Research Behind Influence w/ Brooke Duffy

Research Behind Influence w/ Brooke Duffy

Released Wednesday, 29th January 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Research Behind Influence w/ Brooke Duffy

Research Behind Influence w/ Brooke Duffy

Research Behind Influence w/ Brooke Duffy

Research Behind Influence w/ Brooke Duffy

Wednesday, 29th January 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

So I've talked to creators, especially

0:02

for marginalized communities, who are quite

0:04

fearful about something like, you know,

0:06

tagging their video, LGBTQ, or Black

0:09

Lives Matter, whatever it may be,

0:11

because they want their content to

0:13

resonate with their audience and be

0:16

seen by the audience, but you

0:18

don't know where your content is going

0:20

to end up. Hey Brooke, welcome to

0:22

the show. How are you? I'm great. Thanks so

0:24

much for inviting me to be here

0:26

today. Absolutely. Today I'm very curious

0:28

to talk about certain topics that are there,

0:31

right? But too many times I think that

0:33

we don't discuss about them, right? So I'm

0:35

very curious to see your point of view,

0:37

your research, your analysis, you know, behind that.

0:40

And before we get into that, I would

0:42

love to hear, you know, a bit more

0:44

about yourself. And we use this thing called

0:46

a map with our guest. Basically is dividing

0:48

three main sections to know a bit more

0:50

about... you know your career your personal life

0:52

is basically divided in the mission so

0:55

basically it is what do you aim

0:57

to achieve with your work achievements so

0:59

any notable milestone could be in your career

1:01

your life for both if you want and

1:03

the last one is the purpose so why

1:05

do you do what you do? I am

1:07

Brooke Aaron Duffy and I am an

1:10

associate professor in the Department of Communication

1:12

at Cornell University. So in terms of

1:14

the mission, what do I aim to

1:16

achieve? I mean, I'm an academic and

1:18

so I think a lot about the

1:20

creation of knowledge, but what does that

1:23

mean? Well, I'm interested in producing knowledge

1:25

on the role of social media in

1:27

work, employment, and society with particular attention

1:29

to labor. And of course, that brings

1:31

me to the creator economy. You know,

1:33

another part of my mission as an

1:36

academic is educating students. And so undergraduates,

1:38

of course, many in the communication

1:40

world interested in working in com,

1:42

in tech, in marketing, in the

1:44

social media economy. But I also

1:46

train graduate students who are very

1:48

much interested in thinking about what

1:50

social media means in the context

1:52

of culture and society and economy and

1:54

politics. It's always strange to talk about

1:57

your achievements. And so there's the, you

1:59

know, the. The milestones that matter

2:01

for tenure and promotion, so

2:03

I've published the three books,

2:05

most significantly a book called

2:08

Not Getting Paid to Do

2:10

What You Love, which was

2:12

drawing attention to the work

2:14

and labor of what we

2:16

now think of as creators,

2:18

as they think about the

2:21

difficulties of... the difficulties as well

2:23

as opportunities of career success. Currently working

2:25

on a new book which I think

2:27

we'll get into on the creator economy,

2:29

a huge milestone for me was was

2:31

getting my PhD. I'm a first-generation college

2:33

student. I went to a state school,

2:35

an excellent one, Penn State, but getting

2:37

a PhD was never on my radar

2:39

and so I always like to talk

2:41

to students about that. And finally in

2:43

terms of purpose, why I do what

2:45

I do. I mean part of it

2:47

is I think there's such a lack

2:49

of understanding about what it. work in the

2:52

social media and part of it

2:54

is just because it's changing all

2:56

the time, but there's also a

2:58

sense of dismissiveness or misunderstanding or

3:00

even a lack of value ascribed to

3:02

these careers. And so, you know, one

3:04

of my purposes is to draw attention

3:06

to what it actually means to work

3:08

in these fields. But I think, you

3:11

know, part of this is also because

3:13

so much of our lives are reconfigured

3:15

by social media. and labor. And so

3:17

how can we think and understand

3:19

the relationship between these two when

3:21

whether you're a creator or an

3:23

academic or working in the gig

3:25

economy or working in any field,

3:27

you're very much compelled to put

3:29

yourself out there. And so thinking

3:31

about what the benefits are, but also

3:33

the risks. And I think that what it

3:36

is very important because when I

3:38

was myself in college, too many times

3:40

I was starting things that I've been.

