0:00

What another nickel in the Alex

0:02

Jones was right jar. It turns

0:04

out that whatever they are putting

0:06

in, the water is not only turning

0:08

the freaking frogs gay, but

0:10

it's posing a serious danger to

0:12

our health. And now, all of a the

0:15

e p a admitting

0:17

it, We've got

0:19

a a a just came

0:21

out from USA Today. EPA

0:23

fines no safe level for

0:26

to toxic forever. Chemicals, found

0:28

in many us water

0:30

systems a these quote forever

0:33

chemicals are linked to different types of

0:35

cancer low birth weights and other

0:37

ailments one experts at this

0:40

will set off alarm bells

0:42

so they're all sorts of contaminants in the water

0:45

the he be a will say okay

0:47

well as if it's below the threshold

0:49

that is fine but of the above threshold and

0:51

it's not fine at what the

0:53

vi has discovered is that to these contaminants

0:56

are not safe at any level any

0:58

level that can ever possibly measured

1:00

there still very dangerous to human beings and

1:02

so they've now got to work to

1:04

add take all of that out of water for

1:06

sixty years these

1:09

guys have been mocking american

1:12

people regular old americans is rubes

1:14

and kooks and idiots for asking

1:17

if maybe there's some dangerous stuff

1:19

in the water supplies now they

1:21

tell us there are multiple contaminants in water

1:23

that not safe any level that she's

1:25

issue here the not we

1:28

might currently all be poisoning ourselves

1:30

my problem is not even that are public

1:33

authorities got this and

1:35

so many other things wrong my

1:37

main issue the

1:39

arrogance the haughtiness

1:42

the absolute disdain with

1:44

which are genius rulers

1:47

look on all those ruby idiot

1:49

americans who have the temerity

1:52

to question their wisdom my

1:54

issue is that almost

1:56

every single day now it seems

1:59

the supposed genius experts who

2:01

run our country are being made

2:03

to look like fools by the people

2:05

that they all used to accuse of wearing tinfoil

2:07

half i'm michael knows this michael

2:15

welcome

2:18

back to the show my favorite comment yesterday

2:20

from soul silver silver snore

2:23

lacks who says i tied a cinderblock

2:25

around my ankle before going swimming today

2:27

on the advice of an expert it was

2:30

terrible and i almost drowned but

2:32

imagine how much worse it would

2:34

have been if i didn't have the cinder

2:36

block tied around my legs such a great

2:38

point we gotta make sure goodness

2:40

sakes people tie those cinder blocks around

2:42

your legs the experts say so and

2:45

they can't be proven wrong the literally cannot

2:47

be proven wrong is anything that happens

2:49

they say bruce them right

2:52

we need to talk to each other that

2:54

the mass messages that we are getting

2:56

from the institutions and

2:58

the the big propaganda They

3:00

are not serving us very well. We need to speak

3:02

to one another and communicate. When you want to I

3:05

strongly recommend you check out pure

3:07

talk right

3:08

now. now go to Pure talk.com, use promo

3:10

code, at Knowles podcast later

3:13

on, we're getting to my favorite time of the week.

3:15

That is the mailbag now with the voice

3:17

mail bag in that voice mail bag is

3:19

brought to you pure talk.

3:21

I totally love these guys. If

3:23

you want to keep more

3:26

of of your money if you want to save

3:28

money from work, cell companies that

3:30

are just spending on all sorts of nonsense. If

3:32

you want to keep the voicemail back on this

3:34

show, switch2pure

3:37

talk now, you aren't getting the

3:39

exact same quality

3:42

service is all those other companies that

3:44

you're saving it. Hun of money,

3:46

you can get the unlimited, talk, unlimited, text

3:48

6, gigs of data, beautiful

3:52

5G Network. Pure talk.com.

3:54

What's the catch? There isn't

3:56

one. There's no catch, go to Pure talk.com.

