Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Fellas, you know Degree Cool Rush deodorant,
0:02
right? Well, last year they changed the
0:04
formula, and guys were mad about it.
0:06
One dude even started a petition. So
0:08
guess what? Degree heard us, admitted they
0:10
messed up, and brought the original Cool
0:13
Rush scent back, exactly how it was.
0:15
And it's in Walmart, Target, and other
0:17
stores now for under $4. So grab
0:19
some and remember why its cool, crisp,
0:21
and fresh scent made it the number
0:23
one man's antiperspirant for the last decade.
0:25
Degree Cool Rush is back, and it
0:27
smells like victory for all of us.
0:30
This episode is brought to you by LifeLock.
0:33
Not everyone is careful with your personal
0:35
information, which might explain why there's a
0:37
victim of identity theft every five seconds
0:39
in the US. Fortunately, there's
0:41
LifeLock. LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions
0:43
of data points a second for
0:46
threats to your identity. If your
0:48
identity is stolen, a US -based
0:50
restoration specialist will fix it, guaranteed,
0:52
or your money back. Save up
0:54
to 40 % your first year
0:56
by visiting liflock.com/podcast. Terms apply.
1:10
This is the Daily Blast from
1:12
the New Republic, produced and presented by
1:15
the DSR Network. I'm
1:17
your host, Greg Sargent. After
1:26
the news broke on Tuesday that Amazon
1:29
might be labeling its products with the
1:31
added costs of President Trump's tariffs, the
1:34
White House issued a veiled threat toward
1:36
Amazon. After that, Amazon
1:38
quickly announced that there was no such
1:40
plan after all. Then
1:43
we learned that Trump had called up
1:45
Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to express his
1:47
anger over the decision, and
1:50
subsequently Trump boasted to reporters that
1:52
Bezos had listened to him and
1:54
acted. This
1:56
is an absurd abuse of power. And
1:58
it comes as a new poll from the Public
2:00
Religion Research Institute, shed some really
2:03
interesting new light on what Americans
2:05
think of abuses like these. Today
2:08
we're talking about all of this with
2:10
Melissa Deckman, a political scientist who's also
2:12
the CEO of PRRI and knows this
2:14
data well. Melissa, thanks for coming
2:16
on. Thanks for having me, Greg.
2:18
I appreciate you talking about our survey today. So
2:21
let's start with Trump and Amazon. Trump's
2:24
tariffs are going to drive out costs for
2:26
consumers across the country. There was
2:28
this report that Amazon was going to list
2:31
out the costs imposed by tariffs on its
2:33
products. Then we heard from
2:35
White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt, who
2:37
said this. This is
2:39
a hostile and political act
2:41
by Amazon. Why didn't
2:44
Amazon do this when the Biden administration
2:46
hiked inflation to the highest level in
2:48
40 years? And I would
2:50
also add that it's not a surprise,
2:53
because as Reuters recently wrote, Amazon
2:55
has partnered with a Chinese propaganda
2:58
arm. And then Trump himself said
3:00
he had personally talked to Bezos.
3:03
Jeff Bezos was very nice. He
3:06
was terrific. He solved the problem
3:08
very quickly, and he did the
3:10
right thing, and he's a good
3:12
guy. Melissa, that's not
3:14
okay. The White House shouldn't be threatening
3:17
private companies for flirting with the idea
3:19
of telling the truth about Trump policies,
3:21
should they? No,
3:23
not at all. You know, wearing my political
3:26
scientist hat, it made me think about when
3:28
I used to teach a course in the
3:30
presidency for many years, we talk about the
3:32
imperial presidency. And this was, of course, this
3:34
era during the late 60s, early 70s, largely
3:37
in response to the Vietnam War, where many
3:39
people thought the president was taking too much
3:41
power unilaterally without the control of Congress. Those
3:44
days, however, look quite weight compared
3:46
to, I think, what we're seeing
3:48
now, when I would argue in
3:50
some ways we are seeing an
3:53
imperial presidency. because we really have
3:55
a president who is willing to
3:57
use the full throttle of the
3:59
administrative state, the office to really
4:01
get private businesses, universities, law firms
4:03
to really bend to as well.
