“He Was Pissed”: Trump’s Vile New Threat over Tariffs Takes Scary Turn

“He Was Pissed”: Trump’s Vile New Threat over Tariffs Takes Scary Turn

Released Wednesday, 30th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
“He Was Pissed”: Trump’s Vile New Threat over Tariffs Takes Scary Turn

“He Was Pissed”: Trump’s Vile New Threat over Tariffs Takes Scary Turn

“He Was Pissed”: Trump’s Vile New Threat over Tariffs Takes Scary Turn

“He Was Pissed”: Trump’s Vile New Threat over Tariffs Takes Scary Turn

Wednesday, 30th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Fellas, you know Degree Cool Rush deodorant,

0:02

right? Well, last year they changed the

0:04

formula, and guys were mad about it.

0:06

One dude even started a petition. So

0:08

guess what? Degree heard us, admitted they

0:10

messed up, and brought the original Cool

0:13

Rush scent back, exactly how it was.

0:15

And it's in Walmart, Target, and other

0:17

stores now for under $4. So grab

0:19

some and remember why its cool, crisp,

0:21

and fresh scent made it the number

0:23

one man's antiperspirant for the last decade.

0:25

Degree Cool Rush is back, and it

0:27

smells like victory for all of us.

0:30

This episode is brought to you by LifeLock.

0:33

Not everyone is careful with your personal

0:35

information, which might explain why there's a

0:37

victim of identity theft every five seconds

0:39

in the US. Fortunately, there's

0:41

LifeLock. LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions

0:43

of data points a second for

0:46

threats to your identity. If your

0:48

identity is stolen, a US -based

0:50

restoration specialist will fix it, guaranteed,

0:52

or your money back. Save up

0:54

to 40 % your first year

0:56

by visiting liflock.com/podcast. Terms apply.

1:10

This is the Daily Blast from

1:12

the New Republic, produced and presented by

1:15

the DSR Network. I'm

1:17

your host, Greg Sargent. After

1:26

the news broke on Tuesday that Amazon

1:29

might be labeling its products with the

1:31

added costs of President Trump's tariffs, the

1:34

White House issued a veiled threat toward

1:36

Amazon. After that, Amazon

1:38

quickly announced that there was no such

1:40

plan after all. Then

1:43

we learned that Trump had called up

1:45

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to express his

1:47

anger over the decision, and

1:50

subsequently Trump boasted to reporters that

1:52

Bezos had listened to him and

1:54

acted. This

1:56

is an absurd abuse of power. And

1:58

it comes as a new poll from the Public

2:00

Religion Research Institute, shed some really

2:03

interesting new light on what Americans

2:05

think of abuses like these. Today

2:08

we're talking about all of this with

2:10

Melissa Deckman, a political scientist who's also

2:12

the CEO of PRRI and knows this

2:14

data well. Melissa, thanks for coming

2:16

on. Thanks for having me, Greg.

2:18

I appreciate you talking about our survey today. So

2:21

let's start with Trump and Amazon. Trump's

2:24

tariffs are going to drive out costs for

2:26

consumers across the country. There was

2:28

this report that Amazon was going to list

2:31

out the costs imposed by tariffs on its

2:33

products. Then we heard from

2:35

White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt, who

2:37

said this. This is

2:39

a hostile and political act

2:41

by Amazon. Why didn't

2:44

Amazon do this when the Biden administration

2:46

hiked inflation to the highest level in

2:48

40 years? And I would

2:50

also add that it's not a surprise,

2:53

because as Reuters recently wrote, Amazon

2:55

has partnered with a Chinese propaganda

2:58

arm. And then Trump himself said

3:00

he had personally talked to Bezos.