4:00

to plan enter the promo code knolls

4:02

podcast save fifty percent

4:04

off your first month you can be switched

4:07

over to peer talk in less than ten minutes

4:09

that is professional knolls podcast ken

4:11

w l e s p o d

4:13

c a s t all one word your talk

4:15

that com peer talk is simply smarter

4:18

wireless this pride everyones

4:20

coming through for the trevor project on youtube

4:23

shorts join us create a shorts

4:25

showing how your stepping up for pride using

4:27

the hashtag youtube pride challenge

4:29

come through for pride on youtube short

4:31

visit youtube dot com backslash

4:33

pride

4:35

i'm not sure i want to be citing usa today

4:37

on this water story that's been

4:39

reported elsewhere so i suppose

4:41

we can assume that it's real i saw

4:43

saw the press release from the he the i but

4:45

i don't know that would trust usa today is usa

4:47

today just found itself in a huge

4:50

journalistic scandal yesterday

4:53

the usa today announced that it would be deleting

4:56

twenty three articles almost

4:59

who doesn't articles why is that the

5:02

role by the same rider gabrielle

5:04

i'm miranda they had to delete

5:06

them because it turns out that those articles were

5:08

fake news they

5:11

weren't just fake news in the sense

5:13

that they've got some facts

5:15

wrong they even

5:17

that they slightly misquoted something they were fake

5:19

news in that they were just completely made up

5:22

this reporter is breaking news reporter for

5:24

usa today was just making

5:27

up quotes people out

5:29

of whole cloth and then writing works

5:31

of fiction and in publishing this works

5:33

on usa today why is

5:35

this big deal well one because usa

5:37

today use them some kind of reputation the

5:40

now their reputation has taken thing there's

5:44

political problem too which is that usa today

5:46

is trusted source on social media

5:49

when something appears in usa today that

5:51

helps to push social media

5:54

algorithms in certain direction but

5:57

it can't be trusted source they just believe

6:00

the almost two dozen articles because they were totally fake

6:02

daily wire is never had to delete two dozen

6:04

articles for fake news and we gotten

6:07

everything one hundred percent right all

6:09

the time know there's is occasionally is

6:11

occasionally here and error here you go in new

6:13

corrected we've never had anything

6:16

anywhere close to this and

6:18

yet daily wire the not considered

6:20

trusted super duper special nonpartisan

6:23

unbiased news source for the social

6:25

media algorithm the

6:27

contrary we rely on those algorithms

6:29

we rely on the all of these supposedly

6:32

trusted sources to back up what

6:34

we're saying and if they contradict us and very

6:36

often social media will suppress what we have

6:38

to say my

6:40

problem here isn't

6:42

is not even that there is such a thing as trusted

6:45

sources and as some people so skeptical

6:47

of a power in big tech are

6:50

are so skeptical of power in

6:53

in or thumper press that

6:55

they don't think we should have any trusted sources

6:57

issue that social media and the public's where she just

6:59

a total wild west were no

7:02

no one organization carries any more weight

7:05

than any others i'm not even saying that not

7:07

other look there are total rags out there

7:09

that don't think should carry lot of weight the public

7:11

squares my problem isn't that there squares trusted

7:13

sources quote unquote my

7:15

problem is that the trusted

7:17

sources that that are public square relies

7:19

on are not trustworthy don't

7:22

even mean to beat up usa today usa today's

7:24

far from the worst offender this the

7:27

fact that the new york times councils

7:29

a trusted source is preposterous

7:32

the new york times is not fit to line person's

7:34

birdcage you think of the fake news

7:37

that the new york times the spreads just on of russia

7:39

hoax alone in last five years

7:41

it's a joke in there have been so many other

7:44

medium the fake news that that vinny

7:46

or times spread are drawn to worry sex third

7:48

or really anything having

7:50

any to do with donald trump and

7:52

the the effect of parts of the republican

7:54

party why is that the

7:57

trusted source i'm not saying

7:59

this that in a in a self serving

8:01

manner or at least not exclusively self serving

8:03

matter the daily wire

8:05

is a much more reliable

8:07

trustworthy source than the new york times the

8:10

daily wire the the michael know show

8:12

in particular you know you hear things your first

8:15

i take my crystal ball as nostradamus

8:17

i tell what's gonna happen the future this

8:20

show this news outlet there's

8:22

a much more trustworthy source

8:24

we have a much better record of accuracy

8:27

then washington post them cnn

8:29

obviously then a b c

8:31

cbs nbc been any of the

8:33

supposedly trusted new

8:35

sources

8:37

got experts in we've got experts

8:40

out there beyond just the news organizations

8:42

and we're supposed to trust the

8:45

experts who's that who is the number one experts

8:47

quote unquote in the country you

8:49

know you know who i'm talking

8:52

about as their as courses doctor about it

8:54

is the number one expert whatever

8:56

he says is the law he

8:58

has got more power then

9:01

the ancient sparrows than

9:03

any dictator has presumed

9:06

to have missed whatever he says

9:08

it not only is policy

9:10

whatever he says the

9:12

science he says he's a representative of

9:14

the science and yet thou she

9:17

consistently yes things

9:19

wrong now you have public health establishment

9:21

this is one example encouraging

9:25

the about she out she the boosters the jabs

9:27

all that stuff in very very little

9:29

kids so during a covert hearing yesterday

9:31

sen rand paul asked for

9:34

any scientific evidence all the

9:36

backup that policy thought she comes

9:39

up empty what is the possibility

9:41

if your kid is had covered which is seventy

9:43

five seventy countries that gov it's what

9:45

is the chance of my jobs going of osborne

9:48

dying

9:49

if you look at the number of deaths

9:51

in pediatrics senator

9:53

you can see that there are more deaths

9:56

of the people who have had people

9:59

had disease

10:02

canada we also know of others

10:06

optimal

10:09

you get infected to get vaccinated

10:11

after bachelor in fact showing

10:13

been infection

10:15

the era of am crime and

10:17

sub lineages that facts

10:19

where you can answer the question i asked

10:21

question i ask is how many kids are dying

10:24

and many kids going the hospital we've

10:26

already had covered the answer may

10:28

be zero but you're not even giving

10:30

us the data because you have so much

10:32

wanted to protect everybody from

10:34

all the data because we're not smart enough to look

10:37

the data when you release data earlier

10:39

when cdc release the data they left out

10:41

the category of eighteen to forty nine on

10:43

whether not there was a health benefit for for

10:45

adults eighteen to forty nine why was it

10:47

left out when critics finally complained

