Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
NPR. This
0:12
is The Indicator for Planet Money. I'm Adrian Ma. And
0:14
I'm Weylan Wang. This week, Apple
0:16
did something that it does every year
0:19
around this time. It announced a new
0:21
iPhone. But this year, there
0:23
are legal clouds hanging over Apple and
0:25
the iPhone. For one thing, the day
0:27
after the announcement, the European Union's top
0:30
court ordered the company to pay about
0:32
$14 billion in
0:34
fat taxes to Ireland. That's
0:36
where Apple's European headquarters are. And
0:39
here in the U.S., federal regulators
0:41
have this outstanding lawsuit against Apple
0:43
for allegedly violating antitrust laws. Today
0:46
on the show, we're going to focus on that.
0:49
Why the DOJ brought this suit, and why
0:51
it matters for the millions of people who
0:53
have a smartphone. This
0:56
message comes from NPR sponsor, Greenlight. Want
0:59
to teach your kids financial literacy? With
1:01
Greenlight, kids and teens use a debit
1:03
card of their own, while parents can
1:05
keep an eye on kids' spending and
1:08
savings in the app. Get your first
1:10
month free at greenlight.com/NPR. Message
1:13
comes from and he our sponsor Mint
1:15
Mobile. from the gas pump to the
1:18
grocery store, Inflation is everywhere. So Mint
1:20
Mobile is offering premium wireless starting a
1:22
just fifteen. Dollars a month to
1:24
get your newfound planned for just
1:27
fifteen dollars. Go to mintmobile.com/ This
1:30
message comes from NPR sponsor, Warby Parker.
1:33
Their glasses start at $95, including
1:36
anti-reflective, scratch-resistant prescription lenses that block
1:38
100% of UV rays. Try
1:41
five pairs of frames at home
1:44
for free. Go to warbyparker.com/covered. What
1:47
does the future of food look
1:49
like as the climate continues to
1:52
change? We'll bring you innovations and
1:54
answers during NPR's Climate Solutions Week.
1:56
Explore with us
1:58
at npr.org/climateweek. Rebecca
2:03
Ha Alansworth is a professor at Vanderbilt
2:06
Law School where she teaches antitrust law.
2:09
She says when the Department of Justice initially brought
2:11
its lawsuit against Apple in March of this year,
2:13
it didn't just come out of nowhere.
2:15
The DOJ and the FTC,
2:17
the enforcers of antitrust under
2:20
the Biden administration, have been
2:22
pretty explicit that they want
2:24
to pursue cases against these
2:26
big tech monopolies. And often
2:28
they're identified as the gaffa,
2:31
the Google, Amazon, Facebook, and
2:33
Apple. Oh, I actually have not heard that
2:35
acronym before. Oh, yeah. Well,
2:38
now we need to call it gamma, I guess, because
2:40
Facebook became meta. Over the
2:42
past couple of years, federal regulators
2:44
have sued Google, Amazon, and Facebook's
2:46
parent company, Meta, for allegedly violating
2:48
antitrust law. And then I
2:51
guess they figured, well, we need to complete the
2:53
set. And so they filed this lawsuit against Apple.
2:55
Got to collect them all. Yeah. I
2:57
think that a little cynically, but I actually think
3:00
this suit is not frivolous. Right.
3:02
But yeah, I think the idea behind these
3:04
suits was that the tech companies have gotten
3:06
really powerful. They've stopped innovating as much as
3:08
we would want them to. And
3:12
antitrust can do something about that. In
3:15
a nutshell, the DOJ accuses
3:17
Apple of violating the Sherman
3:19
Antitrust Act by, quote, monopolizing
3:21
smartphone markets, end quote. And
3:23
how supposedly has it been doing that? Well,
3:25
the iPhone has been around since 2007. And
3:29
ever since it debuted, Apple has
3:31
designed a whole suite of products
3:33
and services to work with the
3:35
iPhone. I'm talking MacBooks, Apple watches,
3:38
apps like iMessage, and a whole
3:40
app store full of games. The
3:42
classic metaphor for this carefully curated
3:45
ecosystem is a walled garden.
