Finding Safe Compounding Dividends with TJ Terwilliger

Finding Safe Compounding Dividends with TJ Terwilliger

Released Monday, 3rd February 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Finding Safe Compounding Dividends with TJ Terwilliger

Finding Safe Compounding Dividends with TJ Terwilliger

Finding Safe Compounding Dividends with TJ Terwilliger

Finding Safe Compounding Dividends with TJ Terwilliger

Monday, 3rd February 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Think about your favorite entrepreneur. People

0:02

such as Alex Hermose, Justin Welsh,

0:04

or Matt Gray would be nowhere

0:06

without trusted partners. If your commerce

0:09

platform is pushing away potential customers

0:11

instead of winning them over as

0:13

loyal fans, consider using Shopify. Shopify

0:15

is the commerce platform revolutionizing millions

0:18

of businesses worldwide. Whether you're a

0:20

garage entrepreneur or IPO ready, Shopify

0:22

is the only tool you need

0:25

to start run and grow your

0:27

business without the struggle. Shopify puts

0:29

you in control of every sales

0:31

channel. So whether you're selling satin

0:34

sheets from Shopify's in-person POS system

0:36

or offering organic olive oil on

0:38

Shopify's all-in-one e-commerce platform, you're covered.

0:40

And once you've reached your audience,

0:43

Shopify has the internet's best converting

0:45

checkout to help you turn them

0:47

from browsers to buyers. Shopify's easy-to-use

0:50

system helps you start right away.

0:52

No more procrastination, no more excuses.

0:54

Shopify powers 10% of all e-commerce

0:56

in the U.S. and Shopify is

0:59

truly a Google force, powering all

1:01

birds, Rothies, and Brooklyn, and millions

1:03

of other entrepreneurs of every size

1:06

across over 170 companies. Plus, Shopify's

1:08

award-winning help is there to support

1:10

your success every step of the

1:12

way. This is possibility powered by

1:15

Shopify. Sign up for a $1

1:17

per month trial period at shopify.com/beginners

1:19

all lower case. Go to shopify.com/beginners

1:21

to take your business to the

1:24

next level today. shopify.com/beginners. This episode

1:27

This episode is brought to you by

1:29

Amazon Business. We could all use more

1:32

time. Amazon business offers smart business buying

1:34

solutions so you can spend more time

1:36

growing your business and less time doing

1:38

the admin. I can see why they

1:41

call it smart. Learn more at Amazon

1:43

business.com. I

1:48

love this podcast because

1:50

it crushes your dreams

1:52

and getting rich quick.

1:54

They actually got me

1:56

into reading stats for

1:58

anything. You're tuned in

2:00

to the Investing for

2:02

Beginners podcast. Led by

2:04

Andrew Sather and Dave

2:06

Ahern. Step-by-step premium investing

2:09

guidance for beginners.

2:11

Your path to

2:13

financial freedom starts

2:15

now. Start now. Welcome

2:17

to Investing for Beginners podcast. Today

2:20

we got a fun show. I

2:22

have a new friend joining us

2:24

today. We have T.J. Terwilliger. to

2:42

our chat today. Dave, thanks for having

2:45

me. I'm excited to be here.

2:47

I'm excited to talk about dividends,

2:49

and I'm looking forward to it. I

2:51

think it's going to be fun. Awesome.

2:53

Why stocks? Why do you

2:56

choose to invest in stocks

2:58

when you could pick real

3:01

estate, crypto, any other asset

3:03

class? Why stocks for

3:05

you? Yeah, that is an

3:08

easy one. Thanks for starting

3:10

it off with a softball.

3:13

Answer one, I'm lazy. So

3:15

I don't want to... run real

3:17

estate. I don't want tenants. I don't

3:19

want to manage the property management company.

3:21

You know, it's popular right now to

3:23

kind of invest in the boring businesses.

3:25

Cody Sanchez talks a lot about that.

3:27

I don't want to stock vending machines.

3:29

I don't want to manage people. I

3:32

kind of want to invest and be

3:34

hands off. And I think stocks are

3:36

the best place to do that. Bonds are

3:38

an option, but you know, historically

3:40

the returns haven't been great. Recently

3:42

with the Fed raising interest rates,

3:45

they're getting a little bit more

3:47

interesting. Some of the high-yield

3:49

bonds are interesting. They're

3:51

getting close to stock-like

3:53

returns historically, but in

3:56

the long run, stocks have been the

3:58

place to be crypto. I don't... understand.

4:00

I don't know how to value Bitcoin.

4:03

I don't know what it's worth. It

4:05

could be worth a dollar coin. It

4:07

could be worth a million dollars of

4:10

coin. But if I don't understand it,

4:12

I can't invest in it. I'm not

4:14

a person that can say, you know,

4:16

things are going up. This is the

4:19

place to be. So stocks are something

4:21

that I can understand. There's something I

4:23

can be pretty passive in. Once you

4:26

find the right company and buy it,

4:28

hopefully you can just leave it in

4:30

your portfolio. All right, that makes a

4:33

lot of sense. I kind of feel

4:35

the same way. I don't know if

4:37

I would have described it as lazy,

4:39

but that's probably a good way of

4:42

putting it. I'm letting the companies do

4:44

all the heavy lifting. I just have

4:46

to choose which ones to do the

4:49

heavy lifting. I just have to choose

4:51

which ones to do the heavy lifting.

4:53

Yeah, I'm more than willing to do

4:56

the work up front to find the

4:58

right company, but once I find it,

5:00

I don't want to manage it. All

5:02

right, so do you remember your first

5:05

investment? Yes, my first investment, I started

5:07

the way that most people do and

5:09

probably should. My first investment was an

5:12

index fund in a 401k, you know,

5:14

for the employer match. That was that

5:16

was the first one to tell you

5:19

my first individual stock that I bought.

5:21

Honestly, I don't remember it. Okay. Mine,

5:23

mine, ironically, Andrew and I both bought

5:25

Microsoft in 2014. Okay. Yeah, well, kind

5:28

of funny. I mean, you know, I

5:30

backed up the truck. I bought one

5:32

whole, one whole share of 34 bucks

5:35

a share. So I still own it.

5:37

So that's, I mean, that's awesome. But,

5:39

you know, hindsight is 2020. I should

5:42

have dropped a cool 10,000 into it.

5:44

But, you know, hey. Yes. Yeah. One

5:46

of Google was one of my early

5:48

ones. I don't. I don't think it

5:51

was number one, but it was early

5:53

and it was on one of the

5:55

regulatory scares, you know, Google's going to

5:58

get broken up as a monopoly. Free

6:00

split, I do still hold it, same

6:02

mistake, I should have. I should have

6:05

bought a lot more, but there's definitely

6:07

some early ones that I remember that

6:09

weren't winners. Yeah, I had a few

6:11

of those too. For sure. So I

6:14

guess what, why dividends? Like we have

6:16

this wide universe of things that we

6:18

can invest in. What about dividends as

6:21

attractive to you? Yeah. So I didn't

6:23

start that way. I didn't start as

6:25

a dividend investor. my beginnings were kind

6:28

of in the classic Ben Graham Warren

6:30

Buffett value style. So I remember reading

6:32

the red 2006 version of the intelligent

6:34

investors sitting on the bed in a

6:37

hospital room after my son was born.

6:39

So, you know, holding the newborn baby

6:41

in one hand and Ben Graham and

6:44

the other. And went through that whole

6:46

kind of classical canon, you know, the

6:48

most important thing and the PDF of

6:51

margin of safety. you know, the dondo

6:53

investor by Manich Graberai and Joel Greenblatt's

6:55

books. So that's, that's where I started.

6:57

And the cape ratio at the time

7:00

was, you know, probably 20. We were

7:02

coming out of the great financial crisis.

7:04

It was, you know, 2010, 11, somewhere

7:07

in there. And so that style made

7:09

total sense to me that you find

7:11

something that's priced for less than it's

7:14

worse than you buy it on sale.

7:16

I grew up. both a mother that

7:18

loved a good sale, you know, she

7:20

was one of those people that she

7:23

would take the receipt back in and

7:25

say, hey, you would overcharge me by

7:27

a dollar and she'd get her dollar

7:30

back. So that was instilled in me

7:32

from childhood. So it made total sense.