10:50

it was finally included because there was no

10:52

health benefit from taking booster between

10:54

the eighteen forty nine the cdc study

10:57

fair it is if the expert

10:59

the expert is asked a very simple

11:01

question by rand paul talk

11:04

about you how many children are

11:06

dying of reinspection from kobe severely

11:08

simple question bout

11:11

he starts to answer different quests the

11:13

say well among children generally

11:16

with without prior infection

11:18

and and rand paul says now that's not

11:20

question my question is how many people dying

11:22

from rio rio infection and

11:25

that she says well senator you

11:27

know we know that the optimal

11:29

degree in is a wendy's answering it completely

11:31

unrelated question is is just

11:34

spouting as talking points in

11:36

rand paul says you

11:38

just won't answer you want it why

11:40

won't he answer is it because fouch

11:43

he doesn't have the data he just doesn't

11:45

know is just an idiot maybe

11:47

i could see why you might be inclined to think that

11:49

because he doesn't come off the brightest bulb

11:51

in the pack but them ramp or makes a

11:53

great point says how come if

11:56

the federal government collects all of these data

11:58

about cove and my goodness like every

12:00

little jot and tittle they possibly can about coated

12:03

and then when they released the data they

12:05

leave some parts out the

12:07

only released the data that convenient

12:09

for their narrative believe that whole age groups

12:12

when it comes to risk from kogan why

12:14

beats just conveniently they happened leave

12:16

out all of the age group it's

12:18

show that cove it is not as dangerous

12:20

as the ruling class lead us to believe

12:23

that is not just matter of idiocy

12:25

that is not even just matter of ignorance that

12:28

is a matter corruption when

12:32

you want protect yourself from all sorts of

12:34

bad people and from freeze

12:36

and from fire and from flooding he got check

12:38

out read right now go ring

12:40

dot com slash noles

12:43

summer is here people are

12:45

travelling you're gonna be away from

12:47

your home quite bit if you're anything like

12:49

me you can also rest

12:51

easy if you're anything like me because

12:54

of ring alarm ringing alarm

12:56

is the award winning home security system with

12:58

available professional monitoring when

13:00

you subscribed esteban can

13:03

easily install it yourself friend mine

13:05

just got married here you know what i did

13:07

you know what gave this person for

13:09

her wedding i gave her ring

13:11

alarm pro i love it it makes

13:13

a great gift is really really great for your

13:15

home and you can go pro you can be

13:18

approach just like me ring alarm

13:20

protects your home your your windows

13:22

your doors from freeze fire floods ring

13:25

alarm for protect your physical home and

13:27

your digital home to protect your data we live

13:29

so much of our lives on line make

13:31

sure you're protecting your dad and his guts and

13:33

incredible deal at subscribe

13:36

for professional monitoring right now to learn more

13:38

ring dot com slash knolls thats ring dot

13:41

com slash knolls our

13:43

genius experts are not only

13:45

stupid and incompetent very

13:47

often that there also

13:50

frequently corrupt in

13:52

part of rand paul's beautiful drilling

13:54

of decorative so g the i pontiff

13:56

of bubbly gals rand

13:58

paul ask some questions so much

14:00

about the data in the infections and datsun

14:02

hospitalizations the ask some about

14:04

the money he says do you think dr

14:06

bout you there might be any kind of conflict

14:09

of interest tear there might be any kind

14:11

of the money moving around when

14:13

you guys role making your recommendations and

14:16

you tell me that you have not received

14:18

royalty from any entity

14:20

that you ever oversaw the distribution

14:23

of money and research that's

14:28

what well let's talk about

14:30

where it was us you know that's the question have

14:32

you ever overseen idea receives are

14:34

worthy of fame and from a company

14:37

that you later oversaw money going

14:39

to that company

14:40

you know i don't know was the back but i

14:42

doubt i'll yeah here's the thing is

14:45

why don't you let us know why don't you

14:47

royalist how much you've gotten and from what

14:49

entities the and i get refuses

14:51

to we ask them we ask them nih

14:54

we asked them whether not

14:56

who got it and how much they refused

14:58

to jealous they senate redacted

15:01

not only do they refused to tell

15:03

they'll actually redact specific

15:05

pieces of information that the senate is

15:07

requested rand paul as request

15:11

why later on that exchange

15:13

bout you if

15:14

able to turn in a little bit he says well listen

15:17

for this specific series of years i didn't

15:19

make a lot of money the things that

15:21

that is going to put the question but it's

15:23

not you see it from the the early

15:25

evasion rand paul asks

15:27

direct question this is

15:29

hey do you guys get money what

15:32

do you do you guys get money from his and

15:35

what is not your face you is less and

15:37

less talk about know let's not talk about

15:39

any nonsense that you want talk about bad habits

15:41

you just answer a simple questions you don't want

15:44

to don't want to and by

15:46

the way even if out she's not making let's say that that

15:48

is not making a lot of money than why won't the and i

15:50

it's provide this information of the royalties

15:52

that members these committee

15:54

is members of the public health establishments

15:57

are getting the civically

15:59

with or two companies that

16:01

they are that they are make passing

16:03

judgement why can't

16:06

why won't the government give you that information

16:08

the very fact that they won't provide that kind

16:10

of transparency is is

16:13

proof positive as far i'm concerned that

16:15

there is clearly the possibility the

16:18

open door to corruption the

16:21

issue is not the

16:23

any conspiracy theory there's nothing conspiracy

16:26

theoretical about suggesting that

16:28

there can be conflicts of interest in big politics

16:30

and we should protect against them if

16:33

not even have a question getting rid the experts

16:35

i'd i've no problem where listening

16:39

to expertise and putting expertise

16:41

in it's proper place i i

16:43

i don't believe that the only

16:45

thing we can do is just destroy all

16:47

of the american scientific institutions

16:50

and all becomes yeoman farmers or something and i'm not

16:52

saying that that's what's going to happen but

16:55

surely the experts that we

16:58

have are no good there

17:00

now good their predictions are wrong

17:03

they lie to us not us

17:05

not get things wrong they they will actively lie

17:07

like voucher did during during cove it and

17:10

there is a huge possibility for corruption which

17:12

is now not being dealt with now we're just getting

17:14

stonewalled by the nih so

17:16

what's the solution to that the

17:19

