Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Think about your favorite entrepreneur.
0:02
People such as Alex Hormozi,
0:04
Justin Welsh, or Matt Gray
0:06
would be nowhere without trusted
0:08
partners. If your commerce platform
0:10
is pushing away potential customers
0:12
instead of winning them over
0:14
as loyal fans, consider using
0:16
Shopify. Shopify is the commerce
0:18
platform revolutionizing millions of businesses
0:20
worldwide. Whether you're a garage
0:22
entrepreneur or IPO ready, Shopify
0:25
is the only tool you
0:27
need to start run and
0:29
grow your business without the
0:31
struggle. Shopify puts you in
0:33
control of every sales channel.
0:35
So whether you're selling satin
0:37
sheets from Shopify's in-person POS
0:39
system or offering organic olive
0:41
oil on Shopify's all-in-one e-commerce
0:43
platform, you are covered. And
0:45
once you've reached your audience,
0:48
Shopify has the internet's best
0:50
converting checkout to help you
0:52
turn them from browsers to
0:54
buyers. Shopify's easy-to-use system helps
0:56
you start right away. No
0:58
more procrastination, no more excuses.
1:00
Shopify powers 10% of all
1:02
e-commerce in the U.S. and
1:04
Shopify is truly a Google
1:06
force, powering all birds, Rothies,
1:08
and Brooklyn, and millions of
1:10
other entrepreneurs of every size
1:13
across over 170 companies. Plus,
1:15
Shopify's award-winning help is there
1:17
to support your success every
1:19
step of the way. This
1:21
is possibility powered by Shopify.
1:23
Sign up for a $1
1:25
per month trial period at
1:27
shopify.com/beginners all lower case. Go
1:29
to shopify.com/beginners to take your
1:31
business to the next level
1:33
today. shopify.com/beginners. Hey Kristen, how's
1:36
it tracking? With Karvana Value
1:38
Tracker? What else? Oh, it's
1:40
tracking. In fact, Value Surge
1:42
Alert trucks up 2.5 percent.
1:44
Vans down 1.7. Just as
1:46
predicted. Mm-hmm. So, we gonna...
1:48
I don't know. Could sell,
1:50
could hold? The power to
1:52
always know our car's worth.
1:54
Accelerating, isn't it? Ugh. Tracking.
1:56
Always know your car's worth
1:59
with Carvana Value Tracker. Crushes
2:01
your dreams and getting rich
2:03
quick. They actually got me
2:05
into reading stats for anything.
2:07
You're tuned in to the
2:09
Investing for Beginners podcast. Led
2:11
by Andrew Saver and Dave
2:13
Ahern. Step-by-step premium investing guidance
2:15
for beginners. Your path to
2:17
financial freedom starts now. Start
2:20
now. All
2:27
right folks, welcome to Investing for Beginners
2:29
podcast. Today we're going to answer some
2:31
questions. So I went to the Reddit
2:33
machine and I found some really cool
2:35
questions and we got another great question
2:38
from a listener. So we'll go ahead
2:40
and answer those questions for everybody today.
2:42
So buckle in and have some fun.
2:44
So he got the first one. So
2:47
I'm very new to the stock market.
2:49
I have no idea what to do or how to
2:51
do it and I'm just Dipping my toes
2:53
for now. I was wondering about something.
2:55
Intel stock has dropped significantly in the
2:57
past year. A stock used to cost
2:59
$51.28, now only costs $18 as far
3:01
as I know. Of course, things aren't
3:03
looking good for Intel, but wouldn't it
3:05
be the best time to buy as
3:07
much as I can of their stock?
3:09
Intel is a big company, and surely
3:11
they will rise back up again, right?
3:13
No, I honestly have no idea and
3:16
I would love your opinion on
3:18
the matter. So great question and
3:20
kind of appropriate with the market
3:23
being all schizophrenic at the moment.
3:25
So I think what are your
3:27
thoughts on this question and how
3:29
would you help guide them? I would
3:31
first start by saying, look, you are
3:34
in the game and being in the
3:36
game is the most important part. Investing
3:38
is all about taking your hard-earned money
3:40
and putting it to work for you.
3:43
So whether this decision you make on
3:45
Intel or some other company works out
3:47
in your favor or not, the most
3:50
important thing is to not quit because
3:52
that's what you need for the compounding
3:54
to happen is for you to be
3:57
putting money out there and allowing it
3:59
to grow. for a long time
4:01
period. You're not gonna hit all
4:03
winners, trust me, nobody does, but
4:05
you do it enough and you
4:07
will get enough winners that more
4:09
than pay for your losers. And
4:11
that's how you build significant wealth
4:14
in the stock market. As it
4:16
comes to Intel, oh boy, like
4:18
there are, I don't wanna beat
4:20
up on this person, but there
4:22
are some, I think common misconceptions
4:24
myths or. I guess you would
4:26
call it common sayings that people
4:28
in the market mention that to
4:30
me are just completely wrong. One
4:32
of those being, oh, this is
4:35
a big company so they're gonna
4:37
do fine. That, I very much
4:39
disagree with that and that's like
4:41
the first place I would start
4:43
because I'm automatically staring at that
4:45
and I'm like, no, don't look
4:47
at the stock market that way.