3:42

very outdated. And I understand that many

3:44

times you do have to study things

3:46

that like you know theory or sort of

3:49

things right when it comes to marketing and

3:51

business right but sometimes there is a lack

3:53

right when it comes to starting things that

3:55

are from the 80s and then understanding

3:57

what is happening these days right and

3:59

then I think it's very, but that's

4:01

also why sometimes I do also

4:03

myself lectures for students where we go

4:05

through, okay, this is what is

4:08

happening these days. This is how you

4:10

should approach it, right? From a

4:12

professional standpoint, together with also analytics, right?

4:14

An academic point of view. So

4:16

very important is what you do very

4:18

much needed these days, right? Because again,

4:20

there is sometimes this gap, right? Between

4:22

what you see in the real world, right?

4:24

And what happened sometimes in academia. And

4:26

there has always been this sort of

4:28

lack, right? A few years, right? Sometimes you

4:31

can arrive there. So thank you for

4:33

your work there, very, very important. And

4:35

let's get into that. So, you know, your

4:37

graduate seminar, it's called, you know, there

4:39

is this structure, right? That I find

4:41

also very interesting that it's called the platform's

4:43

power and precarity in the creative economy,

4:45

right? So I would like to know

4:47

a bit more about that. Is it something

4:49

that you come out with that? Like, tell

4:52

me a bit more, how did it

4:54

started? And why do you think that was

4:56

needed to discuss about this free piece?

4:58

Absolutely. And so I was

5:00

very excited to develop and teach

5:02

this course. And it started,

5:04

I taught a version of it

5:06

maybe six or seven years

5:08

ago, which was on media technology

5:10

and society. And so

5:12

when I went to revive the class

5:14

last semester, realized, as you can imagine, that

5:16

a lot of the, not just the

5:19

readings were out of date, but the topics,

5:21

the approaches, the research. And

5:23

so, you know, thought about

5:25

what is it that we're

5:27

talking about when we are

5:29

considering work as an influencer

5:31

or creator economy, and how

5:33

can we make a lot

5:35

of the debates and topics

5:37

connect with both my students,

5:39

but really, you know, the

5:41

wider world of social media and tech.

5:43

And so for me, a lot of

5:45

the debates about what it means to

5:47

be a creator today, what it means

5:49

to produce content, what it means to

5:51

be an entrepreneur, to have your career

5:53

dependent on a particular platform is to

5:55

think about the struggles of power. You

5:57

know, at what point do we have?

6:00

agency of our work compared to

6:02

moments when we're beholden to platforms

6:04

or were tied to the expectations

6:06

of audiences or advertisers. So there's

6:09

the power platforms, of course, you

6:11

know, we're seeing this in the

6:13

past two weeks as once again

6:15

that the Tiktok Band seems to

6:17

be looming. How do creators think

6:19

about longevity and sustaining their business

6:22

when the platform that they have...

6:24

built their audience could potentially vanish

6:26

with little notice. And finally, precarity,

6:28

and precarity is one of these

6:30

academic terms that gets thrown around a

6:32

lot, but we can think of it

6:34

as the insecurity of a job. And

6:37

so that means coming back to the

6:39

example of TikTok, maybe the platform that

6:41

you have your audience on may not

6:43

necessarily be there, or the content that

6:45

you expect to do well is suddenly

6:48

not garter an audience because of this.

6:50

unseen algorithm or the brandyels aren't coming

6:52

in because of some wider force. And

6:54

so the allure of creator careers is

6:57

the fact that you never know what

6:59

the next day is going to be

7:01

like, but that's also a form of

7:04

risk. And so if I don't think

7:06

I'll say about the class is as

7:08

much novelty as there is described to

7:10

this, I think it's really

7:12

important to draw continuities

7:15

between what Tic-tocters and

7:17

YouTubeers and Instagram influencers do

7:19

today, compared to the precursors.