7:34

And when I went off to look

7:37

for bargains, the market pretty much has

7:39

gone up since to where we are

7:41

today. And as that happened, it started

7:43

to make not Not value investing, but

7:46

the market itself started to make less

7:48

and less sense to me. So one

7:50

of the other ideas that came from

7:53

Carly Munger is the idea of finding

7:55

the one-foot bar. to step over and

7:57

not the six-foot hurdle. And as values

8:00

kept climbing, the one-foot bars became harder

8:02

and harder to find. And each comprise

8:04

talked about no-brainer investments, the ones that

8:06

don't have a lot of downside. You

8:09

look at it and you go, yeah,

8:11

that's obviously cheap. And there's been a

8:13

few of those along the way, but

8:16

you're not going to get that many

8:18

of those in a year. So if

8:20

you get one or two a year,

8:23

And you want a really concentrated portfolio

8:25

of, say, 10 stocks, that's five to

8:27

10 years to get fully invested. That's

8:29

a lot of time to not be

8:32

compounding. We know, you know, time is

8:34

the most powerful component in that compounding

8:36

formula. That's the exponent, right? That's what

8:39

does most of the work. So not

8:41

being invested wasn't really a great choice,

8:43

but I was having trouble finding things

8:46

that were interesting. What really led me

8:48

towards the dividend path I was I

8:50

was looking this direction to start with

8:52

you know I'd started looking at some

8:55

some cannibal companies at buybacks that sort

8:57

of thing But what really got me

8:59

on that path was David Einhorn wrote

9:02

some letters He came out with his

9:04

theory that the passive investments broke in

9:06

the markets. I don't know that that's

9:09

necessarily the case. We can talk about

9:11

that if you want to but his

9:13

answer made sense to me and his

9:15

answer was to buy companies that directly

9:18

gave you your return. So shareholder yield,

9:20

you know, either buybacks, paying down debt,

9:22

or dividends. And that that really also

9:25

kind of clicked with me, just like

9:27

the the finding, the no brainers, the

9:29

value investing, that idea made total sense

9:32

that the market doesn't make sense to

9:34

me. Why not try and cut it

9:36

out and get the return directly from

9:38

the company? And the more I thought

9:41

about it, the more I thought this

9:43

is the most fundamental. implementation of the

9:45

idea that stocks or shares of the

9:48

company that there is. Right? If I

9:50

buy a stock and I become a

9:52

part owner, why would I not want

9:55

that company to share? share some of

9:57

the profits. Why would I not want

9:59

to benefit from the growth than the

10:01

profit? So that's that's kind of the

10:04

journey of how I got there. I

10:06

mean, I totally agree. The company is,

10:08

you know, creating cash from its profits

10:11

and it has choices to what it

10:13

wants to do with those with that

10:15

cash and part of the choice is

10:18

paying a dividend. And I think a

10:20

lot of people, especially. with the markets

10:22

being the way they have been the

10:24

last few years, is that everybody's focused

10:27

on growth, but they don't realize that

10:29

that 8 to 10, 7 to 9,

10:31

whatever number you want to put on

10:34

the market returns over the last 100

10:36

years, you know, 2 to 3% of

10:38

that is dividends. You know, you take

10:41

those away and that's the market hasn't

10:43

returned that great. I think dividends should

10:45

be a definite part of somebody's portfolio,

10:47

absolutely. Yeah, I mean the other the

10:50

other interesting point there is that if

10:52

you look at total return and You

10:54

look at reinvesting your dividends and you

10:57

take a good period, you know, like

10:59

20 years You'll find that around half

11:01

of the total return comes from the

11:04

dividends in the reinvestment. So if you

11:06

ignore that component You potentially leave, you

11:08

know, a lot of a lot of

11:10

return on the table, especially when you're

11:13

looking at it from a market perspective

11:15

Right, exactly. So can you explain that

11:17

concept of a drip of reinvesting the

11:20

dividends and how that works? Yeah, absolutely.

11:22

So when you get paid a dividend,

11:24

it's just a cash payment typically, right

11:27

from the company. So they take part

11:29

of the profits and they share it

11:31

with you as a shareholder. And then

11:33

you have choices on what you want

11:36

to do with your cash. So one,

11:38

you can just take it and spend

11:40

it on whatever you want. you can

11:43

let it accumulate in whatever your sweep

11:45

account is in your brokerage account or

11:47

you can reinvest it and some companies

11:50

do have a direct reinvestment plan that

11:52

you can enroll in. The advantage to

11:54

those is that you don't actually get

11:56

the cash. They reinvest it for you

11:59

and that depending on the drip plan,

12:01

depending on where you live, can save

12:03

you on taxes. If the company won't

12:06

do it directly, most brokers will give

12:08

you the option that once that cash

12:10

rolls in, they'll go ahead and reinvest

12:13

it for you and buy whatever, you

12:15

know, it's usually a partial share unless

12:17

you own a lot. Over time, you

12:19

basically reinvest those dividends into the company

12:22

and you own more and more. And

12:24

you can think of that compounding the

12:26

same way that a company reinvesting in

12:29

itself does. You own more of the

12:31

company, the next dividend, you get a

12:33

little bit more because you own more

12:36

of the company and you reinvest that

12:38

back in. And over a good period,

12:40

like you said, 10, 20 years, you

12:42

can end up owning significantly more of

12:45

the company and having a pretty nice

12:47

dividend payment. Yeah, yeah, for sure. I

12:49

use Fidelity and I know that they

12:52

allow to automatically reinvest the money. I've

12:54

had a few times where I bought

12:56

a new company, the paid a dividend,

12:59

and I missed that little trick. And

13:01

then I started noticing like these little

13:03

incremental amounts of cash building up in

13:05

my account. What's this company? And I

13:08

missed the automatic drip, which is, you

13:10

know, yeah. It's a modern marvel that

13:12

I don't think it's talked about enough.

13:15

Yeah, it's really nice. It's a really

13:17

nice speech. You have to think about

13:19

it. Now some some investors do turn

13:22

that off and you know, if you're

13:24

really tracking your dividends and paying attention

13:26

to when they come in, what some

13:28

people like to do is to let

13:31

the payments build up for the quarter

13:33

or the year or whatever. And then,

13:35

you know, they want to pick the

13:38

company that they think is the most

13:40

of your value to invest there. If

13:42

you're really on top of things and

13:45

you're really paying those dividends, that can

13:47

work. but I think for most investors

13:49

honestly just letting your brokerage or letting

13:51

the company do it for you. is

13:54

probably the way to go. You know,

13:56

whatever, whatever you sacrifice in return, because

13:58

you bought a little more expensive share,

14:01

probably comes out in the wash, you

14:03

know, whenever you look at the compounding

14:05

over decades. Right, yeah, totally agree. So

14:08

if you are a newer investor and

14:10

somebody, you know, if a newer investor

14:12

came to you and said, I would

14:14

like to start investing in dividends, where

14:17

would they start? So the easiest place

14:19

to be, especially if you're a U.

14:21

is there are ETFs that are focused

14:24

on dividends. So you can look, you

14:26

know, if you don't want to do

14:28

the work of figuring out individual companies,

14:31

you can look right at an ETF.

14:33

So Vanguard has a high yield ETF.

14:35

They've got one that focuses on dividend

14:37

yield plus stability. You can buy ETS

14:40

that track some of the dividend indexes.

14:42

So there's dividend aristocrats that have paid

14:44

25 years of dividends, or it's 25

14:47

years of dividend raises in a row.

14:49

There's ETS that track that. One of

14:51

the more popular ones is the Schwab

14:54

dividend fund. It's a CED, is the

14:56

ticker. That one runs on an algorithm.

14:58

It rebalaces every, I don't know. Honestly,

15:00

the schedule is quarterly or yearly. but

15:03

it's got a pretty good track record.

15:05

I mean, it's over a 3% yield

15:07

and I think it's grown the dividend

15:10

about 10% a year. So looking into

15:12

ETS is the easiest place to start

15:14

if you want to add some dividends

15:17

to your portfolio. Yeah, that's great advice.

15:19

Now, let's say I want to be

15:21

I want to be different. I want

15:23

to pick my own companies. I don't

15:26

want some algorithm picking them for me.

