Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
So I've talked to creators, especially
0:02
for marginalized communities, who are quite
0:04
fearful about something like, you know,
0:06
tagging their video, LGBTQ, or Black
0:09
Lives Matter, whatever it may be,
0:11
because they want their content to
0:13
resonate with their audience and be
0:16
seen by the audience, but you
0:18
don't know where your content is going
0:20
to end up. Hey Brooke, welcome to
0:22
the show. How are you? I'm great. Thanks so
0:24
much for inviting me to be here
0:26
today. Absolutely. Today I'm very curious
0:28
to talk about certain topics that are there,
0:31
right? But too many times I think that
0:33
we don't discuss about them, right? So I'm
0:35
very curious to see your point of view,
0:37
your research, your analysis, you know, behind that.
0:40
And before we get into that, I would
0:42
love to hear, you know, a bit more
0:44
about yourself. And we use this thing called
0:46
a map with our guest. Basically is dividing
0:48
three main sections to know a bit more
0:50
about... you know your career your personal life
0:52
is basically divided in the mission so
0:55
basically it is what do you aim
0:57
to achieve with your work achievements so
0:59
any notable milestone could be in your career
1:01
your life for both if you want and
1:03
the last one is the purpose so why
1:05
do you do what you do? I am
1:07
Brooke Aaron Duffy and I am an
1:10
associate professor in the Department of Communication
1:12
at Cornell University. So in terms of
1:14
the mission, what do I aim to
1:16
achieve? I mean, I'm an academic and
1:18
so I think a lot about the
1:20
creation of knowledge, but what does that
1:23
mean? Well, I'm interested in producing knowledge
1:25
on the role of social media in
1:27
work, employment, and society with particular attention
1:29
to labor. And of course, that brings
1:31
me to the creator economy. You know,
1:33
another part of my mission as an
1:36
academic is educating students. And so undergraduates,
1:38
of course, many in the communication
1:40
world interested in working in com,
1:42
in tech, in marketing, in the
1:44
social media economy. But I also
1:46
train graduate students who are very
1:48
much interested in thinking about what
1:50
social media means in the context
1:52
of culture and society and economy and
1:54
politics. It's always strange to talk about
1:57
your achievements. And so there's the, you
1:59
know, the. The milestones that matter
2:01
for tenure and promotion, so
2:03
I've published the three books,
2:05
most significantly a book called
2:08
Not Getting Paid to Do
2:10
What You Love, which was
2:12
drawing attention to the work
2:14
and labor of what we
2:16
now think of as creators,
2:18
as they think about the
2:21
difficulties of... the difficulties as well
2:23
as opportunities of career success. Currently working
2:25
on a new book which I think
2:27
we'll get into on the creator economy,
2:29
a huge milestone for me was was
2:31
getting my PhD. I'm a first-generation college
2:33
student. I went to a state school,
2:35
an excellent one, Penn State, but getting
2:37
a PhD was never on my radar
2:39
and so I always like to talk
2:41
to students about that. And finally in
2:43
terms of purpose, why I do what
2:45
I do. I mean part of it
2:47
is I think there's such a lack
2:49
of understanding about what it. work in the
2:52
social media and part of it
2:54
is just because it's changing all
2:56
the time, but there's also a
2:58
sense of dismissiveness or misunderstanding or
3:00
even a lack of value ascribed to
3:02
these careers. And so, you know, one
3:04
of my purposes is to draw attention
3:06
to what it actually means to work
3:08
in these fields. But I think, you
3:11
know, part of this is also because
3:13
so much of our lives are reconfigured
3:15
by social media. and labor. And so
3:17
how can we think and understand
3:19
the relationship between these two when
3:21
whether you're a creator or an
3:23
academic or working in the gig
3:25
economy or working in any field,
3:27
you're very much compelled to put
3:29
yourself out there. And so thinking
3:31
about what the benefits are, but also
3:33
the risks. And I think that what it
3:36
is very important because when I
3:38
was myself in college, too many times
3:40
I was starting things that I've been.