4:05
It's really remarkable. And
4:07
I think it really is a violation of
4:10
sort of the idea of kind of checks
4:12
and balances, the role of government in our
4:14
society. It's pretty remarkable. I
4:17
like to refer to it as
4:19
an all -of -government or whole
4:21
-of -government approach to authoritarian rule.
4:23
They're using every single agency they
4:25
conceivably can in every conceivable way
4:27
they can invent to arrogate more
4:29
and more power in the presidency,
4:31
right? Yeah, and just thinking
4:34
about it from an economic perspective if
4:36
you look at it through the lens
4:38
of kind of traditional conservative Republicanism, you
4:40
know, I think about Milton Friedman I'm
4:42
not an economist but this idea of
4:44
a planned economy right having government dictate
4:46
the terms of what is going to
4:49
be sold at what price is really
4:51
pretty much blasphemy, according to that kind
4:53
of school of thought. And so it
4:55
is a pretty remarkable change of events,
4:57
the overreach that we're seeing with this
4:59
presidency on even on sectors that here
5:02
to for have largely been touted, you
5:04
know, the proper role and scope of
5:06
government should be government getting out, right?
5:08
The invisible hand should be invisible. It
5:10
really shouldn't be this this blatant and
5:12
obvious. Well, what you're
5:15
getting at there is the GOP's takeover by
5:17
MAGA. I think there's
5:19
actually some continuity between the GOP
5:21
and MAGA in many ways. Trump
5:23
is really more of an exacerbation
5:26
than some sort of new aberration,
5:29
but he is an exacerbation. I
5:31
mean, he has essentially turned the
5:33
Republican Party into something that just
5:35
doesn't question things like this, even
5:37
when they go against the Republican
5:39
Party's own stated principles. Or
5:41
they go against the interest of their
5:44
voters, right? If you think about the
5:46
growth of Trump's support among the working
5:48
class, even among, I think, the working
5:50
class of color to some extent, at
5:53
least from 2024, these
5:55
sorts of policies are just really bad
5:57
for the base, economically speaking. They're
5:59
gonna get killed by these tariffs
6:01
and so are farmers as well
6:03
So on to the PRRI poll
6:06
the new poll it asks a
6:08
novel question It asks respondents if
6:10
they agree that quote Trump is
6:12
a dangerous dictator whose power should
6:14
be limited before he destroys American
6:16
democracy or Alternatively if they agree
6:18
that Trump is a quote strong
6:20
leader who should be given the
6:22
power he needs to restore America's
6:24
greatness Your poll found that
6:27
52 % of Americans picked the first
6:29
of those, seeing them as a dictator,
6:31
versus only 44 % who picked the
6:33
second option. Why did you guys
6:35
design the question survey that way? What were you
6:37
trying to measure? Well,
6:40
I think we were getting at trying
6:42
to find a question that would break
6:44
through and really demonstrate, you
6:46
know, Americans thoughts on Trump's
6:48
overall behavior, right? There's lots in terms
6:50
of the specifics of his policies, and
6:52
we can talk about that. But we
6:55
wanted a question that really put in
6:57
stark relief, really what we're seeing here.
6:59
Are we seeing someone who's dictatorial, who
7:01
is willing to use the powers of
7:03
the government in many ways that usurp
7:06
American democracy, or, you know, Are we
7:08
seeing that Americans might be more supportive
7:10
of more authoritarian tendencies within the administration?