15:28

Then where do you go? Yeah. So

15:30

I think you need. Picking a dividend

15:33

paying company is no different than picking

15:35

any other company assuming you're a fundamental

15:37

investor. So what I mean by that

15:40

is you're going to look at the

15:42

financials, you're going to look at the

15:44

profits, and you're going to say what's

15:46

this company worth? You know, if you're

15:49

going to if you're going to do

15:51

it based on technicals and look at

15:53

charts. I'm not your guy to answer

15:56

that. But like I said, not my

15:58

expertise. I know some of it, but

16:00

I don't invest that way. So I

16:03

can't help you. But I think, honestly,

16:05

because when you buy a dividend paying

16:07

company, I think it's the most fundamental

16:09

application of you're an owner, right? Buffett

16:12

and Ben Graham have told us for

16:14

years that shares aren't. ticker symbols, they're

16:16

not lines that go up and down,

16:19

they're not there to be traded, their

16:21

ownership shares the company. And when you

16:23

buy a company that pays your dividend,

16:26

that really does make you an owner,

16:28

you're going to get a payment out

16:30

of the profits. So that's number one,

16:32

you want to make sure it's profitable.

16:35

So I think about honestly buying a

16:37

dividend paying company the same way I'd

16:39

buy about, thinking about buying a company

16:42

down the street, you know, the local

16:44

coffee shop or or whatever, pick your

16:46

business that has the line out the

16:49

door that you know does a bunch

16:51

of cash and you'd love to own

16:53

a piece of, you know, your dentist's

16:55

office. I think about buying a dividend

16:58

company in the same way. So it's

17:00

something that's been profitable in the past.

17:02

We want to own it for a

17:05

long time. So it's something that's going

17:07

to be profitable in the future. We

17:09

want some kind of, some kind of

17:12

advantage that they have. I don't want

17:14

to go in there and make decisions.

17:16

And we want that management to be

17:18

shareholder friendly. So we want to look

17:21

at the dividend history. So basically, you

17:23

know, kind of what that means is

17:25

I'm going to go in, I'm going

17:28

to look at the financial statements, I

17:30

want to see some growth in revenue,

17:32

I want to see some growth in

17:35

profits, I want to see good decisions

17:37

by management, I don't want to see

17:39

terrible acquisitions or, you know, attempts to

17:41

grow into areas that they have no

17:44

business being in, and I want to

17:46

see a consistent dividend history. I want

17:48

to see that they paid one for

17:51

a while. Preferably it goes up on

17:53

a reasonable basis. I don't necessarily need

17:55

an increase every single year, but I

17:58

want that line to generally be trimming

18:00

up. a balance sheet that's going to

18:02

let them continue to pay out a

18:04

dividend. I don't want so much debt

18:07

that that's going to squeeze the extra

18:09

profits. And I want to see that

18:11

the dividend payout ratio is sustainable. So

18:14

that's a metric that is pretty easy

18:16

to calculate. Generally, it's just your dividend

18:18

per share divided by your earnings per

18:21

share. And what that's going to tell

18:23

you is how much of their profits

18:25

are they paying you as a dividend?

18:27

as a company that's paying you 30

18:30

or 40% so that's that's kind of

18:32

the basics of how I would look

18:34

at it. Yeah and those are those

18:37

are all great frameworks to buy any

18:39

company but you know also dividend paying

18:41

companies. You mentioned payout ratio let's let's

18:44

maybe talk about a few ratios or

18:46

metrics that people could use to kind

18:48

of measure dividends and I guess what

18:50

would be the first couple that you

18:53

would look at? So payout ratio is

18:55

definitely going to be one of them.

18:57

I'm going to look and see how

19:00

much are they paying out in profits.

19:02

Now depending on the company, the way

19:04

you want to calculate that can vary,

19:07

so you can look at earnings for

19:09

share. That's the metric that's going to

19:11

come up on most of your brokerage

19:13

accounts, most of your financial sites. But

19:16

alternative ways to calculate that, you can

19:18

use free cash flow. So you can

19:20

use the dividend payment as a percentage

19:23

of free cash flow. Sometimes if you

19:25

have earnings that look a little funny

19:27

because of maybe, you know, one-time charges

19:30

or non-cash charges, that can be an

19:32

interesting way. You know, earnings can be

19:34

kind of manipulated by the accountants. Free

19:36

cash flows harder too. And then depending

19:39

on the company, you may want to

19:41

look at some different ratios. So like

19:43

in a reach, you're not going to

19:46

look at earnings per share. versus dividend

19:48

payments because of the structure there. They

19:50

use a different metric called FFO funds

19:53

from operations. Essentially, it's the free cash

19:55

full of a reach and that's the

19:57

payment ratio you want to look. at

19:59

for them. You want to look at

20:02

the dividend yield, so that's your dividend

20:04

per share divided by your stock price,

20:06

and that's going to tell you essentially

20:08

just like a bond field would. You

20:10

know, if you pay X dollars for

20:12

this stock, you're going to get

20:15

such and such a percentage back

20:17

of the dividend. That's your starting

20:19

dividend yield. So that's definitely an

20:21

important metric for a dividend investor.

20:24

Those are your two biggest to

20:26

start with. And then beyond that, it's

20:28

most of the financial ratios that you're

20:30

going to look at as a fundamental

20:32

investor. So you're going to look at

20:35

growth rates and, like I said, earnings.

20:37

You're going to look at the growth

20:39

rates and revenue. You probably want to

20:41

look at some of the balance sheet

20:43

ratios to make sure that, like I

20:45

said, there's enough cash flow there. So

20:47

the quick one that most of the credit

20:50

agency use is debt to equity. I

20:52

tend to some companies especially your

20:54

older dividend paying companies if they pay

20:56

out a lot to shareholders and if they

20:58

buy back a lot of shares sometimes you

21:00

get negative equity so that's not always the

21:03

best balance sheet metric I tend to look

21:05

at things like you know interest coverage ratios

21:07

how much cash flow do they have versus

21:09

their interest payments I like to look at

21:11

a free cash flow to net debt so

21:13

that tells me how long it would take

21:15

them to pay the debt off you know if they

21:17

decided to run the cash flow in those

21:19

kind of metrics can be useful. in figuring out

21:22

it, does this company have the cash flow

21:24

to keep paying the dividend or are they

21:26

going to cut it? Yeah, that's kind of

21:28

important, huh? Yeah. This podcast is brought to

21:31

you in part by Stash. Saving and

21:33

investing can feel impossible, but with

21:35

Stash, it's not just a reality, it's

21:37

easy. Stash isn't just an investing

21:39

app, it's a registered investment advisor

21:41

that combines automated investing with dependable

21:43

financial strategies to help you reach

21:45

your goals faster. They'll provide you

21:47

with personalized advice on what to

21:49

invest in based on your goals.

21:51

Or if you want to just

21:53

sit back and watch your money

21:55

go to work, you can opt

21:57

into their award-winning expert managed portfolio.

21:59

that picks stocks for you. Stash

22:01

has helped millions of Americans reach

22:03

their financial goals and starts at

22:06

just $3 per month. Don't let

22:08

your savings sit around. Make it

22:10

work harder for you. Go to

22:12

get.stash.com/investing to see how you can

22:14

receive $25 towards your first stock

22:16

purchase and to view important disclosures.

22:18

That's get.stash.com/investing. Paid non-client endorsement, not

22:20

representative of all clients and not

22:22

a guarantee. Investment advisory services offered

22:24

by Stash Investments, LLC, and SEC

22:26

Registered Investment Advisor. Investing involves risk.

22:28

Offer is subject to T&Cs. If

22:30

you're a golfer like me, you

22:32

know that it's just not the

22:34

same playing with someone else's clubs.

22:36

But the problem is, traveling with

22:38

your own clubs can be such

22:40

a headache. It can just be

22:42

so stressful. I mean, even last

22:44

October, I was on my trip

22:46

to California. I remember weaving in

22:48

other people with my luggage in

22:50

one hand, my golf clubs and

22:52

the other, hoping I'm not going

22:54

to bump into something. While I'm

22:56

at bag claim, watching the bags

22:58

bounce violently and hoping I'm not

23:00

going to have to go pick

23:02

up a new set right before

23:04

my round of golf of my

23:06

buddies. That's where ship sticks would

23:08

have helped with their hassle-free delivery

23:10

for your golf clubs and luggage.

23:12

They make it so easy. You

23:14

just schedule a shipment, attach a

23:16

shipment, attach your label, attach, attach,

23:18

or label. They do the rest,

23:20

and you know your gear, and

23:22

you know your gear is getting

23:24

there safely. Right now, Shipsticks is

23:26

offering our listeners 20% off your

23:28

first shipment when you go to

23:30

shipsticks.com and use the code investing.

23:32

Go to shipsticks.com and use the

23:34

code investing to get 20% off

23:36

your first shipment and save yourself

23:38

the hassle this golf season. That's

23:40

s-h-i-p-s-t-i-c-k-s.com. Make sure you use the

23:42

code investing so they know we

23:44

sent you. Yeah, so... Let's maybe

23:46

talk about a couple red flags.