3:42
very outdated. And I understand that many
3:44
times you do have to study things
3:46
that like you know theory or sort of
3:49
things right when it comes to marketing and
3:51
business right but sometimes there is a lack
3:53
right when it comes to starting things that
3:55
are from the 80s and then understanding
3:57
what is happening these days right and
3:59
then I think it's very, but that's
4:01
also why sometimes I do also
4:03
myself lectures for students where we go
4:05
through, okay, this is what is
4:08
happening these days. This is how you
4:10
should approach it, right? From a
4:12
professional standpoint, together with also analytics, right?
4:14
An academic point of view. So
4:16
very important is what you do very
4:18
much needed these days, right? Because again,
4:20
there is sometimes this gap, right? Between
4:22
what you see in the real world, right?
4:24
And what happened sometimes in academia. And
4:26
there has always been this sort of
4:28
lack, right? A few years, right? Sometimes you
4:31
can arrive there. So thank you for
4:33
your work there, very, very important. And
4:35
let's get into that. So, you know, your
4:37
graduate seminar, it's called, you know, there
4:39
is this structure, right? That I find
4:41
also very interesting that it's called the platform's
4:43
power and precarity in the creative economy,
4:45
right? So I would like to know
4:47
a bit more about that. Is it something
4:49
that you come out with that? Like, tell
4:52
me a bit more, how did it
4:54
started? And why do you think that was
4:56
needed to discuss about this free piece?
4:58
Absolutely. And so I was
5:00
very excited to develop and teach
5:02
this course. And it started,
5:04
I taught a version of it
5:06
maybe six or seven years
5:08
ago, which was on media technology
5:10
and society. And so
5:12
when I went to revive the class
5:14
last semester, realized, as you can imagine, that
5:16
a lot of the, not just the
5:19
readings were out of date, but the topics,
5:21
the approaches, the research. And
5:23
so, you know, thought about
5:25
what is it that we're
5:27
talking about when we are
5:29
considering work as an influencer
5:31
or creator economy, and how
5:33
can we make a lot
5:35
of the debates and topics
5:37
connect with both my students,
5:39
but really, you know, the
5:41
wider world of social media and tech.
5:43
And so for me, a lot of
5:45
the debates about what it means to
5:47
be a creator today, what it means
5:49
to produce content, what it means to
5:51
be an entrepreneur, to have your career
5:53
dependent on a particular platform is to
5:55
think about the struggles of power. You
5:57
know, at what point do we have?
6:00
agency of our work compared to
6:02
moments when we're beholden to platforms
6:04
or were tied to the expectations
6:06
of audiences or advertisers. So there's
6:09
the power platforms, of course, you
6:11
know, we're seeing this in the
6:13
past two weeks as once again
6:15
that the Tiktok Band seems to
6:17
be looming. How do creators think
6:19
about longevity and sustaining their business
6:22
when the platform that they have...
6:24
built their audience could potentially vanish
6:26
with little notice. And finally, precarity,
6:28
and precarity is one of these
6:30
academic terms that gets thrown around a
6:32
lot, but we can think of it
6:34
as the insecurity of a job. And
6:37
so that means coming back to the
6:39
example of TikTok, maybe the platform that
6:41
you have your audience on may not
6:43
necessarily be there, or the content that
6:45
you expect to do well is suddenly
6:48
not garter an audience because of this.
6:50
unseen algorithm or the brandyels aren't coming
6:52
in because of some wider force. And
6:54
so the allure of creator careers is
6:57
the fact that you never know what
6:59
the next day is going to be
7:01
like, but that's also a form of
7:04
risk. And so if I don't think
7:06
I'll say about the class is as
7:08
much novelty as there is described to
7:10
this, I think it's really
7:12
important to draw continuities
7:15
between what Tic-tocters and
7:17
YouTubeers and Instagram influencers do
7:19
today, compared to the precursors.