3:03

Jeff Bezos was very nice. He

3:06

was terrific. He solved the problem

3:08

very quickly, and he did the

3:10

right thing, and he's a good

3:12

guy. Melissa, that's not

3:14

okay. The White House shouldn't be threatening

3:17

private companies for flirting with the idea

3:19

of telling the truth about Trump policies,

3:21

should they? No,

3:23

not at all. You know, wearing my political

3:26

scientist hat, it made me think about when

3:28

I used to teach a course in the

3:30

presidency for many years, we talk about the

3:32

imperial presidency. And this was, of course, this

3:34

era during the late 60s, early 70s, largely

3:37

in response to the Vietnam War, where many

3:39

people thought the president was taking too much

3:41

power unilaterally without the control of Congress. Those

3:44

days, however, look quite weight compared

3:46

to, I think, what we're seeing

3:48

now, when I would argue in

3:50

some ways we are seeing an

3:53

imperial presidency. because we really have

3:55

a president who is willing to

3:57

use the full throttle of the

3:59

administrative state, the office to really

4:01

get private businesses, universities, law firms

4:03

to really bend to as well.

4:05

It's really remarkable. And

4:07

I think it really is a violation of

4:10

sort of the idea of kind of checks

4:12

and balances, the role of government in our

4:14

society. It's pretty remarkable. I

4:17

like to refer to it as

4:19

an all -of -government or whole

4:21

-of -government approach to authoritarian rule.

4:23

They're using every single agency they

4:25

conceivably can in every conceivable way

4:27

they can invent to arrogate more

4:29

and more power in the presidency,

4:31

right? Yeah, and just thinking

4:34

about it from an economic perspective if

4:36

you look at it through the lens

4:38

of kind of traditional conservative Republicanism, you

4:40

know, I think about Milton Friedman I'm

4:42

not an economist but this idea of

4:44

a planned economy right having government dictate

4:46

the terms of what is going to

4:49

be sold at what price is really

4:51

pretty much blasphemy, according to that kind

4:53

of school of thought. And so it

4:55

is a pretty remarkable change of events,

4:57

the overreach that we're seeing with this

4:59

presidency on even on sectors that here

5:02

to for have largely been touted, you

5:04

know, the proper role and scope of

5:06

government should be government getting out, right?

5:08

The invisible hand should be invisible. It

5:10

really shouldn't be this this blatant and

5:12

obvious. Well, what you're

5:15

getting at there is the GOP's takeover by

5:17

MAGA. I think there's

5:19

actually some continuity between the GOP

5:21

and MAGA in many ways. Trump

5:23

is really more of an exacerbation

5:26

than some sort of new aberration,

5:29

but he is an exacerbation. I

5:31

mean, he has essentially turned the

5:33

Republican Party into something that just

5:35

doesn't question things like this, even

5:37

when they go against the Republican

5:39

Party's own stated principles. Or

5:41

they go against the interest of their

5:44

voters, right? If you think about the

5:46

growth of Trump's support among the working

5:48

class, even among, I think, the working

5:50

class of color to some extent, at

5:53

least from 2024, these

5:55

sorts of policies are just really bad

5:57

for the base, economically speaking. They're

5:59

gonna get killed by these tariffs

6:01

and so are farmers as well

6:03

So on to the PRRI poll

6:06

the new poll it asks a

6:08

novel question It asks respondents if

6:10

they agree that quote Trump is

6:12

a dangerous dictator whose power should

6:14

be limited before he destroys American

6:16

democracy or Alternatively if they agree

6:18

that Trump is a quote strong

6:20

leader who should be given the

6:22

power he needs to restore America's

6:24

greatness Your poll found that

6:27

52 % of Americans picked the first

6:29

of those, seeing them as a dictator,

6:31

versus only 44 % who picked the

6:33

second option. Why did you guys

6:35

design the question survey that way? What were you

6:37

trying to measure? Well,

6:40

I think we were getting at trying

6:42

to find a question that would break

6:44

through and really demonstrate, you

6:46

know, Americans thoughts on Trump's

6:48

overall behavior, right? There's lots in terms

6:50

of the specifics of his policies, and

6:52

we can talk about that. But we

6:55

wanted a question that really put in

6:57

stark relief, really what we're seeing here.

6:59

Are we seeing someone who's dictatorial, who

7:01

is willing to use the powers of

7:03

the government in many ways that usurp

7:06

American democracy, or, you know, Are we

7:08

seeing that Americans might be more supportive

7:10

of more authoritarian tendencies within the administration?

