Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
All New, All Canadian. The best
0:02
of our great nation, one song
0:04
at a time. This is Justin
0:06
Beaver. Hi, this is Terry Clark.
0:08
We are Nickelback. Made in Canada
0:10
on I-Hart Radio. Rock, pop, hip-hop,
0:12
and when it comes to country.
0:15
It's the true North all the
0:17
way. Loud and proud. An all-new
0:19
digital radio station from coast to
0:21
coast. Made in Canada. Played in
0:24
Canada. On the free I-Hart radio
0:26
app and at I-Harp Radio dot
0:28
C-A. No,
0:33
no, it's it's a good point Mike. You're
0:35
listening to Jim Richards on News Talk
0:37
10-10 Toronto It was a good point
0:39
earlier in the week. No, I'm mad
0:41
I'm angry at Ben Hopefully he doesn't
0:43
come in the room while I'm talking
0:46
about him because I'm a coward and
0:48
I wouldn't say it to his face
0:50
Ben is rusa of my show and
0:52
Ben is the producer of Deb's show
0:54
and Deb just did the show before
0:56
me if you're just joining us here
0:58
streaming us here streaming on the I-heart
1:00
radio I sent him a picture of
1:02
people taking selfies with the Pope
1:05
in the casket and I was
1:07
like, we gotta talk about this.
1:09
And then I totally forgot about
1:12
it. And then he took that
1:14
idea. Folks, can you imagine this?
1:16
Has that ever happened in
1:19
your job? Where somebody takes
1:21
your idea and then takes
1:23
credit as their own? And he gives
1:25
that topic to Deb and Deb
1:27
killed with it. killed with it.
1:30
I gotta say everybody
1:32
did a good job on that
1:34
topic. From Deb to Mike, you
1:36
did a great job on that
1:38
topic. I know. All of
1:40
the callers, Ben just ran
1:42
down the hallway because he
1:44
was in the washroom and
1:46
the radio station plays in
1:48
the washroom. Even when I,
1:50
that's a different topic altogether.
1:53
The callers killed on that
1:55
topic. Mikey did a
1:57
great job. Deb did a
1:59
great job. Everybody did a
2:01
great job. Hang on, Jim. Oh,
2:04
you, Ben. Hang on. You? Stealing
2:06
my topic and giving it to
2:08
Deb is just unforgettable. These are
2:10
the texts I get from Jim.
2:13
Oh. Unforgettable, not unforgettable. Unforgettable is
2:15
a song, but it's also a
2:17
word, actually. No, I don't think
2:20
there's a rebuttal on this one,
2:22
Ben. Go ahead. You sent me
2:24
a picture of the dead Pope,
2:26
and you said, we gotta talk
2:29
about this. Exactly. There was no
2:31
selfie involved, it was just a
2:33
picture of the dead Pope. Could
2:35
it come from anywhere? A picture
2:38
of a person in a casket,
2:40
I think, I, I rest my
2:42
case. Jim, if you're gonna do
2:45
the topic. Why didn't you do
2:47
the topic? Well, because I send
2:49
ideas. It's like the social network.
2:51
Don't hold on. If you invented
2:54
Facebook, you would have invented Facebook.
2:56
Well, that's good. You didn't do
2:58
the topic. Here's how it works.
3:01
I have an idea. I give
3:03
it to somebody else and they
3:05
hold on to that idea until
3:07
the idea needs to be executed.
3:10
I can't be a holder of
3:12
my own ideas because I was
3:14
an idea. It wasn't even an
3:17
idea. No, it's an idea, Ben.
3:19
Ben. Ben, here's the way it's
3:21
supposed to work in the future.
3:23
It's a conception of idea. Exactly,
3:26
good point, Mike, Mike's on my
3:28
side. No, I'm not. I think
3:30
Mike is on my side. I
3:33
have an idea. I don't... I
3:35
don't fully complete the idea and
3:37
the concept, but I park it
3:39
with Ben. And then Ben is
3:42
the holder of the idea. We
3:44
come back to it a little
3:46
bit later on and Ben's like,
3:48
oh, there are that amazing time
3:51
where you sent me a text
3:53
of a picture of the Pope
3:55
in a coffin and said, we
3:58
need to talk about this. Let's
4:00
talk about it right now. How
4:02
do we make that magic? Instead
4:04
of taking that going Ben or
4:07
Deb or Deb? Whatever her name
4:09
is, we need to do this
4:11
as a top. Would we not
4:14
all agree on that? You're ignoring
4:16
that... I don't think I'm ignoring
4:18
it. Thousands of people could have
4:20
come up with this idea if
4:23
they were told hey. That is
4:25
not true. You should talk about
4:27
stuff that's happened this week and
4:30
current events. Could have meant anything?
4:32
I don't know about any of
4:34
these. Was your name on this
4:36
idea, Jim? I didn't see the
4:39
name anywhere. Well it's on my
4:41
text. It's like it says Jim
4:43
Richard's text anyway. What we're talking
4:45
about right now. Wasn't right now?