23:48

If you are looking at the

23:50

payout ratio and a dividend yield,

23:52

for example, are there any numbers

23:54

that you come across that would

23:57

be like, okay, this is a

23:59

red flag? Yeah. So very, very

24:01

high yields can be a red

24:03

flag. They can also be an

24:05

indication. either just that the company's

24:07

very mature and pays out a

24:09

lot of dividends or occasionally that

24:11

it's a good bargain that the

24:13

company's really cheap because that's the

24:15

way to get that's one way

24:17

to get the dividend yield up

24:19

is for the price to get

24:21

down right so you know rule

24:23

of thumb anything over 8% a

24:25

lot of the time kind of

24:27

raises a red flag to me

24:29

to just look a little closer

24:31

on the payout ratio it really

24:33

depends on the yield So a

24:35

high yielding company, something like, you

24:37

know, Altria, is a good example

24:39

of a high yielding company that's

24:41

previously Philip Morris, that makes cigarettes,

24:43

that's Marlboro, Scholl, they tend to

24:45

pay about an 8% dividend, and

24:47

their dividend payout ratio is about

24:49

70%. In that case, that's barely

24:51

normal, right? That's a pretty mature

24:53

company. They don't have to reinvest

24:55

a lot into growth. They're not

24:57

building new plants. they're just going

24:59

to keep selling cigarettes and chewing

25:01

tobacco. So in that case, that's

25:03

fine. A younger company, one that's

25:05

growing faster, I like to see

25:07

a payout ratio somewhere around 50,

25:09

60% or less. And again, that

25:11

depends on the initial yield that

25:13

depends on the growth of the

25:15

company. That depends on how much

25:17

do they have, you know, how

25:19

much room do they have to

25:21

reinvest and grow, kind of where

25:23

are they in the company life

25:25

cycle. But for a high yield

25:27

company, under 70% for a payout

25:29

ratio, for a dividend growth company,

25:31

you know, anything 50, 60% or

25:33

lower is okay with me. Above

25:35

that, I'm a look closer. Yeah,

25:37

yeah. I, during, well, prior to

25:39

the Game Stop meme thing, I

25:41

actually, that was one of the

25:43

companies I made a mistake and

25:45

invested in and part of. part

25:48

of the attraction especially for value

25:50

investors back then was you know

25:52

it was an eight to ten

25:54

twelve percent yield mostly because the

25:56

stock price was dropping so much

25:58

and you know i remember people

26:00

like oh game stop is great

26:02

you know a great play and

26:04

yeah it wasn't so it's it's

26:06

always good to understand the pros

26:08

and the cons when you're when

26:10

you're looking at at different metrics

26:12

so you don't get you know

26:14

you don't drink the cool a

26:16

too much and get too excited

26:18

yeah sometimes chasing high yields is

26:20

a mistake but sometimes like sometimes

26:22

it can be a bargain and

26:24

sometimes it's just something that the

26:26

market is ignoring right now you

26:28

know European companies are really ignored

26:30

some of them are yielding fairly

26:32

high yield. There's some good companies

26:34

there that just aren't getting a

26:36

lot of investment. So it can

26:38

be okay. Did you get pulled

26:40

into Game Stop with Michael Barry?

26:42

No, actually, I know, it was

26:44

just me, and I, using screeners,

26:46

using thin-vis screeners, and it kept

26:48

coming up, it kept coming up,

26:50

and then I started doing some

26:52

research, and I just, you know,

26:54

I thought that maybe what they

26:56

were going to try to do

26:58

with collectibles and things like that

27:00

would be an opportunity for them.

27:02

So, and the, you know, the

27:04

high dividend yield was part of

27:06

the attraction. Yeah, that was, honestly,

27:08

that was one that came up

27:10

on some of my screeners and

27:12

when Murray bought it, it was,

27:14

it was on my list to

27:16

research and I never, I started

27:18

it, I looked at it and

27:20

I never really got deep enough

27:22

into it to convince myself to

27:24

do it. So, so I missed

27:26

it, but I could have been

27:28

right there with you and it

27:30

as a year. Yeah, it's it's

27:32

it's it's always interesting to look

27:34

back on some of your previous

27:36

mistakes and okay, what did I

27:38

learn from this? So we talked

27:41

about you kind of mentioned dividend

27:43

aristocrats and so that's something that

27:45

I think we could probably maybe

27:47

chat a little bit about. So

27:49

I guess first of all, maybe

27:51

can you help define what they

27:53

are? Yeah, so the dividend aristocrats,

27:55

it's a list of stocks. There's

27:57

a few requirements for them. They

27:59

have to be included in the

28:01

S&P 500 to be interested at.

28:03

Depending on who makes the list,

28:05

there's usually some kind of liquidity

28:07

requirement, but typically, you know, when

28:09

you're included. in the S&P 500,

28:11

they clear that one. The other

28:13

requirement is that they've paid an

28:15

increasing dividend for at least 25

28:17

years in a row. I think,

28:19

I shouldn't guess, but I think

28:21

there's around 66 companies on that

28:23

list right now, but there's a

28:25

few others that you can look

28:27

at if you're looking at lists

28:29

of, you know, good dividend payers,

28:31

dividend kings have paid dividends for

28:33

50 years or more. So that's

28:35

an interesting list. are lists of

28:37

companies that have paid dividends but

28:39

are not included in the S&P

28:41

500. So you've got dividend champions.

28:43

Those don't have the S&P 500

28:45

requirements. Those don't have liquidity requirements.

28:47

So that can be an interesting

28:49

list as well because you can

28:51

find some small cap companies. You

28:53

can find some companies that aren't

28:55

in the index that have a

28:57

good dividend history in some of

28:59

those lists as well. So those

29:01

are good places to start. especially

29:03

like you asked if you're a

29:05

starting investor and want to pick

29:07

your own companies, you're getting a

29:09

good dividend history there at least.

29:11

Yeah, yeah, for sure. You know,

29:13

and the thing that a lot

29:15

of newer investors maybe don't realize

29:17

is when a company makes a

29:19

decision to start paying a dividend,

29:21

they don't do it lightly because

29:23

when the market sees a company

29:25

stop paying a dividend or cut

29:27

a dividend, the market does not

29:29

like that. And the companies take

29:32

a big, big hit. I remember

29:34

when Disney, you know, stopped paying

29:36

a dividend obviously was because you

29:38

know they had no revenue from

29:40

the pandemic but still the market

29:42

you know kind of spanked it

29:44

pretty hard because of that. Yeah

29:46

that's that's one thing that you

29:48

know there's a theory that dividends

29:50

are a signal to the market

29:52

from management and you're exactly for

29:54

the reason you mentioned when management

29:56

pays a dividend when they start

29:58

a dividend. That's usually a long-term

30:00

commitment once you start paying a

30:02

dividend shareholders expected to keep coming

30:04

unless you say this is a

30:06

special one-time dividend. We sold this

30:08

division of company and we've got

30:10

this giant cash ball and we're

30:12

going to pay out, you know,

30:14

some percentage of it is especially

30:16

different. But once you start paying

30:18

that quarterly dividend, that's a long-term

30:20

commitment to shareholders. And like you

30:22

said, one of the last things

30:24

management wants to do is cut

30:26

that dividend. That's a long-term commitment

30:28

to shareholders. And like you said,

30:30

one of the last things management

30:32

wants to do is cut that

30:34

dividend. That's a big signal to

30:36

the market. I guess I'm curious.

30:38

When you're searching for. potential investments

30:40

is an area like the dividend

30:42

aristocrats or the kings is that

30:44

something a place that you go

30:46

to mine first or like where

30:48

do you kind of look when

30:50

you're looking around trying to find

30:52

companies compounding dividends we have an

30:54

investable universe it's over 800 companies

30:56

only 800 yeah well you know

30:58

there's 30,000 stocks in the world

31:00

we're global we don't just look

31:02

But we split it into three

31:04

buckets to make it a little

31:06

bit more manageable. So one is

31:08

our dividend growth bucket. And essentially

31:10

those are companies that have grown

31:12

the dividend 10 years or more.

