Q&A: Buying Big, Struggling Companies; Adding to Losers

Q&A: Buying Big, Struggling Companies; Adding to Losers

Released Monday, 31st March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Q&A: Buying Big, Struggling Companies; Adding to Losers

Q&A: Buying Big, Struggling Companies; Adding to Losers

Q&A: Buying Big, Struggling Companies; Adding to Losers

Q&A: Buying Big, Struggling Companies; Adding to Losers

Monday, 31st March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Think about your favorite entrepreneur.

0:02

People such as Alex Hormozi,

0:04

Justin Welsh, or Matt Gray

0:06

would be nowhere without trusted

0:08

partners. If your commerce platform

0:10

is pushing away potential customers

0:12

instead of winning them over

0:14

as loyal fans, consider using

0:16

Shopify. Shopify is the commerce

0:18

platform revolutionizing millions of businesses

0:20

worldwide. Whether you're a garage

0:22

entrepreneur or IPO ready, Shopify

0:25

is the only tool you

0:27

need to start run and

0:29

grow your business without the

0:31

struggle. Shopify puts you in

0:33

control of every sales channel.

0:35

So whether you're selling satin

0:37

sheets from Shopify's in-person POS

0:39

system or offering organic olive

0:41

oil on Shopify's all-in-one e-commerce

0:43

platform, you are covered. And

0:45

once you've reached your audience,

0:48

Shopify has the internet's best

0:50

converting checkout to help you

0:52

turn them from browsers to

0:54

buyers. Shopify's easy-to-use system helps

0:56

you start right away. No

0:58

more procrastination, no more excuses.

1:00

Shopify powers 10% of all

1:02

e-commerce in the U.S. and

1:04

Shopify is truly a Google

1:06

force, powering all birds, Rothies,

1:08

and Brooklyn, and millions of

1:10

other entrepreneurs of every size

1:13

across over 170 companies. Plus,

1:15

Shopify's award-winning help is there

1:17

to support your success every

1:19

step of the way. This

1:21

is possibility powered by Shopify.

1:23

Sign up for a $1

1:25

per month trial period at

1:27

shopify.com/beginners all lower case. Go

1:29

to shopify.com/beginners to take your

1:31

business to the next level

1:33

today. shopify.com/beginners. Hey Kristen, how's

1:36

it tracking? With Karvana Value

1:38

Tracker? What else? Oh, it's

1:40

tracking. In fact, Value Surge

1:42

Alert trucks up 2.5 percent.

1:44

Vans down 1.7. Just as

1:46

predicted. Mm-hmm. So, we gonna...

1:48

I don't know. Could sell,

1:50

could hold? The power to

1:52

always know our car's worth.

1:54

Accelerating, isn't it? Ugh. Tracking.

1:56

Always know your car's worth

1:59

with Carvana Value Tracker. Crushes

2:01

your dreams and getting rich

2:03

quick. They actually got me

2:05

into reading stats for anything.

2:07

You're tuned in to the

2:09

Investing for Beginners podcast. Led

2:11

by Andrew Saver and Dave

2:13

Ahern. Step-by-step premium investing guidance

2:15

for beginners. Your path to

2:17

financial freedom starts now. Start

2:20

now. All

2:27

right folks, welcome to Investing for Beginners

2:29

podcast. Today we're going to answer some

2:31

questions. So I went to the Reddit

2:33

machine and I found some really cool

2:35

questions and we got another great question

2:38

from a listener. So we'll go ahead

2:40

and answer those questions for everybody today.

2:42

So buckle in and have some fun.

2:44

So he got the first one. So

2:47

I'm very new to the stock market.

2:49

I have no idea what to do or how to

2:51

do it and I'm just Dipping my toes

2:53

for now. I was wondering about something.

2:55

Intel stock has dropped significantly in the

2:57

past year. A stock used to cost

2:59

$51.28, now only costs $18 as far

3:01

as I know. Of course, things aren't

3:03

looking good for Intel, but wouldn't it

3:05

be the best time to buy as

3:07

much as I can of their stock?

3:09

Intel is a big company, and surely

3:11

they will rise back up again, right?

3:13

No, I honestly have no idea and

3:16

I would love your opinion on

3:18

the matter. So great question and

3:20

kind of appropriate with the market

3:23

being all schizophrenic at the moment.

3:25

So I think what are your

3:27

thoughts on this question and how

3:29

would you help guide them? I would

3:31

first start by saying, look, you are

3:34

in the game and being in the

3:36

game is the most important part. Investing

3:38

is all about taking your hard-earned money

3:40

and putting it to work for you.

3:43

So whether this decision you make on

3:45

Intel or some other company works out

3:47

in your favor or not, the most

3:50

important thing is to not quit because

3:52

that's what you need for the compounding

3:54

to happen is for you to be

3:57

putting money out there and allowing it

3:59

to grow. for a long time

4:01

period. You're not gonna hit all

4:03

winners, trust me, nobody does, but

4:05

you do it enough and you

4:07

will get enough winners that more

4:09

than pay for your losers. And

4:11

that's how you build significant wealth

4:14

in the stock market. As it

4:16

comes to Intel, oh boy, like

4:18

there are, I don't wanna beat

4:20

up on this person, but there

4:22

are some, I think common misconceptions

4:24

myths or. I guess you would

4:26

call it common sayings that people

4:28

in the market mention that to

4:30

me are just completely wrong. One

4:32

of those being, oh, this is

4:35

a big company so they're gonna

4:37

do fine. That, I very much

4:39

disagree with that and that's like

4:41

the first place I would start

4:43

because I'm automatically staring at that

4:45

and I'm like, no, don't look

4:47

at the stock market that way.