7:22

And so thinking about working in

7:24

Hollywood or traditional advertising or a

7:26

film or as a novelist, there's

7:28

important continuities that I don't think

7:31

get enough attention when we are

7:33

considering the world of cultural work

7:35

today. And you know, in addition to

7:37

precarity, right, the risk, especially when it

7:40

comes to brandyas, right? One month you

7:42

can do fantastic, another month you can

7:44

go. you know, like zero, right? And that's why

7:46

also in other episodes we discussed about

7:49

different revenue streams maximizing your revenues and

7:51

the risk of putting all the eggs

7:53

in one basket, right? There is absolutely

7:55

some of that I think it becomes

7:57

more important instead of being all you

7:59

want. platform, trying to write, or owning

8:01

your audience. Another episode we talk about, you

8:03

know, newsletters, having an email address of the

8:06

people, so you can actually reach all of

8:08

them if needed, right, especially with algorithms changing

8:10

all the time. In addition to this, another

8:12

topic, I think it's quite interesting that you

8:15

also cover is this. thing call it the

8:17

visibility bind, right? So basically, is this concept,

8:19

right, that I would like to know, like,

8:21

with something that you come out also know

8:24

with a term that would be also interesting

8:26

to see. These things where we have this,

8:28

like, you know, double-edged sword of hacker visibility.

8:30

Someone that, you know, without, with just a

8:33

camera internet connection these days, we can get

8:35

in front of a million of people. And

8:37

we have pros and cons of that, right.

8:39

Have you mapped the top? pros and cons

8:42

of these, again, upper visibility that gives you,

8:44

I guess, you know, a lot of benefits,

8:46

pressing time, risk, problems, issues, burnout, and so

8:48

on. So I'm crucial here from you on

8:51

that. Yeah, thanks for that. I'm currently working

8:53

on a book on the topic that, going

8:55

back to your early point about the academic

8:57

lag, I'm trying to finish this project and

9:00

knowing that it'll be out a few years

9:02

down the road, but essentially the concept of

9:04

the visibility bine draws attention to some of

9:06

the precarity and risks that creators face, where

9:09

of course their careers are contingent on reputation

9:11

attention and these metrics of visibility, very indices

9:13

of visibility. So in thinking about what it

9:15

means to be visible today, to put yourself

9:18

out there today, I found that creators experience

9:20

these two quite contradictory experiences and anxieties. One

9:22

of course is the fear of being invisible.

9:24

So maybe the algorithm is going to throttle

9:27

your content today or you are going to

9:29

wake up and have a band or be

9:31

blocked out of your account or potentially the

9:33

shadow band and there's a lot of fuzziness

9:36

surrounding. that or you know invisibility also means

9:38

you're not getting compensated enough right your grants

9:40

are reaching out to you but they're paying

9:42

in this promise of exposure

9:45

rather than any sort

9:47

of compensation. And so

9:49

this to me felt

9:51

like the risks of

9:54

invisibility for creators, but

9:56

at the same time,

9:58

there's the fears of

10:00

being too visible. And

10:03

so you want to

10:05

get your content out

10:07

there, but what if

10:09

it could seem to

10:12

quote unquote, the wrong

10:14

audience? Or if you're

10:16

dealing with hate and harassment

10:18

or quite different kind

10:20

of fear of commercial

10:24

hypervisibility is appropriation. We're seeing

10:26

a lot of these risks

10:28

animated in by Gen AI

10:30

where how do you think

10:32

about ownership and permissions and

10:34

the fact that your content

10:36

may be taken exploited, utilized

10:38

by someone else without your

10:40

knowledge or consent. And so I

10:43

kind of started these projects separately. I

10:45

was studying influence or hate and

10:47

harassment at the same time that I

10:49

was doing this project on algorithms.

10:51

And I realized that this is all

10:53

about visibility and this visibility

10:55

trap that many creators

10:57

find themselves in. And so much of

10:59

the book talks about the trap, but

11:01

also importantly the ways that the creators

11:04

are contesting and resisting the visibility bind.

11:06

And I think that's a really important

11:08

part of it because creators know how

11:10

to work social media, their careers depend

11:12

upon it. And so I think it

11:14

is critical to consider the ways that

11:16

they are pushing back against surveillance and

11:18

platform powers and various inequities, but kind

11:20

of what ties this together is this

11:22

notion of the visibility bind. Is your

11:24

brand ready to amplify its

11:26

reach? Well, the influencer marketing factory

11:29

is here for you. We

11:31

are a global influencer marketing agency

11:33

helping brands ignite their growth.

