0:00

Today,

0:00

the Matt Wall show, my expose on

0:02

Vanderbilt's Gender Clinic, which butchers

0:04

in drugs, kids, and that's not even the worst

0:06

of it. has sparked a massive reaction

0:08

on both the right and the left. Best of all,

0:10

there's now a push for legislation to finally

0:12

put a stop to this. I'll give you the latest on this story

0:14

today. Also, The White House walks back

0:16

Biden's claim that the pandemic is

0:18

over and they say not so. Doctors

0:21

will now start conducting regular screenings

0:23

for anxiety. Why is that

0:25

a bad thing? Well, I'll explain. A therapist

0:27

brags on TikTok about how he indoctrinates and

0:29

manipulates kids. And in our daily cancellation,

0:32

a philosopher comes to the defense OF

0:34

THAT TEACHER IN CANADA WITH THE Giant FATE

0:36

BESS, ALL OF THAT AND MORE TODAY ON THE MAT

0:38

WALL SHOW. Reporter:

0:48

Inside, every progressive is at the consultarians

0:50

screaming to get out. And the team at front page

0:53

magazine has been unmasking these totalitarian

0:55

since the earliest days of the Internet, founded

0:57

by David Horo it's a former red diaper baby

1:00

and new leftist who ultimately became an enemy

1:02

of the left and bestselling author, Front Page Magazine

1:04

has spent over two decades combatting

1:06

the radical the radical left efforts to destroy

1:08

America. There are two new podcasts, the

1:10

right take with Mark Tatson and the Jason Hill

1:13

Show, offer riveting interviews and insightful

1:15

coverage of politics, culture, and current events.

1:17

The right take with Mark Capstone offers fascinating

1:20

in-depth cultural commentary as well as interviews

1:22

with well known conservative thinkers. Jason

1:24

Hellshire offers thoughtful deep dives about

1:26

the ideologies of the radical left and interviews

1:28

who with renowned intellectuals like Peter

1:31

Wood and Bruce Gilly, It takes up village

1:33

to combat the radical efforts destroy

1:35

America. That's why as a fan of my

1:37

show, you should also check out these guys

1:39

or front page magazine by visiting front

1:41

page mag dot com. And

1:44

while you're there supporting their cause by

1:46

making a tax deductible donation, inside

1:48

every progressive is a top to tell telltarian screaming

1:50

to get out and no one understands that better

1:52

than the team at front page magazine. So go to

1:55

front page mag dot com today.

1:58

We moved to Nashville about two years ago

2:00

and have grown to love city

2:02

and the community here, but when I found out

2:04

that my local hospital vanderbilt drugs

2:07

and mutilates kids. I

2:09

knew that that's not something we could

2:11

tolerate. I don't really want to share

2:13

this city with groomers and butchers.

2:15

The town isn't big enough for both of us, you

2:17

might say. So we decided to

2:19

investigate the hospital and I

2:22

admit that I'm no journalist But if

2:24

the actual journalists aren't going

2:26

to do their job, then it falls to me

2:28

and to others on the right, like, lives of

2:30

TikTok and Chris Ruffo and others who have been

2:32

working to expose the horrors of gender

2:34

ideology. And as we

2:36

dug into this, a story began

2:38

to reveal itself yesterday on the show,

2:40

I sort of told you that story,

2:42

took you took you through it chronologically, started

2:45

in twenty eighteen with the unveiling of Vanderbilt's

2:47

new transgender clinic and

2:49

they were motivated to get into the gender transition

2:51

game in large part because of all the money

2:53

there is to be made from it, which

2:56

in and of itself is maybe not a revelation

2:58

that they like making money from this. But

3:00

it was still interesting to hear the video that we played

3:02

of a doctor boasting

3:04

about the profitability of transition

3:07

surgeries quote unquote, She declared

3:09

that bottom surgery for women,

3:11

which is the construction of an artificial penis

3:13

using skin peeled off of the arm or elsewhere

3:15

on the body, is such a big that

3:18

some clinics can thrive financially just

3:20

by performing those surgeries alone. Now

3:22

why are they such a cash cow, though? Well, because

3:25

as she says, they're they're labor intensive,

3:27

and also because they require lots of follow

3:30

ups. So, yes, if you if you get one

3:32

of these surgeries, You

3:34

will be doomed to a life of continued

3:36

hospital visits as doctors

3:38

work to keep your fake sex organs

3:40

nominally functional It'll

3:42

be miserable for you. I mean, you have signed

3:44

on to be a patient forever.

3:48

But it's great for the doctors of Vanderbilt. I mean,

3:50

they love it. Next, we revealed

3:52

the intimidation tactics the hospital has

3:54

used to keep their staff in line

3:57

because, of course, you know, they decided that they're

3:59

gonna start doing this not everybody is on board

4:01

with it. Not everybody wants to butcher people and chop

4:03

their be be a party to this, chopping

4:05

their their, you know,

4:08

bodies apart and creating new

4:10

sex organs and all the rest of it. And

4:12

Vanderbilt knew that not everybody was on board. So according

4:14

to one video we played, staff were warned

4:16

that if they conscientiously object

4:19

or if they exercise their religious liberty, their

4:21

first amendment rights and decline to participate

4:23

in these procedures, quote, there will be

4:25

consequences. And if that didn't get the

4:27

message, Vanderbilt also enlisted an

4:29

army of trans activists to

4:31

actually attend appointments with

4:33

trans patients to include children and

4:36

conduct essentially surveillance of

4:38

the doctors, making sure that they're all

4:40

affirming of the trans identity. And

4:43

then of course, there's the pediatric gender

4:45

clinic, which grew out of the

4:48

overall transgendered clinic.

4:50

And as I proved with video documentation,

4:53

as much as we hear denials about this

4:55

sort of thing now, the

4:57

fact is that Vanderbilt gives chemical

4:59

castration drugs to young children.

5:02

They prescribe cross sex hormones to

5:04

thirteen year olds, which are irreversible. They

5:06

perform double mastectomies. which

5:09

are also obviously irreversible on

5:11

sixteen year olds and they do all of

5:13

this by their own mission

5:15

because there's a lot of money to be made from it.

5:18

Now, after I released our expose

5:21

here on the show and and on Twitter yesterday,

5:24

it caught fire. Fortunately, my Twitter thread with

5:26

all these videos has been retweeted over

5:29

thirty thousand times in a day and counting

5:31

state legislators here in Tennessee

5:33

have responded promising that they will

5:35

work to ban these practices in the state.

5:37

Our governor Bill Lee issued a statement.

5:40

saying in part that Tennessee, quote, should

5:42

not allow permanent life altering decisions

5:45

that hurt children or policies that suppress

5:47

religious liberties, a call for an investigation

5:49

into Vanderbilt. There's been a response

5:51

on the federal level two senator, Marsha

5:54

Blackburn echoed the call for an investigation.

5:56

The majority leader in Tennessee in the Tennessee

5:58

House of Representatives William Lambert tweeted,

6:00

quote, I'm deeply troubled by what Matt

6:02

Wilson covered about the pediatric transgender

6:04

clinic at VUMC. Governor

6:06

Billy is right to call for an investigation,

6:08

and we will support that investigation one

6:11

hundred percent. This type of child mutilation

6:13

should be illegal and soon

6:15

will be in Tennessee. I

6:18

can also tell you that I've had

6:20

people within Vanderbilt Contact

6:22

me, encouraging me to

6:25

continue exposing the institution they work

6:27

for and offering their help from the inside.

6:29

I've been in touch with many activists and

6:31

others here locally and across the country

6:34

wanting to join in the effort to shut

6:36

down Vanderbilt's child butchery

6:38

business. Now

6:40

all of this, of course, has provoked

6:42

the expected reaction from the left. They

6:44

aren't going to engage in

6:46

any sort of discussion they

6:48

aren't going to attempt to defend Vanderbilt's

6:51

practices or explain why it's actually

6:53

good to chop an adolescent girls' breasts off.

6:55

They're gonna do that. They're gonna justify

6:57

Vanderbilt's intimidation tactics against

6:59

their own healthcare providers. They aren't

7:01

going to do internet because they can't. Instead,

7:03

they'll simply try to have me silenced.

7:06

and if they can arrange it arrested too.

7:08

So just reading through a sampling of tweets

7:10

from some verified accounts. And

7:12

this, again, is just a it's small sampling.

7:15

of what's out there. But trans activist Alejandra

7:18

Karabayo posted, quote,

7:20

Vanderbilt Medical Center has had to shift

7:22

medical appointments for its transclinic to

7:24

virtual telehealth appointments as a result

7:26

of threats being made. Matt

7:28

Walsh is inciting a terror campaign

7:31

against a hospital and disrupting care.