4:49
So when you're looking at what
4:51
kind of stock to buy, what
4:53
you want to invest in for
4:56
the long term, it is true
4:58
that usually the biggest company in
5:00
an industry is the one that's
5:02
going to be the better one,
5:04
especially because of something called economies
5:06
of scale. So the bigger you
5:08
are, the more you can spread
5:10
your costs and the more advantages
5:12
you get. And so you do
5:15
get a lot of... the leaders
5:17
or the top dogs of an
5:19
industry who remain that way and
5:21
even strengthen their position from their
5:23
size. But and especially in technology
5:25
where things move so fast, Intel
5:27
is actually a poster child of
5:29
what can happen when you're big
5:31
fat and happy in the technology
5:33
space. And what can happen is
5:36
disruption. Clayton Christensen is a professor
5:38
at Harvard Business School. He wrote
5:40
a great book about this called
5:42
The Innovators dilemma, where, and I
5:44
love for Dave to explain this
5:46
because I think he has thought
5:48
about it more deeply than I
5:50
have lately, but basically. an incumbent,
5:52
a big company who is the
5:54
leader, gets taken over by a
5:57
small company because the small company
5:59
is more innovative. And there's several
6:01
other factors that kind of play
6:03
into that and kind of feed
6:05
into that. But that would be
6:07
my first point is like, look.
6:09
Just because it's big and just
6:11
because you know it doesn't mean
6:13
it's a great investment. Yeah, that
6:15
is 100% true I think the
6:18
description of Intel becoming fat and
6:20
happy is probably a really really
6:22
good place to start with Because
6:24
if you look back on the
6:26
history of Intel if you read
6:28
the book Chip Wars if you're
6:30
curious about the the semiconductor space
6:32
you need to read the book
6:34
Chip Wars. Not necessarily that it's
6:37
going to help you pick out
6:39
the best one today, but it'll
6:41
certainly give you a framework and
6:43
a groundwork to understand what's going
6:45
on today. And Intel was the
6:47
invidia of its day. It was
6:49
leading edge, it was cutting edge.
6:51
They were on the forefront of
6:53
everything. And through a Basically change
6:55
in management and a series of
6:58
poor managers. This is the Intel
7:00
will be someday a great case
7:02
study for what can happen to
7:04
a company that's that's on the
7:06
forefront and suddenly gets behind and
7:08
basically Intel lost its edge. I
7:10
mean it's the easiest way to
7:12
say it is they lost their
7:14
edge and now they're scrambling to
7:16
try to catch up. And as
7:19
Andrew has taught me in the
7:21
semiconductor space in particular, it's not
7:23
just a matter of throwing a
7:25
whole bunch of money at something
7:27
so that you can... become the
7:29
leader again, you have to advance
7:31
in the technologies, you have to
7:33
do the work to understand the
7:35
technology to become back at the
7:38
leading edge. And you can't just
7:40
skip forward, so to speak. You
7:42
have to go through the steps.
7:44
You have to learn this to
7:46
learn that to learn that to
7:48
learn that. And you can only
7:50
do that through a process. And
7:52
so you can't just go, okay,
7:54
I want to go from here
7:56
to D. You have to go
7:59
through B and C to get
8:01
to D. And Intel is trying
8:03
to do that. now, but now
8:05
they're trying to do it quickly
8:07
to get to D, which is
8:09
already where invidia and Micron and
8:11
AMD and everybody else is already
8:13
playing and beyond and and tell
8:15
us behind. So anyway, all that
8:17
to say, you know, the innovator's
8:20
dilemma certainly strikes hard and and
8:22
deep and swift with Intel. And
8:24
really what it boils down to
8:26
is the innovators dilemma and Andrew
8:28
described it really well. It's an
8:30
incumbent, it gets kind of fat
8:32
and happy and they start to
8:34
lose their edge. And then other
8:36
companies, younger, smaller companies, come along
8:38
and they find a niche product
8:41
in this case, invidia with GPUs.
8:43
It's a different way of computing.
8:45
Because they were so small and
8:47
because it was very niche, it
8:49
was really hitting in the gaming
8:51
industry for a long time, that
8:53
was not something Intel was interested
8:55
in and never thought it would
8:57
ever really be anything. And we
9:00
have learned since that, yeah, it
9:02
became something and it's taking over
9:04
everything. And so that's what happens
9:06
in the interface dilemma is a
9:08
company comes along in a small
9:10
niche. the big fat and happy
9:12
ones kind of ignore it until
9:14
it's too late and that's really
9:16
what's happening now with with Intel
9:18
and the idea of you know
9:21
a big company will always bounce
9:23
back yes there have been some
9:25
examples recently things like meta for
9:27
example that was really down and
9:29
out and has bounced back it
9:31
wasn't business related that was more
9:33
stock price related and the perception
9:35
of the company related as opposed
9:37
to meta not doing its thing.
9:39
So that's kind of a different
9:42
case, but Microsoft was definitely on
9:44
the down and out before Satie
9:46
Nadella took over and kind of
9:48
shifted the company and where they're
9:50
going and how they're going. So
9:52
that's a good example, but unfortunately
9:54
the history of the stock market
9:56
is littered, littered with dozens and
9:58
dozens, hundreds of companies that were
10:01
unable to shift and were overtaken
10:03
by other better competitors. And that's
10:05
the nature of the beast. And
10:07
it doesn't matter how big they
10:09
are. Sears at one time was
10:11
a massive company. Companies like GE
10:13
were massive companies and now they're
10:15
just shelves of themselves. So history
10:17
has shown that just because it's
10:19
a big company doesn't mean it's
10:22
gonna last forever. And they all
10:24
go through life cycles and whatnot.