11:35

From influencer identification to campaign strategy,

11:37

handling legalities and agreements, to

11:39

managing shipping logistics, we got you

11:41

all covered. We work with

11:43

hundreds of brands across different verticals

11:45

from Fortune 500 companies to

11:47

direct to consumer brands. And we

11:49

don't just stop there. With

11:51

detailed ROI analysis, we help brands

11:54

like yours measure success at transforming

11:56

impressions into conversions. You can

11:58

find out that the influencer marketingfactory.com

12:00

or just searching the influencer marketing factory

12:02

on Google. And for reasons you

12:04

know I find all the time you

12:06

already kind of mentioned it about

12:08

getting in front of the wrong audience

12:11

sometimes they happen to be to

12:13

find the same video on TikTok and

12:15

then Instagram or also or YouTube shorts

12:17

and you will see I think it's very

12:19

interesting as a study when you

12:21

take the same video from the same

12:23

creator posted on free for different

12:25

different social media and then in

12:27

addition to that saying if that video

12:30

is seen by followers versus non -followers and

12:32

it's quite interesting to see the type of

12:34

comments like I noticed that sometimes making

12:36

an example maybe there is a creator that

12:38

is well known by their audience for

12:40

their acting like in a way of doing

12:42

things or you know a very niche

12:44

tone of voice or whatever right when he

12:47

gets in front of their followers these

12:49

people know right okay the is the style

12:51

of this person but then when he

12:53

gets like pushed on a social media

12:55

to non -followers then the type

12:57

of comments that they don't get

12:59

the reference right is totally different

13:01

so have you ever I'm curious have

13:03

you ever studied like or done

13:06

any any analytics for research on something

13:08

like that again same content from the

13:10

same creator to followers versus

13:12

non -followers and also like

13:14

how do how do they get like

13:16

on different social media I'm curious to

13:18

see if there is something that you ever

13:21

explored that would be a fantastic study

13:23

and I want to see it done

13:25

no I haven't but I've heard many

13:27

accounts from creators who talk exactly about

13:29

that where and you know the euphemism

13:31

of course is doing well and so

13:33

something they'll post on Instagram does you

13:35

know does well resonates well

13:38

with their audience gets a lot

13:40

of positive commentary and then TikTok

13:42

you know the algorithm the the

13:44

black boxed force lands in you

13:46

know discoverability ends up getting seen

13:48

by a different audience that has

13:50

very different views and so that's

13:53

where we get into discussions about

13:55

like rage baiting or engagement baiting

13:57

and so how do you create

13:59

content for your audience when there's the

14:01

reality that you don't necessarily know

14:04

where the content is going to

14:06

be seen. And so I've talked

14:09

to creators, especially from marginalized communities,

14:11

who are quite fearful about something

14:13

like, you know, tagging their video LGBTQ

14:15

or Black Lives Matter, whatever it may

14:18

be, because they want their content to

14:20

resonate with their audience and be seen

14:22

by the audience. but you don't know

14:24

where your content is going to end

14:26

up. And so that's where, you know,

14:28

even going back to my earlier example

14:30

of, to what extent can we map

14:33

social media creation onto earlier careers,

14:35

it doesn't quite work the same way,

14:37

right? Because if you're working in a

14:39

traditional TV or magazine environment, you

14:42

know, production distribution exhibition, we have

14:44

kind of a clear lineage where

14:46

now because of algorithms, because of

14:49

practices of sharing and even hate

14:51

sharing, because of the potential of...

14:54

audiences who can in a lot

14:56

of ways weaponize content. There are so

14:58

many ways where you can't really anticipate

15:00

where your content is going to be

15:03

seen and by whom. And when you

15:05

collect all this data, right, for instance,

15:07

for this new book that is coming,

15:09

is it a combination of one-on-one

15:12

conversation with creators? Is it like, you

15:14

know, with that... together with, let's say,

15:16

quantitative surveys. Tell me a bit more

15:18

about the methodology there to understand what

15:20

is your typical day slash week in

15:22

order to collect all these data and

15:25

then translate that into a book that can

15:27

be understandable, like, you know,

15:29

from also people are not necessarily in

15:31

the industry. Yeah, and your question about a

15:33

typical day or typical week, I feel

15:35

like that the response to that is

15:38

very much like a creator. Like everything

15:40

is different every day and the reality

15:42

is I'm spending like most of my

15:45

time managing email, but I tend to

15:47

rely upon qualitative interviews and so I've

15:49

done about a hundred interviews so far

15:52

mostly with creators, also with industry experts

15:54

and platform representatives. And you

15:56

know, I have hundreds and

15:58

hundreds of patients. of interview

16:00

transcripts that I go through,

16:02

I, you know, what researchers

16:04

call qualitatively code the data to

16:07

pull out themes and make connections.

