Alton Brown: A Culinary Legend Offers Food for Thought

Alton Brown: A Culinary Legend Offers Food for Thought

Released Wednesday, 5th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Alton Brown: A Culinary Legend Offers Food for Thought

Alton Brown: A Culinary Legend Offers Food for Thought

Alton Brown: A Culinary Legend Offers Food for Thought

Alton Brown: A Culinary Legend Offers Food for Thought

Wednesday, 5th March 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This is the reason interview with

0:02

Nicholasby. My guest today is Alton

0:04

Brown, who for years hosted Good

0:06

Eats on the Food Network and

0:09

married his interest in science to

0:11

the making of dinner. He's currently

0:13

touring the country and he's also

0:15

just published Food for Thought, a

0:18

fantastic collection of essays about food

0:20

culture and his life on and

0:22

off the screen. I talked with

0:24

him about how food transcends politics,

0:27

why fusion cooking isn't cultural preparation,

0:29

and why there's always room

0:31

for Jello salad on

0:33

his menu. Here is

0:36

the reason interview with

0:38

Alton Brown. Alton

0:40

Brown, thanks for

0:42

talking to Reason. Happy to be

0:44

here. Thanks for having me. So you

0:47

are on a farewell tour, and yeah,

0:49

and you also have a new book

0:51

ad. I want to ask, based on

0:53

some research I did, is this a

0:56

real farewell tour, or is this like

0:58

the Ramones and the Who, you know, at

1:00

various stages? No, no, I'm going to

1:03

stick the landing on this one. No,

1:05

this will be my last national tour,

1:07

for sure. This whole thing about living

1:09

on a bus for 13 weeks, it's

1:12

not nearly as glamorous issue, I think.

1:14

I you know I yeah I think

1:16

it would be but I guess a

1:18

little bit no it actually really isn't

1:21

if you could if you could take

1:23

a train like a you know your

1:25

own coach like Yeah, I was going

1:27

to say President Garfield in Wild Wild

1:30

West or something, right? Yeah, that would

1:32

be a different matter entirely. But then you wouldn't get

1:34

anywhere, right? You would be stopping in the middle of

1:36

nowhere half the time. I kind of like the idea

1:38

of that, though. If you had a train with a

1:40

couple of extra cars that could open up and you

1:43

would just do your show out in the middle of

1:45

a field on a site in some place and then

1:47

close it up and then close it up and go

1:49

to you know. That would be, you know, that might

1:51

heal the country, that might heal the country as well,

1:53

that might heal the country as well, that might heal

1:56

the country as well. So your book, Food for Thought,

1:58

I want to start, you open it, you... were

2:00

born in 1962, so you're towards

2:02

the end of the baby boom,

2:04

and you open talking about watching

2:07

TV and eating Captain Crunch. I

2:09

have two sons, I was born

2:11

in 1963, so I'm right there

2:13

with you. I reading that, it

2:15

was like reading Pruss talking about

2:17

a Madeline, I started having internal

2:19

bleeding on my mouth. What is

2:22

it about Captain Crunch? watching, you

2:24

know, in front of TV on

2:26

Saturday mornings. Why is that so

2:28

important? Well, I think that, you

2:30

know, no kid today, no child

2:32

today can understand the magic of

2:35

Saturdays. You know, it was... literally

2:37

a magical day. And you know,

2:39

if you were good, at least

2:41

in my household, you got complete

2:43

control of one of the TVs

2:45

for several hours. And so number

2:47

one, it was your first real

2:50

exposure to choice. It was also

2:52

first exposure to a form of

2:54

media that was completely out of

2:56

control as far as trying to

2:58

manipulate your young mind, which you

3:00

did. And Captain Crunch was just

3:02

a flavor. And as you pointed

3:05

out a moment ago when you

3:07

mentioned internal bleeding. The sense memory

3:09

of these hard little pillows shredding

3:11

the roof of your mouth, which

3:13

I enjoyed, I think I've always

3:15

liked a little pain with my

3:18

pleasure. And so I think that's

3:20

what makes that memory so potent.

3:22

That in the folding tray table.

3:24

Or is in the particular story

3:26

that I tell, also another shocking

3:28

element. Yeah, talk about the, I

3:30

think you said that it had

3:33

flowers on it and things like

3:35

that. Explain what a folding tray

3:37

table was. And in your household,

3:39

was it considered a break with

3:41

decorum to eat somewhere other than

3:43

the kitchen or dining table? Yes,

3:45

yes. It was a break with

3:48

decorum. It was special. It was

3:50

something that had to be kind

3:52

of, you had. apply for it

3:54

in advance like a passport. And

3:56

the only time that it was

3:58

unilaterally allowed in my house was

4:01

when either the Saturday morning or

4:03

if a Jacques Cousteau special was

4:05

on TV in the evenings, in

4:07

which case it was also allowed.

4:09

Yeah, it did seem like you

4:11

were kind of giving up as

4:13

a family in the late 60s,

4:16

early 70s, if your parents were

4:18

like, fuck it, we're eating in

4:20

front of the TV. No, we

4:22

had a little kitchenette, a little

4:24

dinette. area in our kitchen that

4:26

was really, you know, that is

4:28

where most meals were taken. And

4:31

we didn't break from that. You,

4:33

so describe a little bit, I

4:35

mean, you talk about the powerful

4:37

sensation of the way the milk,

4:39

and at one point you use

4:41

buttermilk in your. No, the whole

4:44

story is about the accidental grabbing

4:46

of buttermilk. That's the story. That's

4:48

the entire story. Is that. I

4:50

accidentally shoved it in my job

4:52

and it was buttermilk. And one

4:54

bottle had a blue label and

4:56

one bottle had a blue label

4:59

and one bottle had a blue

5:01

label and one bottle had a

5:03

blue label and one bottle had

5:05

a green label and one bottle

5:07

had a green label and I

5:09

thought the green was prettier. I

5:11

didn't for a moment at my

5:14

age considered that there would be

5:16

a differentiation of the product, which

5:18

of course there would be. And

5:20

so you know I poured on

5:22

my cereal and I poured on

5:24

my cereal and I poured on

5:27

my cereal. of that flavor. That

5:29

flavor. I didn't know there was

5:31

such a thing as buttermilk. I

5:33

mean, why would there be? How

5:35

could that exist? Why would it?

5:37

What was buttermilk used for other,

5:40

I mean, I guess you make

5:42

biscuits with it. I know it

5:44

was water on my household, but

5:46

my mother drank it. My mother

5:48

drank it. My mother was raised

5:51

on the stuff in the South

5:53

and enjoyed just consuming it. It

5:55

was a very different product back

5:57

then. You know, today's butterm buttermilk

5:59

is is far more like horrible

6:01

yogurt than it. actually better about,

6:04

but back then it was quite

6:06

sour. It wasn't viscous enough to

6:08

where I recognized it as a

6:10

different product, but the memory, he's

6:12

like the first time that I

6:15

was surprised by anything in a

6:17

negative way in life in such

6:19

a powerful way. But I think

6:21

the telling part of the story

6:23

is that revolting. as it was,

6:26

as shockingly revolting at it was,

6:28

after a few minutes I did

6:30

go back and taste it again.