7:33

he will get people hurt or killed.

7:37

This, of course, is the common thing. You're gonna get

7:39

people killed. You're killing people.

7:42

BY FACTUALLY REPORTING ON WHAT THIS HOSPITAL

7:44

IS DOING.

7:44

NOA

7:47

BRILOTSKY, WHO IS A BESAR freak

7:49

who's written for that creepy pro pedophile

7:51

organization, Prostasia, he

7:54

tweeted crying out to

7:56

Twitter to shut me down saying Twitter support.

7:58

How on Earth is Matt Walsh not violating

8:01

terms of service? You are complicit in

8:03

terrorism and you're going to be complicit in

8:05

murder if you don't take action.

8:08

This sentiment was echoed by Leah

8:10

Torres, who's an abortionist, who,

8:12

by the way, if you maybe recognize

8:14

the name from a while ago, she was the abortionist,

8:16

who once bragged about

8:19

cutting the baby's vocal cords during an

8:21

abortion so she can't hear them scream.

8:24

That's what she said. So she's

8:26

she responded saying Matt Walsh is off the rails

8:28

and he is behaving dangerously. I

8:31

reviewed his post just from today, and he's

8:33

going to get people hurt and or killed.

8:35

I reported the post, but that

8:37

hardly feels like enough. Now,

8:40

of course, coming from her accusing me of getting people

8:42

killed, I can't even tell if she means that as a compliment.

8:45

She then tagged the

8:47

FBI, of course, because she wants to get the FBI

8:50

involved. And so did leftist creep named

8:52

Zach Hunt who says, hey, FBI, and

8:54

justice department, and MNPD, Nashville.

8:57

Matt Walsh's targeting Vanderbilt Hospital the

8:59

same way he targeted Boston Children's

9:01

Hospital. Please intervene before one of

9:03

his followers starts calling in bomb threats

9:05

or worse.

9:05

This is

9:07

the strategy they've, of course, long

9:10

since settled on. And

9:12

it tells you everything you need to know.

9:14

Because if there was any possible defense

9:16

of these practices, the

9:18

left would make that argument. They tell us

9:20

what the defense is. If

9:23

there was anything they could say to rationalize

9:25

it, they would say it. But

9:28

there's nothing. There's no defense. Vanderbilt,

9:31

like so many other hospitals and medical

9:33

clinics, is enriching

9:35

itself by permanently damaging

9:38

the bodies and minds of children.

9:40

It cannot be defended. So

9:43

instead, they cry excitement and hope that

9:45

the FBI comes and takes me

9:47

away. What

9:49

that means is that is that these people

9:51

at some level. They

9:54

know that we are right. They

9:56

know it. all the people

9:58

responding. FBI come they

10:00

they all at some level know

10:02

that they're the bad guys here.

10:06

which makes them even the even bigger bad

10:08

guys. Makes you makes you even more evil

10:10

when you're aware of how evil you are.

10:12

They know that this is horrific and

10:15

inexcusable and they must

10:17

recognize that fact or else

10:19

they wouldn't be so desperate to shut down

10:21

any conversation about

10:22

it. If they

10:24

believe that Vanderbilt was entirely in

10:26

the right, they would say, yeah,

10:29

Vanderbilt is doing all of that, and it's

10:31

good. Thank you for the free advertisements. Yep.

10:35

As a as a comparison, the

10:37

left likes to talk about the

10:39

the evils perpetrated by pregnancy

10:42

centers. You know, and and,

10:44

of course, they say all these things about pregnancy centers. And

10:46

then pregnancy centers are actually physically

10:49

attacked, and there's our sin

10:51

and and and everything else. but

10:53

that's not an incitement.

10:54

But here's

10:56

here's the interesting thing. If

10:58

if somebody on the left were to

11:00

post a

11:03

long thread going through

11:05

picking out any pregnancy center and saying, look at what

11:07

this pregnancy center does. And then

11:09

they post an

11:11

accurate description of all the resources and

11:13

all of the, you know, practices of this pregnancy

11:16

center. As a supporter

11:18

of pregnancy centers, I would say,

11:20

great. That's exactly what Partnership Centers

11:22

do. Thank thank you for letting people

11:24

know. Please post more like

11:26

this. As an advocate,

11:28

and a supporter of pregnancy centers. I am proud

11:30

of that.

11:31

If you

11:34

wanna talk about pregnancy centers, we can

11:36

definitely talk about it. Not like I try shut you down

11:38

for talking about it.

11:38

See, that's

11:42

what you do if you believe you're in the right.

11:45

If you believe you're in the wrong, then you,

11:48

you know, literally call the police

11:50

and try to have me thrown in a jail

11:52

cell just for factually

11:54

reporting about what this institution is doing, and

11:56

who they're doing it to. Now

11:58

as for Vanderbilt's response,

12:00

they have so far issued no statement

12:03

except They did in effect issue a

12:05

statement when they took down their website for their

12:07

transgender clinic. Now when I say they took

12:09

down the website, I mean, the

12:11

whole site. They

12:13

deleted the entire site.

12:16

Getting rid of all the evidence. Now,

12:18

fortunately for them, we anticipated that,

12:20

and we spent the previous

12:22

week archiving, saving videos, and

12:24

taking screenshots, so we have it all. It's

12:26

too late to get rid of it, guys. We have

12:28

it. I mean, what I

12:30

posted yesterday talked about the show. That's

12:32

only a small fraction of what we have. We

12:34

have the rest.

12:35

But up until

12:38

now, I mean, how do we get a a hold of this stuff?

12:40

Because up until now,

12:42

they were posting everything online

12:44

with reckless abandon we didn't

12:46

dig through their trash or secretly film

12:48

them to get this footage? They

12:51

filmed it and posted it. The

12:53

footage of their doctor threatening reprisals

12:55

for conscientious objections was

12:58

streamed live to Facebook and

13:00

then published and posted there and kept there

13:02

for two years, same for

13:05

the video of the woman admitting to

13:07

Avanderbilt's greed and profit motives.

13:09

streamed it. Put it

13:10

on Facebook. Didn't even take down the stream

13:13

afterwards. Didn't even say to themselves, oh,

13:15

well, she she went a little off script there

13:17

with some of this. I think we're gonna take this down. left

13:19

it up

13:19

there. For

13:23

years, these people did whatever they

13:25

wanted, and they did it out in the open.

13:27

without fear of pushback or

13:29

criticism.

13:30

But those

13:32

days are over. they're

13:35

over and they're never coming back.

13:37

So if you're in the

13:40

gender butchery business, you ought to

13:42

know that. You operated

13:44

with impunity for a while,

13:47

but now that's done.

13:48

and

13:51

I am not satisfied to simply

13:53

report on what Vanderbilt is

13:55

doing. Like I said, I'm not a journalist. I

13:59

will act the part if I

14:01

have to because the real journalist

14:03

won't.

14:03

But

14:06

III have an opinion here. III have a

14:08

perspective. I have

14:11

an agenda. The agenda

14:13

is protecting kids. and exposing

14:16

horrors and atrocities where they're happening.

14:18

And the other part of the agenda is to

14:20

shut this down. k? We're gonna put

14:22

a stop to it. We're

14:24

gonna put a stop to it. We're not going to allow

14:29

this to happen to children. We're gonna

14:31

make this illegal. That's

14:34

what happens next. And

14:36

we're just getting started. Now

14:39

let's get to our five headlines.

14:47

I can't say enough good things

14:49

about my Helix mattress. You know, we got we

14:51

got one Helix mattress, and we gave it to my

14:53

daughter for her for her to sleep in. And

14:55

then I felt very jealous of that, so we said we need to get a

14:57

second Helix mattress. And now finally, my wife and

14:59

I have one. You

15:01

can get a great night's sleep on a Helix mattress.

15:03

And if you wanna see for yourself, well,

15:05

Helix has several different mattress miles choose from. They

15:07

have soft, medium, and firm mattresses. Match

15:09

is great for cooling it down. If you sleep

15:11

hot, Match is great for a spinal alignment

15:13

to prevent mornings, aches, and pains, and even

15:15

a Helix plus mattress

15:17

for plus size sleepers, very important.