16:09

You know, I consume the content

16:11

myself and think it's really important

16:14

when you're talking about creators to

16:16

draw attention to how much of

16:18

their lives and careers are reflected

16:21

through what they create. And I

16:23

also, like, I, as I keep

16:25

mentioning my interest in looking about

16:27

the precursors of this, like I

16:30

find myself going back to early

16:32

studies of the celebrity publicity machine

16:34

or studies of like TV audiences

16:37

to think about what's new here and

16:39

what's not necessarily new here and so

16:41

I was looking at this TV sociology

16:43

book from like the early 80s and

16:46

the author talks about how TV executives

16:48

were really centered on like predicting the

16:50

unpredictable and it's just like what we

16:52

were talking about right I mean that's

16:55

what creators do you're trying to manage

16:57

uncertainty and contain some of the

16:59

risk when you really can't because not

17:01

only is are we thinking about an

17:04

oversaturated attention economy and these unseen algorithms,

17:06

but you know, so much of this

17:08

content reflects what's going on in the

17:10

world around us and like those trends

17:13

can't be anticipated. And so yeah, it's

17:15

a lot of reading and trying to

17:17

make sense of the data and having,

17:19

having interview conversations and of course just

17:21

like sitting down and writing. So for

17:24

me, the best time to write is

17:26

first thing in the morning. I feel

17:28

like my brain starts to wane after like

17:30

9 a. So I get up very early

17:32

and get my writing done so I can

17:34

have a little. more space to continue to

17:36

have the conversation. And I'm pretty sure

17:38

that during this conversation, one of

17:41

the things that you also discuss

17:43

with influencers and conduct creators is

17:45

also all the monetary aspects of this,

17:47

right? If we take influencer McMe of

17:49

10 years ago, it was this hobby

17:51

thing where maybe I'm going to get a product

17:54

for free, I'm going to do 50 bucks, right?

17:56

And everyone was happy at the time. Because it

17:58

was so, it was too new. was regulated,

18:00

you know, it was the West. But

18:02

then in the years, right, we

18:04

start kind of have a sense

18:07

of how much to pay inferences

18:09

based on deliverables, relocation, industry, metrics,

18:11

right, and so on. If you're represented,

18:13

if you're like independent and so on,

18:15

so now we do have a better

18:18

sense. I still believe that we're kind of

18:20

far away from having red cards that

18:22

can work for everyone because it's so,

18:24

again, it's so unique, right, that the

18:26

infrastructure marketing world. So with that said

18:28

again, I'm pretty sure that you discuss

18:31

about that. And one of the things

18:33

that more and more is coming up

18:35

is about influencer NoPega, right? So first

18:37

of all, if it's something that you

18:39

discussed with creators, I would like to

18:41

see if this anything that they said

18:44

is a challenge, is a challenge, is

18:46

an issue. And if so, why? Like, you

18:48

know, trying to understand a bit, like, no,

18:50

the cause of that. And yeah, well, I

18:52

just understand me more. Again, it's such an

18:54

important topic. So I would like to see

18:56

you as a researcher, right? What did you

18:59

find out about that so far? Yes, and

19:01

so your point about how much

19:03

has changed over the past 10,

19:05

15 years. I mean, my last

19:07

major research project before this was

19:09

on the gendered inequity in the

19:11

emerging influencer space. And so I

19:13

found so many examples of influencers

19:16

expected to do what I call

19:18

aspirational labor where, you know, here,

19:20

do this work and we'll give

19:22

you free swag or we'll post

19:24

about you on our Instagram account,

19:26

but no material rewards. And so,

19:28

again, fast forward. a few years,

19:30

and in some ways, there's a

19:32

lot more money to go around,

19:34

but it's still incredibly lopsided. It

19:36

is a winter-take-all economy where, you

19:38

know, we hear the accounts of

19:40

the people making tens, hundreds

19:43

of thousands of dollars for a post,

19:45

and not about the so-called creator middle

19:47

class, where people are, you know, kind

19:49

of doing okay, or in some ways

19:52

scrambling a bit based on what's going

19:54

on in the larger economy. Survey data

19:56

suggests that, you know, and creators of

19:58

color of color are... facing.