6:32

And I think that that's what

6:34

kind of sets the pattern for

6:36

my own culinary life, is that

6:39

I will go back after the

6:41

strange flavor. And that was certainly

6:43

typical of my childhood. Is that

6:45

temperamental or is that something that

6:47

can be taught? Because you put,

6:50

I mean, throughout your entire body

6:52

of work, you put a lot

6:54

of... emphasis on things like curiosity

6:56

and trying things or seeking things

6:58

out. I think that I do

7:01

talk a lot about curiosity, which

7:03

I think is the most powerful

7:05

and most kind of positive human

7:07

emotion, so to speak. I don't.

7:09

I don't think that one needs

7:11

to delve into strange things for

7:14

the sake of strange things, but

7:16

there is a real value in

7:18

the brain being out of its

7:20

comfort zone, your sense is being

7:22

out of their comfort zone, your

7:25

body being out of its comfort

7:27

zone, in a thoughtful, exploratory manner.

7:29

I'm not suggesting that we eat

7:31

really strange foods for shock factor,

7:33

but I think that, you know,

7:36

especially as you grow older and

7:38

you get used to so many

7:40

things. 99% of what we put

7:42

in our mouths, adults, we know

7:44

what it's gonna taste like when

7:47

it gets to us. I mean,

7:49

we just do from experience. I

7:51

think that stepping outside of that

7:53

in a thoughtful manner, really thinking

7:55

about what's going on, the input

7:57

that we're getting, is something I

8:00

certainly want to. I'm not going

8:02

to say that it's critical to

8:04

be a good person or anything,

8:06

but I do think that it

8:08

makes life a hell of a

8:11

lot more interesting. How you would

8:13

mention before that, you know, in

8:15

the 60s, and this was partly

8:17

actually in response to early, or

8:19

very early in the 60s when

8:22

the then head of the FCC

8:24

declared that television was a vast

8:26

wasteland we started getting more kind

8:28

of educational television although it certainly

8:30

it was not educating us in

8:32

the way that maybe the government

8:35

wanted us to but you you

8:37

talked about how you know we

8:39

were being sold a ton of

8:41

stuff a ton of products there

8:43

were tie-ins between the cartoons and

8:46

the products that were being sold

8:48

how much how much of the

8:50

captain crunch experience and I Don't

8:52

think that 25-year-old me would ever

8:54

have imagined that, you know, 61-year-old

8:57

me would be asking a question

8:59

like this to somebody like you.

9:01

How much of the Captain Crunch

9:03

experience was the packaging and the

9:05

commercials and him swash buckling? Like,

9:07

how does that factor into that?

9:10

First off, let's step back from

9:12

the captain and look at the

9:14

world of cereals, of sugary cereals

9:16

in the 60's. What's significant, and

9:18

I don't know if anybody's ever

9:21

written a study on this, hell

9:23

I might, is that this is

9:25

really the first time that children

9:27

were being directly marketed to by

9:29

very smart people, right, who were

9:32

designing products and designing advertising specifically

9:34

to pump us full of, look,

9:36

it doesn't matter that it was

9:38

crap. Right. Which it was and

9:40

still is. What matters is that

9:42

kids all of a sudden, we've

9:45

felt seen by a bigger world.

9:47

And there was something, you know,

9:49

I remember sending in box tops

9:51

for whatever the price was promised.

9:53

But I'll tell you something that

9:56

was really worthwhile is like you

9:58

would save up like three. Cheerios,

10:00

I wasn't usually Cheerios, but some

10:02

other. Cheerios were kind of a

10:04

punishment, right? Well Cheerios, you know,

10:07

it was like, time out. You're

10:09

like, you're in life magazine, like

10:11

you're really in trouble, but in

10:13

great nuts. Although I really love

10:15

it. I'm a texture guy. So

10:17

this, this the anticipation of like,

10:20

of going through all this cereal,

10:22

getting the box tops, sending the

10:24

box tops in by mail, and

10:26

then waiting. waiting for the thing

10:28

to come, which was usually weeks,

10:31

right? And so the anticipation, I

10:33

mean, it was very, I'm not

10:35

gonna say empowering, but powerful in

10:37

a way, that whole experience was

10:39

instructive. Instructive, right? I think so.

10:42

It certainly taught you how to

10:44

be a consumer. And, you know,

10:46

and that's that's a valuable lesson

10:48

in and of itself. But I

10:50

don't think that people, people that

10:52

didn't live during that time, right,

10:55

do not know what this feels

10:57

like. And I will say that,

10:59

like, I was the last year

11:01

of the baby boomers, so I'm

11:03

practically Gen X, but I think

11:06

that once Gen X is over,

11:08

no one knows what that feels

11:10

like anymore. And I think it

11:12

informed us in more ways than

11:14

a lot of people think. Yeah

11:17

and it can be seen as

11:19

being cynical but it's also being

11:21

realistic and just being you know

11:23

kind of out there in the

11:25

world because as that same you

11:27

know we were being marketed to

11:30

the results of things like wacky

11:32

packages and you know critiques that

11:34

were being mass marketed to us

11:36

but that were critiques of mass

11:38

marketing. You know and we can

11:41

be we can be critical about

11:43

that because you know a lot

11:45

of companies were we're selling kids

11:47

really crap nutrition but let me

11:49

tell you something the world has

11:52

not changed one iota. In fact,

11:54

it's just taken that model and

11:56

perfected it more and more and

11:58

more and more as we break

12:00

into micro tribes. It's the same

12:02

thing. Only really now the product

12:05

is... us. Yeah. I want to,

12:07

you know, Captain Crunch, Madeline Moment,

12:09

is one of the, in the

12:11

book, it's one of the meals

12:13

that you say that made you.

12:16

Another one is a pizza that

12:18

you had in Tuscany. Describe that

12:20

and I was born in Brooklyn.

12:22

I grew up in New Jersey.

12:24

You know, pizza. But I also,

12:27

what it reminded me of is

12:29

when I went to college, 25

12:31

miles from my hometown, and I

12:33

had a white pizza for the

12:35

first time, and I was like,

12:37

like, I have never experienced something

12:40

so sophisticated, so delicious, my taste

12:42

buds are exploding, just thinking about

12:44

it. The way you describe this

12:46

pizza is, you know, it's one

12:48

of the best pieces of writing

12:51

I've read in forever. What was

12:53

going on with that pizza that

12:55

it blew your mind? Well, first

12:57

off. I'm not from New York

12:59

or New Jersey, so I had

13:02

not ever, this happened in college,

13:04

so I had never been exposed

13:06

to what I would call great

13:08

or even authentic pizza. Pizza for

13:10

me was pizza, hot pizza. Well,

13:12

that's not entirely true, because I

13:15

actually worked in a pizzeria during

13:17

college that they made better than

13:19

average pizza, but still, it was

13:21

deck pizza at best. It was

13:23

New York's lifestyle pizza. And like

13:26

most of the, it's funny. All

13:28

three of the stories in the

13:30

book that are meals that made

13:32

me, I realize in retrospect having

13:34

written about them is that they,

13:37

one of the greatest elements is

13:39

surprise, not knowing that this is

13:41

coming. I was lucky enough to

13:43

spend a semester of college in

13:45

a small town in Tuscany and

13:47

Italy doing theater there with the

13:50

University of Georgia and I literally.