solution to that is to go in and

17:21

wield political power to make better

17:24

there there are two reactions from the right two

17:27

completely different strategies for how

17:29

deal with this kind of thing there's one

17:31

which is the kind of the libertarians

17:34

tend to favor the strategy more which is just

17:37

get rid of the experts fruit forget

17:39

about the you know ignore the experts entirely

17:41

and and take

17:43

them all the money in the power away and and

17:45

nobody gets power and we just reduce

17:48

the amount of power in the government

17:50

and reduce the amount of power specifically

17:52

in a in a scientific drop receipts

17:54

and then everything will be better i get

17:56

why that suggestion

17:59

is tempting that why that sounds it

18:01

does sound if we could just take

18:03

that power at washington dc take

18:05

that power out of the nih

18:07

or any other aspect the deep states

18:09

or i would i would love that wouldn't be so wonderful

18:11

would that it were so simple the

18:14

conservative solution this good solution

18:16

that the conservatives generally tend to favor

18:18

more though says you're

18:21

not you're never gonna get rid of exports

18:24

every state every government

18:27

in the history the entire world has

18:29

had exports the has had

18:31

bureaucracies and has

18:33

had specialization and

18:35

it's up complete pipe dream say that

18:37

you're going to get rid them furthermore

18:40

every state every society and the history of

18:42

world has political

18:45

power that is conserve political

18:47

power not just gonna disappear not

18:49

just gonna go away not going to just pop

18:51

it like balloon it's going

18:53

about it's gonna exist especially a big

18:55

powerful country like ours you're not going

18:57

just make the power go the

18:59

just gonna move the power

19:01

gonna be in this part the government

19:03

has the power going be more with the corporations has

19:05

the power and be more the universities as the power to

19:07

be more with technology is the power

19:09

to be more silicon valley is the power going to be more

19:12

washington dc is the power be more

19:14

with the republicans as power to be more with the democrats

19:18

some people might not like that they might think it's kind

19:20

of picky and yucky when you mean we can't just

19:22

make the power magically go away by waving

19:24

magic wand i would that at

19:26

were so simple dies but it is

19:29

not there is going

19:31

to be power the only question

19:33

is coming to be who is going wield it

19:36

where is it going to reside what

19:38

is it going to be wielded in service

19:43

i'm not giving you some kind of utopian

19:45

dream fantasy of how

19:48

we're going to just knocked down

19:50

all the buildings in washington d c and

19:52

send all of those deep state bureaucrats

19:54

to st helena and then we're going to

19:56

return to the republic of the seventy

19:59

nine these then all will be well again

20:01

no that's not gonna happen i'm

20:03

i don't think it's going happen don't even really i

20:06

don't even really wanted to have an idea it's just so fantastical

20:09

to suggest anything like that the

20:11

question right knows what do we do i

20:14

think very very easily you

20:16

could one just to rand

20:18

paul's point you could demand little

20:20

bit more transparency on the conflict of interests

20:22

these guys have you could take

20:24

some of power away from the south she's of the

20:26

world and give it back to the rand paul's

20:28

of the world now be now been improvements

20:30

take some power away from the

20:32

scientific your accuracy give it back to senate

20:35

maybe take some power away from the federal government

20:37

give it back to the states you're not saying

20:39

going to magically get rid power ubuntu you can

20:41

move it around in such a waste is more

20:43

conducive to flourishing to a traditional

20:46

american government then can awesome

20:48

power away from these idiot experts

20:50

these jerks nice erupt

20:53

people these deceiver this these

20:55

beasts out a just so awful could take

20:57

some power away from those experts and give it

20:59

to rx can

21:02

take some power away from the democrats give to the republicans

21:04

as at perfect solution for all time know

21:06

but would it would do quite

21:08

lot the improved the state of our

21:10

country in the state corruption and

21:13

then if the republicans screwed

21:15

up and will go somebody else their

21:17

new experts were it will go somebody else and will

21:19

we will keep this thing moving so the power

21:21

doesn't become so concentrated and

21:23

in this horrible elite the become so

21:25

corrosive to to the

21:28

american form of government we're getting

21:30

all sorts of bad answers from

21:32

the biden administration right the

21:35

do see peter doocy at fox

21:37

news just grilled the new press

21:39

secretary green lumpy

21:41

or he after why

21:44

is inflation so bad and and the press secretary

21:46

gave this answer that the white house has been pushing

21:49

on television in the press which

21:51

is luck or inflation is no

21:54

worse here than it is anywhere in world

21:56

or it's actually much much worse and isn't better

21:58

here anywhere

22:00

else who as much worse overseas

22:02

and south stop complaining about

22:04

inflation and peter doocy it

22:07

looks down some those numbers is as wait second that's just

22:09

not true i didn't get what

22:11

we don't he says that inflation is worth

22:13

everywhere by gear that such for us

22:16

as worrisome placement germany france japan

22:18

canada india italy saudi

22:20

arabia they

22:22

wouldn't what we are saying is that

22:24

us money talk about inflation

22:27

it is a global thing and it is

22:29

not just about the united states this

22:31

is something that everyone is feelings because

22:33

of coming out of once a once in lifetime

22:36

pandemics because of the war

22:38

that russia has started in utah

22:41

no that's not what you said you're

22:44

changing your answered previously

22:46

you said inflation is worse everywhere else

22:49

come on it's relatively not that bad here the

22:51

computer nice it is no it's actually relatively

22:54

really bad here even relative to other places

22:56

in world mint green jump years has no look we're

22:58

just point now it's like a global thing know

23:01

that that is not what you pointed

23:03

out that is not what you said either

23:06

you guys just got numbers completely

23:08

wrong and you're incompetent or

23:11

you know what the real numbers were and you live

23:15

either way not good either way does

23:17

not speak very highly of our current the

23:19

ruling elite there

23:22

is a very different country that we're

23:24

living in right now compared

23:27

to most certainly

23:29

compared to the country that we had at the at the

23:31

start of the united states the very different

23:33

country that we're living in right now compared the country

23:35

we had three years ago i just saw it

23:37

the other day i said your member when trump

23:39