31:14

And so that's that includes your

31:16

risk crafts, that includes your kings,

31:18

the dividend champions that I mentioned

31:20

earlier, those are your 25 years

31:23

or more, no. index requirement, no

31:25

liquidity, and then the contenders are

31:27

the list that is 10 to

31:29

24 years of dividend growth. So

31:31

that's pretty much what makes up

31:33

that list. There is our high-yield

31:35

universe that's anything over a 4%

31:37

yield, and then we also look

31:39

at our cannibal bucket. So those

31:41

companies do not actually have to

31:43

pay a dividend, oh, some of

31:45

them do. But those are companies

31:47

that have a nice history of

31:49

buying back shares. So you can

31:51

think of, you know, your auto

31:53

zones, you know, Domino's Pizza has

31:55

bought back a lot of shares

31:57

over the years. Those type of

31:59

companies are in that bucket. So

32:01

those have all been screened and

32:03

and developed. So that's that's where

32:05

I tend to hunt. But for

32:07

someone that does not have access

32:09

to that, yeah, the aristocrats, the

32:11

contenders, the champions, pick your list,

32:13

that's a great place to start.

32:15

Yeah, yeah, I agree. Let's talk,

32:17

if we could, let's talk a

32:19

little bit about, you kind of

32:21

mentioned cannibals, and you and I

32:23

were talking off air about, you

32:25

know, Med Faber and Jim O'Shaugher,

32:27

Maybe you could explain a little

32:29

bit about what that really is

32:31

and how you use that for

32:33

your investments. Yes, this is this

32:35

is one of my favorites. Shareholder

32:37

yield is a combination typically as

32:39

your dividend yield, plus your buyback

32:41

yield, plus the yield from debt

32:43

pay down. And those three components

32:45

added together make up what's called

32:47

shareholder yield. And the reason for

32:49

that is if you think about

32:51

management, when they make a profit,

32:53

they have some options. You know,

32:55

basically you can reinvest in the

32:57

company, right? You can grow it,

32:59

you can maybe acquire another company,

33:01

you can pay down debt, or

33:03

you can keep it on the

33:05

balance sheet, just let the cash

33:07

sit there and build up, or

33:09

you can share it with the

33:11

shareholders. And those three ways really

33:13

are the ways the cash either

33:16

directly or indirectly gets back to

33:18

share. So the dividend payment. is

33:20

easy. That's a direct payment rate

33:22

to you. Share buybacks are a

33:24

way to give you more ownership

33:26

of the company. So every time

33:28

the shares shrink, your shares that

33:30

you own become worth more of

33:32

the company. And then debt pay

33:34

down, you can think of the

33:36

same way you would think of

33:38

it as if you were paying

33:40

off, you know, credit card or

33:42

auto loan debt. When you pay

33:44

that debt off, you don't have

33:46

to make that payment next month.

33:48

So then the earnings of the

33:50

company you're going to go up.

33:52

and then you can get more

33:54

either through your share buybacks or

33:56

your dividend yield. The really interesting

33:58

thing and the reason I like.

34:00

The shareholder yield metric so much

34:02

is one you mentioned that dividends

34:04

are a long-term commitment. So management

34:06

wants to be a little cautious

34:08

with those, right? They want to

34:10

set it at a target where

34:12

even in kind of a bad

34:14

year or bad couple years that

34:16

they're going to be able to

34:18

keep paying that dividend. They don't

34:20

want to get it cut. So

34:22

they tend to be a little

34:24

bit conservative on that. Buybacks are

34:26

flexible. Right so the board approves

34:28

such such and such a number

34:30

we're gonna approve three billion and

34:32

buy that's or whatever number They

34:34

approve but management gets to decide

34:36

when those shares get bought back

34:38

and how many so some buybacks

34:40

Just basically moth up share-based compensation,

34:42

you know, they issue so many

34:44

shares with one hand There's a

34:46

better that way So buybacks can

34:48

be used basically to mop up

34:50

the share base compensation and kind

34:52

of hide that. That's not overly

34:54

value creative. I would argue it's

34:56

not my favorite way to do

34:58

it. Honestly, I would rather them

35:00

just pay the, pay the bonuses

35:02

out in cash or whatever and

35:04

not play the, the buyback game.

35:07

But assuming the company is actually

35:09

reducing the number of shares and

35:11

doing so at a reasonable valuation,

35:13

that can be very, very. beneficial

35:15

to shareholders. But you have really

35:17

good management that pays attention and

35:19

waits and buys back shares of

35:21

cheap valuations. You can do very,

35:23

very well there. And then of

35:25

course the debt pay down, you

35:27

know, if they've got high yield

35:29

debt, they've got expensive debt to

35:31

pay that off. That can raise

35:33

your earnings and open up more

35:35

cash for dividends and payments back

35:37

to you. The other interesting piece

35:39

is that, you know, a lot

35:41

of people get worried about taxes

35:43

or dividends. That's not something necessarily

35:45

I discuss all the time because

35:47

it's so dependent on what what

35:49

account do you hold the dividend

35:51

in the you know the dividend

35:53

payer in? Where do you live?

35:55

Where's the company based because those

35:57

are all going to affect taxes,

35:59

but typically buybacks are more tax

36:01

efficient because you never receive that

36:03

payment. So you don't get a

36:05

tax, you know, on the dividend,

36:07

on the income, however that's taxed.

36:09

So a little bit more of that comes

36:11

back to you. So that shareholder

36:14

yield, it saves on some taxes

36:16

and it lets management, if

36:18

they're good, really drives some value

36:20

for you. Yeah, yeah, exactly. I

36:22

look at fin chat, has they

36:25

calculate? shareholder yield, which is nice

36:27

so you can look look at

36:29

it quickly without having to do

36:31

all the do all the heavy lifting

36:33

of figuring it out. It's good to

36:35

look at it to to see how

36:38

those you know interact. Some companies like

36:40

you said, AutoZone and O'Reilly

36:42

and Home Depot, they're all big

36:44

share cannibals, but they also pay

36:46

dividends. Well, well, does Home Depot

36:49

pay a dividend? Yeah, they do.

36:51

But one thing that surprised me

36:53

years ago, I was looking at

36:55

Johnson and Johnson, and they're obviously

36:57

famous for being a dividend aristocrat,

36:59

and they actually pay out more.

37:02

They spend more on buybacks than

37:04

they do on dividends, which kind

37:06

of surprised me. And that was

37:08

kind of my first introduction to

37:10

this whole advantage of buying back shares.

37:13

Oh, hey, this could actually be a

37:15

big thing. So I guess, what are

37:17

your thoughts on companies that are... You

37:19

mentioned the negative equity. So a company

37:21

like Starbucks and Home Depot, I believe,

37:23

are both negative shareholder equity. How do

37:26

you feel about that as like a

37:28

dividend paying company? Is that something that

37:30

concerns you? Or is it just kind

37:32

of a nothing burger? It really depends

37:34

on the company. It really depends

37:36

on the reason for the negative

37:38

equity. Like I said, sometimes you

37:40

see that, especially in companies that

37:42

do return a lot of capital

37:44

to their shareholders. The other thing

37:47

sometimes you see that in is companies

37:49

that don't have a lot of physical

37:51

assets. So think about like, you know,

37:53

McDonald's owns most of their real estate.

37:55

That goes on the balance sheet. But,

37:57

you know, a franchise company, like a...

37:59

like a domino's pizza, don't own the

38:02

majority of the restaurants. So the

38:04

land, the buildings, the equipment, none

38:06

of that's on the balance sheet.

38:08

And when they pay dividends and

38:10

buyback shares, that puts their equity

38:12

negative. Like I said, you really,

38:14

you have to dig in and

38:16

understand the reason that the equity

38:18

is negative. Yeah, yeah, that's a

38:20

good point. I guess kind of

38:22

on the flip side of that,

38:24

how do you feel about companies

38:26

that borrow to pay dividends? Typically,

38:29

I would say that that's a

38:31

bad idea. You know, one that

38:33

famously did that was Boeing. If

38:35

you look at charts for Boeing,

38:37

you can see the dividends going

38:39

up, and if you chart the

38:42

long-term debt alongside it, it gets

38:44

up right along with the dividend,

38:46

and then of course eventually they

38:48

cut the dividend way down, and

38:50

then they stop paying one altogether.

38:52

So it's typically a bad sign.

38:54

I really prefer to see the

38:56

dividend coming from earnings. Would I

38:58

say that I would absolutely never

39:00

ever ever invest in a company

39:02

that did that? I hate to

39:04

say never period. I guess I

39:06

could see maybe a situation where

39:08

during you know the zero interest

39:10

rates where it was a better

39:13

idea to invest in this thing

39:15

for growth and then borrow a

39:17

little bit to pay the dividend

39:19

because the yield on the growth

39:21

was going to be so high

39:23

and the debt was so cheap,

39:25

a little bit of financial engineering,

39:27

but I would be really, really

39:29

cautious and that would make me

39:31

really look hard at management. You

39:33

know, that's not a strategy that

39:35

I love to see. Most of

39:37

the time, if they're borrowing to

39:39

pay the dividend, that's a bad

39:42

sign. And GM did it for...