13:52

as the story unfolded, it was

13:54

just an accident. I just got

13:56

invited by this old man and

13:58

his couple of kids and his

14:01

grandchildren to go up in the

14:03

hills. I would never be able

14:05

to find it again in 100

14:07

years. I don't even know if

14:09

it exists. To this shack. you

14:12

know, literally a pizza hot that

14:14

this guy, you know, was making

14:16

pizza and the pizza was utterly

14:18

alien when delivered to me. It

14:20

was like an amoeba of flat

14:22

cracker burnt on the bottom dough

14:25

with a little oil, a little

14:27

cheese and shaved artichokes, which I'd

14:29

never had before, shaved baby artichokes

14:31

and some peppers, like all that

14:33

was on it. And yet when

14:36

I ate it, and look, I'm

14:38

not saying it's the best pizza

14:40

I ever had. pizza I ever

14:42

had. But it summed up a

14:44

lot of things that I had

14:47

never had before in that kind

14:49

of way. That is the Gestalt

14:51

of the whole thing being very

14:53

very powerful. And I've never been

14:55

able to completely get my head

14:57

around why that was so important.

15:00

But I will also say that

15:02

the place itself was very important.

15:04

This strange kind of mysterious place

15:06

that I went, it was almost

15:08

like something out of the Odyssey,

15:11

to be honest, which of course

15:13

I never went back to again.

15:15

It's become now in my mind

15:17

over decades epic. At the time,

15:19

I probably thought, oh this is

15:22

really great, but it wasn't revelatory

15:24

then. It was only revelatory as

15:26

the years went by that that

15:28

moment. that one pizza stood out

15:30

as such an important thing and

15:32

hearing that old man say to

15:35

me and an Italian you remember

15:37

this which yeah darn right mister

15:39

oh that is like the Odyssey

15:41

or something like in my in

15:43

my mythology and let's face it

15:46

when you get into your 60s

15:48

if you're not building mythology out

15:50

of your past you're really missing

15:52

out because yeah one of the

15:54

great pleasures of divity is being

15:57

able to create something a little

15:59

more epic of your history than

16:01

perhaps the events that actually took

16:03

place. Yes, I say in the

16:05

author's statement on the book, you

16:07

know, most of this happened and

16:10

if it didn't, it should have.

16:12

Because I'm not about to pretend

16:14

for a moment. that my memory

16:16

is a documentary filmmaker. Yes, everything

16:18

in that book happened in my,

16:21

if it didn't, if it didn't,

16:23

I remember it that way. But

16:25

who's to say, you know, who's

16:27

to say how good memories? But

16:29

that pizza, yes, it was the

16:32

best pizza in the world, absolutely

16:34

not. Life changing for me, totally.

16:36

The third meal is at a

16:38

roadside restaurant that served Indian food.

16:40

No, it was a motel. It

16:42

was a motel in South Carolina

16:45

being managed by an Indian family

16:47

who were living on the premises.

16:49

And it was them sharing part

16:51

of their dinner. And there's, by

16:53

the way, just to be clear,

16:56

it's South Asian Indians. Yes. And

16:58

you were told that there was

17:00

going to be. Curry, explain what

17:02

happened there and why this has

17:04

stayed with you. Well, it turned

17:07

out to be kati, which is

17:09

a different thing altogether, but I

17:11

didn't know that. It's basically a

17:13

relatively simple yogurt-based soup that is

17:15

heavily spiced, and I had never

17:18

had it. It watched it being

17:20

made, helped a little bit, could

17:22

not have been more humble. And

17:24

yet it conveyed an entire continent

17:26

of flavors. But then also, I

17:28

can't remove the incredibly generous hospitality

17:31

and openness with which it was

17:33

given to us. These were really

17:35

humble people living at a very

17:37

humble little apartment in the back

17:39

of a motel, and they opened

17:42

that home up to us without

17:44

reserve. And I think that flavors

17:46

meal. in a very powerful way.

17:48

Yes, the soup was amazing. It

17:50

was redolent of all these spice.

17:53

It was literally like somebody had

17:55

put southern India into a juicer

17:57

and squeezed it, extracted how everything

17:59

of it. and then put it

18:01

in this little cup and given

18:03

it to me. So that was

18:06

a powerful sense memory kind of

18:08

thing, but also I don't think

18:10

that I had ever experienced that

18:12

level of open hospitality, of just

18:14

the simple act of people giving

18:17

me strangers feeding me, which I

18:19

think you get about. You still,

18:21

you try to recreate or you've

18:23

tried to recreate that meal and

18:25

you get close, but not quite

18:28

there. So

18:30

you're like chasing the drag? It's

18:32

not in my bones. It's not

18:34

in my bones. I can scratch

18:36

the edge, but the edge never

18:38

goes away. And it won't ever.

18:40

Probably because, you know, that woman

18:43

learned that recipe from her mother-in-law.

18:45

A time after time, every time

18:47

of making it in India. I

18:49

don't have that in my bones.

18:51

I'm not going to be able

18:53

to replicate that. I can get

18:56

close enough to just miss it

18:58

worse. You, in the book and

19:00

throughout your career, you've talked a

19:02

lot about questions about cultural appropriation

19:04

and the use of things. And

19:06

can you talk a little bit

19:08

about this because, you know, one

19:11

of the things that is fascinating

19:13

about food in an era where

19:15

you said, you know, we're breaking

19:17

down into micro tribes and things

19:19

like that. And that is kind

19:21

of true and there's good parts

19:24

to that and bad parts to

19:26

it. But one of the things

19:28

that has flourished. certainly over our

19:30

lifetimes is, you know, this profusion,

19:32

I don't want to say world

19:34

cuisine, but you know, people growing

19:37

up in a small town in

19:39

Georgia or in a cosmopolitan, you

19:41

know, in Atlanta or New York

19:43

or Bombay or whatever, Mumbai. You

19:45

know, everybody is mixing. You know,

19:47

what's the positive case for cultural

19:50

appropriation in an era where oftentimes

19:52

people are like, hey, you know

19:54

what? You know, you shouldn't be

19:56

making that food. Maybe you shouldn't

19:58

even be eating it. I do

20:00

have an essay in the book

20:02

about this because of something. think

20:05

about a lot. And I, you

20:07

know, this, the American ideal, you

20:09

know, so many foods are not

20:11

actually where you think they're from.

20:13

You know, I talk about the

20:15

fact that, you know, fish and

20:18

chips in England, you know, that's,

20:20

that's, that's a, that's a Jewish

20:22

diaspora dish. That, that was created

20:24

by, by, by, by Jesus after,

20:26

after Cromwell, as time, or... Right.

20:28

And it's, because I found that

20:31

interesting, it was actually... Jews from

20:33

Portugal, right, who eventually got kicked

20:35

out and end up back in

20:37

England, where the Jews have been

20:39

kicked out by Edward the first

20:41

in the 1300s. So it's like

20:44

we're already in a real worldly

20:46

bird of, you know, a lot

20:48

of national dishes are that way,

20:50

you know, Shachuka and Israel, you

20:52

know, it's North African, you know,

20:54

nothing is, everything's fluid, right, as

20:57

people move around the planet. And

20:59

I think that the appropriation part

21:01

becomes an issue or what we

21:03

call appropriation. I call it plagiarism

21:05

is when you claim something without

21:07

appreciating and kind of clearly stating

21:09

where it's from and what it

21:12

is. You know, if you if

21:14

you are and it doesn't matter

21:16

who you are where you're from,

21:18

it's like. I talk in the

21:20

book about, you know, if a

21:22

Greek family starts a pizzeria, if

21:25

a Chinese family straight from Beijing

21:27

opens a hot dog shop, are

21:29

they appropriating? Are they just smart?

