Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Think about your favorite entrepreneur. People
0:02
such as Alex Hermose, Justin Welsh,
0:04
or Matt Gray would be nowhere
0:06
without trusted partners. If your commerce
0:09
platform is pushing away potential customers
0:11
instead of winning them over as
0:13
loyal fans, consider using Shopify. Shopify
0:15
is the commerce platform revolutionizing millions
0:18
of businesses worldwide. Whether you're a
0:20
garage entrepreneur or IPO ready, Shopify
0:22
is the only tool you need
0:25
to start run and grow your
0:27
business without the struggle. Shopify puts
0:29
you in control of every sales
0:31
channel. So whether you're selling satin
0:34
sheets from Shopify's in-person POS system
0:36
or offering organic olive oil on
0:38
Shopify's all-in-one e-commerce platform, you're covered.
0:40
And once you've reached your audience,
0:43
Shopify has the internet's best converting
0:45
checkout to help you turn them
0:47
from browsers to buyers. Shopify's easy-to-use
0:50
system helps you start right away.
0:52
No more procrastination, no more excuses.
0:54
Shopify powers 10% of all e-commerce
0:56
in the U.S. and Shopify is
0:59
truly a Google force, powering all
1:01
birds, Rothies, and Brooklyn, and millions
1:03
of other entrepreneurs of every size
1:06
across over 170 companies. Plus, Shopify's
1:08
award-winning help is there to support
1:10
your success every step of the
1:12
way. This is possibility powered by
1:15
Shopify. Sign up for a $1
1:17
per month trial period at shopify.com/beginners
1:19
all lower case. Go to shopify.com/beginners
1:21
to take your business to the
1:24
next level today. shopify.com/beginners. This episode
1:27
This episode is brought to you by
1:29
Amazon Business. We could all use more
1:32
time. Amazon business offers smart business buying
1:34
solutions so you can spend more time
1:36
growing your business and less time doing
1:38
the admin. I can see why they
1:41
call it smart. Learn more at Amazon
1:43
business.com. I
1:48
love this podcast because
1:50
it crushes your dreams
1:52
and getting rich quick.
1:54
They actually got me
1:56
into reading stats for
1:58
anything. You're tuned in
2:00
to the Investing for
2:02
Beginners podcast. Led by
2:04
Andrew Sather and Dave
2:06
Ahern. Step-by-step premium investing
2:09
guidance for beginners.
2:11
Your path to
2:13
financial freedom starts
2:15
now. Start now. Welcome
2:17
to Investing for Beginners podcast. Today
2:20
we got a fun show. I
2:22
have a new friend joining us
2:24
today. We have T.J. Terwilliger. to
2:42
our chat today. Dave, thanks for having
2:45
me. I'm excited to be here.
2:47
I'm excited to talk about dividends,
2:49
and I'm looking forward to it. I
2:51
think it's going to be fun. Awesome.
2:53
Why stocks? Why do you
2:56
choose to invest in stocks
2:58
when you could pick real
3:01
estate, crypto, any other asset
3:03
class? Why stocks for
3:05
you? Yeah, that is an
3:08
easy one. Thanks for starting
3:10
it off with a softball.
3:13
Answer one, I'm lazy. So
3:15
I don't want to... run real
3:17
estate. I don't want tenants. I don't
3:19
want to manage the property management company.
3:21
You know, it's popular right now to
3:23
kind of invest in the boring businesses.
3:25
Cody Sanchez talks a lot about that.
3:27
I don't want to stock vending machines.
3:29
I don't want to manage people. I
3:32
kind of want to invest and be
3:34
hands off. And I think stocks are
3:36
the best place to do that. Bonds are
3:38
an option, but you know, historically
3:40
the returns haven't been great. Recently
3:42
with the Fed raising interest rates,
3:45
they're getting a little bit more
3:47
interesting. Some of the high-yield
3:49
bonds are interesting. They're
3:51
getting close to stock-like
3:53
returns historically, but in
3:56
the long run, stocks have been the
3:58
place to be crypto. I don't... understand.
4:00
I don't know how to value Bitcoin.
4:03
I don't know what it's worth. It
4:05
could be worth a dollar coin. It
4:07
could be worth a million dollars of
4:10
coin. But if I don't understand it,
4:12
I can't invest in it. I'm not
4:14
a person that can say, you know,
4:16
things are going up. This is the
4:19
place to be. So stocks are something
4:21
that I can understand. There's something I
4:23
can be pretty passive in. Once you
4:26
find the right company and buy it,
4:28
hopefully you can just leave it in
4:30
your portfolio. All right, that makes a
4:33
lot of sense. I kind of feel
4:35
the same way. I don't know if
4:37
I would have described it as lazy,
4:39
but that's probably a good way of
4:42
putting it. I'm letting the companies do
4:44
all the heavy lifting. I just have
4:46
to choose which ones to do the
4:49
heavy lifting. I just have to choose
4:51
which ones to do the heavy lifting.
4:53
Yeah, I'm more than willing to do
4:56
the work up front to find the
4:58
right company, but once I find it,
5:00
I don't want to manage it. All
5:02
right, so do you remember your first
5:05
investment? Yes, my first investment, I started
5:07
the way that most people do and
5:09
probably should. My first investment was an
5:12
index fund in a 401k, you know,
5:14
for the employer match. That was that
5:16
was the first one to tell you
5:19
my first individual stock that I bought.
5:21
Honestly, I don't remember it. Okay. Mine,
5:23
mine, ironically, Andrew and I both bought
5:25
Microsoft in 2014. Okay. Yeah, well, kind
5:28
of funny. I mean, you know, I
5:30
backed up the truck. I bought one
5:32
whole, one whole share of 34 bucks
5:35
a share. So I still own it.
5:37
So that's, I mean, that's awesome. But,
5:39
you know, hindsight is 2020. I should
5:42
have dropped a cool 10,000 into it.
5:44
But, you know, hey. Yes. Yeah. One
5:46
of Google was one of my early
5:48
ones. I don't. I don't think it
5:51
was number one, but it was early
5:53
and it was on one of the
5:55
regulatory scares, you know, Google's going to
5:58
get broken up as a monopoly. Free
6:00
split, I do still hold it, same
6:02
mistake, I should have. I should have
6:05
bought a lot more, but there's definitely
6:07
some early ones that I remember that
6:09
weren't winners. Yeah, I had a few
6:11
of those too. For sure. So I
6:14
guess what, why dividends? Like we have
6:16
this wide universe of things that we
6:18
can invest in. What about dividends as
6:21
attractive to you? Yeah. So I didn't
6:23
start that way. I didn't start as
6:25
a dividend investor. my beginnings were kind
6:28
of in the classic Ben Graham Warren
6:30
Buffett value style. So I remember reading
6:32
the red 2006 version of the intelligent
6:34
investors sitting on the bed in a
6:37
hospital room after my son was born.
6:39
So, you know, holding the newborn baby
6:41
in one hand and Ben Graham and
6:44
the other. And went through that whole
6:46
kind of classical canon, you know, the
6:48
most important thing and the PDF of
6:51
margin of safety. you know, the dondo
6:53
investor by Manich Graberai and Joel Greenblatt's
6:55
books. So that's, that's where I started.
6:57
And the cape ratio at the time
7:00
was, you know, probably 20. We were
7:02
coming out of the great financial crisis.
7:04
It was, you know, 2010, 11, somewhere
7:07
in there. And so that style made
7:09
total sense to me that you find
7:11
something that's priced for less than it's
7:14
worse than you buy it on sale.
7:16
I grew up. both a mother that
7:18
loved a good sale, you know, she
7:20
was one of those people that she
7:23
would take the receipt back in and
7:25
say, hey, you would overcharge me by
7:27
a dollar and she'd get her dollar
7:30
back. So that was instilled in me
7:32
from childhood. So it made total sense.