7:22
And so thinking about working in
7:24
Hollywood or traditional advertising or a
7:26
film or as a novelist, there's
7:28
important continuities that I don't think
7:31
get enough attention when we are
7:33
considering the world of cultural work
7:35
today. And you know, in addition to
7:37
precarity, right, the risk, especially when it
7:40
comes to brandyas, right? One month you
7:42
can do fantastic, another month you can
7:44
go. you know, like zero, right? And that's why
7:46
also in other episodes we discussed about
7:49
different revenue streams maximizing your revenues and
7:51
the risk of putting all the eggs
7:53
in one basket, right? There is absolutely
7:55
some of that I think it becomes
7:57
more important instead of being all you
7:59
want. platform, trying to write, or owning
8:01
your audience. Another episode we talk about, you
8:03
know, newsletters, having an email address of the
8:06
people, so you can actually reach all of
8:08
them if needed, right, especially with algorithms changing
8:10
all the time. In addition to this, another
8:12
topic, I think it's quite interesting that you
8:15
also cover is this. thing call it the
8:17
visibility bind, right? So basically, is this concept,
8:19
right, that I would like to know, like,
8:21
with something that you come out also know
8:24
with a term that would be also interesting
8:26
to see. These things where we have this,
8:28
like, you know, double-edged sword of hacker visibility.
8:30
Someone that, you know, without, with just a
8:33
camera internet connection these days, we can get
8:35
in front of a million of people. And
8:37
we have pros and cons of that, right.
8:39
Have you mapped the top? pros and cons
8:42
of these, again, upper visibility that gives you,
8:44
I guess, you know, a lot of benefits,
8:46
pressing time, risk, problems, issues, burnout, and so
8:48
on. So I'm crucial here from you on
8:51
that. Yeah, thanks for that. I'm currently working
8:53
on a book on the topic that, going
8:55
back to your early point about the academic
8:57
lag, I'm trying to finish this project and
9:00
knowing that it'll be out a few years
9:02
down the road, but essentially the concept of
9:04
the visibility bine draws attention to some of
9:06
the precarity and risks that creators face, where
9:09
of course their careers are contingent on reputation
9:11
attention and these metrics of visibility, very indices
9:13
of visibility. So in thinking about what it
9:15
means to be visible today, to put yourself
9:18
out there today, I found that creators experience
9:20
these two quite contradictory experiences and anxieties. One
9:22
of course is the fear of being invisible.
9:24
So maybe the algorithm is going to throttle
9:27
your content today or you are going to
9:29
wake up and have a band or be
9:31
blocked out of your account or potentially the
9:33
shadow band and there's a lot of fuzziness
9:36
surrounding. that or you know invisibility also means
9:38
you're not getting compensated enough right your grants
9:40
are reaching out to you but they're paying
9:42
in this promise of exposure
9:45
rather than any sort
9:47
of compensation. And so
9:49
this to me felt
9:51
like the risks of
9:54
invisibility for creators, but
9:56
at the same time,
9:58
there's the fears of
10:00
being too visible. And
10:03
so you want to
10:05
get your content out
10:07
there, but what if
10:09
it could seem to
10:12
quote unquote, the wrong
10:14
audience? Or if you're
10:16
dealing with hate and harassment
10:18
or quite different kind
10:20
of fear of commercial
10:24
hypervisibility is appropriation. We're seeing
10:26
a lot of these risks
10:28
animated in by Gen AI
10:30
where how do you think
10:32
about ownership and permissions and
10:34
the fact that your content
10:36
may be taken exploited, utilized
10:38
by someone else without your
10:40
knowledge or consent. And so I
10:43
kind of started these projects separately. I
10:45
was studying influence or hate and
10:47
harassment at the same time that I
10:49
was doing this project on algorithms.
10:51
And I realized that this is all
10:53
about visibility and this visibility
10:55
trap that many creators
10:57
find themselves in. And so much of
10:59
the book talks about the trap, but
11:01
also importantly the ways that the creators
11:04
are contesting and resisting the visibility bind.
11:06
And I think that's a really important
11:08
part of it because creators know how
11:10
to work social media, their careers depend
11:12
upon it. And so I think it
11:14
is critical to consider the ways that
11:16
they are pushing back against surveillance and
11:18
platform powers and various inequities, but kind
11:20
of what ties this together is this
11:22
notion of the visibility bind. Is your
11:24
brand ready to amplify its
11:26
reach? Well, the influencer marketing factory
11:29
is here for you. We
11:31
are a global influencer marketing agency
11:33
helping brands ignite their growth.
