:01
a joint account. It gets complicated and
36:03
then imbalanced and people have taxes
36:05
and people stop contributing. So the way
36:08
to do this would be to open
36:10
up a family trust where you write
36:12
the rules to begin with. So you
36:15
set up some sort of guideline that
36:17
is, hey, we're just going to
36:19
start this here, we're all going to,
36:21
we all agree that we're going to
36:24
each put in $10,000 or whatever it
36:26
is, $50,000 each. And then we're just
36:28
going to let that grow, and here
36:31
are the rules of the rules
36:33
of the trust. the money goes to
36:35
our parents. And an estate planning attorney
36:37
can do that for you. And it's
36:40
about laying out the guidelines today so
36:42
that you don't have these sibling rivalries
36:44
down the line and these family
36:46
issues that will inevitably come up because
36:49
we're talking about money and priorities. And
36:51
everyone's always are going to eventually be
36:53
different even if they're almost exactly the
36:56
same today. So that is one way
36:58
to do this is to kind
37:00
of prescript the rules. And that way.
37:03
I think will really help long term
37:05
not have any sort of family divide.
37:07
The second way more practically the way
37:10
I could see doing this and this
37:12
isn't necessarily perfectly fair either because
37:14
let's say you're making a ton of
37:16
money and you're paying 40% in taxes
37:19
and your sibling is making good money
37:21
but paying 20% in taxes. It
37:23
takes you more earnings to end up
37:26
with $1,000 at the end of the
37:28
day to give to mom and dad.
37:30
But we're also trying to help mom
37:32
and dad here. So I think that
37:34
it may be a more practical way
37:37
to think about this. And I've seen
37:39
this work is that everybody at some
37:41
point when they need the money, which
37:43
also should give you a long time
37:45
here, 10, 20 years before they start
37:48
running out. It allows you to save
37:50
money and increase your earnings over time.
37:52
Then you start supplementing the parents once
37:54
a month. Everyone says, we'll all chip
37:56
in $1,000 a month. And that helps
37:59
fill the gap. between what mom and
38:01
dad are getting and what they really
38:03
need. And that's kind of an easier,
38:05
more palatable way, I think. May not
38:07
be perfectly fair because everyone's tax
38:10
rates are a little different. But this is
38:12
a charitable endeavor here. It's a
38:14
charitable act. So I would look at it
38:16
as if you're going to do it now,
38:18
you're going to want to look at some
38:20
sort of trust formation, you're going to have
38:23
to talk to a state planning attorney
38:25
attorney to do that. Otherwise, think
38:27
of it more practically down the. over
38:29
the course of time. I would also, just
38:31
one other thing, I would have them,
38:33
I would pay for them if you can
38:35
find a fiduciary who's willing to do an
38:38
hourly sit down with the parents. they may
38:40
need a reality dose of what they're going
38:42
to need to save and spend in
38:44
order to maintain their money over time and
38:47
look at their social security in the whole
38:49
picture. And then maybe they can get on
38:51
the kind of budget that would enable them
38:54
to sustain themselves. Like I don't know if
38:56
they've done something like that, but I
38:58
would definitely recommend that as well. That's
39:00
a really good point. There's got
39:02
to be some transparency. When you've got
39:04
a bunch of siblings and you've,
39:06
mom and dad retired, retired early.
39:08
Maybe they have plenty of money coming in.
39:11
Maybe they have 10 grand a month coming
39:13
in, but mom and dad are twirl in the
39:15
world and they need 20 grand a month. Now
39:17
are all the siblings going to be willing to
39:19
kick in for that? So it always goes
39:21
back to kind of these priorities. If it's
39:24
really look, hey, mom and dad just don't
39:26
have enough money and then they've got to
39:28
be able to just live and then it's a
39:30
different conversation. So to your point,
39:33
Chris, that the transparency with the
39:35
family. It's so important and I think
39:37
you're right, if you sat down with
39:39
the CFP or a fiduciary, they can
39:41
really get you some clarity around
39:43
their financial situation, which I'll give you
39:46
clarity around how you really can help. Okay,
39:48
Ryan and Wisconsin wrote in with
39:50
this one, are there any advantages
39:52
to dollar cost averaging more frequently?
39:55
I currently buy index funds once
39:57
per month. The market can change
39:59
drastically. over a month, so I'm wondering
40:01
if weekly or even daily buys would
40:03
be a better way to smooth the
40:06
ride while still being an average meet
40:08
the market investor. Okay, Ryan. There's
40:10
no way to know this because we
40:12
don't know how the market is going
40:14
to ever react into the future, right?