4:48
I guess it is, it could
4:50
be the topic. Does anybody- This
4:52
has become the topic? Yeah, I
4:55
think it has. By the way,
4:57
in the news, we're liquidating all
4:59
of the bays, 350 years down
5:01
the drain, so you can save
5:04
5%. Has anybody ever gotten a
5:06
good deal at a liquidation thing?
5:08
I used to, when Sears went
5:11
out of business, I'm like, you
5:13
know what, I'm gonna go buy
5:15
Sears, and I'm gonna like, I
5:17
don't need a new blank, but
5:20
the savings will be- So amazing
5:22
that I will buy a new
5:24
blank, which is maybe a topic
5:27
for another day. If you don't
5:29
need something, are you getting any
5:31
savings? If it's like 80% off
5:33
of something that you do not
5:36
need, why are you buying it
5:38
if you don't need it, unless
5:40
you're going to sell it? Anyway,
5:42
I found like, okay, I'm in
5:45
the neighborhood of the Sears. I'll
5:47
go in and it's like 5%
5:49
off. We're liquidating everything. You go
5:52
in, it's 5% off. You look
5:54
around, there's like, there's no real
5:56
deals here. Then you go back
5:58
the next week. It's gotta be
6:01
now. The liquidation's gotta be now.
6:03
We're like something, and it's like
6:05
10% off. Then the next week
6:08
it's 15% off, which is just
6:10
the tax. And sooner or later
6:12
or later you give up. But
6:14
I found when I'm trying to
6:17
get, you know, in my history
6:19
of liquidations, folks, whenever I go
6:21
to the liquidators, I don't find
6:24
that the deals are all that
6:26
great. All right, we have, coming
6:28
up in about 10 minutes time,
6:30
we have the Ottawa Senators and
6:33
their fans, Toronto versus Ottawa. Are
6:35
we? Do you ever think that
6:37
people who are jerks know that
6:39
they're jerks? Do you think that?
6:42
Like if you're a let's go
6:44
to what are you looking at
6:46
me for right now Ben? Do
6:49
you think that people or jerks
6:51
know that they're jerks? Could it
6:53
be that we are the NHL
6:55
jerks? Like our fans is impossible
6:58
Montreal Canadian fan in the other
7:00
room nodding his head at me?
7:02
Is it possible that are so
7:05
possible? Like could it be that
7:07
Toronto Maple Leaf fans? are indeed
7:09
jerks. Because this is the way
7:11
I look at it. If you
7:14
want my jerk, sports math, is
7:16
that basketball, Celtics fans, jerks. Baseball,
7:18
New York Yankee fans, jerks. NFL
7:21
football, do you guys know what
7:23
I'm about to say? You want
7:25
to take a guess? In hockey,
7:27
so all of those are the,
7:30
except for football, all of those
7:32
sports, I've named like the Dynasties.
7:34
I grew up thinking that the
7:37
Montreal Canadian fans were jerks. But
7:39
now I'm starting to wonder, because
7:41
there's a better rivalry history between
7:43
Toronto and Montreal, but Toronto and
7:46
Ottawa was like our, I don't
7:48
know, maybe not little brother, but...
7:50
I just I get that we're
7:52
the jerks in that relationship and
7:55
it's more than the Montreal Canadians
7:57
it's a respected rivalry I think
7:59
with Ottawa and Toronto it's just
8:02
hate I that's what I think
8:04
it's just hate and I think
8:06
Toronto Montreal respected rivalry but I
8:08
think Montreal Boston Boston just hate
8:11
just Hate. And I think everybody
8:13
has that relationship maybe with Boston.
8:15
Words just hate. But would anybody
8:18
be, well ask you in a
8:20
couple of seconds, we're going to
8:22
talk to a couple of guys
8:24
from our, or one guy, we're
8:27
going to talk to somebody from
8:29
our, wait a second Ben, my
8:31
idea was two guys that we
8:34
would talk to. Did you have
8:36
two guys on with Deb? Just
8:38
kidding. I only got one just
8:40
I'm just kidding Ben's doing a
8:43
great job. It's me that I
8:45
have a problem with so is
8:47
it possible that Lee fans are
8:49
the jerks would anybody would we?
8:52
Would we come to that realization
8:54
that maybe we are jerks? I
8:56
saw some footage of people just
8:59
like yelling and screaming in the
9:01
face of crying Senator fans yesterday
9:03
and I was like, that's us,
9:05
that is our team, that is
9:08
our guys have gone to Ottawa,
9:10
we've dispatched them to just be
9:12
brazen blank holes to the citizens
9:15
of Ottawa. All right, I've got
9:17
one minute left to do the...
9:19
topic that we had down here
9:21
for four o'clock. Should I save
9:24
it or should I I want
9:26
to talk a little bit? Well,
9:28
just let Deb do it on
9:31
Monday. It's a good point. Deb,
9:33
if you're listening right now, here's
9:35
a topic for Monday. We came
9:37
up with a The traffic czar
9:40
earlier this week and we took
9:42
phone calls on what you wanted
9:44
the traffic czar to be. But
9:46
maybe we should start small. Maybe
9:49
we should start with, not traffic
9:51
czar, I want a sidewalk czar.