21:31

If I put Siracha, you know,

21:33

on my scrambled eggs, am I

21:35

appropriating? Or is that just a

21:38

culinary sense? I think it's all

21:40

a matter of how you do

21:42

it. You know, my thing has

21:44

always been, hey, this is America,

21:46

you buy the groceries, the food

21:48

chairs. And I think that there's,

21:51

there's something about that. In this

21:53

day and age, we can learn

21:55

where things are from. We can

21:57

if we put in the mental

21:59

rigor, the intellectual rigor. learn where

22:01

things are from and something of

22:03

their history. I think that makes

22:06

food taste better. I do that

22:08

not because I feel beholden to

22:10

give credit to someone like, oh,

22:12

the people of Alhaka make this,

22:14

they're the ones, you know, and

22:16

point to them. Is that that

22:19

should be part of the rigor

22:21

of simply figuring out where your

22:23

food's from. Right. So what we

22:25

don't get to do is we

22:27

don't get to just pick up

22:29

things along the way and then

22:32

kind of claim them. and start

22:34

businesses about them and blogs about

22:36

them. But if you really love

22:38

something and you spend time learning

22:40

about it, appreciating it and give

22:42

credit where credit is due, I

22:45

don't think it's appropriation. I don't.

22:47

When I say it's celebration or...

22:49

I think if it's done right,

22:51

it's celebration, absolutely. And if I

22:53

take, you know, something from the

22:55

Hmong culture and working into my

22:57

food, as long as I talk

23:00

about it, and I'm aware of

23:02

it, then I don't think, I

23:04

don't personally think there's anything wrong

23:06

with it. This whole thing, if

23:08

you shouldn't even be eating it.

23:10

What? I'll eat whatever I freaking

23:13

want, if I can afford it,

23:15

and it's for sale, I'm gonna

23:17

eat it. No one's gonna tell

23:19

me not to eat it. Do

23:21

I have the right to then

23:23

start a blog about it? Depends.

23:26

That simply a matter of respect,

23:28

perhaps. Yeah, I'm still I always

23:30

go back to I I'm not

23:32

sure exactly You know who what

23:34

army general so belong to but

23:36

you know It's an interesting circuit

23:39

right like and he may have

23:41

been in the same military that

23:43

captain crunch was you know It's

23:45

kind of like you know a

23:47

chicken chicken catch Tories not not

23:49

Italian it's American right You know,

23:51

there's so many dishes from so

23:54

many places that originated in America

23:56

that happened because of the melting

23:58

pot, which we're very fortunate to

24:00

have. very fortunate to be part

24:02

of. So talk, yeah, I mean,

24:04

you would agree, right, that I

24:07

mean, this is, it seems inarguable

24:09

that food cuisine, or I guess

24:11

there is only food cuisine, but

24:13

cuisine in America has just gotten,

24:15

you know, astronomically better and more

24:17

interesting, or at least more varied

24:20

over the past 60 years. Why

24:22

did that happen? And is it

24:24

a good thing? Or, you know,

24:26

what are the limits to that

24:28

kind of explosion? Well,

24:31

it happened because of food media.

24:33

Above all. Because, you know, if

24:36

a Laoshan family opens a small

24:38

restaurant in Buffalo, New York, and

24:41

no one but Laoshans go to

24:43

it, then it doesn't blow up.

24:45

Instagram and the internet in general

24:48

changed that exposure level, which is

24:50

good. because then more people learn

24:52

about it. The world becomes more

24:55

intimate, you know, in its way.

24:57

There's a great amount of appreciation.

25:00

I think the flip side is

25:02

unfortunately, I think that America's cooking

25:04

skills at home are decaying. do

25:07

not think. And I think that

25:09

part of that is because now

25:11

so many young people consume so

25:14

much culinary content in places like

25:16

TikTok where food videos are more

25:19

freak shows than they are representation

25:21

of food that you would want

25:23

to make and eat and are

25:26

there to kind of thrill the

25:28

eyes and be. they sometimes just

25:30

disgusting or you know sometimes look

25:33

amazing that that's not how you

25:35

make. So this is like the

25:38

you know where you're eating hot

25:40

wings that you need to wear

25:42

a gas mask in order to

25:45

you know consume. There's always that

25:47

been that level of extremism in

25:49

food ever since we started having

25:52

eating contests you know which is

25:54

taking food out of context of

25:57

what it actually is. and turning

25:59

into something else. You know, and

26:01

I think that one of the

26:04

reasons food remains such a hot

26:06

subject is that we still haven't

26:09

figured out how to convey taste

26:11

and smell through technology. And hopefully

26:13

we won't ever figure out how

26:16

to do that. Because then we

26:18

have to do it in real

26:20

life, right? Well, once AI is

26:23

figure out taste and flavor, we

26:25

will. I think that that will

26:28

be the last stroke of humanity.

26:30

You know, we are distinctly human

26:32

because things we smell and things

26:35

we eat form memories via our

26:37

limbic system. That makes us really

26:39

special. And the animal world, you

26:42

know, in general, certainly primates all

26:44

do that. Dogs do that. But

26:47

I think that it keeps us

26:49

still special from the AI. Do

26:51

you, when you say that kind

26:54

of culinary skills are declining or

26:56

degrading in America, is that something,

26:58

you know, you talk about your

27:01

mother as well as especially your

27:03

grandmother in the book? Did you

27:06

learn directly from them or was

27:08

it something where in the same

27:10

way I was just talking about

27:13

this with somebody the other day,

27:15

you know, up through probably about

27:17

1970, it was common that most

27:20

women knew how to sew using

27:22

a sewing machine and they would

27:25

be able to churn out Halloween

27:27

costumes and at least simple clothing.

27:29

They also knew how to cook,

27:32

you know, my mother was not

27:34

a particularly good cook, but she

27:36

was in the kitchen every day.

27:39

I mean, has that? you know,

27:41

has, is the transmission of culinary

27:44

skills gone down because we don't

27:46

do that anymore? Or is it

27:48

that we are, you know, we're

27:51

chasing a very high cuisine rather

27:53

than a kind of basic. Well,

27:55

I'm not going to say that

27:58

we're chasing an Instagram. derived cuisine.

28:00

And we can't look to our

28:03

mothers to say, you know, can

28:05

you make me pat tie tonight?

28:07

You don't let your mother happens

28:09

to be tie. You know, so that what

28:11

I would call the base cuisine

28:13

of what a family used to

28:16

eat. And by the way, when

28:18

I was a kid, it was

28:20

not. at all uncommon for like

28:22

Monday night is this night, Tuesday

28:24

night is this night, Thursday night

28:27

is that night, Friday night is

28:29

fish sticks. You've got, you're either

28:31

Catholic or you've got Catholic

28:34

friends. So a mother, and I'm

28:36

going to use that, a, a,

28:39

a, a, a, the, whatever adult

28:41

supported this, yes, whether it was

28:43

a male or female, could get

28:45

by on 20 dishes, a couple

28:47

of special holiday meals and a

28:49

couple of desserts. So the recipe

28:51

box was not deep nor wide,

28:53

nor did it have to be.