15:19

As well, they also have a sleep quiz that

15:21

matches your body type and sleep preference to the

15:23

perfect mattress because Why would you buy a mattress

15:25

made for someone else? So if you're looking for a

15:27

mattress, take the quiz, order the mattress that

15:29

your mattress to and wait for the delivery

15:31

Your mattress will come right to your door

15:33

for free. You don't ever need to go to the

15:35

mattress store. Again, they have a ten year warranty and

15:38

you get to try it out for a hundred nights

15:40

risk They'll leave it and pick it up for you if you don't

15:42

love it, but you will, I guarantee it. For a limited

15:44

time, Helix is offering up to three hundred fifty dollars

15:46

off all mattress orders and two free

15:48

pillows for our listeners. This is their best

15:50

offer yet to hurry over to

15:52

helix sleep dot com slash walsh.

15:53

I should

15:56

also tell you that

15:59

this is one more reason

16:02

as we're working on this

16:04

with this or the Vanderbilt. And

16:05

as I said, this is just we

16:09

have good plans here. I can't lay them all out

16:11

yet, but that that

16:13

will come soon. And

16:15

this is really just the

16:17

beginning. We

16:20

we are exposing this in Tennessee

16:22

because this is where we live. It seems like a

16:24

logical place to start, but

16:26

it doesn't end

16:27

there. But

16:30

I should tell you that and this is this is

16:32

the truth. We we cannot do

16:34

any of this without our members

16:36

supporting us. And you might think, well, you

16:38

know, why do you need memberships to post a

16:40

Twitter thread about this? Well, this is actually this

16:42

is hours of research and

16:44

and and manpower that goes into something

16:46

like this. Because even though they post all this stuff

16:48

to to the Internet, it's a lot of stuff to

16:50

sift through. And most people just

16:52

don't you don't have the time of the energy to do, which is one

16:54

of the reasons why they've gotten away from it for

16:56

so long. And

16:59

that's something we're able to dedicate the

17:01

resources to because, I mean,

17:03

directly because of our

17:06

members. So if you are a member,

17:08

thank you for that. Thank you for enabling

17:12

us to fight back in this

17:14

way, in a way that's meaningful to, like, actually try

17:16

to make a difference. I sit here every

17:18

day on the show talking about all

17:20

these awful things happening in

17:22

the world. and it gets exhausting at times. I'm sure it

17:24

gets exhausting for you

17:26

and the audience. the

17:29

which is why it's such a relief

17:31

to know that we can actually do something

17:33

about it. To to to take some of these things and say

17:35

we're not just gonna talk about them. We're

17:37

gonna talk about them first to raise awareness, but

17:40

then we're gonna do something about

17:42

it. All of that is possible

17:44

because of our members. So thank you to our members. And if you're not a

17:46

member yet, encourage you

17:48

to think about becoming a

17:50

subscriber and join this

17:52

team, this movement

17:54

that we're building. So go to daily wire dot com and get

17:56

them membership today. I want to begin

17:58

with this in our

17:59

five in our five headlines.

18:02

Turning Point USA has

18:05

this report on their website. It

18:07

says Dylan Mulvaney is a

18:09

man who began publicly identifying as female

18:11

just a hundred and ninety one days ago.

18:13

And demands others use she then

18:15

pronouns when referring

18:17

to him. He was invited to speak

18:19

at the twenty twenty two Forbes

18:21

Power Women's Summit.

18:23

Mulvaney posted about his

18:25

experience going to the Forbes conference

18:27

where he spoke on a panel with two women

18:29

about his transition journey,

18:31

as well as the social media

18:33

to mainstream pipeline. problem

18:36

with his appearance is a simple fact that he is indeed a not

18:38

a woman who presents himself as an overdramatized

18:40

parody of a female. Now we

18:42

have the tweet from Forbes where they

18:44

They posted, you know, an image of this

18:47

Dylan Mulvaney character. And

18:49

the the four at

18:51

Forbes women, says, Dylan Mulvaney

18:53

speaks about collaboration and

18:55

authorship at the Forbes Power

18:58

Women Summit.

18:59

This is something that they've

19:02

invited to the women's summit

19:04

as a speaker to

19:07

address women And I wanna show you this just

19:09

give you an example of the kind of

19:11

thing that Dylan posts. Again, as you

19:13

heard there, just started, quote,

19:15

identifying as a woman Like half

19:17

a year ago. Okay? About six months ago.

19:21

And what does that mean for him?

19:23

I mean, what does what does being a woman

19:25

mean? Well, here it is. Let's find out.

19:29

Day six, being

19:29

a girl, and today I'm in

19:32

nature. Trees, I love

19:34

them. Water

19:36

likes. I love them. Heels.

19:38

They're my hiking heels. I love them.

19:41

Okay.

19:41

ha

19:46

Britches.

19:46

Love them.

19:48

Coconut

19:49

water. Love it. Not mad. Just love

19:52

it. Wind turbine.

19:54

love it. With meadows, love

19:57

them. This is supposed to be what women

19:59

do.

20:01

Is this a This is a woman or is this like

20:03

a woodland elf?

20:07

Columbia.

20:09

Oh,

20:12

Did you receive it?

20:14

Gotta get out of here. Yeah. This is

20:16

deaf. This is this is all kind of information. Alright.

20:18

It's a giant. Oh my god. Okay. There you go.

20:20

If ever again, out of

20:22

your So there's that's Dylan Mulvaney's journey

20:26

becoming a woman. And I

20:28

I only show you that because, again,

20:31

this Forbes invited that

20:33

person to be a speaker at

20:35

a women's leadership

20:38

summit.

20:40

an an utter cartoon.

20:43

Right? A total mockery

20:45

of of womanhood. And

20:48

every time I see something like this, III think,

20:50

like, have you ever met a

20:52

woman? Do do you have you ever even

20:54

met one? what woman acts

20:56

like that? This is this is an

20:58

impression. This is like some sort of it

21:00

would seem to be a parody in actual it would seem

21:02

almost to be an actual intentional

21:05

parity of of a woman.

21:07

Because if

21:09

you've ever met one in your life,

21:11

you would know that nothing about

21:14

that.

21:16

strikes me as remotely feminine

21:22

This is what they turn women into, as well they turn them into

21:25

flamboyant gay men. What do

21:27

you know? Big

21:29

coincidence. And

21:31

the irony is that on the right,

21:33

we're always accused. Anytime we talk

21:35

about if we're talking about

21:37

abortion, for example, our pro life

21:39

conviction as men. The response

21:41

from people on the left always is, well, you

21:44

what do you know about women? Have you ever met a

21:46

woman? A bunch

21:48

of virgins? There's something they

21:50

say to me all the time even though I have six

21:52

kids now. I've got my I'm

21:54

driving around on my twelve passenger van than I

21:56

just bought yesterday by the way. because

21:58

my wife finally did give in and realized

22:00

we had to buy the vans with this big I'm driving around

22:02

my big massive van and soon to be

22:04

filled with six kids And then you've

22:06

got the left. A bunch of childless left is

22:08

not your virgin,

22:10

which

22:12

maybe they they really mean it

22:14

because they they don't know where babies come from.

22:16

They actually don't understand the biology

22:19

of it. And so that makes that's an accusation

22:21

that makes sense of them. So as much as they like we

22:23

always talk about on the left, whatever they say about their

22:25

opposition is actually true of them. So it's nothing

22:27

but projection all the time. And

22:29

that's the case here because This

22:31

is this is the the version

22:33

of womanhood that they

22:35

prop up, which is not

22:37

womanhood at all, but is again a

22:40

satire, a parody, a

22:42

cartoon.

22:42

Okay. I've

22:46

I've never known My my

22:48

wife enjoys being out in

22:50

nature out in the woods. Okay.

22:53

But I've never known her to put on high heels

22:56

and and prance through

22:58

the forest. spinning

23:01

around and talking about how much he loves everything

23:03

in the forest. That's

23:07

Okay. If you got your idea

23:09

of womanhood from watching nineteen

23:14

fifties Disney cartoons, So

23:16

if you got your idea of womanhood from

23:19

Snow Light and the seven doors,

23:21

that's basically what this

23:23

guy's

23:23

got here. That's

23:26

something maybe it's like a snow white. She's she's running

23:28

through the forest and singing and the birds are coming

23:30

and singing along with her a

23:34

literal cartoon. what

23:36

they've turned woman womanhood into.

23:39

I would be, if

23:41

I was a woman, which

23:43

in fact I am not and never could

23:46

be

23:47

the

23:48

despite popular misconceptions.

23:51

I would be deeply

23:53

deeply offended by that sort

23:55

of thing. That would be offensive to

23:58

me. to be portrayed in that

24:00

in that way way. Alright, Joe

24:02

Biden announced a few days ago that the

24:05

pandemic is over.