4:49

So when you're looking at what

4:51

kind of stock to buy, what

4:53

you want to invest in for

4:56

the long term, it is true

4:58

that usually the biggest company in

5:00

an industry is the one that's

5:02

going to be the better one,

5:04

especially because of something called economies

5:06

of scale. So the bigger you

5:08

are, the more you can spread

5:10

your costs and the more advantages

5:12

you get. And so you do

5:15

get a lot of... the leaders

5:17

or the top dogs of an

5:19

industry who remain that way and

5:21

even strengthen their position from their

5:23

size. But and especially in technology

5:25

where things move so fast, Intel

5:27

is actually a poster child of

5:29

what can happen when you're big

5:31

fat and happy in the technology

5:33

space. And what can happen is

5:36

disruption. Clayton Christensen is a professor

5:38

at Harvard Business School. He wrote

5:40

a great book about this called

5:42

The Innovators dilemma, where, and I

5:44

love for Dave to explain this

5:46

because I think he has thought

5:48

about it more deeply than I

5:50

have lately, but basically. an incumbent,

5:52

a big company who is the

5:54

leader, gets taken over by a

5:57

small company because the small company

5:59

is more innovative. And there's several

6:01

other factors that kind of play

6:03

into that and kind of feed

6:05

into that. But that would be

6:07

my first point is like, look.

6:09

Just because it's big and just

6:11

because you know it doesn't mean

6:13

it's a great investment. Yeah, that

6:15

is 100% true I think the

6:18

description of Intel becoming fat and

6:20

happy is probably a really really

6:22

good place to start with Because

6:24

if you look back on the

6:26

history of Intel if you read

6:28

the book Chip Wars if you're

6:30

curious about the the semiconductor space

6:32

you need to read the book

6:34

Chip Wars. Not necessarily that it's

6:37

going to help you pick out

6:39

the best one today, but it'll

6:41

certainly give you a framework and

6:43

a groundwork to understand what's going

6:45

on today. And Intel was the

6:47

invidia of its day. It was

6:49

leading edge, it was cutting edge.

6:51

They were on the forefront of

6:53

everything. And through a Basically change

6:55

in management and a series of

6:58

poor managers. This is the Intel

7:00

will be someday a great case

7:02

study for what can happen to

7:04

a company that's that's on the

7:06

forefront and suddenly gets behind and

7:08

basically Intel lost its edge. I

7:10

mean it's the easiest way to

7:12

say it is they lost their

7:14

edge and now they're scrambling to

7:16

try to catch up. And as

7:19

Andrew has taught me in the

7:21

semiconductor space in particular, it's not

7:23

just a matter of throwing a

7:25

whole bunch of money at something

7:27

so that you can... become the

7:29

leader again, you have to advance

7:31

in the technologies, you have to

7:33

do the work to understand the

7:35

technology to become back at the

7:38

leading edge. And you can't just

7:40

skip forward, so to speak. You

7:42

have to go through the steps.

7:44

You have to learn this to

7:46

learn that to learn that to

7:48

learn that. And you can only

7:50

do that through a process. And

7:52

so you can't just go, okay,

7:54

I want to go from here

7:56

to D. You have to go

7:59

through B and C to get

8:01

to D. And Intel is trying

8:03

to do that. now, but now

8:05

they're trying to do it quickly

8:07

to get to D, which is

8:09

already where invidia and Micron and

8:11

AMD and everybody else is already

8:13

playing and beyond and and tell

8:15

us behind. So anyway, all that

8:17

to say, you know, the innovator's

8:20

dilemma certainly strikes hard and and

8:22

deep and swift with Intel. And

8:24

really what it boils down to

8:26

is the innovators dilemma and Andrew

8:28

described it really well. It's an

8:30

incumbent, it gets kind of fat

8:32

and happy and they start to

8:34

lose their edge. And then other

8:36

companies, younger, smaller companies, come along

8:38

and they find a niche product

8:41

in this case, invidia with GPUs.

8:43

It's a different way of computing.

8:45

Because they were so small and

8:47

because it was very niche, it

8:49

was really hitting in the gaming

8:51

industry for a long time, that

8:53

was not something Intel was interested

8:55

in and never thought it would

8:57

ever really be anything. And we

9:00

have learned since that, yeah, it

9:02

became something and it's taking over

9:04

everything. And so that's what happens

9:06

in the interface dilemma is a

9:08

company comes along in a small

9:10

niche. the big fat and happy

9:12

ones kind of ignore it until

9:14

it's too late and that's really

9:16

what's happening now with with Intel

9:18

and the idea of you know

9:21

a big company will always bounce

9:23

back yes there have been some

9:25

examples recently things like meta for

9:27

example that was really down and

9:29

out and has bounced back it

9:31

wasn't business related that was more

9:33

stock price related and the perception

9:35

of the company related as opposed

9:37

to meta not doing its thing.

9:39

So that's kind of a different

9:42

case, but Microsoft was definitely on

9:44

the down and out before Satie

9:46

Nadella took over and kind of

9:48

shifted the company and where they're

9:50

going and how they're going. So

9:52

that's a good example, but unfortunately

9:54

the history of the stock market

9:56

is littered, littered with dozens and

9:58

dozens, hundreds of companies that were

10:01

unable to shift and were overtaken

10:03

by other better competitors. And that's

10:05

the nature of the beast. And

10:07

it doesn't matter how big they

10:09

are. Sears at one time was

10:11

a massive company. Companies like GE

10:13

were massive companies and now they're

10:15

just shelves of themselves. So history

10:17

has shown that just because it's

10:19

a big company doesn't mean it's

10:22

gonna last forever. And they all

10:24

go through life cycles and whatnot.