7:12
And so this question kind of cuts
7:14
the noise. And I think it's pretty
7:17
revealing. If you had told me even
7:19
four years ago that a majority of
7:21
Americans would describe a president as a
7:23
dictator, I would have been surprised
7:25
at that. But yet this is where we
7:28
are in this political moment. Well, what's interesting
7:30
about this question and the way you designed
7:32
it is that it basically puts a negative
7:34
spin, extremely negative spin, on what we're all
7:36
seeing with our own eyes and then puts
7:39
a more positive one on what we're all
7:41
seeing. and openly defining
7:43
Trump as a dictator in the
7:45
survey question, you would expect would
7:47
push respondents away from supporting that
7:49
reading, but you have a majority
7:52
supporting this idea. So can you
7:54
tell us how independence broke down
7:56
on that particular question? Again, on
7:58
one side, it's do you view
8:01
Trump as a dangerous dictator? And
8:03
on the other, it's do you view
8:06
Trump as a strong leader who needs
8:08
these powers to restore American greatness. How
8:10
did independence break down? So
8:13
we found that independence are far more
8:15
likely to agree with the first statement
8:17
than the second. So 56 % of
8:19
independents basically say that Trump is a
8:21
dangerous dictator whose power should be limited
8:24
before he destroys American democracy versus 42
8:26
% who really viewed him more as
8:28
a strong leader who needs those powers
8:30
to restore America's greatness. That's
8:33
remarkable. I should underscore
8:35
that other polls have actually shown
8:37
fairly strong opposition among independents as
8:39
well to some of Trump's lawless
8:42
abuses of power on immigration in
8:44
particular, which is really interesting
8:46
because you'd think that independents in the
8:48
center of the electorate, maybe they're not
8:51
so pro -immigration, but when what Trump
8:53
is doing is understood as lawless acts,
8:55
as being about fundamental fairness and due
8:58
process and the rule of law, Majorities
9:00
of independents oppose these things and
9:03
you're finding that 56 % of
9:05
independents see Trump as a dangerous
9:07
dictator as opposed to a strong
9:09
leader who should be given the
9:12
power he needs is just really
9:14
stunning to me. It really underscores,
9:16
I think, the degree to which
9:18
independents are alienated by abuses of
9:20
power. Can you talk about that?
9:24
Yeah, I think that's really fair. Maybe
9:26
we return again to immigration. I'm
9:28
actually thinking back to when
9:30
Trump was first president in
9:33
his first term. I
9:36
think most Americans, regardless of ideology, regardless
9:38
of partisanship, would agree that for all
9:40
intents and purposes, our border has been
9:42
broken. We don't have a policy that
9:44
works. I think liberals would say that.
9:46
I think conservatives would say that. But
9:49
I think what you saw in Donald
9:51
Trump, who of course has always been
9:53
motivated by sort of anti -immigrant sentiment
9:55
rate, the great replacement theory, all these
9:57
sorts of things, Trump likes to extol
9:59
those ideas all the time when he
10:01
was on the campaign trail. So
10:04
you had the overreach of family
10:06
separation, for example. And I
10:08
think what we found historically when Trump overreaches
10:10
in terms of these policies, and we asked
10:13
a question about should immigrants
10:16
who are in the country will literally
10:18
be in turning camps guarded by the
10:20
military before they're deported, which is actually
10:22
happening in Guantanamo Bay, right? All these
10:25
sorts of things, very unpopular with most
10:27
Americans, save the Republican base and white
10:29
evangelical Protestants. We find by
10:31
and large that independence are not supportive of
10:33
that. So when there's been an overreach in
10:35
terms of policy, when it comes to immigration
10:37
in particular, it really drives,
10:39
I think, public opinion in the opposite
10:42
direction. Spring
10:44
is finally here. For
10:46
us in DC, that means cherry blossom,
10:49
warmer weather, and more breaking news
10:51
each and every day. To
10:53
stay up to date on all the news that
10:55
you need to know, there's no better place than
10:57
the DSR network. And there's no better way to
11:00
enjoy the DSR network than to become a member.
11:03
Members enjoy an ad -free listening
11:05
experience, access to our Discord community,
11:07
exclusive content, and more. Use
11:10
code DSR2025 for a
11:12
40 % off discount
11:15
on signup at thedsrnetwork.com.
11:18
That's code
11:20
DSR2025 at
11:22
thedsrnetwork.com. Thank
11:25
you and enjoy the show.