7:34
And when I went off to look
7:37
for bargains, the market pretty much has
7:39
gone up since to where we are
7:41
today. And as that happened, it started
7:43
to make not Not value investing, but
7:46
the market itself started to make less
7:48
and less sense to me. So one
7:50
of the other ideas that came from
7:53
Carly Munger is the idea of finding
7:55
the one-foot bar. to step over and
7:57
not the six-foot hurdle. And as values
8:00
kept climbing, the one-foot bars became harder
8:02
and harder to find. And each comprise
8:04
talked about no-brainer investments, the ones that
8:06
don't have a lot of downside. You
8:09
look at it and you go, yeah,
8:11
that's obviously cheap. And there's been a
8:13
few of those along the way, but
8:16
you're not going to get that many
8:18
of those in a year. So if
8:20
you get one or two a year,
8:23
And you want a really concentrated portfolio
8:25
of, say, 10 stocks, that's five to
8:27
10 years to get fully invested. That's
8:29
a lot of time to not be
8:32
compounding. We know, you know, time is
8:34
the most powerful component in that compounding
8:36
formula. That's the exponent, right? That's what
8:39
does most of the work. So not
8:41
being invested wasn't really a great choice,
8:43
but I was having trouble finding things
8:46
that were interesting. What really led me
8:48
towards the dividend path I was I
8:50
was looking this direction to start with
8:52
you know I'd started looking at some
8:55
some cannibal companies at buybacks that sort
8:57
of thing But what really got me
8:59
on that path was David Einhorn wrote
9:02
some letters He came out with his
9:04
theory that the passive investments broke in
9:06
the markets. I don't know that that's
9:09
necessarily the case. We can talk about
9:11
that if you want to but his
9:13
answer made sense to me and his
9:15
answer was to buy companies that directly
9:18
gave you your return. So shareholder yield,
9:20
you know, either buybacks, paying down debt,
9:22
or dividends. And that that really also
9:25
kind of clicked with me, just like
9:27
the the finding, the no brainers, the
9:29
value investing, that idea made total sense
9:32
that the market doesn't make sense to
9:34
me. Why not try and cut it
9:36
out and get the return directly from
9:38
the company? And the more I thought
9:41
about it, the more I thought this
9:43
is the most fundamental. implementation of the
9:45
idea that stocks or shares of the
9:48
company that there is. Right? If I
9:50
buy a stock and I become a
9:52
part owner, why would I not want
9:55
that company to share? share some of
9:57
the profits. Why would I not want
9:59
to benefit from the growth than the
10:01
profit? So that's that's kind of the
10:04
journey of how I got there. I
10:06
mean, I totally agree. The company is,
10:08
you know, creating cash from its profits
10:11
and it has choices to what it
10:13
wants to do with those with that
10:15
cash and part of the choice is
10:18
paying a dividend. And I think a
10:20
lot of people, especially. with the markets
10:22
being the way they have been the
10:24
last few years, is that everybody's focused
10:27
on growth, but they don't realize that
10:29
that 8 to 10, 7 to 9,
10:31
whatever number you want to put on
10:34
the market returns over the last 100
10:36
years, you know, 2 to 3% of
10:38
that is dividends. You know, you take
10:41
those away and that's the market hasn't
10:43
returned that great. I think dividends should
10:45
be a definite part of somebody's portfolio,
10:47
absolutely. Yeah, I mean the other the
10:50
other interesting point there is that if
10:52
you look at total return and You
10:54
look at reinvesting your dividends and you
10:57
take a good period, you know, like
10:59
20 years You'll find that around half
11:01
of the total return comes from the
11:04
dividends in the reinvestment. So if you
11:06
ignore that component You potentially leave, you
11:08
know, a lot of a lot of
11:10
return on the table, especially when you're
11:13
looking at it from a market perspective
11:15
Right, exactly. So can you explain that
11:17
concept of a drip of reinvesting the
11:20
dividends and how that works? Yeah, absolutely.
11:22
So when you get paid a dividend,
11:24
it's just a cash payment typically, right
11:27
from the company. So they take part
11:29
of the profits and they share it
11:31
with you as a shareholder. And then
11:33
you have choices on what you want
11:36
to do with your cash. So one,
11:38
you can just take it and spend
11:40
it on whatever you want. you can
11:43
let it accumulate in whatever your sweep
11:45
account is in your brokerage account or
11:47
you can reinvest it and some companies
11:50
do have a direct reinvestment plan that
11:52
you can enroll in. The advantage to
11:54
those is that you don't actually get
11:56
the cash. They reinvest it for you
11:59
and that depending on the drip plan,
12:01
depending on where you live, can save
12:03
you on taxes. If the company won't
12:06
do it directly, most brokers will give
12:08
you the option that once that cash
12:10
rolls in, they'll go ahead and reinvest
12:13
it for you and buy whatever, you
12:15
know, it's usually a partial share unless
12:17
you own a lot. Over time, you
12:19
basically reinvest those dividends into the company
12:22
and you own more and more. And
12:24
you can think of that compounding the
12:26
same way that a company reinvesting in
12:29
itself does. You own more of the
12:31
company, the next dividend, you get a
12:33
little bit more because you own more
12:36
of the company and you reinvest that
12:38
back in. And over a good period,
12:40
like you said, 10, 20 years, you
12:42
can end up owning significantly more of
12:45
the company and having a pretty nice
12:47
dividend payment. Yeah, yeah, for sure. I
12:49
use Fidelity and I know that they
12:52
allow to automatically reinvest the money. I've
12:54
had a few times where I bought
12:56
a new company, the paid a dividend,
12:59
and I missed that little trick. And
13:01
then I started noticing like these little
13:03
incremental amounts of cash building up in
13:05
my account. What's this company? And I
13:08
missed the automatic drip, which is, you
13:10
know, yeah. It's a modern marvel that
13:12
I don't think it's talked about enough.
13:15
Yeah, it's really nice. It's a really
13:17
nice speech. You have to think about
13:19
it. Now some some investors do turn
13:22
that off and you know, if you're
13:24
really tracking your dividends and paying attention
13:26
to when they come in, what some
13:28
people like to do is to let
13:31
the payments build up for the quarter
13:33
or the year or whatever. And then,
13:35
you know, they want to pick the
13:38
company that they think is the most
13:40
of your value to invest there. If
13:42
you're really on top of things and
13:45
you're really paying those dividends, that can
13:47
work. but I think for most investors
13:49
honestly just letting your brokerage or letting
13:51
the company do it for you. is
13:54
probably the way to go. You know,
13:56
whatever, whatever you sacrifice in return, because
13:58
you bought a little more expensive share,
14:01
probably comes out in the wash, you
14:03
know, whenever you look at the compounding
14:05
over decades. Right, yeah, totally agree. So
14:08
if you are a newer investor and
14:10
somebody, you know, if a newer investor
14:12
came to you and said, I would
14:14
like to start investing in dividends, where
14:17
would they start? So the easiest place
14:19
to be, especially if you're a U.
14:21
is there are ETFs that are focused
14:24
on dividends. So you can look, you
14:26
know, if you don't want to do
14:28
the work of figuring out individual companies,
14:31
you can look right at an ETF.
14:33
So Vanguard has a high yield ETF.
14:35
They've got one that focuses on dividend
14:37
yield plus stability. You can buy ETS
14:40
that track some of the dividend indexes.
14:42
So there's dividend aristocrats that have paid
14:44
25 years of dividends, or it's 25
14:47
years of dividend raises in a row.
14:49
There's ETS that track that. One of
14:51
the more popular ones is the Schwab
14:54
dividend fund. It's a CED, is the
14:56
ticker. That one runs on an algorithm.
14:58
It rebalaces every, I don't know. Honestly,
15:00
the schedule is quarterly or yearly. but
15:03
it's got a pretty good track record.
15:05
I mean, it's over a 3% yield
15:07
and I think it's grown the dividend
15:10
about 10% a year. So looking into
15:12
ETS is the easiest place to start
15:14
if you want to add some dividends
15:17
to your portfolio. Yeah, that's great advice.
15:19
Now, let's say I want to be
15:21
I want to be different. I want
15:23
to pick my own companies. I don't
15:26
want some algorithm picking them for me.
15:28
Then where do you go? Yeah. So
15:30
I think you need. Picking a dividend
15:33
paying company is no different than picking
15:35
any other company assuming you're a fundamental
15:37
investor. So what I mean by that
15:40
is you're going to look at the
15:42
financials, you're going to look at the
15:44
profits, and you're going to say what's
15:46
this company worth? You know, if you're
15:49
going to if you're going to do
15:51
it based on technicals and look at
15:53
charts. I'm not your guy to answer
15:56
that. But like I said, not my
15:58
expertise. I know some of it, but
16:00
I don't invest that way. So I
16:03
can't help you. But I think, honestly,
16:05
because when you buy a dividend paying
16:07
company, I think it's the most fundamental
16:09
application of you're an owner, right? Buffett
16:12
and Ben Graham have told us for
16:14
years that shares aren't. ticker symbols, they're
16:16
not lines that go up and down,
16:19
they're not there to be traded, their
16:21
ownership shares the company. And when you
16:23
buy a company that pays your dividend,
16:26
that really does make you an owner,
16:28
you're going to get a payment out
16:30
of the profits. So that's number one,
16:32
you want to make sure it's profitable.