7:12

And so this question kind of cuts

7:14

the noise. And I think it's pretty

7:17

revealing. If you had told me even

7:19

four years ago that a majority of

7:21

Americans would describe a president as a

7:23

dictator, I would have been surprised

7:25

at that. But yet this is where we

7:28

are in this political moment. Well, what's interesting

7:30

about this question and the way you designed

7:32

it is that it basically puts a negative

7:34

spin, extremely negative spin, on what we're all

7:36

seeing with our own eyes and then puts

7:39

a more positive one on what we're all

7:41

seeing. and openly defining

7:43

Trump as a dictator in the

7:45

survey question, you would expect would

7:47

push respondents away from supporting that

7:49

reading, but you have a majority

7:52

supporting this idea. So can you

7:54

tell us how independence broke down

7:56

on that particular question? Again, on

7:58

one side, it's do you view

8:01

Trump as a dangerous dictator? And

8:03

on the other, it's do you view

8:06

Trump as a strong leader who needs

8:08

these powers to restore American greatness. How

8:10

did independence break down? So

8:13

we found that independence are far more

8:15

likely to agree with the first statement

8:17

than the second. So 56 % of

8:19

independents basically say that Trump is a

8:21

dangerous dictator whose power should be limited

8:24

before he destroys American democracy versus 42

8:26

% who really viewed him more as

8:28

a strong leader who needs those powers

8:30

to restore America's greatness. That's

8:33

remarkable. I should underscore

8:35

that other polls have actually shown

8:37

fairly strong opposition among independents as

8:39

well to some of Trump's lawless

8:42

abuses of power on immigration in

8:44

particular, which is really interesting

8:46

because you'd think that independents in the

8:48

center of the electorate, maybe they're not

8:51

so pro -immigration, but when what Trump

8:53

is doing is understood as lawless acts,

8:55

as being about fundamental fairness and due

8:58

process and the rule of law, Majorities

9:00

of independents oppose these things and

9:03

you're finding that 56 % of

9:05

independents see Trump as a dangerous

9:07

dictator as opposed to a strong

9:09

leader who should be given the

9:12

power he needs is just really

9:14

stunning to me. It really underscores,

9:16

I think, the degree to which

9:18

independents are alienated by abuses of

9:20

power. Can you talk about that?

9:24

Yeah, I think that's really fair. Maybe

9:26

we return again to immigration. I'm

9:28

actually thinking back to when

9:30

Trump was first president in

9:33

his first term. I

9:36

think most Americans, regardless of ideology, regardless

9:38

of partisanship, would agree that for all

9:40

intents and purposes, our border has been

9:42

broken. We don't have a policy that

9:44

works. I think liberals would say that.

9:46

I think conservatives would say that. But

9:49

I think what you saw in Donald

9:51

Trump, who of course has always been

9:53

motivated by sort of anti -immigrant sentiment

9:55

rate, the great replacement theory, all these

9:57

sorts of things, Trump likes to extol

9:59

those ideas all the time when he

10:01

was on the campaign trail. So

10:04

you had the overreach of family

10:06

separation, for example. And I

10:08

think what we found historically when Trump overreaches

10:10

in terms of these policies, and we asked

10:13

a question about should immigrants

10:16

who are in the country will literally

10:18

be in turning camps guarded by the

10:20

military before they're deported, which is actually

10:22

happening in Guantanamo Bay, right? All these

10:25

sorts of things, very unpopular with most

10:27

Americans, save the Republican base and white

10:29

evangelical Protestants. We find by

10:31

and large that independence are not supportive of

10:33

that. So when there's been an overreach in

10:35

terms of policy, when it comes to immigration

10:37

in particular, it really drives,

10:39

I think, public opinion in the opposite

10:42

direction. Spring

10:44

is finally here. For

10:46

us in DC, that means cherry blossom,

10:49

warmer weather, and more breaking news

10:51

each and every day. To

10:53

stay up to date on all the news that

10:55

you need to know, there's no better place than

10:57

the DSR network. And there's no better way to

11:00

enjoy the DSR network than to become a member.

11:03

Members enjoy an ad -free listening

11:05

experience, access to our Discord community,

11:07

exclusive content, and more. Use

11:10

code DSR2025 for a

11:12

40 % off discount

11:15

on signup at thedsrnetwork.com.