9:53
I want somebody who's going to
9:56
tell everybody who is on the
9:58
sidewalk, not to on a busy
10:00
sidewalk, hey, you know what I
10:02
should do right now, text somebody,
10:05
and I'm not going to go
10:07
off to the side. or step
10:09
aside, I'm just gonna stop where
10:12
I'm walking and send somebody a
10:14
text. And that, I get it
10:16
that people are wandering in, I
10:18
saw a funny thing. And maybe
10:21
if you follow me, you'll see
10:23
it because I share funny things
10:25
on my social media. Somebody did
10:28
a remake of what Abbey Road
10:30
would look like today with the
10:32
Beatles Walking Cross Abbey Road. And
10:34
they had them all staring on
10:37
their phones like walking in different
10:39
directions running into each other, which
10:41
I thought was hilarious. So maybe
10:43
we'll get back to my idea
10:46
a little bit later on sidewalks.
10:48
That's where I want to start.
10:50
Sidewalk. Zar. No seniors on the
10:53
sidewalks any longer. All right? That's,
10:55
no, that's, Deb wrote that, Deb
10:57
told me to say that to
10:59
be honest with you. No, she
11:02
didn't. We'll talk to our, do
11:04
I owe the Ottawa TSN people
11:06
an apology for the behavior of
11:09
Toronto Make Belief fans in a
11:11
moment? No? 416-8-7-2-10-10 text me yes
11:13
or no right now time-saver traffic
11:15
this is Jim Richards on News
11:18
Talk 10-10 Toronto Nobody
11:22
cares about my affiliations with
11:24
Joe Bowen, but if they
11:26
wanted to ask I have
11:28
me and Joe Bowen stories,
11:30
but there is a... They
11:32
call him Bones. Bonesy. But
11:34
Ben's... Is it your father
11:36
or your grandfather? Who... somebody...
11:38
No, no, never mind. It
11:40
was somebody else told me
11:42
that their Italian grandfather can't
11:44
pronounce Joe Bowen's name, and
11:46
it's not something I can
11:48
say on the air. I
11:51
think you know what I mean.
11:53
Anyway, that was the game winner
11:55
last night of, we did on
11:57
the phones the other day. I
11:59
was like I was interested that
12:01
everybody in Toronto is like it
12:03
feels different this year for like
12:05
what 60 years now almost Yeah,
12:07
I know it feels different this
12:10
year and I don't know it
12:12
was split But the one thing
12:14
that you do see when you
12:16
watch another game is actual fans
12:18
and in Ottawa they have Actual
12:20
fans not just the rich folks
12:22
who sit on their hands the
12:24
sends players Really appreciative of that
12:26
And Apparently hold on wait a
12:28
second really appreciative of that the
12:30
game really strong we played our
12:32
game right off to bat and
12:34
Like you said, I mean, it's
12:36
been a long time for the
12:39
fans, been a long time for
12:41
us as players, so we were
12:43
excited to play at home in
12:45
front of them for sure. Unbelievable.
12:47
Yeah, it was sick. One of
12:49
the better ones for sure that
12:51
I've seen. And yeah, I thought
12:53
we used it to our favor
12:55
to start the game. And we're
12:57
going to try and sustain that
12:59
a little bit longer. tomorrow. Yeah
13:01
it was unbelievable. See the white
13:03
towel is going and it was
13:05
just awesome atmosphere. So that's important
13:07
for a team and I guess
13:10
Toronto gets it to a certain
13:12
extent but again it is noticeable
13:14
when you go to a Toronto
13:16
game versus if you ever travel
13:18
to watch the leaves what the
13:20
home crowd is like. Steve Lloyd
13:22
joins us right now our sister
13:24
station in Ottawa that talks sports
13:26
is TSN 1200. He is one
13:28
of the hosts on their morning
13:30
show Steve. Thank you very much
13:32
for your time. No problem, oh,
13:34
how are you? I'm good. I
13:36
was saying earlier that when it
13:39
comes to Toronto and Ottawa, I
13:41
think Toronto and Montreal, they have
13:43
a rivalry, but I don't think
13:45
there's as much hatred as there
13:47
is in that rivalry as there
13:49
is in the... Battle of Ontario.
13:51
Would you say that that hatred
13:53
would be, am I accurately describing
13:55
it, that it may be a
13:57
respectful rivalry of some other rivalries?
13:59
But this one is real hate.
14:01
Well, it was, and I think
14:03
we're getting back to that point,
14:05
because what happened since the time
14:08
when the Leafs and the Sims
14:10
faced each other in the playoffs,
14:12
four times in the span of
14:14
about five years, I think it
14:16
was, starting in 2000, like in
14:18
the heart of that 100%, and
14:20
it wasn't just the playoff games,
14:22
the regular season games, and like
14:24
there was so much hatred. Like
14:26
I can remember this as well.