28:55

And the great benefit of that

28:57

is that if you paid any

28:59

attention at all, after a few years

29:02

of Mondays, you'd have that pot

29:04

roast down or pot roast, which

29:06

is usually on Sundays, you would

29:08

learn those dishes as a foundation.

29:10

And we don't have that anymore.

29:12

We don't. Now for one thing,

29:15

during our childhood, mother started

29:17

working and then it became, or the

29:19

rule, then the exception. And then we

29:21

had kind of, I look at the

29:23

80s and 90s, as kind of just

29:25

a wasteland, a culinary wasteland

29:27

in a lot of ways because

29:30

people weren't learning how to cook

29:32

from families. They were learning to

29:34

cook from cookbooks. and magazines. That

29:37

was the great area of,

29:39

you know, like, Ormay magazine,

29:41

the Time Life series, to

29:43

read books. Then, in the

29:45

late 90s, it all changed

29:47

and became television. And for

29:49

a decade, almost, almost two

29:52

decades, I think people

29:54

learned primarily from food shows.

29:56

And food network, certainly,

29:58

what was there. cooking shows just

30:01

turned into competition shows. And now

30:03

I think back, we're back a

30:05

drift again. Yeah, and you're down

30:07

on the competition shows at this

30:10

point, right? I am not, I

30:12

don't want to do any more

30:14

of them. I did my share.

30:16

Hopefully there were some good ones.

30:19

I did them because I had

30:21

a contract and I had to

30:23

do the work. I am, I

30:25

think they have a place, but

30:27

that's all there is any. And

30:30

so I think that young people

30:32

now see food as simply something

30:34

you used to beat somebody else

30:36

for something. I think that it

30:39

is, other than Martha Stewart's whole

30:41

perfection thing, which I despise almost

30:43

beyond my words of description. Why

30:45

do you, why is, why is,

30:48

why does that rank? Well, I

30:50

have a, I have a whole

30:52

essay about the whole affection thing.

30:54

I know a lot more people

30:57

that stopped entertaining after the rise

30:59

of Martha Stewart than those that

31:01

started entertaining because they suddenly became

31:03

self-aware of their own lack of

31:05

perfection. And I know a lot

31:08

of people that used to have

31:10

really good times, that their houses

31:12

eating a bowl of chili or

31:14

whatever, simply stopped because they became

31:17

so aware of the fact that

31:19

they didn't have the right pots

31:21

and pans, and they didn't have

31:23

the tableclaws, and they didn't have

31:26

this. So I hate that. I

31:28

absolutely hate that. I think that

31:30

that whole perfection thing drug us

31:32

into dark ages of home entertainment,

31:35

where no one really cooked for

31:37

friends and family, because we're all

31:39

too scared to do. And if

31:41

we did do it, it was

31:43

because we were competing. And now

31:46

with culinary shows, it was competing.

31:48

It is frustrating. Yeah, when you

31:50

go to, you know, when you

31:52

reach a certain level, I guess,

31:55

in your life and possibly career

31:57

or whatnot, where you're going to

31:59

friends' houses for dinners and everybody

32:01

is out doing themselves, and whether

32:04

the food is good or not,

32:06

you kind of feel compelled to

32:08

be like, this is truly delicious.

32:10

I rather small quality food. You

32:13

know, make a big pot of

32:15

soup and invite a bunch of

32:17

people over and have a good

32:19

time. That used to be what

32:21

hospitality was about. It wasn't about

32:24

impressing, it was about sharing. And

32:26

I think we had a lot

32:28

more fun than. Your inspirations, as

32:30

you listed in the book, include

32:33

Julia Child, Mr. Wizard, and Monty

32:35

Python. Those are the inspirations for

32:37

the show Good Eat's, yeah. They

32:39

obviously, you know, I think everybody

32:42

would agree with that, but focus

32:44

a little bit on Julia Child.

32:46

I mean, she is a fascinating.

32:48

change agent in American society and

32:51

certainly in post-war culture, what grabbed

32:53

you and stays with you about

32:55

Julia Child? Multiple things. And multiple

32:57

things that I don't think have

32:59

ever been replicated in another food

33:02

personality. One, sheer unmitigated joy. She

33:04

loved what she was talking about.

33:06

She loved what she was cooking.

33:08

She loved what she was cooking.

33:11

her openness to share that joy,

33:13

whether things were going right or

33:15

not going right, which she didn't

33:17

mind showing. She's kind of the

33:20

anti-Martha Stewart. The turkey balls on

33:22

the floor, pick up the turkey,

33:24

laugh about it. And that wonderful

33:26

sharing of joy made you want

33:29

to be in there in that

33:31

kitchen with her. Number two. You

33:33

know, she wasn't an expert. She

33:35

became one. But she really wasn't.

33:37

She was constantly in the process

33:40

of discovery herself. I mean, when

33:42

you look at her history, she

33:44

had experience. She wasn't much of

33:46

an expert. I mean, she went

33:49

to court on below. Okay, great.

33:51

But what I think that really,

33:53

there's a class of teacher that

33:55

is great while they are in

33:58

the process of discovery themselves. Great

34:00

teachers are always constantly learning. They

34:02

may not be constantly learning in

34:04

their teaching you. but they are

34:07

constantly learning and that keeps a

34:09

spark going. I would like to

34:11

think that if I followed her

34:13

down any path, at least with

34:15

the show Good Eats, is that

34:18

Good Eats was always fun because

34:20

I was constantly in the state

34:22

of discovery. And when you're discovering

34:24

things, you want to share things

34:27

in a natural way that is

34:29

very catching. And I think that

34:31

the other thing about Julia was

34:33

just her humanity, her absolute humanity,

34:36

that I think carried across through

34:38

everything that she did. And I

34:40

think it's so interesting when people

34:42

do talk about cultural appropriation. Well,

34:45

what the hell do you think

34:47

she was doing it? Right. Yeah,

34:49

yeah. She was, probably she was

34:51

a close appropriating other white people

34:53

being the French. But deciphering, and

34:56

then the last thing is her

34:58

ability to decipher and demistify, you

35:00

know, you take a cuisine like

35:02

French, which is highly organized and

35:05

very rigorous, which I'm actually glad

35:07

of because... It gives us form

35:09

and function for that whole cuisine,

35:11

is that she was able to

35:14

demystify that and make not as

35:16

scary for people, which allowed a

35:18

lot of home cooks in America

35:20

during her reign to feel that

35:23

they weren't just low-class Americans anymore.

35:25

We can make French food, which

35:27

at the time was considered the

35:29

world standard. Right. Mr. Wizard might

35:31

be unfamiliar to people. You know,

35:34

maybe more and after 1907. The,

35:36

the, the, the, the, Bill Nigh,

35:38

you know, Mr. Richard, there were

35:40

a lot of shows. He was

35:43

really the first to try to

35:45

demystify fully or, or, make science,

35:47

higher ideas of science, understandable through

35:49

kind of models and storytelling. Bill

35:52

Nigh certainly would be the, the

35:54

equivalent today, I, I, I would

35:56

say. And for me, the science

35:58

part of cooking has always been

36:01

critical because... I can't cook well

36:03

just walking in the kitchen and

36:05

doing it. I really do need

36:07

to understand what's going on in

36:09

order to be a better cook.