10:26

So just because it's because it's

10:28

big is. probably a mistake. I

10:30

would encourage anybody that's listening to

10:32

this is considering those kinds of

10:35

investments to do your due diligence

10:37

and understand what the business is

10:39

and what the competitive landscape is for them

10:41

and then make a decision not just because

10:44

hey it's a blue chip and hey it's

10:46

really big and it's going to come back.

10:48

That's not always the case. Most of the

10:50

time it's not the case. If you are

10:52

to see that it's big and we've

10:55

reestablished that shouldn't necessarily

10:58

be your yes or no,

11:00

what is the next consideration

11:02

in your mind about this

11:04

as a potential investment? I

11:07

think for me it goes back

11:09

to I really need to understand

11:11

the business. I got to know what

11:13

they're doing, where they're going,

11:16

and how that stacks up

11:18

with their competitors because that's

11:21

really what it all comes

11:23

down to. If they aren't producing a

11:25

product that people like and want

11:27

to buy, then it doesn't matter

11:29

how big they are, it's not

11:31

going to be. I mean, it

11:33

may have some success, but it's

11:36

not going to have an outsized

11:38

success. And so it really comes

11:40

down to what they're doing, where

11:42

they're going, how they plan to

11:44

get there, and how that stacks

11:46

up against the competition. And if

11:48

they don't have that, to me,

11:50

it becomes a too hard pile. And

11:53

it also depends what's your frame on

11:55

this. For me, for Dave, I'll speak

11:57

for him because I know him pretty

11:59

well. are on the frame of 10-year

12:01

we want to hold stuff obviously

12:03

we don't hold everything for 10

12:05

years but ideally you're finding stuff

12:08

that you can hold for 10

12:10

years or longer that are great

12:12

businesses that we can just sit

12:14

back and let great managers and

12:16

the great business models carry the

12:18

compounding for us so we don't

12:20

have to find a new stock

12:22

every single month kind of an

12:24

idea. With Intel it's hard because

12:26

not only does that industry changed

12:28

so fast, but the nature of

12:30

what they do. You mentioned what

12:32

kind of customers they have. What

12:34

we have seen in the industry

12:36

is the demand for CPU computing

12:38

has not been as strong as

12:40

it was, big part like Davis

12:42

saying of the GPUs now. All

12:44

the data centers being GPU driven,

12:46

a lot of compute being taken

12:48

from a physical. computer and sent

12:50

to the cloud. So that has

12:52

a big impact on Intel. So

12:54

even if they have the best

12:57

CPU, if people aren't buying as

12:59

many CPUs, their IT spend isn't

13:01

as high of a percentage as

13:03

it was two, three decades ago,

13:05

that's going to be a problem.

13:07

And unless that changes, it's hard

13:09

to see Intel barring a successful

13:11

pivot into another business model, like

13:13

they are trying to do with

13:15

the foundries, but barring something like

13:17

that. it's going to be very

13:19

tough for them to get if

13:21

you're trying to beat the market

13:23

and just hold a stock for

13:25

10 plus years. It's going to

13:27

be hard to achieve that if

13:29

they don't have these new demand

13:31

drivers or a new business model

13:33

with high growth. Now certainly you

13:35

can look at the price and

13:37

maybe it's come down and maybe

13:39

you can say yeah in the

13:41

next six months or a year

13:43

it's going to rebound and rock

13:45

it up I'll be in and

13:48

I'll be out. Fine by me

13:50

like if you want to play

13:52

that game that, that's totally on

13:54

you. Not really talking about that

13:56

for the kinds of companies that

13:58

we buy and the lens that

14:00

we're using. So those are the

14:02

types of things that I would

14:04

look for But I mean you

14:06

can be successful sometimes buying stuff

14:08

cheap that's hated and then getting

14:10

out when it's not as hated

14:12

because to your point I mean,

14:14

if they still have products that

14:16

are decently profitable, maybe they're not

14:18

taking over the world, but maybe

14:20

they're still bringing in billions of

14:22

dollars. So there's some value there.

14:24

People are gonna buy for a

14:26

dividend or they're gonna buy for

14:28

buybacks or you just won't see

14:30

very many businesses that can survive

14:32

that will trade for such a

14:34

low multiple that, like as an

14:37

example, if a company has. 10

14:39

billion in cash and the stocks

14:41

at 10 billion dollars. Not many

14:43

people because there's so many eyes

14:45

on Wall Street these days, not

14:47

many people are going to ignore

14:49

that unless the company is literally

14:51

about to go bankrupt. So there

14:53

will always be that floor for

14:55

so many different companies and money

14:57

can be made. But if you're

14:59

looking for something over the long

15:01

term, you do have to consider

15:03

the business and the facts of

15:05

the industry make that really hard.

15:07

So we've got piled on on

15:09

this question. What would be the

15:11

silver lining here or what would

15:13

be the next tangible step? Because

15:15

looking at a big company and

15:17

seeing a stock that's down I

15:19

think is a great potential opportunity.

15:21

It's a great way to look

15:23

at things for sure. It's a

15:26

great place to turn over rocks

15:28

and maybe find a good investment.