14:28
Lee fans hated Daniel Alfordson. and
14:30
sends fans, you know, hated Darcy
14:32
Tucker and Travis Green, their current
14:34
head coach as part of that
14:36
group as well. It was to
14:39
the point I know in Toronto
14:41
where to fire up fans at
14:43
Raptors games, they would show a
14:45
picture of Daniel opposite on the
14:47
screen. So that, you know, now
14:49
you're crossing over. That gets into
14:51
New York Rangers, New York Islanders,
14:53
and basically they're yelling pot fan
14:55
sucks at Knicks games, right? So
14:57
that was the level of hatred
14:59
back then. it kind of died
15:01
off for a number of it's
15:03
still there right it's simmering but
15:05
let's be honest the lease went
15:08
through some tough times the sends
15:10
went through some tough times now
15:12
finally they're both good teams at
15:14
the same time and that that's
15:16
what needs to happen you need
15:18
to get back into a playoff
15:20
scenario and i think it may
15:22
be started with regularly greg last
15:24
season stoking it with the clapper
15:26
into the empty net net regular
15:28
season game and Morgan Riley takes
15:30
a suspension and that started it
15:32
going another playing in the playoffs
15:34
again so it's building back up
15:37
towards the levels it used to
15:39
be, but I don't think it's
15:41
quite there yet. You know, so
15:43
I if I was in America
15:45
and say I needed to, I
15:47
wasn't a Philadelphia Eagles fan, I
15:49
would probably think twice about going
15:51
into Philadelphia. you're wearing my team's
15:53
jersey. And I don't know, like
15:55
I always kind of feel that
15:57
way. You're saying it's not that
15:59
bad in Ottawa when they see
16:01
a Toronto Jersey at the Canadian
16:03
Tire Center? Listen, you get the
16:06
odd story and I see some
16:08
of it too and you get
16:10
the odd donkey type episode and
16:12
that cuts both ways. That sends
16:14
fans. Sure. Overzealous, that's Lee fans.
16:16
And you see, but it's not
16:18
the norm super consistent. You still
16:20
see it 100% but I don't
16:22
think it rises to the level.
16:24
I hear you on the Philly
16:26
fan thing like I know friends
16:28
of mine that have gone down
16:30
to Flyers games or whatever. and
16:32
it's not necessarily like a sense,
16:34
pick another team and then like
16:37
don't wear that. Don't wear that
16:39
because there are storage, you get
16:41
dragged into the washroom and somebody
16:43
beats the crap out of you.
16:45
Like I know somebody that's happened
16:47
to, that kind of a thing.
16:49
So it doesn't, it's not quite
16:51
like that. It can get. it
16:53
can get bad there if there
16:55
have been the odd fight on
16:57
the odd fight does occur over
16:59
the years but it doesn't rise
17:01
to that particular level but sure
17:03
yeah it's there there's a level
17:06
though where the senators would prefer
17:08
and they they prefer that they
17:10
try to make it so leave
17:12
fans can't get their hold on
17:14
hands on tickets no Well, this,
17:16
let's go around. What they did
17:18
was, and most teams do this.
17:20
Now, the Leafs don't have this
17:22
problem with the size of the
17:24
fan base in the market, right?
17:26
Season tickets, you know, they're spoken
17:28
for. But the Senators, going through
17:30
the lean years that they did,
17:32
their season ticket base isn't where
17:35
it used to be. So they're
17:37
in the process of trying to
17:39
build it. So when you clinch
17:41
a playoff spot, it's kind of
17:43
like you get the, ahead of
17:45
the advanced sale, like any time.
17:47
And so that's what they did.
17:49
And that's normal in sports. That's
17:51
the business of it. So they
17:53
were able to do that. And
17:55
what they did is they said,
17:57
listen, if you commit to season
17:59
tickets for next year, you get
18:01
front of the line, you can
18:03
get your tickets now for the
18:06
playoffs and we'll give you. extra
18:08
two. Now what happened was, and
18:10
there's nothing you can do about
18:12
this because it's a free market
18:14
that we live in, but there
18:16
was kind of a bit of
18:18
a pre-shaming kind of a campaign.
18:20
Say look at, we're going to
18:22
give you those tickets, but please
18:24
don't sell them the leave fence.
18:26
Don't flip those tickets, those extra
18:28
two that were going to allow
18:30
you to buy. And I think
18:32
that's basically, and then there was
18:35
a grassroots social media, a lot
18:37
of hardcore sense fans, and you
18:39
know what, and last night I
18:41
was there for the game, it
18:43
was electric. And there were leaf
18:45
fans there, of course, there, of
18:47
course, and fans, and you know
18:49
what, and last night I was
18:51
there for the game, it was
18:53
electric, when there was only one
18:55
visit here, and the season ticket
18:57
base is so low right. It
18:59
had to be 70% leave fans
19:01
for that one regular season. Sure.
19:04
Last night, I think it was
19:06
80-20 cents fans. And it was
19:08
just, it was a great vibe.