11:18

That's code

11:20

DSR2025 at

11:22

thedsrnetwork.com. Thank

11:25

you and enjoy the show.

11:36

I want to flag another finding in

11:38

this poll that's fascinating. 78 % of

11:40

Americans disagree with the following statement, quote,

11:42

when decisions by Congress or the Supreme

11:45

Court hold our country back, the president

11:47

should be able to ignore them. By

11:50

contrast, only 18 % agree. I

11:53

think the story here from these findings

11:55

might be that Americans grasp a core

11:58

fact about this moment, which is that

12:00

Trump is trying to concentrate for himself

12:02

and for the presidency. a

12:04

truly immense amount of power, one that's

12:06

deeply destructive to how the system is

12:09

supposed to function at the most fundamental

12:11

level. Do you think that's right? You

12:14

know, I think that what I take

12:16

away from these findings, looking at the

12:18

idea of the basic constitutional design, like

12:21

the separation of powers, checks and balances,

12:23

all those sorts of things. You know,

12:25

Americans have, I think, a strong regard

12:27

for those principles, especially checks and balances,

12:29

right? We don't find

12:32

that even among Republicans, right, we don't

12:34

find support for the idea that Trump

12:36

should, or any president, rather, should disregard

12:38

what is actually happening with the courts.

12:41

I think we're in that crisis

12:43

right now, because of course now

12:45

with the case involving the man

12:47

from Maryland, Kilmar, Abrego Garcia was

12:50

extradited to a prison in El

12:52

Salvador, despite the fact the lower

12:54

courts said this was unconstitutional. And

12:56

you had a unanimous Supreme Court.

12:58

This is a court that rarely

13:00

decides anything from unanimous perspective, saying

13:02

that they had to facilitate his

13:04

return. And that still hasn't happened.

13:07

It's a pretty remarkable act right

13:09

now. in our American political history.

13:11

And again, most Americans, not even

13:13

a majority of Republicans say that

13:15

president should disregard what the Supreme

13:17

Court is saying. You

13:20

guys also find in the poll that

13:22

seven in ten adherents of Christian nationalism

13:24

see Trump positively as a strong leader

13:27

who should be given the power. He

13:29

needs to restore America's greatness, whereas only

13:31

a small minority of them see Trump

13:33

as a dictator figure. Meanwhile, you've got

13:36

that 44 % as we discussed at

13:38

the beginning, who don't see Trump

13:40

as a dictator. In a

13:42

way, with those numbers, you're kind

13:44

of delineating the voters who are

13:47

potentially genuinely authoritarian or have real

13:49

authoritarian sympathies, right? Can you talk

13:51

about that fool of voters? Who

13:53

are they? Yeah,

13:55

and so I would also recommend

13:57

last fall. We did a very

13:59

pathbreaking survey release looking at the

14:01

underpinnings of authoritarianism within the US

14:03

population, right? And so not surprisingly,

14:05

Christian national's adherents are the strongest

14:08

in terms of support for a

14:10

strong man. And so Christian nationalists

14:12

adherents are folks who believe that

14:14

America was founded and should remain

14:16

a Christian nation. And they believe

14:18

that Christians should have preferential treatment,

14:20

like strongly believe this, right? And

14:22

if you believe that God has

14:25

ordained you to be here, and

14:27

if you believe that God ordains

14:29

a certain design of how government

14:31

should be run, the

14:33

order of how society should be

14:35

set up, hierarchically, all those sorts

14:38

of things, then the constitution and

14:40

due process and the norms of

14:42

a democracy are far less important.

14:45

And so those kinds of individuals

14:47

are among the most, I think,

14:50

strongest adherents. They're

14:52

among the most strongest supporters of Donald Trump.