10:26
So just because it's because it's
10:28
big is. probably a mistake. I
10:30
would encourage anybody that's listening to
10:32
this is considering those kinds of
10:35
investments to do your due diligence
10:37
and understand what the business is
10:39
and what the competitive landscape is for them
10:41
and then make a decision not just because
10:44
hey it's a blue chip and hey it's
10:46
really big and it's going to come back.
10:48
That's not always the case. Most of the
10:50
time it's not the case. If you are
10:52
to see that it's big and we've
10:55
reestablished that shouldn't necessarily
10:58
be your yes or no,
11:00
what is the next consideration
11:02
in your mind about this
11:04
as a potential investment? I
11:07
think for me it goes back
11:09
to I really need to understand
11:11
the business. I got to know what
11:13
they're doing, where they're going,
11:16
and how that stacks up
11:18
with their competitors because that's
11:21
really what it all comes
11:23
down to. If they aren't producing a
11:25
product that people like and want
11:27
to buy, then it doesn't matter
11:29
how big they are, it's not
11:31
going to be. I mean, it
11:33
may have some success, but it's
11:36
not going to have an outsized
11:38
success. And so it really comes
11:40
down to what they're doing, where
11:42
they're going, how they plan to
11:44
get there, and how that stacks
11:46
up against the competition. And if
11:48
they don't have that, to me,
11:50
it becomes a too hard pile. And
11:53
it also depends what's your frame on
11:55
this. For me, for Dave, I'll speak
11:57
for him because I know him pretty
11:59
well. are on the frame of 10-year
12:01
we want to hold stuff obviously
12:03
we don't hold everything for 10
12:05
years but ideally you're finding stuff
12:08
that you can hold for 10
12:10
years or longer that are great
12:12
businesses that we can just sit
12:14
back and let great managers and
12:16
the great business models carry the
12:18
compounding for us so we don't
12:20
have to find a new stock
12:22
every single month kind of an
12:24
idea. With Intel it's hard because
12:26
not only does that industry changed
12:28
so fast, but the nature of
12:30
what they do. You mentioned what
12:32
kind of customers they have. What
12:34
we have seen in the industry
12:36
is the demand for CPU computing
12:38
has not been as strong as
12:40
it was, big part like Davis
12:42
saying of the GPUs now. All
12:44
the data centers being GPU driven,
12:46
a lot of compute being taken
12:48
from a physical. computer and sent
12:50
to the cloud. So that has
12:52
a big impact on Intel. So
12:54
even if they have the best
12:57
CPU, if people aren't buying as
12:59
many CPUs, their IT spend isn't
13:01
as high of a percentage as
13:03
it was two, three decades ago,
13:05
that's going to be a problem.
13:07
And unless that changes, it's hard
13:09
to see Intel barring a successful
13:11
pivot into another business model, like
13:13
they are trying to do with
13:15
the foundries, but barring something like
13:17
that. it's going to be very
13:19
tough for them to get if
13:21
you're trying to beat the market
13:23
and just hold a stock for
13:25
10 plus years. It's going to
13:27
be hard to achieve that if
13:29
they don't have these new demand
13:31
drivers or a new business model
13:33
with high growth. Now certainly you
13:35
can look at the price and
13:37
maybe it's come down and maybe
13:39
you can say yeah in the
13:41
next six months or a year
13:43
it's going to rebound and rock
13:45
it up I'll be in and
13:48
I'll be out. Fine by me
13:50
like if you want to play
13:52
that game that, that's totally on
13:54
you. Not really talking about that
13:56
for the kinds of companies that
13:58
we buy and the lens that
14:00
we're using. So those are the
14:02
types of things that I would
14:04
look for But I mean you
14:06
can be successful sometimes buying stuff
14:08
cheap that's hated and then getting
14:10
out when it's not as hated
14:12
because to your point I mean,
14:14
if they still have products that
14:16
are decently profitable, maybe they're not
14:18
taking over the world, but maybe
14:20
they're still bringing in billions of
14:22
dollars. So there's some value there.
14:24
People are gonna buy for a
14:26
dividend or they're gonna buy for
14:28
buybacks or you just won't see
14:30
very many businesses that can survive
14:32
that will trade for such a
14:34
low multiple that, like as an
14:37
example, if a company has. 10
14:39
billion in cash and the stocks
14:41
at 10 billion dollars. Not many
14:43
people because there's so many eyes
14:45
on Wall Street these days, not
14:47
many people are going to ignore
14:49
that unless the company is literally
14:51
about to go bankrupt. So there
14:53
will always be that floor for
14:55
so many different companies and money
14:57
can be made. But if you're
14:59
looking for something over the long
15:01
term, you do have to consider
15:03
the business and the facts of
15:05
the industry make that really hard.
15:07
So we've got piled on on
15:09
this question. What would be the
15:11
silver lining here or what would
15:13
be the next tangible step? Because
15:15
looking at a big company and
15:17
seeing a stock that's down I
15:19
think is a great potential opportunity.
15:21
It's a great way to look
15:23
at things for sure. It's a
15:26
great place to turn over rocks
15:28
and maybe find a good investment.