24:07

He announced that on sixty minutes, but his

24:09

administration isn't quite ready to give up the

24:11

pandemic yet. They they still have they

24:13

still have COVID coordinators on staff

24:15

for goodness sake. They have a they're

24:17

using their pandemic powers to ram

24:19

through unconstitutional measures, and they probably have some

24:21

more they wanna do with that power. So

24:23

they need this. They need the pandemic. They're not

24:26

ready to give it up. Yet they've

24:28

got old Uncle Joe up there, babbling about

24:30

how the pandemic is over, going

24:32

off script, And so now the administration is in cleanup

24:34

mode. And here is Karen Jean pair on

24:36

MSNBC. Try your best to clean

24:38

up after her boss. Let's see how

24:40

she does. president

24:42

also in the sixty minutes interview

24:44

said that the pandemic is over. There's been

24:46

quite a bit of pushback

24:49

to that statement by the

24:51

president. Where is he today on that?

24:52

So just to step back for a second,

24:55

what we saw during that interview

24:57

sixty minute interview when he made those comments. He was

24:59

walking through the

25:02

Detroit car show, the halls of the

25:04

Detroit car show, AND HE WAS

25:06

LOOKING AROUND. WE HAVE TO REMEMBER THE LAST

25:08

TIME THEY HAD HELD THAT EVENT

25:10

WAS THREE YEARS AGO. EVEN AS WE'RE

25:12

TALKING ABOUT UGGA, THE PRESIDENT IS GOING

25:14

TO SPEAK shortly as I just mentioned, we that hasn't

25:16

been held in in person for about

25:18

three years as well. So we are in

25:20

a different time. He's been very

25:22

consistent about that. And

25:24

the reason why is because we are not

25:26

prepared. We are now ready. We

25:28

know how to deal with

25:30

this pandemic. It is now more

25:32

manageable. It's not as disruptive as

25:34

it's been in the prior in the

25:36

prior years. And so and it is because of

25:38

what this president has done on day

25:41

one. If you think about where we were, when he walked

25:43

in, three thousand people were dying a

25:45

day. That has come down ninety percent

25:48

You think about schools that were closed. Now schools are open.

25:50

Think about businesses were closed. Now

25:52

businesses are open. And it's because of the work

25:54

that this administration has done. Now what

25:56

he has been very consistent about

25:58

is that we have to continue to

26:00

have a front foot on this. So

26:02

we have the funding, so that we are

26:05

ahead of this, of any

26:07

other, as we look at

26:09

future vaccines and future

26:11

treatments, we need to make sure that we

26:13

are ready for that as we're also

26:15

leading, as we're talking of the

26:17

backdrop of anger, as we're

26:19

leading globally as well.

26:22

Pretty

26:22

good. I you know, I was I'm I've had to admit.

26:24

I don't give her a lot of credit. I'll give her some credit

26:27

there. Just her

26:29

ability to to pretty good job

26:31

filibustering there. Keep on

26:33

talking. Keep on talking. To stop them from asking

26:35

any follow ups, not that they would have anyway because

26:37

it's MSNBC. and they're they're all on the

26:39

same team. But

26:40

com she

26:41

was talking around the issue, of

26:43

course. It usually she doesn't do a very good job. I mean, that

26:45

that is if you're a White House press secretary especially

26:48

for a Democrat president. That's all you're ever

26:50

supposed to do is talk around the issues, not answer

26:52

any questions. Usually, she fumbles around

26:54

quite a bit with that. She is getting a little better.

26:56

She's learning. So that's nice.

26:58

And there she talks about two

27:00

minutes. But

27:01

in summation, if

27:02

we were to summarize everything she just said, she

27:04

is claiming that her boss the president

27:06

of the United States was wrong. She's she's saying no, he

27:08

was wrong about that. The pandemic

27:11

is still ongoing. She didn't come out outright and say,

27:13

but that is in fact what said. her

27:15

spin is that, well, the pandemic still

27:17

happened, but it's under control. And

27:19

so when you said the pandemic is over, he actually meant that

27:21

the pandemic is not over, but it's

27:24

under control. And why did he say that? Because

27:26

he was walking around at a car

27:28

show. I don't see I don't see

27:30

the connection. Well, Of

27:32

course, he thought the pandemic was over. We was walking around at

27:34

a car show. You

27:37

know, and he saw a bunch of empty cars

27:39

and he didn't see COVID in them. So he thought that's what was

27:41

happened. I he thought there was no COVID.

27:43

So let's

27:46

start her explanation started a little bit

27:48

rough in that, but she pivoted away from the

27:50

car show and then just started babbling

27:52

about COVID response and all this stuff like

27:54

that. That that was that's what we got

27:56

to the what what her

27:58

her job is.

27:59

Alright. So

28:02

I wanna

28:03

show you this

28:05

segment from -- and this is also from

28:07

NBC about the supposed right

28:09

wing effort to ban books.

28:12

We hear a lot about this now,

28:14

and TracStar is from CNN. How do you

28:16

tell the difference anyway? we're

28:19

constantly hearing about how on the right. We're out

28:21

there just burning books, banning

28:25

books. Now as a right way

28:27

extremist myself, And as a sarcastic

28:29

terrorist, I've never been

28:31

invited. I'm a little bit offended that all these

28:33

book burnings are happening on the right. I've never

28:35

even been invited one. But

28:37

apparently, this is what we're doing. Want you to watch

28:39

how this segment plays out there. Watch this. In

28:41

our varied lead,

28:42

that's what we call stories we do not think

28:44

are getting enough attention. AT

28:47

LEAST fifty GROUPS ARE FIGHTING TO BAN

28:49

BOOKS IN U. S. SCHOOLS, THAT'S ACCORDING TO

28:51

PIN A NON PROFIT LITERARY

28:53

ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION. A new report from Penn says

28:55

these groups are fighting to ban material

28:57

related to race and LGBTQ rights

28:59

and critical race theory and

29:01

more. Joining us now to discuss, Jonathan

29:03

Friedman, he's the director of free expression and

29:05

education programs at Pan America.

29:07

Jonathan, thanks for joining us. Your report breaks

29:09

down the subject matters for the books that are Currently,

29:11

there are pushes for them to be banned. A majority of

29:13

them have LGBTQ plus themes

29:16

or have a protagonist of

29:19

color Explain more

29:21

if you would. And obviously, the

29:23

devil's advocate argument might be to

29:25

a parent out there. Hey, I don't want MY

29:27

FIRST GRADE READING ANYTHING HAVING TO DO WITH SEXUALITY MUCH

29:30

L GTBQ OR HADROSEXUAL

29:32

ANYTHING. Adrienne: YEAH, THANKS FOR

29:34

HAVING ME. I'M HAPPY TO TALK ABOUT THIS.

29:37

you know, in district after district, we've

29:39

been tracking book bands, efforts to

29:41

remove and restrict and diminish access

29:43

to literature for young people And

29:46

the trends are very

29:48

clear that LGBTQ books, books

29:50

that touch on race and racism, or books

29:52

that have any kind of sexual content, you

29:54

know, whether it's book a young

29:56

adult, work of fiction that

29:58

has a couple kissing or

29:59

a book teaching a young person about

30:02

puberty is on the chopping block and it's

30:04

the same books being targeted everywhere.

30:06

Now parents do have a right to

30:08

get involved, have a voice, bring

30:11

their concerns to teachers, to librarians, to

30:13

school districts. But increasingly,

30:15

we are not seeing any kind of

30:17

regular process is being instituted

30:19

in response to those domain demands.

30:21

Someone demands the book is removed and

30:23

they don't want it maybe for their own child, but

30:26

immediately that book is taken away everybody else. You

30:28

can't run schools that way. Yeah.

30:30

So you

30:30

notice that you notice what you notice what you

30:32

don't notice that you notice what's missing.

30:35

And first of all, he doesn't answer he doesn't actually answer the

30:37

question from Jake Tapper. What about

30:39

parents who say that there shouldn't be sexual content

30:41

of any kind especially in elementary

30:43

school classroom or library. Doesn't

30:46

answer that question. The other thing they don't do

30:48

is give any examples

30:51

of the books that are being banned.