19:10
I was so happy for the
19:12
fan base. Eight years without the
19:14
playoffs. It's a great playoff building
19:16
and it was just a lot
19:18
of fun, except for the end
19:20
result for the home fans. I
19:22
think even leave fans need to
19:24
be happy that other Canadian markets
19:26
are doing better, right? So I
19:28
think that's a good thing for
19:30
hockey right across the board. that
19:32
maybe, you know, sometimes you realize,
19:35
wait a second, maybe I'm the
19:37
jerk in this relationship. Do, I
19:39
mean, do Senate, I think, maybe
19:41
Toronto fans, as you say, they
19:43
travel a lot. Are we, would
19:45
Ottawa say that we're bigger jerks
19:47
than Montreal fans? Oh. I hate
19:49
to tell you, but yeah. I've
19:51
got friends of mine, like people
19:53
that don't know Ottawa. Ottawa got
19:55
no regions, like 1.3, 1.4 million
19:57
people now, but it behaves much
19:59
smaller than that. It feels like
20:01
more of a small, you're always,
20:04
you bump into people, if you
20:06
don't know that person, you're within
20:08
two or three degrees of separation,
20:10
it seems, especially in the sporting
20:12
circles, right? And I know a
20:14
lot of... of cops and firefighters
20:16
and they'll volunteer to work sense
20:18
games and that's commonplace at sporting
20:20
events and they got to the
20:22
point a bunch of them said
20:24
they stopped volunteering for leaf games
20:26
because they got sick and tired
20:28
of breaking up fights and because
20:30
it just became it's just like
20:33
I'm done with this and and
20:35
I think just to bring it
20:37
not to overly politicize it but
20:39
it's kind of akin to a
20:41
lot of leaf fans that want
20:43
to get really obnoxious about it.
20:45
Don't think that Ottawa deserves a
20:47
team. you know, 51state kind of
20:49
stuff, not a real country kind
20:51
of stuff, you know what I'm
20:53
saying? I think that that's the
20:55
kind of vibe that not everybody,
20:57
I don't want to paint everybody
20:59
the same brush, but that's the
21:01
vibe that sometimes leave fans can
21:04
give off to people here in
21:06
Ottawa and you can understand how
21:08
it rubs in the wrong way.
21:10
Sure, sure, I can't. All right,
21:12
I'm late for break, but is
21:14
it going more than five games
21:16
or is going in five games?
21:18
but there's just something every bounce
21:20
every little thing seems to be
21:22
going the leaf's way and they're
21:24
earning that i'm not saying they're
21:26
lucky their full value i i
21:28
think this could end tomorrow night
21:30
all right i think a lot
21:33
of leaf fans are hoping that
21:35
way but best of luck to
21:37
Ottawa and again uh... the one
21:39
thing you guys got going is
21:41
that there are real fans in
21:43
the state even not just the
21:45
rich people sitting on their hands
21:47
thanks Steve All right, take care.
21:49
Steve Lloyd is a host at
21:51
TSN 1,200 in Ottawa. News Talk
21:53
10, 10, time-saver traffic. You're listening
21:55
to Jim Richards on News Talk
21:57
10, Toronto. Just a reminder that
21:59
you're streaming us, or you could
22:02
be streaming us on the I
22:04
heart radio app, wherever you go,
22:06
whether you're driving out of our
22:08
signal area, or you're driving under
22:10
a straight car, could be a
22:12
lot better. You could be listening
22:14
to the I heart radio app
22:16
and not lose us wherever you
22:18
go. And there you can find
22:20
the podcasts of some of the
22:22
people I'm about to talk to.
22:24
I loved too. topics earlier today
22:26
as I sit back and make
22:28
my job a little easier by
22:30
stealing from other hosts. I love
22:33
Deb's topic from two until four
22:35
when she asked this question. I
22:37
wanted to ask you whether you
22:39
voted or not, what was it
22:41
that sealed the deal vote? I
22:43
like that topic. And then I
22:45
like Jerry's topic earlier today as
22:47
well. It occurs to me today
22:49
that if you do not vote
22:51
conservative or liberal, you're really not
22:53
participating in this election. Polls are
22:55
tight. Do you like that? Which
22:57
one do you guys like? Because
22:59
I'm going to steal one of
23:02
them right now. You know what?
23:04
Deb just talked about that an
23:06
hour ago, so it was a
23:08
good part of her podcast, which
23:10
you can find on the I
23:12
Heart Radio Up. I did like
23:14
Jerry's qua- I like both questions
23:16
because I thought they were really
23:18
interesting and who knows maybe there's
23:20
a conversation that you would like
23:22
to hear people have about this
23:24
election where it's not necessarily a
23:26
breaking down a platform thing or
23:28
something like that like a bigger
23:31
question like Jerry. It occurs to
23:33
me today. that if you do
23:35
not vote conservative or liberal, you're
23:37
really not participating in this election.