15:30

So. If you had to give

15:32

this hypothetical person a pound the

15:34

back in a direction for what

15:36

would you say? I would say

15:38

that looking for contrarian ideas is

15:40

a really good place to try

15:42

to to mine for potential ideas

15:44

and I think it's a great

15:46

idea to look at companies that

15:48

you may know well and may

15:50

have an understanding about what the

15:52

business does and whatnot. And if

15:54

it is unloved or unloved comparatively,

15:56

then that could offer you a

15:58

good opportunity to get into the

16:00

company. And so I definitely like

16:02

the way that they're trying to

16:04

think and trying to look. And

16:06

I think it just comes down

16:08

to you got, I mean, you

16:10

have to take it case by

16:12

case. is some companies in this

16:15

case Intel is unloved probably for

16:17

a good reason, whereas maybe some

16:19

other ones that could be more

16:21

on the unloved side may not

16:23

be as logical. There may be

16:25

maybe not systematic. reasons why they're

16:27

unloved. It could be the investor

16:29

sentiment toward that sector has turned.

16:31

Or maybe there's been some bad

16:33

news recently that is kind of

16:35

more of a nothing burger. So

16:37

there's definitely those circumstances. So I

16:39

like I like the way that

16:41

they're going and I think, you

16:43

know, kind of use a basketball

16:45

term to keep dribbling with your

16:47

head up and looking for opportunities.

16:49

But you have to take a

16:51

case by case and don't assign

16:53

a kind of a blind obedience

16:55

to, okay, it's big, it's cheap,

16:57

it must be, it'll get, it'll

16:59

bounce back again. I think we've

17:01

kind of explored that you need

17:03

to think about the idea that

17:06

it is. and make sure that

17:08

it is a legitimate idea that

17:10

it still has good prospects going

17:12

forward as Buffett would say, you

17:14

know, you can analyze it and

17:16

see that it has good prospects.

17:18

And if it doesn't, then, okay,

17:20

that's too hard pile, move on

17:22

to something else because there's a

17:24

million in one companies that you

17:26

could choose from. And so I

17:28

guess that's kind of what I

17:30

would suggest to them. Yeah, that's

17:32

good advice. Okay. All right. Both

17:34

business and life, safeguarding your assets

17:36

is crucial. Imagine the legacy you

17:38

want to leave for your family,

17:40

one that ensures their comfort and

17:42

security even in your absence. Life

17:44

is unpredictable, but you can take

17:46

steps to protect your family's future.

17:48

Consider securing your hard-earned assets with

17:50

a tailored life insurance policy from

17:52

Select Quote. Ensuring your legacy remains

17:55

attacked and your loved ones are

17:57

financially secure. It's what I did,

17:59

and it was easy and painless.

18:01

So why select quote? They are

18:03

one of America's leading insurance brokers

18:05

with nearly 40 years of experience,

18:07

helping over 2 million customers find

18:09

over $700 billion in coverage since

18:11

19- 1985. Other life insurance brokers

18:13

offer impersonal, one-size-fits-all policies that may

18:15

cost you more and cover you

18:17

less, while select quotes licensed insurance

18:19

agents work for you to tailor

18:21

a life insurance policy for your

18:23

individual needs in as little as

18:25

15 minutes. Did you know that

18:27

the more life insurance coverage you

18:29

need, the more likely you are

18:31

to overpay for it? With select

18:33

quote, you can save up to

18:35

50% compared to other companies, whether

18:37

you need a $500,000 policy or

18:39

a $50 million policy. At the

18:41

selectquote.com and a licensed insurance agent

18:44

will call you right away with

18:46

the right policy for your life

18:48

and your budget. They shop, you

18:50

save. At the right life insurance

18:52

for you, four less, at selectquote.com/beginners.

18:54

Go to selectquote.com/beginners today to get

18:56

started. That's selectquote.com/beginners. The money guy

18:58

who likes keeping more money than

19:00

I spend. I want to talk

19:02

to you about Mint Mobile, who

19:04

by the way also wants you

19:06

to keep more of your money.

19:08

There in your corner. In the

19:10

opposing corner, we have traditional big

19:12

wireless who also wants to keep

19:14

more of your money. After years

19:16

of crazy high bills, bogus fees,

19:18

and freak perks that actually cost

19:20

more in the long run, we

19:22

have Mint Mobile coming to our

19:24

rescue. Say bye to your overpriced

19:26

wireless plans, jaw-dropping monthly bills and

19:28

unexpected overages. Mint Mobile is here

19:30

to rescue you with premium wireless

19:33

plans starting at $15 a month.

19:35

All plans come with high-speed data

19:37

and unlimited talk and tax delivered

19:39

on the nation's largest 5G network.

19:41

Use your own phone number with

19:43

any Mint Mobile plan and bring

19:45

your phone number along with all

19:47

your existing contacts. Ditch overprice wireless

19:49

and get three months of premium

19:51

wireless service from Mint Mobile for

19:53

$15 a month. No matter how

19:55

you say it, don't overpay for

19:57

it. Shop data plans at mintmobile.com/beginners.

19:59

Up for a payment of $45

20:01

for three month five gigabyte plan

20:03

required equivalent to $15. per month.

20:05

New customer offer for first three

20:07

months only. Then full price plan

20:09

options available. Taxes and fees extra,

20:11

see Mint Mobile for details. So

20:13

let's let's move on to our

20:15

next question here. So question is

20:17

how can management decisions such as

20:19

capital allocation and mergers and acquisitions

20:21

affect shareholder value? Fantastic question and

20:24

what are your thoughts on this? It

20:26

can certainly change the values a

20:28

lot and more so even It can

20:30

do a lot of bad, and you'll

20:32

see the bad will be really bad.