30:53

Because it is true that we on

30:55

the right, otherwise known as just like rational,

30:58

morally decent people, which

31:01

when they say the right, that's actually what they mean these days,

31:03

which fine I'll accept it. But

31:05

we we have called for

31:07

banning certain books from the

31:09

classroom

31:09

But

31:11

those are books that are explicitly

31:14

sexual and graphic And that's

31:16

why they don't actually they don't give an example. They don't say, well, this specific Here's

31:19

one specific book that conservatives have

31:21

wanted to take out of the classroom. Here

31:23

it is. Now much less do

31:25

they show you any of the images

31:27

from these books? Not gonna do

31:29

that because if they did,

31:31

every single even the the average CNN viewer

31:33

would see it and say, well, that's in the

31:35

classroom. Are you kidding me? That's

31:38

what you guys are complaining

31:39

about? One

31:42

of the books and there are

31:44

there are only a sort of a really

31:46

a few books that are in in contention

31:49

here. and they're only in contention because the left

31:51

came along and said we want to put these books

31:53

into the classroom.

31:57

And then we who are rational saying morally

31:59

decent people said, no, you're not

32:01

putting that in the classroom. The left

32:03

comes along and says, hey, we got a great day. We're gonna put

32:05

some pornography in the classroom.

32:07

And then we say, no. I'm

32:09

putting porn in the classroom. Oh, you book

32:11

burners. You're just like Nazis.

32:12

You're

32:14

the one trying to inject this

32:16

stuff into the classroom. The kids were

32:18

doing fine

32:19

without it. Well,

32:21

they don't wanna

32:22

give you an example because one

32:24

of one of the most infamous examples

32:26

is book genderqueer.

32:28

which is a

32:31

pornographic It's kind of a

32:33

graphic novel in graphic in

32:35

multiple senses of the word. And we've talked

32:37

before about some of the stuff that's in this

32:39

book. There's there's pornographic

32:41

stuff depicting, for example,

32:43

Felicia and those sorts of things. In the

32:45

book, pictures of it.

32:46

But they're not

32:49

gonna show you that. Because like

32:51

I said, if they showed you that,

32:53

the average CNN viewer, even the average

32:55

CNN viewer, if they showed, okay, here's a

32:57

book, genderqueer, here's here's one of the books they

32:59

wanna ban. And and here's the page that

33:01

has really been come under contention

33:03

the most And and there you see you you see someone with a

33:05

with a strap on Dildo and

33:07

someone else is performing Felicia on them. That's

33:09

in the

33:10

book. People

33:12

watching CNN are gonna say, what in the world? You're

33:14

telling me that is in the classroom.

33:16

Yep? Of

33:21

course, Tapper also says that the other

33:23

books that are being banned are ones where

33:25

there's a protagonist of color. Because

33:27

right, because you've heard conservative's call

33:29

for that. I think of all the conservatives who said, no,

33:31

we don't want any books with protagonists of

33:34

color. get that book out of the We've seen

33:36

all these school board meetings where parents get

33:38

up there and they and they they present the

33:40

books that they found in their kids

33:43

school's library and they say, we don't want this

33:45

book. How many of those videos have we seen

33:47

where the parent stands up and

33:49

has a book and says, this book doesn't belong in the classroom. has

33:51

a protagonist of color in

33:53

it. How many videos

33:55

like that have you seen? Well, none at all

33:58

because Those are not the books

33:59

anyone has a problem

34:01

with. We're very

34:03

specific about this. We just don't want

34:06

graphic pornographic depictions

34:08

in books given to kids in

34:10

elementary schools or at any other grade

34:12

level? that That's

34:14

all. That's

34:15

our only point.

34:17

Let's see.

34:18

NBC has this report.

34:20

US

34:20

doctors

34:22

should regularly screen all adults under sixty five for

34:25

anxiety, an influential health guidelines

34:27

group proposed on Tuesday. The

34:30

first time the US preventative services task force has recommended

34:33

anxiety screening in primary care

34:35

for adults without symptoms. The

34:37

proposal is for public comment until October

34:40

seventeenth, but the group usually

34:42

affirms its draft guidance. The recommendations

34:44

are based on a review that began before the COVID

34:46

nineteen pandemic evaluating

34:48

studies showing potential benefits and

34:50

risks from screening. Given reports of a

34:52

surge in mental health problems linked with

34:54

pandemic isolation

34:56

and stress, The guidance is very timely, says

34:58

Lori Bert, a task

35:00

force member and

35:02

co author. Actually,

35:04

your name is pronounced your name is spelled PBERTP

35:07

Burt? The word is.

35:08

P Burt is

35:09

a psychologist researcher at the University

35:11

of Massachusetts, Chan Medical School.

35:14

So this is what they're recommending now. And

35:16

this and they're recommending it, and the

35:18

recommendations always always

35:20

end up becoming policy. So this is gonna be the policy now. We're gonna

35:22

do anxiety screenings for

35:24

adults without

35:26

symptoms. And it's the kind of thing

35:28

that I think if you're not really clued in and paying

35:30

attention, you might hear that and you might

35:32

say, well, sounds like a good idea. Sure. Extreme for

35:35

anxiety is a bad thing and why

35:37

not have a doctor screened for it. This

35:39

is actually a terrible idea. This

35:41

is an awful idea. Because I

35:43

tell you what this functions as and I

35:45

tell you what the purpose of it is,

35:47

It is to funnel more and more

35:49

people into the pharmaceutical

35:52

pipeline. Get more and more people

35:54

on drugs. They wanna like, we don't have enough

35:56

people on psychotropic drugs already. We don't have enough

35:58

people on anti anxiety, anti depressants

35:59

already. Even though

36:01

with antidepressants, the

36:03

whole the medical basis for antidepressants has

36:05

been destroyed now, has been revealed to be a

36:07

fraud, but still millions of

36:10

people on these drugs Not enough though

36:12

for the system. They want even more people. And so

36:14

now they're gonna they're gonna start screening you

36:16

for anxiety

36:18

symptoms. So if they find a hint of

36:20

anxiety, they can say, well, let's get him on a drug too. Good news. You get to be on

36:23

a drug. Screening

36:25

for an

36:25

anxiety symptoms.

36:28

Everyone

36:28

has anxiety. It is

36:31

the human condition. It is

36:33

one of the most

36:36

the It's it's it

36:38

is

36:38

a hallmark of the human condition. In

36:40

fact, there's anxiety. It's one of the things

36:43

that separates us from the

36:46

animals. It's

36:46

one of the defining

36:48

traits of

36:49

the human psyche is anxiety.

36:51

Everyone has

36:53

it. Every single person. You right now.

36:55

Every single person watching. You all

36:57

have anxiety. All of you. Like, there's never

36:59

been a person who has walked through

37:02

a day and not experienced anxiety. It has never happened ever in the history of

37:04

humanity.

37:05

And

37:08

so now for screening everyone for it on a regular basis, that

37:10

means that what do you know? We're gonna

37:12

find millions of more cases

37:14

of anxiety and that's millions of

37:18

more customers for the pharmaceutical

37:21

industry. And not just funneling

37:23

them into the clutches of

37:25

the pharmaceutical industry, but also into

37:28

the clutches of therapists and counselors, which is a problem

37:30

as well. Because although because

37:33

although in theory, therapy and counseling can

37:35

be a good thing. I mean, the whole idea between

37:37

behind therapies, you go and you talk to someone, you

37:39

talk about your

37:42

problems, In theory, that's a very good thing. And there are very good therapists and

37:44

counselors out

37:45

there. But a lot of them

37:48

are rapid

37:50

ideologues. and gender

37:52

ideology cultists with their own

37:56

agenda. And their agenda has nothing to do with

37:58

act with anything therapeutic. They're not looking to

37:59

help you. with your problems. So for

38:02

example, here's a viral TikTok posted by

38:04

lives of TikTok. Well, reposted she didn't

38:06

post it initially. This

38:08

is from a therapist,

38:12

and this is a TikTok that

38:14

he posted. And

38:16

this is what therapy is today in so many cases. So

38:18

we'll play it and we'll read the captions up

38:20

here, but go ahead and play it.

38:24

So it says, point of view, your homophobic, transphobic

38:26

parents drop you off to therapy thinking

38:29

I'm a hetero. When he

38:32

starts dancing, me,

38:34

queer as if here to validate your

38:36

feelings, support you, talk about oppression,

38:38

and challenge your parents.

38:40

Then this is, again, something he posts willingly to kick doc for everyone to see.

38:43

So he says, here's what he's actually here to

38:45

do. Put put put the back up up on

38:47

the screen for a second. the

38:49

end of that? What he's actually

38:51

here to do? Say, the

38:53

parents drop the kids off thinking that, well, am

38:55

I gonna get my kids therapy?

38:58

They need some help. They have emotional problems. Make sense as a parent. You'd like

39:01

to think that you that you could trust a therapist.

39:03

But he says, no, that's not his agenda.