15:30
So. If you had to give
15:32
this hypothetical person a pound the
15:34
back in a direction for what
15:36
would you say? I would say
15:38
that looking for contrarian ideas is
15:40
a really good place to try
15:42
to to mine for potential ideas
15:44
and I think it's a great
15:46
idea to look at companies that
15:48
you may know well and may
15:50
have an understanding about what the
15:52
business does and whatnot. And if
15:54
it is unloved or unloved comparatively,
15:56
then that could offer you a
15:58
good opportunity to get into the
16:00
company. And so I definitely like
16:02
the way that they're trying to
16:04
think and trying to look. And
16:06
I think it just comes down
16:08
to you got, I mean, you
16:10
have to take it case by
16:12
case. is some companies in this
16:15
case Intel is unloved probably for
16:17
a good reason, whereas maybe some
16:19
other ones that could be more
16:21
on the unloved side may not
16:23
be as logical. There may be
16:25
maybe not systematic. reasons why they're
16:27
unloved. It could be the investor
16:29
sentiment toward that sector has turned.
16:31
Or maybe there's been some bad
16:33
news recently that is kind of
16:35
more of a nothing burger. So
16:37
there's definitely those circumstances. So I
16:39
like I like the way that
16:41
they're going and I think, you
16:43
know, kind of use a basketball
16:45
term to keep dribbling with your
16:47
head up and looking for opportunities.
16:49
But you have to take a
16:51
case by case and don't assign
16:53
a kind of a blind obedience
16:55
to, okay, it's big, it's cheap,
16:57
it must be, it'll get, it'll
16:59
bounce back again. I think we've
17:01
kind of explored that you need
17:03
to think about the idea that
17:06
it is. and make sure that
17:08
it is a legitimate idea that
17:10
it still has good prospects going
17:12
forward as Buffett would say, you
17:14
know, you can analyze it and
17:16
see that it has good prospects.
17:18
And if it doesn't, then, okay,
17:20
that's too hard pile, move on
17:22
to something else because there's a
17:24
million in one companies that you
17:26
could choose from. And so I
17:28
guess that's kind of what I
17:30
would suggest to them. Yeah, that's
17:32
good advice. Okay. All right. Both
17:34
business and life, safeguarding your assets
17:36
is crucial. Imagine the legacy you
17:38
want to leave for your family,
17:40
one that ensures their comfort and
17:42
security even in your absence. Life
17:44
is unpredictable, but you can take
17:46
steps to protect your family's future.
17:48
Consider securing your hard-earned assets with
17:50
a tailored life insurance policy from
17:52
Select Quote. Ensuring your legacy remains
17:55
attacked and your loved ones are
17:57
financially secure. It's what I did,
17:59
and it was easy and painless.
18:01
So why select quote? They are
18:03
one of America's leading insurance brokers
18:05
with nearly 40 years of experience,
18:07
helping over 2 million customers find
18:09
over $700 billion in coverage since
18:11
19- 1985. Other life insurance brokers
18:13
offer impersonal, one-size-fits-all policies that may
18:15
cost you more and cover you
18:17
less, while select quotes licensed insurance
18:19
agents work for you to tailor
18:21
a life insurance policy for your
18:23
individual needs in as little as
18:25
15 minutes. Did you know that
18:27
the more life insurance coverage you
18:29
need, the more likely you are
18:31
to overpay for it? With select
18:33
quote, you can save up to
18:35
50% compared to other companies, whether
18:37
you need a $500,000 policy or
18:39
a $50 million policy. At the
18:41
selectquote.com and a licensed insurance agent
18:44
will call you right away with
18:46
the right policy for your life
18:48
and your budget. They shop, you
18:50
save. At the right life insurance
18:52
for you, four less, at selectquote.com/beginners.
18:54
Go to selectquote.com/beginners today to get
18:56
started. That's selectquote.com/beginners. The money guy
18:58
who likes keeping more money than
19:00
I spend. I want to talk
19:02
to you about Mint Mobile, who
19:04
by the way also wants you
19:06
to keep more of your money.
19:08
There in your corner. In the
19:10
opposing corner, we have traditional big
19:12
wireless who also wants to keep
19:14
more of your money. After years
19:16
of crazy high bills, bogus fees,
19:18
and freak perks that actually cost
19:20
more in the long run, we
19:22
have Mint Mobile coming to our
19:24
rescue. Say bye to your overpriced
19:26
wireless plans, jaw-dropping monthly bills and
19:28
unexpected overages. Mint Mobile is here
19:30
to rescue you with premium wireless
19:33
plans starting at $15 a month.
19:35
All plans come with high-speed data
19:37
and unlimited talk and tax delivered
19:39
on the nation's largest 5G network.
19:41
Use your own phone number with
19:43
any Mint Mobile plan and bring
19:45
your phone number along with all
19:47
your existing contacts. Ditch overprice wireless
19:49
and get three months of premium
19:51
wireless service from Mint Mobile for
19:53
$15 a month. No matter how
19:55
you say it, don't overpay for
19:57
it. Shop data plans at mintmobile.com/beginners.
19:59
Up for a payment of $45
20:01
for three month five gigabyte plan
20:03
required equivalent to $15. per month.
20:05
New customer offer for first three
20:07
months only. Then full price plan
20:09
options available. Taxes and fees extra,
20:11
see Mint Mobile for details. So
20:13
let's let's move on to our
20:15
next question here. So question is
20:17
how can management decisions such as
20:19
capital allocation and mergers and acquisitions
20:21
affect shareholder value? Fantastic question and
20:24
what are your thoughts on this? It
20:26
can certainly change the values a
20:28
lot and more so even It can
20:30
do a lot of bad, and you'll
20:32
see the bad will be really bad.