3:47
Yeah. But according to the
3:49
DOJ's lawsuit, Apple has constructed its garden
3:52
in such a way that it effectively
3:54
locks users in. One
3:56
example it gives has to do with smartwatches.
4:00
If you have an Apple watch, it's designed
4:02
to really only work with the iPhone.
4:04
Conversely, if you have a smartwatch made
4:07
by some other company, like a Fitbit
4:09
or a Samsung watch, it
4:11
can work with iPhone, but the
4:13
DOJ asserts that Apple purposely limits how
4:15
well those other watches work on the
4:18
iPhone. They're making it harder to switch.
4:21
So what we would call this an
4:23
antitrust is barriers to entry. And
4:26
if there's something I don't like about
4:28
the iPhone, it's very, very difficult for
4:30
me to essentially, it feels like, upend
4:32
my life and switch ecosystems. That
4:35
idea that it's hard for consumers to
4:37
switch fortifies Apple's
4:41
monopoly power, says the government. And
4:43
they have actually taken specific steps, according to
4:46
the government, to make it harder for
4:48
me to switch. Another
4:50
way Apple has allegedly made it harder for
4:52
users to switch has to do with these
4:55
things many iPhone users might not be familiar
4:57
with, super apps and cloud-based
4:59
gaming apps. Basically, super apps combine
5:01
multiple functions into one app. So
5:04
imagine an app that lets you
5:06
text, post videos, order food and
5:08
transfer money all in one. That
5:11
sounds delightful because I never want to stop
5:13
using my smartphone. You're
5:17
like, just press a button. It's like, now
5:19
it's making me french fries. Now it's doing
5:22
my laundry. This sounds delightful in
5:24
a sort of dystopian way. But
5:26
it's not just super apps. The DOJ
5:28
also points to these cloud-based gaming apps,
5:30
which let users stream video games to
5:33
their phones, sort of like you would
5:35
stream a movie. For
5:37
both these kinds of apps, the DOJ says
5:39
Apple has historically stifled their rollout in the
5:42
app store. And both of these claims
5:44
are that consumers, if they
5:46
really started living, not in the
5:48
Apple ecosystem, but in the ecosystem
5:50
of these apps or in the
5:53
ecosystem of these clouds, that
5:55
the hardware becomes kind of irrelevant.
6:00
run these sorts of apps on any old
6:02
phone, you might not shell out a thousand
6:04
bucks for the latest iPhone. Yeah,
6:06
I'm going to do it on my rotary phone. That
6:08
I would love to see how you play Angry Birds
6:10
on a rotary phone. Yeah,
6:13
like five hours later, I did it. I
6:17
launched one bird. We
6:19
reached out to Apple. They said basically
6:21
the DOJ is wrong. They
6:23
do have super apps like WeChat
6:26
on iPhone. And when it
6:28
comes to cloud gaming services, they do have
6:30
them in the app store. Although it's worth
6:32
noting that's a more recent development. Now
6:34
one more thing that the DOJ points
6:37
to as evidence of Apple's allegedly anti-competitive
6:39
conduct is the fact that text
6:41
messaging between iPhones and Androids has always been
6:43
a little wonky. Like
6:46
if you have an iPhone, you know when
6:49
somebody's texting you from an Android because it
6:51
appears in like a little green bubble instead
6:53
of a blue one. Or like the way
6:55
that when somebody sends you a picture or
6:57
a video, it looks all shrunken and grainy.
7:00
Yeah, it's like you never know what the quality is going to
7:02
be. Yeah. To somebody who's
7:04
in the Apple ecosystem, Android looks pretty
7:06
bad. And the idea is
7:08
that that's an artificial thing that Apple is doing. So
7:11
to summarize the DOJ's case against
7:13
Apple. What the DOJ is sort
7:15
of arguing is that it's one
7:17
thing if Apple constructed a really beautiful
7:19
walled garden and it says, don't you
7:21
love it in here? Isn't it great?