39:05

It's not that. His agenda because

39:08

he's queer as f is to

39:10

validate your feelings, support you,

39:13

talk about oppression, and

39:15

challenge your parents. That

39:18

is not therapy. That is not counseling.

39:20

At

39:22

validating your feelings,

39:24

is is the

39:27

not just not therapy, that's

39:29

the opposite of what a therapist

39:31

is supposed to do. if

39:34

if the patient is gonna sit

39:36

down there and the client

39:38

is gonna sit down there and you're gonna

39:41

validate whatever they say, Why are

39:43

they there? What are you there for? What's the function

39:46

exactly? You're not supposed to be there to

39:48

validate whatever

39:50

unreasonable, delusional thing

39:52

you might think to validate your and

39:55

affirm your lack of perspective,

39:58

your confusions, they're

39:59

supposed to be there for

40:01

clarity and

40:04

perspective.

40:06

And if a child isn't getting along with

40:09

his parents, the therapist is supposed to

40:11

help heal that relationship. help

40:14

the child see more clearly, help the child understand

40:16

his feelings and his thoughts,

40:18

and help to heal the

40:20

divide between parent and child.

40:24

But now for so many of these people as they will

40:26

willingly announce for everyone

40:29

to see, they see their

40:31

jobs as the opposite. their job is

40:33

to sever the parent child destroy it,

40:36

and to take all of the mental confusion

40:38

that's causing the problem and

40:41

encourage it. And there's

40:44

gonna be more victims. As we as we

40:46

start screening people for anxiety and

40:48

depression and all these other things, that

40:50

that means sending them more into therapists. And then

40:52

and then what happens? So if someone gets screened,

40:54

maybe your kid gets a little anxiety

40:56

screening. And the doctor says, yep.

40:58

got some anxiety. Let's get them on drugs. Send them to a therapist. Sits down with

41:01

a therapist. And the therapist says, well, you know, I've

41:03

figured out what your anxiety is all about.

41:05

Turns out that you think you're a boy

41:07

but you're actually a girl. That's what the anxiety

41:10

is. And your parents would tell

41:12

you otherwise, don't listen to them. They're a bunch of

41:14

scumbags and and they're oppressive and and

41:16

bigoted. Don't listen to

41:16

them. This is the

41:20

process. This

41:20

is how you trans an entire generation,

41:22

which is what they're doing

41:25

right now. Alright. Let's get to the

41:27

comment section. Made swear

41:29

to my fly off the handle

41:31

with rage. Coose Blame.

41:36

It's a sweet baby

41:40

gang.

41:42

Matthew says, Bexar County

41:44

is pronounced Bear County for future

41:46

reference. Please don't say Bexar County

41:48

again. It is a macro I

41:52

should not micro. You're also canceled for this offense. No. That's not

41:54

how it's pronounced. And I and there

41:56

are many other comments too because I talked

41:58

about Bexar County and the Democrat Sheriff

42:01

down there, to arrest Ron DeSantis. All these comments, that's not

42:03

it's pronounced Bear County. No, you're

42:05

wrong.

42:06

k? You live in

42:07

Inexar County, and and

42:09

you are actually wrong about how your own

42:12

town is pronounced. I am telling you as an

42:14

outsider how to actually pronounce it.

42:16

The DEXAR

42:16

is not pronounced

42:19

bear. There's

42:20

no version of the English language

42:23

that would arrive, that that

42:25

that can make bear out of

42:27

BEXAR It's

42:30

Bexar. Hate to tell you. You've been

42:32

pronouncing it wrong this all the time.

42:34

That's how you put The

42:38

letters have there are certain sounds that that letters make. And

42:40

this is how we This is how you learn English in the

42:42

first place. This is how we

42:44

teach kids. And

42:47

I know English can get a little funky sometimes and you've got

42:49

silent letters and all these different things, but there have

42:51

to be limits to it.

42:53

k?

42:55

You can't

42:56

We

42:58

have to draw the line somewhere.

43:00

That

43:04

is Bexar County. Rachel

43:06

says, my eighth grader, Roquee

43:09

Hall, as his preferred pronouns in his health class. I

43:11

told him that it was my proudest

43:13

parenting moment to date and and

43:16

rightfully so rightfully so.

43:18

That is exactly how kids

43:20

should respond. make a

43:22

joke out of it. Make a mockery of it.

43:24

Fantastic. Jay Starz says I thought Matt

43:26

was gonna cancel the rap in grandma. He was

43:28

even reclining back in at the end of the video, which always

43:30

does. But right before he tears into somebody, he just

43:32

goes to show that though we may know Matt Walsh,

43:34

we don't really know him. He is beyond

43:36

our understanding, beyond us, mortal humans.

43:39

Matt

43:39

Walsh simply

43:42

is. But why would you

43:43

think that I would want to well, you're banned from

43:45

the show for that. Why would I

43:47

don't a policy of cancelling every single

43:50

person who performs a kind of

43:52

awkward and embarrassing rap. That's not a policy

43:54

on

43:56

this show. If you got the wholesome quotient, I might not be a

43:58

very wholesome guy myself. I might not

43:59

always appreciate

44:02

wholesome things. But you know what,

44:04

wholesomeness can go a long way, I think.

44:06

You can get a you can get away with a lot,

44:08

with your wholesome. And the grandma, she was

44:10

wholesome, and so

44:12

it's allowed. Ashley says, my favorite part of the show is

44:14

when Matt tells sweet stories about his

44:16

kids. Well, they aren't just sweet. I mean, I I tried to

44:18

tell stories that are funny. I'm not up

44:20

here like, Let me tell you about

44:22

another cute thing my kid

44:24

did. See, there seems to be a bit of a false narrative

44:26

building here, which is why I wanna address this because

44:28

last night, one of our

44:30

superfans on Twitter after

44:32

watching Backstage, she tweeted

44:34

and she said that she thought I was I

44:36

was such a sweetheart

44:38

during Backstage. This is

44:40

what? What kind of

44:42

irresponsible

44:42

misinformation is

44:44

this? This is dangerous

44:46

misinformation. and a threat to

44:49

our democracy. I will tell you

44:51

one sweet story about my kid. Fine. I last

44:53

and there's no nothing funny that happens at the end of

44:55

this, but this is just I'll give

44:57

you one. So last night, I get

45:00

home from backstage. And

45:02

my nine year old daughter comes out of a

45:04

room, and says, Daddy, I've been waiting up for you. I need to show you something. So she

45:06

was waiting up to show me such wait. It's like two hours.

45:08

She was waiting up. And then I go into room,

45:10

she hands me her little notepad.

45:13

where she had written a song. And

45:16

and she waited up for, like, two hours to show

45:18

me the song that she wrote. And it

45:20

was it was a very

45:22

sweet song. and it was

45:23

very nice. There was a little derivative of other

45:25

songs I've heard. You know, there might be some

45:28

plagiarism a little

45:30

bit, but It was still was very it

45:32

was very cute. Very

45:34

nice. Peter

45:36

Van Eaton says, hi, Matt.

45:38

What happened to that trans Phd student that was sending drugs to other

45:41

transgenders by mail? That story became

45:43

very quiet. I yeah. Eli

45:45

Herlick, I have forgotten

45:47

about that. I can tell you

45:50

that.

45:52

That's just

45:54

like Vanderbilt, this is not something that

45:56

I'm going forget about because that's part of

45:59

the story. So we

45:59

have the

46:01

ways that kids are

46:03

legally right now, drugged and

46:05

mutilated about that. But then even

46:08

when you stop it from happening legally, I mean, that's gonna

46:10

put that's gonna save a lot of kids

46:12

just just on

46:14

its but they're also the underground black market

46:16

operations. Eli Ehrlich is

46:18

one example of that not the

46:20

only one. So that's

46:22

something we're working on to. I'll just tell

46:24

you that. We haven't forgot about it.

46:28

I'll also say that not

46:31

everything can be

46:32

achieved by talking about it publicly.

46:34

about a public

46:37

Hebirth Alvarez says careful

46:40

Matt, Ben has tried to commit facial hair

46:42

appropriation. You can't let

46:44

him appropriate. Flannel. No. I'm

46:46

yeah. I did see Ben backstage last night

46:48

had a little bit of facial hair going on. I

46:50

there's no appropriation here. I always

46:53

welcome I'm very tolerant and welcoming

46:55

and inclusive in the

46:57

bearded facial hair community, and I

46:59

welcome anybody in IIIII

47:02

welcome anybody in a sort of like a long lost brother,

47:04

you know. So I think that's a

47:08

wonderful thing. And finally, Adam says, Matt, I appreciated your discussion about

47:10

porn during Backstage last night, but I

47:12

thought you personally came off as holier

47:14

than thou

47:16

and judgmental to those who

47:18

struggle with watching

47:20

porn. With respect,

47:22

if you thought that from watching the discussion

47:24

that I can only think that you didn't you weren't watching it very carefully. Just

47:27

because we're talking about

47:29

something and saying that it's bad and we

47:31

shouldn't do it, that doesn't that's

47:34

not holier Holier than now is if I were to stand up

47:36

and say, I am better than all of you

47:38

and I follow

47:40

my example, That's

47:43

not how I approach any conversation. We're

47:45

just talking about the issue.