20:34

And of course, you know, some

20:36

managers can do good too,

20:39

but usually the very bad cases

20:41

outweigh the very good cases,

20:43

always exceptions to the world, but

20:45

in general, you will see some

20:48

very bad ones, and that's just

20:50

kind of the case. What are

20:52

your thoughts on this? Well, to

20:55

me, Kappa allocation is job

20:57

number one, and for every

20:59

CEO. their job is to allocate

21:01

the money that the business makes

21:03

to try to make the business

21:05

grow. And the better they do

21:07

that, the ideally, the business

21:09

will grow. And the hard part

21:11

about this is that sometimes

21:13

it's hard to measure. And

21:15

the other part about it that

21:18

can be challenging is that

21:20

many CEOs that get into the

21:22

positions either have no experience

21:24

in that particular industry or they

21:26

come from, let's say operations, let's

21:29

say operations, or they come

21:31

from marketing and really have no

21:33

experience allocating capital. And so

21:35

maybe they have to off lay that

21:38

to maybe the CFO for example,

21:40

because that's maybe not their area

21:42

of expertise. And so it just

21:44

some of those things can lead

21:47

to problems for the company if

21:49

they're not done correctly. And a

21:51

lot of times when you see

21:53

businesses that maybe are struggling

21:56

to grow, it's because they've...

21:58

put money in in bad.

22:00

acquisition seems to be the one

22:02

where they can get the most

22:04

trouble because sometimes I like this

22:07

phrase they're trying to empire build

22:09

and as opposed to necessarily build

22:11

the business and Really what I'm

22:13

saying is it becomes more about

22:15

the ego of the CEO as

22:17

opposed to creating shareholder value and

22:19

a lot of times they overspend

22:22

to satisfy that ego and then

22:24

it doesn't turn out well. And

22:26

when it doesn't turn out well,

22:28

really the shareholders are the ones

22:30

who suffer. And so this is

22:32

where it can really cause a

22:34

lot of damage to us as

22:37

shareholders. And this is one of

22:39

the things that really has set

22:41

Buffett apart from the PAC is

22:43

that he's done a really fantastic

22:45

job of acquiring businesses. putting them

22:47

under their umbrella and allowing them

22:49

to succeed. Mark Leonard has also

22:52

done an amazing job of doing

22:54

that. That's generally the way they

22:56

grow is by making acquisitions and

22:58

they make hundreds of them a

23:00

year. And so that's certainly a

23:02

skill that he has that not

23:04

every company has. So it's definitely

23:07

something to be aware of. Yep.

23:09

So do you have any examples

23:11

you wanted to maybe share of

23:13

somebody that's? Maybe not done a

23:15

good job of that? Well, I

23:17

think one of the classic ones

23:19

is the whole, was it AT&T

23:22

buying Time Warner, and it was

23:24

something where they paid 200, 220

23:26

billion plus, and ended up, oops,

23:28

it was only worth like 10

23:30

or 20 billion. That was a

23:32

lot of money they laid on

23:34

fire, and hurray for the shareholders

23:36

who got bought out. But if

23:39

you look at the stock price

23:41

for AT&T after that, it was

23:43

not pretty. And that's what happens

23:45

is you basically have what happens

23:47

in effect. is a company makes

23:49

profits and shareholders all, the stock

23:51

market all assumes that those profits

23:54

are gonna continue to grow because

23:56

they have been growing, and then

23:58

you make this huge mistake in

24:00

capital allocation. And now what was

24:02

supposed to lead to growth is

24:04

now no longer leading to growth.

24:06

And now you have money that

24:09

instead of being reinvested in the

24:11

business, maybe is paying off debt

24:13

on something that was a complete

24:15

waste of money. And I think

24:17

that's pretty common, but you don't

24:19

hear a lot of a lot

24:21

of a lot of bad capital

24:24

location can sometimes fly under the

24:26

radar Especially because you won't necessarily

24:28

see the the negative effects right

24:30

away And Wall Street has this

24:32

weird thing that they do where

24:34

they don't look unfavorably on impairments

24:36

almost like it's everything's always priced

24:39

in like all we already saw

24:41

that your growth had stagnated so

24:43

I mean I guess it makes

24:45

sense, but still it's You generally

24:47

don't want to be in a

24:49

situation where the capital allocation has

24:51

not been ideal. Another form of

24:54

bad capital allocation would be buybacks

24:56

when a stock's valuation is super

24:58

super high because the return you

25:00

get on those are very small.

25:02

Buybacks ideally will reduce the pie,

25:04

making your slice of the pie

25:06

bigger as a shareholder as part

25:09

owner of a business. But if

25:11

a company is taking its profits

25:13

and buying back its stock at

25:15

150 PE, they're not getting very

25:17

many shares for the profits that

25:19

they're making. And so your slice

25:21

of the pie is very, you're

25:23

lucky if it's growing at all

25:26

at that point. Maybe it's just

25:28

off-sitting dilution. So that can be

25:30

another way where it's like, cool,

25:32

this business is making all this

25:34

money, maybe. And none of it's

25:36

benefiting a shareholder in a tangible

25:38

way. because it's just being thrown

25:41

at this expensive stock price. And

25:43

that has happened a lot. I

25:45

think you're starting to see some

25:47

of the effects of that. when

25:49

there's market turmoil. But I mean,

25:51

calling me surprise, because these kind

25:53

of stories seem to happen all

25:56

the time and nobody seems to

25:58

batn I and, you know, we're

26:00

all no wiser for it because

26:02

people continue piling into these stories.