16:35
So I think about honestly buying a
16:37
dividend paying company the same way I'd
16:39
buy about, thinking about buying a company
16:42
down the street, you know, the local
16:44
coffee shop or or whatever, pick your
16:46
business that has the line out the
16:49
door that you know does a bunch
16:51
of cash and you'd love to own
16:53
a piece of, you know, your dentist's
16:55
office. I think about buying a dividend
16:58
company in the same way. So it's
17:00
something that's been profitable in the past.
17:02
We want to own it for a
17:05
long time. So it's something that's going
17:07
to be profitable in the future. We
17:09
want some kind of, some kind of
17:12
advantage that they have. I don't want
17:14
to go in there and make decisions.
17:16
And we want that management to be
17:18
shareholder friendly. So we want to look
17:21
at the dividend history. So basically, you
17:23
know, kind of what that means is
17:25
I'm going to go in, I'm going
17:28
to look at the financial statements, I
17:30
want to see some growth in revenue,
17:32
I want to see some growth in
17:35
profits, I want to see good decisions
17:37
by management, I don't want to see
17:39
terrible acquisitions or, you know, attempts to
17:41
grow into areas that they have no
17:44
business being in, and I want to
17:46
see a consistent dividend history. I want
17:48
to see that they paid one for
17:51
a while. Preferably it goes up on
17:53
a reasonable basis. I don't necessarily need
17:55
an increase every single year, but I
17:58
want that line to generally be trimming
18:00
up. a balance sheet that's going to
18:02
let them continue to pay out a
18:04
dividend. I don't want so much debt
18:07
that that's going to squeeze the extra
18:09
profits. And I want to see that
18:11
the dividend payout ratio is sustainable. So
18:14
that's a metric that is pretty easy
18:16
to calculate. Generally, it's just your dividend
18:18
per share divided by your earnings per
18:21
share. And what that's going to tell
18:23
you is how much of their profits
18:25
are they paying you as a dividend?
18:27
as a company that's paying you 30
18:30
or 40% so that's that's kind of
18:32
the basics of how I would look
18:34
at it. Yeah and those are those
18:37
are all great frameworks to buy any
18:39
company but you know also dividend paying
18:41
companies. You mentioned payout ratio let's let's
18:44
maybe talk about a few ratios or
18:46
metrics that people could use to kind
18:48
of measure dividends and I guess what
18:50
would be the first couple that you
18:53
would look at? So payout ratio is
18:55
definitely going to be one of them.
18:57
I'm going to look and see how
19:00
much are they paying out in profits.
19:02
Now depending on the company, the way
19:04
you want to calculate that can vary,
19:07
so you can look at earnings for
19:09
share. That's the metric that's going to
19:11
come up on most of your brokerage
19:13
accounts, most of your financial sites. But
19:16
alternative ways to calculate that, you can
19:18
use free cash flow. So you can
19:20
use the dividend payment as a percentage
19:23
of free cash flow. Sometimes if you
19:25
have earnings that look a little funny
19:27
because of maybe, you know, one-time charges
19:30
or non-cash charges, that can be an
19:32
interesting way. You know, earnings can be
19:34
kind of manipulated by the accountants. Free
19:36
cash flows harder too. And then depending
19:39
on the company, you may want to
19:41
look at some different ratios. So like
19:43
in a reach, you're not going to
19:46
look at earnings per share. versus dividend
19:48
payments because of the structure there. They
19:50
use a different metric called FFO funds
19:53
from operations. Essentially, it's the free cash
19:55
full of a reach and that's the
19:57
payment ratio you want to look. at
19:59
for them. You want to look at
20:02
the dividend yield, so that's your dividend
20:04
per share divided by your stock price,
20:06
and that's going to tell you essentially
20:08
just like a bond field would. You
20:10
know, if you pay X dollars for
20:12
this stock, you're going to get
20:15
such and such a percentage back
20:17
of the dividend. That's your starting
20:19
dividend yield. So that's definitely an
20:21
important metric for a dividend investor.
20:24
Those are your two biggest to
20:26
start with. And then beyond that, it's
20:28
most of the financial ratios that you're
20:30
going to look at as a fundamental
20:32
investor. So you're going to look at
20:35
growth rates and, like I said, earnings.
20:37
You're going to look at the growth
20:39
rates and revenue. You probably want to
20:41
look at some of the balance sheet
20:43
ratios to make sure that, like I
20:45
said, there's enough cash flow there. So
20:47
the quick one that most of the credit
20:50
agency use is debt to equity. I
20:52
tend to some companies especially your
20:54
older dividend paying companies if they pay
20:56
out a lot to shareholders and if they
20:58
buy back a lot of shares sometimes you
21:00
get negative equity so that's not always the
21:03
best balance sheet metric I tend to look
21:05
at things like you know interest coverage ratios
21:07
how much cash flow do they have versus
21:09
their interest payments I like to look at
21:11
a free cash flow to net debt so
21:13
that tells me how long it would take
21:15
them to pay the debt off you know if they
21:17
decided to run the cash flow in those
21:19
kind of metrics can be useful. in figuring out
21:22
it, does this company have the cash flow
21:24
to keep paying the dividend or are they
21:26
going to cut it? Yeah, that's kind of
21:28
important, huh? Yeah. This podcast is brought to
21:31
you in part by Stash. Saving and
21:33
investing can feel impossible, but with
21:35
Stash, it's not just a reality, it's
21:37
easy. Stash isn't just an investing
21:39
app, it's a registered investment advisor
21:41
that combines automated investing with dependable
21:43
financial strategies to help you reach
21:45
your goals faster. They'll provide you
21:47
with personalized advice on what to
21:49
invest in based on your goals.
21:51
Or if you want to just
21:53
sit back and watch your money
21:55
go to work, you can opt
21:57
into their award-winning expert managed portfolio.
21:59
that picks stocks for you. Stash
22:01
has helped millions of Americans reach
22:03
their financial goals and starts at
22:06
just $3 per month. Don't let
22:08
your savings sit around. Make it
22:10
work harder for you. Go to
22:12
get.stash.com/investing to see how you can
22:14
receive $25 towards your first stock
22:16
purchase and to view important disclosures.
22:18
That's get.stash.com/investing. Paid non-client endorsement, not
22:20
representative of all clients and not
22:22
a guarantee. Investment advisory services offered
22:24
by Stash Investments, LLC, and SEC
22:26
Registered Investment Advisor. Investing involves risk.
22:28
Offer is subject to T&Cs. If
22:30
you're a golfer like me, you
22:32
know that it's just not the
22:34
same playing with someone else's clubs.
22:36
But the problem is, traveling with
22:38
your own clubs can be such
22:40
a headache. It can just be
22:42
so stressful. I mean, even last
22:44
October, I was on my trip
22:46
to California. I remember weaving in
22:48
other people with my luggage in
22:50
one hand, my golf clubs and
22:52
the other, hoping I'm not going
22:54
to bump into something. While I'm
22:56
at bag claim, watching the bags
22:58
bounce violently and hoping I'm not
23:00
going to have to go pick
23:02
up a new set right before
23:04
my round of golf of my
23:06
buddies. That's where ship sticks would
23:08
have helped with their hassle-free delivery
23:10
for your golf clubs and luggage.
23:12
They make it so easy. You
23:14
just schedule a shipment, attach a
23:16
shipment, attach your label, attach, attach,
23:18
or label. They do the rest,
23:20
and you know your gear, and
23:22
you know your gear is getting
23:24
there safely. Right now, Shipsticks is
23:26
offering our listeners 20% off your
23:28
first shipment when you go to
23:30
shipsticks.com and use the code investing.
23:32
Go to shipsticks.com and use the
23:34
code investing to get 20% off
23:36
your first shipment and save yourself
23:38
the hassle this golf season. That's
23:40
s-h-i-p-s-t-i-c-k-s.com. Make sure you use the
23:42
code investing so they know we
23:44
sent you. Yeah, so... Let's maybe
23:46
talk about a couple red flags.