47:46

And there are some realities

47:47

with pornography, and none of the

47:50

realities are

47:52

good. It is a dirty, shameful, awful thing,

47:54

which is why men who suffer from

47:56

a porn addiction want to

47:57

get over. I mean, they know this. They don't need

47:59

me to tell

47:59

them that.

48:00

the me to tell them and they

48:03

wouldn't disagree.

48:03

I think and and you should that

48:06

was the members block

48:08

of the backstage last

48:10

night, which is another reason to become a member, so you can watch

48:12

great content like that. But I thought it was a really

48:14

interesting conversation. And and

48:16

III enjoy Backstage

48:18

the most when we get into kind of debates and arguments. reason

48:20

why the debates are interesting is

48:22

because we agree fundamentally

48:25

on the basic principles.

48:27

And

48:29

when you agree on the basic

48:31

principles, you can have much more interesting arguments. This

48:33

is why debates in our

48:35

culture generally are so uninteresting and

48:37

tedious and boring and they don't they don't amount

48:39

to anything or go

48:42

anywhere because there's there's a fundamental disagreement about the basic principles

48:44

and so you you can't get anywhere in the

48:46

conversation. You can't get past

48:48

square one. because

48:50

you are your your, you know, your company, you're

48:52

living in two different universes. But when

48:54

you can agree on the basic principles, then

48:56

it allows you to get a little

48:59

bit deeper into the weeds and talk about more interesting things. And so that was was happening in the

49:01

in that porn conversation. I'm not gonna rehash

49:03

the entire thing. I will just reiterate some of the

49:05

points that I was trying to

49:08

make. in that that conversation,

49:10

which is that well, there's

49:14

two

49:14

things. there's

49:16

this idea that, well, all men look at porn and there's nothing that could

49:18

be done about it. Everyone looks at it and you can't,

49:20

you know, you can't really stop men from doing

49:23

it. Men can't stop themselves. That

49:25

wasn't said exactly in the conversation, but, you know, there's there's

49:28

this idea in general that you hear sometimes.

49:30

And I

49:31

reject

49:34

that. you

49:34

know, I I reject that

49:36

it's that it's this automatic uncontrollable

49:39

thing. I rejected it.

49:41

It's not true. It is it is in fact

49:43

possible to not look at porn. Now

49:46

if you have an addiction and especially if

49:48

you've been

49:50

immersed in these addictions from childhood

49:52

and your very your your fundamental

49:54

notions of human sexuality have been

49:56

warped and perverted by this filth

49:59

that swimming in from a young age, then

50:01

getting past that, that is very

50:04

difficult.

50:04

But

50:07

it is

50:08

possible to not look at pornography. Like,

50:09

as a man, it doesn't have to be part of

50:11

your life.

50:14

It's not a judgmental holier than thou statement. I

50:16

think it's actually a

50:18

that's a message of hope. Like, you don't have to this is this

50:20

is not this doesn't automatically come

50:22

with a territory. It is possible to have a life

50:26

totally free of this filth. You can That is possible.

50:29

Very possible.

50:30

But the other part of

50:32

it is that I think we have to

50:36

validate to use the leftist to use

50:38

the leftist term. They're

50:40

validate the feelings of women and

50:42

of wives

50:44

who feel totally devastated and destroyed

50:46

by their husbands looking at pornography.

50:48

I mean, the way they see it

50:51

is when their, you know, their husband's upstairs look at

50:53

it. Other people have sex while she's

50:55

now taking care of the kids. I mean, she sees this

50:57

as a total

51:00

betrayal.

51:01

And I agree with her. She should see it that

51:04

way. She's not

51:05

crazy for seeing

51:07

it that way. That's how

51:09

men should see it.

51:10

It

51:10

gives you all the more motivation to

51:12

try

51:12

to free yourself from

51:16

this. Because when you look at

51:18

porn, especially if you're a married man, that

51:20

is not a victimless

51:21

crime. It's

51:23

it's it's not neutral. you

51:25

you're actually hurting people. I mean, you're hurting yourself and you're hurting your family

51:27

and your wife and your kids, you're

51:29

hurting everybody. That's closest to you.

51:31

People you love the most. So

51:34

that's the

51:35

point I wanted wanted to make. I'm not

51:37

sure what you see the holier than now

51:39

in that. There are

51:40

two

51:41

ways to absolutely stop the

51:43

left inch tracks. Their first is to point out

51:45

their lunacy. The second is to take as much

51:47

money away from them as possible. And if you're

51:49

a regular a regular listener to

51:52

this show, you're doing the former. If you made the decision to stop

51:54

supporting Harry's or Gillette and go to

51:56

Jeremy's razors, then you're

51:58

doing both. now. But

52:00

if you haven't heard yet, we've got a

52:02

brand new incentive for you. It's the

52:04

Jeremy's Razor's contest for

52:06

the car. Whether we call it that because it's a contest for a

52:08

car. Here's how it works. For every person you

52:10

refer, whether they buy a Jeremy's razors kit or

52:12

a deli wire

52:14

annual membership, You both

52:16

get point in the race to win the God

52:18

Kings, McLaren. If someone

52:20

from the Sweet Baby Game wins this thing, it'll

52:22

warm my heart. So get out there

52:24

and start hustling to sign up and start

52:26

competing. Go to jeremy's razors dot com

52:28

slash play. The race for the car ends on

52:30

November first. So get into the

52:32

competition today. See terms and conditions for complete details at jeremy's razors dot com

52:34

slash referral terms. The programmers

52:38

open only to the legal to legal US residents residing in the

52:40

USDC, excluding residents of

52:42

Colorado Connecticut, Maryland, Puerto

52:44

Rico, and US territories

52:46

and possessions eighteen and

52:48

older. Remember, friends don't let

52:50

friends shave with woke

52:52

razors. Now let's get to our

52:54

daily cancellation.

52:57

So you have at this point

52:59

certainly heard the story about the teacher

53:01

in Canada who enjoys wearing

53:04

giant prosthetic breasts

53:06

to class. acting out his perverse sexual fantasies in front of his students.

53:08

In fact, he forces them to

53:10

participate in effect in his

53:11

fetish against their will just by

53:14

being there. The story has

53:16

resonated because I I think it's so disturbing and

53:18

weird and shocking. That's one reason why it's caught

53:20

people's attention.

53:21

Nobody could have predicted

53:23

it exactly, but I think this

53:25

pervert in Canada with his giant fake breasts may serve as

53:28

a turning point for the culture

53:30

because people

53:31

can finally see

53:33

where gender ideology leads. Even those who, to

53:36

this point, generally went along with it,

53:38

using preferred pronouns and so on, all

53:40

in the name of being polite. They wanted to

53:42

be polite. now that we're getting to

53:44

notice the slope that

53:46

they're rapidly slipping down. Because if you

53:48

start affirming everybody no matter

53:50

how degraded their self perception

53:52

might be, You quickly end up with things like this. You end up

53:54

with fetishists wearing sex aids to

53:56

school. And that's far

53:58

from the worst of it.

54:00

But not everybody is ready to condemn the man with the fake breasts. Peter

54:02

Bauchosian, who is who bills

54:05

himself as a philosopher tweeted, infamous

54:08

fetishists along with the caption,

54:11

quote, most people have

54:13

strong moral impulses about whether

54:16

this individual should be allowed to teach their children in a public school.

54:18

But very few can construct a good

54:20

argument why or why not. It's

54:22

more difficult than you think.

54:24

Try it.

54:25

bryant Well, actually,

54:26

Peter, it's not difficult at all. I mean, you might as well

54:28

claim that it's difficult to come up with an argument

54:30

against setting puppies on fire or

54:33

or purging, torching nursing homes.