20:34
And of course, you know, some
20:36
managers can do good too,
20:39
but usually the very bad cases
20:41
outweigh the very good cases,
20:43
always exceptions to the world, but
20:45
in general, you will see some
20:48
very bad ones, and that's just
20:50
kind of the case. What are
20:52
your thoughts on this? Well, to
20:55
me, Kappa allocation is job
20:57
number one, and for every
20:59
CEO. their job is to allocate
21:01
the money that the business makes
21:03
to try to make the business
21:05
grow. And the better they do
21:07
that, the ideally, the business
21:09
will grow. And the hard part
21:11
about this is that sometimes
21:13
it's hard to measure. And
21:15
the other part about it that
21:18
can be challenging is that
21:20
many CEOs that get into the
21:22
positions either have no experience
21:24
in that particular industry or they
21:26
come from, let's say operations, let's
21:29
say operations, or they come
21:31
from marketing and really have no
21:33
experience allocating capital. And so
21:35
maybe they have to off lay that
21:38
to maybe the CFO for example,
21:40
because that's maybe not their area
21:42
of expertise. And so it just
21:44
some of those things can lead
21:47
to problems for the company if
21:49
they're not done correctly. And a
21:51
lot of times when you see
21:53
businesses that maybe are struggling
21:56
to grow, it's because they've...
21:58
put money in in bad.
22:00
acquisition seems to be the one
22:02
where they can get the most
22:04
trouble because sometimes I like this
22:07
phrase they're trying to empire build
22:09
and as opposed to necessarily build
22:11
the business and Really what I'm
22:13
saying is it becomes more about
22:15
the ego of the CEO as
22:17
opposed to creating shareholder value and
22:19
a lot of times they overspend
22:22
to satisfy that ego and then
22:24
it doesn't turn out well. And
22:26
when it doesn't turn out well,
22:28
really the shareholders are the ones
22:30
who suffer. And so this is
22:32
where it can really cause a
22:34
lot of damage to us as
22:37
shareholders. And this is one of
22:39
the things that really has set
22:41
Buffett apart from the PAC is
22:43
that he's done a really fantastic
22:45
job of acquiring businesses. putting them
22:47
under their umbrella and allowing them
22:49
to succeed. Mark Leonard has also
22:52
done an amazing job of doing
22:54
that. That's generally the way they
22:56
grow is by making acquisitions and
22:58
they make hundreds of them a
23:00
year. And so that's certainly a
23:02
skill that he has that not
23:04
every company has. So it's definitely
23:07
something to be aware of. Yep.
23:09
So do you have any examples
23:11
you wanted to maybe share of
23:13
somebody that's? Maybe not done a
23:15
good job of that? Well, I
23:17
think one of the classic ones
23:19
is the whole, was it AT&T
23:22
buying Time Warner, and it was
23:24
something where they paid 200, 220
23:26
billion plus, and ended up, oops,
23:28
it was only worth like 10
23:30
or 20 billion. That was a
23:32
lot of money they laid on
23:34
fire, and hurray for the shareholders
23:36
who got bought out. But if
23:39
you look at the stock price
23:41
for AT&T after that, it was
23:43
not pretty. And that's what happens
23:45
is you basically have what happens
23:47
in effect. is a company makes
23:49
profits and shareholders all, the stock
23:51
market all assumes that those profits
23:54
are gonna continue to grow because
23:56
they have been growing, and then
23:58
you make this huge mistake in
24:00
capital allocation. And now what was
24:02
supposed to lead to growth is
24:04
now no longer leading to growth.
24:06
And now you have money that
24:09
instead of being reinvested in the
24:11
business, maybe is paying off debt
24:13
on something that was a complete
24:15
waste of money. And I think
24:17
that's pretty common, but you don't
24:19
hear a lot of a lot
24:21
of a lot of bad capital
24:24
location can sometimes fly under the
24:26
radar Especially because you won't necessarily
24:28
see the the negative effects right
24:30
away And Wall Street has this
24:32
weird thing that they do where
24:34
they don't look unfavorably on impairments
24:36
almost like it's everything's always priced
24:39
in like all we already saw
24:41
that your growth had stagnated so
24:43
I mean I guess it makes
24:45
sense, but still it's You generally
24:47
don't want to be in a
24:49
situation where the capital allocation has
24:51
not been ideal. Another form of
24:54
bad capital allocation would be buybacks
24:56
when a stock's valuation is super
24:58
super high because the return you
25:00
get on those are very small.
25:02
Buybacks ideally will reduce the pie,
25:04
making your slice of the pie
25:06
bigger as a shareholder as part
25:09
owner of a business. But if
25:11
a company is taking its profits
25:13
and buying back its stock at
25:15
150 PE, they're not getting very
25:17
many shares for the profits that
25:19
they're making. And so your slice
25:21
of the pie is very, you're
25:23
lucky if it's growing at all
25:26
at that point. Maybe it's just
25:28
off-sitting dilution. So that can be
25:30
another way where it's like, cool,
25:32
this business is making all this
25:34
money, maybe. And none of it's
25:36
benefiting a shareholder in a tangible
25:38
way. because it's just being thrown
25:41
at this expensive stock price. And
25:43
that has happened a lot. I
25:45
think you're starting to see some
25:47
of the effects of that. when
25:49
there's market turmoil. But I mean,
25:51
calling me surprise, because these kind
25:53
of stories seem to happen all
25:56
the time and nobody seems to
25:58
batn I and, you know, we're
26:00
all no wiser for it because
26:02
people continue piling into these stories.