26:04

But it is what it is.

26:06

That's just something that, to me,

26:08

I would avoid those kinds of

26:11

situations because you can lose a

26:13

lot of money that way. Yes.

26:15

Yeah, for sure, for sure you

26:17

can. And it seems like it's

26:19

become a source of pride to

26:21

announce that you're buying back shares,

26:23

and they just do it because

26:26

they think that shareholders expect them

26:28

to, regardless of whether it's a

26:30

good choice for the capital allocation

26:32

or not. And that's where it

26:34

becomes, okay, was it really a

26:36

good choice? You know, to your

26:38

point, it's trading at 122 PE.

26:41

Is that really the best? Is

26:43

that the best place you could

26:45

put the money? Seriously? Like, you

26:47

have no other investment ideas you

26:49

could put it into, if it's

26:51

that expensive, and it's probably doing

26:53

well. Like, you could probably reinvest

26:56

something in the business that's doing

26:58

better. And it definitely, I mean,

27:00

these all have impacts on us,

27:02

like Andrew was saying about the

27:04

slice of the pie. I think

27:06

that's a great illustration. And if

27:08

they're choosing poorly, then, you know,

27:10

I'm getting a smaller. bite of

27:13

the pumpkin pie and that's never

27:15

going to make me happy. So

27:17

that's the way I look at

27:19

it. And again, it's job number

27:21

one. This is the most important

27:23

thing that they do. And so

27:25

finding good capital alligators is it's

27:28

an art and once you do

27:30

find one, it's definitely something you

27:32

want to hang on to. Any

27:34

examples burn in your brain about

27:36

like this was a really bad.

27:38

Apple allocation story. Probably two that

27:40

spring to mind. Number one is

27:43

the whole AOL Yahoo thing. That

27:45

was a dumpster fire in the

27:47

offing and it basically destroyed both

27:49

businesses. So it wasn't just killing

27:51

Yahoo. It also kind of killed

27:53

AOL too. And that was a

27:55

gross, gross misuse of capital. And

27:58

I think a couple other ones

28:00

that have sprung to mind would

28:02

be in the payments industry, Fidelity

28:04

National and Global Payments Network, GPN.

28:06

They both bought payment processors and

28:08

this was at the same time

28:10

that Fyser bought a payment processor.

28:13

So all three big. payment companies

28:15

invested heavily in these companies and

28:17

they all spent roughly around the

28:19

same amount 35 to 45 billion

28:21

on these on these acquisitions and

28:23

the first two have already have

28:25

already spun those offer putting them

28:28

up for sale and have impaired

28:30

their income statements billions because they

28:32

were terrible acquisitions. They did a

28:34

horrible job of integrating them and

28:36

really crushed the stock price for

28:38

both businesses and of course they'll

28:40

probably recover to a certain extent,

28:43

but they've really set the businesses

28:45

back and the shareholders back a

28:47

long, long way. It's just because

28:49

all three of them wanted to

28:51

go down the payments playground and

28:53

only Fyserv was able to do

28:55

a good job of integrating their

28:57

acquisition and the other two. didn't

29:00

and they chose poorly and it's

29:02

it impacted the companies mightily and

29:04

it still is. That's a great

29:06

example and I think it's more

29:08

common than somebody should write a

29:10

book about it maybe and maybe

29:12

some of the ads but just

29:15

this idea that companies will literally

29:17

copy what they see their peers

29:19

doing without even putting thought into

29:21

whether this is a good decision

29:23

or not. Well they're jumping off

29:25

a cliff so we'll do it

29:27

too. And that's usually not a

29:30

good recipe if it's in a

29:32

business that's not a good ROI

29:34

business. And so that's a great

29:36

example of that. Yeah. Yeah. McDonald's

29:38

meets the Minecraft universe with one

29:40

of six collectibles and your choice

29:42

of a Big Mac. This episode

29:45

is brought to you by Indeed's

29:47

Sponsored Jobs, now available with a

29:49

Minecraft movie meal. I participate in

29:51

McDonald's for a limited time, a

29:53

Minecraft movie, only in theaters. This

29:55

episode is brought to you by

29:57

Indeed. When your computer breaks, you

30:00

don't wait for it to magically

30:02

start working again. You fix the

30:04

problem. So why wait to hire

30:06

the people your company desperately needs?

30:08

Use Indeed sponsored jobs to hire

30:10

top talent fast. And even better,

30:12

you only pay for results. There's

30:15

no need to wait. Speed up

30:17

your hiring with a $75 sponsored

30:19

job credit at nd.com/podcast. Terms and

30:21

conditions apply. The best stock picks

30:23

require a light ball moment to

30:25

see exactly what that looks like.

30:27

Check out one of my previous

30:30

reports at stock write up.com. So

30:32

for our final question for today,

30:34

so this is. Dave and Andrew.

30:36

I have been listening to your

30:38

podcast for a few years now

30:40

and I cannot thank you enough

30:42

for the work that you do.

30:44

I have been a subscriber to

30:47

Value Spotlight and I love it.

30:49

Every month I put it in

30:51

a set amount for the recommendations

30:53

you make. I have some extra

30:55

money and I want to invest

30:57

that into some of the companies

30:59

you've recommended in the past. I

31:02

notice two opportunities have peaked my

31:04

interest. I want to put the

31:06

extra cash into the Texas Instruments

31:08

as well as the Crown Castle.