was president and pretty much everything

23:41

was better to remember that seems so

23:43

long ago what about

23:45

what about other historical more kind country

23:48

are we living in now and going be living

23:50

in the future the

23:53

country that the libs want

23:55

to give us is not

23:58

the historical american they've

24:02

george washington university the

24:04

named after george washington oh

24:08

resides in washington

24:11

dc also named after

24:13

george washington or during russians

24:15

the father of country their mascot is

24:17

mascot colonial looks like george

24:19

washington called colonials

24:22

well this gorgeous voted get rid of it in

24:25

the name of inclusivity here

24:28

is where the school said the

24:30

moniker must unify our

24:33

community draw people together and

24:35

serve as a source of pride this

24:37

is the chairman of the school board trustees

24:40

we look forward to the next steps in an

24:42

inclusive process to identify

24:44

a monocle that fulfills this

24:46

aspiration gotta

24:48

be really inclusive

24:53

i suspect that

24:56

if you took a poll of americans most

24:59

americans still like george washington i

25:01

think george washington is pretty inclusive

25:05

she w pushes policies that

25:08

are not so inclusive everyone's

25:10

views the w pushes

25:12

transgender isn't

25:15

i don't know if a if a boy wants to go

25:17

into the growth dress up like a girl going to girls' bathroom

25:19

at gw i i strongly suspect

25:22

that he would be allowed to do that that's

25:24

not inclusive if inclusive

25:27

of that deluded

25:29

man that and it is small

25:32

band of other deluded people that's

25:34

not inclusive of their views the majority

25:36

americans far from when

25:39

i say inclusivity there

25:42

near describing inclusivity for

25:44

their group there and they're describing

25:47

inclusivity , an extremely exclusive

25:50

group that doesn't include you especially

25:52

nice the or this line about this

25:55

line senate the bad about the political

25:57

elite broadly is it's big club and you

25:59

ain't in when

26:02

we hear the word inclusion some

26:04

people are deceived to believing that means

26:06

just include everybody know it doesn't

26:09

the means we include everyone in

26:11

this extremely corrupt stupid

26:14

elite and we exclude everybody

26:16

else that's what it really means even

26:19

now to the point where you've got these radicals

26:21

at university saying we're gonna

26:23

we're gonna cancel george washington at

26:26

george washington university in

26:28

washington dc who

26:31

are you gonna replace him with either

26:34

you're going to just become completely

26:38

nothing completely generic remember

26:40

they got rid the redskins and they scalded

26:42

the washington football team for a while now

26:44

and of now they call it the commanders the

26:46

still pretty bland not quite as blandest the washington

26:48

football team sweaty gonna

26:50

do that the war you're

26:53

going to pick some radical

26:55

who promise you is less

26:58

popular and almost certainly

27:00

less virtuous than george washington after

27:03

going be the new mascot ebro max candy

27:06

sheets of university steer is our

27:08

new mascot the ragweed

27:11

having fried my there were that struggling

27:13

they're everywhere now that's gonna our new inclusive

27:15

mascot is on a don't you feel like that's very

27:17

inclusive when

27:19

i was an undergraduate there was going

27:21

to be out of class wide dance

27:24

and think it was themed after gone with wind

27:26

or of south or something like that and

27:29

and it was gone with wind then

27:31

some liberal northerner

27:34

took issue with this white

27:36

liberal norther took issue with this and said

27:38

that's racist it's terrible not

27:41

inclusive this

27:44

thirteen fourteen years ago they hadn't

27:46

gotten nearly as crazy they are now but you sow the seeds

27:48

of already this is not

27:50

this is not inclusive all as is terrible

27:52

and so what what did the same becomes any

27:55

seem that we tried pick someone

27:58

to contrive a problem with oh

28:01

no well this theme is offensive to this group

28:03

this theme could be misconstrued to be offensive to disrupt

28:05

this theme upholds a norm and standard that

28:07

now is considered unfashionable and politically incorrect

28:10

and so there's no sixty we do not seem

28:12

we ended up going with hello

28:15

blue with the thief because

28:19

no one yet with able to come up with

28:21

a with a an issue to have with

28:23

blue the probably they would now is this

28:25

the country wanna live in seems

28:27

like either way this this i'm have been

28:29

radicalized by this gw mascot issue

28:33

he can only take our country one of two ways

28:35

both of which are worse than the current like the one

28:37

way that it could take us has to get rid of all particular

28:39

things the anything in particular

28:42

nice beautiful you can have attachment

28:45

to goes away and now i'm really is bland

28:47

and generic the and and

28:49

totally plane without

28:51

anything that would draw you to it or

28:54

it goes in direction of particular radicals

28:57

the we get we can we cancel thomas jefferson

29:00

and we exalts he

29:02

abram x candy malcolm

29:04

x somebody like that or

29:06

angeles angels davis' a good example of this

29:08

angela davis is an actual communist

29:11

who was credibly accused i think

29:13

of of terrorism and now

29:15

she's considered this great luminary bill errors

29:17

of the weather underground bill ayers was considered a mentor

29:20

to brock obama radical

29:22

leftists terrorist hilarious

29:24

though he gets his his exalted he's

29:27

fed the john

29:29

adams george washington those guys were terrible not

29:31

to cancel them gonna tear down there statues speaking

29:33

of that washington football team jack

29:36

del rio coach over there with

29:39

other commanders he just got

29:41

a whole lot of trouble because he

29:43

had the audacity to contradict the official

29:45

regime genius expert narrative

29:48

on

29:49

new worry sex as

29:52

, images on tv people's

29:55

livelihoods are being destroyed do this

29:57

destroyed do burned down your

30:00

bread and , we have a ghost

30:02

of of company company

30:04

nothing look and

30:07

we're not going to talk about three make that major do

30:09

i major think it's , two

30:11

spoons and if we two the same

30:14

school and we're going to be reasonable

30:16

with each other to be discussion must

30:19

be reasonable let's have discussion

30:22

let's compare similar events

30:25

that guy nearly got cancelled

30:27

for those comments he got

30:29

massive financing was by one hundred thousand

30:31

dollars he is now at the at

30:34

the of a ton of

30:36

attack pieces why is what did he say

30:39

the sanjana dust up at capitol methane

30:42

it was good what i'm saying

30:44

relative to other insurrections

30:47

violent uprisings what it

30:49

wasn't big deal that's just true that's

30:51

just fact we know that john

30:54

dory sex was not the worst insurrection