39:44

for quite some time before they

39:46

got failed out. Like I said,

39:48

Boeing more recently. I honestly don't

39:50

know of any cases where that

39:52

was done and it turned out

39:54

well. Right. Yeah. Like I said,

39:56

that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

39:58

That doesn't mean somebody didn't take

40:00

really cheap debt whenever money was

40:02

basically free and and take advantage

40:04

of it, but I would be

40:06

hard-pressed to think that that's a

40:08

good sign. Yeah, me too. Both

40:11

business and life, safeguarding your assets

40:13

is crucial. Imagine the legacy you

40:15

want to leave for your family,

40:17

one that ensures their comfort and

40:19

security even in your absence. Life

40:21

is unpredictable, but you can take

40:23

steps to protect your family's future.

40:25

Consider securing your hard-earned assets with

40:27

a tailored life insurance policy from

40:29

select quote. Ensuring your legacy remains

40:31

attacked and your loved ones are

40:33

financially secure. It's what I did

40:35

and it was easy and painless.

40:37

So why select quote? They are

40:40

one of America's leading insurance brokers

40:42

with nearly 40 years of experience,

40:44

helping over 2 million customers find

40:46

over $700 billion in coverage since

40:48

1985. Other life insurance brokers offer

40:50

impersonal, one-size-fits-all policies that may cost

40:52

you more and cover you less,

40:54

while select quotes licensed insurance agents

40:56

work for you to tailor a

40:58

life insurance policy for your individual

41:00

needs in as little as 15

41:02

minutes. Did you know that the

41:04

more life insurance coverage you need,

41:06

the more likely you are to

41:09

overpay for it? With Select Quote,

41:11

you can save up to 50%

41:13

compared to other companies, whether you

41:15

need a $500,000 policy or a

41:17

$50 million policy. At the Select

41:19

quote.com and a licensed insurance agent

41:21

will call you right away with

41:23

the right policy for your life

41:25

and your budget. They shop, you

41:27

save. At the right life insurance

41:29

for you, for less at Select

41:31

quote.com/beginners. Go to selectquote.com/beginners today to

41:33

get started. That's selectquote.com/beginners. Would you

41:35

wear the same shoes for every

41:37

occasion or rock the same outfit

41:40

seven days a week? Of course

41:42

not. Your style is better with

41:44

options. Your investments could be too.

41:46

Sibo index options give you access

41:48

to various contract sizes, global trading

41:50

hours, and potential tax advantages. That's

41:52

a good look for any portfolio.

41:54

If you're ready to invest in

41:56

style, head to better with options.com.

41:58

There are risks associated with CBO

42:00

company products. Review the disclosures and

42:02

disclaimers at cbo.com/U.S. underscore disclaimers. My

42:04

recommendation, our free e-book and email

42:06

series at stock market pdf.com. I

42:09

know I remember a few years

42:11

ago, might have been during the

42:13

pandemic or prior to that, that

42:15

I think was Exxon or Chevron

42:17

was kind of on the struggle

42:19

bus and I know that they

42:21

were borrowing some money to pay

42:23

the pay the dividend because they

42:25

didn't have the cash flow because

42:27

of oil prices were all over

42:29

the place. Like when you're thinking

42:31

about companies like that, does that

42:33

play into how you're evaluating them

42:35

because they're their commodity based business

42:38

and so there's going to be

42:40

wild fluctuations in what goes on

42:42

with them? Yeah, so so so

42:44

in that case, I mean, that's

42:46

that's an odd case, you know,

42:48

when when oil prices are negative,

42:50

that's something I don't think anybody's

42:52

ever seen before. No, no, I

42:54

wouldn't have predicted that. So in

42:56

that sort of case, yeah, to

42:58

borrow to cover because, you know,

43:00

commodity prices have crashed, you know,

43:02

you sit there and you look

43:04

and you go in two years,

43:07

is oil still going to be

43:09

negative now? you know, there's no

43:11

way. So in that case, yeah,

43:13

that's probably, you know, a safe

43:15

bet, especially in something like an

43:17

Exxon or a Chevron. And if

43:19

you look at those companies, I

43:21

honestly, I don't know Exxon as

43:23

well. I know Chevron fairly well.

43:25

Chevron's got a pretty solid balance

43:27

sheet at this point. Yeah, yeah,

43:29

for sure. And I think Exxon

43:31

does as well. So those large

43:33

companies like that, like I said,

43:36

for a one-time event to borrow.

43:38

Yeah, that's fine. That's probably a

43:40

smarter move than cutting the dividend.

43:42

Like you said, that's a that's

43:44

a massive signal to the market.

43:46

Your stock's going to sell off.

43:48

Your cost of equity is going

43:50

to go way up. That creates

43:52

more problems than taking on some

43:54

debt until oil prices you've covered

43:56

and you paid off. Yeah, very

43:58

good point. Very good point. Are

44:00

there any sectors or asset? classes

44:02

I guess that are more favorable

44:04

to dividends than others? Yeah so

44:07

traditionally there are certain sectors that

44:09

tend to pay more out in

44:11

dividends that you already mentioned one

44:13

with energy and your bigger mature

44:15

industries tend to pay more in

44:17

dividends so think things like utilities

44:19

Some of your like cable companies

44:21

and then as far as asset

44:23

classes, we already talked a little

44:25

bit about reets that the real

44:27

estate investment trust. They're actually required

44:29

to pay out 90% of their

44:31

profits as dividends for tax reasons

44:33

that based on the structure. So

44:36

reets are always a heavy. dividend

44:38

paying asset class. There's another structure

44:40

called a master limited partnership, very

44:42

similar to a read, they're required

44:44

to distribute, they don't tend to

44:46

pay a dividend, they they distribute

44:48

cash to limited partners, but that's

44:50

common in, think like your pipeline

44:52

companies, so your companies that run

44:54

pipelines to transport oil or gas,

44:56

that's your most common MLP structure,

44:58

and they tend to be pretty

45:00

heavy dividend payers as well. Is

45:02

the tech industry traditionally much in

45:05

dividends at this point? Traditionally, no.

45:07

But some, you know, when you

45:09

think you're magnificent seven, they're starting

45:11

to pay out some dividends. It's

45:13

not heavy, it's not a lot.

45:15

But, you know, Google's got a

45:17

dividend going, Apple's been paying a

45:19

dividend for quite some time. I

45:21

don't know, some of the listeners

45:23

that have been around a while

45:25

might remember, Apple had a lot

45:27

of shareholder. Ravel about building up

45:29

a bunch of cash on on

45:31

the balance sheet. Carl icon maybe

45:34

got in there. There was an

45:36

activist investor. Yeah, I think they

45:38

had over like a trillion dollars

45:40

of cash sitting on the balance

45:42

sheet. The investors got upset and

45:44

they said, hey, you should be

45:46

sharing this. That's kind of an

45:48

apple initiated the dividend. They've been

45:50

paying the dividends. Envidia pays a

45:52

dividend. Envidia actually is buying back

45:54

shares, which kind of baffles me

45:56

as far as valuation of the

45:58

business. Capital allocation goes, but they're

46:00

buying back shares. Tesla, I do

46:02

not believe pays a dividend and

46:05

Amazon does not, but if Amazon

46:07

initiated a dividend, it wouldn't shock

46:09

me either at this point. No,

46:11

no, and I think a lot

46:13

of people when they think about

46:15

dividends We talked about this off-air

46:17

is they think of it as

46:19

kind of a fuddy-deddy It has

46:21

that stereotype of a fuddy-deddy, but

46:23

then you throw off something like

46:25

a video Which everybody thinks is

46:27

a brand new company. It's really

46:29

been around for like 25 years.

46:31

What's what's touched on that? When

46:34

if somebody comes to you say

46:36

yeah, dividends are boring, you know,

46:38

I want to invest a tack

46:40

I want to be exciting well

46:42

What's your counter to that, sir?

46:44

Well, first of all, I would

46:46

say if you're investing for excitement,

46:48

that's probably the wrong reason. If

46:50

you want to, if you want

46:52

to take some money that you

46:54

can afford to lose and gamble

46:56

it and invest in, you know,

46:58

micro strategy or pick your flavor

47:00

of the week, if you want

47:03

to ride the game stop roller

47:05

coaster or buy an NFT in

47:07

2021, that's, that's okay with me.