11:35
From influencer identification to campaign strategy,
11:37
handling legalities and agreements, to
11:39
managing shipping logistics, we got you
11:41
all covered. We work with
11:43
hundreds of brands across different verticals
11:45
from Fortune 500 companies to
11:47
direct to consumer brands. And we
11:49
don't just stop there. With
11:51
detailed ROI analysis, we help brands
11:54
like yours measure success at transforming
11:56
impressions into conversions. You can
11:58
find out that the influencer marketingfactory.com
12:00
or just searching the influencer marketing factory
12:02
on Google. And for reasons you
12:04
know I find all the time you
12:06
already kind of mentioned it about
12:08
getting in front of the wrong audience
12:11
sometimes they happen to be to
12:13
find the same video on TikTok and
12:15
then Instagram or also or YouTube shorts
12:17
and you will see I think it's very
12:19
interesting as a study when you
12:21
take the same video from the same
12:23
creator posted on free for different
12:25
different social media and then in
12:27
addition to that saying if that video
12:30
is seen by followers versus non -followers and
12:32
it's quite interesting to see the type of
12:34
comments like I noticed that sometimes making
12:36
an example maybe there is a creator that
12:38
is well known by their audience for
12:40
their acting like in a way of doing
12:42
things or you know a very niche
12:44
tone of voice or whatever right when he
12:47
gets in front of their followers these
12:49
people know right okay the is the style
12:51
of this person but then when he
12:53
gets like pushed on a social media
12:55
to non -followers then the type
12:57
of comments that they don't get
12:59
the reference right is totally different
13:01
so have you ever I'm curious have
13:03
you ever studied like or done
13:06
any any analytics for research on something
13:08
like that again same content from the
13:10
same creator to followers versus
13:12
non -followers and also like
13:14
how do how do they get like
13:16
on different social media I'm curious to
13:18
see if there is something that you ever
13:21
explored that would be a fantastic study
13:23
and I want to see it done
13:25
no I haven't but I've heard many
13:27
accounts from creators who talk exactly about
13:29
that where and you know the euphemism
13:31
of course is doing well and so
13:33
something they'll post on Instagram does you
13:35
know does well resonates well
13:38
with their audience gets a lot
13:40
of positive commentary and then TikTok
13:42
you know the algorithm the the
13:44
black boxed force lands in you
13:46
know discoverability ends up getting seen
13:48
by a different audience that has
13:50
very different views and so that's
13:53
where we get into discussions about
13:55
like rage baiting or engagement baiting
13:57
and so how do you create
13:59
content for your audience when there's the
14:01
reality that you don't necessarily know
14:04
where the content is going to
14:06
be seen. And so I've talked
14:09
to creators, especially from marginalized communities,
14:11
who are quite fearful about something
14:13
like, you know, tagging their video LGBTQ
14:15
or Black Lives Matter, whatever it may
14:18
be, because they want their content to
14:20
resonate with their audience and be seen
14:22
by the audience. but you don't know
14:24
where your content is going to end
14:26
up. And so that's where, you know,
14:28
even going back to my earlier example
14:30
of, to what extent can we map
14:33
social media creation onto earlier careers,
14:35
it doesn't quite work the same way,
14:37
right? Because if you're working in a
14:39
traditional TV or magazine environment, you
14:42
know, production distribution exhibition, we have
14:44
kind of a clear lineage where
14:46
now because of algorithms, because of
14:49
practices of sharing and even hate
14:51
sharing, because of the potential of...
14:54
audiences who can in a lot
14:56
of ways weaponize content. There are so
14:58
many ways where you can't really anticipate
15:00
where your content is going to be
15:03
seen and by whom. And when you
15:05
collect all this data, right, for instance,
15:07
for this new book that is coming,
15:09
is it a combination of one-on-one
15:12
conversation with creators? Is it like, you
15:14
know, with that... together with, let's say,
15:16
quantitative surveys. Tell me a bit more
15:18
about the methodology there to understand what
15:20
is your typical day slash week in
15:22
order to collect all these data and
15:25
then translate that into a book that can
15:27
be understandable, like, you know,
15:29
from also people are not necessarily in
15:31
the industry. Yeah, and your question about a
15:33
typical day or typical week, I feel
15:35
like that the response to that is
15:38
very much like a creator. Like everything
15:40
is different every day and the reality
15:42
is I'm spending like most of my
15:45
time managing email, but I tend to
15:47
rely upon qualitative interviews and so I've
15:49
done about a hundred interviews so far
15:52
mostly with creators, also with industry experts
15:54
and platform representatives. And you
15:56
know, I have hundreds and
15:58
hundreds of patients. of interview
16:00
transcripts that I go through,
16:02
I, you know, what researchers
16:04
call qualitatively code the data to
16:07
pull out themes and make connections.