20:01

structural inequities, where if you look

20:03

at the payment systems, there is

20:05

a staggering gap. And so I've

20:07

still even in this latest round

20:09

of interviews heard people that are

20:11

like, yeah, brands will reach out

20:13

to me. And when I when

20:16

I send them my rape card,

20:18

they're like, oh, we don't have

20:20

a budget for that. And so,

20:22

you know, there's a lot of

20:24

reasons we can think about larger

20:26

inequalities. We can think about the

20:28

devalued status of labor. and says,

20:30

oh, I want to be an influencer

20:33

and creator. And people are like, oh,

20:35

you just post all that. And it's

20:37

like, no, it is incredibly labor intensive.

20:39

And I mean, you know this very

20:41

well, how much time, energy, insight, and

20:43

money goes into this space. But I

20:45

think it's still not valued by brands

20:47

or. or a lot of platform companies

20:50

are courting high-profile creators, but not

20:52

necessarily the middle tier, despite how

20:54

much attention they bring to the

20:56

companies. And so, you know, that

20:58

goes back to this question of

21:00

like, why does this still persist?

21:02

Well, there's a lack of transparency.

21:05

It is a sprawling industry where,

21:07

you know, it's not like we

21:09

can trace the lineage into one

21:11

particular company. There are so many

21:13

players. It is so... complicated to

21:15

think about where power and accountability

21:17

lies. That said, I've been talking

21:20

to influencers and creators during these

21:22

interviews about what they're doing

21:24

within this space. And I think

21:27

the emergence of these. pay

21:29

transparency sites. I think you did

21:31

a show recently about, fuck you pay

21:33

me, the clarifer creators. I think

21:35

it's, you know, we're seeing these spaces

21:38

where creators are coming together and kind

21:40

of challenging this notion that it's incredibly

21:42

individualistic by saying, look, there are

21:44

forms of collective advocacy and support where

21:47

we are trying to push back against

21:49

the wider inequities. I've talked to a

21:51

lot of creators who say like, we

21:54

share just with those in our network

21:56

because otherwise you don't know. You

21:58

have no idea. how much the

22:00

person next you who on the surface has

22:02

the same number of followers and is doing

22:04

the same kind of work and creating the

22:07

same kind of content, but you know, it's

22:09

this race to the bottom in terms of

22:11

payment. So I think there's important spaces that

22:13

are emerging to kind of contest this, but

22:15

yeah, absolutely the inequities and the exploitation remain

22:17

rife. And again, I think also because

22:19

it's so 10 years ago was the

22:22

West and to me still it is

22:24

sometimes because I just feel there is

22:26

like a lot of confusion, there is

22:28

sometimes, you know, terminology is using, you

22:30

know, different ways, miscommunication, misunderstanding, so lost

22:32

in translation many times, right? So I

22:34

really do believe that we're going to

22:37

need absolutely a better structure and this,

22:39

and hopefully, right, this whole problem is going

22:41

to go away, or at least, you know,

22:43

try to decrease the most possible in the

22:45

next years. And just to, you know, also

22:47

know a bit more, because, you know, we

22:49

discussed about what was before, right, and about

22:51

the presence, but I'm pretty sure that when

22:53

you talk with all these influences and conduct

22:55

creators, you might also add a sort of

22:57

idea of what the future holes, maybe in

22:59

terms of what this is happening right now.

23:01

but you know creators would like to see

23:04

these together like you know maybe in

23:06

their relationship with their viewers right or

23:08

creators would like to see these happening.

23:10

So I'm curious if during your conversation

23:12

again in addition to what is happening

23:14

now everyone's like at a grasp of

23:17

okay creators viewers this is what

23:19

they expect to happen maybe I don't say

23:21

in the next five years because five years

23:23

in the great economy it's it's crazy just

23:25

like a bad but let's say in the next

23:28

12 months let's put it like that Okay,

23:30

so that's that's more manageable.