23:48
If you are looking at the
23:50
payout ratio and a dividend yield,
23:52
for example, are there any numbers
23:54
that you come across that would
23:57
be like, okay, this is a
23:59
red flag? Yeah. So very, very
24:01
high yields can be a red
24:03
flag. They can also be an
24:05
indication. either just that the company's
24:07
very mature and pays out a
24:09
lot of dividends or occasionally that
24:11
it's a good bargain that the
24:13
company's really cheap because that's the
24:15
way to get that's one way
24:17
to get the dividend yield up
24:19
is for the price to get
24:21
down right so you know rule
24:23
of thumb anything over 8% a
24:25
lot of the time kind of
24:27
raises a red flag to me
24:29
to just look a little closer
24:31
on the payout ratio it really
24:33
depends on the yield So a
24:35
high yielding company, something like, you
24:37
know, Altria, is a good example
24:39
of a high yielding company that's
24:41
previously Philip Morris, that makes cigarettes,
24:43
that's Marlboro, Scholl, they tend to
24:45
pay about an 8% dividend, and
24:47
their dividend payout ratio is about
24:49
70%. In that case, that's barely
24:51
normal, right? That's a pretty mature
24:53
company. They don't have to reinvest
24:55
a lot into growth. They're not
24:57
building new plants. they're just going
24:59
to keep selling cigarettes and chewing
25:01
tobacco. So in that case, that's
25:03
fine. A younger company, one that's
25:05
growing faster, I like to see
25:07
a payout ratio somewhere around 50,
25:09
60% or less. And again, that
25:11
depends on the initial yield that
25:13
depends on the growth of the
25:15
company. That depends on how much
25:17
do they have, you know, how
25:19
much room do they have to
25:21
reinvest and grow, kind of where
25:23
are they in the company life
25:25
cycle. But for a high yield
25:27
company, under 70% for a payout
25:29
ratio, for a dividend growth company,
25:31
you know, anything 50, 60% or
25:33
lower is okay with me. Above
25:35
that, I'm a look closer. Yeah,
25:37
yeah. I, during, well, prior to
25:39
the Game Stop meme thing, I
25:41
actually, that was one of the
25:43
companies I made a mistake and
25:45
invested in and part of. part
25:48
of the attraction especially for value
25:50
investors back then was you know
25:52
it was an eight to ten
25:54
twelve percent yield mostly because the
25:56
stock price was dropping so much
25:58
and you know i remember people
26:00
like oh game stop is great
26:02
you know a great play and
26:04
yeah it wasn't so it's it's
26:06
always good to understand the pros
26:08
and the cons when you're when
26:10
you're looking at at different metrics
26:12
so you don't get you know
26:14
you don't drink the cool a
26:16
too much and get too excited
26:18
yeah sometimes chasing high yields is
26:20
a mistake but sometimes like sometimes
26:22
it can be a bargain and
26:24
sometimes it's just something that the
26:26
market is ignoring right now you
26:28
know European companies are really ignored
26:30
some of them are yielding fairly
26:32
high yield. There's some good companies
26:34
there that just aren't getting a
26:36
lot of investment. So it can
26:38
be okay. Did you get pulled
26:40
into Game Stop with Michael Barry?
26:42
No, actually, I know, it was
26:44
just me, and I, using screeners,
26:46
using thin-vis screeners, and it kept
26:48
coming up, it kept coming up,
26:50
and then I started doing some
26:52
research, and I just, you know,
26:54
I thought that maybe what they
26:56
were going to try to do
26:58
with collectibles and things like that
27:00
would be an opportunity for them.
27:02
So, and the, you know, the
27:04
high dividend yield was part of
27:06
the attraction. Yeah, that was, honestly,
27:08
that was one that came up
27:10
on some of my screeners and
27:12
when Murray bought it, it was,
27:14
it was on my list to
27:16
research and I never, I started
27:18
it, I looked at it and
27:20
I never really got deep enough
27:22
into it to convince myself to
27:24
do it. So, so I missed
27:26
it, but I could have been
27:28
right there with you and it
27:30
as a year. Yeah, it's it's
27:32
it's it's always interesting to look
27:34
back on some of your previous
27:36
mistakes and okay, what did I
27:38
learn from this? So we talked
27:41
about you kind of mentioned dividend
27:43
aristocrats and so that's something that
27:45
I think we could probably maybe
27:47
chat a little bit about. So
27:49
I guess first of all, maybe
27:51
can you help define what they
27:53
are? Yeah, so the dividend aristocrats,
27:55
it's a list of stocks. There's
27:57
a few requirements for them. They
27:59
have to be included in the
28:01
S&P 500 to be interested at.
28:03
Depending on who makes the list,
28:05
there's usually some kind of liquidity
28:07
requirement, but typically, you know, when
28:09
you're included. in the S&P 500,
28:11
they clear that one. The other
28:13
requirement is that they've paid an
28:15
increasing dividend for at least 25
28:17
years in a row. I think,
28:19
I shouldn't guess, but I think
28:21
there's around 66 companies on that
28:23
list right now, but there's a
28:25
few others that you can look
28:27
at if you're looking at lists
28:29
of, you know, good dividend payers,
28:31
dividend kings have paid dividends for
28:33
50 years or more. So that's
28:35
an interesting list. are lists of
28:37
companies that have paid dividends but
28:39
are not included in the S&P
28:41
500. So you've got dividend champions.
28:43
Those don't have the S&P 500
28:45
requirements. Those don't have liquidity requirements.
28:47
So that can be an interesting
28:49
list as well because you can
28:51
find some small cap companies. You
28:53
can find some companies that aren't
28:55
in the index that have a
28:57
good dividend history in some of
28:59
those lists as well. So those
29:01
are good places to start. especially
29:03
like you asked if you're a
29:05
starting investor and want to pick
29:07
your own companies, you're getting a
29:09
good dividend history there at least.
29:11
Yeah, yeah, for sure. You know,
29:13
and the thing that a lot
29:15
of newer investors maybe don't realize
29:17
is when a company makes a
29:19
decision to start paying a dividend,
29:21
they don't do it lightly because
29:23
when the market sees a company
29:25
stop paying a dividend or cut
29:27
a dividend, the market does not
29:29
like that. And the companies take
29:32
a big, big hit. I remember
29:34
when Disney, you know, stopped paying
29:36
a dividend obviously was because you
29:38
know they had no revenue from
29:40
the pandemic but still the market
29:42
you know kind of spanked it
29:44
pretty hard because of that. Yeah
29:46
that's that's one thing that you
29:48
know there's a theory that dividends
29:50
are a signal to the market
29:52
from management and you're exactly for
29:54
the reason you mentioned when management
29:56
pays a dividend when they start
29:58
a dividend. That's usually a long-term
30:00
commitment once you start paying a
30:02
dividend shareholders expected to keep coming
30:04
unless you say this is a
30:06
special one-time dividend. We sold this
30:08
division of company and we've got
30:10
this giant cash ball and we're
30:12
going to pay out, you know,
30:14
some percentage of it is especially
30:16
different. But once you start paying
30:18
that quarterly dividend, that's a long-term
30:20
commitment to shareholders. And like you
30:22
said, one of the last things
30:24
management wants to do is cut
30:26
that dividend. That's a long-term commitment
30:28
to shareholders. And like you said,
30:30
one of the last things management
30:32
wants to do is cut that
30:34
dividend. That's a big signal to
30:36
the market. I guess I'm curious.
30:38
When you're searching for. potential investments
30:40
is an area like the dividend
30:42
aristocrats or the kings is that
30:44
something a place that you go
30:46
to mine first or like where
30:48
do you kind of look when
30:50
you're looking around trying to find
30:52
companies compounding dividends we have an
30:54
investable universe it's over 800 companies
30:56
only 800 yeah well you know
30:58
there's 30,000 stocks in the world
31:00
we're global we don't just look
31:02
But we split it into three
31:04
buckets to make it a little
31:06
bit more manageable. So one is
31:08
our dividend growth bucket. And essentially
31:10
those are companies that have grown
31:12
the dividend 10 years or more.
31:14
And so that's that includes your
31:16
risk crafts, that includes your kings,
31:18
the dividend champions that I mentioned
31:20
earlier, those are your 25 years
31:23
or more, no. index requirement, no
31:25
liquidity, and then the contenders are
31:27
the list that is 10 to
31:29
24 years of dividend growth. So
31:31
that's pretty much what makes up
31:33
that list. There is our high-yield
31:35
universe that's anything over a 4%
31:37
yield, and then we also look
31:39
at our cannibal bucket. So those
31:41
companies do not actually have to
31:43
pay a dividend, oh, some of
31:45
them do. But those are companies
31:47
that have a nice history of
31:49
buying back shares. So you can
31:51
think of, you know, your auto
31:53
zones, you know, Domino's Pizza has
31:55
bought back a lot of shares
31:57
over the years. Those type of
31:59
companies are in that bucket. So
32:01
those have all been screened and
32:03
and developed. So that's that's where
32:05
I tend to hunt. But for
32:07
someone that does not have access
32:09
to that, yeah, the aristocrats, the
32:11
contenders, the champions, pick your list,
32:13
that's a great place to start.