16:09
You know, I consume the content
16:11
myself and think it's really important
16:14
when you're talking about creators to
16:16
draw attention to how much of
16:18
their lives and careers are reflected
16:21
through what they create. And I
16:23
also, like, I, as I keep
16:25
mentioning my interest in looking about
16:27
the precursors of this, like I
16:30
find myself going back to early
16:32
studies of the celebrity publicity machine
16:34
or studies of like TV audiences
16:37
to think about what's new here and
16:39
what's not necessarily new here and so
16:41
I was looking at this TV sociology
16:43
book from like the early 80s and
16:46
the author talks about how TV executives
16:48
were really centered on like predicting the
16:50
unpredictable and it's just like what we
16:52
were talking about right I mean that's
16:55
what creators do you're trying to manage
16:57
uncertainty and contain some of the
16:59
risk when you really can't because not
17:01
only is are we thinking about an
17:04
oversaturated attention economy and these unseen algorithms,
17:06
but you know, so much of this
17:08
content reflects what's going on in the
17:10
world around us and like those trends
17:13
can't be anticipated. And so yeah, it's
17:15
a lot of reading and trying to
17:17
make sense of the data and having,
17:19
having interview conversations and of course just
17:21
like sitting down and writing. So for
17:24
me, the best time to write is
17:26
first thing in the morning. I feel
17:28
like my brain starts to wane after like
17:30
9 a. So I get up very early
17:32
and get my writing done so I can
17:34
have a little. more space to continue to
17:36
have the conversation. And I'm pretty sure
17:38
that during this conversation, one of
17:41
the things that you also discuss
17:43
with influencers and conduct creators is
17:45
also all the monetary aspects of this,
17:47
right? If we take influencer McMe of
17:49
10 years ago, it was this hobby
17:51
thing where maybe I'm going to get a product
17:54
for free, I'm going to do 50 bucks, right?
17:56
And everyone was happy at the time. Because it
17:58
was so, it was too new. was regulated,
18:00
you know, it was the West. But
18:02
then in the years, right, we
18:04
start kind of have a sense
18:07
of how much to pay inferences
18:09
based on deliverables, relocation, industry, metrics,
18:11
right, and so on. If you're represented,
18:13
if you're like independent and so on,
18:15
so now we do have a better
18:18
sense. I still believe that we're kind of
18:20
far away from having red cards that
18:22
can work for everyone because it's so,
18:24
again, it's so unique, right, that the
18:26
infrastructure marketing world. So with that said
18:28
again, I'm pretty sure that you discuss
18:31
about that. And one of the things
18:33
that more and more is coming up
18:35
is about influencer NoPega, right? So first
18:37
of all, if it's something that you
18:39
discussed with creators, I would like to
18:41
see if this anything that they said
18:44
is a challenge, is a challenge, is
18:46
an issue. And if so, why? Like, you
18:48
know, trying to understand a bit, like, no,
18:50
the cause of that. And yeah, well, I
18:52
just understand me more. Again, it's such an
18:54
important topic. So I would like to see
18:56
you as a researcher, right? What did you
18:59
find out about that so far? Yes, and
19:01
so your point about how much
19:03
has changed over the past 10,
19:05
15 years. I mean, my last
19:07
major research project before this was
19:09
on the gendered inequity in the
19:11
emerging influencer space. And so I
19:13
found so many examples of influencers
19:16
expected to do what I call
19:18
aspirational labor where, you know, here,
19:20
do this work and we'll give
19:22
you free swag or we'll post
19:24
about you on our Instagram account,
19:26
but no material rewards. And so,
19:28
again, fast forward. a few years,
19:30
and in some ways, there's a
19:32
lot more money to go around,
19:34
but it's still incredibly lopsided. It
19:36
is a winter-take-all economy where, you
19:38
know, we hear the accounts of
19:40
the people making tens, hundreds
19:43
of thousands of dollars for a post,
19:45
and not about the so-called creator middle
19:47
class, where people are, you know, kind
19:49
of doing okay, or in some ways
19:52
scrambling a bit based on what's going
19:54
on in the larger economy. Survey data
19:56
suggests that, you know, and creators of
19:58
color of color are... facing.