47:09

But as far as long-term investing

47:11

goes, I'm of the opinion that

47:13

it should be boring. I don't

47:15

want my life savings going up

47:17

and down 20% every year. I

47:19

would prefer 10% for 20 years

47:21

in a row. So that would

47:23

be, that would be point number

47:25

one. Point number two is the

47:27

idea that, so let me back

47:29

at the second. So one of

47:32

the reasons I think people get

47:34

down on dividends is they say

47:36

that, you know, that's money that

47:38

could be reinvested back in the

47:40

business. That's money that could grow

47:42

the business, right, but. When you

47:44

look at some of these companies,

47:46

where are they going to reinvest?

47:48

What's Google going to do? What's

47:50

the profit it makes? What's invidia

47:52

going to do with the profit

47:54

it makes? You can only reinvest

47:56

so much cash in things that

47:58

that have a high return. And

48:01

then the question beyond that becomes,

48:03

what do you want management to

48:05

do with it? And actually, one

48:07

of the arguments for dividends, and

48:09

there's been academic research that's looked

48:11

at this, is that by taking away some

48:13

of the excess cash that's laying around,

48:15

it forces management to make better capital

48:17

allocation decisions. So if you don't have

48:19

a trillion dollars on the balance sheet

48:21

like Apple did, that you don't have

48:23

anything to reinvested in, you're much less

48:25

likely to buy a new corporate jet.

48:28

Right, you're much less likely to

48:30

acquire some company that really doesn't add

48:32

anything. You're much less likely to try

48:34

and build an empire. And the other

48:36

thing that does is it forces sometimes

48:38

for expansion and for those ideas that

48:41

management has, it makes them go to

48:43

the capital markets, you know, to either raise equity

48:45

or to take on some debt. And

48:47

when that happens, there's a lot more

48:49

scrutiny of the company and of the

48:51

management. So again, that's one of those

48:53

forcing functions to make them. make better

48:56

decisions instead of wasting

48:58

capital. So that's one thing.

49:00

And number two is that the market

49:02

we've had, I touched on it

49:05

earlier, that some of the things

49:07

that are going on in the markets

49:09

don't really make sense to me at

49:11

this point. And when you look

49:14

at what's going on essentially since

49:16

2009, to today versus historical,

49:18

it's odd. It doesn't look like

49:20

the past. Historically, dividends have been,

49:23

like I said, a big component,

49:25

you know, close to half of

49:27

your total return. So if you

49:29

intentionally avoid them, assuming that the

49:32

market doesn't go up the way that

49:34

it has forever, you're probably giving

49:36

up some potential return. And we

49:38

talked about it offline a little

49:40

bit, you know, you threw out

49:42

seven, nine percent, ten percent, whatever,

49:44

pick your historical market return over

49:46

the long run, we've had twenty

49:49

percent recently, you know. for quite some

49:51

time. So if you think that the

49:53

long-term return is going to be that

49:55

seven, nine, ten percent, then there's

49:57

either a lot of sideways trading.

50:00

or at some point there's a

50:02

big drawdown. And in both those instances,

50:04

dividends are a big component of your

50:06

return. So whenever the market draws down

50:09

and your stock prices are lower, your

50:11

dividend return is always positive. The total

50:13

return might not be. But if your

50:16

portfolio's got a 5% dividend yield, that's

50:18

5% that you're getting. And it comes

50:20

off to the negative yield. And if

50:23

you're reinvesting, assuming those companies come

50:25

back, you're just. buying more shares of

50:27

that company cheaper on the way down,

50:29

you know, when it recovers, that dividend

50:32

payment's going to go up and so's

50:34

the stock price. So it may not

50:36

be the most exciting way to invest,

50:39

but I think, you know, historically it's

50:41

worked. Historically, companies that have grown their

50:43

dividends have outperformed the S&P and companies

50:46

that don't pay a dividend, and especially

50:48

companies that cut the dividends, and it

50:50

adds some stability to the portfolio,

50:52

you know, it kind of takes away

50:55

some of those market effects. Yeah. Yeah,

50:57

for sure. And if you look at

50:59

the, if you look back at even

51:02

just the last 20, 30 years of

51:04

the market, you know, if you break

51:06

it into five or 10 year, you

51:09

know, components, the top five or top

51:11

10 companies from 20 years ago are

51:13

not the same that they are today.

51:16

And history tells us that. in the

51:18

next 20 years, those probably won't be

51:20

the same that we're seeing today.

51:22

There may be a few, but not

51:25

all of them. And so the markets

51:27

will change. And as those companies evolve

51:29

and grow, they have, as you said,

51:32

allocation decisions to make. And I think

51:34

our whole discussion today. to me really

51:36

indicates how important what a company does

51:39

with the money that they make and

51:41

how important those capital allocation decisions really

51:43

are and I think you know the

51:46

more the more you can figure that

51:48

out and find the best capital

51:50

allocators the better your returns are going

51:53

to be over the longer run. Yeah

51:55

absolutely I think And management is important

51:57

no matter what type of investing you're

52:00

doing. But if you're looking at dividend

52:02

paying companies, they're really important because those

52:04

are the guys that are going to

52:07

decide, workouts, that are going to decide

52:09

how much they're paying out. Are they

52:11

going to continue to pay out dividends?

52:14

Are they going to buy back shares?

52:16

Those are the people that drive

52:18

your shareholder return. And, you know, no

52:20

matter what the market does, like you

52:23

said, it's definitely uncertain. Top 10 companies

52:25

change, which country does the best changes.

52:27

You know, there's been periods. Japan outperformed

52:30

the US for a long time. International

52:32

stocks have outperformed small caps about performed.

52:34

What does the best, you know, varies

52:37

from year to year decade to decade.

52:39

But one of the things about dividend

52:41

investing for me is that I just

52:44

can't think of a reason that

52:46

it's a bad idea. to own a

52:48

company that generates a lot of cash

52:50

and shares some of it with me.

52:53

Right. Yeah, I mean, I think that's,

52:55

that last little sentence, I think you

52:57

said, is something that's really important for

53:00

people to understand. Companies that pay dividends

53:02

are generating a ton of cash. You

53:04

know, companies that don't generate a ton

53:07

of cash can't pay a dividend. And

53:09

that's, and you want companies that are

53:11

generating a lot of cash because it

53:14

gives them optionality, choices to make

53:16

of what to do with that money.

53:18

You may think of Coca-Cola as a

53:20

boring company, but the fact of the

53:23

matter is it makes a lot of

53:25

money. And it pays a nice dividend

53:27

because it makes a lot of money.

53:30

And those are the companies we all

53:32

want to find. There's cash flow in

53:34

companies. So another question I think is

53:37

kind of interesting to explore is what

53:39

are your thoughts on Buffett? So he

53:42

loves dividends, but he doesn't want

53:44

to pay one. and he hasn't paid

53:46

one and he unlikely will before he

53:48

leaves the company. So what are your

53:51

thoughts on that? Yeah, that's that's a

53:53

good question. Buffett's interesting in this in

53:55

this regard. And I just read, I

53:58

just reread the intelligent investor, you know,

54:00

it came out with a new addition,

54:02

Jason's wife. did new commentary. It's worth

54:05

it for his new commentary. It's really

54:07

interesting. But when you read Ben Graham

54:09

and you read the intelligent investor,

54:11

there's a pretty big focus on dividends

54:14

there. And you think about, you know,

54:16

the companies and the stock market in

54:18

his day, most of the companies paid

54:21

a dividend. It was expected. You were

54:23

an owner of the company and you

54:25

deserve, you know, your share. And when

54:28

you look at Buffett's top holdings, All

54:30

of them pay dividends. I mean, you

54:32

know, he's selling down Apple, but Apple

54:35

was a big holding for a long

54:37

time, a dividend payer. Bank of America

54:39

was a big hoard, a dividend

54:41

payer. He owns a lot of Chevron,

54:44

dividend payer, Coca-Cola, Coca-Cola, as you mentioned,

54:46

dividend payer, Coca-Cola, as you mentioned, dividend

54:48

payer, as you mentioned, dividend payer, as

54:51

you mentioned, that's a dividend payer, but

54:53

that's a buyback company. you know, Domino's

54:55

Pizza was a recent acquisition. That's a

54:58

buyback company and they pay a dividend.

55:00

Occidental Petroleum pays small dividend, but they

55:02

buy back a bunch of shares. So,

55:05

Buffett really seems to like this shareholder

55:07

yield model. When you look at

55:09

what he does and what he holds,

55:11

he really does seem to like it.