32:15
Yeah, yeah, I agree. Let's talk,
32:17
if we could, let's talk a
32:19
little bit about, you kind of
32:21
mentioned cannibals, and you and I
32:23
were talking off air about, you
32:25
know, Med Faber and Jim O'Shaugher,
32:27
Maybe you could explain a little
32:29
bit about what that really is
32:31
and how you use that for
32:33
your investments. Yes, this is this
32:35
is one of my favorites. Shareholder
32:37
yield is a combination typically as
32:39
your dividend yield, plus your buyback
32:41
yield, plus the yield from debt
32:43
pay down. And those three components
32:45
added together make up what's called
32:47
shareholder yield. And the reason for
32:49
that is if you think about
32:51
management, when they make a profit,
32:53
they have some options. You know,
32:55
basically you can reinvest in the
32:57
company, right? You can grow it,
32:59
you can maybe acquire another company,
33:01
you can pay down debt, or
33:03
you can keep it on the
33:05
balance sheet, just let the cash
33:07
sit there and build up, or
33:09
you can share it with the
33:11
shareholders. And those three ways really
33:13
are the ways the cash either
33:16
directly or indirectly gets back to
33:18
share. So the dividend payment. is
33:20
easy. That's a direct payment rate
33:22
to you. Share buybacks are a
33:24
way to give you more ownership
33:26
of the company. So every time
33:28
the shares shrink, your shares that
33:30
you own become worth more of
33:32
the company. And then debt pay
33:34
down, you can think of the
33:36
same way you would think of
33:38
it as if you were paying
33:40
off, you know, credit card or
33:42
auto loan debt. When you pay
33:44
that debt off, you don't have
33:46
to make that payment next month.
33:48
So then the earnings of the
33:50
company you're going to go up.
33:52
and then you can get more
33:54
either through your share buybacks or
33:56
your dividend yield. The really interesting
33:58
thing and the reason I like.
34:00
The shareholder yield metric so much
34:02
is one you mentioned that dividends
34:04
are a long-term commitment. So management
34:06
wants to be a little cautious
34:08
with those, right? They want to
34:10
set it at a target where
34:12
even in kind of a bad
34:14
year or bad couple years that
34:16
they're going to be able to
34:18
keep paying that dividend. They don't
34:20
want to get it cut. So
34:22
they tend to be a little
34:24
bit conservative on that. Buybacks are
34:26
flexible. Right so the board approves
34:28
such such and such a number
34:30
we're gonna approve three billion and
34:32
buy that's or whatever number They
34:34
approve but management gets to decide
34:36
when those shares get bought back
34:38
and how many so some buybacks
34:40
Just basically moth up share-based compensation,
34:42
you know, they issue so many
34:44
shares with one hand There's a
34:46
better that way So buybacks can
34:48
be used basically to mop up
34:50
the share base compensation and kind
34:52
of hide that. That's not overly
34:54
value creative. I would argue it's
34:56
not my favorite way to do
34:58
it. Honestly, I would rather them
35:00
just pay the, pay the bonuses
35:02
out in cash or whatever and
35:04
not play the, the buyback game.
35:07
But assuming the company is actually
35:09
reducing the number of shares and
35:11
doing so at a reasonable valuation,
35:13
that can be very, very. beneficial
35:15
to shareholders. But you have really
35:17
good management that pays attention and
35:19
waits and buys back shares of
35:21
cheap valuations. You can do very,
35:23
very well there. And then of
35:25
course the debt pay down, you
35:27
know, if they've got high yield
35:29
debt, they've got expensive debt to
35:31
pay that off. That can raise
35:33
your earnings and open up more
35:35
cash for dividends and payments back
35:37
to you. The other interesting piece
35:39
is that, you know, a lot
35:41
of people get worried about taxes
35:43
or dividends. That's not something necessarily
35:45
I discuss all the time because
35:47
it's so dependent on what what
35:49
account do you hold the dividend
35:51
in the you know the dividend
35:53
payer in? Where do you live?
35:55
Where's the company based because those
35:57
are all going to affect taxes,
35:59
but typically buybacks are more tax
36:01
efficient because you never receive that
36:03
payment. So you don't get a
36:05
tax, you know, on the dividend,
36:07
on the income, however that's taxed.
36:09
So a little bit more of that comes
36:11
back to you. So that shareholder
36:14
yield, it saves on some taxes
36:16
and it lets management, if
36:18
they're good, really drives some value
36:20
for you. Yeah, yeah, exactly. I
36:22
look at fin chat, has they
36:25
calculate? shareholder yield, which is nice
36:27
so you can look look at
36:29
it quickly without having to do
36:31
all the do all the heavy lifting
36:33
of figuring it out. It's good to
36:35
look at it to to see how
36:38
those you know interact. Some companies like
36:40
you said, AutoZone and O'Reilly
36:42
and Home Depot, they're all big
36:44
share cannibals, but they also pay
36:46
dividends. Well, well, does Home Depot
36:49
pay a dividend? Yeah, they do.
36:51
But one thing that surprised me
36:53
years ago, I was looking at
36:55
Johnson and Johnson, and they're obviously
36:57
famous for being a dividend aristocrat,
36:59
and they actually pay out more.
37:02
They spend more on buybacks than
37:04
they do on dividends, which kind
37:06
of surprised me. And that was
37:08
kind of my first introduction to
37:10
this whole advantage of buying back shares.
37:13
Oh, hey, this could actually be a
37:15
big thing. So I guess, what are
37:17
your thoughts on companies that are... You
37:19
mentioned the negative equity. So a company
37:21
like Starbucks and Home Depot, I believe,
37:23
are both negative shareholder equity. How do
37:26
you feel about that as like a
37:28
dividend paying company? Is that something that
37:30
concerns you? Or is it just kind
37:32
of a nothing burger? It really depends
37:34
on the company. It really depends
37:36
on the reason for the negative
37:38
equity. Like I said, sometimes you
37:40
see that, especially in companies that
37:42
do return a lot of capital
37:44
to their shareholders. The other thing
37:47
sometimes you see that in is companies
37:49
that don't have a lot of physical
37:51
assets. So think about like, you know,
37:53
McDonald's owns most of their real estate.
37:55
That goes on the balance sheet. But,
37:57
you know, a franchise company, like a...
37:59
like a domino's pizza, don't own the
38:02
majority of the restaurants. So the
38:04
land, the buildings, the equipment, none
38:06
of that's on the balance sheet.
38:08
And when they pay dividends and
38:10
buyback shares, that puts their equity
38:12
negative. Like I said, you really,
38:14
you have to dig in and
38:16
understand the reason that the equity
38:18
is negative. Yeah, yeah, that's a
38:20
good point. I guess kind of
38:22
on the flip side of that,
38:24
how do you feel about companies
38:26
that borrow to pay dividends? Typically,
38:29
I would say that that's a
38:31
bad idea. You know, one that
38:33
famously did that was Boeing. If
38:35
you look at charts for Boeing,
38:37
you can see the dividends going
38:39
up, and if you chart the
38:42
long-term debt alongside it, it gets
38:44
up right along with the dividend,
38:46
and then of course eventually they
38:48
cut the dividend way down, and
38:50
then they stop paying one altogether.
38:52
So it's typically a bad sign.
38:54
I really prefer to see the
38:56
dividend coming from earnings. Would I
38:58
say that I would absolutely never
39:00
ever ever invest in a company
39:02
that did that? I hate to
39:04
say never period. I guess I
39:06
could see maybe a situation where
39:08
during you know the zero interest
39:10
rates where it was a better
39:13
idea to invest in this thing
39:15
for growth and then borrow a
39:17
little bit to pay the dividend
39:19
because the yield on the growth
39:21
was going to be so high
39:23
and the debt was so cheap,
39:25
a little bit of financial engineering,
39:27
but I would be really, really
39:29
cautious and that would make me
39:31
really look hard at management. You
39:33
know, that's not a strategy that
39:35
I love to see. Most of
39:37
the time, if they're borrowing to
39:39
pay the dividend, that's a bad
39:42
sign. And GM did it for...