23:39
Polls are tightening between the two
23:41
leaders, but there seems to be
23:43
no path for the NDP. The
23:45
block is down and we can't
23:47
vote for them anyway. It seems
23:49
to me that while you might
23:51
think what I just said is
23:53
radical, it is in fact the
23:55
position that former NDP voters have
23:57
apparently taken. And it does look
24:00
like the one that Jugmee Singh
24:02
is doing too. I mean, in
24:04
an article with the Toronto Star,
24:06
he sat down with their editorial
24:08
board to waste their time. I'm
24:10
just, am I kidding? Jugmee Singh,
24:12
leader of the NDP, sits down
24:14
with the editorial board to waste
24:16
their time. But he did say
24:18
that he had made a concerted
24:20
effort to keep tribute around. more
24:22
not that he liked Trudeau but
24:24
he just didn't like the idea
24:26
of Pierre Polyev becoming the Prime
24:28
Minister that that is why he
24:31
did that so he didn't necessarily
24:33
I thought that was interesting that
24:35
everybody is like oh he propped
24:37
it up because he likes this
24:39
government no he propped it up
24:41
because he didn't like the idea
24:43
of a Pierre Polyev government maybe
24:45
it's one and the same to
24:47
you But I do kind of
24:49
agree with Jerry, and I wanted
24:51
to open up the phones on
24:53
that, and whether or not you
24:55
agree with the concept of, maybe
24:57
every election is the most important
25:00
election of our life. Because nobody
25:02
right now in 2025 is going
25:04
to be pretty sure it was
25:06
that one in 1980 something. That
25:08
was the most important one. There
25:10
were always probably going to be
25:12
the most important one. But this
25:14
one probably really is. So are
25:16
you, is anybody out there voting
25:18
NDP right now? And what would,
25:20
like, what would the reason be?
25:22
And maybe it's not the minute,
25:24
maybe it gets down to the
25:26
minutia of your riding, like your
25:29
guy's not going to win, or
25:31
the liberal's not going to win,
25:33
or the conservative's not going to
25:35
win, and... I know we hear
25:37
from a lot of people who
25:39
are going to vote the People's
25:41
Party, but I'd say you're wasting
25:43
your time if you vote People's
25:45
Party too, and perhaps your local
25:47
candidate could have won if you
25:49
voted conservative. So whether it's on
25:51
the left with the NDP or
25:53
whether it's on the right with
25:55
the People's Party, who a couple
25:57
elections go got 11% of the
26:00
vote. And I think now they're
26:02
down to less than 1%. So
26:04
if you are not voting for...
26:06
one of those two, why would
26:08
that be? And maybe you could
26:10
say, hey, you could ask that
26:12
question any election. I don't know.
26:14
More so right now. 416-87-10. It
26:16
occurs to me today that if
26:18
you do not vote conservative or
26:20
liberal, you're really not participating in
26:22
this election. Polls are two. Do
26:24
you find that to be true?
26:27
And maybe you could say, no,
26:29
that's not true, because I always
26:31
vote, I don't know, conservative, and
26:33
my guy never wins. But I
26:36
always feel like I'm participating, because
26:38
that's the way the system works.
26:40
Hasn't been working for me, because
26:42
my guy hasn't won. But I
26:44
still know that I did my
26:46
best by voting for the person
26:48
that I wanted to be the
26:50
leader. And my voice is going
26:53
to be heard, whether it registers
26:55
or not. 416-872-10-10-10. Again,
26:57
416-8-7-2-10. I don't know that
26:59
it's a media thing to
27:01
say this is the most
27:03
important election. Certainly with the
27:05
way the polls are going,
27:07
people are telling you that.
27:09
I got into a bit
27:11
of, I don't think it
27:13
was an argument, I think
27:15
Jerry misunderstood me, but he
27:18
was like, no, the liberals
27:20
didn't lose. Sorry, the conservatives
27:22
didn't lose 27 points. Like
27:24
when you're at 39% in
27:26
the polls, he's right. They
27:28
didn't lose 27 points. Just
27:30
the NDP and the block
27:32
collapsed. That's what happened. Pierre
27:34
didn't lose a 27-point lead.
27:36
We like to say it
27:38
that way, but it's not
27:40
true. Here's David. David, why
27:42
vote for a party other
27:44
than the Liberals or the
27:46
Conservatives? MP is the only
27:48
green MP right now that's
27:51
probably going to win because
27:53
loose with Mason and lose
27:55
hers. Yeah. Her riding. But
27:57
yeah, so I voting green
27:59
and so are most people
28:01
in our riding because we
28:03
have the only green candidate
28:05
and he's going to win
28:07
again. So somebody thinks you
28:09
might try it or disguising
28:11
your voice. No, I don't
28:13
live in Guelph. Okay, yeah,
28:15
it's different here. Guelph is
28:17
not to that person, Mike,
28:19
but techno. So the Green
28:21
Party, the Green candidate is
28:24
going to win in your
28:26
riding, and that's why you're
28:28
voting green. Is that because
28:30
you really support the green
28:32
or you don't like the
28:34
other two? Well, ironically, I've
28:36
supported green for probably two
28:38
decades, and so I'm just
28:40
happy that I happen to
28:42
be living in the only
28:44
riding that... They're winning right
28:46
now, so it's it's I
28:48
don't know fortuitous all right
28:50
I Well, how would you
28:52
feel if the the the
28:54
the the the party that
28:57
you didn't want to win
28:59
the most ended up getting
29:01
a one-seat majority? Yeah That's
29:03
a tough one All right,
29:05
thank you appreciate it, but
29:07
good call Dave appreciate it
29:09
back-to-back Dave's commercial free nonstop
29:11
We went from one Dave
29:13
one of the best Dave's
29:15
in Kitchener to one of
29:17
the best Dave's in Hamilton
29:19
Dave. Thank you very much
29:21
for being a part of
29:23
this special back-to-back Dave commercial
29:25
free segment You're welcome. All
29:27
right Why vote for someone
29:30
other than the conservatives or
29:32
the liberals? What
29:36
you need is you always need
29:39
a minority government. That's why you
29:41
need three parties. If we don't
29:43
have three parties, what would this
29:45
be like the Americans? And you'll
29:47
either have a Democratic or Republican
29:50
government. Why do you want, I
29:52
mean, you could argue that what
29:54
the NDP has forced the liberals
29:56
to do is very good for
29:58
Canada. I understand why people would
30:01
like pharma care and dental care.