11:36
I want to flag another finding in
11:38
this poll that's fascinating. 78 % of
11:40
Americans disagree with the following statement, quote,
11:42
when decisions by Congress or the Supreme
11:45
Court hold our country back, the president
11:47
should be able to ignore them. By
11:50
contrast, only 18 % agree. I
11:53
think the story here from these findings
11:55
might be that Americans grasp a core
11:58
fact about this moment, which is that
12:00
Trump is trying to concentrate for himself
12:02
and for the presidency. a
12:04
truly immense amount of power, one that's
12:06
deeply destructive to how the system is
12:09
supposed to function at the most fundamental
12:11
level. Do you think that's right? You
12:14
know, I think that what I take
12:16
away from these findings, looking at the
12:18
idea of the basic constitutional design, like
12:21
the separation of powers, checks and balances,
12:23
all those sorts of things. You know,
12:25
Americans have, I think, a strong regard
12:27
for those principles, especially checks and balances,
12:29
right? We don't find
12:32
that even among Republicans, right, we don't
12:34
find support for the idea that Trump
12:36
should, or any president, rather, should disregard
12:38
what is actually happening with the courts.
12:41
I think we're in that crisis
12:43
right now, because of course now
12:45
with the case involving the man
12:47
from Maryland, Kilmar, Abrego Garcia was
12:50
extradited to a prison in El
12:52
Salvador, despite the fact the lower
12:54
courts said this was unconstitutional. And
12:56
you had a unanimous Supreme Court.
12:58
This is a court that rarely
13:00
decides anything from unanimous perspective, saying
13:02
that they had to facilitate his
13:04
return. And that still hasn't happened.
13:07
It's a pretty remarkable act right
13:09
now. in our American political history.
13:11
And again, most Americans, not even
13:13
a majority of Republicans say that
13:15
president should disregard what the Supreme
13:17
Court is saying. You
13:20
guys also find in the poll that
13:22
seven in ten adherents of Christian nationalism
13:24
see Trump positively as a strong leader
13:27
who should be given the power. He
13:29
needs to restore America's greatness, whereas only
13:31
a small minority of them see Trump
13:33
as a dictator figure. Meanwhile, you've got
13:36
that 44 % as we discussed at
13:38
the beginning, who don't see Trump
13:40
as a dictator. In a
13:42
way, with those numbers, you're kind
13:44
of delineating the voters who are
13:47
potentially genuinely authoritarian or have real
13:49
authoritarian sympathies, right? Can you talk
13:51
about that fool of voters? Who
13:53
are they? Yeah,
13:55
and so I would also recommend
13:57
last fall. We did a very
13:59
pathbreaking survey release looking at the
14:01
underpinnings of authoritarianism within the US
14:03
population, right? And so not surprisingly,
14:05
Christian national's adherents are the strongest
14:08
in terms of support for a
14:10
strong man. And so Christian nationalists
14:12
adherents are folks who believe that
14:14
America was founded and should remain
14:16
a Christian nation. And they believe
14:18
that Christians should have preferential treatment,
14:20
like strongly believe this, right? And
14:22
if you believe that God has
14:25
ordained you to be here, and
14:27
if you believe that God ordains
14:29
a certain design of how government
14:31
should be run, the
14:33
order of how society should be
14:35
set up, hierarchically, all those sorts
14:38
of things, then the constitution and
14:40
due process and the norms of
14:42
a democracy are far less important.
14:45
And so those kinds of individuals
14:47
are among the most, I think,
14:50
strongest adherents. They're
14:52
among the most strongest supporters of Donald Trump.
14:55
We find that pretty consistently. And
14:57
of course, I think it's not
14:59
a coincidence that a lot of
15:01
Trump's agenda, not all of us
15:03
certainly, but a lot of it's
15:05
driven by Project 2025 from the
15:07
Heritage Foundation, which is a longstanding
15:09
conservative organization. So from
15:11
pronatalist policies to banning reproductive rights
15:13
to getting rid of, you know,
15:15
the rights of transgender Americans to
15:17
getting rid of DEI initiatives, all
15:19
of these are of a cord
15:21
that kind of harken back to
15:23
some Christian nationalist viewpoints. And so
15:25
I'm not surprised at all throughout
15:27
the report, you'll see the strongest
15:29
supporters for Trump for his policies
15:31
and administration really come from Americans
15:33
who subscribe to Christian nationalist views.