30:56

history we know wasn't worst insurrection of the year

30:58

that would have been blm the even look

31:00

attacks on cap nineteen

31:02

fifteen a harvard professor blows up

31:04

the senate reception and set off explosives in the

31:06

senate reception nineteen when

31:09

was it nineteen forty the

31:12

rear system the

31:14

rainy was nineteen fifty three you had group

31:16

of porta rican activists

31:19

who shot up the house of representatives injured five

31:21

members of congress nineteen seventy one the

31:23

weather underground you know bill ayers is organizations

31:26

weather underground radical leftist groups blew

31:28

up part of the center the

31:30

a little over ten years later another radical

31:32

group then a radical leftist

31:35

for you we'll have another part of the

31:37

sent did

31:39

the johnny january six people blow up

31:41

the senate did shoot at the house of representatives

31:43

did they do really anything other

31:45

than dance around in a horde had cracker coors

31:47

light the rotunda and make mess of nancy pelosi

31:49

desks i'm not even excusing that but

31:52

the language the jack rio is

31:54

using here is absolutely

31:57

precise and he's not allowed to say the

32:00

now itself which which narrative

32:02

or do you think is more accurate the

32:05

narrative that your getting from c n washington

32:07

post a b c n b c new

32:09

york times liz chaney nancy pelosi

32:11

everything big tech everything

32:13

the january six was the worst event ever the whole

32:15

history our democracy was on the brink of collapse

32:18

or they've got this

32:20

football coach who says yeah

32:22

you know as bills have conversation about that little

32:24

duster back there let's just be reasonable

32:26

have cooler has which one which one

32:28

you think is more accurate which do you think more precise

32:31

my problem is not experts

32:34

my problem is not we're talking

32:36

about political events my problems my

32:39

problem is with this

32:42

current crop and the answer

32:44

to miss current crop of experts

32:47

hollowed out institutions political

32:50

rulers the answer is not

32:52

barrier heads in the sand and hope that the power goes

32:54

away the answer is not to pretend

32:56

that there some kind of neutrality here and can find

32:58

some new trials any neutral bring the

33:00

answer is to take political power

33:02

away from them and redistribute

33:05

that blame of redistributing face redistribute

33:08

that political power it's to experts

33:10

who are who have greater expertise

33:13

who public servants who

33:15

are more interested in serving the public who

33:19

institutions that are more

33:21

conducive to human flourishing the answers to

33:23

engage in that political process and

33:25

to wield the power that we get

33:28

you know right now

33:31

one at when when there is political power off read

33:33

our country obviously in senate obvious and gore

33:35

it's obviously and big tech entertainment

33:38

is one that conservatives often neglect with

33:40

the daily wire or not neglecting it's we've

33:42

got a big movie we on cancelled

33:44

gina carano or that movie is available

33:46

right now

33:47

its over the daily wire daily wire com

33:49

slash subscribe you

33:52

can watch terror on the prairie with gina carano

33:55

we'll be right back with a voicemail back

34:08

i love the voice mail bag this is my

34:10

favorite thing weve done on the show in years

34:13

if you want to keep voice mail back voice

34:16

mail bag continuing you

34:18

need to switch your cell phone service

34:20

to pure talk i love pure talk

34:22

theyre sponsoring theyre voice mail bag theyre making

34:24

it possible go to pure talk dot com

34:26

select plan enter carano go nols

34:29

podcast save fifty percent

34:31

off your first month will save a ton of money you will

34:33

get exactly same high quality service

34:36

that youve got now maybe youll end getting better service

34:38

but most importantly you will keep the voice

34:40

mail bag coming so can hear your

34:42

dulcet tones all right lets take

34:44

it away with the first question there

34:47

mister michael my name is stanley

34:49

are just wanna say first off i'm big fan

34:51

and one of those came for ben stayed for michael

34:54

kind of guys and of other questions

34:56

i might ask you about your thoughts on politics

34:58

religion be

35:00

no relationships etc really

35:02

the one question one question love for to answer and

35:04

so glad the voicemail is here because

35:06

i didn't know how to ask you this and are in the email

35:09

why do you pronounce certain words with the shore

35:11

i sound rather than along i sound

35:13

words like davis of rather than divisive

35:16

more words like

35:18

the ideology rather than ideologies

35:20

to me i would take the root

35:22

word idea or divide

35:25

this and make it ideology

35:27

or divisive so i wanna know

35:29

why you do the etiology or do

35:31

this of kind of pronunciation otherwise

35:33

i'd love hear you have say have a great

35:35

one

35:37

the answer to this is a very very good

35:39

question the answer to this question

35:41

is extremely complicated but

35:43

the short version is the

35:46

fallen world my friend that's

35:48

why of why pronounce certain with so for

35:50

any allergy i believe

35:52

that any allergy or ideology or

35:54

both considered com somewhat common and

35:56

acceptable pronunciations that

35:59

you hit on the word that is very divisive

36:01

and that would the word divisive and

36:03

think in case of to visit thank

36:06

my pronunciation is technically

36:08

incorrect it

36:11

com popular especially in politics

36:14

but it is i believe incorrect i

36:17

googled this some time ago because

36:19

was having a debate with a friend over divisive or divisive

36:22

and apparently doesn't mispronunciation

36:24

first popularized by george h w

36:27

bush i then popularized

36:29

again by barack obama i

36:31

i believe it is the common pronunciation

36:34

in canada america's hat that

36:36

in america and in united kingdom in

36:38

in new england the

36:41

preferred pronunciation is divisive

36:44

just i just say it wrong and

36:46

i find easier to say davison the

36:48

top what's the word that there's another word

36:50

the want this one definitely get correct but bothers

36:53

people islam versus

36:55

schism people wanna say schism it's not it's system

36:58

one the drives people absolutely up

37:00

there so many i said coffee because

37:02

i'm from new york some people say coffee

37:05

i don't i see don't have the will say i you know i

37:07

don't miss there are there is some variation

37:09

here but i i the

37:12

prescriptive best as i am when it comes to language

37:16

i will have the humility to admit sometimes get

37:18

it wrong i'm so damn stubborn i

37:20

won't change next question hello

37:22

nostradamus my best friend who was

37:24

another country recently told me that by

37:26

december next year she will either conceive

37:29

child with partner or we artificially

37:31

inseminate it i asked her why she

37:33

wouldn't want to find man who would stick around for