40:16
So if you were to say I
40:19
want to really dollar cost average and
40:21
you were starting in 2007, then slower
40:23
dollar cost averaging would have
40:25
been better because the market went
40:27
down for two straight years. If
40:29
you were deciding a dollar cost
40:31
average in early 2020 when the
40:34
pandemic bottom came, then dollar cost
40:36
average would cost you money. So
40:38
forget, more frequently, you
40:40
want to do this all in one
40:42
lump sum. We should really talk about
40:44
this as a larger segment. But there
40:47
is no perfect answer because we
40:49
don't know how markets are going
40:51
to react. So there are plenty
40:53
of studies around this. Around 70% of
40:55
the time. Seven out of ten, but
40:57
there's three out of ten where this
40:59
doesn't work. Putting money to work
41:02
faster is better, because markets do
41:04
have the propensity that they're
41:06
up over time. So the quicker
41:08
you get money invested, the higher
41:10
the probability, and no guarantee here,
41:12
that your money has a better rate
41:14
of return. So to answer your question,
41:17
I would say, invested when you have
41:19
it, particularly when you're younger, and
41:21
sooner is better. That would be
41:23
my short answer to that really.
41:25
more complicated than it sounds question.
41:27
And we'll definitely do that in
41:30
the future. Mark that down. Lisa
41:32
and Texas says West recently mentioned
41:34
phasing into retirement. Aren't Social Security
41:36
benefits driven by the beneficiaries annual
41:38
earnings? Well, reducing earnings or cutting
41:41
those in half for the final
41:43
years of a working history adversely
41:45
impact annual benefits. Not necessarily, Lisa.
41:48
Remember, Social Security takes your top
41:50
35 years and then they average
41:52
them. It really depends, but for a
41:54
lot of folks, when you worked really
41:56
early on, you've got some really low
41:58
years in there. And even if
42:00
you're scaling back to half time and
42:03
you're phasing in a retirement, I call
42:05
it the retirement gray zone, your 2025
42:07
earnings that are kind of working half
42:09
are still probably replacing some of the
42:12
really low years. Right, if we work
42:14
from age 20 to age 65, I
42:16
mean, that's 45 years. So we get
42:18
a lot of years you can cancel
42:20
out that don't even matter. We're only
42:23
taking the top 35, and that's what
42:25
your Social Security payments are predicated upon,
42:27
and of course your age. So usually
42:29
it does not hurt. It sounds like,
42:31
wait a minute, I'm making less at
42:34
the end, and now it's going to
42:36
reduce my Social Security. Usually the formula
42:38
really doesn't have that big of a
42:40
negative impact. Because again, we can look
42:43
at the best 35 years. And even
42:45
part-time work may be replacing some of
42:47
the smaller years way back when you
42:49
were young working. Super young working. Well,
42:51
thank you so much Wes. Thanks everyone
42:54
for tuning in today. We really appreciate
42:56
it. We will be back tomorrow with
42:58
a new Clark episode. Hope the rest
43:00
of your day is fantastic. Today's
43:05
episode is sponsored by Smart Travel, a new podcast
43:07
from Nurd Wallet. I'm Sally French. And I'm Megan
43:09
Coyle. We're travel writers at Nurd Wallet, and we
43:11
love helping you make your travel budget work smarter,
43:14
because who doesn't love more trips for less money?
43:16
People who hate fun Megan, that's who? But that's
43:18
definitely not you. Person who is listening to this
43:20
right now. On Smart Travel, we don't just hand
43:22
out travel advice. We break it down. Like, should
43:24
you get that fancy airline travel? We have the
43:26
answers. The answer is, it depends, by the way.
43:28
That's why we do the research for you. We
43:30
crunch the numbers, dissect the fine print, and make
43:32
sense of loyalty programs so you don't accidentally spend
43:34
all your hard-earned points on a sad airport hotel
43:36
booked amidst a canceled flight. Each week we tackle
43:38
real travel questions. Like, is travel insurance worth it?
43:41
How do you spot a good flight deal before
43:43
it's gone? And can you actually use those random
43:45
miles? on gave you for
43:47
Christmas. Also, I want that
43:49
on. I want that on. Look, we
43:51
we don't just sit here
43:53
and talk about travel.
43:55
We live it. I once
43:57
turned a canceled flight
43:59
into a free trip to
44:01
Denver, into a free trip to Denver, $200
44:03
in United Vouchers, and And you
44:06
were so patient through it
44:08
all. We've had practical
44:10
tips, expert interviews, and plenty
44:12
of hot got them hot
44:14
tips, To help you travel
44:16
smarter, not harder. So
44:18
whether you're planning your next
44:20
getaway or just love
44:22
staying ahead of the travel
44:24
game, follow Smart Travel
44:26
on your favorite podcast app.
44:28
passport will thank you you
44:30
so will your wallet.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More