31:10

My question is if you had

31:12

to choose one, which would you

31:14

would you would you pick Both

31:17

are at lower prices. Do you

31:19

still have the same conviction for

31:21

Texas Instruments or for Crown Castle?

31:23

And which do you think would

31:25

be the smarter play? Either way,

31:27

I would love to get your

31:29

insights on this potential idea. Keep

31:32

up the great work. So this

31:34

is from Boz. And great question.

31:36

And this is directed at you,

31:38

Sir Andrew. Well, thanks for writing

31:40

in Boz. We really appreciate you

31:42

listening and taking the time to.

31:44

to ask us this, because this

31:47

is kind of fun. Maybe not

31:49

so fun for me, because both

31:51

of these stocks have been among

31:53

the worst decisions I've made in

31:55

the past couple years, and both

31:57

for different reasons. I think the

31:59

Crown Castle one... is interesting right

32:02

now because what we have seen

32:04

is an impairment. And that was

32:06

reflective of the CEO who's now

32:08

gone, but basically taking a bunch

32:10

of money and putting it in

32:12

this strategy, this fiber strategy, small

32:15

cells strategy that is now been

32:17

determined that that's not gonna produce

32:19

the type of ROI, the type

32:21

of growth that the company would

32:23

hope for. And so you haven't

32:26

really seen the stock be affected

32:28

all that much, but Wall Street

32:30

has seemed to know this story

32:32

for a while. And there were

32:34

some activists who came in and

32:37

stirred things up in relation to

32:39

everything that is happening. So we

32:41

are getting an example in real

32:43

time of when poor capital allocation

32:45

can happen. And unfortunately, I've had

32:48

to ride through that. And at

32:50

the time, I thought it was

32:52

a good capital allocation. I thought

32:54

it made sense. I thought the

32:56

5G thing with self-driving vehicles and

32:59

all of the data that is

33:01

needed for those things with robotics,

33:03

I really thought small cells would

33:05

be the next area for growth

33:07

for Crown Castle and it has

33:10

not been. Luckily I buy things

33:12

with a margin of safety so

33:14

while it has underperformed we are

33:16

still getting six percent, six and

33:18

a half percent on the dividend.

33:21

So that's been nice. The

33:23

question of whether to add to

33:25

a position like that I think really

33:27

boils down to what is

33:29

your opportunity set at the

33:31

time and how does the

33:33

company you're looking at compare

33:35

to that. Obviously we won't

33:37

get this right every single

33:39

time, but you do want to try

33:42

to think deeply. It's

33:44

unfortunately I haven't found that it's

33:46

as simple as buy all the stocks

33:48

that are down in your portfolio and

33:50

you will do great because Crown Castle

33:52

was actually a buy the dip situation.

33:54

It was a good buy the dip

33:56

but it still hasn't made the stock

33:58

take off like I like I originally

34:00

thought. So to me, again, it comes down

34:02

to the opportunity set. What do you have

34:04

in front of you? Do you like the

34:07

outlook of those stocks or of the stock

34:09

you're thinking of buying the dip for? And

34:11

then the flip side of that, you know,

34:13

one of the arguments is, well, if

34:15

you wouldn't buy a stock, why hold

34:18

it? Why don't you just sell it?

34:20

I think that's a dangerous way to

34:22

look at things because then you can

34:24

second guess yourself with every stock you

34:26

buy for now to the end of

34:28

history. Because if I'm looking at Crown

34:31

Castle, I'm not adding to them at

34:33

this time. That doesn't necessarily mean that

34:35

I'm going to sell them either. You

34:37

just have levels of conviction, you have

34:39

levels of optimism, levels of opportunity. And

34:41

so we're constantly juggling those. I think

34:44

it's always good to ask yourself

34:46

if it's just a time and

34:48

place to buy in and buy

34:50

the dip. As it stands right

34:52

now, though, we've been talking about

34:54

semiconductors, I have dipped my toes

34:56

in a couple semiconductors in the

34:58

last few months, and I liked

35:00

the opportunity set and the future

35:02

potential of those semiconductor companies more

35:04

than a company like Crown Castle.

35:06

And I just think the ceiling

35:08

there is higher, and so with

35:10

my longer time frame, that appeals

35:12

more to me. And because Crown

35:14

Castle does not have that small

35:16

cell growth... Outlook moving forward. There

35:18

are upsides not as high as I

35:20

previously thought. So not a case to

35:22

sell, but also not a case to

35:24

add. So that kind of thought process

35:27

I hope is helpful in debugging a

35:29

situation. Maybe you're holding the stock

35:31

and maybe it does dip and you're wondering

35:33

do I buy this dip? Try to think

35:35

of it from a business perspective. Try

35:37

to think about where you see the

35:40

next 10 years and think about upside

35:42

and downside. I always like to think

35:44

an upside and downside when it comes

35:47

to buying something because I think that

35:49

helps. That certainly helps simplify

35:51

things and sometimes make those decisions

35:53

a little bit easier. Yeah, that's

35:55

a good explanation. So I guess,

35:57

what are your thoughts on Texas

35:59

instruments then? Texas Instruments is a hard

36:01

one. I mean, I know you're bullish

36:04

on it. They've, we both have it.

36:06

I know Leandro's bullish on them, but

36:08

they have been struggling. So profitability for

36:10

Texas Instruments has really come down. The

36:13

revenue growth isn't comparable to peers. They've

36:15

really been pulling back that business and

36:17

there's competition from China, which is making

36:19

it hard, but they're really sort of

36:22

consolidating and Reinvesting and growth in a

36:24

way by having these new bigger factories.