26:04
But it is what it is.
26:06
That's just something that, to me,
26:08
I would avoid those kinds of
26:11
situations because you can lose a
26:13
lot of money that way. Yes.
26:15
Yeah, for sure, for sure you
26:17
can. And it seems like it's
26:19
become a source of pride to
26:21
announce that you're buying back shares,
26:23
and they just do it because
26:26
they think that shareholders expect them
26:28
to, regardless of whether it's a
26:30
good choice for the capital allocation
26:32
or not. And that's where it
26:34
becomes, okay, was it really a
26:36
good choice? You know, to your
26:38
point, it's trading at 122 PE.
26:41
Is that really the best? Is
26:43
that the best place you could
26:45
put the money? Seriously? Like, you
26:47
have no other investment ideas you
26:49
could put it into, if it's
26:51
that expensive, and it's probably doing
26:53
well. Like, you could probably reinvest
26:56
something in the business that's doing
26:58
better. And it definitely, I mean,
27:00
these all have impacts on us,
27:02
like Andrew was saying about the
27:04
slice of the pie. I think
27:06
that's a great illustration. And if
27:08
they're choosing poorly, then, you know,
27:10
I'm getting a smaller. bite of
27:13
the pumpkin pie and that's never
27:15
going to make me happy. So
27:17
that's the way I look at
27:19
it. And again, it's job number
27:21
one. This is the most important
27:23
thing that they do. And so
27:25
finding good capital alligators is it's
27:28
an art and once you do
27:30
find one, it's definitely something you
27:32
want to hang on to. Any
27:34
examples burn in your brain about
27:36
like this was a really bad.
27:38
Apple allocation story. Probably two that
27:40
spring to mind. Number one is
27:43
the whole AOL Yahoo thing. That
27:45
was a dumpster fire in the
27:47
offing and it basically destroyed both
27:49
businesses. So it wasn't just killing
27:51
Yahoo. It also kind of killed
27:53
AOL too. And that was a
27:55
gross, gross misuse of capital. And
27:58
I think a couple other ones
28:00
that have sprung to mind would
28:02
be in the payments industry, Fidelity
28:04
National and Global Payments Network, GPN.
28:06
They both bought payment processors and
28:08
this was at the same time
28:10
that Fyser bought a payment processor.
28:13
So all three big. payment companies
28:15
invested heavily in these companies and
28:17
they all spent roughly around the
28:19
same amount 35 to 45 billion
28:21
on these on these acquisitions and
28:23
the first two have already have
28:25
already spun those offer putting them
28:28
up for sale and have impaired
28:30
their income statements billions because they
28:32
were terrible acquisitions. They did a
28:34
horrible job of integrating them and
28:36
really crushed the stock price for
28:38
both businesses and of course they'll
28:40
probably recover to a certain extent,
28:43
but they've really set the businesses
28:45
back and the shareholders back a
28:47
long, long way. It's just because
28:49
all three of them wanted to
28:51
go down the payments playground and
28:53
only Fyserv was able to do
28:55
a good job of integrating their
28:57
acquisition and the other two. didn't
29:00
and they chose poorly and it's
29:02
it impacted the companies mightily and
29:04
it still is. That's a great
29:06
example and I think it's more
29:08
common than somebody should write a
29:10
book about it maybe and maybe
29:12
some of the ads but just
29:15
this idea that companies will literally
29:17
copy what they see their peers
29:19
doing without even putting thought into
29:21
whether this is a good decision
29:23
or not. Well they're jumping off
29:25
a cliff so we'll do it
29:27
too. And that's usually not a
29:30
good recipe if it's in a
29:32
business that's not a good ROI
29:34
business. And so that's a great
29:36
example of that. Yeah. Yeah. McDonald's
29:38
meets the Minecraft universe with one
29:40
of six collectibles and your choice
29:42
of a Big Mac. This episode
29:45
is brought to you by Indeed's
29:47
Sponsored Jobs, now available with a
29:49
Minecraft movie meal. I participate in
29:51
McDonald's for a limited time, a
29:53
Minecraft movie, only in theaters. This
29:55
episode is brought to you by
29:57
Indeed. When your computer breaks, you
30:00
don't wait for it to magically
30:02
start working again. You fix the
30:04
problem. So why wait to hire
30:06
the people your company desperately needs?
30:08
Use Indeed sponsored jobs to hire
30:10
top talent fast. And even better,
30:12
you only pay for results. There's
30:15
no need to wait. Speed up
30:17
your hiring with a $75 sponsored
30:19
job credit at nd.com/podcast. Terms and
30:21
conditions apply. The best stock picks
30:23
require a light ball moment to
30:25
see exactly what that looks like.
30:27
Check out one of my previous
30:30
reports at stock write up.com. So
30:32
for our final question for today,
30:34
so this is. Dave and Andrew.
30:36
I have been listening to your
30:38
podcast for a few years now
30:40
and I cannot thank you enough
30:42
for the work that you do.
30:44
I have been a subscriber to
30:47
Value Spotlight and I love it.
30:49
Every month I put it in
30:51
a set amount for the recommendations
30:53
you make. I have some extra
30:55
money and I want to invest
30:57
that into some of the companies
30:59
you've recommended in the past. I
31:02
notice two opportunities have peaked my
31:04
interest. I want to put the
31:06
extra cash into the Texas Instruments
31:08
as well as the Crown Castle.