39:44
for quite some time before they
39:46
got failed out. Like I said,
39:48
Boeing more recently. I honestly don't
39:50
know of any cases where that
39:52
was done and it turned out
39:54
well. Right. Yeah. Like I said,
39:56
that doesn't mean it didn't happen.
39:58
That doesn't mean somebody didn't take
40:00
really cheap debt whenever money was
40:02
basically free and and take advantage
40:04
of it, but I would be
40:06
hard-pressed to think that that's a
40:08
good sign. Yeah, me too. Both
40:11
business and life, safeguarding your assets
40:13
is crucial. Imagine the legacy you
40:15
want to leave for your family,
40:17
one that ensures their comfort and
40:19
security even in your absence. Life
40:21
is unpredictable, but you can take
40:23
steps to protect your family's future.
40:25
Consider securing your hard-earned assets with
40:27
a tailored life insurance policy from
40:29
select quote. Ensuring your legacy remains
40:31
attacked and your loved ones are
40:33
financially secure. It's what I did
40:35
and it was easy and painless.
40:37
So why select quote? They are
40:40
one of America's leading insurance brokers
40:42
with nearly 40 years of experience,
40:44
helping over 2 million customers find
40:46
over $700 billion in coverage since
40:48
1985. Other life insurance brokers offer
40:50
impersonal, one-size-fits-all policies that may cost
40:52
you more and cover you less,
40:54
while select quotes licensed insurance agents
40:56
work for you to tailor a
40:58
life insurance policy for your individual
41:00
needs in as little as 15
41:02
minutes. Did you know that the
41:04
more life insurance coverage you need,
41:06
the more likely you are to
41:09
overpay for it? With Select Quote,
41:11
you can save up to 50%
41:13
compared to other companies, whether you
41:15
need a $500,000 policy or a
41:17
$50 million policy. At the Select
41:19
quote.com and a licensed insurance agent
41:21
will call you right away with
41:23
the right policy for your life
41:25
and your budget. They shop, you
41:27
save. At the right life insurance
41:29
for you, for less at Select
41:31
quote.com/beginners. Go to selectquote.com/beginners today to
41:33
get started. That's selectquote.com/beginners. Would you
41:35
wear the same shoes for every
41:37
occasion or rock the same outfit
41:40
seven days a week? Of course
41:42
not. Your style is better with
41:44
options. Your investments could be too.
41:46
Sibo index options give you access
41:48
to various contract sizes, global trading
41:50
hours, and potential tax advantages. That's
41:52
a good look for any portfolio.
41:54
If you're ready to invest in
41:56
style, head to better with options.com.
41:58
There are risks associated with CBO
42:00
company products. Review the disclosures and
42:02
disclaimers at cbo.com/U.S. underscore disclaimers. My
42:04
recommendation, our free e-book and email
42:06
series at stock market pdf.com. I
42:09
know I remember a few years
42:11
ago, might have been during the
42:13
pandemic or prior to that, that
42:15
I think was Exxon or Chevron
42:17
was kind of on the struggle
42:19
bus and I know that they
42:21
were borrowing some money to pay
42:23
the pay the dividend because they
42:25
didn't have the cash flow because
42:27
of oil prices were all over
42:29
the place. Like when you're thinking
42:31
about companies like that, does that
42:33
play into how you're evaluating them
42:35
because they're their commodity based business
42:38
and so there's going to be
42:40
wild fluctuations in what goes on
42:42
with them? Yeah, so so so
42:44
in that case, I mean, that's
42:46
that's an odd case, you know,
42:48
when when oil prices are negative,
42:50
that's something I don't think anybody's
42:52
ever seen before. No, no, I
42:54
wouldn't have predicted that. So in
42:56
that sort of case, yeah, to
42:58
borrow to cover because, you know,
43:00
commodity prices have crashed, you know,
43:02
you sit there and you look
43:04
and you go in two years,
43:07
is oil still going to be
43:09
negative now? you know, there's no
43:11
way. So in that case, yeah,
43:13
that's probably, you know, a safe
43:15
bet, especially in something like an
43:17
Exxon or a Chevron. And if
43:19
you look at those companies, I
43:21
honestly, I don't know Exxon as
43:23
well. I know Chevron fairly well.
43:25
Chevron's got a pretty solid balance
43:27
sheet at this point. Yeah, yeah,
43:29
for sure. And I think Exxon
43:31
does as well. So those large
43:33
companies like that, like I said,
43:36
for a one-time event to borrow.
43:38
Yeah, that's fine. That's probably a
43:40
smarter move than cutting the dividend.
43:42
Like you said, that's a that's
43:44
a massive signal to the market.
43:46
Your stock's going to sell off.
43:48
Your cost of equity is going
43:50
to go way up. That creates
43:52
more problems than taking on some
43:54
debt until oil prices you've covered
43:56
and you paid off. Yeah, very
43:58
good point. Very good point. Are
44:00
there any sectors or asset? classes
44:02
I guess that are more favorable
44:04
to dividends than others? Yeah so
44:07
traditionally there are certain sectors that
44:09
tend to pay more out in
44:11
dividends that you already mentioned one
44:13
with energy and your bigger mature
44:15
industries tend to pay more in
44:17
dividends so think things like utilities
44:19
Some of your like cable companies
44:21
and then as far as asset
44:23
classes, we already talked a little
44:25
bit about reets that the real
44:27
estate investment trust. They're actually required
44:29
to pay out 90% of their
44:31
profits as dividends for tax reasons
44:33
that based on the structure. So
44:36
reets are always a heavy. dividend
44:38
paying asset class. There's another structure
44:40
called a master limited partnership, very
44:42
similar to a read, they're required
44:44
to distribute, they don't tend to
44:46
pay a dividend, they they distribute
44:48
cash to limited partners, but that's
44:50
common in, think like your pipeline
44:52
companies, so your companies that run
44:54
pipelines to transport oil or gas,
44:56
that's your most common MLP structure,
44:58
and they tend to be pretty
45:00
heavy dividend payers as well. Is
45:02
the tech industry traditionally much in
45:05
dividends at this point? Traditionally, no.
45:07
But some, you know, when you
45:09
think you're magnificent seven, they're starting
45:11
to pay out some dividends. It's
45:13
not heavy, it's not a lot.
45:15
But, you know, Google's got a
45:17
dividend going, Apple's been paying a
45:19
dividend for quite some time. I
45:21
don't know, some of the listeners
45:23
that have been around a while
45:25
might remember, Apple had a lot
45:27
of shareholder. Ravel about building up
45:29
a bunch of cash on on
45:31
the balance sheet. Carl icon maybe
45:34
got in there. There was an
45:36
activist investor. Yeah, I think they
45:38
had over like a trillion dollars
45:40
of cash sitting on the balance
45:42
sheet. The investors got upset and
45:44
they said, hey, you should be
45:46
sharing this. That's kind of an
45:48
apple initiated the dividend. They've been
45:50
paying the dividends. Envidia pays a
45:52
dividend. Envidia actually is buying back
45:54
shares, which kind of baffles me
45:56
as far as valuation of the
45:58
business. Capital allocation goes, but they're
46:00
buying back shares. Tesla, I do
46:02
not believe pays a dividend and
46:05
Amazon does not, but if Amazon
46:07
initiated a dividend, it wouldn't shock
46:09
me either at this point. No,
46:11
no, and I think a lot
46:13
of people when they think about
46:15
dividends We talked about this off-air
46:17
is they think of it as
46:19
kind of a fuddy-deddy It has
46:21
that stereotype of a fuddy-deddy, but
46:23
then you throw off something like
46:25
a video Which everybody thinks is
46:27
a brand new company. It's really
46:29
been around for like 25 years.
46:31
What's what's touched on that? When
46:34
if somebody comes to you say
46:36
yeah, dividends are boring, you know,
46:38
I want to invest a tack
46:40
I want to be exciting well
46:42
What's your counter to that, sir?
46:44
Well, first of all, I would
46:46
say if you're investing for excitement,
46:48
that's probably the wrong reason. If
46:50
you want to, if you want
46:52
to take some money that you
46:54
can afford to lose and gamble
46:56
it and invest in, you know,
46:58
micro strategy or pick your flavor
47:00
of the week, if you want
47:03
to ride the game stop roller
47:05
coaster or buy an NFT in
47:07
2021, that's, that's okay with me.