36:12

And that understanding, for me at

36:14

least, almost always comes out of

36:16

science. It either comes out of

36:18

historical understanding of why and how

36:21

an ingredient or a food way

36:23

got someplace or the science of

36:25

what the food actually is doing

36:27

and needing. How did you come

36:30

up with, you know, in good

36:32

eats? I mean, you were constantly

36:34

coming up with new ways to

36:36

illustrate the science of gluten or,

36:39

you know, how different molecules mix?

36:41

Was that all just kind of,

36:43

you know, trial and experimentation to

36:45

figure out what would represent something?

36:47

I'm going to say that probably

36:50

50% of the time that I

36:52

spent researching and writing that show

36:54

was about coming up with workable...

36:56

visual, entertaining, and yet accurate models.

36:59

What I did not let myself

37:01

get caught up in was a

37:03

level of exactitude that would have

37:05

resulted in no one understanding any

37:08

of it at all. This is

37:10

a complaint that scientists had about

37:12

the show, especially in the early

37:14

days, when they would say, well,

37:17

that's not really how gluten works.

37:19

And I'm like, well, look, if

37:21

there's a scale of understanding about

37:23

gluten from, I don't know which

37:26

side of the screen you're looking

37:28

at, I'm going to do that

37:30

because the rest of it, I

37:32

don't care about. I just don't

37:34

care. And I would rather have

37:37

70 than nothing. And I think

37:39

that a lot of teaching that's

37:41

done by scientists in both high

37:43

school and college level ends up

37:46

not working because they go for

37:48

100% or nothing. They go for

37:50

brooch. If you don't get it

37:52

100% right, then you end up

37:55

not getting any of it. And

37:57

I rather have people get 70%.

37:59

And doing that in a way

38:01

that's entertaining. Which is absolutely critical

38:04

if you aren't entertaining people. They

38:06

are not paying attention So with

38:08

models whether it's like a skit

38:10

or it's a whatever it is

38:12

or puppets, you know, which We

38:15

used a locked and out puppets

38:17

because people will watch them and

38:19

people will be entertained. And it

38:21

may be days before they realize

38:24

they learned something. Hell, they may

38:26

never realize that they learned something,

38:28

but they did. But they did.

38:30

And then how did Monty Python

38:33

round out this? I mean, it's

38:35

an influence and it's apparent through

38:37

what you're doing. But what was

38:39

the essence of Monty Python that

38:42

you really loved? We lost David

38:44

Lynch recently, one of my favorite

38:46

filmmakers and artists, who staunchly believe

38:48

that you don't need to explain

38:50

it. You don't need to explain

38:53

a lot of things. And I

38:55

think that is what makes Money

38:57

Python humor very often still to

38:59

this day so wickedly our point

39:02

is that it doesn't. very often

39:04

explain itself at all, which opens

39:06

us up to understanding the things

39:08

that human beings think are funny

39:11

are not always explicable. Unlike something

39:13

like Saturday Night Live, which I

39:15

also riffed on from time to

39:17

time, nothing is cringe-worthy about Monty

39:20

Python humor now. There's actually, there's

39:22

nothing politically incorrect, there's nothing sexist.

39:24

It simply still works. you know,

39:26

the absurdism of having, you know,

39:28

the Spanish Inquisition bust into the

39:31

room. Why is that funny? I

39:33

don't know. I don't know why

39:35

it's funny. There's certainly nothing funny

39:37

about the Spanish Inquisition and yet

39:40

there it is. And we used

39:42

it. I stole it because I

39:44

could and used it very often

39:46

in good eats as a celebration

39:49

of that. But I do believe

39:51

the laughing brains are more absorbent.

39:53

And I still look to Python

39:55

as... the absolute model of what

39:58

skit humor can do without explaining

40:00

itself. Yeah, it seems like you

40:02

respond to and are mirroring I

40:04

think larger trend in American cultures

40:06

in the post-war era where it

40:09

became more participatory or rather I

40:11

mean you know people like Julia

40:13

Child and Mr. Wizard certainly demystified

40:15

things and then so like you

40:18

know and maybe you can do

40:20

this too. Is that is that

40:22

a big I mean obviously the

40:24

good eats is part of that

40:27

the cooking shows and they have

40:29

their excesses they you know suddenly

40:31

you're like oh you know what

40:33

I'm gonna try something different. Certainly

40:36

with good eats. We saw a

40:38

whole, not generation, but a whole

40:40

person type, get off the sofa

40:42

for the first time. And that

40:44

was the engineer-minded American male who

40:47

was, a lot of them were

40:49

motivated by either the devices that

40:51

we kind of hacked on good

40:53

eats like smoking a fish in

40:56

a cardboard box or the sudden

40:58

understanding how something worked. Got a

41:00

lot of people the mechanics of

41:02

that and the mechanic mindedness of

41:05

that got a lot of people

41:07

into the kitchen who had not

41:09

been in the kitchen So I

41:11

can only speak to that population.

41:14

Yeah, because they were the population

41:16

that that talks to me the

41:18

most and and His voice their

41:20

appreciation for that that approach You

41:22

have a great essay titled Howl

41:25

of the Husky for Younger, I

41:27

think, certainly people born after the

41:29

baby boomer, Gen X, might not

41:31

realize that Husky was a category

41:34

of youth clothing, or at least

41:36

for boys. I don't know if

41:38

there were Husky girls as well.

41:40

I don't think there were. Husky.

41:43

Yeah. Husky was, you can't fit

41:45

in the regular clothes. And it

41:47

was a sub, you know, it

41:49

said over the aisle. Husky. And

41:52

if you entered that aisle. wherever

41:54

was you were buying clothes, you

41:56

know, you're, you're, you now have

41:58

a label, you're husky. And it

42:00

wasn't like we're not saying you're...

42:03

fat, you're aske. And I wonder,

42:05

I've never been able to find

42:07

out who decided that was the

42:09

word. Aske. You know, we're, we're,

42:12

what? Why? Why? Why? Why is

42:14

that? Why not? We're not slightly

42:16

balloon-like. You know, I, one of

42:18

these days, I'll figure out a

42:21

little thick. You're like plus size

42:23

kind of but not a piece

42:25

but I would I would dare

42:27

you to walk into a women's

42:30

wear store and look for an

42:32

aisle that says plus size yeah

42:34

it might be the whole store

42:36

is is kind of gauged in

42:38

that too rich but no husky

42:41

and it's gone now we don't

42:43

I don't think we see yeah

42:45

and you became husky because you

42:47

were eating too much right after

42:50

the loss of your father and

42:52

yes It wasn't just eating too

42:54

much, it was what I was

42:56

eating, which was massive amounts of

42:59

crap. A lot of crap. Can

43:01

you talk about what snapped you

43:03

out of that? Because you also

43:05

have, you know, it's a fascinating,

43:08

you know, if, you know, more

43:10

complex, sophisticated, wider ranging food as

43:12

part of the post-war experience, so

43:14

is dieting and, you know, both

43:16

getting fat and skinny and you

43:19

talk about how... you decided yeah

43:21

you were not going to be

43:23

husky you were husky no more

43:25

would talk about your dieting issues

43:28

and what you know I didn't

43:30

food consumption I think through most

43:32

of most of college I was

43:34

relatively fit because I delivered pizzas

43:37

for a living so it's a

43:39

huge amount of running up and

43:41

downstairs so I didn't try to

43:43

to not be husky it just

43:46

I It was just

43:48

part of life, my life is

43:50

that my body didn't do that.