31:10
My question is if you had
31:12
to choose one, which would you
31:14
would you would you pick Both
31:17
are at lower prices. Do you
31:19
still have the same conviction for
31:21
Texas Instruments or for Crown Castle?
31:23
And which do you think would
31:25
be the smarter play? Either way,
31:27
I would love to get your
31:29
insights on this potential idea. Keep
31:32
up the great work. So this
31:34
is from Boz. And great question.
31:36
And this is directed at you,
31:38
Sir Andrew. Well, thanks for writing
31:40
in Boz. We really appreciate you
31:42
listening and taking the time to.
31:44
to ask us this, because this
31:47
is kind of fun. Maybe not
31:49
so fun for me, because both
31:51
of these stocks have been among
31:53
the worst decisions I've made in
31:55
the past couple years, and both
31:57
for different reasons. I think the
31:59
Crown Castle one... is interesting right
32:02
now because what we have seen
32:04
is an impairment. And that was
32:06
reflective of the CEO who's now
32:08
gone, but basically taking a bunch
32:10
of money and putting it in
32:12
this strategy, this fiber strategy, small
32:15
cells strategy that is now been
32:17
determined that that's not gonna produce
32:19
the type of ROI, the type
32:21
of growth that the company would
32:23
hope for. And so you haven't
32:26
really seen the stock be affected
32:28
all that much, but Wall Street
32:30
has seemed to know this story
32:32
for a while. And there were
32:34
some activists who came in and
32:37
stirred things up in relation to
32:39
everything that is happening. So we
32:41
are getting an example in real
32:43
time of when poor capital allocation
32:45
can happen. And unfortunately, I've had
32:48
to ride through that. And at
32:50
the time, I thought it was
32:52
a good capital allocation. I thought
32:54
it made sense. I thought the
32:56
5G thing with self-driving vehicles and
32:59
all of the data that is
33:01
needed for those things with robotics,
33:03
I really thought small cells would
33:05
be the next area for growth
33:07
for Crown Castle and it has
33:10
not been. Luckily I buy things
33:12
with a margin of safety so
33:14
while it has underperformed we are
33:16
still getting six percent, six and
33:18
a half percent on the dividend.
33:21
So that's been nice. The
33:23
question of whether to add to
33:25
a position like that I think really
33:27
boils down to what is
33:29
your opportunity set at the
33:31
time and how does the
33:33
company you're looking at compare
33:35
to that. Obviously we won't
33:37
get this right every single
33:39
time, but you do want to try
33:42
to think deeply. It's
33:44
unfortunately I haven't found that it's
33:46
as simple as buy all the stocks
33:48
that are down in your portfolio and
33:50
you will do great because Crown Castle
33:52
was actually a buy the dip situation.
33:54
It was a good buy the dip
33:56
but it still hasn't made the stock
33:58
take off like I like I originally
34:00
thought. So to me, again, it comes down
34:02
to the opportunity set. What do you have
34:04
in front of you? Do you like the
34:07
outlook of those stocks or of the stock
34:09
you're thinking of buying the dip for? And
34:11
then the flip side of that, you know,
34:13
one of the arguments is, well, if
34:15
you wouldn't buy a stock, why hold
34:18
it? Why don't you just sell it?
34:20
I think that's a dangerous way to
34:22
look at things because then you can
34:24
second guess yourself with every stock you
34:26
buy for now to the end of
34:28
history. Because if I'm looking at Crown
34:31
Castle, I'm not adding to them at
34:33
this time. That doesn't necessarily mean that
34:35
I'm going to sell them either. You
34:37
just have levels of conviction, you have
34:39
levels of optimism, levels of opportunity. And
34:41
so we're constantly juggling those. I think
34:44
it's always good to ask yourself
34:46
if it's just a time and
34:48
place to buy in and buy
34:50
the dip. As it stands right
34:52
now, though, we've been talking about
34:54
semiconductors, I have dipped my toes
34:56
in a couple semiconductors in the
34:58
last few months, and I liked
35:00
the opportunity set and the future
35:02
potential of those semiconductor companies more
35:04
than a company like Crown Castle.
35:06
And I just think the ceiling
35:08
there is higher, and so with
35:10
my longer time frame, that appeals
35:12
more to me. And because Crown
35:14
Castle does not have that small
35:16
cell growth... Outlook moving forward. There
35:18
are upsides not as high as I
35:20
previously thought. So not a case to
35:22
sell, but also not a case to
35:24
add. So that kind of thought process
35:27
I hope is helpful in debugging a
35:29
situation. Maybe you're holding the stock
35:31
and maybe it does dip and you're wondering
35:33
do I buy this dip? Try to think
35:35
of it from a business perspective. Try
35:37
to think about where you see the
35:40
next 10 years and think about upside
35:42
and downside. I always like to think
35:44
an upside and downside when it comes
35:47
to buying something because I think that
35:49
helps. That certainly helps simplify
35:51
things and sometimes make those decisions
35:53
a little bit easier. Yeah, that's
35:55
a good explanation. So I guess,
35:57
what are your thoughts on Texas
35:59
instruments then? Texas Instruments is a hard
36:01
one. I mean, I know you're bullish
36:04
on it. They've, we both have it.
36:06
I know Leandro's bullish on them, but
36:08
they have been struggling. So profitability for
36:10
Texas Instruments has really come down. The
36:13
revenue growth isn't comparable to peers. They've
36:15
really been pulling back that business and
36:17
there's competition from China, which is making
36:19
it hard, but they're really sort of
36:22
consolidating and Reinvesting and growth in a
36:24
way by having these new bigger factories.