47:09
But as far as long-term investing
47:11
goes, I'm of the opinion that
47:13
it should be boring. I don't
47:15
want my life savings going up
47:17
and down 20% every year. I
47:19
would prefer 10% for 20 years
47:21
in a row. So that would
47:23
be, that would be point number
47:25
one. Point number two is the
47:27
idea that, so let me back
47:29
at the second. So one of
47:32
the reasons I think people get
47:34
down on dividends is they say
47:36
that, you know, that's money that
47:38
could be reinvested back in the
47:40
business. That's money that could grow
47:42
the business, right, but. When you
47:44
look at some of these companies,
47:46
where are they going to reinvest?
47:48
What's Google going to do? What's
47:50
the profit it makes? What's invidia
47:52
going to do with the profit
47:54
it makes? You can only reinvest
47:56
so much cash in things that
47:58
that have a high return. And
48:01
then the question beyond that becomes,
48:03
what do you want management to
48:05
do with it? And actually, one
48:07
of the arguments for dividends, and
48:09
there's been academic research that's looked
48:11
at this, is that by taking away some
48:13
of the excess cash that's laying around,
48:15
it forces management to make better capital
48:17
allocation decisions. So if you don't have
48:19
a trillion dollars on the balance sheet
48:21
like Apple did, that you don't have
48:23
anything to reinvested in, you're much less
48:25
likely to buy a new corporate jet.
48:28
Right, you're much less likely to
48:30
acquire some company that really doesn't add
48:32
anything. You're much less likely to try
48:34
and build an empire. And the other
48:36
thing that does is it forces sometimes
48:38
for expansion and for those ideas that
48:41
management has, it makes them go to
48:43
the capital markets, you know, to either raise equity
48:45
or to take on some debt. And
48:47
when that happens, there's a lot more
48:49
scrutiny of the company and of the
48:51
management. So again, that's one of those
48:53
forcing functions to make them. make better
48:56
decisions instead of wasting
48:58
capital. So that's one thing.
49:00
And number two is that the market
49:02
we've had, I touched on it
49:05
earlier, that some of the things
49:07
that are going on in the markets
49:09
don't really make sense to me at
49:11
this point. And when you look
49:14
at what's going on essentially since
49:16
2009, to today versus historical,
49:18
it's odd. It doesn't look like
49:20
the past. Historically, dividends have been,
49:23
like I said, a big component,
49:25
you know, close to half of
49:27
your total return. So if you
49:29
intentionally avoid them, assuming that the
49:32
market doesn't go up the way that
49:34
it has forever, you're probably giving
49:36
up some potential return. And we
49:38
talked about it offline a little
49:40
bit, you know, you threw out
49:42
seven, nine percent, ten percent, whatever,
49:44
pick your historical market return over
49:46
the long run, we've had twenty
49:49
percent recently, you know. for quite some
49:51
time. So if you think that the
49:53
long-term return is going to be that
49:55
seven, nine, ten percent, then there's
49:57
either a lot of sideways trading.
50:00
or at some point there's a
50:02
big drawdown. And in both those instances,
50:04
dividends are a big component of your
50:06
return. So whenever the market draws down
50:09
and your stock prices are lower, your
50:11
dividend return is always positive. The total
50:13
return might not be. But if your
50:16
portfolio's got a 5% dividend yield, that's
50:18
5% that you're getting. And it comes
50:20
off to the negative yield. And if
50:23
you're reinvesting, assuming those companies come
50:25
back, you're just. buying more shares of
50:27
that company cheaper on the way down,
50:29
you know, when it recovers, that dividend
50:32
payment's going to go up and so's
50:34
the stock price. So it may not
50:36
be the most exciting way to invest,
50:39
but I think, you know, historically it's
50:41
worked. Historically, companies that have grown their
50:43
dividends have outperformed the S&P and companies
50:46
that don't pay a dividend, and especially
50:48
companies that cut the dividends, and it
50:50
adds some stability to the portfolio,
50:52
you know, it kind of takes away
50:55
some of those market effects. Yeah. Yeah,
50:57
for sure. And if you look at
50:59
the, if you look back at even
51:02
just the last 20, 30 years of
51:04
the market, you know, if you break
51:06
it into five or 10 year, you
51:09
know, components, the top five or top
51:11
10 companies from 20 years ago are
51:13
not the same that they are today.
51:16
And history tells us that. in the
51:18
next 20 years, those probably won't be
51:20
the same that we're seeing today.
51:22
There may be a few, but not
51:25
all of them. And so the markets
51:27
will change. And as those companies evolve
51:29
and grow, they have, as you said,
51:32
allocation decisions to make. And I think
51:34
our whole discussion today. to me really
51:36
indicates how important what a company does
51:39
with the money that they make and
51:41
how important those capital allocation decisions really
51:43
are and I think you know the
51:46
more the more you can figure that
51:48
out and find the best capital
51:50
allocators the better your returns are going
51:53
to be over the longer run. Yeah
51:55
absolutely I think And management is important
51:57
no matter what type of investing you're
52:00
doing. But if you're looking at dividend
52:02
paying companies, they're really important because those
52:04
are the guys that are going to
52:07
decide, workouts, that are going to decide
52:09
how much they're paying out. Are they
52:11
going to continue to pay out dividends?
52:14
Are they going to buy back shares?
52:16
Those are the people that drive
52:18
your shareholder return. And, you know, no
52:20
matter what the market does, like you
52:23
said, it's definitely uncertain. Top 10 companies
52:25
change, which country does the best changes.
52:27
You know, there's been periods. Japan outperformed
52:30
the US for a long time. International
52:32
stocks have outperformed small caps about performed.
52:34
What does the best, you know, varies
52:37
from year to year decade to decade.
52:39
But one of the things about dividend
52:41
investing for me is that I just
52:44
can't think of a reason that
52:46
it's a bad idea. to own a
52:48
company that generates a lot of cash
52:50
and shares some of it with me.
52:53
Right. Yeah, I mean, I think that's,
52:55
that last little sentence, I think you
52:57
said, is something that's really important for
53:00
people to understand. Companies that pay dividends
53:02
are generating a ton of cash. You
53:04
know, companies that don't generate a ton
53:07
of cash can't pay a dividend. And
53:09
that's, and you want companies that are
53:11
generating a lot of cash because it
53:14
gives them optionality, choices to make
53:16
of what to do with that money.
53:18
You may think of Coca-Cola as a
53:20
boring company, but the fact of the
53:23
matter is it makes a lot of
53:25
money. And it pays a nice dividend
53:27
because it makes a lot of money.
53:30
And those are the companies we all
53:32
want to find. There's cash flow in
53:34
companies. So another question I think is
53:37
kind of interesting to explore is what
53:39
are your thoughts on Buffett? So he
53:42
loves dividends, but he doesn't want
53:44
to pay one. and he hasn't paid
53:46
one and he unlikely will before he
53:48
leaves the company. So what are your
53:51
thoughts on that? Yeah, that's that's a
53:53
good question. Buffett's interesting in this in
53:55
this regard. And I just read, I
53:58
just reread the intelligent investor, you know,
54:00
it came out with a new addition,
54:02
Jason's wife. did new commentary. It's worth
54:05
it for his new commentary. It's really
54:07
interesting. But when you read Ben Graham
54:09
and you read the intelligent investor,
54:11
there's a pretty big focus on dividends
54:14
there. And you think about, you know,
54:16
the companies and the stock market in
54:18
his day, most of the companies paid
54:21
a dividend. It was expected. You were
54:23
an owner of the company and you
54:25
deserve, you know, your share. And when
54:28
you look at Buffett's top holdings, All
54:30
of them pay dividends. I mean, you
54:32
know, he's selling down Apple, but Apple
54:35
was a big holding for a long
54:37
time, a dividend payer. Bank of America
54:39
was a big hoard, a dividend
54:41
payer. He owns a lot of Chevron,
54:44
dividend payer, Coca-Cola, Coca-Cola, as you mentioned,
54:46
dividend payer, Coca-Cola, as you mentioned, dividend
54:48
payer, as you mentioned, dividend payer, as
54:51
you mentioned, that's a dividend payer, but
54:53
that's a buyback company. you know, Domino's
54:55
Pizza was a recent acquisition. That's a
54:58
buyback company and they pay a dividend.
55:00
Occidental Petroleum pays small dividend, but they
55:02
buy back a bunch of shares. So,
55:05
Buffett really seems to like this shareholder
55:07
yield model. When you look at
55:09
what he does and what he holds,
55:11
he really does seem to like it.