43:52

But then I got husky again

43:55

later, you know, certainly after the

43:57

birth of my child, after the

43:59

birth of my daughter. I did,

44:02

I would total dad, but plus.

44:04

although I don't really appreciate that

44:06

term, but when I did finally

44:08

realize that something had to change,

44:11

when I did finally realize that

44:13

something had to change, I decided

44:15

to base, create a diet that

44:18

was based on what I had

44:20

to have, not what I couldn't.

44:22

The couldn't list was relatively small,

44:25

and some things were only allowed

44:27

once a week, but mostly I

44:29

had to focus on what I

44:32

needed from a good nutrition level.

44:34

And that I allowed me. to

44:36

lose a great deal of weight.

44:39

The problem was that I had

44:41

not set a goal and kind

44:43

of lost my mind after I

44:46

lost about 50 pounds because after

44:48

I lost about 50 pounds, I

44:50

kind of became another person. I

44:52

looked like another person. I didn't

44:55

recognize myself anymore and I ended

44:57

up going through a really traumatic

44:59

psychological period after I'd lost the

45:02

weight. Not before. I wasn't, you

45:04

know, and you know, you could

45:06

be you could be too thin,

45:09

right? Well, look, everybody will tell

45:11

you that you can be too

45:13

thin, you know, it's why we

45:16

have an erectia problems. For me,

45:18

it was simply a matter of,

45:20

you know, personal identity. You know,

45:23

who are you? You know, who

45:25

is this person looking back at

45:27

me in the mirror? And by

45:30

the way, I never saw a

45:32

thin person. I just saw someone

45:34

else that wasn't me. When you

45:37

lose your visual identity with yourself,

45:39

you can go a little crazy.

45:41

That's what the Invisible Man is

45:43

about. You know, once you can't

45:46

really be seen, you know, what

45:48

are you? And I think the

45:50

more people should probably talk about

45:53

that. So I am, I'm back

45:55

to Husky. I am. I'm Husky.

45:57

It's who I am. I'm Husky.

46:00

I try to stay fit. I

46:02

try to eat well. But I'm

46:04

Husky. And I mostly Husky because

46:07

I like alcohol. And I'm not

46:09

willing to give up alcohol to

46:11

not be husky. Is you invoked

46:14

the concept of dad by... is...

46:16

I hate that expression very much,

46:18

but it is... Yeah, and I

46:21

mean, is it good now? We

46:23

seem to have a wider range

46:25

of, you know, kind of positive

46:27

body types. And, you know, you

46:30

can be gigantically fat and obese

46:32

where you need, you know, a

46:34

motor scooter and things like that.

46:37

I think most people would agree

46:39

that's bad, but... Are we more

46:41

forgiving of body types now than

46:44

we used to be? And if

46:46

so, is that a good thing?

46:48

I think we say that we

46:51

are. I think we say that

46:53

we are. I don't think we

46:55

actually are. Yeah. We're animals. Yeah.

46:58

We're still animals. And we still...

47:00

We say that we are. Yeah.

47:02

And I think that... The important

47:05

part of that is that, you

47:07

know, media is what's what got

47:09

us in doing a lot of

47:11

trouble. The media around fashion certainly

47:14

has. It has become more accepting.

47:16

I think it's interesting that more

47:18

body types are considered acceptable and

47:21

beautiful and in when it's women

47:23

than men. I think that dad

47:25

bought is almost universally looked down

47:28

on as weak as as, no,

47:30

I, I, I, so I think

47:32

there's a bit of a contradiction

47:35

going on there that, that I

47:37

hope work out. But I think

47:39

that what we need to focus

47:42

on, you know, by and large

47:44

is simply being healthy and to

47:46

understand you can be healthy and

47:49

have different sizes and shapes and

47:51

shapes. That's culture. Right. Yeah, that's

47:53

genetics. You know, my genetics want

47:55

me almost universally to stay at

47:58

exactly the same weight. My weight

48:00

hasn't changed a pound in the

48:02

last three years. It's a husky,

48:05

but I've never had. a cavity.

48:07

Genetics. You know? Can I go

48:09

out every morning and run five

48:12

miles and work out and blah

48:14

blah blah and be lighter? Yes.

48:16

Am I going to? Odds are

48:19

no. I'm not gonna. I'm not

48:21

gonna do it because I don't

48:23

like it. So there... What's your

48:26

take on drugs like Ozempec and

48:28

other... you know, other things that

48:30

make, you know, there has always

48:33

been such a moral equation of,

48:35

you know, that if you're fit,

48:37

you are morally superior. And now

48:40

we seem to be in an

48:42

era where, maybe you can look

48:44

good in a pair of jeans,

48:46

you don't have to go husky,

48:49

and it's not because you've really

48:51

changed anything in your moral character.

48:55

A lot of these drugs are,

48:57

for some we can just look

48:59

at them as weight loss drugs

49:01

because a lot of these drugs

49:03

are proving to have a lot

49:05

of effect in other areas. A

49:07

lot of other areas of health,

49:09

I am not a doctor, do

49:11

not play one on TV, I

49:13

read a lot, but I'm not

49:15

about to get into the discussions

49:17

of certain rare cases of diabetes

49:19

or any of these other things.

49:21

I will say this. Medicine

49:24

should cure things, right? And then

49:27

allow you to go on your

49:29

way without it. If you break

49:31

your leg, you get a crutch.

49:34

The crutch lets you walk until

49:36

your leg heals. There's nothing wrong

49:38

with a crutch. Do you want

49:41

to walk on it for the

49:43

rest of your life? I personally

49:45

wouldn't. I wouldn't want to be,

49:47

I would strive to live my

49:50

life to not be in a

49:52

mobility scooter all my life, because

49:54

I don't like to take it.

49:57

technology. Whatever it is, I think

49:59

the goal is to get yourself

50:01

to where you don't need it

50:04

anymore. What I'm afraid of is

50:06

that that is not going to

50:08

be what happens with these drugs.

50:10

People realize I can eat the

50:13

family bag of Cheetos and still

50:15

look like this, which is kind

50:17

of a weird kind of bait

50:20

and switch when you think about

50:22

it. So I hope, but I

50:24

have no faith that these drugs

50:27

will be used with restraint to

50:29

get people where they need to

50:31

go because there are a lot

50:33

of folks that don't, I mean,

50:36

look, I've asked myself when I

50:38

take it. I see myself, I'm

50:40

realistic. No, no, because I earned

50:43

this. I don't have a medical

50:45

problem. I earned looking like this.

50:47

You know why? I put things

50:49

in here. You play like martinis

50:52

and things. So no, I'm not

50:54

going to, but I do think

50:56

that for people that do use

50:59

these, if it is really radically

51:01

changing their health and obviously for

51:03

the better, they should do it.