7:24
But in addition to what
7:26
it's doing in constructing this walled
7:28
garden is keeping other potentially nice
7:31
things out and making stuff
7:33
outside the garden seem worse than it really
7:35
is. Exactly. And
7:37
it's not just about keeping the stuff out, but it's
7:39
also keeping you in. You know, when
7:41
it's time for a new phone, it's an opportunity maybe for
7:43
you to think about getting out of that garden and finding
7:45
a new one. But if they've
7:47
built up the walls so high that
7:49
you're not actually making a real choice,
7:52
it's antitrust harm right there. Apple
7:55
says the DOJ is wrong on the facts
7:57
and the law. It says the suit will
7:59
threaten Apple's ability to keep making products
8:01
that consumers love in a highly
8:03
competitive smartphone market. Maybe worth
8:05
noting here that iPhone sales have not
8:07
been stellar overseas in recent months, especially
8:09
in China. Well, I saw, didn't
8:11
the Chinese company reveal this tri-fold phone? I
8:14
mean, that's pretty cool. I haven't seen anything
8:16
like that here. Not from
8:18
Apple. Just saying. Rebecca,
8:22
for her part, thinks the DOJ has
8:24
a strong case, but she's hesitant to
8:26
call it a slam dunk. Do
8:28
you see any weaknesses in the Department of
8:31
Justice's case? Oh
8:33
yeah, lots of weaknesses. One
8:36
challenge will be proving that all
8:38
these alleged tactics by Apple translate
8:40
into actual monopoly power. According
8:42
to the DOJ, iPhones account for about 65
8:44
to 70 percent of
8:46
the U.S. smartphone market. Is
8:48
that enough to say that Apple has a
8:50
monopoly market share? Rebecca says
8:52
it's debatable. Apple says
8:55
that number is inflated because the DOJ
8:57
is basing it on revenue rather than
8:59
the number of phones. And
9:01
from Apple's point of view, the better view
9:03
of its market power is global sales. Worldwide,
9:06
sales of Android phones far exceed
9:08
iPhone sales, and iPhones only make
9:10
up about 20 percent of smartphones.
9:13
So both sides of this case are
9:16
clearly digging in for some protracted litigation.
9:19
And you've got to wonder, by the end of
9:21
it, what is the government hoping to accomplish? So
9:24
we put that question to Jonathan Cantor. He's
9:26
Assistant Attorney General who heads up antitrust litigation
9:28
at the DOJ. I
9:30
can't speak to the specific lawsuit because that
9:32
is live litigation and we don't
9:35
talk about live cases. But I can
9:37
tell you more broadly that the remedy
9:39
in an antitrust case really depends on
9:41
the nature of the violation. And ultimately,
9:43
our goal is to make sure that
9:45
we're prying open competition because
9:47
we believe that when competition
9:50
is alive and well, it doesn't just make the
9:54
smaller companies challenging them and hopefully
9:56
better. The competitive spirit is what
9:59
drives innovation. In the case
10:01
of US vs. Apple, it could take a
10:03
very long time before we see a final
10:05
resolution. Long enough even that
10:07
we might sooner see another iPhone 17
10:09
or 18. Or
10:12
a 19. Or
10:14
a 20. Should we just keep counting?
10:16
Look at us counting higher and higher. This
10:20
episode was produced by Cooper Katz McKim with engineering
10:22
by Neil Rauch. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez.
10:25
Macon Kennan edits the show and the indicators production
10:27
of NPR. This
10:34
message comes from NPR sponsor, American
10:36
Express. Take your business
10:38
further with the smart and flexible
10:40
Amex Business Gold Card. It's packed
10:43
with benefits that help unlock more
10:45
value from your business purchases. Learn
10:48
more at americanexpress.com/business
10:50
gold card. This
10:53
message comes from NPR sponsor, Capella University.
10:55
Capella's programs teach skills relevant to your
10:58
career so you can apply what you
11:00
learn right away. See how Capella can
11:02
make a difference in your life at
11:04
capella.edu.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More