14:55

We find that pretty consistently. And

14:57

of course, I think it's not

14:59

a coincidence that a lot of

15:01

Trump's agenda, not all of us

15:03

certainly, but a lot of it's

15:05

driven by Project 2025 from the

15:07

Heritage Foundation, which is a longstanding

15:09

conservative organization. So from

15:11

pronatalist policies to banning reproductive rights

15:13

to getting rid of, you know,

15:15

the rights of transgender Americans to

15:17

getting rid of DEI initiatives, all

15:19

of these are of a cord

15:21

that kind of harken back to

15:23

some Christian nationalist viewpoints. And so

15:25

I'm not surprised at all throughout

15:27

the report, you'll see the strongest

15:29

supporters for Trump for his policies

15:31

and administration really come from Americans

15:33

who subscribe to Christian nationalist views.

15:36

Can we talk about the whole

15:38

pool of voters who seem to

15:41

have authoritarian tendencies? It

15:43

looks as if it's maybe a minority

15:45

of the country. It's hard to tell

15:47

exactly how big because it's a little

15:49

hard to measure, but it's got to be

15:51

at least a third. Who

15:54

do you think is in that

15:56

pool in addition to Christian nationalists?

15:58

Yeah, so we found pretty consistently

16:00

that about four in 10 Americans,

16:03

we would describe as having more

16:05

support for authoritarian tendencies, right? And

16:07

so in addition, of course, to

16:09

Christian nationalist adherents and even sympathizers,

16:11

these are folks who generally support

16:13

the ideas of Christian nationalism, maybe

16:15

not to the same extent as

16:17

who we classify as adherents. That's

16:20

about 30 % of the US

16:22

population. But clearly, it's the

16:24

base of the party, strong Republicans.

16:26

I mean, I think Republicans have

16:29

been far more likely to endorse these kinds of

16:31

views. We see that showing

16:33

up over and over in our poll.

16:35

If you go back to last fall

16:37

survey of authoritarianism, it's many Republicans as

16:39

well. But I think a consistent finding,

16:42

it's really a good 35 to 40

16:44

% of the country are really behind

16:46

Donald Trump, this kind of MAGA base.

16:48

These are the folks who are watching

16:51

Fox News or more conservative news outlets.

16:53

They're getting their news and information from

16:55

podcasts that lean in that direction. You

16:59

know, and they're, they're certainly getting, um,

17:01

their ideas about policy are shaped very dramatically

17:04

by this right wing echo chamber in lots

17:06

of ways. All those sorts of things I

17:08

think have endeared Trump and his approach, uh,

17:10

to, to a lot of these folks. Look,

17:12

I had a lot of these folks think

17:14

that, you know, America is broken, um, and

17:16

that you really need a strong man who's

17:18

willing to, to, you know, scramble some eggs

17:21

or, or to break things in order to

17:23

fix it. And so they're, less willing to

17:25

say that the principles of democracy, the

17:27

rule of law, the things that are in code

17:29

in our constitution are really, really important. So

17:33

to bring this back to Bezos and

17:35

Trump, I think what's

17:37

emerging here, the big story is

17:40

that there's this small authoritarian core

17:42

in the country, but

17:44

there's this large body of voters

17:46

in the middle that includes independence,

17:48

maybe a fair amount of whom

17:51

voted for Trump, who originally went

17:53

into this, meaning voted for Trump,

17:55

with the thought that, as

17:57

you said, this is a guy who

18:00

will break the furniture, you know, he'll

18:02

knock heads together, he'll make things work.

18:04

But they're not there when it comes

18:06

to the actual authoritarianism. And when they

18:09

start to see that, they get alienated.

18:11

And what strikes me about all this

18:13

is that You've got today's thing where

18:16

Trump bullied Amazon and Jeff Bezos and

18:18

the White House threatened Amazon. They're

18:21

all out there boasting about this.