30:03
I would like it too if
30:05
we could actually afford it. I
30:07
don't think we should be doubling
30:10
down on things that we can't
30:12
effectively pay for. But why would
30:14
you, because I mean the Liberal
30:16
Party ended up doing stuff that
30:18
it didn't want to do just
30:21
so it could, you know, maintain
30:23
power. Why is that a good
30:25
thing? Well, the liberals had to
30:27
do a lot of things. We
30:29
were in COVID in 2020 and
30:32
a lot of things. I mean,
30:34
As far as the housing prices
30:36
and everything going out, that was
30:38
all a combination of the interest
30:40
rates going to what they were.
30:43
When they dropped the interest rates
30:45
down to 0% or 1%. That's
30:47
what created the housing market. That
30:49
was just uncontrollable. Okay, different topic,
30:52
but appreciate your phone call. In
30:54
a moment, it was really touched
30:56
by a different segment that Jerry
30:58
did earlier today. And it's unacceptable
31:00
that a veteran that served this
31:03
country that is battling all sorts
31:05
of demons would be offered up
31:07
the, hey, have you thought of
31:09
medical assistance in dying? That is
31:11
preposterous. The person behind these stories
31:14
in a moment, 445 News Talk
31:16
10 10 times safer traffic. You're
31:18
listening to Jim Richards on News
31:20
Talk 10 10, Toronto. If you're
31:23
young and voting, we're just in
31:25
general. I just wanted to ask
31:27
you in general, maybe you could
31:29
tie it to the election. And
31:31
maybe this is too broad, but
31:34
we thought we would ask, in
31:36
general, are people optimistic? Are you
31:38
optimistic? Coming up in 15 minutes
31:40
time. Just about the future. It
31:42
just sounds too... Now that I
31:45
say it out loud, it sounds
31:47
a little too vague. It'll like
31:49
a little too wide. No, it
31:51
doesn't need to be honed more.
31:53
Have faith, Jim. All right, we
31:56
have faith. I'm optimistic about it.
31:58
Are you? optimistic. I got to
32:00
tell you, man, coming back from
32:02
Afghanistan, so many of the soldiers
32:05
that went proudly there to defend
32:07
their country. This country had left
32:09
them down. I've interviewed a lot
32:11
of these dudes and some of
32:13
them I've said, If you had
32:16
to do it all over again
32:18
knowing what you know now because
32:20
the country failed them to give
32:22
them what they need to cope
32:24
with some of the issues that
32:27
they came back with, they said
32:29
no, they don't want to fight
32:31
their country for the proper, whether
32:33
it's medical things or any number
32:36
of different programs. They don't want
32:38
to fight their country. They don't
32:40
want to go on hunger strikes.
32:42
A great podcast, fantastic podcast, Mark
32:44
Menke, has is called Operation Tango
32:47
Romeo, where he talks to many
32:49
of the soldiers that have fought
32:51
on behalf of our country. Brian
32:53
Pasifumi was on with Jerry Egar
32:55
earlier today. He wrote about the
32:58
fact that there are many, there
33:00
are a handful of soldiers that
33:02
have been asked, well, have you
33:04
thought of medical assistance and dying?