55:14

And, you know, we talked about capital

55:16

allocation and management. I have a hard

55:18

time arguing. that when you have the

55:21

best capital allocator in the world running

55:23

the company, that I'm going to do

55:25

a better job with the capital that

55:28

he is. Berkshire not paying a dividend

55:30

and building up the cash is is

55:33

kind of okay in my book. Just

55:35

like I said, that's that's the

55:37

best capital allocator in the world. Management

55:39

I trust, you know, like nobody else.

55:42

So to let Buffett build up a

55:44

bunch of cash and hope that, you

55:46

know, something interesting comes along before you

55:49

know, he passes away. I don't have

55:51

an issue with that. I suspect that,

55:53

you know, when Buffett's gone, that Berkshire

55:56

probably will become a dividend paying company.

55:58

But I don't think, you know, some

56:00

people look at that as a contradiction

56:03

and Buffett's written pretty extensively about it.

56:05

You know, as long as you

56:07

can generate more than a dollar for

56:09

every dollar you keep in the company, then

56:11

that's a good decision. You know, given

56:13

his track record, I think Buffett deserves

56:16

a lot of leeway. I trust them to

56:18

generate more than a dollar for everything he's

56:20

keeping. Yeah, for sure, for sure. Do

56:22

you, so I guess speaking of

56:24

that, do you own companies in

56:26

your portfolio that do not pay

56:29

a dividend? I do, Berkshire Hathaway

56:31

being obviously the prime number one.

56:33

Yeah, I do. So it's not the only

56:35

way that I invest. I do own Berkshire. And

56:37

I do own some other

56:39

non-divident paying companies. So like I

56:41

said earlier, whenever I kind of

56:43

talked about my my road to

56:45

dividends and shareholder yield, the other

56:48

piece that really makes sense to

56:50

me. you know, no brainer, like

56:52

something is going on with this

56:54

company and the market is way

56:56

mispricing it. I'll, I'm more than happy to

56:58

take advantage of those. So, so I

57:00

do own some of those types of

57:03

companies that, that I've had along the

57:05

way. Probably, most recently to

57:07

give you an example, you know, Netflix,

57:09

whenever it dropped under $200 a share

57:11

in 2022. Yep. Because they lost a

57:14

few subscribers coming off the pandemic and

57:16

the market went good, Netflix is over.

57:18

It's done. Yeah, that's he's gonna win.

57:20

Yeah, that's one of those ones I

57:22

bought and I should have bought a

57:25

lot more, but you know, still hold

57:27

Netflix and part of it even

57:29

goes back to kind of this this

57:31

shareholder deal cash flowing mentality, you know,

57:33

at that time, and still, it's only

57:35

the second. I think there's two

57:38

streamers that actually make money at

57:40

this point. Disney Plus just became

57:42

profitable. But at the time, Netflix

57:45

was the only streamer that actually

57:47

had positive cash flow. You know, they

57:49

had a pile of subscribers, the data

57:51

they have is unbelievable. They know what

57:54

you want to watch before you do,

57:56

and they use that data to make

57:58

shows that will be hits. You know,

58:00

whatever it dropped that cheap, I went,

58:02

I got to buy some of this.

58:05

So that's, you know, those kind of

58:07

things I will take advantage of. You

58:09

know, I do still like the quality

58:11

companies, like the compound and quality philosophy.

58:14

I own, I own some of the

58:16

companies that are in that portfolio. I

58:18

haven't bought every single one of them.

58:20

There's been a few that Peter will

58:23

pay a higher price than I will.

58:25

I'm still a cheap paid paid at

58:27

heart. So there's still some of those

58:29

that have been a little pricey for

58:31

a little pricey for me that I

58:34

don't. But I do have some of

58:36

those quality companies in my portfolio and

58:38

I do have some of those that

58:40

were no brainers that just got way

58:43

too cheap. Yeah, yeah, you got to

58:45

take advantage when the market, you know,

58:47

when Mr. Market offers you a deal,

58:49

sometimes you got to take advantage when

58:52

you can. Yeah, yeah, so I'm not

58:54

I'm not a dividend purist. I'm not

58:56

a you have to pay a dividend

58:58

for me to be interested But I

59:01

think especially right now. That's a that's

59:03

a very interesting way to invest I

59:05

think it's defensive I think it protects

59:07

you against whatever unknowns are coming in

59:10

the market And since you know growth

59:12

is such a focus at this point

59:14

I think a lot of these dividend

59:16

payers are are underpriced compared to the

59:18

rest of the market Yep, I totally

59:21

agree. I totally agree. Well, TJ, this

59:23

has been a lot of fun. I've

59:25

learned a lot today and made me

59:27

think about some things differently that maybe

59:30

I had kind of thought about. So

59:32

where can people find more about what

59:34

you got going on and what you're

59:36

doing with compounding dividends. Net? You can

59:39

sign up for the newsletter there. We

59:41

do have a free subscription and then

59:43

if you want to become a paid

59:45

partner and get access to the entire

59:48

portfolio and all of the all of

59:50

the companies in the watch list the

59:52

investigative universe the over 800 companies that

59:54

I mentioned earlier and you can do

59:56

that there is a compounding dividends Twitter

59:59

account that's compounding W you can find

1:00:01

me there as well it's TJ underscore

1:00:03

to Williger those are probably the best

1:00:05

places to find us and keep track

1:00:08

of what's going on and he's very

1:00:10

active on Twitter as someone who follows

1:00:12

and interacts with T.J. tries to keep

1:00:14

up with him on a daily basis.

1:00:17

He's very active on Twitter and he

1:00:19

posts a lot of great stuff so

1:00:21

it's definitely worth your mentioning your following.

1:00:23

The blog posts are great as well,

1:00:26

the subscription, the subscription, the subscription, I

1:00:28

was actually just reading when he wrote

1:00:30

about a breakdown of reets earlier today

1:00:32

and fascinating lots of great info in

1:00:35

there so it's well well worth your

1:00:37

time for sure. And thanks for joining.

1:00:39

Yeah. Thanks for having me, Dave. Really

1:00:41

enjoyed it. You're welcome. All right. All

1:00:43

right. Well, that folks, we'll go ahead

1:00:46

and sign us off. You guys go

1:00:48

out there and invest with the margin

1:00:50

of safety. Have a great week. And

1:00:52

we'll talk to you all next week.

1:00:55

We hope you enjoyed this content. Seven

1:00:57

steps to understanding the stock market shows

1:00:59

you precisely how to break down the

1:01:01

numbers in an engaging and readable way

1:01:04

with real life examples. Get access today

1:01:06

at stockmarket pdf.com Until next time have

1:01:08

a prosperous day The information contained is

1:01:10

for general information and educational purposes only

1:01:13

it is not intended for a substitute

1:01:15

for legal commercial and or financial advice

1:01:17

from a licensed professional Review our full

1:01:19

disclaimer at e investing for beginners. One

1:01:22

of my favorite podcasts, and has been

1:01:24

for a while, is the Personal Finance

1:01:26

Podcast. If you want to show as

1:01:28

bingeable as the Sweet Games and pack

1:01:30

with insightful tips, you need to check

1:01:33

it out. Andrew G. Nkola, the show's

1:01:35

host, shares insights helping you build generational

1:01:37

wealth and using your money as a

1:01:39

tool to get the most out of

1:01:42

what you want for your life. It's

1:01:44

not about pinching pennies and saving every

1:01:46

last time. Instead, he shares ideas around

1:01:48

making money from your job to creating

1:01:51

different passive income streams income streams income

1:01:53

streams. For example, one of his latest

1:01:55

episodes, How to Break the Paycheck to

1:01:57

Paycheck Cycle, who doesn't want that? He

1:02:00

discusses some of the tools and the

1:02:02

ways that you can find other sources

1:02:04

of income while also setting aside more

1:02:06

money. That's just a drop in

1:02:08

the bucket of the information Andrew weighs

1:02:11

down in his shows. He exudes enthusiasm

1:02:13

and expertise, a rare combo. It's one

1:02:15

of my favorite shows every single week.

1:02:17

The Personal Finance Podcast has something for

1:02:19

everyone. It is filled with so many ideas

1:02:22

to help you get better with your money

1:02:24

and grow your wealth. So I highly recommend

1:02:26

you check it out. Just search for the

1:02:28

Personal Finance Podcast on Apple Podcast, Spotify, or

1:02:31

wherever you listen to your podcast and enjoy.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features