18:23

Trump advisors are out. Stephen Miller

18:25

went on on TV and basically

18:27

gloated about what had happened. Caroline

18:31

Levitt was clearly flaunting the

18:33

fact that they were bullying

18:35

Amazon, a private company with

18:37

the White House power. Trump

18:39

gloated about the fact that Bezos had essentially

18:42

bent the knee to him. They don't seem

18:44

to care that the middle of the country

18:46

is alienated by this stuff. What do you

18:48

make of that? I

18:50

think you have really a newly

18:52

emboldened Donald Trump who has learned

18:55

some lessons from his first term

18:57

in office. He of course has

18:59

surrounded himself by administrators who you

19:01

know, are willing to really not even just

19:03

push the needle, but to go over all

19:05

the way over into acts that I think,

19:08

frankly, are quite unconstitutional. You

19:10

know, it's not necessarily something, though, that we

19:12

see in our survey today that most Americans

19:14

endorse. To be fair,

19:16

I think that most Americans voted for

19:18

Donald Trump, and we did see him

19:20

make gains, like with Hispanic voters, with

19:22

some African American voters, not as many

19:24

as I think initially thought. potentially, but

19:26

with younger voters, Gen Z men in

19:28

particular. But I think

19:30

what was really driving that was really

19:33

frustration, not just with the political system,

19:35

but with the economy. You had for

19:37

the first time in decades sustained inflation.

19:39

That was largely a product of COVID

19:42

and looking at supply chains and all

19:44

of that, the vestiges of that. But

19:46

nonetheless, this was really new for a

19:48

large share of American voters. And for

19:50

those Americans who don't pay a lot

19:53

of attention, they're like, hey, I vaguely

19:55

remember that life was more affordable in

19:57

the first Trump administration. They

19:59

also really didn't like Joe Biden and

20:01

so that made them I think cast

20:03

their lever for Donald Trump. But you

20:06

don't have Americans voting for a system

20:08

that's purely authoritarian and yet or for

20:10

a system in which the president can

20:12

routinely disregard what the courts say. I

20:15

think Congress right now, of course, is marching

20:17

and locked up with Trump because you have

20:19

a slim majority, of course, both houses being

20:21

controlled by Republicans who are supporting him. But

20:23

nonetheless, I don't think this is what many

20:25

Americans signed up for when they voted for

20:27

Donald Trump last fall. It sure

20:29

sounds as if the findings of this poll

20:31

are that the middle of the country is

20:33

alienated by this stuff pretty strongly. Yeah,

20:36

yeah, we'll have to see. You

20:38

know, we're only 100 days in.

20:40

There's a lot left to look

20:42

at in terms of his performance

20:45

in office. You know, I think

20:47

that. Americans are also going to

20:49

probably be very fatigued by Donald

20:51

Trump, right? I think the constant

20:53

bombardment of changes that are being

20:55

afoot, whether it's doge cuts or

20:58

disregarding court decisions, I

21:00

think what's really going to happen, my prediction is,

21:02

is that once tariffs are fully in effect, And

21:05

the cost of everyday living goes up.

21:07

I think many Americans are going to

21:09

turn pretty quickly. But I also think

21:11

if, in fact, we see a situation

21:13

where Medicaid is cut on the table,

21:15

where social security checks aren't coming in

21:17

on a regular basis, and people are

21:20

trying to call their office and figure

21:22

this out, the mechanisms of government that,

21:24

by and large, are largely popular with

21:26

the American public are really being threatened.

21:28

And I think on that front is

21:30

where you'll see, I think, more disapproval

21:32

of Trump's job as president. I

21:34

totally agree. I think what we're going to

21:37

see develop here is ports are going to

21:39

stop getting products in, shelves are going to

21:41

be empty, government's going to

21:43

be breaking down in its core

21:45

services, and Trump's authoritarianism is

21:47

just going to be sitting out there on

21:50

the table without any kind of actual effective

21:52

governance behind it, and it's going to get

21:54

a whole lot worse for the president. Melissa

21:57

Deckman, thank you so much for coming on with us today. Great discussion.

21:59

Oh, thank you so much. Glad

22:01

to be here. On

22:03

May 14th, the New Republic's

22:05

editor Michael and writers Matt

22:07

Ford, Timothy Noah, Tori Otten, and

22:09

myself will host the next

22:12

in our series, America

22:14

in Crisis. With the

22:16

new administration in place, this

22:18

event will bring together influential

22:20

political commentators with TNR's most

22:22

engaged readers to explore what

22:24

we can do to fight

22:26

back against Trump's anti -democratic rampage.

22:28

Join us on May 14th.

22:30

You can register at atlasarths .org

22:32

slash events slash TNR. Thanks so

22:34

much.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features