36:26

So it's it's a tough it's a

36:28

tough situation I have had stocks where

36:31

I bought the dip I don't do

36:33

it very often, but it has happened

36:35

and you ask yourself at that time

36:37

like I bought Pulte Group years ago

36:40

when everybody was freaking out about residential

36:42

real estate I still thought the business

36:44

look great and I thought things were

36:46

intact so I I purchased it. When

36:49

you buy the dip in a stock,

36:51

you don't always need to have numbers

36:53

that just rebound miraculously. A stock can

36:55

sell off even if the numbers look

36:58

great. And so to me, that can

37:00

be a great time to buy the

37:02

dip when the numbers still look pretty

37:04

good, but the stock's getting hammered because

37:07

people are just being emotional about the

37:09

company. Apple is actually a great example

37:11

of this. always buy the dip in

37:14

Apple. Right. People like, people like, people

37:16

will repeat the phrase that Apple doesn't

37:18

innovate and then they come out with

37:20

the iPhone 6 and then they come

37:23

out with the iPhone 13. So those

37:25

are the types of situations where earnings

37:27

can be going up and up and

37:29

up and earnings been share up and

37:32

up and up and people just get

37:34

this idea about the companies. Some, some

37:36

analysts says something and you know, some

37:38

macro thing happens and Wall Street's really

37:41

down on the stock, but if the

37:43

numbers still look good and the moat

37:45

has still not been really damaged. That

37:47

can be a really great opportunity to

37:50

buy the dip. So it's not always

37:52

easy. It's a great question. I've been

37:54

looking at those stocks for a while

37:56

and it's very tempting for Texas Instruments.

37:59

I'm waiting for those numbers to look

38:01

better. For Crown Castle, similar story. I'm

38:03

waiting for those numbers to look better.

38:05

And we'll just have to. Wait and

38:08

see and you know I bought these

38:10

companies for a reason so I'm not

38:12

selling them I still believe in the

38:14

strength of their business models But the

38:17

opportunities that I see compared to those

38:19

where the numbers aren't great That kind

38:21

of frames my mindset on it I

38:23

think that's a great way to think

38:26

about them. I mean you have to

38:28

take a case by case and you

38:30

have to look at What I love

38:32

the idea of looking at the opportunity

38:35

cost in the opportunity set of these

38:37

particular ideas versus other things you may

38:39

own or other things that are out

38:41

there and Understanding where each of them

38:44

is in their own business Cronkastles at

38:46

a different place than Texas Instruments is

38:48

and so You just have to I

38:50

think I think that's the best way

38:53

to do it. It's just the way

38:55

the opportunities and decide I think it's

38:57

best not to just blindly just buy

38:59

because it's down. I think it's better

39:02

to understand what it is you're buying

39:04

and why you're buying it and why

39:06

it's down. It's not unusual for companies

39:08

to go through draw-downs. It's a normal

39:11

part of the stock market, but you

39:13

need to understand why it is and

39:15

not just blindly buy it just because

39:17

you really like it and it's down.

39:20

There are a lot of times there's

39:22

an actual reason why it's down and

39:24

you need to understand that it before

39:26

you pull the trigger and buy something

39:29

just cause. Yeah, and unfortunately for both

39:31

of these, there has been things that

39:33

have happened and yeah, the numbers have

39:35

not looked as great as they used

39:38

to. Right. Yeah, it makes it hard,

39:40

right? That's what makes the game hard.

39:42

It does make it hard, yes. That's

39:44

why we pay you the big bucks

39:47

to make all the decisions for us.

39:49

Well, yeah, I am looking at these

39:51

every single month. I'm looking at the

39:54

whole portfolio. I'm looking and trying to

39:56

balance between opportunities. And if you're there

39:58

and you're taking advantage, then that's great

40:00

because we're all making money together. Right.

40:03

Exactly. All right, well, with that, we

40:05

will go ahead and wrap up our

40:07

conversation for today. I hope you enjoyed

40:09

our question answering. And again, if you

40:12

have a question, please send it to

40:14

us at newsletter at e investing for

40:16

beginners.com. You can also send us on

40:18

Spotify for beginners.com. You can also send

40:21

us questions on Spotify. You can ask

40:23

them on the app or you can

40:25

reach out to us on the X

40:27

machine. So with that, we'll go ahead

40:30

and sign us off. You guys go

40:32

out there and invest with the margin

40:34

of the margin of the margin of

40:36

safety. And if it on the margin

40:39

of safety. Have since on the safety.

40:41

Have's on the safety. Have's on the

40:43

safety. Have's on the safety. Have's on

40:45

the safety. Have's on the safety. Have's

40:48

on the safety. Have's on the safety.

40:50

Have's on the safety. Have's on the.

40:52

Have's on the. Have's on the. Have.

40:54

Have. Have. Have. Have. Have. Have. Have.

40:57

Have. Have. Have. Seven steps to understanding

40:59

the stock market shows you precisely how

41:01

to break down the numbers in an

41:03

engaging and readable way with real-life examples.

41:06

Get access today at stockmarket pdf.com. Until

41:08

next time, have a prosperous day. The

41:12

information contained is for general

41:14

information and educational purposes only.

41:16

It is not intended for

41:18

a substitute for legal, commercial,

41:20

and or financial advice from

41:22

a licensed professional. Review our

41:24

full disclaimer at e investingfor

41:26

beginners.com.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features