23:32

I have been struck by

23:34

the ways that creators are speaking out

23:36

against some of the less auspicious elements

23:39

of this career. And so I hope

23:41

we continue to see more of that

23:43

in terms of looking ahead. I do

23:45

think the relationships between creators and fans

23:48

is a really important space to pay

23:50

attention to and the emergence of fan

23:52

communities who are really ready to rally

23:54

on behalf of the creators and emulate

23:57

some of the practices we would think

23:59

of in. in the world of

24:01

traditional media, I think given the

24:03

precarity in the social media

24:05

environment, we're gonna continue to see

24:07

more diffusion in terms of

24:09

more merch, more platforms, more educational

24:11

offerings where creators push back

24:13

against that a legs in one

24:15

basket culture or embrace the

24:17

all legs in one basket culture.

24:20

And which of course makes

24:22

sense as a risk mitigation strategy

24:24

but that amounts to more

24:26

work at the same time. But

24:28

I think, you know, overall,

24:30

I having been studying this

24:32

for so long, I'm cautiously

24:34

more optimistic than I was

24:36

when I started this research

24:38

about, you know, the potential

24:40

for creators to rust back

24:42

some of the power and

24:44

economics within this space. Well,

24:47

that is good, right? Because usually the more data

24:49

that you have, many times like, oh, it's

24:51

gonna go, it's not looking well, right? Okay, guys.

24:54

But if you say like actually more optimistic,

24:56

that is great here on that. And is

24:58

there anything else that I didn't ask you

25:00

today that you would like to share with

25:02

us, either about something that you're studying

25:04

these days or anything else

25:06

that excites you in the

25:08

creative economy/influencers, /even celebrities or

25:10

like on more traditional media? The

25:13

only thing I'll say, and I am,

25:15

as anyone who's been working on

25:17

a project for a few years, you

25:20

can't wait to start the next

25:22

big thing. I'm like, I just

25:24

need to get this book out

25:26

and move on. And so I've

25:28

been thinking a lot about kind

25:30

of going back and thinking about

25:32

the role that celebrity paparazzi played

25:34

in perhaps being a precursor to

25:36

creators' representational practices. And

25:38

that's kind of as far as I've

25:40

thought about it, but there's a lot

25:42

of attention to what happens

25:45

when a career is usurped by

25:47

the newest thing. And we

25:49

think about journalism being killed and

25:51

magazines being killed, but thinking

25:53

about what happened to the celebrity

25:55

paparazzi industry and how that

25:57

might help us make sense of

25:59

social media. course, like anyone else, I'm

26:01

trying to make sense of how Gen

26:04

A.I. is reshaping this space, but also

26:06

if it is reshaping the space, because,

26:08

you know, there's a hype machine

26:10

there, and so how do we cut

26:12

through and think about both the promises,

26:15

but also the perils for

26:17

creators. Absolutely. And it's one of the

26:19

questions that we asked last year and we ask again

26:21

now for our new report about. Actually, the report is

26:23

a guide for creators that, you know, has a lot

26:26

of different sections inside. And, you know, it's curious to

26:28

see, but to be honest to see that is, as

26:30

of now, it's been a big helper more than, you

26:32

know, a substitution or a replacement. So, but I want

26:35

to see again, you know, in the next year, and

26:37

there are so many new AI tools every new AI

26:39

tools every single day. It's every single day. It's a

26:41

bit difficult to say. It's a bit difficult to say.

26:43

It's a bit difficult to say. In the loop of

26:46

days, there's trends every day, I open

26:48

the news, there is like a thousand

26:50

new things, and like, you know, sometimes

26:52

you are a bit hard to learn

26:54

new tricks all the time, right? So

26:56

yeah, I'm also very curious about the

26:58

future of that. But Brooke, thank you

27:00

so much for joining me today for

27:03

sharing all your knowledge, and yeah, I'm

27:05

very look forward to reading your book

27:07

as soon as it's life and out.

27:09

Thank you so much. It was great

27:11

to chat. Absolutely. Absolutely.

27:14

I'm

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features