36:26
So it's it's a tough it's a
36:28
tough situation I have had stocks where
36:31
I bought the dip I don't do
36:33
it very often, but it has happened
36:35
and you ask yourself at that time
36:37
like I bought Pulte Group years ago
36:40
when everybody was freaking out about residential
36:42
real estate I still thought the business
36:44
look great and I thought things were
36:46
intact so I I purchased it. When
36:49
you buy the dip in a stock,
36:51
you don't always need to have numbers
36:53
that just rebound miraculously. A stock can
36:55
sell off even if the numbers look
36:58
great. And so to me, that can
37:00
be a great time to buy the
37:02
dip when the numbers still look pretty
37:04
good, but the stock's getting hammered because
37:07
people are just being emotional about the
37:09
company. Apple is actually a great example
37:11
of this. always buy the dip in
37:14
Apple. Right. People like, people like, people
37:16
will repeat the phrase that Apple doesn't
37:18
innovate and then they come out with
37:20
the iPhone 6 and then they come
37:23
out with the iPhone 13. So those
37:25
are the types of situations where earnings
37:27
can be going up and up and
37:29
up and earnings been share up and
37:32
up and up and people just get
37:34
this idea about the companies. Some, some
37:36
analysts says something and you know, some
37:38
macro thing happens and Wall Street's really
37:41
down on the stock, but if the
37:43
numbers still look good and the moat
37:45
has still not been really damaged. That
37:47
can be a really great opportunity to
37:50
buy the dip. So it's not always
37:52
easy. It's a great question. I've been
37:54
looking at those stocks for a while
37:56
and it's very tempting for Texas Instruments.
37:59
I'm waiting for those numbers to look
38:01
better. For Crown Castle, similar story. I'm
38:03
waiting for those numbers to look better.
38:05
And we'll just have to. Wait and
38:08
see and you know I bought these
38:10
companies for a reason so I'm not
38:12
selling them I still believe in the
38:14
strength of their business models But the
38:17
opportunities that I see compared to those
38:19
where the numbers aren't great That kind
38:21
of frames my mindset on it I
38:23
think that's a great way to think
38:26
about them. I mean you have to
38:28
take a case by case and you
38:30
have to look at What I love
38:32
the idea of looking at the opportunity
38:35
cost in the opportunity set of these
38:37
particular ideas versus other things you may
38:39
own or other things that are out
38:41
there and Understanding where each of them
38:44
is in their own business Cronkastles at
38:46
a different place than Texas Instruments is
38:48
and so You just have to I
38:50
think I think that's the best way
38:53
to do it. It's just the way
38:55
the opportunities and decide I think it's
38:57
best not to just blindly just buy
38:59
because it's down. I think it's better
39:02
to understand what it is you're buying
39:04
and why you're buying it and why
39:06
it's down. It's not unusual for companies
39:08
to go through draw-downs. It's a normal
39:11
part of the stock market, but you
39:13
need to understand why it is and
39:15
not just blindly buy it just because
39:17
you really like it and it's down.
39:20
There are a lot of times there's
39:22
an actual reason why it's down and
39:24
you need to understand that it before
39:26
you pull the trigger and buy something
39:29
just cause. Yeah, and unfortunately for both
39:31
of these, there has been things that
39:33
have happened and yeah, the numbers have
39:35
not looked as great as they used
39:38
to. Right. Yeah, it makes it hard,
39:40
right? That's what makes the game hard.
39:42
It does make it hard, yes. That's
39:44
why we pay you the big bucks
39:47
to make all the decisions for us.
39:49
Well, yeah, I am looking at these
39:51
every single month. I'm looking at the
39:54
whole portfolio. I'm looking and trying to
39:56
balance between opportunities. And if you're there
39:58
and you're taking advantage, then that's great
40:00
because we're all making money together. Right.
40:03
Exactly. All right, well, with that, we
40:05
will go ahead and wrap up our
40:07
conversation for today. I hope you enjoyed
40:09
our question answering. And again, if you
40:12
have a question, please send it to
40:14
us at newsletter at e investing for
40:16
beginners.com. You can also send us on
40:18
Spotify for beginners.com. You can also send
40:21
us questions on Spotify. You can ask
40:23
them on the app or you can
40:25
reach out to us on the X
40:27
machine. So with that, we'll go ahead
40:30
and sign us off. You guys go
40:32
out there and invest with the margin
40:34
of the margin of the margin of
40:36
safety. And if it on the margin
40:39
of safety. Have since on the safety.
40:41
Have's on the safety. Have's on the
40:43
safety. Have's on the safety. Have's on
40:45
the safety. Have's on the safety. Have's
40:48
on the safety. Have's on the safety.
40:50
Have's on the safety. Have's on the.
40:52
Have's on the. Have's on the. Have.
40:54
Have. Have. Have. Have. Have. Have. Have.
40:57
Have. Have. Have. Seven steps to understanding
40:59
the stock market shows you precisely how
41:01
to break down the numbers in an
41:03
engaging and readable way with real-life examples.
41:06
Get access today at stockmarket pdf.com. Until
41:08
next time, have a prosperous day. The
41:12
information contained is for general
41:14
information and educational purposes only.
41:16
It is not intended for
41:18
a substitute for legal, commercial,
41:20
and or financial advice from
41:22
a licensed professional. Review our
41:24
full disclaimer at e investingfor
41:26
beginners.com.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More