37:35

her and commit to her in child and

37:37

she told me that she would prefer that put her and

37:39

goes to have baby and she's perfectly fine

37:41

with being single mother if for time

37:43

when runs out then she got

37:45

with artificial insemination she

37:47

told me that she wants to be they wanted anything which is understandable

37:50

because we're , nineteen

37:52

we talked about marriage and children since

37:54

we met five years ago and

37:56

we haven't talked about wedding dresses and everything

37:59

that and talk about about marriage

38:01

in the future on the

38:03

my question is how can i help my best

38:06

friends on the guy who will commit to her and

38:08

and child and if she goes the other out

38:10

how can be supportive friend for her

38:12

and this baby regardless of

38:14

circumstances of their conception thank

38:16

you for advice love the show wow

38:19

that

38:20

with real shock right there

38:22

the middle of that question was kind

38:24

of going along with the question i understand i think

38:26

lot people are dealing with some of these issues and said

38:28

the girls nineteen i'm i'm not

38:30

pregnant by next summer a minute i'm gonna

38:33

artificially inseminate myself intentionally

38:35

to deprive my child of his her

38:37

father nineteen

38:40

if not like your biological clock is running

38:43

out that were okay that will that that makes it extremely

38:46

clear cut case tell your friend stop being so

38:48

damn selfish and recognize that

38:50

a baby is not all about her obviously

38:53

not ready to the a mother because she still is

38:55

only viewing world entirely through

38:58

her own desires and the

39:00

the satisfaction of her own caprices and appetites

39:03

the bait what what is good for the baby is the

39:05

question there's no question

39:07

it is much better for baby to be raised

39:10

in a stable home with

39:12

mother and father who were married to

39:14

each other the no question about that

39:17

not that you can't have a good life being raised by

39:19

single mother or the raised in some

39:21

kind of difficult circumstance anything of course you

39:23

get the and and people can do that wonderfully

39:25

i say that's but

39:28

it's not ideal if

39:30

you had your choice not

39:33

that you know the husband leaves it's not that have

39:35

a spouse dies it's not that they're

39:37

it's there is some difficult circles ever

39:39

just you're you're you're planning and out no

39:42

it's extremely selfish who

39:44

choose to bring baby into the

39:46

world intentionally to

39:48

deprive that baby of his natural

39:50

father and his natural mother join together

39:52

matrimony a to to do intentionally

39:55

deprived that fought that child's of any

39:57

kind of fatherly influence in his life

39:59

it's just that's just the whole thing to do tell

40:01

your friend stop being so damn selfish

40:04

it right now she's thinking of it as

40:07

wonderful gift that she can give

40:09

the gift of life and then she is she's

40:11

she's trying to position herself in her

40:13

own mind as the this

40:15

sort of hero this wonderful giving person

40:18

think you need to make it clear to your friend his

40:20

knee extremely selfish

40:23

as is often case is often the case you know

40:25

it's it's not that it's not that your

40:27

friend has friend has heart that

40:29

her heart is not in the right place this aligned

40:31

the chesterton used about his friend george banerjee

40:33

is a birch are is a great read the

40:36

socialist playwright bernard shaw the

40:38

conservative christian just of and said the

40:40

promises horse not the right place deter

40:42

you from get a hardened right place meet

40:45

man the normal way get married that's

40:47

settled happened at children

40:49

right way next question

40:55

week my company came out with a

40:57

company diversity equity and

40:59

inclusion style guide to so

41:01

we don't make any missteps and

41:03

, notice love going through it it

41:06

instructed not to capitalize

41:08

to arm because

41:11

that refers to that goes that

41:13

to white supremacy and

41:15

the we are supposed to capitalize

41:17

blacks in all instances

41:20

so i'm wondering how

41:22

that's not racist and

41:24

when your thoughts are on that thanks

41:27

well it obviously is racist don't

41:29

that the word racist means anything anymore

41:31

i try to use even more specific language the

41:34

the policy is designed

41:36

to punish white people and

41:39

to give an advantage to black people to

41:41

say that white people or worse and black people

41:43

which is why we're going to lower case

41:46

this let know he just that that's just what the symbolism

41:48

suggests your lower casing

41:50

the word white be as white people or lesser

41:52

them black people who deserve more and and

41:55

or that is represented in the capital

41:57

letter the south i would not

41:59

do that i would not follow that policy

42:01

nothing have to quit your job nothing

42:04

even need to make big hullabaloo at that diversity

42:07

equity training or anything but i would

42:10

not go along with that policy and if

42:12

if one of your superiors has a problem

42:14

with that guy thinking very calmly explain said

42:16

you know i just find this very racist and

42:18

so i'm i'm not going to go along with that

42:20

if they insist upon it then you you

42:22

might you might want to consider

42:24

other employment cause

42:29

especially when we're talking about language this

42:31

is not just a your your

42:33

manager telling you hague they go over

42:35

there and do that grunt work that you don't wanna do

42:38

maybe maybe you you don't really wanna

42:40

go do it but hey at your job you're gonna pay checking

42:42

your notice what them were talking about language

42:44

this is your manager say hey this

42:47

card your beliefs hey

42:50

say something that you know isn't true

42:53

or didn't say something that you think is

42:55

evil or say something even

42:57

if not conducive human flourishing that that's

43:00

a that's far more insidious

43:02

i would i would would not

43:04

be able to do that next question michael

43:07

got one for yeah amen anesthesia provider

43:09

in blue states does gender affirmation

43:11

surgeries yes by institution

43:13

cuts perfectly functioning body parts

43:15

of people with ,

43:18

prefrontal cortex is and

43:21

mental illnesses question

43:23

is a question do i conduct myself an atmosphere

43:25

i do not want be an arm

43:28

i love what i do this

43:30

is only a sliver of

43:34

what i do as analyses your provider

43:36

but i have very difficult time operating

43:38

room surrounded by people who

43:42

were , the title of doctor

43:44

although they fail

43:46

on maintaining

43:48

objective reality in truth and

43:51

doing this and they consistently

43:54

call , boys and boys girls

43:57

gimme some advice ah anything

44:00

wow

44:01

really tough problem i don't think you necessarily

44:04

need to quit your job by

44:07

i would not be able to participate

44:09

in those kinds of surgery so you say doesn't

44:11