51:06

I would look to, you know,

51:08

six months down the line. Is

51:10

there a way to not live

51:12

your life with this? Is there

51:15

a way to live sustainably? But

51:17

I don't think that is what's

51:19

going to happen. You have been,

51:22

you've been outspoken in talking about

51:24

how the U.S. Department of Agriculture

51:26

and the Food and Drug Administration

51:29

are not particularly good, who are

51:31

involved in these kinds of drugs

51:33

as well as, you know, various

51:35

kinds of food pyramids or portions

51:38

on. Which have almost always been

51:40

designed for industry. Yeah. Not to

51:42

protect consumers. The great protector of

51:45

our health. Look, organizations like the

51:47

USDA should absolutely have hard and

51:49

fast labeling rules, quality rules. You

51:52

shouldn't be able to say one

51:54

thing when it's another. I don't

51:56

even think you should be able

51:58

to take a container of corn

52:01

oil and put the label gluten-free.

52:03

on top of it. Okay, yeah,

52:05

it is. But there's no gluten

52:08

and corn. You know, so I

52:10

think that we need better controls

52:12

on what goes into food. I

52:14

think we need warning labels. I

52:17

think that a bag of cheetahs

52:19

should be labeled like a pack

52:21

of cigarettes. Because in the end,

52:24

the level of damage is, I

52:26

would say, close to the same.

52:28

If not, worse. I mean, we

52:31

need education. We need education. We

52:33

need, I used to say that

52:35

culinary and nutritional education should be

52:37

in the home. It's not realistic

52:40

anymore. I don't know any parents

52:42

that can fight phones and iPadsats

52:44

and social media. No, we need

52:47

to be like the Japanese. We

52:49

need to have home act in

52:51

school from about age six to

52:54

graduation. Absolutely, we need that. Discuss

52:56

the Japanese experience then. How does

52:58

that work in a way that

53:00

they have a homec course that

53:03

does everything from teaching how to

53:05

balance a bank book through nutritional

53:07

training. And of course they put

53:10

a lot of good nutrition on

53:12

the table in the restaurant. So

53:14

granted, we're talking about a country

53:17

that has a very homogenous. cuisine,

53:19

right? Japanese cuisine. Now there's a

53:21

lot of different types of Japanese

53:23

cuisine. The point is, they put

53:26

a lot of emphasis on the

53:28

fact that if you teach someone

53:30

about nutrition, a child about nutrition,

53:33

and empower them, whether it's shelling

53:35

the peas or draining the tofu,

53:37

whatever it is, they then go

53:39

home and engage in their families

53:42

in a more team-like way. which

53:44

is the probably the most important

53:46

part of the model is that

53:49

it makes them better family members.

53:51

Now you're talking about families that

53:53

have, you know, are preparing meals

53:56

together the way that perhaps American

53:58

families don't anymore. But by doing

54:00

that and by getting the child

54:02

engaged and empowering them with knowledge

54:05

and skills, they eat better and

54:07

they tend to be better family

54:09

members, which eventually is going to

54:12

make a better societal member. If

54:14

we don't get culinary nutritional training

54:16

in two schools, I don't know

54:19

what will happen. Because obesity, you

54:21

know, people don't want to admit

54:23

what a problem of obesity actually

54:25

is. There's two industries thrive on

54:28

it. The food industry and the

54:30

medical industry thrive on it. So

54:32

I think we're being farmed, basically.

54:35

We're being farmed. Are you, what's

54:37

your sense of the Make America

54:39

Healthy movement that has really kind

54:42

of emerged with the appointment of

54:44

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to Health

54:46

and Human Services? Is that something

54:48

you applaud? Do you think it's

54:51

BS or what's your sense of

54:53

it? I have not read a

54:55

piece of news since the election.

54:58

don't know enough to talk about

55:00

this. I needed to disengage from

55:02

all of that. They're all going

55:04

to do whatever it is that

55:07

they're going to do. We'll all

55:09

live with it, I guess. So

55:11

I'm not going to say whether

55:14

I agree or not, because I

55:16

don't know. I don't know. I

55:18

know one thing. School, education, or

55:21

it won't matter. Or it won't

55:23

matter. I guess I want to

55:25

end on two points. One, you

55:27

talk about a family recipe Christmas

55:30

jello salad, which seems, I don't

55:32

know if that would pass muster

55:34

in a Japanese home act class,

55:37

but can you talk a little

55:39

bit about why you love that

55:41

and how that kind of exemplifies

55:44

on a certain level the southern

55:46

culture, broadly speaking that you come

55:48

out? We like our congealed salads.

55:50

We do. Jello Bay salads are

55:53

a big thing in the South.

55:55

I love them and always have

55:57

and I always will. You mix

56:00

up a couple of different jellows

56:02

and put a bunch of stuff.

56:04

in there and I'm just, I'm

56:07

hooked. My grandmother's and my mouthwater's

56:09

thinking about it is lemon and

56:11

orange jello with pecans and chunks

56:13

of pineapple and whole cranberry sauce.

56:16

There is something texturally very satisfying

56:18

to me about that. I don't

56:20

think it's the worst thing you

56:23

can eat. You know, it's fat

56:25

free. Yeah, there's sugar. And

56:28

I think that for the southern

56:30

sensibility, there's a very very special

56:32

place for that. But what's more

56:34

important is the generational connectivity, you

56:36

know. And the fact that when

56:38

I talk about, you know, Jello

56:40

mold stuff, people go, oh, right.

56:42

It's interesting. So I'm going to

56:44

stick it. Is that, I mean,

56:46

is it partly because now we're

56:48

all, we're sophisticated and Jello. you

56:50

know, is kind of a post-war

56:52

product. I mean, it pre-exists, but

56:54

it's like, oh, it's day class,

56:56

say, anybody can each other. Talk

56:58

a bit about what is the

57:00

power of coming from a broadly

57:02

southern background. You used to be

57:04

a southern Baptist, you're not quite

57:06

any more, but how does being

57:08

from the South inform your worldview

57:10

and, you know, something that other

57:12

Americans as well as, you know,

57:14

people from wherever, from wherever, can

57:16

learn. Southern Cook means understanding the

57:18

incredible culinary heritage of the southern

57:20

experience and I absolutely that that

57:22

is deeply entrenched not only in

57:24

people escaping Europe you know Scotland

57:26

to the the Appalachians but in

57:28

very much embracing the full situation

57:30

of the experience of the experience

57:32

of the experience of enslaved people.

57:34

have influenced what we call southern

57:36

cuisine. And so to be a

57:38

southern cook I think means constantly

57:40

being aware of it. and

57:42

with your place

57:45

in that system. that

57:47

system, better, for

57:49

worse, least being

57:51

aware of it

57:53

and appreciating it

57:55

and studying where

57:57

these things come

57:59

from and how

58:01

they got there and

58:03

how a rich is

58:05

a rich quilt work of people's

58:07

of peoples and

58:09

experiences. that Yeah.

58:11

And that intentionality

58:13

or knowing where

58:15

you're from and

58:17

where you might

58:19

be headed might to

58:21

be central to

58:23

everything you do.

58:25

to I think it's gotta

58:27

be there. it's got to be there. I think you're

58:29

robbing yourself of a whole dimension. of

58:31

a whole dimension. All right, we're gonna leave

58:34

it there, there. Alton Brown. Thanks for talking Thanks

58:36

for talking to on Good luck

58:38

on your farewell tour the book Food for

58:40

food for you so much. you so much.

58:42

Fantastic, fantastic conversation. I really enjoyed

58:44

I Thank you so much. this. Thank you

58:47

me much. Yeah, me too.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features