55:14
And, you know, we talked about capital
55:16
allocation and management. I have a hard
55:18
time arguing. that when you have the
55:21
best capital allocator in the world running
55:23
the company, that I'm going to do
55:25
a better job with the capital that
55:28
he is. Berkshire not paying a dividend
55:30
and building up the cash is is
55:33
kind of okay in my book. Just
55:35
like I said, that's that's the
55:37
best capital allocator in the world. Management
55:39
I trust, you know, like nobody else.
55:42
So to let Buffett build up a
55:44
bunch of cash and hope that, you
55:46
know, something interesting comes along before you
55:49
know, he passes away. I don't have
55:51
an issue with that. I suspect that,
55:53
you know, when Buffett's gone, that Berkshire
55:56
probably will become a dividend paying company.
55:58
But I don't think, you know, some
56:00
people look at that as a contradiction
56:03
and Buffett's written pretty extensively about it.
56:05
You know, as long as you
56:07
can generate more than a dollar for
56:09
every dollar you keep in the company, then
56:11
that's a good decision. You know, given
56:13
his track record, I think Buffett deserves
56:16
a lot of leeway. I trust them to
56:18
generate more than a dollar for everything he's
56:20
keeping. Yeah, for sure, for sure. Do
56:22
you, so I guess speaking of
56:24
that, do you own companies in
56:26
your portfolio that do not pay
56:29
a dividend? I do, Berkshire Hathaway
56:31
being obviously the prime number one.
56:33
Yeah, I do. So it's not the only
56:35
way that I invest. I do own Berkshire. And
56:37
I do own some other
56:39
non-divident paying companies. So like I
56:41
said earlier, whenever I kind of
56:43
talked about my my road to
56:45
dividends and shareholder yield, the other
56:48
piece that really makes sense to
56:50
me. you know, no brainer, like
56:52
something is going on with this
56:54
company and the market is way
56:56
mispricing it. I'll, I'm more than happy to
56:58
take advantage of those. So, so I
57:00
do own some of those types of
57:03
companies that, that I've had along the
57:05
way. Probably, most recently to
57:07
give you an example, you know, Netflix,
57:09
whenever it dropped under $200 a share
57:11
in 2022. Yep. Because they lost a
57:14
few subscribers coming off the pandemic and
57:16
the market went good, Netflix is over.
57:18
It's done. Yeah, that's he's gonna win.
57:20
Yeah, that's one of those ones I
57:22
bought and I should have bought a
57:25
lot more, but you know, still hold
57:27
Netflix and part of it even
57:29
goes back to kind of this this
57:31
shareholder deal cash flowing mentality, you know,
57:33
at that time, and still, it's only
57:35
the second. I think there's two
57:38
streamers that actually make money at
57:40
this point. Disney Plus just became
57:42
profitable. But at the time, Netflix
57:45
was the only streamer that actually
57:47
had positive cash flow. You know, they
57:49
had a pile of subscribers, the data
57:51
they have is unbelievable. They know what
57:54
you want to watch before you do,
57:56
and they use that data to make
57:58
shows that will be hits. You know,
58:00
whatever it dropped that cheap, I went,
58:02
I got to buy some of this.
58:05
So that's, you know, those kind of
58:07
things I will take advantage of. You
58:09
know, I do still like the quality
58:11
companies, like the compound and quality philosophy.
58:14
I own, I own some of the
58:16
companies that are in that portfolio. I
58:18
haven't bought every single one of them.
58:20
There's been a few that Peter will
58:23
pay a higher price than I will.
58:25
I'm still a cheap paid paid at
58:27
heart. So there's still some of those
58:29
that have been a little pricey for
58:31
a little pricey for me that I
58:34
don't. But I do have some of
58:36
those quality companies in my portfolio and
58:38
I do have some of those that
58:40
were no brainers that just got way
58:43
too cheap. Yeah, yeah, you got to
58:45
take advantage when the market, you know,
58:47
when Mr. Market offers you a deal,
58:49
sometimes you got to take advantage when
58:52
you can. Yeah, yeah, so I'm not
58:54
I'm not a dividend purist. I'm not
58:56
a you have to pay a dividend
58:58
for me to be interested But I
59:01
think especially right now. That's a that's
59:03
a very interesting way to invest I
59:05
think it's defensive I think it protects
59:07
you against whatever unknowns are coming in
59:10
the market And since you know growth
59:12
is such a focus at this point
59:14
I think a lot of these dividend
59:16
payers are are underpriced compared to the
59:18
rest of the market Yep, I totally
59:21
agree. I totally agree. Well, TJ, this
59:23
has been a lot of fun. I've
59:25
learned a lot today and made me
59:27
think about some things differently that maybe
59:30
I had kind of thought about. So
59:32
where can people find more about what
59:34
you got going on and what you're
59:36
doing with compounding dividends. Net? You can
59:39
sign up for the newsletter there. We
59:41
do have a free subscription and then
59:43
if you want to become a paid
59:45
partner and get access to the entire
59:48
portfolio and all of the all of
59:50
the companies in the watch list the
59:52
investigative universe the over 800 companies that
59:54
I mentioned earlier and you can do
59:56
that there is a compounding dividends Twitter
59:59
account that's compounding W you can find
1:00:01
me there as well it's TJ underscore
1:00:03
to Williger those are probably the best
1:00:05
places to find us and keep track
1:00:08
of what's going on and he's very
1:00:10
active on Twitter as someone who follows
1:00:12
and interacts with T.J. tries to keep
1:00:14
up with him on a daily basis.
1:00:17
He's very active on Twitter and he
1:00:19
posts a lot of great stuff so
1:00:21
it's definitely worth your mentioning your following.
1:00:23
The blog posts are great as well,
1:00:26
the subscription, the subscription, the subscription, I
1:00:28
was actually just reading when he wrote
1:00:30
about a breakdown of reets earlier today
1:00:32
and fascinating lots of great info in
1:00:35
there so it's well well worth your
1:00:37
time for sure. And thanks for joining.
1:00:39
Yeah. Thanks for having me, Dave. Really
1:00:41
enjoyed it. You're welcome. All right. All
1:00:43
right. Well, that folks, we'll go ahead
1:00:46
and sign us off. You guys go
1:00:48
out there and invest with the margin
1:00:50
of safety. Have a great week. And
1:00:52
we'll talk to you all next week.
1:00:55
We hope you enjoyed this content. Seven
1:00:57
steps to understanding the stock market shows
1:00:59
you precisely how to break down the
1:01:01
numbers in an engaging and readable way
1:01:04
with real life examples. Get access today
1:01:06
at stockmarket pdf.com Until next time have
1:01:08
a prosperous day The information contained is
1:01:10
for general information and educational purposes only
1:01:13
it is not intended for a substitute
1:01:15
for legal commercial and or financial advice
1:01:17
from a licensed professional Review our full
1:01:19
disclaimer at e investing for beginners. One
1:01:22
of my favorite podcasts, and has been
1:01:24
for a while, is the Personal Finance
1:01:26
Podcast. If you want to show as
1:01:28
bingeable as the Sweet Games and pack
1:01:30
with insightful tips, you need to check
1:01:33
it out. Andrew G. Nkola, the show's
1:01:35
host, shares insights helping you build generational
1:01:37
wealth and using your money as a
1:01:39
tool to get the most out of
1:01:42
what you want for your life. It's
1:01:44
not about pinching pennies and saving every
1:01:46
last time. Instead, he shares ideas around
1:01:48
making money from your job to creating
1:01:51
different passive income streams income streams income
1:01:53
streams. For example, one of his latest
1:01:55
episodes, How to Break the Paycheck to
1:01:57
Paycheck Cycle, who doesn't want that? He
1:02:00
discusses some of the tools and the
1:02:02
ways that you can find other sources
1:02:04
of income while also setting aside more
1:02:06
money. That's just a drop in
1:02:08
the bucket of the information Andrew weighs
1:02:11
down in his shows. He exudes enthusiasm
1:02:13
and expertise, a rare combo. It's one
1:02:15
of my favorite shows every single week.
1:02:17
The Personal Finance Podcast has something for
1:02:19
everyone. It is filled with so many ideas
1:02:22
to help you get better with your money
1:02:24
and grow your wealth. So I highly recommend
1:02:26
you check it out. Just search for the
1:02:28
Personal Finance Podcast on Apple Podcast, Spotify, or
1:02:31
wherever you listen to your podcast and enjoy.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More