33:06
To talk about that, Mark Menke
33:09
joins us right now, his podcast
33:11
again, Operation Tango Romeo. Mark, thank
33:13
you very much for shedding some
33:15
light on what's going on right
33:18
now. I appreciate you having me
33:20
on. Could you give me the
33:22
circumstances that Veterans Affairs have said
33:24
this to? I think you've documented
33:26
three soldiers that this has happened
33:29
to? Three that have come out
33:31
and used their name, but there's
33:33
many, many, many more. So Veterans
33:35
Affairs Canada, their service agents, how
33:37
they work is that they have
33:40
files by province. So when the
33:42
story originally broke a few years
33:44
ago, that was somebody that was
33:46
living in BC and they had
33:48
a BC service agent and then
33:51
Minister Macaulay at the time says,
33:53
oh, and this is just a
33:55
one-off that one of our service
33:57
agents went rogue and offered to
34:00
kill a veteran. said to help
34:02
them. It's just one though, it's
34:04
just one, honest, but that was
34:06
somebody in BC. Since then, I've
34:08
talked to an RCP member that
34:11
it happened to in Alberta, and
34:13
so you can't have a service
34:15
officer from BC if you're in
34:17
Alberta. We've talked to veterans in
34:19
Manitoba that have been on my
34:22
show as whistleblowers, Ontario, Quebec,
34:24
and numerous of them. So I don't
34:26
even know what we're at right now
34:28
for veterans, but the story that was
34:31
put out by Mr. McCauley when I
34:33
testified in Ottawa at the Standing Committee
34:35
at Veterans Affairs. The story that they
34:38
had was it was just one rogue
34:40
person and they swore on a stack
34:42
of Bibles it was only one veteran
34:44
that happened to until I brought two
34:47
more to the stage and is okay,
34:49
okay, okay. It was more. It was
34:51
four veterans, the government. says, and then
34:53
Christine Goate comes forward, says, hey, it
34:56
happened to me too, and they just
34:58
called her a liar instead of acknowledging
35:00
it. It's like, well, we don't see
35:02
any evidence of that. She must be
35:04
a liar. And of course, she isn't
35:07
a liar. It did happen to her.
35:09
And the person that knows the most,
35:11
but not everybody's willing to come forward,
35:13
so we keep their names quiet, is
35:15
Blake Richards, the shadow minister of Veterans
35:18
Affairs. He just had somebody last week
35:20
that has been offered it four separate
35:22
times. So, of course, it was system-wide.
35:24
It's unimaginable to
35:26
think that that's the case,
35:28
but there's no other explanation
35:31
of how it could be
35:33
so widespread across the country
35:35
in five different provinces that
35:37
little old me has discovered.
35:40
You know, and I don't even
35:42
have the resources. You would think
35:44
that there would be some sort
35:46
of documentation of saying, hey, we're
35:48
not to do this ever again.
35:51
can understand where maybe somebody thinks
35:53
like if I'm working for veterans
35:55
affairs and I have somebody at
35:57
their wits end and I can't
36:00
help them. I can understand how somebody
36:02
thinks, thinks that they're being compassionate, but
36:04
that is not an answer. It should
36:06
not ever be an answer. I don't
36:08
know maybe if they're freelancing because they
36:10
think that they're at their wet sand
36:12
and maybe it's a compassionate thing to
36:14
do, but it's certainly 100% should not
36:16
be something that should be coming out
36:18
of a government employee's mouth. I'm in
36:20
my sixth or seventh year now of
36:22
the show and what I do is
36:24
I'm an aggregate for healing modalities. One
36:26
of the three, one of my three
36:28
main pillars. So I go around and
36:30
I find everything I can that helps.
36:32
I find every helping healing modality from
36:35
psychedelics to veterans retreats and everything in
36:37
between and peer support and you name
36:39
it. And so I've got a pretty
36:41
good handle on what works and what
36:43
doesn't. I'm probably the subject matter expert
36:45
on resources for the country. And yet
36:47
Veterans Affairs Canada has never ever called
36:49
me. I've invited them on the show
36:51
numerous times. I could get... I can
36:53
get anybody, but I can't get veterans
36:55
affairs. But they've never called me, they've
36:57
never asked for advice for me or
36:59
anybody else in the healing community that
37:01
I know of, saying, hey, what do
37:03
people want? What works out there? You
37:05
know, what other services should we provide?
37:07
They've never asked that question. Instead, they
37:09
put us in this teeny weeny little
37:11
box and they say, shut up, sit
37:13
down. and just take it. Whatever we
37:16
spoon feed you, that's what you take,
37:18
and there are no other options. And
37:20
that's what they're doing. So there's a
37:22
pile of little mom and pop shops
37:24
out there trying to fill that gap,
37:26
including my show. But all the resources
37:28
are there, they're just not supported. They're
37:30
all privately funded. I'm so sorry that
37:32
we're out of time, but it seems
37:34
to me sometimes that when you hear
37:36
these worst case scenarios from health insurance
37:38
stories in the states where they're denying
37:40
people their benefits, that's what when veterans
37:42
affairs should be helping these men and
37:44
women. It seems more
37:46
like that the roadblocks
37:48
that they're there to
37:50
there to deny, than to
37:52
help and that's why
37:55
And know why, you know, that's
37:57
why when you
37:59
hear these stories, maybe
38:01
they're more likely they're
38:03
more likely, they're so
38:05
believable and tragic at
38:07
the same time same
38:09
I'm so sorry.
38:11
I'm out of time.
38:13
Thank you very
38:15
much for yours Thank you
38:17
so much. I
38:19
appreciate it. Please check
38:21
out the stories
38:23
as told out the stories as
38:25
told his podcast his podcast,
38:27
Operation Tango Romeo.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More