15:36
Can we talk about the whole
15:38
pool of voters who seem to
15:41
have authoritarian tendencies? It
15:43
looks as if it's maybe a minority
15:45
of the country. It's hard to tell
15:47
exactly how big because it's a little
15:49
hard to measure, but it's got to be
15:51
at least a third. Who
15:54
do you think is in that
15:56
pool in addition to Christian nationalists?
15:58
Yeah, so we found pretty consistently
16:00
that about four in 10 Americans,
16:03
we would describe as having more
16:05
support for authoritarian tendencies, right? And
16:07
so in addition, of course, to
16:09
Christian nationalist adherents and even sympathizers,
16:11
these are folks who generally support
16:13
the ideas of Christian nationalism, maybe
16:15
not to the same extent as
16:17
who we classify as adherents. That's
16:20
about 30 % of the US
16:22
population. But clearly, it's the
16:24
base of the party, strong Republicans.
16:26
I mean, I think Republicans have
16:29
been far more likely to endorse these kinds of
16:31
views. We see that showing
16:33
up over and over in our poll.
16:35
If you go back to last fall
16:37
survey of authoritarianism, it's many Republicans as
16:39
well. But I think a consistent finding,
16:42
it's really a good 35 to 40
16:44
% of the country are really behind
16:46
Donald Trump, this kind of MAGA base.
16:48
These are the folks who are watching
16:51
Fox News or more conservative news outlets.
16:53
They're getting their news and information from
16:55
podcasts that lean in that direction. You
16:59
know, and they're, they're certainly getting, um,
17:01
their ideas about policy are shaped very dramatically
17:04
by this right wing echo chamber in lots
17:06
of ways. All those sorts of things I
17:08
think have endeared Trump and his approach, uh,
17:10
to, to a lot of these folks. Look,
17:12
I had a lot of these folks think
17:14
that, you know, America is broken, um, and
17:16
that you really need a strong man who's
17:18
willing to, to, you know, scramble some eggs
17:21
or, or to break things in order to
17:23
fix it. And so they're, less willing to
17:25
say that the principles of democracy, the
17:27
rule of law, the things that are in code
17:29
in our constitution are really, really important. So
17:33
to bring this back to Bezos and
17:35
Trump, I think what's
17:37
emerging here, the big story is
17:40
that there's this small authoritarian core
17:42
in the country, but
17:44
there's this large body of voters
17:46
in the middle that includes independence,
17:48
maybe a fair amount of whom
17:51
voted for Trump, who originally went
17:53
into this, meaning voted for Trump,
17:55
with the thought that, as
17:57
you said, this is a guy who
18:00
will break the furniture, you know, he'll
18:02
knock heads together, he'll make things work.
18:04
But they're not there when it comes
18:06
to the actual authoritarianism. And when they
18:09
start to see that, they get alienated.
18:11
And what strikes me about all this
18:13
is that You've got today's thing where
18:16
Trump bullied Amazon and Jeff Bezos and
18:18
the White House threatened Amazon. They're
18:21
all out there boasting about this.
18:23
Trump advisors are out. Stephen Miller
18:25
went on on TV and basically
18:27
gloated about what had happened. Caroline
18:31
Levitt was clearly flaunting the
18:33
fact that they were bullying
18:35
Amazon, a private company with
18:37
the White House power. Trump
18:39
gloated about the fact that Bezos had essentially
18:42
bent the knee to him. They don't seem
18:44
to care that the middle of the country
18:46
is alienated by this stuff. What do you
18:48
make of that? I
18:50
think you have really a newly
18:52
emboldened Donald Trump who has learned
18:55
some lessons from his first term
18:57
in office. He of course has
18:59
surrounded himself by administrators who you
19:01
know, are willing to really not even just
19:03
push the needle, but to go over all
19:05
the way over into acts that I think,
19:08
frankly, are quite unconstitutional. You
19:10
know, it's not necessarily something, though, that we
19:12
see in our survey today that most Americans
19:14
endorse. To be fair,
19:16
I think that most Americans voted for
19:18
Donald Trump, and we did see him
19:20
make gains, like with Hispanic voters, with
19:22
some African American voters, not as many
19:24
as I think initially thought. potentially, but
19:26
with younger voters, Gen Z men in
19:28
particular. But I think
19:30
what was really driving that was really
19:33
frustration, not just with the political system,
19:35
but with the economy. You had for
19:37
the first time in decades sustained inflation.