20:01
structural inequities, where if you look
20:03
at the payment systems, there is
20:05
a staggering gap. And so I've
20:07
still even in this latest round
20:09
of interviews heard people that are
20:11
like, yeah, brands will reach out
20:13
to me. And when I when
20:16
I send them my rape card,
20:18
they're like, oh, we don't have
20:20
a budget for that. And so,
20:22
you know, there's a lot of
20:24
reasons we can think about larger
20:26
inequalities. We can think about the
20:28
devalued status of labor. and says,
20:30
oh, I want to be an influencer
20:33
and creator. And people are like, oh,
20:35
you just post all that. And it's
20:37
like, no, it is incredibly labor intensive.
20:39
And I mean, you know this very
20:41
well, how much time, energy, insight, and
20:43
money goes into this space. But I
20:45
think it's still not valued by brands
20:47
or. or a lot of platform companies
20:50
are courting high-profile creators, but not
20:52
necessarily the middle tier, despite how
20:54
much attention they bring to the
20:56
companies. And so, you know, that
20:58
goes back to this question of
21:00
like, why does this still persist?
21:02
Well, there's a lack of transparency.
21:05
It is a sprawling industry where,
21:07
you know, it's not like we
21:09
can trace the lineage into one
21:11
particular company. There are so many
21:13
players. It is so... complicated to
21:15
think about where power and accountability
21:17
lies. That said, I've been talking
21:20
to influencers and creators during these
21:22
interviews about what they're doing
21:24
within this space. And I think
21:27
the emergence of these. pay
21:29
transparency sites. I think you did
21:31
a show recently about, fuck you pay
21:33
me, the clarifer creators. I think
21:35
it's, you know, we're seeing these spaces
21:38
where creators are coming together and kind
21:40
of challenging this notion that it's incredibly
21:42
individualistic by saying, look, there are
21:44
forms of collective advocacy and support where
21:47
we are trying to push back against
21:49
the wider inequities. I've talked to a
21:51
lot of creators who say like, we
21:54
share just with those in our network
21:56
because otherwise you don't know. You
21:58
have no idea. how much the
22:00
person next you who on the surface has
22:02
the same number of followers and is doing
22:04
the same kind of work and creating the
22:07
same kind of content, but you know, it's
22:09
this race to the bottom in terms of
22:11
payment. So I think there's important spaces that
22:13
are emerging to kind of contest this, but
22:15
yeah, absolutely the inequities and the exploitation remain
22:17
rife. And again, I think also because
22:19
it's so 10 years ago was the
22:22
West and to me still it is
22:24
sometimes because I just feel there is
22:26
like a lot of confusion, there is
22:28
sometimes, you know, terminology is using, you
22:30
know, different ways, miscommunication, misunderstanding, so lost
22:32
in translation many times, right? So I
22:34
really do believe that we're going to
22:37
need absolutely a better structure and this,
22:39
and hopefully, right, this whole problem is going
22:41
to go away, or at least, you know,
22:43
try to decrease the most possible in the
22:45
next years. And just to, you know, also
22:47
know a bit more, because, you know, we
22:49
discussed about what was before, right, and about
22:51
the presence, but I'm pretty sure that when
22:53
you talk with all these influences and conduct
22:55
creators, you might also add a sort of
22:57
idea of what the future holes, maybe in
22:59
terms of what this is happening right now.
23:01
but you know creators would like to see
23:04
these together like you know maybe in
23:06
their relationship with their viewers right or
23:08
creators would like to see these happening.
23:10
So I'm curious if during your conversation
23:12
again in addition to what is happening
23:14
now everyone's like at a grasp of
23:17
okay creators viewers this is what
23:19
they expect to happen maybe I don't say
23:21
in the next five years because five years
23:23
in the great economy it's it's crazy just
23:25
like a bad but let's say in the next
23:28
12 months let's put it like that Okay,
23:30
so that's that's more manageable.