54:36

It is very easy to explain why these things are bad. In the case

54:38

of a teacher, I can do it in one

54:40

sentence. You shouldn't act

54:43

out your sexual fetishes in

54:45

front of children. They're

54:47

done. I could add,

54:49

you know,

54:50

I could add to that that you shouldn't act out your

54:53

sexual fetishes at work, at all, even if you

54:55

don't work with children, you shouldn't act them

54:57

out in public. So there

54:59

there are

54:59

three good arguments

55:01

against this behavior That's only a very

55:03

partial list. But what is Peter's actual point? And

55:06

why is he pretending that

55:08

the freak with the the the big fake

55:10

boobs presents some

55:12

sort of complex moral dilemma. Why is the acting

55:14

like this is something that Greek philosophers might

55:16

have might have written about and argued about?

55:19

perhaps Aristotle wrote a treatise on fetish gear in

55:21

the classroom. Well, I'll have to

55:24

check. I'm not sure.

55:26

Well, I think that What we really

55:28

see here is first,

55:31

the insistence that

55:33

we cannot condemn anything unless

55:35

we're able to come up with a universal generalized overarching principle

55:37

for everything that

55:40

that that and that if potential

55:42

exceptions at all to the principle,

55:44

then the condemnation is

55:48

automatically invalid. So this is this is

55:50

the idea. You can't commit anything unless you have an overarching general

55:52

principle that applies to it. And if there are

55:54

any exceptions to that principle, then the principle

55:57

no longer hold. This is the attitude on the left

55:59

which is why you can never get them to talk

56:01

about any specific thing. Immediately, they'll

56:04

go to

56:06

the exceptions. which are supposed to

56:08

negate whatever you said about the specific

56:10

thing, that was not an exception.

56:12

So how does this relate to the dude with the big fake

56:14

boobs? Well,

56:16

I imagine then if you condemn the

56:18

prosthetic breast, somebody like Peter would respond, well, why

56:20

is it wrong to wear prosthetics?

56:23

What about a teacher with a prosthetic leg?

56:26

What

56:26

about that? Gotcha.

56:28

And

56:28

even if you hinge your argument

56:31

as I did on the idea that

56:33

adults shouldn't be acting out their fetish is in front

56:35

of children? Somebody like Peter might retort with

56:37

something like are all fetish is bad?

56:40

But what if someone has a fetish for

56:42

wearing pants? Does that

56:44

mean they they shouldn't wear pants in the

56:46

classroom? Got

56:48

you again. This is how they

56:50

play

56:50

the game. You know, if you

56:52

think I'm exaggerating, consider that the left

56:54

has actually argued and has been arguing today

56:57

after this after the Vanderbilt

57:00

expose They

57:00

argue that it's invalid to criticize

57:02

double mastectomies for gender

57:05

confused girls because sometimes

57:08

girls need double mastectomies as

57:10

breast cancer treatment. So

57:12

they take two completely different situations,

57:15

which are extremely easy to distinguish between and

57:17

claim that because there is one

57:19

through line connecting them, you

57:22

automatically cannot condemn the one without

57:24

condemning the other. Like,

57:26

they they act as though the only way to condemn

57:28

double mastectomies for teenage girls

57:30

is to argue that double

57:32

mastectomies in and of themselves

57:35

are wrong all the

57:38

time. It's

57:38

an utterly absurd tactic, but this

57:40

is what most

57:41

debates on the Internet

57:43

boil down I think there's something else going on

57:45

here too. Peter acknowledges that

57:48

most people have a strong moral

57:50

impulse against this kind

57:52

of activity. that he

57:54

declares that this moral impulse isn't

57:56

sufficient. Like, we have to come up with a

57:58

rational argument

58:00

against it. In this case, you know, we we

58:02

can come up with with rational arguments easily

58:04

in this case. It's not it's not it's not actually

58:06

hard to

58:08

do. But even if we couldn't,

58:10

putting that aside, why isn't

58:12

our moral impulse good enough?

58:14

Now why isn't

58:15

it good enough? He says

58:17

people have a moral impulse that this is wrong. Okay.

58:19

Well, say no more. I mean,

58:21

we You acknowledge this is our

58:23

moral impulse tells us that

58:26

it's wrong to behave this way. Why

58:28

do you need more than that? This

58:30

is something we all

58:31

inherently recognize as

58:34

wrong, almost everyone in the

58:36

world knows it's wrong to wear fetish

58:38

gear in front of

58:39

kids. The people who actually

58:41

do it also

58:42

know that it's wrong which is part of the sixth

58:44

thrill they derive from it. They're

58:46

masochist titulated by humiliation

58:48

and also excited by

58:51

breaking taboos. As for

58:53

the people who don't personally

58:55

engage in his behavior, yet would defend

58:57

it on principle, most of them like the

58:59

school administrators who defended him They know that

59:01

it's perverse and gross, but they feel compelled

59:04

to accept it in the name of gender

59:06

identity intolerance. Any

59:08

small fraction of people remaining who are

59:10

not themselves fetishes, but genuinely

59:13

don't believe that this activity

59:15

is wrong. Well, it's easy

59:17

to explain them a combination of mental illness and deep

59:19

moral confusion engrained in them practically from birth

59:22

by the nihilistic degraded culture

59:24

they live

59:26

in. So we have a world where

59:28

almost everyone intuitively inherently sees

59:30

that this sort of activity is

59:34

wrong. along may maybe along with a small minority

59:36

who don't see it because they're mentally

59:38

disturbed and diluted. Well, Peter

59:40

says that's that's that's not good

59:44

enough. We have to be able to explain these things, things

59:46

that everyone knows, and if we

59:48

can't explain them, then the thing

59:50

can be ignored or discarded.

59:53

This is the trick the left has been

59:55

pulling for decades. Our

59:56

inherent moral intuition as human

59:58

beings must be

59:59

explained to

1:00:02

their satisfaction or else they're

1:00:04

entitled to just ignore it completely. But that's not

1:00:06

true. It's not

1:00:07

how it works. that how works

1:00:10

And

1:00:10

it also unfairly flips the burden of proof around. See,

1:00:12

it's not up to

1:00:14

you or to me

1:00:16

to

1:00:17

explain why grown men should not play

1:00:19

out their sexual fantasies in front

1:00:21

of kids? I can't explain it, but that's

1:00:23

not my job. If

1:00:25

Peter or anybody else thinks that this activity

1:00:27

is acceptable, it's up to

1:00:29

them to present their

1:00:31

arguments defending it. So you see

1:00:33

the tactic here. If we can't

1:00:36

rationally defend our moral

1:00:38

intuition, then they can do

1:00:39

whatever

1:00:41

they want. But they

1:00:42

don't have to rationally defend anything.

1:00:45

It's all us. They don't have

1:00:47

to defend or explain anything. We have

1:00:49

to defend and explain everything. We

1:00:51

have to tell them

1:00:53

why they shouldn't do it. They don't have

1:00:55

to tell us why they

1:00:58

should. Except again,

1:00:58

that's not how it works.

1:01:00

Like, if

1:01:01

you're coming along and insisting that the moral impulse shared

1:01:03

by nearly everyone in the world

1:01:05

is wrong, you have to

1:01:07

make your

1:01:08

case. You have present

1:01:10

your evidence and convince us that actually

1:01:12

it's good for men to wear enormous fake boobs

1:01:14

in the classroom. The

1:01:16

burn of proof

1:01:17

is on you.

1:01:20

It's on you.

1:01:20

When when the man shows up with the giant

1:01:22

fake boobs, he no. No. He can't

1:01:24

say Don't give me one good reason why

1:01:27

I

1:01:27

shouldn't wear these. No. No. You're

1:01:30

you're freaking weirdo? You give me one good

1:01:32

reason why you should. You're

1:01:35

the one showing up here like that. Explain

1:01:37

to me. Explain to yourself. Explain

1:01:39

to me why you are acting

1:01:41

that way. I don't have

1:01:43

to explain myself. I'm not

1:01:45

the one doing something bizarre and

1:01:47

ridiculous and gross. That's

1:01:49

you.

1:01:50

yourself

1:01:51

You explain yourself. But that's a burden

1:01:53

you can't meet, which is why

1:01:54

they always try to flip the conversation around and

1:01:56

put the onus on us as

1:01:59

if our conviction that children should

1:02:02

fetishes of adults in some sort

1:02:04

of radical idea in need of

1:02:06

explanation. It

1:02:08

isn't. We need to explain

1:02:10

nothing. We need

1:02:13

only say to Peter Bughosian and

1:02:15

his friend with the breast. You're

1:02:18

canceled. And I'll do it for

1:02:20

us today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening.

1:02:22

Have a

1:02:23

great day. Godspeed. as

1:02:25

we move into our members block. Okay. Godspeed.