happen frequently maybe but when

44:14

, little kids come in and their psycho

44:16

parents and these sick doctors decide

44:18

put them under and then chop off their body parts

44:21

you might be called and to provide the anesthesia

44:24

if i were you i would not be able to do that

44:27

i don't i find it think

44:29

it would probably disturb your sleep night think

44:31

your conscience will probably bother you because

44:33

of that i would i would not participate

44:36

there are different what different degrees to which

44:38

people participate in evil there

44:40

are really indirect ways really

44:43

indirect way that one could participate

44:45

an evil is by going over needing

44:48

a girl scout cookie at friend's house and girl

44:50

scout cookie funds the girl scouts

44:52

organization of america and some

44:54

chapters of girl scouts organization used

44:56

partner with planned parenthood and south

44:58

as as result you're basically performing

45:01

abortion when meet your friends cookie right most

45:03

new reserve there is remote participation

45:05

the people there perhaps but it's not it's

45:07

not very direct one at certain point

45:09

you can't really operate in the world

45:11

if it depending on how remove you

45:13

become from as the very fact that you

45:15

and i pay taxes means that we

45:17

are the funding plan

45:19

parents the have to stick on and same

45:21

example so there are there

45:24

are a near his new ones

45:26

and we're talking about very very remote participation

45:29

with evil you're not you're not morally required

45:31

participate evil and in any way certainly

45:33

not but it's it's different situation

45:36

and we're we're talking that direct participation

45:38

with an evil act so would i wouldn't i

45:40

wouldn't say no to that i

45:43

i like to think that your your

45:46

superiors would comedy that

45:48

i i know some people who work in medical field who

45:50

say they they're not going to do that kind of thing specifically

45:52

on transgender surgeries and

45:55

the people that i now have who is who have voice

45:57

has concerns have been accommodate it's your

46:00

they may vary in might need to go to a different health care

46:02

center but that's that's the way i would force the issue

46:04

or i one more question from recently michael

46:06

i need your advice i've always had problem wanting everyone

46:08

to like me with i know is impossible especially

46:11

as right wing conservative i've heard people say just

46:13

get over it but i need more advice in and have

46:15

you handle the liberal attacks and you have

46:17

any suggestions on how i can speak

46:19

up for what i believe is right without

46:21

getting emotional and letting

46:23

libs get under my skin yes i

46:26

like it when people like me i don't need

46:28

people to like me obviously i would have

46:30

chosen chosen different professions had ice

46:32

a said i really needed people to like me

46:34

up but i like it by i don't i

46:37

don't get thrill when everybody hates me

46:39

i know that some people feel that way and made they

46:41

want to always be the object

46:43

of squirrel in any room and it but i

46:45

don't i like it when everybody

46:47

can get along okay so

46:49

then it if you're inclined that way as

46:51

it seems that you are how do you

46:54

the all with it when you

46:57

are maybe an otherwise perfectly lovely

47:00

charitable nice kind person

47:02

whom everyone should love but because of your politics

47:05

at least half the country hates you into the bus the liberals

47:07

you of the culture the numbers probably even

47:09

higher

47:11

this is where christianity is very helpful

47:13

for two reasons one look at what they did jesus

47:16

okay that when you say

47:18

things that are true mom

47:20

in the case jesus when you are the truth

47:23

then they really come at you and even when you say

47:25

things that true when you when you take the side

47:27

of truth that's generally

47:29

unpopular that's been true since the very

47:31

beginning of the world almost certainly

47:34

, then and death from aids or so you

47:36

can take some call saul us and comfort and that's

47:39

and then there is there traditional christian

47:41

and certainly now certainly this now in considered a

47:43

catholic point of view that suffering

47:45

is sanctifying that suffering is not

47:47

just a bad thing the people and door it's really annoying

47:50

it's sad and it's just just generally

47:52

depressing know suffering can be a good

47:54

when we suffer we can kiss it up to god

47:57

that's another old way of talking about

48:00

that actually the greatest saints in history have suffered

48:02

great deal lauren suffered

48:05

the much as could be suffered under cross

48:07

and so when when that happens

48:09

we are we are the

48:11

way of connecting ourselves to christ

48:14

this is what st paul writes about this he says

48:17

rejoice in my sufferings i am

48:19

making up in my flesh that

48:21

is that which is lacking in cross of christ which christ

48:23

or really pregnant

48:26

phone line of the scriptures

48:29

but and this is this is that connection that we

48:31

are we are we're

48:33

do in some way doing

48:35

some good when we endorse suffering

48:37

with patients and with grace suffering

48:39

is not a big is a moral category

48:42

it's not that is just really really bad to live

48:44

in dishes really really good suffering is just fact

48:46

of the world the the only question

48:48

that you have is how will you react to

48:51

suffering will you react to suffering in a whiny

48:53

petulant of self absorbed

48:56

destructive way where will you react to suffering

48:59

way that is sanctifying it and edifying

49:01

what's your eyes up to heaven hopefully the latter

49:03

my friend i'm michael noses the michael

49:05

osha

49:11

if you enjoyed this

49:13

episode don't forget to subscribe

49:15

and you want help spread the word please give

49:17

us a five star review and tell your friends

49:19

to subscribe were available

49:21

on apple podcasts modify and

49:23

wherever else you listen to podcasts

49:26

also be sure to check out the other daily wire

49:28

podcasts including the men shapiro show

49:30

see reclaiming show and the matt

49:32

walsh show the michael osha was produced

49:34

by then babies executive producers

49:36

jeremy boring supervising producer

49:39

math is glover production manager hobbled

49:41

been asking editor and associate producer

49:43

danny domingo healthy producer

49:46

just the interim audio mixer

49:48

my core mean and hair and makeup

49:50

by cherokee hard michael know show

49:52

is daily wire production copyright daily

49:54

wire twenty twenty two

49:56

hey everybody this is andrew clay then hosted the advertising

49:59

chef some people are depressed

50:01

because the republicans collapsing the end

50:03

of days is approaching and the moon's turned

50:05

to blood bought on the andrew cleveland

50:07

show that's where fun just get started so

50:09

come on over to the andrew cleveland show and laugh your

50:11

way through the fall of the republic with me and

50:13

replacement