23:32
I have been struck by
23:34
the ways that creators are speaking out
23:36
against some of the less auspicious elements
23:39
of this career. And so I hope
23:41
we continue to see more of that
23:43
in terms of looking ahead. I do
23:45
think the relationships between creators and fans
23:48
is a really important space to pay
23:50
attention to and the emergence of fan
23:52
communities who are really ready to rally
23:54
on behalf of the creators and emulate
23:57
some of the practices we would think
23:59
of in. in the world of
24:01
traditional media, I think given the
24:03
precarity in the social media
24:05
environment, we're gonna continue to see
24:07
more diffusion in terms of
24:09
more merch, more platforms, more educational
24:11
offerings where creators push back
24:13
against that a legs in one
24:15
basket culture or embrace the
24:17
all legs in one basket culture.
24:20
And which of course makes
24:22
sense as a risk mitigation strategy
24:24
but that amounts to more
24:26
work at the same time. But
24:28
I think, you know, overall,
24:30
I having been studying this
24:32
for so long, I'm cautiously
24:34
more optimistic than I was
24:36
when I started this research
24:38
about, you know, the potential
24:40
for creators to rust back
24:42
some of the power and
24:44
economics within this space. Well,
24:47
that is good, right? Because usually the more data
24:49
that you have, many times like, oh, it's
24:51
gonna go, it's not looking well, right? Okay, guys.
24:54
But if you say like actually more optimistic,
24:56
that is great here on that. And is
24:58
there anything else that I didn't ask you
25:00
today that you would like to share with
25:02
us, either about something that you're studying
25:04
these days or anything else
25:06
that excites you in the
25:08
creative economy/influencers, /even celebrities or
25:10
like on more traditional media? The
25:13
only thing I'll say, and I am,
25:15
as anyone who's been working on
25:17
a project for a few years, you
25:20
can't wait to start the next
25:22
big thing. I'm like, I just
25:24
need to get this book out
25:26
and move on. And so I've
25:28
been thinking a lot about kind
25:30
of going back and thinking about
25:32
the role that celebrity paparazzi played
25:34
in perhaps being a precursor to
25:36
creators' representational practices. And
25:38
that's kind of as far as I've
25:40
thought about it, but there's a lot
25:42
of attention to what happens
25:45
when a career is usurped by
25:47
the newest thing. And we
25:49
think about journalism being killed and
25:51
magazines being killed, but thinking
25:53
about what happened to the celebrity
25:55
paparazzi industry and how that
25:57
might help us make sense of
25:59
social media. course, like anyone else, I'm
26:01
trying to make sense of how Gen
26:04
A.I. is reshaping this space, but also
26:06
if it is reshaping the space, because,
26:08
you know, there's a hype machine
26:10
there, and so how do we cut
26:12
through and think about both the promises,
26:15
but also the perils for
26:17
creators. Absolutely. And it's one of the
26:19
questions that we asked last year and we ask again
26:21
now for our new report about. Actually, the report is
26:23
a guide for creators that, you know, has a lot
26:26
of different sections inside. And, you know, it's curious to
26:28
see, but to be honest to see that is, as
26:30
of now, it's been a big helper more than, you
26:32
know, a substitution or a replacement. So, but I want
26:35
to see again, you know, in the next year, and
26:37
there are so many new AI tools every new AI
26:39
tools every single day. It's every single day. It's a
26:41
bit difficult to say. It's a bit difficult to say.
26:43
It's a bit difficult to say. In the loop of
26:46
days, there's trends every day, I open
26:48
the news, there is like a thousand
26:50
new things, and like, you know, sometimes
26:52
you are a bit hard to learn
26:54
new tricks all the time, right? So
26:56
yeah, I'm also very curious about the
26:58
future of that. But Brooke, thank you
27:00
so much for joining me today for
27:03
sharing all your knowledge, and yeah, I'm
27:05
very look forward to reading your book
27:07
as soon as it's life and out.
27:09
Thank you so much. It was great
27:11
to chat. Absolutely. Absolutely.
27:14
I'm
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More