19:39
That was largely a product of COVID
19:42
and looking at supply chains and all
19:44
of that, the vestiges of that. But
19:46
nonetheless, this was really new for a
19:48
large share of American voters. And for
19:50
those Americans who don't pay a lot
19:53
of attention, they're like, hey, I vaguely
19:55
remember that life was more affordable in
19:57
the first Trump administration. They
19:59
also really didn't like Joe Biden and
20:01
so that made them I think cast
20:03
their lever for Donald Trump. But you
20:06
don't have Americans voting for a system
20:08
that's purely authoritarian and yet or for
20:10
a system in which the president can
20:12
routinely disregard what the courts say. I
20:15
think Congress right now, of course, is marching
20:17
and locked up with Trump because you have
20:19
a slim majority, of course, both houses being
20:21
controlled by Republicans who are supporting him. But
20:23
nonetheless, I don't think this is what many
20:25
Americans signed up for when they voted for
20:27
Donald Trump last fall. It sure
20:29
sounds as if the findings of this poll
20:31
are that the middle of the country is
20:33
alienated by this stuff pretty strongly. Yeah,
20:36
yeah, we'll have to see. You
20:38
know, we're only 100 days in.
20:40
There's a lot left to look
20:42
at in terms of his performance
20:45
in office. You know, I think
20:47
that. Americans are also going to
20:49
probably be very fatigued by Donald
20:51
Trump, right? I think the constant
20:53
bombardment of changes that are being
20:55
afoot, whether it's doge cuts or
20:58
disregarding court decisions, I
21:00
think what's really going to happen, my prediction is,
21:02
is that once tariffs are fully in effect, And
21:05
the cost of everyday living goes up.
21:07
I think many Americans are going to
21:09
turn pretty quickly. But I also think
21:11
if, in fact, we see a situation
21:13
where Medicaid is cut on the table,
21:15
where social security checks aren't coming in
21:17
on a regular basis, and people are
21:20
trying to call their office and figure
21:22
this out, the mechanisms of government that,
21:24
by and large, are largely popular with
21:26
the American public are really being threatened.
21:28
And I think on that front is
21:30
where you'll see, I think, more disapproval
21:32
of Trump's job as president. I
21:34
totally agree. I think what we're going to
21:37
see develop here is ports are going to
21:39
stop getting products in, shelves are going to
21:41
be empty, government's going to
21:43
be breaking down in its core
21:45
services, and Trump's authoritarianism is
21:47
just going to be sitting out there on
21:50
the table without any kind of actual effective
21:52
governance behind it, and it's going to get
21:54
a whole lot worse for the president. Melissa
21:57
Deckman, thank you so much for coming on with us today. Great discussion.
21:59
Oh, thank you so much. Glad
22:01
to be here. On
22:03
May 14th, the New Republic's
22:05
editor Michael and writers Matt
22:07
Ford, Timothy Noah, Tori Otten, and
22:09
myself will host the next
22:12
in our series, America
22:14
in Crisis. With the
22:16
new administration in place, this
22:18
event will bring together influential
22:20
political commentators with TNR's most
22:22
engaged readers to explore what
22:24
we can do to fight
22:26
back against Trump's anti -democratic rampage.
22:28
Join us on May 14th.
22:30
You can register at atlasarths .org
22:32
slash events slash TNR. Thanks so
22:34
much.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More